Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
NC0063860_Report_20190215 (2)
AL wr.•�f" February 15, 2019 NCDENR / DWQ/ Water Quality Permitting NPDES Complex Permitting, Wastewater Branch Attention: David Hill 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Re: Aqua North Carolina, Inc. Harbor Estates Wastewater Treatment Plant NPDES No. NC 0063860 Mr. Hill, RECENED1DENR/DWR FEB 21 2019 Water Resources Permitting Section Enclosed is a hard copy of the Cormix model report for Harbor Estates Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). Should you need any additional information or assistance, please feel free to contact me at aaowens@aquaamerica.com or at 919-653-6965. Best regards, Amanda Berger Manager of Environmental Compliance Eric: Cormix Model Report Harbor Estates WWTP Outfall Plans 202 MacKenan Court, Cary, NC, 27511 - 919.467.8712 - AquaAmerica.com Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP Prepared by Jerry K. Snyder, P.E., DEE, DWRE for Aqua North Carolina, Inc. February 2019 02/06/2019 Jerry K. Snyder, P.E. Date Typed Name Pennsylvania P.E. License No. PE032686E Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY.........................................................................................................I 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................1 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING OUTFALL...............................................................2 1.3 PURPOSE OF DILUTION MODELING STUDY.....................................................3 2.0 MODELING APPROACH.................................................................................................3 2.1 MODELING OBJECTIVES........................................................................................3 2.2 MODELED CONDITIONS.........................................................................................3 2.3 INPUT DATA..............................................................................................................7 3.0 MODEL RESULTS..........................................................................................................13 4.0 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS.............................................................................................15 5.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................16 5.0 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................18 6.0 ATTACHMENTS.............................................................................................................20 LIST OF TABLES 1 Discharge Limits for Harbor Estates WWTP NPDES Permit # NCO063860.................2 2 Outfall Pipe Configuration..............................................................................................3 3 CORMIX Model Scenarios.............................................................................................4 4 Measured Data for Lake Wylie and Harbor Estates........................................................7 5 Water Density Calculations.............................................................................................8 6 Zone of Initial Dilution (ZID) Calculations..................................................................10 7A Harbor Estates CORMIX2 Input Data.......................................................................... I I 7B Harbor Estates CORMIX 1 Input Data..........................................................................12 8 Water Quality Criteria...................................................................................................13 9 Input Concentrations and Water Quality Criteria.........................................................13 10 Dilution and Distance Required to Meet Water Quality Criteria..................................17 11 Dilution Achieved at the Zone of Initial Dilution Distance..........................................17 12 Sensitivity Analysis Summary for Harbor Estates........................................................19 13 Proposed Effluent Limits for Harbor Estates................................................................19 LIST OF FIGURES 1 Facility Location Map.....................................................................................................5 2 Outfall Pipe Construction Drawing.................................................................................6 3 Plan View of Plume from Harbor Estates Outfall...............................................................10 Modeling Plan for Harbor Estates WWTP —NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 Dilution vs. Distance from Outfall................................................................................14 In -Stream Waste Concentration along Plume Centerline — Harbor Estates ...........................15 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS CORMIX Input and Output Files ii Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP —NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the first revision of a modeling report that was submitted in November 2018. In response to comments from NCDEQ, the following changes were implemented and are reported in this report: 1. The contraction ratio used in the model for the slotted openings in the pipe is now 0.6. 2. The Zone of Initial Dilution (ZID) is now calculated based on a single opening or port rather than the sum of the port areas. 3. Sensitivity analyses were performed. a. Restricted the number of openings to 9 (from 30) to simulate clogging of the diffuser. b. Restricted the number of openings to 21 (from 30) to simulate clogging of the diffuser. c. Simulated the effect of a double -ended break in the 3-inch diameter discharge pipe. The mixing behavior of the Harbor Estates WWTP discharge into Lake Wylie was simulated using the CORMIX model. Three discharge constituents were modeled, chloride, copper, and zinc. A generic simulation was also performed that could be applied to any constituent in the discharge. The simulations indicated that the slotted diffuser at the end of the outfall pipe. is highly effective at creating rapid mixing and dilution within a short distance of the outfall. A zone of initial dilution (ZID) was calculated as 0.9 meters based on the outfall configuration. The ZID is an initial mixing area within a short distance from the outfall. Based on a dilution factor of 15.9 achieved at the ZID and accounting for background concentrations where applicable, discharge limits for chloride (2,898 mg/L), copper (0.0285 mg/L), and zinc (0.3776 mg/L) are proposed. The proposed discharge limits will allow the most stringent water quality criteria to be met within the ZID distance. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND This Dilution Modeling Report presents the results of a dilution modeling study performed in accordance with a Modeling Plan submitted in September 2018 and approved on October 4, 2018. Some information provided in the Modeling Plan is included in this Modeling Report for completeness. Aqua North Carolina, Inc. operates the Harbor Estates Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) under NPDES Permit NCO063860. The WWTP treats 100% domestic wastewater from the Harbor Estates. The WWTP is located on Pine Harbor Road (NCSR1113), Charlotte 28278, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The WWTP is permitted to discharge up to 0.0416 million gallons per day (MGD). The average discharge flow rate in 2017 was 0.0124 MGD. The current discharge limits for Harbor Estates for chloride, copper, and zinc are listed in Table 1 below. Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 Table 1 Discharge Limits for Harbor Estates WWTP NPDES Permit # NCO063860 Parameter Monthly Average I Units Daily Maximum I Units Flow 0.0416 MGD1 Total Chloride 230 mg/L2 230 mg/L2 Total Copper 7.88 ug/L3 10.47 ug/L3 Total Zinc 125.7 ug/L3 125.7 ug/L3 Notes: 1. MGD is million gallons per day 2. mg/L is milligrams per liter 3. ug/L is micrograms per liter 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING OUTFALL The WWTP discharges treated domestic wastewater to Lake Wylie in the Catawba River Basin through a permitted outfall pipe. Lake Wylie is classified as WS-III & B (Water Supply III and Full Contact Recreation). A location map showing the locations of the facility and the outfall pipe is included as Figure 1 below. The outfall is a 3-inch diameter slotted polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe that ends in Lake Wylie 210 feet from the shore. A construction drawing showing the profile of the outfall pipe is included as Figure 2 below. The pipe ends with two 20-foot sections of PVC pipe. The end section is capped and filled with concrete, presumably to anchor the pipe on the bottom. The adjacent section of pipe has slotted perforations covering the length of the 20-foot section. These were described as being approximately 1/8-inch wide and 4 inches long at 1-inch spacing on the crown (top) of the pipe. The end sections of pipe were inspected and cleaned in July 2017. According to one of the divers, the pipe was located under 30-35 feet of water. Based upon the construction drawing of the pipe profile and the United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.) Lake Wylie, NC Quadrangle Map, the depth at the endo of the pipe is 20 feet. This is the ambient depth that was used in the CORMIX model scenarios. On occasion the concentrations of total chloride and total copper have exceeded the permit limit of 230 mg/L and 7.88 ug/L respectively. The basic configuration of the outfall is described in Table 2 below. 2 Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP —NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 Table 2 Outfall Pipe Configuration Harbor Estates Location Lake Wylie Orientation of pipe Horizontal on bottom Distance from Shore, feet 210 Diameter, inches 3 Diffuser Perforated Pipe (slotted) Material PVC Easement Width, feet 24 1.3 PURPOSE OF DILUTION MODELING STUDY In 2017 the Facility exceeded its monthly average limit for the concentration of total chloride and total copper in September and December. The measurements of copper in September and December were 38 ug/L and 21 ug/L respectively while the Monthly Average limit for total copper is 7.88 ug/L. The total chloride concentrations measured in September and December 2017 were 570 mg/L and 405 mg/L respectively while the Monthly Average limit for total chloride is 230 mg/L. This study will establish effluent dilution credits for total chloride, total copper, and total zinc. The objective will be to determine the in -stream waste concentration (IWC) at various distances from the end of the discharge pipe. The distance where the permitted concentrations are met will be determined as an objective of this dilution study. This will be the basis for a recommended dilution credit. The dilution credit will be an allowance of end -of -pipe concentrations greater than the permit value as long as the permitted concentrations are achieved within a short distance from the end of the pipe. Dilution credits may be developed and applied to other constituents as well. 2.0 MODELING APPROACH 2.1 MODELING OBJECTIVES The objective of the modeling study is to simulate the behavior of the discharge plume from the outfall. The simulation will allow evaluation of the IWC of total chloride, total copper, and total zinc in the discharged water as the plume mixes with ambient water. Although total chloride, total copper, and total zinc are the main constituent of interest in this study, the simulation results will be general and could be applied to any constituent in the discharged water. 2.2 MODELED CONDITIONS The simulations were accomplished using a well -established and accepted hydrodynamic model, Cornell Mixing Zone Expert System (CORMIX). The CORMIX model was used to simulate the plume behavior of the existing discharge under existing conditions. The model was be used to develop a steady-state concentration profile along the discharge plume centerline. 3 Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 The location and distance from the end of the outfall pipe where the permitted total chloride, total copper, and total zinc concentrations are met was determined. A total of four simulations were performed, to simulate the IWCs of total chloride, total copper, total zinc, and a generalized non-specific (generic) parameter. Since the pumps cycle on an off with the treated effluent level in the pump tank, a single instantaneous pumping rate was used in the model to represent the discharge flow rate. This reflects the actual mixing behavior at the outfall pipe while the discharge is active. The instantaneous pumping rate is independent of the flow rate passing through the treatment plant. If the average daily flow to the plant changes, the pumps cycle more or less frequently, but the instantaneous pumping rate while the pumps are on will remain the same. Specific model runs were made for total chloride, total copper, and total zinc. The parameter -specific simulations accounted for the background concentration of total chloride, total copper, and total zinc in the ambient environment when present. A generalized plume simulation assumed 100% as the discharge concentration and 0% in the background concentration. The results of the generalized simulation can be used to calculate the IWC of any constituent in the discharged water by multiplying the model -predicted percentage concentration in the plume by the concentration of that constituent at the end of the pipe. The four model scenarios are summarized in Table 3 below. In addition to the baseline simulations, three sensitivity analysis simulations were performed. These included two simulations of partial blockage of the slotted openings in the outfall pipe and one scenario simulating the behavior of an open-ended rupture of the 3-inch outfall pipe. Table 3 CORAUX Model Scenarios Discharge Modeled Discharge Flow 1 Constituent Concentration Units (gpm) Total 83 Chloride 230 ug/L Total 83 Copper 10.47 ug/L 83 Total Zinc 125.7 ug/L Generalized 83 Parameter 100 1. The instantaneous pumping rate will be used for all scenarios. 4 Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates W W TP — NPDES 4NCO063860 February2019 Figure 1 Facility Location Map �--_. ` � r. �+� % � . Shuplon Rd N• r iti J ! uY kp ovlmate b_ , Facility Boundary ne t tr outf001a11 �v ? - _ r �S f< Uoe� r/ f\ Catawba River (Lake W}Lc) [flows south] -. s Aqua North Carolina, Inc. Facility Harbor Estates W WTP Location jEdW Nine Harbor Road 04CSR 113L Charlotte 28278 Scale I�:aooa RRel.kn 4nyn; Cmvb Rigel ewl'livl u....,-aw; wsv:9 M. QW1011so! NPDES Permit NC0063860 !s•oroo^ lcr : el^Rrss• 1VOith �� &RUEd `''-'-�_A'=-la=: ONSErLate gyve Mecklenburg County 5 Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP —NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 Figure 2 Outfall Pipe Construction Drawing Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 2.3 INPUT DATA The CORMIX model is a hydrodynamic computer code that simulates the behavior of hydraulic plume or "jets" in various ambient environments. It has been applied extensively to model or simulate the behavior of water discharges into lakes and stream environments. The model calculates utilizes data on the discharge configuration, ambient environment, and relative densities between the ambient water and the discharged water. The CORMIX model has separate modules to simulate submerged single -port discharges (CORMIXI), submerged multi - port diffusers (CORMIX2), and buoyant surface discharges (CORMIX3). The CORMIX2 module will be used for this study. CORMIX models the concentrations of constituents in water, no matter which units of measure are used, as the concentrations above background. Therefore, if there is a non -zero background (ambient) concentration of any modeled constituent, that background concentration is subtracted from the discharge concentration and the water quality criterion as well. For interpretation of the calculated model output concentrations, the background concentrations are added to the predicted plume concentrations. Because both the discharge concentration and water quality criteria are adjusted for background levels, the dilution factors (S) calculated by the model is the ratio of the adjusted discharge concentration to the adjusted water quality criterion. In addition to the model scenarios listed in Table 3 above, two additional scenarios were run. These represented the maximum chloride and copper concentrations reported in September 2017. Additional water samples were collected on October 11, 2018 and analyzed for use in this dilution modeling study. These are listed in Table 4 below. Table 4 Measured Data for Lake Wylie and Harbor Estates October 11, 2018 Measurement Location Parameter Value Units Effluent Temperature 23 °C Effluent Total Dissolved Solids 834 mg/L Effluent Chloride 205 mg/L Effluent Copper 0.037 mg/L Effluent Zinc 0.079 mg/L Upstream Temperature 24 °C Upstream Total Dissolved Solids 34 mg/L Upstream Chloride 6.3 mg/L Upstream Copper <0.005 mg/L U pstream Zinc 0.014 mg/L Downstream Temperature 25 °C Downstream Total Dissolved Solids 41 mg/L Downstream Chloride 8.3 mg/L Downstream Copper <0.005 mg/L Downstream Zinc <0.010 mg/L Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 In Table 4, the measurements reported as less than, indicated by the "<" symbol were treated as zero. The downstream samples were not used as their location was not provided. Water Density Calculations The behavior of the discharge plume modeled in CORMIX is affected by the energy (velocity) of the discharged jet and the relative density of the discharged water and the receiving water. These densities were calculated from the measured total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration and temperatures measured on October 11, 2018. These are summarized in Table 5 below. Table 5 Harbor Estates Water Densities Total Dissolved Solids, TDS Temperature 1 Density mg/L °C kg/m3 Discharge 834 23 998.174 Lake Wylie 34 24 997.325 1. Density was calculated from Sea Water Equation of State online calculator, http://fermi.jhuapl.edu/denscaic.htmi. Discharse Rate The discharge rate was calculated from the measured time required for the discharge pump to draw down a holding tank between the upper and lower set points on the tank. The 46-inch diameter tank was drawn down 23 inches in 2 minutes. This resulted from a pumping rate of 83 gallons per minute (gpm) or 0.120 million gallons per day (mgd). Downstream Velocity The downstream velocity was calculated from the relative drainage areas between the discharge location at Pine Run (2810 square miles, s.mi.) and the Catawba River near Rock Hill, SC (U.S.G.S., gage 02146000 drainage area 3050 s.mi.) and the average annual flow at the gage station (3,895 cubic feet per second, cfs) based on five years of daily discharge data. The calculated average annual flow along the Catawba River at Pine Run is 3,589 cfs. The cross -sectional area of the Catawba River was measured from a U.S.G.S. Quadrangle map (Lake Wylie, SC, 7.5-minute quadrangle, 1993) as 44,500 square feet, s.f. The calculated downstream velocity if 0.08 feet per second, fps. Diffuser Configuration The diffuser at the end of the discharge pipe consists of a 20-foot section of 3-inch diameter PVC pipe. The diffuser was modeled as 10 groups of three openings on the top of the pipe. Each opening was 1/8- inch wide and 4 inches long, which gave it an opening area of 0.5 square inches (in 2) and an equivalent diameter of 0.798 inches (0.0665 feet for model input) for each opening. The total opening area for the 30 openings is 15 in and the equivalent diameter is 4.37 inches. Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 Diffuser Orientation The diffuser is perpendicular to the orientation of the Catawba River. The origin for the coordinate system for model output is at the middle of the diffuser pipe on the bottom. The coordinates are oriented as follows. The downstream direction of flow is the positive X direction. The opposite river bank is the positive Y direction, and straight up from the bottom is the positive Z direction. Figure 3 shows the dimensions of the plume originating from the diffuser pipe. The plume originates on the left side and proceeds toward the right (southerly). Zone of Initial Dilution WD) The ZID is a limited area around a discharge pipe or outfall where the water quality criteria for toxic constituents may be exceeded as long as the criteria are met at the edge of this limited zone and the limited nature of the ZID allows for passage of aquatic life around the zone. The dimensions of the ZID can be calculated as the minimum of 5*ambient depth or 50*discharge length scale (DLS). The DLS is defined as the square root of the area of a single discharge port or opening. Based on a port area of 0.5 in' and an ambient depth of 35.25 feet, the ZID for the diffuser is 2.95 feet (0.90 meters). The limiting factor is the port opening area, which is 0.5 square inches. Table 6 below shows the calculation of the ZID distance for Harbor Estates. Note that the ZID used for the sensitivity analysis scenario simulating an open-ended break of the 3-inch outfall pipe was 3.38 meters, which reflects the 3-inch opening in that case. Table 7 below lists the input values used in the generalized model scenario. Only the discharge concentration and water quality criterion values, listed in Table 4, changed for the other scenarios. Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP —NPDES #NC0063860 February2019 Figure 3 Plan View of Plume from Harbor Estates Outfall Horizontal Plume Trajectory and Width 4 v 3 Left Edge of Plume a 2 CJ E 1 m Plume Centerline p -2 E -3 __ _ Right Edge of Plume w -4 --- - 0 w 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 eu ,$ Downstream Distance from Outfall, Meters Table 6 Zone of Initial Dilution IZIDI for Harbor Estates Diffuser Discharge Length Scale, Avg. Depth at Zone of Initial Zone of Initial Harbor Estates Area DIS SO DLS Discharge 5x Depth Dilution, ZID Dilution, ZID (s.f.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (m) One opening(0.5 in2) 0.0035 0.059 2.95 20.00 100.00 2.95 0.90 Open 3-inch diameter discharge pipe 0.0491 0.222 11.08 20.00 100.00 11.08 3.38 Note: The ZID was adjusted forthe sensitivity run simulating an open 3-inch diameter pipe. The model input values are listed in Table 7A below. 10 Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 W....__.._.._ _... _ _...._W_...-... Table 7A Harbor Estates CORMIX2 Input Data Module: CORMIX2 Submerged Mulit-Port Diffuser TAB INPUT DATA UNITS OF MEASURE Project Tab Name: Harbor Estates - Lake Wylie Scenario: Generalized Ambient Tab Average Depth: 20 feet Discharge Depth: 19.67 feet Ambient Velocity: 0.08 feet per second, fps Bounded/Unbounded Bounded Width: 600 feet Manning's n: 0.025 Wind Speed: 0 meters/second, m/s Ambient Density Data Fresh/Uniform Water Density: 997.325 kilograms per meter squared, kg/m2 Effluent Tab . Flow Rate: 0.120 million gallons per day, MGD Concentration: 100 percent, % Discharge Density 998.174 kilograms per meter squared, kg/m2 Pollutant Type: Conservative Discharge Tab Nearest Bank: Left Diffuser Length: 20 feet Distance to one endpoint: 200 feet Distance to other endpoint: 220 feet Port Height: 0.25 feet Port Diameter: 0.0665 feet Contraction Ratio: 0.6 Total No. of Openings: 30 Alignment Angle Gamma (y): 90 degrees, ° Tab - No. of Nozzles per Riser Several No. of Nozzles per Riser: 3 Tab - Net Horizontal Momentum Flux Zero Nozzles orientation: Same Direction Mixing Zone Tab Toxic/NonToxic NonToxic WQStandard NoWQStandard (for generalized parameter scenario) Specified Mixing Zone Tab Mixing Zone Specified Distance: 0.90 meters Region of Interest 2000 meters Grid Intervals for Display 200 No. of Display Steps 11 Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 Table 76 Harbor Estates CORMIXi Input Data Module: CORMIXiSubmemed Sinele Port Discharge TAB INPUT DATA UNITS OF MEASURE Project Tab Name: Harbor Estates - Lake Wylie Open -Ended Break of 3-inch Outfall Pipe Scenario: Generalized Ambient Tab Average Depth: 20 feet Discharge Depth: 19.67 feet Ambient Velocity: 0.08 feet per second, fps Bounded/Unbounded Bounded Width: 600 feet Manning's n: 0.025 Wind Speed: 0 meters/second, m/s Ambient Density Data Fresh/Uniform Water Density: 997.325 kilograms per meter squared, kg/ mZ Effluent Tab Flow Rate: 0.120 million gallons per day, MGD Concentration: 100 percent, Discharge Density 998.174 kilograms per meter squared, kg/m2 Pollutant Type: Conservative Discharge Tab Nearest Bank: Left Distance to Nearest Bank: 200 feet Port Height: 0.25 feet Port Diameter: 0.25 feet Vertical Angle Theta (0): 0 degrees, ° Horizontal Angle Sigma (s) 90 degrees, ° Mixing Zone Tab Toxic/NonToxic NonToxic WQStandard No WQStandard (for generalized parameter scenario) Specified Mixing Zone Tab Mixing Zone Specified Distance: 0.90 meters Region of Interest 2000 meters Grid Intervals for Display 200 No. of Display Steps 12 Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 Water Quality Criteria and Background Concentrations Lake Wylie is classified as WS III/B water uses. Class WS III is a water supply classification and B is for primary contact recreation. In addition, there are chronic and acute limits that apply to freshwater aquatic life. Table 8 below lists the water quality criteria for chloride copper and .zinc for Lake Wylie. Table 8 Water Quality Criteria FW Aquatic Parameter Units B WS III Chronic Acute Background Chloride mg/L N/A 250 230 230 6.3 Copper' ug/L N/A N/A 2.26 2.95 0 Zinc' ug/L N/A N/A 30.21 29.97 14 1. A hardness value of 20 mg/L as CaCO3 was used to calculate the criterion for copper. 2. A hardness value of 20 mg/L as CaCO3 was used to calculate the criterion for zinc. Adiustments for Background Concentrations The input concentrations for chloride, copper, and zinc adjusted for background concentrations are listed in Table 9 below. Table 9 Input Concentrations and Water Quality Criteria Adjusted for Background Concentration Parameter Units Discharge Concentration above Background Water Quality Criterion above background Scenario Name Chloride mg/L 223.7 223.7 Daily Max. Chloride Copper mg/L 0.01047 0.002 Daily Max. Copper Zinc mg/L 0.1117 0.016 Daily Max. Zinc Max. Chloride mg/L 563.7 223.7 Highest Measured Chloride Max. Copper mg/L 0.038 0.002 Highest Measured Copper 3.0 MODEL RESULTS The slotted diffuser creates rapid mixing and significant dilution within short distances from the outfall pipe. A dilution factor, S, is defined, for the purposes of CORMIX, to be the discharge concentration divided by the in -stream concentration at a location along the plume centerline. For example, if the dilution factor is 25, the concentration at the plume centerline is 4 % of the discharge concentration. 13 Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 Generic Simulation Results A plot of the calculated dilution factor versus distance from the outfall pipe is shown in Figure 4. Note that all output from CORMIX is in metric units even though it does allow input of English units for most parameter values. The CORMIX model converts all input values to metric units for processing. Figure 5 is a corresponding plot of the Instream Waste Concentration (IWC) versus distance from the outfall pipe. Figure 5 is based on the discharge concentration of 100% and can be applied to any constituent in the discharged water. 14 Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 Figure 5 In -Stream Waste Concentration along Plume Centerline — Harbor Estates 100 _ 90 80 70 0 'P 60 L s0 40 0 u 30 aj 20 10 E a, 0 40 c Instream Waste Concentration (IWC) vs. Distance from Outfall at Harbor Estates 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Downstream (X) Distance from Outfall, Meters Note that the concentration is greatest at the centerline of the plume and drops of with increased lateral distance from the centerline. Therefore, the IW_C illustrated in Figure 5 above is the maximum concentration at the distance from the outfall. The results of the generic parameter simulation are listed in Tables 10 and 11. Table 10 lists the distance from the diffuser required to meet the most stringent water quality standard based upon the current discharge limits. Using the same discharge concentrations as Table 10, Table 11 summarizes the concentrations of chloride, copper, and zinc at the ZD distance of 0.9 meters. The impact from the maximum measured discharge concentrations of chloride and copper are also included in Tables 10 and 11. Parameter -Specific Model Results Three scenarios were run showing calculated in -stream concentrations of chloride, copper, and zinc. Two additional scenarios were run using the maximum chloride and copper concentration measured in the discharge. Since CORMIX evaluates excess concentration (i.e., concentrations above background levels, if present) the discharge concentrations and water quality criteria were reduced by the measured background levels of chloride and zinc. There was no copper measured in the background water sample. The results of the parameter -specific scenarios are summarized on Tables 10 and 11. In the case where the discharge concentration of total copper was .038 mg/L (38 ug/L), the in -stream copper limit of 0.002 mg/1 was not met at 0.9 m from the diffuser. In other words, a discharge limit for copper should be less than 0.038 mg/L. The recommended permit limits are discussed in Section 5 below. 4.0 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Three sensitivity analyses were performed. Two of these were intended to evaluate the effect of loss of clogging of some of the openings in the diffuser and of an open-ended break of the outfall pipe. Based 15 Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 on the description of the diffuser from a diver who inspected the pipe, the existing diffuser pipe is simulated as having 30 slotted openings on the top of the pipe in 10 groups of 3 openings. The sensitivity analysis scenarios simulating clogging used 9 open ports and 21 open ports. The configuration of three slots was maintained. The third sensitivity analysis scenario simulated an open- ended rupture of the outfall pipe. The simulation involving 9 openings resulted in the highest exit velocities since all the flow was being passed through only 9 of the 30 openings. Since the slots are located across the top of the pipe, the center slot is directed upward and the other two slots direct flow vertically upward but angled slightly upstream and downstream. In the 9-opening scenario the jets angles slightly in the upstream direction created a plume in the upstream (negative X) direction. That is why there are two entries under the 9-opening scenario. In the open-ended rupture scenario, the plume is directed in a direction perpendicular to the River bank (the positive Y direction). Note that the ZID applies in any direction from the discharge opening. The sensitivity analyses were run for the generic case as well as the parameter -specific cases. The generic cases are summarized in Table 12 below. The input and output files for all sensitivity analysis simulations, including the parameter -specific cases, are included in Attachment 1. For comparison, the IWC at the ZID in the baseline generic case is 7.96%, while the IWCs for the 9-opening case is 5.28%. For the 21-opening case the IWC is 11.6%. For the open-ended break case the IWC is 11.9%. 5.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The results of the dilution modeling indicate that the slotted diffuse is highly effective and it promotes rapid mixing within a short distance from the outfall. A ZID distance of 0.90 meters was calculated in Table 6 based on the minimum criterion of 50*DLS. This method for calculating a ZID is generally recognized by the USEPA, Environmental Regulators, and is referenced in the CORMIX user's manual. Table I I below summarizes the predicted centerline plume concentration for the five scenarios noted in Table 10 plus the generic or generalized parameter case, where the discharge concentration was set at l 00%. Note that the centerline concentrations at 0.90 meters is significantly below the most stringent water criterion, which is the chronic fresh water aquatic life criterion. Table 1 I demonstrates that a dilution factor of 12.6 is achieved at a ZID distance of 0.90 meters downstream from the outfall and is quite protective of all measured chloride, copper, and zinc concentration measured at the outfall. The maximum daily discharge Iimits could be raised significantly and still be protective of the most sensitive water quality criteria. The maximum discharge concentrations of chloride copper and zinc were calculated as: Cnew = S * WQ' + BG Where: CXW = the daily maximum discharge concentration that will allow the most sensitive water quality criterion to me met at the ZID distance from the outfall. S = 12.6, the calculated centerline dilution ratio calculated at the ZID distance from the outfall. WQ' = the water quality criterion adjusted for background concentration, WQ - BG. WQ = the water quality criterion. BG = the background concentration of the parameter of interest. 16 Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP - NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 Table 10 Dilution Required to Meet Water Quality Criteria and Distance from Diffuser Minimum Distance Distance Distance Dilution Discharge Water Quality X Y Z Factor Centerline Parameter Units Conc. Criterion Meters Meters Meters S Concentration Chloride mg/L 223.7 223.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.0 224 Copper mg/L 0.010 0.002 0.07 0.00 0.63 5.5 0.002 Zinc mg/L 0.112 0.011 0.14 0.00 0.76 7.3 0.015 Max. Chloride mg/L 563.7 223.7 0.010 0.00 0.37 2.7 208 Max. Copper mg/L 1 0.038 0.002 0.92T 0.00 1.03 15.9 0.002 Table 11 Dilution Achieved at the Zone of Initial Dilution Distance of 0.90 meters - Harbor Estates Maximum Minimum Distance Distance Distance Dilution Predicted Discharge Water Quality X Y Z Factor Centerline Parameter Units Conc. Criterion Meters Meters Meters S Concentration Chloride mg/L 223.7 223.7 0.20 0.00 0.91 12.6 15.8 Copper mg/L 0.010 0.002 0.20 0.00 0.91 12.6 0.0008 Zinc mg/L 0.112 0.016 0.20 0.00 0.91 12.6 0.009 Max. Chloride mg/L 563.7 223.7 0.20 0.00 0.91 12.6 44.9 Max. Copper mg/L 0.038 0.002 0.20 0.00 0.91 12.6 0.003 Generic % 100 N/A 0.20 0.00 0.91 12.6 7.96 17 Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 Table 12 lists the maximum discharge concentrations of chloride, copper, and zinc that will allow the most sensitive water quality criterion to me achieved within the ZID distance from the outfall. Our recommendation is that the discharge limits for Harbor Estates be raised to reflect the limits in Table 12. Note that these are based upon achievement of the water quality criteria at the ZID of 0.90 meters. 5.0 REFERENCES 1. Mixing Zones in North Carolina July 23, 1999. 2. Technical Support Document for Water -quality Based Toxics Control, pp. 71-72 (EPA/505/2-90- 001 March 1991). 3. User's Manual for CORMIX: A Hydrodynamic Mixing Zone Model and Decision Support System for Pollutant Discharges into Surface Waters. G.H. Jirka, R.L. Doneker, and S. W. Hinton September 1996. 18 Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP - NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 Table 12 Sensitivity Analysis Summary for Harbor Estates Distance Distance Distance Dilution Discharge ZID X Y Z Factor Centerline Scenario Units Conc. Meters Meters Meters Meters S Concentration Generalized Baseline Scenario % 100 0.90 0.20 0.00 0.91 12.6 7.96 9-Openings % 100 0.90 -0.90 0.00 0.00 18.9 5.28 9-Openings % 100 0.90 0.91 0.00 0.00 25.3 3.95 21Openings % 100 0.90 0.12 0.00 0.93 8.6 11.6 Open -Ended Break % 100 3.38 0.610 3.86 0.00 8.4 11.9 Table 13 Proposed Effluent Limits for Harbor Estates Proposed Minimum Distance Distance Distance Discharge Water Quality Background X Y Z Dilution Parameter I Units Conc. (CneW) Criterion (WQ') Concentration (BG) Meters Meters I Meters Factor (S) Chloride mg/L 2,898 223.7 6.3 0.20 0.00 0.91 12.6 Copper mg/L 0.0285 0.002 0.000 0.20 0.00 0.91 12.6 Zinc mg/L 0.3776 0.016 0.014 0.20 0.00 0.91 12.6 Cnew = S * (WQ' + BG) Z Dilution Modeling Report for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 February 2019 6.0 ATTACHMENTS (electronic files provided separately) 20 i JUC 00 6 3wn0 MODELING PLAN FOR HARBOR ESTATES WWTP Prepared by Jerry K. Snyder, P.E., DEE, DWRE for Aqua North Carolina, Inc. SEPTEMBER 2018 • Jcay K. Snyder. P.E .,.• 1. ►`++;r.I✓ /�� Typed Name t Na PE032686E Modeling Plan for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 September 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................I 1.1 BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................1 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING OUTFALL...............................................................1 1.3 PURPOSE OF DILUTION MODELING STUDY.....................................................4 2.0 MODELING APPROACH.................................................................................................5 2.1 MODELING OBJECTIVES........................................................................................5 2.2 MODELING APPROACH..........................................................................................5 2.3 INPUT DATA REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCES.................................................6 LIST OF TABLES 1 Discharge Limits for Harbor Estates WWTP NPDES Permit # NCO063860.................1 2 Outfall Pipe Configuration..............................................................................................4 3 CORMIX Model Scenario..............................................................................................6 4 CORMIX Date Requirements and Sources.....................................................................7 LIST OF FIGURES 1 Facility Location Map.....................................................................................................2 2 Outfall Pipe Construction Drawing.................................................................................3 i Modeling Plan for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 September 2018 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND Aqua North Carolina, Inc. operates the Harbor Estates Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) under NPDES Permit NC0063860. The WWTP treats 100% domestic wastewater from the Harbor Estates. The WWTP is located on Pine Harbor Road (NCSR1113), Charlotte 28278, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The WWTP is permitted to discharge up to 0.0416 million gallons per day (MGD). The average discharge flow rate in 2017 was 0.0124 MGD. The future discharge limits for chloride, copper, and zinc are listed in Table 1 below. Table 1 Discharge Limits for Harbor Estates WWTP NPDES Permit # NCO063860 Parameter Monthly Average Units Daily Maximum I Units Flow 0.0416 MGD2 Total Chloride' 230 mg/0 230 mg/L3 Total Copper' 7.88 ug/O 10.47 ug/O Total Zinc' 125.7 ug/O 125.7 ug/L4 Notes: 1. The discharge limits will become effective June 20, 2020. 2. MGD is million gallons per day 3. mg/L is milligrams per liter 4. ug/L is micrograms per liter 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING OUTFALL The WWTP discharges treated domestic wastewater to Lake Wylie in the Catawba River Basin through a permitted outfall pipe. Lake Wylie is classified as WS-III & B (Water Supply III and Full Contact Recreation). A location map showing the locations of the facility and the outfall pipe is included as Figure 1 below. The outfall is a 3-inch diameter slotted polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe that ends in Lake Wylie 210 feet from the shore. A construction drawing showing the profile of the outfall pipe is included as Figure 2 below. The pipe ends with two 20-foot sections of PVC pipe. The end section is capped and filled with concrete, presumably to anchor the pipe on the bottom. The adjacent section of pipe has slotted perforations covering the length of the 20-foot section. These were described as being approximately 1/8-inch wide and 4 inches long at 1-inch spacing on the crown (top) of the pipe. The end sections of pipe were located under 30-35 feet of water when they were inspected and cleaned out several years ago. On occasion the concentrations of total chloride and total copper have exceeded the anticipated permit limit of 230 mg/L and 7.88 ug/L respectively. The basic configuration of the outfall is described in Table 2 below. Modeling Plan for Harbor Estates W WTP —NPDES #NC0063860 Figure 1 Facility Location Map September 2018 616) :l: \�\. Shopton Rd W Pine 11arbor Rd Approximate Facility 13ound7n t v Outfall 001 \� j rl� i _- i 7 - _ Caia%%haRiver(I.al.el1\fir) - IOuwssoullrJ - ,' Aqua North Carolina, Inc. kFacdiry !!arbor Estates WWTP tion rx1 Pine Harbor Road (NCSR 113h Charlotte 28278 y4AN Cwww i.n(WCW)irl sn..scr�. %$V:u at..w ta1sl asosotousos NPDES Permit NC0063860srorar la.�d:� erorsr OtuEIW Ww r Mecklenburg County F Modeling Plan for Harbor Estates W WTP — NPDES #NC0063860 September 2018 Figure 2 Outfall Pipe Construction Drawing Modeling Plan for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 September 2018 Table 2 Outfall Pipe Configuration Harbor Estates Location lake Wylie Orientation of pipe Horizontal on bottom Distance from Shore, feet 210 Diameter, inches 3 Diffuser Perforated Pipe (slotted) Material PVC Easement Width, feet 24 1.3 PURPOSE OF DILUTION MODELING STUDY In 2017 the Facility exceeded its monthly average limit for the concentration of total chloride and total copper in September and December. The measurements of copper in September and December were 38 ug/L and 21 ug/L respectively while the Monthly Average limit for total copper is 7.88 ug/L. The total chloride concentrations measured in September and December 2017 were 570 mg/L and 405 mg/L respectively while the Monthly Average limit for total chloride is 230 mg/L. The study will establish effluent dilution credits for total chloride, total copper, and total zinc. The objective will be to determine the in -stream waste concentration (IWC) at various distances from the end of the discharge pipe. The distance where the permitted concentrations are met will be determined as an objective of this dilution study. This will be the basis for a recommended dilution credit. The dilution credit will be an allowance of end -of -pipe concentrations greater than the permit value as long as the permitted concentrations are achieved within a short distance from the end of the pipe. Dilution credits may be developed and applied to other constituents as well. 4 Modeling Plan for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 September 2018 2.0 MODELING APPROACH 2.1 MODELING OBJECTIVES The objective of the modeling study is to simulate the behavior of the discharge plume from the outfall. The simulation will allow evaluation of the IWC of total chloride, total copper, and total zinc in the discharged water as the plume mixes with ambient water. Although total chloride, total copper, and total zinc are the main constituent of interest in this study, the simulation results will be general and could be applied to any constituent in the discharged water. 2.2 MODELING APPROACH The simulations will be accomplished using a well -established and accepted hydrodynamic model. The modeling approach consists of the following tasks: Task 1 Compile and Evaluate Data. The data required for modeling will be obtained from existing sources as much as possible. This includes Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs), previous dilution and wasteload allocation calculations, outfall construction plans, and Duke Energy, who operates Lake Wylie. Task 2 Per Parameter -Specific and Generalized Simulations. The CORMIX model will be used to simulate the plume behavior of the existing discharge under existing conditions. The model will be used to develop a steady-state concentration profile along the discharge plume centerline. The location and distance from the end of the outfall pipe where the permitted total chloride, total copper, and total zinc concentrations are met will be determined. A total of four simulations will be performed. Since the pumps cycle on an off with the treated effluent level in the pump tank, the instantaneous pumping rate will be used in the model. This will reflect the actual mixing behavior at the outfall pipe. The instantaneous pumping rate is independent of the flow rate passing through the treatment plant. If the average daily flow to the plant changes, the pumps cycle more or less frequently, but the instantaneous pumping rate while the pumps are on will remain the same. Specific model runs will be made for total chloride, total copper, and total zinc. The parameter -specific simulations will account for the background concentration of total chloride, total copper, and total zinc in the ambient environment. The generalized plume simulation will assume 100% as the discharge concentration and 0% in the background concentration. The results of the generalized simulation can be used to calculate the IWC of any constituent in the discharged water by multiplying the -model -predicted percentage concentration in the plume by the concentration of that constituent at the end of the pipe. The four model scenarios are summarized in Table 3 below. Modeling Plan for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 September 2018 Table 3 CORMIX Model Scenarios Discharge Modeled Discharge Flow 1 Constituent Concentration Units (gPm) Total 83 Chloride 230 ug/L Total 83 Copper 10.47 ug/L 83 Total Zinc 125.7 ug/L Generalized 83 Parameter 100 1. The instantaneous pumping rate will be used for all scenarios. Task 3 Prepare a Written Report of Findings. The results of the CORMIX simulations will be summarized and presented in a written report. The report will present the model input data and results of the simulations. The results from all simulations will include a presentation of the IWCs at various distances from the end of the discharge pipe. 2.3 INPUT DATA REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCES The CORMIX model is a hydrodynamic computer code that simulates the behavior of hydraulic plume or "jets" in various ambient environments. It has been applied extensively to model or simulate the behavior of water discharges into lakes and stream environments. The model calculates utilizes data on the discharge configuration, ambient environment, and relative densities between the ambient water and the discharged water. The CORMIX model has separate modules to simulate submerged single -port discharges (CORMIX 1), submerged multi - port diffusers (C0RMIX2), and buoyant surface discharges (CORMIX3). The CORMIX2 module will be used for this study. The data requirements for the CORMIX model and the sources of those data are listed in Table 4 below. Modeling Plan for Harbor Estates WWTP — NPDES #NC0063860 September 2018 Table 4 CORNUX Data Requirements and Sources Category Parameter Source of Data Discharge Data Flow Rate Measured Flow Rate While Pumps Are On Discharge Data Temperature Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) Discharge Data Total Dissolved Solids Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) Discharge Data Density Calculated from Temperature and Total Dissolved Solids Discharge Data Velocity Calculated from Flow Rate and Pipe Diameter Discharge Configuration Pipe Diameter Construction Drawings Discharge Configuration Slotted Pipe Construction Drawings Discharge Configuration Location, Distance from Shore Construction Drawings Discharge Configuration Direction/Orientation of Pipe Construction Drawings Discharge Configuration Copper Concentration Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) Ambient Data Depth Construction Drawings Ambient Data Temperature Sample Collection Ambient Data Total Dissolved Solids Sample Collection Ambient Data Density Calculated from Temperature and Total Dissolved Solids Ambient Data Total Chloride Concentration Sample Collection Ambient Data Total Copper Concentration Sample Collection Ambient Data Total Zinc Concentration Sample Collection Rodriguez, Teresa From: Rodriguez, Teresa Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 3:44 PM To: Berger, Amanda A Subject: Re: [External] Diamondhead & Harbor Estates Cormix Modeling Plans Amanda, the Division agrees with the proposed modeling plans for Harbor Estates and Diamond Head. When you submit the final report please submit all the model runs input and output files. The PDF documents include the figures for the outfall configurations, but these are not legible, could you submit a paper copy of the figures with your final report. Thanks, Teresa From: Berger, Amanda A <AAOwens@aquaamerica.com> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 4:13:00 PM To: Rodriguez, Teresa Subject: [External] Diamondhead & Harbor Estates Cormix Modeling Plans Hi Teresa, I hope all is well. Attached for your review and approval are the Cormix modeling plans for Diamondhead (NC0074772) and Harbor Estates (NC0063860). If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, A • A, ®' Amanda Berger Manager, Environmental Compliance Aqua North Carolina 202 MacKeuan Court, Cary NC 27511 0:919-653-6965 M:910-773-0406 ©©©