20240503 Ver 1_Grove at Anderson PCN Package Final Reduced_20240329

LaBeRa
Powered by partnership.
February 14, 2024
USACE Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Branch
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, NC 28262
Re: Joint Application for Permit —Nationwide Permit 29 and Pre -Construction Notification
Horlak, LLC
13815 Cinnabar Place
Huntsville, NC
LaBella Project No. 2234318
On behalf of Horlak, LLC, we are submitting a Pre -Construction Notification for your review and approval.
Horlak, LLC seeks approval under a Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 for 0.08 acres of permanent impacts to
federally jurisdictional wetlands and 130 linear feet (0.0138 acres) of permanent impacts to federally
jurisdictional streams. These impacts total 0.0938 acres, which is well under the 0.5-acre NWP threshold
and the 0.1 acre threshold for mitigation. This permit specifically pertains to the proposed construction of a
residential development and associated roads and infrastructure to accommodate the current and future
housing needs of the City of Albemarle. In accompaniment to the NWP, Horlak, LLC is submitting a Pre -
Construction Notification.
We have submitted the following materials in support of this PCN (attached):
• JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
• EXHIBIT 1— PROJECT NARRATIVE
• EXHIBIT 2 — PROJECT PLANS
• EXHIBIT 3 — MAPS AND FIGURES
• EXHIBIT 4 —PROTECTED SPECIES
• EXHIBIT 5 — WETLAND REPORT
• EXHIBIT 6 — PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Eric Prunchak, PWS
LABELLA ASSOCIATES, D.P.C.
Environmental Manager
400 S Tryon Street, Suite 1300 I Charlotte, NC 28285 I p 704-376-6423
www.labellapc.com

�`'aE
ca
M
� y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑x No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes x❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑Yes ❑x No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
The Grove at Anderson
2b. County:
Stanly
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Albemarle, NC 28001
2d. Subdivision name:
The Grove at Anderson
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
N/A
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Horlak, LLC
3d. Street address:
13815 Cinnabar Place
3e. City, state, zip:
Huntsville, NC 28078
3f. Telephone no.:
704-875-9704
3g. Fax no.:
N/A
31h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Thaddeus Pecorak
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Horlak, LLC
4d. Street address:
13815 Cinnabar Place
4e. City, state, zip:
Huntsville, NC 28078
4f. Telephone no.:
704-875-9704
4g. Fax no.:
N/A
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Eric Prunchak
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
LaBella Associates
5c. Street address:
400 S Tryon Street, Suite 1300
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28285
5e. Telephone no.:
703-975-9718
5f. Fax no.:
N/A
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2of10
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Multiple parcels, please see Exhibit 3
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.354562 Longitude: 80.156606
1 c. Property size:
57 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Mountain Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV
2c. River basin:
Yadkin Pee -Dee
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area consists of forested and agricultural land. Surrounding areas consist of agricultural land and residential development.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.57
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3,859
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Please see Exhibit 1
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Please see Exhibit 1
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
x❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: LaBella Associates
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
August 8, 2022 - See Exhibit 6
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
X❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
This project is Phase 1 of a 2-phase residential development.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory Please See Exhibit 3
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
AI Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
PEM
No
Corps
0.08
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.08
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Stream A
PER
Corps
5
130
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
130
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.

cts
4.�ed
If thpacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the I list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Nam waterbody
(if applic
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
pose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. d or Lake Construction
If and or construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
sed use or
purpose and
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit o.
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. er Impacts (for DWQ)
If project i impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any i cts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which p cted basin?
❑ Neuse ❑Tar -Pamlico ❑Catawba ❑Randleman ❑Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for imps
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/Nc
B3
Yes/Nc
B4
es/Nc
B5
Yes/Nc
B6
Yes/Nc
61h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
ia. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Please see Exhibit 1
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Please see Exhibit 1
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Co if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
pe: Choose one
Type: C ne
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. ete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval Iette in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requeste
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temp'erarLm,Choose
one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 s
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments:
S. Comp n a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mi i rovide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes FA] No
buffer mitigation?
6b. es, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amo of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Rea for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffe 'tigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is pro to private mitigation bank,
�(afy,ent
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an ape fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) Please See Exhibit 2
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes x❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes X❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan Please See Exhibit 2
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Please see Exhibit 2
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's 'urisdiction is this ro'ect?
stanly county
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑X Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes ❑X No
attached?
4. DW ater Program Review
El Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented storm nagement programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
El Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes Lj N3
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review Please See Exhibit 2
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
El Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the viclation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) Please See Exhibit 2
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑x No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina Wildlife Resources and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes x❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
North Carolina Wildlife Resources and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC National Register
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL)
Eric Prunchak
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.
Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice.

� LaBeLLa
EXHIBIT 1
PROJECT NARATIVE

LaBeLLa
Powered by partnership.
EXHIBIT 1
Project Narrative
Project Purpose
This Horlak, LLC project involves the construction of a single-family residential development and associated
roads and infrastructure. Specificto this permit application, the construction of single-family homes will impact
130 linear feet (0.0138 acres) of a federal lyjurisdictional perennial stream channel (Stream A) at one stream
crossing, and 0.08 acres of a federal lyjurisdictional palustrine emergent (PEM) wetland. A Nationwide Permit
(NWP) is required for discharges of dredged or fill material to culvert one stream crossing for an access road
and fill one wetland for residential structures. Due to the limited wetland and stream impacts, the project is
seeking NWP-29 for Residential Developments. The proposed project will involve minimal tree clearing as part
of the residential development but impacts to state and/or federally listed bats or other threatened and
endangered species are not anticipated.
Project Description
Horlak, LLC is proposing to construct a two-phase residential development, with a total of 79 single-family lots.
Associated infrastructure improvements include roadways, sewer, water, and stormwater management.
Anderson Grove Church Road will be widened to accommodate new traffic patterns and entry roads. The
Project Area is contained within the City of Albemarle on Stanly County Parcels #655804544617,
655802563026, and 655802652437 and located at street address 127 Charter Street.
The Project Area is comprised of mixed landscape of forested land and agricultural fields. A federally
jurisdictional perennial stream (Stream A) is located in the eastern portion of the Project Area and will be
culverted at one crossing during the construction of an access road in the eastern portion of the Study Area.
Please refer to Table 1 below and the project plans in Exhibit 2.
Project Impacts
A portion of perennial Stream A will be permanently impacted for one road crossing. Impact #1 will occur in
the northern half of the site. The stream will be culverted with a 20-foot-wide box culvert. Culvert headwalls
will be constructed to reduce erosion and seepage into the stream and stabilize the area. Using a bottomless
box culvert will allow for the stream's flow to continue beneath the access road and to continue a hydrological
connection to the non -impacted stream and wetlands on -site. A portion of PEM Wetland F will be permanently
impacted for residential lots and an associated roadway.
Table 1 below details the approximate amount of permanent disturbance to the onsite streams and wetlands.
Detailed drawings of the site plans are included in Exhibit 2. For more information regarding onsite wetlands
400 S Tryon St, Suite 1300 I Charlotte, NC 28285 I p 704-376-6423
vcivc w.babellapc.com

e
and streams, please refer to the Wetland Delineation Report and Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
(PJD) in Exhibit5.
Table 1. Proposed Permanent Stream and Wetland Disturbance
Impact
Permanent
Permanent
Permanent
Feature ID
Classification
Impact Method
Disturbance
Disturbance
Disturbance
Number
(Acres)
(Linear ft)
(Square ft.)
Stream
Perennial
1
Culvert for Access Road
0.0138
130
601
Wetland F
PEM
2
Residential Lots and
0.08
N/A
3,488
Roadway
Total
0.0938
130
4,089
Avoidance and Minimization
The Project will avoid permanent and temporary stream impacts to approximately 2,510 linear feet of a
perennial stream channel, 1,219linearfeetof intermittent stream channels, and 153 linearfeetof ephemeral
stream channels. The Project will also avoid permanent and temporary wetland impacts to 0.25 acres of PEM
wetlands and 0.24 acres of palustrine unconsolidated bottom (PuB) wetlands. The avoidance of these features
was achieved by locating the majority of the residential development in the northwestern portion of the project
area to avoid the major wetland and stream areas within the Study Area limits. Additionally, the stream
crossing, which is classified as a permanent impact to Stream A will be culverted to allow the stream to have
continuous flow following the development of the access road, which is perpendicular to Stream A to reduce
the impact footprint to the greatest extent possible. Community entrances have been limited to one to avoid
multiple stream crossings. All appropriate Soil and Erosion Control (ESC) measures and Best Management
Practices (BMPs) will be installed and utilized per the Project Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).
Please refer to the Erosion Control Plans and the Impact Map in Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3, Figures 6 and 7,
respectively.
USFWS National Wetland Inventory Mapping
According to National Wetland Inventory (NWI) mapping, there is one NWI mapped freshwater pond and
connecting R5UBH and R4SBC riverine systems onsite. The open water pond is mapped in the northwestern
portion of the Study Area and corresponds to delineated Pond B. The R5UBH riverine system corresponds to
delineated Stream A and the R4SBC riverine systems, correspond to delineated streams Ab, Af, and C. Refer
to Exhibit 3, Figure 2.
FEMA Flood Zones
The Study Area is not located within a FEMA 100-year flood zone or FEMA Floodway. As a result, the proposed
project will not permanently or temporarily impact flood zones. Refer to Exhibit 3, Figure 3.
February 14, 2024 P a g e 1 2

e
Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species
According to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation
(IPaC) Official Species List, the Northern Long-eared Bat (NLEB - Myotis septentrionalis), Monarch Butterfly
(Danaus plexippus), and Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) were identified as potentially
occurring on orwithin the vicinity of the Project Area. There are no known hibernacula, roostingtrees, or critical
habitat known to occurwithin, or in the proximityof the Project Area for NLEB. Asurvey of potential Schweinitz's
Sunflower habitat was conducted on August 23, 2022 and did not identify any individuals located on the site.
Additionally, the Study Area is not located within close proximity of North Carolina Department of Natural and
Cultural Resources state -threatened or endangered species or Bald Eagle nests/roosts.
A self -certification package was submitted to USFWS NC Field Office on April 26, 2022. Impacts to Threatened
and Endangered Species as a result of this project are not anticipated. Refer to the Threatened and
Endangered Species Report and IPaC Submittal Package in Exhibit 4.
February 14, 2024 P a g e 1 3

� LaBeLLa
EXHIBIT 2
PROJECT PLANS

301S311HMNOWV3S
mmms
VNI10-3 HlilON'3lilV-1V
3
1N3WdOl3A3(3103SNVHI
eoy s 3AONE) NOSN34NV
...... . <�`.
O
U
cu
O
L
cu
U
co
0 LO
co
Z o
X co
LU cu x `n
> E x �s
0 o x
M x
Q o
0 o
o C)
ca o 0
co
Z LO
*� LO
U v
U) L 0
I..L O �
U L'
N
W a� co
o LO
Z CD it
Z
O �
L
Q
o0l
z
O
F
a
U
h
W
0
U
W
w
a
-KoN al 0-0 1osoi aims an— nnano Od— 1111 ON S—Oossvaaoisalition NO—S ©1He1a 00

moissi-dmal1- lnoHlimaso-d nmvaod oasn ao aam H nmv w oaonooadaa ae iom 7VHs smmnvao siHi oKom-O-HO l osoi aims an- Wil-Od-uu onuS-OOssvaamsa1-NO-S©1Heia 00

a
o
ao
eFg�
� w
mg w og3
1

34IS3ilHMNOWV3S
spy"
tlNIIO tlDH1 ON'3l tlW39ltl
■ ■
s
W
fir,
1N3WdOl3n30103SNt/211
3/�021J NOS2134Nb'�o
m
¢ 0
Jz �rj
v
EMEMS
�
>-wJ
O
� rc
Oaa
W N E
___
'Ev
Li
Cl)
i
U
I
°9sa�� 8"s sa :s
ssa � s
€s �a
a s s
cO-ON—0—HOlogo--ins anmanvnI—Od— 1111 ONI S—OOSS—Gis-W NO—S ©iHeia 00

<
i
zo
_
? (1)
�F U
30IS31IHMNOWV3
..M
■ ■
_
m
m m
N
."�
�� VNIIOUVD H—N'V-GIV
3li
1N3WdOl3A30103SNVHI
s 3/�021J NOS2134b' N
e°y
Q
W �
Z \p
4
z % g
Y
Ajwl
��<,� ��� ®o ✓ 11I� ✓ i� ��
m 3
50
ge
d°>
ONI 531VIOOSSV 93015311WN NO—S ©1HOIi1M0�

VNIIO V3 HIbON'91bVW9G1V
1N3WdOl3n30103SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
i z
zo
gF
„oo rc as
N
U
301S311HMNOWV3S
:: MS
m m
d
Y I/
W 1
i
F �mh
N d
Pe,u
Baas _ .aas
:>;>,
17�F
/� �%/�i,
17
g�
�\, —�n—.o`o.
3.1
GRc��

301S311HMNOWV3S
..MS NN m
U � U
z `na
y d \
W
Y
W
S CU
K
W
N
1
1
VNIIOUVD H—N'3li V-GIV
1N3WdOl3n30103SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
& i
z
zo
gF
o 2 rc as
U
oO-ON 3u0-0logo—ins 3NN— I—Od-1III ONI S— OOSS—GIG-W NO-3 — 1-00

,@g2e#Now93 z=:<=: »<': »�.
`w o ! - :\; -
e \
]a0NNOSN]aNV }\{}-
�MS\\\};�\ IN
\y§
'o\
}
:
\:
} ,( /\ z
}
�
_
\i
\\�}}
p»:§o,
\::§(«J >
53>
: \
22:R{:J:
52:7(S\:\«
- -
«;
y(92«
_
\\}{}\
I:o»
(}}
\
\
)
\
) {
:_
(}
l{
}}(\\�
}
Z«I(\y2:

3WdOl3A3
3 41 S 31 I H M1 N O W V 3 S � � ��io„�.. vNnoavo NiaoN'a�avwaew � a
■ I
1N0103SNtR11
m Jzo
ms a 3/�021J NOS2134Nb' _ - v
z
I
d
�o
w z
�,..."
o �aw >&o
noon . owo
o
75
3 g U
mg Y o�
1
m w s
w !
D
u a rc
a / 1a w
ol
I '
l
c)
w
u)
------ ---- —� -- =—�-- — ---- --------
/ y
LLLuluujj
/
UBO
doo�w
-- — --,---------, ''��-------------
✓�� /Ad
zYo�a- - — — - - - — — — - -------------------------yI-------]
lo
1 1 W
oo
0
w
zoY�..hz 5F 1 1 / j
o
SF_sF s-
x.
zo
N
//
<o
/G��'///
.=o
ooa
0
d =�
� .
zd
w /
�.
wo a= o _mo
o a
w mm ew mwd
/�i!/i�� �I
=.o m
a_=_�m
w o
Iz
oo
we m
o.
o d,ww4..so
o
6
NOISSINd3dN3iilinOHilM3SOdandANVdOAo3sna0d�N�HANVNIo3onaoad3d3eiON vHS�N�dGSIHio9-N—O—H�Iogo,iins--I—Od-1111 N�s-1—s-1s 1—NO-3 —1-00

301S311HMNOWV3S
mmms
A
VNIIO VD H—N'3li V-GIV
s1N3WdOl3A30103SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
<�.
� a
Zp
z o,
oZ
00 wo
t
-9— 3u0— 0logo—ins -- I—Od— 1111 ONI s— OOSS-1s 1— NO—S ©— 1-00

30IS31IHMNOWV3S �-
_ �� tlNllOiltlD H1ilON'3liltlW39ltl d
..M
1N3WdOl3A30103SNVHI 0�
s 3/�021J NOS2134Nb' N oZ
m U
o `"� ..
�o
noon � WU
0
a
_. -- ...�---,•-• _..._i ...,,,. .. ._ � � r�--�,...�>. —---t---- III Yil, ,
Y'
I ' '
1 \\1 1 1
Ao
IIi
(
�i
�Lo IYvvts
o
d ,
i e w
Ig
I
�� �I 1 it i � I 1 18 l l � I � I I�, l �/✓Y — J,!X fi� III -Ill jltj�
1 1 1 i 11
I 1 1 ! / 1/ 1 I f ! ! f , /1 If l lJi{ i �j III I�/!,✓
J' / )J ,' ] ! /
/� � •I I I i i i +� �! ,i !� lJ l' ,'�J/ � J'', / /' � � I /%/� � III � Ili / I
�
I/
(
JI I d, , � i � /' i l� !/ I� i l /�� !! i � i 1YY'( � � �! IY J r`�Y � �.' •+ A �I�I�
�A,
J '
J J I /. I I 1 3 Q I I I 1 ♦ 1 1 I I I I I 1 /, / 1
J
Nolsslwdad NaiilanninouilmasoeanenNvnoNoasnd0daNnvwnNVNIoaonooddadaeioNIvHSsN vdaslui oo9--O—Ho Iosoeilns anmanvn I—Od—uu ow semloossvaems 1-NO—Sa iuelawoo

30IS31IHMNOWV3S
_A
� tlNllOiltlD H1ilON'3liltlW39ltl
.M
_
.a s
1N3WdOl3n30103SNt/211
■■
NOS2134b'
Na"
o3/�021J
a
M
00 U
o
oZ
00 w°
-9--0—HOloso—ins--I—Od-1111 ONIS31 OOSS-1s 1 NO-3 — 1-00

moissi-dmal1- lnoHlimaso-d nmvaod oasn ao aam H nmv w oaonooadaa ae iom 7VHs smmnvao siHi oKom-O-HO l osoi aims an- Wil-Od-uu onuS-OOssvaamsa1-NO-S©1Heia 00

301S311HMNOWV3S
MEMS
m
m
o
§a
it
mI.II®
�o� w
me
—7
/ / 4
VNIlOV3 H1ilON'3l V-12ltl
1N3M013n30103SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
a
Jo0LO
ooHowo
U
w�wOz
...
>IxO
r
I
h
I
I
I IITi
Y
ii �I III P- I i
w r 611,
w
.-- --- -- ----------------T -- -------- ------L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TI 1 1 * \ \
Q Q U
Nwa I 1
0 0
m � i
LU
U) 1 W
_
' /y
1 , U) r
Ur
I �
ova
o�ww
vzwLL rc z 8
m
0 El
a. \
— — — — — — — — — — — ----------- --- ti— — — — — — - —
= 1
I
0 0<
.mo e.w
ow
_
o�
.w
wo
as
oar �08
o
_ P.
o
M F
00 -
w
1
NOISSINa�dN�///noH/lM�SodandANVdOAo�snaod�NWHANVNIo�onaoad�d�eiON VHS�N�dOSIH/ 4O-ON-0—HOlogo—ins--I—Od-1111 ONIs—OOSS—GIG-WNO——I-00

3 WdOl3n3
341$311HMNOWV3S �� ���o=< vNnoavo NiaoN'a�avwaew � a
■ ■ 1N0103SNt/211 m o0
.....
��M� zm�a�m aam a rdo 3AONE) NOSN34.
NV 0 v
...... .
8 L N
> > a x Y — Z
O m a O
aw
-9— e 0-0 logo —ins anmanv n I—Od— 1111 ON S—OOSS-1s 1— NO—S ©i 1-00

301S3iIHMNOWV3S
_
''""""""
� tlNllOiltl3 H1ilON'3liltlW39ltl
.M
_
0
.a s
1N3WdOl3n30103SNt/211
A
■■
NOS2134b'
Na"
o3/�021J
NoISSI—dN-1—inoNl—Odd—Ndaoda3SadO—WwdN-1a3aaGO—d—ON dNS--Ns oO-aN3uo—alogo—ins 3aN—I—Od-1111 ONIS—OOSS—GIG- NO-3 —I-00

moissi-dmal1- lnoHlimaso-d nmvaod oasn ao aam H nmv w oaonooadaa ae iom 7VHs smmnvao siHi oKom-O-HO l osoi aims an- Wil-Od-uu onuS-OOssvaamsa1-NO-S©1Heia 00

301S311HMNOWV3S
::MS
VNIIO VD H—N'3li V-GIV
- s A
1N3WdOl3A30103SNtR11
3AONE) NOSN34NV
<.
-9--0-0logo—ins --I—Od-1111 ONIs—Ooss-1s 1 NO-3 —1-00

301S3iIHMNOWV3S
..MS NN m
VNI10-3 H1 N'3l Vl Gltl
1N3WdOl3n30103SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
o o��
OZI-
00 w0.
oo
a p= a
p
A>_ o z= ==a
-
Iq
-
o_
_ - \B,
Ob
9 w §
o
-
o026 a w5
M.d
O I P-11
III
a\ j
IIII Q
o
G'
-- 4 ➢ a s
0
��,y
�a \
II�I�I
Z
O
N.
I
§ a
cl�o
s V gg 8A
qq
M4
o pY h
LU
D
oc,U
O
u
W
T
O
d
w
J
J
o
a
si
Z
LU
x "ao
(n
�G WwW�ppN i
W
[if
0
Ln
Q
_m m
IS - -
4G
Q
z
- -
ao
4
0
o
Qt
4 4Hp
- iG a�
e
€
s. rvm ns
3
N✓iaE mrn �c�✓iw arrcvio Nw
Z
� �
� -
`ra
O
UQ
{ 3�
O
\/
- W
z
o N
Z
CJ
O
z
mde .P�9
o KON al 0l 0losoiaims anN nnano 0—H 1111 ONI S—OOssvaamsalition NOHvas ©lueia 00

301S311HMNOWV3mmmsS
49 VNIIOUVD H—N'3li V-GIV
3
1N3WdOl3A3(3103SNVHI
eoy s 3AONE) NOSN34NV
...... . <�.
z o_0
o
oZ<
.00
v
U
.j,.
i O'',',•.
�\
v
cn
—
O
z
m
o
{tt.(IN il p$gNO
cn
U
H-
u�
VO-ON —0—HO l o50—ins 3f1N-11OdOd— 1111 ONI S—OOSS—GIG-W NO—S ©1H1-00

301S311HMNOWV3S
mmms
—N'3lil—GIG
3
1N3WdOl3A3(3103SNVHI
eoy s 3AONE) NOSN34NV
...... . .....
<�.
i 2
1 spa
1 2,
1
U
w
T
------
z
& z
s
rc O C7
ZO
<
�v9
1
1
1
_
1
s
-
1
p
dw
;
1
`
xs ;
NOISSINd�dN�llllnOHilM�SOdandANVdOAo�sna0d�NWHANVNIo�onaoad�d�eiON7VHS�N�dOSIHi oO-ON-0—HOlogo—inS--I—Od-1111 ONIS—OOSS—GIG-WNO——1-00

301S311HMNOWV3S
VNIIOUVD Hl N'3li Vtl GIV
..M
m
s
1N01�3SNtR11
3WdOl3A3
3AONE) NOSN34Nv
N
�W
��
—
¢¢¢ v
..
m
eoy
o
n o o n rc
C7oa
W�E
�/j �// f�✓�� I � � °o Nt of
a
0
d
a
0
2
z
'! s
w� �= o
0
ow
Ir
41
N wa
�o.o
z
m
e
s
r
m y
T < \
` / d.
���J"llllllL4
°
d
�IV
�
Li
FF
a
m
= o m
\ =
1
�e
s
o
i
r
.d
a_
w � o
NOISSIaad Nall—lnOHlima ddnd nNv dod oasn do a a mn nmv Ni aaonao dae iON 7mHs sm wnvda siHi oKoNa Om Ho I osoi aims anm Wil—od—uu omi samioossvaamsa1—NO—Sa igsia 00

3WdOl3n3
341S311HMNOWV3S vNnoavo NiaoN'a�avwaew
■ ■ m N
MS s 1N0103SNt/211 o z¢
■■ m m g 4Nv
N «Z
3AONE) NOSN3v
d
°y
n o o rc C7oa
NI�E
o m
w x sax. 9d d ,a o»yp _ 3g
z
o
IF v
u
u
n
z
�o
ro
me
3
0
Qo
a.
sod�so 0
,w
-- z
_r 1
_ mw
r
o/
d
bT
>�
�� \a
s%
%
Val
mv
w 53
rY.
g
— s� a a ✓ j � 53,
w =
w
s
P/
tf �f
v
NoISSINd3dN3iil iooHilM3SodaoddNVdOAo3soa0d�NNdwdNVNIo30000ad3d3SiON dHSdNN dGSIHs 101—N—O—HHIoso3Sios3oN—I—Od-1111 S--s— G-ill NO-3 — I-00

301S311HMNOWV3S
::MSm
9�e
LL &
tlNllOiltlD H1ilON'3liltlW39ltl
1N3 WdOl3n30103SNt/211 x
3AONE) NOSN34NV �
q� w M
z 4 In
<<= v
F rc
Ooa
a�n
W �E
a�v
z � m
a
777
oo~ «�>o
w®y�
ao=
o�e
d
-LA—
T
�a
�a
-KON—0-01osoiaims an— n I—Od— 1111 ON S—OOssvaamsa 1— NO—S ©1H 1-00

301S311HMNOWV3S
::MS
■
VNIlO V3 H1ilON'3lilV-1V
1N3 WdOl3A3(3103SNtR11
doy 3AONE) NOSN34NV
...... . .....
<�.
f f I i ,' lip" is2
l
Z
z
U5
Q LO
pzz U
<<E
rc
C7oa
;m=
N
o
W�E
�
3
on
�o-;0
of
-KoN al 0-0losolaims an— nnano Od— 1111 oN S—OOssvaaaisail— NO—S ©lueia 00

301S311HMNOWV3S
-
..MS NN m
LL &
VNIIO VD H—N'3li V-GItl
1N3WdOl3A30103SNVH ¢w
LO
3AONE) NOSN34NV z v
w ¢O
rc oa
4a ��
sao vz
LL <a'
0_
04
z
W
2
z zz
J z
Q
m oo
(9 J�
W w
_ <
LL W w o w
w
0 w Z w �o
and LU
d
Q LU
z
z I
oW
o�
z
0
J
Q
W
J
LL
0
Na
a
CD
Q
F-
ez
oLU
z
C7
m J
� Q
w
LL
0
a
M
Q
z
w
z
c9
J
Q
-9— —0-0 3nN3nvn I—Od— 1111 ONi s3i OOSSva3ois3 1— NO—S ©iue1aw00

,@g2e#Now9�
z=:<=:
`
MS
\� \ \
»<':
»��.
I wow ! - :\
]a0Ne NOSN]aNv }\{};
\
-� o
\\
9\
\,
///\ƒ;\
\
)j
§
)
j :
} (}H M
LU
§
0
E
$
§
3
2i
z
\
R
0
co
)
G
z
LU
2
ƒ
#
0
}:n
B
R
0
E
)
§
§
ii
z
2
#
0
_
E
w !
§
�§
w
�
ƒ
a,

,@g2e#Now93
m m _
!
ms
; wow// !
\ 3a0Ne NOSN]aNV
........
=e_ ; )
w §
~` ƒ
))
,§
°I
>
§
)
— —
-
W
1
P
�
.
-
�
°ƒ
2 )
�■� � �
—
� � � � � � � � � �■■� I � t ■� .
!

moissi—dmal1— lnoHlimaso—d nmvaod oasn ao aam H nmv w oaonooadaa ae iom 7VHs smmnvao siHi oKom—O—HO l osoi aims an— Wil-Od-uu onuS—OOssvaamsa1—NO-S©1Heia 00

3(1IS3ilHMNOk4V3
VNIIOUVD H—N'—V-GIV
�H,--
MMS
IN 3WdOl3A3(3 103SNVHI
4 zo
3AONE) NOSN3(]Nv
< (0
oz 0
E■
0 0
...... . .....
I
-H
M-
z
0
LU
LU
z o
03
q—
o zzzp
ono o o
as
-9— —0-0 logo —ins --I—Od— 1111 ONI S—OOSS-1-1— NO—S ©-1-00

301S311HMNOWV3S
:: MS � N
LL &
tlNllOiltlDHlilON'3liltlW39ltl
N
s
1N3 WdOl3n3(3103SNt/211¢
J
:doy
3AONE) NOSN34Nv
3
o J& v
rc
�aa
S
3�M
N
1
J
7 p p
O [If
� U
a_ J
m m ,
e a
_ aas
yT
p
Y
m-- ----- - _ J----- ---
e
aa,e
o �
pus �a
aa,ttg3
ro�a�ti

301S311HMNOWV
mm
ms�
A
VNIIO VD H—N'3li V-GIV
s1N3WdOl3A30103SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
...... . <.,
o
>o M
zo
=zI
o rc zaa
i
0
w z
O
C7
�
Z
❑
i z
w
0
W
w
LL
W
w
li
o
W
J
I
o �
I
oO-ON 3 0-0logo—ins -- I—Od— 1111 ONI s— OOSS—GIG-W NO—S ©— 1-00

341$31IHMNOWV3S o vXnoavo H—N'au V-GIv
■ s fir, LN3WdOl3A30103SNVHI ■ m �¢ J
�MMS �mwa�maam =do 3/�021J NOS2134Nb' = v
z a
z
o pZ
z y ur o —
- XYYY eWK1s.: va Fm eg
r I
._� 0 9
n z w��g
M ...�iRNanfi.,
3025 3 3YOX00 �� 3a� _ Sd1Ntl __. � �
I I pW Yrwid Qz � ew �. wWi � �
w dg
O p3 w \
w a II�x�
s�
IF
00 A
w — � a
I �� b�
pp
w s
_
wa A w a o o ® ¢ h e zs a O } R Y (n
inw - 2 w
XXPS�
Hoo
TV
y �e o
n�;O.1LLn o�g i 3
- - Y�uF� a ewn Yxr
Ysure� •ewn vnnxoa
a a
m
� H
O
u m
K
W
� o
$ X �
Al
� E �
----III �
0
w
�
w
w
_ 5 9 a
m
,
2
33 q R
W
N O ua.S�a49
y5
all
tla s ffi gag s m �-.J o
s'
_d qg fat ag s a N
9 as tgx. a a s§ 3 sy
45
Q -- _
r > --J u
prig - iis e e t w z a
W ~ b
E
IR
O
'ON
i"3
00
NOltlSI—dN3wlwino l—Odd—Nd OA—nao—WHAN-1a—GO—d—ON —tl—d—Hi oO-ON3w0-0logo—ins -- I—Od-1111 ONltl3w OOSS—GIG wW NO-3 — 1-00 "

moissi-dmal1- lnoHlimaso-d nmvaod oasn ao aam H nmv w oaonooadaa ae iom 7VHs smmnvao siHi oKom-O-HO l osoi aims an- Wil-Od-uu onuS-OOssvaamsa1-NO-S©1Heia 00

301S311HMNOWV3S
E M MS
w �
_ �
o
.� <<�
doy
LL &
tlNllOiltl�HlilON'3liltlW39ltl
1N0103SNtR11
3WdOl3A3
o
3/�021J NOS2134Nb'
noon �
YW
moo
s
w
€_7
@
f 1
il
"�
�
3
s.
�
�...�
-. .- al: ..
�
6�P�Fa. �. �wz a��3 II '• l0
�ae a I
i-E'l
U
_
X-
i
Z�
-
O
Ko
S
'S
WE
r
n n
e �cs. 4 sa se
J
tr
L
L��IIWI�-6a wi
.e
w g.. .... 'W4 €
p
a
d
Jk.a•
'
a
0
0
- � �
!nw
I
NII
JS 1 a 9
A
III IIII �
Ia Ill lj S k S $
-I
�
a� T
6 e
- a F
i
-
tlp
.� i
L-I�• �
3
U5
IIII III - 3
i e
z
w0
ow
I s
y
z
K
w
z
w
U
ze
.�
E
i'
O:
U
N
- _.
ws
��
-
9
-
�°
¶ �p
11 e
Os
U�
-
m
°
s
I_
,
PU a
II
I
z
4a
JI- --
a
of
B3
w
LZ
lDi
molsslNdad Naiilanninoeilmasoeanenmvaoaoasnaoaamnvwnmvmloaonooaeaaaeiom7VHS mNnvaoslei oo9--0—Hologo—ins enmenvnvinoaoa— 1111 onu semlooSS-1s 1—mowvas©ieelawoo

30IS311HMNOk4V3
MMMS�
VNI10-3 H—N'—V-GIV
I 3WdOl3A3(3 103SNVHI
A N
..
3AONE) NOSN3(]NV
...... . ... I
o
z <
0
Z¢
0 o w
moll
II
monsoon
VO- ON —O—HO I ogoi ­ns —Wil—Od— 1111 ONI S—OOSS—GIS-W NO—S ©1H 1-00

,@g2e#Now9�
z=:<=:
»<':
»��.
I w o ! - :)
]a0Ne NOSN]aNv
®
G
\\
EMMS
\\\\\}
\....
\\/
N `
w` \
s >

17
I-
C)
301S311HMNOWV3S
::MS m �5 m
Q
z�
tlNllOiltlD H1ilON '3liltlW39ltl J LL
1N3WdOl3n30103SNVZA.L - a0
3AONE) NOSN34NVo
' X
_ , %' n"
o
Lo _
>�oo-.
-
m�
-o a
N
- - o --�
i_
a$a�a��oo�
ao
o
'o
-
�a=t
w
W E
a
o_n��r�;
�_
�-���
oo"
j;
-o�
a
0
0 0
0
-QoxoLL
o
w Qp
�a
_
3
LU
N w
_ -
Q
z
-
-
_-_- _
o
az w"o
d
s-
�z
w
- - w��zw�o
0o
T.
Fw
a
�
LU
w
F
wo�a Q>
�i
o
w
z
ZaZ s
lbw=
o
of
ru
o�
��
J
OL
Oyu
o
-
�p�� r�
d
LL�wQ�o
oMSE`az"`=a00000�
og
boa
off" o�
���
apr
a
-_
o�
w�
oo
o
o
o.
add ad
o
- l��
,A
i
J_
LL
No
%
d
CD
V A
2
CO
LLI

301S311HMNOWV3S
mmms
HUMM-
(D
W E w LL w p .4"
S LU
Z_ i `aQo
— oW
.3~
lo o_
, — H- 000 a �_
s:l,la
W
tlNllOiltl�HlilON'3liltlW39ltl
1N3 WdOl3n30103SNt/211
Q—
>0
eoy s
3AONE) NOSN34Nv
g�
FZ
.,
rc
Da
t,
Po
-0
0
-0 -.0
9
z
o
-0
-o
M
A !o
J
Fng
&
a
��wmwa�w
LLwn -
_
>
-oLL ;
r Wo
LAW
- LLoa�
�w
ooi
-
a�p�>_r -
og
=� ow
1-1
-
-
o� >>
�o
_
_o�ooa�
OE
-o
a
-
=�iaw�aaw���-- -
-off
�o
-
Lg- w �a'a
'o
'aF�
LLa�wo�`�' �- r
5a
-
-
a��
p
oQ
a
�wro
- o
- -
�o
o m
-
.w�-� _
_ a 0 o��r->
_o
Leg
>
a-_-_0
0_
0
oao
oe
>
o
w
___
w
a, »o
ON
--
��
I
—
E'L�133HS
335
I
Ib)�5`eb
I I
jM
Z'L�133HS
33S
tt9]
1
I
I
1
usss43
®,sec♦
A 13
,..»
6 I
pw
Pia
�
�
1
I.-H1 � 1
I/
I
va nv; o3
se�g3
vI
�e
i
1
1
N
U
l �
\
¢
F
LL a.
t
n
N 11 astl 33
o9HN3,l0—HOioso—ins3HN—I—Od-1111 HNIS—OOSSdN3o1S 1 NO—S©LH1-00

301S311HMNOWV3S
■■
EMM�
� � �
m
m m
o
��''"""""��
��
�' '
d
o
VNllOUVD H—N'3liV-GIV
1N0103SNVHI
3WdOl3A3
3/�021J NOS2134Nb' _
noo
JLL1
�
�o v
5<
N
W -(T�E
S
z
0 0
0
Z w z
W �
WLU
LL
d
z
}
oolo
ono o
=
o _
o �w� wo - -
o o-
-
=Q -
-=o o -
oo
j
-
-'>
- poop
=aQ"om s -
w-
a
o
o
o
oo
o<
-
_
�aw��� o
= Q
�o�o�o
'H ohm
LL��=ww a
-
���o'o
��aw.o
a
-
aow =
��w� m
28
o ^_
_ -
m =_=
o o�a�� - m
w
= a
a�ig� -
- oWpW�
oo�
-
_owo
o -
o�o
o
o-��oo�=wo
53 a 3
-
-
a
i
--��~z
_� a
- -
o
- --
o
o00 -- -oQ haw �a o
yoQj z
oW aoEo,�`d= o a
=`dWo
- off=
n�
aka
aka om
i
o,
woo�oo
w ww 3
3�
---o— z
a oyw wei �a w
�oQ p.�� a
o
-r `G,
o o
om H' H
a
�� i a� a
- -��
�� a�,wo�� LL�LL as a a
W
J
LL
O
a
x
m
x
U)
x
w
ra
VOLSLON —0-0logo—ins 3f1N-11OdOd— 1111 ONI S—OOSS—GIS-WN NO—S ©1H1-00

Sm � � ��''"" """�� �' '
_ �� iltl� H1ilON '3liltlW39ltl
3 01 S 31 I H M N O W V 3 tlNllO LL
1N3WdOl3n30103SNt/211 ap
>� I\
� � MS m `may s 3/�021J NOS2134Nb' � N ~a
�o
o � —
a" z
noon � �<
w z
Q 0
zw z
C7 ='
w LL w
J
LU
d}
w
z
J I
-w-
_
,
nF� .
W
LL
O
a
rn
LU � N
u E
a
CxH I
s
��3 =
n5 oss�s�. oi3i N
-KoN al 0-0 1osoi aims an— n I—Od— Iu oN S—OOssvaamsa 1— NO—S ©luela 00

301S311HMNOWV3S
m
m
����
rtl s
��c
d s
VNI10-3 H lilON'3lilV-1V
1N3WdOl3A30103SNtR11
3/�021J NOS2134Nb'
o
N
}�
~< v
■■ 0 �,
s�,,,.
°y
J
b
z
o
d
w
w
e
w
®o(Eltl
<
e ._
z
err
a %
/e s
<,
<s
(D
of
o
m
o�
N
(O
m a
Q
m
m
I �
-
ee
I
1 iCg
I O
v
o
m
p gns3m
o
a
Q g9q�
c o gp6E6 �
,
e
<
O
E i
�
o
_
Y
w
w
a8
w
v e, �c 3worvd ey 3e mns3er
-..�
yea
113 E ,9 ENV W 1SV93tld
h
4
n
t
D
_
- R
xu�
O
K
Grl �r=uU� u l 1
III tt
�.zl
,-
w
o
0
t m
�
I- a
\\ II o
I
- �`- a -
x
O
�
O
0
z
O
�,
--avcr___is%�!�'
a
a
H
➢0' C3jE}Y}�
_
U
_
0 5�s
<
�:
I III
K:
. $§
N
O
V
O
O
=5a s 'ee
-
e a`<---
p
^
11;01
iZ
OU
=
Q `��'
iZ
0
v
�w
e
-
w
o
4$
.g
w
w
�ry
—
w
w_
,r
i
T
—
2
z
<
<
�
% i
tl4
v-
�85z�z
w
<--
J
,
p
= o
�
w
<
b�Sy
@<:
m
NOISSl—d N3111ifM1f10Hl—Odi1f1d AN-0A0 ndO d—HANVN1—noodd-910N—S ON IMViIO- OO9--0-010501311f153f1N-11Od0d-1111 ONI S-10OSSV9 1-11HM NO—S©1HOIi1M00

301S311HMNOWV3S
..MS
o
81 1 0
ono I
I I U-3
U ° a
O °
\a �o
i I
w , awj
01,
wI<II
�
8 . 41 it
VNIlO V3 H1i IN l V-12ltl
1N3WdOl3n30103SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
H
-
Zz
z¢
0
m=
1
z
��
o
O I:z
o nz—
zWC)
Q
- Q W
I I o � zU)
U�3 �
o
O
w
�a
0
z m
Q
�wwa
mo O o0
o
wO�ma
o �
REE��ARo pR�owvotH
__�0 P
IL
&oA
LU
a4
a�
r��ymery
000i8
a
�oeSo
-
o
e
o
a d
m
w
w
dw 1
�Ow
8¢
oxo a
§N3m
-
�w
sw
=
o§
o
$o
lo
L
-9--0—N°1ogo—I°s3°N—I—Od-1111 °NIs3° OOSSdN G-ilI-NO-3 °N I-00
06
U

341S311HMNOWV3S=< vNnoavo NiaoN'a�avwaew �
■ ■ s fir, 1N3 WdOl3A301�3SNtR11 m za N
EMS
s 3AONE) NOSN34Nv °�~ v
N o
.....= a� Z�5
< w
Des
0 > /% >
� � 0
Z Z o
O
w Iii � � w
Z K �
Sp q
Q o
I n
'4
II
aw aw
z o w r
o�
W iI
al w
lA I
/ I o
e a ,
_ 5
aos y�- e ti aw
am=«=o
��«md,.00
Z
J w w
Rw\co VRE° w DjN�Rw °jN a
fo m �5 '\ 6o, pUB�C U 6C� eUgUCRw U
a
z zLu
Lu
a> `7 r aj.�
--. 0 Ojj \ 9 J o6 S.o
— l w
I w
Pua
§3m N
o, t
a.
z
w
In
a `s o 93 Q N
�o
Y a5
1 _ N d= _ a9a o _ sYa
NOISSI—d N311—in—lM3SO nd AN-Oi—n dO a3NNdw ANv NI 030000—die lON IvHS dN dG SIHi -K% N—O—H0I ogoi3 ns 3n—Wil—Od-1111 ONI S31-SSva G-ill—NO—S©1H I-00

301S311HMNOWV3S
..MS
NN m
r
p
1/
O
/9
x
I
1"k
�
y
U�3
011>
w
of .c
Q
GgRcRw\Ro pRDw\ID
66 v
/
.
j/
I
VNIIOUVD H-N'3lil-GIG
1N3WdOl3n30103SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
1
1
i
I
I
r
r
o
o
I
I
�._ Vao3
(M
00
U
w
�
o
z
'o
1
Q
K K
r
w z
z z
�
LL
o
r
wLLw
O
Qmo3
Y
J
LLB
d
�
LU
Z
i
�
J
S—OOss-1s 1- NO—S ©—Idl —

301S311HMNOWV3S
:: MS
m
ol
jW
1
ooz
0
III
Ila
�
=
moo
J
boo
�z
III
U�o
Om�
w
�l
z
o0
~Q 0<
o
�� ,o
o
0000z
o-o z�
—
I"
z
a
I
om5,
_oho
-
ood
o
w<
00
K Qi o_a
O
d —
OD
VNI10-3 H—N'3lil—GIG
1N3 M013n30 103 SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
w�
o
o=< U
a_�= rc
0
zinoa
w
LL
O
a
z
z
o�
z
(7
a
0
O
U
`O
cr
W z
QQ 00
0 0 �
zw z
W
U y y
LL1 LL w
q J
w
d
H
w
z_
VO-ON —O—HO I osoi3 ns 3n—Wil—Od— 1111 ONI S—OOSS—GIS-W NO—S ©1H 1-00

301S311HMNOWV3S
::MS
VNI10-3 H—N'3li V-GIV
1N3WdOl3A3(3103SNtR11
doy 3AONE) NOSN34NV
...... . .....
<�.
li
w
00 U?
z
FUZO 00
o❑�z U
rc
z�w
o
o
§:
=�o
S�o�Hm�p
Osp
a
a
o
za}oXo�Qa
o.
-
oy
F
oo66a--
��
0
w z
❑ 0
Q O
O O
O ❑ 7
Z z
—
w w
LU LL
J
w
LU
0_
L
W
Z
J
i
I
vO-ON —O HOI osoi aims an—Wil—Od— 1111 ONI S—OOssvaaOisalW NO—S ©lu 1-00

301S311HMNOWV3S
mmms
i
og
eg_4
do _
d
g�
d�
pR
e
r\
VNIIOUVD H—N'3li V-GItl
1N3WdOl3A3(3103SNVHI
.d m -
3AONE) NOSN34Nvo
�0o 06
U
z
—
—
0 � �
C7
oaHmNw�
w
Z i Z
W
=oo5p
w y
W LL w
z
O ao
J
o
w
d
apzoa
. ,.3aiw
a>oa�
Hw
W
z
cn a�raz�+6
Z I
og
F
zozo�m�o
�—wHSwoow
9od�o
ova
J
w M.
2\
V
i
i
1
og
�g
e�
�s
T`
��
em
e
0
U
Z
-9— —0—Ho l ogo—ins anmanv n I—Od— 1111 oN S—OOSS-1s 1— NO—S © ce 1-00

30IS3ilHMNOk4V3
mmms\� \ \ \}
E2
VNIIOUVD H-N'-V-GIV P.
LN3WdOl3A3(3 103SNVHI z
o
3AONE) NOSN3(]Nv
2 -
Ow
00 06
oo�z 0
o<o
00.
z�w
0
00
0
0
m
w
<
0
-0
w z Lu
O MM-
LU U: z w
t,
o
LU
LU
\
\\\\\}
z
o
o
o
r 1—
A
A

,@g2e#Now93
m m _
!
ms
wow � ! - :\
\ ` ]a0Ne NOSN]aNv \ //
Ow
2
- o
00.
j ) j
\
\
/
LU
.
\
\\\\\}o
�
z
ol
8.
\\ \:
\
�
.
\
`
z ` \ /}
,:
d�

30Ig2e#Now93
ME _
!
No MS
\�\\\}
wow C]// !
3a0Ne NOSN]aNV
\
ow
.. :
-)
}(}( /
Z)w
�
:
»&
!!
�
�,+
}
/
o
g z:
-
j ) j
�
\
\
/
LU
\\
\-M

M
),@g2e#Now9wwo! 17
\- );]a0Ne NOSN]aNV zwE \ ;� I
j
�
\
\
/
LU
\
\\\\\}
S

301S311HMNOWV3S
��m�
_
0 m
�N
��
eoy s
tlNllO iltl3 HlilON'3liltlW39ltl
1N3 WdOl3n301�3SNt/211
3/�O21J NOS2134Nb'�o
noon �
F J
ow
Zo
nIsre xOltlD abtlaxvls xo 35n bm
GOON ONtl `831tltl8 `3Wtltld
sAtlruisix io xo?SsntN
53'3vss3w atlo orvv Sl0eNAs
SONIMtltlwu1N3W3Atld
tlN—V31100 8 GUMONtl
tl31100 etl00 313tlON0I
d
4�
ew
A!
e
za
£
awe I e
»
6 e : _
«
a
w3
t
¢ xa
$
W
4 wa
�gwewwb:w w
-
(r.
7
-
-
NIBtlB XO1tl0 s313tlON00
S 1—
'0'N 'HO[3ltlb
oiiviuslx cars xb osl
VNIl00bv1 H1
tl31109 Ovv �. .��xt
dWtltl08tlN]
tl03 Dxixvt0 0 -
-
S135 o ONtl SUA1 3111
SSNI31UVW 1N3W3Atld
tl0d ONIMtlbO OtltlONtl15 AtlMOtlOb
o
a
a•
w5
i
4� —
eee
14
`w
s u.Wa^ya^y°°
o r
ET
I
o
r
'0'N 'iF.lt3ltltl
sndmxslx do xols[nIo
x0I1vtl1Ne0d5x11300'i
i0 31tli5 n
NIStle HO1tl0 ObtlONV15 NO 350 um
GOON ONtl `S31tltl8 3Wtltl!
s—o{d SNIMvtl0 0tlOs AtlMAtlOtl
m noiiv�i [io 3�s11�o�ieiN
NltlM30I8 313tlON00
sAtlNrail aos Hs[3lvs
tl0 rviOS, 1Id3
n� xlsoN
53NV1 Ntl01
88NI8tltlW 1N3!IAVd
=
f"Ntl1S
TIx
s
7 -Ti
1
e
w
J
��
�
,
rME
_.
,, In
a
s a
Mil
I a �
_ s
o
w
us
-
NOISSINd1dN3iil inOHilM3SOddnd ANVdOAo3snd0dgNMHANVNI0,onGOdd3d13 i0N7VHSONI dGSIHI OO9-3l101—logo—if153f1N-11Od0d— 1111 ONI S-00SSV9 G-ill—NO—S©1HOIi1M00

301S311HMNOWV3S
..MS NN m
VNIIO VD H—N'31i V-GItl
1N3M013AM 103SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
o
z
0¢
�M UW
noon � ZD
r
00
U
'3'N ' 9I31tln
S—HOIx d0 NOISIAIO 03SO13 3Ntl1 4-AtlMOVOtl A Z '3Ntl1-Z
NOI1tl1nO s—I d0 '1d30
tlN 10— H .Ox S3tlOSOl3 3NVl AtltltlOdW31 00
do 31v1s tlm 9NIMtlna ativaxvls Avmavon �
? o€
IILL l IIII
f s�
.5-
z"ss
34;
O a g
e c o owwtl : ,s
a
'3'N ' 9I31tltl
sAvmxOIH do rvoISIAIo
NOI1V1tlodSNtltl1 I1d30
tlNIlOtltl3 H1tlON
d0 31v1S
S3IlIlIOVd 030IAIONO AVM-OM1
tlOd SNSIS 9N INtltlM 30NtlA0V 3NOZ JItlOM
tl01 ONIMdtlO OtltlONtl15 AtlMOtlOtl
Fi`
pis ®§ I
16
if
�"-
yle
®I
ae
-
I
.1.1 'HOI3ltltl
SAV WF H 30 WMAIO
NOI1tl1HOds, d0 '1d30
—low, H1aoN
S13Sdd0 OMd S3dA1 3NI1
SONINUVW 1N3W3AVd
l0 3nls
tlo3 nNlmvtla ativaNvis Avmavou
• •
W of
4
``4 2
3�
3si
s
E
k
'O'N 'H9I3lNH
- �
C
SAVMIfJIH d0 x0I9IAI0
NOI1tl1tlOdSNtltl1 d0 '1d30
AIIO ^, H1ON
SONVISI 03JNItld k
- N
SSNoun LN3W3AVd CN
d0 31tl1S
tl03 ONIm awaw15 AV.O om -
d
b
L
a
=
H
� �
9
-
d"=
_
g
o ax �k
x g ae
-9— 3 0-0loso—iins 3nrv3nvn I—Od— 1111 ONi sal OOSSva3ois3 1— NO—S ©lH 1-00

301S3iIHMNOWV3S
..MS m
VNIIOUVD H—N'3li V-GIV
1N3WdOl3n30103SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
r---------------
L—_ —_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
t
� hI'
n �
r
I
I I
I I
I I
I
L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J
i
i
— — — — — — — — 1 — — — —
I
-9— e 0-0 logo —ins anmanv n I—Od— 1111 ONI S—OOSS-1s 1— NO—S ©ie 1-00

301S311HMNOWV3S
::MS
m m
o
o
w ao o�
y?ao
w o
OS
J
W
Z
io w
Uo
VNIIO VO HIUON'31i1 981V
1N3WdOl3n30103SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
N
W E
so
�_.
IN
/ 1
/ I 1
I
�.._
0
6 I.. -
Ln
�1111111 .• I_ ..' I
r
I
O _
, I
0
'a
J F
17
J
wl =51 ==on
a
-9— —0—HO l ogo—ins anmanv n I—Od— 1111 ONI S—OOSS-1s 1— NO—S ©ie 1-00

301S3iIHMN0WV3S
mmms
VNI10-3 HlilON'3lilV-1V
3
1143 WdOl3A30103SNtR11
eoy s 3AONE) NOSN34NV
� w
a N
z U
o J
— ZZ
0
000
o
So
e
N
W E
so
vO-ON —O—HO l osoi altos an—Wil—oalaw 1111 oN samioossvaaoisalW Nowvas ©1He1aed00

301S311HMNOWV3S
m
::MS o
o -
-
o o o.
o
03'
o
m
-
�� — y?w aoo� LL
ao w
OS J
I.
W
Z -
¢
B
�\
N
.H
wonv, �,.� Z
Z Q
W
(7_�ry
-
VNI10-3 H—N'3lil—GIG
1N3 M013n30 103 SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
N
W E
so
)
z U
o J
- o
Z
rr
s
z -
u
z
3as-- NO—S ©i�

301S311HMNOWV3S
..MS oo m
VNIlO V3 H1i IN l V-12ltl
1N3WdOl3n30103SNVHI
3AONE) NOSN34NV
� w
a
z U
o J
- oZ
e
=m
°HN
ao
ino
oho
},
new
Fla
noLLo
W=�o
~O
n�
30
�J
a -
=Qok
I I /
\
y'A �

30IS3ilHMNOk4V3
::MSo
�
VNIIOUVD H—N'—V-GIV
I 3WdOl3A3(3 103SNVHI
A N
3AONE) NOSN3(]NV
...... . ..... I
ZO
Z.<w
Owo
o
o
o
oU
o
:SN HH
w
oz-
So
ot,
�o
oo 5.
n
I
0
LU
LL
0
0
2
z
0
U)
0
z
F--
U)
x
LU
LU
co
LU
LU
[if
F--
M
wok
HA
HMOHn wH�H wo war
N ;H
U.
Hw-
N.
H
Mwo
�W-oo Hoozl
oll
HTMD HT
M
5—N 4
NOISSI—d N-1— in—l—S—nd INI— ,sn dO dl— ANV NI —nood— �9 iON 7VHS —dG SlHi
MWO-ow" ff
NO
LU
�-o
-,00 -o
�,o
o
o o.
�o
--o
Ro --o
T-
u
J;� .-0, 0
E0
-,o
-
>
�,o
Po - -o
?
R
" 0
L
0
',o om
01
D'o
D 'o
60<0
A I
o
mo3
o 1�
g
Hnrc NH
M
H
Mo
-o
Lu
10
LU
HUI
zPaz
0
-Mwoo
Lu
LU
M
o
ol,
U)
0
o
2 z
Z
Mw HUH
<
'n—,
wo
(I
-9-N —0—HOlogo—sins --I—Od— 1111 ONI S—OOSS-1-1— NO—S ©-1-00

� LaBeLLa
EXHIBIT 3
MAPS AND FIGURES

o£
J
p
•a
p Z
U
a
J
W MN
co
co
c
cu
a
w
a z� _
�
a= a
0)
1
J
• 17
I
l {j C 'C• 111 1
• .J � .tea `k �' � I n • ; �`.' �� � � �`
Y
r
I `�` _ti � �•� ,..�--��� � �¢ Y�,- �' , u L� � i� 1 � r � 1 � boa r �, `� ` �.. r�.S"

f[S
N
s
m
0
> U
Z
—a
Q}
c
=
a
C °
m
Q
o
MN
LLIcu
co
cu
a+
C V
z� w LL a
asp
3
s
J
LL
Z
u
J01110
tm$
❑� �amainatl MN-ioleap

�
o
�
Q}
c
U
a
co
Q
a
G
LLI M
(6
T
a+
O t C�
i
z�
m �o w
N
LL
at�a
G
mm
i
O
LL
m 5
Q U Q
ati a >
LL
w a °'
Q
LL
rn a
amgmN
W
z
�a®�
LL
HMN-1 0

$
§
!
E 0
�®
\
CL
k
2
e#
/\
\
oI/
`
)
_
c
w
co
\
k
2 f
�
(
k k
�
_
{§ )
<Z
/
z
< <
/

cn
_
:
E
)
2 >
\
(;3lo
\ )^-
\
co
/\\
w�
-� ee;
��
��
2 \
2
w \
c
<
`
°���`)§/
%
��
I
§%§`�^�°\
CU
\
®.
t
£ 3
�
>
2
< <
e=:�_-�oo
�cJ w :=::»±:z,
.
_:
§I
2®

p u >
fn p o m
z 0) >
^� Tp p Z a in o - o
p p �' O E "O E. E. w m m .tug.. d. _- N£ W N N
coE. E. m ai N m /y O ° i
CU
io
J p pt� 2 E m o
° f zza i J
a �U
? Q Qm E o m L -m o am o o
z °IIG0111 . �IIO ��� am
s via
1 J
e ..8 MN m—D

c
-
E
mm
2
> v
a
= 0
3
—
rye ?'
=
'
Q
Q
Q
0co
000
m m al m.1 -o E m a
n ny `� O
a o>
w z
L.LI
}(
(6
C�
E E > > m
a
o x
O` A
N U
L J
L23
/y
\L
/
+
V o
Q Q
E E A Q Q Q Q Q d N L
2— N B N 'T N O O O O O E O N +O-' O_ Q O N iyj
£ N
¢ 4-
V J
Z
—
di .
001 ®i i -
a�
am a
Ol-a Nay W 1-1-13

\
$
/
b
�§
�\
§
#
2
0
§§§
f } /}:
®�
/
/
«
\
�ƒ
I
c
\
«
-
oo£
w\
02E ~-
f\ -©`� eea/o<
§ :, :!/Z{{ §}\
d
-�;cam
��
��
\0
;[
&9
§
j)
�\
I
a�G
]G2 °
:;§�
\r®r2:EEE((}�k{\\f):
: 6
cu
L
}}}}\::I1:< j
/ `\/
\/
001 0
�
-11
/V �[(E5
\. .
.0
13

N
o
E
G
V
; U f
p Z
IC
N A "m6 T
w m
� N
�Gt
r
�o £
�,/^�
c
"
N
Vi C.
co
a
a
Q
a 0 (u
C
O O¢ a d 3
Y
Y Y� � E Y IQ
Q Q ; N
tl_
2 a o
a
VJ
-0
Q
ccn
�o
LJJ
O E z
i i �
B A N N Y U
E E (n � Y (n N iJ m
� .. � � in am o m CD in � � min � �
>>
o
o £ � N a
(6
�
Q'
a�
♦ eS (6
LL
ai
d
CU�
�E�Eam n n n nn`m�m��n+��LLm
2 0 0 0 0 0 E O N +O-' O_ O_ O N O_
''
_aJ�
(6
LL J
1_I
LLJ
IS
Ol-a Nay W 1-1-13

� LaBeLLa
PROTECTED SPECIES

LaBeRa
Powered by partnership.
February 20, 2024
USACE Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Branch
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, NC 28262
Re: Endangered Species Act Compliance Review
The Grove at Anderson Residential Development
La Bella Project No. 2234318
LaBella Associates has conducted a preliminary Threatened and Endangered Species Survey on behalf of
Holrak, LLC for the Grove at Anderson project. This letter is prepared to address the potential requests for
compliance with the Endangered Species Act prior to USACE approval.
We have included the following materials in support of this document:
• Exhibit 1: Threatened and Endangered Species Survey
• Exhibit 2: Schweinitz's Sunflower Potential Habitat Photos
Protect Location and Description
The project area contains 57 acres and is located at 127 Charter Street in Albemarle, North Carolina.
Current land use includes agricultural purposes and vacant forested land. A perennial stream flows north
through the middle of the project area. The project proposes the construction of a single-family residential
development, associated roadways and utilities, including electrical, stormwater, sewer, and water.
Federally Protected Species
According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPAC)
and North Carolina National Heritage Program (NCNHP), the Northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionolis), Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helionthus schweinitzii), and Bald Eagle (Halioeetus leucocepholus)
have potential to occur in the project area. Refer to Exhibit 1: Threatened and Endangered Species Survey.
Table 1. Federally Protected Species with On -Site Potential.
Common Name
Scientific Name
Federal
Habitat
Biological
Status
Present
Conclusion
May Affect -
Northern Long -Eared Bat
Myotis septentrionolis
E
Yes
Not Likely to
Adversely
Affect
May Affect -
Schweinitz's Sunflower
Helionthus schweinitzii
E
Yes
Not Likely to
Adversely
Affect
Bald Eagle
Halioeetus leucocepholus
BGEPA
No
No Effect
E- Endangered; BGEPA- Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
400 S Tryon Street, Suite 1300 I Charlotte, NC 28285 I p 704-376-6423
www.labellapc.com

0=3
Northern Long -Eared Bat
Habitat Description: Most of the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) occurrences in North Carolina are in the
western mountain region, with scattered occurrences in the coastal and Piedmont regions. During the
winter, NLEB hibernate in small crevices of caves or mines. During the other warmer months, NLEB will
roost underneath bark, in cavities or crevices of mature trees, living or dead. It is also possible, though less
likely, to find them roosting in structures, such as barns or sheds. NLEB use mature forested habitat to
forage.
Field Observations: Although the project area is within potential NLEB range, no suitable habitat was
observed during a site visit on January 27, 2022. The project area does not contain any caves or mines to
support winter hibernation. No dense stands of mature forest exist in this project area, and no cavities or
crevices were observed during the site visit.
Biological Conclusion: May Affect — Not Likely to Adversely Affect.
USFWS. 2023a. Northern Long -Eared Bat. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/species/northern-long-eared-
bat-myotis-septentrionalis. Accessed January 2023.
Schweinitz's Sunflower
Habitat Description: This perennial sunflower typically grows in areas with full to partial sun and poor soils.
This species prefers open, frequently disturbed areas typical of maintained roadsides and utility rights -of -
way.
Field Observations: During a site visit on January 27, 2022, suitable habitat was observed along the
roadsides and open field areas within the project area. At the request of USFWS, a second site visit to
survey the suitable habitat was conducted on August 22, 2022, during the optimal survey window for this
species. LaBella surveyed the suitable areas and did not observe any individuals of Schweinitz's Sunflower
during that time. Refer to Exhibit 2: Schweinitz's Sunflower Potential Habitat Photos. A review of the IPAC
and NCNHP databases showed no previously recorded populations of this species within the project area.
Biological Conclusion: May Affect — Not Likely to Adversely Affect.
USFWS. 2023b. Schweinitz's Sunflower. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/species/schweinitzs-sunflower-
helianthus-schweinitzii. Accessed January 2023.
Bald Eagle
Habitat Description: Bald Eagles nest near rivers, lakes, and marshes that provide ample foraging
opportunities. They build their nests in mature, stable trees that offer good vantage points.
Field Observations: The project area was surveyed for potential bald eagle habitat during a site visit on
January 27, 2022. The project area lacks the mature forest for bald eagles to nest. No bodies of water
suitable for foraging are located within the project area and no nests or active eagles were observed.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect —Suitable habitat is not present.
USFWS. 2023c. Bald Eagle. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/species/bald-eagle-haliaeetus-leucocephalus.
Accessed January 2023.

Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
LABELLA ASSOCIATES, D.P.C.
Eric Prunchak, PWS
Environmental Manager

� LaBeLLa
EXHIBIT
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES

LaBeLLa
Powered by partnership.
4/26/2022
Janet Mizzi
Unite States Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
Re: Online Project Review Request, Ryan Homes: The Grove at Anderson, Stanly County,
North Carolina, IPaC Consultation Code: 2022-0037386
We have reviewed the referenced project using the Asheville Field Office's online project review
process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We
completed our review on January 271, 2022 and are submitting our project review package in
accordance with the instructions for further review.
Our proposed action consists of: A 57-acre single family residential development. This
development includes single family homes, along with the associated roadways and electrical,
stormwater, sewer, and water utilities.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed map.
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species, critical habitat,
and bald eagles considered in our review, and the species conclusions table included in the
package identifies our determinations for the resources that may be affected by the project.
For additional information, please contact Eric Prunchak at [phone] or
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Eric Prunchak, Environmental Manager
Enclosures:
1) ENTIRE PROJECT REVIEW PACKAGE
400 S. Tyron St, Suite 1300 Charlotte, NC 28285 p 704-376-6423
www.labellapc.com

Q
cu
G
�� aTi
a Z
o'co
_ o£
- 0
a 0 N
o
W z
>
d m ai
v�i 2 E z�
___
cco
oi
M s
J
Lid
�= ( -
a
_
Ewa
w
=vim
a a
<��-
a __
0)IJ
LL
r'
z
J
a a
h
U
4
� "
L ti
4 (J.
44
- 9,y ilr9r{rJS 1
13 \
C P 00
aU Vd r
�: J �pCNO %T,. ..
a'
AY OH
eN
ella0.0
e`
0
N51JN57 -...
2'tr
7"
AVt
I
L IURAS LN
j
i
A — 'ay WSV 1-1-13

)�\/
{{
`
t$
Ft
}\ \
. 0
)!
a���
-
e
\®2/#
_]!«a
\\)
)/\\(
Ll m
CLA
E0-0
.0
rA22/
0 L

M
Lcc
r
U)
a
O
U)
t�
O
U
N
Q
N
U
Z
Cll
L
Cis
O
N
L
!_On
V
Cll
C—
H
N
cu
Z
U
N
O
o
O O a>
m
m
J 0
c
m m
U
o
c�
U
`o
c
V)
V)
m
m O
m
L O
v,
m
o
ro
o -2 15
Q
:3 E
Q
O
m
o .a>
Cis
C O m
E
N
'�
E
O
Q O
U
C
O
"C3
� C-
O N
N Q
(n (>B >
U
m c�
0 O U 0
(n
W
0
U E
CU N N
c
mQ
LL
U O
D
O
c
c
E
°'
to 0-U
LLLL E
U
0
L
"� (B U
O
'a
W
O
"C3
U
(U6
LL N
p �O•.
Z
O
LL U
U
=D Z
Z
N
—0.�
(B
.� C Q�
N v
_
Q
L Z
—
"O
L Z
Q
L
O U
M
m
E
� N
N (B
� U O
N O0 O N
mU>
E
N
E
U
O
O E
p N
E
�,
L U -0U
O
p
U
O p-
O N
C >.
�,
W-0
O
U
�,
W-
O
U
:2
0
O a_�.�
(�
N -a
O N
C
O a_O
N
C
O
U)
L
O O
U
(B
2� U N
O O 00 N
U
(B N
U
(B
N
OU O
Q C
L
Z `p
E 'V
O
O O .U0-2
Z `p
E 'V
O
Z `p
E
O
N p
N p
N
U C N
O U (B
N p
O
N p
Z
Q
F-z 5
F,. C
(n
Q to Q
a O
(n
Cn
N
>
N
>
5
-0
0)
0
O
O
U
an
O7
0
cu
U
U
U
�O
LU
2
0
U �
N
!E
N
N
L CQ
U=
0-
O
z
O
z
O
z
cl-
T
U U)N
Q N
U) 0-
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
Cl.
U
io
L
U
m
p
N
E
cB
0
Z
O
J
"'
N
N
N y
E
(B
U
O
W
Q Cis
FU
U) =
Z
(n
co

i htil I I, WV 4N.I I 11 'c
M1 7L\'LY'F
United States Department of the Interior �.
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
http://www.fws.p,ov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html
In Reply Refer To: April 29, 2022
Project Code: 2022-0037386
Project Name: The Grove at Anderson
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The enclosed species list
fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Please note that new species information can change your official species list. Under 50 CFR
402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list
should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends you visit the ECOS-IPaC website at
regular intervals during project planning and implementation to ensure your species list is
accurate or obtain an updated species list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A biological assessment (BA) or biological evaluation (BE) should be completed for your
project. A BA is required for major construction activities (or other undertakings having similar
physical impacts) considered to be Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c))
(NEPA). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a BE be
prepared to determine effects of the action and whether those effects may affect listed species
and/or designated critical habitat. E?ects of the action are all consequences to listed species or

04/29/2022
critical habitat that are caused by the proposed action, including the consequences of other
activities that are caused by the proposed action. A consequence is caused by the proposed action
if it is reasonably certain to occur and would not occur "but for" the proposed action..
Recommended contents of a BABE are described at 50 CFR 402.12. More information and
resources about project review and preparing a BABE can be found at the following web link:
https://www.fws. gov/office/asheville-ecological-services/asheville-field-office-online-review-
process-overview.
If a Federal agency determines listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected
by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR
402. The Service is not required to concur with "no effect" determinations from Federal action
agencies. If consultation is required, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed
species, proposed critical habitat, and at -risk species be addressed within the consultation. More
information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of
permit or licensed applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook"
at the following web link: https://www.fws.gov/media/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Act, there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project -
related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds,
including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12
and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). More information about MBTA and BGEPA can be found at the
following web link: https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds.
We appreciate your consideration of Federally listed species. The Service encourages Federal
agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species in their project planning
to further the purposes of the Act. Please contact our staff at 828-258-3939, if you have any
questions. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference the
Consultation Code which can be found in the header of this letter.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
• Migratory Birds
• Wetlands

04/29/2022
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

04/29/2022
VA
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0037386
Event Code: None
Project Name: The Grove at Anderson
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: Housing Development
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.3549188,-80.15516414117079,14z
rY�
ft
i'
Counties: Stanly County, North Carolina

04/29/2022
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 3 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Insects
NAME
STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
STATUS
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

04/29/2022
USFWS National Wildlife Refuge Lands And Fish
Hatcheries
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.

04/29/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS
Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location.
To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see
the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that
every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders
and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data
mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For
projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative
occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional
information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory
bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental 31
USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental 10
USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA

04/29/2022
NAME
BREEDING SEASON
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental Aug 31
USA and Alaska.
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( ')
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.

04/29/2022
3
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC
Prairie Warbler
++++ +—+— ++++ ++'+ -N-+4-+ 4-4-4-1-I--I--N
+ ++—+ — — — —
---+ —+—+ —+--
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
+'+, ', + + ++ + ++ $ ' '
+ + + + + + +
+ + --�—
++++ ,
"� '
+ —++—�
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird ++++ +—,— ++++,+++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++­+ — — — — ---+ —+—+ —+--
BCC-BCR
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide +++-{- +—+— +-I--{ I I I 1 +—+ ----- -•-----+ --,-I--+ �+—�
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoidinv--and-minimizinc-incidental-take-micratorv-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.

04/29/2022
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, bandim
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and

04/29/2022
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell

04/29/2022
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

04/29/2022
Wetlands
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
WETLAND INFORMATION WAS NOT AVAILABLE WHEN THIS SPECIES LIST WAS GENERATED.
PLEASE VISIT HTTPS://WWW.FWS.GOV/WETLANDS/DATA/MAPPER.HTML OR CONTACT THE FIELD
OFFICE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.

04/29/2022
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency:
LaBella Associates PC
Name:
Eric Prunchak
Address:
400 S Tryon St
Address Line 2:
#1300
City:
Charlotte
State:
NC
Zip:
28285
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
7043766423

Roy Cooper, Governor
■■EIN INC DEPARTMENT OF
E E
mono■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
E MEN
April 29, 2022
Eric Prunchak
La Bella Associates PC
400 S Tryon St
Charlotte, NC 28285
RE: The Gove at Anderson; 220546
Dear Eric Prunchak:
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Bu_llanan
Deputy Director, Natural heritage Program
041011 iUDTM1111i91i3
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
C]E'VA PImE+JT Qr' NAiu;:*nI- ANC.u1.'C1JPAL PESCLIPC_E'5
4P,1 I'ti l ti'.. I„h7l''-` i" iP�:� 1 I ..�"ill fdi f,!v14'"V. 1 I hl'rI'G:; G�1' i_I'(;I e f•i�. ,' rayik!}

le
\ CO
2
\
s
7a
\ / /
e
�
/
\
\
CO
3 ®
9
2
\
i
ts
}
= e
=
u
3 /{ CO
e \�
6
/
e
C3 g
- u.
s
0
2 «
CO «
®«
o =
CO
=
9 %{ 2
e
s
s
u
_
LLJ
\
\
(n
«
0
\
\
/
7z
\
CO
2
\
»
/
t
G}
E
3/
}
( \
/
\
E
» ®
Oco
\ 5
®=5
d
ze
3/
u
)
\
\ \
/
,\
ID\
e
c-
/a%
°3
/
e
4 //
7-0
9
O a c
»
%
\\\
3 _±
/
E\ e 2
2
x
\(/
u�
0
0) a) e a ƒ
0.
= s c a m
ƒ \
CO
/ \
\
©
y w § y o
9 \ ®2 /
/ \ \ \ \
9
9
$
2 \
_ > U Z
e
« } G\
\
\
2 2
c j&
© 0 /
/
w
y
±
/
t 00
%
%
u
e
/
4
\
°
CO>
a
CO
/
%
3
/
E e
§
Z
\ \ \
\
/
\
\
/ >
\
\
^
Cl
z
y
e 2
z
\
5 e
®
\
>
) ƒ
/{
/
CO
\:
CO0
z
?
4 2 2\
§
m E :
g
2
z E \
CO
\
\ / \
\
\
\
\ \
/
\
/
/
E
E
E
CO
CO6
\\
°
\
H
/
/
0
. \
s
\
z
/
CO+
_
e
=
©
/.g \
g
/
\
t
\ z
i
co
/\ e
3
t
g
t
m
%
\
\/
\ \
\
\
\ \
:\
\
C
° COcn
CO
n
\
E
D-
$ {
/g \
/
v
±
/°\2
/
\
\
`
( \ \
\ \
/
±
/
Zg/
\
CO
`®^
}E
%\
u
CO
CO
\
±
± y e
-0-
/ 2 \ %
6
6
\
\
\ \
COm%
-0/
e
E
e z s:
t a
CO
a
2
CO
e
//
e 2
e
\ a
> E
e
\\\ \\\
\
\
\\\\
\\
§
\
c

C
Q
i_
Q.�
v
a
r0n
V
CD
CQ
00
I—
Y--
i
2
U
z
Pi wal
^0 nty.
A
d �4beads
- A
H�
h�
Pond
]sea Alin"
a
�`cKzis
1
o
Ta
St
to
Q
M
4
'^ any fia�y
C
Smith St a a 2
C a w
IS uoISIU3 W
� E a
a ° Y
o a
� N 9th SY c I5 IIpM zt
�:
� o
�
M
O
M

� LaBeLLa
EXHIBIT ?
SCHWEINITZ'S SUNFLOWER POTENTIAL HABITAT PHOTOS

4-1
4—+
"
LL
••.
a. � Y.r;;
mod. w "�.:.
CD
,a
•_ .. .. 'fir 4�„°t
i
O
♦CD
WILI
}FTia
0
O
j
4!A
t0
cNi
N;
4-1
O
y
O
LL
+�
r
O
•�
cc
F
/
E
Y
00
4-1
m
4
(B
2
W
0
W
m
O
O
Q�

kip,
E-L
(-4
(14
1, 1.
+-j
o
I I
cNi
top
A
<
b
in
Co
SY
I AOX
,
cc
0O �
4f
(n
<
M§�73MMISIMEMEF-3
A
40
-Arlo
00
E

I
4-j
4-j
rr
4--
O
E
4-1
4-1
�cr,
O

� LaBeLLa
EXHIBIT F
Wetland Report

LaBella
Powered by partnership,
WETLAND AND STREAM DELINEATION REPORT
The Grove at Anderson
127 Charter St
Albemarle NC, 28001
LaBella Project No. 2220546
Prepared For: Ryan Homes
10710 Sikes PI #200
Charlotte, NC 28277
Scott Munday
704-815-3500
[e-mail]
Prepared By: LaBella Associates, D.P.C.
400 S Tryon St Suite 1300
Charlotte, North Carolina 28285
Date: July 2022
400 S Tryon Street, Suite 1300 Charlotte, NC 28285 p 704-376-6423

we
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................1
1.1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................1
1.2
PURPOSE.......................................................................................................................................1
n
MFTHOr--)OL_OCY
2.1
RESOURCES..................................................................................................................................1
2.2
JURISDICTIONAL AREA DELINEATION..........................................................................................2
3.0
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND RESOURCES............................................................................'
3.1
PHYSIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................................2
3.2
SOILS.............................................................................................................................................2
3.3
HYDROLOGY..................................................................................................................................3
4.0
�ESULTS............................................................................................................................................3
4.1
UPLANDS.......................................................................................................................................4
5.0
CONCLUSIONS..................................................................................................................................4
6.0
SIGNATURE OF WETLAND PROFESSIONALS...................................................................................5
7.0
REFERENCES....................................................................................................................................6

e
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1. SOIL MAP UNITS WITHIN THE STUDY AREA
TABLE 2. DELINEATED WETLANDS ..............................
TABLE 3. DELINEATED STREAMS ................................
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIXA- FIGURES
FIGURE 1 - WETLAND AND STREAM DELINEATION OVERVIEW
FIGURE 2 - WETLAND AND STREAM DELINEATION SURVEY
FIGURE 3 - USGS SITE LOCATION
APPENDIX B
- DATA FORMS
APPENDIX C -
PHOTOLOG
APPENDIX D
- NRCS SOIL/HYDRIC SOIL MAP
APPENDIX E -
NWI MAP
APPENDIX F -
FEMA FIRMETTE
APPENDIX
- JD REQUEST FORM
►a
.3
El

1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Ryan Homes (Client) retained LaBella Associates, D.P.C. (LaBella) to perform a wetland and stream
delineation for the Grove at Anderson (the Project). For the purposes of the wetland and stream
delineation, the Project Study Area is defined as an approximately 57-acre area in Albemarle, Stanly
County, North Carolina consistingof tax parcels #655804544617, 655802563026, 655802652437
at 127 Charter St Albemarle NC, 28001. Please refer to Appendix A, Figure 3 for the Study Area location
and boundary. The geographic coordinates of the approximate Study Area center are: 35.354562, -
80.156606 (NAD83). Wetland and stream delineation field work was performed on January 27 2022.
1.2 PURPOSE
This report was prepared for the purpose of obtaining concurrence from the United States Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE)-Wilmington District and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ) Mooresville Region on jurisdictional wetland and stream boundaries within the Study Area,
in support of the Project. Specific tasks performed for this report include a field delineation of Federal
Waters of the United States (WOUS) encompassing wetlands and streams, NCDEQ Section 401
wetlands and streams, a survey of jurisdictional water boundaries, and a detailed description of the
delineated waters based on hydrology, vegetation, and soils information collected in the field.
This report describes the results of the delineation and data collection efforts performed by LaBella,
and a description of the wetlands and streams that were delineated. This document is intended to
provide the information required to support a Jurisdictional Determination with the USACE-Wilmington
District, a NCDEQ section 401 stream determination, or a Joint Permit Application if regulatory permit
authorizations are required.
METHODOLOGY
2.1 RESOURCES
Materials and literature supporting this investigation are derived from a number of sources, including:
United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangles; United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) 2022 Stanly
County, North Carolina Soil Survey (USDA-NRCS, 2022); USDA-NRCS Soil Map Unit shapefiles; USDA-
NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA-NRCS, 2018); Munsell Soil Color
Charts (Kollmorgen Corporation, 1988); Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) digital Flood
Hazard data; United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI)
shapefiles; North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Online GIS (NCDEQ) shapefiles.
Vascular plant names follow nomenclature found in the USDA PLANTS database (USDA, 2019).
Wetland indicator status for vegetative species was determined by reference to the National Wetland
Plant List (Lichvar et al., 2018). Jurisdictional features are characterized accordingto the NWI mapped
wetlands and deepwater habitat classification system (Cowardin, 1979).
-1-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
The Grove at Anderson
LaBella Project No. 2220546

2.2 JURISDICTIONAL AREA DELINEATION
La Bella field staff performed the wetland and stream delineation within the Study Area on January 27
2022, in accordance with the methods presented in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987), as supplemented by the Regional Supplement to the Corps
of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Supplement, Version 2.0
(USACE, 2012).
Wetland and stream boundaries were defined in the field with sequentially -numbered pink surveyor's
flagging or pink pin flags. Each flag was digitally recorded using a sub -foot Global Positioning System
unit. Data and observations were collected from both wetland and upland data points within the Study
Area. These data points were recorded on routine USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms
(Appendix B).
Representative photographs were taken of the data point locations, delineated wetlands, and streams
within the Study Area (Appendix C).
The USACE has jurisdiction of WOUS under section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (40 Code of
Federal Regulations [CFR] 230) (CFR, 2010).
The North Carolina Administrative Code Section 15A, Subchapter 02B (15A NCAC 02B) sets water
quality standards and gives NCDEQ jurisdiction over perennial and intermittent streams, and their
associated riparian buffers. 15A NCAC 02B also gives NCDEQ jurisdiction over USACE non -
jurisdictional isolated wetlands, in addition to USACE jurisdictional wetlands.
?HYSICAI_ CHARACTERISTICS AND RESOURCES
3.1 PHYSIOGRAPHY
The Project is located in the Northeastern Forage and Forest Region (LRR P), Southern Piedmont
(MLRA 136). The Study Area topography consists of a stream valley with cleared agricultural plateau
to the northwest and southeast. Land cover within the Study Area consists of Forests and agriculture.
Elevations within the Study Area range from approximately 530 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) to
approximately 560 feet AMSL.
3.2 SOILS
The Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, NRCS Web Soil Survey indicates there are 4 soil map units
within the Project Study Area, as outlined in Table 1.
Table 1. Soil Map units within the Study Area
NRCS Soil Map Unit
Map Unit
Symbol
Drainage Class
Hydric
Soil?
Hydric
Rating
(°y.)
Badin channery silt loam, 2 to
BaB
Well drained
No
0
8 percent slopes
-2-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
The Grove at Anderson
La Bella Project No. 2220546

Badin channery silt
BaD
loam, 8 to 15 percent
Well Drained
No
0
slopes
Kirksey silt loam, 0 to 6
KkB
Well Drained
No
0
percent slopes
Oakboro silt loam, 0 to 2
Somewhat
percent slopes,
OaA
Poorly Drained
Yes
4
frequently flooded
Source: USDA, NRCS, 1996; Soil Survey Staff, 2022
The Hydric Soil ratings outlined in Table 1 and the Web Soil Survey map provided in Appendix D,
indicate there is 1 soil map unit that contains hydric components. Oakboro silt loam has a hydric rating
of 4 and is somewhat poorly drained.
3.3 HYDROLOGY
The Study Area is located in the Upper Pee Dee watershed (USGS Hydrologic Unit code 03040104).
The project source of surface hydrology for the study area is precipitation that flows into the valley and
feeds system A. The City of Newell receives an average of 47 inches of precipitation annually (NRCC,
2020).
4.0 RESULTS
La Bella field staff delineated three Palustrine Emergent wetlands (PEM), one Palustrine
Unconsolidated Bottom wetland, and one Perennial stream (R3), four Intermittent streams (R4) and
two Ephemeral streams (EPH) within the Study Area (See Appendix A, Figures 1 and 2). Tables 2 and
3 provide areas and classifications of the delineated wetlands. The remainder of the Study Area is
considered to be upland agricultural habitat. These habitats lack wetland hydrology and hydric soils.
Table 2. Delineated Wetlands
Wetland ID
Cowardin
Acreage On -site
Latitude, Longitude
Jurisdiction
Classification
(NAD83)
Pond B
PuB
0.24
35.357325,-80.154112
USACE,
NCDEQ
Wetland D
PEM
0.03
35.354665,-80.153644
USACE,
NCDEQ
Wetland E
PEM
0.16
35.354239,-80.154086
USACE,
NCDEQ
Wetland F
PEM
0.14
35.352900,-80.153463
USACE,
NCDEQ
-3-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
The Grove at Anderson
La Bella Project No. 2220546

Table 3. Delineated Streams
Stream Name
Cowardin
Approximate Stream
Jurisdiction
Classification
Length within Study
Area (If)
Stream A
Perennial
2,640
USACE,
NCDEQ
Stream Ab
Intermittent
320
USACE,
NCDEQ
Stream Ac
Ephemeral
149
USACE
Intermittent
221
USACE,
NCDEQ
Stream Af
Intermittent
550
USACE,
NCDEQ
Stream Ag
Ephemeral
40
USACE
Stream C
Intermittent
200
USACE,
NCDEQ
4.1 UPLANDS
Uplands were dominated by cleared agricultural fields of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) with wind
breaks of eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) and white oak (Quercus alba). Data Forms, provided
in Appendix B, summarize the observed conditions adequate to characterize all uplands and wetlands
within the Study Area.
La Bella field staff delineated three Palustrine Emergent wetlands (PEM), one Palustrine
Unconsolidated Bottom wetland, and one Perennial stream (R3), four Intermittent streams (R4) and
two Ephemeral streams (EPH) within the Study Area. These systems totaled 0.53 acres of wetland and
4,540 linear feet of steams. All systems drain to the center of the study area and feed system A.
All systems detailed in tables 2 and 3 are considered to be jurisdictional Waters of the United States
(WOUS) under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Any Project -related filling or disturbances within the
delineated boundaries of these systems (as approved by the USACE and NCDEQ) will require Federal
CWA Section 404 authorization through the USACE. In addition, such activities would also require a
CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the NCDEQ. Both authorizations may be obtained
through the Joint Permit Application process.
All jurisdictional boundaries are subject to verification by the USACE-Wilmington District and/or the
NCDEQ - Mooresville region, under their respective jurisdictions
-4-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
The Grove at Anderson
La Bella Project No. 2220546

n SIGNAT"RE WETLAND PROFESSIONAL>
We appreciate the opportunity to serve your professional environmental needs. If you have any
questions please do not hesitate to contact Eric Prunchak at 703-975-9718.
Report Prepared By:
G rp�-,
--
Eric Prunchak
Wetlands Ecologist
-5-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
The Grove at Anderson
La Bella Project No. 2220546

CFR. 2010. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40: Protection of the Environment, Part 230: Section
404 (b) (1) Guidelines for Specification of Disposal Sites for Dredged or Fill Material. United
States Army Corps of Engineers.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Goblet and E.T. LaRoae. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, OBS-79/31,
Washington, D.C.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report
Y-87-1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Waterways Experiment Station; Vicksburg, MS.
Kollmorgen Corporation. 1988. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Macbeth Division of Kollmorgen
Corporation, Baltimore, MD.
Lichvar, R.W., M. Butterwick, N.C. Melvin, and W.N. Kirchner. 2018. The National Wetland Plant List:
2018 Wetland Ratings. Phytoneuron 2014-41: 1-42. Available at: http://wetland-
plants.usace.army.mil/nwpl_static/index.htm I
NRCC. 2020. Northeast Regional Climate Center, National Oceanic Applied Climate Information
System Annual Climate Data. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Cornell
University, Ithaca, NY. Available at: http://agacis.rcc-acis.org/ Accessed September, 2019.
NCAC. 2018. North Carolina Administrative Code, Capter 15A: Department of Environmental Quality,
Subchapter 0213: Surface Water and Wetland Standards.
NCDEQ. 2021. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Online GIS. North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh, NC. Available at:
https://data-ncdenr.opendata.arcgis.com/
Soil Survey Staff. 2019. Web Soil Survey. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource
Conservation Service. Available at:
https://websoilsurvey.sc.eF-Fov.usda.F-Fov/App/HomePaF-re.htm
USACE. 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern
Mountain and Piedmont (Version 2.0). Technical Report TR-12-1. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers: Engineering Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.
USDA. 2022. The PLANTS database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC. Available at:
http://plants.usda.gov/.
USDA-NRCS. 2022. Soil Survey of Stanly County, North Carolina. United States Department of
Agriculture Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with Cornell University Agricultural
Experiment Station, Washington, D.C.
-6-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
The Grove at Anderson
La Bella Project No. 2220546

USDA-NRCS. 2018. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 8.2. L. M. Vasilas, G.
W. Hurt, and J. F. Berkowitz (eds.). USDA, NRCS in cooperation with the National Technical
Committee for Hydric Soils.
-7-
Wetland and Stream Delineation Report
The Grove at Anderson
La Bella Project No. 2220546

� LaBeLLa
APPENDIX A
FIGURES

cn
m
£
J
Q
y:
% 'a Z M
6
m
N
`o £
Q
cu
TA0 u4
co
co
-
LU
o0
T
cu a
in i C f
>A
o
•%
J
a N
y N
Q U QLL
Z
wnon
�01
N a �a
d3:la -6 WStl:lo1-3

cu >
Jcn
f6
N U
o w `m
c=
i
OG
o
cl UO U
ail
=LU
nN
NO
mM_
_o a
cu T
�
IC
� ��
Uamm`C
d�
�N
o�� ma X"aw
�
♦♦_e�S
f6�
o
m o `m n o nm oo
>
QUQ
m E m o
y in o c� w a a _ w z ow a� in
J 0�
i
,.
"Ila,

cn
cu >
c
C
V
O
W
G §
,iny u�
N a
+y+ y
N
coW
_
i
O
co
a p m o
O w C w - m
e-
N
-_ -
fliLU
N
O z-
T
CCo
Q:
C ICz�
rr V
i
m N `� `� o Ua O E
N N Y (n U Z Y N
"6 U O
= `
3
c
M d °E
N (0 (0
B
y
o
C
/�tE
Q
E? ma X
n o .� Q o
=
>
Q
o o
y in o c� w a a w z ow a��£�
a
EJ
w+r
�.�MEW
GRPJE
w x LL
' R
yr. E[EZy
��.LrJ ... ..
Mul
( x„
a
0
a] -d wsv�oiea-�

cn
£
cu
a
�' c
o�Z
co?a
Nc
_ �£
M o
_
cu
� a�i
c�� z-
cu
T
cu c
E
c
d
� ID
c V
a�£t_
m
LL J
Z
a Q
J
T!
y
`
l
`r
1 �!
r C
Zom
F
L
�
2.
4.
`..
-
13
t
obi
g?
000
<' PANE) 5
U
.�qY OH
SrppLln.
` •-
Q�o-�-
o
ell
,tirC
2,1r
� M
�ec�rvaat),,vc
i
'
t
' -
^� �`
'
✓ iAURAS LN �
r
-
_ -
A — 'ay WSV 1-1-13

L LaBella
CwmJ Powkerea by partnersillp.
APPENDIX B
Data Forms

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Grove at Aderson
City/County:
Albemarle/Stanley Date: 1/27/2022
Applicant/Owner:
NVR, Inc.
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP 2
Section, Township,
Investigator(s):
Eric Prunchak
Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
Local relief (conc-,
etc.):
Floodplain
one):
Concave Slope (%): 0-5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
MLRA 136 of LRR P
Let:
35.354664 Long:-80.153635 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name:
OaA- Oakville Loamy Fine Sand
NWI Classification: PEM
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation
No , soil No , or hydrology
No significantly disturbed?
Are "Normal Circumstances present?) Yes X No
Are vegetation
No , soil No , or hydrology
No naturally problematic?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Hvdrologv
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
X Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (Inches): 0.5
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (Inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (Inches): 0
Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP 2
Loudoun County, VA
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot size:
) % Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
1 Quercus palustris
60
Y
FACW
2
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
All Strata: 3 (B)
4
5
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
7
60
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
OBL Species 15 x1= 15
1
FACW Species 80 x2= 160
2
FAC Species 0 x3= 0
3
FACU Species 0 x4= 0
Wei
UPI -Species 0 x5= 0
5
Column Totals: 95 (A) 175 (B)
6
7
Prevalence Index =B/A= 1.84
0
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
Dominance Test is > 50%
2
Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in
4
Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
6
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
7
unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
0 =Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Carex Lurida
15
Y
OBL
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Juncus effusus
15
Y
FACW
breast height (DBH).
3 Andropogon glomeratus
5
N
FACW
4
5
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
6
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
7
8
9
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
10
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
11
12
35
=Total Cover
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
1
2
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
3
4
5
Hydrophytic Yes X No
0
=Total Cover
Vegetation Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
Y Color (Moist) Y Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 7/4
90% 10YR 7/8 10% C M
Sandy Loam
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
X Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? yes X No
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Grove at Aderson
City/County:
Albemarle/Stanley Date: 1/27/2022
Applicant/Owner:
NVR, Inc.
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP 3
Section, Township,
Investigator(s):
Eric Prunchak
Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
Local relief (conc-,
etc.):
Terrace
one):
Concave Slope (%): 5-8%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
MLRA 136 of LRR P
Let:
35.354244 Long:-80.154082 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name:
OaA- Oakville Loamy Fine Sand
NWI Classification: PEM
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation
No , soil No , or hydrology
No significantly disturbed?
Are "Normal Circumstances present?) Yes X No
Are vegetation
No , soil No , or hydrology
No naturally problematic?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Hvdrologv
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No X
Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (Inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (Inches): 5
Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

✓EGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP 3
Loudoun County, VA
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot size:
) % Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
1
2
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
All Strata: 5 (B)
4
5
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
FACW, or FAC: 80% (A/B)
7
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
OBL Species 0 x1= 0
1 Liquidambarstyraciflua
35
Y
FAC
FACW Species 45 x2= 90
2
FAC Species 55 x3= 165
3
FACU Species 25 x4= 100
UPI -Species 0 x5= 0
5
Column Totals: 125 (A) 355 (B)
6
7
Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.84
35
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
Dominance Test is > 50%
2
Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in
4
Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
6
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
7
unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
0 =Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Juncus Effusus
25
Y
FACW
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Eupatorium capillifolium
25
Y
FACU
breast height (DBH).
3 Centella erecta
20
Y
FACW
4 Rubus pensilvanicus
20
Y
FAC
5
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
6
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
7
8
9
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
10
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
11
12
90
=Total Cover
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
1
2
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
3
4
5
Hydrophytic Yes X No
0
=Total Cover
Vegetation Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist) Y Color (Moist) Y Type' Loc' Texture
0-4 10YR 3/2 100% Sandy Clay Loam
4-12 10YR 3/2 90% SYR 5/8 10% C M Sandy Clay Loam
Sampling Point: DP-3
Remarks
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
' Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
X Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? yes X No
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Grove at Aderson
City/County:
Albemarle/Stanley Date: 1/27/2022
Applicant/Owner:
NVR, Inc.
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP 4
Section, Township,
Investigator(s):
Eric Prunchak
Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
Local relief (conc-,
etc.):
Plateu
one):
Concave Slope (%): 0-5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
MLRA 136 of LRR P
Let:
35.3529 Long:-80.153463 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name:
BaB - Barnstable Sandy Loam
NWI Classification: PEM
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation
No , soil No , or hydrology
No significantly disturbed?
Are "Normal Circumstances present?) Yes X No
Are vegetation
No , soil No , or hydrology
No naturally problematic?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Hvdrologv
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
X
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
X
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
X
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
X
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (Inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (Inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (Inches): 0
Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

IEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP a
Loudoun County, VA
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot size:
) % Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
1
2
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
All Strata: 3 (B)
4
5
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
7
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
OBL Species 40 x1= 40
1 Liquidambarstyraciflua
10
Y
FAC
FACW Species 60 x2= 120
2
FAC Species 10 x3= 30
3
FACU Species 0 x4= 0
UPI -Species 0 x5= 0
5
Column Totals: 110 (A) 190 (B)
6
7
Prevalence Index =B/A= 1.73
10
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
Dominance Test is > 50%
2
Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in
4
Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
6
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
7
unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
0 =Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Juncus effusus
60
Y
FACW
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Carex lurida
25
Y
OBL
breast height (DBH).
3 Leersia oryzoides
15
N
OBL
4
5
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
6
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
7
8
9
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
10
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
11
12
100
=Total Cover
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
1
2
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
3
4
5
Hydrophytic Yes X No
0
=Total Cover
Vegetation Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
Y Color (Moist) Y Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 4/6
100%
Muck Augar Refusal Past 2 inches
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
X Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
X Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? yes X No
Remarks:
Soil was too mucky and loose to be sampled past the surface.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Grove at Aderson
City/County:
Albemarle/Stanley Date: 1/27/2022
Applicant/Owner:
NVR, Inc.
State: NC
Sampling Point: DIPS
Section, Township,
Investigator(s):
Eric Prunchak
Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
Local relief (conc—,
etc.):
Plateunone):
Convex Slope (%): 5-8%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
MLRA 136 of LRR P
Let:
35.354562 Long:-80.156606 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name:
BaB - Barnstable Sandy Loam
NWI Classification: UP
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation
Yes , soil Yes , or hydrology
No significantly disturbed?
Are "Normal Circumstances present?) Yes No X
Are vegetation
No , soil No , or hydrology
No naturally problematic?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Site is mowed and maintained hay field with turned over soil.
Hvdrologv
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No X
Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (Inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (Inches):
Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

:GETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP S
Loudoun County, VA
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot size:
) % Cover Species? Status
FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
1
2
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
All Strata: 1 (B)
4
5
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
FACW, or FAC: 0% (A/B)
7
0 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
OBL Species 0 x1= 0
1
FACW Species 0 x2= 0
2
FAC Species 0 x3= 0
3
FACU Species 95 x4= 380
UPI -Species 0 x5= 0
5
Column Totals: 95 (A) 380 (B)
6
7
Prevalence Index =B/A= 4.00
0 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
Dominance Test is > 50%
2
Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in
4
Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
6
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
7
unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
0 =Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1
95 Y FACU
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2
breast height (DBH).
3
4
5
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
6
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
7
8
9
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
10
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
11
12
95 =Total Cover
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
1
2
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
3
4
5
Hydrophytic Yes No X
0 =Total Cover
Vegetation Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
Y Color (Moist) Y Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 4/4
100%
Sandy Clay Loam
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? yes No X
Remarks:
Soil has been turned over.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Grove at Aderson
City/County:
Albemarle/Stanley Date: 1/27/2022
Applicant/Owner:
NVR, Inc.
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP 6
Section, Township,
Investigator(s):
Eric Prunchak
Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
Local relief (conc-,
etc.):
Plateunone):
Convex Slope (%): 5-8%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
MLRA 136 of LRR P
Let:
35.356767 Long:-80.154503 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name:
BaB - Barnstable Sandy Loam
NWI Classification: UP
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation
Yes , soil Yes , or hydrology
No significantly disturbed?
Are "Normal Circumstances present?) Yes No X
Are vegetation
No , soil No , or hydrology
No naturally problematic?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Site is mowed and maintained hay field with turned over soil.
Hvdrologv
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (135)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No X
Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (Inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (Inches):
Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

:GETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP 6
Loudoun County, VA
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot size:
) % Cover Species? Status
FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
1
2
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
All Strata: 1 (B)
4
5
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
FACW, or FAC: 0% (A/B)
7
0 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
OBL Species 0 x1= 0
1
FACW Species 0 x2= 0
2
FAC Species 0 x3= 0
3
FACU Species 95 x4= 380
UPI -Species 0 x5= 0
5
Column Totals: 95 (A) 380 (B)
6
7
Prevalence Index =B/A= 4.00
0 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
Dominance Test is > 50%
2
Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in
4
Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
6
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
7
unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
0 =Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Schedonorus arundinaceus
95 Y FACU
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2
breast height (DBH).
3
4
5
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
6
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
7
8
9
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
10
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
11
12
95 =Total Cover
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size:
)
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
1
2
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
3
4
5
Hydrophytic Yes No X
0 =Total Cover
Vegetation Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
Y Color (Moist) Y Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 4/4
100%
Sandy Clay Loam
' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? yes No X
Remarks:
Soil has been turned over.

� LaBeLLa
APPENDIX C
Photo Log

E
O
Cl)
Q
_0
�
Q
�G
m CN
> CO
O
0 r,�
Q
_
qcc
o C)
ef,
%
O E
0
m
�
. 2
� 0
E 0
(a
m =
co C)
-0/�
@ 3
! —
row
\�\:
�
4-1
_
O
Cf)
two
E
.\
E
LL
�
E
E
/
Cf)
�
./
E
/
O
�
0
W
E
w
�
E
O
E
L LL
m
_0
E
O
0-

1' 744
lilt
I.
n.;Tk

O
O
Q
(U N
N (14
> O
O N
N
H cc
U) (B
1
O U
� Z
cc
O
f1
N Q
O cc
® o
E
(c i
a
U U
0 >O
� p
cc (D

LaBeLLa
APPENDIX
NRCS Soil/Hydric Soil Map

N
576500 576600
35o 21' 31" N
9
� ✓fib �..
.d
H
93
R
93
Soil Map—Stanly County, North Carolina
(The Grove at Anderson) In
576700 576800 576900 577000
35o 21' 31" N
lot
njr'
r
ER �4�J.�d'r � Y
v / p
L_JGLJ
t
o ;'p r
o D a 8
35o 21'4"N '---7-
576500 576600 576700 576800 576900 577000
m
Map Scale: 1:4,000 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
$ Meters N
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 150 300 E00 900
Map projection: Web Mercator Conermordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: lfrM Zone 17N WGS84
t!sl)n Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
4
8
35o 21' 4" N
in
4/21/2022
Page 1 of 3

Z
O
O
LL
Z
Ca
G
0
Z
W
W
J
a
O O
U)
m
O
U
a)
U
UU) U)
O-
(6
U)
O
C 0
O L
6CL
�_
7
U) O
�_ O
m
E
.N 3 E
Nw�
-
fU)
O
N
E
Y)m
U
o
U
O
C
LO
O N N 7
a) m U) cr
U
(n
m
C00
E
U
fOA m O
a) U)
s
a)
O
N
O
a)
U)
a) C7
U)
-o
Z
O O
U
UU))
U E U) 'O
Q
m
U
c a
a) o m
a) U) m
Q
N
3:
o
-o
a)
o >
s a)
E
U w
m m 2
(n
c�
m
N m m
U
N
t0
m
O �N
O
Z O
a)
O-
m
0-ate
O
N
o
E
3 U
>' a) U
O
E a)
c,
N
U)
O
E m
0
aa)
L� '� a) m
o
U
o
a) m E a)
U
N a)
U) a) CL
'0
'6 O
� ,o
N
N
E N C
U)
>
+�- J
m�
O Q .- 0
(n U)
c
n
U
N
U)
7
t O O
N
a)
Z E
-0 2Q 8
m o m o
a)
a)
m
m
a)
MO)
o 0�
:L---0
-O
m
O O) T
C y
O_ N j,
N m m 7
,U)
C
N Q
U) (60
O 'O m Q
-0O
m
>'
u 3 U
:5 �� m�
U .o
Q m
-
0
m
s 0� E
E
cn -
O
E m 3 U
D O a) a) O
7 to
O O
Q
7
O- O
N
m 00
o m
0 -6 O
fOA U)
O O
U U) -6
U) U O
>
O- a)
(n N
m O
E O
y 0
N
0 .Q a) C
m m
a) a)
7 0
O a) O
O-.� 6 O U
m O U)
U)
L
—
O 7
— O
O N
m
a) E m s
FL E
U U
U
2 o- =0 Q m
H o
U U
U
m
H U .E
y
�
y
Q
4
Li
O
U
R
L
L
O-
Q
>.
a)
2
y
a
-yo
O
L
d
Q
0 0
CL
U)
J
m
N
E
m
y
0
O
O
o
o O
U) cn
Z N
>
°
L_
O
U)
aR
y
cn
�
O
a)
°
R
U
S
m
a Q
ju
R
N
t..
R
�
O tt
C
�
O
•
R
R *
U
F
m
y
C
O
y
0
.�
O
Q
U)
a°
a°
N
cL
N
a
Q
a
U
C C
> >
C
>
a)
Q
Q
o
w
Q
U)
3 y
O `
R
O
o
>
>
O`
w
o
�
0
�
°
LU
Q
_
o
O-
0
a
R
-
y
—oo
C)
3
3
O
a
w>>
aRaoc
O
FL
O
oo
o
Ya)-
o
ao
y
Q
0
n n
0
n
p
m
O
'
N
0-
O
m
m
U)
R
U)
o
U)
in
U)
U)
w
a
R
+p��
®
x
+
R
y
O
■
a)
Q
V
oo
Q
U)
Uo
� (n
� a)
m
'o �
(n Q
_a O
U
m
0
m
Z

Soil Map—Stanly County, North Carolina
The Grove at Anderson
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
BaB
Badin channery silt loam, 2 to
8 percent slopes
28.3
49.8%
BaD
Badin channery silt loam, 8 to
15 percent slopes
15.3
26.9%
KkB
Kirksey silt loam, 0 to 6
percent slopes
3.7
6.5%
OaA
Oakboro silt loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes, frequently
flooded
9.5
16.8%
Totals for Area of Interest
66.9
100.0%
k;sim Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/21/2022
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Stanly County, North Carolina
N (The Grove at Anderson) In
576500 576600 576700 576800 576900 577000
35o 21' 31" N I y� I I , I 1 35o 21' 31" N
9 +
s g
a,
D
aa,
OP P
00,
AO
Gm
_ ^.r`..
Soil MaN may not he valiel at this scale.
Wmj
35o 21'4"N 35o 21'4"N
576500 576600 576700 576800 576900 577000
min
Map Scale: 1:4,000 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
$ Meters
N $
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 150 300 E00 900
Map projection: Web Mercator Coner000rdinates: WGS84 Edge tics: lfrM Zone 17N WGS84
t!sl)n Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/21/2022
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5

0
7 O
o (�
U a)
m Q
o
'E O
D CD
CL a)
m
H
rn
c
m
U
U
N
m p N
N N
(n
a)
OU
`p
m
c U O
O
U
N U O
U
3
p O
N
m O O
E
O
N _6 U '6
+�
U)
p_
CL
U N E
N
O
U
> - .- N
m
O_
m
00
- U N
Z
m
m
CL N
N
N `' N a
O m
U
C
N
U
U)-0 O
N U
O
m
O' _6 m
U)�
N
L
O_ 3 N
O y
O
U
-
p N
O
U
" N
N
U)
E (6
N
U)
N C7
U)
6
Z
O O
U
UU))
U) -6
QC
2i
_
N
O
Q
(n
0-
p m
Q
N
Zi
O
O N>
U)
E
co) W
m m O O N
Q
U
N
m
O_
O N
O
O_ C
U m= a)
L
U)
-0
C U) m
O
Z C
N
m
C U) �
p- Q
O
=
U) E U)
m
N
U
`) O C O
O
a)
>.
m
O
CL - Uj N
E
>+
>
p U a)
7 U
O
>, O p
_
+' O
E
C
7
U)
O
E� m U)
Z
N
�
O L
N -O
O
N
N 2
L '� N (0
3 U) U O
O�
V O
O_
N m E N
J N
_
CL
Q
0
U
m 0
U
U)
3 J>
O N QE O-
—
m>
U
N
N -O O o
m
E
Q o o
(U
Q 0 w
a�
m
a)
o N of
U)
O
E C H y
>+
t N N (0
O) (U
m
m N
E
0 0) N
y
O_ N >+
N U (6 (U 7
,U) -O
N Q
(n
.-
O -0 T
-0m Q
O
U
C m N U)
rn
0 0
3 U
U °?
m N
U .O
=
Q
= O
0
O N E
0_ m
(n
0
C
ENE
E N .�
N 'O y
N E
0= (p
O C
E m p
O a
O p U p ""
'6 2
O>
CL 0
O O
w
m
O '6
p O
U)
E
m
� C (6
Q N
N 7
U) U)
O
i U 'O
U) U C
fl- N
3 >,
U O
E O
O
O)
N C
O OCL
L N
O 'N C O U
N a)
p > N p
m O Mn �_ U
Q -0
U)
L Z
o 7
0_
O N
m O
t p m
W E— U U)
a E
U> U
Q m
H O
U U
U
(`")
H U. U)
y
N
L
T
L
CL
�
°'
y y
y 0 R
o
r
O
0
C R
O
R
N
U R J
0
Q
O
C
O
tt
W
R
�w
V
F
R
m
W
CL
R
R
R
o
0(L
-
C
do)
No o
R
.-. d) (O
o
O
N
Op
o O
O
m
(0 N
O
0
O
O
rn
a
y
(0M
a.o
a
O
y
(O
ro
co
a
y
Q 0
0 .�
a a a
=
a
m w .�
c
a
a a a
= m
0 a
a
a a
Q
y
pf 2 2 2
c
2 Z
Z pf 2
c
2 2 2
Z Z
p) 2
c
2
2 2
Z Z
(n
16 �
■
■
0 0
R
LL
■ 0
v
U)0
•uJ
i
Uo
� U
� a)
0 0
U o_
_a O
U
m
0
m
Z

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Stanly County, North Carolina
The Grove at Anderson
Hydric Rating by Map Unit
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
BaB
Badin channery silt
0
28.3
49.8%
loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes
BaD
Badin channery silt
0
15.3
26.9%
loam, 8 to 15 percent
slopes
KkB
Kirksey silt loam, 0 to 6
0
3.7
6.5%
percent slopes
OaA
Oakboro silt loam, 0 to 2
4
9.5
16.8%
percent slopes,
frequently flooded
Totals for Area of Interest
66.9
100.0%
k;sim Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/21/2022
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Stanly County, North Carolina
The Grove at Anderson
Description
This rating indicates the percentage of map units that meets the criteria for hydric
soils. Map units are composed of one or more map unit components or soil
types, each of which is rated as hydric soil or not hydric. Map units that are made
up dominantly of hydric soils may have small areas of minor nonhydric
components in the higher positions on the landform, and map units that are made
up dominantly of nonhydric soils may have small areas of minor hydric
components in the lower positions on the landform. Each map unit is rated based
on its respective components and the percentage of each component within the
map unit.
The thematic map is color coded based on the composition of hydric
components. The five color classes are separated as 100 percent hydric
components, 66 to 99 percent hydric components, 33 to 65 percent hydric
components, 1 to 32 percent hydric components, and less than one percent
hydric components.
In Web Soil Survey, the Summary by Map Unit table that is displayed below the
map pane contains a column named 'Rating'. In this column the percentage of
each map unit that is classified as hydric is displayed.
Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils
(NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding
long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the
upper part (Federal Register, 1994). Under natural conditions, these soils are
either saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support
the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation.
The NTCHS definition identifies general soil properties that are associated with
wetness. In order to determine whether a specific soil is a hydric soil or nonhydric
soil, however, more specific information, such as information about the depth and
duration of the water table, is needed. Thus, criteria that identify those estimated
soil properties unique to hydric soils have been established (Federal Register,
2002). These criteria are used to identify map unit components that normally are
associated with wetlands. The criteria used are selected estimated soil properties
that are described in "Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 1999) and "Keys to Soil
Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 2006) and in the "Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey
Division Staff, 1993).
If soils are wet enough for a long enough period of time to be considered hydric,
they should exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field.
These visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to
make onsite determinations of hydric soils are specified in "Field Indicators of
Hydric Soils in the United States" (Hurt and Vasilas, 2006).
References:
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
k;sim Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/21/2022
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Stanly County, North Carolina
The Grove at Anderson
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources
Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436.
Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Percent Present
Component Percent Cutoff.- None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Lower
k;sim Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/21/2022
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5

� LaBeLLa
APPENDIX E
NWI Map

)�\/
{{
`
t$
Ft
}\ \
. 0
)!
a���
-
e
\®2/#
_]!«a
\\)
)/\\(
Ll m
CLA
E0-0
.0
rA22/
0 L

� LaBeLLa
APPENDIX F
FEMA FIRMette

J =
Jill Oil 9 d H _ �� �
Rg oR
PI
I grog 5 � �a J
R
a
la
io f
PIL
i �I'i� �# .4
I
0
0
0

� LaBeLLa
EXHIBIT 6
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION

Requestor:
Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail:
Size (acres)
Nearest Waterway
USGS HUC
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-01861 County: Stanly U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Albemarle
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Ryan Homes
Sco tt Mundav
10710 Sikes Place #200
Charlotte, NC 28277
704-815-3500
jemunda a nvrinc.com
57
Mountain Creek
03040104
Nearest Town Albemarle
River Basin Upper Pee Dee
Coordinates Latitude:35.354562
Longitude:-80.156606
Location description: Project is located at 127 Charter Street, near Albemarle, Stanly County, North Carolina.
PIN(s):655804544617, 655802563026, 655802652437
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters onthe above described project area/property, thatmay be subjectto Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters have been
delineated, and thedelineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate andreliable. Theapproximate boundaries
of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation mapdated 7/22/2022. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computationof
impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and otherresource protection measures, a permit decision made onthe basis of a
preliminary JD will treat a ll waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted a ctivity onthe site as if they
are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action underthe Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFRPart 331). However, you may request an approved JD,which is an appealable
action, by contactingthe Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appearto be waters onthe above described project area/property, thatmay be subjectto Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the waters
have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process.
Without a verified wetland delineation, this prelim inary determination is merely an effective pre sumption of C WA/RHA
jurisdiction over allof the waters at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate andreliable to support anenforceable
permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. Asthe Corps may not be able
to accomplish thiswetland delineationin a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultantto conduct a delineation that can
be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above describedproject area/property subjectto the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or ourpublished regulations, this determinationmay be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waterson the above described project area/property subjectto the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean
WaterAct(CWA)(33USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our pub fished regulations, this determination maybe
relied upon fora period notto exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may notbe able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a de lineation that can be verified by
the Corps.
❑ The waters on yourproject area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown onthe enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly suggest youhave
this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey

SAW-2021-01861
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to C WA j urisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in
the law or our published regulations, maybe relied upon for a periodnotto exceed five years.
❑ The waters have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official
identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or ourpublished regulations, this determinationmay be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subj ectto the
permit requirements of Section404 of the Clean WaterAct (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination maybe relied upon for a period notto exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Managementin Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Pla cem ent of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 3 01 of the Clean Water Act (3 3 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placementof structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Krystynka B Stygar at 252-545-0507 or
kr�stynka.b.stygar&sac e.a rmy.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 8/24/2022.
D. Remarks: See approximate aquatic resources on map, "NVR-Ryan Homes- Anderson Grove, Albemarle,
NC 0712212022"
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has beenconductedto identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction forthe particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may notbe valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Actof 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appealunder Corps regulations at 3 3 CFR Part 3 3 1. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. Ifyourequest to appealthis
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PH I LI P.A. SHANNIN&USACE.ARMY.MIL
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, thatit meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFRpart 331.5, andthat it has been receivedby the Division Officewithin 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
* * It is not necessary to submit anRFAform tot e Division Office if you do notobject to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: _ &_
t
Date of JD: 8/24/2022 ExpirationDate of JD: Not aLILrlicable

SAW-2021-01861
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/Pp=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: LaBella Associates, D.P.0
ErikPrunchak
Address: 400 South Tryon Street. Suite 1300
Charlotte, NC 28285 -
Telephone Number: 704-376-6423
E-mail: enrunchak(a�LaBellaPC.com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Ryan Homes, ScottMunday File Number: SAW-2021-01861
Date: 8/24/2022
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Penn it or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Penn it or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
®
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies yourrights and options regarding an administrative appealof the above decision.
Additional information may be found at orhttp://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re"latoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and yourwork is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Penn it or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appealthe permit, including its terns and conditions, and approved jurisdictional detenminations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the perm it (Standard or LOP) because of certain term sand conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appealthe permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a)modify the permit to address allof your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and yourwork is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Penn it or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appealthe permit, including its terns and conditions, and approved jurisdictionaldetenminations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terns and conditions therein,
you may appealthe declined permit underthe Corps of Engineers Administrative AppealProcess by completing Section II of
this form and sendingthe form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appealthe denialof a permit underthe Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept orappealthe approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appealthe approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appealthe approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative AppealProcess by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which maybe appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new inform ation for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe yourreasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where yourreasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appealis limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum forthe
record of the a ppea I conference ormeeting, and any supplemental information that the review officerha s determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant northe Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/orthe
If you only have questions regarding the appealprocess you may
appealprocess you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN
Attn: Krystynka B Stygar
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
Charlotte Regulatory Office
CESAD-PDS-O
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8803
Charlotte, North Carolina28262
PHONE: [phone]; FAX[phone]
EMAIL: PHILIP.A.SHANI\lIN&USACE.ARMY.MIL
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appealprocess. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi yations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Kry stynka B Styg ar, 8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite
615, Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 06/08/2022
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Ryan Homes, Scott Munday, 10710 Sikes
Place 4200, Charlotte, NC 28277
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Villas at Grove, SAW-2021-
01861
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Project is located at 127 Charter
Street, near Albemarle, Stanly County, North Carolina. PIN(s):655804544617, 655802563026,
655802652437
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Stanly City: Albemarle
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decim alform at): Latitude: 35.354562 Longitude: -80.156606
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearestwaterbody: Mountain Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
®Field Determination. Date(s): June 14, 2022
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated
amountof
aquatic
resources in
reviewarea
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic
authority to which
the aquatic resource
"may be" su bje ct
(i.e.,Section 404or
Section 10/404)
Pond B
35.357325
-80.154112
0.24 acre
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Wetland D
35.354665
-80.153644
0.03 acre
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland E
35.354239
-80.154086
0.16 acre
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland F
35.352900
-80.153463
0.14 acre
Wetland
Section 404
Stream A
35.355162
-80.153941
2640 LF
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream Ab
35.357691
-80.153993
320 LF
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream C
35.357658
-80.154622
200 LF
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream Ag
35.355677
-80.153538
40 LF
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream Ac 1
35.354261
-80.153939
221 LF
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream Ac 2
35.354010
-80.153443
149 LF
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream Af
35.35260
-80.154523
550 LF
Non -wetland waters
Section 404

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may bejurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subjectpermit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative orjudicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affectedby the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: LaBellaFor Ryan Home
s
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets:
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
El Office doesnotconcurwith data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
El Corps navigable waters' study:
El U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data:
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: 04/21/2022-Appendix D
® Nationalwetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Appendix E : NWI Map
❑ State/localwetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: Appendix F: NFHL FEMA FIRMETTE
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ® Other (Name & Date): Site Photographs taken January 27, 2022
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
®Other information (please specify): Figure 3: Site Location Map, April 2022
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
4p;uj �
Signa lure and date N Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
8/24/2022
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtainingthe signature is
impracticable)'
'Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

cn
m
£
J
Q
y:
% 'a Z M
6
m
N
`o £
Q
cu
TA0 u4
co
co
-
LU
o
ca
(6
T
r- N
cu a
p L f6 z
in i f
>A
o
>
Jcu
Gi
Q U Q
L
z
Z
j
>
no
w n
�01
d3:la -6 WStl:lo1-3

_
z
cu T
�f
G
(D
c
N
O� Z f
a n . o
o a
fli (n
N N
M�
i
O
o a m
cl
_ =a
Lu O
��
W
cu
T
C�
Q:
�_
C ICz�
i
��
o m m m Ua O m 0
N Y co U Z Y N
o
__ _
� +�
�n
d�
J
�
r-N
�(D
o:a� ma
�
♦♦_e�S
f6�
o
o� o `m n o no o
� Joy
J
�
QUQ
m E m o
y in o c) w a a _ w z oa ¢� in a cooEll
++
J 0�
da�a Naa ASv,111-

cn
cu >
c
V
W
§
,ins u�
N a
+y-r y
N
co
i
V, O
co
v
O LL E A N w - m
__ -
Lu o
N
o
T
CCo
C IC z�
m N `� `� o U a O m 0
o
-_
3
CU
n
d °E
J
i0
"a�4
6 U 0
E B
a
y
o
c
tE
�U_ o
Q
s ar E ma x
m> m? o m
n o .� o:
=
a
�
Q
o : oo o
in o a a
y c� w w z ow65
�00
r 4'
a
U LLh
Q1[�
?:. E{�y
♦{ r
R � � m
m
( N i
J
W Q m
IL
a a
G
a] -d wsv�oiea-�