The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About310005_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240321 (2)0 Division of Water Resources El Division of Soil and Water Conservation El Other Agency Facility Number: 310005 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS310005 Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Duplin Region: Wilmington Date of Visit: 03/21/2024 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 4:00 pm Incident #: Farm Name: Scott Farm Sites 1-4 Owner Email: Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone: 910-296-1800 Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 283980487 Physical Address: 313 Elnin Carter Ln Bowdens NC 28398 Facility Status: 0 Compliant El Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 02' Longitude: 78' 05' 24" North of Warsaw. On East side of Hwy 117 approx. 0.5 mile North of SR 1343. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Michael Norris Primary Inspector: Brian S West s� Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: Site visit 3/21/24, records reviwed at office 3/25 Page 1 of 5 Permit: AWS31OW Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 310005 Inspection Date:03/21/24 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine Regulated Operations Swine Design Capacity Current promotions Swine - Wean to Finish 14,375 I 10,489 Total Design Capacity: 14,375 Total SSLW: 1,653,125 Waste Structures Effective Built Closed Designated Observed Type Identifier Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard Lagoon PRIMARY (SCOTTA) 03/07/2005 12/31/1992 19.90 32.00 Lagoon SCOTT 4 03/07/2005 12/31/1992 21.60 40.00 Lagoon SECONDARY (SCOTT 1 03/07/2005 12/31/1992 35.52 68.00 Page 2 of 5 Permit: AWS31000`. Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 310005 Inspection Date:03/21/24 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Page 3 of 5 Permit: AWS31000`. Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 310005 Inspection Date:03/21/24 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ Crop yields? ❑ Page 4 of 5 Permit: AWS31000`. Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 310005 Inspection Date:03/21/24 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine Records and Documents 120 Minute inspections? Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field Lagoon / Storage Pond Other If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAW M P? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes No NA NE EJ #4 POA dated 5/23 Yes No NA NE ❑■❑❑ ❑■❑❑ ❑■❑❑ 01 ❑■❑❑ Page 5 of 5