20201937 Ver 2_DeadTree_PhaseA_MY2_MonitoringR_FINAL_20240320

Annual Monitoring Report MY2 (2023) FINAL

DEAD TREE PHASE A NUTRIENT OFFSET BANK PARCEL
DWR Project # 2020-1937 V2

Tar-Pamlico River Basin

In Agreement with:
The Dead Tree Mitigation Banking Instrument for
Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits Pursuant to the
Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Management Strategy

MARCH 2024

Prepared By:

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel pg1
Year 2 Monitoring Report – COMMENT RESPONSE MEMO – MARCH 2024
Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel - DWR Project # 2020-1937 V2
Year 2 Monitoring Report – COMMENT RESPONSE MEMO
Comments/Responses:
Comment 1. A requirement for an easement boundary check to be performed every year is noted in section
5.2 but does not seem to be included in the monitoring report. Include this information as a response to this
comment and make sure that this information is included in all future monitoring reports even if no
encroachments were observed – it is recommended that this information be included as a stand-alone section
either within, before or after “Parcel Maintenance”. Response: Noted. A boundary check was performed in
2023. There are no encroachments to report at this time.

Comment 2. No stem height or vigor data is included in this report, despite being required as per the relevant
BPDP Section 5.1 which states "Species Composition, height, and survival rates will be evaluated on an annual
basis by plot". RS needs to submit the missing data in response to this comment. DWR will accept the CVS
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) datasheets with raw data to meet this requirement. It is not required to
export vigor and height into tables
Response: Noted. This data has been added to Appendix B.

Comment 3. Section 5.1 states that 46 out of 49 plots are meeting the success criteria. This is incorrect, as it
is only true for the density success criteria of 260 stems/acre and does not take into account the diversity
criteria. Only 41 of the 49 plots are meeting all of the vegetation success criteria. Failing diversity success
criteria will not always result in the necessity for an AMP, but it is data that is required to be recorded and
acknowledged as a performance standard to accurately reflect the site characteristics Response: Noted.

Comment 4. Of the 8 plots failing one of the success criteria, the 3 that are newly failing in MY2 are 19, 35,
and 44. Is another AMP being considered to address the trajectory of these plots meeting success criteria?
Response: An AMP may be considered if early monitoring during MY3 shows a significant area of concern. The
areas around the listed plots will be checked.

Comment 5. Additionally, plots failing density requirement of 260 stems/acre are not specified in Figure 2.
Make sure to color code which plots are failing density success criteria in Figure 2 in all future monitoring
reports.
Response: Noted.

Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Table of Contents
MY2 Monitoring Report – MARCH 2024
Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset and Bank Parcel
DWR Project # 2020-1937 V2
Annual Monitoring Report MY1 (2023)

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Parcel Location ................................................................................................................................. 1
2.1 Parcel Background ..................................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Parcel Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 2
3.0 Restoration Activities ....................................................................................................................... 3
3.1 Riparian Area Restoration Activities ......................................................................................... 4
3.2 Parcel Protection ....................................................................................................................... 5
4.0 Mitigation Potential ......................................................................................................................... 6
5.0 Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria ........................................................................................... 6
5.1 Monitoring Protocol .................................................................................................................. 6
5.2 Parcel Maintenance .................................................................................................................. 6
5.3 Long Term Management Plan ................................................................................................... 7
6.0 Financial Assurance .......................................................................................................................... 7
7.0 References ....................................................................................................................................... 7

Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
Figure 1 - Parcel Location / Service Area
Figure 2 - Current Conditions Plan View
Table 1 - Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 - Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 - Project Contact
Table 4 - Project Baseline Information and Attributes

Appendix B: Vegetation Data
Table 5 – MY2 CVS Output Data
Vigor Data
Vegetation Plot Photos 1 – 49

Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 1
MY2 Monitoring Report – MARCH 2024
1.0 Introduction
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC
DWR) this Annual Monitoring Report (MY2 2023) for the Dead Tree Phase A Bank Parcel (Parcel) as
agreed upon in the Dead Tree Nutrient Offset Umbrella Banking Instrument (UBI) and Dead Tree Phase A
Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP), made and entered into on October 19, 2021 by Restoration
Systems, LLC, acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR). This document details the riparian area restoration
activities, monitoring efforts, and the final mitigation potential of the Parcel.

Measuring 65.15 acres, the Parcel is designed to provide mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due
to development within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. NCDWR representatives conducted an onsite
determination for parcel applicability and suitability of Site Features on December 30, 2020 and January
5, 2021. A Site Viability letter for Buffer & Nutrient Offset was provided by the Division on April 6, 2021
and May 11, 2021.

Restoration Systems (RS) was granted a Conservation Easement by the various landowners on April 5,
2022. The final conservation easements were recorded at the Edgecombe County Register of Deeds in
Book No. 1754, Page 992-1008, 1009-1023, and 1024-1049. A plat including all easement areas was
recorded in Plat Cabinet 12 pages 219-224 on February 10, 2022. Easements were assigned to the North
Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation on May 31, 2023- see Book 1780 pages 649-668, 669-699, and 720-
741.

RS began preparation for restoration of the riparian buffer and planted the Parcel in February of 2022.
Riparian buffer restoration activities included ripping/bedding of the parcel with a narrow set plow, bare-
root planting, and broadcast application of a permanent seed mix. On September 27-28, 2023, Axiom
Environmental surveyed forty-nine (49) Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) monitoring plots and collected
Year 2 Monitoring data (Appendix B).

2.0 Parcel Location
The Parcel is located between Whitakers and Leggett, approximately 5.5 miles east of the town of
Whitakers in Edgecombe County, NC. The Parcel is within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin 14- digit USGS
Cataloging Unit 03020101130100 of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (North Carolina Division of Water
Quality [NCDWQ] Sub-basin Number 03- 03-02) (Figure 1, Appendix A).

Parcel Location: (36.093067°, -77.621206°)
Directions to Parcel from Raleigh:
- Get on I-440 E from Capital Blvd (2.4 mi)
- Take exit 14 and continue on US-64 E (43.9 mi)
- Take exit 464 and merge onto I-95 N toward Richmond (6.4 mi)
- Take exit 145 for NC-4/NC-48 toward US-301 and turn left onto NC-4 N/NC-48 N
(1.0 mi)
- Turn right onto Watson Seed Farm Rd (3.4 mi)
- Turn right onto NC-33 E (3.0 mi)
- Turn left onto S White St/White Oak Swamp Rd (0.1 mi)
- Turn right onto W Pippen St and continue onto NC-33 E (5.4 mi)
- Turn left onto Red Hill Church Rd and destination is on the left (0.3 mi)
- Latitude, Longitude: 36.093067°, -77.621206°

Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 2
MY2 Monitoring Report – MARCH 2024
2.1 Parcel Background
The Parcel encompasses 65.15 acres of land over one tract of forested and open historical agricultural
fields. Prior to Parcel development, land use is described as agricultural row crop production including
cotton, corn, and peanuts. The landowners regularly applied fertilizers and herbicides to the fields. Site
Features are devoid of woody vegetation outside of forested areas due to historic and agricultural
practices.

The Parcel is comprised of one tract with hydrological features that drain to White Oak Swamp
approximately 1.2 miles downstream. White Oak Swamp is classified as C and NSW by DWR. Class C waters
are designated for recreational use, agriculture, fishing and fish consumption, and the maintenance of
biological integrity for wildlife. The NSW designation applies to surface waters that are experiencing
excessive growths of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation.

There were no existing structures in the project area. An existing utility line runs along the northern edge
of Red Hill Church Road. The utility lines are excluded from the Parcel’s footprint. An additional five-foot
offset has been applied between the utility right-of-way and the start of the conservation easement
boundary.

2.2 Parcel Objectives
The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas within the Bank Parcel focused on
providing ecological and water quality enhancements to the Tar-Pamlico River Basin by restoring the
riparian area to create a functional riparian corridor. Goals were accomplished as outlined in the following
table.

Goal Objective
Decrease nutrient levels
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the
agricultural fields through restored native buffer zones. The off-
site nutrient input will also be absorbed on-site by filtering
flood flows through restored floodplain areas, where flood
flows can disperse through native vegetation.
Decrease sediment input
Sediment from off-site sources will be captured by deposition
on restored floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow
overland flow velocities.
Decrease water temperature and
increase dissolved oxygen
concentrations
Planted riparian trees will shade the streams as they mature
reducing thermal pollution.
Create appropriate terrestrial
habitat
Riparian areas adjacent to ditches and streams will be restored
by planting native vegetation.
Permanently protect the project
Parcel from harmful uses A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel.

Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 3
MY2 Monitoring Report – MARCH 2024
3.0 Restoration Activities
Riparian area restoration involved planting appropriate native tree species along the 200-foot-wide
riparian corridor of streams and hydrologically connected ditches at a density of 680 stems per acre on
8ft x 8ft spacing. Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the first few
years of tree establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent encroachment of undesirable
species that may out-compete the planted native vegetation. Tree species planted across the riparian
areas of the Parcel included those listed in Table C. Stems were mixed prior to planting to ensure diversity
of bare roots across the planted area. A seed mix including the species listed in Table D was applied to
provide temporary and permanent ground cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment loss
during rain events in areas without existing herbaceous cover. Planting took place on February 1, 2022.

Table A – Restoration Plan Activities
Restoration
Plan Activity Phase Specific Actions
Riparian
Restoration
Within the Site' s proposed conservation easements:
- Treatment of Bermuda and fescue grass species within active pasture areas (see
Herbaceous Treatment note above).
- Site-wide discing of agricultural and pasture areas ahead of planting — discing
occurred parallel to the Site Features, promoting floodwater attenuation by
increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters crossing Parcel floodplains.
- Establishment of a native herbaceous community via site -specific seed mix (see
Permanent Seed – Table D)
- Establishment of a native hardwood forest via the planting of bare -root saplings
from the top of bank out a maximum of 2QB' along Parcel Features —Planting List
– Table C

Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 4
MY2 Monitoring Report – MARCH 2024
Table B – Summary Protection Activities
Parcel
protection
(65.44 acres)
1.) Restoration Systems (RS) was granted a Conservation Easement by the various
landowners on April 5, 2022. The final conservation easements were recorded at
the Edgecombe County Register of Deeds in Book No. 1754, Page 992-1008, 1009-
1023, and 1024-1049. A plat including all easement areas was recorded in Plat
Cabinet 12 pages 219-224 on February 10, 2022. Easements were assigned to the
North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation on May 31, 2023- see Book 1780 pages
649-668, 669-699, and 720-741.

2.) RS marked the easement at every corner with an iron, CE cap, and corner t-post.
Additionally, easement posts were placed every 200-feet along the Parcel
boundaries.

3.1 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Restoration of the riparian area allows for recolonization and expansion of characteristic species across
the landscape. The riparian areas were restored according to the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (2014). The planting plan for the riparian restoration area included planting 42,000
native bare-root hardwood saplings across 60.271 acres at a Parcel density of +/- 600 stems per acre and
live stakes for stream bank stabilization where necessary. The planted species composition is intentionally
diverse and while based on these communities, also accounted for local observations and nursery
availability.

All species were selected based on their ability for sediment stabilization, rapid growth rate, the ability to
withstand hydraulic forces associated with flood events, suitability to specific soil types, and Parcel
conditions. Tree species were mixed thoroughly before planting to provide a diverse and random plant
across the Site. Planting density is set to ensure sufficient diversity and density of planted stems outlined
in Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 (2014) of 260 trees per acre at the end of five years. No one tree species will
be greater than 50% of the established stems.

The bare root planting list is provided in Table C followed by the permanent seed mix in Table D. Year 2
(2023) vegetation data is provided in Appendix B. Year 2 data was collected on September 27-28, 2023 by
Axiom Environmental and derived an average planted stem density of 441 planted stems per acre.

Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 5
MY2 Monitoring Report – MARCH 2024
Table C – Planting List
Common Name Scientific Name Tree/Shrub* Number of Stems Species % of Total
River birch Betula nigra Tree 3,750 8.9%
Common hackberry Celtis occidentalis Tree 2,100 5.0%
Eastern redbud Cercis canadensis Shrub 2,100 5.0%
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana Tree 3,600 8.6%
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Tree 2,100 5.0%
Yellow poplar Liriodendron tulipifera Tree 3,600 8.6%
Southern crabapple Malus angustifolia Tree 500 1.2%
Mulberry Morus rubra Tree 3,600 8.6%
Black gum Nyssa sylvatica Tree 2,100 5.0%
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis Tree 2,200 5.2%
Oak (White) Quercus alba Tree 3,600 8.6%
Oak (Swamp chestnut) Quercus michauxii Tree 3,600 8.6%
Oak (Water) Quercus nigra Tree 3,600 8.6%
Oak (Red) Quercus rubra Tree 1,050 2.5%
American elm Ulmus americana Tree 3,600 8.6%
Southern arrowwood Viburnum dentatum Shrub 900 2.1%
Total 16 Species 42,000 100%

Table D – Permanent Seed
Common Name Amount (in pounds) Common Name Amount (in pounds)
Common Yarrow 1.80 Perennial Gaillardia (Blanketflower) 3.00
Winter Bentgrass 3.00 Narrowleaf Sunflower 2.40
Blue False Indigo 0.60 Oxeye Sunflower 3.00
Plains Coreopsis 3.00 Wild Bergamot 0.60
Lanceleaf Coreopsis 3.00 Deertongue, Tioga 3.0
Cosmos 3.00 Clasping Coneflower 0.60
Rocket Larkspur 1.80 Blackeyed Susan 3.00
Showy Ticktrefoil 3.00 Purpletop 15.00
Purple Coneflower 3.00 Blue Vervain 1.20
Virginia Wildrye, 'Madison' 6.00
Total (pounds) 60.00

3.2 Parcel Protection
Restoration Systems (RS) was granted a Conservation Easement by the various landowners on April 5,
2022. The final conservation easements were recorded at the Edgecombe County Register of Deeds in
Book No. 1754, Page 992-1008, 1009-1023, and 1024-1049. A plat including all easement areas was
recorded in Plat Cabinet 12 pages 219-224 on February 10, 2022. Easements were assigned to the North
Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation on May 31, 2023- see Book 1780 pages 649-668, 669-699, and 720-
741. RS marked the easement at every corner with an iron, CE cap, and corner t-post.

Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 6
MY2 Monitoring Report – MARCH 2024
4.0 Mitigation Potential
Of the Parcel's 65.15 acres protected under the conservation easement, 60.02 acres are anticipated to
provide Nitrogen and Phosphorus Nutrient Offset Credits equivalent to 135,901.542 pounds of nitrogen
offset credit and 8,753.110 pounds of phosphorous offset credit. Riparian area restoration, measured
from the top of bank on Parcel streams and ditches, will include at least 50' from the tops of banks and
will extend outward a maximum of 200' from tops of banks and will generate Nutrient Offset Credits that
are not transferable to Riparian Buffer Credit per the approved UBI. Nitrogen and Phosphorous offset
credits will be generated from the project and shown on separate ledgers.

5.0 Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation at each Phase will monitor plant survival and species
diversity. Quantitative sampling will include forty-nine (49) permanent 10 x 10-meter vegetation plots as
outlined in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and will occur
no earlier than Fall of each year (Figure 2, Appendix A). Vegetation plot placement will adequately
represent riparian buffer credit and nutrient offset credit areas. A reference photo will be taken from the
origin point of each plot (Appendix B). All planted stems in the plots will be marked with flagging tape and
recorded. Data collected will include species, height, planting type (planted stem and/or volunteer). Total
and planted stem density by plot and species will be reported during monitoring years 0-5 (Table 5,
Appendix B). Individual and average stem height data will be reported during monitoring years 3-5.
Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled.
Restoration Systems shall submit to NCDWR annual monitoring reports no later than December 31st of
each year. Each report will document the success of the vegetation and any maintenance, supplemental
planting, or encroachment within the easement areas. Success criteria within the buffer will be based on
the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre after five years of monitoring.

Year 2 (2023) monitoring occurred on September 27-28, 2023, and resulted in an average of 441 planted
stems/acre across the Site. Additionally, 46 out of the 49 individual plots met success criteria (Appendix
B).

5.2 Parcel Maintenance
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/ or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented. Site
maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high likelihood
of affecting the project success. Such items include, but are not limited to, fire, flooding, drought, or
insects that cause excess tree mortality. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the success
criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. Any parcel maintenance
performed will be included in the monitoring report for that year. A rigorous herbicide schedule may need
to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the restoration areas to prevent the
establishment of invasive species that may out-compete the planted native vegetation. The only
herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved herbicides that will be applied in accordance with
North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.

The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. Easement boundary
conditions and any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to DWR. If
mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must receive
approval from DWR prior to conducting any mowing within Tar-Pamlico Buffer Zones 1 and 2 to ensure
that no buffer violations have occurred.

Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 7
MY2 Monitoring Report – MARCH 2024
5.3 Long Term Management Plan
A permanent conservation easement to preserve all areas and prohibit all use of the property inconsistent
with its use as a nutrient offset and riparian buffer mitigation property, including any activity that would
materially alter the biological integrity of the Site/ Parcel was recorded at the Edgecombe County Register
of Deeds on 4/05/2022 in Book 1754, Page 992-1008, 1009-1023, and 1024-1049. RS assigned the
conservation easement and its interests in perpetuity to a qualified holder under NC General Statute
("GS") 121- 34 et seq. and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code on 5/31/2023. The assignment is recorded
in Deed Book 1780 pages 649-668, 669-699, and 720-741. The holder is the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat
Foundation, which is certified under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and has been approved by
DWR.

6.0 Financial Assurance
RS secured all financial assurances according to the approved UBI. No bond shall be less than $150,000 to
cover the costs of construction and no less than $100,000 initially, to cover monitoring expenses.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the next year’s monitoring
period, with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when
applicable. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted
without proof of bond renewals when applicable.

7.0 References

Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule - 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (Published November 17, 2014)

Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation.
Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.

Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.

US Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2021. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm [Accessed July 19, 2021].

US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2021. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species, Wake
County, North Carolina (online). Available:
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wake.html (Accessed July 19, 2021).
Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
MY2 Monitoring Report – MARCH 2024
Appendix A: General Figures and Tables

Figure 1 - Parcel Location / Service Area
Figure 2 - Current Conditions Plan View
Table 1 - Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 - Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 - Project Contact
Table 4 - Project Baseline Information and Attributes

!(
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Projec t No.:
Title:
Projec t:
Prepared for:
1³
Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank Parcel
USGS 14-D igit Hydrologic Unit03020101-130100
36.093067°, -77.621206°
0 30 6015Miles
Legend
NC County Boundaries
Tar Pamlico River Ba sin
NC River Subbasins: USGS 8 -Digit HUCs
Bank Parcel Service Area - Nutrient Offset: Tar-Pamlico Rive r, S ub-Basin USGS Hydrologic Unit 0302 0101
Edgecombe County
Service Layer Credits: Sou rces: Es ri, HERE,DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO,USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, KadasterNL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Ko ng), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, ©
RJH
August 2022
1:1,000,000
2020-1937 V2
PARCEL LOCATIONAND SERVICEAREA
NC DEQ Division of Water Resou rces
401 & Isolated Wetlands/Waters Program & 401 Stormwater
DEAD TREE PHASE A (T P 01)NUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
ASBUILT
Feat ur e 1A-D
Dit ch
Feat ur e 1A-E
Ephem e ra l
Feat ur e 1A-1
Int er m itt ent /Per ennial
Feat ur e 1B
Dit ch
Feat ur e 1Ca
Ephem e ra l
Feat ur e 1E Ditch
Feat ur e 1F
Dit chFeature 1 - St art
Int er m itt ent /Per ennial
Feat ur e 1D Dit ch
Feat ur e 1
Int er m itt ent /Per ennial
Utilit y Line : 30-Foo t Right -O f-Way (RO W)
Ease me nt is 5-Fee t Byo nd RO W
Dif fu se Flow Cre dit
Deduc tion Re quir ed;
Area P la nte d &
No C red it G iv en
Dif fu se Flow Cre dit
Deduc tion Re quir ed;
Area P la nte d &
No C red it G iv en
No D if fu se Flow Cre dit Dedu ct io n Requ ir ed;
Edge of Ease m ent is St ar t of Dit ch F lo w int o Par cel,
Rem ainde r of Dit ch Sub je ct t o Pha se B Ease m ent
and Rep la nt in g.
No D if fu se Flow Cre dit Dedu ct io n Requ ir ed;
Or igin Point o f Ditc h is I nc lu ded in th e
Conse rv at io n Ease me nt . Ar ea Abo ve Ditc h to b e P la nt ed.
No D if fu se Flow Cre dit Dedu ct io n Requ ir ed;
Or igin Point o f Ditc h is I nc lu ded in th e CE.
No C onne ct io n Unde r Red Hill Chur ch Rd .
Area A bov e D it ch wa s P la nt ed.
Cred it Rem ov ed fo r Les s Than 50 -f ee t.
5 6
8
4
72
3
1
9
11
12
10
20
40
18
17
24
38
14
23
15
26
33
25
46
16
19
37
48
35
44
28
13
32
30
29 27
31
47
22
39
34
42
45
43
36
21
49
41
400 0 400 800 1,2 00200
Feet
Legen d
Dead Tr ee - Su bject Fee-Sim ple Par cels
Dead Tre e Pha se A (TP 01 ) - Co ns er vat ion Ea se m ent : 6 5.15 A cr es
Dead Tre e Pha se B (TP 02) - Co nse rv at ion Ea sem e nt : 1 50.94 Acr es
Dead Tr ee Ph ase A (TP 0 1) - I nst alled CVS Plot s (4 9 Tot al)
Dead Tr ee - Su rv eye d Top of Ba nk
Dead Tre e - Ph ase A (TP 0 1) - NO C Ar ea s
No Cre dit (DW R M em o #200 8-019 , Diff u se Flow )
No Cre dit - Les s Tha n 50-Fe et
Rest or at ion (TO B - 2 00-f t) - NO C
Pre ser v at io n (TO B - 200 -f t ) - No Cr edit
TO B O f f set s - S ur vey ed Top of Ban k O ff se ts
TO B t o 5 0 Fee t
TO B t o 1 00 Fe et
TO B t o 2 00 Fe et
NO TE ABO UT W I DTHS & CREDI TI NG :
Nutr ient O ff set C red it (NO C)
Nut rien t O ff set Cre dit is cont iguo us f rom TO B, is a m in im um of
50 f t. f r om t he TO B and a m ax im u m of 200 f t. fr om th e TO B.
FIGU R E
Dra wn b y:
Da te:
Sca le :
Pro jec t N o.:
Tit le:
Pro jec t:
Pre pa red fo r:
2³
Ed g ec om be C ou n ty
KR J
1:4 ,5 0 0
C C P VAND C R E D IT MA P
D E A D T R E E PH A S E A (TP 01 )N U TR IE N T OF F SE TBANK PA R C E L
N C D EQ D iv isio n o f Wa te r R es o urc e s
40 1 & Iso la te d Wetla n ds /Wate rs Pr og ra m & 4 01 Sto rm wa ter
Ima ge ry: 20 2 1 NC On eMa p
Octo be r 20 23
20 20 -19 3 7 V 2
Table 1. Dead Tree Bank Parcel - Phase A - Tar-Pam 01, 2020-1937v2, Project Credits
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
Credit Type Location
Subject? (enter
NO if
ephemeral or
ditch 1)
Feature Type Mitigation Activity Min-Max Buffer
Width (ft)Feature Name Total Area (ft2)
Total (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
Mitigation (ft2)
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)% Full Credit Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Convertible to
Riparian
Buffer?
Riparian Buffer
Credits
Convertible to
Nutrient Offset?
Delivered
Nutrient Offset:
N (lbs)
Delivered
Nutrient
Offset: P (lbs)
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 0-100 1A-D, 1Ca, 1D, 1E, 1F 711,270 1 100%No —Yes 37,115.019 2,390.494
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 101-200 1A-D, 1Ca, 1D, 1E, 1F 646,853 1 33%No —Yes 33,753.654 2,173.996
———
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 0-100 1A-E, 1B 94,631 1 100%No —Yes 4,937.972 318.044
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 101-200 1A-E, 1B 109,656 1 33%No —Yes 5,721.997 368.541
———
Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I / P Restoration 0-100 1, 1A-1 550,860 1 100%No —Yes 28,744.611 1,851.375
Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I / P Restoration 101-200 1, 1A-1 491,547 1 33%No —Yes 25,649.579 1,652.031
———
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration Diffused Flow Deduction
Features 1Ca, 1F 8,700 1 No —No ——
———
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration Less Than 50-Feet
Feature 1D 945 1 No —No ——
———
———
———
———
———
———
———
Totals (ft2):2,614,462 0 0.000 135,922.832 8,754.481
Total Buffer (ft2):0 0
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):2,614,462 N/A
Total Ephemeral Area (ft2) for Credit:0 0
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft2):0 0.0%Ephemeral Reaches as % TABM
Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Eligible for Preservation (ft2):0 0.0%Preservation as % TABM
Credit Type Location Subject?Feature Type Mitigation Activity Min-Max Buffer
Width (ft)Feature Name Total Area (sf)
Total (Creditable)
Area for Buffer
Mitigation (ft2)
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)% Full Credit Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Riparian
Buffer Credits
Buffer —
Buffer —
Buffer —
—
—
—
—
Buffer —
Buffer —
Preservation Area Subtotals (ft2):0 0
Square Feet Credits
0 0.000
0 0.000
0 0.000
0 0.000
Square Feet Credits
Nitrogen:135,922.832
Phosphorus:8,754.4812,614,462
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Nutrient Offset:
Preservation:
Total Riparian Buffer:
Tar-Pamlico 03020101
19.16394
297.54099
Restoration:
Enhancement:
Mitigation Totals
1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250 (5)(a).
last updated 08/03/2020

Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
MY2 Monitoring Report – MARCH 2024
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity / Milestone BPDP Proposed Date Actual Date
BPDP Approved NA November 16, 2021
Parcel Protection NA Recorded April 5, 2022
Planting February, 2022 February, 2022
As-built Data Collection March, 2022 April 27 – May 5
Construction Completion Walkthrough NA June 21, 2022
As-built Report Submittal NA August, 2022
MY1 Report Submittal NA December, 2022
MY2 Report Submittal NA December, 2023
Year 2-5 Monitoring December 2023 - 2026 On schedule

Table 3: Project Contact
Firm POC & Address
Full Delivery Provider Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer
919.755.9490
Designer/Permitting: Restoration Systems, LLC
Raymond Holz: 919.755.9490
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Planting Contractor: Restoration Systems, LLC
Josh Merritt: 919.755.9490
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Seeding Contractor: Restoration Systems, LLC
Matthew Harrell: 919.755.9490
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Nursery Stock Suppliers: ArborGen 1.888.888.7158
Baseline Data Collection Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
218 Snow Ave. Raleigh, NC
27603
Vegetation Monitoring: Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
218 Snow Ave. Raleigh, NC
27603

Table 4: Project Baseline Information & Attributes
Project Information
Project Name Dead Tree Phase A
County Edgecombe
Project Area (acres) 65.44
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) 36.093067ºN, -77.621206ºW (NAD83/WGS84)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Inner Coastal Plain
River Basin Tar-Pamlico
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03020101 USGS Hydrologic Unit14-digit 03020101130100
DWR Sub-basin 03-03-02
Project Drainage Area, Total Outfall (acres) 256
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious
Area <5%

Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B: Vegetation Data
MY2 Monitoring Report – MARCH 2024
Appendix B: Vegetation Data
Table 5 – MY2 CVS Output Data
Vigor Data
Vegetation Plot Photos 1-49

Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Acer rubrum red maple Tree
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 555 111
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 111333
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 444222111 111 333
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 666
Juglans nigra black walnut Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 2 2 20 9 333 2216
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 222333666111333
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 222 111
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 2 2 2
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree
Quercus oak Tree 2 2 2 111222
Quercus alba white oak Tree 444 111
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 111333222333222222444111111
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 222 111
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 111111 111111
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 1 1 1 111444 111111
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 222
11112999186667771313139991414141111111111117778822
1111111111
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
666556444333555555444444555555555
445.2 445.2 1174 364.2 364.2 728.4 242.8 242.8 242.8 283.3 283.3 283.3 526.1 526.1 526.1 364.2 364.2 364.2 566.6 566.6 566.6 445.2 445.2 445.2 445.2 445.2 445.2 283.3 283.3 283.3 323.7 323.7 890.3
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
22010_01‐01‐0001 22010_01‐01‐0002 22010_01‐01‐000522010_01‐01‐000422010_01‐01‐0003 22010_01‐01‐001022010_01‐01‐000922010_01‐01‐000822010_01‐01‐000722010_01‐01‐0006
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
22010_01‐01‐0011
1
0.02
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
Project Code 22010_01.  Project Name: Dead Tree 01
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Acer rubrum red maple Tree
Betula nigra river birch Tree 444333 222111222333
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 1 1 1
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 224
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 333111 111
Juglans nigra black walnut Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 118111333 111222
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 111 111
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 111
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 2 113 444114
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 64
Quercus oak Tree 3 3 3
Quercus alba white oak Tree 222
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 222666555444111333333222222 444
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2 222 222333
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 111
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 222555 3312111
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 222
12121213131310101010101088171010101111135559918111117101019
555444444444667444555222555556556
485.6 485.6 485.6 526.1 526.1 526.1 404.7 404.7 404.7 404.7 404.7 404.7 323.7 323.7 688 404.7 404.7 404.7 445.2 445.2 526.1 202.3 202.3 202.3 364.2 364.2 728.4 445.2 445.2 688 404.7 404.7 768.9
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
22010_01‐01‐0012
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
22010_01‐01‐0019 22010_01‐01‐002022010_01‐01‐0013 22010_01‐01‐0014 22010_01‐01‐0015 22010_01‐01‐0016 22010_01‐01‐0017 22010_01‐01‐0018 22010_01‐01‐0021 22010_01‐01‐0022
1
0.020.02
1
0.02
11
0.02 0.02
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Project Code 22010_01.  Project Name: Dead Tree 01
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
Stem count
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Acer rubrum red maple Tree 10
Betula nigra river birch Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 111333 111111
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 222111111111 555
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 222111
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 2 2 2 444114
Juglans nigra black walnut Tree 7
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 20 26
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 15 1 1 20
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 333222222
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 777 111
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 228222 333
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree
Quercus oak Tree 222
Quercus alba white oak Tree
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 888444 222222111
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 555333 777222222
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 111
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 6 1 1 1 444333111111 222222
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 333666
7 7 19 13 13 13 12 12 12 10 10 10 12 12 12 11 11 11 13 13 13 16 16 43 15 15 41 11 11 31 16 16 42
334555555555555555666778778667556
283.3 283.3 768.9 526.1 526.1 526.1 485.6 485.6 485.6 404.7 404.7 404.7 485.6 485.6 485.6 445.2 445.2 445.2 526.1 526.1 526.1 647.5 647.5 1740 607 607 1659 445.2 445.2 1255 647.5 647.5 1700
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
111
0.02 0.02 0.02
22010_01‐01‐0023 22010_01‐01‐0024
Stems per ACRE
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
Project Code 22010_01.  Project Name: Dead Tree 01
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
0.02
1
0.02
22010_01‐01‐0025 22010_01‐01‐0026 22010_01‐01‐0027 22010_01‐01‐0028 22010_01‐01‐0029 22010_01‐01‐0030 22010_01‐01‐0031 22010_01‐01‐0032 22010_01‐01‐0033
Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Acer rubrum red maple Tree
Betula nigra river birch Tree 111111333222 222
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 999 333333111111444
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 111 222
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 111 3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 4 4 4 111111
Juglans nigra black walnut Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 113111
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 111 111
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 111
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree
Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 1 1 6 6 6 5 5 5 2 2 2
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 111
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 111999151515
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 2
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 111
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 888111 222 666
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 111
7779998881111111818181414142222222020208813777666
555222444555444888666333334555333
283.3 283.3 283.3 364.2 364.2 364.2 323.7 323.7 323.7 445.2 445.2 445.2 728.4 728.4 728.4 566.6 566.6 566.6 890.3 890.3 890.3 809.4 809.4 809.4 323.7 323.7 526.1 283.3 283.3 283.3 242.8 242.8 242.8
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
22010_01‐01‐0044
1111
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
22010_01‐01‐0041 22010_01‐01‐0042 22010_01‐01‐0043
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
Project Code 22010_01.  Project Name: Dead Tree 01
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
22010_01‐01‐0034 22010_01‐01‐0035 22010_01‐01‐0036 22010_01‐01‐0037 22010_01‐01‐0038 22010_01‐01‐0039 22010_01‐01‐0040
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Table 5. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T
Acer rubrum red maple Tree 10
Betula nigra river birch Tree 444111222 454545444444545454
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 1 1 1 44 44 44 55 55 55 60 60 60
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1 111111161616222222505050
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 333222 262631262626242424
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 1 1 1 25 25 28 28 28 28 38 38 38
Juglans nigra black walnut Tree 7
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 46
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 29 29 112 30 30 30 39 39 39
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 111111111111333333363636363636
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 333111 333202020232323262626
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 2 2 2 777111 292942272727313131
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 10
Quercus oak Tree 13 13 13 24 24 24 40 40 40
Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 1 1 22 22 22 25 25 25 23 23 23
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1 99 99 99 110 110 110 123 123 123
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 48 48 48 53 53 53 59 59 59
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 111111 999555555
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 222111535368545454505050
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 3 3 3 21 21 21 18 18 18 17 17 17
12 12 12 14 14 14 10 10 10 7 7 7 10 10 10 534 534 726 580 580 580 675 675 675
777888444555777171721161616161616
485.6 485.6 485.6 566.6 566.6 566.6 404.7 404.7 404.7 283.3 283.3 283.3 404.7 404.7 404.7 441 441 599.6 479 479 479 557.5 557.5 557.5
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% P‐all = Planting including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits
Annual Means
MY2 (2023) MY1 (2022) MY0 (2022)22010_01‐01‐0045 22010_01‐01‐0046 22010_01‐01‐0047 22010_01‐01‐0048
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
49
1.21
49
1.21
49
1.21
Current Plot Data (MY2 2023)
22010_01‐01‐0049
Project Code 22010_01.  Project Name: Dead Tree 01
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Dead Tree Phase A Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Dead Tree Phase A Site Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
MY2 Monitoring Report – December 2023
Plot 8Plot 7
Plot 1 Plot 2
Plot 3 Plot 4
Plot 5 Plot 6
Dead Tree Phase A Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Dead Tree Phase A Site Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
MY2 Monitoring Report – December 2023
Plot 15
Plot 9 Plot 10
Plot 11 Plot 12
Plot 13 Plot 14
Plot 16
Dead Tree Phase A Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Dead Tree Phase A Site Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
MY2 Monitoring Report – December 2023
Plot 23
Plot 17 Plot 18
Plot 19 Plot 20
Plot 21 Plot 22
Plot 24
Dead Tree Phase A Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Dead Tree Phase A Site Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
MY2 Monitoring Report – December 2023
Plot 32Plot 31
Plot 25 Plot 26
Plot 27 Plot 28
Plot 29 Plot 30
Dead Tree Phase A Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Dead Tree Phase A Site Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
MY2 Monitoring Report – December 2023
Plot 40Plot 39
Plot 33 Plot 34
Plot 35 Plot 36
Plot 37 Plot 38
Dead Tree Phase A Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Dead Tree Phase A Site Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
MY2 Monitoring Report – December 2023
Plot 48Plot 47
Plot 41 Plot 42
Plot 43 Plot 44
Plot 45 Plot 46
Dead Tree Phase A Site
MY2 (2023) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Dead Tree Phase A Site Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
MY2 Monitoring Report – December 2023
Plot 49