20151245 Ver 1_Application_20151202

iransportatian
November 30, 2015
Mr. Tom Steffens
NCDOT Coordinator
Washington Regulatory Field Office
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
2407 W Sth Street
Washington, NC 27889-1000
Dear Sir:
PRT McCRC7RY
Covernor
N[CHQ�.AS J. TEI'JNYSQN
Secretary
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit (NWP) 23 and Section 401 Water Quality
Certification for the replacement of Bridge No. 29 over Little Fishing Creek on NC 561
in Halifax County; TIP Project B-4761; Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-561(18); Debit
$240 from WBS 38533.1.1.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace existing Bridge
No. 29 over Fishing Creek on NC 561 in Halifax County. The project involves replacement of the
existing 198-foot bridge and approaches with a new 210 foot bridge. The roadway approaches will
be improved by widening the travel lanes and shoulders for approximately 356 feet from the
western end of the new bridge and 334 feet from the eastern. This will provide for two 12-foot
travel lanes and eight-foot shoulders (two-feet paved, six-foot turfj.
Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Form, USFWS concurrence letter, DMS Acceptance Letter, permit drawings, buffer
drawings, stonnwater management plan, and roadway plans for the project. A Programinatic
Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed for this project on September 30, 2014 and distributed
shortly thereafter. This project calls for a letting date of June 21, 2016 and a review date of May 3,
2016; however, the let date may advance as additional funding becomes available.
Proj ect construction will require 0.12 acre of fill and 0.05 acre of inechanized landclearing in
wetlands. The project will have allowable riparian buffer impact to 3,608 sq. ft. in zone 1 and
1,750 sq. ft. in zone 2.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway
Administration as a"Categarical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The NCDOT
requests that the project be authorized by NW 23 for bridge construction.
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3891 will apply to this project.
Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer authorization will also be needed for impacts to riparian buffers.
�Nothing �Cornpares�,�
State of Nortlt Carolina I Depadment of Transportation � PDEA-Natural Environment Section
1020 Birch Ridge Drive, 27610 I 1598 Mail Service Center � Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
919-707-6000 T 919-212-5785 F

A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT Website at
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Pages/default.aspx, under Quick Links > Permit
Applications. A copy of the PCE is also available at the above website address under Quick Links
> Environmental Documents. Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Gordon Cashin at [phone].
Sincerely,
-For Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List.

�o� vvArE�,� Office Use Only:
� � 4 � Corps action ID no.
i�. � i � r DWQ project no.
� � Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 29 over Little Fishing Creek on NC 561
2b. County: Halifax
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Hollister
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_4761
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable
applicable):
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.278938 Longitude: -77.908653
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 5.3 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Little Fishing Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, NSW
2c. River basin: Tar Pamlico River Basin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Forested with some agricultural and residential
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.44 acre.8
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
200
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a structurally deficient bridge.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing a 198-foot bridge with a 210-foot bridge on the existing alignment with an off-site detour.
Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained fo�r this property / � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments: Requesting a preliminary JD at permitting
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NCDOT
Name (if known): Chris Underwood Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands � Streams - tributaries � Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem orar T
Site 1� P � T Bridge & fill riparian � Yes � Corps 0.12
❑ No � DWQ
Mechanized � Yes � Corps
Site 1� P � T riparian 0.05
clearing ❑ No � DWQ
Site 3❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 5❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 6❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.17 Perm.
0.0 Temporary
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average �mpact length
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width
Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet)
other)
Site 1❑ P� T Bridge & fill Little Fishing � PER � Corps 30 0.03 ac
Creek ❑ INT � DWQ
Site 1❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 3❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 5❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 6❑ P 0 T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0.0 Perm
0.03 Temp
3i. Comments:

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number— waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Temporary T
01 ❑P�T
02 ❑POT
03 ❑P�T
04 ❑P�T
4f. Total open water impacts 0.0 Permanent
0.0 Temporary
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction roposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond Excavat
Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
im acts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse � Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem orar T) re uired?
B1 � P❑ T Bridge Little Fishing � Nos 3,608 1,750
Creek
B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts 3,608 1,750
6i. Comments:

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed bridge is longer than the existing bridge with fewer spans; the proposed bridge will be at approximately the
same grade as the existing structure; an off site detour will be used.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Design Standards for Sensitive Watershed will be implemented.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
If no, ex lain:
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ � Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.34 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached permit drawings.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW
(check all that apply): ❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) � Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
10

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
� Yes ❑ No
� Yes ❑ No
� Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS County Site, NC Natural Heritage site
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes � No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? I� Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
�'� Richard Hancock � -_ '�'� _. =��m�` � �� 3� ' 2 0 � �
,� .---
— _- _
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is nrovided.l
11

Environmental
Quality
PAT MCCRORY
GOvernor
DONALD R, VAN D�R VAART
Secretary
October 21, 2015
Mr. Richard W. Hancock, P.E.
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Hancock:
Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-4761, Repiace Bridge 29 on NC 561 over Little Fishing Creek, Halifax County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide the
compensatory wetland mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on October 21,
2015, the impacts are located in CU 03020102 of the Tar-Pamlico River basin in the Northern Inner Coastal Plain
(CP) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Tar-Pamlico Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
03020102 Non- Coastal
�Cp Cold Cool W� �P�� � arian Mazsh Zone 1 Zone 2
Impacts 0 0 0 0.17 � 0 0 0 0
feedacres)
*Some of the stream impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio, See pemut application for
details.
DMS commits to implementing sufficient compensatory riparian wetland mitigation credits to offset the
impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies in accordance with the Tn-Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance
letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from DMS.
If you have any questions or need addiiional information, please contact Beth Hannon at 919-707-8420.
Sincerely,
James . Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Mr. Tom Steffens, USACE — Washington Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Amy Chapman, NCDWR
File: B-4761
!'�''Nothing Compares°=�.�
State ot tdorlti Caiolin� � En.�iionmental Quaiily
1601 Mail Serii<e Cenrer ; Faleigii. Nortii Catolina ?IFi99� 1601
. 4119J07 Sf:00

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Cai�olina ?7636-3726
July 22, 2014
Ricl�ard W. Hai�cock, P.E.
Nort11 Carolina Department of Transpoi•tatioi7
Project Develop�ne�lt aud Environmental Analysis
1598 Mail Seivice Center
Raleigh, Nortl� Carolina 27699-1598
Dear Mr. Hancock:
This letter is in response to your letter of July 14, 2014 which provided the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service) with the biological conclusion of the North Carolina Department of Transpor-tation that the
t•eplacement of Bridge No. 29 oi� NG561 over Little Fishing Creek in Halifax County (TIP No. B-4761)
may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the federally endangered dwarf wedgemussel
(Alasn�idonta heteroc�o�) and Tar Rive1• spinyinussel (Elliptio steinsiansa�a). These co�ntnents are
pi•ovided in accordai�ce with Section 7 of tl�e Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531-1543).
According to information pt•ovided, a mussel survey was conducted at the project site on Apri124, 2014.
The survey extended 100 meteis upstream and 400 meters downstr•eam of NG561. Although five species
of mussels were observed, ueither of tl�e federally listed species was found. While suitable habitat was
present in tl�e survey reach, the habitat in the immediate vicinity of tl�e bridge was poor. However, the
Tar Rivei• spinymussel has recently been observed in Little Fishing Creek approximately 10.5 miles
downstream. While not known to occur in Little Fishing Creek, the dwarf wedgemussel has been recently
obse�ved in a tributary to Little Fishing Creek approximately 5.0 miles upstream of NG561.
Based on the mussel sui•vey reslilts and other available informatioil, the Seivice conciu•s with youi•
conclusion that the proposed bridge replacement may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the dwat•f
wedgemussel and Tai• Rivei• spinymussel. We believe tliat the r•equirements of Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA
have been satisfied. We remind you that obligations under Section 7 consultation must be reconsidered
if: (1) new infori��ation reveals iinpacts of this identified action that tnay affect listed species ar critical
l�abitat in a mannei• not previously considered in this review; (2) tl�is action is subsequently modified in a
inanner that was not considered in tliis review; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat determined
that may be affected by this identi�ed action.
The Sej•vice appreciates the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions regarding oui•
response, please contact Mz�. Gai•y Jo►•dan at [phone] (Ext. 32).
Sincei•ely,
. -�i �� �,_ ��
r � r{ �
/
�fe- Pete Benjamin
� Field Supervisor

Electronic copy:
Tom Steffens, USACE, Washington, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Cr•eedmoor, NC
Ron Lucas, FHWA, Raleigh, NC

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Gordon Cashin, NCDOT, 1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CESAW-RG-L
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
TIP: B-4761 Description: Replace Bridge No. 29 over Little Fishing Creek on
NC 561
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Halifax City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 36.278959, °N, Long. : -77.908626 ° W
Universal Transverse Mercator: NA
Name of nearest waterbody: Little Fishing Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: See table, linear feet: 44
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: 0.44 acres.
Cowardin Class: Forested
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: N/A
Non-Tidal: N/A
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date:
❑ Field Determination Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this

preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
�

SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24000;
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey
Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or ❑ Other (Name &
Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
� Other informafiion (please specify): Figure 3 and Tables 5& 6 from the
Natural Resources Technical Report showing jurisdictional areas.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified bv the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
3
.
�� C -� � `��/5
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Estimated
Cowardin amount of
Site Name Latitude Longitude Class aquatic Class of aquatic resource
resource in
review area
36.278549 -77.909347
WA oN oW PF01 E 0.08 acre(s) non-section 10 — wetland
36.278862° -77.909267
WB N oW PF01 0.36 acre(s) non-section 10 — wetland
36278959 -77.908626
S oN oW 200 linear feet non-section 10 — non-wetlan
�N �W
°N °W acre(s)
°N °W acre(s)
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal
°N - °W acre(s) section 10 — tidal

k 11�;11�� <14' North Carolina Department of Transportation
Sl[?l"llitYel�'Pf �.���
Highway Stormwater Program �.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.02; Released April 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 38533.1.1 TIP No.: B-4761 County(ies): Halifax Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element: 38533.1.1 TIP Number: B-4761 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 7/13/2015
NCDOT Contact: Jonathan L. Moore, PE Contractor I Designer:
Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Dr. Address:
Raleigh, NC 27610
Phone: [phone] Phone:
Email: 'Imoore6 ncdot. ov Email:
Cit ITown: Hollister Count ies): Halifax
River Basin s: Tar-Pamlico CAMA County? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Description
Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.269 miles Surroundin Land Use: �Nooded/Agricultural
Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site
Pro'ect Buiit-Upon Area ac. 1.3 ac. 1.0 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: Two 12' lanes with 2' paved shoulders. The proposed bridge will have two 12' lanes with Two 11.5' lanes with 1.5' paved shoulders.
6' shoulders.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: 3100 Year: 2035 Existin : 2590 Year: 2016
General Project Narrative: The existing roadway consists of 2-11.5' lanes and 1.5' paved shouders. Existing bridge #29 is 198' long with a clear roadway of 25'. The existing bridge has deck drains on 6'
(Description of Minimization of Water centers on both sides along the entire length of the structure. The proposed roadway typical consists of 2-12' lanes, 2' paved shoulder shoulders, and 6' grass shoulders.
Quality Impacts) Proposed structure #29 is a 210' long bridge with 12' lanes and 6' shoulders. There will be no direct discharge into the stream. Runoff along the roadway is to be treated by
grass shoulders. 0.22 acres of runoff that is to be collected from the bridge will be discharged onto a rip rapped pad 25' outside of Buffer Zone 2 in the southwest quadrant.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): Little Fishing Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 28-79-25
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments: None
Aquatic T&E Species? Yes Comments: Tar River Spinymussel and Drwarf Wedgemussel (may affect-not likely to affect)
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: Tar-Pamlico
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? No
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)

�
�
See Sheet 9A f�or Index of Shects
TO ESSEX
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4761
����� �� ����� ��������
���%�5�� � �� �I� ���������YS
HALIFAX CO U1�TY
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO. 29 OVER LITTLE FISHI11lG CREEK
011t 111C 56l
TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVIIVG AND STRUCTURE
WETLAND & STREAM IMPACTS
-L- STA. 12 + 90.00 �
�
_
� S ITE 1
V
h
�/
—L—_NC 561
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA. 19 + 06.00
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA
50 25 0 50 l00 ADT 2016 = 2,590
`ItIT�I� ADT 2035 = 3,100
PLANS K = 10 %
D = 55 %
SO 2S � 5O �OO T= �H %*
V = 60 MPH
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =10% DUAL =8%
l0 5 p l0 2o FUNC CLASS =
MINOR ARTERIAL
PROFILE (VERTICAL) REGIONAL TIER
0
END BRIDGE
-L- STA. 21 +
T2 E PROIECT REFERENCE NO.
�� B-4761
PROI. NO. . w. PROI. NO.
38533.1.1 � BRSTP-561(lE
38533.2.1
END TIP PROJECT B-4761 5
-L- STA. 2 9+ 2 0. 00
_ _ ___ NC __4__ __ _ _ TO SR 1315
---- -----
, ��
�, � �
,' , \
�� � � �
� , �,c�
,���,
,, � �
,, , �
�
� �
� C
S6
I
- CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
- THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDRIES.
PROJECT LENGTH Prepared in /he Office of:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
/000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4761 = 0.269 MILES zmz sznxnnan sr�crFrca�,o,vs
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4761 = 0.040 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4761 = 0.309 MILES RIGHT OF WAY DATE: REKHA PATEL PE
MAY 19 � 2 O� S PROJECT ENGfNEER
LETTING DATE: SAMUEL L. ST. CLAIR
J U N E 21. 2 016 PROJECT DESIGN ENGlNEER
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.
�
EscRIPT1oN
PE
& UTIL
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 6
����.d������ ��.���
DO NOT L�SE FOR CONSTRUCTTON

r�r 0 2.5 5 PROJ. REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
N ����1� B-4761 X-2
�
5 1 1 1 1 5
ERM T D WI G
I
— — .0: .0� _ _ _ —.
� —z —
— ; —. —
_ — _ _ _
—. — _
3•. /7/ 2 .�
-- - -- -- -- j -- -
�- .
ME HA IZ D
�----
I �
3•. /7/ 5 � 3:7
I
i � I
� _ — — — �
— ,— — — I-
+
FILL I ET N E HA IZE
L AR N
CL AR NG
i
•1 � �
/7 /6 3:7
, � I
—�— -- -- -- --
_ �
_ _ — —.
_ _ �
�
3 � �
� /7 /5 �7 �
� �
�
� -- -- �` j
�
� — — — — —
� I � — I
� —
� � � _
� — — —
�� �
�,�
��
��
�L
��
�Q
�z
��
�"�
� —
��
��
�� s s s � , i i i s

PE RMIT D RAW I N G B-476/
RNJ SHEET NO.
S H E ET � O F � ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC
ENGINEER ENGINEER
1P]E�IEII.d1�1[IN�IB� ll�b,AN�
DO NOT USE FO CONSTRUCTION

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 14+90 to 20+10 -L- Bridge and Roadway Fill 0.12 0.05 0.03 44
TOTALS*: 0.12 0.05 0.03 0 44 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Revised 2013 10 24

�
�
See Sheet 9A f�or Index of Shects
TO ESSEX
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4761
����� �� ����� ��������
���%�5�� � �� �I� ���������YS
HALIFAX CO U1�TY
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO. 29 OVER LITTLE FISHI11lG CREEK
011t 111C 56l
TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVIIVG AND STRUCTURE
-L- STA. 12 + 90.00 �
�
_
� SITE
V
h
�/
—L—_NC 561
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA. 19 + 06.00
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA
50 25 0 50 l00 ADT 2016 = 2,590
`ItIT�I� ADT 2035 = 3,100
PLANS K = 10 %
D = 55 %
SO 2S � 5O �OO T= �H %*
V = 60 MPH
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =10% DUAL =8%
l0 5 p l0 2o FUNC CLASS =
MINOR ARTERIAL
PROFILE (VERTICAL) REGIONAL TIER
0
BUFFER IMPACTS
4
1
END BRIDGE
-L- STA. 21 +
T2 E PROIECT REFERENCE NO.
�� B-4761
PROI. NO. . w. PROI. NO.
38533.1.1 � BRSTP-561(lE
38533.2.1
END TIP PROJECT B-4761 5
-L- STA. 2 9+ 2 0. 00
_ _ ___ NC __4__ __ _ _ TO SR 1315
---- -----
, ��
�, � �
,' , \
�� � � �
� , �,c�
,���,
,, � �
,, , �
�
� �
� C
S6
I
- CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
- THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDRIES.
PROJECT LENGTH Prepared in /he Office of:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
/000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4761 = 0.269 MILES zmz sznxnnan sr�crFrca�,o,vs
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4761 = 0.040 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4761 = 0.309 MILES RIGHT OF WAY DATE: REKHA PATEL PE
MAY 19 � 2 O� S PROJECT ENGfNEER
LETTING DATE: SAMUEL L. ST. CLAIR
J U N E 21. 2 016 PROJECT DESIGN ENGlNEER
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.
�
EscRIPT1oN
PE
& UTIL
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 3
����.d������ ��.���
DO NOT L�SE FOR CONSTRUCTTON

N
�
�
PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET 1
B U F F E R D RAW I N G BEGIN APPR.SLAB BRIDGE/ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP B-476/ 4
S H E ET 2 O F 3 S I T E 1 -`- SrA,e{9,Bj "� T° 5`,� -`- � 5'° 2'{3'� R'�`' SHEET NO.
BEG/N BRIOGE END APPR.SLAB
-�TItRf�+(�� -L- STAZ�t$OJ7 ROADWAY DESIGN HYDR.4ULIC5
a - T \ M ENGINEER ENGINEER
— — � � �� END BRIDGE �Io
�M _ tO -L- STA2/+16D0
� N -L- �
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 � � N
�� � ���'.�.d�l� ��' ��..°���
DO NOT USE FO CONSTRUCTION
pa�� p.&RCE55 ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 y �
OB•2l19 PG•�6! �O �
SHOULDER BERM GUTTER FROM STA.18-i-75
TO BEGIN BRIDGE LT. & RT. -L-
/
/ O
_— � �
� �
� �S � � nO��rR,BWGE55
� 48° CHLK �.2� �_�� ST�TE OY NORTx C�NOLN�
S 55� p,ppp�pE . � C/0 ST1TE PNOPERi7 M�N�CEp
���995 FG•73 � � � � � c OB'2Z2S PG•6i5
S� w0oD5 O y. � �,� / F� TEMPORARY ROCK CAUSEWAY
BARN k �
� � y' � r' � CLAS$ 'll' RIP RAP .� � �+� WOODS
� - �`J i � � � .� '� � y� ,� '� � TO SHOULDER POINT WnoDS N � 1() �
I I �LP � � � '� � � � � / (STRUCTURE PAY ITEM) I / �- E N E
� ISFD GAS I �, y< -� �Y- . �'-i- �'-`ii��ti.✓�.i-'�i�'ti��+✓�,�r4�r�;Jr-i.. .v-�-�vs4r'-�v_, O�
/'-- �:
�i
�cIGN I � � In I �:r�;;�, nw-w�:��I ��w�.� _ -�r`�'�m i s ' 1;�:_✓�-�^ �,r � �— � F _ � F F N
� �
�o. � � m �-�""�`" -f-� �n",� � -- � � � i / — —�. F F �— �
�nNu � -� � � � � �
� � � F _,;� ",r`" �� _ ��� ,, � ,� � .� �, . � ���.N.���. � ��,.r„"., � �� � � \� � � �� �,_�r,����s^,� - ,�� �,� �W�r�,_r�rr � -� ,1r �,1�� �
� �� N �
— � � .� ac � ��- - - - � � ` � --
' �" N
_ � —w�e � i1, i, - .; _ -v _ . �. _ . ,P _ _ _ .��� ;.r�.r' 4��vs'-.�.�'-�a'�n.�`�v' "4 I
�iro- .� _ �� �.
___—" r F ' Fe - .r..
— � — . i - �'�' .._ _. � J
C� N 650�0'3/..3'E ,� R P-iv e i�cEnz9 c� �
� � w
— -- W W w
N. 64' 4 5' E ` �__ __ rs � 64' 56' 35.3' E �
� -�=„�,�,�_-��- ��_����
l :,= m,
�
�} F �r' F ��j � - � eieow � �,��n ���,��-�,_ � ., — —
� _ ��rv .,��,. � . �,1.� ��n Z
woo
� � R � �,v...-......�..,. 5 — — — — — w000s — — — � F �,� � s� w oos \ _— — -- p � � �— � i
�I � F r r CL B RIP RAP 1 TON � � �I I �� � F�� _ � R rQ
� N <
J � J�^'� F �� �Y' Y� �- } R 5 SY GEOTEXTILE I CLASS 'll' RIP RAP
i�vti� �
1 E
� / � � -� � � � -ti' '� \ � TEMPORARY ROCK CAUSEWAY � � TEMP�RARY ROCK CAUSE AY 70 SHOULDER POINT
`L � � � � I � � (STRUCTURE PAY ITEMJ O
aaaOe� 3 y E
\ u0 tELECF�x C01p�Nr
�` p9-Mb PG•Y�i f� O I m � �t COFFERDAM FOR REMOVAL
� ~; � r POLLT R.&1RGE55 % � _ I r C/OiS�iE���iv�Yu�GER
'�-�,�� ^�� `� oe•ix, x•+ee r � � _ 3�
ioo� r ioo� �ca� 3oa�
\ z � t � t �
I.�■t■t _J
. ������� S���E
�
ENC R #2
� � - - ST . 21 60.6 �
2 .03' T
ES/ N F EOU NCY = RS I ��� SP� ETN UMS OF
. FS/(�N Fl VAT N =/_50 T
l3tpp l4+pp
� I pATEI OF
15+00
�
�
�
16+00 /7t00 �8+00
■����������
�������!d��
� :: i� i���i� 1 �.�'�
�����.�f��l■� �� �
.�.....
��'', I�1'I� �,--•�,. •�
�� ���► 1 �
�� �'���� �\������11
20+00 2/tpp 22+00 23+00 24+pp 25+00 26+00

BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACT BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
STRUCTURE SIZE / STATION ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
SITE NO. TYPE (FROM/TO) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ftZ) (ftZ) (ftZ) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ftZ)
1 Bridge 19+00 to 20+70 -L- X 3608.2 1750.1
TOTAL: 3608.2 1750.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Rev. May 2006

� �
�
V
�
�
O
V
See Sheet 9A Fo� Index of Sheets
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4761
-L- STA. 12 + 90.00
-L- NC 561
BEGIN BRIDGE
—L— STA. 19 + 06.00
2
�
�
V
h
�
v,
+
����� �� ����� ��������
�������� �� ���������
HALIFA .X CO U1�lTY
LOCATI0111: BRIDGE NO. 29 OVER LITTLE FISHI11lG CREEK
01V 111C 561
TYPE OF WORK GRADI11lG, DRAINAGE, PAVI11lG AND STRUCTURE
�I
�
END BRIDGE
—L— STA. 21 + 16.
END TIP PROJECT B-4761 5
-L- STA. 2 9+ 2 0. 00
_______ NC _4 ________ TO SR 1315
------- --------
, �-
;\, \� �
,;�,, � ��
� � ,. .
;;�\�,tic
,, ,
.
�� � �
\\` � �
. �,
S6I
— CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
— THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDRIES.
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

Note: Not to Scale
*S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.•
State Line
County Line
Township Line
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin
Property Corner
Property Monument
Parcel/Sequence Number
Existing Fence Line
Proposed Woven Wire Fence
Proposed Chain Link Fence
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
Existing Wetland Boundary
Proposed Wetland Boundary
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
Known Soil Contamination: Area or Site —
Potential Soil Contamination: Area or $ite —
0
E�P
�
0
E[M
23
—x x x—
�
e
�
- - - -wt8- - - -
wt8
Ee8
EPB
—�-- �
-�� -- �%
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.•
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap O
$ign �
W6�� �w
$mall Mine 'SZ'
Foundation �
Area Outline 0
Cemetery 0
Building �
School �
Church �
Dam
HYDROLOGY.•
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
Jurisdictional Stream
Buffer Zone 1
BufFer Zone 2
Flow Arrow
Disappearing Stream
Spring
Wetland
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
False Sump
��'��rE �lF ���11$�]�I �C�l]I$�]L�1����
�������1� C�]� I�I���I�V�1Y�
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
RAILROADS.•
$tandard Gauge
RR Signal Milepost
Switch
RR Abandoned
RR Dismantled
RIGHT OF Wf1Y.•
Baseline Control Point
Existing Right of Way Marker
Existing Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line with _
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Concrete or Granite WW Marker
Proposed Control of Access Line with
Concrete UA Marker
Existing Control of Access
Proposed Control of Access
Existing Easement Line
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement -
Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement
Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement
Proposed Permanent Drainage /Utility Easement
Proposed Permanent Utility Easement
Proposed Temporary Utility Easement
Proposed Aerial Utility Easement
Proposed Permanent Easement with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
ROADS AND RELATED
Existing Edge of Pavement
Existing Curb
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill
Proposed Curb Ramp
Existing Metal Guardrail
Proposed Guardrail
Existing Cable Guiderail
Proposed Cable Guiderail
Equality Symbol
Pavement Removal
l�EGETATION.•
Single Tree
Single Shrub
Hedge
Woods Line
�
CSX 7RANSPoRTATION
O
MlLEPoST 35
O
swircH
C�
�
��
W
i�
L�✓i1
FEATURES.•
E
TDE
PDE
DUE
PUE
TUE
AUE
�
C
F
Orchard
Vineyard
EXISTING STRUCTURES.•
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
UTILITIES.•
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
WG Power Cable Hand Hole
H-Frame Pole
Recorded U/G Power Line
Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*)
TELEPHONE:
4 fl f? f3
vi�Byo�a
CONC
- J CONC WW I
�
CONC HW
�--------�
� CB
�
•
•
O
►1
r
��
�
CR Existing Telephone Pole f
Proposed Telephone Pole �
T T T T Telephone Manhole OO
n n � Telephone Booth ❑O
n n n n Telephone Pedestal ❑O
� Telephone Cell Tower �
� U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole HH
Recorded U/G Telephone Cable �
� Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) — - - - -�- - - -
p Recorded U/G Telephone Conduit ��
�,,. Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*� - - - -��- - - -
�,,,,, Recorded WG Fiber Optics Cable '°�
Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*� - - - -T ��- - -
WATER:
Water Manhole WO
Water Meter o
Water Valve �
Water Hydrant �
Recorded U/G Water Line •
Designated U/G Water Line (S.U.E.*� - - - -•- - - -
Above Ground Water Line ^.c Wata�
N:
TV Satellite Dish O'
TV Pedestal ❑O
TV Tower �
U/G N Cable Hand Hole HN
Recorded U/G TV Cable T�
Designated U/G TV Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - -*�- - - -
Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable r� ��
Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*r - - - -*� ��- - -
GAS:
Gas Valve �
Gas Meter �
Recorded U/G Gas Line �
Designated WG Gas Line (S.U.E.*) - - - -�- - - -
Above Ground Gas Line A�c cos
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole OO
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout 0+
U/G $anitary Sewer Line s5
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A�c sa�,ta�Y Sewer
Recorded SS Forced Main Line F55
Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) — - - - -F:S- - - -
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown U/G Line
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Underground $torage Tank, Approx. Loc.
A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Geoenvironmental Boring
U/G Test Hole (S.U.E.*)
Abandoned According to Utility Records
End of Information
•
O
O
❑s
,�.�
�
usT
�
�
�
AATUR
E.O.I.

O
K
�
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
PROP. APPROX. 1%p" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 59.56,
Cj AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 768 LBS. PER S�. YD.
PROP. APPROX. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE SUflFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.56,
(�,'2 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 768 LBS. PER S�. YD. IN EACH OF TWO
LAYERS.
PROP. VAP. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SUFFACE COURSE TYPE 59.56,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 712 LBS. PER S�. YD. PER 1�' DEPTH, TO
C3 BE PLACED TN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 1Vp" IN OEPTH OR GREATER THAN
3" IN DEPTH.
D1 PROP. APPROX. 2%p" ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE,
TYPE I19.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 285 LBS. PER SQ. YD.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE,
TYPE I19.08, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 714 LBS. PER 5�. YD. PER 1"
D2 DEPTH, TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 2%Z" IN DEPTH OR
GREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH.
E� Pf10P. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.06,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER S�. YD.
Pf10P. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.OB,
E•Z AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH, TO
BE PLA�ED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 4" IN DEPTH OR GREATER
THAN 5/p" IN DEPTH.
R'i SPECIAL SHOULDER BERM GUTTER, SEE DETAIL 2C-?
T EARTH MATERIAI
U EXISTING PAVEMENT
W VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (SEE WEDGING DETAIL)
�E: PAVEMENT EOGE SLOPES APE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
Detail Showing Method of Wedging
GRADE TO THIS LINE
\ IIVSET A
USE IIVSET A:
-L- STA. 18 + 75.00 TO -L- STA. 19 + 06.00 (LT AN D RT)
ORIGINAL
ORIGINAL
GROUND
3�
� -L-
36' (CLEAR ROADWAY)
�
6�. 12' ]Y 6'.
�
I GRADE �
I AOINT ' ADDITIONAL WIDTH NEEDED FOR
I HYDRAULlC SPREAD
02 02
BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTI0IV
-L- STA. 19 + 06.00 TO -L- STA. 21 + 16.00
� —L—
8' 12' l2' 8'
11' Wi�GR I Il' W/GR
I
2' FDPS � � GRADE � 2' FDPS
I AOINT
�
�2 �� W C� �2
0�_08 0�_02 0.02 0.08
- i= -_�__- ��
T Dl l,, 9yZ"� 9%2>' p� T
el EXISTING PAVEMENT et
GRADE TO GRADE TO
THIS LINE THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTI0IV #1
-L- STA. 13 + 75.00 TO -L- STA. 18 + 00.00
-L- STA. 25 + 00.00 TO -L- STA. 28 + 70.00
TRANSITION FROM TYP. SECT. NO. 1 TO EXISTING
-L- STA. 12 + 90.00 TO STA. 13 + 75.00
-L- STA. 28+70.00 TO STA.29+20.00 (LT)
-L- STA. 27+40.00 TO STA.29+20.00 (RT)
� -L-
8' 72' 12' 8'
11' Wi�GR I 11' WiGR
�
2' FDPS � � GRADE � 2' FDPS
I POINT
I
n nR 0`OZ CZ � 0.0 �2 n na
� GRADE TO THIS LINE J
TYPICAL SECT701V #2
-L- STA. 18+00.00 TO -L- STA. 19+06.00 (BEGIN BRIDGE)
-L- STA. 21+16.00 (END BRIDGE) TO -L- STA.25+00.00
ORIGINAL
ORIGINAL
GROUND
PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-476/ 2A-1
RM' SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION