20151266 Ver 1_Application_20151207

Pre-Construction Notification
1. Processing
Offce Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project na.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
:1� Form
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps7
❑ Yes � No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular � Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes ❑ No � Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu � Yes � No
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)� ❑ Yes
2. Pro�ect Information
2a. Name of project:
2b. County:
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
prolect no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Bridge #23
Hoke
Raeford
NA
SF-460023
NCDOT Highway Division 8
902
North Sandhill Blvd. Aberdeen, NC 28315
(910)- 944-2344
�/ .
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: � Agent ❑ Other, specify: DEO
4b. Name: Art King
4c. Business name NCDOT Hi hwa Division 8
(if aoolicablel: 9 Y
4d. Street address: 902 North Sandhill Blvd.
4e. City, state, zip: Aberdeen , NC 28315
4f. Telephone no.: 910-944-2344
4g. Fax no.: 910-944-5623
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. AgenNConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
Se. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
1c. Propertysize:
2. Surtace Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
3. Project Description
Latitude: 34.92652
(DD.DDDDDD)
1 acres
Big Middle Swamp
C; Sw
Lumber
Longitude: - 7925722
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Rural, agricultural
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.25 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100ft
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a deficient, obsolete bridge with a modern structure that meets current standards for safety.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Remove and replace the existing bridge using: crane, track hoe, dump truck, pile driver.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: delineation by NCDOT staff
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary � Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): NCDOT PDEA staff
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
see attached wet file data
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past� ❑ Yes
Sb. If yes, explain in detail according to "help fle" instructions.
6. Future Project Pians
6a. Is this a phased project?
6b. If yes, explain.
❑ Yes
� No ❑ Unknown
// .
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. �r� �o .
Wetland impact
number—
Permanent (Pl or
W1 �P�T
W2 ❑P�T
W3 ❑P❑T
W4 ❑P❑T
WS ❑P❑T
W6 ❑P❑T
Type of impact
fill
fill
Mechanized
Type of wetland Forested
(if known)
riverine
m
❑ Yes
� No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ — non-404, other)
Corps
DWQ
Corps
DWQ
Corps
DWQ
Corps
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
Area of impact
(acres)
0.01
0.02
0.01
2g. Total wetland impacts 0 04
2h. Comments: Listed impacts for clearing and rip rap placement.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type ofjurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
PTem orat (PT�r intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear
P rY i ) (INT)� . .
S1 �P❑T
S2 ❑P�T
S3 ❑P❑T
S4 ❑P❑T
S5 ❑P❑T
S6 ❑P�T
3h. Total stream and
3i. Comments:
fill
fill
impacts
Big Middle Swamp
� PER
❑ INT
� PER
❑ INT
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DW4
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
(feet) feet)
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
58
17
75ft

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number— (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
01 ❑POT
02 ❑P�T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P�T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Proposed use or purpose
number of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
Sf. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surtace area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f.
Buffer impact 69
number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T im act re uired?
B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
62 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 a.
1 b.
itlance and Minimization
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State7
26. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
4h. Comments:
❑ Yes � No
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type � Quantity
❑ Yes
linear feet
❑ warm ❑ cool
square feet
acres
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
acres
acres
❑cold
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation7
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
Zone 1
Zone 2
Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier
(square feet)
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
Required mitigation
(square feet)
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Ruies?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes ❑ No
33 %
❑ Yes � No
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4.
Review
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
401 Unit
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Certified Local Government
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DW(� Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
� Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes � No
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House7 (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surtace Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
❑ No
/� .
❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? ❑ Yes � No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat? ❑ Yes � No
Sb. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
5c. If yes, i�dicate the USFINS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Yes � No
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
Sd. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCDOT SDV layer, NCDOT Staff field survey.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I � Yes
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
USF&W reference material for endangered species in NC.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes
►� .
►/ .
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCSHPO screening. NCDOT HEU screening.
8, Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? I� Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: see attached stormwater management plan.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NCDOT hydraulics study
�� Cp ` ' ' ' ��� L/ ' � ��!�
ApplicanUAgenYs Pr rtt�d Name ApplicanUAgenYs Sign�ture
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an aut o iiafion letter from the applicant
-7-/�
Date
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: BR460023 (BR23 over Big Middle Swamp on SR 1116 City/County: Near Raeford/Hoke Sampling Date: 04/25/2012
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: BR460023 Wet
Investigator(s): Greq Price, Amv James, Jim Mason, Chris Underwood Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0=2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 34.926479 Long: -79.257444 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam NWI classification: PF01 F(estimated)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No � Is the Sampled A?ea Yes � No ❑
within a Wetland.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No ❑
Remarks: One data point taken to represent all wetlands shown in Microstation wetfile. WAM wetland type is Riverine
Swamp Forest.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
� High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
� Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Dry-Season WaterTable (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (DS)
� Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes � No ❑ Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No ❑
(includes capillary fringe) Yes � No ❑ Depth (inches): 0
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: wetland point taken along edge; ponded nearby.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

vt�t i ia i i�rv - use scienunc names or piants
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30' Radius)
1. Acer rubrum
2. llex opaca
3. Persea borbonia
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species7 Status
40 Y FAC
20 Y FAC
10 N FACW
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20°/o of total cover: 14
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size30' Radius)
1. Acer rubrum 10 Y FAC
2. Lipustrum sinense 10 Y FAC
3. Clethra alnifolia 10 Y FACW
4. Vaccinium corvmbosom 7 N FACW
5. Cvri/la racemiflora 5 N FACW
6.
7.
8.
42 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 21 20% of total cover: 8.4
Herb Stratum (Plot size30' Radius)
1. Woodwardia areolata 50 Y OBL
2. Osmunda cinnamomea 3 N FACW
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11,
12.
53 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 26.5 20% of total cover: 10.6
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:30' Radius)
1. Smilax rotundifolia 30 Y FAC
2. Vitis rotundifolia 5 N FAC
3.
4.
5.
35 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 17.5 20%o of total cover: 7
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation met.
roint:
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species � �A�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant � �B�
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species 100 (A/B)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of : Multiplv bv:
OBL species x1 =
FACW species x2 =
FAC species x3 =
FACU species x4 =
UPL species x5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
�Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
and greater than 3.28 ft tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Yes � No ❑
Present?
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

JVIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
0-5 10YR 3/1 100
5-12+ 10YR 4/1 100
Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture
Muckv loam
Sand 70 % coated
ruini.
Remarks
�Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (A1) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (lRR O)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR U) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536)
� 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Rema�ks: Hydric soil indicators met.
Hydric Soils Present? Yes � No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

����� ���,4�y North Carolina Department of Transportation
SG[�Y�11W2tPr . I
�
,,.,.,,.,, Highway Stormwater Program ��.�
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.02; Released April 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 17BP.8.R.58 TIP No.: SF-460023 County(ies): Hoke Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element: 17BP.8.R.58 TIP Number: SF-460023 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 7/14/2015
NCDOT Contact: W. Galen Cail, PE Contractor I Designer: Sungate Design Group, PA
Address: Hydraulics Unit Address: g15 Jones Franklin Road
1590 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27606
Ralei h, NC 27699-1590
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Email: cail ncdot. ov Email: 'clemmons sun atedesi n.com
Cit ITown: Raeford Count ies): Hoke
River Basin s: Lumber CAMA County? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Description
Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 365' Surrounding Land Use: Rural/Swamp
Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site
Pro'ect Buiit-Upon Area ac. 0.2 ac. 0.2 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: 2@ 11' Paved Lanes w/ 2' Paved Shoulders and 2' Grassed Shoulders 2@ 11' Paved Lanes w/ 4' grassed shoulders
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 1300 Year: N/A Existin : 1300 Year: 2010
General Project Narrative: This project involves the replacement of Bridge No. 460023 over Big Middle Swamp on SR 1116 (Old Maxton Rd.) in Hoke County, NC. The existing bridge, a 2@ 17.5'
(Description of Minimization of Water concrete deck with timber piles, beams, and abutments, will be replaced with a 1@ 57.75' 24" Cored Slab Bridge with 2.5' End Bent Caps. Bridge replacement and associated
Quality Impacts) roadway improvements have been designed in a manner to minimize the increase in impervious surtace area to the maximum extent possible. No deck drains will be required
with this project. A crest exists on the bridge therefore drainage devices will be necessary at both ends of the bridge in order to convey stormwater runoff from the bridge deck.
Stormwater runoff from the south side of the bridge deck will be conveyed to the base of the proposed fill slope through a grated inlet and 15" pipe to the base of the existing fill.
The proposed 15" pipe will outlet onto a class 'B' rip rap pad in order to protect against erosion. Stormwater runoff from the north side of the bridge deck will be conveyed
through a grated inlet and 15" pipe to the base of the existing fill. The proposed 15" pipe will outlet onto a class 'B' rip rap pad to protect against erosion. Existing drainage
patterns will convey all additional project flows into the existing swamp surrounding the project. No ditches are proposed for this project.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): Big Middle Swamp NCDWR Stream Index No.: 14-10-1.5
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification: Swamp Waters (Sw)
Other Stream Classification: None
Impairments: None
Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: N/A Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)

w
�.
q
�s
'�^
v J
•
�
�
�
�
�
•�
�
V
W
0
�
�
See Sheet 9A For Zndex of Sheets
See Sheet 98 For Standord SymGclogy Sheet
1. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN A MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY.
2. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO
THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
BEGIN PROJECT 17BP.8.R.58
-L- STA. Il +35.00
� TO SR 1124
����� �� ����� ��������
�������� �� ���������
HOI�E CO U1�lTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE #460023 OVER BIG MIDDLE SWAMP
O1V SR 1116 (OLD MAXT011t ROAD)
TYPE OF WORK GRADIIIIG, PAVING, DRAINAGE, F�' STRUCTURE
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
s�
/�P�
j���
����
S�
�s�`
NOTE: AREA FLOODED BY BEAVERS.
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM UNDETERMINED.
CREEK BANKS COULD NOT BE LOCATED.
i
� �- �- BEC;IN BRIDGE i y , i END:� BRIDGE �� �� .� �
�, ,.Y _ �L- ST/+. 12+86�:00 y. ._ � 1 �L- STq.. 13+46. �� 0 ._ �... � � '�
� 1 � �
� � �
� 1 p �- 1. l� � ' ' $_ � i o:
__._ _ _ . __ 1 \ ' -�� � :.. >,
- .__ __ y_ _ ._ - `V � 1-_ .. - uir�.-. __ __ - _ - _ _ _ � _ _ � ,.
-L-
SR 1116 (OLD MAXTON ROAD)
�
'n --- -- - - -_ .
� -- - - � - -wte- - --- -
� � I om ` 1 � 1�. ✓
_-
_- -
_ - -
� � � � 1
� � � � a � y�
� � � � I N � i� � � � �
_�_ �' � � ' 'z �. �- '- �
� :L 'y .�, Y - -- - q � - � , �
'- - - '- ` .� � �
.. ` �- '. � - �.
�
PERMIT DRAWINGS
SU BMITTED: 10-16-2015
SUBMITTAL #A-017-R1
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 5
END AROJECT 17BP.8.R.58
-L- STA.15 + 00.00
�� N
C 2If�
\�
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PRO ECT LENGTH PLANS PREPARED Fox THE NCDOT BY: HYDRAULICS
'� STV ENGINEERS, INC. ENGINEER
20 t0 0 20 40 ADT 2010 = 1300 9ao west z.Qae sr., sre. ns, cha.ro:te xc, zazoz
LEIVGTH OF ROADWAY PROJECT 17BA.8.R.58 = 0.058 MILES NC License Number F-0991 ��� ��w��y�
DHV = N/A 2012 STAYDARD SPEC7F/CAT/ONS ��� ���o
PLANS D= N/A LENGTH OF STRUCTURE PROJECT 17BP.8.R.58 = 0.011 MILES PE � �
2o to 0 20 4o T= 6% # TOTAL LEIVGTH OF PROJECT 17BA.8.R.58 RIGHT OF WAY DATE: GERALD H. McCAULEY, pE s�cNArunE: � �
= 0.069 MILES A �
ROADWAY
V= 55 MPH MAY 20� �LO�4 PROJECT ENGINEER DESIGN ���g � j�
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) ENGINEER �� p�p��
* TTST = 3% DUALS = 3%
4 2 0 4 8 NCDOT CONTACT: VIRGINIA MABRY LETTING DATE: ETHAN P. WRIGHT, EI
FUNC. CLASSIFICATION: MAY 20, 2014 rxo�ecz Dss,cxen
MINOR COLLECTOR Priority Projects Unit
PROFILE (VERTICAL) PE
SIGNATURE:

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 12+64 to 12+94 -L- LT Rip-Rap Stab./Silt Fence < 0.01 < 0.01
12+58 to 12+78 -L- RT Rip-Rap Pad/Silt Fence < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
12+93 to 13+47 -L- Bridge Const./Rip-Rap Stab. < 0.01 0.06 58 17
13+33 to 14+28 -L- LT Rip-Rap Stab./Silt Fence < 0.01 < 0.01
13+39 to 13+75 -L- RT Rip-Rap Pad & Stab. /Silt Fence < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
14+28 to 15+00 -L- LT Temp. Mat/Power Line Install 0.02 0.02
TOTALS*: < 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 < 0.01 0.06 58 17 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
2013 10 24