20240239 Ver 1_More Info Received_20240328

TERRAIN
o ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTING
March 28, 2024
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attention: Mr. David Moose
Subject: Incomplete Application Response
SAW-2022-01450
Forrest Run
1295 Village Point Road
Shallotte, NC
Dear Mr. Moose:
Terrain Environmental Consulting, PLLC (Terrain) appreciates your comments
regarding the Nationwide Permit application for the Forrest Run site received via email
on February 14, 2024. Our responses to those comments are below.
Comment 1: Currently the delineation is not accurate, and the plans do not account
for all impacts. The application is considered incomplete due to not meeting the
general condition 32. After the Field visit conducted on 211412024 additional wetlands
and waters of the US were located on the site that will need to be addressed.
Response 1: The additional wetland identified in the southwest corner was delineated
and flags were located with sub -meter accurate GPS on February 14, 2024 following
our field meeting. That wetland is shown on the revised and attached Figure 6 —
Jurisdictional Features and the revised/attached PJD Appendix 2 form as Wetland 5,
and it totals approximately 1.19 acres. No impacts are proposed to that feature.
However, portions of it will be located in subdivided lots 21-25. A copy of deed
restriction language was included in our PCN submittal on February 6, 2024 and will
be used for these lots as well.
Five additional channels were observed during our field visit and determined to be
jurisdictional by you. Those have also been shown on Figure 6 and the PJD Appendix
2 form, as Stream 4, and Jurisdictional Ditches 1, 2, 3 and 4. These total
approximately 346 linear feet (If), 164 If, 497 If, 71 If, and 580 If, respectively.
Permanent impacts are proposed to Jurisdictional Ditches 2 and 4 associated with
roadway crossings. Temporary impacts are proposed to Jurisdictional Ditches 1 and 2
associated with utility installations.
A discussion of each impact is provided further below.

Terrain Environmental Consulting Project 23-041-WS March 28, 2024
Forrest Run Incomplete Application Response
Comment 2: There appear to be more streams on the site. I would like to see how
DWR would call these features since you are planning on impacting them.
Response 2: We have made several attempts to coordinate a site meeting with Holley
Snider, DWR, via phone and email. The last attempt was made via email on March 4,
2024. No response has been received prior to this submission. In an effort toward
submitting a timely response to your comments, we requested in our last email to Ms.
Snider to identify all of the excavated/altered channels as jurisdictional ditches with the
understanding that she may consider them to be streams. If that occurs, then we
would only have to revise the mitigation coverage as impacts to them would be
discussed and accounted for in this submittal. We are available for a site meeting at
Ms. Snider's convenience.
Comment 3: 1 know the PCN States "A stub out road is proposed on the western
property line to allow interconnectivity to future development of property adjacent to
the west, as being required by the Town of Shallotte. " But this area spears to be in a
wetland that was not previously shown on the map. If the town is requiring the
connection, I would think that it would not be to a presumed wetland are on the
adjacent tract.
Response 3: The location of the stub out road has been moved approximately 200+
feet east to avoid this wetland. The new road location is not near any jurisdictional
features on the site, and remote mapping resources do not suggest the presence of
jurisdictional features near the stub out on the property adjacent south.
Comment 4: For planned lots 9, 80, 81 and 82 please provide a conceptual layout for
a home and the work area around the home that show how there will be no additional
impacts to the wetlands.
Response 4: In light of the additional Wetland 5 identified in the southwest corner, the
site plan was revised in an effort to recapture some of the lots lost in that area. The
lots with appreciable wetland remaining on them are 9, 10, 21-25, and 70-72. Deed
restrictions will be placed on those lots to prevent wetland impact. Sample deed
restriction language was provided in the initial application. Once the subdivision plat
has been approved by the Town of Shallotte, the upland areas on each lot will be
deeded and recorded as the only buildable portions of those lots in order to provide
additional wetland protection. Development on those lots will be in compliance with
Town of Shallotte zoning regulations for setbacks and site improvements.
REVISED JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES
The newly identified Wetland 5, Stream 4 and Jurisdictional Ditches 1-4 have been
included in the attached/revised PJD Appendix 2 form.
2

Terrain Environmental Consulting Project 23-041-WS March 28, 2024
Forrest Run Incomplete Application Response
REVISED IMPACT TABLE AND DISCUSSION
The revised impacts to jurisdictional Waters of the US are shown below in Table 1 and
a discussion of each impact follows the table.
TABLE 1 — REVISED WETLAND IMPACTS
Impact Area
Impact
Type
Resource
Type
Purpose
Impact
Amount
Impact 1
Permanent
Wetland — NRI
Roadway fill
0.367 ac
Impact 2
Permanent
Wetland — R2
Roadway fill
0.035 ac
Impact 3
Permanent
Wetland — R
Roadway fill
0.066 ac
Impact 4
Permanent
Stream
Roadway culvert
0.011 ac
Impact 5
Permanent
Ditch
Roadway culvert
0.006 ac
Impact 6
Permanent
Ditch
Roadway culvert
0.011 ac
Impact 7
Permanent
Wetland
Roadway fill
0.002 ac
Impact 8
Temporary
Wetland
Utility installation
0.028 ac
Impact 9
Temporary
Wetland
Utility installation
0.001 ac
Impact 10
Temporary
Wetland
Utility installation
0.001 ac
Impact Totals
Permanent
0.496 ac
Temporary
0.03 ac
Notes:'NR = Non -riparian wetland
2R = Riparian wetland
IMPACTS DISCUSSION
Impact 1: A minor reduction in this impact (0.368 ac to 0.367 ac) has been made
resulting from moving the utility installation at the roadway entrance into the
Temporary Impact 8, discussed below. Additional explanation for the location of the
roadway was requested via email on February 15, 2024. That was provided to you via
email on February 15, 2024 and included the following reasons:
• Line of site for the road curvature as per the DOT guidance;
• Correct opposite alignment from Marsh Hen Lane per DOT guidance;
• Town requested it be placed where we have it for public safety;
• To align the entrance road with Bill Holden Road (as you've mentioned) would
require moving the pump station but the pump station needs to be where it is
for engineering purposes (it's the low point on the property along Village Point
Road where the existing sewer is). This reason is no longer valid as the Town
requested that the pump station be away from the road and to a more -interior
location on the site; and
• Aligning with Bill Holden Road would require an additional entrance to provide
adequate response time for fire/EMT/public safety response to all houses within
the subdivision.
No additional response/comment was received from that email.
Impact 2: No change was made to this impact from the original submittal and no
comments were received pertaining to it.
3

Terrain Environmental Consulting Project 23-041-WS March 28, 2024
Forrest Run Incomplete Application Response
Impact 3: No change was made to this impact from the original submittal and no
comments were received pertaining to it.
Impact 4: Roadway crossing of a stream using a culvert. This impact was moved
approximately 300 feet downstream resulting from the additional wetland identified in
the southwest corner. This realignment allows for impact avoidance to that wetland
and upland development of lots and infrastructure in the southwest portion of the site.
This impact has been minimized by crossing the stream at an angle between 75 to
105 degrees, by using a rip -rap apron only on the downstream end of the culvert, and
by crossing the stream where there are no adjacent wetlands. The culvert burial depth
complies with what is required to allow for water and aquatic life passage. The impact
also allows for placement of utilities in the road shoulder fill between the edge of
pavement and the culvert headwalls.
Impact 5: Roadway crossing of a jurisdictional ditch using a culvert. This impact has
been minimized by crossing the ditch at an angle between 75 to 105 degrees and by
using a rip -rap apron only on the downstream end of the culvert. The culvert burial
depth complies with what is required to allow for water and aquatic life passage. The
impact also allows for placement of utilities in the road shoulder fill between the edge
of pavement and the culvert headwalls.
Impact 6: Roadway crossing of a jurisdictional ditch using a culvert. This impact has
been minimized by crossing the ditch at an angle between 75 to 105 degrees and by
using a rip -rap apron only on the downstream end of the culvert. The culvert burial
depth complies with what is required to allow for water and aquatic life passage. The
impact also allows for placement of utilities in the road shoulder fill between the edge
of pavement and the culvert headwalls.
Impact 7: Roadway fill impact resulting from extension of a roadway to access the
proposed pump station. The pump station was originally proposed along Village Point
Road with access to it from that road; however, the Town of Shallotte requested that it
be moved to a more -interior location on the site. This resulted in extending an interior
roadway to provide access to the pump station and impacting the top of a wetland
feature. The 300-foot zoning setback from Village Point Road does not allow for the
road to be moved further north to avoid the impact while still allowing lots 55-60 to
meet the minimum lot size requirement. This impact has been minimized by limiting
the fill slope to 3:1 and pushing the impact to the very top of the wetland to avoid any
future hydrologic connection disruptions. The impact also allows for placement of
utilities in the road shoulder fill between the edge of pavement and the culvert
headwalls.
Impact 8: Temporary wetland impact associated with a utility installation. This impact
is resulting from additional space needed to perform a directional drill for a water line.
The location of the hydrant across the road required that the bore pit be expanded
north, away from the access road from the original submittal. The bore pit area will be
backfilled using the excavated soils and stabilized upon completion. Ground surface
elevation will be restored to pre -construction conditions. Soil stockpiling will be done in
accordance with sedimentation and erosion control requirements. Pit excavation, soil
4

Terrain Environmental Consulting Project 23-041-WS March 28, 2024
Forrest Run Incomplete Application Response
side -casting and backfilling will be performed in accordance with Nationwide Permit 12
requirements.
Impact 9: Temporary impact associated with a stormwater pipe crossing of a
jurisdictional ditch. The ditch will be restored to pre -construction conditions and
stabilized once the installation is complete.
Impact 10: Temporary impact associated with a stormwater pipe crossing of a
jurisdictional ditch. The ditch will be restored to pre -construction conditions and
stabilized once the installation is complete.
MITIGATION
We have coordinated mitigation through Stone Farm Mitigation Bank and we are
proposing 1 acre of wetland mitigation to provide 2:1 mitigation for the 0.496 acres of
proposed permanent wetland impacts. The mitigation acceptance letter from Stone
Farm has been attached.
CLOSING
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
Paul Masten, LSS, PWS
President/Owner
Attachments
Figure 6 — Waters of the US (revised to reflect additional jurisdictional features)
PJD Appendix 2 forms (revised to include additional jurisdictional features)
Wetland 5 data forms
Wetland Impact Exhibit prepared by Stroud Engineering
Stone Farm mitigation acceptance letter
5

"I I V 4ifflo. W 'I, I I . I , , I I s - , , � r
lf�o`, En,
71
NOW
ji r
A,
0.0 -acre
-P
to
SkFI
AA
�4-
�k? ff��D
0 o
41 - 1� I , . - 4 -? -
Sl
993 If
2831f
S4
.;)�-�346 If
V
S3
197 If
12#cres
WS
A
0 08' acres
Zw,
W5
A
1.19 acres l
Vl-
lk,
Adi
X6.

PJD APPENDIX 2 FORMS

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Paul Masten, Terrain Enviornmenta
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: SAW-2022-01450
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Brunswick City: Shallotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 33.932406 Long.:-78.378213
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: The SWash
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑■ Field Determination. Date(s): ocl.bc, 9-11, 2023, December 22, 2023, and February 14, 2024
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
W1
33.93153
-78.376735
10.27 ac
wetland
404/401
W2
33.933576
-78.37904
0.06 ac
wetland
404/401
W3
33.931832
-78.375965
0.12 ac
wetland
404/401
W4
33.932198
-78.380253
0.08 ac
wetland
404/401
W5
33.932082
-78.381652
1.19 ac
wetland
404/401

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figures 1 through 6
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
Shallotte 1:24000
❑m Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web SOII Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): NC OneMap 2023
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: SAW-2022-01 450
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Brunswick City: Shallotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 33.932406 Long.:-78.378213
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: The SWaSh
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑■ Field Determination. Date(s): October9-11,2023, December 22, 2023, and February 14, 2024
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
S 1
33.931125
-78.376677
1993 If
stream
404/401
S2
33.931656
-78.378821
283 If
stream
404/401
S3
33.931645
-78.377727
197 If
stream
404/401
S4
33.931831
-78.378983
346 If
stream
404/401
D 1
33.931692
-78.376585
164 If
d itch
4 04/4 01
D2
33.932136
-78.377688
497 If
d Itch
404/401

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figure 1 through 6
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
Shallotte 1:24000
❑■ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
* Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
NC OneMap 2023
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Paul Masten - Terrain Environmental
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: SAW-2022-01 450
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Brunswick City: Shallotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 33.932406 Long.:-78.378213
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: The SWaSh
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑■ Field Determination. Date(s): October9-11,2023, December 22, 2023, and February 14, 2024
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
D 3
33.932872
-78.377533
71 If
d itch
4 04/4 01
D4
33.932398
-78.37861
580 If
d itch
404/401

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figures 1-6
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
Shallotte 1:24000
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
* Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date)
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
NC OneMap 2023
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

WETLAND/UPLAND
DATA FORMS

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Forrest Run City/County: Shallotte Sampling Date: 1/14/24
Applicant/Owner: 1295 Village Point Road, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: W5 Wet
Investigator(s): Terrain Environmental - Paul Masten Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA); LRR T Lat; 33.932082 Long:-78.381652 Datum: NAD83(2011)
Soil Map Unit Name: Torhunta - Typlc Humaquepts NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes '/ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
— High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
100r Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes '� No
Depth (inches): 9
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W5 Wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
2.
Pinus taeda
20
Yes
FAC
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
4.
Quercus nigra
20
Yes
FAC
5.
Nyssa sylvatica
20
Yes
FAC
6.
100
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover:
20
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Cyrilla racemiflora
40
Yes
FACW
2. Ilex opaca
20
Yes
FAC
3. Magnolia virginiana
10
No
FACW
4.
5.
6.
70
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35
20% of total cover:
14
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Lyonia lucida
60
Yes
FACW
2. Ilex glabra
20
Yes
FACW
3. Ilex opaca
5
No
FAC
4. Persea borbonia
5
No
FACW
5.
6.
9
50% of total cover: 45
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 10 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals: 0
(A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
n 3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
0 = Total Cover
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
20% of total cover: 18 approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Smilax laurifolia 15 Yes FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes P1 No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W5 Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 2/1 100
RM M
sandy loam mucky mineral
8-14 7.5YR 2/2 100
RM M
sandy loam mucky mineral
14-18 7.5YR 4/4
sandy loam cemented hardpan
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
— Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: hardpan
Depth (inches): 14
Hydric Soil Present? Yes W1 No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Forrest Run City/County: Shallotte Sampling Date: 1/14/24
Applicant/Owner: 1295 Village Point Road, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: W5 Up
Investigator(s): Terrain Environmental - Paul Masten Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 33.932202 Long:-78.381674 Datum: NAD83(2011)
Soil Map Unit Name: Torhunta - Typic Humaquepts NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
— Sediment Deposits (62) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 22
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 18
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W5 Up
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
)
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Ilex opaca
40
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
2.
Pinus taeda
30
Yes
FAC
Liquidambar styraciflua
15
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant 7
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Magnolia virginiana
5
No
FACW
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45
20% of total cover:
18
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling
Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
OBL species x 1 =
1.
Ilex opaca
30
Yes
FAC
FACW species x 2 =
2.
Quercus nigra
15
No
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
3.
Acer rubrum
15
No
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
4
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5.
6•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
60
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 30
20% of total cover:
12
[] 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
)
p✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
Lyonia lucida
30
Yes
FACW
�
11 3 -Prevalence Index is <_3.0
2.
Ilex glabra
15
Yes
FACW
13 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
3.
Symplocos tinctoria
15
Yes
FAC
4•
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5,
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
60
= Total Cover
30
12
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
)
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
4.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
$•
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30 ft )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10
= Total Cover
Vegetation
W/1
50% of total cover: 5
20% of
total cover:
2
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W5 Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-9
10YR 2/1
70
10YR 4/2 30 D M
sandy loam
9-20
10YR 3/2
80
10YR 5/3 20 C M
sandy loam
20-24
10YR 2/2
100
sandy loam cemented hardpan
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
— Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
J Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: hardpan
Depth (inches): 20
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _21 No LL
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

----------------------
^
/
--:§LVIII-LA�E POINT ROAD
SR
1141,
\ /| C | k | | -T-\,/ M /\ P
" I ~ |
' \ /
/ \ '
| ' _� |
' � o�� | -� � '
- | _/'
-
^�) |
-- ^-'-
------�--_ \
`~
/
\|/
SF A\L
35677
o
100 50 O 100 200'Nom
DAVID L M7E- us fy:E ----------
GRAPKC SCALE: 1^ = 100'
FORRESTRUN 1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD, LLC
711 CAROLINA BEACH AVENUE NORTH
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428
LINE TAZ3LE
PRO BOUNDARY
EX R MAIN
EX FORC IN
SILT FENCE
DISTURBED AREA
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
SR 1148
SCALE: 1^ = 100'
PRO BOUNDARY
EX R MAIN
EX FORC IN
SILT FENCE
DISTURBED AREA
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
SR 1148
SCALE: 1^ = 100'

� ��^h� 10
CD
o=oQo
12
0 13
N
END OF, STREAM
Q
21 50 pY� DR
` Deb/cw� Y
22
\` 23 24
404
1\180 24 26 Iw
38501,
I
1
I
1
1
I
/
1
I
404 WETLAND
z�.
u�J
wm
Ir :::)';
mm;
O.
L�O't
'n 1
IMPACT #1
TYPICAL
SECTION
2
9 8-----------
7 6
HYD FIELDS IMPACT #3
5'_PUg IC T WETLA D 4 3 ;r
RFILL
873- AY�0.06 AC)
14
I
29
30
31
N85 06 50 "W
w I
1
I
1
�>
I
Q� I I
I
1
I I
I
°I
I
I
I I I
1 I
I I
I
EX I
I I
I
YD-
I I
_ L
-- ---
72
\TEMPORARY
IMPACT #8
WETLAND
UTILITY INSTALLATION
1241 SF (0.028 AC)
404 WETLAND
IMPACT #1
WETLAND
ROADWAY FILL
15566 SF (0.367 AC)
71
70
N 1EX
— I
I \
N \
�O I \HYDZL�/QO J �(� � \�
,0
4,j�
�� / Ij �c�o
max c) —T / � c� Q o
S�84j, I �� / oc��co� °�Qo v��o� \ D,70)
,7 \\
9g 86 S7 47 3 / �m Q Q / O _� / ��o � o � SSQ F \ \
8°
IV o��(3 O
98 6 00 l z,�o� / O�� ctDr 404
c�"
WETLAND / Ste' / _ C) Q ��
69
UR
PI�Q LAn 67 IMPACT 5 n 6F ^00 \ \
_ J j IMPACT- #2_
38 WETLAND
ROADWAY ILL
\ 1527 SF 0.035 AC
�\ 40 41
37
36
ROADWAY CROS
480 SF (0.011 AC)
LENGTH: 80 FT
34
YD
33
32
42
43
404 WETLAND
INFILTRATION
BASIN 1
4
ILAND
IFILTRATI
BASIN
1184 05'43 "W
506.80 '
O= � C<v OV-
�v
=0 0���
Q7 OQ QQ
JURISDI TIONAL TCH
kiAD AY CROS ING
255 F (UO AC)
LEN TH: 85 64
63
62
44
N FI VTR ATI O
BASIN 2
404 -N
WETLAND
61
45
� �7- HYD
END OF
EAM
47��
!rJS/T
1
UJ
%
48>-m
zLL
z
D
49n
50
51
IMPACT #6
1 JURISDICTI0 AL DITC1
ROADWAY ROSSING
464 SF 0.T�-11 AC)
LENG 116 T
58
52 1�
(REAM
IMPACT 10 ---
-NAL
JURISDIC
IO* DI
II
UTILITY I STALLAT
48 SF ( .001 AC)
li
o �1
a �1
JURISDICTIONA2
` STREAM.,4041 WETLAND j
N84 06'10 "W
100 50 0 100 200
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 100'
W Q
2
a
VILLAGE POINT ROAD
SR 114.5
SR 1148
V C N TY MAP
\\\
A; -
IN
Q) \
\
C) o` Quo \
0
\
ry
o _�
\
o� m
°EX
Q 1gg•�
\
HYD
57
\�
56
55
\�
�, t
\
LIE
Vf) \
T 0
; TEMPORARY
o BILL HOLDEN
N/uIPACT #
IMPACT #9 ,
ROAD
\ SR 1148 gp' PUBLIC R/W
WETLAND
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH ���
��
ROADWAY FILL
UTILITY INSTALLATION!
\� I `- -
)11112 �9G}-- -
26 SF (0.001 AC) ?404
�(�1.0
\ �1
-+WETLAND
ON�Z- Ile
Jo
�
o
� O Q O o �
\�\
INFIL-rR-ATIefN-
o�(°
1
BASIN 4
7- IQ7
\
I
\
�
` I
i
o
i
I
I
Q Q ^j°
O S v C\/
\�
I i
I �
F G R R E G T R � I DEVELOPER/OWNER:
U � 1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD, LLC
711 CAROLINA BEACH AVENUE NORTH
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428
SHALLOTTE, NC 28470 [phone]
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L I
S15 58'47 "W
10.20'
L2
S63°08'34"E
72.49'
L3
S60°47'47"E
69.11'
L 4
S57°50'18 "E
50.77'
L5
I S54°53'30"E
24,47'
L6
S37°47'00"E
25.27'
L 7
531 °43'54 "E
75. 24'
L8
526'19'15"E
56,60'
L9
S2157'47"E
57.85'
L IO
S17 57'17 "E
45. 09'
L1I
S15°44'03"E
55.96'
LEGEND
PRO BOUNDARY
EX R MAIN —
EX FORC IN
STORMDRA
EX CONTOURS_-_-
SILT FENCE
DISTURBED AREA --- —
SCALE: 1 " = 100'
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
102-D CINEMA DRIVE SHEET: WC2 OF 32
WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WETLAND COVER
[phone] LICENSE # C-0647

5' 3'
SIDEWALK PLAZA
o
v 35.29
3b
---- -� 34.71 o34.96
3,44�v
34 � 3 11
J �, -�_33 _
33-
i 8
i � chi
I
31
T 2.0
34 / - - -- -
33 — -
33.90
33.6 � 32 -
33.52 0
- 33.30
_ - 32
31 31
��,
5 I
X I
O� I
O
I
I
OO
I
O � I
I
� I
DI 1
ill RIM 28.8
\ - DI 2 g" IINV 25.5
�29RIM 29.� I
NPACT # 1 1NV 25.7A CI 1,a- .
� 29 29.
TCk 29;X'
' Chi 1 �,
TYP CAL 4 L INVi25.6�
TGBC�29.1 P I \1
INN 25.8
SECT ON NPACT 1
t
WETLAND
61 FT IMPACT WIDTH
EL=29.2
3' 5'
PLAZA SIDEWALK
J
404 '\WETLA D
I
I
ROADWAY HLL
I
15566 SE (0.367 AC)
I
I
� I
I I
I I
2�
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 30'
EX GRADE AT EDGE I UPPER 8 (MAX) v LOWER EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=29.0 RIM=29.0 EX -GRADE _________________________________________________ FILL____RIM=28.8 OF IMPACTS=28.8
RETAINED
WETLAND
UPPER
INV=25.7
52 LF 18" HP
CROSS SECTION
I\ TS
LOWER
INV=25.5
RETAINED --A
WETLAND
310 FT IMPACT LENGTH ALONG CENTERLINE
PROPOSED ROADWgy
UPLAND �� �'�-
EX GRADE
WETLAND _ FILL
PROFILE RIM=29.0
NTS INV=25.7
WETLAND --'A
-- WETLAND ROADWAY HLL
\\\�\\V C A R�0�/���/
o� FOSS/6
a SEAS -
35677 =
�.
o
UPLAND iA
202`t

i
I
i
\�
CI 131,
TCB 25.8
INV 22.5
i
,\ I
28_ %
--------- 27 r" \
' \
66 FT IMPACT WIDTH
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 30'
5 3' 3' 5'
SIDEWALK PLAZA EL-24.9 PLAZA SIDEWALK
EX GRADE AT EDGE UPPER 5' 1' (MAX)1 �� LOWER EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=24.0 RIM=24.0 _EX _GRADE__________________________________________________FILL____ ________ RIM=23.8 OF IMPACTS=23.8
RETAINED --A
WETLAND
UPPER
INV=21.0
58 LF 18" HP
CROSS SECTION
NTS
1� RETAINED
WETLAND
LOWER
NV=19.5
MPACT #2
25 FT IMPACT LENGTH ALONG CENTERLINE
PROPOSED ROADWAY
UPLAND i� �-___
---___ -EX- GRADE
WETLAND iA
-- WETLAND ROADWAY FILL
1.0' (MAX)
FILL
RIM=23.8
INV=19.5
PROFILE
NTS
WETLAND iA
\\\�\\V C A R�0�/���/
o� FOSS/6
.a SEAS -
35677 =
�.
o
UPLAND -'A
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
202`t
FORREST RUN
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD
SHALLOTTE, INC 28470
DEVELOPER/OWNER:
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD, LLC
711 CAROLINA BEACH AVENUE NORTH
CAROLINA BEACH, INC 28428
[phone]
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
rvv
102-D CINEMA DRIVE HEET: W2 OF 32
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
[phone] LICENSE # C-0647ETLAND PROFILE

I -�
I
2610 26
44 FT IMPACT WIDTH
PROPOSED ROADWAY
' I-M--FYA//Cll --- #3
WETLA N D
ROADWAY FILL
2873-
i
i
Jai
CI 11
TCBC 24.5
INV 21.3/'
3
i
i
-= n I` 5" n6 ' ) AC)
`-C
TCBC 2 5 �
INV, 21_2_-
Ri
UPLAND i�-___ EX_GRADE 1.5' (MAX)
------__
----------------------------- UPLAND
WETLAND- "k
-- --------------
CROSS SECTION
IIIT
WETLAND iA
24'LF
18' H P
4
®'mid
I
1
i
CI10 �g
TCBt 24.5 j
INVi (18) 21.0 i
J
IN (24) 20.5 %
25 \
I It
24
25
23\`i
24--\
22
LL 4- J/404 WETl ,P25.5 �, �
23/
22 -
23
TCBC 25.5 J 25 --- - -�
INS (24) 20.2 �
r IN� (30) 19.7
� 26
i
i
i
DD
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 30'
76 FT IMPACT LENGTH ALONG CENTERLINE
3' 5' 3'
EL=25.6 PLAZA WALK SHOUL
---- --------EX GRADE----------------------
-------------------
UPLAND
WETLAND ROADWAY FILL
PROFILE
T
a SEAS -
35677 =
�.
2' WALL
EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=23.5
RETAINED
WETLAND
202`t

-E N-a-\') OF
STREAM
1
EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=18.2
1� RETAINED
WETLAND
5' 3'
SIDEWALK PLAZA
80 LF IMPACT
EL=25.0
i ----- 26
3' 5'
PLAZA SIDEWALK
EX_GRADE
------------- _____ 53_LF 60" HP
UPPER ----------------------------- EX GRADE
INV=17.2
LOWER
NV=17.0
CROSS SECTION
N TS
MPACT ,4
30 15 0 30 60
9' WALL
RIPRAP
APRON
EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=18.0
RETAINED --A
WETLAND
23 24
22 1
--� ��-- ------ 23
\-�j i
T - -ZOv 21
HEl WALL -
Tq�P, -o-
1 �
8
I24 22 19�C^�_y� J
3
tJR.3 2-„HP - 2
480 SF -
LENGTH:
PROPOSED ROADWAY ELEVATION AT CROSSING = 25.0
----------------- EX -GRADE
6 FT IMPACT WIDTH
AT CROSSING
60" HP
INVERT AT CENTERLINE
OF IMPACTS=17.1
EX GRADE
AT CENTERLINE
OF IMPACTS=18.1
STREAM ROADWAY CROSShG
PROFILE
NTS
\\\�\\V 0 A R�0�
o� FOSS/6
a SEAL -
35677 =
�.
o
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
27/202`f-
FORREST RUN
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD
SHALLOTTE, INC 28470
DEVELOPER/OWNER:
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD, LLC
711 CAROLINA BEACH AVENUE NORTH
CAROLINA BEACH, INC 28428
[phone]
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
102-D CINEMA DRIVE
WILMINGTON, INC 28403
[phone] LICENSE # C-0647
SHEET: W4 OF 32 1
WETI-AND PROFILF

EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=22.5
1� RETAINED
WETLAND
67
27
_ CI 17
-TCf3G 23.5 %
INV 20.2
- - 11P``
24 LF _
18
_2CI 16
TCBC-23.-5 "
INV 20.0 ; 7*'
25--��
JB1,1 r
0 25.'q
INV 19.6\
85 LF IMPACT
27
,
-J
26
,,; >>� �IMPACT 5
?J � J.27R1-SDI TIONAL , CH26 -�2
Y A Y CROS ING
DL 25.O TOP2 5 5 F(bt 0 6 A C ��` 25
INV-21-0 \\
\ LEN TH. 85 T
64////'
26
26 �
CI 42
1
TCBC 23.0
INV 19.7
*E'�AL
J, A6p"A0
24
IN,V6/20.7
r
3 44
111 I�
23��i 1 _ --�--
i
24
,
,
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 30'
5' 6' 6 5'
SIDEWALK PLAZA SIDEWALK
EL=24.5 PLAZA
__ ----------
EX_GRAD E
---- -------------------------70_LF 30" HP EX GRADE
UPPER LF-
--------
INV-21.0
LOWER
INV=20.7
CROSS SECTION
N TS
4' WALL
y 1
TCBC 23.0
INV 19.5
RIPRAP EX GRADE AT EDGE
APRON OF IMPACTS=221
1� RETAINED
WETLAND
PROPOSED ROADWAY ELEVATION AT CROSSING = 24.5
4 FT IMPACT WIDTH __-----
-------_____ EX GRADE AT CROSSING __-------
30" HP
INVERT AT CENTERLINE
OF IMPACTS=20.8
EX GRADE
AT CENTERLINE
OF IMPACTS=22.3
PROFILE
T
MPACT µ5 -- JIJR6DICTIONAL DITCH ROADWAY CROSSING
C A RI0�/���/
o� F�SSI6�
a SEAS -
35677 =
�.
o
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
27/202'
FORREST RUN
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD
SHALLOTTE, INC 28470
DEVELOPER/OWNER:
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD, LLC
711 CAROLINA BEACH AVENUE NORTH
CAROLINA BEACH, INC 28428
[phone]
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
102-D CINEMA DRIVE SHEET: W5 OF 32
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
[phone] LICENSE # C-0647 WETI-AND PR05ILF

`I
I
I
I
I
I
II I
6,111
i ) �� A 1A��v� 1 25 -%23
'
-
20 i�22
17 , �_, �� l l� 2
zo "�� � ��, �,, ���� - ,� -ACT #6 , � �� 25 ,
23 ���>>) l f %j 22
r/ 4y
_2 ISD CT O AL 'D I TC
HEADWALL �`� -- -
oP-21.0
ROADWAY CROSSING
22.1
ti
1 �jil I V 15.v
y
464 SE 000 AC)
20 c � � 1,6 ' �V `� � � ��
RIM �1.7 1 LEN GT
- T
I 17.6 '
CI 35
J,
i -----\ - -- 19
20 it
\I
19
J i I
l '(�HtXkW,ALIr
TOP--19.@ Cl
yqV 14.5 -
16i i i (li Ill 19 Tmc 1 q
I N V 16 2-
�
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 30'
TC�C 19.7 ;
IN06,4 /
J �-
116 LF IMPACT PROPOSED ROADWAY ELEVATION AT CROSSING = 20.6
5' 6' 6' 5'
SIDEWALK PLAZA SIDEWALK '--�_
EL=20.6 PLAZA
4 FT IMPACT WIDTH -�
5' WALL 5' WALL EX GRACE ' - _ _ AT CROSSING "
EX GRADE AT EDGE - "
OF IMPACTS-16.0 "
EX -GRADE 1 00LF 48" HP RIPRAP EX GRADE AT EDGE
RETAINED1�
UPPER ---------------___-- - GRADE---------
_ APRON OF IMPACTS=15.4 48" HP
WETLAND INV=15.0 INVERT AT CENTERLINE --__-
LOWER o o OF IMPACTS=14.8
INV=14.5 RETAINED EX GRADE
WETLAND AT CENTERLINE
CROSS SECTION OF IMPACTS=15.7
NTS
PROFILE
NTS
MPACT #6 -- JUMSDICThCINAL DITCH ROADWAY CROSSING
o� F'�SS���
a SEAS -
35677 =
�.
o
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
27/202`f-
FORREST RUN
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD
SHALLOTTE, INC 28470
DEVELOPER/OWNER:
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD, LLC
711 CAROLINA BEACH AVENUE NORTH
CAROLINA BEACH, INC 28428
[phone]
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
102-D CINEMA DRIVE
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
[phone] LICENSE # C-0647
SHEET: W6 OF 32 1
WETLAND PROPILF

EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=13.0
WETLAND ---A
EX GRADE
24" HP STORM
INVERT AT CENTERLINE
OF IMPACTS=9.5
7
RIM 18.0_-
-- -INV �1/�) 14.5 --
INVJ (24) 9 8-J
18 FT IMPACT WIDTH
3'
SHOULDER EL=15.0
WETLAND ---A
CROSS SECTION
N TS
12 --
EL
1-1-2 -__SF,�(9,00lj AC
77
7M
g
i
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 30'
EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=14.5
UPLAND i*
�- 11
JB 4
BRIM-Ti.
INV 8.5
8 FT IMPACT LENGTH ALONG CENTERLINE
PROPOSED ROADWAY ELEVATION AT CROSSING = 15.0
UPLAND -'A �-___
-------- EX_GRADE J -_A---- ---------------------------- UPLAND �
---------------
WETLAND
MPACT yl -- WETLAND ROADWAY FILL
')d" NP
PROFILE
NTS
F�SS6�,'�9�%
a SEAL
35677 =
�.
WETLAND iA
27/202`f-
FORREST RUN
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD
SHALLOTTE, INC 28470
DEVELOPER/OWNER:
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD, LLC
711 CAROLINA BEACH AVENUE NORTH
CAROLINA BEACH, INC 28428
[phone]
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
102-D CINEMA DRIVE
WILMINGTON, INC 28403
[phone] LICENSE # C-0647
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
SHEET: W7 OF 32 1
WETLAND PROPILF

41 40 r
39
i
l
---_ 38
37� 38
36
30
I 30 C i v 30
T E M P 0 R A RY
IMPACT #8
ml x 5I WETLAND
UTILITY NSTALLAI
241 SE (0.028 A
O 0 I l
I
i
O
1 '
35 FT IMPACT WIDTH
EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=31.2
8" PVC WATER MAIN zvol
INVERT AT CENTERLINE
OF IMPACTS=24.0 6' WIDE x 40' LONG
x 7' DEEP BORE PIT
CROSS SECTION
NTS
MPACT #8
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 30'
EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=31.1
i
38 ET IMPACT LENGTH ALONG WATER MAIN
--------___EX GRADE__
UPLAND �� �-----__
WETLAND ---A
TEMPORARY WETLAND UTILITY
8 PVC
PROFILE
IJ -1
NSTALLAT0N
WETLAND i� PERMANENT
IMPACT #1
202`f-

EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=10.2
WETLAND ---A
_-J /
TEVPORARY ��� �� 14/ ,,/ � _____ 12
14 - - —
IMPACT #9
13
JUR6DICTIONAL DITIC'
JB 4 UTUTY I N S TAL L A Tt 04��
INV 8.5 26 SF--(O.0'01--AC)< 404
E T L AND
cJ
I
7 <
L / i
SL0 10.0 e
INV i�0�''o
SUMP 0.0 �,.• 1
II��i■ICI■:�Il�►►►II■1:1
1wl911:11817a
24" HP STORM
INVERT AT CENTERLINE
OF IMPACTS=8.2
CROSS SECTION
,T
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 30'
EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=10.1
WETLAND ---A
2 FT IMPACT WIDTH ___----
------------- EX GRADE AT CROSSING __--"--"-
UPLAND
UPLAND
MPACT #9 -- TEMPORARY JURISDICTIONAL NTCH UTILITY
')d° uD
PROFILE
N TS
NSTALLATION
\\\�\\V CA
o� -, Ss 16 -
a SEAS -
35677 =
��i � F!O I N��.' •�JG' ��
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
27/202`f-
FORREST RUN
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD
SHALLOTTE, NC 28470
DEVELOPER/OWNER:
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD, LLC
711 CAROLINA BEACH AVENUE NORTH
CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428
[phone]
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
102—D CINEMA DRIVE
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
[phone] LICENSE # C-0647
SHEET: W9 OF 32 1
WETI-AND PROPILF

EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=12.9
WETLAND iA
1
I
I
j � I
I I
---4 7 �[ i
I
I I V
18
I
CI 38 I 20 L � CI �7
I I
4 TCBC 119.0 18 P , TCBC 19.0 �>> �� 16� 1
INV 1512 INV, (18) 15.5 a'
INV (24) 15.0 �� ��v 1
� � I �� �I i 117�
I , )
I l
18 RIM 18.0�-,
�,��•,� — ��`,`�,,/ ' NP ,----_INV (1/) 14.5--
�zr ���� - �� I �A� LF �� �� �,� INV- (24) 9�8-�
�0
Lf
2049 JI3 8 ' l l
J ) ,
RIM 19.0
INV 18 14.0 TEMPOR-A _Y _
20 EN Da F
0
INV 24 10.2 'I 1 I ill�(1 —
NPACT 10
TR) E A V,rl
J �� J ,� �1 �� ( i
JURISDIC IONALDilTH50 �,
T 1 TY I ST All'
48 SE �001�
�< < ,
13
20 CI 36 V ' 13 V ;
5 T0� — — —TCBC- 1 .0 -�
�- 6 / )� 4 '
� Al
IJdV 14.5 /� ,� �,14 1 \
14
12- r ��
14
I 't
12 FT IMPACT WIDTH
24" HP STORM
INVERT AT CENTERLINE
OF IMPACTS-10.1
CROSS SECTION
II-
N;IFACT #10
EX GRADE
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 30'
EX GRADE AT EDGE
OF IMPACTS=12.8
WETLAND -'A
4 FT IMPACT WIDTH - ___----
-------____ EX GRADE AT CROSSING __-------
UPLAND i�
UPLAND
')A" LJD
PROFILE
N T-)
-- TEMPORARY JURISDICTIONAL DITCH UTILITY NISTALLATION
o� F' Ss s 0�
a SEAS -
35677 =
�.
o
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
27/202`f-
FORREST RUN
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD
SHALLOTTE, INC 28470
DEVELOPER/OWNER:
1295 VILLAGE POINT ROAD, LLC
711 CAROLINA BEACH AVENUE NORTH
CAROLINA BEACH, INC 28428
[phone]
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
102-D CINEMA DRIVE SHEET: M 0 OF 32
WILMINGTON, INC 28403
[phone] LICENSE # C-0647 WETLAND PROFILE

STONE FARM REGIONAL MITIGATION BANK
CREDIT REQUEST ACCEPTANCE
Date: 3/26/2024
1295 Village Point Rd LLC
Brian Fleer
1001 Military Cutoff Ste 101
Wilmington, NC 28405
Project Name: Forrest Run
Expiration of Acceptance: 09/26/2024
Dear Brian Fleer:
DRAFT
Stone Farm Mitigation Bank, LLC
2618 New Village Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank (Bank) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision
does not assure that the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project
impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the
Bank will be approved. It is also the responsibility of the applicant to determine the appropriate credit ratios
that will be required for the corresponding wetland and/or stream impacts. You must also comply with all
other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed
activity.
This acceptance is valid for six (6) months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received payment for the accepted credits of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit
within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. Predicated on the total payment due to the Bank, as
set forth herein, a ten (10) percent non-refundable deposit is due at the time of acceptance by the Bank. It is
the applicant's responsibility to send copies of their permits to the Bank. Once the Bank receives a copy of
the permit(s), an invoice will be issued based on the information identified below. Payment must be made
prior to conducting the authorized work. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the credit types and
amounts identified below are consistent with the compensatory mitigation requirements of the permit(s)
issued. The Bank and/or its agents are not responsible for determining the applicant's mitigation
requirements.
Based on the information supplied by the applicant, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation
are summarized in the following table:
..........._.
CU Location
Stream (ft.)
Wetlands ac.
Nonri arian
Riparian
Impact
03040207
.37
.1
Credits
.g
.2
Note that the impact and credit totals above were provided by the applicant. It is the applicant's
responsibility to provide accurate information (including the requested mitigation credits). The Bank and/or
its agents are not responsible for determining the required credit amounts. The Bank's decision to accept
credits is based upon the information provided by the applicant. The Bank is not liable for any credit
shortage should the applicant's required mitigation credits exceed the amount specified in the above table.

Based upon the type and amounts of credits requested above, the following payment must be provided to
the Bank prior to issuance of credits:
Credit Type
Unit
Per Unit Credit Fee
Sub -Total
Stream
0
$740.09
$0.00
Nonriparian Wetland
0.8
$76,150.13
$60,920.10
Riparian Wetland
0.2
$76,150.13
$15,230.03
Total Payment Due
$76,150.13
Non-refundable Deposit
$7,615.01
Balance Due Upon Invoice
$68,535.12
Upon receipt of full payment, the Bank will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If
the regulatory agencies require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and should the applicant
want the Bank to provide such credits, it is the applicant's responsibility to submit an additional credit
request form to the Bank.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jordan Cline at 910-251-8543 or
[e-mail]
Sincerely, Jt,,V,
Cl't 0.
Jordan Cline
Stone Farm Mitigation Bank, LLC
cc: NCDWQ-Raleigh
USACE
NCDWQ-Local
Agent