20151229 Ver 1_Individual_20151130

-AAOPTI
PIEDMONT TRIAD AIRPORT AUTHORITY
November 24, 2015
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Attention: Mr. David Bailey
NC Deparhnent of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury St., 9`h Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Ms. Daren Higgins
Subject: Application for Section 404 Individual Permit, Section 401 Water Quality
Certification, and Jordan Buffer Allowance for HAECO Facility Improvements
at Piedmont Triad International Airport, Guilford County
The Piedmont Triad Airport Authority (PTAH) hereby applies for Individual Permit and Water
Quality Certification under Sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act and
15A NCAC 2H .0500 and Jordan Buffer Allowance under 15A NCAC 213 .0267 for unavoidable
impacts to jurisdictional 'Waters of the United States for improvements to the Timeo Aviation
Services dha Haeco Airframe Services (HAECO) tenant facility at the Piedmont Triad
International Airport (PTIA). This project was addressed in a short form I?nvironmental
Assessment (EA) pending a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) by the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), consistent with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Jurisdictional resources within the project area have been verified (SAW -2015-00920) by the
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Division of Water Resources (DWR).
The existing HAECO facility is a purpose-built facility complex for aircraft base maintenance,
located on approximately 112 acres Southeast of PTIA Runway 5Rf23L, between the Cessna
Citation Service Center (to the Southwest) and the Honda Aircraft Company World Headquarters
(to the Northeast). The complex includes three wide-body hangars (Hangars I -III) as well as a
fourth (Hangar IV) for narrow body aircraft, The hangars are complemented with 60 acres of ramp
parking space to accommodate HAECO's commercial, government, military, and other private
aircraft owners and operators. The facility complex also includes corporate and customer offices;
an on-site training center; shipping and receiving; and IIAECO's engineering design, integration,
and manufacturing division.
1000A Tt�d Johnson Parkwny • Greensboro, North C,nrnlhl i 271100 • Pliono: 3313.665.56200 • Fvm 336,+665.11125

Mr. David Bailey and Ms. Karen Higgins
November 24, 2015
Page 2 of 7
Proposed Project
The proposed HAECO Facility Improvements include site preparation of approximately 16 acres
of Airport land to be added to the existing HAECO facility for aviation -related development,
including clearing, grading, fill, and excavation for:
1. Expansion of the existing concrete apron by approximately 204,600 sq. ft., with engine
run-up pad and 21,200 sq. ft. connector throat to an existing Taxiway M connector (the
connector throat will also link the two sides of the HAECO complex);
2. Construction of an approximately 177,400 sq. ft. two -bay wide-body aircraft maintenance
hangar;
3. Construction of an approximately 33,810 sq. ft. support annex;
4. Construction of a new fire/water provision and expansion of the existing hazardous
materials (HazMat) facility;
5. Addition of vehicle and pedestrian access and fire lanes.
Extension of utilities to the new structures including communications, electrical, natural gas,
water, and sanitary sewer (land disturbance for utility extensions are anticipated to be within the
proposed project grading limits and will not impact additional special resources). Stormwater
management and off-site mitigation for unavoidable wetland and stream impacts are also
anticipated.
Project Purpose and Need
The proposed improvements would address the need to service two wide-bodied aircraft
simultaneously by providing movement and hangar space. HAECO requires the capacity to
service wide-bodied aircraft to meet current demand and to integrate its US operations with its
international business of maintaining wide-bodied aircraft. These improvements will also provide
a needed connection between the two sides of the existing HAECO complex to allow for
movement of vehicles, supplies and equipment from one side to the other without having to cross
airport taxiways or to depart and reenter secured areas for travel along public roads. The project
would increase operational capabilities and improve efficiency at HAECO's PTIA facility.
Affected Environment
The proposed project is located entirely within the existing airport property. The HAECO facility
is bounded by the PTIA Air Operations Area (AOA) to the Northwest, by Radar Road to the
Southeast and by additional jurisdictional resources (wetlands and streams) then adjacent PTIA
tenants to the Southwest and Northeast. The location is predominantly developed (aprons,
taxiways, parking, hangars, buildings, and other structures) with maintained in -field lawns and
stormwater/fire management ponds. The project area is located between the HAECO Hangars I -
III complex to the Southwest and the Hangar IV complex to the Northeast. This approximately
16 -acre site includes nearly 11 forested acres with 1,601 linear feet unnamed perennial stream
tributaries to Horsepen Creek and 0.81 acres abutting riparian wetlands.
Alternatives to the Project
During early project planning, consideration was given to locating the proposed new hangar
adjacent to HAECO Maintenance Hangar I, at the southwest end of the HAECO facility, but this
alternative would have required removal and replacement of the fire suppression system for
existing Hangars I -III and would have reduced employee parking for those hangars. This

Mr. David Bailey and Ms. Karen Higgins
November 24, 2015
Page 3 of 7
alternative involved significant relocation of utilities and complicated employee access. This
alternative does not satisfy the purpose and need for the project and was not carried forward.
There are no reasonable actions, other than the preferred alternative, that feasibly substitute for the
proposed project. The project, requiring specific dimensions and orientation of components, must
be located at the existing HAECO facility, at the area available between existing Hangars III and
IV. Locating the project on the northeast side of Hangar IV would eliminate some of the essential
facility parking and fail to connect the Hangar IV facility with the rest of the HAECO complex.
Locating the project on a site that is not contiguous with the existing HAECO facility would also
fail to provide the necessary internal connection between the HAECO hangars and result in
duplication of utilities, storm water management controls and other support facilities that are
capable of serving an integrated facility.
For a "No -Action / No -Permit" alternative, HAECO would have to continue routing aircraft and
vehicular traffic on airport taxiways or through security and along public roads in order to traverse
from one side of its existing complex to the other. HAECO would be required to explore other
sites, other airports, and/or construct entirely new facilities in order to address its operational need
to service wide-bodied aircraft.
The preferred alternative is the only reasonable alternative that meets the project purpose and need.
Due to the limited available space and location of streams and wetlands on both sides of and in the
middle of the HAECO property, there is no project alternative which does not impact jurisdictional
resources. Minimization of project impacts by decreasing the size of the proposed hanger is not
possible because it is sized for the wide-bodied aircraft specified by the project need and purpose,
and the size of the aircraft ramp cannot be reduced without sacrificing maneuvering space that is
required by aircraft entering and exiting from the hangar or without eliminating the connector
throat to Hangar IV. Retaining walls to minimize the side slopes would not reduce stream and
wetlands impacts since it is the hangar structure itself, and the ramp pavement, that overlap the
stream and wetland sites rather than the side slopes.
Minimization of Impacts
Based on the limited space at the HAECO facility, constraints of the site (jurisdictional resources
on both sides and in the middle of the facility), and lack of practicable alternatives; it is anticipated
that 1,601 linear feet perennial channel and 0.81 acres abutting wetlands will be impacted by the
proposed project. PTAA will minimize potential unavoidable adverse effects of the Project
consistent with FAA requirements and Section 404(b)(1) guidelines to the extent possible as
follows:
• Construction of stream culverts will minimize smothering of organisms by utilizing
"pump -around"; minimize construction time; control turbidity through adherence to the
Erosion and Sedimentation Control (E&SC) Plan; avoid unnecessary discharge; prevent
creation of standing water; and prevent drainage of wet areas.
• During construction, physiochemical conditions will be maintained and potency and
availability of pollutants will be reduced; material to be discharged will be limited;
treatment substances may be added if necessary; chemical flocculants may be utilized to
enhance the deposition of suspended particulates in appropriate disposal areas.
• The effects of dredged or fill material may be controlled by selecting discharge methods
and disposal sites where the potential for erosion, slumping or leaching of materials into

Mr. David Bailey and Ms. Karen Higgins
November 24, 2015
Page 4 of 7
the surrounding aquatic ecosystem will be reduced. These methods include using
containment levees, sediment basins, and cover crops to reduce erosion.
Discharge effects will also be controlled by containing discharged material properly to
prevent point and nonpoint sources of pollution; and timing the discharge to minimize
impact, for instance during periods of unusual high water flows.
The effects of a discharge will be minimized by the manner in which it is dispersed, such
as, where environmentally desirable, orienting dredged/fill material to minimize
undesirable obstruction to the surface water or natural flow, and utilizing natural contours
to minimize the size of the fill; using silt screens or other appropriate methods to confine
suspended particulates/turbidity to a small area where settling or removal can occur;
selecting sites or managing discharges to confine and minimize the release of suspended
particulates to give decreased turbidity levels and to maintain light penetration for
organisms; and setting limitations on the amount of material to be discharged per unit of
time or volume of receiving water.
Discharge technology will be adapted to the needs of the site. The applicant will consider
using appropriate equipment or machinery, including protective devices, and the use of
such equipment in activities related to the discharge of dredged or fill material; employing
appropriate maintenance and operation on equipment or machinery, including adequate
training, staffing, and working procedures; using machinery and techniques that are
especially designed to reduce damage to streams; designing access roads and channel
spanning structures using culverts, open channels, and diversions that will pass both low
and high water flows, accommodate fluctuating water levels, and maintain circulation and
faunal movement; employing appropriate machinery and methods of transport of the
material for discharge.
Minimization of adverse effects on populations of plants and animals will be achieved by
minimizing changes in water flow patterns which would interfere with the movement of
animals; managing discharges to avoid creating habitat conducive to the development of
undesirable airport wildlife hazards; avoiding sites having unique habitat or other value,
including habitat of threatened or endangered species; using planning and construction
practices to institute habitat development and restoration to produce a new or modified
environmental state of higher ecological value by displacement of some or all of the
existing environmental characteristics; timing discharge to avoid spawning or migration
seasons and other biologically critical time periods; and avoiding the destruction of
remnant natural sites within areas already affected by development.
Compensatory Mitigation
As of November 1, 2015, there are no available USACE or NCDEQ approved mitigation bank
stream (SMU) or wetland (WMU) credits available for the Cape Fear 02 Hydrologic Unit
(HUC 03030002) httDs:Hribits.usace.annv.mil/, htti)://Dortal.ncdenr.orp-/c/document library/.
Compensation for unavoidable impacts to perennial stream channels and riparian wetlands will be
provided off-site by the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). An In -Lieu
Fee Request Form is being submitted to NCDMS and payment is pending approval by USACE
and D WR.

Mr. David Bailey and Ms. Karen Higgins
November 24, 2015
Page 5 of 7
Cumulative Impacts
No cumulative project environmental effects are anticipated: Past projects have included the
nearby Honda MRO and Connector Road and the extension of Taxiway M. Only the Connector
Road project involved quantifiable impacts (Nationwide 404/401 Permit and minor buffer variance
for stream crossing). Future projects are the Cross -Field Taxiway and Northwest Development
Site on the opposite side of the Airport in the Brush Creek rather than Horsepen Creek Sub -basin,
and North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) roadway improvement projects in the
project vicinity (I 73 Connector, US 220/NC 68 Connector, 1840, widening US 220, and widening
Market Street). No significant environmental impacts have been determined for these projects.
Cumulatively, the HAECO Facility Improvements would not add significant impacts, rather, the
roadway improvements anticipate such development at PTIA.
Fish and Wildlife
As of March 25, 2015 the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists Small Whorled Pogonia
(endangered) as the only protected species for Guilford County. The project is anticipated to have
No Effect on this species - suitable habitat is not present at the project site and review of Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) records indicated no known occurrences within 1 mile. No water
body large enough and sufficiently open to be considered a potential feeding source for Bald Eagle
(Bald & Golden Eagle Protection Act) is located within 1.13 miles of the project and there are no
known occurrences of this species within 1 mile of the project. No Federal Candidate species are
listed for Guilford County and there are no State -listed endangered or threatened species known
to occur within 1 mile of the project.
Approximately 4.95 acres of Piedmont bottomland forest and 5.77 acres mixed pine/hardwood
forest would potentially be directly impacted by the project. An approximately 0.75 -acre non -
jurisdictional fire -suppression pond will also be impacted. Wildlife potentially displaced include
limited terrestrial and aquatic species typical of the area. Loss of this isolated potential habitat
area will be mitigated in conjunction with the mitigation of wetland and stream impacts and will
not result in fragmentation or impacts to off-site habitat.
Historic, Cultural, Scenic, and Recreational Values
No resources eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) will be
impacted by the project according to the HPOWEB map. The North Carolina Department of
Cultural Resources (NCDCR) State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) had no comment in
response to scoping or to the draft EA for the proposed project.
Stormwater
Stormwater control measures (SCMs) needed to develop the HAECO facility improvements in
compliance with NCDEQ regulatory requirements for new airport development are described in
the attached SCM Report. A 0.8 -acre high flow rate bioretention pond will infiltrate runoff
generated from the 1St inch of rainfall at a relatively high rate to satisfy the water quality
requirements outlined in Session Law 2012-200. In addition to providing treatment for the
proposed new impervious areas associated with the HAECO facility improvements, the SCM will
replace the treatment being provided by the existing wet pond located on the northeastern side of
the site. The proposed project may cause increases to peak flows downstream but will not flood

Mr. David Bailey and Ms. Karen Higgins
November 24, 2015
Page 6 of 7
insurable structures, roads, or cause damage to existing property or the existing Harris Teeter
detention pond.
Prior to the commencement of construction, an E&SC plan for the project will be submitted to
NCDEQ and PTAA will obtain the applicable E&SC approval and National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) construction permit. Potential temporary impacts to surface water
quality as a result of the Build Alternative construction activities will be effectively mitigated
through adherence to the approved E&SC plan and permit requirements, as well as through
compliance with FAA AC 150/5370-1 OB.
Other Federal, State, or Local Requirements
Through the NEPA process, FAA has explored practicable project alternatives and impact
minimization prior to addressing compensatory mitigation (sequencing). FAA has also explored
the cumulative impacts of the proposed project. These potential cumulative impacts are detailed
in the EA/FONSI.
A lack of practical alternatives has been demonstrated pursuant to 15A NCAC 02H .0506(f). After
consideration of size and configuration of the proposed activity, and all alternative designs, the
basic project purpose cannot be practically accomplished in a manner which would avoid or result
in less adverse impact to surface waters or wetlands.
Minimization of impacts has been demonstrated pursuant to 15A NCAC 02H .0506(g) because the
surface waters are able to continue to support the existing uses after project completion, and the
impacts are required due to the spatial and dimensional requirements of the project; the location
of existing structural and natural features that dictate the placement and configuration of the
proposed project; and the purpose of the project and how the purpose relates to placement and
configuration.
The project: (1) has no practical alternative; (2) will minimize adverse impacts to surface waters
based on consideration of existing topography, vegetation, fish and wildlife resources, and
hydrological conditions; (3) will. not result in the degradation of groundwater or surface waters;
(4) will not result in cumulative impacts, based upon past or reasonably anticipated future impacts,
that cause or will cause a violation of downstream water quality standards; (5) provides for
protection of downstream water quality standards through on-site stormwater treatment; and
(6) provides for replacement of existing uses through mitigation. Additional regulatory
requirements are addressed in the EA/FONSI.

Mr. David Bailey and Ms. Karen Higgins
November 24, 2015
Page 7 of 7
We appreciate your consideration of this request. Please feel free to contact me
(rossera(a.esoair.ora, 336.665.5620) or Richard Darling (rdarlinaambakerintl.com,
919.481.5740) with questions or comments. One (1) complete and collated original application
and supporting documentation are being provided to USACE with four (4) complete and collated
copies to NCDEQ along with the application fee.
Sincerely,
P DMONT RIAD AIRPORT AUTHORITY
J. lex Rosser, P.E.
Deputy Executive Director
Enclosures Completed Eng. Form 4345 (3 pages, PTAA signed)
Permit Drawings (13 sheets, full size and 11"x 17")
Stormwater Control Measures Report (31 pages)
In -Lieu Fee Request to NCDMS
PTAA Check for $570 as NCDEQ Application Fee
cc: Sue Homewood, DWR-WSRO
Richard Darling, Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
003
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL N0.
EXPIRES: 28 FEBRUARYRY 20 20133
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R.
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO.
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
First - J.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BYAPPLICANT)
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
Middle -Alex Last - Rosser
Company - Piedmont Triad Airport Authority
E-mail [e-mail]
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
First - Richard Middle -B. Last - Darling
Company - Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
E-mail [e-mail]
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address- 1000A Ted Johnson Parkway Address- 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
City - Greensboro State - NC Zip -27409 Country -USA City - Cary State - NC Zip -27518 Country -USA
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. WAREA CODE 10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax a. Residence
336.665.5600 336.665.5694
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
b. Business c. Fax
919.481.5740 919.463.5490
11. [hereby authorize, Richard B. Darling to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit app' tions Jj CIA,,
I I ��cl�15
C 1 1JATURE OF APPLICANT ATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
HAECO Facility Improvements
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Unnamed tributaries to Horsepen Creek Address 623 Radar Road
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: -N 36.096914 Longitude: oW 79.931388 City - Greensboro State- NC
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID Municipality
Section -
Township -
Range -
Zip- 27410
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3.

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
from I-40 take exit 212B, take ramp right for I-73 N / Future I-840 toward Bryan Blvd.; At exit 2, take ramp right and follow signs for W
Friendly Ave.; Turn left onto W Friendly Ave.; Turn right onto Old Friendly Rd.; Turn right onto Radar Rd.; Arrive at 623 Radar Rd. - turn
left into HAECO secure facility and announce arrival in intercom - follow directions from security personnel.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
Site preparation of approximately 16 acres of Airport land to be added to the existing HAECO facility for aviation -related development,
including clearing, grading, fill, and excavation for: Expansion of the existing concrete apron by approximately 204,600 sq. ft., with engine
run-up pad and 21,200 sq. ft, connector throat to an existing Taxiway M connector (the connector throat will also link the two sides of the
HAECO complex); Construction of an approximately 177,400 sq. ft. two -bay wide-body aircraft maintenance hangar; Construction of an
approximately 33,810 sq. ft, support annex; Construction of a new fire/water provision and expansion of the existing hazardous materials
(HazMat) facility; Addition of vehicle and pedestrian access and fire lanes. Extension of utilities to the new structures including
communications, electrical, natural gas, water, and sanitary sewer (land disturbance for utility extensions are anticipated to be within the
proposed project grading limits and will not impact additional special resources). Stormwater management and off-site mitigation for
unavoidable wetland and stream impacts are also anticipated.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The proposed improvements would address the need to service two wide-bodied aircraft simultaneously by providing movement and
hangar space. HAECO requires the capacity to service wide-bodied aircraft to meet current demand and to integrate its US operations with
its international business of maintaining wide-bodied aircraft. These improvements will also provide a needed connection between the two
sides of the existing HAECO complex to allow for movement of vehicles, supplies and equipment from one side to the other without
having to cross airport taxiways or to depart and reenter secured areas for travel along public roads. The project would increase
operational capabilities and improve efficiency at HAECO's PTIA facility.
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Wetlands and streams must be filled in order to bring the site up to match existing taxiway and apron elevations. The proposed project is
located entirely within the existing airport property. The HAECO facility is bounded by the PTIA Air Operations Area (AOA) to the
Northwest, by Radar Road to the Southeast and by additional jurisdictional resources (wetlands and streams) then adjacent PTIA tenants to
the Southwest and Northeast. The location is predominantly developed (aprons, taxiways, parking, hangars, buildings, and other
structures) with maintained in -field lawns and stormwater/fire management ponds. The project area is located between the HAECO
Hangars I -III complex to the Southwest and the Hangar IV complex to the Northeast. There are no reasonable actions, other than the
preferred alternative, that feasibly substitute for the proposed project. The project, requiring specific dimensions and orientation of
components, must be located at the existing HAECO facility, at the area available between existing Hangars III and IV.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
cy clean fill
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres 0.81 ac. wetlands, and
or
Linear Feet 1,60111 perennial stream channel
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions)
Based on the limited space at the HAECO facility, constraints of the site (jurisdictional resources on both sides and in the middle of the
facility), and lack of practicable alternatives; impacts to streams and wetlands cannot be avoided. PTAA will minimize potential
unavoidable adverse effects of the Project consistent with FAA requirements and Section 404(b)(1) guidelines to the extent possible.
Compensation for unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional stream channel and riparian wetlands will be provided by the North Carolina
Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS).
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 2 of 3

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes QNo IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
a. Address- Timco Aviation Services dba HAECO Airframe Services; 623 Radar Road
City - Greensboro
State - NC
b. Address- Honda Aircraft Company Inc.; 6430 Ballinger Road
City - Greensboro
State - NC
Zip - 27410
Zip - 27410
c. Address- Textron Aviation - Cessna Citation Service Center; 615 Service Center Road
City - Greensboro
State - NC
d. Address- North Carolina Department of Transportation; 1020 Birch Ridge Drive
Zip - 27410
City - Raleigh State - NC Zip - 27610
e. Address -
City - State - Zip -
26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL* IDENTIFICATION
NUMBER
FAA EA
*Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
8/31/2015
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to -authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I rther certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant
GNATURE OF APPLICANT "DATE SI4Gt OFA DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 3 of 3