20240217 Ver 1_Alexandra Place Revised PCN Packet 3-27-24 Reduced_20240328

DWR
GNIM.n of Ware, Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
October 2, 2023 Ver 4.3
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs. deq. nc. govfWaterResou rces/DocV iew. aspx?d bid=0&id=2196924
A. Processing Information V
If this is a courtesy copy, please fill in this with the submission date.
Does this project involve maintenance dredging funded by the Shallow Draft Navigation Channel Dredging and Aquatic Weed Fund or involve the distribution or transmission of energy or
fuel, including natural gas, diesel, petroleum, or electricity?"
Yes QQ No
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?"
Q Yes QQ No
County (or Counties) where the project is located:"
New Hanover
Is this a NCDMS Project"
Q Yes QQ No
Click Yes, only if NCD MS is the applicant or co -applicant.
DO NOT CHECK YES, UNLESS YOU ARE DMS OR CO -APPLICANT.
Is this project a public transportation project?"
U Yes QQ No
This is any publicly funded by municipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project.
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:"
0 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?"
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?"
0 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
❑ Regional General Permit (RGP)
rn Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?"
Q Yes QQ No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 18 - Minor Discharges
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
List all NW numbers you are applying for not on the drop down list.
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
check all that apply
0 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
❑ Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?

For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Q Yes QQ No
For the record only for Corps Permit: O Yes QQ No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?"
() Yes QQ No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
Q Yes QQ No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Click the upload button or drag and drop files hereto attach document
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?"
OO Yes No
1 i. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?"
Yes No O Unknown
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?"
() Yes (* No
Linkto trout information: http://vvvwv.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
B. Applicant Information
la. Who is the Primary Contact?"
Dana Lutheran
1 b. Primary Contact Email:"
[e-mail]
1d. Who is applying for the permit?"
_ Owner
(Check all that apply)
1e. Is there an AgentlConsultant for this project?"
U Yes (_) No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:"
Aftew Properties, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB 3497 PG 245
2c. Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
Dr. Arnold Sobol
2d.Address*
Street Address
2020 Churchill Drive S
Address Line 2
City
Wilmington
Postal /Zip Code
28403
2e. Telephone Number:"
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address:"
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:"
Dana Lutheran
1c. Primary Contact Phone:"
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
❑ Applicant (other than owner)
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
U

4b. Business Name:
(if applicable)
Southern Environmental Group, Inc. (SEGi)
4c. Address"
Street Address
5315 South College Road
Address Line 2
Suite E
City
Wilmington
Postal /Zip Code
28412
4d. Telephone Number:"
[phone]
4f. Email Address:"
[e-mail]
C. Proiect Information and Prior Proiect History
1. Project Information
1a. Name of project:"
Alexandra Place
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
NA
1c. Nearest municipality/town:"
Wilmington
2. Project Identification
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
4e. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2a. Property Identification Number:
(tax PIN or parcel ID)
2b. Property size:
R07500-001-003-000 and R07500-001 -001 -
(in acres)
000
30.0 +/-
2c. Project Address
Street Address
5950 River Road and the parcel just south of Motts Creek Bridge
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
Wilmington
NC
Postal /Zip Code
Country
28412
US
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey -grade GPS device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on how the location was
determined. (For example, most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude:" Longitude: "
34.128144-77.915668
ex: 34.208504-77.796371
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:"
Motts Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:"
C; sw
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?"
Cape Fear
u
lJ
lJ

3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located."
030300050702
River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:"
The site is located on the west side of River Road and adjacent to Motts Creek, which is classified as an inland waterbody that carries a 30' Area of Environmental Concern, by the NC
DCM (see attached). Swamp forest wetlands abut the uplands on the tract. The upland portion of the tract is wooded and has a thick understory. Residential is the main land use within the
vicinity of the project.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?"
Q Yes QQ No a Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
10 Ac
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(intermittent and perennial)
2500 +/-
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:"
The purpose of this project is to provide housing in an area where the demand is high.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:
The project will entail permanently filling 0.098 acres of Swamp Forest, which is necessary to facilitate the development of a 63-unit, townhome community to be called Alexandra Place.
The impact will be distributed across 11 areas on the site and are mainly for building pads and road crossing (see attached site plan and Section D 2 for a summary of the proposed
impacts).
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?"
Yes No
Comments:
2022
The wetlands were last verified by Emily Hughes, with the USACE, in 2Q44F
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?"
Q Preliminary Q Approved Q Not Verified Q Unknown QQ N/A
Corps AID Number:
Example: SAW-2017-99999
SAW-2009-01847 expired 27 June 2016 (see attached).
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): David Scibetta
Agency/Consultant Company: SEGi
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?"
Q Unknown
O Yes OO No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any partof the proposed projector related activity? This includes other
separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.
The project is not part of a larger project and has independent utilities and access. Furthermore, separate and distant crossings were not needed to facilitate the project.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Q Wetlands ❑ Streams -tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
"W." will be used in the table below to represent the word "wetland".
2a. Site #* M 2a1 Reason"(?) 2b. Impact type*(?) 2c. Type of W. 2d. W. name" 2e. Forested" 2f. Type of Jurisdicition" 2g. Impact
(?) area"
v

PI-1
Lot 11 d Road
P
mland Hardwood Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.034acres
Crossing
J
ff
()
PI-2
Lot B3
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.000
(acres)
PI-3
Lot B5
P
ffomland Hardwood Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.015
(acres)
PI-4
Lot B9 & 10
P
ffomland Hardwood Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.000
(acres)
PI-5
Lot B11 & 12
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.006
(acres)
PI-6
Lot B19
P
Forn land Hardwood Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.010
(acres)
PI-7
Road Crossing
P
ffomland Hardwood Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.003
(acres)
PI-8
Lot B27
P
ffomland Hardwood Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.000
(acres)
PI-9
Lot B28
P
ffomland Hardwood Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.025
(acres)
PI-10
Lot B40
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.002
(acres)
PI-11
Lot B40
P
ffomland Hardwood Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.002
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.097
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.097
2i. Comments:
The table does not provide for impacts smaller than 0.001 AC. Permanent Impact (PI) areas 2 (14 SF/0.0003 AC), 4 (9 SF/0.0002 AC), and 8 (18
SF/0.0004 AC) amount to 0.0009 AC), and thus the total impact is 0.0979 AC or 0.098 AC.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation U
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:"
Prior to designing the project, the applicant had the wetlands delineated and great effort was directed to designing the project to impact the least number
of wetlands as possible. This was undertaken by limiting the number of units and installing retaining walls. It is estimated that 0.20-acre of wetlands
impact has been avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:"
Prior to undertaking land disturbing activities, the wetland line will be marked, and silt fence installed along the line, as well as installation of other
sediment and erosion control best management practices. The measures will be inspected regularly. Work with in wetlands will only take place during
dry times.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Due to the de minims amount of wetland impact needed to facilitate the development, as well as the fact that stormwater runoff will be collected and treated prior to discharging offsite,
mitigation is not being proposed.
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington Districts RIBITS website.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) U
*** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section .***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
O Yes No
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.

If no, explain why:
The project is not located within one of NC's riparian buffer river basins
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?"
Q Yes .) No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?"
Yes No
To look up low density requirement click here 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2).
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?"
OO Yes No
O N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
Hint: projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathenng from state or locally implemented stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally -implemented storm —ter programs through use of community in -lieu programs should answer
no to this question.
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply (check all that apply):"
Q Local Government Q State
If you have a local government approval please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
Local Government Stormwater Programs"
Phase II NSW
USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using."
New Hanover County pre -construction stormwater
State Stormwater Programs"
Phase II Q Coastal Counties
HWQ or ORW U Other
Comments:
The project is a high -density development, where stormwater will be collected and treated prior to discharging into downstream receiving water. The stormwater application is currently
being sought through the State. The permit will be in place prior to commencing with construction of built upon area.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?"
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?"
O Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?"
O Yes OO No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not provide access to currently land locked property. Furthermore, sewer and water lines are available off of River Road, thus no distant
crossings are necessary. Lastly, stormwater will be collected and treated before discharging into downstream receiving water during and after
construction.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?"
*Yes O No O N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
CFPUA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?"
Yes No

5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?"
OQ Yes O No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?"
O Yes No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?"
Yes _r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?"
OO Yes O No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?"
O Yes OO No
Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*"
O Yes OO No
Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?"
n Yes (* No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?"
SEGi utilized the USFWS IPaC to obtain the Official Species List (see attached), as well as the NLEB May Effect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect NLEB
Consistency Letter (see attached). It is was undetermined whether or not the project is within a consultation area, but SEGi completed the RCW
SLOPES form, which resulted in a finding of No Effect, due to lack of habitat (see attached). No critical habitat was identified in the species list.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?"
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?"
The project does not entail work within a waterbody that would support EFH.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Linkto the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/h/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust
designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?"
O Yes OO No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?"
NC HPOWEB 2.0 Map (see attached).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https:Hmsc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?"
v Yes U No
8b. Ifyes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
See attached floodplain development permit.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the flood plain determination?"
NHC GIS Flood Map (see attached).
Miscellaneous
Comments
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Alexandra Place PCN Attachments 2-1-24.pdf 18.18MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Signature

0 By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief', and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act'),
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"),
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature, AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:"
Dana A. Lutheran
Signature"
Date
_... _ _ _ ". 3/27/24

S E G'i'
i 1
Alexandra Place
Preconstruction Notification Attachments
Prepared for:
Aftew Properties, LLC
2020 Churchill Dr. S.
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
Prepared by:
Dana Lutheran
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, NC 28412
[phone]
dlutheran&segi.us
Date:
27 March 2024

Alexandra Place PCN Attachments 3/27/24 SEGi*
PCN Attachments
Number
Description
Page
1
New Hanover County GIS Aerial Photo and Parcel Information
3
2
Vicinity Map
4
3
NC DWR Water Classification Map
5
4
Agent Authorization
6
5
Alexandra Place Wetland Impact Map & Site Plan
7
6
USACE Signed JD 2011 Map - Expired
8
7
USFWS IPaC, NLEB Consistency Letter, & RCW SLOPES Form
9
8
New Hanover County GIS Flood Map
10
9
New Hanover County Floodplain Development Permit
11
10
SHPO HPOWEB2.0 Map
12
Page 2 of 12

Alexandra Place PCN Attachments 3/27/24 SEGi*
Attachment 1
New Hanover County GIS
Aerial Photo & Parcel Information
*W
-A ` { r
r.h
L _,
-
t. * +
Tf �F tt 4 'VNjr V
w r
rF4PL
I
16
IL do
1
n - ` •`�4 t
� * S
� 4
l
�f A. r I?d
JF
A F
+ t
dip
fi
.�.1

Alexandra Place PCN Attachments 3/27/24 SEGi*
Attachment 2
Vicinity Map
Page 4 of 12

Alexandra Place PCN Attachments 3/27/24 SEGi*
Attachment 3
NC DWR Water Classification Map
Surface Water Classifications; V x
*� Zoom t, °
r f
Stream Index: 18-82 l
Stream Name: Mott Creek (Todds Creek)
Description: From source to Cape Fear
River
Classification, C;Sw
Date of Class.: August 31, 1974
What does this Class. Vi ew
� V
I
Page 5 of 12

Alexandra Place PCN Attachments 3/27/24 SEGi*
Attachment 4
Agent Authorization
Page 6 of 12

EG
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM:
.PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL I.D. R7500-001-001-000 and R7500-001-003-000
STREET ADDRESS: 5950 River d WVilmin on NC
Property Owner (please print): Aftew Properties, LLC
The undersigned, registered property owner of the above noted property, does hereby authorize
Southern Environmental Group, Inc. (SEQ) to act on their behalf in matters regarding areas of
environmental concern.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
2020 Churchill Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28401
Email: lobos25 1 aol.com
TeIephone:
91 0-763-2629
We h eby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of
orar wledge.
� "I" " � " a VaVj 4�
Property Owner Authorized Signature SEGi Authorized Signature
Print Name
- 6"01
_ , / I J_
Date
David Scibetta
Print Name
4/ 1 /2022
Date

Alexandra Place PCN Attachments 3/27/24 SEGi*
Attachment 5
Alexandra Place Wetland Impact Map and Site Plan
Page 7 of 12

5 COLLEGE RD
(NC 132) i2
Oy K� yN�
d bey`.
I �?
W
u co
§
pp
S��$.�sm
oaks �gN9g un
g� uumuio...
`4a ��
4'�`F}rnnignm�pp•�
4
u� t�
w �4
f21
3l!
s ss
�««<g Q
,.e a
-�o
(Zi aaso°.
�Z FEEEffo�� � B89B° z.�..
�.Eo„ f6„ HE aHH. gam¢
w�ww�aaa Jo>
�n 000raeoia:ol � c� eg ®ocD r•II � w43��i� � ° �nz
G;i III:
III
a s
t
a
£zzWw : a ::
I
V

/
45 /
Ito
3
a
p�
H.s
B6
Ull

Niyle - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
.. . . . . . . . . .
am m
Oil \1
1j,
. . . . . . . .....
le
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Y. . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . ....
1XI
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . .. . .. ... . ...
...........
Am
F- 27
a- Fan
-
,0
0 <

,
\ \\
{ \
aim \
9g$5
W - t
'" 1.2
8 .

Alexandra Place PCN Attachments 3/27/24 SEGi*
Attachment 6
USACE Signed 2011 JD Map
SAW-2009-01847
Page 8 of 12

5w
F- W LU
WT
rO
99
oft

Alexandra Place PCN Attachments 3/27/24 SEGi*
Attachment 7
USFWS INC, NLEB Consistency Letter, & RCW SLOPES Form
Page 9 of 12

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
3916 Sunset Ridge Rd
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2024-0009822
Project Name: Alexandra Place
F S'ilf 1x 15'IW1[1F}.
V7i'4'1�'P-
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
https: //www.fws. gov/sites/defaultlfiles/documents/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.pdf
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/what-
we-do.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservation-
migratory-birds.
2 of 16

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List
■ USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
■ Bald & Golden Eagles
• Migratory Birds
■ Marine Mammals
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
3916 Sunset Ridge Rd
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
3of16

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2024-0009822
Project Name: Alexandra Place
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: Small townhouse community to be located in New Hanover County, NC.
The site abuts Mott's Creek to the north and west and River Road to the
east. The project site is currently wooded and work is anticipated to start
within the next 3-6 moths.
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www. google.com/maps/(a)34.126392550000006.-77.91478251034408.14z
27
t
S
C�
r
r.5
�5
Counties: New Hanover County, North Carolina
4of16

Project code: 2024-0009822 03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 15 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
5of16

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
MAMMALS
NAME
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
This species is also protected by the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and may have additional
consultation requirements.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
STATUS
Endangered
Proposed
Endangered
Threatened
BIRDS
NAME STATUS
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Threatened
Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations] - Wherever found, except
those areas where listed as endangered.
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Rufa Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Threatened
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
REPTILES
NAME
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Appearance
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
(Threatened)
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas
Threatened
Population: North Atlantic DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii
Endangered
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea
Endangered
6ot16

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
NAME
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: htips://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
STATUS
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Threatened
Population: Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: htips://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110
SNAILS
NAME STATUS
Magnificent Ramshorn Planorbella magnifica Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6216
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: htips://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3281
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS
AND FISH HATCHERIES
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
7 of 16

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
BALD & GOLDEN EAGLES
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act1 and the
Migratory Bird Treaty ActZ.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or
golden eagles, or their habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below. Specifically,
please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
1. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
2. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
There are likely bald eagles present in your project area. For additional information on bald
eagles, refer to Bald Eagle Nesting and Sensitivity to Human Activity
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental
Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper
Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret
this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
8of16

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort ()
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Noe
Jill lif
�
*+*+ 10+0 *00111111�� � Jill
Vulnerable
_
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/librar3L/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
■ Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
■ Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-
project-action
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection ActZ.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below. Specifically,
please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
V oT lb

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
American Oystercatcher Haematopus palliatus Breeds Apr 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8935
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Black Skimmer Rynchops niger Breeds May 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 15
and Alaska.
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/523
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Jul 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
btips://ecos.fws.gov/eqp/species/9427
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 25
and Alaska.
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9406
Chuck-will's-widow Antrostomus carolinensis Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions to Jul 10
(BCRs) in the continental USA
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/960
Coastal (waynes) Black -throated Green Warbler Setophaga virens waynei Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions to Aug 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/11879
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus voci ferns Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 20
and Alaska.
btips://ecos.fws.gov/eqp/species/10678
Gull -billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9501
10 of 16

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
NAME
King Rail Rallus elegans
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
btips://ecos.fws.gov/eqp/species/8936
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
btips://ecos.fws.gov/eqp/species/9679
Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9481
BREEDING
SEASON
Breeds May 1
to Sep 5
Breeds
elsewhere
Breeds
elsewhere
Painted Bunting Passerina ciris Breeds Apr 25
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions to Aug 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9511
Pectoral Sandpiper Calidris melanotos Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere
and Alaska.
btips://ecos.fws.gov/eqp/species/9561
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
btips://ecos.fws.gov/eqp/species/9439
Purple Sandpiper Calidris maritima Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere
and Alaska.
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/957
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ec;p/species/9398
Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres morinella Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
btips://ecos.fws.gov/eqp/species/10633
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
btips://ecos.fws.gov/eqp/species/9478
ohmne e[:1

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Short -billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere
and Alaska.
btips://ecos.fws.gov/eqp/species/9480
Southeastern American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Aug 31
(BCRs) in the continental USA
btips://ecos.fws.gov/eqp/species/4076
Swallow-tailed Kite Elanoides for ficatus Breeds Mar 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jun 30
and Alaska.
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8938
Willet Tringa semipalmata
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
fts://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10669
Wilson's Plover Charadrius wilsonia
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
btips://ecos.fws.gov/eqp/species/9722
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
btips://ecos.fws.gov/eqp/species/9431
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
Breeds Apr 20
to Aug 5
Breeds Apr 1 to
Aug 20
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental
Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper
Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret
this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort ()
12 of 16

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAiiNFiEyBy MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP y OCT
yyNOV
yy DEC
yy
American
Oystercatcher
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Bald Eagle 11 1 Non -BCC ��� +��+ ++++ 10+1 *1110001110+ 40
Vulnerable
Black Skimmer BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Brown -headed �1I I �� ���� 1111 111� �11� 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
Nuthatch
BCC -BCR
Chimney Swift BCC Rangewide +++ I I I 1 1011111$ 0111111111111111100+ ++++ + 1 (CON) mmmm
Chuck-will's-widow ++++
BCC -BCR ++++ +++T *0V I I I + t1a *0*0 ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
Coastal aynes) Black -throated
Green Warbler
BCC -BCR
Eastern Whip -Poor -
++1+ I ttt tttt ttt+ +0 I I
I I I I ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
will
I I I I- t
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Gull -billed Tern I I I l r++ I I I I I I I I ++ ++++ ++++ +y++ ++++ + BCC Rangewide
(CON)
King Rai
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Lesser Rangewide
Yellowlegs
BCCCCRangewigewide 11+� ++++ ++++ T00+ *T++ ++++ ++T+ ++o+ +*++ ++++ ++*+ 40
TT
(CON)
Marbled Godwit ++++ ++++ +++* 10++ ++++ ++++ +*++ +*+* *00 +Ty+ *+++ *+++
13 of 16

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Painted Bunting BCC-BCR +to*
Pectoral Sandpiper BCC Rangewide
(CON) II y yy yyi
Prothonotary Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Sandpip
B C1Rangewide ++ I I I I ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON)
Red-headed Woodpecker oil$ ON logo mill Me 111111ll IN IN NII 11l11111 BCC Rangewide
(CON) Ruddyurnstone
BCC -BCR 14 +++, N„I 100 +iiy ii +1 y y
0
Rusty Blackbird ITT +� ++++ ++4 I ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +T*+ 00+0
BCC -BCR IT
Short -billed Dowitcher 0TTTT0 TT++ T++++ ++++ T+T+loom T+*T
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Southeastern +�
American Kestrel +++T ++++ I I I I I I I I ++ +4 11 1 1 1 I I BCC -BCR +
BCC
Swal1Rangew dKite ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++*+ +++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON)
C BC Rangewide 010100010011*11*1+ 01 fit tT*l 1111111111111111 su$
BCC
(CON) 11 yy + yyyy
Wi Rangewide
Plover
BCCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ T I I I I I T+++ ++ I I I I I-■ +TT+ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON)
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR yAPR MAY JUN11 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Wood Thrush+++ ++++ ++++ T+ I I I I I T+ ++ I I I I I I++ +TT+ ++++ + BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
14 of 16

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
■ Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
■ Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-
project-action
MARINE MAMMALS
Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also
protected under the Endangered Species Act! and the Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals are
shared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [responsible for otters, walruses, polar bears,
manatees, and dugongs] and NOAA Fisheries3 [responsible for seals, sea lions, whales, dolphins,
and porpoises]. Marine mammals under the responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on
this list; for additional information on those species please visit the Marine Mammals page of the
NOAA Fisheries website.
The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the take of marine mammals and further
coordination may be necessary for project evaluation. Please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Field Office shown.
1. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973.
2. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
(CITES) is a treaty to ensure that international trade in plants and animals does not
threaten their survival in the wild.
3. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
WIVWIMI
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus
Species profile: htips://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
15 of 16

Project code: 2024-0009822
03/28/2024 20:07:03 UTC
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
Name:
Dana Lutheran
Address:
5315 South College Road
Address Line 2:
Suite E
City:
Wilmington
State:
NC
Zip:
28412
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9102281841
LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Lead Agency: Army Corps of Engineers
Name: Brad Shaver
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
16 of 16

e _ti.
!` V7i'4'1'P-
°�` United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: October 27, 2023
Project code: 2024-0009822
Project Name: Alexandra Place
Federal Nexus: yes
Federal Action Agency (if applicable): Army Corps of Engineers
Subject: Technical assistance for 'Alexandra Place'
Dear Dana Lutheran:
This letter records your determination using the Information for Planning and Consultation
(IPaC) system provided to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on October 27, 2023, for
'Alexandra Place' (here forward, Project). This project has been assigned Project Code
2024-0009822 and all future correspondence should clearly reference this number. Please
carefully review this letter. Your Endangered Species Act (Act) requirements are not
complete.
Ensuring Accurate Determinations When Using IPaC
The Service developed the IPaC system and associated species' determination keys in accordance
with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) and based on a standing analysis. All information submitted by the Project proponent into
IPaC must accurately represent the full scope and details of the Project.
Failure to accurately represent or implement the Project as detailed in IPaC or the Northern
Long-eared Bat Rangewide Determination Key (Dkey), invalidates this letter. Answers to certain
questions in the DKey commit the project proponent to implementation of conservation
measures that must be followed for the ESA determination to remain valid.
Determination for the Northern Long -Eared Bat
Based upon your IPaC submission and a standing analysis, your project is not reasonably certain
to cause incidental take of the northern long-eared bat. Unless the Service advises you within 15
days of the date of this letter that your IPaC-assisted determination was incorrect, this letter
verifies that the Action is not likely to result in unauthorized take of the northern long-eared bat.

10/27/2023 1 PaC Record Locator: 689-133881036
Other Species and Critical Habitat that May be Present in the Action Area
The IPaC-assisted determination for the northern long-eared bat does not apply to the following
ESA -protected species and/or critical habitat that also may occur in your Action area:
■ American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Similarity of Appearance (Threatened)
■ Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi Endangered
■ Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened
■ Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii Endangered
■ Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea Endangered
■ Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Threatened
■ Magnificent Ramshorn Planorbella magnifica Endangered
■ Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
■ Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Threatened
■ Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
■ Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
■ Rufa Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Threatened
■ Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed Endangered
■ West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus Threatened
You may coordinate with our Office to determine whether the Action may cause prohibited take
of the animal species listed above. Note that if a new species is listed that may be affected by the
identified action before it is complete, additional review is recommended to ensure compliance
with the Endangered Species Act.
Next Step
Consultation with the Service is necessary. The project has a federal nexus (e.g., Federal funds,
permit, etc.), but you are not the federal action agency or its designated (in writing) non-federal
representative. Therefore, the ESA consultation status is incomplete and no project activities
should occur until consultation between the Service and the Federal action agency (or designated
non-federal representative), is completed.
As the federal agency or designated non-federal representative deems appropriate, they should
submit their determination of effects to the Service by doing the following.
1. Log into IPaC using an agency email account and click on My Projects, click "Search by
record locator" to find this Project using 689-133881036. (Alternatively, the originator of
the project in IPaC can add the agency representative to the project by using the Add
Member button on the project home page.)
2. Review the answers to the Northern Long-eared Bat Range -wide Determination Key to
ensure that they are accurate.

10/27/2023 1 PaC Record Locator: 689-133881036
3. Click on Review/Finalize to convert the `not likely to adversely affect' consistency letter to
a concurrence letter. Download the concurrence letter for your files if needed.
If no changes occur with the Project or there are no updates on listed species, no further
consultation/coordination for this project is required for the northern long-eared bat. However,
the Service recommends that project proponents re-evaluate the Project in IPaC if: 1) the scope,
timing, duration, or location of the Project changes (includes any project changes or
amendments); 2) new information reveals the Project may impact (positively or negatively)
federally listed species or designated critical habitat; or 3) a new species is listed, or critical
habitat designated. If any of the above conditions occurs, additional coordination with the
Service should take place before project implements any changes which are final or commits
additional resources.
If you have any questions regarding this letter or need further assistance, please contact the
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office and reference Project Code 2024-0009822 associated
with this Project.

10/27/2023 1 PaC Record Locator: 689-133881036 4
Action Description
You provided to IPaC the following name and description for the subject Action.
1. Name
Alexandra Place
2. Description
The following description was provided for the project 'Alexandra Place':
Small townhouse community to be located in New Hanover County, NC. The site
abuts Mott's Creek to the north and west and River Road to the east. The project
site is currently wooded and work is anticipated to start within the next 3-6 moths.
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/(a)34.126614599999996,-77.91481025851209,14z
�
n
�G
L

10/27/2023 1 PaC Record Locator: 689-133881036
DETERMINATION KEY RESULT
Based on the answers provided, the proposed Action is consistent with a determination of "may
affect, but not likely to adversely affect" for the Endangered northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis).
QUALIFICATION INTERVIEW
1. Does the proposed project include, or is it reasonably certain to cause, intentional take of
the northern long-eared bat or any other listed species?
Note: Intentional take is defined as take that is the intended result of a project. Intentional take could refer to
research, direct species management, surveys, and/or studies that include intentional handling/encountering,
harassment, collection, or capturing of any individual of a federally listed threatened, endangered or proposed
species?
No
2. Your project overlaps with an area where northern long-eared bats may be present year-
round. Time -of -year restrictions may not be appropriate for your project due to bats being
active all year.
Do you understand that your project may impact bats at any time during the year and time -
of -year restrictions may not apply to your project?
Yes
3. The action area does not overlap with an area for which U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
currently has data to support the presumption that the northern long-eared bat is present.
Are you aware of other data that indicates that northern long-eared bats (NLEB) are likely
to be present in the action area?
Bat occurrence data may include identification of NLEBs in hibernacula, capture of
NLEBs, tracking of NLEBs to roost trees, or confirmed NLEB acoustic detections. Data
on captures, roost tree use, and acoustic detections should post-date the year when white -
nose syndrome was detected in the relevant state. With this question, we are looking for
data that, for some reason, may have not yet been made available to U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
No
4. Does any component of the action involve construction or operation of wind turbines?
Note: For federal actions, answer `yes' if the construction or operation of wind power facilities is either (1) part
of the federal action or (2) would not occur but for a federal agency action (federal permit, funding, etc.).
No

10/27/2023 1 PaC Record Locator: 689-133881036
5. Is the proposed action authorized, permitted, licensed, funded, or being carried out by a
Federal agency in whole or in part?
Yes
6. Is the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA),
or Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding or authorizing the proposed action, in
whole or in part?
No
7. Are you an employee of the federal action agency or have you been officially designated in
writing by the agency as its designated non-federal representative for the purposes of
Endangered Species Act Section 7 informal consultation per 50 CFR § 402.08?
Note: This key may be used for federal actions and for non-federal actions to facilitate section 7 consultation and
to help determine whether an incidental take permit may be needed, respectively. This question is for information
purposes only.
No
8. Is the lead federal action agency the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or Federal
Communications Commission (FCC)? Is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) funding or authorizing the proposed action,
in whole or in part?
No
9. Is the lead federal action agency the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)?
No

10/27/2023 1 PaC Record Locator: 689-133881036
10. Have you determined that your proposed action will have no effect on the northern long-
eared bat? Remember to consider the effects of any activities that would not occur but for
the proposed action.
If you think that the northern long-eared bat may be affected by your project or if you
would like assistance in deciding, answer "No" below and continue through the key. If you
have determined that the northern long-eared bat does not occur in your project's action
area and/or that your project will have no effects whatsoever on the species despite the
potential for it to occur in the action area, you may make a "no effect" determination for
the northern long-eared bat.
Note: Federal agencies (or their designated non-federal representatives) must consult with USFWS on federal
agency actions that may affect listed species [50 CFR 402.14(a)]. Consultation is not required for actions that will
not affect listed species or critical habitat. Therefore, this determination key will not provide a consistency or
verification letter for actions that will not affect listed species. If you believe that the northern long-eared bat may
be affected by your project or if you would like assistance in deciding, please answer "No" and continue through
the key. Remember that this key addresses only effects to the northern long-eared bat. Consultation with USFWS
would be required if your action may affect another listed species or critical habitat. The definition of Effects of
the Action can be found here: https://www.fws.gov/media/northern-long-eared-bat-assisted-determination-kM-
selected -definitions
No
11. Your project overlaps with an area where northern long-eared bats may be present year-
round.
Is suitable northern long-eared bat habitat present within 1000 feet of project activities?
Yes
12. Will the action cause effects to a bridge?
No
13. Will the action result in effects to a culvert or tunnel?
No
14. Does the action include the intentional exclusion of northern long-eared bats from a
building or structure?
Note: Exclusion is conducted to deny bats' entry or reentry into a building. To be effective and to avoid harming
bats, it should be done according to established standards. If your action includes bat exclusion and you are
unsure whether northern long-eared bats are present, answer "Yes." Answer "No" if there are no signs of bat use
in the building/structure. If unsure, contact your local U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services Ecological Services Field
Office to help assess whether northern long-eared bats may be present. Contact a Nuisance Wildlife Control
Operator (NWCO) for help in how to exclude bats from a structure safely without causing harm to the bats (to
find a NWCO certified in bat standards, search the Internet using the search term "National Wildlife Control
Operators Association bats"). Also see the White -Nose Syndrome Response Team's guide for bat control in
structures
No

10/27/2023 1 PaC Record Locator: 689-133881036
15. Does the action involve removal, modification, or maintenance of a human -made structure
(barn, house, or other building) known or suspected to contain roosting bats?
No
16. Will the action directly or indirectly cause construction of one or more new roads that are
open to the public?
Note: The answer may be yes when a publicly accessible road either (1) is constructed as part of the proposed
action or (2) would not occur but for the proposed action (i.e., the road construction is facilitated by the proposed
action but is not an explicit component of the project).
No
17. Will the action include or cause any construction or other activity that is reasonably certain
to increase average daily traffic on one or more existing roads?
Note: For federal actions, answer `yes' when the construction or operation of these facilities is either (1) part of
the federal action or (2) would not occur but for an action taken by a federal agency (federal permit, funding,
etc.). .
Yes
18. Will the increased vehicle traffic occur on any road that lies between any two areas of
contiguous forest that are each greater than or equal to 10 acres in extent and are separated
by less than 1,000 feet? Northern long-eared bats may cross a road by flying between
forest patches that are up to 1,000 feet apart.
Note: "Contiguous forest" of 10 acres or more may includes areas where multiple forest patches are separated by
less than 1,000 feet of non -forested area if the forested patches, added together, comprise at least 10 acres.
Yes
19. For every 1,000 feet of road where increased traffic is expected, will there be at least one
place where bats could cross the road corridor by flying less than 33 feet (10 meters)
between trees whose tops are at least 66 feet (20 meters) higher than the road surface?
Yes
20. Will the proposed action involve the creation of a new water -borne contaminant source
(e.g., leachate pond pits containing chemicals that are not NSF/ANSI 60 compliant)?
No
21. Will the proposed action involve the creation of a new point source discharge from a
facility other than a water treatment plant or storm water system?
No
22. Will the action include drilling or blasting?
No
23. Will the action involve military training (e.g., smoke operations, obscurant operations,
exploding munitions, artillery fire, range use, helicopter or fixed wing aircraft use)?
No

10/27/2023 1 PaC Record Locator: 689-133881036
24. Will the proposed action involve the use of herbicides or pesticides other than herbicides
(e.g., fungicides, insecticides, or rodenticides)?
No
25. Will the action include or cause activities that are reasonably certain to cause chronic
nighttime noise in suitable summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat? Chronic noise
is noise that is continuous or occurs repeatedly again and again for a long time.
Note: Additional information defining suitable summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat can be found at:
https://www.fws. gov/media/northem-long-eared-bat-assisted-determination-key-selected-definitions
No
26. Does the action include, or is it reasonably certain to cause, the use of artificial lighting
within 1000 feet of suitable northern long-eared bat roosting habitat?
Note: Additional information defining suitable roosting habitat for the northern long-eared bat can be found at:
https://www.fws. gov/media/northem-long-eared-bat-assisted-determination-key-selected-definitions
No
27. Will the action include tree cutting or other means of knocking down or bringing down
trees, tree topping, or tree trimming?
Yes
28. Has a presence/probable absence summer bat survey targeting the northern long-eared bat
following the Service's Range -wide Indiana Bat and Northern Long -Eared Bat Survey
Guidelines been conducted within the project area? If unsure, answer "No."
No
29. Does the action include emergency cutting or trimming of hazard trees in order to remove
an imminent threat to human safety or property? See hazard tree note at the bottom of the
key for text that will be added to response letters
Note: A "hazard tree" is a tree that is an immediate threat to lives, public health and safety, or improved property
and has a diameter breast height of six inches or greater.
No
30. Are any of the trees proposed for cutting or other means of knocking down, bringing
down, topping, or trimming suitable for northern long-eared bat roosting (i.e., live trees
and/or snags >_3 inches dbh that have exfoliating bark, cracks, crevices, and/or cavities)?
Yes
31. [Semantic] Does your project intersect a known sensitive area for the northern long-eared
bat?
Note: The map queried for this question contains proprietary information and cannot be displayed. If you need
additional information, please contact your state agency or USFWS field office
Automatically answered
No

10/27/2023 1 PaC Record Locator: 689-133881036
32. Your project overlaps with an area where northern long-eared bats may be present year-
round. To minimize or avoid impacts to the northern long-eared bat, all activities affecting
trees should not occur from December 15th to February 15th and April 15th to July 30th.
Will any project activites occur from December 15th to February 15th and/or April 15th to
July 30th.
Yes

10/27/2023 1 PaC Record Locator: 689-133881036
PROJECT QUESTIONNAIRE
Enter the extent of the action area (in acres) from which trees will be removed - round up
to the nearest tenth of an acre. For this question, include the entire area where tree removal
will take place, even if some live or dead trees will be left standing.
12
Will all potential northern long-eared bat (NLEB) roost trees (trees >_3 inches diameter at
breast height, dbh) be cut, knocked, or brought down from any portion of the action area
greater than or equal to 0.1 acre? If all NLEB roost trees will be removed from multiple
areas, select `Yes' if the cumulative extent of those areas meets or exceeds 0.1 acre.
Yes
Enter the extent of the action area (in acres) from which all potential NLEB roost trees will
be removed. If all NLEB roost trees will be removed from multiple areas, entire the total
extent of those areas. Round up to the nearest tenth of an acre.
12
For the area from which all potential northern long-eared bat (NLEB) roost trees will be
removed, on how many acres (round to the nearest tenth of an acre) will trees be allowed
to regrow? Enter `0' if the entire area from which all potential NLEB roost trees are
removed will be developed or otherwise converted to non -forest for the foreseeable future.
12
Will any snags (standing dead trees) >_3 inches dbh be left standing in the area(s) in which
all northern long-eared bat roost trees will be cut, knocked down, or otherwise brought
down?
No
Will all project activities by completed by April 1, 2024?
No

10/27/2023 1 PaC Record Locator: 689-133881036 12
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
Name:
Dana Lutheran
Address:
5315 South College Road
Address Line 2:
Suite E
City:
Wilmington
State:
NC
Zip:
28412
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9102281841
LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Lead Agency: Army Corps of Engineers
Name: Brad Shaver
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

RCW SLOPES Manual - North Carolina
March 2022
Appendix B- Red -cockaded Woodpecker Effects Determination Key
Date i - ;;02 2-4
USFWS Reference No, (if applicable): 2D�Lq- 06C93 2-2-
LJ5 Army Carps
of Engineers.
1) Is the action area' located within the RCW consultation area (see Appendix A and project -specific
results from a project -specific IPaC or internal USACE GI5 review)?
a) Yes................................................� ...... . . .go to 2
b) No ................................ �e�:!�!.da-, ��1 ..r1.............'........................................................No effect'
2) Is the action area' located in the northeastern coastal plain (see Appendix A)?
a) Yes............................................................. .................................... ...................................................... go to 3
rNo (the project is located in piedmont, sandhiIIs, or southeastern coastal plain)..................go to 4
3) Is the action area' located in a forested area with pine trees present in northeast North Carolina (e.g.,
high pocosin, Atlantic white cedar, nonriverine swamp forests, pond pine woodland, coastal fringe
evergreen forest, wet successional pine pine -hardwood forest, or pine plantation or uplands)? If yes,
are the pine trees greater than 30 years of age (if stand age is not readily determined, refer to Table
1 for a description of the minimum dbh of 30-year-old pines associated with each community type).
If the answer to both of these questions is yes, choose Yes below. if the answer to one or both
questions is no, then choose No below.
a) Yes..... .................................................................................................................................................. go to 8
b) No ............................... ........... ....... ........... .............................................. ....................................... .. No effect
4) Is the action area' located within suitable RCW foraging or nesting habitat (pine or pine/hardwood
stands in which 50% or more of the dominant trees are pines and the dominant pine trees are 30
years of age or older or?8-inches dbh')?
a) Yes....................................................................................................................................................-go to 5
0- No ...................................................................................................................................................No effect
5j WIII any activity in the action area' remove trees equal to or greater than 8 Inches dbh; or wIII ally
activity occur within 200 feet of known RCW cavity trees? If unable to determine the location of a
cavity tree with confidence, contact the U5FW5 Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office.
a) Yes (to one or both)... .................... I ........................................... __ ... _.............................go to 5
b) No- ................. ...... ................................................... .................................... - ....... ........ ............... — N LAA3
12

RCW SLOPES Manual — North Carolina
March 2022
6) is the action area' located in suitable RCW nesting habitat (in the sandhilis and piedmont: pine or
pine/hardwood stands that contain pines 60 years in age or older or -k10 inches dbh; in the
southeastern coastal plain: pine or pine/hardwood stands that contain pines �tg inches dbh, including
but not limited to pine ffatwoods, pocosIn, pine savannah, upland pine/hardwood)?
a) Yes...... .... ........ •...••••••..••................... ................... ......... ............. ........................... •••-•••...•• .................go to 9
b) No—...__ ....................................................................... I ......... ­ ...... ..................................... ­....­ .... go to 7
7) Does suitable nesting habitat occur within 0.5 miles of suitable foraging habitat that would be
impacted by any activity in the action areal?
a) Yes ..................................................... .......................................................... .............. ....... .................. go to 9
b) No ...... ......................................................................................................................... ...................... .... NLAA3
8) Refer to Table 1 in the SLOPES for the northeastern north Carolina habitat type in the action area'.
Are pine trees with a dbh equal to or greater than that shown in Table 1 proposed to be removed in
the action area', or is the action area' within 200 feet of a cavity tree? if the answer to either of these
questions is yes, choose Yes below. If unable to determine the location of a cavity tree with
confidence, then contact the USFWS Raleigh Field Office.
a) Yes ....... ..................................................................... ............ ................................................... ........... go to 9
b) No_._ ........................................................................................................................................ _ ....... N LAA3
9) Contact the appropriate USAGE representative for a pre -application meeting to determine if a survey
is necessary (for a list of USACE representatives please see the contact list at htt saw-
reg.usace.armv.mil/FO/PMList.pdf). Note that project -specific information, such as a delineation of
waters of the U.S., project plans, and details concerning certain activities on disturbances that would
accur in the action area' (e.g. percussive activities, forest management, or similar disturbances), may
be needed for the USAGE to determine the action area(s)' of the project. If a survey is required and
agreed to by the applicant, al! suitable RCW nesting habitat within 0.5 miles of the action areal should
be surveyed according to USFWS protocol for the presence of RCW cavity trees'. If the applicant is
unwilling or unable to conduct the survey, standard consultation with the USFWS should begin. Such
surveys are conducted by running line transects through stands and visually inspecting all medium-
sized and large pines for evidence of cavity excavation by RCWs. Transects must be spaced so that all
trees are inspected and are run north -south.
Was a survey performed?
a) Yes, a survey was performed, and RCW cavity trees were observed.......................................go to 10
b) Yes, the survey was submitted to the USFWS for concurrence, and the USFWS concurred with the
results (no RCW cavity trees were observed) ........................... ............ .................. ....................... NLAA3
c) No, the USACE determined that a survey was not required and the USFWS
concurred........................ ........ ......... ..................... .................. ........................................................... NLAA3
d) No, a survey was not performed..........................................................................Consultation requireds
10) Does the project involve activities or disturbances in the action area' (e.g., percussive activities, forest
management, or similar disturbances) within the 200-foot cavity tree buffer, and/or cause removal or
damage to RCW cavity trees (e.g., via root compaction, soil compaction)? If yes to either or both then
consultation is required.
a) Yes...... ............... — .................................................................................................... Consultation required'
b) No...................................................................................................................................................... go to 11
13

RCW SLOPES Manual — North Carolina
March 2022
11) Has a foraging habitat analysis (FHA)' been conducted to determine whether enough foraging habitat
would remain for each RCW group past -project? For information on how to conduct an FHA6, refer to
the "Procedures for Determining Foraging Habitat Availability" and the Private Land Guidelines.'
a) Yes, the FHA' has been submitted to the USFWS for concurrence$ and the USFWS concurred
that adequate amounts of foraging habitat would remain post -project ................... .............. NLAA3
b) Yes, and review of the FHA by the USACE along with concurrence from USFWS determined
inadequate amounts of foraging habitat would remain post -project ......... Consultation required'
cj No, an FHA6 has not been conducted...............................................................Consultation required'
'Action Area means all areas to be affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action and not merely the immediate area involved
in the action. Please contact the appropriate USACE representative for any questions as to the action area for the Federal action.
For a list of USACE representatives, please see the contact list at: htto:Ilsaw-reg.usace.army. miI/FCIPM Ust.pdf.
'No effect — The proposed project would result in no effect to this species and/or its federally designated critical habitat (if
applicable). Further consultation with the USFWS Raleigh and Asheville Ecological Services field offices is not necessary for the
project as described.
3NLAA — The proposed project may affect but is not likely to adversely affect this species and/or its designated critical habitat (if
applicable). NLAA determinations for projects made pursuant to this key require no further consultation with the USFWS Raleigh
and Ashevilte Ecological Services field offices, therefore, consultation is considered complete for this species. For General Permits,
submittal of a Pre -Construction Notification to the USACE will he required for all NLAA determinations.
°Follow link to USFWS RCW Recovery Plan, Appendix 4 for additional information on nesting and foraging habitats, and survey
protocol(httos:Ilwww.fws.govlrcwrecovery/filleslRecovervPlan/survey protocol.pdf)
'Consultation required — Contact the USACE to begin this consultation process. For a list of USACE representatives please see the
contact list at http://saw•reg.usace.armV.mil/F0/PMList.pdf. Further consultation with the USFWS Raleigh and Asheville
Ecological Services field offices is necessary to discern if the activity would result in a "no effect," "not likely to adversely affect,"
or "likely to adversely affect" determination.
6Follow links for additional information on conducting FHA (httpsJ/www.fws. ovlrcwrecovery/matrix.html) and for
determining foraging habitat availability (htts: www.fws, ov ncsandhiils files fha data collection rocedures. d .
7Foiiow link for additional information regarding determination for adequate amount of foraging habitat
(https:Ilw,rw.fws.rtoy/rcwrecove rv(files/RecovervPIanlorivate lands Qpidelines.pdfj.
s FHA — When an FHA is conducted, the USACE must provide the FHA to USFW5 for review and concurrence.
Additional Information t k—,SLib04_ -P V-xas GL+in� c�_
14

Alexandra Place PCN Attachments 3/27/24 SEGi*
Attachment 8
New Hanover County Flood Map
Page 10 of 12

Alexandra Place PCN Attachments3/27/24 SEGi*
Attachment 9
New Hanover County Floodplain Development Permit
Page 11 of 12

New Hanover County
Building Safety
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 170
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Permit#: FDP-24-000003
Permit Type: NHC Floodplain Development Permit
Issued Date:
Project Address:
Owner:
Address:
Phone:
Parcel#: R07500-001-003-000
Occupancy Type:
Project:
Contractor:
Address:
Phone:
I
Project Details
Scope of Work:
SQ Ft: 0 Valuation: $0.00'
Set Back Front: Set Back Left:
Set Back Rear: Set Back Right:
Set Back Between Structure:
Special Zoning Comments: Proposed disturbance of 7.82 acres, AE 9', Coastal A. Scope of work is for fill & retaining walls.
Description: 68 Lot townhouse development; proposed development outside of LiMWA for retaining walls & fill; AE 9'
Name
NHC Floodplain Commercial Final Inspection
0
Totals:
Special Notes and Comment:
$45.00
Paid
$45.00
$45.00
Due
$0.00
$0.00
Contractor hereby agrees to take full responsibility as required by law for compliance with all State and Local Codes and
Ordinances pertaining to construction and the conditions of this permit. All construction debris must be removed by the
contractor. The county will not pick up any construction debris. Please call 910-798-7308 for inspections. Inspections requested
by 3:30pm will be scheduled for the next business day. Inspections requested from 3:30pm to 5pm are scheduled for the day after
the next business day Monday through Friday. Any disagreement with a decision made by a Building Safety Official (i.e. field
inspector, or plan reviewer) may be brought before the Chief Building Inspector for review.
Notice
Page 1 of 2 230 Government Center Drive Suite: 170 Wilmington, NC 28403

Alexandra Place PCN Attachments 3/27/24 SEW
Attachment 10
SHPO HPOWEB2.0 Map
Pl-
- - Find address�hisloric resource Q ps NLorr""eC lyro,
N Lon acne n
t �
1 a
t `� v rn Q Normar+di
n �
. � 6 P o Brewster Ln
dd
-p V°
Arrowhead
park C
� q Ya1Ge Ln
}� w
� v Hanna Or
t
Pr
rss Glen ti•-�t
i,�oro M
ptl Dr
-NEW HANOVE
27
x
rg�` g matte �
yam" ganders F
ar Ct 1
r as
� a
s
c -
P 4 �uv erw oor�,
a o4 Ur
SWICK
c;
do pp o
a
Page 12 of 12