20151226 Ver 1_401 Application_20151115

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC
Environmental Consultants
November 201h, 2015
TO: Mr. John Policarpo
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
'Oup, '0V
6'
RE: NWP 18 Application; Rourk Woods Subdivision; Lot 51 (Brunswick County)
Applicant: Bill Clark Homes
Dear Mr. Policarpo:
NOV g p 2015
Enclosed is a NWP 18 application for your review. This application is submitted on behalf of Bill
Clark Homes in order to construct a single-family residence on Lot 51 located within the Rourk Woods
Subdivision in Shallotte, NC. Because of the amount and location of wetlands within the lot, 0.048 acre
of 404 wetland fill is needed to construct the home. The applicant proposes buying into the Stone Farm
Regional Mitigation Bank to mitigate for proposed impacts.
The Pre -Construction Notification form, associated maps, and site plan are enclosed for your
review. Note that Kyle Dahl approved the wetland line in April but a JD has not yet been issued. Please
contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sinc rely,
Kim Williams
Environmental Scientist
Encl
Cc: Landon Weaver, Bill Clark Homes
Chad Coburn, DWR
Jennifer Burdette, DWR
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403

\VN4 A -r6�9
61
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no,
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
11 fil
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing NUV 3 0 tu'l
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: Section 404 Permit F1 Section 10 Pemi'�,
0:F_- 0U '3C
J
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 or General Permit (GP) number.- G
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? n Yes No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
E] 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular EJ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
E] 401 Water Quality Certification — Express El Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
0 Yes ❑ No M Yes 0 No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation Yes El No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h Yes El No
below.
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? E]Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project.- Rourk Woods; Lot 51
2b. County: Brunswick County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Shallotte
2d. Subdivision name: Rourk Woods Subdivision
2e, NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state N/A
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Bill Clark Homes of Wilmington LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3422 0687
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Mr. Landon Weaver
3d. Street address: 200 E. Arlington Boulevard; Suite A
3e. City, state, zip: i Greenville, NC 27858
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address.
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
1
I
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address.-
ddress:4e.
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
1
I
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
1I
Kim Williams I
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Land Management Group, Inc. 1
1
5c.
Street address:
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
5d.
City, state, zip:
1I
Wilmington, NC 28403 1
5e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID)
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
1c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
3. Project Description
213GA051
Latitude: 33.954040 N, Longitude: -78.407273 W
(DD DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
0.23 ac
The Mill Pond
C; Sw; HQW
Lumber
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application.-
The
pplication:The site is currently undeveloped and forested. The lot is located within an existing residential subdivision and adjacent
land use is residential or undeveloped.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.12 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
N/A
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a single-family house within the lot. Because of the amount of
wetlands within the lot, wetland impacts are needed.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project includes the construction of a 1,900-sf single-family residence, driveway, porch, and patio. Track hoe, loader,
dump truck, bob cat, and other standard construction equipment will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ❑ Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Rob Moul Land Management Group, Inc.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Kyle Dahl of the USACE visited the site on 4/29/2015 and verbally approved the wetland line.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for I ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Earlier in 2015, the project engineer for the HOA coordinated with Kyle Dahl to use a non -notifying NWP 3 to maintain the
stormwater conveyance system. No permanent wetland impacts were needed.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
Page 4 of 11

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 ®P ❑ T Fill for house
Non -riparian
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.048
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.048
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts N/A
If there are perennial or intermittent stream
impacts (including
temporary impacts)
proposed on the site, then complete
this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b.
3c.
3d.
3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10 stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404, width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other) (feet)
feet)
S1 ❑P❑T
S2 ❑P❑T
S3 ❑PFIT
S4 ❑P❑T
S5 ❑P❑T
3i. Comments
❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts N/A
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds,
estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b.
4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable)
Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts 1
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction N/A
If pond or ake construction proposed, the i complete the chart below.
5a. 5b.
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
❑❑
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
1
1
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) N/A
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d.
6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason
Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary (T) impact
required?
F-1 Yes 1
131 ❑P❑T
❑ No
F-1 Yes
B2 ❑P❑T
❑ No
❑ Yes 1
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant has attempted to minimize wetland impacts as much as possible in the site design while still abiding by
local building setbacks. Note that a previous USACE-approved wetland delineation in 2004 showed a lower wetland line
in this location and also classified this wetland pocket as isolated. Since then, roads were constructed around the pocket
and culverts installed under the roads were placed at incorrect elevations, which caused water to back up in the wetlands.
When wetlands were redelineated in 2015, LMG found a larger amount of wetlands. Note also that Kyle Dahl with the
USACE determined that the wetland pocket was no longer isolated.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Silt fencing will be used during construction to reduce sediment from eroding into adjacent wetland areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
❑ DWQ ® Corps
® Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) I Type: Non -riparian I Quantity: 0.1 ac
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program N/A
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan N/A
❑Cold
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ N/A
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires I ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet) 11
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) 1I
Zone 2 1.5 11
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: I
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan N/A
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? —30%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Rourk Woods Subdivision already has stormwater permit, which allows up to 4,750 sf of impervious cover for this lot (they
propose 3,105 sf).
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review N/A
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes
❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review N/A
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session
Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes
®No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review N/A
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes
❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) El Yes ❑ No
Comments: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project will not provide access or utilities to adjacent properties. No future wetland impacts are needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated by this project ties into the local municipality.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program GIS layer was used to determine the presence of federally -listed species. No federally
listed species are known to occur within the lot or within a one -mile radius of the lot. Several historical records exist of
state -listed species within a one -mile radius of the lot. Additionally, four natural communities and the Sandy Branch Sand
Ridge and Bay Complex are known to occur within a one mile radius of the site (to the south and west).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper GIS program was used to determine the presence of Essential Fish
Habitat. No EFH is known to occur within or near the site.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS mapping resource was used to determine the presence of
cultural or historic resources. No cultural or historical resources were noted within or adjacent to the site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? I ❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The NC Floodplain Mapping Information System
website was used to determine the boundaries of the 100 -year floodplain.
Kim Williams 11/17/2015
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )
Page 11 of 11

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Uwe, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group, Inc. to act as our agent in the
preparation and representation of information related to the Section 404/401 permit application
for the Rourk Woods Subdivision; Lot 51 project. All questions in regards to this project should
be directed to Land Management Group, Inc.
Sincerely,
Owner/Applicant
,FILL_ (2zA2X gmFC of 1,4A LM)'-0nZ tI. LLC
Print Name 3� 61H eVL b a�, "A"41a"
Date

N MgRy"S SW esrw °MrtP CA9 MO/1C''ELEM IT v. .v
CHURCH ST d ,TLAND,�,"B /NET 35 PAGES,59_614' ,,,
MAR
OF CHURCH •�• •v �' tAST COAST ENGE MAXPREPAR
W — E �. v. .vMROU NR��1ANOR/ NG onda'SURIYJNG .v
P. C
S oe2 AB UFDDA �Yti .�. .v /6 RK WOODS�ROT�PPR7-Y pWNER SU�'Y FOR.
y
DirjF SJ' PLEASANT T04/L24/�$'OC1A,V0N
O pJ
CHURCH
IANC Sp PINE LAKE DR. SW \ P
L Ji f 0z- 1L 1L
MAPLE HILL R� L L L Ji L
Q .�. \�C�� E' "v 7446 `$5'02 "� 'I,'
y3P�78,94'
,
� GP�•� .v .v 784 .v E �'R.v •v _ •v
41
VICINITY MAP NO SCALE PA 77901 � 200± Sq. Ft
AREWSED: ADD NEW p * LOT 51
WETLAND LINE y 10,Z24+ �q. Ft.
06/29/15 C14
2� REVISED: NEW ^� �,,';; mq�'w W?LAN�'
FOUNDA TION ��°���:'
z
CALCULATE vIMPA�T
210± $Ft.
WETLAND .�: �� ' %4/. q 141,
IMPACT AREA
08/31/15 � FO
.v
U ��, . , pI�V��,.;� >,
LOT 50N 7HE JACK $ lV A �' LO' 52
A,3REVISED: 09/04/15 : �' � 1,90
IMPACT AREA MAP
FRONT
A4REVISED: 09/16/15 PORCH
VACANT LOT SURVEY 162± Sq. Ft. '
WALK—6 WETLAND LINE
A5REWSED: 10/29/15 69± DA TED: 04/24/15
ADD BOOKSHEL VES Sq. Ft. !,o
and FIREPLACE R/W •.. • . s' R/W _
Err R• - S40'06'53"W; 87•.:'5'
a,- ; DRI VEWA Y
N 774± Sq. Ft.
H_EYWARD STREET
o (50' PUBLIC R/W)
Survev Reference
MAP CABINET 35 O NO TES.
PAGES 59-61 J 1.) THIS LOT IS NOT LOCATED /N A FLOOD
MAP PREPARED BY -I, V HAZARD AREA.
EAST COAST ENG/NEER/NG I m 2.) SETBACKS ARE ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW
and SURVEYING, P.C. CC BY RELEVANT PARTIES
MAP ENTITLED WETLAND Q CL�
DELINEATION SURVEY FOR: ZNO7FS• PER M.C. 35 PGS. 59-61 BU/LD/NG SETBACKS
ROURK WOODS PROPERTY �- 0 FRONT 30' SIDE. 8' CORNER: 15' REAR: 20'
OWNERS ASSOCIATION �- EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE and UTILITIES. 5' INS/DE
DA TED: 04/24/15 FRONT LOT LINES, 5' INS/DE ALL SIDE LOT LINES, 5'
GRAPHIC SCALE.- 1"-- 30' INS/DE REAR LOT LINES /F THE LOT HAS AN ABUTTING
LOT TO THE REAR, and 10' INSIDE REAR LOT LINES IF
774E LOT DOES NOT HAVE AN ABUTTING LOT TO THE
30 0 30 60 REAR.
Plot Plan For. PREL/M/NARY
BILL CLARK HOMESLOT 51 PLOT PONLY
ROURK-WOODS SUBDIVSION PHASE 1
SHALL07F TOWNSHIP BRUNSWICK COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA P FRE L. I M I NARY
Legend.
E.I.R. EXISTING IRON REBAR NOT FOR REAL ESTATE
I.P.S. IRON PIPE SET
IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS SALES OR CONVEYANCE
TOTAL: 3,105± Sq. Ft.
MAX• 5, 000± Sq. Ft.
MICHAEL UNDERWOOD and ASSOCIATES, PA 10/29/15
102 CINEMA DRIVE, SUITE A MICHAEL N. P.L.S.
LICENSE NUMBBERER L-2962
WILMINGTON, NC 28403 FIRM LICENSE No.: SEAL OR STAMP
PHONE. • 910-815-0650 C-0615
FAX.•910-815-0393 E-MAIL: [e-mail] ©2015 MICHAEL UNDERWOOD and ASSOCIATES, PA

Jy,
p,ryr+ N+rY � uga7'1
�yg17 N
SITE
m
j.
�L
Bm k LandN
Shallotte
1j5
Rwers Edy
GOR C lub
e r wwood
'oH course
0
AL
AL
Mammon
Golf Club
♦ 0
ai•
Sources: Esri, HERE, Del-orme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand),
TomTom, Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User
Community
*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute
Map Source: ArcGIS World Street Map SCALE 1" = 1 mile
Rourk Woods S/D; Lot 51 LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP—
Brunswick County, NC F ° mP°° C°°_°+r°°t= Figure 1
www.lmgroup.net Vicinity Map
November 2015 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 40-15-297 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

0
*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: USGS Shallotte Quadrangle 7.5 minute
Rourk Woods S/D; Lot 51
Brunswick County, NC
LMG
\h \I:\NMIi.\11 SI R, It i'
www.lmgrouo.net
November 2015 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 40-15-297 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
I
SCALE 1" = 400'
Figure 2
USGS Topographic Map

w.&
Fo R
kf
♦+ rex +., Ii•
r ,
b.
'k !14r" SA
Mu
Mu d
y IL
A66
N
4
r
KrBif
BSB
s
4 4 Lc
maR.-. ET -IL u ,�Ep1.–a Cott.Apte litu�Tclrm.03T?lft—.G ; Ann
- s ` T,� CeU.�tf'c�d e�- .T t,f� u. +o�t�le��c�i —gi f. i!
Irl

3p
00
i6.
All
Or
JL
cl.
10
RfrAMr7.,Cxz -.JArcz, 9WRpirl Cxz p-,
rlrz- ct R Uprz IC -4m Tri w

N ,
SIGMA
T ST,
ca
0
Al
N-
5CATON PL,
$5 ROF AT NW 00R?*R
OF LOT 1, D,5. ll.� R 48 z
SILVER p j
Jean C. Hardy
E. COTTON AVE
D, B, 2279, P, 840 :yqU
pj. 151, P. III
Ata
71 SUBJECT
PROPERTY
LOCATION MAP
BASIS OF BEARING; NC 3R,3 NORTH NAD 83 (NSRS 2010
BASED UPON RIK GPS QBSEF IA TIDNS,
BASIS OF ELEVATIONt NAV, 88 BASED UPON RTK GPS N<'.
%
OBSERVATIONS. pop
REBAR FO, AT COR,
OF D,B, 4916, P, 913
Leslie Wbite & Dawna Wade
D.B. 406, P. 1527
5 RBF
pz. 113, ps 46
z. 4' PVC4-
INV 2
441,0'
MANHOLEti
SEWER
TOP 24434
INV 2437y,
X11r.
P 163, P, n
INV 2436� 5,
A
5 RBF
SEWER MANHOL
TOP = 2442 g` 4
-.yr. p"
INV 2436.2'
I -C
N
T
"A `J
#5 REIF
Z
2443S'
V�
A-
n"hyP €.` ( �S�i` j///J � ",,� ^.. � .;:i."p' .4� ,' \ Vin."�.'".,d°;ro ad L EGEND
24' BLO 18- NRO
0 CMF� CONCRETE MONUMENT ,UUND
jti
X (0) RBF. . . REBAR FOUND (SIZE ,,,S NOTED)
(p) IP& IRON PIN 'AR W1 ID CAP)
24411'511�
SET(#5 RE3
T
L PF, !RON PIN FOUND
-7
A, 0 CNF, CONCRETE MDNUMENT ;7JUND
0
-N:,T SET CALCULATED POINT
24413�
FIRE HYDRANT
CNS 2440
UTILITY POLE & LlhES
12" PIP
(0 ELECTRIC METER
INV 24,35.6' Laurel Court Association
RBF
',e
GAS METER
#5 RBF
D.B. 4916, P. 913
CLEAN OUT
<
X X
R4313A� 2439,6' 28' WHO
P B, 9S. P, 91
B ,
Sarauel E. & Tracy M. Taylor WA TER VAL VE
X
B ' ::,,. '
q/
36. POP, X D.B. 5220, P. 653 0/ UNDERGROUND FIDEROPTIC MARKER
24' CMP X.., 12' OPP 'WATER METER
24 INV - 2435,9'
IN743t6
CNF I'N EXISTING MANHOLE & SEWERLINE
24° CMP STUM UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
INV = 24 5 REI
PIW
UNDERGROUND GAS
4 7, 95 REB NORTH
16 WHO OF LINESLE
h
STORM MANHOLE 24* WHO 71 ATER JNE
W W 24X w- UNDERGR17UND W
24' WHO
TOP - 2436
-C x X
P
3
24� M 2437,3' T . . . CATCH BASIN STORq DRAIN
I E435& / I
X T
�0 � I X IPS
4® PVC HVAC COMPRESSOR UN,17
INV = 24320 X 10.0' WHO/ 2437,5' HV
2437T 4�+ "Nu #5 RBF TR
26' WHO 74�67' TRANSFORMER BOX
/ 1� N "t 1,, 11� jW6 WHO
B.M. SEWER MANHOLE C�01 T 2-1 - f 11y, I TL TELCOMM B17X
20' WHIP
@ 0%
aIN Ij I I - 7,
T J CABLE PEDESTAL
Nl-� -, - -
ff 1, -< '1� - 20' PERMANENT/__ �OT 4 00 OC
TOP ELEV. 2436.2 PROPQ-cZ& tW 12' BCH
20.0' ELECTRICAL STUB
SEWER MANHOLE EKSEMENT B" 0
PROPOSE 0' r
TOP 24361'
INV 242&6* Br - EASEMENT FOR pRI
12' CPP 0' 2 UTILITY GUY WIRE
24,33.0, 111 VATE DRIVE AREA LIGHT
MH #1 2-0'37 MH #3
IOT 4 24355'
av 2 X
4� WHO B
STA. 0+00 2436Z PS CNN STA. 3+69�22 10' PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR
C.Q.RVICE LINE X 12" CHR
1W
24,30.�"
LD DINT RING 2e '.MP LOT 3
I I I F-1
I X ", 1 --1
X
37 333'
AND COVER a4 e4 r
2432.5'
EXISTING8" WATER UNE
X 00 243',
24 5?,1
XI
24' 12' BCH
43.48 L.F. BORE AND JACK \�i 436N 243111' LP 20,3'
0. OT
S 6 7'3 7'5 " E N Q 2437.4' N
24343'
24293 C, 2 S TORY X
(SEE PROFILE) FRAME 6' WHO
C-
24" WHO
36' WHO
X
24' NRO
RIP \\�,,PER, -TAI 1�18\�',02 \ I
DOT MAINTENANCE 0 BAN D' P436.6' -Z HOUSE
4* C'4 2431.7*X
U) Ix FFE X
24292' 1
EASEMENT 80: 1 \ 2431A'
U)
04
0 1 X
1 -*n 01� n
2434
M!L#2 I Lewis A. & Georgia A. Buck
'91
af STA r 24 WHO 2438.01 N 2430,4'
2437,3'
0+43.48' DR X D.B. 1706, P. 523
/12430,54-&T RING N
24' WHO -z
COVER
0 18' PINE
AWLI X Ole
18- WHO o
24' WHO WHO
24' WHO 0
M
N 0
P, */1
---I& '
�-144304'
5
A R ES
A
24 18' WJD
0 Pvc N X
1W
z 20! 24�2,9'
24i7 -.4-X- -,Z:-
U
I � 2431,W
2430. V X
AII'l/ 7--
U
0 U ev
20' WHO I
24291'
24" 242X9121
- 36' WHO 0 X
S
b SEVIER MANHOLE 6' WHO
Top
K
2433.8' PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR:
INV' 2427.4'
0
-1 v -
SETBACK LINES (SEE NOTE
IPF WIN G k
F
36 CMP t5 -
IW 2428.3'
IP5"
G ary E. & Phyllis S. Cox
4, CZ
a�paJm x;
7VIQEXISTINGFIA/PP SERVICE LINE D.R 208 1, P. 82 #5 RBFMCCONNA UGHY, IN G's
Lij W
z z
t
0 10, 10'
t:
MONTREAT RD, TYPICAL SECTION
20' PAVEMENT WIDTH
N,T.S.
H*VOL- ,AS
RECOf',NECT WITH PROPOSED SEWER LINE
AT CLEAN-OUT #1
P. B, 45, P, 6
Clint D. & Laura M.
McKinney
D.B. 4454, P. 640
U2
P,& 45, P, 6
Kristi H. Neat
D.B. 20 10, P. 485
P.I.]V. 0619-39-4983
Town of Black M I ountain, Buncombe County, NC
1 inch = 30' ft OCTOBER 7, 2015
30' 0 15' 30' 60, 120'
REFERENCESDEED BOOK 5325, PAGE 1989
:2
0
LJJ
<
>
7- 6
j
7; X1
(zko!11
a_
Cr-
Ld
l51 b5
<
Q0
0
LIJ
<4,
ly-
-j
F-
LIJ
F-
Z
V)
0
0
V)
00
:>C
0
�
00
LIJ
SHEET
LIJ
V)
4 -
in
00
00
C\j
4-1
CJ
cf)Aa
r .. 4
0
cf)
C)
CIO
C'2
06
>1
4--1
00
(A)
CIO
0
---
>
X
r
I >
LO
Uj
ea
®>
0
CY)
0.
:2
0
LJJ
<
>
7- 6
j
7; X1
(zko!11
a_
Cr-
Ld
l51 b5
<
Q0
0
LIJ
<4,
ly-
-j
F-
LIJ
:2
0
LJJ
<
>
0
j
0
N
a_
Cr-
Ld
0
<
Q0
0
LIJ
ly-
Lo
F-
LIJ
F-
Z
V)
0
0
V)
00
:>C
0
�
00
LIJ
SHEET
LIJ
V)
L0
cl-
j
0
N
Cr-
Ld
0
Q0
0
LIJ
0
Lo
0
0
Z
0
0
0
..
W
U5
>
W
:>C
C
ly-
SHEET

BASE FLOOD ELEV. 2437
CONSTRUCT NEW MANHOLE OVER EXISTING 8" LINE
NO "DOG -HOUSING" 'LLOWED.
CONTRACTOR VERIFY INVERT OF EXIS-NG LINE
im
0+60
ffilm
i - 2,0 1+50 1+80 2+10
2+40
mm
irm
im
4+20
94r,�
2415
1-20 1+50 1+80 2+10 2+40 2+70 3+00 3+30 3+60 3+90 4+20
SCA _E: 1"=30' HORIZ.
1"=5' VERT.
E
SEWER WORK TO BE PERFORMw, D BY A LICENSED N.C. UTILITY CONTRACTOR.
SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREKENTS OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT SUPERCEDE
-_HERS IN CONSTRUCTION OF PR"'(�OSED EXTENSION.
_,Y CROSSING CLEARANCE REQI_ REMENTS ARE TO BE MET OR FERROUS SEWER PIPE WITH
EQUIVALENT TO WATER MAIN S-ANDARDS WILL BE USED FOR A DISTANCE OF 10 FEET
SAID POINT OF CROSSING.
SEWERS 24 --INCHES VERTIC-',-
18-iNCHES VERTICA­
"S E
AER OVER WATER REQUIRES THk,- BOTH PIPES SHALL BE FERROUS PIPE
'NA 2C -FOOT jOINTLESS SPAN `JTERING AT CROSSING).
C
24 --INCHES VERTIC/-_
G A 24 -INCHES VERTIC41_
24 -INCHES VERTIC-'-
-�:_-'\,CHFD VERTICAL 18 -INCHES
SLOPE OF EMBANKMENT OR Cl,-",,, OF 2 FEET OR MORE VERTICAL
.,17 - 10 FEET
v ',AjI`J SIPARATION DISTANCES FRJM ALL SEWER COLLECTION STSTEMS ARE TO BE MET OR
_0US SEWER PIPE WITH JOINTS 11VALENT TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS WILL BE USED.
tvj SJjFRS 5 -FEET rCRIZONTAL
MAINS 10FEE"HORIZONTAL
TING FOUNDATIONS 5 FEET �,ORIZONTAL
Mc! _N _'
I 10 FEE` HORIZONTAL
Nr WATFR LOWERING
SURFACE DRAINAGE DITCH 10-1-EET HORIZONTAL
S.'VIOG POOL 10 -FEE- HORIZONTAL
RCU_PTION DRAINS 10 - FEE - HORIZONTAL
SHEF_-I FOR LOCATION OF 10,' -YEAR FLOOD PLANE,
:1 ENJIRL PERMANENT EASEMENT :0RRIDOR MUST BE CLEARED AND
VAN CLEAR OF TREE PLANTINGS AND PERMANENT STRUCTURES.
_-T ,
�OjFC' IS ASSIGNED MSD PFJECT NO. 2015126
v,l INFORMATION
.'t N:= ,N,_) VCCONNALJGHY
3",' HE HWY 70 E
3 .1 .✓, MCUNT-AIN, NC 28711
828-273-2997
VA�OHIE19EWINGMCCONNAUGHY.0 -IM
J7,9 -39-4983
1, n
v i
LL_
0
I ­
Ln
z
Lo
LJ
3.
Lj
<
0
V)
N
0
CL
LiJ
z
0
Ld
0
[If
z
M
0
3::
Lli
Z
0
0:2
cr-
SHEET
V)
00
or_o
00
LLJ
:5
Lli
V)
00
4-1
cic$
CIO
0 1 0
+
Na
0
E
ct
c
1-0
.:z
­" >
"T
Li
CIO
C\l
_
1, n
v i
LL_
0
I ­
Ln
z
Lo
LJ
3.
Lj
<
0
V)
N
0
CL
LiJ
z
0
Ld
0
[If
z
M
0
3::
Lli
Z
0
0:2
cr-
SHEET
V)
00
or_o
00
LLJ
:5
Lli
V)
2or4
LL_
0
Ln
Lo
LJ
3.
0
NLd
0
V)
N
0
LiJ
z
0
<
Z
0
z
0
z
M
0
3::
<
cn
cr-
SHEET
2or4