20071970 Ver 1_401 Application_20071107

s
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
111 MacKenan Drive
GARY, NORTH CAROLINA, 27511
[phone]
FAX [phone]
TO: iVcr-~~Q
~ 3a ~ c,Tn.1,'t~~:~ ~i..a
WE ARE SENDING YOU
^ Shop Drawings
^ Copy of Letter
^ Attached via
^ Prints
^ Change order
U Plans
^ Diskette
_ the following items:
^ Samples ^ Specifications
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
~' ~c-N ~' " x~,..• 1, : -~ v~ ~O i R.~ vu-
i ~,,~'le. •d .. ~ ~'~

~~ ~~ ~~ ~

QENB - WA7F{? 4UALI 1'Y
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
^ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ^ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS: --~,, , _
`For approval ^ Approved as submitted
~or your use ^ Approved as noted
^ As requested ^ Returned for corrections
^ For review and comment ^

® i l
COPY TO:
^ Resubmit
^ Submit
^ Return
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
~~~~~Q o~ ~~Qa~~a~~a~
DATE „ ~ ~~ JOB NO. o y
ATTENTION ;~~,
PHONE # -F ~ S _ `
RE: ~ v ~...s `1o r

SIGNED: o+,an -C ~-t~-~wC ~.,a_.~~
/f enc%sures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

WITHERS ~,~~~" RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
November 20, 2007
US Army Corps of Engineers NC-Division of Water Quality
Attn: Mr. Jamie Shern Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly P~
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604 (~ ~
Re: Evans Farm Subdivision
Request for 4o4/4oi Certification and Isolated Wetland Fill R!~~ ~ ~ 201
W&R Project Number - 02040242
oE~r~ - ~v~Y~~~t c~~Aln.~
p 7- 1 9 7 0 y~0.~~D sTOr~~!~.~ r+
Dear Mr. Shern and Ms. Karoly:
On behalf of O'Kelly -Durham Associates, LLC we are requesting authorization from
the USACE to use NWP's 18,12, & 29 for the construction of a residential subdivision.
We are also requesting 4oi-Certification and authorization from the NC-DWQ for the
impacts to jurisdictional waters, jurisdictional wetlands, and isolated wetlands.
The subject property is 84.22 acres in size and is located immediately southeast of
the intersection of O'Kelly Chapel Road (SR 1625) and Green Level To Durham (SR
1625). Latitude: 35.8395938°N and Longitude: 78.8979511°W in Cary, North
Carolina. The site contains unnamed tributaries to Nancy Branch and Nancy Branch
which is located in the Cape Fear River Basin. The Water Quality Classification for
these features is: WS-IV;NSW, the Cataloging Unit for this site is: 03030002, and the
Stream Index number is: 16-41-1-17-3-2•
Project History
Wetlands were delineated by Soil and Environmental Consultants and a site meeting
was conducted with the USACE on the northern most parcel, June 25, 2002. A site
meeting was also conducted with the Town of Cary in, July 2002, to confirm the
riparian buffer origins.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed permanent impacts consists of 435 linear feet of jurisdictional stream
channel (349 l.f. unimportant/intermittent channel + 86 l.f. of important/perennial
channel), 4,088 square feet of jurisdictional wetlands, and 6,259 square feet of
isolated wetlands for the installation roadways, BMP's and lot fill. Temporary
impacts include 24 linear feet of unimportant/intermittent channel for the
installation of a utility line. The impacts are summarized on the overall impact map
as well as the PCN form.
iii MacKenan Drive i Cary, NC 27511 i tel: [phone] i fax: [phone] i www.withersravenel.com
7040 Wrightsville Avenue i Suite lol i Wilmington, NC z84o3 i tel: 91o.z56.9z77 i fax: 91o.z56.z584
loz7 Sabbath Home Rd, SW i Supply, NC z846z i tel: 91o.84z•939z i fax: 91o.84z.8o19

Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan development, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland
delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands and `waters' could be
minimized. Impacts were minimized by crossing the channel at a nearly
perpendicular angle and through the use of steeper fill slopes at the stream
crossings.
Stormwater Management Plan
The proposed impervious for this project is expected to be 34.78%~ therefore
constructed wetlands forested stream buffers will be used to treat the Stormwater
before it leaves the site. We have submitted the Stormwater plans to the Town of
Cary for their review. A copy of the approval letter, plans, and, supporting
calculations will be submitted under separate cover. During construction the
applicant will utilize BMP devices to prevent sediment from entering jurisdictional
stream channels or wetlands.
Mitigation
Because impacts to perennial channels are less than 150 linear feet and wetland
impacts are less than o.i acres, we do not believe that mitigation will be required.
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
WITHERS & RAVENEL, INC.
I
Todd Preuninger
Attachments -
1) PCN Form
2) Site plans
3) Agent Authorization
4) USGS Quadrangle Map
5) Wake County Soil Survey Map
6) 1D Forms
7) Stream forms for I/P determinations

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No. O 7 1 9 7 0
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ® Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12,18, & 29
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check her p ~ (~ ~ \1
II. Applicant Information L,~ \~
N~V ~ G 2007
1. Owner/Applicant Information QENR -WATER 4UAL17Y
Name: O'Kelly Durham Associates, LLC -Attn: Glen Fut~I4~~~ST~"~"~~H
Mailing Address: 150 Towerview Court
Cary, NC 27513
Telephone Number: 919-535-0111 -ext. 224 Fax Number: 919-535-0127
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Withers & Ravenel Attention: Todd Preuninger
Company Affiliation: Engiineer/Consultant
Mailing Address: 111 Mackenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Telephone Number: 919-469-3340 Fax Number: 919-535-4545
E-mail Address: TPreuninger(a~WithersRavenel.com
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
5
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant`s discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USAGE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Evans Farm Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only)
NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Wake County Pin Numbers: 073603015021,
073603002178 073501192557 073501192806 073501092668 073501492973
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Evan's Farm
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located
immediately southeast of the intersection of O'Kell~pel Road SR 1625) and Green
Level to Durham Road (SR 1625).
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8395938 °N 78.8979511
6. Property size (acres): 84.22 Acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Nancy Branch
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is consists of wooded areas and agricultural fields.
In addition several single family homes are located on-site. Land use in the vicinity of the
project is primarily residential.
sheet that
oW
Page 2 of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: This
project consists of 84 acres, which will be developed into a mixed community of town homes
and single family residential homes. Large rg ading_equipment i.e. bulldozers and trackhoes)
will be utilized for the installation of the infrastructure (i.e. sewer line, roads, BMPS and site
nrenaration.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this proposed work is to meet
the demand for town homes and single family homes in this quickly rig area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP. project, along with
construction schedules. Wetlands were delineated by Soil and Environmental Consultants and a
site meeting was conducted with the USACE on the northern most parcel, on June 25, 2002. A
site meeting was conducted with the Town of Cary in, July 2002, to confirm the riparian buffer
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
This is a single and complete project with no additional phases anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed permanent impacts
consists of 435 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel (3491.f. unimportant/intermittent
Page 3 of 8

channel + 86 l.f. of important/perennial channel , 4~ 088 square feet of wetland impact, and
6 259 square feet of isolated wetlands for the installation of roads, BMP's, and lot fill.
Temporary impacts include 24 linear feet of unimportant/intermittent channel for the
installation of a utility line.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet)
D (NWP 18) Fill forested No Abutting 0.09
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.09
3
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: Less than
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Intermittent? Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
A (NWP29) UT to Nancy Culvert/Permanent Intermittent 2 4 ft 79 0.005
Branch
B (NWP29) Nancy Branch Culvert/Permanent Perennial 3-8 ft 86 0.009
C (NWP29) UT to Nancy Culvert/Permanent Intermittent 2-4 ft 147 0.01
Branch

E (NWP29) UT to Nancy
Culvert/Permanent
Intermittent 2-4 ft
123
0.08
Branch
E (NWP12) UT to Nancy Temporary Intermittent 2-4 ft 24 0.001
Branch
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 459 L.F. 0.105
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
NA NA NA NA NA
Total Open Water Impact (acres) NA
Acre
Page 4 of 8

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.105
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.09
Open Water Impact (acres): NA
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.195
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 459
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ®Yes ^ No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
The nrovosed isolated wetland imvacts consist of 6,259 square feet (0.14 acres). The impact
will be permanent, for lot fill and grading, in order to construct Townhomes.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.}: NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Prior to site plan development,
the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that imvacts to
wetlands and `waters' could be minimized. Impacts were minimized by crossing the channel at a
nearlyperpendicular angle and through the use of steeper fill slopes at the stream crossings.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8

USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http: //h2o. enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm~ide.html .
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because impacts to perennial channels are less than 150 linear feet and wetland impacts are
less than 0.1 acres, we do not believe that mitigation will be required
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Page 6 of 8

IX.
X.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC ZB .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) I SA NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 NA 3 (2 for Catawba) NA
2 NA 1.5 NA
Total NA NA
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 1 SA NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. NA
Page 7 of 8

Xl. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 24%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The proposed impervious for this project is
expected to be 34.78%, therefore constructed wetlands stream buffers will be used to treat the
Stormwater before it leaves the site. We have submitted the stormwater plans to the Town of
Cary for their review. A copy of the approval letter, plans, and, supporting calculations will be
submitted under separate cover. During construction the applicant will utilize BMP devices to
prevent sediment from entering jurisdictional stream channels or wetlands.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitarv Sewer will be utilized.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC ZH .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: Any
development that occurs on the adjacent parcels will be required to comply with the NPDES
Phase II stormwater rules as well as the Town of Cary Stormwater requirements, and stream
buffers, therefore, we do not believe that this project will will lead to a degradation of
downstream water quality
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction dates to
allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints associated with
construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates
associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's
control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

L,L'yi~S CEt. f 6 `
• I'_ ,~,
..r
~:,_ ,_ _
t
,, _
;, _ _ ..
,_,,_
~, f , f ~, I a'.?1E34_ ~ + i ``~`-' . is
/ • !
.~ ` r ,.
,,` .6 ,` .r ~~ ~,
~r
J/~,~/l~ \yi',~, ~} ~i.~ f t" ('rc'Pli _ _ fl,'.~ t- r
is ~i' ~, t , •l~ v ~ 7 ` ~~~ it !
.,. ~ ~, ~ I J~ ~ ~ . 1 , ~ ' Jay,-~ ~. ~.
~_ ~
~~ ~ . .
~ ~_ ..
~` ~ ~~
~l~ ~; ~e;~ , ~ ;_ ;, - ~-,~~ ;
'r_ ~ fir ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. , ` 1 ~~~'
)tr 1, r ' /' ~ ^ ~, J; ~ ~ O -. `S`~~ ~`.. }}
tr
,`
J,/' ~ ~
cfl jt rte, / _ L . `. - : `•, _.--~' {``
~' ~ I ~/. .`l ~-~/ IJC~C },` '-r ~,1 r1F:3U', l; ~:~,`~ ~~(~ ~ € ~ )'
~~ ~~ ' ~ ~~ ~ V 'A -
-. ~~~=~~~, ~ ~ ~ \.. u l r' ~ ~ ; ~:. _-\ isle
1 `\ ~ -~ ( i \/ ~ •_ ~.. ~ ~_ ' - i`r 1033
. ,
~`
t ._'_~_
//j
. .-
'll~all
~/ r f (~ j /
1 (l_ -
' ~ '9 Bh~S ~ (~ 1~..~~ , I .acv rl ~s23 ~., . J ` I - ~~~,arPe'
' , t ~/ , ~'"~ 1A
Green Level USGS Quadrangle ~n"J ` "~ ,.~_ - ~ ± ~`"_
I ~ ~ ~ .~_ - .{ ,
WITHERS ~~ RAV ENEL "t _ "`-~-~~ i= /// '
F N~~! N F F R 5 a L A N N F R i S ~.: x 'I F V i 1 0 5 j1'? '~/ ..,. ~. y ~Jj -`.., D• • "_ ~• ,I • Cam! y I~
111 MacKenan Drive Gary, North Carolina v~ ` ~ • ~ '' ' ~ ~ ~-~
telephone. [phone] ~wwu.withersraveneLcom~ I~ ~ \` k ~' } ~ ~-~
2,000 1,000 0 2,000Feet / ~ / \ k ,` - 1 ~"-T ti ~,~
1 inch equals 2,000 feet ~,'.
Pro ect tt02040242 - GISIUSGS.mxd
07-1970

`~' ~ h ~j
~ i1' se v ~ Ws62 Ws82 WsC2
~y ~
Ws ?
C
I ~ ~' ' WsC2
r WsBZ
~ 1 / WsE _

k ~~ ~
.. wSBZ wscz
- \ I
~ ,
cm
wscz
_ `a ; \
'' WsC2
E
W
~, ,~
~
' ~ 1 Gti
I
~_'L~~
~~ s
'~ sC2 yyy ~ s
~
i
F '~
` /~ i J
sE
~
/ C ~ \
\ ~
N
~ _
~ ~
y/ !
0ti y 1 s ~
i/
F 1'( WsE ~
WsC2
€ ~

I s

~ 3 `y

I se \
\ \
i ~`~~: ';,+ WYI I
t 1. Ws62 \ \ ~ W5C2 i
~"
~ W 2
a, ~
,-~
'"' /
' Y Wsg W sC2 ~! 55
WsC
~ I
Ws62

its;,
~ ' I

ti
Ws~_\ CrB2

N '~,

WsC WsC2
~
°: ~',
\~~
~ CrC2 Cm
~ / WsB2 I II
_ ( ~
\i \~~ sC2 J Gu 1
Cm r ns

WITHERS
Site Access/Agent Authorization Form
Project Name:
Evans Farm Subdivision
~~~ RAVENEL
E NGiNE EP.S I PL 4NNF RS ~ SI:R VEYORS
Property Owner/Contract Purchaser: n t loll - oti~~~~ ~4ss aca~~.~~s . ~Le--
6' !-LN N ~r~ f ~~ L t_
Address: lsCt TrJUr-yi u~,' c~~r- C~
A r~i ~ /V ~ e ~,`7 S ~~
Phone: °!l ~ S'35 -- d ~ t ~ Ex~, ZZ~
Fax: r'- ~ ~ ~ 3 c - c~ t Z-7
Email : ~ ~ -l ~ J'LC ~ ~ n-,o ~fwt
I hereby grant Withers and Ravenel, INC permission to conduct environmental
studies on the property described above. In addition, I authorize Withers and
Ravenel to act on my behalf as my agent when conducting site meetings and/or
correspondence (i.e. permit applications etc.) with the USACE and the NC -Division
of Water Quality, if necessary.
Property Owner: 6 ~~iw, n. ~'v~fr--~ ~ 1 Date: fit- /mil " 0~
(Print Name)
(Signature)
0 ~'' 1 9 70

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: NC County/parish borough: Wake City Cary
Center coordinates of site (latllong in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.8395938° , Long. 78.8979511 ° .
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Nancy BrancWJordan Lake
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Jordan Lake and Haw River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03030002
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are availab]e upon request.
[] Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
[~ Oflice (Desk) Determination. Date:
[~ Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There ge8r to "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in
the review area. [Required)
^ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
^ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Requirerl~
Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
C] TNWs, including ten-itorial seas
^ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 500 linear feet: 2-5 width (ft) and/or NA acres.
Wetlands: ~0.3 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: DeI' ti~Mana~
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
~ Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section flI below.
s For purposes of this form, an 1tPW is defined as a tnbutary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION Ill: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW: NA.
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent": NA.
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: re m3jes
Drainage area: s ~ miles
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
^ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
^ Tributary flows through tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are ~ic1~.~st river miles from TNW.
Project waters are j'i~ Llsf river miles from RPW.
Project waters are ~itk~~ls aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 'kj.igt aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow mute to TNWS:
Tributary stream order, if known:
'Note that the hustmctional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be descnbed by identifying, e.g., tnbutary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tnbutary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that annlv):
Tributary is: ^ Natural
^ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
^ Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
^ Silts ^ Sands ^ Concrete
^ Cobbles ^ Gravel ^ Muck
^ Bedrock ^ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
^ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riflle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick Li
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope):
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick L
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: .Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: .Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
^ Bed and banks
^ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
^ clear, natural line impressed on the bank ^
^ changes in the character of soil ^
^ shelving ^
^ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ^
^ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ^
^ sediment deposition ^
^ water staining ^
^ other (list):
^ Discontinuous OHWM.~ Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by:
^ oil or scum line along shore objects
^ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
^ physical markings/characteristics
^ tidal gauges
^ other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
^ survey to available datum;
^ physical markings;
^ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; genera] watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
^ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
^ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Genera] Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flew Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick l st. Explain:
Surface flow is: ck Lfs
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: List. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
^ Directly abutting
^ Not directly abutting
^ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
^ Ecological connection. Explain:
^ Separated by benn/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity,~Relationshi~TNW
Project wetlands are ]i'+ck,~,i~~ river miles from TNW.
Project waters are ]p3~, aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: ~r;~.iet.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick Lid floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetlaud supports (check all that apply):
^ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
^ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if an
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: ~ X.
Approximately ( )acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acresl Directly abuts? (YMl Size {in acresl
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tnbutary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLl~:
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (fl), Or, acres.
~] Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: macrobenthos present in (caddisfly, stoneflys) feature B.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILB. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: evidence of OHW mark in alt other tributaries on-site.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 500 linear feet 2-5 width (ft).
~] Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWsB that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
~ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
II Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section I11.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: wetland drains into creek.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.3 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section II1.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters v
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
[~ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (I -6), or
~] Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED (INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
[~ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
gSee Footnote # 3.
v To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CNECK ALL THAT APPLl~:
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
^ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
^ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
[]. Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
^ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
[~ Lakes/ponds: acres.
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
^ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicandconsultant.
^ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
^ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
^ USGS NND data.
^ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Green Level Quad.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: .
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ^ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ^ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: This form has been completed as part of a permit application for impacts to streams
and wetlands - Impact B is a perennial channel, the remaining streams on-site are RPW's that are intermittent.

PERMANENT PERMANENT TEMPORARY NT
PERMANE PERMANENT
PERENNIAL INTERMITTEN INTERMITTENT WETLANDS ISOLATED
REA STREAM STREAM STREAM IMPACT WETLANDS
IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT (SF) IMPACT
(LF) (LF) (LF) (SF)
A 7
B 86
C 17
D 4 088
123 24
F 6 259
TOTAL 86 349 24 4,088_ 6,259
SITE DATA
TOTAL SITE AREA 84,22 ACRES
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
TOWNHOME SECTION 10.3 ACRES
SINGLE FAMILY SECTION;
STREETS & SIDEWALK 8,2 ACRES
LOTS (3200 SF/LOT) 10.8 ACRES
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 29.3 ACRES
IMPERVIOUS% 34.78 %
WAKE COUNTY P(N 073603015021
073603002178
073501192557
073501192806
073501092668
073501092973
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 150 300 6
1 inch = 300 ft.
.'; 1 '1' l I/ii
..~r\t~~l\ 1 , N
.~ : ~1~~\~ti\ }l t~ ~f~r
~'~"~=.~\1~~~~~ fir
~-~.`tA1~~1,1` ~ ~
~l V`~is
- n'~J r1~d vh`.
;,,,~~~,
~~.t~t
,,,,,~.
t +,~;
t ~,.>
/~
I~,~y f,+i `iiilii~„~ :..7,"~~~r~~/i/i;'r'. ;;'~'~~~~ I 2•'`ii ,'.~~;\ /r ,~~.11+tl,trr,, t,~ltt•;~'ll \-/ 'u~~rrr, ~i~i' `~,~i~'~~+.\11~~~~~~}t+~~jll
x3"~r1P •; ;%"~3„~;,;,;,,,;.;=%~;%;~'.';-~r;'R~~ r ,+i l' ~,~~ / / , ~tlt tt1,~1t,, ,,\ (~III,LI,I/~ ~--;;, 1\ .\~~\,~, , ,,, , 1) Il
7,5: ,+n' =:W.d~':'o/ r r ~n'~l l i 1}Itttltt~tltltll}'1 ~_/Illllinllrr ~- ., ~ ~~A~ >~~ rrl } I
L;' .;~ r~°,i+i~,ji~'%;~'~%;~,r ~ '~ ~ -_!nd' +~~,~ I 1 t.1 tut n,.ultt 1111 Ilnl I i .,~F` i A~ \ttJ~1) ',11 141h ~
yyrr,, :; ~; a~:~.~ 111'1 ~ ~ I ~I t'l },11+1.1 t111i 1t,1+j i~ ` __iiu~1'iiii ~~/ ~ i ). ~ ~~` r ) II r ~1 1 rrrrll-
'r'v°•.~ - =~rrr ' rrPo ~ _ -_r I~, 1 1 1 1 / / I ~ )), )fl( t IJ
- i~t%~ i r a!k`: .-ni\~.\ 1. 1I11~1 I In li illr/./ ~ / ~ 4rr(•`. 1i1i '(
4,.,`` 's ~. 'r~/ .;~`,c ~~ 1 t+ll Ili a If 11 ~ III(r Irr/ ~'~'...-r r 1 1 I((~(r n d.,(11 ~.~.
_~~"} !1 r: ,~~ t ,,,._:.~i~~.` -_ ;,\\• ~ ~ 1i~~~i l"I, iI I~:,iI .. ..J1IIIIW II I Ifl __ _J n t lirhlhrul ~\111t ~__
6 ~ r ~r,~ _. _ "~^:~~~~r. \~r46~ ~ lll;r 1111 li ( ~. 1j141 j11rf II i'~ / 1 Illlr i-I tli~ll ~_
r 1
W ~m r _ ;vc; ~ ~ W I ( r~iP1 LI ~ 1 1(1(111 ~~ v
%'i:'-~' i-:~_-'_-~A~i. '~x V 1"~' 1 A .~ ~ 1( ~i' I }'I i 1 1 t1A\~ '~
~ : r ~ ~'~~'- ~_.~.~~`~~j i I' 11 11 ~ 1! + I 1 _ 1 I, lil 1 ~1
~ . S' ~ I ll~ t .. A~ ~i11 ~~~~tA71 i ~ 1 I i'~1111(I ~ "~: ,-.~
~~~~ . ~ ~~~~ ~~ 1~~., A\ i~ ,t t V t 1 ~ 1 1 I1. rl l i ,r ~ ~~ t
'" %t'f` - VA ~'~, ` ~) 1. ~~1 I I 11111u1 1 r^~ t~~'
ro / : /- ,+: a - ~, ~~t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~1~i1+" ~ ~ 1 i(111111 1 J V A
~~~~.~°- - _ im+~r `~. ~~ t to ~ _ )lit1.1 1 ~ ~ lil nil! t / :A~~
! ''r /Il '_ __ i riyr.i ~ \~: ~`t~"p Kt"~i /~!ii -"r I 1 ,1~ \\ `
/; i r~ 4
~ ~~~ ' `. ~, ~ . ~ `. `~ I
4~kt 1 r r ~ ~ r,t
r/ ~~~ S ~iI 11'~ r+ ~J ~ 'rrO~ ~ ~ .~ /% ~
~, ~ ,I. ,
~ ~ ,,;/y,'I,l i , l
~6./ :'~)~~i i
/~~: /i ~% /l/ r
;;/ , ~
~~~ i~/II~~ 1 ~r u ~ i j r~/ ~~,1i 111t~+~\~~
it % ~ ~ ~ I (1 (l (I' i ~ l ~ '
r/.. f r l (I1 III / 1~. ~ ~~'
i .fir I r l i i l l li l l~"_'V ';
', I,r t~
~ (~ ) I I ~ Ilri +i ~1r ~~~ t ~" .
~~ ` I t' ~illrr /~~VAV ' ri+
~~. 1,i N~ru rryr ~'. 'i,a
?: 1 , ~ „ ,,,,,,, ' 1'1,1 }} ~i~ ~
~~ - / ~/ ii ~%i r / V~11'i 1Y~ I
r r l / , I ~,
I~!I~ :~/~~','i /r/ ,~i ~~~~~n~
r,
I'i'II ~1 ~; rr~~lr 1 li.' ~Fffi 1
I l .'/ . i r r / , I ~ '
i~ I i/, i; , r 1 t~ ~,t
r/
fr i 1
I ! ~ l • ~r / /~ i ~ 1 >~I
r i ~
t - ' /i I( / ~ il~++ ~ .. ~ X11
r,
_ r ! /.r 1
I i i ~ ~' 1
_- I+ ~ ~~,
_ II r
_, ! ~c"
/ , rr
! r r I ~ i 1 ~ ~r
it I i ~i~
/ /,
_ , r /~ n~
i r/r /~ 1 ~ t 1 ~~.~
r r l l' ~ \
~'
- ~ 1 ~ `
i1
~ \.
! !
~` -~_ ~~~ a#~
'!~ /
r y :~
- ! --~ // i//, ~'
- ~~ ~
~I
! /r ~I
-~~ r/rr+'-r ~~ rr ~ / I
~~1~I r I }r / _ 1 ~... I
11i~ 11 I 1 r/ _' _ t + t
u / t 1
1i i lip ~I I i! r~/i~'~A ~ -- tQ ~ _ 1 t •,'. Ii I'
l i r. rte' ~i
I', 1
11,1 I1~1~;i ~ "i!
~1 t 111111111 r /.. ^,1 1 . l ~i rv
'+tit to ~ I,~u'I' l Ili ~_, .t _ ~ ~~t I~i1~~
'tA11t ~t f ,ilia 1 I lr,r/~~ _ ~~.~ ~ tJ I ~t i~
1d, ititt~ vll'i'11i1~111 11 ~ (I ~ _ ,. +11~~ Jr
~P1t\U~11\\~'~11HIng11,~f'( rr~i~J- :~`~\11~11~~'/
t~L~~J: ~~~~A}. 1, 1; 1tiu1~~!~I l l ~i ii/i,/i ;-~ ~:~:~~11 tt, ~i+~~t A. ~.
>, ~ 1 . ~ ' ,
;i,,. ~._,, .,~~.,, r~( t
yN r ~('~~ ~ - ~ J /'
~f~ r ~ir _ ~ ~ u w r , l ~ i r i. l - - _ - ~f', / / l G•( ~,i... ~ ~ ~ ~.l i . I ~ 1 ~1 ~ V l ~:.~~ - ~.
~r r` rrr' ~ I i' ' 1 I - _ w I ~ r ,'yy~i.i~~' .,:'_~; _, ~ _.., _- c _ , r 1 V`~ ~ ~J C"~.
rr 111 it i i r1i1 I 1 - - rr><, , i r I I r ~u'rlo ~1q X11, .'M0. ~ ![ m'-p 1 ~ / ! r ~`'_ -.J-
- " __ '--` t,'j 1b nr~lr ,, 1 Ii +i i J~y~1 ? ~~~~_ °,L_r~~~', - li/'~J Il -- __
r rtn a ~ n qlh 1 + r , u I rrnrr , n .°"~ ~ - c ~__ ~1ij ~ r/N -,' /~~ _ - ~~ __.
r ,1 1++ ~~+'ri it frrn r S n °i~ lr_t~0..'~~ _ __ -' 'i/r'// /~.'-_ ~ ~ t !'
4N~ I ,! 't 'y~ 1e 4,11, ,I,r r ,kr r' _ _ -.-t, <r //. ~__
i ' ., 1 e ~s i 1 r
r "n }V I ~ , i 1 I
., ~ ~X ~ 0 9 ~ Q ~ ~, ;±Y i ~ 1 ~i 1 ~l~ ~r _
;r~„' I
~ Iri'i'' _ .s" `~ ,fir ' / ~\__ ''/'~ r+ r r
I , ;'d ~ - ~ ~ ~Sa, r ' ~ , rr~
r n~
, h,p h) I JS' ~ P ~ ~ .:~ ~; l~tnr + ~ ~ ~~ ~' 'r~ _ _ I :fir' r
,I/~ 41 M5'. irii '~~ "o~ _ - ~ i,Jrv ~~i "iirilbi 1~ ~ ili
,~, ~ , ~?,~, r -- ~~r I , ~ 1 ~; 1
'r+1 ~ \ ~,,~~LL • 1 ~; , .h< r_~ 1 i r ,~,. r 1 r ~ !~ 11 1 I I I
i1 G ~ ey, 1 A 1,\ t > q. 1 - ~ YI ~1 ~ ' 1~ 1 / rr - ~ / ~~~ i r l I ' ~ I
~.rp~ fl +q ~'i ~ ~ ~ / In 1 ~i ~ /:/ ~ X11 I II
~~li & ~ i H r. r , _ »° ry ~~ y w d y u~r.,, ~1~~ . ~. ' / L~r r I . 1
~~t ~ u ~~ t+' 1 ~~\ ~~ i I r/ rr/ 7
~AJ (~ d ~n ,y ~ ~ __ 'a 16' }~ ~ 7/„ ~ {0{1 +u t i /I ~ j ~~1 irrir~ l i r / J i '~
Y';~v r ~ 1~ 1~ ~``~ ~~ / - ¢..., rn~ ~ i / rrrr. ~~/'~ r. r~ r ~' 1 (r l .
~'~~~~ r ~1~I ~ JP Y- ay~~+ d/ l~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~! / r'/r rr ll/r ( / r ~
- I
_ ~ _.. ~°.I~ vyTr ,1 }' I { 'r/rim ~` `141' ,~_. \ r r i ~ \ ;\.
., -
~ ~, ~ _ I I ~~ _ ~ I ~
- ~ t ~ ~ 1 ~ -x-- 1 w ~ ~ -_ ~
~ L` IE11 !-%, 1t 11 ll t `~ 1 1 i 11. 1!i r ',1 1 mot? `.'~. ~. ~ ` l ~ ~'d
~^~ // ~~:`.~\\~~~~~ i..~l(r+~(~!~-~`~ ~~-r .VttttllA~` till 'iilll,'111i (I 1''~''t ~ ~~`\~C'~T ~ i ~~~I /r ~~ .,~;~ ~ ..
~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~A ~~~ ~ H'~1 1.111 (', i ( ~_, {,. .,'vp ~ ~ t 111}'. 1 I i In 1 : I r t •,~ t ~ _~-°,t .+~, / ._ I 1 \t •.~ ~~
-- t tt+~~1 IIII 1 ~ / ~~_: 1" tqA `t tl 'Jn 11 I ~ i r A~ .`\ a"r`
t~i~vi. .OVA ~V'yO. 1 ~ ;~ L ~\~ ~A1t ~d 11~ ill i r .. ~A~ - .~ Y ~~t,~ /. f .,•,
I
1=;,-. ~ `t t i~ 111 ll,li rrrr (7r r i ~~ ~ ~AA~t'ti Ip~ll1 i,;Il(r1 I r r/ ~~~~:~~ ~ J -at ~', tjU r ~~ A~\ ~~' }li +~
Ilrr 1 r ~ti \
~ V 11 t/ Y. ~ ~
l ' I I '.1 „
`~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~. ~, ~,~.
(I lil -. .t\ 11 i11 i 1j1~1, i ~ i1i1+``t\t1 \t ~` ,1 l~'/ ,..\ \11 t +1 glut till ~t tt ( ` ~ ~ ~ t~\t t'~~,I~\~~ I~.l^, ,\~~ _
,1(„ // _ ~,t 1t 111tU~,.~111!ll,-J1,1t'ttttt'. 1 '. r - ~ n.~.~t.+~\~\it~a`tt`• ~+`,11 ~~ _ ~ ~ i... ,.` \ ?
u1i(//r` l.'. ItA 11J J 14i111~i1^ _tttlt At1t1, l r ~ :~VAt t:`~t~t:~J ~t ~~11 t t ~'~~ _~A ~~Att ttiA~ ,~1'~ ~:. ~~._
Ju (r r /` A!.. I ~ t\.!.,1Y.C~ Ir. `~`\~, ,1111 111 11. I `.}t+t1 }~.~ td1. IAQ1q,t1 t _ t _
I!II P!r ~'..1 1AAt .-"~ Jr ~.~J?~,t ,. 1111 i r~ ~~'t t~ t ~1`~AA I 1 ,1~\, ,t,+~ /, •VA -~ t~U A-. tt~~~ly lll~in ..
Ill i,r ''I';i 1 ~Il i,ll;}.,%( ~~r~,+11t,~,1 1{ ~ i I ~^111 t titV1. •. ,.~ ~ q.:A~. t t + I '~~ ~~ t tV ` ~'I .-..~'~~~;~._ -
'ul!lI/ 1:~,!I' i ~j 11 r~~u li / ___ t~,,tt1111'. ~, Atlt lt111 1,, 1 ~ t ',t1 ~ /~. _ t 1't~. .AAr Jn,~r ~___ - ~- ~.
I ~r ~ ~ t, 1~ 1~V11.11 ~.~-J~ t .tt.V ( 1 ~ ~ ~~~ •,t 1t l~ ~/ :I.. - _-
1n ' r1;111 I 1 -.l - 1, 111 .n 1 _., ~~`~~ t.,\tt , i - .1,t`..\, ~ Ott ,1i;. r ~~ _- ~-
n!(,Ii, I'IIU1.+114!;1; i',/i ~, ,J1 rrrr\+1,,.'t 111t1nt i1111.•~r_.-J t~~~ ~'\~~ ~.~'~1 t t\t\ 11t 1'1'1,1 _ _
~rlll//~~IIU11r111i~,1; o!~r/ri',_it+rttttll 111tt11tt n i:. ttt~~~tt~ ti / -~ tttt1t~11tt~~ t~J'11u11~ --
n,1~ ,Il,~llll/-Jl,lilll Ilrtr.%.~~',:,..J111t,t1 t,t+l+t~t,1,l+lll`r~i-.~;+ ,ltt1A~~`.~A\t,ll~ 1 Vt.At+1',I,tt.~1t A,.~1,11~1-'11r '---~~~.___-. ..
~01~- R~,~la~~~o~' ay; ~~~ ~~~ ~~ t _ ~I EVANS FARM SUBDIVISION ~ ~ OVERALL SITE ; wiTH ERs ~~~ ~RavENE~ ~~ ~ '~'"° I~
~ ~ ~oc
I__.. _I _._ ___ ~ x1.9141643]10 b914W1{0p! wxv.MEm lwelmm
weal io+oz<zou GARY WAKE NorthCarohna _ ~ 111rr,~~~HO,„.ory,no~ac.a~~.z~sn __ _ _~ I ~
r h' _ I -r ..
r ) r ~+. 1 ~rr ~ r1 "-
/ ~ 1 r%
111111 rl f~ 1i~ ~11i 1+~ii +~i1 ~+A` r~, - rr rr'rir ,iir q,n y~ '~~~ jin ~y .~~~ .
1 I1) r 1 ) II t I~i i+r_ ~-/I ~ii' _~ ~ +~1~1 ~'~ ~ ii ~'%/r~ - _'~"~~ ~
07- 1 97'0

--- ----
_ -
-~
/' ~
~~ A ~ ~ , ~ ~ A ~ ._.r_ ~
~ A X ~ ~ ~ ~`~ ~ ...~
~ ;, /
~,
;~
,/
i
~, ,
,.- / Ili
~, ~ ~~
I ~
i
.~i-
I~ ~. ~ ,
/ `~
\ ~ I
~I j
.\ \~ >, ` j ~, ~ J
~ fl ~ ~ - % l
~, ~~, ~, ~~ ~ j ~'
Ii' ,
{
i ! ~' I .
,- /
I ~ , li ~ ~~ ~ ~ / ~I
,ri- ,\ `
i
i i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1
~ I ~ ~ ~ .
S
k~
~' ~ I ,
s . - '~
~ A~ ~~ ~ ~. :~ ~ , I
I <' ~. ~ ~,, ( ~ i
/ III ~ ` / \ ! ~..,\ \\j \' //!
~ I
/ /\
- I / _.
~ ~ ~ j ~ __.._. _ _..
G ~ I ~, ,~ .....
~' 4 ~r'i ~' ....... ., I .. ., .,~
~I
i r
_i~ _ `~
~~,
II
~. ~ ' ~ ~ ~ `AREA ~4
~~
,,~
~.
7~J LF PERMANENT INTERM,TTENT
i
~`
I ~
' `STRE~vI IMPA T
I C
I ` ', ~ ~
I
I
r 'Y'`~ ' -~ '`
_~ , I~ ~~ , II ~_ --- -- ~_ ; i
~_
„
' ~ I ~ ~ ~ t = - "~_
_ . ~ -,
~ ~ ! _ - __
I ~
~~~ ~ ,,
- - --
l ~~ '~
`,.
___
~, --- _
i
; ;,
' ~ `4 ~ /" I
~~ ~
. ~ , ~ ~'
~ ~, ~
,-
_ _ ~, i~, , ~ ~ ~- % ~ 0 7 - 1 9 7 0 ~~
; ~
~' ~ ~ ' 1 ~ ~ ~~ I
j ~ ~ 1 ; ~ j ,, ~ '
C~ GRAPHIC SCALE
' ,
' ' 30 0 15 30 60
I r
i ,~
i , i
, '~
j I i
i inch - 30 ft. ~
-------------- - --- i
____ _ -
- - - ---------
EVANS FARM SUBDIVISION ~ II II ~ WITHERS ~ RAVENEL
i STREAM IMPACT' A ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS ~
CARY _______-_Wake..___.___..-._.__..-___.__NoKh Carolina ~___.__- ____._--.__-_.- ____._____J L.+++rw~Kw.n m.e c.~. vqn c.~au.x sn riis~cs~s~c_L•:eps~eooe_+w._wx.~~mn,~

-- -
~~
.,- `'

~.

; ,~~ / ~ ~'~
~
1

'

,
/ /, j ~ /
%
~ ~
~ ~ ~- j- ~- ~ / /
i ,- i ~

j

! --
! - / r' 4
`

~
I /
n _
\
/
~- ~-~,- / /~ ~
~ ~
~i
. ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~
~ ~
O
I
' II
~n
~ /
/ /~ /
~ ~
'

i '
I ~ _
l .~ i ! , ~ ~ ~ , ~

.-
i

~ I
.<

I , ' ~

~
~I
' ~

~ ~ ~ ~
,~~"

i 1
I
,~
,~~ ~, 1r ~
~,

I ,

i'
~~
i

~
~ ~
~ / ~

~
I l
i ~~.i; - ~
i l .~-

~ \ ~ ~ AR,~A E3 ~ %~ ~ ~I ~
I ~!,
,
i
~

j ~
~~ ~
1 ~~.
~~\ ; ~ . 86' LF PERMANENT PERENNIAL
~
~ ~ ~ S~REAM ~MPACT
~

' ~
I
I
,; - ~
1. ~
~
~ t I
I~

~
/
~ ~
I,~t~
i
\
~ ,
~~ ~ ~~~ ~

\~

I
~

I ~-

\
~ ~ / ` ~ ~

i
1

I
~

~ i
~ ~
~
"' ~-,.,
\ ~ \
,
l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~,
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~

~~~

~ I

~~ ~ ~ A ~ J
i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~

,I ~~ -

1 ~ , ~ `~ I

~,-- -..,
07 1970
,

I ~ ~
i ~ `
/
~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~
GRAPHIC SCALE
,
I , r~ / /
~ t..
y
\ / 30 0 15 30 6i
[ /
~
_-~ - -- ~ ~ ~ -/ - 1 inch - 30 ft _l
EVA NS FARM SUBDI VISION STREAM IMPACT "B" ~ W~THER8 ~ RAVENEL
EN6IN EE RS I PLANNERS i SURVEYORS
CARY Wake North CarolilW i „, w~K.~on.~c.n wwcwix. vs„ m: nr«asw eu: r,wsraare ».....xrr~..~
3
°s
S

-''~ --' ~ ~ ~.~4~7 LF PE MP~N~NT~INTERAITTENT
~ .,,-°, '' ~,,. -- ~ ` .,s' ~, STEAM IM~ACT
-~°°
~ `' ~ ~, ~ ~
l~ ~~°
~.~~ ~ ~-° ; 0 7- 1 9 7 0
l f~ ~- t
'~ jf ~"" ~ } GRAPHIC SCALE
/ ~ d ~ 30 0 15 30 60
r ~ ~~
,,~,-' ~ j ~ / ~ 1 inch = 30 ft.
WITHERS LA~ RgVENEL
EVANS FARM SUBDIVISION STREAM IMPACT "C"
onn G,ali~a 3)Sit , (9390 fax: 919K>~6008 www.waFernM~m~
_. ,.,_i.,. North Carolina
___. _

~ ,-~,,.
~ ~` ~ ,~
/ ~ ~l ' ~r
//~/~
~ i ~ ---__
1 _.. -_-
`•J
~ ~ ~ / ~~ ~~ / ~ ~ / ~ i '
! J I i' ~ ~~~ _ ' I ~ ~ !~
/ ~ ~~
,' ~ I~~ o~ / / ~
1 I'
~' / I I I' ----.. ~ ~
~,
i' - / ~ ~ % j I i ~ I ~ ~- '~'r~ , ,
i _ , I
~ ~I ~ J
i I ~ ~ 1
i ~ `i ( ~
I~I
`~~i;,I i
~, 1 ~
J
I~
J ~ ~\ ~\
~~`
-. ~
ii
/~ \
,/. ~ ,.
/ ; / r _ / ~ ~ ~- ~. + ~~+~ + ~ ` . ` ) / it
~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~ i' /i r / ~ AREA D + + `+ J ~~
~ ~ ,~ % I ', , ~/ ,4,088 SF ~ + + + ~ = ~ ~
~I // ~ ~ i ~ WETLAND IMPACT ~ /~ ~~ /
~i ~ / ~/ ~ + ~ + l ~ ~ j,
~ / ~ +
'i
~ ~
1
~.` ~
I , ~~ ~ . , , ~~, ;; ; , , ~ r ~~ , ~~ ~ ,, ~ ,,; ~;; ~.'.;, ~,
I
,,~ /
r i ~! ~ ~ i
r
t
~ J i I
i ~Jy y, ~ ~
~ ~ / ~ ~ )~~ ~ ~ ~7
;~ ~ ,~ r ~ ~ i' ~, ~ ~/~ 1~~ - iii i ~ 1 ~, ~ ;1 ~ i , , i l ,
~~ ~ l ~ li ';~ I ~,', '~ ~ % , ~~ ~ / ,
~ ~~'~ ~ ~~ 07- 1 970
_ i
r ~ ~ l ~ )~~! ~` ~~ ~ ` ~ I~ / ~ GRAPHIC SCALE
\ ~ / ~ ~ ~ f-' ~ ~~~ ~ ~ `--~ < ~~.~~ 60 0 30 60 120
i ~I ._ _.~, ~/~,,~ ~ ~~.,~~ ~ -~ ---~~~ ~-- ~, r
/ ;.
1 / , i 1.
` ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ 1 incf~ = 60 ft.
~ ',
EVANS FARM SUBDIVISION I WETLAND IMPACT "D" I WITHERS ~ RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

__ ~ ~ i
~ - i~ - i
/ /
~, / ,
~ ~ % '~ i I
i
,~ ~ /
,~ -' /~ -~
/ ~ PERMANENT IMPACT ~ d ~ I ~ / ~ i_ i
,,
i
_ / ~ ~ i i
,~~_ __ _ _ ~_ % ~ _~ / I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~,
t
~ _" ~ ~`, ~ _~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ) ~
/ ~ // " ' ~

~~. ~ I`
I / ~ t
_~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~s
~~ / _~~ _ ~
~ ~, ~,_ -
i~^ '_~
I
~ ~/ - ~' i O wQ, ~ ~ ~ /
., ~ ,.
~- ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ f ~
/~ j r ~ ~ ~
L, ~C
i ~-
--TEMPORARY IMPACT 1 ! ~
_ ~, .~~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -_
r' i
- -- ~
i
~,. / ~"
,- ~ I
~i ! i
-L- ---- ~ ~ ( , ~ i
~~. _,
~ f __ r
/y ~ I
it ~--=~ --- ~ ~ ~ AREA E
~'~ ~ ~ ~ 123 LF PERMANENT INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT
~~~ _- ~~ ~ ____ .~~ ~ ,~( ~~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ 24 LF TEMPORARY INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT
~~
F ' ~ I'I' ~ j ~_ \ ~/ ~ ,.,_. ~ ~ ._.. - GRAPHIC SCALE
_ ` ___ ~ / ~ ~ ~ 30 0 7 5 30 60
.=:~a,~:
-_.._~ /, / ~ 1 ~ __~.~- ..:,: 17 ~ - '~ ~ 7 ~ t inch - 30 ft.
f r ~-_
EVANS FARM SUBDIVISION i STREAM IMPACT "E" WITHERS ~ RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
% ~ARY Wake NorthCarollna i ~ _..... _

\~ -'
~ ~ i ~ ~ ~i/ ~- ,~1~ ,, ;-~~-,. _-
~ % ~ ~ l ~ - / ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ ii
~ / / / ~ ~ ~
~i~ i ,,,
~ / ~ ~ ; , ~ t~ / ~ t i
~r / ~ ~ ~j ~ r ~- i ~ ; ~~
/ ~ ,~li~, /~ ~, ~~A ~ ,% /'~ ~
~ f ~ ' ~ ~ `" ;~; ~, ~~ / `ti /
i ~; , ~
i
i ~ ' ~ i -, ~ ~` ~ % i
:'' / i
~-
l /
i - ~
i ~ ,I
i~ i
/ , i ~ / ~ ~/ AREA F ~ ~, ,, ~~„ i
%, ~ \ ~
i -
~~
11
Ili 7 ,l^
,, ~ / /6,259 SF ~ ~~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
' - j i i ,, ~~ ~ ~~~ /ISOLATED ; ~ ~ ~ ' ; ~~ ~i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
' ~ / ~ ~ ~ WETLAND IMPACT ,. ~ ~ \ , l ~ i ~ ~ ~ I /
r'~
~ i~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i l` ~ ~ ~
~ '~
/ i i
7
1
/, ` ~ ~
I ,
-~ ; ~~~ : ii~~ ~ ,~j l,. , ~ ~ ~ I I ~ j l ~~ I
~I ~
__ / 1
- I
~ / r ~
l ,
\ ' I
_ ~ ~ ',
- ~ '~ ~, ~i~ i I ~ ~ ~
i ~ ;,
i
III
-----,,; i //i~ ; , ~, ~ ~ ~ ~
it i
,~ ~
I
---- /,
' ~ I
~ ~ ~ ~
___ ~ '~ , / / / I ~ I ~
' - ~ ~~
--- I
i
I~~ ~~ 07- 1 970
\ -- ~

GRAPHIC SCALE
_- _ ~ j WETLAND IMPACT NFI, - -, _ _- -- __ --- _. - -
EVANS FARM SUBDIVISION r WITHERS ~(' RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

60° C"' "ma"r
EXISTING GRADE
PROPSED
INVERT
AQUATIC LIFE PASSAGE
(EXISTING & PROPOSED ELEVATIONS)
EXISTING PROPOSED INVERT.
LOCATION GRADE ELEV.
UPSTREAM 286.00 285.00
DOWNSTREAM 284.00 283.00
UPSTREAM SECTION

EXISTING GRADE
NOT TO SCALE
07-~~7®
PROPSED
INVERT
DOWNSTREAM SECTION
WITHERS ~(' RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] hx: 919~67fi00B www.withersravenel.mm
NOT TO SCALE
~~-~2-0~
SVtiNS rAiRP/ SUBCIViSrO~'
i=iGUf?F A: aC?U=~T1~; ~_IFE_: r'~S~AGF 1:~F T,=111

48" ~, „ . ,r~,r
EXISTING GRADE
PROPSED
fNVERT
UPSTREAM SECTION
48° rr ~r ~rrnr
EXISTING GRADE
AQUATIC LIFE PASSAGE
(EXISTING & PROPOSED ELEVATIONS)
LOCATION EXISTING PROPOSED INVERT.
GRADE ELEV.
UPSTREAM 296.80 296.00
DOWNSTREAM 296.30 295.50
NOT TO SCALE
0 7 1 9 7 0
PROPSED
INVERT
DOWNSTREAM SECTION
WITHERS ~(' RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
171 MadCenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27517 tel: [phone] faz: 919.4676008 www.withersravenel.mm
NOT TO SCALE
11-12-07
~~tiNS ~A,4r~ sueJivision~
~~u,z~ ~: ,~Qi/r,~r c ~ir~ ~,assAC~ u- ~~~i
~i~~~~~E ~~" ~ ~;i v~,Yr - ~ri~,~c r ~i,~tA