NC0037737_Wasteload Allocation_19820525

Facility Name:
Existing J�d Permit No.
Proposed Q
WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Pipe No.:
Engineer
Date Rec.
#
Q
Date:
County: 'S t")a;,P,
Design Capacity (MGD): 0100 II/ndustrial (% of Flow): Domestic (% of Flow): �� O
Receiving Stream: �� NG %��A +�� /2 R, Class: —Tlr Sub -Bassin:
Reference USGS Quad: (Please attach) Requestor: 40+ e!!!ZZA �I S Regional Office./
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Design Temp.: �d /e+L Drainage Area: 0,1 ,, z Avg. Streamflow:
7Q10: 0/ G Ts Winter 7Q10: 30Q2: n O 2
a- 0 : L'
Location of D.O.minimum (miles below outfall): SlopeS
Velocity (fps):+,% Kl (base e, per day, 200C);_ K2 (base e, per day, 200C): H,
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
0
S
t
goo 16a
S
�
Original Allocation
Revised Allocation
Prepared By:
Effluent
���; 6, P. o., �es� rn 1, -4
Date(s) of Revision(s) —
(Please attach previous allocation)
S, Reviewed By: '�z �� 3 Date:

REQUEST NO. + 203
######*#*######*##### WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
FACILITY NAME
TYPE OF WASTE
COUNTY
REGIONAL OFFICE
RECEIVING STREAM
7010 + 0,01 CFS
DRAINAGE AREA
NANTAHALA VILLAGE
DOMESTIC
SWAIN
+ ASHEVILLE
UT NANATAHALA R.
W7010 - CFS
0010 SCE+MI:
REQUESTOR D. ADKINS
SUBBASIN + 04--04-02
3002 0.02 CFS
STREAM CLASS +B-TROUT
######################## RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS ########################
WASTEFLOW(S)
(MGD) +
0+0078
DOD-5
(MG/L)
30
NH3--N
( MG/L )
NR
D.O.
(MG/L) +
4
PH
(SU) +
6-9
FECAL COLIFORM
(/100ML)+
200
TSS
(MG/L) +
30
FACILITY IS + PROPOSED ( ) EXISTING rV) NEW ( )
LIMITS ARE + REVISION ( ) CONFIRMATION i ) OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED RY#
MODELERaL_
4
HEAD,TECHNICAL SERVICES BRANCH +__A___eL�-DATE
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR +______________________DATE +_____ ___
PERMITS MANAGER : 1&--DATE
APPROVED BY +
DIVISION DIRECTOR
ATE

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
May 13, 1982
1EMORANDUM TO FILE
BY: W. E. Anderson
Environmental Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Nantahala Village
Swain County, North Carolina
The effluent from the surface sand filter at Nantahala Village flows
to a ditch. The ditch is for the most part located within a briar patch.
Ray Carnes, Maintenance Supervisor, says that he has explored the area
during the busiest part of the season when the system was discharging and
was never able to find anything discharging to surface waters. It is ex-
tremely unlikely that any person would come in contact with the effluent
from this system.
WEA/mkd
cc: Mr. Roy M. Davis
Mr...Eorrest Westall

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 3, 1982
TO: Roy Davis
FROM: Forrest Westall
Lee Fleming
SUBJECT: Nantahala Village and Hemlock Inn
Your comments concerning the two subject wasteload allocations have been
noted and reviewed. While we understand your concern for the effluent
limitations recommended for these two discharges, the basis of limitations
must still be 7-day 10-year low flow. As a result the limits which were
recommended must be included in order to be consistant with North Carolina's
water quality program.
As a matter of information,we would point out that Lhe issue of discharge
to dry streams is being reviewed by the water quality task force. It is
possible that recommendations from this group may result in program
modification that would allow the Division some flexibility in the application
of its effluent limitations.
A copy of the recommended effluent limitations is attached for your information.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please let us know.
FRW:cs
Attachments
cc: Mark Lewis

vision of Environmental Management
May 3, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: Roy Danis
FROM: Mark Lewis �(I� • �•
SUBJECT: Wastel oad Allocation - Nantahala Village
USGS had recently lowered the 7Q10 estimate at Nantahala Village downward
from 0.01 cfs to 0 cfs. This revision had caused the effluent limits for
Nantahala Village to go from secondary to BOD5 = 17 mg/l, NH4-N = 9 mg/l.
During a phone conversation with Heath Dobson on March 31 it was decided to
use the old 7Q10 estimate of 0.01 cfs. The resulting effluent limits are
attached. Secondary limits with an effluent D.O. of 4 mg/l is sufficient
to protect the water quality standard for D.O. Please note that because of
the "B-Trout" classification of this water it was necessary to maintain the
fecal coliform limit. Normally, a total residual chlorine limit is also
required of. facilities that discharge disinfected waste into trout waters.
However, this T-acili ty is located in close proximity to Fontana Lake. We
believe that the mixing zone likely extends to the mouth of the unnamed
tributary. Once in Fontana Lake, there should be sufficient dilution such
that the limit for total chlorine residual may be omitted for this facility.
If you have any further questions, please call.

********#*#*#**# WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM **#****************
FACILITY NAME
:
NANTAHALA VILLAGE
COUNTY
:
SWAIN
REGIONAL OFFICE
ASHEVILLE
REQUESTOR
:
D.ADKINS
RECEIVING STREAM
:
U.T. NANTAHALA
RIVER�UBBASIN : 04-04-02
7010 : 0 CFS
W7010 : 0
CFS 30Q2 :0 CFS
DRAINAGE AREA
:
0.10 SO.MI.
STREAM CLASS :B-TROUT
********#*#*##*#**#* RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS
WASTEFLOW(S)
(MGD) :
0.0078
BOD-5
(MG/L) :
eJ;5,�- 3 6
NH3-N
(MG/L)
D.D.
(MG/L) :
�6
PH
(SU) :
6-8.5
FECAL COLIFORM
(/100ML):
12"-
TSS
(MG/L) :
-1:0-- 3 v
PLEASE NOTE THAT USGS ESTIMATE
WAS REVISED DOWNWARD FROM A
7010 OF 0.01 TO 0 CFS
FACILITY IS : PROPOSED ( ) EXISTING ( )
LIMITS ARE : REVISION (-�) CONFIRMATION ( ) OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY:
MODELER
HEADYTECHNICAL SERVICE BRANCH
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR
PERMITS MANAGER
APPROVED BY
D A T E
'----------------------DATE :----------
DIVISION DIRECTOR :______________________DATE ------------

*>ic MODEL SUMMARY DATA **
DISCHARGER t NANTAHALA VILLAGE SUBB ASIN :04-04-02
RECEIVING STREAM U.T. NANTAHALA RIVER STREAM CLASS##B—TROUT
DESIGN TEMPERATURE 20 DEGREES C. WASTEFLOW : 0.0078 MGD MGD
ISLOPE I
VELOCITY
IDEPTH
1 K1
I Kr
I Kra
I K2
I Oro I
IFT/MI I
------------------------------------------
FPS
I FT
--------------------------------------
I /DAY
I/DAY
I/DAY
1/DAY
ICFS/MII
1 I
SEGMENT 1 REACH 1 1250.001
I 1
------------------------------------------------
0,10
I
1 0.09
I
I
1 1.00
I
-----------------
I
1 1.00
1
I
1 0.00
I
I
119,75
I
-----------
I I
1 0+00 1
I 1
----

� � �. yy yy yy yy WW yy yy yy yy yy yy yy yy yy
THE ENO D.O. IS 6.67 MG/L
THE ENO CBOD IS 46.90 MG/L
THE END NBOD IS 0.00 MG/L
THE D.O. MIN. OF SEGMENT 1 IS 6.06 MG/L
THIS MINIMUM IS LOCATED AT SEGMENT MILEPOINT 0.01
WHICH IS LOCATED IN REACH NUMBER 1
THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH 1 IS 53 MG/L
i�