NC0037508_Wasteload Allocation_19940825

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMrr NO.: NCO037508
PERMITTEE NAME: Moore County Board of Commissioners
FACILITY NAME: Moore County Regional W.W.T.P.
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major _q Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 6.7 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
am
4.2 %
Comments:
Facility has a pretreatment pro rg am•
r f M s�crf 6/6yf,/
RECEIVING STREAM; Aberdeen Creek
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-07-50
Reference USGS Quad: G21SW (please attach)
County: Moore
Regional Office: Fayetteville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 11/30/94 Treatment Plant Class: IV
Classification changes within three miles:
change to C Sw HOW at Drowning Creek. pU-0
Requested by: Sel, Goris Date: 6/20/94
Prepared by:-- Date: I q Qi Gus; i99�1
Reviewed by: ("Oil4, F, MdJ 42:) - Date:
860,E lo9.5/ 165 q
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
Area (mio: 36.3
(cfs)
15.2
Average Streamflow (cfs): 47.2
w7Q10 (cfs): 28.7 30Q2 (cfs): n/a
(Ceriodaphnia) P / F Toxicity Test: Qrtly @ 41 % [March, June, September, December]
i Monitoring:
Parameters: temperature, dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, conductivty
Upstream Location: at least 1 00'upstream of outfall
Downstream Location: SR 1225
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/l):
DO (mg/I):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (4g/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
6.7
22
30
17
monitor
5.0
5.0
30
30
200
200
6-9
6-9
monitor
monitor
nr
nr
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Daily Maximum
Cadmium (µfill):
nr
Chromium (fig/1):
nr
Copper (µg/):
monitor
Nickel (µo):
nr
Lead Wl):
nr
Zinc (µo):
monitor
Cyanide (µgp):
monitor
Selenium (µgll):
nr
Mercury (µo):
nr
Silver (µo):
monitor
LTMP: monitored per Long Term
Monaoring Plan
LTMP
LTMP
LTMP
LTMP
LTMP
LTMP
LTMP
LTMP
LTMP
LTMP
shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace

J

OFFICE OF SYSTEM SUPERINTENDENT
April 20, 1994
'::A001EZ CVv�L_'L & 4::9F_CVF_T <.-::4viLt�ty
Water Pollu*ion Control System
P. 0. Box 813
Pinebluff, North Carolina 28373
p, W. A. S, I
1989
GOUM�{
Mr. Kerr T. Stevens, Regional Supervisor
Division of Environmental Management
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, _'.C. 28301-5043
Ref: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
MOWASA (Moore County) WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Correspondence of April 7, 1994
Dear Mr. Stevens:
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Mr. David Harris, President of MOWASA, has forwarded to me your correspondence
of April 7, 1994 to reply to Item 10 which states that the Moore County WWTP
Plant needs to have a pernanent sludge disposal program.
Presently the WWTP is ev lusting three disposal methods.
1. Contract hauling of our sludge to a sub -title D Landfill in Sampson
County.
2. Land Application of Sludge: Within the next 60 to 90 days DEM should
receive from MOWASA a completed land application permit for our sludge
to be applied on the following sites:
A. The Wastewater Treatment Plant
B. Closed cells at the Moore County Landfill
+' C. Adjacent property near the WWTP (farmland) bermuda hay production
and pine tree/seedling growth.
3. Composting: The WWTP has developed a compost recipe of sludge,
shredded newspaper & yard waste. This project is still in its infancy
stage.
If you have any questions concerning my explanation, please do not hesitate
to call me at 910-281-3146.
Iari cerely,
y Frick, System Superintendent
GAF/emb
pc: Mr. David Harris, President, MOWASA
Mr. W. David McNeill, Jr., County Manager

FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 7884
Facility Name: Moore County Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant
NPDES No.: NCO037508
Type of Waste: Domestic - 95.8 % Industrial - 4.2 %
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Receiving Stream: Abedeen Creek
Stream Classification: C
Subbasin: 03 - 07 - 50
County: Moore Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office: Fayetteville USGS #
Map Report Update
Requestor: Goris Date:
1994
Date of Request: 6/21 /94 Drainage Area (miz):
36.3
Topo Quad: G 21 S W Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
15.2
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
28.7
Average Flow (cfs):
47.2
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC M:
41 %
Wasteload Allocation Summary
�t •�
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
0
Facility not taking dissolved oxygen measurements for Instream Monitoring data.
The facility will not recieve a change in NH3-N since they have been consistently passing their
Toxicity Test. (one fail 3 / 94)
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Flo i?o�K rlek �ccvf.++•.�...\ Mct.w� :4..:� '(ham does •) Fob `iti
e..
U• 'k •f vim•.s .t J'. ','&
Recommended b
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineerin
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY: AUG 17 1994

CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
Wasteflow (MGM
6.7
BOD5 (mg/1):
22
30
NH3N (mg/l):
17
monitor
DO (mg/1):
5.0
5.0
TSS (mg/1):
30
30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
200
200
pH (Si):
6-9
6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
monitor
monitor
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
nr
nr
TP (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
TN (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
There shall be no discharge
of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Recommended Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter WQ or EL
Wasteflow (MGD):
6.7
BOW (mg/1):
22
30 WQ / M
NH3N (mg/1):
17
monitor WQ / -
DO (mg/1):
5.0
5.0 wp
TSS (mg/1):
30
30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
200
200
pH (Si):
6-9
6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
monitor
monitor
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
nr
nr
TP (mgft
monitor
monitor
TN (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
There shall be no discharge
of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Limits Changes Due To:
Parameter(s) Affected
(explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis including new flows, rates, field data,
interacting discharges)
(See page 4 for miscellaneous and special conditions, if applicable)

TOMCS/UETALS
Type of Toxicity Test: Chronic (Ceriodaphnia) Toxicity Test P / F
Existing Limit: 41 %
Recommended Limit: 41 %
Monitoring Schedule: March, June, September, and December
Existing Limits
Daily Max.
COD (mg/):
nr
Cadmium (µg/1):
monitor
Chromium (µg/1):
monitor
Copper (Nib):
monitor
Nickel (µg/1):
monitor
Lead (µg/1):
monitor
Zinc (µg/1):
monitor
Cyanide (µg/1):
12.0
Selenium (µg/1):
12.0
Mercury (µg/1):
monitor
Silver (µg/1):
monitor
. 7 7T 61700 M
Daily Max. WQ or EL
COD (mg/):
nr
Cadmium (µg/1):
nr *
Chromium (µg/1):
nr *
Copper (µg/1):
monitor *
Nickel (µg/l):
nr *
Lead (µme):
nr *
Zinc (µg/1):
monitor *
Cyanide (µg/1):
monitor *
Selenium (µg/l):
Mercury (µg/1):
0.03
Silver (µg/l):
monitor *
*monitored per Long Term Monitoring Plan
Limits Changes Due To:
Parameter(s) Affected
refer attached
FRO pc*-'sW!r 4` zv. W/ -r1\ts P'V.t.aG v►Mvtr6r--14 .
'C�►s 10*-r— q A RV-Powte-D Fk O%A%S WAS "Vr
OMB Wcr 1rkp L �S-Cltti►•r
f tyw�
x Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
•O
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: at least 100' upstream of outfall
Downstream Location: SR 1225
Parameters: Temperature, dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, conductivity
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected three times per
week during the months of June, July, August, and September and once per week during the remaining
months of the year.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Has the facility depnonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes V No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
• _• 41 •
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach updated evaluation of facility, including toxics spreadsheet, modeling
analysisif modeled at renewal, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name Moore County Regional WWTP Permit # NCO037508 Pipe # 001
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic
Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality is 41 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit
holder shall perform Quart� monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit
condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the
months of March, June, September, and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be
performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of
the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the
waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring
will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test
requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened
and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require
immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will
constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10
Permitted Flow
1WC
Basin & Sub -basin
Receiving Stream
County
15.2 c fs
6.7 MGD
41 %
03-07-50
Aberdeen Creek
Moore
QCL P/F Version 9191
Recommended bX
Farrell Keough
i
I
Date d
V

Lead:
Max. Pred Cw
97.5
all 26 data points were below detection levels of at least 25.0 µg/1(reason
Allowable Cw
61.6
for a max. predicted value was a A in detection levels).
no recommended requirement in NPDES Permit
Zinc:
Max. Pred Cw
231
maximum value of 110 µg/l
Allowable Cw
123.2
Monitor in NPDES Permit, per current SOP
Mercury:
Max. Pred Cw
0.3
25 out of 26 data points were below detection levels of at least 0.2 µg/1
Allowable Cw
0.03
positive value of 0.2 µg/l on 2 December,1993
Limit due to hits and strong possibility of having levels in effluent
Silver:
Max. Pred Cw
18.7
24 out of 26 data points were below detection levels of at least 10 µg/l
Allowable Cw
0.1
Monitor in NPDES Permit, per current SOP
Cyanide:
Max. Pred Cw
28.9
60 out of 61 data points were below detection levels of at least 5.0 µg/l
Allowable Cw
12.3
Monitor in NPDES Permit [ per Pretreatment, this a POC in all three
SIU's ]
Selenium:
Max. Pred Cw
0.0
all 61 data points were below detection levels of at least 5.0 µg/1
Allowable Cw
12.3
no recommended requirement in NPDES Permit
Cadmium:
Max. Pred Cw
4.3
all 26 data points were below detection levels of at least 50 µg/i
Allowable Cw
4.9
no recommended requirement in NPDES Permit
Chromium:
Max. Pred Cw
42.5
all 26 data points were below detection levels of at least 50 µg/1
Allowable Cw
123.2
no recommended requirement in NPDES Permit
Copper:
Max. Pred Cw
341
maximum value of 110 µg/1
Allowable Cw
17.2
Monitor in NPDES Permit, per current SOP
Nickel:
Max. Pred Cw
52.5
all 26 data points were below detection levels of at least 50 µg/l
Allowable Cw
216.8
no recommended requirement in NPDES Permit
SIU"S
Town of Aberdeen
Pinehurst Village
Southern Pines
Pinebluff Resort
JPS Carpet Corporation
Eritech Corporation
bases]
Ingersoll Rand Aro Tool
Carolina Galvanizing Corporation
Intek
Princival Product
municipality
municipality
municipality
municipality
Yarns, Latex, Soaps
Grounding System [steel, copper, nickel, acids,
Pneumatic Hand Tools [steel, aluminum, bar stock]
Copper Bonded Ground Electrodes [steel, copper,
nickel, acids, bases]
Woven Polyester Product [yarn and dye]

Request # 7884
Facility Name:
Moore County Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant
NPDES No.:
NC0037508
Type of Waste:
95.8 % Domestic / 4.2
% Industrial
Facility Status:
Existing
Permit Status:
Renewal
Receiving Stream:
Aberdeen Creek
Stream Classification:
C
Subbasin:
03-07-50
County:
Moore
Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office:
Fayetteville
USGS #
Requestor:
Goris
Date:
Date of Request:
6 / 21 / 94
Drainage Area (mi2):
36.3
Topo Quad:
G 21 SW
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
1 0.q
15 Z
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
20.0
.}
Average Flow (cfs):
47
y;-Z
3002 (cts):
2 .8
_
IWC (%):
4 .6 % rf/%
Existing WLA checked:
x
Staff Report:
x
Topochecked: USG
USGSFlows confirmed:
HA update attached
}�i) rror U taco p rlAtaa fin.
-iv o
eeNeuNo [
WC Spreadsheet:
nr
--
Stream Classification:
x
Nutrient Sensitivity:
Instream Data:
x FACILITY DID NOT TAKE DO's
Brief of wr a Analysis
1977: recommended secondary limits; 100% Domestic w/ design capacity of 6.7 mgd
1982: renewed w/ same limits
1986: remodelled w/ recommended limits of: BODs 22 (30), NH3-N 17 (monitor), dissolved oxygen 5 (monitor), TSS 30, fecal coliform
1,000, pH 6 - 9, and Chronic Toxicity Test. Facility now considered 95 % Domestic / 5 % Industrial
1992: renewed with new flows, (slightly lower 7010). No change in ammonia limit due to consistent passing of toxicity test, (although
DMR's were wll below permitted levels). Cyanide and Selenium had recommended limits w/ monitoring for all other metals.
DMR's
well below permitted levels, (chlorine very low for these types of facilities)
facility did not take DO's with their instream monitoring
Facility has consistent Passing of Toxcity Test
LTM P
Lead:
Max. Prod Cw
97.5
x
all 26 data points were below detection levels of at least 25.0 µgA (reason
Allowable Cw
61.6
for a max. predicted value was a A in detection levels).
no recommended requirement in NPDES Permit
Zinc:
Max. Prod Cw
231
x
maximum value of 110 µg/I
Allowable Cw
123.2
Monitor in NPDES Permit, per current SOP
Mercury:
Max. Pred Cw
0.3
x
25 out of 26 data points were below detection levels of at least 0.2 µg/I
Allowable Cw
0.03
positive value of 0.2 µg/I on 2 December, 1993
Limit
- Silver:
Max. Pred Cw
18.7
x
24 out of 26 data points were below detection levels of at least 10 µg/I
Allowable Cw
0.1
Monitor in NPDES Permit, per current SOP
Cyanide:
Max. Pred Cw
28.9
x
60 out of 61 data points were below detection levels of at least 5.0 µgA
Allowable Cw
12.3
Monitor in NPDES Permit [ per Pretreatment, this a POC in all three SIU's ]
Selenium:
Max. Pred Cw
0.0
x
all 61 data points were below detection levels of at least 5.0 µgA
Allowable Cw
12.3
no recommended requirement in NPDES Permit
Cadmium:
Max. Pred Cw
4.3
x
all 26 data points were below detection levels of at least 50 µgA
Allowable Cw
4.9
no recommended requirement in NPDES Permit
Chromium:
Max. Pred Cw
42.5
x
all 26 data points were below detection levels of at least 50 µgA
Allowable Cw
123.2
no recommended requirement in NPDES Permit

' Copper: Max. Pred Cw
341
Allowable Cw
17.2
' Nickel: Max. Prod Cw
52.5
Allowable Cw
216.8
SIU's
Town of Aberdeen
Pinehurst Village
Southern Pines
Pinebluff Resort
JPS Carpet Corporation
Eritech Corporation
Ingersoll Rand Aro Tool
Carolina Galvanizing Corporation
Intek
Pretreatment
refer attached spreadsheet
maximum value of 110 µgA
Monitor in NPDES Permit, per current SOP
all 26 data points were below detection levels of at least 50 µgA
no recommended requirement in NPDES Permit
municipality
municipality
municipality
municipality
Yarns, Latex, Soaps
Grounding System [steel, copper, nickel, acids, bases]
Pneumatic Hand Tools [steel, aluminum, bar stock]
Copper Bonded Ground Electrodes [steel, copper, nickel, acids, bases]
Woven Polyester Product [yarn and dye]
x Waste Water Treatment Plant NC00

May, 1993 through May, 1994
Facility Name =
Moore Co. Re Iona
NPDEss=
NCO037508
Ow (MGD) =
6.70 m d
7010s (cfs)=
10.54 cfs
1wc(%)=
49.63%
BDL FINAL RESULTS
ad Maximum Value 25.0
Max. Prod Cw 97.5
Allowable Cw 50.4
Zinc [AL]
Maximum Value
Max. Prod Cw
Allowable Cw
25 BDL [26 total data pts]
Mercury
Maximum Value
Max. Prod Cw
Allowable Cw
24 BDL
Silver [AL]
Maximum Value
Max. Prod Cw
Allowable Cw
60 BDL [61 total data pts]
Cyanide
Maximum Value
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
61 BDL
Selenium
Maximum Value
Max. Prod Cw
Allowable Cw
26 BDL
Cadmium
Maximum Value
Max. Prod Cw
Allowable Cw
26 BDL
Chromium
Maximum Value
Max. Prod Cw
Allowable Cw
Copper Maximum Value
Max. Prod Cw
Allowable Cw
26 BDL
Nickel Maximum Value
Max. Prod Cw
Allowable Cw
110.0
231.0
100.7
0.2
0.3
0.02
11.0
18.7
0.1
17.0
28.9
10.1
2.5
0.0
10.1
2.5
4.3
4.0
25.0
42.5
100.7
110.0
341.0
14.1
25.0
52.5
177.3
uelnt�cl FtCW5
Shank z� 1f ud�
old �1ou73 - dtc�N�
hlaj�c � dl�cNcc.
P'11* out Afqo'-� Co
7/1194

May, 1993 through May, 1994
Facility Name=
Moore Co. Regional WWTP
NCO037508
NPDES A=
6.70 m d
Ow (Mcn) =
15.20cfs
7010s(c1s)=
40.59%
lwC
26 BDL FINAL RESULTS
Lead Maximum Value 25.0
Max. Pred Cw 97.5
Allowable Cw 61.6
Zinc [AL] Maximum Value 110.0
Max. Pred Cw 231.0
Allowable Cw 123.2 ^x J t0� `cuea c.
0oP l
25 BDL [26 total data pts]
i
Mercury Maximum Value 0.2
Max. Pred Cw 0.3
Allowable Cw 0.03 Lko"
24 BDL
Silver [AL] Maximum Value 11.0
Max. Pred Cw 18.7
aoN tea is rzn�
5oP1
Allowable Cw 0.1
6,0 BDL [61 total data pts]
Cyanide Maximum Value 17.0
Max. Pred Cw 28.9
Allowable Cw 12.3
61 BDL
Selenium Maximum Value 2.5
Max. Pred Cw 0.0
0 1 M,c aEcc.r�
Allowable Cw 12.3
26 BDL
Cadmium Maximum Value 2.5
Max. Pred Cw 4.3
Allowable Cw 4.9
26 BDL
Chromium Maximum Value 25.0
Max. Pred Cw 42.5
l Lc
Allowable Cw 123.2 v a M r
may, G�
Copper CAI Maximum Value 110.0
Max. Pred Cw 341.0
r,°ticraa-`
- J01ok
Allowable Cw 17.2
26 BDL
Nickel Maximum Value 25.0
Max. Pred Cw 52.5
lz ec
.4.4
Allowable Cw 2168
6/24/94

May. 1993 through May. 1994
M�
Parer awat
Lead
Parameter-
Enc (AL]
Standad -
25
}rgA
Standard -
50
µgA
n
BDLa1/2DL
If 1/2 DL RESULTS
n
BDL-1/2DL
elf 1/2 DL RESULTS
1
2.5
SW Dev.
9.7
1
12
SW Dev.
26.7
2
2.5
Mean
7.7
2
15
Mean
42-7
3
2.5
C.V.
1.3
3
23
C.V.
0.6
4
2.5
4
25
'
5
2.5
5
41
6
2.5
Adult Factors
3.9
a
40
Mult Factor -
2.1
7
2.5
' Max. Value
25.0 pgA
7
49
Max. Value
110.0 µo
8
2.5
Max. Prod Cv
97A po
8
34
Max. Pred Cv
231.0 po
9
2.5
Allowable Cw
61.6 po
9
42
Allowable Cw
123.2 pgll
10
2.5
10
40
11
2.5
11
110
12
2.5
12
65
13
2.5
13
23
14
2.5
14
40
15
2.6
15
32
16
2.5
16
44
17
2.6
17
10
'
16
2.5
16
10
'
19
2.5
19
58
20
2.5
20
50
21
25
'
21
47
22
25
22
33
23
25
23
110
24
25
24
26
25
25
•
25
40
26
25
28
92
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
39
40
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
48
46
47
47
48
48
49
49
50
50
51
51
52
52
53
53
54
54
55
5
56
56
57
57
58
58
59
59
60
60
61
61

May,1993 through May,1994
Parameter-
Memury
Parameter-
Sliver(AL]
Standard-
0.012
pm
StwWard-
0.06
µw
n
BDL=1/2DL
If 1/2 DL RESULTS
n
BDL=1/2DL
If 112 DL RESULTS
1
0.1
SW Dev.
0.0
1
11
Std Dev.
10
2
0.1
Mean
0.1
2
2.5
Mean
5.1
3
0.1
C.V.
0.2
3
5
C.V.
0.4
4
0.1
4
5
'
5
0.1
5
5
`
6
0.1
Malt Factor a
1.3
6
5
Wt Factor =
1.7
7
0.1
` Max. Value
0.2 po
7
5
' Max. Value
11.0 �q/l
6
0.1
Max. Prod CM
0.3 PO
e
5
' Mm. Prod CM
18.7 �gA
9
0.1
Allowable Cw
0.03 yn
9
5
Allowable Cw
0.1 �n
10
0.1
10
5
'
11
0.2
2 Deownber.1993
11
5
'
12
0.1
12
5
'
13
0.1
13
5
'
14
0.1
14
5
'
15
0.1
15
5
'
16
0.1
i6
5
'
17
0.1
17
5
'
18
0.1
is
5
'
19
0.1
19
5
'
2D
0.1
20
5
'
0
0.1
21
2.5
'
22
0.1
22
2.5
'
23
0.1
23
2.5
'
24
0.1
24
8
25
0.1
25
2.5
'
28
0.1
'
26
10
27
27
28
28
28
29
30
30
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
39
40
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
49
49
60
50
51
51
52
52
53
53
54
54
55
55
56
56
57
57
56
58
59
59
60
60
61
61

May. 1993 through May, 1994
Parameter•
Cyanide
Parameter-
Selenium
Standard
5
µall
Standard
5
µall
n
BDL.1/2DL
•lf 1/2 DL RESULTS
n
BDL-1/2DL
If 1/2 DL RESULTS
1
2.5
Sid Dev.
1.9
1
2.5
SW Dev.
0.0
2
2.5
Mean
Z7
2
2.5
Mean
2.5
3
2.5
C.V.
0.7
3
2.5
C.V.
0.0
4
2.5
`
4
2.5
'
5
2.5
5
2.5
'
6
2.5
bluff Factor -
1.7
6
2.5
Wit Facbr a
0.0
7
2.5
Max. Value
17.0
µSA 7
2.5
Max. Value
2.5 µgil
8
2.5
Max. Prod CM
28.9
µall 8
2.5
Wax. Pred Cv
0.0 µgll
9
2.5
Allowable N
12.3
µall 9
2.5
Allowable C%
12.3 µgll
10
2.5
10
2.5
'
11
2.5
11
2.5
'
12
2.5
12
2.5
'
13
2.5
13
2.5
'
14
2.5
14
2.5
`
15
2.5
15
2.5
'
16
2.5
16
2.5
'
17
2.5
17
2.5
`
18
2.5
`
18
2.5
'
19
2.5
19
2.5
'
20
2.5
20
2.5
'
2/
2.5
21
2.5
'
22
2.5
22
2.5
'
23
2.5
23
2.5
'
24
2.5
24
2.5
'
25
2.5
25
2.5
'
28
2.5
26
2.5
`
27
2.5
27
2.5
'
28
2.5
28
2.5
'
29
2.5
29
2.5
`
3a
2.5
30
2.5
'
31
2.5
31
2.5
'
32
2.5
32
2.5
`
33
2.5
33
2.5
'
34
2.5
34
2.5
'
35
2.5
35
2.5
`
36
2.5
36
2.5
'
37
2.5
37
2.5
'
38
2.5
38
2.5
`
39
2.5
39
2.5
'
40
2.5
40
2.5
'
41
2.5
41
2.5
'
42
2.5
42
2.5
'
43
2.5
43
2.5
'
44
2.5
44
2.5
'
45
2.5
45
2.5
'
46
2.5
46
2.5
`
47
2.5
47
2.5
'
48
2.5
48
2.5
'
49
2.5
49
2.5
'
50
2.5
50
2.5
'
51
2.5
51
2.5
'
52
2.5
52
2.5
'
53
2.5
53
2.5
'
54
2.5
54
2.5
'
55
2.5
55
2.5
'
58
2.5
66
2.5
'
57
2.5
57
2.5
'
56
2.5
58
59
17
13-May-93
59
60
2.5
60
61
2.5
61

May.1993 through May.1994
rs
Pamamemw
Cadmium
stanaad-
2
PO
n
BDL-1/2DL
If 1/2 DL RESULTS
1
1
Std Dev. 0.5
2
1
Mean 1.2
3
1
C.V. 0.4
4
1
'
5
2
'
6
2
` Mint Factor w
1.7
7
1
Max. Value
2.5 µgh
8
1
Mm Prod Cn
4.25 µell
9
1
Allowable Cw
4.93 µell
10
1
'
11
1
'
12
1
`
13
1
'
14
'
15
1
`
16
1
`
17
1
`
19
1
`
19
1
'
20
1
'
21
1
`
22
1
'
23
1
'
24
1
'
25
2.5
'
28
2.5
`
27
26
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
6o
Pffameter.
Chromium
Standad
50
PO
n
BDLs1/2DL
If 1/2 DL RESULTS
1
2.5
Std Dev. 8.3
2
2.5
Mean 21.5
3
2.5
C.V. 0.4
4
2.5
'
5
25
`
6
25
Mint Facbr s
1.7
7
25
' Max. Value
25.0 µo
8
25
IAax. Prod Cv
42.5 µo
9
25
Allowable Cw
123.2 µgel
10
25 '
11
25 '
12
25 '
13
25 '
14
25 '
15
25 •
16
25 •
17
25 '
16
25 '
19
25 '
20
25 '
21
25 `
22
25 •
23
25 `
24
25 '
25
25 '
26
25 f
27
26
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

May, 1993 through May, 1994
Parameter-
Copper
Parameter-
Nickel
sra mwm
7
90
star da d-
88
µO
n
BDLs1/2DL
If 1/2 DL RESULTS
n
BDLs1/2DL
If 112 DL RESULTS
1
1
SEd Dev.
22.1
1
5
SW Dev.
9.9
2
1
Mean
21.8
2
5
Mean
17.3
3
10
C.V.
1.0
3
5
C.V.
0.6
4
11
4
5
'
5
10
5
25
•
6
10
Mult Factor
3.1
6
25
Mint Factor =
2.1
7
10
Max. Value
110.0 µga
7
25
Max. Value
25.0 µgm
8
10
Max. Pred Ca
341.0 µell
8
25
Max. Prod Cv
52.5 µgel
9
10
' Allowable Cw
17.2 µgA
9
25
' Allowable Cw
216.8 µgel
10
10
10
25
'
11
22
11
25
'
12
45
12
25
'
13
33
13
25
'
14
24
14
25
'
15
26
15
25
`
16
30
16
25
'
17
10
17
25
'
18
110
18
25
'
19
10
19
25
'
20
10
20
25
•
21
45
21
5
'
22
29
22
5
'
23
10
23
5
'
24
10
24
5
'
25
30
25
5
'
20
40
20
5
'
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
30
37
37
38
38
39
39
40
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
48
47
47
48
48
49
49
50
50
51
51
52
52
53
53
54
54
55
55
66
56
57
57
58
58
59
59
60
60
61
61
624/94

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes
If yes, SOC No.
To: Attention:
Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
April 6, 1994
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County Moore
Permit No. NCO037508
PART I. GSNBRAL IkWOORMATION
No x
1. Facility and Address: Moore County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant
P.O. Box 813
Pinebluff, NC 28373
2. Date of Investigation: March 24, 1994
3. Report Prepared By: Grady Dobson, Environmental Engineer, FRO
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Gary Frick, Sys. Super., (910)
281-3146
5. Directions to Site: Take SR 1100, south of Addor, for approximately
1 mile. Treatment plant is on right side of road.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 350 04' 04" Longitude: 78' 28' 07"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and
discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No.: G21SW USGS Quad Name: Pinebluff, NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application? Approximately
50 acres.
x Yes No (If no, explain)
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Flat and terraced;
0-10% slope.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: None within 1,000 feet.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: AgGapEerJ CiraEti
a. Classification: "Class C"
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03-07-50
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
Fish and wildlife propagation, secondary recreation, agriculture,
and other uses requiring waters of lower quality.

Staff Report and Recommendation
Page 2
PART II - DffiI3tIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WM; KS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: 6.67 MGD (Ultimate Design
Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater Treatment
facility? 6.67
C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design
capacity). 6.67
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two (2) years.
N/A
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially
constructed wastewater treatment facilities. N/A
The existing waste facility consists of the following: Preaeration
and grit removal, primary clarification, first (1st) stage activated
sludge, intermediate clarification, second (2nd) stage aeration,
final clarification, anaerobic sludge digestion, sludge drying beds,
and post aeration.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment
facilities: N/A
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
In development Approved x
Should be required Not needed--
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
This facility currently still landfills sludge at the Moore County
landfill. A sludge pilot study is currently underway to determine if
sludge can be utilized with Moore County yard waste and made into a
compost material suitable to be utilized as a landscaping product around
the many golf courses in this area. Mr. Gary Frick further indicates
that land applying the stabilized sludge is a possibility. He is
currently obtaining the necessary information to apply for a land
application of sludge permit. Also, Mr. Frick is looking into the
possiblity of taking the sludge to the HFI landfill in Sampson County
near Roseboro, North Carolina.
Although no permitted sludge solution has been finalized, various
alternatives are being examined, and a final solution should be
determined within the next six months.
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM Permit
No. NA,.
Residual Contractor - N/A
Telephone No. N/A

` Staff Report and Recommendation
Page 3
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP x PFRP Other
C. Landfill: Moore County
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify): Pilot study for
composting.
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): Grade IV
4. SIC Code(s):
Primary $?,I Secondary 55 57
Main Treatment Unit Code: T 1 V0 1—
PART III - OTeMI PERTIMM INP'OERMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants Funds or are
any public monies involved (municipals only)? N/A
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: N/A
3. Important SOC, JOC, or Compliance Schedule dates (please indicate): N/A
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications . . . . . . . . N/A
Begin Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
Complete Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the
nondischarge options available. Please provide regional perspective for
each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation: N/A
Connection to Regional Sewer System: N/A
Subsurface: N/A
Other disposal options: N/A
5. Other Special Items: N/A

Staff Report and Recommendation
Page 4
PART IV - $VALUATION AND RECOMMNDATION
It is the recommendation of this office that permit application be
processed and the appropriate permit issued.
rigHitureCdf Report Preparer
•M, &,. 0 wcv-
Water Quality -Regional Supervisor
5 • �� • q�
Date