20220139 Ver 2_Salem As-built March 2024_20240319

ID#* 20220139 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:
Blake Hartshorn
Initial Review Completed Date 03/27/2024
Mitigation Project Submittal - 3/19/2024
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: * Email Address:
Catherine Roland [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#: * 20220139 Version:* 2
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Salem Nutrient Offset Bank
County: Wayne
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation As -Built Plans
File Upload: Salem As -built March 2024.pdf 15.18MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Catherine Roland
Signature: *

As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Salem Nutrient Offset Bank
Monitoring Year 0
Calendar Year of Data Collection: 2024
Neuse River Basin (CU 03020201)
DWR Project #2022-0139 V2
Wayne County, NC
Data Collection Period: February 2024
Submission Date: March 2024
Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27620
Prepared by:
WATER & LAND SOLUTIONS
7721 SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 130, RALEIGH, NC 27615
(919)614 - 5111 1 waterlandsolutions.com

Table of Contents
1 Project Summary ....................................................
1.1 Project Location and Description ...................
1.2 Project Success Criteria ..................................
1.2.1 Vegetation ..............................................
1.2.2 Visual Assessment ..................................
2 Project Mitigation Components .............................
2.1 Project Components ......................................
2.2 Design Approach ............................................
3 As -Built (Baseline) Condition .................................
3.1 As -built (Baseline) Survey ..............................
3.2 As -Built/ Baseline Assessment .......................
3.2.1 Vegetation ..............................................
...........................................................................1
...........................................................................1
...........................................................................1
...........................................................................1
........................................................................... 2
........................................................................... 2
........................................................................... 2
........................................................................... 4
........................................................................... 4
........................................................................... 4
........................................................................... 4
........................................................................... 4

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Background Figures
As -Built Plat
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Appendix B Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 1 Final Planting Species List
Table 2 Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table
Table 3 Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities
Appendix C Site Photos
MYO Vegetation Plot Photographs
Additional Photographs
Appendix D Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets

1 Project Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Salem Nutrient Offset Bank ("Bank Parcel") is operated under the terms and conditions of the Salem
Nutrient Offset Mitigation Banking Instrument (NOBI), made and entered into by Water & Land Solutions,
LLC (WLS), acting as the Bank Sponsor ("Sponsor"), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ) and Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). The Parcel was planned according to the
NOBI, 15A NCAC 02B .0703, which became effective on April 1, 2020.
The Bank Parcel (35.456793,-77.993107) is located in Wayne County, North Carolina, between the Town
of Pikeville and the City of Goldsborough (Figure 1). The parcel boundary is within the Neuse River Basin
8-digit HUC 03020201 and is located in the Buck Swamp- Little River subwatershed (030202011604). To
access the site from Raleigh, NC, follow US Interstate 40 East towards Benson/Wilmington. Take Exit 309
for US-70 East towards Smithfield/Goldsboro. Continue onto US 70 bypass East. Then take Exit 356 for US-
117 towards Goldsboro. Follow Belfast Road to Salem Church Road, turn right onto Salem Church Rd and
the site will be on the right.
The Bank Parcel will provide nutrient offset credits which may be used for stormwater requirements for
new and existing development requiring offsets. The project will involve the restoration of Neuse buffers
to help reduce non -point source discharge of contaminants into streams within the Neuse River basin.
The project area is comprised of a 12.322-acre easement.
The Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP) had an easement area of 12.32 acres, with 11.51 acres being
restored for nutrient offset restoration credit. These acreages have been updated slightly based on actual
survey, and the as -built acres are as follows. The easement area is 12.322 acres, with 11.552 acres being
restored for nutrient offset restoration credit.
1.2 Project Success Criteria
The success criteria for the Site will follow the approved performance standards and monitoring protocols
presented in the approved BPDP, developed in compliance with the DWR Rule 15A NCAC 02B 0295.
Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a minimum of five years and will be conducted
during the fall season. Nine permanent and two random vegetation monitoring plots were installed and
evaluated within the nutrient offset areas to measure the survival of the planted trees. Riparian buffer
vegetation monitoring will be based on the Carolina Vegetation Survey -Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Protocol for Recording Vegetation: Level 1-2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4.2.
The measures of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree
species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of the established stems, established at a density
of at least 260 planted trees per acre at the end of Year 5. Appropriate native volunteer stems of native
hardwood tree species may be included to meet the performance standards with DWR approval.
1.2.1 Vegetation
Nine vegetation monitoring plots were installed (10m x 10m), as well as two non -fixed random vegetation
transects (50m x 2m or 25m x 4m). These plots cover at least two percent of the 12.322 acres of the
planted area. Plots were randomly placed throughout the easement. The locations of the plots are shown
4

on Figure 2. All planted stems are marked with flagging tape and a wood stake. In the field, the four
corners of each permanent plot were marked with PVC at the origin and rebar at the other corners. Photos
of each plot will be taken from the origin each monitoring year. Vegetation monitoring will occur in the
fall each required monitoring year, prior to the leaf fall. Plots will be monitored for a minimum of five
years. The following data are recorded for all planted trees in the plots: species, common name, height,
planting date, and grid location. The total number of volunteer woody stems will also be documented and
reported by species. Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species composition, density, and height.
Data are processed using the NCDMS Shiny App data entry tool.
1.2.2 Visual Assessment
Visual assessments are performed within the site semi-annually during the five-year monitoring period.
Problem areas will be noted (e.g. low stem density, vegetation mortality, invasive species, or
encroachment). Areas of concern will be photographed, mapped, and accompanied by a written
description in the annual report. Problem areas will be re-evaluated during each subsequent visual
assessment. Should remedial actions be required, recommendations will be provided in the annual
monitoring report.
2 Project Mitigation Components
2.1 Project Components
Out of the 12.322 acres that are protected with a permanent conservation easement, 503,025 ft2 are
proposed to generate nutrient offset restoration credits. The total potential nutrient offset credit that
the Bank Parcel will generate is summarized in the Project Credit Table (Table 1). Nutrient offset credit is
proposed from 0'-200' along Ditch 1 and Ditch 3 and from 0'-100' on Stream A. These areas are not
convertible to riparian buffer credit per the NOBI. The nutrient offset credit generating area is entirely
cleared active agricultural land (unforested) and includes a 0.05-acre deduction on each side of a non -
diffuse flow entry point at the entry of Ditch 1, 4, and 5 into the proposed easement, per NCDWR Buffer
Interpretation/Clarification 2008-019.
4

Table 1. Salem, 2022-0139 V3, Project Credits
Neuse 03020201-Outside Falls Lake
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ftZ/pound)
19.16394
N/A
Credit Type
Location
Subject? (enter
NO if
ephemeral or
ditch')
Feature Type
Mitigation Activity
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
Feature Name
Total Area (ft')
Total (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
2
Mitigation (k)
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:l)
%Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Convertible to
Riparian
Buffer?
Riparian Buffer
Credits
Convertible to
Nutrient Offset?
Delivered
Nutrient Offset:
N (Ibs)
Delivered
Nutrient Offset:
P (Ibs)
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-100
DI
235,562
1
100%
No
—
Yes
12,291.940
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
101-200
D1
200,527
1
33%
No
—
Yes
10,463.767
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-100
D3
32,513
1
100%
No
—
Yes
1,696.572
—
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
101-200
D3
20,940
1
33%
No
—
Yes
1,092.677
—
Nutrient Offset
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
Stream A
415
1
100%
No
—
Yes
21.655
—
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
diffused flow deductions
13,068
0
1
—
—
—
Totals (ft2):
Total Buffer (ft2):
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):
503,025
0
0.000 25,566.611 0.000
0
0
503,025
N/A
Total Ephemeral Area (ft2) for Credit:
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft2):
Enter Preservation Credits Below
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Min -Max Buffer Width (ft) Feature Name
Preservation Area Subtotals
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
I credits
Restoration:
0
0.000
Enhancement:
0
0.000
Preservation:
0
0.000
Total Riparian Buffer:
0
0.000
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Nutrient Offset:
Nitrogen-
503,025
25.566.611
Phosphoru
o.000
ki
0
0
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
Total Area (sf)
Total (Creditable)
Area for Buffer
Mitigation (ft')
0
0
Ephemeral Reaches as %TABM
Preservation as %TABM
Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian Buffer
Ratio (x:1) %Full Credit Ratio (x:1) Credits

2.2 Design Approach
The land use adjacent to the ditches was primarily active farmland. The restoration areas required limited
site preparation due to current tilling practices and a lack of hardened plow layers. In preparation for
planting, the site was ripped the first week of January 2024 and seeded January 24, 2024. No soil
amendments were needed to support the planted trees.
Riparian restoration was proposed along both sides of the uppermost reach of Ditch 1 and along the left
bank of the ditch as it turns ninety degrees at the confluence with Ditch 2. Riparian restoration also
includes the right bank of Ditch 3 where it begins to flow towards the stream on the Parcel. Both Ditch 1
and Ditch 3 flow into Stream A. A small portion of Stream A is included within the conservation easement
to ensure the hydrological connection of Ditch 1 and 3. All ditches have stable banks, and no bank
stabilization or earthwork was required. The revegetation plan for the entire riparian restoration area
included planting native bare root tree species. WLS removed 13,068 ft2 from nutrient offset crediting to
satisfy non -diffuse flow requirements per DWR guidance (Table 1). The reduction of credit is located
where Ditches 1, 4 and 5 enter the easement.
WLS will utilize herbicide and hand pruning to control invasive species and other undesirable vegetation
during the monitoring period to promote the growth of the target community and achieve success criteria.
If mowing is necessary within the conservation easement for purposes of establishing healthy stems by
WLS during the monitoring period, WLS will receive approval from NCDWR prior to any mowing activities.
If necessary, WLS will develop a species -specific control plan.
3 As -Built (Baseline) Condition
3.1 As -built (Baseline) Survey
An as -built survey plat conducted under the responsible charge of a North Carolina Professional Land
Surveyor (Chris Cole, PLS with Ascension Land Surveying), was utilized to document the as -built or baseline
condition of the Site post -planting. The Project planting was completed in February 2024, and the as -built
plat was completed in March 2024. Baseline monitoring activities occurred in February 2024. The
conservation easement is marked at least every 150 feet with Unique Places to Save conservation
easement signs attached to t-posts.
3.2 As -Built/ Baseline Assessment
No significant deviations were documented between final construction plans and as -built conditions. One
minor erosion rill on the bottom portion of Ditch 1 was observed during the as -built site visit on March
13, 2024. The area was raked, re -seeded, and covered with straw on March 18, 2024. Before and after
photos of the area are included in Appendix C.
3.2.1 Vegetation
Monitoring of the nine permanent and two random vegetation plots was completed during February
2024. Vegetation data can be found in Appendix B with the associated photos located in Appendix C. The
MYO average planted density is 743 stems per acre, which exceeds the interim measure of vegetative
success of at least 260 planted stems per acre at the end of the fifth monitoring year. Each individual
vegetation plot successfully meets criteria with stem counts between 688 and 810 stems per acre. No

volunteer species were observed at baseline monitoring. Table 2 details the average stem density per plot
type (permanent or random) based on associated performance criteria.
Table 2: Stem Density Per Plot Type
4

Appendix A:
Background Figures
As -Built Plat
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)

Q Conservation Easement
Q Parcel Boundary
Q HUC8 Watershed
Boundary
Project is located in:
HUC8 03020201
HUC12 030202011604
Upper Neuse
Project L• •
,,,,w..■■ir■�!���i!�
� Greem,ale
Columbia
n o
Atlanta SOUTH
Y CAR OLINAs,Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO,
NOAA, USGS, EPA, NPS
z :-
117.
--
n�
S
O 9X X
�
a cp
ryh Dr
Goldsboro
Gt�e Wayne
°oK s M.\`35.4548821 -77.98973 Municipal poit
c
tarKlrn $<arch o
2 w Q
Middle Neuse
7
swaCombs Rd
mp R Crc �
Goldsboro
Wayne
Municipal
-.A_irFort
o°
Storey Cree_
a
Stoney Hlll Rd
rn S
A/ G�
e�
an cr 117'
Rd M a-,\
3
z
� Branch �Owell's 13r
am - d,
Ra
•70,
e� D r all
0 0.25 0.5 1 1 lie w ' City^ G Idsboro,�tate of North Carolina DOT, rl, HERE, Garmin,
Miles
J°� INCREMENT P, Inter.map,'US�GS, METI/NASA, EPA, USDA
/N 1 in = 0.5 mi arse
WATER & LANCC
SOLUTIONS
Salem Nutrient Offset Bank
Upper Neuse 03020201
Wayne County, North Carolina
Project
Location Map
Figure
1
Date: 3/19/2024

f
0/' ..e 9►
A A
Q Conservation Easement
Q Parcel Boundary
Stream A
Ditch
" Vegetation Plots
Permanent Vegetation Plot (9)
Random Vegetation Transect (2)
Riparian Restoration for Nutrient Offset
' C Ditch 1, 0-100ft
Ditch 1, 101-200ft
y/hw j Ditch 3, 0-100ft
Ditch 3, 101-200ft
NC CGIA, Maxar, Microsoft 1 Stream A, o-looft
!, �. + Non -Diffuse Flow, No Credit
Nonqzrp-Diffuse
-
f
7 J %e .. .
R
8 } # 1 i► for
�y l
�1
NC CGIA, Maxar, Microsoft
WATER & LANDTM
SOLUTIONS
Salem Nutrient Offset Bank
Wayne County, North Carolina
DWR Project ID:
2022-0139v2
March 2024
MYO
Current Conditions Plan View
Monitoring Year 0
FIGURE
2
NAD 1983 2011 State Plane
North Carolina FPS 3200 FT US

Appendix B:
Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 1: Final Planting Species List
Table 2: Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table
Table 3: Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities

Table 1: Final Planting Species
List - Salem Nutrient Bank
Scientific Name
Betula nigra
Common Name
River birch
% by Species
12%
Wetland Tolerance
FACW
Number Planted by
Species
1,000
Quercus phellos
Willow oak
10%
FACW
850
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel oak
10%
FACW
850
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
15%
FACW
1,250
Quercus alba
White oak
10%
FACU
800
Ulmus americana
American elm
10%
FAC
800
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
8%
FAC
700
Quercus nigra
Water oak
10%
FAC
850
Magnolia virginiana
sweetbay magnolia
8%
FACW
650
Persea borbonia
IRedbay
8%
FACW
650
TOTAL
8,400

SUM
Veg Plot 3 F
Veg Plot
1 F
Veg Plot
2 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
729
1
8
0
729
2
7
0
729
1
8
0
Veg Plot
4 F
Veg Plot
5 F
Veg Plot
6 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
688
2
7
0
729
2
9
0
810
2
9
0
Veg Plot
7 F
Veg Plot
8 F
Veg Plot
9 F
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
729
2
8
0
769
2
9
0
769
2
9
0
Veg Plot
Group 1 R
Veg Plot
Group 2 R
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species
% Invasives
Stems/Ac.
Av. Ht. (ft)
# Species % Invasives
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
769
j 2
j 9
0
729
2
j 8
0
*Each monitoring year represents a different plot for the random vegetation plot "groups". Random plots are denoted with an R, and fixed plots with an F.

Table 3: Salem Nutrient Offset Bank Planted Stems and Densities
Planted Acreage 12.32
Date of Initial Plant
2024-02-22
Date(s) of Supplemental Plant(s)
NA
Date(s) Mowing
NA
Date of Current Survey
2024-02-22
Plot size (ACRES)
0.0247
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
RUM;
17F
1
1
1
1
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
FAC
3
3
1
1
2
2
3
3
Magnolia virginiana
sweetbay
Tree
FACW
4
4
2
2
Persea borbonia
redbay
Tree
FACW
3
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
2
2
5
5
5
5
2
2
3
3
Quercus alba
•
white oak
Tree
FACU
3
3
2
2
3
3
1
1
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
FACW
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
FAC
2
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
FAC
1
1
1
1
2
2
4
4
1
1
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
FACW
2
2
1
1
3
3
4
4
Performance Standard
18
18
18
18
18
18
17
17
18
18
Current Year Stem Count
18
18
18
17
18
Stems/Acre
729
729
729
688
729
Species Count
8
7
8
7
9
• Dominant Species Composition (%)
17
28
28
24
22
• Average Plot Height (ft.)
1
2
1
1
2
2
Invasives
0
0
0
0
0
Current Year Stem Count
18
18
18
17
18
• Stems/Acre
729
729
729
688
729
• Species Count
8
7 A
8
7
9
Dominant Species Composition (%)
17
2
28
24
22
Average Plot Height (ft.)
1
2
1
2
2
Invasives
0
0
L 0I
1 0
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation plan
addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized).
3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and
proposed stems.

Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
FACW
4
4
4
4
2
2
M.-
3
3
3
4
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
FAC
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
3
Magnolia virginiana
sweetbay
Tree
FACW
2
2
1
1
1
• Persea borbonia
redbay
Tree
FACW
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
FACW
3
3
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
3
Quercus alba
•
white oak
Tree
FACU
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
FACW
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
FAC
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
FAC
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
2
2
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
FACW
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
Performance Standard
20
20
18
18
19
19
19
19
19
18
Current Year Stem Count
20
18
19
19
19
18
Stems/Acre
810
729
769
769
769
729
Species Count
9
8
9
9
9
8
• Dominant Species Composition (%)
20
22
26
26
26
22
• Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
2
2
2
2
2
Invasives
0
0
0
0
L
0
1 0
Current Year Stem Count
20
18 19
19
19
18
• Stems/Acre
810
729 769
769
769
729
• Species Count
9
9
9
8
Dominant Species Composition
Average Plot Height (ft.)
2
2 2
2
2
2
Invasives
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation plan
addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized).
3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and
proposed stems.

Appendix C:
Site Photos
MYO Vegetation Plot Photographs
Additional Photos

Pv-
,r7�� yet
.,s"'.d` 4✓ :..., g«. ;.� f aF .s �` !`4a emu._

4, 3:16
me Cou
.. AF-
Fixed Veg Plot 9 (MY-00)

Easement Marking – facing north Easement Marking – facing north
Easement Marking – facing northwest Easement Marking – western border facing north
Erosion rill – Before (MY-00)Erosion rill – After (MY-00)
Erosion rill – Before (MY-00)Erosion rill – After (MY-00)

Appendix D:
Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data Sheets

Plot ID Scientific Name Performance Standard Approval Planted or Volunteer? X Coordinate (m) Y Coordinate (m) MY0 Height MY1 Height MY2 Height MY3 Height MY5 Height MY7 Height Map_ID
1 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.1 0.3 1.3 a
1 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 5.3 0.2 1.7 b
1 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 8.3 0.1 0.6 c
1 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.7 2.5 1.8 d
1 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.5 1.4 1.8 e
1 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 2 1.6 1.4 f
1 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 1.7 3.6 1.2 g
1 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 4 3.1 1.3 h
1 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan Planted 6.4 4.5 1.5 i
1 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan Planted 8.4 6.1 1.5 j
1 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan Planted 6.2 6.8 0.7 k
1 Quercus laurifolia Approved Mit Plan Planted 1 6.1 0.5 l
1 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 3.5 5.2 1.2 m
1 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.9 9.1 1.5 n
1 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan Planted 3 7.9 0.4 o
1 Quercus laurifolia Approved Mit Plan Planted 5.2 9.3 2.1 p
1 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.8 8.2 0.3 q
1 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.9 9.5 1.8 r
a b c
d
ef
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
X (m)
Y
(
m
)
Plot 1
Plot ID Scientific Name Performance Standard Approval Planted or Volunteer? X Coordinate (m) Y Coordinate (m) MY0 Height MY1 Height MY2 Height MY3 Height MY5 Height MY7 Height Map_ID
2 Magnolia virginiana Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.2 0.2 0.7 a
2 Magnolia virginiana Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.1 2.7 1.5 b
2 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.1 5 2.1 c
2 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 1.9 9 1.5 d
2 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.1 6.3 1.9 e
2 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.4 3.4 0.8 f
2 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.7 1 2.3 g
2 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.9 0.2 1.7 h
2 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.7 2.8 1.6 i
2 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.5 5.7 1.4 j
2 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.2 8.2 1.5 k
2 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 6.9 7.9 1.9 l
2 Magnolia virginiana Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.1 5.2 1.1 m
2 Magnolia virginiana Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.2 2.3 1.4 n
2 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.7 0.9 1.5 o
2 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.5 3.5 2.5 p
2 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.3 6.2 1.6 q
2 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.2 8.7 1.7 r
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
X (m)
Y
(
m
)
Plot 2
Plot ID Scientific Name Performance Standard Approval Planted or Volunteer? X Coordinate (m) Y Coordinate (m) MY0 Height MY1 Height MY2 Height MY3 Height MY5 Height MY7 Height Map_ID
3 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.1 0.5 1.5 a
3 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.1 7.3 1.3 b
3 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 1.6 9.2 1.5 c
3 Quercus laurifolia Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.3 6.5 2.2 d
3 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan Planted 1 5 1.7 e
3 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan Planted 1.6 1.9 0.6 f
3 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 3.6 0.9 1.5 g
3 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 3.3 3.7 1.8 h
3 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.1 8.2 1.6 i
3 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan Planted 5.3 9.5 1.2 j
3 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.5 5.3 0.5 k
3 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan Planted 5.5 2.7 1.4 l
3 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 8 1.3 1.2 m
3 Quercus laurifolia Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.3 4.3 1.6 n
3 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 6.7 6.8 2.5 o
3 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 8.9 6.3 1.1 p
3 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.6 8.6 1.9 q
3 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.3 9.8 1.6 r
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
X (m)
Y
(
m
)
Plot 3
Plot ID Scientific Name Performance Standard Approval Planted or Volunteer? X Coordinate (m) Y Coordinate (m) MY0 Height MY1 Height MY2 Height MY3 Height MY5 Height MY7 Height Map_ID
4 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.4 0.1 1.6 a
4 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.7 0.4 2.1 b
4 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 5.2 0.4 1.7 c
4 Magnolia virginiana Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.6 0.5 0.8 d
4 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 8.7 2.7 2 e
4 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 6.4 2.7 1.6 f
4 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 3.6 2.7 1.9 g
4 Magnolia virginiana Approved Mit Plan Planted 1.2 2.6 0.7 h
4 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 1.9 5 1.9 i
4 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.4 5.1 1.6 j
4 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.3 5 1.6 k
4 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.8 5 1.6 l
4 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.9 8 1 m
4 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.8 8.1 1.5 n
4 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 5.3 7.8 2.2 o
4 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.9 7.6 1.3 p
4 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.3 7.4 0.6 q
a
b c d
efgh
i j k l
mn
opq
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
X (m)
Y
(
m
)
Plot 4
Plot ID Scientific Name Performance Standard Approval Planted or Volunteer? X Coordinate (m) Y Coordinate (m) MY0 Height MY1 Height MY2 Height MY3 Height MY5 Height MY7 Height Map_ID
5 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.6 0.5 1.8 a
5 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 4 0.3 1.7 b
5 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.3 0.6 1.6 c
5 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 5.9 1.8 1.8 d
5 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.2 2.2 1.3 e
5 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.5 4 0.9 f
5 Quercus laurifolia Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.2 3.5 1.7 g
5 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 8.2 3.3 2 h
5 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.7 5.4 1.7 i
5 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 6.6 5.3 1.7 j
5 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.8 5.2 1.6 k
5 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan Planted 1.3 6.6 0.8 l
5 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.5 6.8 1.4 m
5 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.7 7.2 1.4 n
5 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.3 9.4 1.5 o
5 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 6.5 8.9 1.8 p
5 Quercus laurifolia Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.7 8.8 1.6 q
5 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.2 8.3 1.5 r
a b
c
d
e
f
g h
ijk
l m
n
o
pq
r
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
X (m)
Y
(
m
)
Plot 5
Plot ID Scientific Name Performance Standard Approval Planted or Volunteer? X Coordinate (m) Y Coordinate (m) MY0 Height MY1 Height MY2 Height MY3 Height MY5 Height MY7 Height Map_ID
6 Quercus laurifolia Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.1 0.3 2 a
6 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.3 1 1.2 b
6 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 6.9 0.4 1.6 c
6 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.5 0.2 1.7 d
6 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.8 2.1 2.6 e
6 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 5.3 2.2 1.8 f
6 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.1 3.5 1.5 g
6 Quercus laurifolia Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.6 2.8 1.3 h
6 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 1.1 6.5 1.7 i
6 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.4 5 1.8 j
6 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.4 5.8 2.1 k
6 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan Planted 8.3 5.9 0.3 l
6 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.7 4 1.8 m
6 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.4 8.3 1.3 n
6 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan Planted 6.9 7.5 1.4 o
6 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 3.1 7.6 1.6 p
6 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 1.3 9.3 2.3 q
6 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 5.2 8.9 1.6 r
6 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.4 9.9 1.4 s
6 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 6 3.8 2.1 t
a
b
c d
ef
g
h
i
j
k l
m
n
op
q
r
s
t
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
X (m)
Y
(
m
)
Plot 6
Plot ID Scientific Name Performance Standard Approval Planted or Volunteer? X Coordinate (m) Y Coordinate (m) MY0 Height MY1 Height MY2 Height MY3 Height MY5 Height MY7 Height Map_ID
7 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.1 0.3 2.5 a
7 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.9 2.6 1.4 b
7 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 1 6.4 1.5 c
7 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 1.5 9 2.1 d
7 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 3.8 9.4 1.7 e
7 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 3.3 7.3 2.1 f
7 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.8 4.4 1.7 g
7 Magnolia virginiana Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.8 0.7 0.6 h
7 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.4 2.3 2.1 i
7 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 5.3 5.1 1.3 j
7 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan Planted 5.3 8.2 0.6 k
7 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.2 9.6 1.6 l
7 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 7 6.5 2.3 m
7 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.1 3.2 1.1 n
7 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 6.1 0.6 2.5 o
7 Magnolia virginiana Approved Mit Plan Planted 9 0.9 0.8 p
7 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 8.5 4.9 1.7 q
7 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.5 7.9 1.9 r
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
X (m)
Y
(
m
)
Plot 7
Plot ID Scientific Name Performance Standard Approval Planted or Volunteer? X Coordinate (m) Y Coordinate (m) MY0 Height MY1 Height MY2 Height MY3 Height MY5 Height MY7 Height Map_ID
8 Quercus laurifolia Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.3 0.2 2.1 a
8 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 1.8 1.8 1.4 b
8 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.9 4.5 1.6 c
8 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.2 7.7 1.7 d
8 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 1.8 9.6 1.5 e
8 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan Planted 3.3 8.6 1.8 f
8 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.4 6.1 2.6 g
8 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.9 3.1 1.8 h
8 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 4 0.1 1.3 i
8 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 5.2 1.6 1.5 j
8 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.9 4.2 1.9 k
8 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 5.1 7.5 1.7 l
8 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 6.5 9.4 1.7 m
8 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 6.7 6.2 2.1 n
8 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.3 2.4 0.8 o
8 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.3 0.3 1.6 p
8 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.6 0.9 1.4 q
8 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 8.6 5.1 2.1 r
8 Magnolia virginiana Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.1 8.1 1.9 s
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
X (m)
Y
(
m
)
Plot 8
Plot ID Scientific Name Performance Standard Approval Planted or Volunteer? X Coordinate (m) Y Coordinate (m) MY0 Height MY1 Height MY2 Height MY3 Height MY5 Height MY7 Height Map_ID
9 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.3 0.5 2.6 a
9 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.2 3.2 1.7 b
9 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.2 5.9 0.7 c
9 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 0.1 8.3 2 d
9 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.5 7.6 2.7 e
9 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.6 4.6 1.7 f
9 Quercus laurifolia Approved Mit Plan Planted 2.7 1.9 1.7 g
9 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 5 1.9 1.5 h
9 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.9 4.4 1.7 i
9 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.8 7 2.4 j
9 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 4.8 9.5 1.5 k
9 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.3 8.3 1.8 l
9 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.3 5.4 1.6 m
9 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.4 2.7 1.6 n
9 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan Planted 7.5 0.3 2.1 o
9 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.9 0.2 1.6 p
9 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.8 2.7 1.7 q
9 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.7 5.9 1.9 r
9 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan Planted 9.6 8.8 0.7 s
a
b
c
d
e
f
g h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o p
q
r
s
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
X (m)
Y
(
m
)
Plot 9
Plot ID Monitoring Year Scientific Name Performance Standard Approval Height
1 0 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan 1.5
1 0 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan 2.2
1 0 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan 1.4
10Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan 1.6
10Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan 1.1
1 0 Magnolia virginiana Approved Mit Plan 1.8
1 0 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan 1.4
10Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan 1.7
1 0 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan 1.8
1 0 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan 2.6
1 0 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan 1.9
1 0 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan 1.8
1 0 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan 1.6
1 0 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan 1.7
1 0 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan 1.6
1 0 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan 1.9
1 0 Quercus laurifolia Approved Mit Plan 2.2
1 0 Quercus nigra Approved Mit Plan 1.9
1 0 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan 1.4
Plot ID Monitoring Year Scientific Name Performance Standard Approval Height
2 0 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan 1.3
2 0 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan 1.5
2 0 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan 2.2
2 0 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan 1.5
2 0 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan 2.6
2 0 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan 2.4
2 0 Quercus laurifolia Approved Mit Plan 2.1
2 0 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan 1.3
2 0 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan 2
2 0 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan 1.7
2 0 Platanus occidentalis Approved Mit Plan 2.1
2 0 Ulmus americana Approved Mit Plan 1.6
2 0 Carpinus caroliniana Approved Mit Plan 1.7
2 0 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan 1.7
2 0 Quercus phellos Approved Mit Plan 1.8
2 0 Persea borbonia Approved Mit Plan 1.7
2 0 Quercus alba Approved Mit Plan 2
2 0 Betula nigra Approved Mit Plan 1.9