NC0064246_Engineering Alternatives Analysis_19920731

31
PACE MOBILE HOME PARK
JERRY G. PACE
2720 BUFFA%OE ROAD
CLAYTON, N.C. 2?520
JULY 31, 1992
Mr. Preston Howard, PE Acting Director
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535
Res Pace Mobile Home Park Report Submittal
NPDES Permit No. NC0064246, Johnston County
Dear Mr. Howard:
E I
J U L 31 1992
DIV. OF ENVIRONMENTAL MGMNT.
DIRECTOR'S OFFICE
>_.::..,
JUL 81 1992
WATER QUALITY
SECTION
We would like to take this opportunity to transmit a document
relating to our existing NPIIES permit. This document is being
forwarded bused on a condition contained in our permit and is required
since our wastewater plant discharges into a stream with a 0 cfs. 7910.
The purpose of this letter is to transmit this document.
For your use, we have attached the following information as a part of this
requirement:
I. 1 copy of a document which reviews various disposal alternatives.
This report is being sent to your Division within the one year period
which is specified in our permit. We hope this report satisfies the
requirement as stated in the Q permit condition.
With respect to our f
pe permit, we note that, if your Division finds this
report satisfactory, then our permit limits may be lowered in 1994. _-
If we are required to meet lower limits, we will need to expend _
more funds to upgrade our plant. Also, with the low limits which we n
currentlyhave in our permit, and the lack of knowledge that our dis-
charge is having an impact on the receiving stream, we would appreciate
your consideration of leaving our permit limits as they are now.;
Finally, we would like the opportunity to discuss with you issues -;
relating to the possible use of the effluent channel designation, lower
permitted flow rate, and any other action which will improve the
continued discharge at our site.
Should questions arise concerning this submittal, please feel free to ,
contact Mr. W. Lee Fleming, Jr. PE at 919/833-1234. i
7erry
relyyours, G. Pace
Attachment: As listed �:,

4.
PACE MOBILE HOME PARK
ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION REPORT
DATE PREPARED: JULY 30, 1992
JUL 31 1992
WATER QUALITY
SECTION
,. JUL s 1 1992
DIU, OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DIRECTORS OFFICE ���T
Prepared By:
W. Lee Fleming Jr., Engineering
601 Oberlin Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, N.C. 27605
919/833-1234

9.
PACE MOBILE HOME PARK
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT ENGINEERING STUDY
DATE PREPARED: JULY 30, 1992
I. General Information
A. Background Information
1. Facility Name - Pace Mobile Home Park
2. NPDES Permit Number - NCO064246
3. County - Johnston County
4. Facility Address - Mobile Home Park is located on State Road
1003, 1.5 miles north of Archers Lodge,
North Carolina
5. Name of Permittee - Mr. Jerry G. Pace
6. Permittee's Mailing Address:
Pace Mobile Home Park
2720. Buffalo Road
Clayton, N.C. 27520
Phone - 919/365-4208
7. Name of Receiving Stream - Unnamed Tributary to Buffalo Creek
8. Topographic Map - Attachment Number 1, illustrating point of
discharge
9. Report Preparer—"- W. Lee Fleming, Jr. PE
10. Report Preparer's N.C. PE Certification Number - 9262
11. Report Preparer's Address:
W. Lee Fleming, Jr. Engineering
601 Oberlin Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, N.C. 27605
Phone - 919/833-1234
12. Report preparation period - July 20 to July 30, 1992
B. Description Of The Existing Treatment Works Including Size
Of Major Components
A wastewater treatment plant has been installed which is
capable of treating 15,000 gallons per day of domestic strength
wastes. The plant was installed as a dual. train plant and the
facility consists of the following components:
1. Manually cleaned bar screen
2. Equalization chamber - 1 ea 3,000 gallon
3. Aeration chambers - 2 ea 77500 gallons
4. Clarifiers - 2 ea 1,250 gallons
5. Aerated sludge holding chamber - 1 ea 5,000 gallon
6. Dual air blowers - dual 115 cfm
7. Chlorination system - 250 gallon with tablet chlorinator
8. Site fence
9. Plant outfall
The facilities were designed to protect all electrical and
mechanical components from the 100 year flood as defined by the
-1-

a
most recent flood snapping. Sludge is removed from the existing
plant by a licensed sludge hauler. The current plant was designed
to operate at a rate of 15,000 gallons per day and to meet the
permit limits contained in NPDES Permit Number NCO064246 first
issued on December 19, 1985 and reissued on August 1, 1991.
C. Description Of The Origin And Type Of Waste Which Is Discharged
From The Treatment Facilities
The existing wastewater treatment plant is designed to serve a
mobile home park with 45 homes and is designed to treat
domestic strength wastewater. The following calculations
illustrate the estimated sewerage volume from these homes:
45 homes X 2.75 bedrooms per home X 120 gpd per bedroom = 14,850
gpd. Allow for design considerations of plant size, then design
for 15,000 gpd (Flow rate in existing-NPDES permit)
D. Planned Phases
There are no phases planned for this facility. The complete
mobile home park exists at this time with 45 spaces available.
Currently, there are approximately 36 lots served by the WWTP.
E. Evaluation of Past Compliance History
The Division of Environmental Management's Raleigh Regional
Office provided a computer printout of the past two years of
self monitoring data for this facility. This information is
provided as Attachment Number 2. In addition, the 1991
self monitoring data was obtained. These sheets are included
in Attachment Number 2.
The compliance of this facility, with the issued NPDES permit,
has been demonstrated by operation of the plant since the park
was opened. From the available data, it appears that the
existing plant has met the limit for BOD5 almost consistantly.
There have been minor violations of the Ammonia limit in the
past and problems with the fecal coliform limit. These parameters
are being reviewed and operating procedures changes to attempt
to improve the compliance with these parameters. To date, the
Permittee has received several NNP letters and a NOV (for a
reporting violation; not a limitation violation problem).
Further, the Ammonia level illustrated on the DEM printout for
the month of September, 1991 is incorrectly listed as 118 mg/l.
According to the DMR for September, 1991, and the Permittee, the
value was 1.18 mg/l. Finally, from discussions with the
Permittee, it appears that the sample for fecal coliform may
have been taken at the incorrect location in the past. The
sample location has now been clearly identified and the Permittee
has indicated that the samples will be taken at the correct
location in the future.
F. Discussions About the Receiving Stream
According to available documents, the unnamed tributary to Buffalo
—2—

4
Creek is assigned the stream classification of C - Nutrient
Sensitive Waters. This classification was derived since this
tributary discharges into the Buffalo Creek and Neuse River
drainage basins.
With respect to the identification of the UT Creek's 7 day, 10
year low flow, the recently issued permit renewal defines this
stream flow as 0 cfs by inclusion of permit condition Part III,
F. - "Engineering Alternatives Analysis Condition".
II. Evaluation of Environmental Feasibility of Nondischarge Alternatives
A.1) Connection to Sewerage System
a) Existing Sewerage Systems
There are only two municipal sewerage systems which are
located in the vicinity of the mobile home park. These
are the Town of Wendell and the Town of Clayton. Using the
attached maps, it appears that these sewer systems are either
equal to, or greater than, 5 road miles of the project WWTP.
In addition, although there may be other permits issued for
facilities closer to the park site, no known plants are avail-
able to this site. Finally, there are no known non -discharge
systems close to this system with the capacity to accept
the generatedwa�stewater.
Phone inquiries were made to both municipalities about
the possible connection to their systems. The following
findings were gathered:
According to Mr. Steve Bigs, Assistant to the Town Manager,
Town of Wendell, the closest existing sewer main is located at
the Town's wastewater plant. The only way the mobile home park
could connect to the Town of Wendell's system would be by force
main. The Town does not believe that service will be provided
to this area since the park is located in Johnston County and
the Town is located in Wake County. Accroding to Mr. Bigs,
the Town does not plan to provide service into Johnston County.
In a conversation with Mr. Randy Mundt, Planning Director
with the Town of Clayton,,there are no -sewer mains outside
current Town limits. Also, Mr. Mundt indicated that he did
not know of any plans to extend sewer service past the Neuse
River to the north of Town.
Based on the aforementioned findings, the connection to an
existing municipal system is not considered feasible.
To add to this finding, Mr. David Glover, with the N.C. DOT,
has indicated that the Owner would be required to obtain
easements from property owners along the.roadway route
if the necessary rights -of -way widths were not recorded with
DOT. This requirement could make this connection difficult.
The right-of-way width along the routes is unknown at this
time. There are no other available routes to the Towns along
private property.
—3—

Based on these findings, proceed to A.1 (b)
b) Future Sewerage System Extensions
The Town of Wendell indicates that the only extension of a
sewerage system closer to the mobile home park will be the
installation of a new force main from the Town's wastewater
plant to the City of Raleigh's gravity sewer system. This
force main will deliver the Town's raw sewerage to the City of
Raleigh to allow abandonment of their wastewater discharge.
This main will travel south on State Road 1003 and turn right
on to Turnipseed Road. This main will be located approximately
2.2 miles from the mobile home park WWTP. In discussions with
Mr. Bigs, it is understood that the Town has not decided
whether they will allow connection of public or private mains
into this new force main. Without the Town's approval,
connection to this proposed force main cannot be evaluated.
Finally, the new Wendell force main is planned to be installed
in 1994.
The Town of Clayton does not anticipate the extension of
sewer beyond the Neuse River bridge to the north of Town
according to Mr. Mundt. Based on this determination, the
consideration of.t:he connection of the mobile home park's
sewer to the Town of Clayton is not considered feasible
due to the length of force main to make this connection from
the mobile home park WWTP by road.
Based on these findings, proceed to A
A.2) Subsurface Disposal System
a) Determine if Permittee Owns Suitable Lands
1) In 1985, Johnston County visited the project site to review
the possible location of septic tanks. Also, at the same
time the County review a site across the State Road is also
.owned by the Permittee. Copies of the reports prepared
by the County are provided as Attachment Number 3. In
order to review the use of these sites, a report was
prepared by Mr. Frank Doonan, with Whitestone, Inc. which
provided a preliminary loading rate for an LPP system.
This report is provided as Attachment Number 4.
2) If a central subsurface disposal system were considered,
the following components could be required:
1. Land required - 18.0 acres
1. Dosing chamber - 2,500 gallons
2. Dosing pumps and controls - 10 each
3. Disposal fields - 30,000 lineal feet of LPP trench,
20 fields each with 10 lines each 150 feet in length
4. Force main - 5,000 if
This design uses a loading rate of 0.1 gpd per square foot
IM

C
of Low Pressure Pipe (LPP) disposal system as provided by
Mr. Doonan. Using this loading rate and buffer zones, the
active area would be 9.0 acres and, using an equal area for
repair, the total area would be 18.0 acres. From the
reports provided and application of the required buffer
zones, it appears that the Permittee does not own sufficient
lands to install a central 15,000 gpd subsurface system as
illustrated by:
Existing mobile home park land - The site has been modified
by the installation of raods, drainage, lots, and WWTP.
Based on this disturbance, this site could not be used.
Alternate parcel - Using the map provided on the County,
it appears that the section of land along the road front may
be useable. With a width of 400 feet and a depth of about
900 feet, the total useable property is about 8.2 acres.
This is less than the active area required; with no land for
a 100% repair. Finally LPP systems require that the dis-
posal system be installed along the contour. This require-
ment will further reduce the ability to locate an LPP system
within the useable property.
Based on these findings, it appears that the Permittee
does not oewn,,.sufficient suitable land for the installation
of this large of a system and additional suitable land may
be required to be purchased for this system to be installed.
3) The following buffer zones were used in this evaluation:
Distance between fields - 20 feet
Buffer to property line - 50 feet
Distance to well - 100 feet
Distance to creek or drainage - 25 feet
4) Sufficient suitable lands are not available for the install-
ation of a central 15,000 gpd subsurface disposal system on
lands currently owned by the Permittee.
5) Based on these findings, proceed to entry A.2 (b)
b) Determine if Adjacent Suitable Lands Could Be Purchased
The Pemittee has reviewed the lands immediately adjacent to
the mobile home park site. He has found that the lands are
either not for sale, are designated for farming activities,
or are planned for residential development. These findings
were otained by direct conversations with the land owners
by the Permittee. In addition, two (2) adjacent property
owners were contacted and letters were otained which state
that their land is not available. These are provided as
Attachment Number 5.
A.3) Spray Irrigation System
a) Determine if Permittee Owns Suitable Lands
-5-

c
1) Using the report provided by Mr. Frank Doonan, the ability
to use the lands owned by the Permittee for spray irriga-
tion can be evaluated. From this report, it can be seen
that the lands owned by the Permittee have limited value
for a spray system due to steep slopes and eroded areas.
2) Based on the findings of the report by Mr. Doonan,
and using a conservative irrigation rate of 0.58 inches
per week, it would take approximately 6.7 acres of active
area plus 9.5 acres to provide the required buffer zones for
this project. In addition, if 50 days of storage were
required for holding the treated effluent during poor irri-
gation of this pond would have to be over 0.50 acres in size
if the pond were 5 feet deep. When the buffer zones for the
pond is added to the pond area, then about 1.5 acres would
be required for the storage -of the effluent. In total, it
would take about 17.7 acres for the spray irrigation alter-
native. Also, the wastewater treatment would be provided by
the existing plant. Finally, due to the configuration
of the permittee's land (width of property is 400 feet),
then additional lands would be required. This conclusion
is based on the following discussion:
Existing -.;mobile home' park land - The site has been modified
by the installation of raods, drainage, lots, and WWTP.
Based on this disturbance, this site could not be used.
Alternate parcel - Using the map provided on the County, and
Mr. Doonan's report it appears that the front half of the
property may be useable. With a width of 100 feet and
a depth of about 1,400 feet (buffers of 150 feet from
the property lines and 400 feet from road frontage dwelling
have been taken from the property dimension), then the
total useable property for spray is about 3.2 acres.
This is less than the active area required of 6.7 acres.
Based on these findings, it appears that the Permittee
does not own sufficient suitable land for the installation
of this large of a system and additional suitable land may
be required to be purchased for this system to be installed.
If a spray irrigation system were considered, the following
components could be required:
1. Land required - 17.7 acres
2. Storage pond - 1 each 50 day
3. Irrigation pump - 2 each
4. Control panel - 1 each
5. Force main - 2,000 feet
6. Irrigation system,- 20 heads with drain valves
3) The following buffer zones were used in this evaluation:
Distance between irrigation and property line - 150 ft
Buffer of lagoon to property line - 50 feet

(L
Distance to residence - 400 feet
Distance to creel: or drainage - 50 feet
Distance to well - 100 feet
4) Sufficient lands are not available for the installation
of a central 15,000 gpd spray irrigation system on
lands currently owned by the Permittee due to the restric-
tive loading rate, site limitations, and the configuration
of the property.
5) Based on these findings, proceed to entry A.3 (b)
b) Determine if Adjacent Suitable Lands Could Be Purchased
The Pemittee has reviewed the lands immediately adjacent to
the mobile home park site. He has found that the lands are
either not for sale, are designated for farming activities,
or are planned for residential development. These findings
were otained by direct conversations with the land owners
by the Permittee. In addition, two (2) adjacent property
owners were contacted and letters were otained which state
that their land is not available. These are provided as
Attachment Number 5.
B) Evaluation of•.Three Non -discharge Alternatives
From the information provided above, it appears that none
of the non -discharge alternatives are feasible due to the
distance of the site to existing sewer collection systems
and the lack of suitable lands for sub -surface and spray
irrigation systems.
Based on the determination that there are no feasible alter-
natives, proceed to II.C.
C) Evaluation of the Relocation of the Discharge Point
C.1) Distance to Alternate Discharge Point
A review of Attachment Number 1 topographic map indicates
that the mobile home park is located approximately 3.5 miles,
by road, from a potential discharge point into Buffalo Creek.
Due to the drainage area above this point, the stream may have
a positive 7 Q 10 flow. In addition, when the Permittee first
investigated this park, a wasteload allocation was prepared
for two sites. The first site was the selected discharge
point and the second site was a point into an unnamed
tributary to Big Arm Creek. Since this wasteload allocation
indicated that the Big Arm limits are higher than the selected
discharge point, then this site may have a positive 7 Q 10.
A copy of this wasteload allocation is provided as Attachment
Number 6.
If relocation of the discharge point was installed to Buffalo
Creek, the following components could be required:
-7-

1. Lift station - 5 foot with dual pumps
2. Control panel - 1 each
3. Standby power - 1 each generator
4. Force main - 18,500 feet in length
C.2) Required Easements
fie.IV
f1
cr''"
If the Permittee were to relocate the discha
Buffalo Creek, an encroachment agreement would be required
from the N.C. DOT to allow the delivery force main to be
installed from the mobile home park to the bridge over
the creek. In addition, an easement or land purchase may
be required to install the plant outfall pipe into the creek.
As outlined in the connection to a municipal collection
system section of this report, the DOT would require that the
Owner obtain easements from property owners where the DOT
right-of-way was not sufficient for the installation of
the force main. This condition is unknown at this time.
Should the investigation of the unnamed tributary of Big
Arm Creek find that there is a positive 7Q10 flow, then
a new main may be installed across the Permittee's property.
In this case, no new easements would be required; but a DOT
encroachment would be required to allow the force main pipe to
allow the pipe::to cross under State Road 1003.
D) Feasibility of Discharge Relocation
Based on the requirement to obtain a N.C. DOT Encroachment
agreement for the Buffalo Creek discharge point, the
uncertainty of the 7Q10 flow in the unnamed tributary of Big
Arm Creek, the fact that the closest possible positive 7Q10
stream is 3.5 miles from the project, this alternative appears
to be not feasible. Using the findings of this report, the
following chart can be prepared'
Alternative Feasiblity Reason
Sewer extension none distance and easement
Subsurface disposal none site limitations and no new land
Spray irrigation none site limitations and no new land
Discharge relocation none distance, easement, & 7Q10 flow
Based on the instructions provided by the DEM guidelines
for the preparation of this report, Section III should not be
completed if the aforementioned alternatives are found to
be not feasible.
III. Cost Estimation and Comparison
Based on the above findings, this section is not required.
IV. Additional Information

In order to allow the DEM to better understand'the costs
associated with the
upgrade of
the existing wastewater
treat-
ment plant to achieve
the new 5
mg/l BOD5
and 1 mg/1
Ammonia limits, the
following discussions
are offered:
The installation of
plant component
modifications to the
meet the 5 mg/1 BOD5
and 1 mg/l
Ammonia will be as follows:
Unit
Existing
Existing
Required
Required
Size
Design
Size
Design
Bar screen
-Provided
None
No Change
None
Equalization
3,000 gal
20% ADF
No Change
20% ADF
"Equalization blower
None
None
25 cfm
25 cfm/
1000 cf
Aeration chamber
15,000 gal
24 Hrs
22,500 gal
36 Hrs
@ ADF
@ ADF
Clarifiers
2,500 gal
4 Hrs
No Change
4 Hrs
@ ADF
@ ADF
Sludge chamber
5,000 gal
4.5 cf/
No Change
2.0 cf/
100 gal
100 gal
J.
Plant blowers 2-115 cfm 3-115 cfm
^Chlorxne contact
250 gal
24 min
468
gal
45 min
@ ADF
@ ADF
"Tertiary filter
None
None
12
sq ft
1.0 gpm
sq ft
"Clear well
None
None
900
gal
15 gpm for
10 min
"Mud well
None
None
1,000
gal
clear well
+ 10 min X
ADF
"Post air chamber
None
None
468
gal
45 min
@ ADF
"Dechlorination
None
None
Tablet
None
Expanded unit
*^New unit
Notes,
i. This is a preliminary estimate of
units only.
ii. Existing unit
sizes taken
from information
provided by the
Owner.

J
iii. No DEM notification of dechlorination requirement to date.
In order to understand the cost to improve the existing plant
to meet the lower limits, the following costs are estimated:
Package plant expansion - $44,500.00
Installation - $10,000.00
Electrical connection - $1,500.00
Total construction - $56,000.00
Notes
i. This is a preliminary estimate only. The costs included
in this report were provided by Mr. Jack Chapman by letter
dated July 27, 1992. See Attachment Number 7.
ii. The cost of the plant will be directly related to the
field conditions encounterL-d as the plant is designed.
No land costs since there is an existing plant site.
With respect to the operating costs of the plant, this facility
is owned and operated by the permittee; thus there are no
direct utility charges to the home owners. The permittee has
obtained his operator's certification, therefore, there are no
costs for operator services. Currently the only costs for
operation of -the plant ale: electrical power costs, twice per
month sampling costs, chlorine tablet purchase, maintenance
and repair costs, and DEM annual fees.
Due to the large potential cost of modification of the plant,
the extremely restrictive existing permit limits, and the fact
that the flows from the plant are generally much lower than
the permitted flow, the Permittee requests that DEM consider
the removal of the lower limits from the permit conditions and
retain the permit limits at the current levels specified in
NPDES Permit Number NC0064246.
Prepared By: W XtZ- I
I Date:tgot?x
Wilton L. Fleming, Air. PE
Approved For Submittal:
Da t e
Jerr G. Pace
-10-

v
ATTACHMENT NUMBER 2 COMPLIANCE INFORMATION

G,KE:X88/MP
07/2:3/92
COMPL:(ANCE
EVALUATION ANALYSIS
REPORT
PAGE 1 1
PE:I
MI'T•••-•NC0064246
i77:F'E:•••• 00:1.
REPORT
PERI001
9006-•93.0;'.7
LOC:••••••••-•1:
Fr•1f,:IL,1'T'Y�••PFaC;i
Mi:)B:I:L.GG HOME
PARK
DE;3:CC,N FLOW----
Oi.."i0
L.C)C:A'r10N
„CLAYTON
REGION/COUNTY---05
JOHNSTON
50050
0021.0
00'.S:30
00610
3J.61.6
50060
00300
000J.0
MONTH
CJlMcliu
8011
RES/TSS
NI•,3+Nhl4-•
FEC CC)LI
CHLORINE:
DO
TEMP
L..Iril'r
.0150 P,
9.00
F 30.0
F 4.00
Jr 1000.0
NOL. F
6.00
NC)L_
90/ 06
. 004,1
;1. 60
6.8
1.100
67.B
.300
6. 00
"(S . 00
90/07
.0043
3.00
5.5
3.4,'
1(54.9
.1300
6100
26,00
90/08
0043
.20
4.1
1.00
1.766.3i=
.300
6.00
26.00
90/09
.0045
3.00
0.9
4.66F
210
300
6.00
?2 00
90/10
. 004)
3.10
10.4
2,19
2'2999 . Oi'*
300
6. 00
:1.9 • fi0
90/ 1.:1.
0045
3100
1410
•I.. 00
498.0
.200
6.00
1.9 . 00
90/12
.0045
3.0()
4.0
1.00
2,0
.300
6.00
19.00
91/01
004'5
3100
5.0
1.100
93.0
.300
6.00
19.00
91/02
004;5
3.:10
4,0
4102F
7266.0E
.'300
6.00
16.00
9:V03
O04
3.00
410
J..76
6410
.300
6.00
16.00)
91. /04
. 00250
3.00
J. 6. O
5 .:1. 2 „
"149 , 0
. 500
6.00
2:1., OU
91/05
0035
::3. 4';)
4 . 5
6 . 69F
:Lfi4 0
500
6.00
24.00
AVE:RAC)E
MAXIMUM
.0045
005E5
2.84
7.2
2.74
2880.5
.32 U
6.00
21 .08
MIN INUM
0043
13.60
16.0
6.69
2399910
.1,100
6.00
26.00
UNIT
M(3L)
130
MG/1...
4.0
1.100
2.0
200
6.00
:1.6100
MG/L..
MG/L.
0/100ML
MG/L
MG/L
DEG .0
07. 2::. 9C
04:31 P1.1
Pnl

E.4YALUATION ANAI
L
IE.
FT R M 11 . .... — Ni C 0 0 6 4 2 4 6 p 00 J.
'I
CAI. :. Fl 0 R 1' F' E" RT. 0 D '. 9 0 0 6 9 105
L. 0 C — E
oiso
PACE M(3131--- HOMEM.3TON
FAC Ii-.I'I*Y-- LL-1304RK
11
0 N C Cl U 14 Ty OU
LOCAT I OiN-----CLAYI*OiN
00400
0 0600 0 6 6
HOWN-i Pli
Tol' A L N NAOS .... TOT
I m 3: It 910 6.0
90106 7.0-7.0
90/07 7 . 0---e-? - 10,
90/08 7.0-7.0
90/09 7.0-7.0
90/10 7.2-7.0
7.0-7.0
90/12 7.0-6.8
fl./Ol 7. 0-6. Os
91 0/02 7.0 .... 7.0
91/03 7. 0 6 . 1,21
91/04 7.0-6.5
L I m IT 9.0 6.0
NOL NOL
A Y E R A Q Le
..... . .
MAXIMUM 7.200
........ . ...........
Wl iq i m U m 6 1 '%!50 0
1. ...... .. ......
U N' I T * sti
MG/L MG/1..

.1 , i'tQ0 3
:L6 :?:a; 11.
TERMINAL
C(:)NNFt.'1'L:I]
TO:i.MS
IMEi
GKEXG8/MP
07i23/9:
COMPI...:I:ANC:I•,;:
1::,VAI,.LJATJ:GN
ANALYSJ:S
RU'01
T
PAGE:
P1iCRMI••-•-N00064246
T'
P;LF'1:.: ^001.
RiiLPGR'T'
FFR:CGf,I: 91•Qt>^'i�O
L(:I C-----E
FACII_I'1"Y-•-PACE
MOBILIE
1-1(3Mi;
PARK
Di":1.3.1"Gil P'I_(1W-....
o:l.i0
CI._ASfS._.... ;
I,..00A'T'IGN--Ci
AYTON
RG:C71:0N/CMUNTY-
--- U.';
JOHNSTON
`SUQ:YQ
00:3:i3O
005()
00610
31,616
iOU60
00300
OUO1G
Iri0NTH
Q/MfiO
FOE)
RC::S/TSS
NH3•e•NI.14--
FEM CCILI CHLORINE
D0
TI"MP
L..I'ri I l'
F` 03.50
F 9 .00
IF 1110 . 0
1= 4.00
F 1000.0
NOL. F
6.00
N Q L
91./06
00:'.55
3.00
4,3
1.. OQ
2 .0
.11,700
6.10
25.00
9i/07
0060
3.00
4.0
1.00
1::3;;. 6
1500
6.00
- ;.0O
LIMIT
F 01t5'0
F• 9.00
F 30.0
F 4.00
IT 2001Q
NGL.
NGL
N01-
1./0(EI
.0060
3. 00
4 .0
1. , QQ
F.3l3:L , OF
400
6 , 00
24.00
91/09
.0060
1.20
4,S
:L,L0 00P'
2713,OF"
.400
6100
24.00
91/.J.O
. 0060
3.40
9 , 7
1. u . 4017'
1.041:4 , 41-
.400
6 , 00
20 , 00
91/:i.J.
0060
31O0
12,0
1,00
;I,i.0
:iS(i0
6.00
16,00
91./ 1'2.
.00450
;3 . 10
4 „ ':i
1.00
2-9000 , QF
.300
6. 00
14i . 60
92/01
00dr0
7.60
7. 0
1.100
133. U
.400
6100
J.6, 00
9 2 / 0 ^2
.0060
14.00F
2110
1.. Q0
J.:7.5. 0 EV
t.'i00
6.00
:I.:'i 00
si'r'f03
. 006U
:3. 50
7.0
;°i , 1501''
4094 . OF
4:` 0 .
6. 00
15 • 90
92. 04
.0060
2:,40
iJ..0
J..00
104.0
.400
6.00
J.9.00
i'2/0113
.0060
1.80
4.0
1.00
916.OF
2.500
6.00
20.00
AVERAGE
. 00t:77
4 .2t:i
7.8
1.1. , 90
3-16,5, 6
604
6.00
19. f..i.
MAXIMUM
0060
14.00
21,0
1.113 . 00
23000.0
11500
6, 10
25 00
ilINIMUm
00t.5;
I180
4,0
1.100
2.0
.300
6,00
1„5 00
UNIT
M G D
MG/1.,
MG/L
MG/L
4/100141-
MC/L..
MG/1„
E,11;6.(,
07. 23. 92 04:31 Phi PO'2

07/23/92
G. i( x 8 i:� H P
COMPI...XAN(:'f*r,.-.'
EV./-- UJATION ANALYSIS REPORT
(:,I::. 12
P E- R
M I I'-- N C , 0 0 6 4'2 46
JJ 1: f� F.7. 0 01
R E. 1:1 C) R T P E R 10 0 9.1.0 1) 92 0 ','5 L-OC------E
0:1. IJ 0
CL.ASf
C I L I T y
so,? f4 Cl� El MID B I LE. HOME".
PARK
R EGI ON/CC)UNI*)'--- Oe;.; JOHNSTON
L..(.'jC'.�()TION-----C',LAYTC)N
00400
C"0600
0 0 6 6!5
F, H
J'o T A L. N
P F1 0 S .... T C) T
LIMIT
9.0 6.0
NOL
N -1-3 L
91/06
7. 0-6.5
9:1. / 0 7
7.0 .... 6.7
Ll: M I T
9.0 6.0
N Cl IY.
N C.) 1'.
9 J. /0 .0
7. 0--'/'*'. o
9
0-6. 6
91/1.0
7 .0--6 , r.--;
41100
9 1 /3. 1
7 0-6 .9
92/02
"Y' i 0 .... 6,6
9 2.1
92/04
7. 0-6. 5
AVE", RAGr ... . ............ — . . . . .......... . ....... . ....... 3.. 2e04
MAXIMUM 7 0 ...... ................. 0500
MINNUM 6. re-00 15100
(!
UNT'r S jj 11G/L M (**)/ L
I
ij
07. 23. 92 04: 31 PM P03

EFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO: v ` DISCHARGE NO: MONTH: MO YEAR:
FACILITY NAME: R e CLASS: -COUNTY: v ��
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHAR E (ORC): GRADE:._sz�._
CERTIFIED LABORATORY:
CHECK BLOCK IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON (s) COLLECTING SAMPLES
Mail original and one copy to: I CERIIFY THAT THIS REPORT ;
ATT: Central Files IS ACCURATE AHO COMPLETE TO
Division of Environmental Manitclement +
N C Depsutment of NRCD PO Box 27697 IRE BEST OF MY KNOWLEOC[.
11 07— cl--L
Raleigh. North Carolina 27611 X
i;alursh nE dnAffininr in rnsnenukin eltarae
will
Ira
ON===�mm
■m�r
m
©rmmm®m
m
�®
®lm
MI-M
Elmo
ffimmmm
1Jr.P1 11uM1 1" R• 1 1 1 1 /o'i

EFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO : A DISCHARGE NO:Qel MONTH: - YEAR: ,
FACILITY NAME: d �il� e:.L cs _ CLASS:-. LCOUNTY: '3"al( cTr
OPERATOR 1N RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC)� ��'-� C- _ _._.GRADE:_
CERTIFIED LABORATORY: Lc-�=k
CHECK BLOCK IF ORC HAS CHANGED F PERSON (S) COLLECTIN& SAMPLES:.
Mail original -anal one copy to: I CERTIFY INAT THIS REPORT '
AT T: Central Files IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE 10
Division of Environmental Management
N C Department of NRC D PO Box 27697 THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
Raleigh. North Carolina 27611 X
�r in respStnible
charge
•
IWO
MM
mum
moos=
wwo
=
mm
�==
OWN
MAIN
WINIMINI
IBM
�Mlmm�
mmm
MUNNIN
MWOMMM
==Oman
om
'mom■OMMMINIMM
Flaw
MHim
�Ciii�ii
WE
110
In M
0�11M
mrr�
rii=iie�°�
mom■
MIMI
WE
01
r" w —

EFFLUENT ,
.
6 �7yfol NO: D �' MONTH: �!��'��..—.--YEAR:__.L `
DISCHARGE
NPDES PERMIT NO � - �.4�•��s/J,�-o �
A e- e CLASS:Z COUNTY
FACILITY NAME
�-�-� Pee_ GRADE_. .._
IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC)
OPERATOR,
CERTIFIED LABORATORY: e�.
PERSON (S) COLLECTING SAMPLES
i
CHECK BLOCK IF ORC HAS CHANGED '
1 CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT
'` t
Mail original and one copy to: 9
AFT: Central Files IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE 10
Division of Environmental Management 1.
N C Department of NRCO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. '
PO Sox 27687 !
Raleigh. North Carolina 77611 X
Si rtaturc of operator in responsible charge
50050 00010
1 00401
00545
$0060
00310 1
00330
g6ly
00500
00300
INI(R PARAMETER
CODE ABOVE
LUW
NAME AND UNITS
BELOW
U
ti
$
EFF 0w
;
Q
p
N
d
A
W O;
JW
-CcT
4W
c.9
uj
�?
CV
Q
a Cn
W�7
Jw
A�
to
GQ
A ��'�
JA
.;
j4..!
�Q•�
A v
�
'�
� `
.'.j• ;.
1.i
Y
., .
Q
A
NE
C5
aG
,
CC F-••
W� L J
C-i
L
Cl
Lai
H
LaiS
OC C2
CDp
CON
G]
CI.2
NE ~
am Z
O w
h- I�t/�CC
Q A W
w A V
LA-C2•C7
y �" c
C! O
.
A--
RS
MGD
1111
ML/L
MG/L
MG,L
MG'
MG; I.
MC:
MGi
/33100 L
MG,L
2
4
s
,��
� ys•
0
3
6
7
a_
101
Icf..<iY
,
14
I
.
.?
�
iY
•,
>
1 _Y
`•
t`
c
15
A
S
21
'
i•
sw�ir..•+
22
..�ri.rar
�.:::r
23
14
1
26
21
N
bpi
17
28
30
j'
Average �c`NS
3
„�•
L 'O
Max.
Min.
Com .(C)/ Gmb(G)
Monthly Limit
/of Z)
.0p
DVh1 Fotm MIt•l t 1 1184 i

EFFLUENT-
9:NPDES EP RMIT NO: �DISCHARGE NO:y "% MONTH: YEAR •
FACILITY NAME: c s CLASS:... COUNTY:
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) :��` `� �f c.--_-- GRADE:
CERTIFIED LABORATORY:
PERSON (S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: U—C OLOL-
CHECK BLOCK IF ORC HAS CHANGED
_
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT
Mail ori43inal and one copy to:
AT T: Central Files IS ACCURATE AND COMPUTE TO
Division of Envitonmcntal Management '
14 C Department of NRC[)
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, P111
PO Box 27697
I
Raleigh. North Caiolina 27611 X
Si r lure o pc for in responsible charge
51050 00010 00401 00545 150060 00310 1 003io, IA to V0530 f 31616 00300
INTER PARAMETER CODE ABOVE
NAME AND UNITS BELOW
w �
a � �fcn�Lcc
p Inf 1."J am CID_j w 4 Z � .� LQ+J
,V
+tea' Cn QC V) W LAJ d Z `-� xuj
N L.1 ...rw OC OQ L"A wd� pCL_w .
_
�--' •g `� )w., � y.,r t-- H OJ G i' cm "E )�-- Fes-- in 1__CnCnn acc �
to x w w ac o a ._ o w w C S
oA w �++ o C»L&i
I.- CS p ►-- C-20 CL V) .� a Ca a* cV Ca •Q: % t-- F_Cn = LB.. C.iim C=
MRSI MGD UNIT ML/L MG!I MG/L MGiL MG/L MCI MG/ / 00 L MG/L '
2
l
4
e
�a
10
.
12
;
14
3v
es U
r
16
:....
., :.
-. .•::
. ..•
.:�-
r�r.rrr
'.`'
uw...i.w.
•niiitse`iiwii.r
:
is
.-:-` -----
a
,, 1
• ..2-3
20
err
21
22
13
14
a
•
26
1
•
1i-.•
2a
..•..��
wrwww�•
.r.irrwt�.w�-
,
1�..rr.rr
.....i.�.�
.
21
21
30
o
I O d sV
D
.S
r__a
L
Avcra e
o D
/
U
Max.
3 a
r
3
Min.
Com .(C)/ Grab(Gj
Monthly Limit
. J
! 0
4� 1-1
Gc p
. ��
1)I:ht Form hilt-1 111/84

t
t
EFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO: 01V w?` 4 DISCHARGE NO: MONTH: EAR:
FACILITY NAME: c• �� -� -��` �• <- 5 CLASS:,�,COUNTY: �1",4dly
i�
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) : yt" d:4 i1 p1je -e- GRADE:.._
CERTIFIED LABORATORY:- 1�0 etf6'~-e( '
PERSON (s) COLLECTING SAMPLES: ',Tc 7 7
C1•IECK BLOCK IF ORC IIAS CNANCEE)
Mail original and one copy to: 1 CIl11UY 1RA1 IRIS AII'ORI '
AT T: Cf-ntral Files IS ACCUAAIE AND 00MP1 I I( 10
Division of E nviioimiental Management
N C Department of NRtm PO Box 276117 IN[ stsl 0! Mr I1nOw110r,E
�
Raleinh North Ca+ulina 27411 v
_
_i nature o
wee' for in I•e1:1 onsible char *
00010
p0109
00515
50060
00110
ODl1
0610
OOS
00510
11616
a j 0xINUR
rARAME111
000E ABOVE
MW
CD,,,
�NAME
AND UNIT
1!(lOW
U
4
J
O
O
L
©
a�v
O
a
�''� W
—i
J WCCiC
QC
I
7-
O
J
a- V11
W. •
Iti
t= �
H �
l!1
C] i�
O .
O O
� a
";IE
J
� �
J1�►�
.QQ.
,.-'J O V
t.. � � �
=
W
y C.7
p
�,,,,
�L KL
A DC
IW 1+1
1--► C3
Q
'
bN
t/f .Tc
uj
OC C.�
Q O
00 cv
C7 I
C.2 '
`
-c 7S
FO— OWe
�--Nti�
GNUS
Lw� v •C)
.
G Q
;
RRS
MC0
Nl
UL
MG/ L
MG,, L
MG
MC: L
MG/ L
'M / L
/100mi
Bit
'}'
1,
•r -
.t•. `Z' :r•
'.0`
1
is
.. '.t,
•.i%.- � �.
'
1
6
2L7-
t.
12
'
�►
p
3/ 0
8
• V
16
�....:..r.
��• > •fit:
1\
.�
•V•
�w�r�,
t
l
�`
�MINl.�NI
7•• 1tY
f .�
7
t
• Y
•
1'
20
I
t
-
•'
f'
21
3
is k . /�
�", _ •: ,�-
E..
,ti.: �f > � 7�
!' " a
D
21
is
26
tt<
Average
Iv
�, • c
v
Max.
_"...."'
Men.
Cofn.(C)/ Grob(G)
Monthly limit`—'
--
`
111I:A1 Foml A1it. 111
1;R•1

EFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO: DISCHARGE NO: MONTH: T' dY _YEAR:.
FACILITY NAME;: 1�.-_.1�- s' , CLASS: ,,.COUNTY: 1y�L ,
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) : �� ,_ .� '�— GRADE,
CERTIFIED LABORATORY:--
PERSON (s) COLLECTING SAMPLES:
CHECK BLOCK IF ORC HAS CHttNGED
;
Mail original and one copy to: I CERIITY IIIAT INIS R[PORI kk ;
ATT: Central Files t
Division of Environmental Management IS ACCURATE AND COMPIE It 10
NC Department of NRCD
,
PO Box 27697 1HE BEsI DF Mr KllowttnrE ;
Raleigh. North Carolina 27611 X -•__ ��
Si na a of o erat to responsible charge
51050
00010
00.101
00545
50060
00310
00340
0 I
00500
530
1616
003,10
FLOW
[N11 R PARAM(T[R
CODE ABOVE
EFF ❑
C=O�
HAM[ AND UNITS
BELOW
CJ
cry
W
�W./
�
W 04
tl
4
INF
►LJ
W
en
Laien
C'' H
1� �~.
a ;c
O
�C-71
`ZE cm
�
'� A
GLQ
.rI y.
W_
Ca W
U
4
La C1�
w w
F+ CJ
d
W
V!
w
= C�
O p
= N
C�
CI?
I—
+Y 7C
Q W
(-� CIC
���.�
h� V1 CC
i W O
La. C.i • U•
H K
C] O
NRS
MGD
Will
ML/L
MG/l
MG:L
MG
MG�I
MG;L
MG/
/I fl
MG/L
2
4
i�
.o �s
•c�
J
•�•!)
1,v
.D
I D
6
8
•
10
12
14
j
t
16
1
20
77
22
-
23
24
Ar
28
�
30
Averse
Max.
Min.
Com .(C)/ Gmb(G)
Monthly Limit
0
I
IWNI Form mit-1 (1 1/84 i

EFFLUENT _
NPDES PERMIT NO : U ` DISCHARGE NO: a MONTH: J u YEAR:
FACILITY NAME:. dyZC _ ' CLASS,: COUNTY: re LyrZ0 n�
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) : GRADE:---
CERTIFIED LABORATORY : - �J e A rGC�,e yuA_„ 2 � ZrPERSON (S) COLLECTING SAMPLES: C4-,?
CHECK BLOCK IF OFiC HAS CHANGED
Mail original and one copy to: I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT '
ATT: Central Files IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO
Division of Environmental Management
N C Department of NRCD
PO Box 27617 THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. E
Raleigh. North Carolina 27611 X
Signaturg gf merat'
MMN
=901M
®
®
mM�®
m
r���r�
��s�■�
Limit

4
9?
0
P. r
J
141
������NT
�Z et�l NTH:.': YE R
NPDES'ERMIT: NO
DISCHARGE NO* -1mc
A,
T FACILI'YjNAM CLASS: COUNTY: 2"""21 A/
klil it
�,Ld- y
OPERATOR,IN, RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC): I "It t T GRADES
c/0;,l, Ali I -
CERTIFIED:. LABORATORY:
CI-111i BLOCK IF ORC HAS CHANGED
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT
C-1
original.and one copy t o-.
MATT:
Central Fil
h Division of Enviiallimental Management
IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO I
q 1%
ly--N C Department of NRCD t
'Box
j
.14"!
Ul
PO 27687
THE BEST Of MY KNOWLEDGE.
'Raleigh North Carolina 27611
x
c�
.7
igna
re of o pA responsible.,!chorpe
A I o d.1n
00010 .00401
50060 - -
06310 00340 0Ouw
00500 3516 -- I Olga
f,os,—
W CJ LOW
Lf 6=�w
J
lj'j' 14,
SHIER PARAMETER CODE ABOVE
Cw
IS
NAME AND UNIT! BELOW
C* ;'INf 0
i
LAJ
Lai 9= :E
Lai L&A c-
Ln c-, ME
-ILAJ 2M
cm LAJ
QXcL.9 N4 E
c j
LAJ Lai Ld6J
C-2 C.> C16 29
w C=) ME t=
c1n
= 3 =3
Lai
9=1 04 con
—
cc czo cc C14
1--Cnd= 7 Lb. C.3
HRSAND c UNII m
Kc/ 111, MCl/ L MG, MG/L
MG/ L MG/L 1 /100 ML MG/
77.
;�N: . 's t tol fll-zll t; .1; ;A
- . , - J
P., -V H::
2c,
A
4
7777
R. :4
PAUL. fiz h
6
mT
z
4 mpqdpp'
, j1.
b. Lany.V
.
Igo:
b
EIRE-
10
.
iv ... 1;
ip
12 i
Ilk.
r
14
v
af
d n
Too
771
V;
f
:
Y.
;: 1-* .1
jII
7;
24
24
26
4 'A
291
rtc;,l
IF!1, A
�Db
XY
ocIt
D
I
PLAY
Average
_44,0
Max. A
Min.
J-!j -
Comp.(C)/ Grab(G)
-J
2.
Monthly Limit
do
-.
DE M POtin , MR-1 t 11/84

.41
4
N
lit L
TWENT ) . v . ,1 {I i..4 e 01
NPDES PERMIT. NO: JIL7�'!'WW I— DISCIIAnGr- NO: MONTH# Kf *71 No 9-
3
FACILITY. NAME.: 14;2 dzZt-- c L.- -s i CLASS: t;L COUNTY,: 32:21A&' a
'..OPEnATOR IN rtc-SPONS113LE CI­IAnGE (OrIC): GRADE!
All lil:,*1 f . I
CERTIFIED LABORATORY:-- - '0
P F A Zre_ J-64. V
FlIqo1w ,I C'( L1�-tT I`Jr. RAM
.1. $
CIIECK 13LOCKir- 011C I 1AS CIIANGED
I
• J
Mail oilijinal and ono copyto: I CIA111Y .111AI 1111S RI PORI
1
r ;,�: bi. ► il, ; ,t.
�;.': ;0,. �
AT To Cantial Filopt IS ACCURAII AND commu io
lo 'A"
ni tivir D N C 0el). ml of N111C
L
PO Box 7Y6117 IN[ III S I of my 11-h0lyl I D(.I
flatelgh. Hosth Carolina 27611
S f re 0 afor in re )011 1 1 chat gov
10j4-00010 —, 5t) 4 0 1 02545 $0060 00310 0 0 60 0 y jo MLI
TL V GOP 1111tii rmmmit com A10vt
3E j K A.14 E NO Ails 1111, w
F I
0W6J
IMF ro.. _j H
-i Lai L"
c'. P wm IN' q
;,-.
C,4 cc: V) LLA -x 7' G
83- _j 4 Cml C31 _j c1i -J
ty LLI Dc: y.
CL. rt C
;*.i __j ca c=1 c
c� .­1
cm L" -% L" c:11 C.-* Cl> z:- L.2
di:k cc 45 Z) M V .1 C-)l -1c zr_ 0-04
His MUD V -11MIl ML/L MCIL MG; L MG-L_ I MC 4 k MG,IL /IQOML
W:
t
1+ 2f 1� .4
Lit.
4
ij*
0 —LO ek 7
Af!
A
it. 01.6
ILL
r.7
Jw-
I.Y7
LLO
'!i �141 0
his
Aw,
.
. . . . . . . . . . .
16
-P
J
A
A
20
j
i,
_41
.1.l1
Lff
j
24
ii1l
V
AM
26
.3
A
4_112
"
S
I
ZI
i,l
ot
"T
AN
.4.1 11
1
Ell
114
30
..Wb ....
j; 4-:111
"fit'
�'ij
il�i:r!,lif
lt�j11•►1+,r�:t
J.
A.
Average
6(>
U
-iq -1.ij
Maxi
M *1 n.
-
COMPAO/ Grub(G)
A
m
Mon
Monthly Limit
onessomm
-d
9.0
13
I
Zo
z
0
I!V
I 11: Id . is, Moat. , Kt 11 1 11
1 OU-1
.
11

EFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO: 40L2 t&,_ DISCHARGE NO: MONTH:' YEAR:
FACILITY NAIVIE:.. &s- s CLASS:-QZ-COUNTY: M ZA/s'r°'��..,
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) : %j c 11 PA 0- '- :.:._; GRADE►,_.�
CERTIFIED LABORATORY :..._ B J o
PERSON (S) COLLECTING SAMPLES:
CHECK BLOCK IF ORC HAS CIIANGED
Mail original and one copy to: I CEitTIfT 1NA1 IRIS REPORT
ATT: Canlial Files
Division of Environmental Mann age,ent
IS ACCURATE AND COMPLI11 TO '
N C Department of NHCD / i ' '! li;r. i :; • a .
PO Box 27617 THE BEST OF MT KN01YlE0GE.
Raleigh. North Carolina 27611 )(
51, nat 6fe of opt dt r in res onsible char •
toso
00010
00403
oo54s
S0060 I
00110
00a4
00 l
00500
00$ 9
3161630
w
a
Vc
9
g
N
1+
�
_�F
C
a4
c�
41
(,
a
W O
w Gi
}� V
m
.•.1 �.
w
fA 31e
w
QC
d
w
f7C C.�
a!7
A :
O c
AO N
n
y
,r
O O
g .r
-X T
—� Q
o w
►— pC
�
...rw
Fes. V) ^
po}+.j
F—�OC
;: .
1..r► Q �"
=
1aJ O
L+. C.? •
w
"�
h �0...
H st
G� O
IVIR PARAMETER
NAME AND UN
CODE AIDYL
111LOW
�#�
:.
`
'
z +`
INF El
•aG
p QC
Hits
MCD
C*
UNII
MIrL
mGit
MG-1
MC-L
MCIL
MC/
MC/L100
lit.
mi/l,RIE.
-• L
—
2
lit
6
AL
12
t�
i�J
1 +
f}, w� ,�,
e ;
: f'.i .
, ; 2
�
• j
k, _ t
�_
•: yl i tRy
'f � < >
a
: y+�<.t-•
14
16
al:.'+
tf�1}L
S
•>I
•'f
(
.{
•
� ��! fV`f.'•
> • `•
•1�
i��f: i'?;?
1�y,�'t/f �L
•{K:1 �'�,
Itjoj
I jeod o
d
3,'0
20
22
..
1 •1
24
�a
'+.N
Y�4•
.2�:('f}
..
,�
/
'
...
1{l eiy� # i:l..
16
�
•.
si
Oslo
<:�.•
30
,
,, :. ,: , ,
: •
. ,i
�
: • .f
, is i
0
ft.. '.
�. �:i l'f
��•'. :q;.
Average
6,96 o
Max.
Min.
Com .(C)/ Gmb(G)
Monthly Limit

EFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO: '..A . DISCtIARGE NO: 'L' __ MONTH:
- ,�%�'' �%�YEAR:�.
FACILITY NAME: c �:
Yl/c' .�' !�' CLASS::,COUNTY:-
J f
r�/�Aj VA)
;r•OPERATOR IN RESPONSt13LE CHARGE
•
(ORC) :. `'_r �•� .�,�,� �� �„� +�•
'
� ;
CERTIFIED LABORATORY _ fi eld
__--._GRADE
. CHECK BOCK #r• one I1AS CIIANGED
PERSON (s) COLLECTING SAMPLES
i�
{ Mail original and 4na copy (0:
I C11111V THAI THIS RlrOR1 }
:• i
I
AT Ti Cenlret Fila•
"i:;'''11.
+'is�:
f Divlslon of Environmental Mimagamen)
IS ACCURIIIL AND COMrt i 11 10
#
N C Drtlarlrtrcnt of NnC U
� •
. t.:
%i'� ; - '
PO Box 27617
THE BISI Of MY KNOWllOia.
{
•
Tialeigh, T'Jorlb Caroling 27611
{
` i �.•
X
-
IOSO
OOOlO
Ii010
ODSIS
_
0060
003I0
Signalt+f' of n�+er
00Jf0 9O I0 I S O- OOs14
"or i reu+olilsil3le
1
charge
'
Q,rr''''
TLW
1111111 FARAMIITA
COPE ASOVE
c
. li , NO UAI
IELOW
'
Iff Y
;hAMI
Y.
4u
.aC
W
CL.
y
iL a LIP)"d
aE
1�`�
h-
Fn
�n
o
O
F. r:.:
...1
•►c
uiw
� C%-,„.
' Q ~
a..
r-+
4
p
M
y
ZZ �
o AC
_j
w w
F— tJ
Q
w ";
h `.�
u.r a:
OC G�
.
a ea
no V4
ca
C �
I.
H- in
N
6. CA
p�l..i
K
;I c ,
►+.1 A
cy
H yt
7t�
1'
S
CD
��
_EMI
/l
MCiI
MG, l
t,S
MG. L
�[ 7�:
C• l
QwC
KLL
MC. L
..r.rrr..
•r:...:.:w.-
-
iSft,'. i3.r:ryi1{�e-
.:Y'f ..�i
1}±►t '
:ie`i•{1•s:
'S l.�
,` is
1
�
•4
�'_,�'
Ste:+..:.:.•
�,''
.-��-..
, ��
�s� :ii.�.:.'y'
.. ',
L',14:1
:r9. 1
j t.
-;.._.,::+.._.�...:.....:�..
• a
•i�
.
��,�,,,,�_
�r
i ;..•� { �,{ �.•!'
, •
�yr)'�I:I t w
.�•J `. is ••
°
. { tip ' '.
' !
{
//.
Ifridi.ar.
' "'
.11 �.,...,,.,,.,•„
�' �
_ .�
�•-
• L7
"L../
G�
..
F
'
y't -.
:►:.
,,,�„�,,,,,
.
101
f.b
EL
.rrriw...
+I�iil.•+IInIr
.r.
� � ,
-
i
•wr.ar.
•
; s ::;54t
({
.-' � .: :.it•
'A{{J i
�`,�� =t r:
i. ,.. k;
.,.a_.r...�
. .
!•'.
�.).
• a...oi�e�1.
20
.../.._..,�,
r_.,..,.,,
+iirl
..r.,::r,r,.
• ; . ,,
.�lwr.irr
i
2J
�
i
s` '
II
I:1
-
..w�r�.
.
rwr.��
y�,��
t li'•r,�i: �': �
t•.'
: ' •y .'{ ,;i•
t •
•'..«w Mr
S L> :
Y�:Y •i
; r.a i•
t�ii
'. ly:
�1
"
ti
• i
��
•"y •
: fi
• � ; {..
;.;•. �
'•:
• -.
••r•-raw.• .�.-.��..�
•
'
�.�..�
'
•
;
I.-�Iw-•
•
-�rrr-
•.•.I.JJ...
•Y�'Y:I,Y,i.;l;lll.•
t
is'
•, i � ,
I
'
111
iy�{'.6
'�
.1• •{ � %'.:t?:
i
' , i
Illy 1
� : { •
f
'
/.
Average
q;
Gd
.•
,S
.�
,..�...1..:...
::.
s,•
, ,
Max.
Min •
-----•�--
3't•:..,
..__a..W.
r .
W:ht Form AI lt• l (I
l Iba
Lai d .
"
�.

Ott
EFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO : l-DISCHARGE NO: Lo MONTH -..,,YEAR
• ' � 1
•
FACILITY
NAME: 4 7A d
e'i/� Z 4 !�'r. �'
. CLASS:
,
OPERATOR. IN .RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) :
..COUN'ry:
GRADE: �...
CERTIFIED LABORATORY:— c-�>>/�_ a `' `'
..
j " ; '``'
;+
• " ±
•�„�/
PERSON (s) COLLECTING SAMPLES:
CItECK BLOCK IF Of1C NAS CIInNCl:D
i
Moil orlilinal and one copy In:
I Ctaufr 1NAI IRIS RIPORI
+
;'
'
AT T: Cent.ul Flla>,
Divisional Fn vilonmf+nlal Mulfagrment
IS ACCUAAII AND COMFII II 0
I
}.
. i•'"•, '' �
i
'I
E N C Dl partmenl of NRC U
• '
!i
Po Boll 27617
THE Rt51 Of MY KNOWIIOCI,
,:. ; .
�r;;,.l, • :��;` ,`+ .,
Raleigh. North Cwolina• 27611
X
.t��.
.i
'
tutu of nin
s otisiGlh
charge '
I
0010
OOS
050
0]1
Dslos0
0610
i OS00�
00
11
�'v
F
j'
!
WIN I'AAAMtltlt
HAML ANO
COD1 AIOYE
<'
t
u,
t' •; i'
+.
D
tow
i
"QQ
H
ccw
Lai
LA
�
t.al
f:L.
Y+
4.
"'� ►-+
= QC
an
•:
O Ocr.
� =
u
� O ' v
1 �
, _
. � • :
t �;..
,
!
a
O
fJ
+ar
w w
x
Q
w "X
am[
W
O'
N
O
1—
1-- N
Lj
►_ V)t/1
t l=
ham„
;.
►;
! i
CS f 1C
U
N
CIC C.
a]
C-10
wr X_
L1C
►_— v) AG
Lwa. . fJ
A 0
NRS
MCO—C,_
NII
M /l.
MC: I
MSC, L
C
C 1
MGA
go, j
,
. r ;
•....«
•'�
(�
i
J
•/ �'
. � •:�
•i►j'yf � i'=s'
tk1 s��+�
!! t•'
•
r ..
10
�
.L•%
,
,:.
1
.�...�•..
:
.•,
:',��a�;::r<.
.,•
•:tii� �'
j��tlirf
�Ixs.•�.�►
�! '
}:.j.t, j.
•�
1
'
��
'te:fi
.�+ii
,•y> .'a} 'i
•�
1
it if'.
!'
j
3 1••�;}i %�'.'
i
1•i
.(F�}1:.1•
<
}.:
t
16
t 1
`'
j
l {7--.r_
•Y
�.
V D
, �
.
4)
� ..�i���J/� V
'�, j C •t
�iyj i:3 �N
��'�, R t'►•
e.��•� � �v.
'
Is
•.r�.�...
p.• ]
� V
)
. r
'
1
U
�.,•I",
•
,,,.. ,.
' °�
,•
'`s•
.<.
• ..
r '`•
- : ,
;1i+�it txu;{:
>s��,
..
fn
. 3 . •
•rZr{��.;�
r, : _�•
�'s;•;t
t 1 ::
Ili`:,>:
ytY• i-<�� �.
1
�O
•�
rr u� ---
�..ww.r.sr,
•••.s;�
,•i
ci ,i.
t��i_
i€i�'�•'
fi�,'�
•`
tj
`
...:.r..�..
.�,�y
'
'
;•IY:lti!':1:JY+:i
•'•'+•i'
.a�3'
r�'�j:il?':�
�I#�,y1'3
.��;:1°a.
� �•''.
•
!la
V
u
•-.+err.•...
}
tt
«.w......
�-
-
....,-.,,..,
,..,.....��
Ali—
_
�ilw: , : .��a
fry
r• .� i.;
-;
+I'
'w
~
�
it 1!"!t r�'; t•i":
1,
i'
.11•' tl}i .L�1�'..I''
•+!�,"
l�i`s'
r
Average
if
are.. �,;:•,.;•
> , ; .
:: :.:;.
,1r v:=•;.
,�..:}:
•: r
r ►Y. r:i'!'•`
`
Max.
:'� . I ' a
-_....._.._.
�s
�', , :: •
. U
Min
,'
---
-------
—.......—
._.._._._.
! s 1` � �
- -
•_ � � . �,
t -,
t :•! li .
t
i
Cont Grttb((3) I
.(C)/
N9ontltly limit
t p
_
•'
. •.
DEN natal N1 R. I i
1 I mi,
.
•4
J�1

.r,
ATTACHMENT NUMBER 3 -- COUNTY SITE REPORTS

1_
f
JOHNSTON COUNTY HEALTH CENTER
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH -
205 South Second Street SmIthtteld, N. C. 27677 Telephone 934-76N
SOIL REPORT NO. 816 APPLICATIOM HO.
INSPECTION OR IMVESTIGATION REPORT OF Jerry Pace Property
nn
Requested by___..ww__www DgilwCOatr'4-1- ©5
--..w-...wrrwrw�wwwwrw»+w«wwwwwLldtE'-.w•+w.-wwww
Address_w. C..ownws•.u.1l.•wta..nwt�s.. wrwrwrwwwwrrwlwwwr+w�wwwr�rwwrrwwwwwwtr.w.rw
Location ___Rtgfit-!:,ide,of SRw1003_- approximately -1.5+miles �north �ofwArcher Lodge
Person(s) Contacted ....r+.wwwwrwwwww..wwwwww.rwwwwww.�wwwww-wwwiw.r.�wwwwwr.►wwwurwrw
Purposew„__TQ_dgtQatiLQwthe_suit�hility_oE_th- Ie,soil�onwthis_wtract_of_land :�
for septic tank sys gems �� moo .
Copies to:
✓Jerry Pace - Duffaloe Rd., Clayton
1
Don Coat-9
File
S41.L• .REPORT:.. . .
This is a gently rolling to steep tract of land approximately. 12 acres* in size.
No water or sewer improvements were noted .on this tract of land.
For the purpose of this report the soils on this tract -are divided into two
general soil areas. Those areas are described in the following paragraphs and
are delineated on the accompanying map.
Soil area one has *a gently rolling topography. In this area the soils have a
brown sandy loam surface layer.. G to 15 inches thick. The subsoil is a yellowish
brown to. grey sandy clay to clay that extends to a depth of 20 to •..'0 inches. .
Underlying the subsoil is weathered rock or soil strata with grey soil colors., -
indicating poor soil permeability.
soil area two consists primarily of: drainageways. Grey'soil colors, indicating the
prosence of -a seasonal high watertable were noted within -at least 30 inches of
the soil surface in this area.
RESULTS
The majority of the soils on this tract of.land are considered unsuitable for septic
tank systems. North Carolina and Johnston County Regulations pertaining to the use
..of septic tank systems require that the depth to the seasonal high watertable
and soil strata with poor.permeability be at least 3G inches where septic tank systems
are to be used.

Jerry Pace Property
Page 2
A few sites exist in area one where conventional or alternative septic tank systems
(alternative septic tank systems involve the use of a pump) could be permitted.
Due to the variable and orimarily unsuitable soil conditions only very low
density development using septic tank systems appear to be feasible. Should you
choose to develope this tract of land we will work with ,you to locate as many
residence sites as possible.
. I
Should you have any further questions please feel free to contact us.
Conducted by: Joseph T.. Lyon, III
Soil Scientist -!�ce
,, 1
'r
I
I
I

• i

JOHNSTON COUNTY HEALTH CENTER
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH'
205 South Second Street Smithfield, N. C. 27577 ' Telephone 834-76W
SOIL REPORT NO, 815 APPLICATION NO.
IMSPECTIOM OR INVESTIGATION REPORT OF Jerry Pace Property
_..
Requested by ........ 4 1 a5
c10 Ragsdale Consultants,, Smithfield
Address ........... _Mw_ ww___�_._w_w____ww_MMae ..1_ '
Location... Left side of SR 1003 _ approximately 1 5 miles +orth of Archer -Lodge:
Person(s) Contacted_.r.w_w_wwrr_...
i
Purpose,._ Determine the suitability of the soils on this tract of land for
•__w.n_ww..w.��_�w_..�w_ww__f_ww_.���_wwwr_Norw____�0.__w__urwr__
tank systems
_w
septic stems ; : ;
Copies to:
✓Jerry Pace -- Buffaloe Rd., Clayton
Don Coats
File
SOIL REPORT:
This is a gently rolling to steep tract of land a.pproximately 27 acres in size.
No water or sewer improvements were noted on this tract of land.
For the purpose of this report the soils on this tract are divided into two
general soil areas. Those areas are described in the following paragraphs
and are delineated on the accompanying map.
Soil area one has a gently rolling topography. In this area the soils have a
brown sandy loam surface layer.6 to 15 inches thick. The subsoil is a yellowish
brown to grey sandy clay to clay that extends to a denth of 20 to 30 inches.
Underlying the subsoil is weathered rock. Grey. soil colors, indicating poor -soil
permeability, were noted 20 to 30 inches below':the surface over parts of this area.
Soil area two has a nearly level to steep topography. This area consists of
drainage ways and adjacent steep side slopes. In the drainage ways grey soil
colors indicate the presence of a seasonal high.watertable•within at least 24
inches of the soil surface. On the side slopes weathered rock was encountered
within at least 24 inches of the soil surface. '

Jerry Pace Property
Page 2
RESULTS:
The majority of the soils on this tract of land are considered unsuitable for
septic tank systems. North Carolina and Johnston County Regulations,pertaining
to the use of septic tank systeiRs require that the depth to the seasonal high
watertable, soil strata with poor Permeability, or weathered -rock be at least ;
36 inches where septic tank'systems are to be used. Portions of this tract are,
also considered unsuitable for septic tank systems due to: steep_ slopes and the'
presence of drainageways.
A few -sites exist in area -one where conventionalior alternative septic tank systems
(alternative septic tank systems involve the, use' of a pump) ,*could be permitted.'
Due to the variable and primarily unsuitable soil conditions only very low density
development using septic tank systems appear to be feasible. Should you choose
to develop this tract of land we will work with you to locate as many residence
sites as possible.
Should you have any further questions please feel free to contact us.
r •
Conducted by: Joseph T. Lyon, III
Soil Scientist %�?�� f.-� �� �,
i V l

4-
�Aeo-
IJ
rem _ a
SG�t � � 7 =�9O I •
r•

ATTACHMENT NUMBER 4 - SOILS REPORT
t

y
' _ �110' ro"
all
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
P.O.. 13OX 3 218 4
RA.LEIGM NC 27622
919- 8810 2028
W. Lee Fleming, Jr. P. E. July 30, 1.992
333 St. Albans Dr., Suite 105
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr, FL*ming s
Attached is report on the estimated application rates for
spray irrigation and on -site septic systems
for
the
e 'park
oposed
waste water disposal sites for the
MobilePace HThese estimates
near Archers Lodge, NC in Johns County.
are based on Johnston County Soil Survex, observation made
by
the Johnston County Health Department and conveil.ationsons
Daniel Blyly who worked in the County on the
Pexmiting of these sites for waste water disposal must
dn of all
require extensive on -.site e�valuation and pand other limiting
set backs to property bounderies dwellings
features.
Please contact our office if you have any questions or need
for our services.
In your�sexvice,
WHI ES.3fONE', INC I
}10
Frank A. Doonan, CPS$.

vv•..a, ac a.j.Jd p V1V(V1ggrU X K H 1NU Id
l
. .. I WH I TEjSTQ-K _... -11fC:.
SOILS REPORT FOR THE POTENTIAL WASTE WATER
DISPOSAL SITES FOR THE PACE MOBILE HOME PARK
NEAR ARCHERS LODGE, NORTH CAROLINA IN JOHNSTON COUNTY
1.0 - LOCATION:
The sites is located about 1 mi 1 e east of Archers Lodge,
North -Carolina on*SR 1003.
2.0 - SOILS, TOPOGRAPHY & LANDFORM3:
2.1 - TOPOGRAPHY & LANDFORMS :
These sites are 1 ocated on a gently rolling piedmont plateau
surface disected by moderately steep to steep intermittent
streams. The soil materials are mainly with thin relic
marine terrace sediments on the higher gently sloping knobs
and points disbursed throughout. .
The steeper areas of the intermittent drains are generally
unsuited for both spray irrigation and LVV systems based on
the observation by the Johnston County health department and
the soil Survey. The slopes are froln 0% to 40% and have
intermittent streams running through the V shaped valleys.
These areas often have severely eroded clayey surfaces and
bedrock at depths of 24" to 36". The steep slopes, shallow
depths to bedrock and the clayey textures neax the surface
cause high rates of surface run off that make these areas
generally unsuited.for spray irrigation and LPP waste water
disposal Systems. These areas make up the western half of the
tract of land on the west side of SR 1003 and the side slopes
of the 'drains running through the eastern half of the tract
of land on the east aide of SR 3.0030 Haeed can the soil maps
and the observations by the Johnston County Health
.Department, these steeper eroded areas make up about 25% of
the area of the eastern tract and 50% of the area on the
western tract.For an accurate determination of the extent
and nature of this limitation a detailed field evaluation
must be made.
1

e
-• - " -*• 79 0ay6„ Co 9 K H INN 82
RHJT .STYE , c
2.2 - SOILS
The soils on the sites are'moderately well drained Gilead and
well drained Wedowee with clayey subsoils. These soil:; occur
in a mixed pattern that is difficult to separate. The Gilead
soils occur mostly on the higher areas where the stratified
sediments occur. The Wedowee soils are mostly on the slopes
below the Gilead soils and form in materials weathered from
granites and schists. other associated soils are the poorly
drained Lynchburg and Wahadkee soils that occur in the drains
that Bisect the site. This evaluation considered the soils on
the proposed sites and the soil patterns of the surrounding
area. The soils on the proposed rites evaluated are typical
of the pattern of the soils found on the properties in the
surrounding area.
Based on the soils described by the health department
sanitarian the dominant soils on the gently sloping ridge top
are Gilead soils."The steeper side slopes were described as
Wedowee soils with mottled saprolite and bedrock within 36"
of the surface. The heavy clayey textured Bt horizon and the
soil wetness condition between 18 and 30" are the most
limiting factors for septic tank filter fields and spray
irrigation. Both of these soils are considered to' have
kaolinitic mineralogy which has a lower shrink swell then
other clayey soils with mixed mineralogy.
' To Permit these soils for 'septic tank filter fields the
health department, may require that the soils be tested for
shrink swell. Potential system failure it.- }-sigh on these soils
due installation and management problems associated with
clayey stratified soils. UP and spray irrigation zystems
require large areas and high levels of management to function
properly.
The moderately well drained Gilead soils have a yellowish
brown sandy clay to clay Bt horizon 24" to 40" thick.
Eatimat:ed pe nivabi 1 i ty is 0.06 to 0.6 inches/hr. These soils
have stratified subsoils and underlying materials which may
have less permeable layers,
The well drained Wedowee soils have a yellowish brown to
reddish brown clay loam to clay Bt horizon 24" to 40" thick.
Estimated permeability is 0.06 to 2.0 inches/br. These soils
have Bt horizons that are somewhat more permeable and coarser
then the Gi, l ead soils. Depth to granitic bedrock ranges from
4' to more then 10'.
2

06/29/92 15:34 a V1VfW144(b K R H into W.►
�1HI TESTONE. INC.
3.0 - ESTIMATED APPLICATION RATES:
These aStimatea for application rater for septic tank filter
fields and spray irrigation represent estimates based on the
field observations by the Johnston County health department
and USDA SCS Johnston County Soil Survey.' Permitting -this
site for waste disposal will require a more comprehensive
site evaluation.
Due to severe soil limitations these areas would not: be
suited for Conventional sewage systems. The application rates
for LPP sewage systems is dependent on the daterminaLion that
the soils have Suitable or Provisional Suitable structure and
clay mineralogy. For dominant Gilead soils with a clay to
sandy clay Bt horizon the application rate range i, 0.05 to
0.2 gpd/ft2, The included Wedowee soils with a clay loam to
clay Bt horizon with more variable subsoil textures the
application rate will range from 0.05 to 0.3 gpd/ft2. For
purposes of estimated the amount of area needed for I..PP
systems an estimated rate of 0.1 gpd/ft2 may be used.
The application rate for spray irrigation rates for dominant:
most limiting Gilead soils is 30 to 50 inches/year or 0.58 to
0.96 inches/week. Estimate based on 9y.aluati.on of. Soils
gystems, for the Idand Disposal of, Xndugitg�@1_ .Ead Liuni.aipal
Effluents by B. L. Car 1 i 1 e and J, A. Phi l l i.pn . The
application Late for spray irrigation should be based on the
most limiting soil being used when the pattern of soils is
mixed to the point that they cannot be separated' out in a
management system. For purposes of estimating the amount of
area needed for a spray irrigation an application rate of
0.58 inches/ week may be used.
Permitting of these: sites for waste water disposal must
require extensive on -site evaluation and consideration of all
set backs to property boundaries dwellings and other limiting
features.
in your service,
WHITESIiE, INC.
f
Frank A. Doonan, CPSS.
soil Scientist.
3

From << TPA SOFTWARE SYSTEMS INC. PHONE No. : 919 365 9000
J h
Ju1.31 1992 9:34PM P03
w
07. 31. 92 09:25 AM P03

From r TPA SOFTWARE SYSTEMS INC. PHONE No. : 919 365 9000 Ju1.31 1992 9:35AM PO4
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Clenn Parker l u land adjoining Face Mobil* Home Park -ia not for
sale at this time.
Glenn Parker
7/30/92

t
ATTACHMENT NUMBER 6 - WASTELOAD ALLOCATION

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Raleigh Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor DIVISION OF EtjVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
September 19, 1905
Mr. Jerry G. Pace
2720 Buffaloe Road _
Clayton, NC 27520
SUBJECT: Wasteload Allocation
Proposed Mobile Home Park
• Site #1 and Site #2
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Pace: '
• Our Technical -Services Unit has prepared a wasteload allocation for the
discharges of domestic wastewater to an unnamed tributary to Buffalo Creek
(Site #1 - NPDES Permit No. NCO064246) and to an unnamed tributary to -Big Arm
Creek (Site #2). To protect the water quality standards of the receiving
stream, the following -effluent limitations would be required in an NPDES
Discharge Permit.
Effluent Limitations
Monthly Average
Effluent Characteristics Concentration
_ N
Dice If air:e 9Z
Design Flow 0.015 MGD D
GODS -Day
9 mg/l 19 mg/1.
Ammonia Nitrogen 4 mg/l 15 mg/l.
Total Suspended Solids- 30 mg/1 30 mg/l
Fecal Coliform Bacteria 1000#/100.m1 1000#/100 ml
pH (range) - 6-9 s.u. 6-9 s'u.
Dissolved Oxygen (minimum) :: 6.0;mg/l 6.0 mg/1r
it is noted, these effluent limits are preliminary and can only be con-
sidered final when issued as final effluent
S4�t•
If
you have any questions, please contact this office at.919/733231
Sincerely,
avid T. Adkins
Water quality Supervisor
DTA/CDM/jf '
cc: Carolyn McCaskill
3600 Barrett Drive, p.0 Boot 27667, Raleigh, N 6.27611.7687 • Telephone [phone]
• y:;r
An Equal Opportunity Afft��;�`;� Action f:�nployer

ATTACHMENT NUMBER 7` --WWTP COST ESTIMATE

July 27, 1 _a92
W. Lee Fleming, Jr. Engineering
601 Oberlin Street
kaleigh, NC 27SO'
SubA t: Budgetary Estimate WWTP at .a MHP in Johnston Oty.
Dear Lee,
Thw rniowing is an estimate an you requested. The "attached
design table uhoud reflect plant Criteria.
Ww l,ra.,a7O= tO add anU or• modify the t-ub.ject plant as follows:
A dual Path 7St:O gal.lan0750 each) aeration basin with
t'a.apingr walkway and hande ail.
A motor blower assembly for flow equalization.
A nr-, or blower acsrambly for aeration.
A twrt:cary filter with 468 gallon LL2 and 46B Dechlor and
punt .air.
Punt piping for sludge return and •filterr connections
The above assembled on base slab with electrical hook—up,
excavation, fencing and .landscaping by others.
Price: $44,500.00 plats applicable taxes.
i ChblmntO Of'faarmd without
suite
vWi•t
*r
plans)
ploa� .. eel l �r'
'
quouti nis.
Thank
you
for
this. opporhunity�
n
Sinc l.��:_
A
ALLachment
J Wa.l j �
ern Region
P.Q. Box 1885 • Plnehurst, North Carollne 28374 • 9191295.5536
• ^••07. 28. 92 04: l8 PM Pea

DESI£M TABLE PROJECT:
MHP
DATE:
10/25
SECONDARY
'
DESIGN CRPRCITY (MGD):
D.015
AVERFGE DAILY FLOW(GPM):
10.42
FLOW EDURLIZATI Ott CRITERIA
M :
25.00
FLOW EgURLIZATION VOLUME(GAL):
3750.00
AIR REQU I RMENTS CF./£) ( CFM) :
10.03
AE:RAT I Oil VOLUME(GRL):
EACH
11250. 00
RETEPTION(HRS):
36.00
RETEPTION(HRS): 4.00
CLARIFIER SURFACE LORDING(GPD/SDFT): 250.00
CLARIFIER APEA(SOFT): 60.00
HER LIFTS:
2
CLARIFIER OIR.(FT):
M/A
SIDE WATER OEPTH(FT):
10
CLRRIFIER VOLUME(GRL):
2500
SLUDGE RET1JRN RATE(/) :
D-15W.
SLUDGE HOLDING CRITERIA(CUFT/PE):
2.00
SLUDGE HOLDING VOLUME (GAL) : -
2244.00
AIR REOUIREMENT(CFM?:
6
BLOWER CAPACITY(MRIN)
(E RC4 IF DUPLEX) ( CFM) : 63.60
CERCi- IF TRI PL.EK) ( CFM) : 31.80
FLOW ECUALIZRTIOM (CFM): 10.03
1
ENGIHEER:FLEMIMG
TERTIARY
DESIGN CRPRCITY (MGD):
flVERRGE DRILY F LOW ( GPM) :
FILTER RATE(GPD/SQF"T):
FILTER CELLS:
FILTER ARER EACH(SOFT):
AIR SCOUR RRTE (CFM/SUFT) :
AIR SCOUR REDUIREMENTS(CFM):
BACKWRSH RATE @ 15GPKeS0FT(GPM):
CLERRWELL VOLUME(GRL):
MUDWEL.L VOLUME(GRL):
MUDWELLRETURN RRTE(GPM):'
CL2 RETENTIDN(MIN):
CL2 VOLUME ( GAL) :
POST AERATION RETEMTION(MIN):
POST AERATION VOLUME(b�):
0.0150
1iO. 42
1
2.00
5.21
1.5
7.61
_78.13
781.25
885.42
75. co
45.00
468. 75
45
468.75

� i�