310562_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240321

0 Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 310562 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS310562 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Duplin Region: Wilmington
Date of Visit: 03/21 /2024 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 4:00 pm Incident #:
Farm Name: Rose Hill Buying Station Owner Email:
Owner: Duplin Marketing Company LLC Phone:
Mailing Address: 277 Faison W McGowan Rd Kenansville NC 28349
Physical Address: 239 Wells Brothers Rd Rose Hill NC 28458
Facility Status: 0 Compliant El Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 34° 49' 53" Longitude: 77' 57' 45"
East of Rose Hill. On South side of SR 1996 approx. 0.9 miles West of Hwy 11.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title
Phone
24 hour contact name Michael
Norris
Primary Inspector: Brian S West
sty W&V 5-
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Page 1 of 5

Permit: AWS31056, Owner: Duplin Marketing Company Facility Number:310562
Inspection Date:03/21/24 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine
Waste Structures
Effective
Built Closed
Designated Observed
Type
Identifier Date
Date Date
Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
#1
07/18/2005
1 D1/01/1992
20.10
Page 2 of 5

Permit: AWS31056', Owner: Duplin Marketing Company Facility Number: 310562
Inspection Date:03/21/24 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc
❑
❑ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE
❑
❑ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Page 3 of 5

Permit: AWS31056, Owner: Duplin Marketing Company Facility Number:310562
Inspection Date:03/21/24 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Page 4 of 5

Permit: AWS31056', Owner: Duplin Marketing Company Facility Number: 310562
Inspection Date:03/21/24 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit %
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 5