Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240548 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20240411DWR Dki of Water Rftourc� Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits (along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications) October 2, 2023 Ver 4.3 Initial Review Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process? Yes No Is this project a public transportation project?* Yes No Charge only if needed Does this project involve maintenance dredging funded by the Shallow Draft Navigation Channel Dredging and Aquatic Weed Fund or involve the distribution ortransmission ofenergy or fuel, including natural gas, diesel, petroleum, or electricity? Yes No BIMS # Assigned Version#* 20240548 1 Is a payment required for this project?* No payment required Fee received Fee needed - send electronic notification Reviewing Office* Raleigh Regional Office - (919) 791-4200 Information for Initial Review la. Name of project: Savannah Ridge la. Who is the Primary Contact?* Kate Hefner 1 b. Primary Contact Email:* kate.hefner@timmons.com Date Submitted 4/11/2024 Nearest Body of Water Deep River Basin Cape Fear Water Classification WS_IV Site Coordinates Latitude: 35.632781 A. Processing Information Is this project connected with ARPA funding? Yes No County (or Counties) where the project is located: Chatham Is this a NCDMS Project Yes No Longitude: -79.082756 What amount is owed?* $240.00 $323.00 Select Project Reviewer* Kristina Morales: Kristina. Morales 1 c. Primary Contact Phone:* (919)866-4953 $570.00 $767.00 Is this project a public transportation project?* Yes No Ia. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act) Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act) Has this PCIM previously been submitted?* Yes No I b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization? Nationwide Permit (NWP) Regional General Permit (RGP) Standard (IP) 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS): 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR: 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit Individual 401 Water Quality Certification 29 - Residential Developments le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: For the record only for Corps Permit: If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? * Yes No Ig. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? Yes No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? Yes No I h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? Yes No 1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? Yes No B. Applicant Information 1d. Who is applying for the permit? Owner Applicant (other than owner) le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project? Yes No 2. Owner Information 2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: Esplande Communities of Florida LLC 2b. Deed book and page no.: 2141/0174 2c. Contact Person: 2d. Address Street Address 3000 Gulf Breeze Parkway Address Line 2 city Gulf Breeze Postal / Zip Code 32563 401 Water Quality Certification - Express Riparian Buffer Authorization State / Province / Region FIL Country USA Yes No Yes No 2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number: (000)000-0000 2g. Email Address:* none@email.com 3. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 3a. Name: Zach Daugherty 3b. Business Name: Garden Street Communities Southeast, LI-C 3c. Address Street Address 149 US Hwy 70 Address Line 2 city State / Province Region Garner NC Postal / Zip Code Country 27529 USA 3d. Telephone Number: 3e. Fax Number: (850)934-0479 3f. Email Address: zdaugherty@gardenstreetcommunities.com 4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable) 4a. Name: Kate Hefner 4b. Business Name: Timmons Group 4c. Address Street Address 5410 Trinity Road Address Line 2 Suite 102 city State Province Region Raleigh NC Postal / Zip Code Country 27607 USA 4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number: (919)866-4953 4f. Email Address: kate.hefner@timmons.com C. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Project Information 1b. Subdivision name: (if appropriate) Savannah Ridge Subdivision 1c. Nearest municipality I town: Moncure 2. Project Identification 2a. Property Identification Number: 2b. Property size: 9678-55-1853 150.58 011 2c. Project Address Street Address 0 Moncure School Road Address Line 2 city Moncure Postal / Zip Code 27559 3. Surface Waters 3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: Deep River 3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-1V 3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?* Cape Fear 3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located. 030300030608 & 030300020705 4. Project Description and History State / Province / Region NC Country USA 4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time ofthis application: * The Savannah Ridge site is approximately 150.58 acres located off of Moncure School Road in Moncure, North Carolina within Chatham County, just north of and adjacent to U.S. Route 1 (US 1). The majority of the Site consists of pine plantation used for silviculture with smaller areas of hardwood forests throughout. Additionally, there are multiple earthen roads that run throughout the Site. The Site is bound by Jordan Dam Road and forested areas to the north; by Moncure School Road, private residences, forested areas, and Moncure School to the east; by forested areas and US-1 to the south; and by forested areas, current construction, and Jordan Dam Road to the west. The proposed residential development will consist of a conventional subdivision on approximately 151 acres with 78 single-family lots, mail kiosks, and associated infrastructure. The average lot size will be 52,453 square feet. There will be 42.08 acres of open space for this proposed project. A delineation of the project area was completed by Timmons Group on January 9, 10, and 14, 2020. An on -site review of potentially jurisdictional features was conducted by James Larstinger of the USACE on July 27, 2020, and by Drew Blake of the Chatham County Watershed Protection Department on July 28, 2020. An offer to conduct an on -site review was extended to NC DWR but was declined, indicating deferral to the USACE and the County. Following a site review by the USACE and Chatham County regulators, determinations were made regarding which delineated features would fall under federal or County jurisdiction. A Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. delineation map can be found in Appendix A and includes a corresponding table with jurisdictional feature details. The AJD approval was issued on August 31, 2020 and the Buffer Determination approval was issued on August 25, 2020. 4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? * Yes No Unknown 4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.23 4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property: 2,985 4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the project is to construct a single-family residential development consisting of individual homes with community cohesion and the necessary amenities within Chatham County. The project will help address the increasing housing needs of central North Carolina while preserving Chatham County's rural character. 41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: * The proposed project is a residential development that is located just north of and adjacent to U.S. Route 1 (US 1), approximately 10 miles south of Pittsboro and approximately 14 miles northeast of Sanford. Both entrances to the development are proposed to be located along Moncure School Road in Moncure, North Carolina within Chatham County. The project will include 78 single-family lots and associated amenities, including stormwater control measures and utility and road improvements. Lots are to be constructed individually following construction of stormwater controls measures, utilities, and roads , but are all separated from jurisdictional features by Chatham County buffers with buffer distances of30-ft offof ephemeral streams, 50-ft off of intermittent streams, wetlands, and ponds, and 100-ft off of perennial streams (stream buffers measured from top of bank). All work will be conducted in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. Traditional equipment will be used consisting of front-end loaders, bulldozers, paving equipment, graders, and earth movers. SCMs are required and will be used. 5. Jurisdictional Determinations 5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? Yes No C) Unknown Comments: 5b. Ifthe Corps made ajurisdictional determination, whattype ofdetermination was nri Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A Corps AID Number: SAW-2020-01047 5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Timmons Group Other: 5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR 01/09/2020, 01/10/2020, and 01/14/2020 — Delineation completed by Timmons Group personnel 07/27/2020 — Site Visit with James Lastinger of the USACE 07/28/2020 — Site Visit with Drew Blake of the Chatham County Watershed Protection Department 08/25/2020 — Buffer Determination approval issued by Chatham County 08131/2020 — AJD approval issued by the USACE 10/03/2023 — OHWM Stream measurements completed by Timmons Group personnel at proposed impact locations 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project?* Yes No Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? No other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) are intended to be used for development of the proposed project. All project impacts are being accounted for in this permit application. D. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply): Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction 3. Stream Impacts a F3a. I Reason for impa 3c. Type of impact* me* 3e. Stream Type* 3f. Type of 3h. I M Jurisdiction leng Culvert Installation Culvert J Stream A Both Rip Rap Installation Rip Rap Fill J Stream A Both Culvert Installation Other J Stream A Both 3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet: 0 3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 114 3i. Total stream and ditch impacts: 125 3i. Total temporary stream impacts: 11 3j. Comments: Stream Impact 1 (Sheets IM-2 to IM4) includes permanent and temporary stream impacts to a perennial stream. The permanent impact is required to construct a road, Telfair Lane, within the development that connects to an access road, Orleans Drive, off of Moncure School Road. Telfair Lane is necessary to connect lots on the western portion of the Site to the eastern portion of the Site, along Moncure School Road. The temporary impact to the stream is necessary due to the construction buffer required for the installation of the road. The culvert is sized for the 25-year storm event per NCDOT and Chatham County Standards, therefore no floodplain culvert is required. A water line is proposed to be installed beneath the road to avoid additional crossing impacts. Stream Buffer impacts have been noted on the impact maps due to requirements by Chatham County in areas outside of the Jordan Lake Watershed. These are not state riparian buffers. The road crossing is compliant with the Chatham County Watershed Protection Ordinance Section 304 (F) of allowed uses in riparian buffers outside of the Jordan Lake watershed. E. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization N 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project: Impacts to jurisdictional features have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating resourceful site planning, including utilization of the wetland/strearn delineation to adjust the layout of the Site design to avoid and minimize impacts. The remaining impacts proposed are necessary in order for the project's goals to be realized. The project is avoiding and minimizing impacts to jurisdictional features to the maximum extent practicable. There will only be one stream crossing for a roadway that is necessary to allow access to the western portion of the Site. The only impact will be to the perennial stream and no wetlands. The proposed crossing location was selected based upon the relatively straight section of stream and topographic limitations. Alternative road locations to access the western portion of the site would require impacts to multiple wetlands. The proposed design is following the existing drainage patterns and not bulk grading any of the property. This should have minimal impact to the existing hydrology of all features. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques: Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and installation as described in accordance with the requirements of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources: Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual (May 2013) and local codes. All work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non -jurisdictional, stable ground. The contractor shall install silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, division ditches, temporary coffer dams, tree protection, and clearing only as necessary to install devices. All erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and operation following every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be made immediately to maintain all measures designed. An erosion control inspections report is required and will be kept by the owner's representative. Temporary seeding and permanent seeding plans are included to restore impacted areas. The project will meet all relative requirements of Best Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control Structures as outlined through State and Local Stormwater Rules. Measures will be taken to prevent oil, tar, trash, debris, and other pollutants from entering adjacent jurisdictional features. Any excess excavated materials not utilized as back fill will be placed and contained within upland areas and permanently stabilized to prevent erosion into adjacent jurisdictional features. Therefore, stockpiling of excavated material within jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will be strictly prohibited as part of the construction of this project. All project construction activities initiated within jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will be carried to completion in an expeditious manner to minimize the period of disturbance within jurisdictional waters. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? Yes No 2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why: The impacts to streams are below the threshold for mitigation requirements. F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No If no, explain why: The project is located within the Cape Fear River Basin and therefore, is not subject to the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules. However, the project will be impacting Chatham County buffers, but the road crossing is compliant with Section 304 (F) of allowed uses in riparian buffers outside of the Jordan Lake watershed. 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPIDES permit NCS000250? Yes No 2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? Yes No 2c. Does this project have a stormwarter management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program? Yes No N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre 2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply: Local Government State Local Government Stormwater Programs Phase 11 NSW USMP Water Supply Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using. Chatham County Comments: The stormwater management design for the project will be reviewed and approved by Chatham County Watershed Protection/Stormwater Department which is a state -approved local program. G. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation Ia. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No 2. Violations (DWR Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Welland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface WaterorWetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?* Yes No 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement) 3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No 3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The proposed project is a single and complete project that will not result in additional impacts. All impacts associated with the project are accounted for herein. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement) 4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? Yes No N/A 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? Yes No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? Yes No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh 5d. Is another Federal agency involved?* Yes No Unknown 5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8? Yes No 5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.? Yes No 5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? Yes No 5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?* Yes No 5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.? Yes No 5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? A search of the USFWS IPaC database identified three federally listed endangered species, including red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocholas), and harperella (Ptilimnium nodosum) as potentially occurring within the vicinity of the Site. No federally listed threatened species were identified as potentially occurring within the vicinity of the Site. Additionally, one proposed endangered species, the tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus), and one candidate species, the monarch butterny (Danaus plexippus), were identified as potentially occurring in the vicinity of the Site. No critical habitats were identified within the project area or a 1 -mile radius. Additionally, a search of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database did not identify occurrences of federally listed species or state -managed areas within the project limits. Cape Fear shiner was noted within a 1 -mile radius of the project area in 2021 and harperella was noted within a 1 -mile radius of the project area in 1971. Further, no critical habitat was identified within the Site or a 1 -mile radius. It is the opinion of Timmons that the project will have no effect on red -cockaded woodpecker, harperella, and monarch butterfly and may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the Cape Fear shiner. Additionally, it is the opinion of Timmons that the project is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the tricolored bat. USFWS consultation for this Site was completed in 2020 (lPaC Consultation Code 04EN200- 2020-SLI-1433, Event Code 04EN2000-2020-E-03271), with an initial review request sent on 07109/2020 and concurrence of opinion received from John Ellis of the USFWS via email on 08105/2020. Due to the time that passed since initial consultation, re -consultation of this project was conducted on 10/2312023. Although species were re -assessed, opinions for red -cockaded woodpecker, Cape Fear shiner, Harperella, bald eagle, and northern long-eared bat remain consistent with our previous determinations. On 12/22/2023 the USACE responded indicating the project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the Cape Fear shiner and recommended application of stringent sediment and erosion controls and establishment of forested buffers. No further comments were received. The project will incorporate the following sediment and erosion control measures, as requested by the USFWS: - Inspect all vehicles for leaks immediately prior to entering the jurisdictional impact areas each day. Repair any leaks and clean construction vehicles thoroughly to remove any residual dirt, mud, debris, grease, motor oil, hydraulic fluid, coolant, or other hazardous substances from construction vehicles. When not in use, materials and vehicles will be staged in upland areas outside of the Chatham County riparian buffer. The size and number of access corridors for construction vehicles in jurisdictional water and riparian buffer impact areas have been minimized to only one crossing. Outlets from silt fence and other construction erosion control devices will not discharge closer than 50 feet to the top of bank. Inspections, repairs, cleaning, and/or servicing should be conducted either before the vehicle, equipment, or machinery is transported into the field or at the work site. - Fuel and maintain vehicles or equipment and store potentially toxic substances (fuels, paints, solvents, lubricants, etc.) within a containment area in uplands. Additionally, as previously stated all features, including non -jurisdictional ephemeral streams, are protected by Chatham County riparian buffers. The only buffer impact will be that required for the necessary road crossing. Please see Appendix D for the USFWS T&E Review request package and LISFWS concurrence for additional information 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?* Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? * Yes No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? * Based on a review of the NC Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Online GIS Service and project site files at the NC Office of State Archaeology (OSA), there are five previously recorded archaeological sites within 1 -mile of the current project area (Appendix E), none of which are within or adjacent to the project area. One of the aforementioned sites, 31 CH690 is a historic lock and dam transportation feature located on the Deep River that has been listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The remaining four sites have not been evaluated for eligibility. Following a review of the NC HPO Online GIS Service, there are 20 previously recorded historical sites within a 1 -mile radius of the project area (Appendix F). None of the sites are located within or adjacent to the current project limits, with the closest site located approximately 0.4-miles south across US 1. The recorded resources include one site, CH0018, which appears to correspond with the aforementioned archaeological resource listed on the National Register consisting of a canal, powerhouse, and canal complex. The remaining resources are historic residences that have been surveyed only or have been destroyed. No structures were observed within the proposed project's limits during the site reconnaissance. Additionally, disturbance associated with the proposed project will be limited to on -site areas and will not affect the surrounding area or its historical resources. Timmons personnel -initiated consultation with SHPO on July 9, 2020, and with the Chatham County Historical Association (CCHA) on August 10, 2020 to solicit comments on the proposed project. CCHA identified concerns regarding a potential early-1 800s grave -site or cemetery on a portion of the property associated with the Minter family. The suspected cemetery location was on parcel 11371 , located approximately 0.46-miles north of the proposed jurisdictional impact location and located outside of the project limits. Based on the distance from proposed impacts and location outside of the project limits, it is the opinion of Timmons Group that this is outside of the 404 permit area of potential effect. Although beyond the 404 APE, additional information regarding the investigation is provided below to aid in review. A letter obtained from the current landowner, a descendant of the Minters, was provided to both offices attesting to no known gravesites formerly or currently on the property. CCHA confirmed receipt of the letter and expressed they would like to see an on -site cultural resources investigation completed at the property if possible. SHPO replied on August 26, 2020 stating no archaeological sites have been recorded within the project area; however, due to the information provided by CCHA, they recommend reconnaissance by an experienced archaeologist. Based on the information provided by the current landowner, an on -site investigation will not be pursued. Additionally, SHPO determined the proposed project will have no effect historic structures. Construction Drawings for the project site will contain the requirement that if a grave and/or human remains are discovered during construction, all construction activities will halt and SHPO and the County medical examiner will be contacted immediately. A copy of the SHPO Consultation request, including the Minter Property No Graves letter, and a copy of SHPO's Response are included in Appendix E. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 1 00-year floodplain? * Yes No 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM panel 3710967800L (effective 11/17/2017) Miscellaneous Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred. Click the upload button or drag and drop files hem to attach document 2024.04.11ePCN Attachments PackageFINAL (reduced).pdf 42.36MB File must be PDF or KMZ Comments Signature By checking the box and signing below, I certify that: The project proponen hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and The project proponentt hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period oftime. I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form; I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form. Full Name: Kate Hefner Signature WeRr"INIM Date 4/11/2024 a