EBX Comment Response_Revised AsBuiltReview

Baker, Caroline D
From: Daniel Dixon <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:55 PM
To: Hartshorn, Blake
Cc: Jamey Mceachran
Subject: [External] RE: Dogtown As Built Report 2nd Review
Attachments: RES_20181097v2_Dogtown Bank Parcel As Built Report_3.2024.pdf, Final Dogtown
Stream Mitigation Project Buffer Plat (002).pdf, Fig ure2BDogtown South. pdf,
Final_AB_Cred it -Ca lcs_Dogtown_3.24.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the Report Message
button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home tab.
Good afternoon Blake,
Listed below are comments provided by DWR on March 4, 2024 regarding the Dogtown: As -Built Report and RES'
responses in bold.
1. In a comment response about the pond foot print size being larger in the As Built Report than the approved
BPDP, EBX stated that the footprint was originally calculated based on aerial imagery during the Plan
phase. Delineating the different credit generation areas using aerial imagery potentially provides
inaccurate data and moving forward on future projects, DWR highly recommends using GPS points when
gathering this data for accurate as possible crediting information.
RES has recently shifted to GPSing tree lines and other project features but at the inception of this
project aerial imagery was used.
2. DWR would like to know how tree line survey data was gathered for preservation area. Was it aerial or
gathered by GPS/surveyor? Please respond to this email with these details.
Preservation lines were determined using aerial imagery at the time of the BPDP.
3. Point out where the collapsed crossing was in either figure 2A or 2B. You can send me just the PDF of the
figure via email.
Figure 2113 is attached depicting the collapsed crossing area and included in the attached report.
4. The survey still does not have a signature on it (seems like technically difficulties on one of our ends). If you
have a signed PDF you can email that to me and we can see if that will work.
The signed survey is attached on email. We apologize for the technical difficulties.
5. According to the survey, there are 519,234 sgft for 0-50ft width but the credit ledger shows 519,224 sgft. In
the credit ledger, add 10 sgft in the "Total Area" column within any one of the 0-50 width features
generating credit so that the totals align with the survey.
The credit table now reflects the accurate numbering. It has been attached separately and replaced
within the report.
6. According to the survey, there are 10,432 sgft for 51-100ft width but the credit ledger shows 10,442 sgft. In
the credit ledger, have the 51-100ft width row show 10,432sgft in the "Total Area" so that it aligns with the
survey. Once the credit ledger corrections are completed, you can email me the PDF and I can replace it in
the report.
The credit table now reflects the accurate numbering. It has been attached separately and replaced
within the report.

Thankyou,
Daniel Dixon
Ecologist
RES I [e-mail]
Mobile: [phone]
From: Hartshorn, Blake <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 2:00 PM
To: Daniel Dixon <[e-mail]>
Subject: Dogtown As Built Report 2nd Review
Good Afternoon,
DWR has reviewed the 2"d draft as Built Report submitted by EBX for the Dogtown Mitigation Bank (DWR#2018-
1097v2), which was received on February 13, 2024. Please see comments and revisions below:
1. In a comment response about the pond foot print size being larger in the As Built Report than the approved
BPDP, EBX stated that the footprint was originally calculated based on aerial imagery during the Plan
phase. Delineating the different credit generation areas using aerial imagery potentially provides
inaccurate data and moving forward on future projects, DWR highly recommends using GPS points when
gathering this data for accurate as possible crediting information.
2. DWR would like to know how tree line survey data was gathered for preservation area. Was it aerial or
gathered by GPS/surveyor? Please respond to this email with these details.
3. Point out where the collapsed crossing was in either figure 2A or 2B. You can send me just the PDF of the
figure via email.
4. The survey still does not have a signature on it (seems like technically difficulties on one of our ends). If you
have a signed PDF you can email that to me and we can see if that will work.
5. According to the survey, there are 519,234 sqft for 0-50ft width but the credit ledger shows 519,224 sqft. In
the credit ledger, add 10 sqft in the "Total Area" column within anyone of the 0-50 width features
generating credit so that the totals align with the survey.
6. According to the survey, there are 10,432 sqft for 51-100ft width but the credit ledger shows 10,442 sqft. In
the credit ledger, have the 51-100ft width row show 10,432sgft in the "Total Area" so that it aligns with the
survey. Once the credit ledger corrections are completed, you can email me the PDF and I can replace it in
the report.
Once EBX has responded to these comments and provided the necessary documentation we can move forward on
approving the report. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to reach out. There will be no need to re-
submit anythingvia the mitigation submission form, all items in these email can be sent to be in PDF or email
response.
Thankyou,
Blake Hartshorn (he/him)
Mitigation Specialist, Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality

Office: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized
state official.

Table 1. Dogtown, 2018‐1097v2, Project Credits
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
Credit Type Location
Subject? (enter 
NO if 
ephemeral or 
ditch 1)
Feature Type Mitigation Activity Min‐Max Buffer 
Width (ft)Feature Name Total Area (ft2)
Total (Creditable) 
Area of Buffer 
Mitigation (ft2)
Initial Credit 
Ratio (x:1)% Full Credit  Final Credit 
Ratio (x:1) 
 Convertible to 
Riparian 
Buffer? 
 Riparian Buffer 
Credits 
 Convertible to 
Nutrient Offset? 
 Delivered 
Nutrient 
Offset: N (lbs) 
 Delivered 
Nutrient 
Offset: P (lbs) 
Buffer Rural No In‐Line Pond Restoration 0‐50 3 Ponds (PA, PB, PC) 81,107 81,107 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 81,107.000 No — —
Buffer Rural No I / P Restoration 0‐50 S1 107,998 107,998 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 107,998.000 No — —
Buffer Rural No I / P Restoration 0‐100 S1 (51‐100) 10,432 10,432 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 10,432.000 No — —
Buffer Rural No I / P Restoration 0‐50 S2 29,074 29,074 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 29,074.000 No — —
N/A — N/A — —
Buffer Rural No I / P Restoration 0‐50 S3 79,886 79,886 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 79,886.000 No — —
Buffer Rural No I / P Restoration 0‐50 DT1 29,425 29,425 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 29,425.000 No — —
Buffer Rural No I / P Restoration 0‐50 DT2 5,387 5,387 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 5,387.000 No — —
Buffer Rural No I / P Restoration 0‐50 DT3 96,783 96,783 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 96,783.000 No — —
Buffer Rural No I / P Restoration 0‐50 DT4 94,390 94,390 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 94,390.000 No — —
Buffer Rural No I / P Restoration 0‐50 Baker's Creek 76,291 76,291 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 76,291.000 No — —
———
———
———
———
———
———
———
———
Totals (ft2):610,773 610,773 610,773.000 0.000 0.000
Total Buffer (ft2):610,773 610,773
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):0 N/A
Total Ephemeral Area (ft2) for Credit:00
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft2):203,591 0.0%Ephemeral Reaches as % TABM
Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Eligible for Preservation (ft2):203,591 25.0%Preservation as % TABM
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Min‐Max Buffer 
Width (ft)Feature Name  Total Area (sf) 
Total (Creditable) 
Area for Buffer 
Mitigation (ft2)
Initial Credit 
Ratio (x:1)% Full Credit  Final Credit 
Ratio (x:1) 
 Riparian 
Buffer Credits 
Buffer Rural No I / P0‐50 DT1, DT2, DT3,
 DT4, S1, S2, S3 478,959 203,591 5 100% 5.00000 40,718.200
Rural No I / P 101‐200 Baker's Creek, S2, DT2, 
DT4, DT3 190,731 0 5 33% —
—
—
—
Preservation Area Subtotals (ft2):669,690 203,591
Square Feet Credits
610,773 610,773.000
0 0.000
203,591 40,718.200
814,364 651,491.200
Square Feet Credits
Nitrogen:0.000
Phosphorus:0.0000
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Nutrient Offset:
Preservation:
Total Riparian Buffer:
Catawba Buffer
N/A
N/A
Restoration:
Enhancement:
Mitigation Totals
1.  The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250 (5)(a).
last updated 08/03/2020
LCE
L
C
E
LC
E
LCE LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE LCE LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
LC
E
LC
E
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
L
C
E
LCELCEECLCL
LCE
L
C
E
LC
E
LCCLCELCELCECECCC LCE
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
LL
C
E
LL
C
L
C
L
C
LCE LCE LCE
LC
E
LCE
LLLLLCECCC
LL
LCE
LCE
LCECELLCE
LC
E
E
LC
ECCL
C
E
C
E
C
E
EEE
L
C
LL
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
C
CELCELC
LC
E
ELCELCCELCELCEL
L
C
E
L
C
LCLC
E
E
C
E
L
C
LCEE
LCE
LC
E
LCE
LCE L
C
E
C
E
EEE
C
E
LCEE
LCECELLCE
C
E
L
C
E
LCE
LCE
LCELL
LC
ECECEEEE
LC
E
LCECELELCECLCE
CE
LC
L
C
E
LC
E
LC
E
L
C
E
LCELLLLCLC
LCE
LCEELCLCE
L
C
E
L
C
L
C
C
E
L
C
E
C
E
C
E
CC
E
C
E
E
LC
E
LC
E
LLLCCEEE
LC
E
L
LCLCLC
C
L
C
E
L
C
L
C
E
C
E
E
LLLLLL
C
L
C
E
L
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
LC
E
CE
LC
E
L
LCCE
L
C
E
C
E
LCLCEECEECCCCEE
CLC
ECEEC
LCELCLCC
L
C
L
C
L
C
CC
LCEE
L
C
E
CCCC
LCCEE
L
C
E
C
E
LL
C
E
LCCCCL
LC
E
LC
LCEE
CECECECEEE
L
C
E
L
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
CC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
EEE
EEEEEE CC
E
EE
C
E
CC
E
C
E
CC
EEEEEECECEECCCCECELCELCECLLLEEELLCECECECELCEE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
LLL
C
L
C
L
C
CCCC
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
LL
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
E
L
C
L
C
E
C
L
C
E
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
EEEE
LC
E
L
C
E
L
C
L
C
E
LL
C
L
C
L
C
CCCC
EEE
E
LC
E
L
L
C
L
C
LLL
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
CCC
L
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
C
L
C
LLL
C
L
C
L
C
E
L
C
E
CC
LCCE
CE
LC
E
L
CE
LC
E
L
LC
E
CCC
LCE
E
L
C
CE
LCE
E
C
E
L
E
C
E
LCLCE
L
EE
EE
LL
C
CCEEE
C
CCC
L
E
EEE
LC
LCLC
L
C
E
L
C
L
C
ECLC
LLCEE CCE LLCE
C
L
C
E
CC
EE LC
LL
E
ECE
L
C
LC
E
LC
E
LL
E
L
L
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
E
LCCE
LCCE
L
C
E
E
C
C
L
C
LCELCLCLC
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
LCCEC
C
E
C
E
LC
E
C
C
E
LC
E
LC
EC
CE
L
C
L
C
L
C
LL
C
L
C
L
C
L
L
C
E
L
C
LL
C
LCCEC
LCLCEELC
L
C
E
C
E
LC
E
L
L
C
E
L
C
L
C
L
C
C
ELCE
LC
E
LCELCELCELCELLECLE
C
E
E L
L
E
E
LCCE
L
C
E
C
E
CCCC
C
CCC
LCEE
C
E
E
L
C
E
LCCCCLL
L
C
E
E LC
CE
LCC
SI
T
E

M
A
P
NT
S
RE
A
C
H

D
T
4
RE
A
C
H

D
T
2
RE
A
C
H

D
T
3
RE
A
C
H

D
T
1
SH
E
E
T

N
U
M
B
E
R
:
REVISIONS:
RELEASED FOR:
PLOT DATE:PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
U
M
B
E
R
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

M
A
N
A
G
E
R
:
DE
S
I
G
N
E
D
:
DR
A
W
N
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
:
SE
A
L
RE
S
O
U
R
C
E

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L

S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
,

L
L
C
36
0
0

G
L
E
N
W
O
O
D

A
V
E
,

S
U
I
T
E

1
0
0
RA
L
E
I
G
H
,

N
C

2
7
6
1
2
As
c
e
n
s
i
o
n

L
a
n
d
Su
r
v
e
y
i
n
g

P
.
C
.
Pr
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l

L
a
n
d
Su
r
v
e
y
i
n
g

&

C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
11
6

W
i
l
l
i
a
m
s

R
o
a
d
Mo
c
k
s
v
i
l
l
e
,

N
C

2
7
0
2
8
Ph
o
n
e
:

(
7
0
4
)

5
7
9
-
7
1
9
7
Em
a
i
l
:

s
u
r
v
e
y
o
r
.
c
h
r
i
s
0
0
7
@
g
m
a
i
l
.
c
o
m
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
CA
T
A
W
B
A

R
I
V
E
R

B
A
S
I
N
:

H
U
C

0
3
0
5
0
1
0
1
JA
N
U
A
R
Y

2
0
2
4
AS-BUILT SURVEY DRAWINGS
1
O
F

2
10
0
1
4
8
CL
C
CL
C
TR
S
BR
C
AS
-
B
U
I
L
T

P
L
A
N
I
M
E
T
R
I
C
S

S
U
R
V
E
Y

P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D

B
Y
AS
C
E
N
S
I
O
N

L
A
N
D

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G
,

P
C

(
N
C

F
I
R
M
LI
C
E
N
S
E

N
U
M
B
E
R

C
-
4
2
8
8
,

C
H
R
I
S
T
O
P
H
E
R

L
.
CO
L
E
,

N
C

P
L
S

L
-
5
0
0
8
)
,

D
A
T
E
D

A
P
R
I
L

2
3
,

2
0
2
3
.
DE
S
I
G
N
E
D

B
Y
:
RE
S
O
U
R
C
E

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L

S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
,

L
L
C
36
0
0

G
L
E
N
W
O
O
D

A
V
E
,

S
U
I
T
E

1
0
0
RA
L
E
I
G
H
,

N
C

2
7
6
1
2
SU
R
V
E
Y
E
D

B
Y
:
AS
C
E
N
S
I
O
N

L
A
N
D

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G
,

P
C
11
6

W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S

R
O
A
D
MO
C
K
S
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
7
0
2
8
PR
O
J
E
C
T

D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
Y
I,

C
H
R
I
S
T
O
P
H
E
R

L
.

C
O
L
E
,

C
E
R
T
I
F
Y

T
H
A
T

T
H
I
S

P
L
A
T

W
A
S

D
R
A
W
N

U
N
D
E
R

M
Y
SU
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N

F
R
O
M

A
N

A
C
T
U
A
L

S
U
R
V
E
Y

M
A
D
E

U
N
D
E
R

M
Y

S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N

(
F
R
O
M
DE
E
D
S

S
H
O
W
N

O
N

T
H
E

F
A
C
E

O
F

T
H
I
S

P
L
A
T
)
;

T
H
A
T

T
H
E

B
O
U
N
D
A
R
I
E
S

N
O
T

S
U
R
V
E
Y
E
D
AR
E

C
L
E
A
R
L
Y

I
N
D
I
C
A
T
E
D

A
S

D
R
A
W
N

F
R
O
M

I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N

F
O
U
N
D

I
N

(
D
E
E
D
S

S
H
O
W
N
ON

T
H
E

F
A
C
E

O
F

T
H
I
S

P
L
A
T
)
;

T
H
A
T

T
H
E

R
A
T
I
O

O
F

P
R
E
C
I
S
I
O
N

O
R

P
O
S
I
T
I
O
N
A
L
AC
C
U
R
A
C
Y

A
S

C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
E
D

I
S

1
:

1
0
,
0
0
0
'
;

T
H
A
T

T
H
I
S

P
L
A
T

W
A
S

P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D

I
N
AC
C
O
R
D
A
N
C
E

W
I
T
H

G
.
S
.

4
7
-
3
0

A
S

A
M
E
N
D
E
D

A
N
D

T
H
A
T

T
H
I
S

S
U
R
V
E
Y

I
S

O
F
AN
O
T
H
E
R

C
A
T
E
G
O
R
Y
,

S
U
C
H

A
S

T
H
E

R
E
C
O
M
B
I
N
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

P
A
R
C
E
L
S
,

A
CO
U
R
T
-
O
R
D
E
R
E
D

S
U
R
V
E
Y
,

O
R

O
T
H
E
R

E
X
E
M
P
T
I
O
N

O
R

E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N

T
O

T
H
E

D
E
F
I
N
I
T
I
O
N
OF

S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
.
WI
T
N
E
S
S

M
Y

O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L

S
I
G
N
A
T
U
R
E
,

R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N

L
I
C
E
N
S
E

N
U
M
B
E
R

A
N
D

S
E
A
L

T
H
I
S
12
T
H

D
A
Y

O
F

F
E
B
R
U
A
R
Y
,

A
.
D
.
,
2
0
2
4
.
CH
R
I
S
T
O
P
H
E
R

L
.

C
O
L
E

L
-
5
0
0
8
TH
E

P
U
R
P
O
S
E

O
F

T
H
I
S

S
U
R
V
E
Y

I
S

T
O
SH
O
W

T
H
E

B
U
F
F
E
R

Z
O
N
E
S

O
N

T
H
E
DO
G
T
O
W
N

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
.

N
O
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y

L
I
N
E
S

O
R

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T

L
I
N
E
S
WE
R
E

S
U
R
V
E
Y
E
D

A
T

T
H
I
S

T
I
M
E
.
BA
K
E
R
S

C
R
E
E
K
LE
G
E
N
D
0-
5
0

F
T

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N

B
U
F
F
E
R
51
-
1
0
0

F
T

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N

B
U
F
F
E
R
0-
5
0

F
T

P
R
E
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N

B
U
F
F
E
R
15
1
-
2
0
0

F
T

P
R
E
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N

B
U
F
F
E
R
Ri
p
a
r
i
a
n

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

C
r
e
d
i
t
i
n
g

Z
o
n
e
s
Zo
n
e
Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

T
y
p
e
To
t
a
l

A
r
e
a

(
S
F
)
Re
s
t
o
r
e
d

P
o
n
d
Fo
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
81
,
1
0
7
0-
5
0

F
T

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
51
9
,
2
3
4
51
-
1
0
0

F
T

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
10
,
4
3
2
0-
5
0

F
T
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
47
8
,
9
5
9
15
1
-
2
0
0

F
T

P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
19
0
,
7
3
1
51
-
1
5
0

F
T
US
A
C
E

E
x
t
e
n
d
e
d

B
u
f
f
e
r
1,
0
2
2
,
9
9
5
RE
S
T
O
R
E
D

P
O
N
D

A
R
E
A
51
-
1
5
0

F
T

U
S
A
C
E

E
X
T
E
N
D
E
D

B
U
F
F
E
R
Ch
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r

L
.

C
o
l
e
Di
g
i
t
a
l
l
y

s
i
g
n
e
d

b
y

C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r

L
.

Co
l
e

Da
t
e
:

2
0
2
4
.
0
2
.
1
2

2
0
:
3
5
:
3
5

-
0
5
'
0
0
'
LCE
LCELCE
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LCE
LCE
LCE LCE LCE LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LCE LCE
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LC
E
LC
E
LCE
LCE
LCE
LCE
LC
ECECE
LCEEELCECCCC
ELCEEE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
E
LC
EEEE
LCELCECECL
E LC CE
EEE
LC
E
LC
LC
E
LC
E
EEE
LCCCLCCLC
LCE
LCELCE
LCE
LCLCELCLLLCLLLLCCE
LCE LCE
LCE
LCE
LCELCEEEL
LCE
LCE
LC
E
LLCL
LCE LCECEECEC
LCEE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCLC
LC
ECECECE
LC
E
LC
EC
LCE
LCE
LCELCLLCLC
LCEEEEEEE
LCLCLCLCL
CECECELCEELCLCELC
CE
LC
E
LCCE
E
LCLLCLLCLCLCLC
LC
E
L
LC
LC
E
EE
CLC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CC
E
C
E
E
E
CEEE
LC
LC
ELCELCELCLCLLC
LCLCCLCLCLLL
CE
EEEE
LC
E
E
LC
E
CCCC
E
C
E
C
ELCECE
LCE
LCE
LCE
E LCEL E LCECE
LCE
LCECE
LCE
LCLCE
ELCELC
CELC
CELCE
CLLCC
LCLCEE
LCLCE
ECEEE
CCCC
LCECEECEE
LC
CEC
CE
CE
CCE
LCE
LC
LC E
E LL
CCE
LL CECE
E
CE
LC
CLC
LLCC
E
ECE
LLC
LC
E
CEC
CC
LC
E
E
L
LL
ECE
LC
EEEE
LCCE
LC
E
LCCEC
E
L
C
E
LC
E
CE
LC
E
LC
E
LC
E
LCLCLC
E
C
L
E
CELC
E LCE
C
E
LCE
LCE LCELLELCECE
LCE
LCE
LCE
CE
LC
LC E LCE
LCE
CCCE
LCE
C
L CE
LLCE
LCELC
E LC
LCCE
CE
LCLCCLC
CCE
CE
CECCC
SI
T
E

M
A
P
NT
S
RE
A
C
H

S
2
RE
A
C
H

S
1
RE
A
C
H

S
3
SH
E
E
T

N
U
M
B
E
R
:
REVISIONS:
RELEASED FOR:
PLOT DATE:PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
U
M
B
E
R
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T

M
A
N
A
G
E
R
:
DE
S
I
G
N
E
D
:
DR
A
W
N
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
:
SE
A
L
RE
S
O
U
R
C
E

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L

S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
,

L
L
C
36
0
0

G
L
E
N
W
O
O
D

A
V
E
,

S
U
I
T
E

1
0
0
RA
L
E
I
G
H
,

N
C

2
7
6
1
2
As
c
e
n
s
i
o
n

L
a
n
d
Su
r
v
e
y
i
n
g

P
.
C
.
Pr
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l

L
a
n
d
Su
r
v
e
y
i
n
g

&

C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
11
6

W
i
l
l
i
a
m
s

R
o
a
d
Mo
c
k
s
v
i
l
l
e
,

N
C

2
7
0
2
8
Ph
o
n
e
:

(
7
0
4
)

5
7
9
-
7
1
9
7
Em
a
i
l
:

s
u
r
v
e
y
o
r
.
c
h
r
i
s
0
0
7
@
g
m
a
i
l
.
c
o
m
DO
G
T
O
W
N

S
T
R
E
A
M

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
CA
T
A
W
B
A

C
O
U
N
T
Y
,

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
CA
T
A
W
B
A

R
I
V
E
R

B
A
S
I
N
:

H
U
C

0
3
0
5
0
1
0
1
JA
N
U
A
R
Y

2
0
2
4
AS-BUILT SURVEY DRAWINGS
2
O
F

2
10
0
1
4
8
CL
C
CL
C
TR
S
BR
C
AS
-
B
U
I
L
T

P
L
A
N
I
M
E
T
R
I
C
S

S
U
R
V
E
Y

P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D

B
Y
AS
C
E
N
S
I
O
N

L
A
N
D

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G
,

P
C

(
N
C

F
I
R
M

L
I
C
E
N
S
E
NU
M
B
E
R

C
-
4
2
8
8
,

C
H
R
I
S
T
O
P
H
E
R

L
.

C
O
L
E
,

N
C

P
L
S
L-
5
0
0
8
)
,

D
A
T
E
D

A
P
R
I
L

2
3
,

2
0
2
3
.
DE
S
I
G
N
E
D

B
Y
:
RE
S
O
U
R
C
E

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L

S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
,

L
L
C
36
0
0

G
L
E
N
W
O
O
D

A
V
E
,

S
U
I
T
E

1
0
0
RA
L
E
I
G
H
,

N
C

2
7
6
1
2
SU
R
V
E
Y
E
D

B
Y
:
AS
C
E
N
S
I
O
N

L
A
N
D

S
U
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G
,

P
C
11
6

W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S

R
O
A
D
MO
C
K
S
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
7
0
2
8
PR
O
J
E
C
T

D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
Y
I,

C
H
R
I
S
T
O
P
H
E
R

L
.

C
O
L
E
,

C
E
R
T
I
F
Y

T
H
A
T

T
H
I
S

P
L
A
T

W
A
S

D
R
A
W
N

U
N
D
E
R

M
Y
SU
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N

F
R
O
M

A
N

A
C
T
U
A
L

S
U
R
V
E
Y

M
A
D
E

U
N
D
E
R

M
Y

S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N

(
F
R
O
M
DE
E
D
S

S
H
O
W
N

O
N

T
H
E

F
A
C
E

O
F

T
H
I
S

P
L
A
T
)
;

T
H
A
T

T
H
E

B
O
U
N
D
A
R
I
E
S

N
O
T

S
U
R
V
E
Y
E
D
AR
E

C
L
E
A
R
L
Y

I
N
D
I
C
A
T
E
D

A
S

D
R
A
W
N

F
R
O
M

I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N

F
O
U
N
D

I
N

(
D
E
E
D
S

S
H
O
W
N
ON

T
H
E

F
A
C
E

O
F

T
H
I
S

P
L
A
T
)
;

T
H
A
T

T
H
E

R
A
T
I
O

O
F

P
R
E
C
I
S
I
O
N

O
R

P
O
S
I
T
I
O
N
A
L
AC
C
U
R
A
C
Y

A
S

C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
E
D

I
S

1
:

1
0
,
0
0
0
'
;

T
H
A
T

T
H
I
S

P
L
A
T

W
A
S

P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D

I
N
AC
C
O
R
D
A
N
C
E

W
I
T
H

G
.
S
.

4
7
-
3
0

A
S

A
M
E
N
D
E
D

A
N
D

T
H
A
T

T
H
I
S

S
U
R
V
E
Y

I
S

O
F
AN
O
T
H
E
R

C
A
T
E
G
O
R
Y
,

S
U
C
H

A
S

T
H
E

R
E
C
O
M
B
I
N
A
T
I
O
N

O
F

E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

P
A
R
C
E
L
S
,

A
CO
U
R
T
-
O
R
D
E
R
E
D

S
U
R
V
E
Y
,

O
R

O
T
H
E
R

E
X
E
M
P
T
I
O
N

O
R

E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N

T
O

T
H
E

D
E
F
I
N
I
T
I
O
N
OF

S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
.
WI
T
N
E
S
S

M
Y

O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L

S
I
G
N
A
T
U
R
E
,

R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N

L
I
C
E
N
S
E

N
U
M
B
E
R

A
N
D

S
E
A
L

T
H
I
S
12
T
H

D
A
Y

O
F

F
E
B
R
U
A
R
Y
,

A
.
D
.
,
2
0
2
4
.
CH
R
I
S
T
O
P
H
E
R

L
.

C
O
L
E

L
-
5
0
0
8
TH
E

P
U
R
P
O
S
E

O
F

T
H
I
S

S
U
R
V
E
Y

I
S

T
O
SH
O
W

T
H
E

B
U
F
F
E
R

Z
O
N
E
S

O
N

T
H
E
DO
G
T
O
W
N

M
I
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N

S
I
T
E
.

N
O
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y

L
I
N
E
S

O
R

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T

L
I
N
E
S
WE
R
E

S
U
R
V
E
Y
E
D

A
T

T
H
I
S

T
I
M
E
.
BA
K
E
R
S

C
R
E
E
K
LE
G
E
N
D
0-
5
0

F
T

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N

B
U
F
F
E
R
51
-
1
0
0

F
T

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N

B
U
F
F
E
R
0-
5
0

F
T

P
R
E
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N

B
U
F
F
E
R
15
1
-
2
0
0

F
T

P
R
E
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N

B
U
F
F
E
R
Ri
p
a
r
i
a
n

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

C
r
e
d
i
t
i
n
g

Z
o
n
e
s
Zo
n
e
Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

T
y
p
e
To
t
a
l

A
r
e
a

(
S
F
)
Re
s
t
o
r
e
d

P
o
n
d
Fo
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
81
,
1
0
7
0-
5
0

F
T

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
51
9
,
2
3
4
51
-
1
0
0

F
T
Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
10
,
4
3
2
0-
5
0

F
T

P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
47
8
,
9
5
9
15
1
-
2
0
0

F
T
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
19
0
,
7
3
1
51
-
1
5
0

F
T
US
A
C
E

E
x
t
e
n
d
e
d

B
u
f
f
e
r
1,
0
2
2
,
9
9
5
RE
S
T
O
R
E
D

P
O
N
D

A
R
E
A
51
-
1
5
0

F
T

U
S
A
C
E

E
X
T
E
N
D
E
D

B
U
F
F
E
R
Ch
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r

L
.

C
o
l
e
Di
g
i
t
a
l
l
y

s
i
g
n
e
d

b
y

C
h
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r

L
.

C
o
l
e

Da
t
e
:

2
0
2
4
.
0
2
.
1
2

2
0
:
3
6
:
5
1

-
0
5
'
0
0
'
©
Figure 2B - CCPVDogtown South
DogtownMitigation Project
Catawba County,North Carolina
Date: 3/19/2024 Drawn by: DGD
Document Path: R:\Resgis\Projects\NC\100148_Dogtown_Bank\MXD\6_M
onitoringM
aintenance\M
Y0\DWR M
Y0\Final\Layout_SOUTH_DWR_MY0-_Dogtown_Bank_CCPV_1.mxd
Restoring a resilient earth for a modern world
1:3,000
0 400200
Feet
Restoration - Pond
Restoration 0-50'
Restoration 51-100'
Preservation 0-50'
Preservation 151-200'
USACE Extended
Dogtown
Vegetation Plot Within BufferMitigation Area
Vegetation Plot Outside ofBuffer Mitigation Area
Supplemental
Enhancement II
Enhancement III
Enhancement III (7.5
Checked by: RTM
Collapsed Crossing