HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0083933_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20151207 i
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
December 7, 2015
Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
Attn: Thomas J. Roberts, President
202 Mackenan Court
Cary, NC 27511
RECEIVEDIDENRIDWR
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Mikkola Downs Subdivision WWTP, NC0067091; DEC 1 0 2015
Greystone Subdivision, NC0078115; and,
Salem Quarters WWTP, NCO083933 Water Quality
Permittee:Aqua North Carolina, Inc. Permitting Section
Forsyth County
Dear Mr. Roberts,
Ron Boone of the Winston Salem Regional Office (WSRO) of the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (DWR or the Division) conducted compliance evaluation inspections of the Mikkola Downs Wastewater
Treatment Plant, the Greystone Subdivision, and the Salem Quarters Wastewater Treatment Plant, on December 1,
2015. The assistance and cooperation of Morgan Turner, Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC), was greatly
appreciated. Inspection reports are attached for your records and inspection findings are summarized below.
Mikkola Downs Wastewater Treatment Plant, NCO067091
General Information
The Mikkola Downs Wastewater Treatment Plant is located near 2777 Stable Hill Trail in Kernersville,
Forsyth County, North Carolina, at approximate coordinates 36.182120° West, 80.053833° North. Aqua NC is
authorized to operate this 0.072 million-gallon-per-day (MGD) wastewater treatment plant, which consists of a-flow
splitter box,bar screen,dual aeration tanks,dual blowers,dual clarifiers,sludge holding tank, Sanuril tablet chlorinator,
chlorine contact tank, dechlorination, post aeration tank, and an effluent flow recorder, and discharge treated effluent
from outfall 001 of said treatment works, which is located approximately 150 feet southwest of the treatment works at
approximate coordinates 36.1825260 West, 80.054143° North, to East Belews Creek, which is currently classified as
Class C waters and is located in the Roanoke River Basin.
Site Review
Mr. Boone reviewed the entire plant with Mr. Turner. No discrepancies or violations were noted. The plant
appears to be well operated and maintained.
Documentation Review
Mr.Turner had all required documentation for the inspection and everything was complete and current.This
included discharge monitoring reports, chains of custody, laboratory records, calibration records, operator visitation
records, and operation & maintenance logs. No discrepancies or violations were noted. Mr. Turner has done an
excellent job of documenting his operation and maintenance of the plant.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
450 West Hanes Nfill Road,Suite 300 1 Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27105
336 776 9800
r
Greystone Subdivision Wastewater Treatment Plant NCO078115
General Information
The Greystone Subdivision Wastewater Treatment Plant is located off the north end of Pine Creek Road in Kernersville,
Forsyth County, North Carolina, at approximate coordinates 36.167662°, 80.086436°. Aqua North Carolina, Inc is
authorized to operate this 0.032 million-gallon-per-day (MGD) wastewater treatment plant, which consists of a bar
screen,an influent pump station,an equalization basin,dual extended aeration basins and clarifiers,a sludge digester,
tablet chlorination and dechlorination,and a flow meter,and discharge treated effluent from outfall 001 of said treatment
works, which is located approximately 25 feet east of the treatment works at approximate coordinates 36.167670°,
80.086130°, to Belews Creek, which is currently classified as Class C waters and is located in the Roanoke River
Basin.
Site Review
Mr. Boone reviewed the entire plant with Mr. Turner. No discrepancies or violations were noted. The plant
appears to be well operated and maintained.
Documentation Review
Mr.Turner had all required documentation for the inspection and everything was complete and current.This
included discharge monitoring reports, chains of custody, laboratory records, calibration records,-operator visitation
records, and operation & maintenance logs. No discrepancies or violations were noted. Mr. Turner has done an
excellentjob of documenting his operation and maintenance of the plant.
Salem Quarters Wastewater Treatment Plant, NCO083933
General Information
The WWTP is located inside the Salem Quarters subdivision in Winston Salem, Forsyth County, NC, at
approximately coordinates 36.191667N, 80.109722W. The permit authorizes Aqua North Carolina Inc.to operate this
0.06 MGD WWTP,which consists of a bar screen,a flow splitter box,an equalization basin,dual aeration basins,dual
clarifiers, a sand filter, an ultraviolet disinfection system, backup chlorination, contact and dechlorination system, a
sludge holding tank, and standby power, and discharge the treated effluent via outfall 001 into an unnamed tributary
(UT)to Belews Creek,this section of which is currently classified as Class C waters in the Roanoke River basin.
Site Review
Mr. Turner has done a good job operating and maintaining the plant. The only problem noted during the
inspection was the presence of excessive sludge solids in the weir troughs on the effluent side of the clarifiers. It is
unknown at this point what is causing the solids to accumulate in the troughs but Mr. Turner is preventing the solids
from being discharged and plans to bring the effluent filters on line to filter out the solids. It is unknown when the filters
will be brought on line. Mr. Boone noted no discrepancies.
Documentation Review
All documentation was reviewed. No discrepancixes were found. Mr. Turner has done an excellent job of
documenting the operation and maintenance of the plant as required by the permit. This includes operations and
visitation logs, discharge monitoring reports and laboratory and field laboratory records, chains of custody, etc.
Mr. Boone noted no concerns during any of these inspections. If you have any questions regarding the
inspections or this letter, please call him or me at(336)776-9800. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Sherri V. Knight
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations
Division of Water Resources
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Report
CC: WSRO-SWP
Central Files
FNPDES Unite
Aqua North=Carolina, Inc.
Attn: Dave McDaniel
152B Furlong Industrial Drive
Kernersville, NC 27284
Aqua North Carolina, Inc.
Attn: Morgan Turner
152B Furlong Industrial Drive
Kernersville, NC 27284
United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved
EPA Washington,0 C 20460
OMB No 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A National Data System Coding(i e,PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 1 2 15 1 3 ' NCO067091 I11 12 I 15/12/01 I17 18 Lc 19 L 201 I
211I1I11 111111 1 11II1II1111 1 I IIIII IIIII1111 -II �6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA —— — —Reserved----------
67 70 LJ 71 _ _ 72 LJ 73I I74 751 I I I I I I 80
Section B• FacilityData
Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 01 OOPM 15/12/01 12/05/01
Mikkola Downs Subdivision WWTP
NCSR 2016 Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
Kernersville NC 27284 02 OOPM 15/12/01 17/02/28
Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
///
Morgan Lee Turner/ORC/336-996-2841/
Name,Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Thomas J Roberts,202 Mackenan Ct Cary NC 275111/919-467-8712/9194661583
No
Section C'Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit ® Flow Measurement Operations&Maintenance Records/Reports
Self-Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal e Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D-Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone WSRO W0//336-776-9690/ / 7
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous editions are obsolete
Page# 1
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
31 NCO067091 h 12 15/12/01 17 18 i c
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additionalsheetsof narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Page# 2
Permit: NCO067091 Owner-Facility: Mikkola Downs Subdivision WWTP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ ® ❑
application?
Is the facility as described In the permit? M ❑ ❑ ❑
#Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ® ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for Inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE ,
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab reg required 5 years)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the chain-of-custody complete? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Dates,times and location of sampling
Name of Individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported CM
Are DMRs complete.do they Include all permit parameters? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the facility submitted Its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? ❑ ❑ M ❑
(If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator ❑ ❑ ❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ❑ ❑ M ❑
Comment: None
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 3
Permit: NCO067091 Owner-Facility: Mikkola Downs Subdivision WWrP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
#Is the facility using a contract labs ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6 0 degrees ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Celsius)?
Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees'? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Incubator(BOD)set to 20 0 degrees Celsius+/-1 0 degrees? ❑ ❑ ❑ N
Comment: None
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is proper volume collected? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the tubing clean? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6 0 degrees N ❑ ❑ ❑
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency, sampling type ® ❑ ❑ ❑
representative)?
Comment None
Upstream/ Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency,sampling type, and ❑ ❑ ❑
sampling location)?
Comment None
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b Mechanical ❑
Are the bars adequately screening debris? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance? ! ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the unit in good condition? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Page# 4
Permit: NCO067091 Owner-Facility: Mikkola Downs Subdivision VVVVTP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext Air
Type of aeration system Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Are the diffusers operational? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the foam cover less than 25%of the basin's surface? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable'? e ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable?(1 0 to 3.0 mg/1) ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids In center well of circular clarifier? ❑ ❑ M ❑
Are weirs level? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of weir blockage? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? O ❑ ❑ ❑
Is scum removal adequate? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the drive unit operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the return rate acceptable(low turbulence)? i ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?(Approximately Y4 of the sidewall depth) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Comment: None
Pumps-RAS-WAS Yes No NA NE
Are pumps In place? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Are pumps operational? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site'? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Disinfection-Tablet Yes No NA NE
Are tablet chlorinators operational? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 5
Permit: NC0067091 Owner-Facility: Mikkola Downs Subdivision WW TP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Disinfection-Tablet Yes No NA NE
Are the tablets the proper size and type? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Number of tubes In use? 3
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de-chlorination? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Comment: None
De-chlorination Yes No NA NE
Type of system? Tablet
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount(1 to 1)? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is storage appropriate for cylinders? M ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is de-chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Are tablet de-chlorinators operational? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Number of tubes in use? 3
Comment: None
Flow Measurement- Effluent Yes No NA NE
#Is flow meter used for reporting? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: None
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the capacity adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 6
Permit: NCO067091 Owner-Facility: Mikkola Downs Subdivision WNITP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the mixing adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is the odor acceptable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: None
Page# 7
United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved
EPA Washington,D C 20460 OMB No 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires B-31-98
Section A National Data System Coding(i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 1 2 15 I 3 I N00078115 111 12 15/12/01 17 18 L�j 19 1 s t 201 I
21111111 111111111 11 1 11 1111 1 1 11 111 1111111 11 1 1 f6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA --- — —671
--
67 70 L 71 L.J 72 LtiJ t 73 I I 174 751 I I I I I L180
Section B- Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 11 30AM 15/12/01 12/05/01
Greystone Subdivision WWTP
Lot 74 Creek Bed Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
Kernersville NC 27284 12 30PM 15/12/01 17/02/28
Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
///
Morgan Lee Turner/ORC/336-996-2841/
Name,Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Dustin K Metreveon,NCSR 1802 Salisbury NC 28144//704-788-9497f7047886006
No
Section C Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated)
M Permit ® Flow Measurement Operations&Maintenance ® Records/Reports
Self-Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review ® Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776-9690/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
kT��tGtyvY� hLs•- /;?-/-7�/ 3
EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous editions are obsolete
Page# 1
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1
31 NCO078115 I11 12 15/12/01 17 18 ICI
Section D Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Page# 2
Permit: NCO078115 Owner-Facility: Greystone Subdivision WVVTP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit. Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires In 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ M ❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for Inspection? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg required 5 years)? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the chain-of-custody complete? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of Individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs O
Are MRS complete:do they Include all permit parameters? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the facility submitted Its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? ❑ ❑ M ❑
(If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow)Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ❑ ❑ M ❑
Comment. None
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 3
Permit: NCO078115 Owner-Facility: Greystone Subdivision VWVMP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is proper volume collected? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the tubing clean? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency, sampling type ❑ ❑ ❑
representative)?
Comment: None
Upstream/ Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency, sampling type, and ® ❑ ❑ ❑
sampling location)?
Comment: None
Laboratory I Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? N ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is the facility using a contract lab? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees ❑ ❑ ❑
Celsius)?
Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0 2 degrees? ❑ ❑ ❑
Incubator(BOD)set to 20.0 degrees Celsius+/-1 0 degrees? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Pump Station - Influent Yes No NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the wet well free of excessive grease? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps operable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are float controls operable? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Page# 4
Permit: NCO078115 Owner-Facility: Greystone Subdivision WVVTP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a Manual
b Mechanical ❑
Are the bars adequately screening debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the unit in good condition? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment None
Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE
Is the basin aerated? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the basin free of excessive grease? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps operable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are float controls operable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are audible and visual alarms operable'? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is basin size/volume adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Are weirs level? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of weir blockage? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is scum removal adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the drive unit operational? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Is the return rate acceptable(low turbulence)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?(Approximately'/4 of the sldewall depth) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Comment None
Page# 5
Permit: NCO078115 Owner-Facility: Greystone Subdivision WWTP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext Air
Type of aeration system Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational? ❑ ❑ E ❑
Are the diffusers operational? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the foam cover less than 25%of the basin's surface? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable?(1 0 to 3 0 mg/1) ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Pumps-RAS-WAS Yes No NA NE
Are pumps In place? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are pumps operational? ®• ❑ ❑ ❑
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Flow Measurement- Effluent Yes No NA NE
#Is flow meter used for reporting? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? e ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: NoneNone
Disinfection-Tablet Yes No NA NE
Are tablet chlorinators operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Number of tubes in use? 3
Is the level of chlonne residual acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de-chlorination? ❑ ❑ ❑ E
Comment: None
Page# 6
Permit: NCO078115 Owner-Facility: Greystone Subdivision WVVTP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
De-chlorination Yes No NA NE
Type of system? Tablet
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount(1 to 1)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is storage appropriate for cylinders? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is de-chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment None
Are tablet de-chlorinators operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Number of tubes In use? 3
Comment. None
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: None
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the capacity adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the mixing adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is the odor acceptable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Operations& Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex MLSS, MCRT, Settleable 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable'?
Comment: None
Page# 7
United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved
EPA Washington,D C 20460 OMB No 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A National Data System Coding(i.e,PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 1 2 15 I 3 I NC0083933 I11 12 15/12/01 17 18 L C J 19 L G j 201 I
211111 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 11 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I �6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA -------------------Reserved--------------
67 70 LJ —
I 71 I JI 72 � N � 73 I I 174 75 80
Section B.Facility Data LJ
Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 10 OOAM 15/12/01 12/05/01
Salem Quarters WWTP
9999 Rangecrest Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
1100AM 15/12/01 17/02/28
Winston Salem NC 27103
Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)fTitles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
///
Morgan Lee Turner/ORC/336-996-2841/
Name,Address of Responsible Offiaal/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Thomas J Roberts,202 Mackenan Ct Cary NC
No
27511/President/919-653-6967/9194661583
Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations&Maintenanc6 Records/Reports
Self-Monitoring Program ® Sludge Handling Disposal ® Facility Site Review Effluent/Receivi6g Waters
Laboratory
Section D Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776-9690/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
/al7� 5
EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous editions are obsolete
Page# 1
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1
31 NCO083933 I11 121 15/12/91 117 18 c I
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
I
Page# 2
Permit: NCO083933 Owner-Facility: Salem Quarters WWTP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
application?
Is the facility as described In the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the Inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab reg. required 5 years)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the chain-of-custody complete? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Dates, times and location of sampling 0
Name of Individual performing the sampling 0
Results of analysis and calibration 0
Dates of analysis 0
Name of person performing analyses 0
Transported COCs 0
Are DMRs complete do they Include all permit parameters? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
(If the facility Is=or>5 MGD permitted flow)Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: None
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 3
Permit: NCO083933 Owner-Facility: Salem Quarters WNIrP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
#Is the facility using a contract lab? N ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6 0 degrees N ❑ ❑ ❑
Celsius)?
Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44 5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees? ❑ ❑ ❑ N
Incubator(BOD)set to 20 0 degrees Celsius+/- 1 0 degrees? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Comment: None
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is proper volume collected? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the tubing clean? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6 0 degrees ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency,sampling type ® ❑ ❑ ❑
representative)?
Comment None
Upstream/ Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as.required by the permit(frequency, sampling type, and ® ❑ ❑ ❑
sampling location)?
Comment: None
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b Mechanical ❑
Are the bars adequately screening debris? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the unit In good condition? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE
Page# 4
Permit: NCO083933 Owner-Facility: Salem Quarters WWTP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE
Is the basin aerated? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the basin free of excessive grease? i ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps operable? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Are float controls operable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are audible and visual alarms operable? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is basin size/volume adequate? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment. None
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext.Air
Type of aeration system Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Are the diffusers operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the foam cover less than 25%of the basin's surface? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1) A ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment. None
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids In center well of circular clarifier? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Are weirs level? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of weir blockage? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is scum removal adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the drive unit operational? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Is the return rate acceptable(low turbulence)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 5
Permit: NC0083933 Owner-Facility: Salem Quarters WWTP
inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?(Approximately%of the sidewall depth) ❑ ❑ ❑ M
Comment: Excessive solids in weir trough. Unknown where they're coming from. Intend to place
effluent polishing filters in operation in order to contain solids.
Pumps-RAS-WAS Yes No NA NE
Are pumps In place? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are pumps operational? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Flow Measurement-Effluent Yes No NA NE
#Is flow meter used for reporting? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Disinfection - UV Yes No NA NE
Are extra UV bulbs available on site? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Are UV bulbs clean? ® ❑ ❑ ❑-
Is UV Intensity adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is transmittance at or above designed level? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is there a backup system on site? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is effluent clear and free of solids? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? N ❑ ❑ ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ M ❑
Comment: None
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the capacity adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 6
Permit: NCO083933 Owner-Facility: Salem Quarters WWTP
Inspection Date: 12/01/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the mixing adequate? O ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is the odor acceptable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: None
Operations& Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: None
Page# 7