NC0036935_Wasteload Allocation_19920522

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCO036935
PERMI= NAME: Pine Mountain Property Owners Association
FACILITY NAME: Pine Mountain Lakes Development W WTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity:
Minor `1
0.0696 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 100 %
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
STREAM INDEX: 11-129-2-(4)
RECEIVING STREAM:Jacob Fork
Class: WS-IIIORW
Sub -Basin: 03-08-35
Reference USGS Quad: E12SE, Casar (please attach)
County. Burke
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 8/31/92 Treatment Plant Class: 11
Classification changes within three miles:
Drops to WS-III at Camp Creek. ca. 10 mi.
Requested by Jule
Prepared b ° A,
�Cw I3S
wGL�eZ �-
Dare: 3/16/92
Date: 9L
Date: a0
� oZ-
Modeler
I Date Rec.
I #
tJ
I 3 /6 L
I(v
Drainage Area (mil ) 16 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): -�2•`f
7Q10 (cfs) Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 9,S 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
30
NH3-N (mg/1)
AV*7 All-
D.O. (mg/1)
h✓
TSS (mg/1)
30
F. Col. V100 ml)
pH (SU)
6
Comments:
refer: Basinwide / Streamline WLA file
at front of subbasin

FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 6823
Facility Name:
Pine Mountain Lakes Development W WTP
NPDES No.:
NC0036935
Type of Waste:
Domestic - 100%
Facility Status:
Existing
Permit Status:
Renewal
Receiving Stream:
Jacob Fork
Stream Classification:
WSIIIORW
Subbasin:
030835
County:
Burke
Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office:
Asheville
USGS #
Requestor:
Shanklin
Date:
Date of Request:
3/16/92
Drainage Area (mi2):
16.6
Topo Quad:
E12SE
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
6.5
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
9.5
Average Flow (cfs):
32.4
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
1.6
Wasteload Allocation Summary &)— �
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility requesting renewal of existing NPDES permit. Tech Support recommends renewal of
existing limits. rpr 0a.) qMX&-j- p F .FJ w luat'CS veal %`� � �•
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: r\3
Recommended byA///
a
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional
Permits
RETURN TO
Date: 4/14/92_
~a.
=Y
O
Ca

� f r-
Existing Limits:
Waseeflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/l):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. 000 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1)
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
0.0696
30
monitor
nr
30
1000
6-9
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
0.0696
30
monitor
nr
30
200
6-9
LanDiue To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
WQ or EL
Fecal coliform
X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity
of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
••
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Ad�uacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility 4elhonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities. Yes No
If no, wti,hparameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _N _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

0
�ST�a
4fAM QUO n �
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
May 5, 1992
Mr. Steve Rohaly, Executive Manager
Pine Mountain Property Owners Association
Route 1, Box 205
Connelly Springs, North Carolina 28612
Subject: Effluent Limitations
Pine Mountain Lakes
Burke County
Dear Mr. Rohaly:
Ann B. Orr
Regional Manager
The Asheville Regional Office recently received the effluent
limitations proposed for Pine Mountain Lakes Development's new
wastewater discharge permit. A copy of those limitations is attached.
The proposed effluent restrictions differ from existing limits as
follows:
Parameter Existing Limitation Proposed Limitation
Fecal Coliform 1000 organisms/100 ml 200 organisms/100 ml
The fecal coliform limit change is due to a more restrictive water
quality standard which became effective on October 1, 1989. Review of
Pine Mountain Lake Development's data for the period April, 1991
through March, 1992 suggested that compliance with the new coliform
limitation would not require equipment or operational modifications.
Your attention to this item is appreciated. Please contact me at
telephone [phone] if there are questions concerning the proposed
wastewater discharge permit.
Sincerely,
James James R. Reid
Environmental Chemist
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

�N A141, b4C S Z)kl,

�N za/�f Au. �16JI7 tM/V
�� S% � ��- G�+=mac..✓ � � G� Sl ,_/�0 y� �j li r> � ��
l

pine mt. lake dev. wwtp
AMMONIA ANALYSIS
7Q10: 6.5000 cfs
NH3 Effl. Conc: 3.6000 mg/l
AL (1/1.8 mg/1) : 1000.00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc.: 220.0000 ug/1
Design Flow: 0.0696 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 275.18 ug/l
0.275181 mg/1
NH3 Limit: 47996.66 ug/1
47.99666 mg/1
AMMONIA ANALYSIS (WINTER)
7Q10: 9.5000 cfs
NH3 Effl. Conc: 3.6000 mg/1
AL (1/1.8 mg/1) : 1800.00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc.: 220.0000 ug/1
Design Flow: 0.0696 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 257.95 ug/1
0.257951 mg/1
NH3 Limit: 140936.0 ug/1
140.9360 mg/1

pine mt. lakes dev. wwtp
CHLORINE ANALYSIS
7Q10: 6.5000 cfs
CL2 Effl. Conc: 1.2000 mg/1
AL (17/19 ug/1) : 17.0000 ug/1
Upstream CL2 Conc.: 0.0000 ug/1
Design Flow: 0.0696 MGD
Predicted CL2 Downstream: 19.59 ug/l
0.019591 mg/l
CL2 Limit: 1041.286 ug/l
1.041286 mg/1