NC0063762_Engineering Alternatives Analysis_20091203

k)'c©o ( 3;� 2
Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124-8567
704-788-4455
Fax: [phone]
December 03, 2009
Mr. Bob Guerra
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699 - 1617
Subject: Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) and
Flood Plain Analysis
Carolina Village MHP, LLC WWTP
Concord, NC
Dear Mr. Guerra:
In accordance with the requirements of the NPDES permit, attached are three (3) copies of the
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) and Flood Plain Analysis for Carolina Village. The results
of the EAA show that any alternatives to continuing discharge would be prohibitively expensive.
The results of the flood plain analysis conclude that the existing W WTP is adequately protected
from flooding.
I appreciate the courtesy and assistance you and the NC DENR staff provided during this process. If
you have any questions or if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to call me (704-788-
4455.)
RECEIVED
DEC - 4 2009
DENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
c: Ryan B. Hotchkiss
Wes Bell

Guerra, Bob
From: Guerra, Bob
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 12:28 PM
To: 'Ryan Hotchkiss'
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Carolina Village Mobile Home Park
Thanks for your prompt response and regulatory compliance documentation for this facility.
From: Ryan Hotchkiss[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 10:06 AM
To: Guerra, Bob
Cc: Carolanne Bianco; Thurman Horne
Subject: Carolina Village Mobile Home Park
Importance: High
Hi Bob, I hope all is well and that you had a nice Thanksgiving.
Please know that Thurman Horne, engineer and Cced on this email, has completed the Engineering Alternatives Analysis
and Flood Plain Analysis for the waste water treatment plant at Carolina Village, and he will be sending you a copy of
these reports in triplicate (per the terms of the re -issued NPDES permit). Please also know that I have contacted Wes
Bell and advised him that Edwin Mullins with Gofer Utilities has corrected, repaired, and completed all of the other
violations highlighted in his recent report and a letter will be sent to him regarding same.
Please let me know if there is anything else you need.
Regards,
Ryan B. Hotchkiss
Horizon Land Co., LLC
2131 Espey Ct., Suite 5
Crofton, MD 21114
Main: 3 01-3 92-4923
Cell: 301-254-9055
Fax: [phone]
rhotchkiss�iu,horizonlandco.com
www.horizonlandcoMpany.com
From: Ryan Hotchkiss
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 4:31 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: FW: Carolina Village
Bob, it was very nice speaking with you today. I hope we can work together and establish a very good working
relationship. Per our conversation, please see below my contact information. Also, please consider this a request for a
full signed copy of the NPDES permit for carolina Village mobile home park. As discussed, we have hired Thurman Nome
(704-788-4455) to do the flood plane and engineering reports that my predecessor did not do (we have only owned the
park since Monday October 12th and today is the first day we heard that these reports were never submitted). I will make
sure Thurman gets you those reports as soon as possible.
Regards,
Ryan B. Hotchkiss
Carolina Village MHP, LLC

2131 Espey Ct., Suite 5
Crofton, MD 21114
Main: 301-3924923
Cell: 301-254-9055
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
2

Engineering Alternatives Analysis
And Flood Plain Analysis
Carolina Village Mobile Home Park
NPDES No. NCO063762
Concord, N.C.
Cabarrus County
Owner Horizon Land Co., LLC
2131 Espey Ct., Suite 5
Crofton, MD 21114
Phone: [phone]
Contact: Ryan B. Hotchkiss
Facility Carolina Village Mobile Home Park WWTP
End of Monroe Court
Concord, N.C. 28075
Prepared by: J. Thurman Horne, P.E.
Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124
Ph: 704-788-4455
Date: November 25, 2009

1
Engineering Alternatives Analysis
And Flood Plain Analysis
Carolina Village Mobile Home Park
NPDES No. NCO063762
Concord, N.C.
Cabarrus County
Owner : Horizon Land Co., LLC
2131 Espey Ct., Suite 5
Crofton, MD 21114
Phone: [phone]
Contact: Ryan B. Hotchkiss
Facility Carolina Village Mobile Home Park WWTP
End of Monroe Court
Concord, N.C. 28075
Prepared by: J. Thurman Horne, P.E.
Horizon Engineering & Consul ' g;
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124
Ph: 704-788-4455
a
Date: November 25, 2009
A

M
Table of Contents
Page
Section 1: General...............................................................................3
1.01 Introduction: ................................................................... 3
1.02 Scope: ........................................................................... 3
em Section 2: Background Information........................................................3
2.01 Project Area: ................................................................... 3
FJR 2.02 Site Characteristics: .......................................................... 3
2.03 Receiving Stream Characteristics........................................4
M Section 3: Existing Utilities....................................................................4
3.01 Public Facilities: ............................................................... 4
OR 3.02 Private Facilities: .............................................................. 4
Section 4: Alternatives For Wastewater Service.......................................5
am
4.01: On site surface and/or subsurface disposal .........................5
4.02: Wastewater Reuse: ........................................................ 6
4.03: Surface Water Discharge................................................6
4.04: Combination of Alternatives.............................................7
Section 5: Alternatives For Wastewater Service - Summary
and Conclusions: .................................................................. 8
am
MR
fm
0"
Nq
M
Section 6: Proposed Wastewater Treatment Facilities: .............................. 8
Section 7: Flood Plain Analysis...............................................................8
Appendix
A
Cost Analysis of Alternatives
Appendix
B
Aerial Photo
Appendix
C
Possible Route for Connection to POTW
Appendix
D
Possible Location for Subsurface Land Disposal
Appendix
E
Possible Location for Surface Land Disposal
Appendix
F
SCS Soil Map and Soil Descriptions
Appendix
G
Possible Location for Wastewater Reuse
Appendix
H
Location of 100 Year Flood Plain
Appendix
I
Location of 500 Year Flood Plain
Appendix
J
FEMA FIRM 3710469900J
Appendix
K
Subdivision Survey Map and WWTP Plan Drawing
Appendix
L
City of Concord — Wastewater Collection System Use Fees
N"

on
MR f
Section 1: General
"M 1.01 Introduction:
Carolina Village is a mobile home community located in west Cabarrus County,
IM which was recently acquired by new owners, Horizon Land Co., LLC. The
community homes are served by an existing package waste water treatment plant.
The existing wastewater treatment plant is a 90,000 gpd package type, contact
stabilization process facility which has an influent lift station, bar screen, contact
aeration basin, reaeration basin, secondary clarification, aerobic digester, effluent
chlorine contact basin (tablet feeder), effluent dechlorination basin (tablet feeder)
and effluent flow meter/recorder. The treated effluent is discharged into the Rocky
River, Class C waters in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River basin.
The existing waste water treatment plant has a good overall compliance history
with NC DWQ regulations. Pursuant to the terms of the existing NPDES permit,
Carolina Village has commissioned this investigation to consider alternatives to the
existing level method of wastewater treatment and to evaluate the possibility of
using an alternative means of wastewater treatment to serve the community.
1.02 Scope:
me
The scope of this project is limited to the analysis of the existing location with
respect to the flood plain, and the investigation and evaluation of alternatives for
treating and/or disposing of the wastewaters from the Carolina Village mobile
home community. This includes consideration of the feasibility of continuing the
existing discharge and options for eliminating the existing discharge.
MR
Section 2: Background Information
2.01 Project Area:
The service area is limited to the existing Carolina Village community. All homes
are single family residences. All wastewater is domestic strength.
f, The existing discharge coordinates are: Longitude: -80 deg. 40 min. 58 sec. W
Latitude: 35 deg. 22 min. 16 sec. N
Am
2.02 Site Characteristics:
am The subdivision is located in an urban portion of Cabarrus county that is
experiencing significant growth and development.
IM
am

M
4
am
The general area has soil characteristics which are limited the possibility of on site
treatment and disposal. Hence, the development was built with a centralized
"' sewer collection system for treatment and discharge in accordance with the
NPDES permit.
Terrain is generally rolling but has been graded level at the wastewater treatment
plant site.
As shown in the maps attached in Appendices H and I, the existing wastewater
treatment facilities are located within the 100 year and 500 year flood plains.
2.03 Receiving Stream Characteristics:
FM The receiving stream is the Rocky River which is Class C waters. The receiving
stream has good flow and slope which creates desirable turbulence and aeration.
O, This receiving stream has no known outstanding features or characteristics that
should preclude the continuation of the existing discharge. There are no known
endangered or threatened species, however these are identified as impaired
OM waters.
„m Section 3: Existing Utilities
3.01 Public Facilities:
The nearest existing public sewer is located west of the existing WWTP on the
opposite side of the Rocky River. Connection to the existing sewer could be made
by extending a sewer line from the existing influent lift station, and connecting to
the existing sewer at the nearest point. The distance that would be required for
sewer force mains to be installed would be approximately 250 ft. This sewer was
recently installed and is operated by the City of Concord.
3.02 Private Facilities:
am
There are no known existing private sewer utilities within any reasonable proximity
of Carolina Village that would be available for consideration as a possible
MO alternative. A review of available information revealed that the nearest wastewater
facilities are the Silver Maples Community wastewater treatment facilities that are
located approximately 2,000 feet to the north of Carolina Village. The Silver
Maples facilities are permitted for 0.040 MGD. This facility has a very limited size
and has a history of compliance concerns. Silver Maples has indicated that they
are in the process of eliminating their wastewater treatment facilities and will be
connecting to the City of Concord sewer. Hence, connection to these wastewater
facilities are not a practical alternative for consideration.
am
0"

0"
im
Other than Silver Maples, there are no known other wastewater treatment facilities
or sewers within three (3) miles of Carolina Village that would be a practical
consideration.
Section 4: Alternatives for Wastewater Service
4.01: On site surface and/or subsurface disposal:
go Subsurface Disposal:
Appendix E contains portions of soil survey reports that provide insight as to the
suitability of the soils for subsurface disposal. As described in the report, these
soils are mainly Mecklenburg, Coronaca, Cullen and Poindexter soils with
characteristics that are somewhat limited to very limited with respect to the
potential for subsurface disposal. For the purposes of evaluating subsurface
disposal as a potential alternative, an application rate of 0.30 gpd/SF will be used
as a reasonable assumption for a possible loading rate for these type soils. Of
course, before a final design and/or approval could be given, an actual on site
soils evaluation would be required.
Subsurface disposal requires buffers and land for the drainfields as well as equal
areas of suitable soil, be available and maintained as potential repair/replacement
areas. Carolina Village is a densely developed mobile home community. There are
no practical, useable areas within the property that could be considered for
subsurface disposal.
Given the limitations described in the attached soil survey and discussed above, it
is doubtful that this is a viable option. A full and extensive soils investigation of
potential sites would be necessary to confirm if useable areas are available. In
keeping with the state guidance for alternatives evaluation, the cost effectiveness
of this alternative is further evaluated to determine if a detailed soils analysis is
�► appropriate. The costs associated with this option are estimated in Appendix A.
This option would require that the discharge be conveyed to an acquired site
�► having sufficient area for subsurface disposal and a suitable reserve area of equal
size, and that these areas include adequate buffers from property lines, homes,
wells, etc.
Surface Irrigation:
Disposal by surface irrigation requires storage capacity for periods of inclement
weather when application is not allowable. Therefore, consideration of this as a
possible alternative must also include the provision of storage of the treated waste
Ono waters during periods of inclement weather.
As noted earlier, the soils surveys for this area have determined this to Somewhat
am limited to severely limited potential for on site subsurface disposal. Likewise, the
so

M"
P
ON 0
soil surveys for this area have determined this to be similarly limited for surface
irrigation. Consideration of this alternative is based on an assumed allowable
application rate of 0.75 inches per week which is based on a typical range of 0.5 to
1.0 inches per week for this geographic area and the soil conditions generally
described in the soils survey. Storage requirements for this area are typically in the
range of 45 to 90 days. For purposes of this assessment, a storage requirement of
60 days will be assumed.
AM Due to the size of areas needed for surface irrigation and to maintain the required
buffers, the only possible alternative for on site disposal, either by subsurface or
am surface application, would require the acquisition of off site properties for disposal.
The degree of treatment required for surface application would be virtually the
same as required for treatment and discharge. Although the additional cost of
conveyance and the additional costs for on site disposal should readily be
recognized as a significant cost increase as compared to the alternative of
improving/replacing the existing WWTP, an estimate of the costs for this
alternative is included in Appendix A for comparison.
The evaluation is based on a very conservative assumption that the nearest
available lands that could be reasonably used would actually be available. A
comparison of the costs were made first, using the best (lowest cost) reasonable
assumptions. It would obviously be necessary to perform a more detailed site
investigation and ascertain if the property owner would consider allowing these
lands to be acquired for this purpose.
4.02: Wastewater Reuse
Options for reuse of wastewater for this area are very limited. Reuse is usually
associated with non -potable uses such as irrigation. This becomes potentially
�•+ more viable if there is a need or outlet for reuse such as irrigation of a golf course.
There is an existing golf course located approximately 1,000 feet west of the
�► wastewater treatment plant site that might, in theory, be a potential for reuse. It is
not known what, if any needs the golf course may have with respect to possibly
using the backwash water for irrigation, or if the owner (City of Concord) would be
receptive to such use. Obviously, this would need to be researched if the
conclusions of this investigation indicated that this might be a reasonable
alternative.
For the purposes of evaluating this as a potential alternative, it will be
conservatively assumed that the golf course might be receptive to allowing the
connection of this flow to their irrigation system.
am
am

OM
h
am
IM
There are no other viable options for reuse associated with the subdivision or in
the surrounding area.
4.03: Surface Water Discharge
we This is the current method of wastewater treatment/disposal. There are no plans
to upgrade or possibly expand the capacity of the existing facilities. The existing
wastewater treatment facilities are considered to be in overall good condition and
"" there are no significant compliance issues or other reasons to anticipate the need
for any substantial modifications within the foreseeable future.
An estimate of the costs for the continuation of this alternative is included in
Appendix A for comparison.
4.04: Combination of Alternatives
FM Alternatives to discharge that may be technologically feasible, such as connection
to the nearest public sewer, subsurface disposal and/or surface irrigation, could
not be employed in conjunction with the current method of disposal (surface water
discharge) and yield any reduction in capital expenditures. The evaluation of
alternatives shows that these alternatives are clearly not viable due to the
overwhelming magnitude of associated cost.
am
Combining one of these alternatives while continuing the existing discharge, yields
modest reduction in the cost for non -discharge alternatives alone but merely
Oft increases the overall costs. There would be no overall reduction in capital costs
and the operating costs for combining surface discharge with either of the other
alternatives would be greater than for any single alternative that might be selected.
am
In short, whereas the conclusion that continued surface discharge is the only
viable option due to the overwhelming differential in capital and operating costs,
M• any addition of an additional alternative would merely make the cost differential
worse.
MO
Section 5: Alternatives For Wastewater Service - Summary and Conclusions
am As can be seen from a comparison of the net present value of the various
alternatives, there is a wide difference between the cost estimate of the option of
continuing discharge and options to eliminate the existing discharge.
a
With respect to considering the possibility of continuing to operate the existing
wastewater treatment facility, compared to the cost of the next most cost effective
am and reliable alternative (wastewater reuse) the estimated Net Present Value is
approximately 553 % greater. This represents a difference of $1,637,059.
no
an

am
In light of the financial impracticality, it is not necessary to further pursue whether
connection is politically acceptable to the POTW, or whether land based disposal
or reuse options are workable.
By far, the most practical and cost effective alternative is the continued use of the
existing wastewater treatment facilities and the continued discharge to surface
waters.
The conclusion of this evaluation process is that Carolina Village will continue to
operate the existing wastewater treatment facilities and to discharge into surface
waters.
Section 6: Proposed Wastewater Treatment Facilities
an
Based on the findings of this evaluation, it has been concluded that the most
economical and practical alternative is to continue discharge to surface waters.
M
There are no modifications or improvements required in association with
continuing to operate the existing wastewater treatment facilities.
IM
Section 7: Flood Plain Analysis
The existing wastewater treatment plant is located within the established flood
plains. However, the facilities are located above ground and the top of the walls of
�+ the wastewater treatment plant are at elevation 588.50 (reference Sheet 14 of 17
of plans prepared by Concord Engineering & Surveying, Inc. (See Appendix M)
which is well above the 100 year flood contour elevation (581.5) and the 500 year
flood contour elevation (586.0) as depicted on the maps included in Appendices H,
I and J.
9+ Whereas the wastewater treatment plant is a steel walled, package type
wastewater treatment plant, and since the top of the walls are above the flood
plain elevations, the plant appears to be protected from potential flooding in the
Oft event of 100 or 500 year flood events. Therefore, it is concluded that the existing
facilities are adequately protected from flooding.
am
me
A
SM
im

9
am I Appendix A
on Cost Analysis of Alternatives
am
Note: Cost estimates based on, National Construction Estimator, Means Building Construction
IM Cost Data, consultation with contractors and the engineers experience.
M
am
AM
am
fm
MR
M
ONq
a.
OW
dw

10
w s
1. Continued Surface Water Discharge at Existing 90,000 GPD Flow Rate:
(Using Existing WWTP)
As noted previously, the existing facilities are in reasonably good condition and there are
no anticipated needs for any substantial repairs or improvements. Therefore, there
are no projected capital expenditures for this alternative.
Operation & Maintenance Cost
(Present Value, 20 year life, 5.875% interest):
Contract operations services = $ 1,500/mo. _ $ 18,000/yr
Chemical cost = $ 300/mo. = $ 3,600/yr
Electrical Cost = $ 800/mo = $ 9,600/yr
Total annual O & M costs = $ 31,200
PV Annual Cost = $ 361,621
Total Net Present Value = $ 3619621
M
am
so
am
IM
am
am
RM

Om
r
11
MR
2. Connection to nearest available POTW Sewer System at
90,000
GPD Flow Rate:
MR
Install new gravity sewer outfall to convey wastewater now collected at the influent lift
station to the junction with existing municipal sewer.
a
Distance = approx.. 250 LF
,m
Capital Cost:
Item: Quantity:
Unit Cost:
Cost:
8" gravity sewer 250 LF
$
100
$
25,000
Rock excavation 50 CY
$
100
$
5,000
Manholes 2 Ea
$
41000
$
81000
Tap Fee 1 Ea.
$
11800
$
1,800
Wastewater Capacity 260 Ea.
$
800
$
208,000
Use Fee (per Residence)
Flow Metering Station 1 Ea.
$
409000
$
40,000
Connect influent from LS
$
7,000
$
7,000
Exist. lift station to new
Gravity outfall
Abandon, dismantle and remove LS
$
70,000
$
70,000
Exist. WWTP and influent lift
Station
am
Electrical LS
$
8,000
$
81000
MR
Erosion control LS
$
10,000
$
10,000
,m
Clearing (approx..2 acre) 0.2 acre
$
79000
$
11400
Surveying 2 days
$
11500
$
31000
am
Legal LS
$
10,000
$
10,000
6.
Sub -total
$
397,200
Engineering Design 10 %
39,720
Om

12
Engineering Construction 5 % 19,860
Progress Inspection Services
**Sewer System Evaluation LS $ 22,000 $ 22,000
Total Capital Cost = $ 478,480
Operation & Maintenance Cost:
Local government sewer fee
*Volume charge = $ 5.09/1000 Gallons
Annual sewer volume charges = $ 5.09/1000 Gal x 90,000 gpd x 365 day/yr
_ $ 167,207/yr
* Base charge (6" and 1.5" meters) _ $ 43.01 /month x 12 mo/yr = $ 516/yr
Annual repair and maintenance = $ 400/mo. X 12 mo/yr = $ 4,800/yr
Total annual costs = $ 172,523
(Present Value, 20 year life, 5.875% interest)
Present Value Annual Cost = $ 11999,058
Total Net Present Value = $ 2,477,538
* See Appendix L "City of Concord — Wastewater Collection System Use Fees"
** Sewer System Evaluation required to determine if existing sewer meets City requirements

13
3. Land Based Disposal:
M3A. Subsurface Disposal at 90,000 GPD Flow Rate:
Based on the soil survey information and the engineer's field observations, the soils in
am this area appear to be somewhat limited to severely limited as a medium for subsurface
disposal. In the event that it was found to be apparently a cost effective alternative, an in
MR depth site specific soil investigation would need to be done to confirm that the soils could
in fact be used. However, for the purpose of comparing the potential alternatives within
the scope of this evaluation, it will be assumed that a typical low design loading rate
an would be workable. Therefore, it will be assumed that a loading rate of 0.30 gpd/sq. ft. is
acceptable.
Therefore, based on the design flow, the area required for subsurface disposal is:
909000 gpd / 0.30 gpd/sq. ft. = 300,000 SF
am
Whereas it is required to maintain an equal size area as a reserve for future repair, the
total required area is 600,000 SF. Assuming a roughly rectangular field (600 ft x 1,000 ft.
MM for the initial drain field plus repair and in order to maintain the required buffers to
property lines, etc.), the minimum estimated land required is 850,000 SF or 19.5 acres.
FAIN
Carolina Village is a densely developed mobile home community. As a consequence of
this, there are no areas available for consideration that are currently owned by Carolina
Village. Hence, any consideration for subsurface disposal must be based on the
possibility of acquiring areas of sufficient size off site.
Capital Cost:
Item:
Quantity Unit Cost:
Cost:
4" sewer drain in 3' trenches
100,000 LF
$ 18
$
11800,000
Site Clearing
20 acre
$ 61500
$
130,000
Land
20 acres
$ 25,000
$
500,000
Septic Tanks
260 Ea.
21500
$
650,000
3" FM
31600 LF
$ 20
$
72,000
Pump Station
1 Ea
$ 60,000
$
60,000
�► Surveying
3 days
$ 1,500
$
.4,500
Soils Investigation
2 day
$ 11500
$
31000
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment LS
$ 3,000
$
3,000
Erosion control
LS
$ 10,000
$
10,000
Electrical
LS
$ 12,000
$
12,000
Legal
LS
$ 10,000
$
10,000
Sub -total
$
3,254,500
dw

i
Engineering
Engineering Construction
Progress Inspection Services
10%
5%
Total Capital Cost
14
325,450
162,725
_ $ 317429676
Operation & Maintenance Cost (Present Value, 20 year life, 5.876 % interest):
Annual Cost
0 & M of drain field,
Contract operations services = $ 1,500/mo. _ $ 18,000/yr
Annual electrical charges = $ 200/month X 12 mo/yr = $ 2,400/yr
Annual septage pumping = $ 1,000/yr
PV Annual Cost = $ 247,966
Total Net Present Value = $ 3,999j641
Total Annual Cost = $ 21,400

OR
15
313. Surface Irrigation at 90,000 GPD Flow Rate:
am Surface irrigation preliminary design is based on an assumed allowable application rate
of 0.75 " per week and a required storage basin for 60 days design flow. Based on the
design flow of 90,000 gpd, this results in an estimated disposal area of 31 acres. Allowing
a recommended 50% repair area, the required total area is 46.5 acres. Assuming a
roughly rectangular field (1,400 ft x 1,447 ft. for the initial spray field plus repair and in
order to maintain the required 150 foot buffer to property lines), the minimum estimated
land required is approximately 56.8 acres.
Surface irrigation requires prior treatment to reduce raw wastewater constituents to levels
acceptable for surface application. Therefore, the operating costs estimated in Alternative
1. for continuing to operate the existing wastewater treatment facilities are included in the
Ow estimate of the costs for surface application.
am
Capital Cost:
Item:
Quantity: Unit Cost: Cost:
5,400,000 gal. storage basin
(1)
$
11044,450
Surface irrigation system
1,350,400 SF
$ 0.35
$
472,640
�., Monitoring wells
6 ea
$ 41000
$
24,000
Land
56.8 acres
$ 25,000
$
1,4209000
Fencing
61000 LF
$ 6.00
$
369000
3" FM
3,600 LF
$ 20
$
72,000
Manholes
2 Ea
$ 41000
$
89000
Pump Station
1 Ea
$ 90,000
$
90,000
Surveying
2 days
$ 11500
$
3,000
Soils Investigation
2 days
$ 1,500
$
31000
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment LS
$ 3,000
$
3,000
�► Erosion control
LS
$ 10,000
$
10,000
Easement/Right of Way
29000 LF
$ 10
$
20,000
Clearing (approx. 35 acre)
35 acre
$ 6,500
$
227,500
Electrical
LS
$ 15,000
$
15,000
Legal
LS
$ 10,000
$
10,000
no
no
OM
Engineering
Engineering Construction
Progress Inspection Services
Sub -total $ 39458,590
10%
5%
Total Capital Cost
345,860
17,930
$ 318229380
am

16
(1) Storage:
Excavation 33,492 cu. Yds. @ $ 6.00/yd = $ 200,950
Compaction and Lining 241,000 SF @ $ 3.50/SF = $ 843,500
Sub -total = $ 1,044,450
Operation & Maintenance Cost
(Present Value, 20 year life, 8% interest):
Annual Cost
O & M of spray field,
Contract operations services = $ 1,750/mo. _ $ 21,000/yr
(Includes operation of spray irrigation system)
Annual electrical charges = $ 500/month = $ 6,000/yr
O & M of WWTP (Pretreatment prior to spray irrigation)
Chemical cost = $ 300/mo. _ $ 3,600/yr
Electrical Cost = $ 800/mo = $ 9,6001yr,
Total Annual Cost = $ 40,200
PV Annual Cost = $ 466,805
Total Net Present Value = $ 4,288,186

17
am
4. Wastewater Reuse:
This alternative assumes that the nearby existing golf course might be interested in
allowing the pretreated wastewater to be connected into their existing irrigation system to
Am be applied as irrigation water. This evaluation will be based on a best case assumption
that no additions to the existing golf course irrigation system would be required.
014
Surface irrigation preliminary design is based on an assumed required storage basin for
60 days design flow.
Surface irrigation requires prior treatment to reduce raw wastewater constituents to levels
acceptable for surface application. Therefore, the operating costs estimated in Alternative
1. for continuing to operate the existing wastewater treatment facilities are included in the
estimate of the costs for surface application.
Capital Cost:
Item:
Quantity: Unit Cost: Cost:
5,400,000 gal. storage basin
(1)
$
19044,450
Monitoring wells
6 ea
$ 4,000
$
24,000
Land (for storage lagoon)
3 acre
$ 25,000
$
75,000
Fencing (around storage lagoon)
11400 LF
$ 6.00
$
81400
Site Clearing
3 acre
$ 69500
$
19,500
311 FM
1,000 LF
$ 20
$
20,000
Manholes
2 Ea
$ 41000
$
89000
Pump Station
1 Ea
$ 90,000
$
90,000
Surveying
3 days
$ 1,500
$
4,500
�► Soils Investigation
2 days
$ 19500
$
31000
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment LS
$ 3,000
$
3,000
Erosion control
LS
$ 89000
$
89000
Electrical
LS
$ 15,000
$
15,000
Legal
LS
$ 10,000
$
10,000
Sub -total
=
$
11332,850
Engineering 10 % 133,285
Construction Inspection 5 % 66,640
Total Capital Cost = $ 19532,776
(1) Storage:
Excavation 33,492 cu. Yds. @ $ 6.00/yd = $ 200,950
Compaction and Lining 241,000 SF @ $ 3.50/SF = $ 843,500
Sub -total = $ 1,044,450
A.
AM

9
18
am
Operation & Maintenance Cost
(Present Value, 20 year life, 5.875 % interest):
MR
Annual Cost
xw` O & M of spray field,
Contract operations services = $ 1,750/mo. _ $ 21, 000/yr
(Includes operation of spray irrigation system)
Annual electrical charges = $ 500/month = $ 6,000/yr
om
O & M of WWTP (Pretreatment prior to spray irrigation)
Chemical cost = $ 300/mo. _ $ 3,600/yr
Electrical Cost = $ 800/mo = $ 9,600/yr,
Total Annual Cost = $ 40,200
PV Annual Cost = $ 465,805
MR
Total Net Present Value = $1,9989680
am
am
I"
om
MR
fim
.,

an►
'
19
�i
Appendix B
Aerial Photo

20
Appendix C
Possible Route for Connection to POTW

}j L
h2 r (711
v
Map Source: Cabarrus County GIS
Carolina Village Mobile Home Park
Possible Location for Connection to POTW
Concord, N.C. Scale: 1" = 650'
Horizon Enpineerinp & Consulting. Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 November 16, 2009

�9
21
Appendix D
Possible Location for Subsurface Land Disposal

I
r
Prop. Subsurface Disposal Site
J*N
Map Source: Cabarrus County GIS
Carolina Village Mobile Home Park Horizon Engineering & Consulting. lnC.
Possible Location for Subsurface Disposal 2510 Walker Road
Concord, N.C. Scale: 1" = 650' Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 November 16, 2009

22
i
0
fit
Appendix E
Possible Location for Surface Land Disposal

A�
Prop. Surface Disposal Site
za
Map Source: Cabarrus County GIS
Carolina Village Mobile Home Park Horizon Enctineering & Consulting. Inc.
Possible Location for Surface Disposal 2510 Walker Road
Concord, N.C. Scale: 1" = 650' Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 November 16, 2009

23
Appendix F
SCS Soil Maps and Soil Descriptions

USDA
United States
Department of
Agriculture
- o
MRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
M
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Cabarrus County,
North Carolina
November 13, 2009

am
a
MM
am
am
P" Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil
RM map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
no
MR
FM
IM
M
MR
w
S"
a"
40
4M
7
am

O
0_
�
N
N
U
=a
om
0
'o U
U
o
y
U
W p
N
X r-
kc
lop
099>l6E 006V16E OOZet6C
H
m �
�WIWIA

I I
A
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of interest (AOI)
(Z Very Stony Spot
Map Scale: 1:10,900 if printed on A size (8.5" X 11 ") sheet.
r— ;
Area of Interest (AOI)
Wet Spot
Soils
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Soil Map Units
♦ Other
Special Line Features
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map
Special Point Features
rti^ Gully
measurements.
V
Blowout
®
Borrow Pit
... Short Steep Slope
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Other
Web Soil Survey URL: http://webscilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
X
Clay Spot
Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17N NAD83
Political Features
Closed Depression
(b Cities
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
X
Gravel Pit
Water Features
the version date(s) listed below.
..
Gravelly Spot
`- Oceans
Landfill
Streams and Canals
Soil Survey Area: Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 10, May 28, 2009
A
Lava Flow
Transportation
j,
Marsh or swamp
++* Rails
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 6/22/2006; 6/20/2006
R
Mine or Quarry
Interstate Highways
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
p
Miscellaneous Water
- US Routes
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
p
Perennial Water
Major Roads
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
v
Rock Outcrop
ry Local Roads
+
Saline Spot
..
Sandy Spot
_
Severely Eroded Spot
0
Sinkhole
p
Slide or Slip
0
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
40
Stony Spot

4M
om
No
OR
am
AM
M"
mo
No
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Cabarrus County, North Carolina (NCO26)
Map.Unit.Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
ArA
Armenia loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
Coronaca clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
51.0
76.6
145.2
67.5
43.2
65.3
20.2
35.8
94.4
6.7
0.8
0.0
606.7
8.4°%
12.6°%
23.9°%
11.1
7-.1 %
10.8°%
3.3%
5.9°%
15.6°%
1.1 %
0.1 %
0.0%
100.0 %
ChA
COB
COD
Coronaca clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Cullen clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Cullen clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
CuB2
CuD2
EnB
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Iredell loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
IdA
MeB
Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Poindexter loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
PoB
PoF
WeA
Totals for Area of Interest
Poindexter loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
!' A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
�+ class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally
10

am
Custom Soil Resource Report
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
am
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If
intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
FM
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
MR
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
00
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
Im
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or
anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
am
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
an An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
am

Custom Soil Resource Report
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
ArA—Armenia loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
no Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
on Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
an Armenia, undrained, and similar soils: 85 percent
Description of Armenia, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Drainageways on interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Residuum weathered from diorite and/or residuum weathered from
gabbro and/or residuum weathered from diabase and/or residuum weathered
from gneiss
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: Rare
Available water capacity: High (about 9.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
,.� Land capability (nonirrigated): 6w
Typical profile
0 to 5 inches: Loam
5 to 50 inches: Clay
50 to 80 inches: Clay loam
no
," ChA—Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
12
me

No
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Composition
Chewacla and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Description of Chewacla
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 6 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 11.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 4w
Typical profile
0 to 4 inches: Loam
4 to 26 inches: Silty clay loam
26 to 38 inches: Loam
38 to 60 inches: Clay loam
60 to 80 inches: Loam
Minor Components
Wehadkee, undrained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
�+
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
me
me
CoB—Coronaca clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
13
MR

am
Custom Soil Resource Report
fop
Map Unit Composition
Coronaca, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 100 percent
Description of Coronaca, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Pin Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Saprolite derived from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase and/or
gneiss
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
�► (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.4 inches)
OW
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2e
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Clay loam
6 to 80 inches: Clay
80 to 96 inches: Clay loam
CoD—Coronaca clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
I Map Unit Composition
Coronaca, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 100 percent
�+ Description of Coronaca, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
14

OM
Custom Soil Resource Report
Parent material. Saprolite derived from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase and/or
am gneiss
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 3e
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Clay loam
6 to 80 inches: Clay
80 to 96 inches: Clay loam
F"
CuB2—Cullen clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
am
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
RM Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
fm Map Unit Composition
Cullen, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 80 percent
Description of Cullen, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Saprolite derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
MR
15

MR
Custom Soil Resource Report
Interpretive groups
O' Land capability (nonirrigated): 2e
Typical profile
0 to 7 inches: Clay loam
"' 7 to 54 inches: Clay
54 to 80 inches: Silt loam
A
CuD2—C ullen.clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Cullen, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 80 percent
Description of Cullen, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Saprolite derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 3e
Typical profile
0 to 7 inches: Clay loam
'®4
7 to 54 inches: Clay
54 to 80 inches: Silt loam
Im
am
16
an

Custom Soil Resource Report
`W EnB—Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Enon and similar soils: 85 percent
Description of Enon
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material.- Saprolite derived from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase and/or
gneiss
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2e
Typical profile
FM
0 to 7 inches: Fine sandy loam
7 to 10 inches: Sandy clay loam
10 to 27 inches: Clay
27 to 33 inches: Clay loam
33 to 80 inches: Loam
em
am IdA—Iredell loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
no
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
MR lredell and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
MR Description of lredell
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
no Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
am Parent material: Saprolite derived from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase and/or
gneiss
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. High (about 10.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
FW Land capability (nonirrigated): 2w
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Loam
6 to 25 inches: Clay
25 to 28 inches: Clay loam
28 to 33 inches: Sandy clay loam
33 to 80 inches: Sandy loam
Minor Components
no Armenia, undrained
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Drainageways on interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
an
am
18
am

•
Custom Soil Resource Report
MeB—Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
A.►
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
+.+
Mecklenburg and similar soils: 85 percent
Description of Mecklenburg
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material., Saprolite derived from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase and/or
gneiss
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding. None
�.,
Available water capacity: High (about 9.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2e
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Loam
8 to 25 inches: Clay
.,
25 to 36 inches: Clay loam
36 to 80 inches: Sandy clay loam
am
PoB—Poindexter loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Poindexter and similar soils: 75 percent
Description of Poindexter
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Saprolite derived from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase and/or
gneiss
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock; 40 to 80 inches to
lithic bedrock
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to low (0.00 to
0.01 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding., None
Frequency of ponding. None
Available water capacity: Low (about 3.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Im Land capability (nonirrigated): 2e
Typical profile
0 to 4 inches: Loam
"'t 4 to 12 inches: Loam
12 to 18 inches: Sandy clay loam
18 to 23 inches: Sandy clay loam
23 to 42 inches: Weathered bedrock
42 to 80 inches: Unweathered bedrock
M"
„M PoF—Poindexter loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Poindexter and similar soils: 80 percent
M"
20
am

am
Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Poindexter
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase and/or
gneiss
Properties and qualities
�* Slope: 15 to 45 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock; 40 to 80 inches to
lithic bedrock
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to low (0.00 to
0.01 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
�.�► Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Low (about 3.7 inches)
Im Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): fie
Typical profile
OM 0 to 4 inches: Loam
4 to 12 inches: Loam
12 to 18 inches: Sandy clay loam
18 to 23 inches: Sandy clay loam
no 23 to 42 inches: Weathered bedrock
42 to 80 inches: Unweathered bedrock
me
M WeA—Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
FM Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Wehadkee, undrained, and similar soils: 85 percent
Wehadkee, drained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Description of Wehadkee, Undrained
.. Setting
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
am
21
me

Custom Soil Resource Report
Parent material: Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
"` Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
a. Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
a' Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.9 inches)
'm Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 6w
Typical profile
fm 0 to 8 inches: Loam
8 to 43 inches: Sandy clay loam
43 to 80 inches: Sandy loam
am
Description of Wehadkee, Drained
Setting
MO Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
fft Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
no Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
no Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. High (about 9.9 inches)
am Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 4w
do Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Loam
8 to 43 inches: Sandy clay loam
43 to 80 inches: Sandy loam
OR
M"
am
me
22
MR

am
no
Soil Information for All Uses
Oft
Soil Reports
The Soil Reports section includes various formatted tabular and narrative reports
"' (tables) containing data for each selected soil map unit and each component of each
unit. No aggregation of data has occurred as is done in reports in the Soil Properties
and Qualities and Suitabilities and Limitations sections.
OM The reports contain soil interpretive information as well as basic soil properties and
qualities. A description of each report (table) is included.
OM
Sanitary Facilities
This folder contains a collection of tabular reports that present soil interpretations
related to sanitary facilities. The reports (tables) include all selected map units and
components for each map unit, limiting features and interpretive ratings. Sanitary
facilities interpretations are tools designed to guide the user in site selection for the
safe disposal of sewage and solid waste. Example interpretations include septic tank
absorption fields, sewage lagoons, and sanitary landfills.
Sewage Disposal (Soil Report for Carolina Village
Vicinity)
This table shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect septic tank
absorption fields and sewage lagoons. The ratings are both verbal and numerical.
Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil
features that affect these uses. Not limited indicates that the soil has features that are
very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance
,^ can be expected. Somewhat limited indicates that the soil has features that are
moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or
minimized by special planning, design, or installation. Fair performance and moderate
maintenance can be expected. Very limited indicates that the soil has one or more
features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot
be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or expensive installation
procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected.
Numerical ratings in the table indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings
are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They indicate gradations
fm
23
A"

Custom Soil Resource Report
between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use
am (1.00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0.00).
Septic tank absorption fields are areas in which effluent from a septic tank is distributed
into the soil through subsurface tiles or perforated pipe. Only that part of the soil
no between depths of 24 and 72 inches or between a depth of 24 inches and a restrictive
layer is evaluated. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect absorption
of the effluent, construction and maintenance of the system, and public health.
Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), depth to a water table, ponding, depth to
PW bedrock or a cemented pan, and flooding affect absorption of the effluent. Stones and
boulders, ice, and bedrock or a cemented pan interfere with installation. Subsidence
interferes with installation and maintenance. Excessive slope may cause lateral
seepage and surfacing of the effluent in downslope areas.
Some soils are underlain by loose sand and gravel or fractured bedrock at a depth of
less than 4 feet below the distribution lines. In these soils the absorption field may not
adequately filter the effluent, particularly when the system is new. As a result, the
ground water may become contaminated.
Sewage lagoons are shallow ponds constructed to hold sewage while aerobic bacteria
decompose the solid and liquid wastes. Lagoons should have a nearly level floor
surrounded by cut slopes or embankments of compacted soil. Nearly impervious soil
material for the lagoon floor and sides is required to minimize seepage and
contamination of ground water. Considered in the ratings are slope, saturated
hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), depth to a water table, ponding, depth to bedrock or a
cemented pan, flooding, large stones, and content of organic matter.
Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) is a critical property affecting the suitability for
am sewage lagoons. Most porous soils eventually become sealed when they are used as
sites for sewage lagoons. Until sealing occurs, however, the hazard of pollution is
severe. Soils that have a Ksat rate of more than 14 micrometers per second are too
am porous for the proper functioning of sewage lagoons. In these soils, seepage of the
effluent can result in contamination of the ground water. Ground -water contamination
is also a hazard if fractured bedrock is within a depth of 40 inches, if the water table
is high enough to raise the level of sewage in the lagoon, or if floodwater overtops the
ON lagoon.
A high content of organic matter is detrimental to proper functioning of the lagoon
because it inhibits aerobic activity. Slope, bedrock, and cemented pans can cause
MP construction problems, and large stones can hinder compaction of the lagoon floor. If
the lagoon is to be uniformly deep throughout, the slope must be gentle enough and
the soil material must be thick enough over bedrock or a cemented pan to make land
smoothing practical.
Information in this table is intended for land use planning, for evaluating land use
alternatives, and for planning site investigations prior to design and construction. The
information, however, has limitations. For example, estimates and other data generally
apply only to that part of the soil between the surface and a depth of 5 to 7 feet.
Because of the map scale, small areas of different soils may be included within the
mapped areas of a specific soil.
The information is not site specific and does not eliminate the need for onsite
investigation of the soils or for testing and analysis by personnel experienced in the
design and construction of engineering works.
Government ordinances and regulations that restrict certain land uses or impose
specific design criteria were not considered in preparing the information in this table.
ma
24
ow

am
Custom Soil Resource Report
Local ordinances and regulations should be considered in planning, in site selection,
am and in design.
am Report --Sewage Disposal (Soil Report for Carolina Village
Vicinity)
[Onsite investigation may be needed to validate the interpretations in this table and to
em confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. The numbers in the value columns range
from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the potential limitation. The table
shows only the top five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have additional
me limitations]
OW
MR
ON
MM
ray►
OM
am
L'_1
am
MM
4M
Sewage Dlsposal— Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Map symbol;and soil name
Pet. of
Septic tank absorption fields
Sewage lagoons
map..unit
-Rating class and limiting
Value
Rating class and limiting
VaZtte: .
features
features
ArA—Armenia loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes, rarely flooded
85
Very limited
Slow water movement
Depth to saturated zone
Flooding
---------------
Very limited
Depth to saturated zone
Flooding
Armenia, undralned
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.40
0.40
ChA--Chewacla sandy loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
Chewacla
85
Very limited
Very limited
Flooding
1.00
Flooding
--1.00
Depth to saturated zone
1.00
Depth to saturated zone
1.00
Seepage, bottom layer
Slow water movement
1.00
0.50
Seepage
0.50
CoB—Coronaca clay loam, 2 to
8 percent slopes
Coronaca, moderately eroded
100
-----
Somewhat limited
Slow water movement
Somewhat limited
Slope
Seepage
--- ---... __. -----
0.50
----
0.68
0.50
CoD—Coronaca clay loam, 8 to
._ - --
-
15 percent slopes
100
Somewhat limited
Slope
0.63
Very limited
Slope
Coronaca, moderately eroded
1.00
Slow water movement
0.50
Seepage
0.50
CuB2—Cullen clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Cullen, moderately eroded
80
Somewhat limited
Somewhat limited
Slow water movement
0.50
Slope
0.68
Seepage
0.50
am
25

OM
no
am
Am
0"
me
fm
r.o
M4
a"
am
0"
00
am
am
Om
Custom Soil Resource Report
Sewage Disposal— Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Map ymtidl�artd soll:name
Pct. of
Septic tank absorption fields
Sewage lagoons
map unit
Rating class and limiting
Value
Rating class and limiting
Value.
features
features
CuD2--Cullen clay loam, 8 to
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
80
Somewhat limited
Slope - -.
----0.63
Very limited
Slope_.._.._
Cullen, moderately eroded
1.00
Slow water movement
0.50
Seepage
0.50
EnB--Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes
85
Very limited
Slow water movement
— 1.00
Somewhat limited
Slope
Enon
0.68
Seepage
0.32
IdA—Iredell loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes
80
Very limited
Slow water movement
Depth to saturated zone
— r1.00
Very limited
Depth to saturated zone —
Seepage
Iredell
0.99
0.32
1.00
MeB—Mecklenburg loam, 2 to
8 percent slopes
Mecklenburg
85
Very limited
Somewhat limited
Slow water movement
1.00
Slope
0.68
Seepage
0.50
PoB--Poindexter loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes
Poindexter
75
Very limited
Depth to bedrock
1.00
Very limited
Depth to soft bedrock
-- 1.00
Depth to hard bedrock
Slope
Seepage
0.96
0.68
0.50
PoF—Poindexter loam,15 to 45
percent slopes
Poindexter
80
Very limited
—
Very limited
Too steep
Depth to bedrock
1.00
1.00
Depth to soft bedrock
Slope —
Depth to hard bedrock
Seepage
1.00
1.00
0.96
0.50
am
26

No
am
OM
�]
am
�1
no
0"
MR
SM
x"
am
MR
00
am
Custom Soil Resource Report
Sewage Disposal— Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Mapsymbol-and soil name
`
Pct. of
map unit -
Septic tank absorption fields
Sewage lagoons
Rating class and limiting
features
Value
Rating class and limiting
features
Value
We/-Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes, frequently
flooded
85
Very limited
Flooding
Depth to saturated zone
Seepage, bottom layer
Slow water movement
1.00
Very limited
Flooding
Depth to saturated zone
Seepage
Wehadkee, undrained
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
e f ^jai ads
16.
Very limited-
Verylimited
}
'Flooding :`
1.Q0
Flooding
>
Depth to,-saturated.zone
100
Depth to saturated zone
Seepage, bottom layer
1.00
Seepage
Slow water movement
0.50
27
Am

j 24
Appendix G
Possible Location for Wastewater Reuse

Map Source: Cabarrus County GIS
Carolina Village Mobile Home Park
Possible Location for Wastewater Reuse
Concord, N.C. Scale: I"=440'
N
Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 November 16, 2009

. as
Appendix H
Location of 100 Year Flood Plain

Map Source: Cabarrus County GIS
Carolina Village Mobile Home Park
100 Year Floodplain Location - Topography
Concord, N.C. Scale: 1 " = 325'
N
Horizon 9wineerin_a & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 November 16, 2009

i
MI
Appendix I
Location of 500 Year Flood Plain
26

M
t�.._
� ED
r
} • �� '.'. c.-'Ziff. � }��7
,
Exist. WWTP c tve,4
oxta x l '
dry
_ _ r _ fi• � � I r 1 Ir,. p f �?
s �' 1 • a 4� � � sdo �.Ty,l•�-�X-77-500
Year Flood Plain
1� l bi r.
j. S f� 5 �u - ark ,} duc
7" 71II a �i'dA2.�5 -u988
r ✓,,.� �� ---... Srr, c l� 2 faiG 5, 4
572
3 �+76
`N Su4 'a •�, ::_y t� h'fri�i '—'r 6uu
5'9y _ rt Sys r 5:2 o . 2 573
�.� � y ryd ,b I - , f �c,U� °8y ✓� '-�, Mai
6�4-
I? ,
Carolina Village Mobile Home Park Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
500 Year Floodplain Location - Topography 2510 Walker Road
Concord, N.C. Scale: 1" = 325' Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 November 16, 2009

Map Source: Cabarrus County GIS
Carolina Village Mobile Home Park Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.
500 Year Floodplain Location - Aerial 2510 Walker Road
Concord, N.C. Scale: 1" = 325' Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 November 16, 2009

27
Appendix . J
FEMA FIRM 3710469900J

.,
r
a.a
r
7n KlC A
Carolina Village Mobile Home Park
Excerpt from FEMA FIRM 3710459900J
Concord, N.C. Scale:
LEGEND
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAS) SUBIECT TO
INUNDATION BY THE I% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD EVENT
The 1% annual dance food (100-year flood), also known as the base Rood, Is the flood that
has a 1% Chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The Special Flood Hand
Area is the area subject: to Ong by the 1% annual chance flood. Areas of Special Food
Hazard include Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V, and VE. The Base Food Elevation is the
water -surface
elevation of the 1% annual chance flood.
ZONE A
No Base Flood Elevation determined.
ZONE AE
Base Flood Elevations determined.
ZONE AH
Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); Base Food Elevations
determined.
ZONE AO
Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet Row on sloping [amain); average
depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also
determined.
ZONE AR
Special Food Hazard Area formerly protected from the 1% annual dance
Rood by a flood control system that was subsequent, dea' dfied. Znne AR
indicates that the former flood control system is being restored to provide
I,p
protection from the 1% annual chance or greater flood.
ZONE A99
Areas to be protested from 1% annual chance flood by a Federal food
protection system under construction; m Base Flood Elevations determined.
ZONE VE
Coastal flood zone with velocity hamrd (wave action); Base Food Elevations
determined.
FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE
The floodway
is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplein areas that must be kept.
free of encroachment so that the 1% annual dance food can the artied without substantial
Increases in flood heights.
OTHER ROOD AREAS
ZONE X
Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with
average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square
mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% animist chance flood.
OTHER AREAS
ZONE X
determined
Areas deterned b ce outside me 01%annual dunce Iloodplzin.
,.`� _
/\ ZONE D
Jim; In whidh flood harards are undeeerminel, but posside.
=
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS
OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAS)
'.:RRS areas and OPAs are normally located within err adjacent to Special Food Hazard Areas.
--- t% annual ciana floodplain boundary
y 01%annual chance floodplain boundary
Floc ay boundary
Zone D boundary
�— ..................••• faRS and OPA boundary
�'- Bounoary tinfting Special Flood Hamam Area Zdnei and boundary
/--- dwiding Special Flood HaIDrd Areas Of different Base Food
Desadom, flood deic ns or flood v oc ies.
-- — 513 — -- Base Flood Swatbn line and value; emiatbn In fee[•
(EL 987) Base Flood Devehon value wham uniform wMn a ; eleation in
fee•
• Referenced to Me NOM American VeNal Datum 01988
UI Goss semon IIre
®--------- aJ Trzrs line
Horizon Engineerinq & Consulting, Inc.
2510 Walker Road
Mt. Pleasant, N.C. 28124 November 16, 2009

28
04
MR Appendix K
Carolina Village - Subdivision Survey Map
4m And WWTP Plan Drawing
an
04
Am
,M
oft
am
Am
Am
m.

1
t n•• UPKV w tOMO TO .errs w Caren.
R
LINE TABLE: ROCKY t`
RtC1gN ta31MiAMI! 1 ••' urw • ".w r r�•'Y' •°' u• erns errs. 0"awr'.'�r •.
Ll S SY 16 91.1 r7 1 t ° r..e~a.a• an,r ~W 11~°s,a h w�wr'�i a�wrrww,rr �irrpvr
LZ N al'2 v Y { { llp9 r Iota W .aI„Ir su.c t. 1 L 4 Il tllq. Il 14 /4 17 W NI I iwM ► ww/.
I� Y A e.erre ale.rw •'.iNrf • ,la. w .8H W Y r.wl •• .r frl. •
1.3 N 1733 SS w tOt.ef tt Y Kurbnda-8oggs InwslmMla. LLC sr ..error w .•f••Irrs rrsr Tors sr Y w .nrwr fr•.e.. • rw
r.+rrrw ••/Tree Y .. tar r awr dr•L ti ar" nor I.wee r .Y •nwp
LI N 67Y007 If 163.47 R AfE2.1 DO 3g62-265 (1st T.Ct) r .,r �,r y w.�„ r „ap° a.r.
L3 M 11Y0/ 3 w t 00 '02. 'pow b• %9". rhea. Non.• per••
LS -3-0 31 Ss w t 2 " . •
LN /6'0732 w tslAO ' City of Concord 'rr �') fir.% warn & tauYMa L-301 tble
lU N ]■ 9 31 v 67.20 (Rocky 16..f GoR C'ewn)
/ N armor w t07�2 !7 I (s„ Cal,dM1 Iw•.re• f �k ��i / _ y`� •�rMM"
L10 N ta' // t7 s00I not berd) V el �•'' °�
ul N Sal 30 w nSM n { I. arm RE R� /yam /tom ^
13 N / •ID 2/ ,01.500
9 fT G.yiJ/ / ���•'-- \Y" . ....F `•• ° t967)
g o /�r �\ j �" tkB 22 Pq zs {
PW Ned set I
[+14106• a'w p/`TrYr'so "saa
49
:
opoky la .1 e.rreo-Awd .. / /��••"r"` %/ate ' . + `�.°b� " ' 6 \ \ £3 �� .? \ E'3 v 'YJ R=600.00 sad 1L TB
ay i' " t. /br , z .r-[N6 Isla ! o•
( eeae .loran.• / o //� i ];t ! \ '"t.1•d ,� H \' ' ' r i tJ '\\tlj\\ �\I\'• 0 T�,� L=151.M I �Ak
rol towed) / ' ,11 '' - NS','aa'It-I � # � •TC7� � �,} e, �►'
fjg 1\ i 1 3 `•, c.i �.; o, t, 0 .:a 4 rwae a, 4 y�0��� •,
O�'_, ,< •` ' \\ \' ` •`, \ •'-��`•.•• z3 �. N39'17'Ss"fi p o'o,toeltl. kr"eero tir ! -""¢ •a.y. ? • V Y" ■ 'C- •, l?' • '' s 76.15 c 70 a/a3-n6
�� �' ' �� O t i 17 ' f' \` \ ,t\-A .�V3 . �. ;i" ^ f'77a
1 '� • \` '•(' \
1 Iv. .... _-.. 1 •'•. f =a ''� 1 � ''�• \ �d • '' � F�• ' <l ; ` Nudooder-Beggs I".eatmerns. LLC • ;n -J ! \� �
'' • \0 y . \ f \ Y •\ S.�'�\ OB 3962-265 (tat Trott) \ 9 V of -4 p
, �� ' R!f � `� .o r ° q • \ Vy \ s' "� -�\ t�, versa.. Vag" Not.b b ". v k \ n•n. J. corn wf\ 4a \ �o
•�. , '\.,-' 1. s .c'' ' r `, fl. \ 'a•!'• '\ 5.4; . 3: ' t L:w0 \ ,d
� } } I t�'� l �.. /!,' II \ �'�~ l� , ''■ ``\ `,:1 �\ ,Y� �' • 4/x� •� `!: } •'�e�\, i'' •/ � • -, ,� 7su-713f`er fsso
^' L } f jJ^,�e'� `\ I "N� e� tt s .• 'yam•- !s \`/� !� ` \ C'3 \` '•..,!' "'`. C.� t� �; ''� a . ''` , ��.-3 's �' e+ ' ,; b�' � � `3t �2 \
1 �rJ rf / I \_. t '•Y' ...... \?\ 2yt-! \S}. \ fj\. 3� w' '3 \�� , •AJ.tr• \°�v �! ie fps'
l 1 O r J. P' J \ I I\ • i �i}-,.-r�• , /� t \ \ i" \ �•:� '� \'': ' • '`•�, •.\• \ ' 0/ �� i ♦ 3 I ,� \ ! q• + \ ,
....`'-` _ - ; �" . .) •\ ':; ,^f • `\ 1 t £ ,:.•- \. '� , r* are? Llrir•• N« `` d� C
\ . , 2• oe 23i7-this 7 �'o t.
r I a `�.-\\ 1 \ (+\ R4 �`�' -•1} - � '1� � ly � •.�� t�\�\ �.•• •� i f� -:�'ed ., l t�\cs'�l P.��, :,�,i e �
.........
f�A-�_ ��~ i _ !��` \`//' •,, ..� ~\ - Jr i'� �` \ t: `/po fr\
C> II /j,If sjj,�`t.'+�. `I.._ l j,-� \/ / ��.�i ,'•� \sot".�.• �.3 ''`,•. �'�\y� e '` /'`•� �� / \�,, •, w,'L� I� l`4 /
'•Aju
It
i \^'4.� I.--. ..+..'.\• -['� _...� ( I �\ :ram �\ I,?-''�\ ° r......._..�\\� f !
i I 11 } }! " �`i•�; P r' v - `` as
aji f a/ { t I ' j''In t :.._ - slo•ol so"e - 484.11
•ra",_'-•.. �k
r t.= g ♦ : Ty I; rp IY th+ } e j �- _j I L� c+ 0
t` f
1�- 19 Nurlandtr-Ooggs( Inwseme's. L1C / xiw Np/e,4 �. a
�•' I o I \ .. o Z ?..• +�__-_ o O o O otuoe ourt■ ae . e -` ---------- e~ + \ 06 3962- 5th !,act / 'as4r c N7g/ere I
J f\ / / , 'st4 won W' oe •6'-•67
-_ _ _�-\
1 �: ��. 7- f �.._........-_.....__. h 2:
I \ / a3 � ` .\_._._..c ... \ ..,w.�_.....t f r f, ; i ' "1' t' � 1)� � �t P9 23 / 1
,' @i /� �: 8T : ;•. ! 5: ;' [`f H � .3 }Sit � o T / I
a , 4 ,Tan f >a o. 11 ■ `\a •� • ,'tlslwwl a: of ■A mt °M [9A0• � �7au•is / !
Y i \ Ists s e s Y• i i • I _ ? SItYD3'22'lf - 116 29'(T 6 ; § L-
` 4 tbolhw ue6a r3assva \ rs 3ii Y$ 4g3 g SS w �� \ R �• } :lf l g t
1 \ ` I !'� a ! li Id-eti °+� q%'F a •
\ Coal we 29 \ b !'1 b . $�' E& % w, �/ d \ i 4r \ y & a 1 F. $ t R IIA eig "
g I W 179 t102p-f7 '� 16 T s>• ! s tiwv }%�E •cd,+ E 9i i_ei I i =RI.R yYt �l
1 \ 1 \ b, IY'a P}}++ ' ` IdaI>< ",r it�6a I tlkdd '� •p� Ij , ,;
�\ Here Newie•err t \ \ '!� iS�=�IEY 31 Y'S '�iIw..�•I•SC �-`}l.T �'%'Sr." \ y ��}KY���.�'� ��a.: •�"" �'- �ES''1 J� �:l ��! I '� (�,+ I
1 \ 2r " \ \ .. iii��� f•,I�' ti �{ a s s� I >r
t \ ig c' l•�+i \ :I Y\ s }- s a = 3asl s � , 1I•s" '$� gel I
GENERAL NOTES
2. SYoea of tAw ow Back 6M, ►00o UL
3. Pero 1 a 2.t21.621 J. (3IA01 -3. by teorarda4
iM wee N I-tb tote) ewes .f Pownin 9-a" Nta Book 21. Pog•a 23 0-424. Its kc'.fe,A so,1'nse M•wn h•.e" .r• IM ■uebslw crap.•# o* end ere cgp.:..atioe oa•1•d 1-said nvw&
N err,. 1. This
2 •flab w .Ca a�� t1W 7ausnte CIW-., 7 Ca+.,.tY,nwl .4•"•ew O!-COtit2II
b••N.g guy' 20. 2009 n 6dI0 erns.
es, S.•o-e rrl.• 14.
. IMtrn
d-/RM-N 6- ERseven /3) rc0M1
b W Mrlw snd S•N• hrinwRr of 3raa1M
M era► rl
err,.._
a V. •.r..rM .Af- ►w
'
E.•r•P1 '• U.M HCJ, Ftta 162 (rre.w I.w..•).
�') wtaw"w.t-'a�lawwa a.kasa�aru+.aM. t t�s Chowlistt.. Dwl k ..
wn
ALTA/ACSY (AND T1 Lr- SURVEY
rrr. k,w p„ ww.erf
■ 1...«.
eeaw! Iwrnaaa ea Tana We-ab..•cw�tM n 3ma �5a0. Pep 11 (bcelw.a M
ean
aaenles/tes.. dean-
CAROLINA VILLAGE MOBILE HOME PARK
•- err •+'•
Nightawwce
/3) . of .then I, and to W tontinwas •rr0 wOlw..A.d no. a the wets.
en er .:rq Ina .ace era fipwu. d/sr atarat .ydex:s.d to go bM
creg"a
CONCORD, CABARRUS COUNTY, N.C.
(I. etas eaa. PeaM7 crow• hwtan).
R e. 19i00J dot.o 2C a so a•.awy fis
HORIZON LAND COMPANY
.4in,.Per
. Spas, 0-0 as aLMwpee-,- -i . no" hod we r�
Sut,rey Date: July 29. 2D09
S� ^'• •Y'
■ t~ei►M~.�
wna•r s.rr,.rr
se---WA--d ram rasp: w rse .wren oec a ... awtw,...d :Ow t wm y
7. Shia . 6e.e not .Real twe3sb.1WVs.. Cenbct to. NC ONECALL
•+�a ��b
w 1-600-6]2-{fIf .etas a�,7 a!ggwg.
the
100 0 R00 202 _-�0
1�^
a
•-"ww•�Y••^••r•
G Tors •re awI ({�
t time
6' vc
.nwne�t aeo aloe h co N (Feoaaa0.n1 of a Sf' ConRory caaw am (aRht" V.
E.arptloes OoeVa� q CVrrw.pr M gretaa.. Ne other
tena•✓rdbn rJ,e7 •e7 eNar.t
6. a W kc•n b W bjecenl
- --
..Stole 1' • 1W
.r.�.. •rr
-R-�
sl.eb .ubl.ct a. Piab. w r.cardN ea4 web
..to :r 0 Afft of ` -7I.7R,v:. to � , �".e. trek t, �/. la fie
A.G. ZOUTEWELLE
-a'-•' pw
10. Na eb..rala @"- of oU wee w e adls .sole wwp .-V ow • .Uv ,anerss
11. Q-em :.i - 6 .f IN. Pneu, w as. , av (R.ha.a;e, �+q.) wkbh 1... It. ,A.e;./ ~.N. r:
Utbook: ad"wit: 7' R.eywa: Nal04
SURVEYORS
1419 Ea! RiM St. GwbRw NC Se201
20' S' 3$' "a.:.w.
This au.ey den out r~ a 1-1 arody.s. Any re-' ''prr•eN of n.4 prop" is subjecl
Manor 70h31Q-611t ►as: 701-3n-2333
s ae)ed to W Is errs epero,d of W Gl7 of Concord.
r U.w.e. ikar+r C-11131

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I
{til Of MA1l RIAl • Slit Of MAMMAL •1 Sltl Of YATERIAI fill OF MATlRIAL i
01. •.I IaM +A 01I N.1W 1 gKI.A r.' •�
N+ IA
s
r
I
49'- Idl►
i _. _- _ __•— - --- -- sral tat riw f-eaAlA teat We .
1ilAraa�•a /11 ant■ wD.a A.o +( 1 f -
, �•� ( - � "Clam lnArt r1a1'�_ F .
1
-w t
1 at" +tu � MOTES:
411
tawL' CORA MION Or MANOR UMfITS iS CONSIO[R[o Aso.&At- ! i. *,WgMATAAT .. ..�_ L iL �arm tsAe0 Am �To�uo MY Or [ii[CTICN.
-----o LtT ' 1 L WNW MILLNOT ACCEPT AIIT MCKCM U936 rItOMl
1•LaIt.1A 1,0
R up1�TrRCi WELR 'DETAILS APPWAI. a�wtaTwO AM RWCM[. TM um on" .
-YII gr.StN AAD D.a. II ICAIA. CfiTOR9 r SALLI
!: rH ASSTti/. as Atoa�y, ._—_. __ ..••L„_ —.- - !. I NCO LL NO'T R OMSTW CT FOR TILL DESIGN.
OWA
!• [.._.._ i rAT[RIALt, OR CONSTMI1CTtON 0► AIIT COMCRLTi
.vl -I.Pnc >,,. 4 I.'•..o rw�Y•0 1 1 _ , I itORlf A33MATED u7T14 TNS TRLATMM STSTEY.
a Au CINDCONS• w[N IN WMS whits PC—Wto
......,.a..•Da ,
1A•-d ;;>, a14 TNA. "pool n. 1 ....�- • .••j OTNtRrISL
• - t ♦ - 1 ,► 4 OMCO rufttp" TM IFMEM rAS*"T[D rOA
CLARIFIER
ao-•boo :. t...4.. AS 7NONN IRON M pr1rO ODNi�CTION.'L
0 " L~ Rt rl"D UNIA tr[c1/
ru1ED.
I st SLUM .�:_ . _ 1.• • 1 ! / ., a ALL ulr/ sTlrrtNlRt ARE wTIxNAL
S+Ry■ ti- i' t i�llr--7 ' ! -.s• ATAMTYT. 24 ■WC
a SLA4I *CIA* wan I V2 SO, iuerlt `-- --, -- - 3 L 1[4.Lt TO KFYRIGT[D rRCY IN' TlsClt tTEtL
"'r0"A'L�. DRAB. DETAIL ruTc uastt sxwKo orwrRac
!'wti• tYly- trC :'r •. - o . �_� _ L ALL TAIOt{ ARE NLLr MDROSTATIC TNS MT[SI I
DIG£STEA I • REAERATION [INTACT ; -: { Tn 1 tAu131 tt DWGNEO MR AOD+[ OR DEIOu CNADL
t aC. rgTAtIATION. r -
kiiIva" •a4 ..) i?++-t�uuoNati1h:s�['LL°"at j VL �L •• ruwr INAu NRrE TWO Kamm d �s c!N r
IIImcma afar 0,11xAQ-46 3 �.
►LIL7•lA+ At— O>t.1..aLK ! ^• _ - IL LFT STATION WNTROL ►AMIL TO K 1A71INTLO ON
l.At. DftIM6 T14MMENT PLANT WIN A POafA m COCOICT SMITCN
Iw 9011eN CSA►L. /OR [ACM ►YiM YOIwT[D IN 1aIT atCi1 �iSLR.
• - j ..3 12. LIT STATION CONTACL ►ANCL AND TREATMENT r I
[IrWttlT wM tDt a • - SCONTN L ►MEL {OTN TO NR[T NCMA 3R
wriN� /LANGEO VSWQ7
• CDNNlCfgN
Asra rin est■N r■1■IL a■1L SIrL r.w■Rn r IIrA1rr/ wA.a P+A. V.E
r:
N0i1 M.Ki NEO[L � �"�'eR'MIVI�iLNM �w..rr
I[[N11 NIOfi NITl, 11i. IP�ONTNt Y.plr IIfO[L LN�[ w
Iw•.t I.aR[I■w IIOI.L ■NY,ANI LINIIra
•• ••_ wq. YAr LIM ■
NP[[rt elm 4 �.
ArI YNO "Nor YII0Nt4INK
1 Its K Tol.bs nA■DA.MLt • • -
a
. ■LYMCrI.W N■IL 14A lrT RATE. � �• _ . - ? ^ �••! �
m-FI � Yw rfAM YID Mle[! • M►PM. A
I�.L1t • �'^..—..._ ,��♦ 3 � �� tQlr WIL[ w
ESQ WM e[TALI [ sc "Nov L
T ! �' TLa/4 T/rC 1 % '
Orr•,.ye r1.- i� / Lis • . —1 aL.el".aAs� w ;4z_
ca,
N.3w►I._��...M_.- _ nj
�T„IEIa j4 UotANAVANT ;j c. •e LAMIl .
' k Er[!■w , Er►WlMt COME ._.. S tWtt [ACTOR �. .
. o tsiTYw ! sour 6: u[s 7S i - - --
o ' R KNOVAL Ito .
ulOxl.,i-{ talegl • '•i..: � �•? ♦ !• f3i DAJROUNA V0J_AGE
.N4Y.■ Te ff ; t r . I .
ss-
vas -.rs• __ s_- • • "' ss '� .-s-_ i;T• `• 1.' aswlRw[ w funwTN4
y' -_` _ Il, Ma Spam m
•-L . wITN aRDtA14
- 1 ! 1 ! - t'. -._�' - [[ '/A� M• _ SJ i•. I. I �. '-' 4 1 S m -an Ci.
E j DAVtO RitD
S :Aaw i 101.9ASt ILAS Not IN 06= IT" ALL SLAMfI -- - - • 1• i• - , .
KIES
�tMRt a 11 ENO VIEW L' �° � • nls�■iw1�aA:i.rw
ELEVATION 1
��. t r I• " ' tateo slaw-val R-L1DwtS-D1 '

29
Appendix L
so City of Concord — Wastewater Collection System Use Fees
MR
I"
M,
Am
am
M*
so
P"
MR
am
a.
am

om
MW
FY 2009-10 ADOPTED FEES, RATES AND CHARGES SCHEDULE
(Effective July 1, 2009 or first applicable
billing cycle for Utilities;
Fees subject to change by Council.)
ADMINISTRATIVE
Board Meeting Agendas
$ 10.00/yr
City Code
$100.00 Bound Copy
$ 75.00 Unbound Copy
$ 20.00 Renewal Subscription
Laser Printer Copies / Photocopies
1-10 Copies
Free
11 or more Copies
$0.25 photo copy or page printed
Child Support Payroll Administration Fee
$ 2.00 each
�.,
Duplicate W 2's
$ 5.00 each
Official Public Budget Document
$ 50.00/book
Attorney's Fee
$250.00/hr or reimbursement of contract actual cost
Paralegal Fee
$ 95.00 per hour
Parking Deck Fee:
Level 1 & 1.5
$25.00/space/month
Level 3
$15.00/space/month
Level 4
$10.00/space/month
Discount
$ 1.00/space/month on all singly -purchased
blocks of 10 or more spaces
($5 late fee charged on all past due payments)
Parking Deck Sticker (City Employees only)
First two stickers free
Third and each subsequent sticker $10.00 each
Encroachment/Permit for Sidewalk Dining
$175.00
Payment by Credit Card
May be assessed by a Td party vendor a
convenience fee for using this service.
Civil Penalty for Violating City Code, "(a)(1) Unless otherwise specifically provided, violation of any provision of this Code or
any other city ordinance shall subject the offender to a civil penalty in the amount of $500.00 or as specified in the then
current Fees, Rates and Charges Schedule adopted as part of the City of Concord Annual Operating Budget; except, that
where the General Statutes of North Carolina provide specific remedies for violations of provisions of this Code adopted
pursuant to such statutes, such remedies available to the city for enforcement of this Code shall be in addition to the
remedies hereinafter stated; except, that where the General Statutes of North Carolina provide specific remedies for
Violations of provisions of this Code adopted pursuant to such statutes, such remedies available to the city for enforcement
of this Code shall be in addition to the remedies hereinafter stated. (4) Except as otherwise specifically provided, each
day's continuing violation of any provision of this Code or any other city ordinance shall be a separate and distinct offense.
(f)(3) (3) Any willful failure to pay any civil penalty imposed within this Code is a misdemeanor under G.S. § 14-4 and
punishable by a fine of $500.00 or 30 days in jail, or both."
Excerpts from Sec 1.6, Code of Ordinances of the City of Concord.
ems►
AVIATION
DAILY RATES
Category I Remain Over Night (RON): $15.00; Hangar In Common (HIC): $30.00; Landing: $10.00 All Cessna
100/200 Series Models, Tripacer, Colt, Comanche, Cherokee, Pacer, Musketeer, Bonanza, Mooney,
Rockwell Commander, Lance, Arrow, Cirrus.
Category II RON: $18.00; HIC: $35.00; Landing: $12.00 Cessna 310, 335, 336, 337. 401, 402. 411, 414, 421, - All
300's/400's, Aztec, Apache, Navajo, Twin Comanche, Duke, Baron, Duchess, Seminole, Seneca,
Aerostar, Saratoga, Malibu.
�a Category III RON: $25.00; HIC: $50.00; Landing: $30.00 Kingair, Twin Beech (D-18), Queenair, Aero/Grand
Commander, Cheyenne, Turbo -Commander, Conquest, MU-2, Metroliner, Merlin, Caravan, Jetstream,
Avanti, Palatus.
Category IV RON: $25.00; HIC: $80.00; Landing: $40.00 Lear, Citation, Jet -Commander, Saber -liner, Hansa,
Lodestar, Westwind, Starship, Diamond, Beech Jet, Falcon 10, Astra, Premier, Beach 1900, Beachjet
400, Hawker 700, Hawker 800, Hawker 1000.

no
(2)
A penalty of $500.00 for altering, tampering with or removing or replacing a City electric meter for the
purpose of obtaining service after service has been disconnected for non-payment of electric bills
rendered.
(3)
A penalty of $500.00 for straight wiring, jumping or by any other means obtaining electric service from
an existing service pole or pedestal. A penalty of $500.00 for altering the registration of an electric
meter by use of any electronic or mechanical means or the obtaining of electric power by any means
when said power is obtained by bypassing registration of the electric meter.
(4)
If metering equipment is damaged, it will be replaced or repaired according to the City's specifications.
Any offending party whose electric service has been discontinued by the City pursuant to this section
shall not be eligible for reconnection to the City's electric service either at the point of Infringement or at
any other locations on the City's electric system until the penalty imposed and all replacement or repair
costs are paid In full.
(5)
If service has been disconnected from a power source for non-payment or meter tampering and the
customer restores service on a non -protected circuit (i.e. mobile home pedestal, junction pedestal,
transformer, etc), persons involved may face legal prosecution and penalties in the amount of $500.00
will be required in addition to other tampering charges to reconnect service.
(6)
All cases not covered by the specific situations as noted above, will be judged on an individual basis
�+
and treated accordingly.
(7)
In addition to the penalties and cost provided in the above, such conduct described shall be subject to
Immediate disconnection of City electric service if the offending party is an electric customer of the City.
(8)
The penalties and costs herein provided shall be imposed by the Customer Service Manager or his/her
designated agent.
(9)
Any person upon whom any penalties and/or costs are imposed shall have the right of appeal from the
action taken by the Customer Service Manager directly to the Finance Director.
(10)
Any person upon whom any penalty and/or costs are imposed shall have the right of appeal from the
action taken by the Finance Director to the City Manager.
WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES
+� WATER TREATMENT AND DISTRIBUTION USE FEES
Base charge: (Based on Water Meter Size):
Inside City: Outside City:
%" $4.04 $4.54
1" $5.76 $6.61
MR
1 W $9.71 $11.35
2" $14.66 $17.29
3" $26.28 $31.23
4" $42.85 $51.11
,M
6" $83.89 $100.36
8" $133.34 $159.70
10" $191.20 $229.13
12" $355.86 $426.73
MM Fire Service Availability
4" $ 52.01
6" $ 94.44
8" $145.09
�a
10" $217.72
12" $334.30
"Volume Charges:
rN Residential volume charges inside city:
Residential service:
Block 1 (0 - 6,000 gallons/month) $5.08/1000 gallons
Block 2 (6,001 - 8,999 gallons/month) $6.61/1000 gallons
rM Block 3 (9,000+ gallons) & Irrigation service: $8.14/1000 gallons
Residential volume charges outside city:
Residential service:
Block 1 (0 - 6,000 gallons/month)
$6.10 /1000 gallons
Block 2 (6,001 - 8,999 gallons/month)
$7.93 /1000 gallons
Block 3 (9,000+ gallons) & Irrigation service
$9.7711000 gallons
Commercial and institutional volume charges inside city:
Commercial/institutional service
$5.0611000 gallons
Commercial/institutional irrigation service
$8.14 /1000 gallons
Commercial and institutional volume charges outside city:
Commercial/institutional service
$6.07/1000 gallons
Commercial/institutional irrigation service
$9.7711000 gallons
28
am

.w
2" $ 8,212.00 ($5,772 capacity + $1,865 installation + $575
meter)
Installed by others on existing Cfty owned water mains
Meter Size': Capacity Charge: (excludes installation and meter fee)
4" $ 18,186.00
6" $ 36,264.00
8" $ 58.044.00
10" $ 83,527.00
12" $156,054.00
Installed by others on water main extensions not yet owned by the City of Concord
Meter Size": Connection Charge: (includes meter fee)
314" $ 1,282.00 ($1,089 capacity + $192 meter)
1" $ 2.135.00 ($1,851 capacity + $284 meter)
2" $ 6,347.00 ($5,772 capacity + $575 meter)
Installed by others on water main extensions not yet owned by the City of Concord
Meter Size': Capacity Charge: (excludes meter fee)
4" $ 18.186.00
e�
6" $ 36,264.00
8" $ 58,044.00
10" $ 83,527.00
12" $156,054.00
'Notes:
• Connections Installed by others must be by licensed utility contractors approved by the City of Concord.
• All meters > 2" must meet City of Concord specifications and should be provided by the applicant.
• Dedicated fire protection connections are exempt from water connection charges however potable service connections off
the fire line are subject to connection charges.
NON -EMERGENCY. AFTER HOURS, WEEKENDIHOLIDAY CUT OFF/ON $100.00 (For Customers requesting service cut
off/on for non -emergency plumbing repairs)
RM
MOVE EXISTING SERVICE TO ANOTHER LOCATION ON SAME PROPERW At Cost (labor + equipment + materials)
PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT WELL WATER USAGE SIGNS $ 10.00 (each)
am
WATER METER TESTING FEES
5/8" —1" $ 50.00
am 1 Y2%2" $ 125.00
PURCHASE OF RAIN BARREL FOR WATER CONSERVATION Actual cost (set by Purchasing), plus sales tax
r�1 WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM USE FEES
Base Charge: (Based on Water Meter Size):
Inside City Outside City
$3.39 $3.80
$4.80 $5.49
1 %" $8.02 $9.35
2" $12.05 $14.18
3" $21.51 $25.53
4" $34.99 $41.71
6" $68.40 $81.80
8" $108.65 $130.10
10" $155.74 $186.61
as Volume Charges:
Inside i
Water Customers of Concord Utilities $ 5.09/1000 gallons
Flat -Rate Customers $ 33.96 /month
+m Outside City
Water Customers of Concord Utilities $ 6.11/1000 gallons
Flat -Rate Customers $ 40.75 /month
WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGES (Applicable to Residential, Commercial and Institutional, and Industrial Customers
30
An

■.
m
Residential Charges: Residential charges are comprised of a capacity fee and Installation fee. Residential charges do not
aQoly to hotels. motels, resorts, and campgrouads: commercigl charges shall aooly to these facilities.
am
Capacity Fee: $800 per residential unit
A residential unit includes each dwelling separately owned, sold, or leased, regardless if the unit is
metered individually or if the residential development is master -metered. For example, a residential unit
includes, and a residential capacity fee applies to, each and every apartment unit, both units of a
MM
duplex, each single-family home, each mobile home, etc.
Installation Fee:
$1,000 /4-inch service
$1,800 /6-inch service
Non -Residential Charges:
Installed by Concord Utilities on existing City owned sewer mains
Meter Size*: Connection Fee:
%" $ 1,800.00 ($ 800 capacity+ $1,000 installation)
1" $ 2,360.00 ($ 1,360 capacity + $1,000 installation)
2" $ 5,240.00 ($ 4,240 capacity + $1,000 installation)
4" $ 15,160.00 ($ 13,360 capacity + $1,800 installation)
6" $ 28,440.00 ($ 26,640 capacity + $1,800 installation)
8" $ 44,440.00 ($ 42,640 capacity + $1,800 installation)
10" $ 63,160.00 ($ 61,360 capacity + $1,800 installation)
12" $116,440.00 ($114,640 capacity + $1.800 installation)
Installed by others on sewer mains not yet owned by the City of Concord
Meter Size*: Connection Fee (excludes installation fee):
$ 800.00
1" $ 1,360.00
2" $ 4.240.00
4" $ 13,360.00
6" $ 26,640.00
8" $ 42,640.00
10" $ 61,360.00
12" $114,640.00
MOVE EXISTING SERVICE TO ANOTHER LOCATION ON SAME PROPERTY
MR
CONCORD UTILITIES EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION PERMIT FEES
Water permit application review
Wastewater permit application review
rM
LABOR AND EQUIPMENT CHARGES
T.V. Truck
Jet -Vac Truck
,m
Flusher/Sweeper
Motor -Grader
Rapid Response Vehicle
Crew Truck
Pick-up Truck
M
Tandem Dump
5-10 Ton Dump Truck
1-Ton Dump Truck
10-Ton Trailer
FM
54on Trailer
Landscape Trailer
Emergency Response Trailer
Shoring Trailer w/Shore Material
50,000-Pound Class Track Hoe
30,000-Pound Class Track Hoe
Front End Loader
Rubber Tire Backhoe
Mini Excavator
Drum Roller Trench Compactor
�.
185 Cubic Foot per Minute Air Compressor
Concrete Mixer
Argo All -Terrain Vehicle
Core Machine:
4" to 6" core
At Cost (labor + equipment + materials)
(See "ENGINEERING'
(See "ENGINEERING'
$150.004ir, 2 hr. min. charge (Incl. Operator)
$225.00/hr, 2 hr. min. charge (incl. Operator)
$ 75.00/hr 1 %: hr min
$ 40.00/hr
$100.00/hr, 2 hr.-min. charge (incl. Operator)
$ 20.00/hr
$ 17.00/hr
$ 30.00/hr
$ 26.00/hr
$ 20.00/hr
$ 10.00/hr
$ 10.00/hr
$ 10.00/hr
$ 10.00/hr
$ 20.00mr
$ 88.00/hr
$ 45.00/hr
$ 44.00/hr
$ 29.00/hr
$ 25.00mr
$ 27.00/hr
$ 60.00/hour
$ 47.001hr
$ 12.00/hr, 2 hr. min. charge
$175.00/each
31