20110720 Ver 2_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20151130

CEDAR GROVE MITIGATION SITE
Orange County, NC
Bank Parcel Development Plan Monitoring Year 1 Report
DWR Project # 11-0720v2
Issue Date: November 2015
iso' 4. :7
Submitted By:
EPX
r,
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Prepared By
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Project Location and Description..................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives............................................................................................................ 2
2.0 Project Area — Pre -Construction Condition Summary ............................................................................ 2
3.0 Bank Site Conditions.............................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Restoration Plan............................................................................................................................... 3
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots............................................................................................................ 4
3.3 Photo Stations...................................................................................................................................4
4.0 Monitoring Conditions............................................................................................................................ 4
5.0 Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation........................................................................... 5
Appendix A: Site Maps
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2.1: Conservation Easement Area
Figure 2.2: Vegetation Plot and Photo Station Monitoring Locations
Figure 2.3: Neuse Buffer & Nutrient Offset Restoration Areas
Figure 2.4: BPDP Neuse Buffer & Nutrient Offset Restoration Areas
Figure 3: As -Built Exhibit
Figure 4: Cedar Grove Stream Mitigation Plan Map
Appendix B: Existing Conditions Photographs
Appendix C: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 1: Plant Species Summary
Table 2: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 3: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix E: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
Appendix F: Photo Stations
Appendix G: Correspondence Letters
NC DWR Credit Release Letter dated June 22, 2015
USACOE Cedar Grove Mitigation Plan Approval Letter dated May 13, 2014
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

1.0 Introduction
LI Project Location and Description
Located off of McDade Store Road (NCSR 1354), northwest of its intersection with Rick Road in Orange
County, North Carolina (Figure 1), is the Neuse buffer and nutrient offset mitigation site currently known
as Cedar Grove Mitigation Site (Site). The Site is located approximately 0.8 miles southwest of the
intersection of McDade Store Road and State Route 86 and approximately 0.7 miles northeast of the
intersection McDade Store Road and Efland Cedar Grove Road.
The tract containing the Site is approximately 131.5 acres, which includes area within the right- of -way
along its frontage of McDade Store Road. A 60.14 acre conservation easement protects the Site. Within the
conservation easement, existing riparian areas have been restored and enhanced to generate both Neuse
buffer and nutrient offset (nitrogen and phosphorus) credits. In addition, the dimension, pattern, and profile
of existing perennial and intermittent stream channels located within the conservation easement have been
restored at the Site in accordance with the approved stream mitigation plan approved by the Interagency
Review Team (IRT) as provided in Appendix G. The As -Built design of the Cedar Grove Stream
Mitigation Bank site is shown in Figures 2.3 and As -Built Exhibit. The remaining 71.36 acres not placed
within a conservation easement will be developed as a low-density subdivision that will consist of three (3)
single-family lots that are a minimum size of 28 -acres, along with driveways, existing walking trails, and
other infrastructure. Please refer to Table 1, below, for additional information regarding buffer restoration,
buffer enhancement, and nutrient offset credits proposed within this Site.
The Site is located within the Upper Falls Lake watershed in the Neuse River Basin (8 -digit USGS HUC
03020201, 12 -digit USGS HUC 03020201 0301), more specifically within Neuse Sub -basin 03-04-01.
Stormwater runoff from this site drains into the East Fork Eno River (Stream Index #27-2-3), which is
located in the northeastern section of the Site. According to the N.C. Division of Water Quality Basinwide
Information Management System (BIMS), the East Fork Eno River is classified as WS -II (Water Supply
II), HQW (High Quality Waters), and NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters). The WS -II classification is for
"waters used as sources of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes which are
generally in predominantly undeveloped watersheds". HQW is a "supplemental classification intended to
protect waters that are rated excellent based on biological and physical/chemical characteristics" while
the NSW designation is for "Nutrient Sensitive Waters". The purpose of this Site is to improve water quality
within the Neuse River Basin, specifically the Falls Lake watershed, by providing off-site mitigation for
development (both existing and proposed) requiring stream buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 and nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240. Nutrient offset credits can only be
provided to offset nutrient loads in the Upper and Lower Falls Lake Watersheds of the 03020201 HUC.
This Site is established under the terms and conditions of the EBX Upper Neuse Riparian Buffer and
Nutrient Offset Umbrella Mitigation Bank (Bank), signed on February 10, 2012, made and entered into by
EBX Neuse I, LLC (EBX), a subsidiarity of Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES), acting as the
Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources -
Division of Water Quality (DWR). Annual monitoring activities and monitoring reports will be performed
by RES.
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals of this buffer and nutrient offset mitigation project are:
Improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat in and around the unnamed tributaries of
the Neuse River by reducing nutrient and sediment loads into the streams caused by
development and agricultural influences.
Improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the conservation easement.
Provide perpetual protection for the unnamed tributaries to the East Fork Eno River and
associated riparian and upland buffers
These goals will be met through the following objectives:
- Establishing a native plant community to match the endemic plant species at the Bank Site.
- Reducing the quantities of exotic invasive species at the Bank Parcel through chemical
methods.
- Establishing a conservation easement to provide long-term protection for the Bank Site.
- Donation of the conservation easement and all of its interests, in perpetuity, to an accredited or
approved land trust or stewardship program.
2.0 Project Area — Pre -Construction Condition Summary
The majority of the existing riparian areas within the Site were considered maintained/disturbed and
cultivated lands that have, historically, been a maintained golf course, which included fairways, greenways,
driving range, and maintained fields. The Neuse riparian buffer area width within the maintained/disturbed
and cultivated land areas were less than 50 feet in some instances prior to mitigation work activities. As
part of buffer mitigation, Neuse buffers would be restored out to a minimum of 50 feet. Other riparian
areas which extended 51 feet to a maximum of 200 feet on both sides of the bankfull elevation of each
restored stream bank would be planted and described as nutrient offset areas and are shown on Figure 2.4.
These areas were ripped and scarified prior to vegetation planting activities. Existing grasses were mowed
and treated with herbicide to reduce competition with planted species. Where necessary, invasive species
were also treated with herbicide to ensure they do not become dominant, or hinder the establishment, growth
and survival of planted vegetation.
In addition to maintained/disturbed and cultivated land areas within the Site, there are existing forested
riparian areas which have been selectively timbered. Significant portions of the secondary understory within
these existing forested riparian areas have been cleared. Riparian buffer enhancement was considered for
these forested areas that are within 50 feet of the stream, but lacking adequate stem counts. Riparian buffer
enhancement is defined as the process of converting a sparsely woody vegetated area (greater than or equal
to 100 trees per acre but less than 200 trees per acre that are greater than or equal to five inches diameter at
breast height (dbh) for trees and greater than two feet in height for shrubs) to a forested riparian buffer area
(15A NCAC 02B .0233 (2)(m)). Nuisance and exotic vegetation are not included in the stem count.
2
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

3.0 Bank Site Conditions
3.1 Restoration Plan
Stream restoration and enhancement construction activities at the Bank Site were completed in early May
2015 in accordance with the Cedar Grove Stream Mitigation Plan approved by the IRT. Neuse riparian
buffers and other riparian areas were planted on May 13, 2015. Construction activities included priority 1
stream restoration, stream enhancement, bank stabilization, and installation of stream structures. Removal
of golf course cart paths, draining and filling ponds, and planting Neuse riparian buffers (0-50') and other
riparian areas (51-200') within the conservation area were also completed. Monitoring devices were
installed post -construction which included 12 photo stations and 12 vegetation plots. On June 15, 2015,
DWR staff conducted an on-site visit to inspect the As -Built conditions of the buffer mitigation and nutrient
offset areas. Based on DWR's findings at the site visit, approximately 4.22 acres of planted riparian areas
were removed from the creditable acreage for the bank. Originally, Neuse riparian buffers and other
riparian areas were proposed within Conservation Easement Area 3 along Ponds A and B as well as stream
UT6 (Figure 2.4). These areas are considered not subject to generate credit and account for the 4.22 acres
removed from the creditable acreage for the bank. The letter documenting DWR's findings is in ppendix
G.
Abandoned golf course fairway areas within the conservation easement were bush -hogged and scarified
prior to vegetation planting activities. The established microtopography on level surfaces has promoted
diffuse flow and surface water storage. In addition, subsurface hardpans were eliminated to promote
vegetation growth and survival and to increase groundwater recharge rates. Where necessary, invasive
species were treated with herbicide to ensure they do not become dominant within the Bank Site, or hinder
the establishment, growth and survival of planted vegetation.
The Cedar Grove Bank Site was planted with bare root seedlings consisting of species previously observed
on the Bank Site and selected species known to inhabit Dry Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest community type as
described in Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley, 1990).
Table 1 (Appendix C) provides a listing of planted species and a summary of total stems planted at the
Bank Site. A total of 28,200 individual stems, or 787 stems per acre, were planted within the Bank Site,
which is slightly above the desired 680 stems per acre. A total of 3,000 live stakes were also planted along
streams banks to provide bank stability and aquatic cover as required per the stream mitigation plan
approved by the IRT.
The planted species were a mixture of hardwood tree species consistent with those found within a Basic
Dry Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest in the Piedmont. Plant composition consisted of ten (10) tree species.
Temporary and permanent native herbaceous seed mix was applied simultaneously to the nutrient offset
restoration areas within the Bank Site area. Temporary seed will provide cover until the permanent seed
applied becomes established. Temporary cover consisted of millet (Echinochloa crusgalli), annual rye grain
(Secale cereale), and crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum). Permanent ground cover consisted of
switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), deertongue (Panicum clandestinman), black-eyed susan (Rudbeckia
hirta), and riverbank wildrye (Elymus riparius).
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC permanently installed twelve (12) vegetation plots for future
vegetation monitoring purposes. The locations of each vegetation plot are depicted on Figure 2.2
(Appendix A). The vegetation plots were randomly setup throughout the Bank Site and each are 100 square
meters in size (10 meter by 10 meter square plots). Year 1 vegetation monitoring was conducted in general
accordance to CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS-EEP, v4.2). Table 2 (Appendix C)
provides a success summary for each vegetation monitoring plot.,A a resu of DWR's site visit on June
1'5, 2015 and the removal of 4.22 acres from the bank, vegetion plot # does not require monitoring;
However, all twelve vegetation monitoring plots will Contin or --1i6 monitored. Vegetation plot #1
monitoring data will be reported; however, it has been discarded from the site's overall stems/acre average
and will not be counted towards the success criteria.
Monitoring Year 1 field activities were conducted on November 11 and 12, 2015. Based on the Year 1
vegetation monitoring data, all required eleven (11) vegetation monitoring p o s have met the success
criteria for Year 1 monitoring. The Site's overall average Year 1 planted stems per acre is 592 excluding
vegetation plot #1. The Site's overall average Year 1 total stems per acre including volunteer species is 769
excluding vegetation plot #1 (Table 2, Appendix Q. Table 3 (Appendix C) provides a more detailed
summary of stem counts and the type of planted species within each vegetation monitoring plot. The
survival of planted stems per acre during monitoring Year 1 range from 364 to 809 stems per acre.
Photographs of each vegetation monitoring plot are located in Appendix D. Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data Sheets are provided in Appendix E. Each Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheet provides the
measurements, location, and vigor of each planted tree within the vegetation monitoring plots.
3.3 Photo Stations
Photo documentation is a key essential to monitoring the success criteria of the Bank Site. Photographs
provide a visual representation of the onsite vegetation conditions. RES installed twelve (12) permanent
photo stations for future annual monitoring purposes. The locations of each photo station are depicted on
Figures 2.2 (Appendix A). Photographs for the photo stations are located in Appendix F.
4.0 Monitoring Conditions
The Site will be monitored for four (4) more consecutive years or until the required success criteria have
been met as determined by DWR. The Site is performing as planned and is on track to meeting its success
criteria. Overall the site's vegetation has established well in Year 1. An 76undant amount of er aceous
ground cover as well as volunteer trees species were present during Year 1 monitoring activities. No
problems or areas of concern were noted during Year 1 monitoring activities on the Cedar Grove Bank Site.
If site conditions or tree survival rates require remediation, supplemental planting and additional site
modifications will be implemented. DWR will be notified if supplemental planting is to occur within Site.
The Cedar Grove Bank Site contai 12 egetative monitoring plots, 11 of which were monitored and
reported for success criteria in genera cordance with the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation
(CVS-EEP, v4.2). Twelve (10) by ten (10) meter square plots were permanently established following
completion of the planting phase and at least two opposing corners have been permanently installed and
surveyed for future use. The plant species, density, survival rates, and the cause of mortality, if identifiable,
have been recorded within each plot. Twelve (12) vegetation plots were sampled and reported; however,
vegetation plot #1 has been discarded from the site's overall stems/acre average and is not counted towards
the success criteria. Success criteria will be generated from vegetation monitoring plots 2 —12. The primary
4
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

focus of the vegetative monitoring will be solely on the tree stratum, although shrub and herbaceous species
encountered may also be recorded, but will not be counted towards the success criteria.
Within Neuse buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas, success criteria will be based on the survival of a
minimum density of 320 trees per acre after five years of monitoring. Within Neuse buffer enhancement
areas, success criteria will be based on a minimum of at least two tree species at an average density of 320
trees per acre following five years of monitoring. Year 1 vegetation monitoring activities occurred on
November 11 and 12. As of Monitoring Year 1, the Cedar Grove Bank Site yields 592 planted stems per
acre and 769 total stems per acre counting volunteer species. A determination will be i'egarciing-HRe
success of t e projec o owing eco ec ' ua ion of ecological and physical monitoring data,
photographs, and site observations.
5.0 Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
The Cedar Grove Site will provide Neuse buffer and nutrient offset mitigation credits for development
impacts within the Neuse River Basin USGS HUC 03020201, specifically the Falls Lake watershed (Figure
1). Of the 60.14 acres conservation easement (Figure 3), approximately 39.43 acres will be dedicated to
Neuse buffer restoration / enhancement and nutrient offset restoration. A Neuse buffer restoration area of
14.46 acres (629,616 sf) will be used to generate 14.46 acres (629,616 sf) of Neuse buffer credits. A Neuse
buffer enhancement area of 0.75 acres (32,611 sf) will be used to generate 0.25 acr sf))
(enhancement area divide by 3) of Neuse buffer credits. Therefore, a total of 14.71 acr�--�"'86eSite
o
Neuse buffer credit will be generated. The remaining 24.22 acres of riparian restoration ar
(i.e. areas outsi o Ft se buffer) will provide nutrient offset credits for nitrogen and phosphorus. The
Sitewillprov'de 55,.54 ounds of Nitrogen Nutrient Offset credit and 3,545.8of Phosphorous
Nutrient Offse ed
Table 1 provides a summary of mitigation credit for the Site.
Table 1: Mitigation Credit Summary
NEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION/ENHANCEMENT
Conservation Area
Neuse River Buffer Acres
Restoration
Enhancement
1
1.37 59,503 s
0.00
2
3.02 131,551 s
0.75 32,611 s
3
10.07 (438,562 s
0.00
TOTAL ACERAGE
14.46 629,616 s
0.75 32,611 s
RATIO
1:1
3:1
TOTAL CREDITS
14.46 (629,616 sf)
0.25 (10,870 sf)
NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION
Conservation Area
Nutrient Offset
Restoration Acres
Nitrogen Credit
(2,273.02 lbs/ac
Phosphorus Credit
146.4 lbs/ac
1
2.69
6,114.42
393.82
2
7.14
16,229.36
1,045.30
3
1 4.39
1 32,708.76
1 2,106.70
TOTAL
1 24.22
1 55,052.54
1 3,545.81
No
10 Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

6.0 References
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) 2004. Guidelinesfor Riparian Buffer
Restoration. Available at internet site: http://www.ncegp.net/news/rel2orts/buffeE"df. Accessed
August 2009.
Schafale MP and AS Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

I:1»ON11►:I_1
Site Maps
am
IffEnvironmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Rd
03010104
1
Oakley Rd
Lees
o.
O
Rd
Nc
Q'
C
O
N .a
Q �
d
t
O
d
a
M
CG
C
0302020
�xt
Hawkins Rd 0
N
N
d
C
10
V
Off.
k �L
Cedar Grove Mitigation Site a
C1
m
a
Legend
Roads 0
0
3 �
Cedar Grove Streams vo tore Rd �0
3 Carr S o
M Cedar Grove Mitigation Site �p
O -
Q HUC Boundary
© Open,3treetMap (and) contributors, CC -BY -SA
Date: 6/9/2015
FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP
+
�Drawn by: BSH
111 CEDAR GROVE MITIGATION SITE res
0 1,000 2,000 Checked by: xxxxxxxx
Feet ORANGE COUNTY, NC

{
f
1

NEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION/ENIIANCEMENT 2. d
Neuse River Buffer (Acres)
Conservation Area
Restoration Enhancement
i;e fF
1 1.37 59,503 s 0 s'a
2 3.02 131,551 A 0.75 32,611 s
a
3 10.07 438,562 so 0
TOTAL ACERAGE 14.46 629,616 s 0.75 32,611 s D
RATIO 1:1 3:1 a
TOTAL CREDITS 14.46 629,616 so 0.25 10,870 s
NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION
Conservation Area Nutrient Offset Nitrogen Credt Phosphorus Crecit
Restoration (Acres) (2,273.02 lbs/ac) (146.4 lbs/ac)
1 2.69 6,114.42 393.82
2 7.14 16,229.36 1,045.30
3 14.39 32,708.76 2,106.70
TOTAL ---r 24.22 55,052.54 3,545.81 }
N .lj ,
4
tiw

CONSERVATION EASEMENT
AREA 03
1n�,- \.
, et
= �."
M
VAL
'NCONSERVATION EASEMENT
t AREA #2fk
E
y
s' 4 • v
PS
s
i
v� '�� 28 1 AC. (OUTSIDE R/W) "
�r i moi,
00,
If
• .w
UT 5
ENHANCEMENT
AREA t
^' .-_- > �A ,v -•� ''- �� • i_ ENHANCEMENT
� � • AREA 2 �
UT2
1 r \
id "t 1
O
- 52.48 AC. (OUTSIDE R/W)
_ UT 4
CONSERVATION EASEMENT EXISTING DAM TO BE MODIFIED TO SERVE
AREA #1 AS A 25-FT WIDE DRIVEWAY CROSSING
(I.E. PORTIONS OF THE DAM WILL BE
REMOVED TO INSTALL DRIVEWAY
CULVERTS)

1357
1508 77E UNE TABLE
i.SSd L EAK A* 70 NPS -8'
.`� LN4£ BEUONC OSTANC£
L-96 S
O86 L-97 N 1629^57' E 4Q 45'
L-98 N W- 70' E 32.OY
V/C/NR Y MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
NOTES
1. NO NO GRID MONUMENIS WERE LOCATED WDW
2000' OF TNS PROPERTY.
2 ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
MFASURENENS IN FEET h DECIMALS THEREOF,
UMESS O7HERWSE NOTEDD,
3. NO URUTTES ARE SHOWN ON 7NS SURVEY.
LEGEND _
R/N' = RXHT OF WAY
C/L - CENTERLINE
DS = £XZTMK' YNN STAKE
ETP = EXISDNG IwN PIPE
ON - EXLSRNG NAG M41L
EPK = EX60NG PX NUL
ERRS = EXIS17NC RAILROAD SPIKE
£AX = EXISTING AXLE
NPS - NO POINT S£T
O= NO POINT SET
(A) = 17E UNE
(CC) = CONTROL CORNER
N/P = NOW Wi FORMERLY
— - - — = ADJOINING PROPERTY UNE
EXkVMK' PARCEL LINES
(NOT SURVEYED)
I
I
N
I
n
I
1
CHARRING P. McDADE I
DO 775, PG 242
PD 55, PG 127
EXSEMVT
FJ�
0.73 IDLES FROM ERRS, ALONG CENTERLM£
OF MCDAD£ STORE C. 1354) HJ A'
INTERSECTION
Of N.C. HWY.WY. 8 66
SOURCE OF TnLE
OB 5323, PG 198
MB 110, PC 142
7 CH4NN6JG P. "COAX
1 DB 5206, PG 394
PE' 109, PC 8
FLOOD STAMMW
THIS PROPERTY S LOCATED IN 2
AND 15 PART94LLY LOCATED 1"7H1
HAZARD ARGk AS DETtFARNED 8
DATED FERTbARY 2. =7
NUM80S 370342-9858-J d 37
M4RCERET S ANDERSON F
9D -E -3f2
DB 227, PG 1584
PON!
EPK_f
/ v
/ A
L;
CONSERVAWN EASEMENT /2
CONSERVATION EASEMENT /1
JOHN F POPE
DB 1669 PG 60
ERX NEUSE L LLC
DO 5323 PG 198
AS—BUILT EXHIBIT
FOR
CEDAR GROVE MI TIGA TION
BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PI
DWR-PROJECT 111-0720V2
CEDAR GROVE TOWNSHIP JUNE 15, 2015
ORANGE COUNTY, N.C. SCALE: 1" = 200'
200' 100' 0 200' 400'
GRAPHIC SCALE
LINE TARLE
AROUND CONSERVATION Fdcl:MEM 1
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
UNE
8FARING
DISTANCE
L-46
N 313819' £
71.73'L-55
S 08'14'13' £
84.36'
L-47
L-56
S 6 '0 ' E
6234'
L-48
L-57
L-49
N 2759'13' £
85.69'
L-58
S
L-50
N 48' '13' £
127,79'
L-59
L-51
S 46'4739' E
92.35'
L-60
S 4 75' W
96.56'
-52
S 79Y9"29' E
55.04'
L-61
S 48'4439' W
7Q '
L -5J
ML
X22'11' £
M '
L-62
S 8750'46' W
217.64'
L-59
S 21J4�?4' £
111.93'
ERX NEUSE L LLC
DO 5323 PG 198
AS—BUILT EXHIBIT
FOR
CEDAR GROVE MI TIGA TION
BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PI
DWR-PROJECT 111-0720V2
CEDAR GROVE TOWNSHIP JUNE 15, 2015
ORANGE COUNTY, N.C. SCALE: 1" = 200'
200' 100' 0 200' 400'
GRAPHIC SCALE

APPENDIX B
Existing Conditions Photographs
AA
iffEnvironmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Appendix B.
Cedar Grove Existing Conditions Photos
UTI Looking Upstream (11/12/2015)
UT2 Looking Downstream (11/12/2015)
UT2 Looking Upstream (11 / 12/2015)
Appendix B. Existing Conditions Photos
UT 1 Looking Downstream (11 /] 2/2015)
UT2 Looking Downstream (11/12/2015)
UT3 Looking Downstream (11/12/2015)

Appendix B. Existing Conditions Photos
Cedar Grove Existing Conditions Photos
UT3 Looking Upstream (11/12/2015)
UT4 Looking Downstream (11/12/2015)
UT5 Looking Upstream (11/12/2015)
UT5 Looking Downstream (11/12/2015)

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Assessment Data
C�9
�-, I
IFEnvironmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

c
l

APPENDIX D
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 1. Planted Species Summary
Planted Date: May 13, 2015
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
Total Stems
Planted
Betula nigra
River Birch
Bare Root
4,000
Cercis canadensis
Eastern Redbud
Bare Root
200
Liriodendron tuli i era
Tuli tree
Bare Root
4,000
Platanus occidentalis
Americansycamore
Bare Root
8,200
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Bare Root
3,700
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Bare Root
3,000
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Bare Root
2,000
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Bare Root
600
Quercus pagoda
Cherry Bark Oak
Bare Root
2,000
Ce halanthus occidentalis
Common Buttonbush
Bare Root
500
809
607
Total
28,200
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Live Stake
1,000
Populus deltoides
Cottonwood
Live Stake
1,000
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
Live Stake
1,000
10
769
Total
3,000
Table 2. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Stream/
Wetland
Stems/Acre
Riparian
Buffer
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total Stems/Acre
(Including Unknown
Species)
Success
Criteria Met?
1
647
647
0
647
Yes
2
567
567
81
647
Yes
3
647
647
243
890
Yes
4
607
607
405
1012
Yes
5
486
486
81
567
Yes
6
364
364
0
364
Yes
7
809
809
607
1416
Yes
8
445
445
283
728
Yes
9
567
567
0
567
Yes
10
769
769
0
769
Yes
11
809
809
243
1052
Yes
12
445
445
0
445
Yes
Project Average
597
597
162
759
Yes
*Project Average
W/o Plot 1
592
592
162
769
Yes
*Vegetation Plot 1 data was disregarded from the sites success criteria totals.

Table 3: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Project Name: Cedar Grove Mitigation Site
Scientific Name
Common Name
05202015-01-0001
Species Type PnoLS P -all T
05202015-01-0002
PnoLS P -all T
05202015-01-0003
PnoLS P -all T
05202015-01-0004
PnoLS P -all T
05202015-01-0005
PnOLS P -all T
05:
Pno
Acernegundo
Boxelder
Tree
1
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
1 1
1
2
2
2
2
Cercis canadensis
Eastern Redbud
Tree
5 5
5
3
3
3
DONTKNOW: unsure record
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
Liquidambarstyraciflua
Sweetgum
Tree
6
1
1 10
1
2
Liriodendrontulipifera
Tuliptree
Tree
4 4 1
4 1
1 1 1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
7 7
7
2
2
2
1 5 5
5
9
9
9
2
Quercus
Oak
Tree
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak Tree
1 1
1
3
Quercus nigra
wateroak
Tree
2
2
2
3 3
3
1 1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
Cherrybark Oak
Tree
1
1
1
2 2
2
1 1
1
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3 1
2 2
2
1
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
ITree
3
3
3
4 4
4
1
1
1 1
7 7
7
Rhus copallinum
IFlameleafSumac
Shrub
1
Ulmus americana
JAmerican Elm
Tree
Unknown
IShrub or Tree
Stem count 16 16 16 14 14 16 16 16 22
size (ares) 1 1 1
size (ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 3 3 3 6 6 8 6 6 7
Stems per ACRE 647.5 647.5 647.5 566.6 566.6 647.5 647.5 647.5 890.3
15
4
607
1 15
1
0.02
4
607
25 12 12 14 9
a0.02
5 5
1012 485.6

APPENDIX D
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Appendix D. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Cedar Grove Vegetation Monitoring Year 1 Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 (11/12/2015)
Vegetation Plot 2 (11/12/2015)
Vegetation Plot 3 (11/12/2015)
Vegetation Plot 4 (11/12/2015)
V
6
Vegetation Plot 5 (11/12/2015)
Vegetation Plot 6 (11/12/2015)

Appendix D. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Cedar Grove Vegetation Monitoring Year 1 Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 7 (11/12/2015)
Vegetation Plot 8 (11/12/2015)
Vegetation Plot 9 (11/12/2015)
Vegetation Plot 10 (11/12/2015)
Vegetation Plot 11 (11/12/2015)
Vegetation Plot 12 (11/12/2015)

APPENDIX E
Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets
tm
am
fff Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Plot (continued): 05202015-01-0001
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Nov 2015 Data
ddb Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
o THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Dama e* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sproutg g
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05202015-01-0001
27.0
❑
P Role: Date last planted: 05/2015
��
VMD Year (1-5): ' 2 Date:
New lanting date m/yy? C�
/ / /
/
Taxonomic Standard:
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
❑
3
Quercus sp.
O
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
1.1
Latitude or UTM-N:
Missing
890580.3392 Datum:
NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
®
1953374.114 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
0.5'I X -Axis bearing (deg):
168
❑
Plot Dimensions: X:
IOI y; 10 ❑ plot has reverse
orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char O.lm 0.1m
Nov 2015 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
z
0
*
❑
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vi or* Damage* Notes
lcm* I cm sprout g g
1
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
1.0
0.4
27.0
❑
2
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
1.1
2.8
47.0
❑
3
Quercus sp.
O
R
1.1
5.3
Missing
❑
4
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
1.2
7.9
55.0
❑
5
Quercus sp.
O
R
3.2
9.4
Missing
❑
7
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
3.2
7.2
63.0
❑
8
Platanus occidentalis
R
3.2
4.8
18.0
❑
9
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
3.3
2.9
55.0
❑
10
Quercus sp.
O
R
3.3
0.6
Missing
❑
11
Cercis canadensis
O
R
5.6
0.5
25.0
❑
12
Cercis canadensis
O
R
5.6
3.1
Missing
❑
13
Cercis canadensis
Oj
R
5.7
5.8
47.0
❑
14
Cercis canadensis
®
R
5.6
8.4
38.0
❑
15
Cercis canadensis
R
7.6
7.9
30.0
❑
16
Cercis canadensis
R
7.7
5.3
Missing
❑
17
Cercis canadensis
O
R
7.6
3.1
37.0
❑
18
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
7.6
0.7
Missing
❑
19
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.9
0.2
35.0
❑
20
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
9.8
2.4
39.0
❑
21
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
9.7
4.8
22.0
❑
22
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
9.8
7.0
38.0
❑
23
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
9.7
9.2
26.0
❑
# stems. 22 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (m) I cm* 1 cm Vigor Damage Notes
*SOURCE: Ti -Transplant, L=Live stake 13=13 11 and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2 -fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Primed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05202015-01-0001 Nov 201 5
Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species Explanation of cut-off
& subsamMing":
ei ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ IOcm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
D
C
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcut-off >1Ocm or subsample ? 100%. 01
02
.......r.�s:
03
*4
NS
6
S
0 Form WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr Trans )ant L=Live stake B=Ball and burls P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=MechanicAIX, U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2 -fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0001
X-axis: 168 °
# stems: 22
map size:
N LARGE
(0,0) X:5 m
B=
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Hunan TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05202015-01-0002 Pa Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): 1-2 ] Date: / // / New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 890558.7357 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 1954312.697 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 257
Plot Dimensions: X: 16 Y: F 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Nov 2015 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1cm* 1 cm ` Icm* 1 cm sprout g g
36
Quercus rubra
O
R
0.7
0.7
Missing
❑
37
Cercis canadensis
O
R
0.4
2.6
71.0
❑
38
Quercus pagoda
®
R
0.5
5.1
46.0
❑
39
Quercus phellos
®
R
0.6
7.8
8.0
❑
40
Quercus nigra
O
R
2.9
9.7
Missing
❑
41
Quercus nigra
®
R
2.8
7.5
Missin g
❑
42
Cercis canadensis
O
R
2.9
5.1
38.0
❑
43
Cercis canadensis
O
R
2.8
2.9
30.0
❑
44
Quercus pagoda
O
R
3.2
0.7
69.0
❑
45
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.3
0.3
16.0
❑
46
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.3
2.8
Missing
❑
47
Quercus sp.
Oj
R
5.3
5.2
Missing
❑
48
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
5.3
7.6
Missing1:1
49
Quercus nigra
O
R
7.5
8.8
48.0
❑
50
Quercus nigra
R
7.7
6.5
20.0
❑
51
Quercus phellos
R
7.7
3.9
47.0
❑
52
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
7.7
1.9
56.0
❑
53
Quercus rubra
O
R
9.8
0.6
17.0
❑
54
Quercus phellos
O
R
9.8
3.0
31.0
❑
55
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.8
5.7
48.0
❑
56
Quercus rubra
O
R
9.8
8.1
13.0
❑
57
Quercus rubra
O
R
9.8
9.7
7.0
❑
# stems: 22 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Y
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

riot tcontinuen): 05202015-01-0002 Nov 2015 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re -
ID Species Vigor Damage Notes
P char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout j
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamdin¢**:
ei ht Cut-Oif(Allstems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(writDH)
**Required ifcit-off >1Ocm or subsample ? 100%. 01
:2
• 3
..
0 *4
••
NS
••
�6 7 N8
•• N N
N
]0 Form WS2, Va 9.I
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0002 x-axis: 257 # stems: 22
map size:
I I ' LARGE {
N
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burls P --Potted, Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 6 `
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
l

I
E
6
6
71
71
7�
73
74
#s
SFccies INameSource* r Height DBH __ "' •• � triantea woody Stems) Form:
im) gym) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
- I f
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 052020169_—11-nnn,2
Please fill in any missing data and correct anv errnrc_
3wxCl : "1'r Trans 'at
L=Live stake B=Ball and burls P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=baze Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
aa
gtion, UN
1=unlikely. survive yea, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, STOck, ane, /Unkned, VINE 7
M=missing.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to I Ocm if>2.5m and Omlaf>4m. KNown, specify other.
Printed in the CYS EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05202015-01-0003
Nov 2015 Data o 1 J711 r L�"" ----
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species ^& subsant P**:
04,
Heigh Lut-Off (All sterns shoiter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right): ❑ 1OCm ❑ 50em ❑ 100em ❑ 137em
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS--DBH TREES — DBH
10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- =10
Species Name a 50 cm J100 cm 137 cm s�pl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required ifcct-off>10cm or subsample? 100%.
411 • 2 • 3 ♦ 1 • •S 1:46 6N• r ::8 :: ::0 Fom1WS2,ver9.1
• ••
- — --- -- --- -
*SOURCTt-Trans lant L=Live stake B=B 11 and burlap, P=Potted Tu-Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=U own
E:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
*=unlikely to survive year, o=dead, ANIMaI, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m.

Y
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0003
X-axis: 246 °
# stems: 17
map stze:
LARGE
N\
(0,0) X:5m
-Nuutcta;: l f 1Yans lant L=Live stake B=BaII and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown D.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
l=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 1.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 05202015-01-0004
VMD Year (1-5): 721 Date: / / / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 890062.7158 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 1954555.225 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 210
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: '0 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Nov 2015 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
5
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* * Dama e* Notes
ID Species Name char O.Im 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
75 Quercus phellos O R 2.2 0.3 Missing ❑
76 Platanus occidentalis O R 4.2 0.2 46.0 ❑
77 Betula nigra O R 5.9 0.3 58.0 ❑
78 Betula nigra O R 7.8 0.8 49.0 ❑
79 Platanus occidentalis R 9.5 1.2 55.0 ❑
80 Platanus occidentalis O R 7.8 3.7 Missing ❑
81 Platanus occidentalis O R 5.6 3.2 48.0 ❑
82 Quercus pbellos O R 3.8 2.6 27.0 ❑
83 Platanus occidentalis ® R 2.1 2.0 53.0 ❑
84 Platanus occidentalis O R 0.1 1.3 40.0 ❑
85 Platanus occidentalis ® R 0.5 4.4 54.0 ❑
86 Quercus phellos R 3.1 5.0 45.0 ❑
87 Quercus phellos 0 R 5.4 5.7 27.0 ❑
88 Quercus rubra R 8.2 6.1 16.0 ❑
89 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 9.7 9.4 Missing ❑ El 1
90 Platanus occidentalis R 8.1 9.1 59.0 ❑
91 Platanus occidentalis ® R 7.7 8.5 53.0 ❑
92 Platanus occidentalis O R 2.8 7.8 49.0 ❑
93 Quercus phellos O R 0.8 7.8 Missing ❑
# stems: 19 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Ti=Trans lant L=Live stake B=B 11 and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 10
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
05202015-01-0004
Nov 2015 Data
o
— HEIGHT CLASSES
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddb Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
N
*
ddh
(mm)
Height DBH Re- * *
Vigor Damage Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Exulanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamolin¢**:
Heigh Cut -Off (All sterns shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
D
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Required if cit-off>10cm or subsample? 100%. 01
�;10,
3
• *4
•.
N5
••
�6
••
�7
N
tt8
N
�
0 Form WS2, ver 9.1
:
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown 11
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to I0cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0004
Y:5
{
• 1
X-axis: 210' # stems: 19
map sue:
0 LARGE
N
1
(0,0) X:5111
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burls P --Potted, Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown V. 12
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2—fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
t
l
i
II
(0,0) X:5111
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burls P --Potted, Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown V. 12
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2—fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
t
l

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05202015-01-0005 Pa Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): Date: / / 1 F/ / New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 889560.9106 Datum: NAD8YW
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 1954029.015 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5i X -Axis bearing (deg): I 106
Plot Dimensions: X: 10' Y: 10 LlPlot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Nov 2015 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m Icm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
94
Quercus rubra
O
R
0.1
0.3
40.0
❑
95
Quercus rubra
$)
R
0.1
3.4
58.0
❑
96
Quercus rubra
O
R
0.2
6.6
61.0
❑
97
Quercus rubra
O
R
1.0
9.6
61.0
❑
98
Quercus pbellos
0
R
2.8
7.9
Missin g
❑
99
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.7
5.8
Missing
❑
100
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.6
3.2
49.0
❑
101
Quercus nigra
®
R
2.9
LO
51.0
❑
102
Quercus michauxii
O
R
5.7
1.0
40.0
❑
103
Quercus rubra
©
R
5.7
3.3
53.0
❑
104
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.9
5.6
MissingEl
105
Quercus phellos
®
R
6.8
7.7
MissingF-1
106
Quercus pagoda
O
R
7.7
9.6
22.0
❑
107
Quercus rubra
R
9.4
9.0
59.0
❑
108
Cercis canadensis
R
9.5
6.2
Missin 8
❑
109
Quercus rubra
O
R
9.7
3.6
26.0
❑
110
Quercus phellos
O
R
9.4
1.2
Missin g
❑
111
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.2
9.8
46.0
❑
# stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to IOcm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 7.3.1

Plot (continued): 05202015-01-0005 Nov 2015 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
planation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamolina**:
Height Cut -Off (All sterns shorter than this are ignored. If >10an, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifctioff>1Ocm or subsample? 100%. •I
• •2
• 3
• •
• •4
• •
1 N5
• •
:6
•
♦ •7
N•
81
•-•
•-•0 Fonn WS2, ver9.l
*SOURCE: TrTrans lant L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown 1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=11air, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0005
Y
X-axis: 106 °
N # stems: 18
map size:
LARGE
U
(0,0) X:5m
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 05202015-01-0006
VMD Year (1-5): Fil Date: / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 890785.7802 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 1954563.782 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 218
Please fill in any, missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Nov 2015 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
5
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m ]cm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
112
Quercus rubra
O
R
0.1
0.1
Missing71
113
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.6
0.0
42.0
❑
114
Liriodendron tulipifera
Q
R
5.0
0.3
Missing
❑
115
Platanus occidentalis
Q
R
7.4
0.7
10.0
❑
116
Quercus nigra
R
9.8
1.0
8.0
❑
117
Quercus michauxii
Q
R
7.9
3.7
32.0
❑
118
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.3
3.4
10.0
❑
119
Quercus michauxii
Q
R
2.7
3.3
18.0
❑
120
Quercus michauxii
®
R
0.2
3.4
41.0
❑
121
Betula nigra
O
R
0.7
7.1
66.0
❑
122
Betula nigra
®
R
3.2
7.2
57.0
❑
123
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
5.5
7.2
Missing
❑
124
Quercus michauxii
O
R
8.0
6.9
Missing
❑
125
Platanus occidentalis
R
9.7
9.9
MissingEl
126
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
7.7
9.9
Missing
❑
127
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
4.8
9.8
Missing
❑
128
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
1.9
9.7
Missing
❑
# stems: 17 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME,LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05202015-01-0006 Nov 2015 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Ex lanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamoHi 2**:
Heigh Cut-Off(All stems shorter than thisareignored. if>l0cm,explain why tothe right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifcttoff>1Ocmorsubsample?100%. •I
•2
•
•3
••
••4
• •
NS
••
6
•
�•7
j•
�8
3
•r
0 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Trans lant L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=P _d, Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanical) U=Unknown 17
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0—dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0006
Y:5
X-axis: 218 ° # stems: 17
map size:
LARGE
N
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanical) U=Unknown P. 18
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 05202015-01-0007
VMD Year (1-5): 2 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
L '
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Y: Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
atttude or UTM-N: 889142.07 Datum: NAD83/W
(deadeg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 1953725.702 j UTM Zone: 17NLEE -1] L
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5
X -Axis bearing (deg): ]54
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: ]0
❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 de ree t h
- - "- i taus tanr t �2-
ive stake B=Bal] and burla P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=goofair, *DAMAGE: REMikely to survive year, 0 ad, 19
H missing Arang l Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if 12.5m an0 mli f>4m. KNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
g s o t e right of X
FO.lm
Nov 2015 Data z
°
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID
Species Name
Map
Source* X
O.lm
Height
DBH �
Height DBH Re-
129
Quercus rubra
Icm*
1 cm
cm* Vigor* Damage* Notes
I cm sprout
130
Quercus rubra
O R
0.1 0.0
56.0
❑
131
Quercus rubra
c R
❑
0.2 2.6
65.0
❑
132
Quercus rubra
d R
❑
0.2 4.8
51.0
❑
Quercus michauxii
e R
❑
0.3 7.4
52.0
El133
134
Liriodendron tulipifera
b R
❑
0.1 10.0
43.0
❑
135
Quercus pagoda
O R
2.3 8.1
Missing
❑
136
Quercus rubra
® R
2.3 5.3
63.0
❑
137Missing
Quercus rubra
R
2.3 2.7
❑
138
Quercus phellos
O R
2.1 0.2
Missing
❑
139
Platanus occidentalis
0 R
4.1 1.5
61.0
❑
140
Platanus occidentalis
© R
4.2 3.7
43.0
141
Platanus occidentalis
❑j R
4.4 5.6
58.0
❑
142
Betula nigra
® R
4.6 7.6
45.0
❑
143
Quercus phellos
® R
4.5 9.7
38.0
❑
144
Liriodendron tulipifera
❑r R
6.5 8.1
10.0
❑
145
Betula nigra
@ R
6.4 5.6
32.0
146
Betula nigra
® R
6.4 3.0
41.0
147
Quercus phellos
O R
6.3 0,955.0
E]❑
148
Platanus occidentalis
s R
❑
8.2 1.7
24.0
❑
149
Platanus occidentalis
t R
❑
8.3 3.9
45.0
❑
150
Quercus phellos
O R
8.4 5.5
49.0
151
Quercus phellos
v R
❑
8.5 7.6
34.0
❑
#stems:
23 New Stems, not
w R
❑
included last
8.6 9.7
45.0
❑
year,
but are obviously
planted. If
more space
Species Name
';z--* X Y
Heieht
nm4
needed,
use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form
- - "- i taus tanr t �2-
ive stake B=Bal] and burla P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=goofair, *DAMAGE: REMikely to survive year, 0 ad, 19
H missing Arang l Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if 12.5m an0 mli f>4m. KNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05202015-01-0007
Nov 2015 Data o tni�
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
TT) Sneeies char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-0ff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampline**:
Heigh Cut -Off (All stens shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10ctn ❑ 50cm ❑ 10
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH
10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm -
Species Name c Sed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sap1 0-1 cm 1-2.5
**Required if crtoff >] Ocm or subsample ? 100%.
L— — ---
•l t2 •• 1004 INS *61
m ❑ 13 /cm
TREES — DBH
=10
2.5- 5- (write DBH)
X0 Form W S2, ver 9.1-
*SOURCE:T Trans lant L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root nknown
M=MechanicallU=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/U
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to I Ocm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m.

Y
Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0007 x-axis: 154
# stems: 23
N-0
map size:
LARGE
(0,0) X:5m
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05202015-01-0008 Pa : Role: Date last planted:
VMDYear (1-5): Date: / / / / New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 888878.6851 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 1953408.748 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): r 56
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10, ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Nov 2015 DataZ THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
152
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.1
0.1
48.0
❑
153
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.4
0.3
Missing
❑
154
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.7
0.3
42.0
❑
155
Quercus phellos
®
R
6.9
0.2
40.0
❑
156
Platanus occidentalis
R
9.1
0.0
83.0
❑
157
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
8.3
2.9
Missing
❑
158
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
6.1
3.2
Missing
❑
159
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
3.9
3.2
21.0
❑
160
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
1.7
3.1
40.0
❑
161
Betula nigra
O
R
1.4
6.3
53.0
❑
162
Betula nigra
R
3.7
6.3
Missin 8
❑
163
Betula nigra
0
R
6.2
6.5
30.0
❑
164
Betula nigra
R
8.3
6.2
MissingEl
165
Betula nigra
O
R
9.8
8.8
Missing
❑
166
Betula nigra
O
R
7.4
9.1
71.0
❑
167
Betula nigra
O
R
5.2
9.2
71.0
❑
168
Quercus sp.
O
R
3.2
9.1
Missin g
❑
169
Quercus sp.
®
R
1.1
8.8
45.0
❑
# stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* I cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burls P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 2
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05202015-01-0008 Nov 2015 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Exnlanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamoline**:
Ci ht Cut-OIT(Allstems shorter than this are ignored. If>l0cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
D
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
sub_
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcut-off>10cmor subsample?100%. 01
•2
• 3
• 04
0-05
:46
t•7
�8
0 Form WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 2
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0008
Y:
f
# stems: 18
—7 X-axis: 56 ° N
0//
map size.
LARGE
(
*SOURCE: Tr—Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burls P --Potted, Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=MechanicallU=Unknown p. 24
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown t
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other. i
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
T
1�}
O
O
II
O
©
0
II
(
*SOURCE: Tr—Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burls P --Potted, Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=MechanicallU=Unknown p. 24
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown t
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other. i
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05202015-01-0009 P Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): '-21 Date:/ -7-1- / /
New I rating date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 888860.4046 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 1951982.528 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 50
Plot Dimensions: X: 10' Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Nov 2015 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH N Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm O.lm lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
170
Quercus sp.
O
R
0.1
0.1
Missing1:1
171
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
2.2
0.1
35.0
❑
172
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.3
0.2
60.0
❑
173
Quercus rubra
®
R
6.3
0.3
48.0
❑
174
Quercus phellos
@
R
8.6
0.4
45.0
❑
175
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
7.9
3.1
38.0
❑
176
Quercus rubra
O
R
5.3
3.2
130.0
7.0 ❑
177
Platanus occidentalis
R
2.9
3.6
108.0
6.0 ❑
178
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
0.8
2.9
Missing
❑
179
Quercus phellos
O
R
1.1
5.6
62.0
❑
180
Quercus phellos
R
3.3
5.9
Missing11
181
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.4
5.5
Missing
❑
182
Quercus michauxii
O
R
7.5
5.6
60.0
❑
183
Quercus sp.
O
R
9.4
5.4
45.0
❑
184
Quercus sp.
O
R
9.9
9.1
80.0
❑
185
DONTKNOW: unsure record
R
7.8
8.8
Missin g
❑
186
Quercus michauxii
O
R
5.6
8.7
55.0
❑
187
Quercus michauxii
®
R
3.4
9.0
85.0
❑
188
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
1.4
9.8
62.0
❑
# stems: 19 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 2
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05202015-01-0009
map source X Y
1D Species char (m) (m)
Nov 2015 Data o
ddh Height DBH *
(mm) (cm) (cm) (mm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
planation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamyine**:
el htCut-Of(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50em ❑ 100em ❑ 137em
Species Name
p
C
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sap]
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
"Required ifcuoff>lOcmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•
•3
• •
••4
• •
1 •45
• •
:•6 �•7
• • /��
NE
:-•
)
•-�
10 FoimWS2,va9.1
�-•
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=MechanicallU=Unknown p. 2
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
I=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0009
Y:5
X-axis: 50 ° # stems: 19
0 ���N map size:
( ' ) LARGE
(010) X:5)111
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2—fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 05202015-01-0010
VMD Year (1-5): _21 Date: / / / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 889185.9688 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 1952614.215 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5, X -Axis bearing (deg): � 174
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10i Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Nov 2015 Data z
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1m lcm* 1 cm
189
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.1
0.0
55.0
❑
190
Quercus sp.
©
R
0.3
2.1
Missing
❑
191
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.4
4.2
55.0
❑
192
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.3
6.3
62.0
❑
193
Quercus phellos
®
R
0.2
8.4
50.0
❑
194
Quercus nigra
R
2.2
9.5
58.0
❑
195
Quercus rubra
O
R
2.3
6.6
60.0
❑
196
Quercus rubra
O
R
2.4
3.6
62.0
❑
197
Quercus rubra
®
R
2.4
0.7
35.0
❑
198
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.5
2.0
62.0
❑
199
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
4.5
4.5
60.0
❑
200
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.5
7.4
55.0
❑
201
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
4.5
9.8
62.0
❑
202
Betula nigra
R
6.9
7.4
98.0
❑
203
Betula nigra
O
R
6.9
4.5
25.0
❑
204
Betula nigra
O
R
6.9
1.4
80.0
❑
205
Quercus phellos
®
R
9.2
1.3
25.0
❑
206
Quercus sp.
O
R
9.3
3.1
35.0
❑
207
Quercus sp.
O
R
9.3
5.1
Missing
❑
208
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.4
7.5
64.0
❑
209
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.6
9.6
58.0
❑
# stems:
21 New Stems, not included last
year, but
are obviously
planted.
If more space
X
Y
Height DBH
Species Name
Source*
(m)
(m)
1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor*
needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr -Trans lant L=Live stake B=Ball and burls P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=MechanicallU=Unknown p. 2
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05202015-01-0010 Nov 2015 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Ex Dl a don of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamdim¢**:
Height Cut -Off (All steins shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
C
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBII)
"Required ifcitoff>lOcmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•
•3
• •
••4
• •
•-•5
• •
}-•6
•
t•7 tt8
N-• �N-•
�10 FonnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burls P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 29
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0010
Y:
c
X-axis: 174 ° # stems: 21
map size:
No
LARGE
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P --Potted, Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=MechanicallU=Unlmown p. 30
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DIseased, VINE
M missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other. t
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
ft
�J
O
0
5n
O
I
so
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P --Potted, Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=MechanicallU=Unlmown p. 30
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DIseased, VINE
M missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other. t
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 05202015-01-0011
VMD Year (1-5): 71� Date: / /-T F / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 889598.4073 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 1952446.46 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 164
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y; 10; ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Nov 2015 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Dama e* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
210
Quercus michauxii
O
R
0.1
0.0
50.0
❑
211
Quercus michauxii
O
R
2.2
0.1
50.0
❑
212
Quercus sp.
O
R
4.3
0.1
58.0
❑
213
Cercis canadensis
O
R
6.5
0.1
34.0
❑
214
Quercus michauxii
O
R
8.8
0.2
60.0
❑
215
Quercus rubra
O
R
9.6
2.2
20.0
❑
216
Quercus rubra
@
R
7.3
2.2
48.0
❑
217
Quercus rubra
O
R
4.9
2.3
40.0
❑
218
Quercus sp.
R
2.6
2.4
Missing
❑
219
Quercus michauxii
®
R
0.4
2.3
20.0
❑
220
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.8
4.7
48.0
❑
221
Quercus michauxii
®
R
2.9
4.7
45.0
❑
222
Quercus michauxii
O
R
5.0
4.7
Missing
❑
223
Quercus michauxii
®
R
7.0
4.7
53.0
❑
224
Quercus michauxii
O
R
9.0
4.7
80.0
❑
225
Quercus rubra
O
R
8.1
6.7
40.0
❑
226
Quercus rubra
O
R
5.5
6.7
50.0
❑
227
Quercus rubra
O
R
3.2
6.6
45.0
❑
228
Betula nigra
®
R
1.0
6.6
55.0
❑
229
Betula nigra
O
R
2.1
9.1
92.0
❑
230
Quercus phellos
®
R
5.1
9.1
60.0
❑
231
Quercus phellos
O
R
8.0
9.1
58.0
❑
# stems: 22 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 3
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0 -dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05202015-01-0011 Nov 2015 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species planation of cut-off
& subsamolin¢**:
Height fut-0 ff (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>]Ocm,explain why to the right.): ❑ IOCM ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
D
C
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcutoff>] Ocm or subsample? 100%. 01
•2
•
•• • 3
• #4
••
•-05
••
:6 ♦ •7
• N
�8
)
•-�
0 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanical) U=Unknown p. 3
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2—fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to I Ocm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0011
N'
7 X-axis: 164 °
N-0
# stems: 22
map size:
LARGE
(0,0) X:5m
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if>2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Toot ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05202015-01-0012 P Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): FTI Date: / / _ New lanting date m/yy?
Taxonomic Standard: Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 889560.9684 Datum: NAD83/W
(dem)
Longitude or UTM-E: 1952957.56 UTM Zone: 17N
TM -
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): 108
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Nov 2015 Data ZTHIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH N Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m ]cm* 1 cm * lcm* I cm sprout g g
232
Betula nigra
O
R
0.1
0.2
65.0
❑
233
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
2.7
0.4
Missing
❑
234
Quercus sp.
O
R
5.5
0.3
64.0
❑
235
Platanus occidentalis
R
8.3
0.3
60.0
❑
236
Platanus occidentalis
R
8.2
2.9
61.0
❑
237
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
5.9
2.7
20.0
❑
238
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
3.7
2.7
38.0
❑
239
Betula nigra
®
R
1.5
2.6
MissingF-1
240
Liriodendron tulipifem
®
R
0.5
4.9
Missing1:1
241
Quercus phellos
®
R
2.9
4.9
MissingEl
242
Platanus occidentalis
Oj
R
5.4
5.0
Missing
❑
243
Liriodendron tulipifera
R
7.7
5.6
Missin g
❑
244
Quercus phellos
O
R
9.4
7.0
12.0
❑
245
Quercus phellos
O
R
7.5
9.1
43.0
❑
246
Quercus phellos
®
R
5.7
8.1
25.0
0
247
Quercus rubra
Q
R
4.6
9.0
55.0
❑
248
Quercus sp.
O
R
3.6
7.7
Missing
249
Quercus sp.
©
R
1.5
7.7
Missing
❑
250
Platanus occidentalis
G)
R
1.0
9.5
33.0
❑
# stems: 19 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05202015-01-0012 Nov 2015 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & sobsamoline*:
Ci htCut-Oti(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
[21
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sap]
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcit-off >1Ocm or subsample ? 100%. 101
•2
•
• 3
••
• 164
••
•45
••
♦-•6 ♦ •7 �8
•• N
t�3
•,•
0 FormWS2,ver 9.l
*SOURCE: Tr–Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=MechanicallU=Unknown p. 3
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0–dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05202015-01-0012
Y:
t
a
X-axis: 108 ° N # stems: 19
\� map size:
ULARGE r
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burls P --Potted, Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 36
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 24air, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
t
0
0
5n
II
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burls P --Potted, Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown p. 36
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 24air, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
t

APPENDIX F
Photo Stations
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

f -�
f
I
1
1
1
{
1

Appendix F.
Cedar Grove Photo Stations
Photo Station 1
Photo Station 1 North (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 1 East (11/12/2015)
Appendix F. Photo Stations
Photo Station 1 South (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 1 West (11/12/2015)

Cedar Grove Photo Stations
Photo Station 2
Photo Station 2 North (11/12/2015)
Appendix F. Photo Stations
Photo Station 2 South (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 2 East (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 2 West (11/12/2015)

Cedar Grove Photo Stations
Photo Station 3
Photo Station 3 North (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 3 East (11/12/2015)
Appendix F. Photo Stations
Photo Station 3 South (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 3 West (11/12/2015)

Cedar Grove Photo Stations
Photo Station 4
Photo Station 4 North (11 / 12/2015)
Appendix F. Photo Stations
Photo Station 4 South (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 4 East (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 4 West (11/12/2015)

Cedar Grove Photo Stations
Photo Station 5
Photo Station 5 North (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 5 East (11/12/2015)
Appendix F. Photo Stations
Photo Station 5 South (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 5 West (11/12/2015)

Cedar Grove Photo Stations
Photo Station 6
P;
6
Appendix F. Photo Stations
Photo Station 6 North (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 6 South (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 6 East (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 6 West (11/12/2015)
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
t
t
I
l
l
l
I
1
l
l
l
t
l
l
l

Cedar Grove Photo Stations
Photo Station 7
Photo Station 7 North (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 7 East (11/12/2015)
Appendix F. Photo Stations
Photo Station 7 South (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 7 West (11/12/2015)

Cedar Grove Photo Stations
Photo Station 8
Appendix F. Photo Stations
Photo Station 8 South (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 8 East (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 8 West (11/12/2015)

Cedar Grove Photo Stations
Photo Station 9
Photo Station 9 North (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 9 East (11/12/2015)
Appendix F. Photo Stations
Photo Station 9 South (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 9 West (11/12/2015)

Cedar Grove Photo Stations
Photo Station 10
Photo Station 10 North (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 10 East (11/12/2015)
Appendix F. Photo Stations
Photo Station 10 South (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 10 West (11/12/2015)

Appendix F. Photo Stations
Cedar Grove Photo Stations
Photo Station 11
Photo Station 11 North (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 11 South (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 11 East (11/12/2015) Photo Station 11 West (11/12/2015)

Cedar Grove Photo Stations
Photo Station 12
Photo Station 12 North (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 12 East (11/12/2015)
Appendix F. Photo Stations
Photo Station 12 South (11/12/2015)
Photo Station 12 West (11/12/2015)

APPENDIX G
Correspondence Letters
NO Al
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

i
r
C
l
l
1.
1,
l
1.
l
l.�

fi*LA)W�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
June 22, 2015
Ms. Daniel Ingram
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
DWR Project #: 2011-0720v2
Orange County
Re: Upper Neuse River Basin Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (LIMBI)
Cedar Grove Bank Credit Release — Task 2
Dear Mr. Ingram:
On October 2, 2012, the Division of Water Resources (DWR), approved a Bank Parcel
Development Package (BPDP) for the Cedar Grove Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank
Parcel submitted by Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX) and affiliate of Resource
Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES).
On June 9, 2015, Katie Merritt with DWR received documentation from EBX that the subject site
had been constructed in its entirety and monitoring plots had been established. On June 15, 2015,
Ms. Merritt, with assistance from Brian Hockett with RES, inspected the site and confirmed that
most of the subject site had been completely planted and monitoring devices had been established in
accordance with the BPDP. However, planted areas adjacent to Pond A and Pond B, as well as
along the ephemeral channel label "Feature B" are not creditable for riparian buffer mitigation or
nutrient offset under the UMBI, and therefore must be removed from the Bank. Additionally, the
enhancement area along Feature B proposed for buffer mitigation must also be removed. A map
showing these features are attached to this letter for reference. The credits being released have been
modified to reflect any changes to the creditable acreage as proposed in the BPDP.
According to the UMBI signed on February 10, 2012, the following Project Milestones have been
met, and the corresponding credits shall be released:
Task/Milestones
Credit
2) Mitigation Site Earthwork, Planting and Installation of Monitoring 20%
Devices Completed
Division of Water Resources - 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer - Made in part by recycled paper

By copy of this correspondence, DWR confirms that you have satisfied the above requirements for
the above -referenced tract and 20% of your Neuse riparian buffer credits (0.2 x 640,486 ft2 =
128,097.2 ft2) minus 4,325.2 ft2 yields 123,772 ft2 available for sale. Additionally, 20% of your
nitrogen nutrient offset credits (0.2 x 55,052.54 lb -N = 11,010.51 lb -N) minus 1,472.92 lbs -N yields
9,537.59 lbs -N available for sale. Lastly, 20% of your phosphorous nutrient offset credits (0.2 x
3,545.81 lb -P = 709.16 lb -P) minus 94.87 lbs -P yields 614.291bs-P available for sale.
Please note that nutrient offset credits generated at this site must be used for impacts in HUC
03020201 of the Neuse River Basin which includes only the Upper and Lower Falls
Watersheds as defined in 15A NCAC 02B.0276. Additionally, the riparian buffer credits
must be used for impacts in the Neuse River Basin according to guidelines in the new
Temporary Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule, 15A NCAC 02B.0295, which became
effective on October 24, 2014.
Please feel free to call Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
KAH/km
cc:File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Cara Conder — EBX (via electronic mail)

91
fail -
9
CEDAR GROVE NIMGAIION srmEcoEnglneeTng-"
ORANGE COUNTY. NORTH CAROIRVA
iiA
MOVIL PROFOSM MWW Mn%R & WMMW MWr R-MRAMN

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
'rTAiF.S OF P' •
May 13, 2014
Regulatory Division/ I 200A
Action ID: SAW -2012-00294
Mr. Norton Webster
Environmental Banc and Exchange, L.L.C.
Project Manager
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Dear Mr. Webster:
This correspondence is in reference to the Cedar Grove Mitigation Bank Site you are
developing -located off of McDade Store Road (NCSR 1354), just northwest of its intersection
with Rick Road in Orange County, North Carolina, within the Neuse River Basin, Hydrologic
Unit Code (HUC) 03020201. The purpose of this letter is to confirm the initial release of credits
from this Bank.
Pursuant to the approved stream restoration mitigation plan entitled, Cedar Grove Mitigation
Site, dated December 2013, including the Performance Bond received on May 1, 2014 and the
Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) entitled, Neu -Con Umbrella Wetland Mitigation and
Stream Restoration Bank, dated March 8, 2001, fifteen percent (15%) of the Bank's total
restoration credits shall be available for sale immediately upon completion of all of the
following:
a. Execution of the MBI by the Sponsor, the Corps, and other agencies eligible for
membership in the IRT who chose to execute the agreement;
b. Approval of the final mitigation plan;
c. Delivery of the financial assurance described in Section III, Part F, Paragraph 1 of the
MBI;
d. Recordation of the preservation mechanism described in section III, part G of the MBI,
as well as a title opinion covering the property acceptable to the Corps.
Printed on Recycled Paper

By copy of this correspondence, we confirm that you have satisfied the above requirements
and 1090.5 linear feet of stream credits constituting 15% of the Bank's total restoration credits
are now available for sale. Please be reminded that you must also complete the initial physical
and biological improvements to the bank site pursuant to the mitigation plan no later than the
first full growing season following initial debiting of the Bank.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact
Andrew Williams at the Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone], extension 26.
Sincerely,
S .
fjle/an B. Gibby
Chief, Raleigh Regulatory
Field Office
Copies Furnished:
Mr. Todd Allen Bowers
Wetlands Regulatory Section
US EPA Region 4
Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, GA 30303-8960
Mrs. Kathy Matthews
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Mr. Fritz Rohde
National Marine Fisheries Service
101 Pivers Island
Beaufort, NC 28516

Mr. Eric W. Kulz
Stream/Wetland Mitigation Coordinator
NC Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Ms. Shari Bryant
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Post Office Box 129
Sedalia, NC 27342-0129
Mr. Todd Tugwell
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
11405 Falls of Neuse Road
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Mr. Bill Biddlecome
Washington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West 5th Street
Washington, NC 27889
Mr. Carl Pruitt
Assistant District Counsel
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
69 Darlington Ave.
Wilmington, NC 28403
3