Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240538 Ver 1_00_Agent_Authorization_SignedPCNpage_20240408AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM I, Jonathan Stone hereby certify that I have authorized Johanna Velasquez, representing HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing and issuance and acceptance of this permit, and all standard, and special conditions attached associated with the Sweetwater Tap Relocation Project in Catawba County, North Carolina. Property Legal Description: Not Applicable - Utility line right-of-way. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC We hereby certify that the information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. Jonathan Stone Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Applicant's Name A plicarr 's Signature Date hdrinc.com 440 South Church Street Suites 900 & 1000, Chadatte, NC 28 202-2 07 5 T 704.338.8700 F 704,338,6760 Johanna Velasquez, HDR, Inc. Agent's Name Agent's Signature 3127/2024 Date 0 ST , c y o EaeauMn�mE"' NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality Wo ter Resources Office Use Only Corps Action ID no. [Click to enter.] Date received: [Click to enter.] DWR project no. [Click enter.] Date received: [Click to enter.] Site Coordinates: Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 35.722314' Longitude (DD.DDDDDD): 81.310363' Form Version 4.3, April 20, 2022 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form (Ver. 4.2, January 31, 2022)) For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits and corresponding Water Quality Certifications Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * are required. The form is not considered complete until all mandatory questions are answered. The PCN help document may be found at this link: ://edocs.dea.nc.aov/WaterResources/DocView.aSDx?dbid=0&id=2196924&cr=1 Please ensure you have submitted a pre -filing meeting request at least 30 days prior to submitting this form, as DWR will not be able to accept your application without documentation of this important first step. The Division has developed a Pre -filing Meeting Request email address 401 PreFileCa)_ncdenr.gov to accept the federally required pre -filing meeting request and provide confirmation receipt of submittal . This receipt or similar documentation will satisfy 40 C.F.R. Section 121.4(a) which states "At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification request, the project proponent shall request a pre -filing meeting with the certifying agency." In accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.5(b)(7), and (c)(5), all certification requests must include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying authority at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request. Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request to this Application. Date of Pre -filing Meeting Request (MM/DD/YYYY) *: 11/28/2023 Page 1 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 A. Processing Information County (counties) where project is located: * Catawba Additional (if needed). Is this an ARPA project? * ❑ Yes N No If yes, ARPA project number: * The project number can be found on the "Letter of Intent to Fund" (LOIF) or "Offer and Acceptance Letter". If you are unable to locate Click or tap here to enter text. your DWI ARPA Funding Project Number, please contact Corey Basinger at core v.basinger(a)ncdenr.gov for further assistance. Is this a NCDMS project? * (Click yes only if NCDMS is the applicant or co- ❑ Yes N No applicant) Is this a public transportation project? (Publicly funded municipal, state, or federal road, rail, ❑ Yes N No or airport project) Is this a NCDOT project? * ❑ Yes N No If yes, NCDOT TIP or state project number: Click to enter. If yes, NCDOT WBS number: * Click to enter. N Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams, waters, Clean Water Act) la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: * ❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act) Has this PCN previously been submitted? * ❑ Yes N No Please provide the date of the previous submission. * Click to enter a date. N Nationwide Permit (NWP) 1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek * El Regional General Permit (RGP) authorization? ❑ Standard (IP) This form may be used to initiate the standard/ individual permit process with the USACE. Please contact your Corps representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items can be included as attachments and submitted with this form. 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? * ❑ Yes ❑x No NWP number(s) (list all numbers ): 57 — Electric Utility Line and Telecommunications Activities RGP number(s) (list all numbers ): Click to enter. Are you a federal applicant? ❑ Yes N No If yes, please provide a statement concerning compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act Click to enter text. 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from DWR (check all that apply): N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification— Express ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization ❑ Individual 401 Water Quality Certification Page 2 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 Is this a courtesy copy notification ❑ Yes ❑x No 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? * For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: * ❑ Yes ❑x No For the record only for Corps Permit: * ® Yes ❑ No 1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit/certification application? * ❑ Yes ❑x No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. 1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? * ❑ Yes ® No 1 i. Is the project located within an NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? * ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown 1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? * ❑ Yes ❑x No If yes, you must attach a copy of the approval letter from the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission Office. Trout information may be found at this link: http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Permit- Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx Page 3 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 B. Applicant Information 1a. Who is the primary contact? * Jonathan Stone 1 b. Primary Contact Email: * Jonathan.Stone@duke-energy.com 1c. Primary Contact Phone: * (###)###-#### (980) 373-1834 1d. Who is applying for the permit/certification? * (check all that apply) ❑ Owner 0 Applicant (other than owner) 1 e. Is there an agent/consultant for this project?* Z Yes ❑ No 2. Landowner Information 2a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: * Martin Marrieta Materials Inc. and Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC -Easement 2b. Deed Book and Page No.: Book 3819, Page 0629 2c. Contact Person (for corporations): Jonathan Stone 2d. Address * Street Address: 526 S. Church Street Address line 2: Click to enter. City: Charlotte State/ Province/ Region: North Carolina Postal/ Zip Code: 28202 Country: Click to enter. 2e. Telephone Number: * (###)###-#### Click to enter. 2f. Fax Number: (###)###-#### Click to enter. 2g. Email Address: * Jonathan.Stone@duke-energy.com 3. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 3a. Name: * Jonathan Stone 3b. Business Name (if applicable): Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3c. Address: * Street Address: 526 S. Church Street Address line 2: Click to enter. City: Charlotte State/ Province/ Region: North Carolina Postal/ Zip Code: 28202 Country United States 3d. Telephone Number: * (###)###-#### (980) 373-1834 3e Fax Number: (###)###-#### Click to enter. Page 4 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 3f. Email Address: * Jonathan.Stone@duke-energy.com 4. Agent/ Consultant (if applicable) 4a. Name: * Johanna Velasquez 4b. Business Name: HDR Engineering, Inc. 4c. Address: * Street Address: 440 South Church Street Address line 2: Suite 1200 City: Charlotte State/ Province/ Region: NC Postal/ Zip Code: 28202 Country: United States 4d. Telephone Number: * (###)###-#### (980) 337-5012 4e Fax Number: (###)###-#### Click to enter. 4f. Email Address: * johanna.velasquez@hdrinc.com Agent Authorization Letter:* Attach a completed/signed agent authorization form or letter. A sample form may be found at this link: https://www.saw. usace.army. mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre- construction-Notification/ Page 5 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 C. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Project Information 1a. Name of project: * Sweetwater Tap Line Relocation Project 1 b. Subdivision name (if appropriate): N/A 1c. Nearest municipality/town: * Hickory 2. Project Identification 2a. Property identification number (tax PIN or parcel ID): 371215640891 and 371210355299 (Exhibit A-1, A- 2, and A-3) 2b. Property size (in acres): N/A -ROW 2c. Project Address: Street Address: N/A- ROW Address line 2: Click to enter. City: Click to enter. State/ Province/ Region: Click to enter. Postal/ Zip Code: Click to enter. Country: Click to enter. 2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees (using 4-6 digits after the decimal point): * Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): * 35.722314' Longitude (-DD.DDDDDD): *-81.310363° 3. Surface Waters 3a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: * Clark Creek 3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving C water: * The Surface Water Classification map may be found at this link: https:Hncdenr. maps.arcqis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6el 25ad7628f494694e259c8Odd64265 Catawba 3c. In what river basin(s) is your project located? * Choose additional (if needed) 3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is Upper Clark Creek 1030501020302 located: The Find Your HUC map may be found at this link: https:Hncdenr.maps.arc_qis.com/apps/Publicinformation/index.html?appid=ad3a85aOc6d644aOb97cdO69db238ac3 Page 6 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 4. Project Description and History 4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: * The Study Aea consists of approximately 1 mile of an existing utility line right-of-way located south of Tate Boulevard and North 11th Avenue in the City of Hickory, North Carolina (Figure 1). 4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this ❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? * If yes, please give the DWR Certification number and/or Corps [Click to enter.] Action ID (ex. SAW-0000-00000): jClick to enter.] Attach any pertinent project history documentation 4b2. Is any portion of the work already complete? * ❑ Yes ❑x No If yes, describe the completed work. Click to enter text. 4c. List of other certifications or approvals/denials received from other federal, state or local agencies for work described in this application not related to the 404 or 401. TBD 4d. Attach an 8'/2 x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. 4e. Attach an 8'/2 x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. 4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the 0.01 acres property: 4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent 424 linear feet and perennial) on the property: 4g1. List the total estimated acreage of all existing open waters on the 0 acres property: 4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The proposed Project involves the installation of a permanent culvert to provide access for work associated with the relocation of the Sweetwater 100- kilovolt (kV) Transmission Line in Catawba County, North Carolina. The Project area consists of approximately 1 mile of an existing utility line right-of-way located south of Tate Boulevard and north eleventh avenue in the City of Hickory, North Carolina (Figures 1 and 2). The Sweetwater Tap Relocation Project (Project) proposes to install the permanent culvert to provide access for the relocation of the transmission line. Maintaining access to the utility line is critical to perform maintenance and emergency repairs to this important infrastructure. Specifically, one Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) arch culvert will be installed in order to construct an access road across a tributary to Clark Creek (Tributary 2). 4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: * The Project proposes to install a new 40-foot long, 87-inch by 57-inch pipe -arch CMP culvert to provide permanent access for the construction and maintenance associated with the Sweetwater Tap Relocation Project. The culvert was sized to accommodate a 10-year 24-hour storm event without overtopping. Installation of the downstream rip rap dissipation pad will result in permanent impacts below the Ordinary High Water Mark of the tributary to Clark Creek (Tributary 2). A pump around will be implemented in order to work in the dry and will result in temporary fill associated with impervious dikes and de -watering impacts. The culvert will be installed approximately 1 foot below the existing stream bed at a slope that allows for passage of water and movement of aquatic life. Standard construction equipment will be used, such as excavators, backhoes, hauling trucks, etc. 4j. Attach project drawings/site diagrams/depictions of impact areas for the proposed project. 4k. Will this activity involve dredging in wetlands or waters? * ❑ Yes ❑x No Page 7 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 If yes, describe the type of dredging, the composition of the dredged material, and the locations of disposal area. Click to enter text. Page 8 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 5. Jurisdictional Determinations 5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or in ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown proposed impact areas? Comments: Duke Energy contracted Terracon Consultants, Inc. to survey the Project area for the presence of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. regulated under Section 404 of the CWA and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. The survey investigations were conducted in May 2023 and identified three potential jurisdictional streams and one potential jurisdictional wetland (Figure 3). A summary and maps of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., and associated photographs are provided in Exhibit B. 5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, ❑ Preliminary ❑ Approved ❑ Emailed concurrence what type of determination was made? * ❑x Not Verified ❑ Unknown ❑ n/a Corps AID number (ex. SAW-0000-00000): Click to enter. Name (if known): Click to enter. 5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional Agency/Consultant Company: Terracon Consultants, Inc. areas? Other: Click to enter. 5d. List the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determination or State determination if a determination was made by either agency. N/A 5d1. Attach jurisdictional determinations. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑x No 6b. If yes, explain. Click to enter. Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossings for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification. No 7. Addresses of adjoining property owners, lessees, etc. whose property adjoins the waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list) See attached Adjacent Property Owner Mailing List (Table 1) and Catwaba County Parcels (Figure 4). 8. Scheduling of activity: Activity is scheduled to be start as soon as authorization is received. Page 9 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 D. Proposed Impacts Inventory Impacts Summary ❑ Wetlands ❑x Streams - tributaries la. Where are the impacts associated with your project ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters (check all that apply): ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, complete this table for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Site #* 2a 1. Impact Reason/Type* 2b. Impact Duration* 2c. Wetland Type* 2d. Wetland Name* 2e. Forested ?* 2f. Jurisdiction Type* 2g. Impact Area (ac)* W1 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W2 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W3 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W4 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W5 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W6 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W7 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W8 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W9 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W10 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W11 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W12 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W13 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W14 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W15 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter 2g1. Total temporary wetland impacts Click to enter. ac 2g2. Total permanent wetland impacts Click to enter. ac 2g3. Total wetland impacts ac 2h. Type(s) of material being discharged and the amount of each type in cubic yards: Click to enter text. 2i. Comments: No impacts to jurisdictional wetlands are anticipated. Page 10 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream/ tributary impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, complete this table for all stream/ tributary sites impacted. ** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government Site #* 3a Impact Reason* 3b. Impact Duration* 3c. Impact Type* 3d. Stream Name* 3e. Stream Type* 3f. Jurisdiction Type* 3g. Stream Width (avg ft) * 3h. Impact length (linear ft) S1 Culvert Permanent Crossing/ Culvert Tributary 2- T2 Intermittent Both 5 40 S2 Dissipation Pad Permanent Fill (Incl. Riprap) Tributary 2— T2 Intermittent Both 5 34 S3 Pump -Around Temporary Dewatering Tributary 2- T2 Intermittent Both 5 20 S4 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S5 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S6 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S7 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S8 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S9 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S10 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S11 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S12 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S13 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S14 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S15 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S16 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S17 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S18 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S19 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S20 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter 3i1. Total jurisdictional ditch impact: 0 linear ft M. Total permanent stream impacts: 74 linear ft M. Total temporary stream impacts: 20 linear ft 34. Total stream and ditch impacts: 94 linear ft 3j. Comments: The culvert installation will result in 74 If of permanent stream (-0.007 ac), and 20 If of temporary impacts (-0.002 ac.) associated with dewatering activities. Page 11 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S., individually list all open water impacts in the table below. 4a. Site #* 4a 1. Impact Reason 4b. Impact Duration* 4c. Waterbody Name* 4d. Activity Type* 4e. Waterbody Type* 4f. Impact area (ac)* 01 Click to enter. Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter. 02 Click to enter. Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter. 03 Click to enter. Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter. 04 Click to enter. Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter. 05 Click to enter. Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Choose one I Choose one Click to enter. 4g. Total temporary open water impacts Click to enter. ac 4g. Total permanent open water impacts Click to enter. ac 4g. Total open water impacts Click to enter. ac 4h. Comments: No impacts to open waters are anticipated. 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction is proposed, complete the table below. (*This does NOT include offline stormwater management ponds.) 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Pond ID Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (ac) Stream Impacts (ft) Upland # purpose of pond Impacts (ac) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to P1 Choose one enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. P2 Choose one Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. P3 Choose one Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. 5f. Total Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. 5g. Comments: No impacts to ponds or lakes are proposed as a result of this Project. 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no.: Click to enter. 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): Click to enter. 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): Click to enter. 5k. Method of construction: Click to enter. Page 12 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 6. Buffer Impacts (DWR requirement) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts. 6a. Project is in which protected basin(s)? * (Check all that apply.) ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: Click to enter. Site #* 6b. Impact Type* 6c. Impact Duration* 6d. Stream Name* 6e. Buffer Mitigation Required?* 6f. Zone 1 Impact* (sq ft) 6g. Zone 2 Impact* (sq ft) 131 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B2 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B3 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B4 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B5 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B6 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B7 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B8 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B9 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B10 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. 1311 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B12 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B13 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B14 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B15 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B16 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B17 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B18 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B19 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B20 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. 6h. Total temporary impacts: Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft 6h. Total permanent impacts: Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft 6h. Total combined buffer impacts: Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft 6i. Comments: The Study Area is located in the Catawba River Basin. Per the Catawba River Basin riparian buffer rules, a 50- foot buffer applies to all shorelines along Catawba River mainstem below Lake James to the North Carolina/South Carolina border and all shorelines of the Catawba mainstem lakes. The Project is not located along the mainstem of the Catawba River, therefore this buffer requirement does not apply to the Project. Please attach supporting documentation (impact maps, plan sheets, etc.) for the proposed project. Page 13 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 E. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through project design: The proposed Project has been designed to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional surface waters. Duke Energy contracted Terracon Consultants, Inc. to survey the Project area for the presence of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. The field survey was conducted in May 2023 and the investigations aided the Project's design to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional surface waters. The delineation identified 3 streams and 1 wetland within the Project. Furthermore, the stream crossing has been designed to minimize permanent impacts to the maximum extent possible. The length of the proposed culvert was reduced from 90 feet in length (original design, due to site conditions) to a 40-foot-long arched CMP culvert. The culvert design (Exhibit D) as well as other engineering construction alternatives have allowed to the permanent impacts to Tributary 2 to be reduced by 50 feet. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize proposed impacts through construction techniques: The culvert installation will be conducted in a manner that will promote safe passage of fish and other organic organisms. Specifically, the culvert will be buried 1-foot below the stream bed (Exhibit C — Detail 10, Sheet PED3). Erosion control measures will be installed to encompass the construction limits prior to construction. The E&SC plan will be implemented during construction to prevent sedimentation impacts to water resources. Best Management Practices (BMP) will include installing protective silt fencing. The work area will be inspected daily for signs of erosion or degradation and BMP device failure. Pump-arounds or bypass flume will be installed to allow for work to be completed within a dry workspace and water will be passed through a sediment filter bag before returning to the stream. Pump(s) will be sized accordingly to convey normal stream flow. Dewatering will be conducted through a silt bag or sedimentation control measure that is located within the easement and outside of any wetland area (Exhibit C —Detail No. 8, Sheet PED2). Mechanical equipment will not operate within streams or traverse the stream without the use of a temporary bridge. No wastes, spoils, or fill will be placed within the stream, or riparian areas beyond the permitted disturbance limits. Equipment will be kept within construction limits and disturbance minimized by the use of timber mats. Refueling of equipment will be conducted in upland areas away from waterbodies. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S., Waters of the State, or Riparian Buffers 2a. If compensatory mitigation is required, by whom is it required? * ❑ DWR ❑ Corps (check all that apply) 2b. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this ❑ Mitigation Bank project? * (check all that apply) ❑ In Lieu Fee Program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if using a Mitigation Bank (Must satisfy NC General Statute143-214.11 (d1).) 3a. Name of mitigation bank: Click to enter. 3b. Credits purchased/requested: Type: Choose one Quantity Click to enter. Type: Choose one Quantity Click to enter. Type: Choose one Quantity Click to enter. Attach receipt and/or approval letter. Page 14 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 3c. Comments: N/A 4. Complete if Using an In Lieu Fee Program 4a. Attach approval letter from in lieu fee program. 4b. Stream mitigation requested: Click to enter. linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature: Choose one NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington District's RIBITS website: (Please use the filter and select Wilmington district) https://ribits.usace.army.mil/ribits apex/f?p=107:27:2734709611497::NO: RP:P27 BUTTON KEY:O 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only): Click to enter. square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: Click to enter. acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: Click to enter. acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: Click to enter. acres 4h. Comments: N/A 5. Complete if Providing a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If proposing a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan, including mitigation credits generated. Click to enter. 5b. Attach mitigation plan/documentation. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — DWR requirement 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer ❑ Yes ❑x No that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, please complete this entire section — please contact DWR for more information. 6b. If yes, identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 Click to enter. Click to enter. Choose one Click to enter. Zone 2 Click to enter. Click to enter. Choose one Click to enter. 6f. Total buffer mitigation required Click to enter. 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or ❑ Yes ❑ No NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed? 6h. If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services. 6i. Comments: N/A Page 15 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 Page 16 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (DWR requirement) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers ❑ Yes ® No identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents how diffuse/dispersed flow will be maintained. All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM) must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design Manual (httr)s://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/energy-mineral-land-r)ermit- guidance/stormwater-bmp-manual). Associated supplement forms and other documentation must be provided. ❑ Level Spreader What Type of SCM are you ❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower seasonal high water table- SHWT) providing? ❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT) (Check all that apply) ❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen ❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here. Attach diffuse flow documentation. 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Is this an NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? * ❑ Yes ® No 2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? * ®Yes El No To look up low density requirements, click here: http://reports.oah.state. nc. us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental %20guality/chapter%2002%20- %20environmental%20management/subchapter%20h/15a%20ncac%2002h%20.1003.pdf 2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) ❑ Yes ❑ No reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state - approved local government stormwater program? * © n/a — project disturbs < 1 acre Note: Projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of community in -lieu programs should answer "no" to this question. 2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply? ❑ Local Government (Check all that apply.)* E State If you have local government approval, please include the SMP on their overall impact map. ❑ Phase II ❑ USMP Local Government Stormwater Programs * ❑ NSW ❑ Water Supply Page 17 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using. Click to enter. State Stormwater Programs * ❑ Phase II ❑x HQW or ORW ❑ Coastal Counties ❑ Other Comments: Click to enter. Page 18 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 G. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) ❑ Yes ® No funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? * 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental ❑ Yes ❑ No Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? * 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the ❑ Yes ❑ No NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) Comments: N/A 2. Violations (DWR Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), Federally Non -Jurisdictional Wetlands /Classified Surface Waters ❑ Yes ❑x No (15A NCAC 2H. 1400) DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide an explanation of the violation(s): Click to enter. 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby ❑ Yes ❑x No downstream water quality? * 3b. If you answered "no", provide a short narrative description: This project is privately funded and will not require a cumulative impact analysis. Best management practices will be deployed through the duration of the project. The completed project is not anticipated to result in incremental adverse affects to downstream water quality. 3c. If yes, provide a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWR policy. (Attach .pdf) 4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement) 4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? * ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑x N/A Page 19 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 4b. If yes, describe in detail the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant. Click to enter. 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected ® Yes ❑ No species or habitat? (IPAC weblink: https://www.fws.gov/ipac/ rfws.govl) 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species ❑ Yes ❑x No Act impacts? * 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Choose one 5d. Is another federal agency involved? * ❑ Yes © No ❑ Unknown If yes, which federal agency? Click to enter. 5e. Is this a DOT project located within Divisions 1-8? * ❑ Yes ® No 5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.? * ®Yes El No 5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? * ❑ Yes ❑x No 5g1. If yes, have you inspected the bridge for signs of bat use such as staining, guano, bats, etc.? Representative photos of signs of bat use ❑ Yes ❑ No can be found in the NLEB SLOPES, Appendix F, pages 3-7. Representative photos of signs of bat use can be found in the NLEB SLOPES, Appendix F, pages 3-7. Link to NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.miI/NLEB/1-30-17-signed NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf If you answered yes to 5g1, did you discover any signs of bat use? * ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown If yes, please show the location of the bridge on the permit drawings/ project plans 5h. Does this project involve the construction/ installation of a wind turbine(s)? * El Yes ❑x No If yes, please show the location of the wind turbine(s) on the permit drawings/ project plans (attach .pdf) 5i. Does this project involve blasting and /or other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, ❑ Yes ❑x No mechanized pile drivers, etc.? * If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property (attach .pdf) 5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? * USFWS information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) online mapping system for information on threatened and endangered species. Attach consultation documentation. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) Page 20 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat? * ❑ Yes ❑x No Is there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) around the project vicinity? * El Yes ❑x No El Unknown Will this project affect submerged aquatic vegetation? * ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑x Unknown Explain: Click to enter. 6b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Inland, Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper. The query indicated that no EFH consultation was necessary. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data): http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/ 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or ❑Yes 0 No properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? * North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS service database was queried on May 5, 2023 and revealed that no historical resources were located within the project study area. Two cultural resources were mapped within a 0.5-mile radius of the Project; however, their status was "unasssed and gone". 7c. Attach historic or prehistoric documentation. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https:Hmsc.fema.gov/portal/search 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? * ❑ Yes ❑x No 8b. If yes, explain how the project meets FEMA requirements. Click to enter. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Map Panel 3710371200J, eff. 9/5/2007 (Figure 5). H. Miscellaneous Comments: Click to enter. Attach pertinent documentation or attachments not previously requested Page 21 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 I. Signature * ❑x By checking the box and signing below, I, as the project proponent, certify to the following: • The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete, to the best of my knowledge and belief; • The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time; • The project proponent hereby agrees that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); • The project proponent hereby agrees to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act'); • The project proponent hereby understands that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND • As the project proponent, I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN/online form. Full Name: * Johanna Velasquez Signature: * Click to enter. Date: * Click to enter. Page 22 of 22 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022 Figure 1 e r-Rhyne College Highland A vo �F F pve Or SE Sweetwater of Tale 31vd SE m 0 h V 3 F o. ,tp a e SF \� O icon Ex-prisone \ \ � ra of H.ar Fairbrook Legend p.>ti>a Project Study Area 0 500 1,000 Source: USGS Latest Topographic Map 2022; Project Study Area Provided by Duke Energy U.r DUKE Feet Feet ENERGY N- VegeWRon l or anendbn of la or and logy aver urinal one Oisslaimer: The information tle ctetl on this R for infornational pumosea on y Q Catawba River Basin evaluation an aRec[lurisdid'anal sbtus and may require r&evaluationofwetiand prepare ga gineering purposes. amd was not d bq and is not suitabkufor le l or our This information presented is not for regulatory review and is intended for uae only by a Professional Land Surveyor to regulatory review. boundarie . prior Project: Wr Con USGS Topographic 70237263 Date: -^ Sweetwater Ret Tap Hickory B&W - 100kV Relocation Ma 2023 Drwn/Chkd: NR/JH 2491&eMwoed Reed, aaite,W Raleigh, NC27W4 7 Catawba County, NC Figure: 1 Ph.. : P19)873-2211 Fax. (919)893- er-Rhyne College High lend q po �F F pve Or SE Sweetwater u Tate 31vd SE m 0 y @ xrI h V 3 N C m tth sF icon Ex_prisoners of \ \ N'ar Fairbrook Cg132 _ - f - CgC2 P-fB t • �'�. Legend lk' f-r Project Study Area �""""' - ? • . ud.• NRCS Soil Mapping Units lr Soil Mapping Units �, = CfB: Clifford sandy loam, 2-6% slopes " rF CfB CfC: Clifford sandy loam, 6-10% slopes ' O CsA: Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded FaE3: Fairview clay loam, 10-25% slopes, severely eroded FdE�2 FcC: Fairview gravelly fine sandy loam, 6-10% slopes FdE2: Fairview soils, 10-25% slopes, moderately eroded Ud: Udorthents, loamy and clayey 0 150 300 Source: Latest High -Resolution NC Statewide Orthoimagery, NC OnelVap Server, Project Study Area provided by Duke Energy NRCS DUKE Web Soil Survey 2023 It DUKE N Feet NsteoVegeWRonoremoval or ft.ratien of Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for informational purposes only Is or hyd IogyafierinNalsbe and was not prepared for, and is notsuitable for legal orengineedng purposes. evaluation an aRec[urisdid'anal sbtus This information t d is not for re Ito d is Q Catawba River Basin and may require ree lu.fibhofwetland intended for use on b Professional Land Surve a ry re ewanl t bound.d.. only by yor pdoro regua ory review. Project: 70237263 Wraean NRCS Soils Date: ^a) Sweetwater Ret Tap Hickory B&W - 100kV Relocation Ma 2023 Drwn/Chkd: NR/JH gam P19)d 3-2211 te,W .. (919 Ne]9fD4 Catawba County, NC Ph.. : (g,9la,a-z:„ Fax: (919)e93-9555 Figure: 2 e -Rhyne .x J� College Highland t : ' A vc F Or SE Pye Sweetwater 4 Tate 31vd SE y m o ,M1�h I h c • ff m sF T1a o �\ icon E'-Prisoners Clark Creek 90 LF w1 -e_ or \ T2 H,ar UT to Clark Creek Hwy 154 LF Headwater - Fairbrook m Tlb Clark Creek - _ - 139 LF _ ., J a r ;F I° Legend 0 Project Study Area ® Potential Wetlands — Potential Tributaries AL tr T3w.t.- ✓~'r� 3: UT to Clark Creek 42 LF 0 150 300 Source: Latest High -Resolution NC Statewide Orthoirragery, NC OneMap Server, Project Study Area provided by Duke Energy U'DUKE Feet ENERGY N NoteoVegeWdonFeet for ale not Oiaslaimer: The information tle detl on this figure for infornational Is or Iryd logy after mibal one and was not d fop and is not a itabkufor le l or on pumoeee s. y evaluation an a Rest lurisdid'amal status prepare ga gineedng purposes. rI Catawba River Basin and may require revaluation of wetland This information presented is not for regulatory review and is boundarie . intended for use only by. Professional Land Surveyor prior to regulatory review. Project: 70237263 r Potential Wetlands and Waters F �CVJR n Date: Ma 2023 ^a) Sweetwater Ret Tap Hickory B&W -100kV Relocation Drwn/Chkd: NR/JH Ph. Brentwood 3-2211 te,m .. (919 Nez-soa Catawba County, NO Ph.. (e,9la,a-z:„ Fax: (919)a93-9555 Figure: 3 Q Study Area Adjacent Parcel Catawba County Parcel DATA SOURCE: Bing Hybrid Aerial Imagery MEET!!! Caldwell Alexander County County iredell Burke County County Catawba County Lincoln County Gaston County IL, L SWEETWATER TAP RELOCATION PROJECT FYZ �'DLIKE IrNERGY o 250 Feet CATAWBA COUNTY PARCELS Figure 4 H L LL Ca N m N R mromnv ° O c N p N N Y Y E a > R W O Q 0 0 R L 2 3 3 -p a 3 Y GJ7 m p X 2 'O R 2 a O N N ? LL c m y0 N R O_ c Q C C N W LL O O N ¢ N y N m N T a R N V c U 0 o LL Y rl R N N O O N c a O C N Y> p R Cc..0+ o y O p. a c p C R L ° N a N m IL O o m a li m O m° '� U U c m m Y Y S O.R. v ap aai Z o R 2 E Y y N > o N m N N O N C li o U w v m c U) O T W m C N d N Q O S N LL ILL N C O rL C U Y •V w R O p R w O. H N F O C C Y Y m 0 >- O 0 c N O p fy a y '� o o t c t o a Q R N N R N R i> i R N i R i @ N > N am+ N tm/l (N6 a O R E 2N 2 O O 'mO R t 1i U Q J Q Q W Q t U J U$ U 0o 'J U d 2 N LL W O W LLa fn¢ 22 22 wa a wc~i Oa J G Q S 2 = Q O 2 W C.3 LL =o 2 o U)i a¢ f/1 2 H LL Q d= N R N fl. O. z od °ms r. L E R -.0 R N E�yw roo c m O a Y F a by O o y 0 m N a ° O m N O a +L+ t a a R N °p R > 'E' £ R� w N d � >, R R i ¢ m Y yam aw0j �RNd is LR ° 6�.l E£6 o Ow R NaO y ¢> w42 a@E° E p N R O Uw O c 0 Z O y y- a O p W O O. c` N N N a O E> i N NR N Y R- N O N �+ LL c E R N\ C C w f V a E El®HO C R aL+ ° d \NedOl .6R!U R "OR a Rp E !N0 Z. i 2ORN. Oc E NY Z ->cm'o £0W Z O. N a , °OUN mcN Em2 O 0 �°CREc EcCQJ>' R �aO E m i O O O N 0 0 0 0 C 0 CD 0 N 0 M N O N a R cu 0 cu Z ai U i 0 O a N by R a R N N R m 3819 ❑636 Exhibit A-1 z.I .. .TEXHST , 1 • OU VAS, LLC, 1 _ L '. .VN ON TN15 UAIA SURVEY FEET I,i:I c I15 PRQ-i RTY ;S LOW, E4lti I IA2ARb 2.0W ".A[ ' AS 00MD9 • . �;i;iA MAPi�b 3T1037f3[1I71. 9 O - _-- -;= -b'AY WIT)N rOR LINE lSCK7 ISISE PL4 vA q: F. 0�nJG T 73-L71. A-1PROXI1MATE LOCATION OF 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMFNT . — (PB 71, PG 741 l- _ -- PARCEL371210355299 MAR'Ih MARIfTTA MATERIALS REAL FSTATE INIESTM5NT5, INC.- _ OH 31!]6, FG �12 P6 71, °G 74 a3, ' poi r 4 aI ` � l'l --- � iI�� `Rap SEE INSERT ON SHEE1 3 QUARRY CORNER, LLC DB 2086, FIG 1051 MR38•PG114 —_ 998 5i7,_ FT„ 0.023 AC. fOTA{-AREA 184,800SQ rT.. ACCLUIREO 4-242 ACRES TOTAL AREA 111,387 SC- FT-, I\ RELEASED 1.5: i ACRES . PARCLL37_2_S640891 MAR -IN MARII77rh MATERIALS, INC ❑S 2955, PG 736 zz7HAVENU SSE + + y -, -.....- u s`-, I' i CRTiFY THAT 7 HIS MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MYyyyyya+►��` SUPERV!$10N FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER M;:- .., ,._ .. };SON. Pi.S, CFRTIFY THAT TH 5 SUPERV S10N FROM 0E=04ESCRIPTI0N RF.CC]p7E1) IN 800K .: r; ;,: .+ li'; R RAYSU] ERVISIflN ANC7 r ;. AND PACE SHOWN; THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE j PO ICWIryG ;•, ;l.Ai ION WAS USED TO PERFOP5:' INDICATED AND DRAWN 'ROM INFORMATION FOUND INBOOK ` THE SURVEY. AND PAGE SHOWN; TRAT THE RA'i100; PRECISION 15GREATER ' THAN 1-lU,1300, AND THAT THIS PA AP N*F fS THE I (II)CLASS OF SUc. ;z • .I -ASS A REQUIREMENTS OPT]+E STANCARDS OF PRACT-ICE FOR LAND I I 1}POSII10NAL ACCURACY r G 1M' 5URVEYING IN NORTH CARO,!NA.122 NCAC56.1500j. � WITryK55 NYORiGIN& SIGNATL,Rt, IICENSE NUMBER, A\❑ I 31TY9E OF GPS FIELDIPAQCEDJHF VMS SEAL THIS I I. (41DATf 0� SURVEY: 03-15-3022 TH15 24TH DAY OF MARCH 2023. ( SIDAIUM/EPOCf I' NA 83I20111 (6)PIrf)IQ F1T1riKF ] 0032 [7!. USED: CAST (1)GFi71p tvlGbEt. G':flFp]?A (8jC0MI31NF.p GRID FACTOR(S)- 0-999835543 STOPHER . GLOSSON, PIS l-$415 (9)UNITS! MFiEPS CONVF.RTE D T 0 V5 5URWy Ff E7 SITE: 000894 FOR SOUICE OF THE RFFFR TO U.Bk. 31S9, 9G 1479 & D.3k. 2955, PC 736 5HEET1 Dr 3 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC SWEETWATER RETAILTAP 100KV RELOCATION DUKE IiIL=,_C]' V,AY' 7+HIRIT E (CARTINES �RIITT.S INVESMATNRTMENTS INC.� EI�ER�Y ESTATE INV�'S?'3fENT5 I. k 1IdRTIAF MARrRIPTA MATRRIAIS 1,VV . TOWN OF HICKORY CA71AWBA (_0JN7Y, N-C BOOK: 407' O 411a' 80u ] 200 C*;? vv Lr 1,4 _)ATC- 03.24.:[l';R DRAWN BY CC[ J Sck.F ]"=4LQ' SCA_ I f IN H.O.P.="A0,400• 1 Fl:ET LANiT LIN11.=801207 MAP 0088.1-U10416 3819 0637 Exhibit A-2 PI T• _+ GEN 1 32+52.74 _ AP PROX.FOATE LOCATION OF GEN 2 4343? 41 70' SANITArRY SEWER EASEMENT - " v ) $3'67'sG" L r. i {Pp 71, PG 74) NAU83(2011) , --7= N= 725,901-232' E: 1,314,823.313' PAR C E L 37121 D3 5 5299 6JARrIN MARIETTA MAI, RALS REAL ESTATE IN 31D6E PG S52 NTS, INC-��� "31 45 v Clay r 31$ .�,tk FB 7i, PG 74 pOQOSEb SU3g`0.5' L17 -ex TIE N 77' PROPOSED PI T 8 r J GEN 2 40.45.26 �1 PROPOSED PIT •7 PROPOSED DUKE POWER GEN 2 36+02.79 RIGHT OF WAY ON �O0p SEECEL37 INSERT 21 SHEET1 !y J �r w r' PARCEL 371215540891 L7U r' 149 $Q, FT.: 0.003 ACRES T-8 (TO BE REMOVEI7I NC GRID (NA083) j ;f+f ti no GEN 1 27+4P.35 Z Lo RT.0.17' F r r 3434 rZ PROPOSED DUKE POWER RIGHT OF WAY 1"'. FLOOD f ON PARCEL 371215640891 ?CINC AF r 174.315 5Q. FT. Lu w- IF 4.002 ACRES o� 0 l95 ELOO7 �r �i aoNe x ;n PROPOSED PI T-6.5 PARCG'_ 321215544891 �] 34, F\ f GEN 2 31+16.56 �� z� T-7 CD \J IN MARIETTA " ti 34 ARTATERIAL5, INC (TO115 REMOVED) D8 2955, PGRk6 GEN 1 23+4833 ^� Iw RT 0 30' PUKE POWER RIGHT OF WA w p r n TO BE RELEASED 4 to Iw (D3 13, PG 24) Ib 1,337 SO. FT r II aft IO 2-55] ACRES N I ry ,r :86R2 1SED p 0 DUKE PO WAY 3I ON PARCEL 442334 �w' q 6�10,336 .FT �z f �r 237 ACRES � T-6 1 PR PI (TO BE REMOVED) ° 1 GEN 2 GEN 1 19+51,93 5 7$ 34`11 PROPOSED PI T-5.5 1T, p.IE3' 4-5 2Qs. 72' GEN 2 19+58.00 S 7Y Q9' 1, E 10 11 L(5 r rn S �Z3�4 53 y `6 2 5 _CG `4$Z. rZ 45q T-5 _ f 2 y S ?9g.3 E GEN 1 15+33-55 ,nJ1 4 �a - 4$ 4I3 46 s9' N7 724? 97 631' SEE INSERT ON SHEET 3 GSq S 333 Z4� d E: 1,314,644 RO'. QUARRY CORNER, LLC 5� 3 Z 454 , �tiairriarr.r ME 38. PG 114 NU` +` C 998 SQ- FT-; M23 AC..'4G5 NSF _ � :�¢Z� Ess 1 p •�+ ° SEAL r . L-54 o y+ 'y E jl l � Q5r1a FC3 SDURCF GI TITLE REFf R TO FI.P,K 3159, PG- 1479 & LEV : 9'.S. VG 7 35 SIFE ! 2 UIi DUKE ENERGY CAROUNAS, LLC SWEETWATER RETAIL TAP 100KV RELOCATION D' r .,- u KE MARTIN TT.i MATERIALS REAL ENE RAY® ESTATE ' -[ INVESTMENTS INC. dr MARTIN MMUEs TTA MATERLALS INC. TOWN OF HICKORY CATAWBA COUNTY, N-C. 300-- 1U] 0 10p' no, 250' CRFW: LF/LP. t505 TRVOPJ 57R�ET 34T- 03.24 2n,) DRAWN $Y: C:CG C.-{ARLB'T I N.L 5CA,E. 1-200' SCA,_F IN FF.0 R_O_P; 1 a0,L00- IEl cPHQNS N7 i704) 392 23ri1 LAN 7 u NI ; . 28C+7201 h1�A.p: tls2"Ii 83FQiP416 3819 0638 Exhibit A-3 PARCEL TABLE LOT OWNER PARCEL NQ, )rEo REFERENCE PLAT REFERENCE 1 -AR HEEL PROPERTIES OF II;CKCRY, I.LC 371214343533 N 2416. PG 1608 RB 55. PG 175 2 CNS REAL 3STATE!, LLC 371214346600 D8 3220. PC 191. PB 55, PG 175 3 MAO PROPERTIES, LLC 3712:4346735 DB 6297, FG 121 PO 56, PG 175 4 COUNTY -WIDE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. 371?14345931 DO3A5S, PG 613 PH 55, ]G IT, 5 TERRY E7WAR ?S, P.T A�. 371710454989 DB 2911. PG 1335 PR 11, PG 5 p ❑SCAR ROM ERO, ET AI 31]710464130 DB E 576, PG 733 PB I1, PG 5 7 OV�IN ALBER T SCHRONCE 374'10463290 D9 1747. PG 939 M 11. PG 5 $ JOI.ENF & AIAN CROOKS., JR 371210463350 133589. PG 356 PB 11. PG 5 9 IOUNE & ALAN CROOKS, JR. 3)12104£2486 DES 344G. PG V44 PB 11 PG 5 10 MARTIN %148 LTA MATERIALS REAI ESlAIE INVES MI N75, INC 3712144a2334 DR 3159. PG 1479 PB71, PG 183 INSERT 1"=30' 1 PROP OSFD DUKE POW _R I RIGHT OF WAY ON / SEE INSERT ON 5HEE r 3 PARCEL37121564U891 149 5Ct RT.. Q.003 ACPES C ' Pr..9 ic- n � ��aH�a� *,cAaolnnax3l PIT9 OEN 1 32+52.74 GEN 2 43432-41 G E N 2 83'67'30" NA083j 20111 1 N. 725,907.2 E: i,314,823. LINE TABLE L BEARING DISTANCE L? 7ti-40'52" E 50.27 :.2 1_3 IN 76'18'59" `N S 14'S 7'08" E 2 28' L4 LS N 75"20'42" W N 19 3T20' E ?34- 991. L6 5 77'08'25" 1E 176,80' LI 516"S9'44"W 76.OT N 16'57'517" E. -3 11.23 N 14'33'12 195,85' E 15'.92 N 14`2'28 661.47 5`1315" 248.48' N 77`35'A7' 142.97' N 77'37'11" E 182.92' N ?$'05 28" W 104,83' L16 5 04'33`10" E 124,91 L17 N 84`5849" 147.76, LIS S 77`20'20" E 6.52' 719 N 18'10'41"r�789"' 1-20 N 3443849 E L21 N 34'38'A9" E L22 N 34'38'49" E 1Md_ _23 N 13'S5 47' E 102.0 724 N 13'5 '47" E 68.19' US N 11 55'47" ' 94.90' E35 571"45'41" F. 164,58' n INSERT 1"=100' N n!7111 �l c aam I^IAne sI 4r a PARCE1371215540991 +j MARTIN MA:RIETTA � 4 MATERIALS, INC o DB 79S5, PG 736 [QUARRY CORNER, I.1.0 ❑B 2086, PG 1051 M9 38. PG 114 t ° ^ L 998 7G. F',, 0.023 AC. = M !6 T tiF AR' A SHOWN HEREON 1998 SQUARE FEETI IS A 1108110'N 01 .A PARCEL CONVEYED r0 QJARAY CORNER. LLC HEED BOOK 2D35, PAGE 10511. THIS AREA WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE' FALL CAVING C014VEYANWsS 10 TAR HEEL PROPERTE5 01F HICKORY'. LLC (DEED BOOK 21'16, PAGE 16031 & ='ANDA PARTNIRS, LLC IbEED 1360K 2565, PACE 325). A R .+.+ LEGEND 4''.4��►,+ftiG 0� �..+•••+..• ( 4 E Sum EYED PR Ii11E 1Q'¢O�ESSIfl•4�i�++ ---- ADJOINING PARCEL UW ppSS�• SEAL ROAD RIGHT OF V1AY 2 ;r 5415 4 TIE LINL ---- l .EASEM"NT �'►r • '. . •• r SURVE4 LINE ITRANRAISSIONJ —LW— SA,l'1TAM STEW tR(APPROX I NIATEI 0 FOO'NDPROP1RTYCORN ER e CALCGL4TE17POINr ■ SE r 1/i" PIPE _,ITE: 000884 FOR SOURCE ©P TIFLE REFER TO D.H.K. 3159, as;. 1Q79 & ❑.9K. 2955, PG 73E- SH'Fi 3O'r 3 DUKE ENERGY CAROL.INAS, LLC SWEETWATER RETAIL TAP 100KV RELOCAi ON DUKE ''GIJT OF WAY EXIII-'3IT V MARTIN EA TSVENR IffC.LS MARTIN.ESTATYA.WTTAyYAT.KRW5INC. ENERGY. T OWN' OF H:CKGRY CATAVI,'BA COUN TY, N.C. a{'110{. [REvt ll_R i05. T q TAT:: 03,24.202.1 DRAWN BY CCG Cf4R:"11-C.2620 ] rl] 5CAI.kHDp;Z 111 rN•?I'aR1:363 A'dD,_; I_: 287?0 I-1A= r7'3788�;.•k[]%75 Natural &Cultural Resources Report Sweetwater Ret Tap Hickory B&W-100kV Relocation Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Raleigh, North Carolina Catawba County, North Carolina May 2023 Project No. 70237263 Prepared for: Duke Energy Carolinas Charlotte, North Carolina lerracan Explore with us Nationwide ■ Facilities ■ Environmental ■ Gootechnical Terracon.com ■ Materials Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC � �erra�on May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 Table of Contents 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & UNDERSTANDING.............................................1 2.0 BACKGROUND RESEARCH..........................................................................1 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES..............................................................................1 3.1 Topography.......................................................................................1 3.2 Soils.................................................................................................1 3.3 Water Resources................................................................................2 3.4 Floodplains........................................................................................2 4.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES..........................................................................2 4.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S.......................................................2 4.1.1 Potential Wetlands Data.............................................................. 3 4.1.2 Potential Waters Data...............................................................4 4.2 Clean Water Act Permits.....................................................................4 4.3 Coastal Area Management Act.............................................................5 4.4 Construction Moratoria........................................................................5 4.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules...............................................................5 4.5.1 Local and Municipal Buffers.......................................................6 4.6 Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act..............................................6 4.7 Endangered Species Act Protected Species............................................6 4.8 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA).......................................9 4.9 Federal Species of Concern/At-Risk Species...........................................9 4.10 State Listed Species...........................................................................9 5.0 CULTURAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES.............................................10 6.0 SUMMARY................................................................................................10 Appendices Appendix A • Exhibits Appendix B • Representative Photos 2 Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC � �erra�on May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & UNDERSTANDING Terracon has completed the natural and cultural resources due diligence investigation for Duke Energy Carolinas (Duke) for potential work on the Sweetwater Ret Tap Line in Catawba County, NC. The study area consists of 2,900 feet of existing line and approximately 2,800 feet of proposed, new right-of-way. The limits of the study area were provided by Duke as GIS data. The study area is depicted on a current U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map (Exhibit 1), the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey of Catawba County (Exhibit 2), recent aerial photography depicting the delineation results titled Potential Wetlands/Waters (Exhibit 3), and a Flood Zone map (Exhibit 4). Terracon was tasked by Duke to provide the following services for the Sweetwater Ret Tap Line: • Wetland and waters delineation, • GPS data collection for any delineated wetlands and tributaries, • Preliminary protected species habitat assessments for federally Endangered and Threatened species, • Preliminary cultural resources assessment, and • Report, graphics, data, and KMZ file preparation 2.0 BACKGROUND RESEARCH Prior to the initiation of field efforts, available sources were reviewed, including the applicable USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles of Hickory, NC (NGS/ESRI 2011), the NRCS Soil Survey for Catawba County, NC (USDA 1995), and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodplain mapping (FEMA 2019). Additionally, North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) data concerning any known occurrences of state and federally Threatened or Endangered species were reviewed in May 2023 on the Natural Heritage Data Explorer (NCNHP 2022). Field work was conducted by Terracon staff on May 1, 2023. 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES The study area is located within the piedmont physiographic province of North Carolina. Specifically, the study area is in the Biotite gneiss and schist and the Megacrystic biotite gneiss Formations (NCDENR 2018). 3.1 Topography Topography in the study area consists of slight slopes and drainages. Elevations appear to range from a high of approximately 1,160 feet above mean sea level (MSL) down to approximately 1,015 feet above MSL, based on a review of Exhibit 1 and other online data sources. 3.2 Soils The soil mapping units identified by NRCS as occurring in the study area include Clifford sandy loam, 2-6% slopes; Clifford sandy loam, 6-10% slopes; Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded; Fairview clay loam, 10-25% slopes, severely eroded; Fairview gravelly fine sandy loam, 6-10% slopes; Fairview soils, 10-25% slopes, moderately eroded; and 1 Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC � �erra�or� May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 Udorthents, loamy and clayey (Exhibit 2). The soil mapping unit Codorus loam, potentially occurring within the study area is considered a hydric (wetland) soil by NRCS or is known to have hydric inclusions. 3.3 Water Resources Water resources in the study area are located within the Catawba River Basin [USGS hydrologic unit 03050101 (NCDWR 2019)]. A Best Usage Classification (BUC) is assigned to waters of North Carolina based on the existing or contemplated best usage of various bodies of water. Table 1 contains the nearest named water resource associated with features located within the study area, its Stream Index Number (SIN), and BUC. This named stream represents the potential receiving waters of any wetlands and tributaries that are located inside the study area. Unnamed tributaries carry the same BUC as their receiving waters, unless otherwise indicated by North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). Table 1. Named water resources and receiving waters (NCDWR 2019) Stream Name SIN = BUC Basin Clark Creek (Shooks Lake) 11-129-5-(0.3) 1 C Catawba C are waters protected for uses such as aquatic life propagation, survival, and maintenance of biological integrity (including fishing and fish), wildlife, secondary contact recreation, and agriculture. Secondary contact recreation means wading, boating, other uses not involving human body contact with water, and activities involving human body contact with water where such activities take place on an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental basis. 3.4 Floodplains Portions of the study area associated with Clark Creek are designated as the 100-year floodplain (AE zone), which is defined as an area with a 1 percent annual chance of flooding and as a regulatory floodway (FEMA 2019). Under NWP 57, activities within the 100-year floodplain must comply with applicable FEMA-approved state or local floodplain management requirements. These requirements should be evaluated by Duke engineers or the applicable engineering consultant. 4.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES 4.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires regulation of discharges into waters of the U.S. (WOTUS). Although the principal administrative agency of the CWA is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has major responsibility for implementation, permitting, and enforcement of provisions of the CWA. Water bodies such as rivers, lakes, and streams are subject to jurisdictional consideration under the Section 404 program. However, by regulation, certain wetlands are also considered WOTUS. Currently WOTUS are assessed by the CWA's pre-2015 definition of WOTUS. This definition of WOTUS includes the implementation of rulemaking as decided in the Supreme Court's decision of the consolidated cases Rapanos v. United States and Carabeii v. United States. 2 Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC � �erra�on May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 Specifically, the following waters will be under federal jurisdiction pursuant to the CWA: • Traditional navigable waters (TNWs) • Wetlands adjacent to TNWs • Non -navigable tributaries of traditional navigable waters that are relatively permanent where the tributaries typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (3 months) • Wetlands that directly abut such tributaries • Relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water "forming geographic features" that are described in ordinary parlance as "streams, oceans, rivers, and lakes". These are Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs). The following waters will be considered jurisdictional if a significant nexus (contributes to the physical, chemical, or biological integrity of downstream TNWs) exists between these features and traditional navigable waters: • Non -navigable tributaries that are not relatively permanent • Wetlands adjacent to non -navigable tributaries that are not relatively permanent • Wetlands adjacent to but that do not directly abut a relatively permanent non - navigable tributary The following waters will be considered non jurisdictional under the CWA: • Swales or Erosional features (gullies, small washes characterized by low volume, infrequent or short duration flows) • Ditches (including roadside ditches) excavated wholly in and draining only uplands and that do not carry a relatively permanent flow of water. However, wetlands and other waterbodies that do not fall under federal regulation per the CWA may be subject to jurisdiction by the N.0 Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) under the state's Isolated and Other Non-404 Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters program. Our delineation methodology generally follows the guidance outlined in the Regional Supplement to the USACE Wetland Delineation Manual for the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region, which states that areas must exhibit three distinct characteristics to be considered jurisdictional wetlands: 1) prevalence of hydrophytic (water tolerant) plants; 2) presence of hydric soils; and 3) sufficient wetland hydrology indicators within 12 inches of the ground surface. The study area was also reviewed for the presence of tributaries (stream channels) using criteria provided by the USACE and the NCDWR. When present, intermittent, and perennial tributaries, and certain other surface waters, are also considered jurisdictional by the USACE and/or NCDWR. 4.1.1 Potential Wetlands Data One (1) potential wetland was delineated within the study area. As such, this feature is reported for Dukes preliminary due diligence and planning purposes. This potential wetland feature was flagged with sequentially numbered orange and red - and -white striped flagging. Exhibit 3 depicts the approximate extent and approximate location of this feature. These graphics are not intended to be a C Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 it Terracon replacement for a traditional survey and are not intended to be used as such. Table 2 contains a summary of the specific wetland data collected for the wetland that occurred inside of the project study area. This wetland is classified as a Headwater Forest wetland. Headwater Forest wetlands are intermittently inundated to seasonally saturated, dominated by woody vegetation, and located in areas that have less than a second -order stream or are located within a topographic crenulation without a stream. Table 2. Potential wetlands data for the Sweetwater Ret Tap Line Approximate Likely Wetland NCWAM Size in Hydrologic Regime Jurisdictional ID Classification project Authority Study Area Seasonally to semi- W1 Headwater Forest permanently inundated 0.011 USACE/DWR and/or only intermittently inundated. TOTAL f0.01 ac ' Final decision regarding jurisdictional status lies with USACE. 4.1.2 Potential Waters Data Three (3) potential tributaries, Clark Creek and two unnamed tributaries to Clark Creek, were identified by Terracon staff within the project study area. These features are reported for Duke's preliminary due diligence and planning purposes and were delineated with sequentially numbered solid blue and orange flagging. A NCDWR stream identification form was completed for the potential tributaries in the study area to determine if the stream exhibits perennial or intermittent flow. Exhibit 3 depicts the approximate extent and approximate location of these features. This exhibit is not intended to be a replacement for a traditional survey and are not intended to be used as such. Table 3 contains the potential waters data collected as part of this project. Table 3. Potential waters data for the Sweetwater Ret Tap Line Approximate NCDWQ Likely Water Flow Length (ft) in Approximate Stream Jurisdictional s ID Regimes Width (ft) ID Form Study Area Authority Score T1 (Clark Perennial 228 15 >30 USACE/DWR Creek) T2 Intermittent 154 6 24 USACE/DWR T3 Intermittent 42 6 20 USACE/DWR TOTAL 424 LF 'Based on NCDWR score; USACE holds final decision 4 Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC � �erra�on May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 4.2 Clean Water Act Permits Dredge and fill activities in WOTUS must be authorized by USACE as a regulated discharge pursuant to Section 404 of the CWA and by NCDWR pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA. Activities authorized by the USACE are subject to further water quality requirements per Section 401 of the CWA. In North Carolina, the NCDWR administers the Section 401 Water Quality Certification process, which also must include plans on how the applicant proposes to manage stormwater. USACE authorizes many utility projects under the Nationwide Permit (NWP) program. NWP 57 will allow activities required for the construction, maintenance, repair, and removal of utility lines and associated facilities in WOTUS, provided the activity does not result in the loss of greater than 0.5 acre of WOTUS for each single and complete project. Compensatory mitigation can be required by USACE if the proposed project is determined to have an adverse effect on WOTUS, including wetlands, because of a regulated discharge. Mitigation can be required for wetland losses >_ 0.10 acre and/or the loss of >_ 0.02 acre of stream bed. Under NWP 57 activities within the 100-year floodplain must comply with applicable FEMA-approved state or local floodplain management requirements. Coordination is recommended with USACE and NCDWR to determine the applicable jurisdictional authority and the permitting requirements for this project, if any. Section 404 permitting may not be necessary if all wetland and stream impacts are avoided; however, concurrence from USACE and NCDWR should be obtained prior to beginning any activities. 4.3 Coastal Area Management Act North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM) regulates certain wetlands and water bodies in the twenty coastal counties of North Carolina pursuant to the Coastal Area Management Act. Catawba County is not a coastal county and is not subject to NCDCM regulations. 4.4 Construction Moratoria No construction moratoria should apply to this project based on the lack of sensitive environmental resources that could trigger a moratorium. There are no Primary Nursery Areas (PNA) listed for Catawba County (NCDMF 2011). There are no Anadromous Fish Spawning Areas (AFSA) listed for Catawba County (NCDMF 2007). There are no waters/tributaries within the study area or receiving waters that are classified as Trout Waters (Tr) (NCDWR 2018). 4.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules The study area is within the Catawba River Basin. Per the Catawba River Basin riparian buffer rules, a 50-foot buffer applies to all shorelines along Catawba River mainstem below Lake James to the North Carolina/South Carolina border and all shorelines of the Catawba mainstem lakes. This buffer does not apply to any features identified within the study area. 5 Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 it Terracon 4.5.1 Local and Municipal Buffers The project study site is within Catawba County. There appear to be no local or municipal riparian buffer requirements in Catawba County. Terracon makes no definitive statement regarding buffers that are associated with landscaping, viewsheds, zoning, or any purpose other than for the protection of aquatic resources. 4.6 Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act requires authorization from the USACE for the excavation of material, alteration, obstruction, or construction of any structure in or over any "navigable water" of the United States (33 U.S.0 410 et seq.). "Navigable water" is defined as waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide shoreward to the mean high-water mark and/or waters that are presently used, have been used in the past, or are susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce (33 CFR part 329). There are no Section 10 waters within the study area. 4.7 Endangered Species Act Protected Species Species with the federal classifications of Endangered (E) or Threatened (T) are protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Species officially Proposed (P) for such listing are not protected under the ESA, but are recommended for inclusion in evaluations based on potential for status to be upgraded to official listing as E or T. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaQ system (IPAC 2023) indicates that five (5) species are recommended for project consideration based on the location of the project study area. Three of these species, tricolored bat (listed as Proposed Endangered), bog turtle (listed as Threatened -Similar to Appearance), and monarch butterfly (listed as Candidate) do not currently require further consideration. A NCNHP database query was generated in April 2023 to determine if any of these species have been documented inside of or within 1.0 mile of the study area. Terracon conducted habitat assessments inside the study area in May 2023. Table 4. Federal listed species for Sweetwater Ret Tap Line (Catawba County) Potential Federal Habitat Biological Common Name Scientific Name Status Present conclusion (T/E) 1 Y/N May Affect - Northern long- Myotis Yes (summer Not Likely to eared bat septentrionalis E habitat) Adversely Affectz Tricolored bat Perimyotis PE Yes Not Required subflavus X Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC � �erra�on May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 May Affect - Dwarf -flowered Hexastylis T Yes Not Likely to heartleaf naniflora Adversely Affectz Bog turtle Glyptemys T(S/A) No Not Required muhlenbergii Monarch butterfly Danaus plexippus C No Not Required 1 E - Endangered, PE - Proposed Endangered, T-Threatened, T(S/A)-Threatened (Similarity of Appearance, C-Candidate z May require USFWS concurrence if Section 404 permitting is required Northern long-eared bat — During summer, the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) roosts singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices in both live and dead trees and/or snags (typically >3 inches diameter breast height). Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. This bat seems opportunistic in selecting roosts, using tree species based on suitability to provide cavities or crevices or presence of peeling bark. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds when suitable tree roosts are not available. During the summer, NLEB emerge at dusk to forage in upland and lowland woodlands and tree -lined corridors. It is reported that the NLEB hibernation season is October 15 — April 15. The bats spend winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula. They typically use large caves or mines with large passages and entrances; constant temperatures; and high humidity with no air currents. Specific areas where they hibernate have very high humidity, so much so that droplets of water are often seen on their fur. Within hibernacula, surveyors find them in small crevices or cracks, often with only the nose and ears visible (USFWS 2023). Habitat Present: Yes The project study area contains potential summer habitat for NLEB. The forested areas provide the necessary habitat requirements this species needs during the summer months. A review of April 2023 NCNHP records indicates no known occurrences of NLEB within 1.0 mile of the study area. If tree clearing or Section 404 permitting is needed for this project, further coordination with USFWS may be needed to maintain compliance with he ESA. Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect Tricolored bat — The tricolored bat is a small native bat that can be found across the eastern and central United States. During the spring, summer, and fall - collectively referred to as the non -hibernating seasons - tricolored bats primarily roost among live and dead leaf clusters of live or recently dead deciduous hardwood trees. In addition, tricolored bats have been observed roosting during summer among pine needles, eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), within artificial roosts like barns, beneath porch roofs, bridges, concrete bunkers, and rarely within caves. During the winter, tricolored bats hibernate in caves and mines; although, in the southern United States, where caves are sparse, 7 Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC � �erra�or� May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 tricolored bats often hibernate in road -associated culverts, as well as sometimes in tree cavities and abandoned water wells (IPAC 2023). Habitat Present: Yes Potential habitat for the tricolored bat does occur within the study area. The forested areas provide the necessary habitat requirements this species requires. NCNHP data reviewed in April 2023 indicates no known occurrences of the tricolored bat within 1.0 mile of the study area. Biological Conclusion: Not Currently Required This species is listed as Proposed Endangered. Any species the Service has determined is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range and the Service has proposed a draft rule to list as endangered. Proposed endangered species are not protected by the take prohibitions of section 9 of the ESA until the rule to list is finalized. Under section 7(a)(4) of the ESA, Federal agencies must confer with the Service if their action will jeopardize the continued existence of a proposed species. Dwarf -flowered heartleaf- Dwarf -flowered heartleaf is endemic to the western Piedmont and foothills of North and South Carolina. This herbaceous evergreen is found in moist to rather dry forests along bluffs; boggy areas next to streams and creek heads; and adjacent hillslopes, slopes, and ravines. Requiring acidic, sandy loam soils, the species is found in soil series such as Pacolet, Madison, and Musella, among others. Occurrences are generally found on a north facing slope. Undisturbed natural communities such as Piedmont/Coastal Plain Heath Bluff, Dry-Mesic Oak Hickory Forest, and Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest hold the most viable occurrences. However, less viable remnant occurrences are found in disturbed habitats, including logged, grazed, mown, and residential/commercial roadside rights -of -way; and on upland slopes surrounding manmade ponds or lakes (IPAC 2023). Habitat Present: Yes Potential habitat for dwarf -flowered heartleaf, although marginal, does occur in the study area. NCNHP data reviewed in April 2023 indicates one known occurrence of dwarf -flowered heartleaf within 1.0 mile of the study area and one occurrence within the study area. Terracon staff performed pedestrian surveys for this species within the maintained ROW that comprises the study area and found no evidence of the dwarf -flowered heartleaf. Although our survey did not identify the species inside the ROW, due to the proximity of the known locations of this species, Terracon cannot provide a No Effect determination. It is recommended that Duke consult with USFWS prior to land disturbance if Section 404 permitting is necessary for the project. Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect Bog turtle— The bog turtle is one of the smallest turtles in North America with a max length at about 4 inches. They typically inhabit herbaceous sedge meadows bordered by wooded areas. The meadows must contain pockets of dry land and pockets that are n. Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC � �erra�on May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 frequently flooded. Bog Turtles also inhabit open shrub wetlands that contain muddy bottoms with dry pockets. They prefer areas that are dominated by low grasses and sedges. Bog Turtles feed on small worms and snails, and berries. They spend much of their time underwater, in shrubs, or buried in mud (USFWS 2023). Habitat Present: No Species listed as threatened due to similarity of appearance do not require Section 7 consultation with the USFWS. Suitable habitat for the bog turtle was not observed within the project study area. NCNHP data reviewed in April 2023 indicates no occurrences of the bog turtle within 1.0 mile of the study area. Biological Conclusion: Not Required 4.8 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) Bald eagles typically feed on fish but may also consume birds and small mammals. In the Carolinas, nesting season extends from December through May (Potter et al. 1980). Bald eagles typically nest in tall, living trees in a conspicuous location near water and forage over large bodies of water with adjacent trees available for perching (Hamel 1992). The bald eagle was officially delisted and removed from the federal Endangered Species List on August 9, 2007, but they are still protected under the BGEPA (Guidelines) and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (META). The Guidelines prohibits disturbance to a bald eagle. The Guidelines defines disturb as "to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to a degree that causes, or is likely to cause, based on the best scientific information available: 1) injury to an eagle; 2) a decrease in its productivity, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior; or 3) nest abandonment, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior." The definition also covers impacts that result from human -caused alterations initiated around a previously used nest site during a time when eagles are not present, if, upon the eagle's return, such alterations agitate or bother an eagle to a degree that injures an eagle or interferes with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior. Under the current Guidelines, USFWS recommends the following measures for roads, trails, canals, power lines, and other linear utilities. If the eagle nest can be seen from the project site and there is no similar activity within 660 feet, then USFWS recommends that the project: 1) maintain a buffer of at least 660 feet between your activities and the nest; 2) maintain any established landscape buffers; and 3) if possible, create additional landscape buffers to screen the new activity from the nest. If these recommendations cannot be adopted for the project, then coordination is recommended with the local USFWS office. No habitat was identified within the project study area. A review of NCNHP records in April 2023 indicates no known occurrences of the bald eagle within 1.0 mile of the study area. 4.9 Federal Species of Concern/At-Risk Species USFWS also maintains a list of Federal Species of Concern (FSC) and At -Risk Species (ARS). Neither FSC or ARS are afforded federal protection under the Endangered Species Act and 9 Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC � �erra�on May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally listed as P, T, or E under the ESA. However, the status of these species is subject to change, and a review of NCNHP data has been performed to determine if they have been documented in or near the study area. The NCNHP review concludes no FSC/ARS species have been documented within 1.0 mile of the study area based on a review of the April 2023 NCNHP data. 4.10 State Listed Species Some species that are listed as FSC or ARS by USFWS receive limited state protection if state -listed by the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission or N.C. Plant Conservation Service as Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Special Concern (SC). These species receive limited protection under the North Carolina Endangered Species Act (G.S. 113-331 et seq.) and the North Carolina Plant Protection Act of 1979 (G.S. 106-202.12 et seq.). The April 2023 NCNHP review indicates two state -listed species have been documented within 1.0 mile of the study area. Dwarf threetooth (Triodopsis fulciden) was last documented in 1952.. No further coordination regarding these species is necessary pursuant to current regulations. 5.0 CULTURAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Research conducted using the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS service database on May 5, 2023, revealed that while no historical resources appear to be located directly within the project study area, two are mapped within a 0.5- mile radius (Table 5). Both resources have been destroyed and neither were evaluated for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Table 5: Historic -Age Resources within 0.5-Mile Radius of the Project Study Area Resource ID Description NRHP Status CT0462 Duke Power Relay Station Unassessed (Gone) CT0917 Cline Farm Unassessed (Gone) Research conducted by Terracon at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on May 12, 2023, revealed that no archaeological sites have been recorded within a 0.25- mile radius of the project study area. Review of aerial imagery suggests that much of the proposed new location has been previously disturbed by former residential development and subsequent demolition. Given this previous disturbance and that a portion of the proposed project is located within existing right-of-way, is unlikely that the project would adversely affect known cultural resources. However, if federal permitting triggers Section 106 compliance, it is recommended that SHPO be consulted to determine whether cultural resources surveys may be required. 6.0 SUMMARY One (1) potential wetland and three (3) potential tributaries were identified within the project study area. Wetland and tributary impacts should be avoided and minimized as 10 Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC � �erra�on May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 much as practicable. Unavoidable impacts resulting in a regulated discharge of dredge or fill material into wetlands and/or waters must be coordinated with the USACE and NCDWR and Section 404/401 permitting and compensatory mitigation could be required. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is recommended if Section 404 permitting is anticipated. Potential habitat exists for three (3) of the federal -listed species identified for consideration in this portion of Catawba County: Northern long-eared bat, tricolored bat, and dwarf - flowered heartleaf. Surveys for dwarf flowered heartleaf were conducted within the study area at the time of the site visit by Terracon. No evidence of dwarf -flowered heartleaf was identified within the study area. NCNHP does document this species as occurring inside the ROW; however, it is likely that this occurrence has previously been addressed by the quarry due to their expansion plans. Potential summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat and potential habitat for the tricolored bat occurs within the forested parts of the study area. Further consultation with USFWS regarding the impacts to these species is recommended if Section 404 permitting is required for the project. No recorded cultural or historic resources were identified within 0.25 mile of the study area. No archaeological sites have been recorded within 0.25 mile of the study area. If Section 404/401 permitting will be required for this project, further coordination with SHPO may be necessary. 11 Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC � �erra�on May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 References Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2020. FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer. https://fema.maps.arcciis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html (Accessed May 2023). Hamel, P.B. 1992. Land Manager's Guide to the Birds of the South. The Nature Conservancy, Southeastern Region, Chapel Hill, NC. 437 pp. National Geographic Society/ESRI. 2011. I -cubed seamless USGS quadrangle (Hickory, NC). N. C. Department of Environmental and Natural Resources. 2022. Geologic Map of North Carolina 1985. https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apes/MapSeries/index.html?appid=a8281cbd24b 84239b29cd2a7984a10. N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries. 2007. Anadromous Fish Spawning Areas. http://portal.ncdenr.ora/web/mf/ (Accessed May 2023). N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries. 2011. Primary Nursery Areas. http://portal.ncdenr.ora/web/mf/ (Accessed May 2023). N.C. Division of Water Resources. 2020. NC Water Quality Classifications by NC River Basin. http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications (Accessed May 2023). N.C. Division of Water Resources. 2020. Find Your Hydrologic Unit. https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apes/PublicInformation/index.html (Accessed May 2023). N.C. Natural Heritage Program. 2023. Natural Heritage Data Explorer [web application]. NCDNCR, Raleigh, NC. Available at www.ncnhp.org. (Accessed April 2023). Potter, E.F., J.F. Parnell, and R.P. Teulings. 1980. Birds of the Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 408 pp. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2006. Digital Soil Survey of Catawba County, NC. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2012. Regional Supplement to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0). U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS. 179 pp. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2023. Information for Planning and Consultation. https://ecos.fws.ciov/ipac/ (Accessed May 2023). 12 Sweetwater Ret Tap Relocation I Catawba County, NC May 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237263 Appendix A Exhibits r rerracon 13 er-Rhyne College Highlaoo A vo F pve Or SE .. Sweetwater of Tale 31vtl SE m h V 3 m c sF ca^ Ex -Prisoners o � r f Way. Fairbrook 9. 40%r ti C � • Legend pia Project Study Area W0 500 1,000 Source: USGS Latest Topographic Map 2022; Project Study Area Provided by Duke Energy .r DUKE Feet ENERGYNM..il. rhyd,, moval or aftendbn of Disclaimer The information de cted on thisft for informational le or Iryd logy after moral efts and was not d foq and is not suitabkufor le I or an p°^'Dees only evaluation an aRec[lurisdid'anal sbtus prepare ga gineering purposes. Q Catawba River Basin and may require reevaluation ofwetiand This information presented is not for regulatory reviewand is boundarie . intended for u. only by a Professional Land Surveyor prior to regulatory review. Project: 70237263 Wr can USGS Topographic Date: ^a) Sweetwater Ret Tap Hickory B&W - 100kV Relocation May 2023 Drwn/Chkd: NR/JH gam ereMwoed 3-2211 te,W .. (91ll N73-9M Catawba County, NO Ph.. : (g,9la,a-z:„ Fax: (919)e93-9555 Figure: 1 er-Rhyne College High lend q po �F F pve Or SE Sweetwater u Tate 31vd SE m 0 y @ xrI h V 3 N C m tth sF icon Ex_prisoners of \ \ N'ar Fairbrook Cg132 _ - f - CgC2 P-fB t • �'�. Legend lk' f-r Project Study Area �""""' - ? • . ud.• NRCS Soil Mapping Units lr Soil Mapping Units �, = CfB: Clifford sandy loam, 2-6% slopes " rF CfB CfC: Clifford sandy loam, 6-10% slopes ' O CsA: Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded FaE3: Fairview clay loam, 10-25% slopes, severely eroded FdE�2 FcC: Fairview gravelly fine sandy loam, 6-10% slopes FdE2: Fairview soils, 10-25% slopes, moderately eroded Ud: Udorthents, loamy and clayey 0 150 300 Source: Latest High -Resolution NC Statewide Orthoimagery, NC OnelVap Server, Project Study Area provided by Duke Energy NRCS DUKE Web Soil Survey 2023 It DUKE N Feet NsteoVegeWRonoremoval or ft.ratien of Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for informational purposes only Is or hyd IogyafierinNalsbe and was not prepared for, and is notsuitable for legal orengineedng purposes. evaluation an aRec[urisdid'anal sbtus This information t d is not for re Ito d is Q Catawba River Basin and may require ree lu.fibhofwetland intended for use on b Professional Land Surve a ry re ewanl t bound.d.. only by yor pdoro regua ory review. Project: 70237263 Wraean NRCS Soils Date: ^a) Sweetwater Ret Tap Hickory B&W - 100kV Relocation Ma 2023 Drwn/Chkd: NR/JH gam P19)d 3-2211 te,W .. (919 Ne]9fD4 Catawba County, NC Ph.. : (g,9la,a-z:„ Fax: (919)e93-9555 Figure: 2 e -Rhyne .x J� College Highland t : ' A vc F Or SE Pye Sweetwater 4 Tate 31vd SE y m o ,M1�h I h c • ff m sF T1a o �\ icon E'-Prisoners Clark Creek 90 LF w1 -e_ or \ T2 H,ar UT to Clark Creek Hwy 154 LF Headwater - Fairbrook m Tlb Clark Creek - _ - 139 LF _ ., J a r ;F I° Legend 0 Project Study Area ® Potential Wetlands — Potential Tributaries AL tr T3w.t.- ✓~'r� 3: UT to Clark Creek 42 LF 0 150 300 Source: Latest High -Resolution NC Statewide Orthoirragery, NC OneMap Server, Project Study Area provided by Duke Energy U'DUKE Feet ENERGY N NoteoVegeWdonFeet for ale not Oiaslaimer: The information tle detl on this figure for infornational Is or Iryd logy after mibal one and was not d fop and is not a itabkufor le l or on pumoeee s. y evaluation an a Rest lurisdid'amal status prepare ga gineedng purposes. rI Catawba River Basin and may require revaluation of wetland This information presented is not for regulatory review and is boundarie . intended for use only by. Professional Land Surveyor prior to regulatory review. Project: 70237263 r Potential Wetlands and Waters F �CVJR n Date: Ma 2023 ^a) Sweetwater Ret Tap Hickory B&W -100kV Relocation Drwn/Chkd: NR/JH Ph. Brentwood 3-2211 te,m .. (919 Nez-soa Catawba County, NO Ph.. (e,9la,a-z:„ Fax: (919)a93-9555 Figure: 3 eit-Rhyne - College Highland A I•o tiF F pie Or SE Sweetwater 4 Tate 31vd SE m 0 h V 3 F n ifp Que _ SF \� O icon Ex.prisona \ rs of H.ar Fairbrook Zone AE V sw.afwarrr J I Zane AE Zone AE Legend p Project Study Area 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Regulatory Floodway ram'. Special Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard 0 500 1,000 Source: 11SGS Latest Topographic Map 2022; Project Study Area provided by Duke Energy L DUKE Feet u ENERGY N- VegeWEonoremo al or atle bn of Oia Jaime The in ormation tle etl on thing or in onnational Is or Ind logy aver inNal sbe and was not d fop and is not suitable for le I or en ' pu,p. s on y evaluation anaRestlurisdid'anal status prepare ga gineedng purposes. Q Catawba River Basin and may require re-evaluationof-tishd This information presented is not for regulatory review and is boundarie . intended for use only by a Professional Land Surveyor prior to regulatory review. Project: 70237263 Wraean FEMA Flood Plain Date: ^a) Sweetwater Ret Tap Hickory B&W - 100kV Relocation May 2023 Drwn/Chkd: NR/JH Ph. &eminoed 3-2211 ite,o7 .. (919 Nez-soa Catawba County, NC Ph.. (9,a)eP3-2211 Fax: (919)a93-9555 Figure: $(REV by HIDR Appendix B Representative Photos 41L 4ff 4. 4ff .7. CO - A 4.- AL. 4r, L6 CY) LU (1) CA 0 Photograph 3: P CY) rl— +1 cy') 00 0 L6 CY) ANfl N4- rah 7 . k'..p No. 70237263 W rerracon r v ■ m m CO LSD CO D CO CO z 0 n CO co N n Uj m a d� r u V- N N O r ■ +! LO 0) r- C1 O m 00 0 N N N n m z 0 a� N 0 Photograph 5: Tributary T1A (Clark Creek) Photograph 6: Tributary T1 B (Clark Creek) Sweetwater Ret Tap Line Relocation No. 70237263 W rerracon r- m a ■ 4- rn +I qZT LC] a CO CO 0 J LO O CO r CV L{7 m Q J F-- Z a N r L*C m C4 ■ M +I rn 0 m CO 0 CO n iD n LO CO Q J Lu a 0 r 9 Photograph 7: Tributary T2 Photograph 8: Tributary T3 Sweetwater Ret Tap Line Relocation Proiect No. 70237263 rr ierraoon 0 0 ■ w r� +I m rn 00 CY) 0 m 00 z a N N N n LO m Q 1= 0 0) N X Photograph 9: Wetland W 1 Sweetwater Ret Tap Line Relocation NOUVO013N dVl U31VMi33MS 0 a U � O rc � M f y O K F Q ~ W �wwmw W N U D O O' U Z 0oo Alp c- w Z LLI 000 F— L) _M SNz � Y W W O L U Y Y W �- W_ /� V r a V� 7 �a/� �` ��zU� z® Q F O Q - J CO O Q U Z W z N w U W > rnQ= uJ Uz o / V 4 N a _ QM G`I p. H �i 4 a - I_ V r LLJ J jA W Q 57 V Of w LLI W W W Y% Sri -,: H m > Q f I 'irid'.f V5 a K 3 N W J ° �r s= [¢ i - - 3 ® o 0 w2. tow r n o� a5� �8 -z' Z-0o �/�/ z w _ - �6Zo x 'eo W O oWW 3y a _o z 3 _p 0Q6 N� -_ � �� p5rc Z tr�rlrUF o w HE ws� o mg 3o w -_ _p Sxa¢u4a - uirc W U zoos £y� N� _ _ ° _ -_ z p�zo a =' �000w� w w aN r Paz =w w=s ,F�� o=w- ;� H. mm M�_ ~w z�, '-z J23H"9 �a - o0a U = O„'lx o0 ■ nz'g�oN OQ�Q `� o_ °rc�=ori mo °�,� Iz 1; z�z a Ym �n� �aa`�_ Sz�€� W.z Ow �" oa � �EE3 zaW�N oFaW ok m JOFQ�y�E E5w „ ='o 3°°r=o as qQ6 ag��a J�w"'p'o p5g=o Uoio 0 a= =�w wao�oz�ow~aa°�,H pa°o833:99M zO.a° ez a Q.0o �j �U Q(n a�D �Q �Q v rnU� Z � � p Q H W � � t h NON r - z W a w� � W Qp O �� J � ikJ m � it dU' J W Z Z Q� Q�wQw00 d0 aoa��N NOUVO013N dVl U31VMi33MS � S o � a U O z w� O fZ M O K � ww 0 Q y O O N 0 y w E Q 111 �������/Z �J ii Jm� Y W O_a w 3 wo Oa o �= oww lei aN w woo- w y �3 p s \ _� o F= _a N - aka _ o 000 E....12i....y.. E E E Citi-z o f a E E �w _ E f E -k alp a'2p aN`2p &�o -moo sp orc - - a 9 9_ - - 2 o y p m= Cl) a o �¢ 5 U o N3 o <�Z Ga i £ �k wz Z w < OA Wm�Y€ s of-N. - 2�W E�p�3 4 � W U 8' w< ecaW ' e,k gip' C s€�.i `k ° U ? yCp o �£e= s LWi W o 34 O W. RHO G� 3Q m� w 2pp°F'Yl 3- mk `�- a te <5' ^l C� cn Cl) w Nfig 9. _ P} - Z sk J5 rc o g IN 4 a� paIL o .. 5 ka H €@s ME ue ' $mom �'T \ e^w w4a "^p ° o o O o Gm„Nwwp°^w= R:6 q N,_ U w -rc - o8-k, ioiu 2ra 3 `= F°=Ld m 7`P-N, .��asso €°«-:°> cn j NOUV0013N dVI U31VMi33MS O N rc K U) < z lei Vo M 1: P� rc O 21 WN 1 MIN sp ONE WE NN, 6H cc a I "n SH At -SIX 6 oil Mal Elm; a io 117111.19."B'AJANISHIMI"M 61 1010VII1,0111:! ME; JUJI yNg 1 : TSMIg ;MINE I is HAMM-! AM- Mog :019 ARMOR; - S fshmg 2 NOW Mile: ­.._2 Man g _1. 1,1111046:W2,A limit is Mgg" 00911S: 21 IS611:9w 2, Eton IRM-A E in g z E So w HAMM INSIENgbil 8 6 "HII-MA W-6,1581-e 1 -,�-w--&A-EMlaI A T Mt t . -Ite. 0AWKWsi gglI: ! q Ago 61 0W, Of 1 f 0 1,1111SHU6 M111 x v I a I s 6 6 1 :4 1 a 01 go 11 1 6 'A 1 'S z. WN Who 19"p 1 PRE v WS ENQ NNU 6' dw Old 4 Re! =1 I MI S IRWIN on, OWN 6 —0 Mud w Wsm WHIS WAS 08 H WHOM IM phi'Nagy cold M AN popS lh-"H 0HAN 00 Gs i�, H-W 1101"I NINO Q0 O o IQ pzp NOUV0013N dV1 U31VMi33MS rc q 1- ok LU 0 qo W-H.- -RIO- d= -�m !X Alp & HE H'E K. H, 0.9 vgq R UWz N, �0 V . . , �2 -. . w �, --R MA. UN m.,pE H S. Q qH,5,,E qv -.e -M� P "UN 'z-'"- 5-Ne zonolg —=pg, 8 UM, 0 'R 1p NU --lig gq gp'..R 'g. -R� M. In >"3w- m ! REM En W9 n M era "N Ei N-1-H. 3- U-N i en p-ho W gaz. 9.P z U OEM 0- 2 9, g� 0 Q . H. ....... ------- ..�1� RR m Ll w > U) W. L'i z i I 1 0 E CD z z < N N W. 0 Exhibit D U. --------------------- C : N T Eno C H ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS Corrugated Metal Pipe Design Guide C% NTECH' Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) Design Guide Table of Contents Drainage Pipe Selection Introduction......................................................................................................................3 Environment & Abrasion Guidelines / Reference Specifications..............................................4 Usage Guide for Drainage Products....................................................................................4 Product Dimensions and Hydraulics....................................................................................5 HEL-COR® Corrugated Steel Pipe Heightof Cover Tables....................................................................................................... 7 HandlingWeights............................................................................................................ 10 CORLIX® Corrugated Aluminum Pipe Heightof Cover Tables..................................................................................................... 11 HandlingWeights............................................................................................................ 12 ULTRA FLO@ Heightof Cover Tables..................................................................................................... 13 HandlingWeights............................................................................................................ 14 Installationof CMP.................................................................................................... 15 Miscellaneous SmoothCar""................................................................................................................. 16 QUICKSTAB® Joint......................................................................................................... 17 EndSections................................................................................................................... 18 C=:► NTECH` ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS Durability Design Guide Proper design of culverts and storm sewers requires structural, hydraulic and durability considerations. While most designers are comfortable with structural and hydraulic design, the mechanics of evaluating abrasion, corrosion and water chemistry to perform a durability design are not commonly found in most civil engineering handbooks. The durability and service life of a drainage pipe installation is directly related to the environmental conditions encountered at the site and the type of materials and coatings from which the culvert is fabricated. Two principle causes of reduced service life in drainage pipe materials are corrosion and abrasion. Service life can be affected by the corrosive action of the backfill in contact with the outside of a drainage pipe or more commonly by the corrosive and abrasive action of the flow in the invert of the drainage pipe. The design life analysis should include a check for both the water side and soil side environments to determine which is more critical— or which governs service life. The potential for metal loss in the invert of a drainage pipe due to abrasive flows is often overlooked by designers and its effects are often mistaken for corrosion. An estimate for potential abrasion is required at each pipe location in order to determine the appropriate material and gage. This manual is intended to guide specifiers through the mechanics of selecting appropriate drainage products to meet service life requirements. The information contained in the following pages is a composite of several national guidelines. Using the CMP Design Guide The choice of material, gage and product type can be extremely important to service life. The following steps describe the procedure for selecting the appropriate drainage product, material and gage to meet a specific service life requirement. Design Sequence 1. Select pipe or structure based on hydraulic and clearance requirements. Use Tables 5 and 6 as reference for size limits and hydraulic properties of all drainage products. 2. Use Height of Cover tables for the chosen pipe or structure to determine the material gage required for the specific loading condition. 3. Use Table 1 to select the appropriate material for the site -specific environmental conditions. Whenever possible, existing installations of drainage structures along the same water course offer the most reliable estimate of long- term performance for specific environment conditions. In many cases, there will be more than one material that is appropriate for the project environmental conditions. Generally speaking, the metal material types increase in price as you move from top down on Table 1. Please contact your local Contech Sales Representative for pricing. 4. Use Table 2 to determine which abrasion level most accurately describes the typical storm event (2 year storm). The expected stream velocity and associated abrasion conditions should be based on a typical flow and not a 1 C or 50-year design flood. 5. Use Table 3 to determine whether the structural gage for the selected material is sufficient for the design service life. If the structural gage is greater than or equal to the gage required for a particular abrasion condition and service life, use the structural gage. Conversely, if the structural gage is less than the gage required for a particular abrasion condition and service life, use the gage required by Table 3. Note: Both Contech round pipe and pipe -arch are available with either helical or annular corrugations. Contech HEL-COR pipe (helical corrugations) is furnished with continuous lock seams and annular re -rolled ends or non- rerolled ends. For 3"xl " and 5"x l " HEL-COR pipe -arch, we recommend non-rerolled ends with flat or dimpled bands and flat gaskets. Contech riveted pipe is furnished with annular corrugations only. The height of cover tables in this guide are helical corrugations only. Consult your Contech representative for Height of Cover tables on riveted pipe. Material Type Table 1 — Recommended Environments Soil* and Water pH Resistivity (ohm -cm) 3 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Minimum Maximum Galvanized Steel* 2,000 10,000 Aluminized Steel Type 2 (ALT2) 1,500 N/A Polymer -Coated 250 N/A Aluminum Alloy 500 N/A *Appropriate pH range for Galvanized Steel is 6.0 to 10 Abrasion Level Abrasion Condition Bed Load Flow Velocity (fps) 1 Non -Abrasive None Minimal 2 Low Abrasion Minor < 5 3 Moderate Abrasion Moderate 5- 15 4 Severe Abrasion Heavy > 15 "Interim Direct Guidelines on Drainage Pipe Alternative Selection." FHWA, 2005. Application Table 3 - Drainage Product Usage Guide Culverts, Storm Drain, Cross Drain, Median Drain, Side Drain Roadway Classification Rural Minor Major Urban Rural Minor Major Urban Rural Minor Major Urban Design Service Life 25 50 75 100 25 50 75 100 25 50 75 100 Abrasion Level Abrasion Level 1 & 2 Abrasion Level 3 Abrasion Level 4 CMP (1/2" & 1" deep corrugations), ULTRA FLO' & Smooth Car" Minimum gage required to meet design service life, assuming that structural design has been met. Galvanized (2 oz.) 16 12 10 84 14 10 8 N/A 145 10, 85 N/A Galvanized and Asphalt Coated 16 14 10 8 14 12 8 N/A 145 125 85 N/A Galv., Asphalt Coated & Paved Invert 16 16 14 10 16 14 12 8 14 12 10 N/A Aluminized Type 2 (ALT2) 16 16 16 14 14 14 14 12 146 146 146 126 Polymer -Coated 16 16 168 16' 16 16 168 16' 14' 14' 14'-8 14'-9 Aluminum Alloy 16 16 16 16 14 14 14 14 145 145 145 145 Based on Table 1 - Recommended Environments. Smooth Corr" Steel Pipe combines a corrugated steel exterior shell with a hydraulically smooth interior liner. Service life estimates for ULTRA FLO' and Smooth Cor- Pipe assume a storm sewer application. Storm sewers rarely achieve abrasion levels 3 or 4. For applications other than storm sewers or abrasion conditions above Abrasion Level 2, please contact your Contech Sales Representative for gage and coating recommendations. Design service life for 8 GA galvanized is 97 years. Invert protection to consist of velocity reduction structures. Asphalt coated and paved invert or velocity reduction structures are needed. Requires a field applied concrete paved invert with minimum thickness 1 " above corrugation crests. 75 year service life for polymer -coated is based on a pH range of 4-9 and resistivity greater than 750 ohm -cm. 7 00 year service life for polymer -coated is based on a pH range of 5-9 and resistivity greater than 1500 ohm -cm. AASHTO Reference Specifications Material Type Material Pipe Design* Installation* CMP (1/2" or 1" deep corrugations) Galvanized (2 oz.) M218 M36 Section 12 Section 26 Asphalt Coated M190 M36 Section 12 Section 26 Asphalt Coated and Paved Invert M190 M36 Section 12 Section 26 X Aluminized Type 2 M274 M36 Section 12 Section 26 a Polymer -Coated M246 M36 & M245 Section 12 Section 26 L Aluminum Alloy M197 M196 Section 12 Section 26 o. ad ULTRA FLO" (3/4" x 3/4" x 7-1/2" corrugation) a Galvanized (2 oz.) M218 M36 Section 12 Section 26 d Aluminized Type 2 M274 M36 Section 12 Section 26 Polymer -Coated M246 M36 & M245 Section 12 Section 26 Aluminum Alloy M197 M196 Section 12 Section 26 Smooth Car" Polymer -Coated M246 M36 & M245 Section 12 Section 26 * AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification and AASHTO Standard Specification for Highway Bridges Table 5 Drainage Product - Product Dimensions Common Use. Size Limits* Manning's "n" Value Minimum Maximum y .EL d 9 Corrugated Steel (1/2" deep corrugation) Corrugated Steel with Paved Invert (1/2" deep corrugation) Corrugated Steel (1" deep corrugation) Corrugated Steel with Paved Invert (1 " deep corrugation) Corrugated Aluminum (1 /2" deep corrugation) Corrugated Aluminum (1" deep corrugation) Culverts, small bridges, storm water detention/ retention systems, conduits, tunnels, storm sewers. 12" 84" 0.011 -0.021 12" 84" 0.014 - 0.020 54" 144" 0.022 - 0.021 54" 144" 0.019 - 0.023 12" 72" 0.011 -0.021 30" 120" 0.023 -0.027 0 ULTRA FLO' Steel ULTRA FLO® Aluminum Smooth Car'" Steel (1/2" deep corrugation) Smooth Car" Steel (1" deep corrugation) Storm sewers, culverts, storm water detention/ retention systems. 18" 102" 0.012 18" 84" 0.012 18" 66" 0.012 48" 126" 0.012 s Q a Corrugated Steel (1/2" deep corrugation) Corrugated Steel with Paved Invert (1/2" deep corrugation) Corrugated Steel (1" deep corrugation) Corrugated Steel with Paved Invert (1" deep corrugation) Corrugated Aluminum (1 /2" deep corrugation) Corrugated Aluminum (1" deep corrugation) Culverts, small bridges, storm water detention/ retention systems, conduits, tunnels, storm sewers. 1 7" x 13" 83" x 57" 0.011 -0.021 17" x 13" 83" x 57" 0.014 - 0.019 53" x 41" 142" x 91" 0.023 -0.027 53" x 41" 142" x 91" 0.019 - 0.022 17" x 13" 71" x 47" 0011 - 0.021 60" x 46" 1 12" x 75" 0.023 -0.027 d ULTRA FLO" Steel ULTRA FLO® Aluminum Smooth Car- Steel (1 /2" deep corrugation) Smooth Car" Steel (1" deep corrugation) Storm sewers, culverts, storm water detention/ retention systems. 20" x 16" 66" x 51" 0.012 20" x 16" 66" x 51" 0.012 2 1 " x 15" 77" x 52" 0.012 53" x 41" 137" x 87" 0.012 * For sizes outside of these limits, please contact your Contech representative. 2 2/3" x 1/2" 12 in. 15 in. 18 in. 24 in. 36 in. 48 in. 60 in. + 8 in. 10 in. All Diameters Unpaved 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.015 0.018 0.020 0.021 0.012 0.014 0.024 Paved Invert 0.014 0.017 0.020 0.019 0.021 Smooth Car'" 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 N/A Helical*- 3" x 1" 3" x 1" 36 in. 42 in. 48 in. 54 in. 60 in. 66 in. 72 in. 78 in. + All Diameters Unpaved 0.022 0.022 0.023 0.023 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.027 0.027 Paved Invert 0.019 0.019 0.020 0.020 0.021 0.022 0.022 0.023 0.023 Smooth Car" 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 N/A Helical* - 5" x 1" All Diameters 5" x 1" 48 in. 54 in. 60 in. 66 in. 72 in. 78 in. + Unpaved 0.022 0.022 0.023 0.024 0.024 0.025 N/A Paved Invert 0.019 0.019 0.020 0.021 0.021 0.022 N/A ULTRA FLO® 3/4" x 3/4" x 7-1/2" All diameters n - 0.012 N/A * Tests on helically corrugated pipe demonstrate a lower coefficient of roughness than for annularly corrugated steel pipe. Pipe -arches have approximately the some roughness characteristics as their round equivalent pipes. Area and Hydraulic Radius for Corrugated Steel Pipe Flowing Full Round Pipe Diameter (in.) - Area & Hydraulic Radius Hydraulic Radius ft) 0.250 Area (FF) 12 0.8 15 1.2 0.312 18 1.8 0.375 21 2.4 0.437 24 3.1 0.500 30 4.9 0.625 36 7.1 0.750 42 9.6 0.875 48 12.6 1.000 54 15.9 1.125 60 19.6 1.250 23.8 1.375 72 28.1 1.500 78 33.2 1.625 84 38.5 1.750 90 44.2 1.875 96 50.3 2.000 102 56.8 2.125 108 63.6 2.250 114 70.9 2.375 120 78.5 2.500 126 86.6 2.625 132 95.0 2.750 138 103.9 2.875 144 113.1 3.000 Notes: 1. Listed pipe arch dimensions do not include tolerance. 2. For additional detail, please reference the hydraulic radius tables (Figure 4.32 and 4.33) found in the NCSPA CSP Design Manual, 2008. Pipe -Arch -Area & Hydraulic Radius 2 2/3" x 1/2" Corrugated Steel Pipe Diameter (in.) Pipe -Arch Equivalent Size (in.) Waterway Area (Ftz) Hydraulic Radius A/TrD (ft.) 15 17x 13 1.1 0.280 18 21 x 15 1.6 0.340 21 24 x 18 2.2 0.400 24 28 x 20 2.4 0.462 30 35 x 24 4.5 0.573 36 42 x 29 6.5 0.690 42 49 x 33 8.9 0.810 48 57 x 38 11.6 0.924 54 64 x 43 14.7 1.040 60 71 x 47 18.1 1.153 66 77 x 52 21.9 1.268 72 83 x 57 26.0 1.380 Pipe -Arch - Area & Hydraulic Radius 3" x 1" or 5" x 1" Corrugated Steel Pipe Diameter (in.) Pipe -Arch Equivalent Size (in.) Waterway Area (Ftz) Hydraulic Radius A/71D 54 60 x 46 15.6 1.104 60 66 x 51 19.3 1.230 66 73 x 55 23.2 1.343 72 81 x 59 27.4 1 .454 78 87 x 63 32.1 1.573 84 95 x 67 37.0 1.683 90 103 x 71 42.4 1.800 96 112 x 75 48.0 1 .91 1 102 117 x 79 54.2 0 2.031 108 128 x 83 60.5 2.141 114 137 x 87 67.4 2.259 120 142 x 91 74.5 2.373 ULTRA FLOc Pipe -Arch -Area & Hydraulic Radius 2 2/3" x 1/2 ° Corrugated Steel Pipe Diameter (in.) Pipe -Arch Equivalent Size (in.) Waterway Area (Ft2) Hydraulic Radius Mil) (ft.) 18 20 x 16 1.7 0.36 21 23 x 19 2.3 0.42 24 27 x 21 3.0 0.48 30 33 x 26 4.7 0.60 36 40 x 31 6.7 0.71 42 46 x 36 9.2 0.84 48 53 x 41 12.1 0.96 54 60 x 46 15.6 1.10 60 66 x 51 19.3 1.23 HEL-COR° Corrugated Steel Pipe 2 2/3" x 1/2" Height of Cover Limits for Corrugated Steel Pipe H 20 and H 25 Live Loads 0 H 20 and H 25 Live Loads, Pipe -Arch Diameter in. Minimum Cover in. Maximum Cover(') ft. Specified Thickness in. and Gage (0.052) 18 (0.064) 16 (0.079) 14 (0.109) 12 (0.138) 10 (0.168) 8 6(8) 12 388 486 8(8) 12 291 365 10(8) 12 233 292 12 12 197 248 310 15 12 158 198 248 18 12 131 165 206 21 12 113 141 177 248 24 12 98 1 124 155 1 217 30 12 99 124 173 36 12 83 103 145 186 42 12 71 88 124 159 195 48 12 62 77 108 139 171 54 12 67 94 122 150 60 12 80 104 128 66 12 68 88 109 72 12 75 93 78 12 79 84 12 66 E 80 Live Loads Diameter in. Minimum Cover in. Maximum Coverts ft. S ecified Thickness in. and Gage (0.052)18 (0.064) 16 (0.079)14 (0.109)12 (0.138)11 (0.168) 8 12 12 197 248 310 15 12 158 198 248 18 12 131 165 206 21 12 113 141 177 248 24 12 98 124 155 217 30 12 99 124 173 36 12 83 103 145 186 42 12 71 88 124 159 195 48 62 77 108 139 171 54 18 67 94 122 150 60 18 80 104 128 66 18 68 88 109 72 18 75 93 78 24 79 84 24 66 Heights of Cover Notes: 1. These tables are for lock -seam or welded -seam construction. They are not for riveted construction. Consult your Contech Sales Representative for Height of Cover tables on riveted pipe. 2. These values, where applicable, were calculated using a load factor of K=0.86 as adopted in the NCSPA CSP Design Manual, 2008. 3. The haunch areas of a pipe -arch are the most critical zone for backfilling. Extra care should be taken to provide good material and compaction to a point above the spring line. 4. E 80 minimum cover is measured from top of pipe to bottom of tie. 5. H 20 and H 25 minimum cover is measured from top of pipe to bottom of flexible pavement or top of rigid pavement. 6. The pipe -arch tables are based on the corner bearing pressures as shown. These values may increase or decrease with changes in allowable corner bearing pressures. Consider the use of a round pipe in cases where the height of cover exceeds 8'. Size Minimum Thickness (in.) Minimum Cover (1°') Maximum Cover (ft.) Round Equivalent (in.) Span x Rise (in.) 2 Tons/Ft.' Corner Bearing Pressure 15 17x13 0.064 12 16 18 21 x 15 0.064 12 15 21 24 x 18 0.064 12 15 24 28 x 20 0.064 12 15 30 35 x 24 0.064 12 15 36 42 x 29 0.064 12 15 42 49 x 33 0.064* 12 15 48 57 x 38 0.064* 12 15 54 64 x 43 0.079* 12 1 15 60 71 x 47 0.109* 12 15 66 77 x 52 0.109* 12 15 72 83 x 57 0.138* 12 15 E 80 Live Loads, Pipe -Arch Size Minimum Thickness (in.) Minimum Cover (in.) Maximum Cover (ft.) Round Equivalent (in.) Span x Rise (in.) 3 Tons/Ft.' Corner Bearing Pressure 15 17 x 13 0.079 24 22 18 21 x 15 0.079 24 22 21 24 x 18 0.109 24 22 24 28 x 20 0.109 24 22 30 35 x 24 0.138 24 22 36 42 x 29 0.138 24 22 42 49 x 33 0.138* 24 22 48 57 x 38 0.138* 24 22 54 64 x 43 0.138* 24 22 60 71 x 47 0.138* 24 1 22 * These values are based on the AISI Flexibility Factor limit (0.0433 x 7.5) for pipe -arch. 7. For construction loads, see Page 75. 8. 1-'/2" x'/4" corrugation. H 20, H 25 and E 80 loading. 9. Smooth Car'" has some Height of Cover properties as corrugated steel pipe. The exterior shell of Smooth Cor' is manufactured in either 2 213" x'/2" or 3" x 1" corrugations; maximum exterior shell is 72 GA. 5" x 1" or 3" x 1" Height of Cover Limits for Corrugated Steel Pipe H 20 and H 25 Live Loads Diameter in. Minimum Cover in. Maximum Cover ft. Specified Thickness in. and Gage (0.064) 16 (0.079)14 (0.109)12 (0.138)10 (0.168) 8 54 12 56 70 98 127 155 60 12 50 63 88 114 139 66 12 46 57 80 103 127 72 12 42 52 74 95 116 78 12 39 48 68 87 107 84 12 36 45 63 81 99 90 12 33 42 59 76 93 96 12 31 39 55 71 87 102 18 29 37 52 82 108 18 77 114 18 32 72 120 18 30 66 126 18 39 50 61 132 18 36 46 58 138 18 33 43 53 144 18 39 49 Maximum cover heights shown are for 5" x 7 ". To obtain maximum cover for 3" x 7 ", increase these values by 72%. E 80 Live Loads Diameter or Span in. Minimum Cover (in.) 18 Maximum Cover ft. S ecified Thickness in. and Gage (0.064) 16 (0.079)14 (0.109)12 (0.138)10 (0.168) 8 54 56 70 98 127 155 60 18 50 63 88 114 139 66 18 46 57 80 103 127 72 18 42 74 95 116 78 24 39 48 68 87 107 84 24 36 45 63 81 99 90 24 330) 42 59 76 93 96 24 310) 39 55 71 87 102 30 11 290) 37 52 67 11 82 108 30 35 49 63 77 114 30 320) 45 58 72 120 30 30(1 126 36 39 50 61 132 36 36 46 58 138 36 330) 43 53 144 1 36 39 49 Maximum cover heights shown are for 5" x 7 ". To obtain maximum cover for 3" x 7 ", increase these values by 72%. (1) These diameters in these gages require additional minimum cover. Heights of Cover Notes: 1. These tables are for lock -seam or welded -seam construction. They are not for riveted construction. Consult your Contech Sales Representative for Height of Cover tables on riveted pipe. 2. These values, where applicable, were calculated using a load factor of K=0.86 as adopted in the NCSPA CSP Design Manual, 2008. 3. The span and rise shown in these tables are nominal. Typically the actual rise that forms is greater than the specified nominal. This actual rise is within the tolerances as allowed by the AASHTO & ASTM specifications. The minimum covers shown are more conservative than required by the AASHTO and ASTM specifications to account for this anticipated increase in rise. Less cover height may be tolerated depending upon actual rise of supplied pipe -arch. 4. The haunch areas of a pipe -arch are the most critical zone for backfilling. Extra care should be taken to provide good material and compaction to a point above the spring line. 5" x 1" Pipe -Arch Height of Cover Limits for Corrugated Steel Pipe H 20 and H 25 Live Loads Size Minimum Thickness (in.) Minimum Cover (in) Maximum Cover (ft.) Round Equivalent (in.) Nominal 2 Tons/Ft.' Corner Bearing Pressure Min. S an in. Max. Rise in. 54 60 -2.7 46 +2.7 0.109 18 21 60 66 -3.0 51 +3.0 0.109 18 21 66 73 -3.3 55 +3.3 0.109 18 21 72 81 -3.6 59 +3.6 0.109 18 21 78 87 -4.4 63 +4.4 0.109 18 20 84 95-48 67 +4.8 0.109 18 20 90 103 -5.2 71 +5.2 0.109 18 20 96 1 12 -5.6 75 +5.6 0.109 21 20 102 1 17 -5.9 79 +5.9 0.109 21 19 108 128 -6.4 83 +6.4 0.109 24 19 1 14 137 -6.9 87 +6.9 0.109 24 19 120 142 -7.1 91 +7.1 0.138 24 19 Larger sizes are available in some areas of the United States. Check with your local Contech representative. Negative and positive numbers listed with span and rise dimensions are negative and positive tolerances, no tolerance in opposite direction. E 80 Live Loads, Pipe -Arch Size Minimum Thickness (in.) Minimum Cover (in.) Maximum Cover (ft.) Round Equivalent (in.) Nominal s 2Tons/Ft. Corner Bearing Pressure Min. Span in. Max. Rise in. 54 60 -2.7 46 +2.7 0.109 30 21 60 66 -3.0 51 +3.0 0.109 30 21 66 73 -3.3 55 +3.3 0.109 30 21 72 81 -3.6 59 +3.6 0.109 30 21 78 87 -4.4 63 +4.4 0.109 30 18 84 95-4 8 67 +4.8 0.109 30 18 90 103 -5.2 71 +5.2 0.109 36 18 96 112 -5.6 75 +5.6 0.109 36 18 102 1 17 -5.9 79 +5.9 0.109 36 17 108 128 -6.4 83 +6.4 0.109 42 17 114 137 -6.9 87 +6.9 0.109 42 17 120 142 -7.1 91 +7.1 0.138 42 17 Some 3" x 7" and 5" x 7" minimum gages shown for pipe -arch are due to manufacturing limitations. Negative and positive numbers listed with span and rise dimensions are negative and positive tolerances, no tolerance in opposite direction. 5. E 80 minimum cover is measured from top of pipe to bottom of tie. 6. H 20 and H 25 minimum cover is measured from top of pipe to bottom of flexible pavement or top of rigid pavement. 7. The pipe -arch tables are based on the corner bearing pressures as shown. These values may increase or decrease with changes in allowable corner bearing pressures. Consider the use of a round pipe in cases where the height of cover exceeds 8'. 8. For construction loads, see Page 75. 9. Smooth CorT" has some Height of Cover properties as corrugated steel pipe. The exterior shell of Smooth Corr" is manufactured in either 2 213" x '12' or 3"x I' corrugations; maximum exterior shell is 72 GA. 3" x 1" Pipe -Arch Height of Cover Limits for Corrugated Steel Pipe -Arch H 20 and H 25 Live Loads C�) Size Minimum Thickness (in.) Minimum Cover (in.) Maximum Cover Round Equivalent q (in.) Nominal 2 Tons/Ft.2 Corner Bearing Pressure M. S an in. Max. Rise in. 48 53 -2.4 41 +2.4 0.079 12 25 54 60 -2.7 46 +2.7 0.079 15 25 60 66 -3.0 51 +3.0 0.079 15 25 66 73 -3.3 55 +3.3 0.079 18 24 72 81 -3.6 59 +3.6 0.079 18 21 78 87 -4.4 63 +4.4 0.079 18 20 84 95 -4.8 67 +4.8 0.079 18 20 90 103 -5.2 71 +5.2 0.079 18 20 96 1 12 -5.6 75 +5.6 0.079 21 20 102 1 17 -5.9 79 +5.9 0.109 21 19 108 128 -6.4 83 +6.4 0.109 24 19 114 137 -6.9 87 +6.9 0.109 24 19 120 1 142 -7.1 1 91 +7.1 1 0.138 24 1 19 Larger sizes are available in some areas of the United States. Check with your local Contech Sales Representative. Negative and positive numbers listed with span and rise dimensions are negative and positive tolerances, no tolerance in opposite direction. E 80 Live Loads, Pipe -Arch Size Minimum Thickness (in.) Minimum Cover (in.) Maximum Cover (ft.) Round Equivalent (in.) Nominal 2 Tons/Ft.2 Corner Bearing Pressure Min. Span in. Max. Rise in. 48 53 -2.4 41 +2.4 0.079 24 25 54 60 -2.7 46 +2.7 0.079 24 25 60 66 -3.0 51 +3.01 0.079 24 1 25 66 73 -3.3 55 +3.3 0.079 30 24 72 81 -3.6 59 +3.6 0.079 30 21 78 87 -4.4 63 +4.4 0.079 30 18 84 95 -4.8 67 +4.8 0.079 30 18 90 103 -5.2 71 +5.2 0.079 36 18 96 1 12 -5.6 75 +5.6 0.079 36 18 102 1 17 -5.9 79 +5.9 0.109 36 17 108 128 -6.4 83 +6.4 0.109 42 17 114 137 -6.9 87 +6.9 0.109 42 17 120 142 -7.1 91 +7.1 0.138 42 17 Some 3" x 1 " and 5" x 1 " minimum gages shown for pipe -arch are due to manufacturing limitations. Negative and positive numbers listed with span and rise dimensions are negative and positive tolerances, no tolerance in opposite direction. Heights of Cover Notes: 1. These tables are for lock -seam or welded -seam construction. They are not for riveted construction. Consult your Contech Sales Representative for Height of Cover tables on riveted pipe. 2. These values, where applicable, were calculated using K=0.86 as adopted in the NCSPA CSP Design Manual, 2008. 3. The span and rise shown in these tables are nominal. Typically the actual rise that forms is greater than the specified nominal. This actual rise is within the tolerances as allowed by the AASHTO & ASTM specifications. The minimum covers shown are more conservative than required by the AASHTO and ASTM specifications to account for this anticipated increase in rise. Less cover height may be tolerated depending upon actual rise of supplied pipe -arch. 4. The haunch areas of a pipe -arch are the most critical zone for backfilling. Extra care should be taken to provide good material and compaction to a point above the spring line. 5. E 80 minimum cover is measured from top of pipe to bottom of tie. 6. H 20 and H 25 minimum cover is measured from top of pipe to bottom of flexible pavement or top of rigid pavement. 7. The pipe -arch tables are based on the corner bearing pressures as shown. These values may increase or decrease with changes in allowable corner bearing pressures. Consider the use of a round pipe in cases where the height of cover exceeds 8'. 8. For construction loads, see Page 75. 9. Smooth Car" has same Height of Cover properties as corrugated steel pipe. The exterior shell of Smooth Car'" is manufactured in either 2 213" x'12" or 3" x 1 " corrugations; maximum exterior she// is 12 GA. Approximate Weight (lbs/ft) HEL-COR° Corrugated Steel Pipe (Estimated Average Weights -Not for Specification Use) Inside Diameter Specified Thickness in. in. Galvanized & ALT2 Asphalt Coated 6 0.052 4 5 0.064 5 6 8 0.052 5 6 0.064 6 7 10 0.052 6 7 0.064 7 8 Steel Thicknesses by Gage Gage (GA) 18 16 14 12 10 8 Thickness .052 1 .064 .079 .109 .138 1 .168 Inside Diameter (in.) 2 Specified Thickness (in.) 2/3" x 1/2" Galvanized & ALT2 Corrugation Asphalt Coated Asphalt Coated w/ Paved Invert rM Smooth Cor 0.052 8 10 13 12 0.064 10 12 15 0.079 12 14 17 0.052 10 13 16 15 0.064 12 15 18 0.079 15 18 21 0.052 12 16 19 18 0.064 15 19 22 25 0.079 18 22 25 28 0.052 14 18 23 21 0.064 17 21 26 29 0.079 21 25 30 33 0.109 29 33 33 41 0.052 15 20 26 24 0.064 19 24 30 30 0.079 24 29 35 38 0.109 33 44 47 0.064 24 30 36 42 30 0.079 30 36 42 48 0.109 41 47 53 59 0.064 29 36 44 51 36 0.079 36 43 51 58 0.109 49 56 64 71 8 62 69 77 0.064 34 1 42 51 60 0.079 42 50 59 68 42 0.109 57 65 74 82 0.138 72 80 89 0.168 88 96 105 0.064 38 48 57 67 0.079 48 58 67 77 48 0.109 65 75 84 94 0.138 82 92 101 0.168 100 110 119 0.079 54 65 76 87 54 0.109 73 84 95 106 0.138 92 103 114 0.168 112 123 134 0.109 81 92 106 117 60 0.138 103 114 128 0.168 124 135 149 0.109 89 101 117 129 66 0.138 113 125 141 0.168 137 149 165 72 0.138 123 137 154 (2) 0.168 149 163 180 78 0.168 161 177 194 (2) 84 0.168 173 190 208 (2) Speed Inside Thickness Diameter (in.) (in) Galvanized & ALT2 Asphalt Coated Asphalt Coated w/ Paved Invert Smooth OF' 0.064 50 66 84 84 0.079 61 77 95 95 54 0.109 83 100 118 118 0.138 106 123 140 0.168 129 146 163 0.064 55 73 93 93 0.079 67 86 105 105 60 0.109 92 110 130 130 0.138 118 136 156 0.168 143 161 181 0.064 60 80 102 102 0.079 74 94 116 116 66 0.109 101 121 143 145 0.138 129 149 171 0.168 157 177 199 0.064 66 88 111 112 0.079 81 102 126 127 72 0.109 110 132 156 157 0.138 140 162 186 0.168 171 193 217 0.064 71 95 121 120 0.079 87 ill 137 136 78 0.109 119 143 169 168 0.138 152 176 202 0.168 185 209 235 0.064 77 102 130 130 0.079 94 119 147 147 84 0.109 128 154 182 181 0.138 164 189 217 0.168 199 224 253 0.064 82 109 140 139 0.079 100 127 158 157 90 0.109 137 164 195 194 0.138 175 202 233 0.168 213 240 271 0.064 87 116 149 148 0.079 107 136 169 168 96 0.109 147 176 209 208 0.138 188 217 250 0.168 228 257 290 0.064 93 124 158 158 0.079 114 145 179 179 102 0.109 155 186 220 222 0.138 198 229 263 0.168 1 241 272 306 0.079 120 153 188 189 108 0.109 165 198 233 235 0.138 211 244 279 0.168 256 289 324 0.079 127 162 199 200 114 0.109 174 209 246 248 0.138 222 257 294 0.168 271 306 343 0.079 134 171 210 211 120 0.109 183 220 259 260 0.138 234 271 310 0.168 284 321 360 0.109 195 233 274 276 126 0.138 247 285 326 0.168 299 338 378 0.109 204 244 287 289 132 0.138 259 299 342 0.168 314 354 397 0.109 213 255 300 300 138 0.138 270 312 357 0.168 328 370 415 144 0.138 282 326 373 0.168 344 388 435 (2) 1. Weights for polymer -coated pipe are 1% to 4% higher, varying by gage. 2. Please contact your Contech Sales Representative. 3. Weights listed in the 3" x 1 " or 5" x 1 " table are for 3" x 1 " pipe. Weights for 5" x 1 " are approximately 12% less than those used in this table, for metallic coated pipe. m CORLIXO Corrugated Aluminum Pipe 2 2/3" X 1/2" Height of Cover Limits for Corrugated Aluminum Pipe HL 93 Live Load 0 Diameter (in.) Minimum (In )r Maximum Cover ft. Specified Thickness in. and Gage (0.048) 18 (0.060) 16 (0.075) 14 (0.105) 12 (0.135) 10 (0.164) 8 60) 12 197 247 80) 12 147 185 10(4) 12 119 148 12 12 125 157 15 12 100 125 18 12 83 104 21 1 12 1 71 89 24 12 62 78 109 27 12 69 97 30 12 62 87 36 12 51 73 94 42 1 12 62 80 48 12 54 70 85 54 15 48 62 76 60 1 15 52 64 66 18 52 43 3" x 1" Height of Cover Limits for Corrugated Aluminum Pipe HL 93 Live Load 0 Diameter (in.) Minimum Cove(in.) Maximum Cover ft. Specified Thickness in. and Gage (0.060) (0.075)14 (0.105)12 (0.135)10 (0.164) 8 30 12 57 72 101 135 159 36 12 47 60 84 112 132 42 12 40 51 72 96 113 48 12 35 44 62 84 99 54 15 31 39 55 74 88 60 15 28 35 50 67 79 66 18 25 32 45 61 72 72 18 23 29 41 56 66 78 21 27 38 51 61 84 21 35 48 56 90 24 33 44 52 96 24 31 41 49 102 24 39 46 108 24 37 43 114 24 39 120 24 36 2 2/3" x 1 /2" Height of Cover Limits for Corrugated Aluminum Pipe -Arch HL 93 Live Load C:) Size Minimum Gage Minimum Cover (in.) Maximum Cover ft. Round Equivalent in. Span x Rise in. 2 Tons/Ft.2 for Corner Bearing Pressures 15 17x 13 16 12 13 18 21 x 15 16 12 12 21 24x18 16 12 12 24 28 x 20 14 12 12 30 35 x 24 14 12 12 36 42 x 29 12 12 12 42 49 x 33 12 15 12 48 57 x 38 10 15 12 54 64 x 43 10 18 12 60 71 x 47 8(5) 18 12 Notes: 1. Height of cover is measured to top of rigid pavement or to bottom of flexible pavement. 2. Maximum cover meets AASHTO LRFD design criteria. 3. Minimum cover meets AASHTO and ASTM B 790 design criteria. 4. 1 112" x 114" corrugation. 5. 8 GA pipe has limited availability. 6. For construction loads, see page 75. 7. Consult your Contech Sales Representative for E 80 Live Loads. 3" x 1" Height of Cover Limits for Corrugated Aluminum Pipe -Arch HL 93 Live Load Size Minimum Gage Minimum (over (in) Maximum Cover (ft.) Round Equivalent (in.) Span x Rise (in.) 2 Tons/Ft.' for Corner Bearing Pressures 54 60 x 46 14 15 20 60 66 x 51 14 18 20 66 73 x 55 14 21 20 72 81 x 59 12 21 16 78(4) 87 x 63 12 24 16 84(4) 95 x 67 12 24 16 90(4) 103 x 71 10 24 16 96(4) 112 x 75 8(5) 24 16 Notes: 1. Height of cover is measured to top of rigid pavement or to bottom of flexible pavement. 2. Maximum cover meets AASHTO LRFD design criteria. 3. Minimum cover meets ASTM B 790 design criteria. 4. Limited availability on these sizes. 5.8 GA pipe has limited availability. 6. For construction loads, seepage 75. 7. Consult your Contech Sales Representative for E 80 Live Loads. Approximate Weight/Foot CORLIX° Corrugated Aluminum Pipe (Estimated Average Weights -Not for Specification Use) Weight Lb./Lineal Ft.' Diameter 5 ecified Thickness in. and Ga e (in.) (0.048) 18 (0.060) 16 (0.075) 14 (0.105) 12 (0.135) 10 (0.164) 8 6(2) 1.3 1.6 8(2) 1.7 2.1 10(2) 2.1 2.6 12 3.2 4.0 15 4.0 4.9 18 4.8 5.9 21 5.6 6.9 24 6.3 7.9 10.8 27 8.8 12.2 30 9.8 13.5 36 11.8 16.3 20.7 42 19.0 24.2 48 21.7 27.6 33.5 54 24.4 31.1 37.7 60 34.6 41.9 66 46.0 72 50.1 3" x I" Corrugation Aluminum Pipe Weight Lb./Lineal Ft.' Diameter Specified Thickness in. and Gage in. (0.060) 16 (0.075) 14 (0.105) 12 (0.135) 10 (0.164) 8 30 9.3 11.5 15.8 20.2 24.5 36 11.1 13.7 18.9 24.1 29.3 42 12.9 16.0 22.0 28.0 34.1 48 14.7 18.2 25.1 32.0 38.8 54 16.5 20.5 28.2 35.9 43.6 60 18.3 22.7 31.3 40.0 48.3 66 20.2 24.9 34.3 43.7 53.0 72 22.0 27.1 37.4 47.6 57.8 78 29.3 40.4 51.5 62.5 84 43.5 55.4 67.2 90 46.6 59.3 71.9 96 49.6 63.2 76.7 102 66.6 80.8 108 71.0 86.1 114 90.9 120 95.6 Notes: 1. Helical lockseam pipe only. Annular riveted pipe weights will be higher. 2. 7 '/2" x 1/4" Corrugation. 3. 8 GA pipe has limited availability. 12 ULTRA FLO@ Galvanized, ALUMINIZED STEEL Type 2 or 0 Polymer -Coated** Steel ULTRA FLO' H 20 and H 25 Live Load Diameter in. Minimum/Maximum Cover ft. Specified Thickness in. and Gage (0.064) 16 (0.079) 14 (0.109) 12 (0.138) 10 18 1.0/108 1.0/151 21 1.0/93 1.0/ 130 1.0/216 24 1.0/81 1.0/ 113 1.0/ 189 30 1.0/65 1.0/91 1.0/ 151 36 1.0/54 1.0/75 1.0/126 42 1.0/46 1.0/65 1.0/ 108 48 1.0/40 1.0/56 1.0/94 1.0/ 137 54 1.25 / 36 1.25 / 50 1.0 / 84 1.0 / 122 60 1.25*/32* 1.25 / 45 1.0 / 75 1.0 / 109 66 1.5/41 1.25/68 1.25/99 72 1.5*/37* 1.25 / 63 1.25 / 91 78 1.75*/34* 1.5 / 58 1.5 / 84 84 1 .75 / 54 1.75178 90 2.0*/50* 2.0 / 73 96 2.0*/47* 2.0 / 68 102 2.5*/43* 2.5 / 61 108 2.5*/54* 114 2.5*/49* 120 Galvanized, ALUMINIZED STEEL Type 2 or Polymer -Coated** Steel ULTRA FLO" E 80 Live Load 0 Minimum/Maximum Cover ft. S pecified Thickness in. and Ga e Diameter in. (0.064) 16 (0.079) 14 (0.109) 12 (0.138) 10 18 1.0/93 1.0/130 21 1.0/79 1.0/ 111 1.0/ 186 24 1.0/69 1.0/97 1.0/ 162 30 1.0/55 1.0/78 1.0/ 130 36 1.5/46 1.25/65 1.0/108 42 1.5 / 39 1.5 / 55 1.25 / 93 48 2.0/34 1.75/48 1.5/81 1.5/118 54 3.0* / 28* 2.0 / 43 1.5 / 72 1.5 / 104 60 2.0 / 39 1.75 / 65 1.75 / 94 66 2.5* / 35*Ab 2.0/58 1 2.0/85 72 2.0/49 2.0/78 78 2.5/42 2.5/72 84 2.75* / 35* 2.5 / 67 90 2.5 / 62 96 2.5* / 58* 102 3.0* / 52* Notes: 1. The tables for Steel H 20 and H 25 loading are based on the NCSPA Design Manual, 2008 and were calculated using a load factor of K=0.86. The tables for Steel E 80 loading are based on the AREMA Manual. The tables for Aluminum HL 93 loading are based on AASHTO LRFD Design Criteria. 2. The haunch areas of a pipe -arch are the most critical zone for backfilling. Extra care should be taken to provide good material and compaction to a point above the spring line. 3. E 80 minimum cover is measured from top of pipe to bottom of tie. 4. H 20, H 25 and HL 93 minimum cover is measured from top of pipe to bottom of flexible pavement or top of rigid pavement. 5. The pipe -arch tables are based on the corner bearing pressures as shown. These values may increase or decrease with changes in allowable corner bearing pressures. Consider the use of a round pipe in cases where the height of cover exceeds 8'. 6. Larger size pipe -arches may be available on special order. 7. M.L. (Heavier gage is required to prevent crimping at the haunches.) 8. For construction loads, see Page 75. 9. Sewer gage (trench conditions) tables for corrugated steel pipe can be found in the AISI book "Modern Sewer Design," 4th Edition, 7 999. These tables may reduce the minimum gage (GA) due to a higher flexibility factor allowed for a trench condition. Galvanized, ALUMINIZED STEEL Type 2 or Polymer -Coated** Steel ULTRA FLO`Pipe-Arch H 20 and H 25 Live Load Size Minimum/Maximum Cover ft. S ecified Thickness in. and Ga e Round Equivalent in. Span x Rise (in.) (0.064) 16 (0.079) 14 (0.109) 12 18 20x16 1.0/16 21 23x19 1.0/15 24 27x21 1.0/13 30 33x26 1.0/13 1.0/13 36 40x31 1.0/13 1.0/13 42 46 x 36 M.L.' M.L.7 1.0 / 13 48 53 x 41 M.L.' M.L.7 1.25 / 13 54 60 x 46 M.L.' M.L.7 1.25 / 13 60 66 x 51 M.L.7 M.L.7 1.25 / 13 Galvanized, ALUMINIZED STEEL Type 2 or Polymer -Coated** Steel ULTRA FLO' Pipe -Arch E 80 Live Load Size Minimum/Maximum Cover ft. Specified Thickness in. and Gage Round Equivalent in. Span x Rise (in.) (0.064) 16 (0.109) 12 18 20x 16 2.0/, NEW - 21 23x19 2.0/, 24 27x21 2.0/18 30 33x26 2.0/18 36 40x31 2.0/17 42 46x36 2.0/18 48 53x41 2.0/18 54 60 x 46 2.0/18 60 66x51 2.0/18 Polymer -coated ULTRA FLO" provides added durability. 70. All heights of cover are based on trench conditions. If embankment conditions exist there may be restriction on gages for the large diameters. Your Contech Sales Representative can provide further guidance for a project in embankment conditions. 11. All steel ULTRA FLO' is installed in accordance with ASTM A798 "Installing Factory -Made Corrugated Steel Pipe for Sewers and Other Applications." * These sizes and gage combinations are installed in accordance with ASTM A796 paragraphs 18.2.3 and ASTM A798. For aluminum ULTRA FLO" refer to ASTM B790 and B788. ** Contact your local Contech representative for more specific information on Polymer -Coated ULTRA FLO' for 12 GA and 10 GA. ***Consult your Contech Sales Representative for E 80 Live Loads for Aluminum ULTRA FLO®. 13 0 Aluminum ULTRA FLO* HL 93 Live Load Aluminum ULTRA FLO'' Pipe -Arch HL 93 Live Load C:) Diameter (in.) Minimum/Maximum Cover ft. Specified Thickness in. and Gage (0.060) 16 (0.075) 14 (0.105) 12 (0.135) 10 18 1.0/43 1.0/61 21 1.0/38 1.0/52 1.0/84 24 1.0/33 1.0/45 1.0173 30 1.25/26 1.25/36 1.25/58 36 1.5*/21* 1.50/30 1.5/49 1.5/69 42 1.75*/25* 1.75/41 1.75/59 48 2.0/36 2.0/51 54 2.0/32 2.0/46 60 2.0*/29* 2.0/41 66 2.0/37 72 2.5*/34* See previous page for height of cover notes. Size Minimum/Maximum Cover ft. Sl iecified Thickness in. and Gage Round Equivalent (in.)16 Span x Rise (in.) (0.060) (0.075) 14 (0.105) 12 (0.135) 10 18 20 x 16 1.0/16 21 23 x 19 1.0/15 24 27 x 21 1 .25/13 1.25/13 30 33 x 26 1.5/13 1.5/13 1.5/13 36 40 x 31 1.75/13 1.75/13 42 46 x 36 2.0/13 2.0/13 48 53 x 41 2.0/13 2.0/13 54 60 x 46 2.0*/13* 2.0/13 60 66 x 51 2.0/13 Handling Weight for ALUMINIZED STEEL Type 2 or Handling Weight for ALUMINUM ULTRA FLO* Galvanized Steel ULTRA FLO* Diameter (in.) Weight Pounds/Lineal Foot Specified Thickness in. and Gage (0.064) 16 (0.079) 14 (0.109) 12 (0.138) 10 18 15 18 21 17 21 29 24 19 24 36 30 24 30 42 36 29 36 50 42 33 42 58 48 38 48 66 80 54 45 54 75 90 60 48 60 83 99 66 66 91 109 72 72 99 119 78 78 108 1 129 84 116 139 90 124 149 96 132 158 102 141 168 108 175 114 196 120 206 Weights for polymer -coated pipe are 7 % to 4% higher, varying by gage. ULTRA FLO" is available in long lengths, and its light weight allows it to be unloaded and handled with small equipment. Diameter (in.) Weight Pounds/Lineal Foot Specified Thickness in. and Gage (0.060) (0.075) (0.105) (0.135) 16 14 12 10 18bmm 5 6 21 6 8 11 24 7 9 13 30 9 11 15 36 11 13 18 23 42 15 21 26 48 24 30 54 27 34 60 30 37 66 41 72 45 Reduced excavation due to the smaller outside diameter of ULTRA FLO®. 14 Installation of CMP Overview Satisfactory site preparation, trench excavation, bedding and backfill operations are essential to develop the strength of any flexible conduit. In order to obtain proper strength while preventing settlement, it is necessary that the soil envelope around the pipe be of good granular material, properly placed and carefully compacted. Bedding Bedding preparation is critical to both pipe performance and service life. The bed should be constructed to uniform line and grade to avoid distortions that may create undesirable stresses in the pipe and/or rapid deterioration of the roadway. The bed should be free of rock formations, protruding stones, frozen lumps, roots and other foreign matter that may cause unequal settlement. Placing the pipe Corrugated metal pipe weighs much less than other commonly used drainage structures. This is due to the efficient strength of the metal, further improved with carefully designed and formed corrugations. Even the heaviest sections of Contech pipe can be handled with relatively light equipment compared with equipment required for much heavier reinforced concrete pipe. Backfill Satisfactory backfill material, proper placement and compaction are key factors in obtaining maximum strength and stability. Backfill should be a well -graded granular material and should be free of large stones, frozen lumps and other debris. Backfill materials should be placed in layers about six inches deep, deposited alternately on opposite sides of the pipe. Each layer should be compacted carefully. Select backfill is placed and compacted until minimum cover height is reached, at which point, standard road embankment backfill procedures are used. Installation References For more information, see AASHTO Bridge Construction Specification Section 26, the Installation Manual of the National Corrugated Steel Pipe Association, ASTM A798 for steel and ASTM B788 for aluminum ULTRA FLO°. Additional Considerations for ULTRA FLO' Installations Bedding and Backfill Typical ULTRA FLO° installation requirements are the same as for any other corrugated metal pipe installed in a trench. Bedding and backfill materials for ULTRA FLO" follow the requirements of the CMP installation specifications mentioned above, and must be free from stones, frozen lumps or other debris. When ASTM A796 (steel) or B790 (aluminum) designs are to be followed for condition III requirements, indicated by asterisk (*) in the tables on page 13 and 14, use clean, easily compacted granular backfill materials. Embankment Conditions ULTRA FLO® is a superior CMP storm sewer product that is normally installed in a trench condition. In those unusual embankment installation conditions, pipe sizes and gages may be restricted. Your Contech Sales Representative can provide you with further guidance. Construction Loads For temporary construction vehicle loads, an extra amount of compacted cover may be required over the top of the pipe. The Height of Cover shall meet minimum requirements shown in the table below. The use of heavy construction equipment necessitates greater protection for the pipe than finished grade cover minimums for normal highway traffic. Temporary Cover For Construction Loads Finished Grade Height of Cove -------------------------------------------- Min. Height Diameter (in.) of Cover HEL-CORD Requirements for Construction Corrugated Steel Pipe* Minimum Cover (ft.) for Indicated Axle Loads (kips) Loads 18-50 50-75 75-110 110-150 12-42 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 48-72 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.0 78-120 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 126-144 3.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 Min. Height Diameter of Cover CORLIX" Corrugated Requirements for Construction Aluminum Pipe* Minimum Cover (ft.) for Indicated Axle Loads (kips) Loads Min. Height of Cover ULTRA Requirements for Construction FLW Pipe* Loads Minimum Cover (ft.) for Indicated Diameter Axle Loads (kips) (in.) 18-50 50-75 1 75-110 110-150 Steel 3/4' x 3/4" x 7-1/2' 15-42 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 48-72 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.0 78-108 1 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Aluminum 3/4' x 3/4' x 7-1/2' 15-42 3.0 3.5 14.0 4.0 Minimum cover may vary depending on local conditions. The contractor must provide the additional cover required to avoid damage to the pipe. Minimum cover is measured from the top of the pipe to the top of the maintained construction roadway surface. 15 Smooth Cor'" Pipe Excellent Hydraulics, Long Lengths and Easy Installation Corrugated Steel Shell Smooth Car pipe has a smooth interior steel liner that provides a Manning's "n" of 0.012. Its rugged, corrugated steel shell supplies the structural strength to outperform rigid pipe. Smooth Cor pipe is both the economical and performance alternate to concrete. Superior hydraulics Smooth Cor, with its smooth interior surface, is hydraulically superior to conventional corrugated steel pipe and with fewer joints and better interior surface, outperforms reinforced concrete pipe. Smooth Cor, with its long lengths, light weight and beam strength, is superior to concrete pipe in many difficult situations such as poor soils, poor subsurface drainage conditions, steep slopes and high fills. Smooth Cor should be specified as an alternate under normal site conditions, and specified exclusively under very difficult situations that demand the strength of CSP with positive joints and a hydraulically efficient smooth liner. Two Pipe Shapes In addition to full -round pipe, Smooth Cor comes in a pipe -arch shape for limited headroom conditions. The low, wide pipe -arch design distributes the flow area horizontally, enabling it to be installed with lower head room than a round pipe. Structural Design Reference specifications Material Polymer -Coated ASTM A 929 AASHTO M246 ASTM A 742 Pipe Polymer AASHTO M245 ASTM A 762 & A 760 Design Steel Pipe AASHTO Section 12 ASTM A 796 Installation Steel Pipe AASHTO Section 26 ASTM A 798 Smooth Cor is lined with either 18 or 20 gage (GA) steel. Contech has taken a conservative approach to the Height of Cover. The maximum heights of cover are based on the shell thickness with no additional structural allowance for the liner as provided for in the AASHTO and ASTM design specifications. Using this approach, the Height of Cover tables for 2 2/3" x 1 /2" and 3" x 1 " steel corrugations can be used for Smooth Cor. Diameters Smooth Car is available in diameters ranging from 18 inches to 66 inches in 2 2/3" x 1/2" corrugation. The 3" x 1" corrugation is available in diameters of 48" to 126" Pipe -arch sizes range from 21 " x 15" through 77" x 52" for 2 2/3" x 1 /2" corrugations, and 53" x 41 " through 137" x 87" for 3" x 1 " corrugations. Materials Smooth Cor is available with a heavy -gage polymer coating that allows the engineer to design for long service life. This coating is a tough, heavy -gage polymer film laminated to both sides of the steel coil, providing a barrier to corrosion and mild abrasion which is particularly effective for protection in corrosive soils. Fittings Smooth Cor can be fabricated into any type of structure including tees, elbows, laterals, catch basins, manifolds and reducers. Pre -fabricated fittings are more economical and have superior hydraulic characteristics when compared to concrete structures. Lockseam Retaining Smooth Interior Liner Offset QUICK STAB° Joint Save Time and Money With Faster Pipe Bell and Spigot Coupling The Contech QUICK STAB Bell and Spigot joint speeds installation of corrugated metal pipe (CMP), reducing your costs. With the QUICK STAB coupling system, installation of CMP storm sewers and culverts has never been easier or faster. The QUICK STAB joint creates a bell and spigot joining system with the bell only 1-1/2" larger than the pipe's O.D. Assembled at the factory, the QUICK STAB bell is shipped to the job site ready for installation. The only field operation is placing a special fluted gasket onto the spigot end of the pipe, applying lubricant and pushing it into the bell end of the preceding pipe. Without bands, bolts and wrenches to work and worry with, you can join pipe segments 50%to 90%faster—saving time, money and aggravation. Soil Tight Joint Contech's QUICK STAB joint provides the some soil tightness as conventional CMP bands. Each QUICK STAB joint uses a double sealing fluted gasket to seal the spigot against the bell. A flat gasket is installed at the plant between the pipe and the corrugated end of the bell. With the deep bell, you gain maximum soil tightness with minimal installation effort. Wide Variety of Coatings and Materials • Plain galvanized • Aluminized Steel Type 2 (ALT2) • Aluminum • Polymeric coated Four Times Faster Installation Than Concrete The QUICK STAB's bell and spigot joining system allows pipe segments to be joined quicker than reinforced concrete pipe. Next, add in Contech's corrugated metal pipe's length advantage each segment is four times longer than standard concrete pipe lengths. That means fewer joints and faster installation —up to four times faster! Plus, with the bell only 1-1/2" larger than the pipe, trench excavation is considerably less compared with concrete again, saving time and money. Field Installation Instructions The spigot and bell ends must be cleaned of any dirt or debris prior to assembly. The fluted gasket shall be placed in the first corrugation with the lower flute nearest the end of the pipe. The bell & gasket shall be thoroughly lubed just before stabbing in the bell. Do not place hands, fingers, or any other body parts between bell and spigot during assembly. If it is necessary to pull the joint apart, the bell, spigot and gasket shall be inspected and cleaned of any dirt or debris prior to re -stabbing. Corrugated Metal Pipe Bell and Spigot Joint Specification The joints shall be of such design and the ends of the corrugated metal pipe sections so formed that the pipe can be laid together to make a continuous line of pipe. The joint shall be made from the same material as the pipe and shall prevent infiltration of the fill material. Bell and Spigot Coupling System for CMP Fluted Gasket with the lower Flute Nearest to DUICR STAB Bell \ the Pipe End \ Z , Pipe with Rerolled End Corrugation to Engage Pipe End — 12.5" This Side is Sleeve Lap is Skip Welded The Bell and Spigot joint is available on ULTRA FLO' and 2 2/3" x 1/2" corrugation in 15" through 60" diameter. Stab Direction 17 End Sections Easily installed, easily maintained culvert end treatments for corrugated metal pipe, reinforced concrete pipe and HDPE Pipe Contech End Sections provide a practical, economical and hydraulically superior method of finishing a variety of culvert materials. The lightweight, flexible metal construction of Contech End Sections creates an attractive, durable and erosion -preventing treatment for all sizes of culvert inlets and outlets. They can be used with corrugated metal pipe having either annular or helical corrugations, and both reinforced concrete and plastic pipes. End sections can be salvaged when lengthening or relocating the culvert. Standard End Sections are fabricated from pregalvanized steel. For added corrosion resistance, Aluminized Type 2 or Aluminum End Sections are available in smaller sizes. Special End Sections for multiple pipe installations may be available on a specific inquiry basis. Better hydraulics Flow characteristics are greatly improved by the exacting design of Contech End Sections. Scour and sedimentation conditions are improved, and headwater depth can be better controlled. Culverts aligned with the stream flow and finished with Contech End Sections generally require no additional hydraulic controls. Improved appearance Contech End Sections blend well with the surroundings. The tapered sides of an End Section merge with slope design to improve roadside appearance. Unsightly weeds and debris collection at the culvert end are reduced. Economical installation Lightweight equipment and simple crew instructions result in smooth and easy installation. Contech End Sections are easily joined to culvert barrels, forming a continuous, one- piece structure. For easiest installation, End Sections should be installed at the same time as the culvert. Installation is completed by tamping soil around the End Section. Low maintenance Contech End Sections reduce maintenance expense because their tapered design promotes easier mowing and snow removal. There is no obstruction to hamper weed cutting. - Va_riable Slope I1 Typical (ross Section Reinforced Edge r...=.:-------- - H 2" a" Optional Toe Elevation Plate Extension Reinforced Edge rH 2" S" Optional Toe Elevation Plate Extension Plan Notes for all End sections: 1 . All three-piece bodies to have 12 GA sides and 10 GA center panels. Multiple panel bodies to have lap seams which are to be tightly joined by galvanized rivets or bolts. 2. For 60" through 84" sizes, reinforced edges are supplemented with stiffener angles. The angles are attached by galvanized nuts and bolts. For the 66" and 72" round equivalent pipe -arch sizes, reinforced edges are supplemented by angles. The angles are attached by galvanized nuts and bolts. 3. Angle reinforcements are placed under the center panel seams on the 66" and 72" round equivalent pipe -arch sizes. 4. Toe plate is available as an accessory, when specified on the order, and will be same gage (GA) as the End Section. 5. Stiffener angles, angle reinforcement, and toe plates are the same base metal as end section body. 6. End sections with 6:1 and 4:1 slopes are available in 12" through 24" diameters. 7. Actual dimensions may vary slightly. 8. During manufacturing, a slight invert slope may result along the length of the end section to be accommodated in the field. Approximate Dimensions, Inches (1) Pipe Diameter Gage A (+/-1") B (Max) H L (Min) (+/-2") W (+/- 2") Overall Width (+/- 4") 12 16 6 6 6 21 24 36 15 16 7 8 6 26 30 44 18 16 8 10 6 31 36 52 21 01 16 9 1 60 24 16 10 13 —Mm42 6 41 48 68 30 14 12 16 8 51 60 84 36 14 14 19 9 60 72 100 42 12 16 22 11 69 84 116 48 12 18 27 12 78 90 126 54 12 18 30 12 84 102 138 60 12/10 18 33 12 87 114 150 66 12/10 18 36 12 87 120 156 72 12/10 18 39 12 87 126 162 78 12/10 18 42 12 87 132 168 84 12/10 18 45 12 87 138 174 End Sections for Pipe -Arch (2-2/3" x 1/2") Approximate Dimensions, Inches M Round Equivalent Span x Rise (in.) Gage A (+/-1") B (Max) H (+/-1 ") L (+/- 2") W (+/- 2") Overall Width (+/- 4") 15 17 x 13 16 7 9 6 19 30 44 18 21 x 15 16 7 10 6 23 36 50 21 24 x 18 16 8 12 6 28 42 58 24 28 x 20 16 9 14 6 32 48 66 30 35 x 24 14 10 16 6 39 60 80 36 42 x 29 14 12 18 8 46 75 99 42 49 x 33 12 13 21 9 53 85 ill 48 57 x 38 12 18 26 12 63 90 126 54 64x43 12 18 30 12 70 102 138 60 71x47 12/10 18 33 12 77 114 150 66 77x52 12/10 18 36 12 77 126 162 72 83x57 12/10 18 39 12 77 138 174 Approximate Dimensions, Inches (1) Round Equivalent Span x Rise (in.) Gage A (+/-1") B (Max) H (+/-1 ") W (+/- 2") L (+/- 2") Overall Width (+/- 4") 48 53 x 41 12 18 25 12 90 63 126 54 60x46 12 18 34 12 102 70 138 60 66x51 12/10 18 33 12 116 77 152 66 73x55 12/10 18 36 12 126 77 162 72 81x59 12/10 18 39 12 138 77 174 78 87x63 12/10 20 38 12 148 77 188 84 95x67 12/10 20 34 12 162 87 202 90 103x71 12/10 20 38 12 174 87 214 96 112x75 12/10 20 40 12 174 87 214 Ce Contech End Sections attach to corrugated metal pipe, reinforced concrete and plastic pipe. End Of Pipe type I 1/2' Th Rod Type 2 Pipe To Which End Section Is Attached 0 0 D ❑ Dimple Band Jaded ,, Collar Bolted To End Section With 3/8" Bolts Type 5 Note: The Type 3 connection is not illustrated. This connection is a one -foot length of pipe attached to the end section. Multiple End Section on Round (SP End Sections are available for (SP Pipe -Arch =' (ontech End Sections are often used on concrete pipe. They can be used on both the bell and spigot end. Contech® Engineered Solutions provides innovative, cost-effective site solutions to engineers, contractors and developers on projects across North America. Our portfolio includes bridges, drainage, erosion control, retaining wall, sanitary sewer and stormwater management products. For more information, call one of Contech's Regional Offices located in the following cities: Ohio (Corporate Office) 513-645-7000 California (Roseville) 800-548-4667 Colorado (Denver) 720-587-2700 Florida (Orlando) 321-348-3520 Maine (Scarborough) 207-885-9830 Maryland (Baltimore) 410-740-8490 Oregon (Portland) 503-258-3180 Texas (Dallas) 972-590-2000 www.ContechES.com 1 800-338-1122 NOTHING IN THIS CATALOG SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS A WARRANTY. APPLICATIONS SUGGESTED HEREIN ARE DESCRIBED ONLY TO HELP READERS MAKE THEIR OWN EVALUATIONS AND DECISIONS, AND ARE NEITHER GUARANTEES NOR WARRANTIES OF SUITABILITY FOR ANY APPLICATION. CONTECH MAKES NO WARRANTY WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, RELATED TO THE APPLICATIONS, MATERIALS, COATINGS, OR PRODUCTS DISCUSSED HEREIN. ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED BY CONTECH. SEE CONTECH'S CONDITIONS OF SALE (AVAILABLE AT WWW.CONTECHES.COM/COS) FOR MORE INFORMATION. M1 BRO-CMP-DESIGN 5/3/2022 Low -slope End Sections—Contech manufactures 4:1 and 6:1 low -slope End Sections for corrugated metal pipe. This photo shows the optional field -attached safety bars. C=4 NTECHp ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS © 2022 Contech Engineered Solutions L-C, a QUIKRETE Company All rights reserved. Printed in USA.