20240513 Ver 1_ProperityChurchRoadPCNCoverLetter_20240404

PREPARED FOR:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 61 S
Charlotte, NC 28262
SWE, Inc.
2016 Ayrsley Town Blvd. Suite 2A
Charlotte, NC 28273
March 22, 2024

n-
March 22, 2024
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Attention: Sam Dailey
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raliegh, North Carolina 27699
Attention: Beth Plummer
Reference: Pre -Construction Notification/Nationwide Permit 14
and General Water Quality Certification 4508
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
Dear Ms. Dailey and Ms. Plummer:
On behalf of the City of Charlotte and the Charlotte Department of Transportation (CDOT), S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is
pleased to submit this application for Department of the Army verification of impacts to Waters of the U.S. in
accordance with Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 14 and a request for Individual 401 North Carolina Water Quality
Certification (WQC) as the project exceeds the thresholds for General Certification (GC) 4246. CSWS will be
considered the applicant, and Kristen O'Reilly of the City of Charlotte will act as the signatory on the electronic
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) for this project.
In addition to the brief project summary provided herein, please find the following enclosed:
Project Figures
Appendix I: 100% Design Plans
Appendix II: Jurisdictional Determination Package / Site Photographs
Appendix III: Protected Species Documentation
Appendix IV: Cultural Resources Documentation
S&ME, Inc. 12016 Ayrsley Town Blvd. Ste. 2-A I Charlotte, INC 28273

Pre -Construction Notification/Nationwide Permit 14
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
I Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
If you need additional information or have questions, please contact Dave Homans at 704-900-9394 or
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
�r f
D. David Homans
Project Scientist
[e-mail]
Senior Review by Sarah Rowe, PWS
Layla Tallent
Natural Resources Staff Scientist
[e-mail]
March 22, 2024

Pre -Construction Notification/Nationwide Permit 14
Propserity Church Road Improvements s
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina III
S&ME Project No. 22350081C E
Table of Contents
1.0 Project Information and Description............................................................................1
2.0 Purpose and Need.............................................................................................................1
3.0 Existing Jurisdictional Waters on Site..........................................................................1
4.0 Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters..................................................................1
5.0 Avoidance and Minimization / Mitigation..................................................................2
6.0 Protected Species and Historical and Cultural Resources........................................2
7.0 Additional Regulatory Considerations........................................................................3
Figures
Appendices
Appendix I —100% Design Plans
Appendix II —Jurisdictional Determination Package, Including Site Photographs
Appendix III — Protected Species Documentation
Appendix IV — Cultural Resources Documentation
March 22, 2024

Pre -Construction Notification/Nationwide Permit 14
Propserity Church Road Improvements s
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina III
S&ME Project No. 22350081C E
1.0 Project Information and Description
The proposed project involves the installation of sidewalks along Prosperity Church Road between Cooper Glen
Drive and Benfield Road, as well as the conversion of the intersection of Prosperity Church Road and Prosperity
Ridge Road. Additionally, modifications to the adjacent sanitary and storm sewer infrastructure are proposed.
Additional information regarding this project is contained in the body of the electronic Pre -construction
Notification (PCN) application. Refer to Figure 1 (Vicinity Map), Figure 2 (U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS)
Topographic Map), Figure 3 (Aerial Photograph / Potential Waters of the U.S. Map) and Figure 4 (Proposed
Project Impacts) as well as Appendix 1 (100% Design Plans) and Appendix II (Jurisdictional Determination
Package / Site Photographs) for additional site and project design information.
Though impacts associated with this project are within the typical 0.10-acre (ac.) threshold, PCN submittal for this
project is required under NWP 14 as the project involves the discharge of dredge or fill material into a wetland /
special aquatic site. Similarly, submittal of an Individual Water Quality Certification (WQC) is required as
permanent fill is proposed in a wetland, which is not covered by General Condition (GC) 4246.
2.0 Purpose and Need
The purpose of this project is to alleviate traffic through the installation of the roundabout and connect existing
sections of sidewalk. Permanent impacts and modifications to the adjacent sanitary and storm water infrastructure
are required to complete this project. The subject property is located within a densely populated and rapidly
growing community. Repairs to Prosperity Church Road and installation of a roundabout are necessary to improve
traffic flow within the community. The installation of a sidewalk is necessary to ensure pedestrian safety.
3.0 Existing Jurisdictional Waters on Site
The project site was delineated by David Homans of S&ME in November 2023. A request for jurisdictional
determination (JD) and site photographs are included in Appendix II of this PCN. The following Jurisdictional
Waters were identified on site:
Wetland WA: This wetland was located within the Prosperity Church Road right of way (ROW) and is
likely the result of a persistent water -main leak, which has saturated downslope soils before flowing into a
stormwater inlet pipe. This wetland is in the Rocky Basin (Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040105) and is
approximately 0.058 ac. in size with 0.048 ac. of wetland within the subject property.
A JD request, including stream assessment forms and site photographs, is included in Appendix II of this PCN.
4.0 Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
The proposed project will require impacts to Wetland WA. Project impacts are shown on Figure 4 and in the
attached 100% Design Drawings in Appendix I. Impact W1 includes approximately 0.048 ac. of permanent
March 22, 2024

Pre -Construction Notification/Nationwide Permit 14
Propserity Church Road Improvements s
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina I I
S&ME Project No. 22350081C
impacts to Wetland WA. This impact involves permanent fill of Wetland WA due to grading and installation of a
new sidewalk. Impact W1 is the only impact proposed for this project. The remaining portions of WA outside of
the proposed project area will be allowed to drain unimpeded into a newly constructed stormwater inlet.
5.0 Avoidance and Minimization / Mitigation
The project was designed to reduce flood and erosion risk while minimizing the disturbance to adjacent areas.
During construction, appropriate sediment and erosion control practices equaling those outlined in the most
recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" will be used to
minimize impacts to off -site waters. All disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched to permanently stabilize
exposed slopes. Areas where runoff concentrates or areas where vegetation is hard to establish will be covered
with a matting consisting of 70% straw and 30% coconut. A proposed headwall will be constructed at the
proposed culvert inlet within the wetland to stabilize the area, protect the proposed sidewalk, and allow surface
water flow from areas in the wetland that will not be directly graded.
The proposed project results in significantly less than 0.10 acre of permanent loss of wetland, the threshold of
impact typically requiring mitigation. As such, no additional compensatory mitigation should be required for this
project.
6.0 Protected Species and Historical and Cultural Resources
To comply with applicable sections of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 USC 1531-1543), S&ME performed
a North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Database review to identify species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project within a one -mile
radius of the project boundary. Additionally, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning
and Consultation (IPaC) online service was used to generate a list of federally protected threatened or endangered
species which may be present in the project area.
The NCNHP review indicated that no extant populations of federally protected species were present within a one -
mile radius of the project.
The USFWS IPaC review identified the following species with current federal protections that may be in the project
a rea:
Michaux's sumac — Rhus michauxii (Endangered)
Smooth coneflower— Echinacea laevigata (Endangered)
Schweinitz's sunflower - Helianthus schweinitzii (Endangered)
Typical habitat for the three plant species listed above includes open areas such as infrequently maintained
roadsides, utility ROW, and open wooded areas maintained by fire. The habitat present within the project work
area was limited to roadsides maintained as turfgrass lawns and wooded fringe areas dominated by invasive
vegetation. As appropriate habitat for the listed species is not present within the proposed project area, the
project was determined to have no effect on these species.
March 22, 2024

Pre -Construction Notification/Nationwide Permit 14
Propserity Church Road Improvements s
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina I I
S&ME Project No. 22350081C
A protected species assessment was presented to Byron Hampstead of the USFWS for comment on March 19,
2024 (See Appendix III). A response from USFWS has not yet been provided.
In order to determine consistency with the Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, a one -mile radius
around the project site was reviewed for known historic properties using the NC State Historic Preservation Office
(NC SHPO) HPOWEB online mapping tool (See Appendix IV). No properties or districts that were listed in or
determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) were identified within this radius.
Additionally, as the project area occurs largely within the existing Department of Transportation (DOT) ROW,
construction is unlikely to encounter unidentified archeological resources.
7.0 Additional Regulatory Considerations
As shown on Figure 2, the proposed project work areas are located outside of Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) regulated floodplains and will not result in impacts to these regulated floodplain areas. None of
the proposed impacts associated with the project occur in special designated waters or unique wetlands, or waters
protected by state buffer regulations.
March 22, 2024

Project Figures:
Figure 1 —Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3 —Aerial Photograph / Potential Waters of the U.S. Map
Figures 4 — Proposed Project Impacts

-1,-.- { � '
PIC-
R
�.
4i i •:IY' I ¢ l w �h I`n Y" ma.p J
AA[[1dms'$.
's `f'p
�•
�• YA _ y
.. f 7``{+ •:iNnon dc� II �a . z��� •,� :-{ ! pL ��al i gas � .5 ���
Q
:,��: .� � (C��`s `'�-•-� �.-� _ 1 �Fsl�+°��t'L�>rn�s ti',: �ca w, i - � 1 1 1 � _ ',
11
rz
yr4£1MIS01 -
}
w J
or x4kr -t�- - 3 a— .: _ . - 0
Q
LU
"Ix
$, '
- � y��4 r a�,• u LU
a p ~
`' R
4:
CIS - _r 4 Q kK, is+Bj- L _ Zeta. Li _ O
_ +®L ate, •• Z
_ . IMPACT W1
-..YEW_ _.
����, s s�+�l�' 0.048 Ac. of Permanent Impact to Wetland WA _- ._ _ Q
s,o;`inw a '"�'�'�--_—= = — Due to grading and installation of new sidewalk --- U w
Qb-fix"- u �Le+ — - i f
��7_. I an c4="---��_cx•cc�sd� aL ��±!}°ate
—
f
1
�A,'a r,,dyyj dFalS 'dliS 94 4L1 dpLld
O �
u:fd R
.. 3 _ hyyLalFGIB z
Fd BRi }i 0-w
-- 'fil k a S rqu171 a ----- ..: ".'!f' `" -� .�._ - :�. _ _ `., a- HIy:M�rl�K.� .r •} i..'arb'a .6' t- 4i- 6 ILI—
U
,�. 3 - ;d+us -riN O cwc
3l, a.,. ] Al. Adw. Gale .l b. - I '• , VMI g,'" 3 U G
j
ypl.r44"t34
NIi8913 -,<
,kd 4L µ414h - 1 - 1 ! .. 3!�
1 r" ;'4M11 kp31.Y16 ;Z O ...7 y 1 O
f .1 +sv 9a : �n .. L `! w
AMYdrJ 1J65J1'o7 �. LIS�'.�.+f-41�.'. .'.-•a /"f'1�1` Y Bf d I�w O
eH5 g9K'3 J r- Ya ig_i�� 9 'J�QI_ LNIIJ-'V}� 7=i i .3�f1 3[IS ti4 F8i5L 9tL '�•
Boa G n a %Y rez ad wiz. as
-aMlLd 9fi"ilLY+N 3'%IB datla 3dri d4,S ;1d £ N
- ?J C •b{+aL -}�- itiL'r9.4 ps dWLd hIy4P a-Hr44Ma7 ^.3es 'a'3 O
yuf 8p5 C,yy4 sfarJt^J Q
lain *►`44 P6� �+e>
yLWs�jquiv�4adr eoW1
r L rP}:1
. 800`
;-1W{
SCALE:
� DATE:
3-22-24
". PROJECT NUMBER
lipi .R ; —• T'� 22350040A TA14
.. �, LEGEND
REFERENCE: 100% DESIGN PLANS —L FIGURE NO.
=j PROJECT LIMITS
DESIGN PLANS OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE. GIS BASE LAYERS WERE I
OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL 0 40 80 �� ® POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY (FEET) +a,
ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. . • Ii6Y. PERMAN ENT W ETLAN D I M PACTS

Appendix I -100% Design Plans

INDEX OF SHEETS
CoverSheet.............................................................................. 1
GeneralNotes and Details ...................................................... 2
CurbRamp Details................................................................. 2A-2D
Curb and Median Staking ..................................................... 2E-2G
TypicalSections.......................................................................
3-3A
StormDrainage Summary ......................................................
3B
Lineand Curve Table.............................................................
3C
Plan& Profile.........................................................................
4-8
CurbElevation Plan...............................................................
9
StormCross Pipe Profiles......................................................
10-11
DemoPlan...............................................................................
DI-D3
TrafficControl.......................................................................
TCP1-TCP3
Pavement Marking & Signing Plan ...................................... PM1-PM4
ErosionControl...................................................................... EC1-EC6
BMP Plans & Details............................................................. CIA-C3.2
Water Distribution Plan.........................................................UC1
Utility By Others Plans......................................................... UBO1-UB03
CrossSections........................................................................ XI-X15
TOTAL SHEETS 64
Z
D
SHEET 4 D
VICINITY MAP
�t•zml :1.=
Begin Project
Sta. 10+00.00 -Ll-
Know what°s below.
Call before you dig.
SURVEY PREPARED BY:
CITY OF CHARLOTTE SURVEY-MAPPING-GIS FROM THE
LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR
THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATES
ESTABLISHED BY: NCGS MONUMENT OR CONTROL
POINT WITH NAD 83(2011) STATE PLANE COORDINATES
OF NORTHING:1469973.7730 EASTING: 592887.6310
ELEVATION NAVD: THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID
FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT (GROUND TO GRID) IS:
0.999841662 VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88 ALL LINEAR
DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES.
DATE RANGE OF SURVEY:02/09/2020 TO 02/16/2020
PLANS PREPARED BY:
600 East Fourth Street
BI NCs Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
9
Phone: [phone]
FOR CHARLOTTE Fax: [phone]
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
GENERAL SERVICES
PLANNING & DESIGN GROUP
CHARLOTTESM
GENERAL SERVICES
Construction Plans of Proposed
Prosperity Church (Old Ridge Rd to Benfield Rd) Improvements
Construction
13+40.00 -Yl-
Project No. PMES191596
Project Features:
Asphalt Pavement
Milling
Concrete Curb and Gutter
Concrete Sidewalk
Concrete Curb Ramps
Storm Drainage
Concrete Pedestrian Refuge
Pavement Markings
Concrete Shared Use Path
Water Main Installation
BMPs
LOCATION MAP
NTS
PROJECT LENGTH = 0.4 MILES
DESIGN SPEED = 35 MPH
NCDOT 2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
EQUAL STATION
STA 20+90 L1
STA 10+00 L2
STA 10+00 Y1
�'AD83 (NSRS2011)
SHEET 7
GRAPHIC SCALES
Plan View .................
20 40 60
Horz. Profile ............
4 8 12
Vert. Profile .............
5 10 15
Cross Section ...........
TO I
PE SEAL
O
O
FINAL DRAWING
For Review Purposes Only
Record Drawings
:ASTFIELD RD.
End Project
Sta. 16+00.00 -L2-
RECOMMENDED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
CDOT -Design
CDOT - Implementation
CLT Water
Construction Administration
Contract Administration
Engineering Services
Landscape Management
Planning, Design & Development
Storm Water Services
Utility Coordination
�h
CHARLOTTE
GENERAL SERVICES
APPROVED
Bid Set No.
FOR CITY ENGINEER DATE
Tuesday, July 18, 2023 12:39:12 PM

824
820
816
812
:e:
804
. Me
796
PROFILE: -L1-
STATION RANGE: 10+00 TO 15+50
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 4'
4
J
J
M
I
�
2
BEGIN PROJECT
M ro
M
N
ao
O
ao
—L1— STA. 10+00
ELEV: 816.58
g n
ab
g a`s
ao
z
o
J
1
zz
—
Z
EXISTING
GRADE AT -1-1-
s�
$
N
J
-153%
-----
W
•O
�
-
.
n N
109LF OF 15" CL III RCP
----
0.45%
2.12%
—
— —
42%
o�
$�
— — — =1 —
$
i i
N
z
g
oo�a
0
— —
10
TOP OF 1.5" DIRECT BURIED TELEPHONE
L1 STA.:10+90.15
TOP OF 14" PLASTIC FIBER OPTIL�
—2.00%
z z
i
F
ELEV: 812.44
L1 STA.:12+03.30
— —
— —
—1.86%
� �
� g
N
ELEV: 809.98
— —
— — —
—1.89%
----
F M
Z Z
U)
TH-11
--
—1.9
�d
.
TH-5
TOP
1 DIRECT BURIED TELEPHONE LINE
—
— — — —1.91%
z y
zzz
TOP OF 1N.25" PLASTIC FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT
L1 STA.:12+02.33
— — — — —— —2.00%
TH-1
L1 STA.:11+05.60
E".. 810.23
— _
TOP OF 2" PLASTIC FIB
OPTIC CONDUIT
E".. 812.15
TH-10
TH-13
——
L1 STA.:10+73.43
ELEV: 812.48
TOP OF (2) 14' PLASTIC FIBER OPTIC
TOP OF 1.25" PLASTIC FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT
—
— — _2.74%
TH-4
L1 STA.:12+02.12
L1 STA.:13+62.84
— ——2.52%
TOP OF 6" STEEL GAS LINE
ELEV: 809.46
ELEV: 807.50
TH-14
— — — — —2.52%
L1 STA.:10+92.05
7H-8
TH-15
TOP OF 6" STEEL
AS LINE
_ — — —
—2.38%132LF
"
TOP OF 6" STEEL GAS LINETOP
DIRECT
L1 STA.: 13+5&51
—
_
OF
et ill tjCp a X
ELEV: 80&73
L1 STA.:13+62
3
ELEV: 806.03
— — — — — —2.556%
—
ELEV: 807.10
148LF 0
18"
CL III RCP ® 1.00X
TH-16
TOP OF 1.25" PLASTIC FIBER OPTICCONDUIT
— — —
7H-7
L1 STA.
1 7.72
TOP OF 24" DUCTILE IRON WATER LINEJ
8013,g5
L1 STA.:10+92.19
E".. 811.11
235LF OF 18"
CL III RCP 01,70X
TH
12
TOP OF (2) 1.25" PLASTIC FIBER OPTIC COND
ITS
L1 STA.:13+6
70
ELEV: BOA
80
(D
co 0
N
I
OD
t
O
^
W)
P,I
0t0
co
O
O
O
O
t
M
CV
c0
CV
N
O
O
0;
O)
O
M
c0
5
p
N
0
O0
O
O0
0^O
0000
'NO�
O
OD
CD
O
D
O
OD GO
CD
OD
O
D
CO 00
—
OD
GO—
aD
a0
D
00OD
OD—
D
aD OD
o0—
CD
00—
CD
00
CD
00
CD
00
0
oD
0000
C
CO
Op
00
10+00
10+50
��
o
I
0
` II
0 H
RDW D 2
m
J -1-1- 10+33.67
G7
Offset: -54.40
I—
R6I
I
0 HAR�WOIOD 2 I
fT1
z
- 1-
n Cf Si
C]
I I
0 HA W
0 HRDWO�D 2
IOH
2
e
-Lj- STA.10t44.76 37.731
ID
�J PROP CURB-R
SEE SHEET 2C
— — — — _
— —
— —
—W �� <
lr)
- in
in
L1-
STA.10+69.
BEGIN MILLING
PROP C
-1-1- 10+34.42�
SEE
DWOOD3
11 +00
11 +50
12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50
aC
1 O OAK 15
14+00
14+50
15+00
824
820
M.
812
-
804
- Me
796
15+50
N i
LLJ
LLJ
cn
Ld
Ld
10
u /
Lo
a
W
C
O
e
N
O
N
co
N N
C
NQf f0
�
w l)
O O
M M
Z
m
..
to w
o
z
O
O
W
c�
a
�Q
W _
CD°.3
O
c X
o m
IL
z
Q
a
CC
t
U
'o
W W
a0
y
wOw
am
jL
=
z
F --aQ
z2, =
ULuU
a
v oLL zz
Im }a a
. Ewa
2
O
a,
U
L1
o�
c�
O
z
V
Z=
�
�
O
y
d
a�
CL
i
d
3
a�
L6
b
N
w
¢
m
U
co
M
N
O
N
>"
a�
x
JQ
7)
v
co
Lo
0)
O
W
m
m
a
V)
O
c�
d
a
w
o
A
W
A/
�
O
w
O O
H
w�
i
�1
C]
!�

820
816
812
804
�: 66
796
792
PROFILE: -L1.-
STATION RANGE: 15+50 TO 19+50
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 4'
0
10
2
J
w
t
A
is
N
w
-t
g
1
s
n^
m
L
BURIED DI
STA.:17+88.12
J
ro
a
.
t
aO
a
°D
El802.18
"..
u�
zz
N
o'r
F>>
y
04.i
n
curio M
S m $ is
PROPOSED GRADE -L1-
STA: 18+85
^'
2 2
y -
ii
ELEV: 804.00
z m
-
EXISTING GROUND
AT -L1-
n
n. ad
nF
TH-48A
z
-22oq
SN 2��m
"1 °'
n
~� z�
7H-26
TOP OF 18" RCP STORM PIPE
STA.:19+11.58
-2.21%
-
�_ TOP '7
TH-26
"COPPER
TOP OF 1.5" & 2" PVC
1�L1.
E".. 805.36
TH-17
-
- -1.90%
z_ z z
z � z ?
TER LINE
IRRIGATION LINES
1.75
TOP OF 1.25" & 2" PVC
- - -
_
z z z z z
L1. ST
18+15.29
STA.:18+15.24
1.22�
-
OF 2 -1.5" PVC I
( )
IRRIGATION LINESL1.
L1. STA.:15+89.88
-1.56%
- - - - - -
ELE1h. 803.09
_ -
- - - - -
---0.89%
-
0.56%
- - - - - - -
-
L1. STA.:19+11.58
- ----
-
.26%
---
-----
- - -
ELEV. 804.87
TH-2o
TH-19
TOP OF 1.25" PLASTIC FIBER OPTIC
DUIT
TOP OF 1.5" DIRECT BURIED TELEPHONE LINE
L1. STA.:15+8&91
L1. STA :1
ELE1h
66
+11.24
799.24
7H-25
T}1-27
TOP OF 8" STEEL GAS LINE
TOP OF .75"
COPPER WATER LINE
ELEV 80213
169LF "
L1. STA.:18+05.61
L1. STA.:18+84.02
TH-23
'
TH-18
TOP OF 1.5" DIRECT
J. STA.:7+70. 8
e127LF'0 15
ueE IV RCP o 0.50%
TOP OF 8" STEEL GAS LINE
L1. STA.:15+89.72
ELEV 799.54
SAND
FILTER
TOP OF (2) 1.25" P
TH-21
C�
TOP OF 8" STEEL GAS LIN
L1. STA ELE1h 79698:17
5
FIBER OPTIC
DUITS
.
L1. STA.:17
ELEV:
11.48
795.29
7H-�
TOP OF 24" DUCTIIE
IRON WATER LINE
L1. STA.:17+75.05
E".. 795.41
N
O
t0
U)
t0
N
^
I�
r7
I�
M
U
M
p
O
R
00
07
00
�
O
t0
1
^ O
p
00
O
00
07
00
M
U)
N
I,
U)
t0
44
M
M
M
O
N
N
N
N
N
n1 CV
N
M
O
Kj
rM
�rj
M
vi
O
p
O
p
O
p
O
p
O
p
O
p
O
p
O
p
O
p O
p
00
p
O
p
O
p
O
p
O
p
00
CO
00
00
00
CO
00
00
00
O
00
00
00
00
00
00
0D 00
00
0D
00
Op
00
00
00
00
00
00
15+50
16+00
16+50
17+00
17+50
18+00
18+50
c) �y- i o>
19+00
820
816
812
tlilMON LINE
800
796
792
19+50
\ � 1
I-
LLJ
LIJ
w
SENSITIVE MATERIAL
Do Not Duplicate
a
W
C
C
O
e
N
O
N
O
� N
C
N
s m
U
M M Z
w
U,
..
LL s
� z8
o
o w
" c7
a
�Q
w
CD w
ID °
c X z
LL a
0_ 0_
�Q
U
�o
w x
a0
F-OU
OWL
Q
z
F --aQ
� ¢zas
� x-
ULUU
z
=
a
LL W
v Ozz
� }tea
O Ewa
2
O
a,
U
o�
c�
O
z
V
Z=
�
�
O
y
as
w
�y
3
J
a�
O
N
w
¢
m
U
Q
N
O
N
III
Q
x
_
7)
Q
co
LO
0)
O
W
m
m
a
V)
O
c�
d
a
�o
A
a
� N
w
�
a
�

812
804
w
V)
n
0
L0
+
cti
PROFILE: -L1 (2)-
STATION RANGE: 19+50 TO 20+90
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 4'
TH-49
TOP OF (3) 1- do (2) 1.75- PVC
TH-49A
L1 (2) SEEV
TOP OF (2) 1.75" FIBER OPTIC
ELEV804.79
ELEV-
L1 (2) STA.:20+43.79
ELEV: 802.79
16
J
M
�
EXISTING GRADE AT -1-1-
0
0)N
s
TH-30
TOP OF 1.5
n 0
i�
a IRRAGATION
PROPOSED GRADE AT
L1-
+ o
c
,�
L1 (2) SO0D
W
F ELEV: 803.
w
Z -
---
»»
Wzzzz
1.50%
TOP OF .5" STEEL GAS LINE
L1 (2) STA.:20+19.94
E". 803'48
18 " CL IV RCP
4LF OF
38LF OF 24" CL III RCP o 0.
0%
OPVCTH-29
WATERSAND LINE
E".. 800.35
TH-50
TOP OF (2) 1.25" FIBER OPTIC
TH-31
L1 (2) STA.:20+32.97
TOP OF 2" PLASTIC
FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT
ELEV: 798.42
TM_28
L1 (2) STA.:20+72.73
TOP OF 12' PVC W
TER LINE
ELIV' 801'88 TH-42
L1 (2) STA.:
0+20.39
TOP OF 1' METTALIC WATER LINE
799.85
n 0)OOi
04 N
N N
N
00
00
C6
co co
00
6
co
c
CO 00
00
816 816
& 2" PVC
LINES
20+73.17
7
804 804
9 2.00%
E:�979�:�919�
796 796
PROFILE: -1-2 (3)-
STATION RANGE: 10+00 TO 11+50
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 4'
90.02' VC
PVI STA. = 11+90.59
PVI ELEV. = 808.78
- -3.
K=30.
HIGH POINT ELEV.
EXISTING GRADE AT -1-2-
HIGH POINT STA.
a:
00
A 00
/
8
_
+
O
00
a
ROPOSED GRADE AT /
+
\ ^ >
m
ROUNDABOUT INSIDE /
c ^
$
\ m
EDGE OF TRAVEL /
$
>
\
PROPOSED GRADE AT -1-2-
n
95tF OF
\TH-34
TOP OF (2) 1.25" PLASTIC
OPTIC CONDUITS
-FIBER
L2 (3)
Station-10+99.52
elev - 803.19
M
M .
N
n
t00
W 00
00
O^
00
0
00 CO
0
0000
00
Op
0
00
0 O
Op 00
ad
00
19+50 20+00 20+50 20+90 10+00
rk
10+50
11 +00
Li
LLJ
U)
n
= 808.48
12+05.66
812
808 808
804 804
800 800
796
11 +50
816
812
796
792
PROFILE: -RAB INSIDE EDGE OF TRAVEL -
STATION RANGE: 0+00 TO 2+76.46
VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 4'
.44' VC 77
PVI STA. = 1+86.42
82.90' VC PVI ELEV. = 806.94
PVI STA. = 0+65.33 A.D. _ -3.87%
PVI ELEV. = 804.23 K = 20.00
K = 20.00 HIGH POINT STA. = 1+9 .51
N
0
Sri
0
OD
OD
r-
CO
04
+
6i
U
>
>
O
M
O +
- -
- -
+
000
00
/
-
to
J /
>
>
_
w _
w
-
- - -272�%
PROPOSED GRADE AT
INSIDE EDGE OF TRAVEL
EXISTING GRADE
AT
INSIDE EDGE OF
TRAVEL
O
t0
t0
;° 0)
OD
ago r
-
0
O
O
O O
0 O
5 O
O
0 O
C) 0
0
O
0
00
00 00
00
00 00
00 00
ao
00 OD
00 OD
00 O
a0 OD
00
0+00
0+50 1 +00
PROFILE: -Y1 (2)-
STATION RANGE: 10+00 TO 11+25
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 4'
7
MJ
M
8
S
g
S
PROPOSED GRADE AT
g
ROUNDABOUT INSIDE
?
EDGE OF TRAVEL
EXISTING
GRADE AT -Y1-
z
zz
-
TH-32
- - - _
TOP OF 5" DIRECT
-
BURIED ELECTRIC
Y1 (2) STA.:10+97.
=
9,%---� -
---
E".. 804.32
TH-32
TOP OF 1.25" DIRECT
BURIED ELECTRIC (PRI
Y1 (2) STA.:10+97.27E1h.
EL801.60
TH-32
84LF OF 18" CL IV RCP ® 2.00%-ZRCOFOOSED
GRADE AT -Y1-
TOP OF (2) 1.25' do
DIRECT BURIED ELEC
Y1 (2) STA.:10+97.2
ELE1h. 800.36
00
^
00
00 t0
M
N
00
04
00
00
00
000
0
00
10+00
NOTE: REFER TO SHEET 10-11 FOR
ADDITIONAL STORM PIPE PROFILES
10+50
816
812
808
B
804
ARY)
800
:2) .5"
tIC
796
792
11 +00 11 +25
1 +50 2+00 2+5(
SENSITIVE MATERIAL
Do Not Duplicate
a
W
C
C
O
�
N
O
N
co
N
C
Qf f0
N 2cn
t m
0 L)
O
M M Z
O
..
l0 .t
� Z
o Lou
" c7
a
c ii z 0 m Q
t
�O
CC
U W w
o_ c7
wOwB
PO
Z
r OJ -a W
r p
I ¢zas
a
� x-
ULUz
= U- W Z
w Ozz
i
9�m
Im}3a
U. Ewa
U.
04
0
a
U
L1
c�
0
z
V
Z=
�
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiic
me
as
�y
d
3
J
a�
_L16
L6
O
N
w
¢
m
U
Q
m
Q
N
o
N
III
-i
7)
Q
U
co
L
-
O
J
a
Ca
m
Q
W
m
m
V)
o
d
a
W �
A �
O O
5
A
�
� o
a

820
816
812
m
804
m
796
792
PROFILE: -L2-
STATION RANGE: 11 +50 TO 16+00
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 4'
PROPOSED GRADE -L2-
-STA. 12+25
ELE1h• 808,19 N
S$
�N
�$
s
E 3
E 2
ON
F55
z
t0
M
o
Ili
0
$
z_
iz
J
T
+
00-1,00%
EXISTING GRADE A
-L2-
a m
a$
, x
------- -
------
---_ _ -0.77%
-
w
W
on
nn�
U
>
>
w
TIa-35
_--_-
---
,ij
�c3
��n
j-
Ka<
M
W
P OF 6" STEEL GAS LINE-2.09%
-
N'
n�
z
�'
zz�
�'� Fi
CO
n
PR
POSED GRADE AT -L2-
L2
Station=12+86.08
elm, = 804,22
_ _
- - -
_ -2.13%
- -
yq
o
Z z
d
8
z_ z z
o
a
z
- -
- -
-2.095v
------
Z5
+
'v
Ea
? z
-
- -
-
_-2 00%
TOP OF 24" DUCTILE
210LF OF
8" CL III RCP ®1•
TH-37
TOPOF(3) 1.5" TELEPHONE
LINES
IRON WATER LINE
7%
TOP OF 6" STEEL GAS LINE
IRON WATER LINE
L2
Station=12+89.12
_
L2 STA :14+63.50
ELES 799.27
L2 STA.:15+17.47
ELEV: 799.83
47LF OF 18" CL III RCP
11 LF OF 15" CL III RCP 0 0.56%
1.3 y,
TH-38
TOP OF 24" DUCTILE
213LF OF 24" C1.
III RCP 0 1.56%
IRON WATER LINE
L2 STA.:15+14.21
ELEV: 798,90
N
p M
M M
03
N
O O
r
O
I�
O
r-
M
O 0,
M
O
0)
O
O
0)
W
N
rn
O W
03
r-
00
In
M O
M
00 M
O
M
CO
CO
O CO
p
CO
p CO
O
I�
I�
t0
O
t�
t0
to
rM
M
M
M N
N N
N
00
O
O O
O
O O
O
p
O
O
O O
O
O
O^
O
O
O^
O
O O
O
O
00
CO
O
O
O
O O
CO
O
O
00
O
O
CO
O O
00
O
O
O
O O
O
O O
O
O
lb
p
pD
lb
00
00
00
p
00
00
00
p
00
00
00
00
11 +50
12+00
PROP. 2'-6" C&G
-L2- 11+84.28
Offset: -52.27
- R0P. 2'146V�&6�
L2+99.52 I
IU I Offse : -47.89
� ' L2-JA.12+0 .47 31.64'L
� j of PROPRB RA
SEE SHEET 2A
(P a R 5%.0'
� Z
W 0 =
12+50
13+00
13+50
0 I
027-561-08
E.P.NISBET COMPANY
MB 3 PG 551
DB 2779 PG 294 0 OAK 14
DB 29491 PG 833 SUE UTE & FEE 0 p�
DB 29373 PG 38 rn
6135 Prosperity Church Rd. 0 OAK 18
PROP• 6' CONC. EXISTING 24" WATER MAIN. EXTREME
SIDEWALK CARE SHALL BE USED IN WORKING e /
NEAR EXISTING WATER MAIN. F _
L �- e
R F °
e e J0 O K16 OOD5 R
OF F
F �
10
I
WV TO GRADE
•ADJUST
•
:• •
•-
\Offset:
9 A-
. •�• -cINDI•!-�
-
C C OAK 11
e�"��
o HARD''- e e S o SPINE 8
V / HARDY `�k��JJ
W o PIE 10 PROP. 8' PLANTING STRIP BEGIN TRANSITION
Z 8 e (TYP) -L2- 12+90.61 o ARE
OAK 8 PROP. 2'-6" CONC. 5:1 SW TAPER b .36.40
e CURB & GUTTER (TYP) -L2- 12+51.96 PROP SW TRANSITION
Offset:42.35 CLDSM 10.23
U PROP. 1CSHARED-USE PATH -L2- 12+72.82 END TRANSITION
o oAKCLoDSM 10.42) 2) o OA, . _ Offset: 36.27 -L2- 12+96.18
Q o OAK 8 Offset:35.66
o OAK 8 =NW�o
C)00
-4 a CONVERT DI ONMW
o I ADJUSIT RADE
TmLn
\RDWOOr
NOTE: REFER TO SHEET 10-11 FOR
ADDITIONAL STORM PIPE PROFILES
CEDAR
FRO 51.4'
14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50
o -
co r�l p
C() -L2- STA.15+77.34 .3f
C F - F1 PROP CUREAtt
o �© \ - I II I SEE S
v ti TIE INTO EXIST. SIDEWALK
o D I -L2- 15+67.11
Offset: 68.00
z
�= Ao \ \ TIE INTO EXIST. SI E ALK
-L2 15�+4 .63
Off et: -4 . \
° IST.rrStDEWALK O EXISTING 24" WATER MAIN EXTREME
1 +96.2 CARE SHALL BE USED IN WORKING
NEAR EXISTING WATER MAIN. _
uun
ADJUST WV TO GRADE �-
� GRADE TO DRAIN -L2- 15+37.30
R 49.0' _ / Offset:-19.07 FO III
F F °° V
FFO
r
• _ „ .. . • -
L5 I
1 LF OF 15" CL III R P 0 0.56%
-L2- PROSPERITY CHURCH ROAD
C5 14+00 L6
------------
15+00.54 1Q
Offset:
••
•. •EXIST C&G L2- PT STA. 13+81.08 E: 1467780.94
• • : D PT STA. - •
Offset: • •
.78
E: 1467778.50
_ VT
G G G
G
C
e �e C C C --- c�
820
816
812
l
END PROJECT
80 -L2- STA. 16-
ELE1h• 801.76
Me]
796
792
16+00
PROP. 2'-6" C&G
-L2- 15+80.31
Offset: -74.21
M
C
r
-
n
�
Z7
Z7
V)
LLJc
�rri
� 3f1S 3f1S 3f1S
F F
W W W W W-
I -L2- STA.15+ .41 26.08'L
PROP CURB R P END MILLING
o SEE SHEET 2D -L2- 15+84.61
0
D_ L 16 00
PROP. 2'-6" C&G
v -L2- 15+45.59 -L2- EP STA. 16+00
Offset: 29.71 \_N: 597442.25
00 E: 1467767.17
LL
O
2 G G G
STA.19+53.45 3 .4 FO FO
P OP CONC DRIVEWAY e epR�'-CON(L�
- STA.13+19.15 23.98'R OEe e 2 _ OE
C DSM 10.25A SIDEWALK (TYP) PROP CONC DRIVEWAY e o CREPEM
I END TRANSITION
-L2- 13+55.81 L2- STA.014+82.92 9.58R
IOffset:40.15 CL DS 0.25A
PROP SW TRANSITION I I
II• CREPE. CLDSM 10.23m I
BEGIN TRANSITION a CREPEM o CREPEM o CREPEM
-L2- 13+49.88 O
O Offset: 38.71
e
OE f OE OE OE -\ -
10 HARDWOOD 6 --aHARDWOOD 8 HARDWOOD
EXIST. SIDEWALK O
5+61.06
3.08
SENSITIVE MATERIAL
Do Not Duplicate
a
W
C
O
�
N
O
N
co
� N
C
of f0
N �
t m
M M Z
W
v LU
..
ti s
o
m Z
o
o w
" c9
a
�Q
W _
C,°.•'
ID
c X z
o m a
IL LL a
it
CC
U
0
W W
a0
W 0 z
~ tY
jL
rA
-01 =zas
ULU0
z
=
a
LL W
V M
Im }0a
Ewa
2
O
v
w
ca
o�
w
c�
O
Z
V
Z=
�
�
O
y
d
a�
CL
3
a�
z
L6
LL.
p
N
w
¢
m
U
Co
Q
N
N
w
III
Q
x
_
�
Q
v
co
0)
0)
O
J
Ca
m
Q
III
W
m
m
a
V)
O
c�
a
a
A
r , +
O
a
� A
O
+

816
812
-
TOP OF 1.25" 1
ELECTRIC L
Y1
804
TH-40
TOP OF .5' DIRECT
BURIED ELECTRIC LINE-
Yf STA.:11+44.81
E".. 800.87
800
TH-42
TOP OF 1" METALLIC
WATER LINE
YI STA.:11+44.81
E". 799.85
Vol
w
W
w
U)
L0
N
+
796
792
PROFILE: -Y1-
STATI ON RANGE: 11 + 25 TO 13+ 40
VERTICAL SCALE: 1 " = 4)
T
6
co
�+
N
6'
HB 87
n
N
z�n i z_z
1
PROPOSED GRADE -Y1-
TH-39
IRECT BURIED
+g
STA: 11+66.98
E (PRIMARY)
C
ELEV 70.27
A.:11+44.69
$
z-
a00.94
----
- -1_52%
-1.679'
EXISTING GRADE AT -Y1
TH-41
TOP OF 2" PLASTIC GAS LINE
Y1 STA.:11+53.19
ELEV: 799.64
TH-40
TOP OF (2) 1.25" k (2) .5"
Y1 STA:11+44.80
ELEV: 800.23
Fn
04 -
00
n
W)
0)
O�
O
n
t^O
M
00
M
00
00
N
N
00
00
00
00
00
O
00
0
0
00
00
00
11 +25 11 +50
CC
J co
J J � 00 CP
�0-1
CLO Oaf
N
Cn LLJ CL
0Zam- °
Q (n :2 a_
0 o
m
,.10 '*
DB 195er ty Church Rd•
6192 prose
61B8 rr
816
812
-
804
-lI
796
792
12+00 12+50 13+00 13+40
N (O N
Ct U mm -0 (D=) r�-0 � O<�Cfl-� W
J Cn N JH of 02 0 OQ Cj ACC yY cif
t���0Qm NOJOm� mr%)oDf
't 10 - T I Z-OCC OC�of I J;:00 D- I Qa00N Q OpW�(7i rT
CL� , N �gCLCL;t �0FW--CL W.�' CNWmrvj 0 Naf 00 0 �ZOC)CL_T ZLd :2
�wH�r.() c nzo p �W�-tn N �QWLLJ N Q) Og=> a_ 00ED a_ 'tLL N �.Y000L�
0ZQZm�-0 O 00`-C�� �j�j�000 0) O)o vai Y 0Lo Q Or7 0)Q WK)N a Ym�
pNgmCL CL� -Y:2 OOJgM 0 m m m OcnLLJ Zm� �Z`tt� Q
0� �Z N N pN QW p- �Qgmm Naf con? O
rn J U) 00 W} 0 w O� O m g m
0�gmL° C70 `� 00 pcmo
p �Q
TIE INTO EXIST.
-Y1- 12+27.64
Offset -29.52
N2EJi( ;:9
"a
�ZZ
Q CC
�(O
�L-JOCL >,
Q
't
O) W vQi
04
0cy:2
10
NJ~
�YOmmN
N
o
o=w
�<0,nO'l �
N�Q O
ou)
0
CD o O
L]
OWmm`-
O CC g m a-
I =
� F- CL
=Q
U z
Q on
m Q)
I (O
gW
m
00
LW
LLIJ
m
g
C]
Q
TIE TO EXIST
C&G (N61`54'11"W 351.64') WALK WALK
Offset:-17.21ttt �M
W �WARMETE WM W
2.5=C&G
PROP BIKE RAMP -Y1- PT STA. 12+48.02
-Y1- 12+15.80 N: 596772.88
Offset: -17.31 E: 1468138.75 1.1113 00 3 40
CLDSM 10.43
2 00 -Y1- C STA. 13+40
PROP BIKE RAMP -Y1- PROSPERITY RIDGE ROAD N: 596 30.22
-Y1- 12+14.09 -Y1- 12+51.70 E: 146 20.24
IC. Offset:17.94 Offset:16.27
PATH CLDSM 10.43 -Y1- 12+57.21
� END MILLING
Offset: 21.44 -Y1- 13+45.84
2.5"C&G 40
UU UUA 9R� WATER MET R M 3
®® UU 030� p <1 na
-Y1- 12+ 1.78 WALK WALK
W TO RELOCATED - Offset:21.3 �-X===��
�N6�`41 LINE IRON
INE
5:1 SW TAPER INTO EXIST. Si EWALK
-Y1- 12+03.01 - 1- 12+33.67
Offset:27.56 0 fset:33.03
00 -�
0 Df o O N
C4 0
FZ O r�VON 0
W c, o O ZO
C) a v �C�CL > 0
g 0 (n d F- 0 Z I m C9 CL �, � W W Cn i Of
p)OZM(n W N 0) v o to O FW- M CL � I g�� O CC r)WO
U 0) W W O N CC CC CL to 'i Q (O 0- W O C
Z Z I O `r .Q � C) N 2 00 Cn (n Cn (7 J O N ,� I
W U` W NF-� CC N ��� ICU 0I-a r- N 0) p(O :O CC W I N 04 00 O P7J� rr)Z(�C
M('�CL(L 1 (n C7 U) N tr OWpr7 0 N�� Z O m N W O rn 0)-D - O Jm� L I O 0� QWC
F- I C� W> 0 g 00 0 Lo ;v 1 C� O O_ N -� O W p] r7
_ Q _ a-. CC I CC 0 rn J O m r') g CL L� C� W T �Y
p p N) CC M� 1 0 Q C� O
r W CL gQ0 p 0 r� C�CL T NO.- pr)QUCL T Z r'`)m� OH Q pF--C
I tYUMZ �) r[) NQ J�OCe I JC�CL T gCL + I g C� CL :L p-per O_ 1 0CC QgmCL = N �� Cn �I
N?-0 O II O�rrn o P7JJ�� T �OCL •' N JCL T �_�� r�F-�0� r')�Lj UW U 0m U 0 1 'tN a NYmr
O�-N�� K�lmmrcVn J�CL� ` �Q�� 10�N a �� u7'L I �Y� ��C7CL >, �ZW 00 g �Y Cnm to 0Wg
�(n�YN NO O I W`-� a) N� O W :t I LLJ N 00 NJmr`) g CI
rO 0 mM 0 -`� OQmN 0 0) a) C1-)o 02gmCL Q
-ET 10-11 FOR 0<:2 ° >- NZmN �gmCL �-1�(O U O0 �O W
ZgmCL 0(p 00:2 C]� OUm� 0O WmED
C](v 00
(O 00 00 of m p�
)IPE PROFILES 0 g 000 N 00
00 J
a
W
O
O
NO
N
� N
C
Q) f0
N �
U) -
s m
O
M M z
w
..
o
� z
o w
" ca7
�Q
w _
o
coo
c X z
o Q
a " d
�Q
t
U
'O
w x
a0
wOz
F-.O
~a
a
Z
r -.6 Wm r 'a'¢zas
m x-
z
=
a
LL W
v o2z
}aa
� Ewa
m
0
a,
U
c�
o�
Ca
O
z
Z=
_
0
y
a�
CL
a�
z
_LL.
L6
O
N
w
¢
m
U
m
Q
N
O
N
III
Q
x
7)
Q
U
co
�
0)
O
oa
m
W
m
m
a
V)
O
c�
a
a
W
i
V
O
a
H

11
11
O
l l —p
I
l l rr► I
rmn I I
p +DWOpD 2 l� ii m
11
11
pH,R WOOD 2 ill
HIRDWO�D 2 u
4H(Ij"
-
<,!
~LLJO
FO
3
p'a UO
OAK 15
�~ I
I
r(') OAK 181 I I I
I--
LLJ
LLJ
Un
LLJ
LLJ
Un
SENSITIVE MATERIAL
Do Not Duplicate
a
W
O
•
N
O
N
Co
N
N.
�
Qf0
Nf �
O O
t m
0 U
LL s
M M'�
o �
Z
W�
o
w
o
"
c X
w
c7
z
�Q
CD°.3
_
t
o m
Q
�O
CC
U
w x
a0
�"
wOz
FAO
~am
a
W
r j 0a W
¢(Z'as
C
0
� x—
ULUO
Z
=
a
LL W
V OZZ
. };a
L)wa
z
O
L1
O
z
Z=
�
0
y
as
�y
3
J
a�
O
N
w
¢
m
U
Q
N
O
N
a�
x
JQ
D
Co
LO
O
0)
m
m
V)
O
d
a
w �
A �
�
x 00
O
� A
w
A
�
w
� O
�
a
A
�
A
L .j

EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. WATERSHED: LOWER CLARKE
2. DISTURBED AREA = f3.0 ACRES
3. SOIL TYPES: CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM (CeB2), HELENA SANDY LOAM (HeB)
4. STABILIZATION IS THE BEST FORM OF EROSION CONTROL. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH THE APPROPRIATE
PERMANENT VEGETATIVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURE(S) WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME FRAME:
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES AND
SLOPES
7
DAYS
HIGH QUALITY WATER ZONES
7
DAYS
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
7
DAYS
SLOPES GREATER THAN 50FTIN LENGTH
REGARDLESS OF SLOPE
7
DAYS
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER AND LESS THAN
50FT IN LENGTH
14
DAYS
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES FLATTER
THAN 4:1
14
DAYS
5. ANY GRADING BEYOND THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLANS IS A VIOLATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION
CONTROL ORDINANCE AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
6. NO ON -SITE BURIAL OF VEGETATION OR CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS WILL BE PERMITTED.
7. ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE FIELD BY THE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR.
8. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS. NEEDED REPAIRS
MUST BE MADE IMMEDIATELY.
9. REFER TO THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, PROFILES, AND DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC DESIGN INFORMATION FOR THE ROADWAY AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS.
10. INLET PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL INLETS LOCATED IN THE WORKING AREA AND IS REQUIRED FOR ALL PHASES OF THE
PROJECT UNTIL THE DISTURBED AREA IS FULLY STABILIZED.
11. WHEN PLACING EXCAVATED SOIL ON PAVEMENT, FIRST COVER PAVEMENT WITH TARP, SAND, OR SCREENINGS.
12. THE MAXIMUM LINEAR FEET OF DITCH WORK THAT CAN BE EXCAVATED BEFORE REQUIRED STABILIZATION IS 200
LF.
13. INSTALL STORM DRAINAGE AND OTHER PERMANENTLY STABILIZED DITCHES AND DRIVEWAY PIPES THAT WILL CONVEY
SURFACE WATER DOWNSTREAM OF THE SITE, FIRST.
14. ALL STOCKPILE AREAS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES SURROUNDING THE AREA. THE STOCKPILE AREAS MAY ONLY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES CONSIST OF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE, TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH, SEDIMENT
TRAP, ETC.
15. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT FROM DEPOSITION ON LOCAL ROADS BY PROVIDING
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXITS. REFER TO CLDSM 30.11 A - STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
16. IN AREAS WHERE SILT FENCE IS WITHIN 5 FEET OF TREE PROTECTION, USE 1606.01
17. EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE APPLIED IN ALL DITCH SECTIONS WHERE LAND IS DISTURBED DURING
CONSTRUCTION. MATTING SHALL CONSIST OF 70% STRAW AND 30% COCONUT, AND BE BACKED (OR EQUIVALENT).
EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE PLAN
1. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE INSTALLED AS NOTED
ON THE CLDSM DETAILS FOR EROSION CONTROL AND THE EROSION CONTROL PLANS.
2. TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND
DISPOSED OF.
3. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS.
NEEDED REPAIRS MUST BE MADE IMMEDIATELY.
VEGETATIVE PLAN
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED BY PERMANENTLY VEGETATING WITH SEED AND MULCH
AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PERMANENT SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS DUE TO THE RESTRAINTS ON THE
LENGTH OF IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR DURATION OF EXPOSED DISTURBED AREA.
2. TO PROMOTE A DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER IN AREAS WHERE RUNOFF CONCENTRATES OR IN AREAS
WHERE VEGETATION IS HARD TO ESTABLISH, A MATTING FOR EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE USED. THE
MATTING TO BE USED WILL BE A MATTING THAT CONSISTS OF 70% STRAW AND 30% COCONUT AND BE
BACKED (OR APPROVED EQUAL). THE MATTING FOR EROSION CONTROL WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PART
OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND SHALL ALSO SERVE FOR VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION PURPOSES.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMITS.
2. HOLD PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
3. FLAG THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND INSTALL TREE PROTECTION.
4. ALL DITCH SECTIONS SHALL BE STABILIZED FOR EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
5. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
6. CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND AS NOTED IN THE
CONSTRUCTION PHASING LISTED ON SHEET TCP1.
7. DISTURBANCE AREAS SHALL BE LIMITED TO ONE DRAINAGE AREA AT A TIME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.
8. AFTER EACH WORKDAY, PROTECT ROADWAY BASE WITH ABC OR BY COMPACTION.
9. INSPECT THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL. MAKE ANY
NEEDED REPAIRS.
10. ONCE THE ENTIRE DRAINAGE AREA IS PERMANENTLY STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING PRACTICES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE NCGO1 CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT
Implementing the details and specifications on this plan sheet will result in the construction
activity being considered compliant with the Ground Stabilization and Materials Handling
sections of the NCGO1 Construction General Permit (Sections E and F, respectively). The
permittee shall comply with the Erosion and Sediment Control plan approved by the
delegated authority having jurisdiction. All details and specifications shown on this sheet
may not apply depending on site conditions and the delegated authority havingjurisdiction.
SECTION E: GROUND STABILIZATION
Required Ground Stabilization
Timeframes
Stabilize within this
Site Area Description
many calendar
Timeframe variations
days after ceasing
land disturbance
(a) Perimeter dikes,
swales, ditches, and
7
None
perimeter slopes
(b) High Quality Water
None
(HQW) Zones
(c) Slopes steeper than
If slopes are 10' or less in length and are
3:1
7
not steeper than 2:1, 14 days are
allowed
-7 days for slopes greater than 50' in
length and with slopes steeper than 4:1
-7 days for perimeter dikes, swales,
(d) Slopes 3:1 to 4:1
14
ditches, perimeter slopes and HQW
Zones
-10 days for Falls Lake Watershed
-7 days for perimeter dikes, swales,
{e} Areas with slopes
ditches, perimeter slopes and HQW Zones
flatter than 4:1
14
-10 days for Falls Lake Watershed unless
there is zero slope
Note: After the permanent cessation of construction activities, any areas with temporary
ground stabilization shall be converted to permanent ground stabilization as soon as
practicable but in no case longer than 90 calendar days after the last land disturbing
activity. Temporary ground stabilization shall be maintained in a manner to render the
surface stable against accelerated erosion until permanent ground stabilization is achieved.
GROUND STABILIZATION SPECIFICATION
Stabilize the ground sufficiently so that rain will not dislodge the soil. Use one of the
techniques in the table below:
Temporary Stabilization
Permanent Stabilization
• Temporary grass seed covered with straw of
• Permanent grass seed covered with straw or
other mulches and tackifiers
other mulches and tackifiers
• Hydroseeding
• Geotextile fabrics such as permanent soil
• Rolled erosion control products with or
reinforcement matting
without temporary grass seed
• Hydroseeding
• App ro p riate ly a pp lie d straw or other mulch
• Shrubs or other permanent plantings covered
■ Plastic sheeting
with mulch
• Uniform and evenly distributed ground cover
sufficient to restrain erosion
• Structural methods such as concrete, asphalt or
retaining walls
• Rolled erosion control products with grass seed
POLYACRYLAMIDES (PAMS) AND FLOCCULANTS
1. Select flocculants that are appropriate for the soils being exposed during
construction, selecting from the NC DWR List of Approved PAMS/Foocculants.
2. Apply flocculants at or before the inlets to Erosion and Sediment Control Measures.
3. Apply flocculants at the concentrations specified in the NC DWR List of Approved
PAMS/Flocculants and in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
4. Provide pond ing area for containment of treated Stormwater before discharging
offsite.
5. Store flocculants in leak -proof containers that are kept under storm -resistant cover
or surrounded by secondary containment structures.
EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
1. Maintain vehicles and equipment to prevent discharge of fluids.
2. Provide drip pans under any stored equipment.
3. Identify leaks and repair as soon as feasible, or remove leaking equipment from the
project.
4. Collect all spent fluids, store in separate containers and properly dispose as
hazardous waste (recycle when possible).
5. Remove leaking vehicles and construction equipment from service until the problem
has been corrected.
6. Bring used fuels, lubricants, coolants, hydraulic fluids and other petroleum products
to a recycling or disposal center that handles these materials.
LITTER, BUILDING, MATERIAL AND LAND CLEARING WASTE
1. Never bury or burn waste. Place litter and debris in approved waste containers.
2. Provide a sufficient number and size of waste containers (e.g dumpster, trash
receptacle) on site to contain construction and domestic wastes.
3. Locate waste containers at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surface
waters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available.
4. Locate waste containers on areas that do not receive substantial amounts of runoff
from upland areas and does not drain directly to a storm drain, stream or wetland.
5. Cover waste containers at the end of each workday and before storm events or
provide secondary containment. Repair or replace damaged waste containers.
6. Anchor all lightweight items in waste containers during times of high winds.
7. Empty waste containers as needed to prevent overflow. Clean up immediately if
containers overflow.
S. Dispose waste off -site at an approved disposal facility.
9. On business days, clean up and dispose of waste in designated waste containers.
PAINT AND OTHER LIQUID WASTE
1. Do not dump paint and other liquid waste into storm drains, streams or wetlands.
2. Locate paint washouts at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surface
waters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available.
3. Contain liquid wastes in a controlled area.
4. Containment must be labeled, sized and placed appropriately for the needs of site.
5. Prevent the discharge of soaps, solvents, detergents and other liquid wastes from
construction sites.
PORTABLE TOILETS
1. Install portable toilets on level ground, at least 50 feet away from storm drains,
streams or wetlands unless there is no alternative reasonably available. If 50 foot
offset is not attainable, provide relocation of portable toilet behind silt fence or place
on a gravel pad and surround with sand bags.
2. Provide staking or anchoring of portable toilets during periods of high winds or in high
foot traffic areas.
3. Monitor portable toilets for leaking and properly dispose of any leaked material.
Utilize a licensed sanitary waste hauler to remove leaking portable toilets and replace
with properly operating unit.
EARTHEN STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT
1. Show stockpile locations on plans. Locate earthen -material stockpile areas at least
50 feet away from storm drain inlets, sediment basins, perimeter sediment controls
and surface waters unless it can be shown no other alternatives are reasonably
available.
2. Protect stockpile with silt fence installed along toe of slope with a minimum offset of
five feet from the toe of stockpile.
3. Provide stable stone access point when feasible.
4. Stabilize stockpile within the timeframes provided on this sheet and in accordance
with the approved plan and any additional requirements. Soil stabilization is defined
as vegetative, physical or chemical coverage techniques that will restrain accelerated
erosion on disturbed soils for temporary or permanent control needs.
C�lNORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
NCG01 GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING
PART III
SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
SECTION A: SELF -INSPECTION
Self -inspections are required during normal business hours in accordance with the table
below. When adverse weather or site conditions would cause the safety of the inspection
personnel to be in jeopardy, the inspection may be delayed until the next business day on
which it is safe to perform the inspection. In addition, when a storm event of equal to or
greater than 1.0 inch occurs outside of normal business hours, the self -inspection shall be
performed upon the commencement of the next business day. Any time when inspections
were delayed shall be noted in the Inspection Record.
Frequency
Inspect
{during normal
Inspection records must include:
business hours)
_
(1) Rain gauge
Daily
Daily rainfall amounts.
maintained n
If no daily rain gauge observations are made during weekend or
good workin;
holiday periods, and no individual- -day rainfall information is
order
available, record the cumulativp rain measurvrnent fnr those un
attended days (anc this will determine if a site inspection is
needed). Days on which no rainfall occurred shall be recorded as
"zero." The permittee may use another rain -monitoring device
approved by the Division.
(2) E&SC
At least once per
1. Identification of the measures inspected,
Measures
7 calendar days
2. Date and time of the inspection,
and within 24
3- Name of the person performing the. inspection,
hours of a rain
4, Indication of whether the measures were opefating
event � 1.0 inch in
properly,
24 hours
5. Description of maintenance needs for the measure,
6. Descrlption, evidence, and date of corrective actions taken.
(3) 5tormwater
At least once per
1. Identif cation of the discharge outfalls inspected,
discharge
7 calendar days
2. Date and time of the inspection,
outfalls (sDCs)
and within 24
3. Name of the person performing the inspection,
hours of a rain
4. Evidence of iindicators of stormwater pollut6on such as ail
event � 1.0 inch in
sheen, floating or suspended solids or discoloration,
24 hours
5. Indication of visible sediment leaving the site,
6. Description, evidence, and date of corrective actions taken.
(4) Perlmete• of
At least once per
If visible sedimentation is found outside site limits, then a record
site
7 calendar days
of the following shall be made:
and within 24
1. Acdonstaken to cleanup or stabilize the sediment that has left
hours of a rain
the site iimlts,
event > 1.0 inch in
2. Description, evidence, and date of corrective action s tak e n, and
24 hours
3. An explanation asto the actions taken to control future
releases.
(5) Streams or
At least anre per
If the stream or wetland has increased visible sedimentation rr a
wetlands onsite
l
7 calendar days
stream has visible increased turbidity ftom the construction
or offsite
and within 24
activity, then a record of the following shall be made:
(where
hours of a rain
1. Description, evidence and date of corrective actions taken, and
accessible)
event > 1.0 inch in
2. Records of the required reports to the appropriate Division
24 hnurs
Regin naI Office per Part III, Section C, Item (2)(aj of this permit
6 Ground
()
After each phase
p
1. The hase of radio installation of erimeter E&SC
p R $( R
stabilization
f radio
a g g
m asu res cIrarin a rubbin instal laden of storm
e g nd g g, st
measures
drainage facilities, completion of all land -disturbing
activity, construction or redevelopment, permanent
ground cover).
2. Documentation that the required ground stabilization
measures have been provided within the requined
timeframe or an assurance that they will be provided as
soon as possible.
NOTE: The rain inspection resets the required 7 calendar day inspection requirement.
PART III
SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
SECTION B: RECORDKEEPING
I. E&SC Plan Documentation
The approved E&SC plan as well as any approved deviation shall be kept on the site. The
approved E&SC plan must be kept up-to-date throughout the coverage under this permit.
The following items pertaining to the E&SC plan shall be kept on site and available for
inspection at all times during normal business hours.
Item to Document
Documentation Requirements
(a) Each E&SC measure has been installed
Initial and date each E&SC measure on a copy
and does not significantly deviate from the
of the approved E&SC plan or complete, date
locations, dimensions and relative elevations
and sign an inspection report that lists each
shown on the approved E&SC plan.
E&SC measure shown on the approved E&SC
plan. This documentation is required upon the
initial installation of the E&SC measures or if
the E&SC measures are modified after initial
installation.
(b) A phase of grading has been completed.
lnitial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
plan or complete, date and sign an Inspection
report to indicate completion of the
construction phase.
(c) Ground cover is located and instaliel
Initial and date a copy of the approved E&5C
in accordance with the approved E&SC
plan or complete, date and sign an inspection
plam
report to indicate compliance with approved
ground cover specificatians-
(d) The maintenance and repair
Complete, date and sign an inspection report.
requirements for all E&SC measures
have been performed.
(e) Corrective actions have been taken
Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
to E&SC measures.
plan or complete, date and sign an inspection
re pert to indicate the completion of the
corrective action-
Z. Additional Documentation to be Kept on Site
In addition to the E&SC plan documents above, the following items shall be kept on the
site and available for inspectors at all times during normal business hours, unless the
Division provides a site -specific exemption based on unique site conditions that make
this requirement not practical:
(a) This General Permit as well as the Certificate of Coverage, after it is received.
(b) Records of inspections made during the previous twelve months. The permittee shall
record the required observations on the Inspection Record Form provided by the
Division or a similar inspection form that includes all the required elements. Use of
electronically -available records in lieu of the required paper copies will be allowed if
shown to provide equal access and utility as the hard -copy records.
3. Documentation to be Retained for Three Years
All data used to complete the a-NOI and all inspection records shall be maintained for a period
of three years after project completion and made available upon request. [40 CFR 122A
PART II, SECTION G, ITEM (4)
DRAW DOWN OF SEDIMENT BASINS FOR MAINTENANCE OR CLOSE OUT
Sediment basins and traps that receive runoff from drainage areas of one acre or more shall use outlet structures that withdraw water from the surface when these devices need to be drawn down
for maintenance or close out unless this is infeasible. The circumstancesin which ii is not feasible to withdraw water from the surface shall ber re (forexample,times with extended cold weather).
Non -surface withdrawals from sediment basins shall be allowed only when all of the following criteria have been met:
(a) The E&SC plan authority has been provided with documentation of the non -surface withdrawal and the specific time periods or conditions in which it will occur. The non -surface withdrawal
shall not commence until the E&SC plan authority has approved these items,
(b) The non -surface withdrawal has been reported as an anticipated bypass in accordance with Part III, Section C, Item (2)(c) and (d) of this permit,
(c) Dewatering discharges are treated with controls to minimize discharges of pollutants from stormwater that is removed from the sediment basin. Examples of appropriate controls include
properly sited, designed and maintained dewatering tanks, weir tanks, and filtration systems,
(d) Vegetated, upland areas of the sites or a properly designed stone pad is used to the extent feasible at the outlet of the dewatering treatment devices described in Item (c) above,
(e) Velocity dissipation devices such as check dams, sediment traps, and riprap are provided at the discharge points of all dewatering devices, and
(f) Sediment removed from the dewatering treatment devices described in Item (c) above is disposed of in a manner that does not cause deposition of sediment into waters of the United States.
E r r
�F. -�
Il� i
rl
e-e
�q=T,rw
r ,ctir� r�i,q IfiR�ifJ !. rlRl
prEp iK�i �1r1�U
E M fir[ WfY�T
iE�or m u•o r16mE fELu
r.r�sEx � nc rrse rc.ur
awcm m rwor ucawsc
PIN
�,n,
149016 GVK1iT YRIII A 1•mrM
ABOVE GRADE V4SHOr1T STRUCTURE
CONCRETE WASHOUTS
1. Do not discharge concrete or cement slurry from the site.
2. Dispose of, or recycle settled, hardened concrete residue in accordance with local
and state solid waste regulations and at an approved facility.
3. Manage washout from mortar mixers in accordance with the above item and in
addition place the mixer and associated materials on impervious barrier and within
lot perimeter silt fence.
4. Install temporary concrete washouts per local requirements, where applicable. If an
alternate method or product is to be used, contact your approval authority for
review and approval. If local standard details are not available, use one of the two
types of temporary concrete washouts provided on this detail.
5. Do not use concrete washouts for dewatering or storing defective curb or sidewalk
sections. 5tormwater accumulated within the washout may not be pumped into or
discharged to the storm drain system or receiving surface waters. Liquid waste must
be pumped out and removed from project.
6. Locate washouts at least 50 feet from storm drain inlets and surface waters unless it
can be shown that no other alternatives are reasonably available. At a minimum,
install protection of storm drain inlet(s) closest to the washout which could receive
spills or overflow.
7. Locate washouts in an easily accessible area, on level ground and install a stone
entrance pad in front of the washout. Additional controls may be required by the
approving authority.
S. Install at least one sign directing concrete trucks to the washout within the project
limits. Post signage on the washout itself to identify this location.
9. Remove leavings from the washout when at approximately 75% capacity to limit
overflow events. Replace the tarp, sand bags or other temporary structural
components when no longer functional. When utilizing alternative or proprietary
products, follow manufacturer's instructions.
10. At the completion of the concrete work, remove remaining leavings and dispose of
in an approved disposal facility. Fill pit, if applicable, and stabilize any disturbance
caused by removal of washout.
HERBICIDES, PESTICIDES AND RODENTICIDES
1. Store and apply herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in accordance with label
restrictions.
2. Store herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in their original containers with the
label, which lists directions for use, ingredients and first aid steps in case of
accidental poisoning.
3. Do not store herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in areas where flooding is
possible or where they may spill or teak into wells, stormwater drains, ground water
or surface water. If a spill occurs, clean area immediately.
4. Do not stockpile these materials onsite.
1AZARDOUS AND TOXIC WASTE
1. Create designated hazardous waste collection areas on -site.
2. Place hazardous waste containers under cover or in secondary containment.
3. Do not store hazardous chemicals, drums or bagged materials directly on the ground.
EFFECTIVE: 04/01 / 19
PART III
SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
SECTION C. REPORTING
1. Occurrences that Must be Reported
Permittees shall report the following occurrences:
(a) Visible sediment deposition in a stream or wetland.
(b) Oil spills if:
■ They are 25 gallons or more,
■ They are less than 25 gallons but cannot be cleaned up within 24 hours,
■ They cause sheen on surface waters (regardless of volume), or
They are within 100 feet of surface waters (regardless of volume).
(c) Releases of hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities under Section 311
of the Clean Water Act (Ref: 40 CFR 110.3 and 40 CFR 117.3) or Section 102 of CERCLA
(Ref: 40 CFR 302.4) or G.S. 143-215.85.
(d) Anticipated bypasses and unanticipated bypasses.
(e) Noncompliance with the conditions of this permit that may endanger health or the
environment.
2. Reporting Timeframes and Other Requirements
After a permittee becomes aware of an occurrence that must be reported, he shall contact
the appropriate Division regional office within the timeframes and in accordance with the
other requirements listed below. Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be
reported to the Department's Environmental Emergency Center personnel at (800)
858-0368.
Occurrence
Reporting Timeframes [After Discovery) and Other Requirements
(a) Visible sediment
• Within 24 hours, an oral or electronic notification.
deposition in a
• Within 7 calendar days, a report that contains a description of the
stream or wetland
sediment and actions taken to address the cause of the deposition.
Division staff may waive the requirement fora written report on a
case -by -case basis.
• If the stream is named on the NC 3030 list as impaired for sediment -
related causes, the permittee may be required to perform additional
monitoring, inspections or apply more stringent practices if staff
determine that additional requirements are needed to assure compliance
with the federal or state impaired -waters conditions.
(b) 0i1 spills and
• Within 24 hours, an oral or electranic notification. The notification
release of
shall include information about the date, time, nature, volume and
hazardous
location of the spill or release.
substances per Item
1 b c above
(c) Anticipated
• A report at feast ten days before the date of the bypass, if possible.
bypasses [40 CFR
The report shall include an evaluation of the anticipated quality and
122.41(m)(3)]
effect of the bypass.
(d) Unanticipated
■ Within 24 hours, an Oral or electronic notification.
bypasses [40 CFR
• within 7 calendar days, a report that includes an evaluation of the
122.41(m)(3)]
quality and effect at the bypass.
( Noncompliance ramp
e No Rance
Within n 74 hours, an oral or electronic notification.
with the conditions
■ Within 7 calendar days, a report that contains a description of the
of this permit that
noncompliance, and its causes; the period of noncompliance,
may endanger
including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not
health or the
been corrected, the anticipated time noncompliance is expected to
environment[40
continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and
CFR 122.41(1)(7)]
prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. [40 CFR 122.41(I)(6),
■ Olvlslon staff may waive the requirement for a written report on a
case-bv-case basis.
• r NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
NCGO1 SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING I EFFECTIVE: 04/01/19I
a
W
O
N
N
co
N
C
N Ln
t A
U
LL
co M Z
v M Lu
O
..
M
'-'
`o
Z
W
W
o
a
c x Z
0 to
co c
a a
o
y
U WW
0-0
W0Z
F0--
a
Z
1= °GaW
0
0<Za
a
it
Ix X
4 VW�
2 LLWZ
v ozz
}3a
UWa
r,�- u. O ~ZJ
04 XX
2
a,
c�
v
ca
>.
oa
Ca
0
z
Z=
�
O
�y
as
0
09am
2
d
3
a�
Z�
O
CV
II
W
¢
m
U
Q
co
M
N
N
W
_
Q
U
c0
0)LO
O
J
OC
L1
04
>.
Ga
Q
U)co
w
m
a
W
O
c�
CL
a
W �
A �
W
O
A
O O
A
a
O
W
W Z
�
W
O
� O
W
a
ww
V
O 4/
�W
W

11 C)
l l
O
11 -gyp
11 IT,
OH RDW D 2 COI I m I I
DID 11
11 rn I I�
0 H I RNOIOD 2
OH RDWO�D 2 UA
II h
LEGEND
SILT FENCE OUTLET (30.06C)
PROTECTED WETLANDS /STREAMS
PROP. TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION
CLDSM 30.09 FOR DI
CLDSM 30.12 FOR CULVERTS
CLDSM 30.15 FOR CB
PROP. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE (NCDOT 1605.01)
PROP. TREE PROTECTION FENCE (CLDSM 40.02)
— — LIMITS OF PROJECT AREA
PROP. RIP RAP APRON (SEE DETAILS FOR QUANTITIES)
XH
O OAK 15PR II/WOOJ PROSPERT1MB 60 PLLC.�jDB 31111 1.I 4530 Asht (YOAK 18I
OAK 22
2�735?nZeb� Knoll Ln �� I ��^ '� I � PROP. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
� N
W �
cn 0
OAK 24 -00 �D F9
mTm -o
U
LLJ
W
W
V /
Ld
Ld
O
L0
L0
Q
cn
cn
LLJ
z
J
a
W
O
�
N
0
N
N
` C
Qf f0
N �
s m
LL s
M M
o
Z
Lu
..
�Q
o
Z
W
°.3
CDz
o
"
c X
o m
w
c7
Q
Q
_
coo °
t
a "
d
�O
CC
U
W W
a0
WOz
a
r j0aW
az�s
C
0
a
� x—
ULuO
= LL W Z
V 0:
. };a
Ewa
z
O
a,
U
L1
o�
0
z
Z=
�
0
y
as
L
d
3
J
a�
z
L6
O
N
w
¢
m
U
Q
co
Q
N
O
N
III
x
7)
Q
co
LO
0)
O
US
W�
m
m
V)
O
a
A �
O
V A^
O
�I
W w
O
I�
�I
w
w
�
o

N
U
W
W
W
V)
O
Ln
Ln
LEGEND
SILT FENCE OUTLET (30.06C)
PROTECTED WETLANDS /STREAMS
PROP. TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION
CLDSM 30.09 FOR DI
CLDSM 30.12 FOR CULVERTS
CLDSM 30.15 FOR CB
PROP. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE (NCDOT 1605.01)
PROP. TREE PROTECTION FENCE (CLDSM 40.02)
LIMITS OF PROJECT AREA
PROP. RIP RAP APRON (SEE DETAILS FOR QUANTITIES)
U
Lv
Lv
Lv
07
Lv
Lv
V)
O
Ln
J
Q
cn
Lv
z
I
U
Q
a
W
O
�
N
0
N
N.
N
Qf0
Nf �
s m
LL s
M M Z
o Lu
�Q
W
°.3
CDz
o w
c X
o m Q
_
coo °
t
a " d
'O
CC
�"
U W
a c7
WOz
~am
a
W
r j 0a W
az�s
C
0
a
� x—
ULuO
= LL W Z
V 0:
. };a
Ewa
z
O
a,
U
L1
0
z
V
Z=
�
�
O
y
as
w
�y
3
J
a�
z
_LL.
L6
p
N
w
¢
m
U
a�
co
Q
N
0
N
x
JQ
7)
co
�
0)
O
US
�a
m
m
V)
O
d
a
w
a
O
~
r�
V A
r�
Vl
w
W
O
O
I�
w
w
�
o

U
W
O
Lo
0
7X
�s
SF
sy
FF
T
Fc
6
u l
U
W
W
W
U)
W
W
U)
0
L0
N
J
cn
W
z
U
Q
LEGEND
SILT FENCE OUTLET (30.06C)
PROTECTED WETLANDS /STREAMS
PROP. TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION
CLDSM 30.09 FOR DI
CLDSM 30.12 FOR CULVERTS
CLDSM 30.15 FOR CB
PROP. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE (NCDOT 1605.01)
PROP. TREE PROTECTION FENCE (CLDSM 40.02)
LIMITS OF PROJECT AREA
PROP. RIP RAP APRON (SEE DETAILS FOR QUANTITIES)
a
W
O
e
N
0
N
co
N N.
NQf �
I m
0 U
LL s
o M Z
v '� U,o � �
..
�Q
o
w
0 °.�'
o U,z
" o
a
c X z
0 m a
_
coo °
t
a " d
'O
CC
y
U w x
a0
wOz
~ a-
o
W 0 U)
r j 0a W
azas
C
0
Q
� x—
ULuO
= LL W z
V Ozz
m.O Uwa
z
0
a
v
c�
m
cz
0
z
z=
o
�y
as
a
�y
d
3
a�
L6
O
N
w
¢
m
U
a�
co
Q
N
O
N
x
JQ
7)
co
Lo
0)
O
US
W
m
m
a
V)
o
c�
d
a
w
A �
O
A �
�
o �
�
A
a
O
w
�
�
w w
O
� o
w
a
W
w
(40)
o (40)
Cf)W
w

872 w u -b O
o c� lI
HARDWOOD 15 Q r
c�
,.ram
A o ) PINE 10
00
rn
N
gt w v iv
o (�r63u cO
c rn n
o
a
LEGEND
SILT FENCE OUTLET (30.06C)
PROTECTED WETLANDS /STREAMS
PROP. TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION
CLDSM 30.09 FOR DI
CLDSM 30.12 FOR CULVERTS
CLDSM 30.15 FOR CB
PROP. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE (NCDOT 1605.01)
PROP. TREE PROTECTION FENCE (CLDSM 40.02)
LIMITS OF PROJECT AREA
PROP. RIP RAP APRON (SEE DETAILS FOR QUANTITIES)
I 10
19
OD o EPWl
m
z
REPEM `
0LLJ
\ \ _800
3ns �3ns 3ns
GV
j4ARDWOOD 4
16*00
i
S 5 HARDWOOD 6 HARDWOOD 8 HARDWOOD 6
0
co
I
I
a
W
O
�
N
0
N
N
N.
Qf0
Nf �
s m
LL s
M M Z
o Lu
�Q
W
°.3
CDz
o w
c X
o m Q
_
coo °
t
a " d
'O
CC
U W
a c7
WOz
a
rA
r j0aW
az�s
C
0
a
� x—
ULuO
= LL W Z
V 0:
. };a
Ewa
z
O
a,
q
0
z
Z=
�
0
y
as
�y
3
J
a�
O
N
w
¢
m
U
a�
Q
N
O
N
x
JQ
�
v
co
Lo
0)
O
US
m
m
V)
O
d
a
W �
A
W
O
A
I� ~
A
aw.l W
a h
W
w
w
�
o
C
W
W

U
W -PEM
I— I o CREPEM
W
w
o CREPEM
V)
W
W
V)
N
(n
LLJ
z_
U
Q
N
J t- a)
oo 0)
p0JON�
11O-Oo
� of elf
H
o Z Q m� 0
<mm
0 �
0o
(1)
N O J O 0
Od_O.-OOf
� Ln
�w�-L
pz<m00 `O
< U)
0
Q>
00
a
of
N N
Q 00 0)
'd- b N -o
o
0ZZO�
20a-
rn rn
�Z_'t'c
Q n t
gmW
Ld
�
CA (�
o ui m N 0
Lo
00
=
cn m 0
0 �
00
mw o
J FJ-
H F- 0) N
Lo 00pc0 00
0
�UCC
)QLu W N Lo N
O00 0
0mto`O
0Lu
fl �
aWOf 0
o�
CD O o0
F-
Z p�
cOOpM;�
O m - O
1 �Colo, a
O m m O
_g�md_
Y O Lo
LO
00
C10 12 00
—Y1 / ROSPERITY RIDGE
/ ROAD
PROP. TEMPORARY INLET
PROTECTION CLDSM 30.15
O(TYP.)
02y-413-23Y
�00, 1 PGN p1
DP B 9510 tPChh R
6cd 6192 _
029-41 RIENDEA�
ERIC DEN SE HALL
41 PG 101
06 2B9,87 ItvChu ch Rd.
10-1
L111
1117� L I E
PROJECT LMITS
O
CC
w_ o
N 1-�
M�C�d_CT (n� -n O O'l O
W W :t Lom<0 O Od
> LO a) NQ J�pO �_ a
I _ >,
°)m�N 0 �J�WI� �Q�PN7 N
pmr7 �� coO I (n�N o
U� a_ I Q0) inuern 0- °'- n �
< In0 N O Z m O O Q g N
Ln OUW Z m
00 (nd-�ma_ ON
00 O
co
c
7
a
LL, O a)
2 0o rn
z rn
Nd_�N'0
I Q 0�
Lo
000pLr);0
L4) >%
N 0 O
g
rnZO�N
.�
�YL` U-) N
NOm� O
I Lu Q
p
m m
O) Z 0)
N Z m N 0
< 00
OO:md_
O
00
00
00
W
-leY W -6
CC
m N
of
O
OO Qf o
01 0 W �o�
It a)
prl O
W
Qf
`rOZoWz
Iy 'c
W
ZZ�UCC
la
o�or- m
.-0o�
I
LL O
I W000 N
tYY�d +)
O C�
�f'UCL >,
1 0 U�
N,ZLU O
pJQgOL
I QQc-Ln N
0
�YOWO E.:
�OOW
�I
md_
d'� 0�
("i N
OmO�M�
�Q�rn o
ma_0) a
NQ�00 0
aW t-
m
pNZQm00 LO
o�ma_
0Z
U� 00
0�
0�
Nmma_
00
00
Q g 0 0)
U OD
l:J
N�LJiNCfl;�
TQ d
LLa—i T
�C]mmN�
00
0)ato Q
O�mm - LO
Ce2mw
Q 0M
m O,
00
J
U
d_
n Y Lf) -0
I=
�o O
I
Cfl D
oUJ
m m
gm0
Z 0
z O
Q rn
LEGEND
SILT FENCE OUTLET (30.06C)
PROTECTED WETLANDS / STREAMS
PROP. TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION
CLDSM 30.09 FOR DI
CLDSM 30.12 FOR CULVERTS
CLDSM 30.15 FOR CB
PROP. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE (NCDOT 1605.01)
PROP. TREE PROTECTION FENCE (CLDSM 40.02)
LIMITS OF PROJECT AREA
PROP. RIP RAP APRON (SEE DETAILS FOR QUANTITIES)
I m O�
�
`nQN:
N
LLL d
�a N'i
I E-��
Z C
�ZZC
O
0) W (p to
NODm
I 11
�ui
I
dL
ow=
It
U
or
gW
m
(N61'54'11 "W 351.64') —
WALK WALK
kw
2.5_C&G
416 195 —
G99 OJT.
IG9 � O� �0�9c�11
WALK WALK
X 4` 611.5 4 11 N �F1 c� �u LINE I
0 v
o O
r�QONa
U
'If�� rn
NO00.0
I � (7�
'O
z
Df
Z
no-
nV) m�T
It
O_n
0) p(0;0
Of
W O
1 U) O
N-mco U)
r7J�N�
�ZC70_
N QUO
U W
Ld 't a)
Z �La
J��
m 0
O-i
O ~g co M o
OJg CL
Q
I LOiCCD
�O T
mad CT
O
m<n'i
p
L�F-�
I W
Q mW
U 0000
O N
= O
�� O N
OQ N
owg�
I =�� La
0)
K)1C�CL
0
�zCD � `
N
00
g
Nm�N 0
Jmt)
m
O<�NCL
�J�N a
_00
O)o O
O�2ma_
< 0
m
0
CD �O 0
Q 00
=04 mN O
O
000
0)
(0
N m O
Ocgmd_
I- gLLJ m LL
00
0
m 0I
0 00
N 000
�
w It
a
W
O
�
N
0
N
N.
N
Qf0
Nf �
s m
s
M M Z
o Lu
..
�Q
Li
� z
W
a.3
CDz
o w
a
c X
0 m Q
_
coo °
t
a " d
'O
CC
U W W
a0
WOz
~am
a
r j0aW
az�s
CC
a
� x-
ULuO
= LL W Z
V 0:
. };a
L)wa
z
O
a,
U
Ca
0�
L1
O
z
Z=
�
0
y
as
�y
3
J
a�
Z�
�LL.
L6
O
N
LL
¢
m
U
Q
m
Q
N
O
N
III
x
7)
Q
co
Lo
0)
O
W
m
m
a
V)
O
c�
a
a
w
A �
O
a
O
V
A
w
wO/
O
w
w
V
O 4/
C
W
W

Appendix II -Jurisdictional Determination Package, Including Site
Photographs

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Form Approved -
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
OMB No. 0710-0024
For use of this form, see Sec 404 CWA, Sec 10 RHA, Sec 103 MPRSA; the proponent agency is CECW-COR.
Expires 2024-04-30
DATA REQUIRED BY THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
Authority Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and
Sanctuaries Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332.
Principal Purpose The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources
within the review area that are or that may be subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the
public, and may be made available as part of a public notice or FOIA request as required by federal law. Your name and property
location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in any approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will
be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if the information is not provided there may be some delay in
processing your request. Failure to provide this information will not result in an adverse action.
System of Record Notice (SORN): The information received is entered into our permit tracking database and a SORN has been
completed (SORN #At 145b) and may be accessed at the following website:
http://dpcid.defense.gov/Privacy/SORNsIndex/DOD-wide-SORN-Article-View/Article/670116/a1146b-ce.aspx
The Agency Disclosure Notice (ADN)
The Public reporting burden for this collection of information, 0710-0024, is estimated to average 10 minutes per response, including time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
Send comments regarding the burden estimate or burden reduction suggestions to the Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, at
[e-mail]. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
1. To (District Name): Charlotte
2. I am requesting a JD on property located at (Street Address): Prosperity Church Road
City/Township/Parish: Charlotte County: Mecklenburg State: North Carolina
Acreage of Parcel/Review Area for JD: N/A
Section: Township: Charlotte Range: Piedmont
Latitude (decimal degrees): 35.376352 Longitude (decimal degrees):-80.785248
(For linear projects, please include the center point of the proposed alignment.)
3. Please attach a survey/plat map and vicinity map identifying location and review area for the JD.
4. X❑ I currently own this property. I plan to purchase this property.
I am an agent/consultant acting on behalf of the requester.
Other (please explain):
The City of Charlotte / Charlotte Department of Transportation is the Requester
ENG FORM 6247, NOV 2023 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 2

5. Reason for request: (check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources
under Corps authority.
❑I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would
be used to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting process.
❑X I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps; this request is
accompanied by my permit application and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list
and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order to obtain my local/state authorization.
❑I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the
aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
6. Type of determination being requested:
❑ I am requesting an approved JD.
I am requesting a preliminary JD.
❑ I am requesting a "no permit required" letter as I believe my proposed activity is not regulated.
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information to inform my decision.
7. Typed or Printed Name: D. David Homans Daytime Phone No.: 704-900-9394
Company Name: S&ME
Address:
2016 Ayrsley Town Blvd., Suite 2-A
Charlotte, NC 28273
Email Address: [e-mail]
By signing below, you are indicating that you have the authority, or are acting as the duly authorized agent of a person or entity with such authority, to
and do hereby grant Corps personnel right of entry to legally access the site if needed to perform the JD. Your signature shall be an affirmation that
you possess the requisite property rights to request a JD on the subject property.
Signature: // Date: 2024-03-22 I
ENG FORM 6247, NOV 2023 Page 2 of 2

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 3/1 5/2024
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Layla Tallent 2o16 Ayrsley Town Blvd., Ste 2-A, Charlotte, NC 28273
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Charlotte/Prosperity Church Road Improvements
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC county/parish/borough: Mecklenburg city: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.376352 Long.:-80.785248
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83
Name of nearest waterbody: Clarks Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
■❑ Field Determination. Date(s): November 11, 2023
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
WA
35.376046
-80.785407
0.058 acre
wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Vicinity Map, USGS Topographic Map, WOTUS Map, Soil Survey.
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
■❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO / Web Soil Survey.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): November 2023
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
/j 3/22/2024
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD ON JULY 30, 2019
AND LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY. THESE FEATURES
WERE RE -ASSESSED ON NOVEMBER 3, 2023 AND DETERMINED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
THE ORIGINAL DELINEATION. FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED
LAND SURVEYOR OR CONFIRMED BY THE USACE.
K k.
� 4 y
y.'
°:4
�.. *, � r{ yr: 5.s` � .?- r � � %, w�'; • Q uj �
I
U
R•�NgI14
' -
xA__hc A,
O
'__ W Q
w z
a w
?"a t►�{. 1 �t ti' �` -• ice- Z) 0LU
U
r i
Lu
ti - P lJ
_ WA UP POTENTIAL WETLAND WA
APPROX. 0.058 ACRESbu
s•,l #' K` c
r• 1 r ;
s .,, �. •� � � "fir. �' - :r�,.,�-`.,� - , -.
'k' it .'��_ �,.. _ - .+. �-y,` •i¢.. '�' lrq�. '�,' � �.. '� _ y-_ ,;,.
$ i
LEGEND
46 -
h:y PHOTO LOCATIONS
,�. (10 UPLAND DATA POINT SCALE:
1 100
` �, - • WETLAND DATA POINT
a DATE:
QT
I
PIPED CONTINUOUS FLOW PATH 3-14-24
PROJECT LIMITS PROJECT NUMBER
�% ,,: u .+'''�,. - .r•..,°�...- a, �.. '� '` ':
•.+.- .� �' ®POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND 22350040ATA14
REFERENCE:2023 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH,.., OBSERVED JURISIDICTIONAL STREAM BANKS FIGURE NO.
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY. 0 100 200 I a ~ ,
THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE STORM WATER INVENTORY STRUCTURES
LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED (FEET)
ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. �]_r *� STORM WATER INVENTORY PIPES

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
E�
0
Daily Total
30-Day Rolling Total
30 Year Normal Range
2023-09-12
J
20 3-11-11
23-10-12
nn— 0 knfl I n 'A n n i 4�1 r 1 ri 16 .0
Apr May
2023 2023
Jun Jul
2023 2023
Coordinates
35.376352,-80.785248
Observation Date
2023-11-11
Elevation (ft)
804.416
Drought Index (PDSI)
Mild drought
WebWIMP HZO Balance
Wet Season
Figures and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool
U5 Army Corps Version 2.0
of Engineers.:
Developed by_
US- Army Corps of Engineers and
U_S_ Army- Engineer Research and
E R DC-o
Development Center
Aug
2023
Sep Oct
2023 2023
Nov Dec
2023 2023
Jan
2024
Feb Mar
2024 2024
30 Days Ending
301h °/pile (in)
701h °/pile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
Product
2023-11-11
1.483465
3.867323
1.240158
Dry
1
3
3
2023-10-12
2.744882
5.817323
0.480315
Dry
1
2
2
2023-09-12
2.574803
4.737402
5.511811
Wet
3
1
3
Result
I
I
I
I
I
IDrier
than Normal - 8
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted A
Days Normal
Days Antecedent
CONCORD
35.4136,-80.5639
669.948
12.73
134.468
7.44
11346
90
CONCORD 1.8 ENE
35.4135,-80.564
675.853
0.009
5.905
0.004
2
0
CONCORD 4.5 SW
35.3647,-80.655
636.155
6.144
33.793
2.972
4
0

Site Photographs
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
SWE Project No. 23350081C
= F
II �
M
N
_ j O
�y k
,n X. A.
1 -
472
Location / Orientation Subject property / Facing north
1
Remarks Maintained space between road and sidewalk on eastern
side of the subject property.
..;
�" �e
Stu
WK
a
Location / Orientation Subject property / Facing north
2
Remarks Maintained space between road and sidewalk on eastern
side of the subject property.

Site Photographs
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
X
x,
I
:.a
•
'
•
Location Orientation
Subject property Facing east
n
AV
r i`
•
Location Orientation
Subject property Facing south
I

Site Photographs
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
1._
•
h
a„
•
1,
l j
2
y
Location Orientation
Subject property Facing north
-41
14,
MW
g1
- -
� a
R
i
l�JA2A tp.
14.
Location Orientation
Subject property Facing east
•

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Prosperity Church Road Site City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 11/3/2023
Applicant/Owner: Char -heck Stormwater Services State: NC Sampling Point: WA - UP
Investigator(s): J. Lawler Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope: 1.0% / 0.6 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.3761690 Long.: -80.7854370 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Helena sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 0 No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * No O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes O No O
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No O
within a Wetland? Yes O No O
Remarks:
Taken near woodland/roadside interface west of WA
November 2023 site observations by D.Homans were consistent with the observations made here
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required;
check all that apply) _
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC-neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes O No
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes O No
Depth (inches): 24
Yes O No O
Saturation Present?
Yes O No OO
Wetland Hydrology
Depth (inches): 24
Present?
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Precip/WETS data obtained from Charlotte -Douglas Airport station.
Remarks:
Based on NRCS method, prior three-month period has been wetter than normal.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Sampling Point: WA - UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liguidambar styraciflua
2. Acer rubrum
3. Ulmus americana
4. Ouercus phellos
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. Elaeagnus angustifolia
2. Ulmus americana
3. Diospyros virainiana
4. Ligustrum sinense
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Digitaria sanguinalis
2. Rubus argutus
3. Solidago canadensis
4. Microstegium vimineum
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2. Toxicodendron radicans
3. Campsis radicans
4. Vitis rotundifolia
5.
6.
Absolute
�r .--.
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
30
0
63.8%
FAC
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
10
�/❑
21.3%
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
5
❑
10.6%
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
2
❑
4.3%
FAC
0
❑
o.o%
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
0
❑
o.o%
0
❑
o.o%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
❑
o.o%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
47
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
5
❑
29.4%
FACU
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
5
0
29.4%
FACW
PAC species 89 x 3 = 267
5
0
29.4%
FAC
FACU species 77 x 4 = 308
2
❑
11.8%
FACU
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
0
❑
0.0%
Column Totals: 176 (A) 595 (B)
0
❑
o.o%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.381
0
❑
o.o°ro
-
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
❑
0.00/0
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0
❑
o.o%
❑ Dominance Test is > 50%
0
❑
o.o%
❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1
17
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
0
❑
0.00/0
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0
❑
0.00/0
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
0
❑
0.00/0
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
0
❑
0.00/0
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
0 ❑ o.00/o _
0
❑
0.00/0
Four Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.00/0
_
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
0
= Total Cover
regardless of height.
d❑
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
50
58.8%
FACU
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
5
❑
5.9%
FACU
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
15
❑
17.6%
FACU
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
15
❑
17.6%
FAC
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
El0.0%
in height.
0
_
0
❑
o.00/o
-
Five Vegetation Strata:
0
❑
0.0%
❑
-
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
0
0.00/0
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
0
❑
0.00/0
diameter at breast height (DBH).
El
-
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
0
❑
0.00/0
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
0
❑
0.00/0
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
-
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
85
=Total Cover
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
15
d❑
55.6%
FAC
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1
5
❑
18.5%
FAC
m) in height.
5
❑
18.5%
FAC
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
2
❑
7.4%
FAC
height.
0 ❑ 0.0%
_
Hydrophytic
0
❑
0.00/0
Vegetation
Yes * No ❑
27
=Total Cover
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffm = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

.Q
Sampling Point: WA _ UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TVDe 1 Locz Texture Remarks
0-12 5YR 4/6 100 Clay
1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
El Black Histic (A3)
El Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
El Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3 Indicators of vegetation and
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
mushydrophytict
wetland hydrology must be present,
hydrology
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No
Remarks:
Soil is not hydric
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Prosperity Church Road Improvements City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 7/30/2023
Applicant/Owner: Charlotte Storm Water Services State: NC Sampling Point: WA
Investigator(s): D. David Homans Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.376118 Long:-80.785415 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Area has recently been mowed. Hydrology appeared to potentially be due to leaking subsurface water lines as significant flow was emerging from a
slope area where groundwater emergence was unlikely. The Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicated that current conditions were drier than typical,
and no rain had been recorded within the previous week.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
See above; surface water was actively flowing downslope and appeared to originate at a potential water line leak.
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 50 x 1 = 50
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
1.
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 65 (A) 80 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.23
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
X 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Typha latifolia
20 Yes
OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Juncus effusus
15 Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex lurida 15 Yes OBL
4. Murdannia keisak
15 Yes
OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
65 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
33 20% of total cover:
13
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The wetland had recently been mowed, impairing species identification. Herbaceous species present at previous observations were used
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 5YR 4/6 95 10YR 5/1 5 RM M Loamy/Clayey
5-14 5YR 5/1 90 5YR 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Appendix III — Protected Species Documentation

�r
r
March 18, 2024
United States Department of the Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service — Asheville Field Office via email: boron [e-mail]
160 Zillicoa Street, Ste B
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Reference: Mr. Byron Hamstead
Reference: Biological Assessment
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
USFWS Project Code: 2024-0063409
Dear Mr. Hamstead:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is conducting an environmental review of a proposed road improvement project on behalf of
Charlotte Storm Water Services. The information contained herein was prepared as part of an evaluation of
potential impacts to migratory birds of conservation concern (BCC), threatened, endangered, and proposed
species, and designated critical habitat. The proposed project is expected to comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) through a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Categorical Exclusion (CE). This
assessment was prepared in accordance with S&ME Proposal Number 23350051C, dated January 2, 2023.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project includes improvements to existing Prosperity Church Road, the construction of a sidewalk
on the west side of the road, and the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Prosperity Church Road
and Prosperity Ridge Road ("project areas") located in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
The proposed project areas are illustrated on the following figures and site photographs included in Attachment I
of this report:
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map
Figure 3: Aerial Photograph
Figure 4: LiDAR Topography
Figure 5: USDA Soil Survey
Site Photographs
METHODOLOGY
S&ME personnel generated a report of federally listed threatened, endangered, candidate, and/or proposed
species known to occur in Mecklenburg County using the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaQ online service and the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) species reviewer website. Results of this review are presented in Table 1 and Table 2. USFWS and

Biological Assessment
4 Prosperity Church Road Improvements
�� Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
NCNHP database reports are included in Attachment II. Federally listed threatened, endangered, and candidate
species information and site habitat observations were reviewed to determine their likely occurrence within the
project areas.
Supporting information, including aerial photography, topography quadrangle maps, soil survey sheets, land use
information, and data from the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), was researched for the purpose of identifying
soil types and vegetative communities. The NCNHP database was also consulted regarding documented Element
Occurrences (EOs) for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and conservation/managed
areas within a one -mile radius of, and including, the project areas.
SITE DESCRIPTION
On November 11, 2023, Mr. David Homans, an S&ME natural resources project scientist, conducted a biological
assessment of the proposed project areas to identify potential habitat for federally listed threatened, endangered,
and candidate species identified in the IPaC report. Habitat within the proposed project areas is maintained
roadside that is cleared frequently and a wetland of approximately 0.058 acre.
Maintained Roadside
Maintained field was the dominant habitat within the proposed project areas. Prevalent vegetation included
common turf grasses, white clover (Trifolium repens), hairy crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), wild onion (Allium
canadense), common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), tall goldenrod (Solidago altissima), wood sorrel (Oxalis
stricta), and Rugel's plantain (Plantago rugelii). No woody vegetation was present within the maintained field
habitat.
Wetland
Wetland habitat occupied a section near the center of the project area. Prevalent vegetation included common
wetland graminoids, bird's eye speedwell (Veronica persica), and hairy bittercress (Cardamine hirsuta).
SITE SOILS
According to the Soil Survey Data (Figure 5, Attachment 1), mapped soils within the proposed project areas are
as follows:
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded (Ce132)
Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (HeB)
MIGRATORY BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN
The following migratory BCC information is intended to identify proposed project areas land use that may be
related to potential impacts to migratory BCC. The IPaC database report included a Resource List (Attachment 11)
which addresses migratory BCC and their probability of presence on the proposed project area. The IPaC report
identified the following migratory BCC that could occur within the proposed project areas, listed below in Table 1
March 18, 2024

Biological Assessment
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
Table 1— Migratory BCC for Mecklenburg County
Common Name
Bald Eagle*
Scientific Name
Heliaeetus leucocephalus
Breeding Season
September 1 to July 31
Chimney Swift
Chaetura pelagica
March 15 to August 25
Eastern Whip -poor -will
Antostomas vociferus
Mau 1 to August 20
Prothonotary Warbler
Protonotaria citrea
April 1 to July 31
Red-headed Woodpecker
Melanerpes erythrocephalus
May 10 to September 10
Rusty Blackbird
Euphagus carolinus
Breeds elsewhere
Wood Thrush
Hylocichla mustelina
May 10 to August 31
*Not a migratory BCC within the project area but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act and potential susceptibilities from
certain types of development or activities.
No migratory BCC, including the bald eagle, were observed during the biological assessment.
The USGS quadrangle map, aerial photographs including Google Earth imagery, and generated IPaC and NCNHP
database reports (Attachment II) were reviewed to determine the general land uses within a one -mile radius of
the project areas. The surrounding land use within the one -mile search radius is largely residential with scattered
commercial properties. Clarks Creek and Stoney Creek are surface water features located within a one -mile radius
that could be conducive to migratory bird concentrations. Impacts to these features associated with the proposed
project are not anticipated.
SPECIES EVALUATION
The IPaC report indicated that no designated critical habitat has been reported within the project areas.
NCNHP maintains a database of EOs for federal- and state -listed species, rare species, natural communities,
natural areas, and conservation/managed areas in the state of North Carolina. The NCNHP database did not
identify EOs of federally listed threatened, endangered, candidate species; natural areas; or natural areas within
the proposed project areas, or within a one -mile radius. The NCNHP report identified the following element
occurrences within a one -mile radius of the project areas:
Delphinium exaltatum (Tall Larkspur); State Threatened; EO ID 13743
Sceptridiumjenmanii (Alabama Grape -fern); State Special Concern Vulnerable; EO ID 33285
The NCNHP report identified the following managed areas located within a one -mile radius of the project areas:
City of Charlotte Open Space owned by the City of Charlotte
The following open spaces owned by Mecklenburg County:
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Clarks Creek Greenway
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Eastfield Park
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Mallard Creek Park
March 18, 2024

Biological Assessment
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
The IPaC report identified federally listed threatened, endangered, and candidate species that could occur within
the proposed project areas. These species are listed in the following table:
Table 2 — Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species for Mecklenburg County
Common Name
Bald Eagle
Scientific Name
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Federal Listing
Bald & Golden Eagle Protection
Act
Tricolored Bat
Perimyotis subflavus
Proposed Endangered
Monarch Butterfly
Danaus plexippus
Candidate
Michaux's Sumac
Rhus michauxii
Endangered
Schweinitz's Sunflower
Helianthus schweinitzii
Endangered
Smooth Coneflower
Echinacea laevigata
Threatened
Bald Eagle
BIOLOGICAL DETERMINATION: NO EAGLE ACT PERMIT REQUIRED
This large raptor has characteristic adult plumage consisting of a white head and tail with a dark brown body.
Juvenile eagles are completely dark brown and do not fully develop its majestic white head and tail until the fifth
or sixth year. Adults average about three feet from head to tail, weigh approximately 10 to 12 pounds and have a
wingspan that can reach seven feet. Generally, female bald eagles are larger than the males.
A typical bald eagle nest is constructed in pine or cypress trees. They consist of large sticks and are lined with soft
materials such as pine needles and grasses. The nests are very large, measuring up to six feet across and weighing
hundreds of pounds. Nesting and feeding sites are generally in the vicinity of large bodies of open water
(coastlines, rivers, large lakes). Bald eagle nesting territories range from 2.5 square miles up to 15 square miles.
No large surface water bodies that could support the bald eagle were observed within the project areas. No bald
eagles, bald eagle nests, or pine or cypress trees that could provide suitable nesting habitat were observed during
the habitat assessment. Accordingly, no Eagle Act Permit is required for the project as proposed.
Tricolored Bat
BIOLOGICAL DETERMINATION: NOT APPLICABLE TO PROPOSED SPECIES
The tricolored bat is a small bat species reaching between two and three inches in length. The tricolored bat is
named after the coloration of each strand of hair, which is dark at the base, blends to yellow midshaft, and ends in
a brown tip. The species' current range is eastern North America, though the tricolored bat is in great decline from
its historic range and population numbers.
The tricolored bat is a generalist feeder that preys on insects using echolocation. The tricolored bat hibernates in
caves or abandoned mines. This species is known to hibernate in man-made structures such as road -side culverts.
During spring, summer, and fall seasons the tricolored bat roosts in trees and leaf clusters. The tricolored bat
tends to hibernate alone and roost singly, though has been known to share hibernacula with other bat species.
March 18, 2024 4

Biological Assessment
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
Owls, raccoons, snakes, hawks, and feral cats, among other species, are predators of the tricolored bat. Threats to
the tricolored bat include habitat degradation, human disturbance of hibernacula, and a lack of knowledge of their
ecology needed to inform management plans.
The NCNHP database query identified no known hibernation sites and/or roost trees. No suitable habitat for the
tricolored bat exists within the project areas. Since the tricolored bat is not federally protected at this time, a
biological determination is not applicable to this species. However, due to the lack of habitat within the project
areas and because no trees will be removed for the project, the project should have no effect upon this species.
Monarch Butterfly
BIOLOGICAL DETERMINATION: NOT APPLICABLE TO CANDIDATE SPECIES
The monarch butterfly is a stunning bright orange insect with scattered white dots and black vein -like markings.
The monarch butterfly's scientific name, Danaus plexippus, translated in Greek means "sleepy transformation" in
reference to the species hibernation and metamorphosis. The monarch butterfly is also one of the few insect
species that migrate. Monarch butterflies fly up to 2,500 miles from their breeding grounds in the United States
and Canada to their overwintering spots in central Mexico.
Monarch butterfly habitat includes fields, roadsides, and other open areas. Monarch butterflies require flowering
plants within these habitats to feed on their nectar. Monarch butterflies breed in areas with milkweed, the host
plant for their larva.
No milkweed or individuals of the Monarch butterfly were observed during the assessment. The proposed project
area does not contain suitable habitat for the monarch butterfly. A biological determination for the monarch
butterfly is not applicable to the proposed project as the monarch butterfly is a candidate species.
Michaux's Sumac
BIOLOGICAL DETERMINATION: NO EFFECT
Michaux's Sumac is a federally endangered shrub endemic to the coastal plain and piedmont of Virginia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. It is a rhizomatous, densely hairy shrub, with erect stems from 1 - 3
feet (ft) (30.5 — 91 centimeters, cm) in height. The compound leaves contain evenly serrated, oblong to lanceolate,
acuminate leaflets. Most plants are unisexual; however, more recent observations have revealed plants with both
male and female flowers on one plant. The flowers are small, borne in a terminal, erect, dense cluster, and colored
greenish yellow to white. Flowering usually occurs from June to July; while the fruit, a red drupe, is produced
through the months of August to October.
Michaux's Sumac grows in sandy or rocky open woods in association with basic soils. Apparently, this plant
survives best in areas where some form of disturbance has provided an open area. Several populations in North
Carolina are on highway rights -of way, roadsides, or on the edges of artificially maintained clearings. Two other
populations are in areas with periodic fires, and two populations exist on sites undergoing natural succession. One
population is situated in a natural opening on the rim of a Carolina bay.
March 18, 2024

Biological Assessment
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
The project area is regularly maintained, and no suitable habitat exists within the project area. The project area
does not extend into the woody vegetation adjacent to the roadside clearings. Accordingly, future development of
the project is expected to have no effect on Michaux's Sumac.
Schweinitz's Sunflower
BIOLOGICAL DETERMINATION: NO EFFECT
Schweinitz's sunflower is a federally endangered wildflower species native to the piedmont regions of North and
South Carolina. Its inflorescences are comprised of relatively small yellow disk flowers and yellow ray flowers.
Schweinitz's sunflower has purple stems and slightly rough leaves; this sunflower provides nectar to pollinators
such as insects, small mammals, and songbirds. It also serves as a larval host plant for the silvery checkerspot
butterfly (Chlosyne nycteis), meaning it provides the nutrients silvery checkerspot caterpillars need to grow and
develop.
This species prefers habitat with dry, well -drained soils and full sunlight. This species relies on regular disturbance,
such as fire or grazing wildlife, to maintain its preferred habitat. Schweinitz's sunflower is found along roadsides,
forest openings, and utility easements.
The project area is regularly maintained, and no suitable habitat exists within the project area. No individuals of
Helianthus genus were observed within the project areas during the assessment. Accordingly, future development
of the project is expected to have no effect on Schweinitz's sunflower.
Smooth Coneflower
BIOLOGICAL DETERMINATION: NO EFFECT
Smooth coneflower is a federally threatened wildflower species. The reported historical range included
Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, and Arkansas. When the plant
was classified as endangered on October 8, 1992, it was known to survive only in Virginia, North Carolina, South
Carolina, and Georgia. The plants known from Alabama and Arkansas were determined to be misidentifications
and the plants from Maryland and Pennsylvania were determined to be waifs, or non -natural populations.
Smooth coneflower is a perennial herb that will live for more than two years. It is not to be confused with its close
relative and commercially available purple coneflower, Echinacea purpurea, both within the
Asteraceae/Compositae (aster) family. Echinacea is a group of herbaceous flowering plants with nine species,
known as coneflowers for their iconic high dome, or cone -shaped seed head. Smooth coneflower is a sun -loving
herb that depends on periodic fires to reduce the shade and competition of woody plants.
Smooth coneflower is typically found in open woods, glades, cedar barrens, roadsides, clearcuts, dry limestone
bluffs, and power line rights -of -way, usually on magnesium and calcium rich soils associated with amphibolite,
dolomite or limestone (in Virginia), gabbro (in North Carolina and Virginia), diabase (in North Carolina and South
Carolina), and marble (in South Carolina and Georgia). Smooth coneflower occurs in plant communities that have
been described as very dry hardpan forests, diabase glades or dolomite woodlands. Optimal sites are
characterized by abundant sunlight and little competition in the herbaceous layer.
March 18, 2024

Biological Assessment
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
The project area is regularly maintained, and no suitable habitat exists within the project area. No individuals of
Echinacea genus were observed within the project areas during the assessment. Accordingly, future development
of the project is expected to have no effect on smooth coneflower.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the readily available information and field review of habitat conditions within the project areas, a no
effect determination is expected for federally listed species included in this biological assessment (Table 2). A
biological determination is not warranted for the tricolored bat or the monarch butterfly, as they are not federally
listed as threatened or endangered.
If there are questions concerning the assessment, please contact Layla Tallent at 828-449-9982 or
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
SWE, Inc.
Layla Tallent
Natural Resources Staff Scientist
I r�
Sarah Rowe, P.W.S.
Senior Reviewer/Natural Resources Project Scientist
March 18, 2024 7

Biological Assessment
Attachments:
Attachment I
Figure 1 —Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3 — Aerial Photograph
Figure 4 — LiDAR Topography
Figure 5 — USDA Soil Survey
Site Photographs
Attachment II
USFWS IPaC Database Report
USFWS Resource List
NCNHP Database Report
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
March 18, 2024

Attachments

Attachment I
• Figure 1 — Vicinity Map
• Figure 2 - USGS Topographic Map / National Wetland Inventory Mapping
• Figure 3 - Site Map
• Figure 4 - 2014 Liar Topography
• Figure 5 - USGS Soil Survey
• Site Photographs

WM-Mg—
CFNOREH
I ^s
�• f III �`� �``�
------------
c
f
s

Site Photographs
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
M
N
O
- N
\
r In
� c
.:
h M
G k%( '3:
T
O
s
a
Location / Orientation Subject property / Facing north
1
Remarks Maintained space between road and sidewalk on eastern
side of the subject property.
N
O
MAI
0
r''A
i YY!}R
•i � �� ry I , i` s
- Ol
s
a
Location / Orientation Subject property / Facing north
2
Remarks Maintained space between road and sidewalk on eastern
side of the subject property.

Site Photographs
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
0
U1
a-+
>_
O
U1
s
Q
Ol
O
O
s
a
Location / Orientation
Subject property / Facing east
3
Remarks
Maintained lawn on eastern side of subject property.
I'(
7
N
r
�
0
c
E
O
-
0
v
s
of
O
O
s
a
Location / Orientation
Subject property / Facing south
4
Wetland WA representing wetland habitat within the
Remarks
subject property.

Site Photographs
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 23350081C
.. o
u
�
M0.ti d � �+ —' ✓�
� 13 � {`"
��d
1.
1 i k` .4,��✓k"� �1 lei' � '-��
Y'C 5� -�
& P
AY
-S
4
k�a -� '�� '4
- � i•n cU
v
�{
t (
Location Orientation
Subject property Facing north
h
Y4K4
•:'
•
Location Orientation
Subject property Facing east
•

Attachment II
USFWS IPaC Database Report
USFWS Resource List
NCNHP Database Report

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street, Suite B
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: 03/15/2024 13:45:26 UTC
Project Code: 2024-0063409
Project Name: Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed, and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through IPaC by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological

Project code: 2024-0063409
03/15/2024 13:45:26 UTC
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at: https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/
endan ered-species-consultation-handbook.pdf
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts, see Migratory Bird Permit I What We Do I U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service (fws.gov).
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws. ov/partner/council-conservation-
mi ratory-birds.
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
2of7

Project code: 2024-0063409 03/15/2024 13:45:26 UTC
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street, Suite B
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]
3 of 7

Project code: 2024-0063409
03/15/2024 13:45:26 UTC
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2024-0063409
Project Name: Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Project Type: Road/Hwy - Maintenance/Modification
Project Description: improvements to existing road and construction of a roundabout
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.37618725,-80.78530011752099,14z
ti
Te. SMppFa
Counties: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
4of7

Project code: 2024-0063409 03/15/2024 13:45:26 UTC
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
5 of 7

Project code: 2024-0063409 03/15/2024 13:45:26 UTC
MAMMALS
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME
STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata
Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
6of7

Project code: 2024-0063409
03/15/2024 13:45:26 UTC
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Charlotte city
Name: Layla Tallent
Address: 2016 Ayrsley Town Blvd, Suite 2-A
City: Charlotte
State: NC
Zip: 28273
Email [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
7of7

INC Explore Location resources
https:Hipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
IPaC
IPaC resource list
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as
critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project
area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the
project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the
project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have
on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/
species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities)
information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for
the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the
introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS
Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources
addressed in that section.
Location
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Local office
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
JJJ [phone]
1 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

tPaC: Explore Location resources
https: //ipac. eco sphere.fws. gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
160 Zillicoa Street, Suite B
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
O00,0\"
Foy
. cv
G�NJ
2 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https:Hipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
Endangered species
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI
includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by
activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish
does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or
eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can
change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project
area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and
project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list
from either the Regulatory Review section_.in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local
field office directly. N
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesl and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program
of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under theirjurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC
also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status
page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see
FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
3 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https: //ipac. eco sphere.fws. gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department
of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
m.r
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
htt s://ecos.fws.gQvL€cp-/5pecies/1 Q515
Insects
STATUS
Proposed Endangered
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate �►
Wherever found
N❑ critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ pecies/9743
Flowering Plants .0
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus �Chauxii
Wherever found' %,0, `f
N❑ critical habitat has been designated for this species.
hops:Ilecos w-s.ggyl-upspecies/5217
Schweinitz's Sunflower i-leHanthus schweinitzii
Whereverfound
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Critical habitats
Endangered
Endangered
Threatened
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
4 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
endangered species themselves.
https:Hipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
There are no critical habitats at this location.
You are still required to determine if your project(s) may have effects on
all above listed species.
Bald & Golden Eagles
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act'
and the Migratory Bird Treaty Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
bald or golden eagles, or their habitats, should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links
below. Specifically, please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and
Additional information can be found using the following links:
■ Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds b-Ups://www.fws.gov/libraryl
co I lecti o ns/avoid i ng-and-minimizing-i ncid e nta I -take -migratory -birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measu res. pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
me is/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-go den -eagles -may_
occu r-project-action
There are likely bald eagles present in your project area. For additional information on
bald eagles, refer to Bald Eagle Nesting and Sensitivity to Human Activity_
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
►�f
BREEDING SEASON
5 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https: //ipac. eco sphere.fws. gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/1626
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most
likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and
schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure
you read "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ
section titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using
or attempting to interpret this report. �14f
Probability of Presence( ) 0<
t*A�6
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 1Okm grid
ceIl(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as
12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The
survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence
score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey
effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events
in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey
events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the
Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted
Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of
presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative
probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a
statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is
the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
6 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

IPaC: Explore Location resources
https: //ipac. eco sphere.fws. gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in
your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timefrarne
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently
relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird
returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas_ 3 is currently
much more sparse. \ so'l
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB WAR APR N?Av JON JUI. AUG SEP
BaldNon Eagle I I I I I I 1111 Ili
a =
I I
Non -BCC
Non
Vulnerable
OCT NOV DEC
What does IPaC use to generate the potential presence of bald and golden eagles in my specified
location?
The potential for eagle presence is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).
The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which
your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply). To see a list of all birds
potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs of bald and golden eagles in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC). and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey_, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention
because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species
that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
7 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https: //ipac. eco sphere.fws. gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project
area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds
potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Please contact your local Fish and Wildlife Service
Field Office if you have questions.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act' and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Actz. ^ -N
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats3 should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links
below. Specifically, please review the "Supplemental information on Migratory Birds and
Eagles". %.I
CN"
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management baps:/Iwww.fws.gQylpmgramleagle-magagement
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gQv/library)
co I lecti ons/avoiding-and-minimizing-i ncid e nta I -take -migratory -birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds tips://www.fws.gov/sites/default/fLes1
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measu res. pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may_
occur -project -action
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To
see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and
around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location,
desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic
8 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

tPaC: Explore Location resources
https: //ipac. eco sphere.fws. gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of
bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast
birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to
properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecplspecies/1625
BREEDING SEASON
Breeds Sep 1 to jul 31
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its %00
range in the continental USA and Alaska. �
eo"N"
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
V*44
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
9 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https:Hipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most
likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and
schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure
you read "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ
section titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using
or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 1Okm grid
ceIl(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as
12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The
survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence
score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey
effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events
in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey
events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the
Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted
Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of
presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative
probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a
statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is
the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season (
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in
your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
10 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

tPaC: Explore Location resources https:Hipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently
relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird
returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently
much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort -- no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 0( r NOV DEC
Bald Eagle 11 I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 j Jill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1., f l 1 1 1 1 �_�+ 11 1 1 1 1
Non -BCC I
Vulnerable
chimney +-Ftt +ttt l I I I 11. 1 .l..l..l.,1.1 1. 1. I. 1 111 1 j! IT TT I I- ++++ ++++
Swift
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
Eastern I II t t t F I I t I I
Whip -poor -
will
BCC
Rangewide
(CON) <000 0
f I Prothonotary ll'{I �I'�i iif� 111f f111 II1.1 1flj 11+1 11{1 11+4 Jill 1111
Warbler
BCC
Rangewide
(CON) II Red-headed 1 1 l i I 1 1 11*+ ++T Jill 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 I f f l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Woodpecker I II I I I
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty I 1 I r ++++ +0++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++0 ++++ ■ 1 I 1
Blackbird
BCC - BCR
Wood I 1 I I- ++++ ++++ +011 J111 Jill '++ 1 +++1 ++++ +m++ ++++ + 1 I 1
Thrush
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
11 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https: //ipac. eco sphere.fws. gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when
birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying
the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization
measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the
Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the
type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project
site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention
because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species
that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project
area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds
potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator {RAIL} Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided
by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey,.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to
interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these
graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps
provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a
bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If
"Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
12 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
https: //ipac. eco sphere.fws. gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout
their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the
Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs)
in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid
and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects 4 P�**
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean
Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be
helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files
underlying the portal maps through the NO_AA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive
Mapping _of_M_arine_Birci_Distributions and Abundance -on the Atlantic_Quter Continental Shelf project
webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For
additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study_ and the nanotag studies
or contact Caleb SpjkgEj� or Pam Loring.
01, *Ak 4
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the
migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the
"probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact
project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by
the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high
survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score
can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of
13 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

IPaC: Explore Location resources
https: //ipac. eco sphere.fws. gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply
a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when
they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps
you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should
presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about
conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom
of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands 'or NON .
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. %
A
There are no refuge lands at this location. 4,.7
Fish hatcheries
r 1CO uiq
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
11�*4( ) N
Wetlands in the National Wetlands
Inventory (NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers District.
This location did not intersect any wetlands mapped by NWI.
14 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

IPaC: Explore Location resources
https: //ipac. eco sphere.fws. gov/location/JQUIOBIQC5AN7CPZW3E...
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether
wetlands occur. Additional information on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis
of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography.
A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any
particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through
image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the
image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth
verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source
imagery used and any mapping problems.
4
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work.
There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information
depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site. _
Data exclusions .0-14
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the
design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state,
or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government
agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland
areas should seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified
agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
15 of 15 3/15/2024, 9:38 AM

RoV Cooper. Governor
`■0■X INC DEPARTMENT OF
■i�■� NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
Ashley Bentz
S&ME, Inc.
3201 Spring Forest Road
Raleigh, NC 27616
RE. Prosperity Church Road
Dear Ashley Bentz.
March 15, 2024
Improvements, 23350081C
1). Reid Wilson, Secretary
M!Ay Buchanan
Deputy Director, Hatwal Hevilage ftograrn
NCNHDE-25305
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact the NCNHP at natural.heritageLdncr.nc.gov.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
1-1 W. JOt4ES STREET. RALElG1A. NC 27603 • 1GS1 MAIL SEWCE CENTER_ RALEIGH. NC 27690
. & OFC 919.707.g120 • FAX [phone]i21

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Prosperity Church Road Improvements
Project No. 23350081C
March 15, 2024
NCNHDE-25305
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Element
Group Observation Occurrence
Date Rank
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s Hi?
Vascular Plant 33285 Sceptridium jenmanii Alabama Grape -fern 1936-09
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner
City of Charlotte Open Space City of Charlotte
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Clarks Creek Mecklenburg County
Greenway
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Eastfield Park Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Mallard Creek Mecklenburg County
Park
2
Accuracy
0
5-Very
Low
5-Very
Low
Federal State
Status Status
f i
--- Threatened
Owner Type =
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Global State
Rank Rank
G3 S2
--- Special G3G4 S2
Concern
Vulnerable
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.org/helr). Data query generated on March 15, 2024; source: NCNHP, Winter (January) 2024.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-25305: Prosperity Church Road Improvements
X
'q5tfn
r
a
w n
v n
3
`o v Hlghkand Creek
FL�,� aSL`,�IdRd a Golf Club
ti
b
Sp7 fr
a
86f jr Barrow Rd
]ahnsion Gehler Rd
�855 ft
o 1-
O n�� yr^ ?AysY 'fi+
Zi
w 028 11 Miles
8 =•
March 15, 2024
Managed Area (MAREA)
Buffered Project Boundary
QProject Boundary
Esll, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA
Cal: rr s Cwnty Government, rn cknc, State of North Carolina DOT, Esn,
TwTom, Go mm, Saf,,00ph. GeoTechriologles. Inc, MEDYNASA USGS. EPA,
NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USF44S
Page 3 of 3

Appendix IV - Cultural Resources Documentation

a
Q. N ,
F%
APO
C
Hus a Eastfold
McGin q
` Qry
`
tits°` Regional
.
Park
a �
0
qw
Q
C
/'a
ao O
IVQ
Creek �
PkWi C
L)
J
3
*e8aYOr Highland
-n �.
Creek
GclfClub
y i a a
min
e06
Mil
a ;
e Ridge 4RP
m
RtdB Road i'�
E W
a � C
Middh a
MK1541 Edgewood Plantation
Farm Housel
o � �K1541 Edgewood Plantation
5 Farm House 1995
w '3�-
`
z �3f
P,Q'
O
✓QS
��
lalali3rd
U ,�d
Cteek a �.
U
Hgh 7 0 gi
peat�� o
o O�
K
LEGEND
Q SUBJECT PROPERTY SL DISTRICTS & BOUNDARIES
N
STUDY LIST BOUNDARY
NR INDIVIDUAL RESOURCES & CENTERPOINTS
BOTH SL AND DETERMINED ELIGIBLE
BOUNDARY
0 NR INDIVIDUAL LISTING
0 NR LISTING, GONE DOE INDIVIDUAL RESOURCES & CENTERPOINTS
' NRHD CENTER POINT Ak DETERMINED ELIGIBLE
U• DOE, GONE
o NR DISTRICTS & BOUNDARIES
A SL AND DOE
0
m NATIONAL REGISTER BOUNDARY
Ak
BOUNDARY OF DESTROYED/REMOVED NR LISTING SL AND DOE, GONE
' DOEHD CENTER POINT
REFERENCE: NORTH CAROLINA
SL INDIVIDUAL RESOURCES & CENTERPOINTS SLDOEHD CENTER POINT
HPOWEB 2.0 DATASET
Q
BASE DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM
o ■ SL INDIVIDUAL ENTRY
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE
m 1 SL AND DOE ENTRY DOE DISTRICTS & BOUNDARIES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE.
° ■ STUDY LIST ENTRY, GONE ELIGIBLE BOUNDARY
ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS
rDETERMINED
1 SL AND DOE, GONE I BOTH DOE AND STUDY LIST BOUNDARY DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED.
THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL
SLHD CENTER POINT 0 0.5 1
SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS
SLDOEHD CENTER POINT Miles STATED OTHERWISE.
0
NC STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
SCALE:
FIGURE NO.
_
1 " = miles
HPOWEB MAPPING
DAATT E:
PROSPERITY CHURCH ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
III
3-14-24
PROJECT NUMBER
PROSPERITY CHURCH ROAD
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
23350081C