20151256 Ver 1_401 Application_20151215

Land Planning , • Permitting Environmental Consulting Construction Management Expert Testimony
December 2, 2015
Ms. Jennifer Burdette
NCDENR Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: Hodge Road PCN submittal
R 15725
6
Dear Ms. Burdette,
I
Please find attached for your review the PCN application for!NWP 39 for th ; proposed project located at 2309 Hodge Road in
Knightdale, NC. Delineation of the project was performed by Spangler Environmental, Inc. As a part of the proposed commercial
development, there are impacts to Jurisdictional waters. On November 4, 2014 a Surface Water Determination Letter was issued for
this property. The Surface Water Determination did not include a small off- lite area located southeast of the 2309 Hodge Road
property which was later delineated for the purposes of planning a proposedutility line. This off-site area was found to contain a
perennial stream. The stream is identified on both the USGS map and the pa er-bound soil survey map and a 50 foot buffer has been
applied to the stream on site plans for planning purposes and to quantify ripalrian buffer impacts. There are no permanent stream
impacts related to this project. There are riparian buffer impacts (0.049 acres zone 1 and 0.059 acres zone 2) due to an aerial sewer line
perpendicular stream crossing (Impact Area 3) and fill associated with a sewer line located upgradient of a stream origin (Impact Area
2). These impacts are classified as "Allowable" in The Neuse River Buffer Rules. Attached are the copies of the proposed Site Plan,
impact cross sections, delineation data containing GIS maps,!Stream Determination, and Agent Authorization letter. Also attached to
this letter is a check in the amount of $ 240.00 for the Minor'Water Quality ,application fee. Thank you for your timely assistance in
this matter.
Sincerely,
_ _ I
Tomas Will v
Project Scientist j
CC: FILE
Attachments - PCN Form
Agent Authorization Letter
Delineation data containing data forms, maps, and Corps f-)rms
DWR Stream Determination
Site Plan Exhibits
Wetland/Stream/Buffer Impact Exhibits
Fee - $ 240.00 (check)
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, N C 27609 tel [phone] fax [phone] Toll Free 1-866-SPANGLER
3961-B Market Street Wilnungton, N C 28403 tel [phone] fax [phone] www.spangl erenvironmen tat com

O� YJA7cR
o� pG Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
b < DWQ project no
Form Version 1 4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la Type(s) of approval sought from the CorpsX❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
lb Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 39 or General Permit (GP) number
1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? I ❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ
For the record only for Corps Permit
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes
❑X No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
❑X Yes
❑ No
or in -lieu fee program
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
❑ Yes
❑X No
below
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
NX No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project Hodge Road Business Park
2b
County- Wake County
2c
Nearest municipality / town. Knightdale
2d
Subdivision name Hodge Road Business Park
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state project no
3.
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed Mary Murphy, Dewey Murphy, Susan Murphy,
Kenneth Murphy,
Gary Murphy
3b
Deed Book and Page No Book 015601 Page 01814
3c Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
3d Street address 310 Hinton St.
3e City, state, zip* Knightdale, NC 27545
3f. Telephone no:
3g Fax no :
3h Email address -
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify Owner of Project
4b Name: Joel Scannell
4c Business name Scannell Development Co
(if applicable):
4d Street address: 800 E 96th St., Suite 175
4e City, state, zip Indianapolis, IN 46240
4f Telephone no
4g Fax no :
4h. Email address. joels@sca n nel I properties com
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a Name. Jim Spangler
5b Business name Spangler Environmental, Inc
Page 2 of 10
(if applicable)
5c
Street address:
4338 Bland Rd
5d
City, state, zip
Raleigh, NC 27609
5e
Telephone no :
919-875-4288
5f
Fax no.
919-875-4287
5g
Email address
Ispangler@spanglerenvironmental com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1 1. Property Identification
1 1a Property Identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID).
1 b. Site coordinates (In decimal degrees) 1 Latitude 35 7632
1c Property size
2. Surface Waters
11743430054
28.41
Longitude. -78 5139
acres
2a Name of nearest body of water to proposed project Neuse River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water C,NSW
2c. River basin Neuse River Basin
3. Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The subject property is partially wooded and primarily undeveloped The property contains agricultural fields, dirt roads, and a utility easement The
land use in the general vicinity is residential
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property' 4 797
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (Intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2,216
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project.
Construct 2 flex space buildings as a commercial business park w/ adequate municipal utility service located near intersection of future 1-495 & 1-540
3e. Describe the overall project In detail, Including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will involve grading/earth moving and utility work by using grading and excavating equipment for the purpose of developing a business park
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have,tunsdictional wetland or stream determinations by the 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / Comments PJD submitted on 11/10/14
project (Including all prior phases) In the past?. (AID SAW -2014-02127)
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? Preliminary E] Final
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company Spangler Environmental
Name (If known) Other -
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Regulatory site visit conducted on 11/10/14 PJD request was subsequently dropped after prospective buyer abandoned protect Findings of the
11/10/14 visit have been incorporated into the delineation data attached to this PCN
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown
this project (Including all prior phases) In the past?
5b. If yes, explain In detail according to "help file" Instructions
6. Future Project Plans
1 6a. Is this a phased project?
6b If yes, explain
1 ❑ Yes ❑X No
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a 2b 2c 2d 2e
2f
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 P Fill Unknown Yes Corps
0 327
W2 P Fill Unknown Yes Corps
0135
W3 P Sewer maint corridor Unknown Yes Corps
0 003
W4 T Sewer maint corridor Unknown Yes Corps
0 164
W5 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W6 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0 629
2h Comments -
W1 is associated with Impact Area #1 W2 is associated with Impact Area #2 W3 & W4 are associated with Impact Area #3 Fill associated with Impact
Area #2 is necessary due to design constraints of the protect and is further discussed in a document attached to this PCN form
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f
3g
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
Impact
number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream
length
Permanent (P) or width
(linear
Temporary (T) (feet)
feet)
S1 Choose one
S2 Choose one
S3 Choose one
= _
=
S4 Choose one
S5 - Choose one
S6 Choose one
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
31 Comments
There are no stream impacts, temporary or permanent, associated with this project The perpendicular stream crossing associated with the
sewer line
in Impact Area #3 is aerial and pilings are located outside of the stream banks
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed Impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then Individually list all open water impacts below
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list
4a 4b 4c
4d 4e
Open water Name of waterbody
Impact number (If applicable) Type of Impact
Waterbody Area of Impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Temporary (T)
O1 Choose one
Choose
O2 Choose one
Choose
03 Choose one
Choose
O4 Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
impact
5. Pond or Lake Construction
required?
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
(square
5a 5b.
5c
5d 5e
Pond ID number Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond
1,215
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated
Flooded Filled Excavated
P1
P2
5g Comments
Choose one
Choose one
5f Total:
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no.
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres).
5k. Method of construction.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list
all buffer
Impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑x Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman
❑ Other
6b 6c 6d.
6e. 6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary (T)
feet)
feet)
B1 P Sewer maint corridor Unnamed (Impact Area # 2)
Yes
128
1,215
B2 P Sewer maint corridor Unnamed (Impact Area # 3)
Yes
1,991
1,375
B3 ..
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
2,119
2,590
6i Comments B1 is in connection with Impact Area # 2, B2 is in connection with Impact Area # 3 Both impacts are classified as "Allowable" in the
Neuse River Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B 0233
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts In designing project
Stormwater BMPs have been designed to avoid impacting jurisdictional wetland areas Slopes will be designed as steeply as possible to minimize the
footprint of permanent Impacts Utility line crossing of streams are at near perpendicular orientation and aerial utility crossings have minimized the use
of pilings Temporary Impact areas will be designed to be restored to original grade
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts through construction techniques
Slopes will be graded as steeply as possible to minimize the footprint of permanent impacts Temporary impact areas to be restored to original grade
and revegetated.
2. Compensatory Mitiqation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑X Yes ❑ No r
impacts to Waters of the U S. or Waters of the State?
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply) ❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
❑x Mitigation bank
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
ElPayment to in -lieu fee program
projects
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (RES)
Type. Choose one Quantity.
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Choose one Quantity
Type. Choose one Quantity:
1 acre of wetland credits is available from RES as documented in the attached letter
3c Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature Choose one
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested. acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested. acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested acres
4h. Comments. Ij
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c 6d 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 211 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1 5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
in -lieu fee fund
Riparian buffer impacts associated with this project are classified as "Allowable" in the Neuse River Buffer Rules 15A NCAC
6h Comments 02B 0233 and thus do not require mitigation
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a Does the project Include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers Identified Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then Is a diffuse flow plan Included? If no, explain why
No stormwater is discharged into riparian buffer areas Stormwater plans submitted to Town of
Kmghtdale ❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a What Is the overall percent Imperviousness of this project? 145%
2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? n Yes ❑ No
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The Stormwater Management Plan submitted to Town of Knightdale for approval Stormwater structures shown on attached site plan
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a In which local government's jurisdiction Is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally -Implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
14. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -Implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply)
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
Town of Kmghtdale
Town of Kmghtdale
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other
❑ Yes X❑ No
❑X Yes ❑ No
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8of10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a Does the project Involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site In violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after -the -fact permit application? F1 Yes ❑X No
2c If you answered `yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)-
N
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result inF1I Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered 'yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
This project purpose requires no future development
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Municipal sanitary sewer will service the subject property
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

17
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program element occurrence dataset, EDR NEPAcheck Report
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
National Marine Fisheries Service essential fish habitat mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes Q No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
EDR NEPAcheck Report
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
A small portion of this project occurs within the 100 -year floodplain Protect meets FEMA requirements by reducing disruption by avoiding hazardous,
uneconomic or unwise use of floodplams as described in National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Floodplain Management Requirements All non-
utility line structures are located outside of the 100 -year floodplain
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA flood map panel # 3720174300J with effective date of 05/02/2006
James A. Spangler
Aa#NAgent's Printed Name
A +nentt'sgnature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided )
Page 10 of 10
/2-5-15--
Date

Justifications for Impact Area #2
• The terminus of the sewer line is fixed due to the location of the nearest existing sewer tie-in at
Poplar Creek subdivision and the location of the spine road is necessary to be parallel to Hodge
Road.
• Sewer downstream from Manhole 8 cannot be lowered. Design constraints include tie-in
elevation to existing manhole in Poplar Creek Subdivision, slope of the sewer main is design at
minimum, aerial crossing design, NCDOT's design of 1-540, and required easement widths per
depth of sewer.
• Fill is required over the sewer to provide adequate cover per City of Raleigh's standards
• Lowering the sewer main between manholes 8 and 9 does not eliminate the need for fill and
permanent impacts to wetlands
• Current design depth is nearing allowable depths per City of Raleigh's standards
• Project requires a wet detention pond south of the sewer main which requires specific grading
for this area

EBX-Neuse I, LLC Stream and Wetland Banks
Statement of Availability December 4, 2015
NC Division of Water Resources
Ms. Katie Merritt
512 N. Salisbury St.
9th floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re Project: Hodge Road Business Park, SAW -2014-02127
ME
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Mr. David Shaeffer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
This document confirms that Scannell Development Co. (Applicant) for the Hodee Road Business
Park (Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 1.00 Riaarian Wetland Mitisiation Credits from the
EBX-Neuse sponsored Bank: Neu -Con Wetland & Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank, specifically the
Howell Woods Site in the Neuse HUC 03020201. As the official Bank Sponsor, EBX-Neuse 1, attests to
the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 919-209-1052.
Best Regards,
Cara S. Conder
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605

M1
S C A N N E L L
Pk QP ERf1ES
December 1, 2015
To Whom It May Concern:
The letter serves to inform you that Scannell Development Company (doing business as Scannell
Properties) located at 800 E 96`h Street, Suite 175, Indianapolis, IN 46240 hereby authorizes
Spangler Environmental, Inc. to act as our technical agent for the purposes of environmental
issues, including wetland and stream identification, permitting, mitigation planning and
regulatory agency coordination at the property known as Hodge Road Business Park, and as
shown in Wake County records as Tax Parcel # 1743430054. All site visits by regulatory
personnel must be coordinated in advance with our agent, Spangler Environmental, Inc. This
letter supercedes all previous Agent -related correspondence.
The following contact persons should be copied on all correspondence:
Contract Purchaser (or Legal Agent/Representative):
Joel J. Scannell
Scannell Properties
1765 Duke Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.302.1892
Technical Agent:
James A. Spangler, CEI, A.M.ASCE
Spangler Environmental, Inc
4338 Bland Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
[e-mail]
Sincerely,
Joel Scannell

8KO15601 PGO 1814
Volct.,l kkatiflk'[ \o
Mad iqwr rec arding it) N., 1-falmict" '048 Km
'03zd."z Blvd, $ic. 26o
hlis felstrivnear sras
WAKE COUNTY, NC
LAURA M RIDDICK
REGISTER OF DEEDS
PRESENTED & RECORDED ON
03-13-2014 12:48:44
NORTH CAROLINA GENF",RAL WARRANTY' DEED
I HISDI, 1-1) In't-11t: 11w, 1`• -1
of Morch, (t 14,
GR A N
Nbry Lou Murphy -wid hiv,,band
Dewe� VMurphy
3y10 1,-, M. e �
Knifish111nt cm 'tiale, NCt 1-71-5-1-5
stisall Maine Nturpby (a 101,44 Undivided,
inwresit), Kenac-th Wayne ;Marphy (a I 91yo
ulldividt,d interest) and Gary NflvhaO
,MUT-J)hy (it 10'Yo undivided interest)
c; , NJw) Lou Niumb,,
3 ID j 11nion street
bto& fm, e..tdl Par dapplopr1u;t" cNxticler oi' esntiti-, f g. ctxpi,atton or jxwtneji�hj
corantol -w"d as med i14rt Hi 'O"' f} ill. -Judo taid parl4n,, and and shalt lndtzd-�,
()r nL-kjlCj as tC,Jkfi,-ed b" cs),IteNt
Olt: Grinaor. }'of avalullb!e con, J1-at3c,11 1),
aid t31 tlw Qran'ltc, Ill.., re'-Cipt of which kht:reh\ ac-latons ledged, ti s xo
1,l thcsC pre, --.-nu S. �—u,aat, barvain,<vii an,l cciifcv tvito Ow (3t-,;ntec. -11 lo_> slmph�, all thm c4nlaln lnl orparcet 'WIAtO situaled ;n 11w
C i VV lki� Cjtint. No;I h C,irol i; -m, iod rwol,`, jxuliL. El 41) 1 ibud as I ill lom,:i:
S�,4 u;tclwd E>zhibit A,
11,,: (.ir"1111or i:, the w"Nae'- o -50% undivided lit ert`m in the pi,operty can-cyed aiU by Lhis conveyance, the
(Juxwiwi JOL:13� C0111-11�v mill each Gnijilee a 1011/ij undivided intere-a in the propt-rty desciihed hot -em Tfw Omnwor-
retain-,
i a 20',-n intei-em in said popQrty.
M11 of a P;,nkml %)x 1&w, pwopqk hu-rohl cons"t:yed dogs not iji+.Iksdv the priniairy iicsidence Grtt akn.
Submitted electronically by "George Hamrick, Attorney"
in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordable documents
and the terms of the submitter agreement with the wake County Register of Deeds.

BK015601PG01815
The Propertyllertirabove describo w gcquhvdby GWgor€ y lnstt4rlrrM M.'Wrded ,'lVai County Re Iey.
A.M#PSh9wiMtheabOve*scribod'property isrecorded in. UoAofl�tafn_ ,.FAV. _ _rWOW 104surtyitnisdry.
W HAlt',$A•'vb rO HOLD tht AfOrOatd toYvrrparYcel 6f land and #€t privikv and appurtexherm, beianging tee the firms in
k simple,
Attd Ott Gtwctr ewew4s widt iha Grantee *at aratatrx �.SeWd of t>xe prgtuise's lrt *vjImpte, bas the rpt to they am sWne #n,,fec
airrlyrk,. g title is snarkeale and ftemrd cmc of alt Clratttor wi♦l wasrapr attd.dgrO tdiAo title sP16€awkW
WAMOf all Msvnit 4V130WOevOtr emeM for the exaOtiMs heminaf a Mterd. 'Cif to lira j o�hereirtatYtiv .ldescrlh t issarkrjttct tb
tAa.fativc3iag'exceptio�:
(1) Easements and other matters 0 may bye shbwii on recorded tnap�
(2) PUblic dtift ftwownts and dShtA of way to public po0s, and.sveets}
(`,3) 2.41.E propeM axes OW yeL dwwW payable,
IN WITNTM WOMWOPft0ranicir flea hermnin set h13 hand And se#, or ifcMpt2aate; hu ca tsed ihis'instrument tp
ber siLmod in fis carpQWe naune by itq,Otsty mut wbWd 011cm-and €ts ttesal to lee ttccetxttta �tffiwatt irY atsttmrtty ot` ,laid ttf
Mtmetcrrs,. the 44y ansf yor fka a6okc urUmm
.- -4cteOv (EAI,)
1urirYJr.67
(SEAL)
Dewey V. _ Urpl�
ta. �:� >� dottit rotina;.CbtttAyof° 4{'t:t
< € i ![' t _ __aintatar tru?o€IC ctftlla
.µ Vtouvoy WA slaw Wit . certify thak Aliny t rm
Moiphy, a#d gM*Mda Arracy Y. M&rPA , OMMOr, Personally appy red WON am
P' 1 (his Ovttstiirtckstoa WO4 ft oxmition a0he fampWo itrsamrnem.
�! C i`i•, o0�vh� WITNEW my bW and oMPA-tamp of scot, #fris• tdgy kf"Nfmh, -IM4
�za�tea�as;i°
NIY' Ctr€ttmission l+.uptMS; 'tam ' t'
i�tdary t6t� ._

BK015601PGO 1816
EXHIBIT A
BEGINNING at a stake and stone pile in the center of the old road, corner to Lot #3;
thence with the center of the old road, South 35' East 387 feet to a stake in the center of
the new road; thence with the center of said road, South 130 East 496 feet to a stake;
thence South 46Q East 404 feet to a stake; thence South 170 20' West 281 feet to a stake
in the center of the road, corner to the school house lot; thence with the school house lot,
North 84P East 233 feet to a stake, T. H. Wall Estate's corner; thence with the Wall line,
North 880 East 2117 feet to a pine stump and stake; thence North 13° 45' East 1320 feet
to a stake, Wall's corner and corner to Lot No. 8; thence with line of lots Nos_ 5 and 8,
South 87° West 1880 feet to a large maple, corner to lots Nos. 5 and 3; thence with line
of Lot No_ 3, South 68* West 1022 feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing 85 acres,
more or less, and being tract No. 4 of The Oaks Farni", as shown upon map thereof
made by G. Sam Rowe, C.E. dated November 1944, recorded in office of Register of
Deeds of Wake County.
LESS AND EXCEPT from the above described property parcels that have been
previously conveyed in deeds recorded in the Wake County Registry listed below:
1)
Deed recorded in
Book 1318, Page 489,
2)
Deed recorded in
Book 1337, Page 132,
3)
Deed recorded in
Book 1348, Page 27,
4)
Tract One and Tract TVvo in Deed recorded in Book 1369, Page 208,
5)
Deed recorded in
Book 2204, page 292,
6)
Deed recorded in
Book 3359, Page 855.

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
James Spangler
4338 Bland Road, Raleigh, NC 27609
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State NC County/parish/borough Wake City. Krnghtdale
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format)
Lat. 357632 ON, Long. -78 5139 °W.
Universal Transverse Mercator NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Wendell Lake
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area
Non -wetland waters:
221592 linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres
Cowardin Class: R4SB, R2SB
Stream Flow: perennial
Wetlands 4 797 acres
Cowardin Class
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters*
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:

Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin Class
stream B
35.7649
-78.5113
R2SB4
stream G
35.7610
-78.5068
R2SB4
stream H
35.7606
-78.5079
R2SB4
wetland C2
35.7624
-78.5146
PFO1
wetland C3
35.7622
-78.5145
PFO1
wetland D1
35.7624
-78.5130
PFO1
wetland D2
35.7625
-78.5130
PFO1
wetland D3
35.7625
-78.5131
PFOI
wetland D4
35,7624
-78.5122
PFOI
wetland D5
35.7627
-78.5115
PFOI
wetland E
35.7621
-78.5119
PFO1
wetland F
35.7622
-78.5112
PFO1
Wetland I
35.7606
-785075
PFOI
Estimated Amount Class of Aquatic
of Aquatic Resource Resource
in Review Area
1,315 linear feet Non -section 10 —
s
non -wetland
313.68 linear feet
Non -section 10—
non-wetland
587.24 linear feet
Non -section 10—
non-wetland
0.003 acres
Non -section 10—
wetland
0.327 acres
Non -section 10—
wetland
0.012 acres
Non -section 10—
wetland
0.038 acres
Non -section 10—
wetland
0.003 acres
Non -section 10—
wetland
0.157 acres
Non -section 10—
wetland
0.005 acres
Non -section 10—
wetland
0.012 acres
Non -section 10 —
wetland
0.060 acres
Non -section 10—
wetland
4.18 acres
Non -section 10 —
wetland
s

r v/��,
—.-+.tsar - _. .' •.1 _. _ _.._ _ .
2�
64
264-
C3
`5
2Qry
a�
rn
lAISTY R1
POUF RD
I'D0�I ILI Io
2309 Hodge Rd. Streams 69
2309 Hodge Road, Knoghtdale SPANGLER
Wake County, NC ENVIRONMENTAL. INC.
April, 2014 4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
� III I I I
Q'
m
USGS Site Location Map
with Labeled Streams
map source:
7.5' USGS Raleigh -East, NCTopo Quad (2013)

2309 Hodge Rd. Streams
2309 Hodge Road, Knoghtdale
Wake County, NC
April, 2014
69
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL. INC.
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
USDA Wake Co. Soil Survey Map
with Labeled Streams
map source:
USDA Wake County Soil Survey Pg. 61 (1970)

2309 Hodge Rd. Delineation
2309 Hodge Road, Knightdale
Wake County, NC
October, 2015
�9
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL. INC.
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, NC 27609
919-875-4288
Stream and Wetlands Map
map source:
2013 NC One Map orthoimagery / Wake Co. GIS

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site 2309 Hodge Road City/County Wake -Sampling Date 4/30/14
Applicant/Owner Scannell Properties State NC Sampling Point C-5.2
Investigator(s) Tomas Will Section, Township, Range Knightdale
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave Slope (%) 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136 Lat 35 7622 N Long -78 5145 W Datum NAD1983
Soil Map Unit Name Colfax Sandy LoamNWI classification
PUBHh
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Pnmary Indicators (minimum of one is reautred. check all that aooly)
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
�❑✓i
lJ
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑�
Saturation (A3)
1❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (61)
1U -f
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑✓
Sediment Deposits (62)L
1I ----If
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
E]
Drift Deposits (B3)
--J
ElRecent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
El
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑✓
Geomorphic Position (D2)
a
Iron Deposits (65)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
II
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
EJ
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 5
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 2 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point C-5 2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 sq ft )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)
2
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata 3 (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A/B)
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of Multiolv by
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
FACW species x2=
Saolma/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
FAC species x 3 =
1
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals (A) (B)
4
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6
II 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8
II 3 -Prevalence Index is s3 0'
= Total Cover
u Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
1 Spartma cynosuroides
2 Arundmana gigantea
3 Smilax Rotundifolia
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
20% of total cover
20 X OBL
20 X FACW
15 X FAC
55 = Total Cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
i
l
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point C-5 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0-3 7/4 7 5 YR 100 loam
3-12 3/1 2 5 YR 90 4/4 2 5 YR 10 sandy clay loam
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0
'Type C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matnxl' MS= Masked Sand Grains
2Location PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
FJ
Histosol (A1)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
0
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
TTT❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
U
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
D
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) -
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
El
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
D
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
D
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Di
Redox Depressions (F8)
TEl
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
E]
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
D
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
D
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
F]
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
D
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
D
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
D
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
D
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
D
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site 2309 Hodge Road City/County Wake Sampling Date 4/30/14
Applicant/Owner Scannell Properties State NC Sampling Point upland D
Investigator(s) Tomas Will Section, Township, Range Knightdale
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) convex Slope (%) 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136 Lat 35 7626 N Long -78 5130 W Datum NAD1983
Soil Map Unit Name Colfax Sandy Loam NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Pnmary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired. check all that anoly)
Q
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
El Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
❑_ High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
❑
Drainage Patterns (B10)
ElSaturation (A3)
t❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑Moss
Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
TL -JT
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Q
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
tu-i
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Q
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
1Q
L -I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
Q
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q Algal Mat or Crust (64)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
Q
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Q Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Q
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)*
Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available.
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft
1 '
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1.
2
3
4.
5
50% of total cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
I
US Army Corps of Engineers
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
II 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 -Prevalence Index is 53 0'
= Total Cover a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
= i otai cover
20% of total cover
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover Present? Yes No X
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0
r
e
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point
upland D
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 sq it )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
15 X FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A)
2
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata
(B)
4 '
Percent of Dominant Species
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A/B)
6
'
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of Multiolv
by
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
FACW species x 2 =
Saolino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
FAC species x 3 =
1
FACU species x4=
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals (A)
(B)
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft
1 '
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1.
2
3
4.
5
50% of total cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
I
US Army Corps of Engineers
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
II 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 -Prevalence Index is 53 0'
= Total Cover a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
= i otai cover
20% of total cover
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover Present? Yes No X
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0
r

}
SOIL
Sampling Point upland D
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0-2 2 5/1 2.5 YR 100 sandy loam
2-12 5/2 2 5 YR 100
sandy clay loam
'Type C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
zLocation PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (A1)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
E
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
]Ej
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
El
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
❑
D
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
n
L_I
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑�
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
1J
Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (Inches)
Remarks
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

N
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site 2309 Hodge Road City/County Wake Sampling Date 4/30/14
Applicant/Owner Scannell Properties State NC Sampling Point D-10 2
Investigator(s) Tomas Will Section, Township, Range Knightdale
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc) hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave Slope (%) 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136 Lat 35 7625 N Long -78 5130 W Datum NAD1983
Sod Map Unit Name Colfax Sandy Loam NWI classification none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reowred)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired, check all that aooly)
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑✓
Surface Water (Al)
El Aquatic Fauna (613)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
IJ
❑✓
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation
113 Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
F1
(A3)
Water Marks (131)
1I ---If
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑✓
Sediment Deposits (62)
1L-Jf
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (63)
1L--Jf
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aqwtard (D3)
Q
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Q
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
IIII
❑
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 7
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 3 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point D-10 2
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
1 Pdea Pumila
2 Smilax Rotundifolia
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
7G V CA -AI
10
50% of total cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
FAC
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
20% of total cover*
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 9
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑✓ 3 -Prevalence Index is 53 0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 sq ft )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liquidambar Styraciflua
15 X FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A)
2 Acer Rubrum
10 FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata
(B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A/B)
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of
MUItiDIv by
= Total Cover
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species 15
x 2 = 30
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
Saolinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
FAC species 35
x 3 = 105 '
1
FACU species
x 4 =
2
UPL species
x 5 =
3
Column Totals 50
(A) 145
(B)
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
1 Pdea Pumila
2 Smilax Rotundifolia
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
7G V CA -AI
10
50% of total cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
FAC
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
20% of total cover*
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 9
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑✓ 3 -Prevalence Index is 53 0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point D-102
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0-4 3/4 7 5 YR 100 loam
4-12 3/1 7 5 YR 90 4/4 2 5 YR , 10 sandy clay loam
'Type C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
[3
Histosol (Al)
E]
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
E
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
E]
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
El
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
✓
Depleted Matrix (F3)
u
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
❑
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
'El
D
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
1:1 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
HSandy
Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

+ WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site 2309 Hodge Road City/County Wake Sampling Date 4/30/14
Applicant/Owner Scannell Properties State NC Sampling Point upland F
Investigator(s) Tomas Will Section, Township, Range Knlghtdale
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) convex Slope (%) 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136 Lat• 35 7622 N Long -78 5111 W Datum NAD1983
Colfax Sand Loam t
Sod Map Unit Name % �� � NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation N Sod N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Sod N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 'X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired. check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (613)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
�❑f
LJ
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
❑
Saturation (A3)
iQT
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑
Water Marks (61)
fQ
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Q
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
�uT
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (63)
IL--Jf
u Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
Q
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q
Iron Deposits (65)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Q
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Q
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial' photos, previous inspections), if available -
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point upland F
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
50% of total cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
= i otai cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
El 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is :53 0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 It (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 It tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 sq ft )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
15 X FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A)
2 Liquidambar styraaflua
10 X FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata
(B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A/B)
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of
MUItIDIV by
= Total Cover
OBL species
x 1 =
50% of total cover-
20% of total cover
FACW species
x 2 =
SaDlina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
FAC species
x 3 =
1
FACU species
x4=
2
UPL species
x 5 =
3
Column Totals.
(A)
(B)
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
50% of total cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
= i otai cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
El 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is :53 0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 It (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 It tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point upland F
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0-3 2.5/1 2 5 YR 100 sandy loam
3-12 5/1 2.5 YR 100
clay loam
'Type C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,-MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
TTT❑111
u
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H
,❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
�Dt
LJ
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
H
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
-1 Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
T❑
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
0I
Marl (F10)•(LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
L_1
Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
D
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
D
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
D
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site 2309 Hodge Road i` City/County Wake Sampling Date 4/30/14
Applicant/Owner Scannell Properties State NC Sampling Point F-4
Investigator(s) Tomas Will Section, Township, Range Knlghtdale
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) hlllslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave Slope (%) 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136 Lat. 35.7622 N Long -78.5112 W Datum NAD1983
s
Soil Map Unit Name Colfax Sandy Loam NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Pnmary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired. check all that aoDly)
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (613)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
�❑✓ f
IJ High Water Table (A2)
EJ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑✓ Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (61)
1L—J7
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (132)
1L�Jf
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
1L�Jf
L—I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
a Iron Deposits (65)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Agwtard (D3)
Q Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Q Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 4
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point F-4
3
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
1 Spartina cynosuroides
2 Arundinana gigantea
3 Smilax Rotundrfoha
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
E✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
= Total Cover a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
15 X OBL be present, unless disturbed or problematic
20 X FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
15 X FAC
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub— Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
55 = Total Cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover _
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 sq ft )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A)
2
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata
(B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of
MultiDIv by
8
OBL species
x 1 =
= Total Cover
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
FACW species
x 2 =
SaDlmo/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
FAC species
x 3 =
1 Acer Rubrum
10 X FAC
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
2
Column Totals
(A)
(B)
3
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
1 Spartina cynosuroides
2 Arundinana gigantea
3 Smilax Rotundrfoha
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
E✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
= Total Cover a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
15 X OBL be present, unless disturbed or problematic
20 X FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
15 X FAC
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub— Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
55 = Total Cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover _
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

• SOIL Sampling Point. F4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type, Loc` Texture Remarks
0-3 5/2 5 YR 90 4/6 2 5 YR 10 loam
3-12 3/1 2 5 YR 90 4/4 2 5 YR 10 sandy clay loam
'Type C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location- PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
E
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
0
❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
El
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
❑Red
H5
cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Parent Material J172)Lr�J
'D Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑
(A8) (LRR
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
r
E]
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
TIOther (Explain in Remarks)
D
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
F1
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
D
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
f] Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
D
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
F]
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
n
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site 2309 Hodge Road City/County Wake Sampling Date 8/14/15
Applicant/Owner Scannell Properties State INC Sampling Point upland I
Investigator(s) Tomas Will Section, Township, Range Knlghtdale
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) hlllslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) convex Slope (%) 10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136 Lat 35 7605 N Long -78 5087 W Datum NAD1983
Soil Map Unit Name Vance Sandy Loam NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Pnmary Indicators (minimum of one is
reawred, check all that apply)
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
❑_
High Water Table (A2)TL-7T
1❑ -r
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
El
Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑
Saturation (A3)
L-1 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (B2)
El Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (63)
El Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (65)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 20% of total cover Present? Yes No X
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point upland I
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 sq ft )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
15 X FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
2 Pinus taeda
15 X FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of Multiply by
8
OBL species x 1 =
= Total Cover
FACW species x 2 =
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
Saolmo/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Acer Rubrum
10 X FAC
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
2
Column Totals (A) (B)
3
4
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8
Q 3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
1
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
2
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height
6
Sapling/Shrub— Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall
8
Herb —All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
g
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11
height
12
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 20% of total cover Present? Yes No X
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point upland I
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0-4 3/1 2 5 YR 100 sandy loam
4-12 4/3 2 5 YR 100 sandy loam
'Type C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2 Location PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils-:
D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) L_I Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
D Sandy Redox (S5) Q Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
n Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑
LJ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
T❑1
u Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
D
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20)
D
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
D
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Red
(MLRA 1538)
Parent Material (TF2)
D
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (MLRA 150A)
Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
D
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
L_I
Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) L_I Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
D Sandy Redox (S5) Q Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
n Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

q ol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Protect/Site 2309 Hodge Road City/County Wake Sampling Date 8/14/15
Applicant/Owner Scannell Properties State NC Sampling Point 1-2
Investigator(s) Tomas Will Section, Township, Range Knightdale
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none) Concave Slope (%) 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136 Lat 35 7607 N Long -78 5076 W Datum NAD1983
Sod Map Unit Name Wehadkee silt loam NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Pnmary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑
Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
0
High Water Table (A2)
0 Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
0
Saturation (A3)
I-1 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
El
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
tQ
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
0
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
a
Iron Deposits (65)
C! Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aguitard (D3)
a
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Q
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 8
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

I
r
i
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point 1-2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 sq ft )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
15 X FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
2
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet -
7
Total % Cover of Multiply by
8
OBL species x 1 =
= Total Cover
FACW species x 2 =
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
SaDllno/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Acer Rubrum
10 X FAC
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
2
Column Totals (A) (B)
3
4
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6
❑✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8
❑ 3 -Prevalence Index is 53 0'
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
1 Arundinana gigantea
2 Spartina cynosuroides
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
20% of total cover
15 X OBL
5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

A
t
SOIL Sampling Point 1-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
0-4 4/2 5 YR 100
4-12 5/1 5 YR 85
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
sandy loam
6/675YR 15
sandy day loam
'Type C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted ) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
E]
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑
-I0 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
D
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
lJ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
j✓
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
❑I
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(MLRA 1538)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_E1
F]L
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_I
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
U Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) L_IReduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
D Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

r
:�
»*

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrcry
Governor
Nuvcmber 4, 2014
Nlaiv I kill Nlurphv
I tanulton Merritt Inc
10-1 Lake ChITC't
C ary \C 27i 13
John E. Skvarla. iii
Secretary
Subject: Surface Nater Determination Letter
\13RRO--14-3,84
1'val.e Cuunn
Determination Type
Buffer Call Isolated or EIP Call
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B 0233)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B 0259) ❑ Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
[:]Jordan (15A NCAC 2B 0267)
i'roICLt \anle 2109 1lod',e Road — -- --,-- -- -
I uL:inon Directions the prolec.ted arca iN located at 2309 Bod e Road . in Kni htdale. `Xdke
COUnty
Suhlrct ~(ream \ease River --------- ------ --- -- - --- ---------
Determination Date: 10/17/2014 Staff: Cheng Zhang
Stream
E1UP-
Not Subject
Subject to
Starta Stop'd
`Noll
l S1,5
to Buffers
Buffers
---- ------------ -----------
-Sur\eN
roPo
1
I
------------
X
-- -
DWQ tlaa (ori yin
?v
N
Ott Nile)
11
Welland
X
---- X
t
---- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'und A 1
Pond A'
X
h
----- --- - ------ i--
13
P
- ---- ------
• ---- - -- --- --
X
--------------- - ---- -----------
I hruu_hout (pond vvaN drained
-- "----
X
- --
X
and NVCUIIl Lhannvl n iC-
k shah! Shin_1
- --- - ---- - -
C I X
//4h0w10 11 hII0111111011 I'w Hills!
it .1 ( ikalowd
I \P!.111.11lon 111C fca11.110 ) Inked above h<tN or have heen IuCated un the Nail SUrve\ of 11,the CUln1R- \orth
t,Jrohna ur the nutNt recent Lol)v oI the t- N(15 1 Opo_r,apiuC mill) at it 1 24 000 Neale I aCh IC.11llre th,lt Is LhCe�Cd
\.n tiullICLI hab been deternuned nut to he J Ntieanl of i' nut prcNent on t11C prupvi f enure, that Jre .hC eJ
NuhilLI-- !la\L been 1OCJted 011 till. Pi„Pert\ and pt,,- CharaLtcr i,tiLN that yu.rlik J tr, he a ,(ream Ihere illi. ;Ne
\urthCarolin,t
Al di/
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mail Service Cen'er Raleigh NC 27699-1528 Phone [phone]C
Internet NWW -' -iterioua'ity ora Lc.:a'.on 3800 Bazett Drive Raleigh NC 27609 Fax [phone]
- --

".I,) I I,, i;. Ro. td
U !ke
I!1 i -'M4
,011,Idered jun,dicnon,ll to he (,1 Anw, ( olp, (.t I n_mecis lid lir ll) elle [)Ib�,IVII of �k diet 1ZeloUI,C,
1)\A R)
This on -Site determination shall expire fine (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made bN the DWR or Delegated Local Authoricv man rty lest a determination hr the
Director. An appeal rcyuest must be made within sivh (60) daNs of date of this letter or from the date the affected
partN (Including downsileam and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. 4 request for a determIna loll by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing cin Karen Higgins, DN R WeBSCaPe l nit. 1650 Mail tiers ice
Center, Raleigh. \C 2'699.
This determination 1s final and binding unless, as detailed above, sou ask for a heannt, or appeal within sixty (611)
dans.
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including an) other Local, State, and
Federal -Agencies) of this decision concerning anN future correspondences regarding the subject propert\ (stated
above). "1 his project man require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed actin it}. fin} Inquiries should he
directed to the Div ision of Hater Resources (Central Office) at (919)-81)7-631)0. and the Lti Armv Corp of Engineers
,Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-1883.
This letter.shill vottl the pre viom huffer tletermimitiutt leder for 130911udge Road Project thuetl Ocuoher
21, ?014.
11 sou have question, regald!r,g this determination. please tee[ Iree to contact Cheng /hanL> at (919; 791-12 N
.c RRO DW R I tic Copy
James Spangler Spengler f -n,. ironmental Inc . 4-, 18 Bland Rudd. Ra elgh \.0 2-h09
1),11111) �11111�1
>uperstsor.WaterOu,1hn
Re_lonnlOperations Center
.c RRO DW R I tic Copy
James Spangler Spengler f -n,. ironmental Inc . 4-, 18 Bland Rudd. Ra elgh \.0 2-h09

t
KE
pobLt RD-
,- t
F'
f

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site 2309 Hodge Road
City/County Wake Sampling Date 4/30/14
Applicant/Owner Scannell Properties
State INC Sampling Point upland B
Investigator(s) Tomas Will
Section, Township, Range Knightdale
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) hlllslope
Local relief (concave, convex, none) convex Slope (%) 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136
Lat 35.7623 N Long -78.5112 W Datum NAD1983
Soil Map Unit Name Mantachie Sandy Loam
NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for
this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation N Sod N or Hydrology N
significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Sod N or Hydrology N
naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map
showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes
No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
No X
Remarks
❑
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Pnmary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that aooly)
13
surface Sod Cracks (136)
El
Surface Surface Water (Al)
El Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
�
LJ
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
❑
Saturation (A3)
llL-----Iff
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
1LJ
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
El
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
1l -J -f
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
0
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
II
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
II
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
u
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches) Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point upland B
3
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
50% of total cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
11 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
= Total Cover a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 sq ft )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
15 X FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A)
2
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata
(B)
4 .
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A/B)
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of
Multioiv by
OBL species
x 1 =
= Total Cover
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
FACW species
x 2 =
Saolmo/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
FAC species
x 3 =
1 Acer Rubrum
10 X FAC
FACU species
x4=
2
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A)
(B)
3
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
50% of total cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
11 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
= Total Cover a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point upland B
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0-4 3/1 2 5 YR 100 sandy loam
4-12 4/3 2 5 YR 100 sandy day loam
'Type C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0
Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
flReduced
❑
E]Hydrogen
Black Histic (A3)
Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) LJ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
-0
Layers (A5)
Q Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
HStratified
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8) IEJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U) 1:1 Other (Explain in Remarks)
D
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ID
Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
D Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
n
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochnc (1717) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site 2309 Hodge Road City/County Wake Sampling Date 4/30/14
Applicant/Owner Scannell Properties State NC Sampling Point B-20 3
Investigator(s) Tomas Will Section, Township, Range Krnghtdale
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) Concave Slope (%) 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136 Lat 35 7622 N Long -78 5112 W Datum NAD1983
Soil Map Unit Name Mantachie Sandy Loam NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation N Sod N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N , Sod N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
Q
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
0
Surface Water (Al)
EJ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
LI
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
❑�
Saturation (A3)
111-1-f
El Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Q
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑✓
E]
Sediment Deposits (62)
Drift Deposits (133)
113
113 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
L -I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
El
Q
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q
Shallow Agwtard (D3)
Q
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Q
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Q
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
II
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 8
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 3 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aenal photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point B-20 3
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
1 Arundinaria gigantea
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size 1
1
2
3
4
5
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
20 X FACW
55 = Total Cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 sq ft )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
15 X FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A)
2
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata
(B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A/B)
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of
Multiolv by
= Total Cover
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species 20
x 2 = 40
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
Saolino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
FAC species 25
x 3 = 75
1 Acer Rubrum
10 X FAC
FACU species
x 4 =
2
UPL species
X5=
3
Column Totals 45
(A) 115
(B)
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
1 Arundinaria gigantea
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size 1
1
2
3
4
5
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
20 X FACW
55 = Total Cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point 8-20.3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist)' % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0-4 4/2 5 YR 100 sandy loam
4-12 5/1 5 YR 90 6/6 7 5 YR 10 sandy clay loam
'Type C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
ZLocation PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T. U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
-1 Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
T❑
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
.E1
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
n
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
HSandy
Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
't.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site 2309 Hodge Road City/County Wake Sampling Date- 4/30/14
Applicant/Owner Scannell Properties State NC Sampling Point upland C
Investigator(s) Tomas Will Section, Township, Range* Knightdale
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) Convex Slope (%) 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) 136 Lat 35 7623 N Long -78.5145 W Datum NAD1983
Sod Map Unit Name Colfax Sandy Loam NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of years Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation N Sod N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N —Sol, N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reowred)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired, check all that apply)
❑
Surface Sod Cracks (136)
E]
Surface Surface Water (Al)
El Aquatic Fauna (613)
El
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
�
LJ
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
❑
Saturation (A3)
iL--TI
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑
Water Marks (61)
1u -f
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
E]
Sediment Deposits (62)
TL�JT
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
1L-Jf
u Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
11
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aqwtard (D3)
Q
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Q
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Presents Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Presents Yes No X Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 sq ft ) % Cover Soecies9 Status
1 Liquidambar styraaflua 15 X FAC
2 Loblolly Pine 15 X FAC
3
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover _
Saolmo/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 sq ft
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Sampling Point upland C
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of
Multiolv by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
L1 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point upland C
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0-2 2 5/1 2 5 YR 100 sandy loam
2-12 4/2 2 5 YR 100 sandy loam
'Type C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Piedmont
�-1
Floodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
u
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface
(MLRA 1538)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
(F7)
Redox Depressions
I❑ -I
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
(F8)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0