NC0036251_Wasteload Allocation_19911113

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0036251
PERNff= NAME: Blue Star Camps, Inc.
FACILITY NAME: Camp Blue Star Summer Camp
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity:
Minor �1
0.04 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
100 %
RECEIVING STREAM. Mud Creek
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 04-03-02
Reference USGS Quad: GENE (please attach)
County. Henderson
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 4/30/92 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
No change within three miles.
Requested by: Mack Wiggins Date: 10/18/91
Prepared by: ar � Date: �� • rr. 9r
Reviewed by: Date:L _
�t, L, /ro.2.S
// 3
U34 4Z -L?L)�—
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
gapi
to Zt
(053
Drainage a (mil) 6.T Avg. Streamflow (cfs): I•V
7Q10 (cfs) p,4 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) c. 5— 30Q2 (cfs) %.7
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream
Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (m )
SOO
3 n
NH3-N (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS (mg/1)
F. Col. (/100 ml)
pH (ISU)
Comments:

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Camp Blue Star Summer Camp
NC0036251
Domestic - 100%
Existing
Renewal
3 Mud Creek
C
04-03-02
Henderson
Asheville Regional Office
Mack Wiggins
10/21/91
GO8NE
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Request #
RECEIVED
Water Quality Section
NOV 1 - i991
6534
Asheville Regional Offig
Asheville, North Caroll"
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
344604301
Date:
1986
Drainage Area (mi2):
0.7
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
0.4
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0.5
Average Flow (cfs):
1.8
30Q2 (cfs):
0.7
IWC (%):
13
Compliance data from summer months only. Facility shou14 be given a choice between a chronic
toxicity test at 13 % or an NH3-N limit of 6 mg/1 summer,/) mg/1 winter. Chlorine letter sent
(28µ>�)• i cl 1H•5
Schedule Reouirements and additional
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment
Regional S*ngpineeir
v
Permits &
Reviewers:
—4
Date: /o; 2Y44i
0Date: a D ' 1l
Dte: I 6 )
tng: 11ed Date:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: N O V 2 6 IJ J 1

Pa
Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/l):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (Si):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
IN (mg/1):
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (Si):
Residual Chlorine (µg/l):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
IN (mg/1):
Toxicity test (P/F):
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Su
Winter
0.040
0.040
30
30
monitor
monitor
30
30
1000
1000
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
monitor
monitor
Monthly Average
with
Monthly
Average with
Toxicity Test
Ammonia
Limit
Summer
Winter
Summer
Winter
WO
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
30
30
30
30
EL
monitor
monitor
6
�iq•S
WQ
30
30
30
30
EL
200
200
200
200
EL
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
EL
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Chronic Toxicity P/F at 13%
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures X Fecal Coliform, NH3-N
New facility information
X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
X2
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

l
• 3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

i
I
I C
�
ci—i
07,
o4 H.4A
SG5'# 14�(_0�130! rr�
Jw
_q
�
1
I C

Dy-o3• o�
a. 032 �uw ax
/�•2Z.91

?• w � is
Camp Blue Star Summer Camp
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia as NH3
Summer
7010 CFS
0.4
7010 CFS
0.4
DESIGN FLOW MGD
0.04
DESIGN FLOW MGD
0.04
DESIGN FLOW CFS
0.062
DESIGN FLOW CFS
0.062
STREAM STD UG/L
17.0
STREAM STD MG/L
1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL UG/L
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL MG/L
0.22
IwC %
13.42
IWC %
13.42
Allowable Concentration u I
126.68
Allowable Concentration m /I
6.03
Winter
7010 CFS
0.5
DESIGN FLOW MGD
0.04
DESIGN FLOW CFS
0.062
STREAM STD MG/L
1.8
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL MG/L
0.22
IWC %
13.42
Allowable Concentration m /I
7.29