The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0037508_Permit Issuance_20050513Michael F. Easley, Governor State of North Carolina William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek P.E., Director Division of Water Quality May 13, 2005 Mr. James Frye, System Superintendent Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant 1094 Addor Road Aberdeen, North Carolina 28315 Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO037508 Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant Moore County Dear Mr. Frye: The Division of Water Quality (the Division) hereby issues this final permit for the subject facility. This permit is issued to the Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994, or as subsequently amended. Renewal Reasonable Potential Analyses — As part of this renewal, the Division conducted Reasonable Potential Analyses (RPA) on contaminants of concern. These include potential toxicants and metals considering Significant Industrial Users (SIUs), previous effluent monitoring, and this facility's Pretreatment Program. This RPA evaluates "reasonable potential" for parameters to exceed North Carolina's instream Water Quality Standards. Having concluded its review, the Division offers the following comments and changes to your previous permit (see table). Table. Permit Renewal -- Changes/Additions: Parameter RP* Comments / Renewal Action Ammonia H3 as Revised Limits: adjusted Summer Monthly Ave. to 2.1 mg/L; Added Summer Weekly Ave. of 6.2 ; added limits Winter Monthly Ave. 6.3 mg1L and Weekly Ave.18.6 TRC Added Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) Daily Max. limit of 28 Copper Yes Action Level Standard, no TOX problem therefore no limits; add monitorin 2/Month Mercury Yes Added Mercury Limit 0.012 2- ear compliance period); See Concerning Mercury. Silver Yes Action Level Standard, no TOX problem therefore no limits; continue monitoring 2/Month Zinc Yes Action Level Standard, no TOX problem therefore no limits; continue monitoring 2/1\4onth *RP = "Reasonable Potential" to exceed instream Water Quality Standard. Priority Pollutant Analyses — All municipal dischargers with flows exceeding 1.0 million gallons per day must submit annual Priority Pollutant Analyses. This requirement was inadvertently omitted from your draft permit. Please note compliance must occur approximately annually with some consideration that sampling represent "seasonal" discharge conditions [see A. (4.)]. AYA WDENR North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 (919) 733-5083 Customer Service 1800 623-7748 Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO037508 Page 2 Concerning Mercury. A weekly average effluent limit of 12 ng/L for total mercury has been added to this final permit. This limit is based on: a) the receiving water listed as impaired for mercury based on fish tissue concentrations; b) a Phase I Lumber River Basin Mercury TMDL (completed in 2000) establishing a target concentration of 12 ng/L; and c) effluent data indicating reasonable potential to exceed this target concentration. Although monitoring commences on the permit effective date, this permit includes a two-year compliance schedule before the mercury limit becomes effective. The compliance schedule provides time for the facility to evaluate effluent concentrations, as well as time to investigate any potential significant sources of mercury. This permit limit assumes that the receiving stream has already reached its assimilative capacity [i.e., mercury background (upstream) concentrations are already at 12 ng/L], and therefore, dilution may not be considered. Considering the above assumption, the permittee may wish to collect some upstream samples and source -water samples, in addition to the required effluent sampling, and analyze these for total mercury using EPA Method 1631. Mercury effluent limits and monitoring may be deleted or modified by the Division in the future, upon written request by the permittee, if the permittee provides new .data (recommended minimum 6-month period) that show: a) no reasonable potential for the effluent concentrations to exceed 12 ng/L; or b) that upstream concentrations are below 12 ng/L; or c) that the facility is not discharging mercury at concentrations above source -water (intake) concentrations. NOTE: If the permittee does not submit such data and does not request a mercury re-evaluation, the mercury limit will become effective in two years from the permit effective date. Revising Ammonia (NH3 as N) Limits — Ammonia Limits have been adjusted for toxicity considering IWC of 41 %. The previous permit's Monthly Average (Summer) limit has been adjusted to 2.1 mg/L, and a limit of 6.2 mg/L Monthly Average (Winter) has been added to the permit. Per statewide policy, the Division has added ammonia Weekly Average limits to this permit. Because Moore County is a major municipal, Weekly Average limits are calculated as' Monthly Average values times three." This corresponds to a new Weekly Averages of 6.3 mg/L (summer), and 18.6 mg/L (Winter). Although new ammonia limits are notably more stringent, the Division reviewed the permittee's ammonia data and anticipates no future compliance problems with new permit limits. Data for the years 2003 and 2004 indicate average daily ammonia levels regularly reported below detection at 0.5 mg/L with a maximum reported as 0.8 mg/L. Total Residual Chlorine (TRC). Finally, in keeping with a newly adopted statewide standard for TRC, the Division has added a TRC limit to your permit of 28 jig/L. Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO037508 Page 3 If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days after receiving this letter. Your request must be in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and must be filed with the office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall be final and binding. This permit is not transferable except after notifying the Division. The Division may require modification, or revocation and re -issuance of this permit. Please notice that this permit does not affect your legal obligation to obtain other permits required by the Division of Water Quality, the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act, or other federal or local governments. If you have questions, or if we can be of further service, please contact Joe Corporon at [Joe.Corooronna,ncmail.netl or call (919) 733-5083, extension 597. Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Mark McIntire Alan W. Klimek, P.E. cc: Central Files Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section NPDES Unit , Aquatic Toxicology Unit EPA Region 4 Y$ C30012 „.01011?C P.n"117,41 411im Permit NCO037508 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Moore County is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from an outfall located at the Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant 1094 Addor Road Moore County to receiving waters designated as Aberdeen Creek located within the Lumber River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, H, III and IV hereof. This permit shall become effective July 1, 2005. This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2009. Signed this day May 13, 2005. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Mark McIntire Alan W. Klimek, PE, Director Division of Water Quality By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Permit NCO037508 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions described herein. Moore County is hereby authorized: 1. to continue discharging 6.7 MGD of domestic and industrial wastewater from the existing wastewater treatment facility consisting of activated sludge wastewater treatment facilities. The treatment system utilizes: • pre -aeration • grit removal • primary clarification • first -stage activated sludge • intermediate clarification • second -stage aeration • final clarification • anaerobic sludge digestion • sludge drying beds • and post -aeration located at the Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant, 1094 Addor Road, Moore County, and 2 to discharge from said treatment facility through Outfall 001 at a specified location (see attached map) into Aberdeen Creek, a waterbody classified as C waters within the Lumber River Basin. I Upstream E Monitoring Point r 14A� a' �- .I •t o+ 1I i \ _\1 e Downstream Monitoring Point t _ — J� (atNCSR 1225) Moore County WWTP and Discharge Line (Approximate Location) Outfa11001 (flows South) Moore County WWTP Receivine Stream: Aberdeen Creek Drainage Basin: Lumber River Latitude: 35' 04' 04" N Loneitude: 780 28' 07" W Sub -Basin: 03-07-50 Permitted Flow: 6.7 MGD State Grid / USGS Ouad; G 21SW / PinebluB; N.C. Stream Class: C 1 71 it Facility Location AAW not to scale North NPDES Permit NCO037501 Moore County Permit NCO037508 A. Q.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS During the period beginning on July 1, 2005 and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge through Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: Y $M —_ i' `i31g iy • l3 �jLL 4n _ �,;a,7'+v'e■�\aui�.+` +; A r � a Flow 6.7 MGD Continuous Recording Influent or Effluent BOD, 5 day, 200C (Apdl 1— October 31 2 22.0 mg/L 33.0 mg/L Daily Composite Influent & Effluent BOD, 5 day, 200C November 1— March 31 2 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L Daily Composite Influent & Effluent Total Suspended Solids SS 2 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L Daily Composite Influent & Effluent NH3 as N (April 1— October 31 2.1 mg/L 6.3 mg/L Daily Composite Effluent NH3 as N November 1— March 31 6.2 mg/L 18.6 mg/L Daily Composite Effluent Fecal Coliform(geometric mean 200 / 100 ml 400 / 100 ml Daily Grab Effluent Total Residual Chlorine RC 3 r2_8_µTg_/_L Daily Grab Effluent Dissolved Oxygen Daii average > 5.0 mg/L Daily Grab Effluent Temperature °C Daily Grab Effluent Conductivity Daily Grab Effluent H > 6.0 and < 9.0 standard units Daily Grab Effluent Total Phosphorus Monthly Composite Effluent Total Nitrogen (NO2-N + NO3-N + TKN) Monthly Composite Effluent Total Copper 21Month Composite Effluent Total Zinc 2/Month Composite Effluent Total Silver 2/Month Composite Effluent Total Mercury 4 12 n L 4 Weekly Grab Effluent Chronic Toxicity 5 Quarterly Composite Effluent Temperature, °C Variable6 Grab U, D L. Dissolved Oxygen Variable6 Grab U, D Footnotes 1. U: approximately 100 feet upstream of the outfall. D: Downstream at NCSR 1225. 2. The monthly average effluent BODS and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15 % of the respective influent value (i.e., 85% removal is required). 3. Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) shall be monitored only if chlorine is used to disinfect. 4. Mercury -- Compliance to the permit limit shall commence on July 1, 2007, 24 months following the effective date of this permit [see A. (2.)]. To facilitate the Lumber River's Phase II TMDL process for mercury, the Permittee shall report mercury using clean -sample collection criteria/test methods established by EPA Method 1631. 5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 41 %; quarterly during March, June, September, December; See A. (3.) 6. Variable: instream samples shall be collected upstream and downstream 3/week during the summer months of June, July, August, and September; samples shall be collected weekly during the rest of the year. Units: mg/L = milligrams per liter µg/L = micrograms per liter ml = milliliter ng/L = nanograms per liter lbs/Day = pounds per day BOD = biochemical oxygen demand NH3 as N = ammonia as nitrogen Effluent shall contain no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts. Permit NCO037508 A (2). MERCURY REOPENER. The Division may re -open this permit to require mercury load limitations, mercury minimization plans, source water characterization, or other measures following completion of the Phase 2 Mercury TMDLs for the Lumber and Waccamaw River watersheds. A. (3.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY) The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 41 %. The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of, March, June, September, and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. If the test procedure, performed as the first test of any single quarter, results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months, as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised - February 1998) or subsequent versions. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Branch 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above. Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during the following month. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document (such as minimum control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and/or appropriate environmental controls) shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing, to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of initial monitoring. Permit NCO037508 A. (4.) SPECIAL CONDITION - EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN The permittee shall perform Effluent Pollutant Scans (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 136) for all parameters listed in the attached table. The Pemrittee shall sample approximately annually except to provide seasonal variation to include a minimum of four (4) scans. Unless otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as "total recoverable." Ammonia (as N) Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether Chlorine, total residual (TRC) 1,1-dichloroethylene Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Dissolved oxygen 1,2dichloropropane Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate Nitrate/Nitrite 1,3dichloropropylene 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether Kjeldahl nitrogen Ethylbenzene Butyl benzyl phthalate Oil and grease Methyl bromide 2-chloronaphthalene Phosphorus Methyl chloride 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether Total dissolved solids Methylene chloride Chrysene Hardness Antimony 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethylene Di-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octyl phthalate Arsenic Toluene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene Beryllium 1, 1, 1 -trichloroethane 1,2dichlorobenzene Cadmium 1,1,2-trichloroethane 1,3dichlorobenzene Chromium Trichloroethylene 1,4dichlorobenzene Copper Vinyl chloride 3,3-dichlorobenzidine Lead Acid -extractable Compounds Diethyl phthalate Mercury P-chloro-m-creso Dimethyl phthalate Nickel 2-chlorophenol 2,4-dinitrotoluene Selenium 2,4-dichlorophenol 2,6-dinitrotoluene Silver 2,4-dimethylphenol 1,2-diphenylhydrazine Thallium 4,6dinitro-o-cresol Fluoranthene Zinc 2,4dinitrophenol Fluorene Cyanide 2-nitrophenol Hexachlorobenzene Total phenolic compounds 4-nitrophenol Hexachlorobutadiene Volatile Organic Compounds Pentachlorophenol Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene Acrolein Phenol Hexachloroethane Acrylonitrile 2,4,6-trichlorophenot Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene Benzene Base -neutral Compounds Isophorone Bromoform Acenaphthene Naphthalene Carbon tetrachloride Acenaphthylene Nitrobenzene Chlorobenzene Anthracene N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine Chlorodibromomethane Benzidine N-nitrosodimethylamine Chloroethane Benzo(a)anthracene N-nitrosodiphenylamine 2-chloroethylvinyl ether Benzo(a)pyrene Phenanthrene Chloroform 3,4 benzofluoranthene Pyrene Dichlorobromomethane Benzo(ghi)perylene 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 1,1dichloroethane Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1,2-dichloroethane Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane The Permittee shall report test results within 90 days of sample collection to the Division in DWQ Form- DMR-PPA1 or in a form approved by the Director. The report shall be submitted to the following address: NC DENR / DWQ / Central Flies 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Fact Sheet Addendum Concerning Mercury Moore County — NCO037508 Lumber River Basin. Tom Belnick, 4/21/2005 [Following discussions with Marshall Hyatt (EPA, Region 4)]. Wording for NPDES Permits subject to new mercury limits — considering dilution Language for Fact Sheet and Cover Letter. A weekly average effluent limit of 12 ng/L for total mercury has been added to this final permit. This limit is based on: a) the receiving water listed as impaired for mercury based on fish tissue concentrations; b) a Phase I Lumber River Basin Mercury TMDL (completed in 2000) establishing a target concentration of 12 ng/L; and c) effluent data indicating reasonable potential to exceed this target concentration. Although monitoring commences on the permit effective date, this permit includes a two-year compliance schedule before the mercury limit becomes effective. The compliance schedule provides time for the facility to evaluate effluent concentrations as well as time to investigate any potential significant sources of mercury. This permit limit assumes that the receiving stream has already reached its assimilative capacity [i.e., mercury background (upstream) concentrations are already at 12 ng/L], and therefore, dilution may not be considered. Considering the above assumption, the permittee may wish to collect some upstream samples and source -water samples, in addition to the required effluent sampling, and analyze these for total mercury using EPA Method 1631. Mercury effluent limits and monitoring may be deleted or modified by the Division in the future, upon written request by the permittee, if the permittee provides new data (recommended minimum 6-month period) that show: a) no reasonable potential for the effluent concentrations to exceed 12 ng/L; or 1/ b) that upstream concentrations are below 12 ng/L; or c) that the facility is not discharging mercury at concentrations above potable source -water (intake) concentrations. NOTE: If the permittee does not submit such data and does not request a mercury re-evaluation, the mercury limit will become effective in two years from the permit effective date. Language for Special Condition- Mercury Re -opener. The Division may re -open this permit to require mercury load limitations, mercury minimization plans, source water characterization, or other measures following completion of the Phase 2 Mercury TMDLs for the Lumber and Waccamaw River watersheds. Edit: J. Corporon, 05May05 _. �G�, are ✓�� rrror�m�4td�hn� Lumber River Basin Wording for NPDES Permits that are subject to new mercury limits and have some dilution (Moore County) Tom Belnick, 4/21/2005 Language for Fact Sheet and Cover Letter. A weekly average effluent limit of 12 ng/1 for total mercury has been added to this final permit. This limit is based on the following factors: a) the receiving water is listed as impaired for mercury based on fish tissue concentrations; b) a Phase I Lumber River Basin Mercury TMDL completed in 2000 establishes a target concentration of 12 ng/l; and c) effluent data indicates the potential for effluent concentrations to exceed this target concentration. This permit also includes a two-year mercury compliance schedule before the mercury limit becomes effective, although monitoring is effective upon the permit effective date. The compliance schedule provides time for the facility to evaluate effluent mercury results as well as investigate any potential significant sources of mercury. This limit assumes that the receiving stream is already at assimilative capacity for mercury (i.e., background (upstream) mercury concentrations are already at 12 ng/1), and therefore dilution cannot be considered. The pemrittee may wish to collect some upstream samples and source water samples, in addition to the required effluent sampling, and analyze them for total mercury using EPA Method 1631. Effluent limits and monitoring may be deleted or modified in the future upon written notification of the Division, if the permittee provides the updated data (recommended 6-month period) that shows a) no reasonable potential for the effluent to exceed 12 ng/1; or b) shows that upstream samples are below 12 ng/l; or c) s ows that th acility is not discharging mercury at concentrations above th our' watei°(intake) concentrations. If the permittee does not submit such data and doe not request a mercuryvaluation, the mercury limit will become effective in two ye s. t Language for Special Condition- Mercury Reopener. The Division may re -open this permit to require mercury load limitations, mercury minimization plans, source water characterization, or other measures following completion of the Phase 2 Mercury TMDLs for the Lumber and Waccamaw River watersheds. Ot sin Perrints s A� subject: NC NPDES- Lumber Basin Permits From: Tom Belnick <tom.belnick@ncmail.net> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:09:05 -0400 To: Marshall Hyatt <Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov> CC: Joe Corporon <Joe.Corporon@ncmail.net> A,1C0037SW- M'O \0, 1, Hi Marshall- I was talking with Joe Corporon about the 3 NPDES permits in Lumber Basin with mercury issues and a Phase I TMDL that we all discussed previously, and noticed they are all slightly different in some aspect. Here's our proposed solutions for the Final permit, and let us know if EPA would concur. NC0037508- Moore County I(' , a�.� 1��, l I !►�{� �� r,-� � An f von V I l Permitted flow-- 6.7 MGD IWC= 41% Issue/Solution: This facility was previously subject to "monitoring -only" with Method 1631, and NC proposed "monitoring -only" in the draft renewal. The RPA for 5 data points (16, 12, 12, 6,7 ng/l) obviously shows RPA>12 ng/l when dilution is not considered. EPA recommends the WQS (12 ng/1) applied at end -of -pipe based on Phase I TMDL. NC proposes a weekly average limit of 12 ng/l with a 2-year compliance schedule for the Final permit, to allow permittee to submit source water, upstream, and effluent data for re-evaluation. If upstream concentration is below 12 ng/1, NC would redo RPA with new allowable concentration/dilution. NC0026000-Town of Tabor City Permitted flow=1.1 MGD IWC= 90% Issue/Solution: Last permit had "monitoring -only" for mercury with Method 1631 and NC proposed "monitoring -only" in the draft renewal. Joe conducted RPA with 12 data points (range 1-12 ng/1), with RPA> 12 ng/l. NC is proposing a weekly average 12 ng/1 limit with a 2-year compliance schedule for the Final permit. There is no consideration for dilution since this is zero -flow. Compliance schedule will allow time for facility to evaluate mercury sources, etc., and to resubmit effluent data for consideration. NC0044725- Laurinburg/Maxton Permitted flow = 2 MGD IWC= 2.6% Issue/Solution: NC proposed a new mercury limit of 0.45 ug/l in the draft, which appears to be in error. Based on further review this facility had no detections (0/31) using the old Method 245.1, and no effluent data was analyzed by the new Method 1631. Thus, NC proposes that we put in monthly "monitoring only" for mercury with Method 1631 in the Final permit, and review at next permit renewal. This facility has a lot of dilution, and hopefully the Phase II TMDL will be completed by next round. N.C. net ii UJ J N.C. DENR/DWQ/NPDES 'J 919-733-5083,ext. 543 04f ��3 JIM'? � 1 of 1 4/14/2005 5:15 3R5/LUU� L:J1 YI RPA/Mercury/Public Notice Subject: RPA/Mercury/Public Notice From: Tom Belnick <tom.belnick@ncmail.net> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 11:18:41.-0500 To: "DENR.NPDES.DWQ" <DENR.NPDES.DWQ@ncmail.net> I'm sending this around again, which you might want to print out and save for future reference. Due to the high cost of low level mercury analysis that some facilities now face, there may be several facilities that request removal of their mercury limit based on an updated dataset showing no detections or small detections relative to their permit limit. If we perform an RPA and conclude that there is indeed no reasonable potential, we can remove the limit. Based on conversations with Marshall Hyatt at EPA, we would not have to public notice this permit change, provided the cover letter to the current permit contained language that allowed such a change. The language I have used in the permit cover letter and that Marshall has agreed with is as follows: "Please note that mercury effluent limits may be deleted in the future, if the permittee provides updated effluent data that shows no reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality standards." I have only put this language into permits where mercury was a hot topic with the permittee, and the facility has requested such a future option due to the high cost of mercury sampling. If the facility does submit additional effuent data down the road, I have told them there is no charge associated with our RPA review. I of 1 2/4/2004 10:33 AM Re: NPDES Question- Public Notice Subject: Re: NPDES Question- Public Notice From: Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 17:04:44 -0500 To*m Belnickktom.belnick@ncmail.net> CC: Dominy.Madolyn@epamail.epa.gov LVA lvMr}�aiVti/ l �itJ11i ��'y r PAI QI) Hi Marshall- I called but you were out today, so I've gone email. I've got a question about when to public notice an extension to a compliance schedule for major facilities. I've got one permit asking for a 4-month extension to their TN limit due to delays in constructing a BNR unit. 1 'I �nterIf the extension is to a final compliance date, that must be 1 ' public noticed. If it was an extension to an im_,q_mpliance ISO C b,U date of 120 days or less, that would be a minor mod. I'm also in settlement agreement discussions with Greensboro on 2 Q2contested permits, and they are requesting that the mercury limit be pushed back from l/l/04 to 10/1/04 due to questionable lab data, which will allow them to collect 6 months of new data with the 1631 method. Does EPA require public notice for all compliance extension requests? 0 Al 1 this would require public notice. Also, for the Greensboro permits I have language in the cover letter stating "Please note that Q�� mercury effluent limits may be deleted in the future, if the permittee provides updated effluent data that shows no (� reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality standards." Based on this language, would I need to public notice in the future if R3, the facility comes back with data showing no RP ? Just want to make sure before I agree to any schedules/etc in the settlement agreement. this. in my opinion, you do not need to go back to public notice for I of 1 12/9/2003 10:17 AM EPA/Metals Language l AMIOeU Mtho"- 141� � g Subject: EPA/Metals Language Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 14:15:43 -0400 From: Tom Belnick <tom.belnick@ncmail.net> To: "DENR.NPDES.DWQ" <DENR.NPDES.DWQ@ncmail.net> This might help to develop permit language that will remove the need to renotice limit deletions in the future. Tom Belnick Asked Marshall Hyatt (EPA): If a permitee requests me to delete a metal limit based on updated data and lack of reasonable potential, would I need to renotice the permit if the original permit contained the following language in the cover letter "The city may request a permit modification from the Division after one year, if the effluent data continues to show that nickel concentrations are under control." Marshall Hyatt (EPA) Replied: because you specified "permit modification" in the existing permit, I think you need to go through the major mod process to make this deletion. In the future, if you said "upon written notification of DENR... 11, that would be acceptable to us and.you wouldn't have to go through the major mod process. hope that helps. EfOvenl 1101di 4040f Aro.�i�v,^�� rNG� �f c(e�elelih o4lie 4-Ateeitle bl�Dorl WrA�1�eu� at j(Wta�toti �5C oM� �1✓eJ�Orl� l�� Crecumrntn��i anl�.cj" ��I� litov� rlo /'eQJgnp-��C Po�vlHwl" '� � 1�CP�e� d��'lhcR W 1 of 1 5/6/02 2:18 PM J�"E�TFS, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY c _ = REGION 4 �`��% e ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER � o= 61 FORSYTH STREET "+'It PRO, EO� ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 JAN 31 2005 Alan W. Klimek, Director Division of Water Quality North Carolina Department of Environment and DIV. OF WATER QUALITY Natural Resources DIRECTOR'S OFFICE 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 SUBJ: Review of Draft NPDES Permit Moore County WPCP - NPDES No. NCO037508 IIrI.T.—M• W11"MW A The EPA, Region 4, is in receipt of the draft permit for the above referenced facility. Based on our review, it is not clear if the draft permit's mercury provisions are consistent with the assumptions and requirements of North Carolina's November 2, 1999, mercury total daily maximum load for the Lumber River, that was subsequently approved by EPA on September 15, 2000. Because the information provided is inadequate to determine whether the draft permit meets the guidelines and requirements of the Clean Water Act, I request that clarification regarding this issue be provided. Pursuant to federal regulatory requirements and language of Section VII.A. of the North Carolina/EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), this letter constitutes an interim objection to the issuance of this permit. In accordance with the MOA and federal regulations, the full period of time for review of this draft permit will recommence when the requested information is received by this Office. I look forward to receipt of the information. If you have any questions, please call me or have your staff contact Mr. Marshall Hyatt at 404/562-9304. Sincerely, 6� James D. Giattina, Director Water Management Division cc: James Frye, Moore County WPCP F E B 1 4 2005 ly Internet Address (URL) • http://w .opa.gov -_---- Recycled/Recyclable •Pdnted with Vegetable Oil Rased Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Posiconsurner) PVT AFFIDAWT OF PUBLICATION 1cle) : •� , . MOORE COUNTY DAVID WORONOFF, PUBLISHER of THE PILOT, a tri-weekly newspaper published in Moore County and the State of North Carolina, being duly sworn, deposes and says: that the attached advertisement: NP4� s was published in the aforesaid newspaper for �_ =mcmgiv iss weeks beginning with the issue dated the G ! day of .�, � _ 20 a d- ing widktWB = LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION/NPDES UNIT 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NC 276"-1617 NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE A' NPDES WASTEWATER PERMIT On the basis of dwough staff review and application 4 NC General Statute 143.21, Pubk Law 92-500 and ether lawful standards and regulations, the North :amlina Err ron ermd Commission .roposes to issue a National P�Discharge Elimi- ation System wastewater discharge permit o the persons ksted below 45 days, from tie publish date of this hotiae::° 4% 4 Wrrtten All be comrrrierits reg = proposed permit accepted imd 30 days the publish date of cis notice. AE comments recyved to dwt date .re considered it the -final � regarding '')e proposed perTi L The DiricWf of the NC Division ,f Water Qu a ky may deddr, to. hold a meeting x the proposed pm* shout w Division receive a ign'diUM degree of publikirtn st ; s: Copies of the drA perfi[ ard.�other Supporting in- xrnabon-an 9e used to determine conditior>s,pre- ertt in the draft pert*bre;avalable upon request and "wMnowf of the mitt o? ieprod tttiort Mad comments ndror requests for 4r abon to the NC Division of Vater Quaky A the above address or call Ms. Car m Bryant at (919);7o 33-5083, «tension 520. Please idude the N pennit`pumber (attadned) in any ommuriiati Irderesbed persau may also visit the )vision of Water Quaky at 512 N. Salisbury Street. ,aleigh, NC Z7"1148 between the hours of 8.00 ,m and SAO pen tip revievii" fomtati in on file. Moore Cc LOW Ptbk -Utmes (Moore County has m-it eLAbeddef Aberdeen Creek locate its d ed v chi theLumber Ri i r Rimer Basin. BOD5. TSS, am- norkkcal mfforiiL''aid totalresdual ddonne are rAerjuaky friihed-This ds&wp may affect future ,de load albcadoits 141tK riceiving stream p 1225c to and subscribed before me, this 1� / day of ,20 My Commission Expires NOWDENR / DWQ / NPDES Unit FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMTr DEVELOPMENT NPDES Permit NCO037508 INTRODUCTION Moore County Wastewater Treatment Plant (W WTP), herein called Moore County or the permittee, requires a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to dispose treated wastewater to the surface waters of the state. The pemrittee's 5-year NPDES permit expired July 31, 2004 and they have requested renewal from the Division of Water Quality (the Division). This Fact Sheet summarizes background information and rationale used by the Division's NPDES Unit to determine permit limits and monitoring conditions. FACILITY RECORDS REVIEW Facility Description. The Moore County W WTP (Table 1) is a 6.7 MGD publicly owned treatment works (POTW) utilizing a Grade IV activated sludge wastewater treatment facility to treat domestic and industrial wastewater. The Moore County treatment system utilizes pre -aeration, grit removal, primary clarification, first -stage activated sludge, intermediate clarification, second -stage aeration, final clarification, anaerobic sludge digestion, sludge drying beds, and post -aeration. Table 1. The Moore County WWTP Facility Information Applicant/Facility Name: The Moore County W WTP Applicant Address: 1094 Addor Road Facility Address: Aberdeen, North Carolina 28315 Permitted Flow (MGD): 6.7 Type of Waste: Industrial and Domestic 4 SIUs Related Permit (s): Land Application W 0018081 Anson County) Facility Grade / Permit Status: Grade IV, Major / Renewal Drainage Basin: I Lumber River Basin County: Moore County Miscellaneous Receiving Stream: Lumber River Regional Office: Fayetteville Stream Classification: C State Grid / USGS To o Quad G 21 SW / Pinebluff, NC 303(d) Listed? No Permit Writer: Joe R. Corporon Subbasin: 03-07-50 Date: 3Dec04 Drainage Area (sq. mi.) 36.3 Lat. 350 04' 04" Long. 78° 28' OS" Summer 7Q 10 (cfs) 15.2 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 28.7 30Q2 (cfs) Average Flow (cfs) 47.2 1WC (%) 41 DRAFT Fact Sheet Renewal — NPDES Permit NCO037508 Page 1 Correspondence Staff Report. Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO) conducted an annual facility inspection and Grady Dobson prepared a Staff Report dated March 22, 2004. The FRO staff found the facility in good condition and in compliance with the permit recommending that the NPDES Unit renew the permit in accordance with the basin plan. Division Records and Permittee's Renewal Application. The current permit expired on July 31, 2004, and the Division received a timely request to renew the permit from the permittee's (Standard Form 2A) on January 20, 2004. COMPLIANCE REVIEW Waste Load Allocation (WLA). The Division prepared the last WLA for the receiving stream in June 1994 and developed effluent limits and monitoring requirements considering an in -stream waste concentration (IWC) of 41 % at 6.7 MGD. The Division views these limits and monitoring requirements appropriate for renewal except as outlined below (see Permitting Approach Summary). Verifying Existing Stream Conditions. This facility discharges to Aberdeen Creek [Stream Index No.14- 2-11-(6)], a Class C waterbody within the Lumber River Basin. Aberdeen Creek is not listed as "impaired" [not 303(d) listed], However, Aberdeen Creek discharges to Downing Creek, one of 11 waters within the Lumber River Basin with fish advisories for mercury. Concerning Mercury. Beginning in September 2003, the Division required Moore County to monitor Quarterly for mercury using new EPA method 1631. The Division did not impose a permit limit. Conditions have not changed. To date, the Division has received five sample results using Method 1631. Quarterly results, beginning chronologically from September 2003, indicate mercury levels of 16, 12, 12, 6, and 7 ng/L compared to a potential permit limit of 30 ng/L, based on IWC. Per agreement with EPA, quarterly monitoring will continue without a permit limit until sufficient data have been collected to firmly evaluate reasonable potential. A note will be added to the cover letter stating that the permittee must continue this quarterly monitoring using Method 1631. A "re -opener" clause has been added to the permit to emphasize the need to reevaluate should compliance questions arise. DMR Instream and Effluent Data Review. The Division reviewed 44 months of DMRs (January 2001 through October 2004) noting monthly -average flows averaging approximately 5.1 MGD or about 76% of its permitted capacity. DMRs appear regular, thorough, and complete The Division contacted the Permittee to correct the database for mercury and the Permittee complied. Effluent Total Residual Chlorine (TRC). The permittee currently chlorinates and de -chlorinates its effluent un-restricted by a Weekly Average TRC limit. In accordance with statewide policy requiring TRC limit in all permits, a limit of 28 µg/L will be added to this permit. Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing. The Division reviewed Moore County quarterly Whole Effluent Toxicity records from January 1997 through September 2004 (32 quarterly tests). The Permittee passed all quarterly toxicity tests during this time period. DRAFT Fact Sheet Renewal -- NPDES NCO037508 Page 2 Notices of Violation (NOVs) and Penalty Assessment. Division records for this facility show no permit limit violations during the time period January 2001 through September 2004. Toxicant Chronic and Acute Impact — Pollutants of Concern (POCs). To establish POCs, the Division reviewed the permit application, discharge monitoring reports (Jan 2001 through Sep 2004), pretreatment data, and the Basin Plan. The Division then used the standard Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) to calculate a maximum predicted concentration for each POC. Each maximum was then compared to the POC's freshwater Chronic Standard (Table 2) and also to its Final Acute Value (%2 FAV) for freshwater (Table 3). If by the above method, a POC showed reasonable potential to exceed its %2 FAV, the Division included a permit limit as a Daily Maximum to protect the receiving stream against acute toxic affects. Similarly, if the maximum exceeded the chronic standard, a Weekly Average limit was added to the permit. Findings and draft permit changes are summarized below (see Renewal Summary, Table 4). Table 2. Moore County WWTP Chronic RPA Findings and Renewal Action aYamefer "' isbftl s ,1 omits ' ° - Y►iaximuri i ; a o abie �ZP � '� omme nts /„ . `r 9 on�entraA� Y � k!rieriew � } (�h ton 7ij f � I t i Y `• .. +j1 Copper 41 41 493.2 µg/L 17 µg/L Yes Action Level Standard — no toxicity problem, therefore no limit; add monitoring 2/Month Mercury 5 5 0.04548 µg/L 12.0 ng/L Limited database (5 samples by EPA Method 1631). Continue monitoring quarterly. Silver 38 10 13.9 µg/L 0.148 µg/L Yes Action Level Standard — no • toxicity problem, therefore no limit; add monitoring 2/Month Zinc 40 40 2,032.5 µg/L 123 µg/L Yes Action Level Standard — no toxicity problem, therefore no limit; add monitoring 2/Month *RP = "Reasonable Potential" to exceed instream Water Quality Standard. Table 3. Moore County WWTP Acute RPA FindinLs and Renewal Action Parameter -- Sames sits: Maximum '/� FYr! Comments f/ (a) Cn) Predicted' , CMC Renewal diction ky/n Copper 41 41 493.2 µg/L 7.3 µg/L Yes Action Level Standard — no toxicity problem, therefore no limit; Add monitoring 2/Month Mercury 5 5 0.04548 µg/L No acute limit; Standard based on bio-accumulation See Table 2 . Silver 38 10 13.9 µg/L 1.23 µg/L Yes Action Level Standard — no toxicity problem, therefore no limit; add monitoring 2/Month Zinc 40 40 2,032.5 µg/L 67 µg/L Yes Action Level Standard — no toxicity problem, therefore no limit; add monitoring 2/Month *RP = "Reasonable Potential" to exceed instream Water Quality Standard. DRAFT Fact Sheet Renewal -- NPDES NCO037508 Page 3 Pretreatment Compliance. This NPDES permit requires the Permittee to implement a Long Term Management Plan (LTMP) or pretreatment program, as specified by federal regulations 40 CFR 403 and Title 15A NCAC 2H.0900 of state regulations. The Permittee's LTMP has been approved by the Division and potential influent parameters were considered during the Reasonable Potential Analysis. Moore County WWTP currently services domestic wastes from several surrounding communities but only Significant Industrial Users (SIU). This SIU provides an average daily discharge of approximately 0.150 MGD or about 2% of Moore County's permitted discharge. Revising Ammonia (NH3 as N) Limits. Ammonia Limits have been adjusted for toxicity considering IWC of 41%. The previous permit's Monthly Average (Summer) limit has been adjusted to 2.1 mg/L, and a limit of 6.2 mg/L Monthly Average (Winter) has been added to the permit. Per statewide policy, the Division has added ammonia Weekly Average limits to this permit. Because Moore County is a major municipal, Weekly Average limits are calculated as "Monthly Average values times three." This corresponds to a new Weekly Averages of 6.3 mg/L (summer), and 18.6 mg/L (Winter). Although new ammonia limits are notably more stringent, the Division reviewed the permittee's NH3 data and anticipates no compliance problems with new permit limits. Data for the years 2003 and 2004 indicate average daily ammonia levels consistently reported below detection at 0.5 mg/L with a maximum reported as 0.8 mg/L. RENEWAL SUMMARY Effluent Monitoring Table 4. Permit Renewal -- Recommended Changes/Additions: Ammonia as Revised Limits: adjusted Summer Monthly Ave. to 2.1 mg/L; Added Summer Weekly Ave. of 6.2 mg/L; added limits Winter Monthly Ave. 6.3 m and Weekly Ave.18.6 TRC Added Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) Daily Max. limit of 28 Copper Yes Action Level Standard, no TOX problem therefore no limits; add monitoring 2/Month Mercury TMDL for the Lumber River Basin dictates Quarterly monitoring by EPA Method 1631 Silver Yes Action Level Standard, no TOX problem therefore no limits; continue monitorin 2/Month Zinc Yes Action Level Standard, no TOX problem therefore no limits; continue monitoring 2/Month *RP = "Reasonable Potential" to exceed instream Water Quality Standard. Instream Monitoring Previous Requirements: Conductivity Fecal Coliform Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Temperature For Renewal: Delete fecal coliform and conductivity from instream testing, per Division statewide permitting guidance. No other changes recommended. DRAFT Fact Sheet Renewal -- NPDES NCO037508 Page 4 PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF ISSUANCE Draft Permit to Public Notice: Permit Scheduled to Issue: NPDES UNIT CONT If you have questior contact Joe Cron AL December 8, 2004 January 31, 2005 any of the above information or on the attached permit, please 5083 ext. 597. COMMENTS NAME: DATE: REGIONAL — 0s NPDES SUPERVISOR: DATE: DRAFT Fact Sheet Renewal -- NPDES NCO037508 Page 5 Draft Pemut reviews (3) Subject: Draft Permit reviews (3) From: John Giorgino <john.giorgino@ncmai1.net> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:26:12 -0500 To: Joe Corporon <Joe.Corporon@ncmai1.net> Hi Joe, I have reviewed the following: NCO037508 - Moore County NCO026000 - Tabor City NC0005312 - Interface Fabrics -�� W J c NC0037508- Moore County: footnote #7 from Section A(1) lists the chr lim @ 2.6%. The chr lim should be 41%. SIn section A(3) it is correct. Thanks for forwarding the permits to me. John 1 of 1 1/13/2005 6:53 AM REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Moore County WWTP NCO037508 Time Period jan2003-sep2004 Ow (MGD) 6.7 WWTP Class IV 7Q10S (cis) 15.2 IWC (%) @ 7Q10S 40.59 7Q10W(cts) 28.7 @7Q16W 26.57 3002 (c/s) 0 @ 30Q2 NIA Avg. Stream Flaw, CA (c/s) 47.2 @ CA 18.034 Rec'ving Stream Aberdeen Creek Stream Class C Outfall 001 Qw = 6.7 MGD STANDARDS& PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA (2) POL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION (1) NC WOS/ MFAV/ CNanic Acute n #Oet. Max Pred Cw Albwable Cw Acute: 7.3 Copper NC 7 AL 7.3 ug/L 41 41 493.2 Chronic 17 No limit- assuming no tox (Action Level parameter) Acute: N/A Mercury NC 0.012 0.0001 ug/L 5 5 I 0.0455 Note: n<12 Chronic: 0.030 MaxPredCW <Chronic Limited data set Limited database (5) —continue monitoring Ouartedy Acute: 1.23 Silver NC 0.06 AL 1.23 ug/L 38 10 13.9 Chronic: 0.748 No lima '�a@suming;no,tox (Actiorl;Level parameter) Acute: 67 Zinc NC 50 AL 67 uWL 40 40 2,023.5 Chronic: 123 No limit- assumingno tox (Actiorlevel parameter) 'Legend: "Freshwater Discharge C = Carcinogenic NC = Non -carcinogenic A = Aesthetic 37508 RPA -- Moore Co, me 12/8/2004 Table 1. Project Information Facility Name WWTP Grade NPDES Permit Outfall Flow, Qw (MGD) Receiving Stream Stream Class 7Q10s (cfs) 7010w (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs) QA (cfs) Time Period Data Source(s) Moore County WWTP IV NCO037508 001 6.7 Aberdeen Creek C 15.2 28.7 47.2 jan2003-sep2004 Par01 Par02 Par03 Par04 Par05 Par06 Par07 Par08 Par09 Part a Par11 Par12 Par12 Par14 Par15 Table 2. Parameters of Concern Name Type Chronic Modifier Acute PQL Units Arsenic NC 50 ug/L Beryllium C 6.5 ug/L Cadmium NC 2 15 ug/L Chromium NC 50 1022 ug/L .,Copper NC 7 AL 7.3 ug/L Cyanide NC 5 N 22, 10 ug/L ';,Fluoride NC 1800 ug/L Lead NC 25 N 33.8 ug/L Mercury NC 0.012 0.0002 ug/L Molybdenum A 3500 ug/L Nickel NC' 88 261 ug/L Phenols A 1 N ug/L Selenium NC 5 56 ug/L Silver NC 0.06 AL 1.23 ug/L Zinc NC 50 AL 67 ug/L 37508 RPA -- Moore Co, input 12/1 /2004 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Copper Mercury Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 Jan-2003 26 26.0 Std Dev. 27.7732 1 Jan-2003 Std Dev. 0.0043 2 Jan-2003 30 30.0 Mean 23.4390 2 Jan-2003 Mean 0.0105 3 Feb-2003 19 19.0 C.V. 1.1849 3 Feb-2003 C.V. 0.4119 4 Feb-2003 33 33.0 n 41 4 Feb-2003 n 5 5 Mar-2003 22 22.0 5 Mar-2003 6 Mar-2003 19 19.0 Mull Factor = 2.7400 6 Mar-2003 Mult Factor= 2.7900 7 Apr-2003 19 19.0 Max. Value 180.0 ug/L 7 Apr-2003 Max. Value 0.01630 ug/L 8 Apr-2003 15 15.0 Max. Fred Cw 493.2 ugtL 8 Apr-2003 Max. Fred Cw 0.04548 ug/L 9 May-2003 180 180.0 9 May-2003 10 May-2003 20 20.0 10 May-2003 11 Jun-2003 16 16.0 11 Jun-2003 12 Jun-2003 17 17.0 12 Jun-2003 13 Jul-2003 19 19.0 13 Jul-2003 14 Jul-2003 21 21.0 14 Jul-2003 15 Aug-2003 16 16.0 15 Aug-2003 16 Aug-2003 13 13.0 16 Aug-2003 17 Sep-2003 16 16.0 17 Sep-2003 0.0163 0.01630 18 Sep-2003 17 17.0 18 Sep,2003 19 Oct-2003 25 25.0 19 Oct-2003 20 Oct-2003 16 16.0 20 Oct-2003 21 Nov-2003 89 89.0 21 Nov-2003 22 Nov-2003 15 15.0 22 Nov-2003 23 Dec-2003 16 16.0 23 Dec-2003 1, 0.0118 0.01180 24 Dec-2003 12 12.0 24 Dec-2003 - 25 Jan-2004 15 15.0 25 Jan-2004 26 Jan-2004 18 18.0 26 Jan-2004 .' 27 Feb-2004 17 17.0 27 Feb-2004 28 Feb-2004 17 17.0 28 Feb-2004 '. 29 Mar-2004 16 16.0 29 Mar-2004 0.0120 0.01200 30 Mar-2004 30 Mar-2004 31 Apr-2004 13 13.0 31 Apr-2004 32 Apr-2004 11 11.0 32 Apr-2004 33 May-2004 12 12.0 33 May-2004 34 May-2004 16 16.0 34 May-2004 35 Jun-2004 19 19.0 35 Jun-2004 0,00577 0,00577 36 Jun-2004 16 16.0 36 Jun-2004 37 Jul-2004 18 18.0 37 Jul-2004 38 Jul-2004 18 18.0 38 Jul-2004 39 Aug-2004 18 18.0 39 Aug-2004 40 Aug-2004 14 14.0 40 Aug-2004 41 Sep-2004 18 18.0 41 Sep-2004 0.00664 0.00664 42 Sep-2004 14 K0 42 Sep-2004 43 43 44 44 45 45 48 46 47 47 48 48 49 49 50 50 51 51 62 52 53 53 54 64 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 199 199 200 1 200 37508 RPA - Moore Co, data -2- 12/3/2004 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Silver Zinc Date Data BDL-112DL Results Date Data BDL-112DL Results 1 Jan-2003 2 2.0 Sul Dev. 3.3130 1 Jan-2003 38 38.0 Sid Dev. 84.6875 2 Jan-2003 3 3.0 Mean 2.4359 2 Jan-2003 '= 47 47.0 Mean 50,3250 3 Feb-2003 2 2.0 C.V. 1.3601 3 Feb-2003 41 41.0 C.V. 1.6828 4 Feb-2003 6 6.0 n 39 4 Feb-2003 47 47.0 n 40 5 Mar-2003 2 2.0 5 Mar-2003 38 38.0 6 Mar-2003 2 1.0 Mull Factor = 3.1000 6 Mar-2003 40 40.0 Mult Factor= 3.5500 7 Apr-2003 21 21.0 Max. Value 21.0 ug2 7 Apr-2003 39 39.0 Max. Value 570.0 uglL 8 Apr-2003 3 3.0 Max. Fred Cw 65.1 ug/L 8 Apr-2003 37 37.0 Max. Fred Cw 2023.5 ug/L 9 May-2003 7 7.0 9 May-2003 570 570.0 10 May-2003 2 1.0 10 May-2003 33 33.0 11 Jun-2003 2 2.0 11 Jun-2003 40 40.0 12 Jun-2003 2 1.0 12 Jun-2003 33 33.0 13 Jul-2003 2 1.0 13 Jul-2003 41 41.0 14 Jul-2003 2 1.0 14 Jul-2003 37 3Z0 15 Aug-2003 2 1.0 15 Aug-2003 27 27.0 16 Aug-2003 2 1.0 16 Aug-2003 40 40.0 17 Sep-2003 2 1.0 17 Sep-2003 43 43.0 18 Sep-2003 2 1.0 18 Sep-2003 41 41.0 19 Oct-2003 2 1.0 19 Oct-2003 64 64.0 20 Oct-2003 2 1.0 20 Oct-2003 34 34.0 21 Nov-2003 2 1.0 21 Nov-2003 9 9.0 22 Nov-2003 2 1.0 22 Nov-2003 25 25.0 23 Dec-2003 2 1.0 23 Dec-2003 37 37.0 24 Dea2003 5 2.5 24 Dec-2003 28 28.0 25 Jan-2004 2 1.0 25 Jan-2004 46 46.0 26 Jan-2004 2 1.0 26 Jan-2004 38 38.0 27 Feb-2004 2 2.0 27 Feb-2004 45 45.0 28 Feb-2004 2 2.0 28 Feb-2004 33 33.0 29 Mar-2004 BDL BDL 29 Mar-2004 37 37.0 30 Mar-2004 30 Mar-2004 31 Apr-2004 2 1.0 31 Apr-2004 26 26.0 32 Apr-2004 2 1.0 32 Apr-2004 26 26.0 33 May-2004 5 Z5 33 M%,2004 32 32.0 34 May-2004 5 2.5 34 May-2004 31 31.0 35 Jun-2004 5 2.5 35 Jun-2004 36 36.0 36 Jun-2004 36 Jun-2004 37 Jul-2004 5 2.5 37 Jul-2004 43 43.0 38 Jul-2004 5 2.5 38 Jul-2004 41 41.0 39 Aug-2004 5 2.5 39 Aug-2004 38 38.0 40 Aug-2004 5 2.5 40 Aug-2004 39 39.0 41 Sep-2004 5 2.5 41 Sep-2004 37 37.0 42 Sep-2004 5 2.5 42 Sep-2004 36 36.0 43 43 44 44 45 45 46 46 47 47 48 48 49 49 50 50 51 51 52 52 53 53 54 54 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 199 199 200 1 200 37508 RPA - Moore Co, data -3- 12JI12004 Instream Waste Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant NC0037508 Prepared By: Joe Corporon, NPDES Unit, 04Nov04 Enter Design Flow (MGD): 6.7 Enter s7Q10(cfs): 15. Enter w7Q10 (cfs): 28 Residual Chlorine 7Q10 (CFS) DESIGN FLOW (MGD) DESIGN FLOW (CFS) STREAM STD (UG/L) UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (UG/L) IWC (%) Allowable Conc. (ug/1) Fecal Limit (If DF >331; Monitor) (If DF <331; Limit) Dilution Factor (DF) NPDES Servor/Current Versions/IWC n QWC) Ammonia (NH3 as N) (summer) 15.2 7010 (CFS) 6.7 DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 10.385 DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L) 0 UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L; 40.59 IWC (%) 42 Allowable Conc. (mg/1) Ammonia (NH3 as N) (winter) 7Q10 (CFS) 2001100ml DESIGN FLOW (MGD) DESIGN FLOW (CFS) STREAM STD (MG/L) 2.46 UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L; IWC (%) Allowable Conc. (mg/1) 15.2 6.7 10.385 1.0 0.22 40.59 2.1 28.7 6.7 10.385 1.8 0.22 26.57 6.2 1213/2004 NC DENR- DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY .0310 LUMBER RIVER BASIN 2B .0300 Classification Name of Stream Description Class Date Index No. Aberdeen Creek From source (at dam at C 08/03/92 14-2-11-(1) Watsons Lake) to backwaters of Pages Lake (Aberdeen Lake) at normal lake elevation Watsons Lake Entire lake B 12/01/63 14-2-11-2 Devils Gut Creek From source to Moore C 09/01/74 14-2-11-2-1-(1) County SR 1205 Muster Branch From source to Devils Gut C 09/01/74 14-2-11-2-1-2 Creek Devils Gut Creek From Moore County SR 1205 to B 12/01/63 14-2-11-2-1-(3) backwaters of Watson Lake at normal lake elevation Unnamed Tributary at From source to U.S. Hwys. 15 C 09/01/74 14-2-11-2-2-(1) Southern Pines and 501 (formerly Moore County SR 1205) Unnamed Tributary at From U.S. Hwys. 15 and 501 B 12/01/63 14-2-11-2-2-(2) Southern Pines (formerly Moore County SR 1205) to backwaters of Watsons Lake at normal lake elevation McCallum Branch From source to Aberdeen C O8/03/92 14-2-11-3 Creek Unnamed Tributary at From source to Aberdeen C O8/03/92 14-2-11-4 Aberdeen water supply Creek (including Aberdeen Water Supply) Aberdeen Creek [Pages Lake From backwaters of Pages B 12/01/63 14-2-11-(5) (Aberdeen Lake)) Lake (Aberdeen Lake) at normal lake elevation to dam of Pages Lake (Aberdeen Lake) Aberdeen Creek From dam at Pages Lake C 09/01/74 14-2-11-(6) (Aberdeen Lake) to Drowning Creek Devil Gut Branch From source to Aberdeen C 09/01/74 14-2-11-7 Creek Forked Creek (Pine Bluff From source to dam at Pine B 12/01/63 14-2-11-9-(1) Municipal Lake) Bluff Municipal Lake Forked Creek From dam at Pine Bluff C 09/01/74 14-2-11-9-(2) Municipal Lake to Aberdeen Creek Big Muddy Creek From source to Drowning C 12/01/63 14-2-12 (Broadacres Lakes, Big Muddy Creek Lake) 2 NC DENR - DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY Alphabetic List of NC Waterbodies LUMBER RIVER BASIN Name of Stream Subbasin Stream Index Number Map Number Class Aaron Swamp LBR54 14-30-3-1 122SW4 C;Sw Aberdeen Creek LBR50 14-2-11-(1) G21NW8 C Aberdeen Creek LBR50 14-2-11-(6) G21NWB C Aberdeen Creek [Pages Lake (Aberdeen Lake)] LBR50 14-2-11-(5) G21NW8 B Abram Branch LBR53 14-22-10-1 I23NW9 C;SW Allen Pocket Canal LBR53 14-22-8 I23NE8 C;Sw Alligator Branch LBR56 15-3-7 J24SE5 C;Sw Alligator Swamp LBR54 14-30-11-3 J22NW9 C;SW Alligator Swamp LBR57 15-7-6 K25SW1 C;SW Ashpole Swamp LBR54 14-30 I22SW1 C;Sw Atlantic Ocean LBR59 99-(1) L26NE7 SB Ausley Branch (Circle T Lake) LBR52 14-10-6.3 I22NE1 WS-IV;Sw Back Swamp LBR51 14-8-(0.5) 121NE5 C;Sw Back Swamp LBR51 14-8-(2.5) I22SW1 WS-IV;SW Bass Branch LBR55 14-32-9-2 H2OSEl B Bay Branch LBR54 14-30-8-1-1 J22NE2 C;SW Bay Branch LBR57 15-7-6-1 K25SW1 C;Sw Bear Branch LBR56 15-5 K24NE4 C;Sw Bear Branch LBR57 15-5 K24NE4 C;SW Bear Branch LBR57 15-11 K25SW4 C;Sw Bear Creek LBR55 14-32-16-1-1 120NE5 C;Sw Bear Ford Swamp (Hester Millpond) LBR53 14-22-11-4 I24NW7 C;Sw Bear Pen Islands Swamp LBR57 15-7-3 K25NE7 C;Sw Bear Swamp LBR51 14-9-(0.5) H22SW7 C;Sw Bear Swamp LBR51 14-9-(1.5) I22NW5 WS-IV;Sw Beasley Branch LBR55 14-32-13-1 H2OSE5 C;SW Beaver Dam Creek LBR50 14-2-13 H21NW1 C Beaver Dam Creek LBR55 14-34-4-3-5 H21NW4 C;Sw Beaver Dam Swamp LBR57 15-17-1-12-1 J23SE7 C;SW Beaverdam Branch LBR53 14-22-1-3-2.5 H22SE3 C;SW Beaverdam Creek LBR54 14-30-11-1 J22NW4 B;Sw Beaverdam Swamp LBR59 15-25-1-12-3 K26SW4 C;SW Bee Branch LBR51 14-18-2-1 I23SW7 C;Sw Bee Tree Branch LBR58 15-4-1-1-2-2-2-1 J24NE3 C;Sw Bell Branch LBR59 15-25-2-15-4 L25NE5 C;SW,HQW Bell Swamp LBR57 15-7-6-2 K25NW7 C;SW Benson Branch LBR58 15-4-1-1-2-4-3 J24NE2 C;Sw Big Bear Branch LBR50 14-2-12-2 G20SE9 C Big Branch LBR51 14-12-4 122NE5 C;Sw Big Branch LBR53 14-22-2-4 H23SW7 C;Sw Big Branch LBR51 14-26-1 J22NE3 C;Sw Big Branch LBR54 14-30-6 J22NW9 C;Sw Big Branch LBR55 14-33-2-1 121NW2 C;SW Big Branch LBR58 15-4-2-2 J23NE6 C;Sw Big Branch LBR57 15-17-1-12-1-1 K23NE1 C;SW Big Branch LBR57 15-17-1-12-5 K24SW1 C;Sw Big Branch (Crappie Lake) LBR50 14-2-7 G20SE5 WS-II;HQW Big Branch Canal LBR51 14-18-1 I23SW7 C;Sw Big Cowpen Swamp LBR54 14-30-11-2 J22NW8 B;Sw Big Creek LBR56 15-2-6 J25SW4 C;Sw:+ Big Creek LBR57 15-21-1 K24SW9 C;Sw Page 1 of 12 Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary March 20. 2001 FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MimentoNg1,002 Penn 24hry/fx limo 9WA Md(combind outfall) V 1997 - Pass - - Pass - - Pam - - Pass - NCM03719/W2 Begin: 1/1/1996 Frequency: Q P/F + Fch May Aug Nov NmComvSindc 19" - Pass - - Pass - - Pam - - Fan - COunty: Cumberland Region: FRO Subbario: CPFI5 law - Pass - - Lets Pass - Fan Pam.Pam - Farm - PF: 1.3 Spaiu 3000 - Pau -- - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - 7Q10:791.0 IWC(%):0.25 Od.r =01 - Moore County WWTP Penn chr limo 41% Y last - - Pam - - Pam - - Pass - - Late NCM3150WOOI Begin:6/)2WO F-reqnrncy:Q Mar Jun Sep Do. + NmComp:SingM 1990 Pass -- Pass - - Pass - - Pam - - Pam Count' Moore Region: FRO Subbasm: LUM50 lose - - Pox - - Pam - - Late Pam - Pam PF: 6.7 91ecW 2000 - - Pa." - - Pass - - Pam - - Pam 7QW: 15.2 IWC(%):40.54 Order: 2001 -- MooresvBleWVVTP Penn chr lim: 90Y.(New perm 3/12001) V 107 - Pass - - Pam - - Psm - - Pam - NC004672W001 Begin:11/1/19W Frequcrcy:QP/F + Fcb May Aug Nov NmComp:SINGLE loan - Pass - - Pam - - Pam - - Pass --- County: Iredell Region: MEG Subbazin: YADII lass - Fare - - Pau - - Fall Fen Pax Pass --- PF: 5.2 Special 2000 _ Pam - - Pax - - Fail r100 -101) Pass -- 7QIO:0.5 IWC(%).9N.15 Order 2001 -- Morehead City W V T PERM 2411R AC P/F UM: W%MYSID (New pcna 4/1200n I997 - Pax - >100 Pam - -- Pau - - Fen Fail NCW26611/Wl Begin:5/1/1993 Fraluenry:Q + Feb Mey Aug Nov NmComp:SWGLE 19% Fail Pess - - Pasa - -- Fail Pere - Peas - counly: CeMrct Region: WIRO Subbmin: WOE03 19N - Pass -- - Para -- -- Pans - - at - PF: 1.7 s cal 30W - Pass - - Poss - - Fail Pam - Pass - 7QW: TIDAL IWC(%)NA Oder Ml - Morganton Pcrm cbrlim:91%;ifpf10.5 chrhn 1294; ifpfl3 chrlim 15% 1997 Pass - - Fan Pass - Pau - - Pax --- - NCO026573MI Bcgin:VI/1995 Frcqurnry: Q P/F + Jim Apr JWOo, broccoli loos Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Fa Tires -- - County: Burke Region: ARO Subleam: M31 1999 Pass - - Pass -- - Pau -- -- Par --- PF: 9.0 Special 2000 Pass - - Pam - - Pax - - Pax - - 7Q10:126 IWC(%):8.96 Oder. 20(31 Fan Mild'. Emerprim.-Paw Creek Perm24hr LC50rc moonepis fihd(gmb) 199T - - - - -100 - -- - - - -- - NCM22187/001 Begin:9/l/1996 Frequcncy:A NmCurri lase - - - - 1100 - - - - - - - County; Mceklrnburg Region: MRO Sublecin: CrB34 1999 - - Pase Pass -- - -- -- - - -- --- PF: NA sperul 2000 6n.1 - -- - - - -- - - - - -- 7QIo:0.0 IWC(%):Iw Wsr. 2101 - Mt. A1r,WWTP From on, lime 42% V1997 Pe.a -- - Fail Per. - Pass -- - Pass --- - NCM21121/001 Begir:P12000 Fmuenry. QP/F Jim Apr Jul Oct + NonCon ingk lase Fail Pass - Pas - - Pax - - Pass - - Coui Sun, Region: WSRO Subbasin: YAD03 19W Pars - - Pass - - Pax -- - Pass - -- PF: TO SFerul 20M as - - Pecs - - Pas. - -- Pass - - 7Q10:14.9 IWC(%).42.0 Oder =1 FalPam Mt. Gilead W WTP Penn chr Jim: 3.2% 1997 - - Pass -- - Fall Pa. - Pan - -.- Pam NCM21105/00I Begin:l/I2000 Fmquency:Q MurJm Sep Dec + N.Comp:Singlc 190 - -- Fell L.le Fail- Late Pass - Pam.Pax - - Pass County: Montgomery Rcgion: FRO Sublimer: YADLO low - - Pass - - - - - Late Pass --- Pass PF: 0.85 Spuul 2000 - --- Pass - - NR Pass - H Pau --- Pamag 7Q10: 40 IWC(Y.):3.2 Oda 2001 - ML Holly WWTP Peter chr lion: 6% 1997 - Pass - - Pau - - Pam - - Pau - NCO0211561001 B.,ke9/Ul996 Frequency: Q P/F + Fcb Moy Aug Nov NoaComp:Singlc 190 - Pass - - Pam - - We Pax - Pax - Coun7 Gaston Region: MRO Subl in: CrH33 tans - Pax - - Pars - - Pam - - Pass - PF: 4.0 Special 2" -- Few - - Pass - - Pass - - Poas - 7QIn:95.0 IWC(%).6.0 Oder. 2001 - Late Mr. Ohre Pleme P-2 perm chr mrnit(100, 73, 50-15, 12.5, 6.25) Ylast &M - - am - - a.as - - 35.36 - - NCOW074/001 Bcgin:VI/IW6 Fmqucacy:Q Jim Apr Jul Oct NmComp: 1998 17.68 -- - 8.83 --- - 17n7 - - BM - - Counry: Wayne Region: WARD Subbuin: CPF21 loss 354 - - 17.68 - - e.as - - 35.A - - PF: 0.40 Spwml 20W B." - - 354 - - NRAW. 3649 - 35A - - 7Q10:0.0 IWC(%):Iw Ordee 2001 117 Mt. Gave Nall Pcrenclulirri 1997 - - Poo - - Pass - - Lets can Pam Pass NM20575/001 Bcgin:9/1/1996 Frequency: Q PX + Mar Jun Scp Dec NosComp:Singlc low - - Pox - -- Pax - -- Fell Fail.Fell a100 Pau County: Wayne Region: WARD Subbmin: CPF21 lase - - wt. Pau - Pam - -- Pax - - Late PF: Lip special Zoo Pass - Pen - - Pau - - Peas - - Pax 7QIo: BO IWC(-A):100 ceder: 2001 - V Pre 1991 Data Available LEGEND: PERM-Pennil Requirement LET-Administrativel-elcr-Teague Frequcnc+=Monitoring fe reacy:Q-Quarterly; M- Monthly;BM- BimOnlhly; SA. Semiannually; A- Annually;OWD- Only when discharging;D- Disccatinucd monitoring oquiroman Begin=Fundmomhmquired 7Q10-Receiving strew low Roweriterion(efr) -qu lymonitodngimr wmonWyuponfv wNR Months Bw letting mutt cam-es.Jm, Apq Jul, Oct N.Comp= Current Compliance Requirement PF-PuminedRow(MGD) IWC%-Imtreamwastcconcentrmim P/F-Pas4Fuil new AC=Acute CHR=Chronic Done Norms.: f- Fmhcad Minnow; •-Ccdodaphnia cep.; my - Mysid shrimp; ChV - Chronic value; P - Monnliry ofalmrd p..logo at highest concentration; at - Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tax Unit; bt- Bud lost Reporting Notation: --= Dam not required: NO - Nut reportud Failiry Amivily Smau:l-Ivactivq N-Newly lsmed(To wastmd); II -Amine but trot diuhmging }-More data available( mmthmquutim;•=ORCaigw uncrecdod 32 Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary November 15, 2004 FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG $EP OCT NOV DEC MIBer Brewing Ca, chrlim:2.1% 2000 -- Pen - - Pan - - Invalid - Pa.. Pass - NC0029980/OOI Bcgiv:9/1/2003 Fregc.y.Q Feb May A.g Nov + NonComp:Single 2031 - Peas - - Pan - - Pas+ - - Pass - Couny. Raekinghane Region: WSRO Subbazin: ROA03 2002 - Paa - - Pau - -- Pau - - Pan - PF: 5.2 Special 2003 ._ Pas. -- - Pan - -- Pass - - Pau - 7QI0:313 IWC(%)2.51 0r4.r. 2004 - Pna - - Pau - -- Pan - MacWville WWTP Beer Creek In lion: 37% Y 2" - Pass -- -- Pass - -- Pas. - - NR Pass NCO05NO31MI Begin:7/I/2003 Fritterer, Q Feb May Aug Nov + NonConepRinglc 2001 NR Pass - - Pass - - <10,Fan NR s10,13.6 13.6 F.a.P.as County. Davie Argues: WSRO Subbalm: YAD06 2o@ NRrFas 13n <10 <10 <IO IN 66.6 Fail >100 -IN Pan - PF: 0.25 Spa®I 2003 _. Pna - - Pass - - Pan - - Pan - 7Q10:0.65 lWC(1n)37 Omer: 2004 _. Pna - Pas,>74(p) Paa.>74(o)t - - Pan - Meeksvine W WTP Dutchman's Ca. chr Us: 7% 1, 2001) Pan - - Paa - - Pau - - Pane - - NCO021491/001 Begin.7/I/3004 Frequrncy:Q Jan Apr Jul Get + NonComp:Single 2001 Pass - - Pas - - Pea. - - Pas. - -- CowyDavie Region: WSRO Subbain: YAD05 2002 Fen s28 9.90 Pass - - Pan - - Pa. -- - PF:0.68 Spalai 2003 Pan - - Pau - - Pass - - Pas - - 7Q10:15.0 IWC(%)6.57 ONen 20M Pass - - Pan,19.6(p) Paaa.a28(01 - Pens - - Pae Monarch Hntery 24hrp/fac line: W% Y2000 - - Pass - - Pass - - NRPaa - - Pass NC0001210/001 Begioll/IR002 FrequencyQ + MarJunacp Dre NNCogurSingle 2001 - - Pa. - - Pas - - Pau - - Far County Al... Region:WSRO Subbasin:CPF02 2M2 Fen Pas Pass - - Pa.. -- - H - - H PF: 0.05 Special 2003 H _ _. _ _ H -_ _ H - - H 7Q10: 47.8 IWC(%)0.16 UJe. 2004 - _ H _ - H - H Monroe WWTP chrlim: 90% 2000 - Pass - -- Pass - - Pe.. - - Pas. NCO024333/001 Begin.9/1/3004 FmquovryQ Mar Jun Sep Con + NonConm Single 2001 - - Pass - - Fail sign tl5 >mtgn) - - Pan(.) County: Union Region: MRO Subbazin: YAD14 2002 - - Pars) - - Pas - - Pau - - Pau PF: 10.4 Special 2003 ... ._ Pan - - Pau --- - Peas -- --- Pa. 7Q10: 0.43 IWC(%)97AO m8en 2004 >100(0) 'IMP)1 Pus >10o(p) - Pass - - Pass Madre C..dry WWTP chr her: 41% Y 2tla - - Pass - - Pass -- - Pass - - Paes NCO0375081WI Begin6/1/2000 FrequencyQ Marlum Sep Dec + NonComp:Singlo 2MI -"' -- Pit. - - Pass -- - Paes - - Pan Co.". Mo.. Region: FRO Subbasin: LUM50 2002 - - Pae - - Pas. -- - Pau - - Pau PF: 67 Spain 2003 _. - Paa. - - Pae -- - Pae. - - Paa 7Q10: 0.2 IWC(%)40.54 O.4er. 2004 50(p) -- Pase>62(p) -- - PaeV62(P) -- - Pesa,>71(P) MooresvBlnRocky River WWTP chr lira: 90% g 2000 - Paa - - Pan - -- Fail >IN >100 Pan - NC0046728/001 B4gim3/In001 FrequencyQ Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Single 2001 - Pass - - Pen - -- Pas. -- - Pan - Couvly: lmdcll Region: MRO Subbain: YADH 2002 - Pass -- - Pau - -- Pass - - Pass - PF: 5.2 SPaul 2003 _ Fail WS IN Paw - - Pau - - Pea - 7Q10:0.5 IWC(%)94.15 Braes 2004 - Fan - - Paa - - Pau - Morehead City WWTP 24hrptfw Ron: 90'G mysid 2a0a - Pus - -- Pass - - Fan Pau - Pass - NM26611=1 Beging/l/2003 FrequencyQ + Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Smgle Not - Paz - - Pan - - Nwass - - Paa - county: Ceneret Region: WIRO Subbasim WOKO: 2002- Failyaes - - Pas. - - Pass - -- Pan - I'F: 1.7 Spenal 2003 _ Paa - - Pass - - Pan - - Pass - 7Q10:TIDAL IWC(V.)NA rnaee 2104 - Pass - - Pass - - Pau - M.M.I.n-C.mwba R. PCF chr lim: 9%; War 10.5 the Has 12%; ifpf 13 chr Into 15% 2000 Pe.e - - Paa. - - Pces -- - Pas. - - NC0026573/001 Begin 10/I0002 FrequencyQ Jan Aprlul Oct + NonComp:Single 2001 Fria ste 16.4 1" >16 >18 NWLam Pass - P. - - Comry. Burke Region: ARO Subbain: CTB3I 2002 Fan >400 25.5 Pun - - Pa. - - Pa. - - PF: 80 Special 2003 Fau - - Is... - - Pan - - Pass - - 7Q10:126 IWC(%)8.96 Orim 2c04 Lan. >30(),Pns - Pase>36(P) - - Pass,>36(P) s36(P) - Motive Enterprises LLC-Greensboro 24hr t.C50 so moult class Rhei (gab) :KM NRI>100 - - - - - - - - - - - NCW22209/001 Begin:VIII996 Frequency:A Noncong, 2001 - >100 - -- -- - - - -- - - - Couny Guilford Region: WSRO Subbain:CPF08 2002 -IN - - - - - -- - - - - - PF: VAR Spacial 2003 on _ 7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%)100 Ocoee 2004 IN - - -- - -- -- -- -- Motiv. Enterprises LLC-I..ng CrADI 24hr LC50 ac mow is Pord 2am - - - - atop - - - - - -- - NC004689VON Begin:9/1/20m Frequeury: A NonComp: tam - - - - Late -IN --- -- - - - - Couny Mecklenburg Region: MEG Subbain: CTS34 2002 - - - -- -IN - '- -- - -- - - PF: NA Special =3 _ _ _ _ >100 _ 7QIO: 0.0 IWC(%)IN Oro. 2004 _ _ - _ >100 _ _ _ _ LEGEND: PERM- Permit Requirement LET -Administrative Leiter -Target Frequency= Monitoring Bcquency: Q. Quarterly; M. Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A. Annually; OWD- Only when discharge,,- Discontinued monitoring requirement Begin =First momhregulred ]QID-Receiving at== low Bow criterion(efs)+-quartedymonito6nEincrrasestomonNiyuponfailum.r NR Months tbat tenivg mat occur -cat. lan.Apr,Jul, Oct NonComp= Curren Compliance Paternoster, PF-Prrmivcd Bow(MGD) IWCA-lostreamwatecwantratiov P/F=PaalFail but AC=Acute CHR-Chronic Data Nomura: f-Fmbrsd Minn.; v -Cerimi pMie so; my - Mysid shrimp, ChV - Chronic value; P- Mortality ofstat>d percentage at highest ....bra ion; at-Pcrformcd by DWQ Actual To. Unit; be- Bad seat Reporting Natation: - =Data not re ifird; NR - Not reported Facility Activity StaresU- Inactive,N - Newly lasued(To conetrue,t);II- Arrive but not discharging;} -More data available for month in gnseun;0= DEC signature needed 30 MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for: Permit: ncoo37508 MRs Between: 1 -2001 and 12 -2004 Region: % Facility Name: % Param Name: % County: % Violation Category: ^/ Subbasin: ^/ Report Date: 12/01/04 Page: 1 of Program Category: % Violation Action: % PERMIT: FACILITY: COUNTY: REGION: MONITORING OUTFALL VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED REPORT /PPI LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE 12/31/69 VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION NPDES/Non-Discharge Permitting Unit Pretreatment Information Request Form DES OR NONDISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT COMPLETES THIS PART: Date of Request 7-May-04 r Moore County Public Utilities M NCO037508 Region Fayetteville Re uestor Joe Corporon Pretreatment A-F Towns- Dana Folley (ext. 523) Contact G-M Towns- Jon Risgaard (ext. 580) N-Z Towns- Deborah Gore (ext. 593) PRETREATMENT UNIT COMPLETES THIS PART: Status of Pretreatment Program (circle all that apply) 1) the facility has no SIU's and does have a Division approved Pretreatment Program that is INACTIVE 2) the facility has no SIU's and does not have a Division approved Pretreatment Program 3) the facility has (or is developing) a Pretreatment Program - 3a) is Full Program with LTMP or 3b) is Modified Program with STMP 4) the facility MUST develop a Pretreatment Program - Full Modified + 5) additional conditions regarding Pretreatment attached or listed below Flow Permitted MGD Actual MGD STMP time frame: Industrial 0.-7 O . -Il ( 04 (os) most recent Domestic 6.- 0 tt• 12 (Q( 46I next cycle Pollutant L Check List POC due to (S) NPDES/Non. STMP LTMP T Discharge Required Required by Frequency at Frequency at MP Permit Limit by EPA' 503 Sludge^ POC tlue to SIU'' Site specific POC (Provide apianation)'•'• effluent effiggit BOD x 4 to It TSS x 4 1 JON NH3 Tkw, tti,,,;l.� 4 jolm Arsenic 4tMMM Cadmium po x 4 Chromium - X x 4 Copper x x 4 Cyanide x 4 Lead x 4 Mercury x a,. - 4 MoryyUiderlurTL x o„-#. 4 Nickel X x 4 Silver X X 4 Selenium x w.„;: .m 4 Zinc > x 4 tOM wo_;�.r 4 �,,.. x rva 74+r 4 d b Ta< K,_; C 4 T'ro x 4 Ort : C.<. tr 4 1 Of M Coo 1 4 01 M 'Always in the LTMP all LTMP/STMP effluent &ta '-Only in the LTMP if the POTW land applies sludge Only in LTMP while the SIU is connected to the POTW on DMRs? Only in LTMP when the pollulant is a specific concern to the POTW (ex -Chlorides for a POTW who accepts Textile waste) Yes 0= Ouade ly No (attach data) M-Monthly Comments: /� 1 (�� 1 �o'ic.. i•;,, SI c�,� �h - �lu4r .1 I available in spreadsheet? wi4:c..T ., "tA Yes No _ LTn mr J 1Y1- C. :+ c� rc„k- aa.>•c - S, 9a,. kt 7 .,ova d. version t0/flt03 37508- Moore Co Pretreatment Request Revised: August 4. 2000 DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY March 22, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Goodrich, Supervisor Permitting and Engineering U FROM: Dale Lonvironmental Specialis t THRU: Paul Rajer Quality Supervisor FayetteegionalOffice SUBJECT: NPDES Staff Report and Recommendations NPDES Permit No. NCO037508 Moore County Water Pollution Control Moore County Please find attached the staff report and recommendations of the Fayetteville Regional Office concerning the renewal of subject NPDES Permit. If you have any questions or require any further information, please advise. DL/bs-m Attachment I'''' 2 4 2004 SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: YES NO X If Yes, SOC No. To: Permits and Engineering Unit Water Quality Section Attention: Charles Weaver Date: March 15, 2003 NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION COUNTY: Moore Permit No. NC 0037508 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Facility and Address: Moore County Water Pollution Control 1094 Addor Road Aberdeen, NC 28315 2. Date of Investigation: December 1, 2003 3. Report Prepared by: Dale Lopez, Environmental Specialist 4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: James D. Frye, System Supervisor 910-281-3146 5. Directions to Site: Take SR 1100, south of Addor, for approximately 1 mile. Treatment plant is on right side of road. 6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points: Latitude: 350 04' 04" Longitude: 780 28' 07" Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on map. U.S.G.S. Quad No. G-21-SW U.S.G.S. Quad Name: Pinebluff, NC 7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application? Approximately 50 acres X Yes No (If No, explain) 8. Topography: (relationship to flood plain included): Flat and terraced; 0-10% slope 9. Location of nearest dwelling: None within 1,000 feet PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION (continued) 10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Aberdeen Creek a. Classification: "Class C" b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Lumber River Basin 03 - 07 - 50 C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Fish and wildlife propagation, secondary recreation, agriculture, and other uses requiring waters of lower quality. PART H - DESCRIPTION OF WASTES AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted: 6.67 MGD (Ultimate Design Capacity) b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater Treatment facility? 6.6 MGD C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity). 6.67 MGD d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two (2) years. N/A e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities: The existing waste facility consists of the following: 6.67 MGD (design capacity), preaeration and grit removal, primary clarification, first (1st) stage activated sludge, intermediate clarification, second (2nd) stage aeration, final clarification, anaerobic sludge digestion, sludge dryng beds, and post aertion. f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): In development Approved X Should be required Not needed PART H - DESCRIPTION OF WASTES AND TREATMENT WORKS (continued) 2. Residuals handling and utilizing/disposal scheme: The dried sludge is routed to a lined landfill in Anson County. a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DWQ Permit No. Permit Number WQ0018018, which has never been used. Residual Contractor: N/A Telephone: N/A b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP X PFRP Other C. Landfill: Uwharrie Environmental Landfill, Troy, North Carolina, Montgomery County d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (specify): 3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): Grade IV (see attached) 4. SIC Code(s): Primary O1 Secondary 55 57 Main Treatment Unit Code: 1 1 0 0 1 PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies involved (municipals only)? N/A 2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: Please note that the Priority Pollutant Analysis showed greater than detection level amounts for Antimony, Copper, Zinc and Calcium. 3. Important SOC, JOC, or Compliance Schedule Dates (please attach): N/A Date Submission of Plans and Specifications.................................................... N/A Begin Construction.................................................................................... N/A CompleteConstruction.............................................................................. N/A PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION (continued) 4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the nondischarge options available? Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated. Spray Irrigation: N/A Connection to Regional Sewer System: N/A Subsurface: N/A Other disposal options: N/A 5. Other Special Items: PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommendation of this office that the permit application be processed and the appropriate permit issued. Water Quality Regional Supervisor Date MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for: Report Date: 02/12/04 Page: 1 of 1 Permit: NCO037508 ' MRs Between: 10 -2001'.'arid 90-:2002 Region: % Violation Category: % Program Category Facility Name: % Param Name:. % . .County: %° Subbasin: % Violation Action: % PERMIT: NCO037508 FACILITY: Moore County Public Utilities - Moore County WPCF COUNTY: Moore REGION: Fayetteville Monitoring Violation MONITORING OUTFALL REPORT / PPI LOCATION PARAMETER 10 - 2001 001 Effluent Copper, Total (as Cu) 10 - 2001 001 Effluent Nitrogen, Total (as N) 10 - 2001 001 Effluent Phosphorus, Total (as P) 10 - 2001 001 Effluent Silver, Total (as Ag) 10 - 2001 001 Effluent Zinc, Total (as Zn) Reporting Violation MONITORING OUTFALL REPORT 1 PPI LOCATION PARAMETER 11 - 2001 001 Effluent Cyanide, Total (as Cn) VIOLATION DATE FREQUENCY 10/31/01 2 X month 10/31/01 Monthly 10/31/01 Monthly 10/31/01 2 X month 10/31/01 2 X month VIOLATION DATE FREQUENCY 11/30/01 2 X month UNIT OF CALCULATED MEASURE LIMIT VALUE ug/l mg/I mg/l ug/I ug/l UNIT OF CALCULATED MEASURE LIMIT VALUE ug/I VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION Frequency Violation BIMS Pre -Production Violation Frequency Violation BIMS Pre -Production Violation Frequency Violation BIMS Pre -Production Violation Frequency Violation BIMS Pre -Production Violation Frequency Violation BIMS Pre -Production Violation VIOLATION TYPE Parameter Missing VIOLATION ACTION BIMS Pre -Production Violation MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for: Report Date: 02/12/04 Page: 1 of 1 Perm',tt•; NC0037508 .... M!R etw6ent d02 acid: 11='2003 Region %o Violation Category ram Cate o 9,a 9.rY._,.. Facility Name % Param: N=6: % - County: °1 Subbasin: Violation Action::% PERMIT: NCO037508 FACILITY: Moore County Public Utilities - Moore County WPCF COUNTY: Moore REGION: Fayetteville Monitoring Violation MONITORING OUTFALL VIOLATION REPORT 1PPI LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY 01 - 2003 001 Effluent Chlorine, Total Residual 01/04/03 5 X week 01 - 2003 001 Effluent Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC 01/04/03 5 X week Broth,44.5C 01- 2003 001 Effluent Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N) 01/04/03 5 X week 11 - 2003 001 Effluent Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as N) 11/29/03 5 X week 12 - 2002 001 Effluent Silver, Total (as Ag) 12/31/02 2 X month 01 - 2003 001 Effluent pH 01/04/03 5 X week UNIT OF CALCULATED MEASURE LIMIT VALUE ug/I #/100ml mg/I mg/I ug/I su VIOLATION TYPE Frequency Violation Frequency Violation Frequency Violation Frequency Violation Frequency Violation Frequency Violation VIOLATION ACTION None None None None None None Department of Public Utilities Wastewater Treatment Plant 1094 Addor Road Aberdeen, NC 28315 waanv, 6l January 2, 2004 Re: NPDES Permit Application NPDES Permit No. NCO037508 Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant Mrs. Valery Stephens NCDENR/DWQ/NPDES 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Dear Mrs. Stephens: Telephone: (910) 281-3146 Facsimile: (910) 281-2047 II JAN 2 0 2004 I J DcNR ONNTER QU! 1- WY FO!N! SOURCE bl-,.ZINCH Moore County's NPDES Permit expires July 4, 2004. In compliance with Federal (40 CFR 122) and State (15A NCAC 2H.0105(e)) regulations, we must submit a Permit Renewal at least 180 days prior to the expiration date. The following items are submitted: 1. Application Standard Form 2A-Municipal-Sections A, B, C, D, E,& F (in triplicate) 2. No renewal fee required as of January 1, 2004 The County of Moore requests that their existing Permit be renewed as is, without any modifications. If additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call me at 910-281-3146. Sincerely, James D. Frye, JDF/sab Enclosures: System Superintendent cc: Mr. Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Office, DEM Mr. Steve Wyatt, County Manager Mr. Phillip Boles, Director of Public Utilities FApIL1TY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN: Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant renewal NCO037508 ' BASIC APPLICATION. INFORMATION PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS. ' All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet. A.1. Facility Information. Facility Name Moore Colinty Water Po11 titian Control Plant _- Mailing Address 1094 A dor Road Aberdeen, NC 28315 Contact Person James D. Frye Title System Superintendent Telephone Number c_ 91 n)9R1-3146 Facility Address _ (not P.O. Box) ............. A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following: Applicant Name Moore County Board of Commissioners Mailing Address _ PO Box 905 Carthage, NC 28327 Contact Person Michael Holden Title Chairman Telephone Number (9_10) 947-640 Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works? $K owner ❑ operator Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant ❑ facility Lt applicant A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works (include state -issued permits). PSD UIC _ otherAj,r 07651R02 RCRA �- _ otherLand App.. WQQ,618018 A-4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.). Name Tn of Aberdeen Pinehurst _ Tn of Sou Pines Tn of Pi.nebll.lff Population Served 14nn 9700� 10900 _ 11QQ� Type of Collection System separate _ separate _ separate separate Ownership town municipal until 3/04 town Tn of Carthage 1870 separate town Tourism/seasonal/resort 6000 separate town PA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 2 of 21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Form Approved V1449 1 Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant OMB Number 2040-0086 A.S. Indian Country. a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country? Yes X No b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows through) Indian Country? X Yes No A.6. Flow. Indicate the design fk)w rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period with the 12th month of "this years' occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal. a. Design flow rate 6.7 mgd Two Years Ano Last Year This Year b. Annual average daily flow rate 4.475 4.338 5.081 mgd c. Maximum daily flow rate 5.021 5.051 6.259 mgd A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent contribution (by miles) of each. X Separate sanitary sewer approximate 17 miles Rio Combined storm and sanitary sewer A.B. Discharges and tither Disposal Methods. a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? X Yes No If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses: I. Discharges of treated effluent 1 ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent n iii. Combined sewer overflow points n iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks) n v. Other p b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface Impoundments that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? Yes X No If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment: Location: Annual average daily volume discharged to surface impoundment(s) mgd Is discharge continuous or intermittent? c. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater? ff yes, provide the following for each land application site: Location: Number of acres: Annual average daily volume applied to site: Is land application continuous or intenmittent? Mgd d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another treatment works? Yes X No Yes X No EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev.1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 3 of 21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant NC0037508 Form Approved 1/14A9 OMB Number 2040-0086 If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works (e.g., tank buck, pipe). If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide: Transporter name: Mailing Address: Contact person: Title: Telephone number. For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following: Name: Mailing Address: Contact person: Title: Telephone number. If known, provide the NPOES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge. Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility. mgd e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included in A.8.a through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection)? Yes X No If yes, provide the following for each disposal method: Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable): Annual daily volume disposed of by this method: Is disposal through this method continuous or intermittent? EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev.1-99). Replaces EPA forms 755M & 7550-22. Pape 4 of 21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant Form Approved V14 99 OMS Number 2040.0086 WASTEWATER DISCHARGES: If you answered "yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfali (including bypass points) through which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "no" to question A.8.a, go to Part B. 'Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd A.9. Description of Outfall. a. Outfall number 001 b. Location Aberdeen 28315 (City or town, if applicable) (Zip Code) Moore North Caroli (35 0)4' 04" 79" Pllaioto (Latitude) (Longitude) c. Distance from shore (if applicable) ft. d. Depth below surface (if applicable) ft. e. Average daily flow rate mgd f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? If yes, provide the following information: Number of times per year discharge occurs: Average duration of each discharge: Average flow per discharge: Months in which discharge occurs: g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser? A.10. Description of Receiving Waters. a. Name of receiving water Aberdeen Creek Yes X No (go to A.9.g.) mgd Yes X No b. Name of watershed (if known) United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (f known): c. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known): United States Geological Surrey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known): d. Critical tow flow of receiving stream (if applicable): acute cfs chronic cfs e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): mg/l of CaCO3 EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 5 of 21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMTTR: Moo, a County Water Po ution Control Plant Fonn Approved 1/1"9 OMB Number 2040.0086 NCO037508 A.11. Description of Treatment a. What levels of treatment are provided? Check all that apply. X Primary X Secondary Advanced Other. Describe: b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable): Design BODE removal or Design CBOD5 removal 90 % Design SS removal 90 % Design P removal 0 Design N removal 75 % Other ova c. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? if disinfection varies by season, please describe. chlorination If disinfection is by chlorination, is dechlorination used for this outfall? X Yes No d. Does the treatment plant have post aeration? Yes X No A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the Indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent Is discharg. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows In this section. All Information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA1QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA1QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart Outfall number. 001 PARAMETER MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE AVERAGE DAILY VALUE Value Units Value Units Number of Samples H Minimum 6.32 S.U. 6.77 S.U. 260 H Maximum 7.85 S.U. 7.41 s . u. 260 Flow Rate 6 m d 365 Temperature nter) 22.4 ° C 15.9 cc 365 Temperature Summer) 26.0 r C 22. 4 ° C 365 For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value POLLUTANT MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE ANALYTICAL ML 1 MDL METHOD Conc. Units Conc. Units Number of Samples CONVENTIONAL AND NONCONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS. BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN BOD-5 14 1 m 7.2 mg/1 260 SM5210B CBOD-5 DEMAND (Report one) FECAL COLIFORM 128 100mL 13 0 100mL 260 SM9222D TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS) 1 m m 260 15119540D END OF PART A. REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 6 of 21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Form Approved 111449 Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant OMB Number 2040-0086 N BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day). All applicants with a design flow rate > 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification). B.I. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration. 750.000 gpd includes the plant & towns Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration. The plant & the towns are checking interceptor lines hoping to cut down on the influent. B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire area.) a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes. b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable. c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground. d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within 114 mite of the property boundaries of the treatment works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant. e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed. f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail, or special pipe, show on the map where that hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stoned, and/or disposed. 8.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant including all bypass piping and all backup power sources or redundancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g. chlorination and dechlodnation). The water balance must show daffy average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram. 8.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s). Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a contractor? Yes -X_No If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional pages if necessary). Name: Mailing Address: Telephone Number. Responsibilities of Contractor. B.S. Scheduled Improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the treatment works has several different Implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5 for each. (If none, go to question B.6.) a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule. 001 b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agendes. Yes X No EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev.1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 7 of 21 FACILITY AME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Mocire County Water Pollution Control Form Approved 1114/99 Plant OMB Number 2040-0086 NCO037508 c If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes; briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable). plan to purchase a new lime system d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as applicable. For improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible. Schedule Actual Completion Implementation Stage MM / DD / YYYY MM / OD / YYYY - Begin construction _1 _/ 2004 - End construction I 12005 _1 I - Begin discharge - Attain operational level e. Have appropriate pennitsJdearances conceming other Federal/State requirements been obtained? Yes XNo Describe briefly: B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY). Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authortty far each outfall throushh which effluent is discharged. Do not Include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old. Outfall Number. 001 POLLUTANT MAXIMUM DAILY AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE DISCHARGE ANALYTICAL ML / MDL Conc. Units Conc. Units Number of Samples METHOD CONVENTIONAL AND NONCONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS. AMMONIA (as N) � n < CHLORINE (TOTAL RESIDUAL,TRC) 304 ug/l 115 ug/l 260 SM4500G DISSOLVED OXYGEN 11.09 m 1 9.35 my/1 365 TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN (TKN) 2.10 m 1 1.21 m 1 14 351.2 NITRATE PLUS NITRITE NITROGEN 16.0 m 1 13.1 MR/1 11 353.2 OIL and GREASE PHOSPHORUS (total) 2.90 me/1 2.34, mg/l 14 TOTAL DISSOLVED -SM450OB&E SOLIDS (TDS) OTHER END OF PART B. REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 8 of 21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NU 8 Moore County Water o�gution Control Plant Form Approved V1449 OMB Number 2040-0086 BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION PART C. CERTIFICATION All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed Form 2A and have completed ail sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted. Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting: X Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet: X Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data) X Part E {Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data) X Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes) Part G (Combined Sewer Systems) ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION. I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Name and official title Michael Holden - Chairman Signature Telephone number 910-947-6403 Date signed Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assess wastewater treatment practices at the treatment works or identify appropriate permitting requirements. SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO: EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 9 of 21 Department of Public Utilities Wastewater Treatment Plant 1094 Addor Road Aberdeen, NC 28315 January 6, 2004 c°JN�yOF �M��'�F j� 1784 v \NORTH C4' �paunt�c o� �aaxe Re: EPA Expanded Requirements for Permit Renewal NPDES Permit No. NCO037508 Mrs. Valery Stephens NCDENR/D WQ/NPDES 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Dear Mrs. Stephens: Telephone: (910) 281-3146 Facsimile: (910) 281-2047 I received a letter in mid -December explaining that EPA had revised and expanded the application requirements for municipal permits. The new requirements mandate additional effluent testing: 1. Conduct 3 Priority Pollution Analysis (PPAs) 2. Conduct 4 toxicity tests for an organism other than Ceriodaphnia Our lab supervisor spoke with Charles Weaver (NPDES Unit) and Kevin Bowden (Aquatic Toxicology) explaining that the permit application was due and we had just found out about the additional tests. She was told to have a PPA and a Fat Head Minnow Toxicity test run in January and then begin piggy backing with our regular quarterly testing starting in March. We will send the test results to you, Mr. Weaver and Mr. Bowden as we receive them. The tests for January have been scheduled for the week of the 18". If additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call me at 910-281-3146. Sincerely, �- G Yames D. Frye, System Superintendent JDF/sab cc: Mr. Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Office, DEM Mr. Steve Wyatt, County Manager Mr. Phillip Boles, Director of Public Utilities FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant Form Approved 1/1"9 OMBNumber 2040-0086 NCO037508 SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section apelles to the treatment works. Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Treatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is dischargg_d. Do not include infomiation on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum. effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old. Outfali number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.) POLLUTANT MAXIMUM DAILY AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE DISCHARGE ANALYTICAL MU MDL Conc. Units Mass Units Conc. Units Mass Units Number Of METHOD Samples METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS. ANTIMONY ARSENIC .4 . 00 g/ 0.00PIT19/1 10 EPA200.8 BERYLLIUM CADMIUM < , 00 <1 0.00 m 10 EPA200.8 CHROMIUM < 10051MRA < 0.00 m / 10 EPA200.8 COPPER .04 mg/ 1 0. 02PM9/l 29 EPA200.8 LEAD .00f m / < 0.00 mg/ 10 EPA200.8 MERCURY D. OOC 14mJ1 < 0.00 2mg 1 10 EPA245.1 NICKEL . OM m / < 0.00 m / 10 EPA200.8 SELENIUM L , 00 mg/ < 0.00 mg/ 10 EPA200.8 SILVER 0. 00f m / I < 0.00 m / 29 EPA200.8 THALLIUM ZINC 0.07 m 0.05 1m 29 bA200.8 CYANIDE BDL m / BDL /l 5 335.3 TOTAL PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS HARDNESS (AS CaCO3) Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer. Aluminum 1 28 m .81 1 110 10 EPA200.8 Iron 11.40imA.76 /114 EPA200.8 EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 10 of 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ` FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER. Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant NCO037508 Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfail discharging effluent to waters of the United MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE States. ) POLLUTANT Number Conc. Units Mass Units Conc. Units Mass Units of ANALYTICAL METHOD MUMDL METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS. Samples Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer Mol bdenwn D .008 mg/1 0.007 mg/1 10 P4200.8 Chloride 39. .m /1 35.6 m /1 10 M4500C1-B NO3+NO2-N 9.22 mg/l < 1 mg/l 8bM4500NOA Page 10a of 21 a CHJ MERITE INCAr • ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc. Client: Moore County WWTP Date Sampled 09/25/03 1094 Addor Rd Digested 09/25/03 Aberdeen, NC 28315 Analysis 10/03/03 Attention Stephanie Brixey Analyst: FP NPDES # NCO037508 EPA 1631 Low Level Mercury Analysis Meritech ID # Sample 1D Result Reporting Limit M B L K 1003B Method Blank < 0.5 ng/L 0.5 ng/l M09250309 Field Blank < 1.0 ng/L 1.0 ng/l M09250310 Plant Effluent 16.3 ng/L 1.0 ng/l I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data. j JE Laboratory Representative 642 Tamco Road * P.O. Box 27 • Reidsville, NC 27320 (336) 342-4748 9 (336) 342-1522 Fax A a - Client: Attention NPDES # MERiTECH, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc. Moore County WWTP 1094 Addor Rd Aberdeen, NC 28315 Stephanie Briley N00037508 Date Sampled 12/08/03 Digested 12/08/03 Analysis 12/ 11 /03 Analvst: EH EPA 1631 Low Level Mercury Analysis Meritech 1D # Sample ID Result Reporting Limit MBLK 1211 B Method Blank < 0.5 ng/L 0.5 ng!1 M12080301 Field Blank < 1.0 ng/L 1.0 ng/1 M12080302 Effluent I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data. aboratory Repre ntative 11.8 ng/L 1.0 ngll 642 Tamco Road • P.O. Box 27 • Reidsville, NC 27320 (336) 342-4748 • (336) 342-1522 Fax FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Form Approved 1I1"9 Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant OMB Number 2040-0086 N SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCFWCERCLA WASTES All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must complete Part F. GENERAL INFORMATION: F.I. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program? XYes No F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works. a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 1 b. Number of CIUs. 1 SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION: Supply the following Information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and provide the information requested for each SIU. F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages as necessary. Name: Intek Mailing Address: 105 Taylor Street Aberdeen, NC 28315 FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge. F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge. Principal product(s): _ woven polyester fabric Rare material(s): polyester yarn dyes F.S. Flow Rate. a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent. 159,, 407 gpd L X continuous or intermittent) b. Nan -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent. gpd (_continuous or intermittent) F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following: a. Local limits X Yes No b. Categorical pretreatment standards Yes X No If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory? EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Form Approved 1/14)39 Modre County Water Pollution Control Plant OMQNumber 2040.0086 F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three ears? Yes X No If yes, describe each episode. RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE: F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated pipe? Yes No (go to F.12.) F.10. Waste Transport Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply): Truck Rail Dedicated Pipe FA 1. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units). EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Uni s CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE 10i ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER: -A F.12. Remedlation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that 0 will) receive waste from remedial activities? Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) No Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13 - F.15.) for each current and future site. F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate in the next five years). F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary). F.15. Waste Treatment a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works? Yes No If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency): b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent? Continuous Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule. END OF PART F. REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 21 Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) Control Authority, Industrial Data Summary Form (IDSF) Town Name => Moore County Use separate forms for each industry/pipe WWTP Name => Moore County WPCPNPDES # _> NC0037508 Enter BDL values as < (value) 1st 6 months, dates => 01-01-02 06-30-02 2nd 6 months, dates => 07-01-02 12-31-02 Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (lb/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations,(chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (lb/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (lb/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Industry Name lntek Corporation IUP # A004 Pipe # 001 Flow, m d BOD TSS Ammonia 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 176 171 10 10 10 10 1 0 0.324 0.346 226 213 320 180 12.6 N / A 0.138 0.170 118 89 185 131 12.6 N / A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A NIA Arsenic Cadmium Chromium COD 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 10 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.002 < 0.002 1648 1192 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.002 < 0.002 1018 869 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA 0 0 Copper Cyanide Lead Mercury s 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.005 N/A N/A < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 0.005 N / A N / A < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA BDL => Below Detection Limit mg/1=> milligrams per liter * POTW must enter at least one of these [UP => Industrial User Permit Ib/d => pounds per day four rows, Please indicate how averages were calculated SNC => Significant Non -Compliance mgd => million gallons per day Avg period could be month, Qtr, or 6-month & if BDL, 1 /2BDL, or zero values used. TRC => Technical Review Criteria WWTP => wastewater treatment plant Chapter: PAR Guidance File name: PAR IDSF.xlsT4=*iohedairzACit6ft lQ2P4!r 9, section B, pages 12, 13, 14 Blank IDSF Form. Copy and use in your PAR Number each set for each IUP pipe - Page of Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) Industrial Data Summary Form (IDSF) Use separate forms for each industry/pipe Enter BDL values as < (value) Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (lb/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (lb/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/l) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (lb/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Industry Name Intek Corporation IUP # A004 Pipe # 001 NO2 + NO3 Total Phos Barium Beryllium 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months l st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 <0.50 N/A 1.40 N/A 0.012 0.012 <0.001 <0.001 <0.50 N/A 1.40 N/A 0.012 0.012 <0.001 <0.001 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A TTO 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 1 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 NIA N/A NIA N/A 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months BDL => Below Detection Limit mg/I => milligrams per liter • POTW must enter at least one of these [UP => Industrial User Permit Ib/d => pounds per day four rows. Please indicate how averages were calculated SNC => Significant Non -Compliance mgd => million gallons per day Avg period could be month, Qtr, or 6-month & if BDL. 1 /2BDL, or zero values used. TRC => Technical Review Criteria WWTP => wastewater treatment plant Chapter: PAR Guidance File name: PAR_IDSF.xisQtavipiohotskvr4Gi*K lChOpitr 9, section B, pages 12, 13, 14 Blank IDSF Form, Copy and use in your PAR Number each set for each IUP pipe - Page of Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) Industrial Data Summary Form (IDSF) Use separate forms for each industry/pipe Enter BDL values as < (value) Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (lb/d) _> * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) _> % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) _> % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _> Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (Ib/d) _> * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) _> * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Total # of samples => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) _> * or Maximum (lb/d) _> * or Average (mg/1) _> * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) _> % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _> Industry Name Intek Corporation IUP # A004 Pipe # 001 Nickel Selenium Silver Zinc 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.002 < 0.002 0.096 0.074 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.002 < 0.002 0.096 0.074 N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA NIA N/A N/A NIA Oil & Grease Aluminum Antimony s F 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st6months 2nd6months 1st6months 2nd6months 10 22 17 2 1 1 1 7.59 7.80 52 66 0.12 0.20 0.25 0.37 N / A N / A 25.5 20.2 0.11 0.20 0.25 0.37 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A NIA N/A Fluoride Chloride Molybdenum TKN 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months I 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0.85 0.87 4.6 4.1 <0.002 N/A 18 N/A 0.85 0.87 4.6 4.1 <0.002 N/A 18 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A BDL => Below Detection Limit mg/1 => milligrams per liter * POTW must enter at least one orthese IUP => Industrial User Permit lb/d => pounds per day four rows, Please indicate how averages were calculated SNC => Significant. Non -Compliance mgd => million gallons per day Avg period could be month, Qtr. or 6-month & if BDL, 1 /2BDL, or zero values used. TRC => Technical Review Criteria WWTP => wastewater treatment plant Chapter: PAR Guidance File name: PAR IDSF.AsQm*ioh t,1Qh8p*r 9, section B, pages 12, 13, 14 Blank IDSF Form, Copy and use in your PAR Number each set for each IUP pipe - Page of Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) Control Authority, Industrial Data Summary Form (IDSF) Town Name => Moore County Use separate forms for each industry/pipe WWTP Name => Moore County WPCP NPDES # => NCO037508 Enter BDL values as < (value) 1 st 6 months, dates => 01-01-02 to 06-30-02 2nd 6 months, dates => 07-01-02 to 12-31-02 Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (lb/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations,(chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 -%) => Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (lb/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/l) => * or Average Loading (ib/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (lb/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Industry Name Erico Incorporated IUP # A005 Pipe # 01 Flow, m d BOD TSS Ammonia 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months l st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 178 173 6 0 ** 6 0 ** 5 0 0.030 0.028 12 N/A 2 N/A 2.17 N/A 0.0158 0.0144 5.8 N/A <2 N/A 1.25 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A Arsenic Cadmium Chromium COD st 6 months 10 2nd 6 months l st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 1I 2nd 6 months l st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 0 11 10 6 1 1 6 0 ** < 0.005 N / A < 0.002 < 0.002 0.009 0.021 21 N / A < 0.005 N / A < 0.002 < 0.002 0.002 0.021 14 N / A NIA N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A NIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 Copper Cyanide Lead Mercury 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 11 10 2 1 5 1 1 0 0.600 0.295 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.003 < 0.00020 N / A 0.099 0.150 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.003 < 0.00020 N / A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A I N/A BDL => Below Detection Limit mg/I => milligrams per liter POTW must enter at least one of these ]UP => Industrial User Permit lb/d => pounds per day four rows, Please indicate how averages were calculated SNC => Significant Non -Compliance mgd => million gallons per day Avg period could be month. Qtr, or 6-month & if BDL, 1 /2BDL, or zero values used. TRC => Technical Review Criteria WWTP => wastewater treatment plant ** See Narrative Chapter: PAR Guidance File name: PAR_IDSF.xIsMzMiehehdaTJGg0k lCh9pdir 9, section B, pages 12, 13, 14 Blank IDSF Form, Copy and use in your PAR Number each set for each [UP pipe - Page of Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) Industrial Data Summary Form (IDSF) Use separate forms for each industry/pipe Enter BDL values as < (value) Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (Ib/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (lb/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Total # of samples => * Maximum (me) => * or Maximum (lb/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/l) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Industry Name Erico Incorporated IUP # A005 Pipe # 01 Fe Molybdenum TKN NO2 + NO3 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 12nd 6 months 1 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 0.051 N/A 0.074 N/A 4.70 N/A 0.71 N/A 0.051 N/A 0.074 N/A 2.52 N/A 0.71 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A Total Phos TTO l st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 0 1 0 0.21 N/A <0.10 N/A 0.21 N / A < 0.10 Certifies for TTO as not NIA N/A N/A being N/ A N/A N/A present 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months I st 6 months 2nd 6 months BDL => Below Detection Limit mg/I => milligrams per liter * POTW must enter at least one of these IUP => Industrial User Permit lb/d => pounds per day four rows. Please indicate how averages were calculated SNC => Significant Non -Compliance mgd => million gallons per day Avg period could be month, Qtr, or 6-month & if BDL, 1/2BDL, or zero values used. TRC => Technical Review Criteria WWTP => wastewater treatment plant Chapter PAR Guidance File name: PAR_IDSF.xIsMzvf siohe lCitgt A lChgptr 9, section B, pages 12. 13, 14 Blank IDSF Form, Copy and use in your PAR Number each set for each IUP pipe - Page of Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) Industrial Data Summary Form (IDSF) Use separate forms for each industry/pipe Enter BDL values as < (value) Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/1) => * or Maximum (Ib/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/l) => or Maximum (lb/d) => or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) => or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) => % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) _> Total # of samples => * Maximum (mg/l) => * or Maximum (lb/d) => * or 6 month using BDL Average (mg/1) => * or Average Loading (lb/d) => % violations, (chronic SNC is >= 66%) _> % TRC violations, (SNC is >= 33 %) => Industry Name Erico Incorporated IUP # A005 Pipe # 01 Selenium Silver Zinc nths F 2nd 6 months ist 6 months 2nd6months 1st6months 2nd6months 1st6months 2nd6months 10 1 0 6 1 6 1 0.100 0.273 < 0.005 N / A < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.025 < 0.025 0.007 0.094 < 0.005 N / A < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.025 < 0.025 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 Oil & Grease Chloride Aluminum FpH s 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 12 10 1 1 5 1 2 1 9.83 9.69 1.8 21.0 26 139 0.75 0.29 N/A N/A 1.8 21.0 12 139 0.43 0.29 0 0 0 0 NIA N/A N/A NIA 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A NIA NIA Fluoride Barium Beryllium Antimony 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1st 6 months 2nd 6 months 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0.84 N/A <0.625 NIA <0.001 N/A 0.005 N/A 0.84 N/A <0.625 N/A <0.001 N/A 0.005 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A "--r- N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA NIA BDL => Below Detection Limit mg/I => milligrams per Inter • POTW must enter at least one of these IUP => Industrial User Permit lb/d => pounds per day four rows, Please indicate how averages were calculated SNC => Significant Non -Compliance mgd => million gallons per day Avg period could be month, Qtr, or 6-month & if BDL, 1 /2BDL, or zero values used. TRC => Technical Review Criteria WWTP => wastewater treatment plant lb Chapter: PAR Guidance File name: PAR_IDSF.xlsdbmoieh rt, ltrhgpd:r 9, section B, pages 12, 13, 14 Blank IDSF Form, Copy and use in your PAR Number each set for each IUP pipe - Page of � MOOR'E COUNTY wATER��UTiaN GONTROL PLANT S. R. 1100, 4 MILES S-E OF PINEBLUFF, W. CAR. 28373 po�,�♦° de 5�P a 4P� � o l,0-13.4 L0-1a.4 10-13.4 m1.0-13.4 m m q q. . m.q 9 Sr%YAGE PVT I i Return Activated 0.6.7m d. I B.0. . Moke-U .0-1.4m.c.d. Igeturn Activoled I I I I I i i l I -ISPOSAL t—PRIMARY SLUDGE 1 I WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE �J I • t I SLUDGE ANAEROBIC THICKENER DIGESTER SLUDGE DRYING BEDS Drainage to Raw Sewage Influent - PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC 1.0 —11 m-9-T L EFFLU ENT , Discharge Uli 1 6.7 MGD ° I- u x i t1pphcat:ion ° L-trr111U Subtitled 'T" 16 ADDENDUM 1 NPDES PERMIT # NCO037508 REQUEST FOR RENEWAL January 2,2004 Sludge Management Plan: The Sludge Management Plan for the Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant consists of two items. 1. Disposal of Sludge in a Subtitle D Landfill. 2. Land Application Permit (Permit #WQ0018018) which has never been used. If you have any questions concerning our Sludge Management Plan do not hesitate to call James D. Frye at 910-281-3146.