20240461 Ver 1_HL-0025_Permit Application_Supporting Data_20240322.1_20240325

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
March 22, 2024
Mr. Stephen Brumagin
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
8340 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
J.R. "JOEY" HOPKfNs
SECRETARY
Subject: Nationwide Permit 14 Application; TIP HL-0025; WBS Element No.
49490.1.1; Proposed Greylock Ridge Road Extension, Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina.
Mr. Brumagin:
Attached are the supplemental attachments for the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Nationwide Pemit 14 application for the proposed Greylock Ridge Road
Extension located in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
The proposed project extends from East John Street (SR 1009) to Tank Town Road (SR
3453) and is included in the 2024-2033 State Transportation Improvement Program. Right
of way acquisition is currently underway and construction is to begin in state fiscal year
2025. A two-lane facility is planned and will include a 5' sidewalk on the north side and a
10' multiuse side path on the south side. On -street parking will be provided along certain
sections of the facility.
There are three wetland impacts attributed to the proposed project. These features include
one basin and two headwater forest wetland areas. A summary of these features and their
characteristics is included in the table below.
Table 1. Potential Wetland Waters of the US.
Site
No.
NCWAM
Classification
Forested
NCWAM
RatingClassification
Hydrologic
404/401
or 401
Area (ac.)
1
Basin Wetland
Y
Medium
Non -Riparian
404/401
0.01
2
Headwater Forest
Y
Medium
Riparian
404/401
<0.01
3
Headwater Forest
Y
Medium
Riparian
404/401
0.13
Total
0.15
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 10
716 WEST MAIN ST.
ALBEMARLE NC, 28001
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
716 WEST MAIN ST.
ALBEMARLE NC, 28001

If you have any questions, please contact me by phone at [phone], or e-mail at
j mhoward(c�r�,ncdot. gov.
Sincerely,
Joel M. Howard, Division 10 PDEA Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Attachments:
• Roadway Design Plans
• Permit Drawings
• In -lieu Fee Mitigation Document
• Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist
• Endangered Species Support Documents
• Essential Fish Habitat Support Document
• FEMA Flood Service Map

Roadway Design Plans

T
U
O
N
L
CD
/
L
/
T
0
0
O
n-
X
W
i
N
U
O
L
CD
/
0
Q
LSi
O
/
X
W
n-
n-
U
_O
T
N
L
CD
LSD
CV
O
O
O
CV
H
U
O
pom
H
H
v
0
v
See Sheet IA For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 9 B For Conventi onol Symbol s
J
e t 51
S Trade St
rn �dh
o /
rn
BEGIN TIP
HL-0025 N
ale
�d
Gr 74
/oak
Rid e
cd Morris
n END TIP
HL-0025
INTERSTATE
485
VICINITY MAP
• • • • • DETOUR ROUTE N.T.S.
ROW REVISION #3
02-02-2024
PROPOSED SIGNAL
m
Z-444-
Z
:�
CAI
0CL0
CN
V�
>
Q
(V
�
?>
O
Q
0�
(V
0�
w
CONSTRUCITON BY OTHERS
TIP 1-5507 /U-4714AB
STATE GF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECI<LENBURG
zi
COUNTY
LOCATION: GREYLOCK RIDGE ROAZ? EXTENSION
FROM E. JOHN ST. TO TA1VK TOWN
RD. IN MATTHEWS, NC
TYPE OF WORK. GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING,
AND SIGNALS
i�
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y3- POT STA. 10 + 55.00
W
11►
fo, I END TIP I-5507AJ-4714AI3_'__------�
BEGIN TIP HL-0025
-L- POT STA. 11 + 04.26 -Y3-
�MORRIS
GREYLOCK RI
--SIDEPA TH-
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION ,
°1p -Y2- POC STA. 10 + 05.24
�O
E RD
STATE
STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
H L-002 5
STATE PROJ. NO.
F. A. PROJ. NO.
DESCRIPTION
49491.1.1
PE
49491.2.1
ROW
49491.2.2
UTL
49491.3.1
CONSTR.
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y2- POT STA. 15 + 30.00
"7 P
FUTURE EXTENSION
TO INDEPENDENCE
POINTS PARKWAY
END TIP HL-0025
-L- POT STA. 25 + 30.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y4- POC STA. 9 + 28.00
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HYDRAULIC DESIGN
E [�c�C�OG�[�nn
l TRULM
5400 TRINITY ROAD
SUITE 102
RALEIGH, NC 27607
919.223.8965 NC LIC. NO. F-128.5
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2023 = 9,050
ADT 2040 = 11,600
K = 9 %
D = 55 %
T = 3 % *
V = 30 MPH
* TTST-1% DUALS = 2%
FUNC CLASS = LOCAL
SUB —REGIONAL TIER
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT HL-0025 = 0.270 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT HL-0025 = 0.270 MILES
PLANS PREPARED BY:
A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE, SUITE 32S•RALEIGH, NC 27609
AAT(919) 8SS-9989• NC LICENSE NO. F-1049
WWW.AMTENGINEERING.COM
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
won
o� p a��Q
2024 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
STEVE KARN IS, P.E.
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
MARCH 311 2023
PROJECT ENGINEER
DAN MORGAN, E.I.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER��
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
5 2.5 0 5 l0
LETTING DATE:
JULY 17, 2024
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
TERRY BURLESON
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
NCDOT CONTACT -DIVISION to

�I�.'1�I�I (�)I ❑(�)-I'"I�I-I ( I'C�>I I ❑ .', II)I�II04000
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.-
State Line -----
County Line
Township Line
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin (EIP)
Computed Property Corner
Existing Concrete Monument (ECM)
Parcel/Sequence Number
Existing Fence Line -X
Proposed Woven Wire Fence
Proposed Chain Link Fence
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
O
EIP
x
0
ECM
123
Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -WLB- - - -
Proposed Wetland Boundary WLB
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary EAB
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary EPB
Existing Historic Property Boundary HPB
Known Contamination
Area: Soil
-X-S-X-S-
Potential Contamination
Area: Soil
-M-S-M-S-
Known Contamination
Area: Water
-X-W-X-W-
Potential Contamination
Area: Water
-nC-W-nC-W-
Contaminated Site: Known or Potential
BUILDINGS AND OTHER
CULTURE:
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
Sign
Well
Small Mine
Foundation
Area Outline
C
Cemetery
Building
School
Church
Dam
HYDROLOGY.-
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
❑
Jurisdictional Stream
is -
Buffer Zone 1
Buffer Zone 2
Flow Arrow
< ---
Disappearing Stream
>----
O
0
S
O
W
0
BZ 1
BZ 2
Spring ❑- _�_
Wetland
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
< FLOW
False Sump
RAILROADS:
Standard Gauge -
RR Signal Milepost
Switch
RR Abandoned
RR Dismantled
CSX TRANSPORTATION Woods Line
o Orchard 0 0 0 0
MILEPOST 35
❑ Vineyard Vineyard
SWITCH
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
MAJOR:
RIGHT OF WAY & PROJECT CONTROL:
Primary Horiz Control Point
Primary Horiz and Vert Control Point
Secondary Horiz and Vert Control Point
Vertical Benchmark
Existing Right of Way Monument
Proposed Right of Way Monument
(Rebar and Cap)
Proposed Right of Way Monument
(Concrete)
Existing Permanent Easement Monument
Proposed Permanent Easement Monument
(Rebar and Cap)
Existing C/A Monument
Proposed C/A Monument (Rebar and Cap)
Proposed C/A Monument (Concrete)
Existing Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line
Existing Control of Access Line
Proposed Control of Access Line
Proposed ROW and CA Line —
Existing Easement Line
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement- —
Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement —
Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement —
Proposed Permanent Drainage/Utility Easement —
Proposed Permanent Utility Easement —
Proposed Temporary Utility Easement —
Proposed Aerial Utility Easement —
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:
Existing Edge of Pavement
Existing Curb —
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut -
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill -
Proposed Curb Ramp
Existing Metal Guardrail
Proposed Guardrail
Existing Cable Guiderail
Proposed Cable Guiderail
Equality Symbol
Pavement Removal
VEGETATION-
/0
0
A
CA
E
-E-
TDE
PDE
DUE
PUE
TUE
AUE
C
F
Single Tree ❑
Single Shrub
Hedge
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert CONC
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall - CONC WW
MINOR:
Head and End Wall CONC HW
---------------
Pipe Culvert
---------------
Footbridge >----------<
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
❑ CB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
OO
Storm Sewer
S
UTILITIES:
* SUE - Subsurface Utility Engineering
LOS - Level of Service - A,B,C or D
(Accuracy)
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
b
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
❑
Power Transformer
U/G Power Cable Hand Hole
H-Frame Pole
�=
U/G Power Line Test Hole (SUE - LOS A)*
U/G Power Line (SUE - LOS B)*
- - - -P- -
U/G Power Line (SUE - LOS C)*
- -P- -
U/G Power Line (SUE - LOS D)*
P
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole
Proposed Telephone Pole
-0-
Telephone Manhole
O
Telephone Pedestal
❑T
Telephone Cell Tower
U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole
19
U/G Telephone Test Hole (SUE - LOS A)*
U/G Telephone Cable (SUE - LOS B)*
- - - -T- -
U/G
Telephone Cable (SUE -
LOS C)* - -T- -
U/G
Telephone Cable (SUE -
LOS D)* T
U/G
Telephone Conduit
(SUE
- LOS
B)* - - - -TC- - - -
U/G
Telephone Conduit
(SUE
- LOS
C)* - -TC- -
U/G
Telephone Conduit
(SUE
- LOS
D)* TC
U/G
Fiber Optics Cable
(SUE
- LOS
B)* - - - -T F°- - -
U/G
Fiber Optics Cable
(SUE
- LOS
C)* - -T F°- -
U/G
Fiber Optics Cable
(SUE
- LOS
D)* T F°
WATER:
Water Manhole
Water Meter
o
Water Valve
Water Hydrant
❑
U/G Water Line Test Hole (SUE - LOS A)*
U/G Water Line (SUE - LOS B)*
- - - -W- - - -
U/G Water Line (SUE - LOS C)*
- -W- -
U/G Water Line (SUE - LOS D)*
W
Above Ground Water Line
A/G Water
TV:
TV Pedestal
TV Towe r
❑
U/G TV Cable Hand Hole
19
U/G TV Test Hole (SUE - LOS A)*
U/G TV Cable (SUE - LOS B)*
- - - -TV- - - -
U/G TV Cable (SUE - LOS C)*
- -TV- -
U/G TV Cable (SUE - LOS D)*
TV
U/G Fiber Optic Cable (SUE - LOS B)* -
- - -TV F°- - -
U/G Fiber Optic Cable (SUE - LOS C)*
- -TV F°-
U/G Fiber Optic Cable (SUE - LOS D)*
TV F°
GAS :
Gas Valve
❑
Gas Meter
❑
U/G Gas Line Test Hole (SUE - LOS A)*
U/G Gas Line (SUE - LOS B)*
- - - -G- - - -
U/G Gas Line (SUE - LOS C)*
- -°- -
U/G Gas Line (SUE - LOS D)*
°
Above Ground Gas Line
A/G Gas
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
8
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
O
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
SS
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
A/G Sanitary Sewer
SS Force Main Line Test Hole (SUE - LOS A)*
SS Force Main Line (SUE - LOS B)*
- - - -FSS- - - -
SS Force Main Line (SUE - LOS C)*
- -FSS- -
SS Force Main Line (SUE - LOS D)*
FSS
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
40
Utility Pole with Base
0
Utility Located Object
o
Utility Traffic Signal Box
❑S
Utility Unknown U/G Line (SUE - LOS B)*
7UTL
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc.
A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Geoenvironmental Boring
Abandoned According to Utility Records
AATUR
End of Information
E.O.I.

N
PAVEMENT
SCHEDULE
(FINAL PAVEMENT DESIGN)
Cl
11/2" S9.513
C2
3" S9.513
C3
VAR. S9.513
D1
4" I19.00
D2
VAR. I19.00
E1
4" B25.00
E2
VAR. B25.00
J1
6" ABC
J2
8" ABC
R1
2'-6" C&G
R2
1'-6" C&G
S1
4" CONC. SW
S2
10' SIDEPATH
T
EARTH MATERIAL
U
EXIST. PAVE.
V
INCD. MILL.
W
WEDGING
NOTE:
EDGE
UNLESS
ALL PAVEMENT
SLOPES ARE 1:1
SHOWN OTHERWISE.
ORIGINAL
GROUND
3•�C� T S�o'°F
VAR. 0'
**VAR. 14.5' TO 19.5' BERM 2' TO 5'
PARKIN
1, 5, 8' 6„
SIDEWALK
(-S l
0.02 �
(Rl
6"
* NOTE: MATCH ADJACENT PROJECT 2:1 SLOPES AT
-L- STA. 11 + 04.26 AND THEN TRASITI0N
SLOPE TO 3:1. SEE CROSS -SECTIONS FOR
MORE INFORMATION.
** NOTE: TIE PROPOSED BERM TO EXISTING BERM
AT -L- STA. 11 + 04.26.
ORIGINAL
GROUND
VAR. 0'
VAR. 14.5' TO 19.5' BERM 2' TO 5'
PARKIN
5' 81 6„
SIDEWALK
S1
n
0
0
::,
_0
ra
0
V
0.02
2
* NOTE: UTILIZE 3:1 MAX. FILL & CUT SLOPES FROM
X
w -L- STA. 20 + 50.00 TO STA. 22 + 00.00
0
0
0
Ln
X
W
_0 ORIGINAL
GROUND
_u V
qR0,6
cU
Ln
CV
m
CV
( R1
14.5' BERM
5'
SIDEWALK
("s,
6"
i 0.02
0.02
�E -L- (GRE
i
VAR. 0-11' 11'
C2
GRADE
POINT
YLOCK
VAR. 0'
TO 52
'ARKING
6"
THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION 1
FROM -L- STA. 11 +04.26 TO STA. 20+50.00
CT
E1 v
-L- (GRE
VAR. 0-11'
GRADE
POINT
RIDGE RD.)
"VAR. 19.5' TO 24.5' BERM
R1)
VAR. 2'
TO 8'
0.02
6" T
10,
SIDE PATH
S2
VAR. 1'
TO 7'
qR F�
3 ' 5' ' 5I << S�
of
� o
CL -SIDEPATH-
YLOCK RIDGE RD.)
11'
VAR. 0'
TO 5' 2' VAR. 19.5' TO 2 4.5' BERM
PARKING
6" VAR. 2' 10,
TO 8'
THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION 2
FROM -L- STA. 20+50.00 TO STA. 23+57.46
FROM -L- STA. 23 + 83.46 TO STA. 24 + 76.61
2' _ 11'
( R1
6"
C2
CE -L- (GRE
5.5' 5.5'
GRADE
POINT
R2 R2
C2
RV
SIDE PATH
J)
VAR. 1'
TO 7'
ORIGINAL
GROUND
0.02
I
�qR Fi
T 5'�55's�yo
pF
CL -SI DEPATH-
YLOCK RIDGE RD.)
11' f' 1, 19.5' BERM
6"
RV
D� E� GRAD O
THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION 3
VAR. 2'
TO 8'
0.02
10,
SIDE PATH
JLI
VAR. 1'
TO 7'
��R Fi
51 or
5
-SIDEPATH-
ORIGINAL
GROUND
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
HL-0025
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
2A-2
PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
ORIGINAL
GROUND
CV
O
CV -
03XNOTE: SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION OF ON -STREET PARKING
FROM -L- STA. 24 + 76.61 TO STA. 25 + 30.00
A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE, SUITE 325•RALEIGH, NC 27609
(919) 8SS-9989•NC LICENSE NO. F-1049
AATWWW.AMTENGINEERING.COM

N
PAVEMENT
SCHEDULE
(FINAL PAVEMENT DESIGN)
Cl
11/2" S9.513
C2
3" S9.513
C3
VAR. S9.513
D1
4" I19.00
D2
VAR. I19.00
E1
4" B25.00
E2
VAR. B25.00
J1
6" ABC
J2
8" ABC
R1
2'-6" C&G
R2
1'-6" C&G
S1
4" CONC. SW
S2
10' SIDEPATH
T
EARTH MATERIAL
U
EXIST. PAVE.
V
INCD. MILL.
W
WEDGING
NOTE:
EDGE
UNLESS
ALL PAVEMENT
SLOPES ARE 1:1
SHOWN OTHERWISE.
c
Q
:::,
:::,
0
/
0
/
n
3
ra
0
/
X
w
Z
u
0
L
/
0
Q
Ln
/
X
W
m
0
L
Ln
N
CZD
CV
26.5' BERM
ORIGINAL �
GROUND
ORIGINAL
GROUND
INSET
A
D'•
USE INSET A
IN CONJUNCTION
WITH TYPICAL
SECTION N0.8
IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS:
-Y2- STA.
13 + 70.00 TO
STA. 14 + 80.00
LT
TRANSITION LT BERM
FROM FROM:
-Y2- STA.
13 + 20.00 TO
STA. 13 + 70.00
LT
-Y2- STA.
14 + 80.00 TO
STA. 15 + 30.00
LT
VARIABLE 2'
WIDTH 6„
�11
��° 1
F,
INSET Bl
USE INSET 131 IN CONJUNCTION WITH
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 10
IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS:
FROM -Y4- STA. 10 + 45.00
TO STA. 11 + 2 5. 00 LT
VARIABLE 2'
WIDTH 6„
•� F-I-�s I m
R1 z
�O,oF•'90 U
002 -,, a
T
76„ E1
INSET 132
GRADE TO
THIS LINE
USE INSET B2 IN CONJUNCTION WITH
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 10
IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS:
FROM -Y4- STA. 11 + 25.00
TO STA. 11 + 75.00 LT
1
ORIGINAL
GROUND
6"
1 6"
IQ
ORIGINAL
GROUND
ORIGINAL
GROUND
ORIGINAL
GROUND
CST R/qe�
a•� M`ppF
?'I
6'1 2'
14.5' BERM
1' 51
SIDEWALK
S1
0.02
CE
-Y2-
(E.
CHA
i
2' _ VARIES 10' TO 14' -
_ VARIES
10' TO
14' -
$, 16
w
_Z
J
R1 u
0.02
T
(C2
C2
GRADE
POINT
0.02
-- ----- --t-- -----
_V-I 11 " 11 "
7' W
GRADE TO E1 D1 U
THIS LINE
RLES ST.)
2' VARIES 14.5'
TO 4' BERM
6"
R1
o.oz
o oz
.6„ T
�� El
TYPICAL SECTION 8
FROM -Y2- STA. 13 + 81.50 TO STA. 15 + 30.00
C� -Y3- (MORRIS RD.)
2' 6'
BERM
6"
Rl
GRADE
POINT , 0.02
0.02
11 " GRADE TO 6„ T
THIS LINE
11'
TYPICAL SECTION 9
FROM -Y3- STA. 11 + 30.00 TO STA. 12 + 89.77
14.5' BERM _ 2'
6"
m
w
Z
Rl u
Q
0.02 -,,
NOTE: TRANSITION FROM TYPICAL SECTION NO. 10
TO EXISTING IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS:
-Y4- STA. 10 + 45.00 TO STA. 11 + 05.00
T
?'I
ORIGINAL
GROUND
� -Y4- (TANK TOWN RD.)
14.5' 14.5'
C2
GRADE
, 0.42 POINT 0.02 -,
- -- ----- --t-- ----- -- -
6"
2'
RI)
GRADE TO Dl El U W El *G_
ADE TO
THIS LINE THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION 10
T
FROM -Y4- STA. 11 + 05.00 TO STA. 11 + 80.54
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
HL-0025
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
2A-4
PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
ORIGINAL
GROUND
NOTE: MILL 1.5" AND REPLACE WITH C1 FROM
-Y3- STA. 10 + 75.00 TO STA. 11 + 00.00
NOTE: TRANSITION FROM EXISTING TO TYPICAL SECTION
NO. 9 IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS:
-Y3- STA. 11 + 00.00 TO STA. 11 + 3 0. 00
14.5' BERM
0.02
5' 1'
SIDEWALK
S1
4�MA �OpF
ORIGINAL
GROUND
AATA. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE, SUITE 325•RALEIGH, NC 27609
(919) 8SS-9989•NC LICENSE NO. F-1049
WWW.AMTENGINEERING.COM

-L-
0
i
Ln
N
El
m
N
N
O
N'-'
\ ro
03X
P/ Sto 11 +33.13
A
= 6° 37' 10.7" (LT )
D
= 14° 19' 26.2"
L =
46.2/'
T
= 23.13'
R
= 400.00'
PI Sto 14+89.5/
Z
= 8° 39' 34.3" (LT )
D
= 11* 27' 33.0"
L =
75.57'
T
= 37.86'
R
= 500.00'
PI Sto 17 +99.8/
Z�
= 8° 4/' 15.5" (RT )
D
= 9° 32' 57.5"
L =
90.98'
T
= 45.58'
R
= 600.00'
-SIDEPATH-
PI Sto 12+24.65
Z�
= 15° 35' 12.5" (RT )
D
= //* 27' 33.0"
L =
136.02'
T
= 68.43'
R
= 500.00'
PI Sto /5 +72.79
Z�
= 8° 4/' 15.5" (RT )
D
= 9° 32' 57.5"
L =
90.98'
T
= 45.58'
R
= 600.00'
PI Sto 18 +75.5/
A
= 8° 39' 43.5" (LT )
D
= 14° 19' 26.2"
L =
60.47'
T
= 30.29'
R
= 400.00'
PI Sto /3 +23.60
A
= 8° 58' 0/.9" (LT )
D
= 14° 19' 26.2"
L =
62.60'
T
= 31.37'
R
= 400.00'
PI Sto 16 +48.49
A
= 8° 39' 43.5" (LT )
D
= 14° 19' 26.2"
L =
60.47'
T
= 30.29'
R
= 400.00'
PI Sto 19 +43.53
Z� = 8° 39' 25.7" (LT)
D = 11* 27' 33.0"
L = 75.55'
T = 37.85'
R = 500.00'
PI Sto 14+3/.49
A
_ 1* 32' 0/.2" (LT )
D
= 3° 48' 11.7"
L =
40.33'
T
= 20.16'
R
= 1,506.50'
PI Sto 17+16.52
A
= 8° 39' 34.3" (LT )
D
= 11* 27' 33.0"
L =
75.57'
T
= 37.86'
R
= 500.00'
PI Sto 20 +47.10
A = 12° 3/' 49.0" (RT )
D = 9° 32' 57.5"
L = 131.22"
T = 65.87'
R = 600.00'
PI Sto 17 +13.57
Z�
= 23° l3' 14.4" (LT )
D
= T 53' 04.1"
L =
597.78'
T
= 303.05'
R
= 1,475.00'

-L -
-SIDEPATH-
n
r
Z
IT
7
C
rT
I
G
u.
C
0
i
Ln
N
El
J
m
N
PI Sto 17 +I3.57
A
= 23° 13' 14.4" (LT )
D
= 3° 53' 04.1"
L =
597.78"
T
= 303.05'
R
= 1,475.00'
PI Sto 20 +47.10
Z�
= 12° 31' 49.0" (RT )
D
= 9° 32' 57.5"
L =
131.22'
T
= 65.87'
R
= 600.00'
PI Sto 23 +34.08
Z� = 6' 07' 4/.1" (RT )
D = I4° 19' 26.2"
L = 42.78'
T = 21.41'
R = 400.00'
PI Sto 26 +39.43
Z�
= 29° 28' 12.6" (RT )
D
= 57° 17' 44.8"
L =
51.441
T
= 26.30'
R
= 100.00'
PI Sto 21 +48.69
Z
= 8° 17' 3I.9" (LT)
D
= 11* 27' 33.0"
L =
72.36'
T
= 36.24'
R
= 500.00'
PI Sto 25 +43.52
A
= 32° 23' 36.4" (RT )
D
= 76° 23' 39.7"
L =
42.40'
T
= 21.78'
R
= 75.00'
PI Sto 22 +96.64
Z� = 6° 07' 4I.I" (LT )
D = I9° 05' 54.9"
L = 32.09'
T = 16.06'
R = 300.00'
P/ Sto 25 +92.24
A
= 70° 09' 44.8" (LT )
D
= 143° I4' 22.0"
L =
48.98'
T
= 28.09'
R
= 40.00'
O��
N
O
N'-'
03X

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
HL-0025 2B -5
co R/W SHEET NO.
;i
EXP. JOINT
SIDEWALK 0° D
y y y y y
PLANTING STRIP -
CONTINUE JOINT AT
BACK OF CURB —
RIM
NOTE:
TRUNCATED DOMES COLORED
PER STD. NO. 10.35E
BACK OF WALK
BACK OF CURB
m
D I EXP. JOINT /f
� m
a a a a E
FACE OF CURB
�A ..
FLOWLINE
PLAN VIEW —PARALLEL RAMP
WITH PLANTING STRIP
SIDEWALK
EXP. JOINT m
I
PLANTING STRIP y
d• i •h •Y
A —�
--- GUTTER LIP
FRONT OF WALK
SLOPE "A" 12:1
SLOPE "B" 1 /4"/FT
K OF WALK SLOPE "D" 3/8"/FT
AJOINT
T OF WALK
EK OF CURB
B D mE OF CURB
WLINE
•Y •Y•Y •Y •YrA
GUTTER LIP
CONTINUE JOINT AT
BACK OF CURB 6 —0 4'-0„ 6'—O TRUNCATED DOMES COLORED
PER STD. NO. 10.3513
DIMENSIONS AT BACK OF CURB
APPROVED DATE: 02/2007 PLAN VIEW —DIAGONAL RAMP WITH PLANTING STRIP
NOT TO SCALE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY ACCESSIBLE RAMP STANDARD WITH
LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANTING STRIP 2' - 6" CURB AND GUTTER STD. N0. REV.
STANDARDS 10.31 A ,
NOTES:
1. RAMP AND WING SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 12:1.
2. GUTTER FLOW LINE AND PLAN PROFILE SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGH
THE RAMP AREA.
3. THE SURFACE OF THE RAMP SHALL BE FLUSH WITH THE FLOWLINE OF THE
CURB AND GUTTER.
4. THE RAMP OPENING (AT THE FULLY DEPRESSED CURB) SHALL BE LOCATED
WITHIN THE PARALLEL BOUNDARIES OF THE CROSSWALK MARKINGS. THE
RAMP CENTERLINE SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE CORNER RADIUS CENTERLINE
UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. DIAGONAL CURB RAMPS
SHALL HAVE A SEGMENT OF STRAIGHT CURB AT LEAST 24 INCHES LONG
LOCATED ON EACH SIDE OF THE WING SLOPE AND WITHIN THE CROSSWALK
MARKINGS.
5. THE WING AND RAMP SURFACES SHALL BE 3600 PSI CONCRETE WITH A
SIDEWALK FINISH IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT EDITION NCDOT STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES.
6. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, MAST ARMS, LIGHT POLES AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS
SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN LINE WITH RAMPS. LOCATION OF THE RAMP SHALL
TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER LOCATION OF OBSTRUCTIONS EXCEPT WHERE EXISTING
OBSTRUCTIONS ARE BEING UTILIZED IN THE NEW CONSTRUCTION.
7. AT ALL LOCATIONS, NOT LESS THAN 2 FEET OF FULL HEIGHT CURB SHALL BE
PLACED BETWEEN THE RAMPS.
8. SEE STANDARD DRAWING 10.35B FOR DETECTABLE WARNING INSTALLATION.
FLOW LINE /
\� 2 N �2.
� ° O� ° ° ° ° / \'° °° °
6 OO
° °
00 °° 00 00 °° 00
o0 0 0 00
1�
ROADWAY
PLAN SYMBOL
CR
FOR PROPOSED
ACCESSIBLE RAMP
4' PLANTING STRIP
CROSSWALK
10' MIN-
6' PLANTING
5'
4' PLANTING STRIP
CROSSWALK
10' MIN —
NOTE
NOTE
NOTE
WALK
5' WALK
2' PLANTING STRIP
6' PLANTING STRIPS 4, 1 I 5' WALK
5' WALK I I ,�
EXISTING OBSTRUCTION TYPICAL LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE
RAMPS AND PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS ON
PLACEMENT FOR OBSTRUCTED CORNER RADIUS OR INTERSECTIONS
SEE NCDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS
APPROVED DATE: 02/2007 CORNER RADIUS LESS THAN TEN FEET NOT TO SCALE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY ��"gVRc STANDARD PLACEMENT OF ACCESSIBLE
LAND DEVELOPMENT REV.
a?�� RAMPS AND GENERAL NOTES
STANDARDS R>� ��� 10.35A
ELEVATION
EXISTING WALK 1 /4" PER FOOT
ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 12:1
N I
1 /4" PER FOOT N
•,, , ° .
12
T
4'-0" OR 5'-0" WALK 4'-0"
APPROVED DATE: 02/2007
TYPICAL RAMP i SECTION
91,
CURB GUTTER
NOT TO SCALE
ACCESSIBLE RAMP SECTIONS WITH
STD. NO.
PLANTING STRIP 2-6" CURB AND GUTTER 110.31B
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4'-0" MIN. (VARIES WITH WIDTH OF RAM
TRUNCATED DOME PLAN VIEW
NOTES:
1. ALL DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES USED IN NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE OF A RIDGID PRECAST OR EMBEDDED
PRODUCT APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER. RETRO FIT MATS WILL ONLY BE ALLOWED ON EXISTING RAMPS
WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER FOR MATERIAL TYPE AND INSTALLATION (IE. RESURFACING).
2. WIDTH OF DETECTABLE WARNING AREA SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4 FEET AND VARY WITH WIDTH OF RAMP.
3. LENGTH OF DETECTABLE WARNING AREA SHALL BE 2 FEET REGARDLESS OF SECTION WIDTH.
4. DETECTABLE WARNING AREA CAN BE SQUARE WHERE USED IN A CURB RADIUS.
5. DETECTABLE WARNING DOMES SHALL BE ALIGNED ON A SQUARE GRID IN THE PREDOMINANT DIRECTION OF
OF TRAVEL TO PERMIT WHEELS TO ROLL BETWEEN DOMES.
6. DECTECTABLE WARNING AREA SHALL BE COLORED BLACK IN ALL LOCATIONS.
7. IF PAVERS ARE TO BE USED, PAVERS SHALL BE 6" THICK AND CAST FROM 5000 psi CONCRETE.
8. MATS ARE TO BE RIGID WITH TURN DOWN EDGES EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE TO ELIMINATE TRIP HAZARD.
APPROVED DATE: 02/2007
gVRG
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Z
z „ At
STANDARDS /y CPRO
0
I
N
1.6" TO 2.4")
(1.6" TO 2.4")
TRUNCATED DOME SPACING
0 0.2"
0.9"
TRUNCATED DOME SECTION
TRUNCATED DOMES
PLAN AND CROSS—SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
10.35B
/
M
CV
CD
o�X

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
HL -0025 2B -6
co RAW SHEET NO.
V
U
0
Q)
Ln
N
1' MIN. 1'
SAW
CUT*
AS PHALT
PAVEENT
5" MODIFIED
MONOLITHIC
CONCRETE ISLANDS
I
ASPHALT OR
COMPACTED
SUBGRADE
SAW 1' MIN.
rCUT**
PHALTEMENT
In
� TOOLED JOINT
2%
ASPHALT PAVEMENT (AS REQUIRED)
11' MIN
SECTION A -A
8'-4"
VARIABLE
DEPTH 6" CONCRETE
CONCRETE
SECTION B-B
PLANTED MEDIAN
2% 2%
--
8' MIN
SECTION C-C
MECKLENBURG COUNTY vrNau
LAND DEVELOPMENT f
STANDARDS
?py v
CA
• a. •:
4
4„ :a.. ;
A ; A
a
NOTE:
** = SAWCUT AS NEEDED IF
1. THIS DETAIL MAY BE USED ON NCDOT-MAINTAINED STREETS ONLY WITH APPROVAL FROM
INSTALLED IN EXISTING
NCDOT.
2• PROPOSED ASPHALT PATCH LAYER THICKNESS WILL VARY AS REQUIRED BY TOWN OF
PAVEMENT
MATTHEWS OR NCDOT.
3. ENSURE PEDESTRIAN PASS-THRU HAS ADEQUATE SLOPE DRAINAGE AND DOES NOT POND
1' MIN.
WATER.
4. INSTALL CONES OR BARRELS IMMEDIATELY AFTER PAVEMENT IS CUT AND WHEN CONCRETE IS
SAW
PLACED. CONES TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL WORK IS ACCEPTED BY THE TOWN OF
UT**
MATTHEWS OR NCDOT.
5. THIS DETAIL MAY BE USED TO PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN REFUGE PASS-THRU IN AN EXISTING
ASPHALT
MEDIAN WITH 1'-6" CURB & GUTTER.
PAVEMENT
6. FOR NCDOT STREETS USE 846.01 FOR TOWN STREETS USE MCLDS 10.17B.
\,--ASPHALT
7. NCDOT REQUIRES MILLING AND OVERLAY TO SEAL JOINT AT SAWCUTS SHOWN. FOR TOWN
STREETS MILLING AND OVERLY MAY BE REQUIRED.
8. NCDOT REQUIRES 1' OFFSET FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALONG CURBLINE TO LANE LINE.
PATCH
9. NCDOT REQUIRES THAT ALL JOINTS IN THE ISLAND MUST BE SEALED PER NCDOT STANDARD.
10. USE "QWICK KURB L104 REFLECTIVE YELLOW PADDLE" OR EQUIVALENT.
SLOPE ON
11. FOR NCDOT ROADWAYS UNDERDRAINS ARE REQUIRED. MUST RECEIVE PRIOR APPROVAL FROM NCDOT.
DEPRESSED CURB
12. FOR NCDOT MONOLITHIC ISLAND SEE DETAIL 852.01 SHEET 1
AT DOMES CANNOT
EXCEED 8.33%
D F_ A
50' MIN
10"
10'-0"
10" j. 8'-4" 10" C
REFLECTIVE
�►.� PADDLE
I
. . . . . . . . . . . . (SEE
PLANTED
NOTE 10)
MEDIAN
0000000000
0 0 0 0 o PLANTED
1' FROM MEDIAN
GROOVE JOINT IN SIDEWALK
1 /8" RADIUS
FACE OF
CURB
TOOLED REFLECTIVE
JOINTS PADDLE
(SEE NOTE 10)
FOR CURB AND GUTTER
SEE NOTE 6
1' MIN.
SAW
CUT**
ASPHALT
PAVEMENT
ASPHALT
••° •:4 1 /8" TO 1 /4"
4„
. a: v 4 v
a. a.
JOINT FILLER
1/2"
TRANSVERSE EXPANSION
JOINT IN S I D EWALK
APPROVED DATE: 02/2007
gV f26•
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT
W,
STANDARDS
pq �L'v2
Th CPRO
6" CONC. 8' MIN
3 B R5'
�°°°°°
11?0?0?020?01
2-4' WIDE APPROX. 1'
DETECTABLE WARNING SAWCUT
D MATS PER 10.35E L AS NEEDED
A FLUSH WITH C FOR CURB AND GUTTER
DEPRESSED CURB SEE NOTE 6
PLAN
5" MODIFIED
FOR CURB AND MONOLITHIC 40d SPIKE
GUTTER SEE CONCRETE ISLAND STAGGERED ON 2'
NOTE 6 CENTER EACH WAY
2% 2% _ 1' MIN
SAW 1' MIN.
CUT**
PATCH ASPHALT ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PAVEMENT (AS REQUIRED)
8' MIN
SECTION D-D
PEDESTRIAN REFUGE:
MATTHEWS
SAW
CUT**
ASPHALT
PAVEMENT
ASPHALT
PATCH
NOT TO SCALE
10.38
GENERAL NOTES:
1. A GROOVE JOINT 1" DEEP WITH 1 /8" RADII SHALL BE REQUIRED
IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT 5' INTERVALS. ONE 1 /2"
EXPANSION JOINT WILL BE REQUIRED AT 45' INTERVALS NOT TO
EXCEED 50' AND MATCHING EXPANSION/CONSTRUCTION JOINT IN
ADJACENT CURB. A SEALED 1 /2" EXPANSION JOINT WILL BE
REQUIRED WHERE THE SIDEWALK JOINS ANY RIGID STRUCTURE.
2. SIDEWALK AT DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES TO BE 6" THICK.
3. WIDTH OF SIDEWALK ON THOROUGHFARE STREETS SHALL BE A
MINIMUM OF 5'.
4. WIDTH OF SIDEWALKS ON NON -THOROUGHFARE STREETS SHALL
BE A MINIMUM OF 5'.
5. SIDEWALK TO BE POURED TO END OF RADIUS AT INTERSECTING
STREETS.
6. CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SHALL BE 3600 PSI. IN 28 DAYS.
7. ZONING CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL WIDTH SIDEWALKS
WHICH SHALL SUPERSEDE THESE STANDARD DIMENSIONS SHOWN.
w
ry
U
0 D
Z5 Of
FtIm
ROPOSED CURB & GUTTER
PROPOSED 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK
DETAILS SHOWING EXPANSION JOINTS
FOR CONCRETE SIDEWALK
NOT TO SCALE
CONCRETE SIDEWALKS
10.22
12:1 SLC
DETECTA
R6"
BACK OF CURB
DETECTABLE
WARNING
W W
SEE DETAIL
W W W •Y
10.35B
W W
W W W
W W W
W R6' W
W W W
W W W W
W W W
W W
W W
W
°°°
A 2% o00
12:1 A
~°°°
AX °°° °°°
MATCH
2' coo
I
SIDEWALK WIDTH
T
R6" °°°
W
W RADIUS
W
y
y
W
W VARIES
W W
WWyWyWyWyCONCRETE
W W
W W SIDEWALK
W
PLAN
PERSPECTIVE
1 /2" EXPANSION JOINT (TYP,)
F-CONSTRUCTION JOINT (TYP.)
ENeuRc e
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT(-^',,
STANDARDS
N CPRO
INSTALLATION OF STREET NAME SIGN
REVISIONS
N0. DATE DESCRIPTION
1 112/981 Note 1
MECKLENBURG COUNTY"gVRc °
•f G
O .Z
LAND DEVELOPMENT �( }� lI
STANDARDS c�
TOP OF CONCRETE CURB
VARIES
0 TO 6"
-2% MAX. :.s• ��
VARIES 712 1
6" TO 5.5' 6"
DETECTABLE WARNING
SEE CURB
DETAIL BELOW
SECTION A -A
91, y3/4'
1
� 76"
L +
CURB DETAIL
1 /2" EXPANSION JOINT
NOTES:
1. USE THIS DETAIL ONLY UNDER THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES:
• 5-FOOT SIDEWALKS WITH CURB RADII OF 35 FEET OR GREATER
• 6-FOOT SIDEWALKS WITH CURB RADII BETWEEN 35 FT. AND 30 FT.
• 8-FOOT SIDEWALKS WITH CURB RADII OF 30 FEET OR LESS
• 10-FOOT SIDEWALKS WITH CURB RADII OF 30 FEET OR LESS
2. DIRECTIONAL RAMPS MAY BE USED WHEN AN 8-FOOT PLANTING STRIP IS
PROVIDED. DO NOT USE THIS DETAIL IF THERE IS HARDSCAPE INSTEAD
OF A PLANTING STRIP.
3. ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE AT LEAST 3600 PSI.
4. IF LENGTH OF CURB TO DOMES EXCEEDS 5', TRUNCATED DOMES
SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE BACK OF THE CURB COVERING THE
FULL WIDTH OF THE RAMP NOT TO SCALE
DIRECTIONAL ACCESSIBLE RAMP
INTERSECTION with
SIDEWALK, CURB, and GUTTER
3'
STREET
NAME STANDARD
MARKER
R/W CURB AND R/W+ GUTTER L
M
VALLEY GUTTER
MINOR
STOP SIGN-/
ACCESSIBLE
RAMPS
R/W F r
R/W
1
MARKER
SIDEWALK oJa 3'
INTERSECTION with
DITCHES, and NO CURB and GUTTER
STREET NAME
MARKER
R/W S � L R/W
R/W F
:H
P SI(
0
Q
MINOR
"AME MARKER
R/W
10.40
INTERSECTION with CURB and GUTTER
STREET NAME MARKER
R/W
8'-0"LSTANDARD
UTTER
SIGN
R/W L2-
VALLEY 0
GUTTER 0 MINOR
I
R/W +
0
STOP SIGN a -0
R/W
STREET NAME MARKER
NOTES
1. TWO STREET NAME MARKERS ARE REQUIRED IF THE
MAJOR STREET HAS 3 OR MORE LANES.
2. ANY VARIANCE FROM THIS STANDARD MUST BE
APPROVED BY THE TOWN AND/OR COUNTY.
APPROVED DATE: 02/2007
NOT TO SCALE
STREET NAME SIGN INSTALLATION
LOCATIONS
50.06
/
CV
CD
c"j_
\ ro
mx

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
HL -0025 2B -7
co RvW SHEET NO.
5/8" DIA. x i POST BOLT
1 1 /4' SPLICE BOLT
4 4 REQUIRED
TERMINAL
SECTION
POST
" MAX. �L
PLAN
5/
1
NC-2
f12 1/2"
4 1 /4" 1 /4"
BEAM TYPE GUARD RAIL 2" 2"
i�
o I
O)4 N
I
MAX. 12'-6" CEN ER TO CENTER OF POSTS POST i
TYPICAL ELEVATION
ER-1 SEE STD.
r2:1 SLOPE (MIN. 3') �NO. 50.08A
STEEL GUARD RAIL —PROPERTY LINE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
DEAD-END STREET BARRICADE
NOTE
THIS DETAIL IS NOT A GUARDRAIL DETAIL. FOR
ROADSIDE GUARDRAIL, SEE NCDOT STANDARD
DRAWINGS 862.01-862.03
APPROVED DATE: 02/2007
MECKLENBURG COUNTY gVRG
".,
V
LAND DEVELOPMENT I�I <
STANDARDS �A v
N CAR
NOTES:
1. WHERE A DEAD—END STREET REQUIRES A GUARDRAIL SECTION,
END OF ROADWAY MARKER (ER-1, 24"x24", RED) SIGNS ARE
REQUIRED.
2. SIGNS ARE TO BE PLACED BEHIND THE GUARDRAIL (SEE
STD 50.07A & B) EVENLY SPACED WITH ONE SIGN PLACED AT
THE CENTERLINE LOCATION AND ADDITIONAL SIGNS AT
6' O.C. (MINIMUM OF 3 SIGNS, MAXIMUM OF 5 SIGNS).
CROSS
SECTION
OF POST
(2 #/FT•)
0
0
0
POST o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
_ o
0
0
BASE o
O
0
0
0
APPROVED DATE: 02/2007
gVRG
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS
y�ARO
3 1 /4"
1 12 5/1 4"
2- FOR POST BOLT
DETAIL OF BOLT
DETAIL OF NUT
I(E13/16" MIN.
�DIA. HOLE
W 6 x 8.5
�1 I~4"
13/16" MIN.
DIA. HOLE
12" DIA. HOLE
TO BE FILLED
NEUTRAL AXIS I GROUND WITH CONC.
3/4" x 2 1/2" POST s
BOLT SLOT z )
s�SPLICE BOLT Lo
SLOT r
29/32" x 1 1/8"
SPLICE BOLT SLOT
ELEMENT DETAIL OF POST
APPROVED DATE
NOT TO SCALE
DEAD END STREET BARRICADE
PROPERTY LINE
ER-1
_I
PAVI
STREET BARRICADE
3' END ROAD FILL
SIGN LOCATION DETAIL
CROSS
SECTION
OF POST
tj
(14 GAUGE)
0
0
0
O
POST
o
0
0
o
p
o
o
Ld
x
<W
o
0
v LL
0
W
Of
0
o
III
0
0
BASE
o
0
(SLEEVE)
o
END OF ROADWAY MARKER
(ER-1)
50.07A
NOT TO SCALE
GENERAL NOTES:
1. STEEL BEAM TYPE GUARD RAILS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE END OF ALL DEAD—END STREETS, EXCEPT CUL—DE—SAC STREETS
WHICH HAVE BEEN IMPROVED WITH A PERMANENT TURN —AROUND.
2. FOR STREETS 26' IN WIDTH THE GUARD RAIL SHALL CONSIST OF TWO(2) 12'-6" SECTIONS OR ONE(1) 25' SECTION, THREE (3) STEEL
POSTS, AND TWO (2) TERMINAL SECTIONS. FOR STREETS GREATER THAN 25' IN WIDTH THE GUARD RAIL SHALL SPAN THE
ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE STREET.
3. GUARD RAIL SHALL CONSIST OF RAIL ELEMENTS FABRICATED TO DEVELOP CONTINUOUS BEAM STRENGTH AND INSTALLED AS SHOWN.
4. MINIMUM THICKNESS OF GUARD RAIL SHALL BE 12 GAGE U.S. STANDARD.
THE RAIL ELEMENT INCLUDING SPLICES, SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH OF 80,000 LBS.
GUARD RAIL PARTS FURNISHED SHALL BE INTERCHANGEABLE WITH SIMILAR PARTS REGARDLESS OF THE SOURCE OF MANUFACTURER.
THE HOLES FOR CONNECTING BOLTS SHALL BE PUNCHED OF DRILLED, BURNING WILL NOT BE PERMITTED.
5. THE GUARD, BOLTS, NUTS, STEEL POSTS. AND ALL OTHER METAL PARTS SHALL BE GALVANIZED TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE COATING CLASS, (2.50 OUNCES PER SQUARE FOOT) OF THE CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ZINC —COATED (GALVANIZED) IRON, AND
STEEL SHEETS, COILS, AND CUT LENGTHS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 123A.
6. IF THE AVERAGE SPELTER COATING AS DETERMINED FROM THE REQUIRED SAMPLES IS LESS THAN TWO (2) OUNCES OF SPELTER PER
SQUARE FOOT, OR IF ANY ONE SPECIMEN HAS LESS THAN 1.8 ONCES OF SPELTER PER SQUARE FOOT OF DOUBLE EXPOSED SURFACE, THE
LOT SAMPLED SHALL BE REJECTED, THE FINISHED SHEETS SHALL BE OF FIRST CLASS COMMERCIAL QUALITY, FREE FROM INJURIOUS DEFECTS,
SUCH AS BLISTERS, FLUX, AND UNCOATED SPOTS.
7. THE GUARD RAIL SHALL BE INSPECTED TO DETERMINE THAT THE MATERIAL, DIMENSIONS, AND WORKMANSHIP ARE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THIS PLAN.
8. WHERE A DEAD—END STREET REQUIRES GUARD RAIL, END OF ROADWAY MARKER SIGNS SHALL ALSO BE REQUIRED.
(SEE STD. 50.08A & 50.08B) (ER-1).
APPROVED DATE: 0212007
NOT TO SCALE
MECKLENBURG COUNTYit
DEAD END STREET BARRICADE
LAND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS GENERAL NOTESSTDN0.
50.07B
TENSION SCREWS
APPROVED DATE: 02/2007
gVRG
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Z
2 �4 J�,I►� Q
STANDARDS /y CPRO
UARD RAIL
JARD RAIL CLAMP (TYPICAL)
END OF ROADWAY MARKER (ER-2)
GUARD RAIL CLAMP INSTALLATION
NOT TO SCALE
• •iC
/
CV
CD
c"j_
r—rr
mx

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
HL —0025 2B —8
co RvW SHEET NO.
ADDITIONAL PARKING BAYS AND
CHAMFERS/REVERSE CURVES
AS APPROPRIATE.
PARALLEL- PARKING
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
PER MUTCD (TYP.)
NOTES:
1. CHAMFERS/REVERSE CURVES NOT NECESSARY IF
ADEQUATE DRAINAGE CAN BE PROVIDED THAT WILL
ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT, WATER, DEBRIS, ETC., DOES NOT
COLLECT IN 90-DEGREE CORNERS.
2. PARALLEL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND LOADING ZONES TO
BE REVIEWED ON A CASE -BY -CASE BASIS.
3. FOR PARKING BAYS THAT ARE 8 FEET IN WIDTH OR
GREATER, THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE SET AT
ONE (1) FOOT LESS THAN THE STALL WIDTH.
4. GREATER SEPARATION FROM INTERVENING STREETS THAN
THE DISTANCES PROVIDED IN THE MATRIX MAY BE
REQUIRED AT TOWN OR COUNTY'S DISCRETION.
5. POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED EITHER BY
INSTALLATION OF APPROPRIATE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
OR SLOPE PARKING AREA TO STREET FLOW LINE.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Z s..
STANDARDS
V
0
0
Ln
N
CD
5
BACK OF CURB
c�
zz
YO
�o
Qw a-�
J U
J O
J J
m�
m m
2'-6" STANDARD CURB & GUTTER
PROVIDE CATCH BASIN OR SLOPE PARKING AREA
TOWARD STREET FLOW LINE.
4' R
-� y
PC c
i /
PT
'A
op
F�
sF
OG
PC
MEASUREDISTANCEDISTANCE TO
NEXT INTERVENING STREET
FROM THIS POINT OR FROM
PT. (SEE MATRIX BELOW)
PT
STREET
7' R
MINIMUM DISTANCE TO NEXT INTERVENING STREET
DRIVEWAY
LOCAL COLLECTOR
TH' AR
LOCAL/COLLECTOR
20'
20'
20'
THOROUGHFARE
20'
20'
50'
APPROVED DATE: 02/2007
PARALLEL PARKING STANDARDS
SCORE FULL WIDTH OF
CURB AND GUTTER —
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
PLAN
FRONT
n
a
2'-0"
6„
m
w �
Q
a U
O 0
W Y
U
0 Q
w m
2'-6"
2'-0" 6„
NOT TO SCALE
0lext ulo0
A
2' MIN. RADIUS
PAINTED AREA
TYPICAL MEDIAN SEPARATED
ISLAND DETAIL
VARIABLE (4' MIN.)
.02 2' FLAT
SURFACE
SECTION A
COMMENDED
loo, MIN RE
.02
2" RADIUS --/
1.75" RADIUS
MOUNTABLE 5" MONOLITHIC CONCRETE ISLAND
CURB
RAMP
NO.
PLAN
SHEET
STATION
LOCATION
CURB RAMP
STANDARD
DRAWING
C R 1
5
22+06
-L- LT
10.40
CR2
5
22+55
-L- LT
10.40
CR3
5
22+06
-L- RT
10.40
CR4
5
22+47
-L- RT
10.40
CR5
5
22+78
-L- LT
10.40
CR6
5
22+78
-L- MED
10.40
CR7
5
22+78
-L- MED
10.40
CR8
5
22+78
-L- RT
10.40
C R9
5
24+26
-L- RT
10.40
C R 10
5
24+74
-L- RT
10.40
C R 11
5
25+08
-L- LT
10.40
C R 12
5
25+08
-L- MED
10.40
C R 13
5
25+08
-L- MED
10.40
C R 14
5
25+08
-L- RT
10.40
C R 15
5
13+02
-Y2- LT
10.40
C R 16
5
13+31
-Y2- LT
10.40
ICI
VARIABLE (4' MIN.)
3" RADIUS
�FrT InAI R
NON —MOUNTABLE 5" MONOLITHIC CONCRETE ISLAND
NOTES: THE APPROACH END OF THE
ISLAND (MOUNTABLE SECTION) SHOULD
BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF /00' FROM
THE GATE ARM. (SEE NOTE)
THE MOUNTABLE SECTION OF THE
ISLAND IS TO BE PAINTED WITH YELLOW
PAINT; THERMOPLASTIC PREFERRED.
CURB RAMP NOTES:
1. RAMP TYPES MAY BE MODIFIED IN THE FIELD AS
NEEDED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
2. MAX. RAMP SLOPES OF 8.33% (12:1) ARE TO BE
FIELD VERIFIED. CURB RAMPS SHOWN IN PLANS
FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES.
3. MINIMUM WIDTH OF ALL CURB RAMPS FOR
SIDEWALKS IS 5'. MINIMUM WIDTH OF ALL CURB
RAMPS FOR SIDEPATH IS 10'.
END
STANDARD METHOD
OF ENDING CURB
AND GUTTER

N x
O
NW,
�_0
00
NOTE: ALL WORK WITHIN
CSX CORRIDOR TO BE
COORDINATED WITH
NCDOT AND CSX.
������PAVEMENT REMOVAL
������CONTRACT
GRAPHIC SCALES
zs iz.s o zs so
PLANS
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
BY OTHERS
z
z
0
m
1 1
0
r�
C 0 �—
WOODS
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/ W
u
z
c�
i NWAy
PAVE
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HL-0025
RNd SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
2B-9
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
NOTES:
1. CONTACT THE NCDOT RESIDENT ENGINEER TO SCHEDULE THE CLOSURE OF TANK TOWN ROAD /E. CHARLES ST ROAD AT —GRADE CROSSING.
2. THE EXISTING PAVEMENT WITHIN THE CSX RAILROAD BALLAST LINES TO BE REMOVED BY OTHERS. THE EXISTING CROSSBUCKS, GATES,
AND FLASHERS WILL BE REMOVED BY OTHERS.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE THE DISTURBED AREA OUTSIDE THE RAILROAD BALLAST LINE.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT NORTH CAROLINA 811 TO LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN THE WORK AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL
ALSO CONTACT CSX RAILROAD TO LOCATE ANY UNDERGROUND RAILROAD UTILITIES IN THE WORK AREA PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF
WORK WITHIN THE CSX RIGHT—OF—WAY.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING HIGHWAY ROADBED AND GRADE AREA TO MATCH ADJACENT TOPOGRAPHY. ANY EXISTING CULVERTS
IN THE RAILROAD DITCHES SHALL BE REMOVED AND GRADE EXISTING DITCHES TO DRAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE
ENGINEER ON HAULING AWAY ANY ASPHALT LEFT BY THE REMOVAL BY OTHERS. ALL PAVEMENT WITHIN THE CSX RAILROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY
CORRIDOR IS TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROJECT.
6. PROVIDE PERMANENT SIGNING AS SHOWN IN THE SIGNING PLANS.
7. PROVIDE SIGNING AND DEVICES REQUIRED TO CLOSE THE ROAD ACCORDING TO THE ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS AND
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLANS.
8. ENSURE ALL NECESSARY SIGNING IS IN PLACE PRIOR TO ALTERNATING ANY TRAFFIC PATTERN
CROSSING
CLOSURE DETAIL
TANK TOWN /E. CHARLES RD
FOR —L— DESIGN SEE SHEET 5.
AMTA. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
6131 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD, SUITE 101•RALEIGH, INC 27609
(919) 8SS-9989• INC LICENSE NO. F-1049
WWW.AMTENGINEERING.COM
u
0

N
LC)
In0C-VI nr'cl 0/1-)r c- On 1
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00
/rOCVI nail 0/nr`C 0n 1
0+00 1 +00 2 +00 3 +00 4+00
P525
P524 15" RCP
15" RCP L=28.92'
L=3.12' 0524 S=0.44% 0525
S=0.64%
. ,. 0( 523) ,.
■IGJ■■ram IN�LWIV
111P�1■■r■I
— lmmmmmml
PR1'1 1
OMEONE RIPRAP
0+00 1 +00
-L -
//'OCVII)nv D"AGE f
In00V1 nr'cl 0/nC0 0n 1
0+00 1+00
i�ocvv RIDGE RD.I
0+00 1+00
/nOCVI nr'v 0/nr'C Dn 1
0+00 1 +00 2 +00
,y-m
irAcv1 nr'lv Aid
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00

-
inAnAAic nn i
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00
0+00 1 +00
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00
S S1
/��CT I%JAIDl CC CT 1
0+00 1 +00 2 +00
RIDGE
/L�CVI oIr)l-%c Dr)
.j
0+00 1+00
0+00 0+50
-Y2 � in o cv i nn v RlL
0+00 1 +00 2 +00

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. I SHEET NO.
COMPUTED BY: J. ADORNO DATE: 10-01-2022
N CHECKED BY: M. DOUGLAS DATE: 10-01-2022
V
O
L
"N" = DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF LANE TO FACE OF GUARDRAIL.
TOTAL SHOULDER WIDTH = DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE TO SHOULDER BREAK POINT.
FLARE LENGTH = DISTANCE FROM LAST SECTION OF PARALLEL GUARDRAIL TO END OF GUARDRAIL.
W = TOTAL WIDTH OF FLARE FROM BEGINNING OF TAPER TO END OF GUARDRAIL.
G = GATING IMPACT ATTENUATOR TYPE 350
NG = NON -GATING IMPACT ATTENUATOR TYPE 350
STATE OF NORTH c A RO I I \ A
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GUARDRAIL SUMMARY
HL -0025 1 3B -2
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
LENGTH
WARRANT POINT
"N" TOTAL
FLARE LENGTH
W
ANCHOR / END UNITS
REMOVE REMOVE & REMOVE &
DIST.
WOODEN RUB RAIL
RESST STOCKPILE
LINE BEG. STA. END STA. LOC.
SHOUL
EXISTING REMARKS
SHOP DOUBLE
APPROACH TRAILING
FROM
WIDTH
APPROACH TRAILING
APPROACH TRAILING
GREU
FOR PEDESTRIANS
EXISTING EXISTING
GUARDRAIL
STRAIGHT CURVED FACED
END END
E.O.L.
END END
END END
B-77 TL-2 TES
GUARDRAIL GUARDRAIL
Y2 10+16.28 10+16.28 CL
37.50
2
Y2 12+55.00 15+30.00 RT
275.00
14+00 15+65.00
2.0' 5.0'
25.0'
1.0'
1
Y2 13+27.97 15+30.00 RT
227.92
L 25+30.00 25+30.00 CL
37.50
2
Y DEV 10+84.45 10+84.45 CL
37.50
2
Y FUT 10+78.40 10+78.40 CL
37.50
2
SUBTOTALS
k
425.00
1
8
227.92
DEDUCTIONS
-
GREU TL-2 @ 25'
-25.00
-
Tota 1
400.00
227.92
SAY
412.5
5 ADDITIONAL POSTS
1
8
235.0
REMOVAL OF EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT
NOTE: COORDINATE WITH NCDOT RAIL DIVISION
& ENGINEER FOR PAVEMENT REMOVAL AT
EXISTING RAILROAD CROSSING.
LINE
STATION
STATION
LOC.
LENGTH OR
AREA
WIDTH
SQUARE
YARDS
-L-
23+22
23+75
CL
930.05
103.34
-Y2-
11 + 17
14+48
RT
55.63
-Y2-
14+48
14+75
RT
41970.57
552.29
-Y3-
11 +00
13+03
CL
41104.30
456.03
-Y4-
10+95
11 + 16
LT
35.88
3.99
-Y4-
11 + 16
13+20
LT
31898.25
433.14
-SIDE PATH-
11 +04
23+29
LT
12, 836.82
11426.31
-SIDE PATH-
24+28
26+65
CL
31087.94
343.10
-Y3 D ET
10+25
12+72
CL
31356.31
372.92
-Y3 DET
13+01
13+47
CL
831.73
92.41
TOTAL
3,783.54
A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE, SUITE 325•RALEIGH, NC 27609
(919) 8SS-9989•NC LICENSE NO. F-1049
AATWWW.AMTENGINEERING.COM

()- C'y-' 'I v I I 1 I 1 A" w � Z � 9 PROJECT REFERENCE NO SHEET NO
90N.�T —_ _ __ I I DETAIL A
S D 1 -T C NC I I BERM DITCH z
� 2 W �-
� �� I F � Q Not to Scale)
C
CONC GR I II I ' u
CONC G X� L -- < I� I a I 5.0' 6.0' 5.0,
FLAG �V I I °
� � o �OLE J „ oa
3.D'
LO
X I plm 10.01Y.C.
S A6°33501 RN <Jv, Q o s
$g�' tJ `(gv233 -- - 0 HL-0025 4
oBN 26a5 PG
s � � RrW SHEET NO.
'PCP � ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
6, V s D
N Ag°\�'6 E ,
43
Min. D= 1.5 Ft.
X X� S 72 W xCON 10'CON } II gl FROM STA. 16712CY DDETA. 19+50 LT
�� I Ilia o OI FROM STA. 12 + 00 TO STA. 16 + 28 LT
xJ X \ R II 58 C� iI s�
x— o wl 0= = o°
ui
° I I I I I I I CONSTRUCTION & ROW ACQUISITION BY OTHERS 9�
x o ;1 I Y I TIP 1-5507 / U-4714AB JEFFREY B. DAVIES
—_ I z s
- S � � - � o + • DB 32773 PG 730 1 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
{ —TV— I o I II I I v T 518 /
� N I � II W UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
II 0 � / Oo �
J co Irr�- 1 I N LBP REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES II
DB 24143 PG 223� / �jN S o/a
w
I � IW `� D �j
Fw)
� -
PN
Lo U, p8
48 c v I I -,---ADP MECKLENBURG, LLC ^
DB 37571PG 580 001
LLI I I I
E
00
# WD I< II II moo- qBW ' 48°26 06„
Q CJ �� I II II 'S\025.31 �I
ZQZ II II � I �� -
pp5 / -L- PCB Sto. 14+10.52
O�� 0� BK� DK I �I II ♦ I �,.E� "�- 6
krr s `J O O ® LATERAL 'V' DITCH
Q J I Ill;m-----`-pe-/___ E-- -_-fl-� — RED PILL Ifs, TMENT SEE DETAIL B pE
O U S I R S, LLC
DB 36219 PG 76
0 O O� C--_
ALL I o oNp �II II ONLY BERM DITCH 2''r ISFD -
165' LANE SHIFT & MEDIAN TAPER o
V) J °� T L A +
� � II- ,, BDOLLJ 75' LEFT LANE TAPER
ULLg� I I � 0404 E TpE BERM 'V' DITCH LATERAL 'V' DITCH / -,��
�I � RpG� 11 N 61° 1'18 � > TD Tp SEE DETAIL A SEE DETAIL B - as
-Z Q o t— wP`� I m I �q pDE �'DE E �O H `_F� -
LQ I I <T II U (.�' p t--�37°I�'53' E _ - ------ -- ----` �p DE 041 /
C______ _ ----
N Q W 2SFD -Yl- PRC Sto. 9.7 ZC II I p6op �GU�' N 54°pq,15' o 2 lE 'Bw/ - C C ---- pIE DE C f
O Q Q Cc G �' 5u0 I I } 134.'d ANE N 62°`��54" E ELBOWS ------ O
_ i
N o u I �5 pN� S I I \� IR 49.01 --- - -- ----- _ _-J P - �I r �� F
<,0403
cu'c CONC o 110 �� c 12" m I _ 0408
/ C C S C� 041
Q Q E z r l � L �
N o �r - - ( ���/ I S = K 31° 0405
° I- I I � W A _ R P r
dS Q O ° `� - —T Foi - I V
_ - - I o I IED / / _ - A \542 F
_ �� O I -L- ao a �� ! CB _ O - D-404.\\' ,
N - G �1 _ — --- -�-- -__ ... L;
� fQQ.QQ -STl � I I � �I I U � � �`�. 0407 0410��,
f80.12 I _ 0402 _-----5 - --_
�I 8"PVC - - - -_/
I S °0 ,� ---- ,yam p - � '
��
N Q I /AA r — \� III I �� `♦ W �� J ' ------------- E C F E EF.o ^' ^', F '' C
Q — ��i \ I a \\ I cQ `p C E E C v, Off, E
J -w- _ / oc �o I 1 I _ I C oW C -?'n ,L \ A Q�
O O - - - - i o c \ `� -o "O n - - I i- 714-BYI 66
�I k— ---�'' % -o J-4714-BYI 65 T 4
C \ I\ I / a I I I I m E�/E G AQ I 5 OUTLET
CLASS ITIOPRAP �F 0414 OUTLET PROTECTION O
� N I ly SEE PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS FOR REVISIONSS� I W. qp ,` I C �° -° 2 T S CLASS I RIPRAP
# Q Y TO PAVEMENT MARKINGS ALONG E. JOHN ST.I I T 1 Q� l
J Z I� II I o 0401
��' `' Il�mI I II I m I I \
Q Q W CI IIII o I �I - - `' o /I TII li I U I \\ \ STABILIZE
o i
LL]o II 8p I Ta�$ T I II I II I °- Lu > TURFGRASS
QOO o-- z} ) III \
�1 J z I c) � 0 II I
Q W Q I CONC
} I \
I Q I I 11 to co \
��� I� I A
O U V I I �j I \
�O Q � I� \ i OUTLET PROTECTION gQ �
I O �� y IIII�� I I 2SBK&FD I I I I In % > 20 TONS CLASS I RIPRAP ��tncb
I zCb I III Im 4. 13 SY GEOTEXTILE\
N N a E pl I" I IIII I I I I I I I I
�p ° .-' hANDARD--
N N N �� y I rq I I I I Ic9 la W -. TA C
N N O o ° 11 I I �ONC - IS OI I I m o \
r R o
a> � I I °Nc III I I I I, I \- I
CC) O O I I II �' n N \�
o ) II I III III I I� D CONSTRUCTION TIP 1-5507/U— 7-1 AB
I n
Gj�1h II I I I I E. CONSTRUCTION TIP HL-0025
z z MT D_-
0 0 o a / R % _,STA. 11 + 04.2 6
CAN
\ \ I I I I D
O I III I
OOO
N
—]=ATV
� '
\\ o I I IIII
Ln
0 J I I I CONSTRUCTION & ROW ACQ . ` ' I N BY OTHERS
coNC IIII \ ?IIII} I 1 TIP /-5507 / U-4714AB
IC I ;
E I -
I
SZ Ill} U
36 SY GEOTEXTILE RED PILL INVESTMENTS,LLC
� � 0 13SYGEOTEXTILE
DB 36219 PG 76
B M # 21 MB 36219 PG 76
0406 OUTLET PROTECTION
10 TONS CLASS I RIPRAP
7 SY GEOTEXTILE
l -
2S�`&Fo 00 0
II m N I II I I
-L - -Yl - (BY OTHERS)
PI Sto 17 -H3.57 PI Sto 130+80.52 PI Sto 138 *80.22 1 II I
= 23° /3' 14.4' (LT) A = 6° 38' 4/.4" (LT) � = 3° 09' 26.1" (RT) - o W \ a a I I —
D = 3° 53' 04.1" D = 0° 34' 22.6" D = 0° 42' 58.3" i o I I \ u 1� D -E B 56 PG 340
L = 597.78 L = 1,159.74 L = 440.84 u . T I ce �. SEWER RAW
PE
T = 303.05' T = 580.52' T = 220.47' / �, 00 1 � CMUD SANIAYR —
R = 1,475.00' R = 10,000.00' R = 8,000.00" _ _ I _ s �2° v - - - --- � � `` 20' —E
= ----------------
e NC (0.021 - ------ - - -
V = 30 mph LL' I J I z _ -,��3- ��--------- _ - _` 5------ - ------ `�r= j-=-- ss OAd zl
o _ -
���F�,�,.
O
MATTHEWS GATEWAY PROJECT, LLC
DB 38153 PG 971
DB 23668 PG 825
MB 51PG 968
MB 70 PG 316
z
w
co O
� W
^T D ETAI L C
FROM STA. 13 + 21 TO STA. 13 + 50 RT
(218 CY DDE; Slope = 2%)
(50 TON CL I RIP -RAP & 132 SY GEOTEXTILE)
E
s
E. JOI
350
1, :00
2,900
EXISTING 3,600
GREYLOCK
RIDGE RD.
650
1, 700
E. JOI
IN ST.
18,500
42,800
1, 650
3, 000
81200 PROPOSED
11,600 GREYLOCK
r600_4
RIDGE RD.
21,800
48,200
IN ST.
FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 6.
FOR -SIDEPATH- ALIGNMENT DETAIL SEE SHEETS 213-1 & 213-2.
FOR -SIDEPATH- PROFILE SEE SHEET 8.
31_S7 - —
�Iz- - HYDRAULIC DESIGN
ROADWAY DESIGN ON] Vmmm
FOR PIPE PROFILE SEE SHEET 2D-1.
A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 5400 TRINITY ROAD
FOR ADDITIONAL ROW & EASEMENT AMT900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE, SUITE 325°RALEIGH, NC 27609 SUITE 102
PROPOSED SIGNAL INFORMATION SEE SHEET 4A. [phone]°NC LICENSE No. F-1049 RALEIGH, NC 27607
WWW.AMTENGINEERING.COM 919.223.8965 NC LIC. NO. F-1285

co
w
w
CC
I
J
W
Q)
Q
CL
�i
LQ
J #
Q
Q Q
C #
O J
LL_LLJ
W
� Q
z �
W o
W LLJ
z �t W
O CD oz
WLLJ
cc
Q Q
c)Qo
O N
�Q#O�I
U Q
� O CD
Q Q ?
cn m v
I �
I o
00 JLLJ J
Q LU
W
Cr- I I
I
N O N
CD N I
C O
op O O
O
I I
I
CD O O
Q Q Q
CC ��
N o
-Y2- POT Sto. 17+02.17 o z
� u
G m IN
n O D
S 46°39'30. W n
406.7p'
WOODS
PEGGY LAWRENCE 10
DB 31856 PG 85
7°2113" E
328.26' S 46°33'I4° W
10+0 897.59, z
----------- -- II --
BE•G-lltl--�C0NST14UCTr~ ___________ __________ __________ - ------------
12" H3- POT Sto.16+55.00 ------ --------------------
;v
ISFD BEGIN PAVING O o
-Y3- POT Sto.10+75.00 > L
-Y3- PC Sto.10+80.74 JOHN CLYBURN
ISFp ^Q 26851 PG 237 � /
F
BEGIN PROPOSED GRADE
x 4 -Y3 - POC Sto.11 +00.00
FII
-Y3- PT Sto. //+50.35
/�
x r� V Y3- PC Sto. 12+13.90
3 � t� bo:7o
D �REES
,USTE S N 48 33 • E /
it MAS IC 2SBLKBUS ONC � CD
JDGE NO 5 BATHO /
N
DB 713 P ,
+tp 20, GUY (2)
---- CD
PB YP h I
NE Y
l0 00 GR ; C To _-_ 2°
------------- --
DEAD _ Al t C13 �tyP� 1051
_ Icy oRCP
� horlo7 , a 8 UNKOWN a RI
C� F C ---_ cB
s 48,
O 0' TAPER % 104,59/,
To EXIST. AFT �.w
DB 31_---
ADP MECKLENBURG, . C R I
I
� F
� �79
•--4{yam •��
LW
-L- PT Sto. 20+08.30
w /N
507
8
�,,
V)
RED PILL , MENTS LLC
I
/
/
LJJ
U
WOODS DB 36219 Pr 76
'I 04 /
C
a5
L
-Y2 PC Ste. //+35.00
I CB °
I
II
N
LATERAL 'V' DITCH �,
I 0 1I
SEE DETAIL B
TDE E
R
I C
O
TDE D
C
�J .01
� (
N \
O
_ ------
V)
��
I E + 85' LANE SHIFT
W o & LANE TAPER
Z BEGIN PROPOSED GRAD
--� -Y2- POT Sto.10 +16.28
= BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
FU- -Y2- POT Sto.10+05.24
5Q
,!► chi U3► =■
7�_DJF"
C7 �
I'1'I i
0501
OUTLET PROTECTION-
10 TONS CLASS I RIPRAP
7 SY GEOTEXTILE
O
RED PILL IN1,L--,.MENTS,LLC
DB 36219 PG 76
MB 36219 PG 76
» ' 200.00'
III100�1`
III
I
I
I END CONSTRUCTION
-Y2- POT Ste.15 +30.00
a
a
TIE TO EXIST.
GUARDRAIL
i
02 1
.01
I
I X
.00 n
-.o, - PT Sto.14+72.32 D
/4' o
02 / I +65 ;a
IF
I
I
W
IL i
II Iq I
I /
Ir
I
B -Y3- P7` Sto. 12+66. 4
I
4 N 64a 46' 28.4" E
I TRUSTEES
` OF MASONIC
1 LODGE NO.566 Z
-Y2 RC Sto. 13+18.20 = DB 713 PG 272 END CONSTRUCTION TIP HL-0025
� -Y3 T Sto.13+03.77 ^'
t -Y2- RC Ste. 12+60.07 : -L- POT Sto.24+50.69 = E"�St�NG R/W N -L- POT STA. 25 + 30.00
-Y4- POT Sto. 13+36.85
-L- Sto.22+27.48 w wo � o
6.6° coo -Y2 - T Sto. // +r�0.00 4 N 3 u 5I 41 • E `'��° � �
m CRESTDALE 106.47' 0� � z o m
C
z CROSSING Ln Ln `O _< >
W to
o HOMEOWNERS `n o LA LA m
c�. LA
0
m ' z 71 ASSOCIATION, INC. N �'' �' -4� � z - N 40°07'59" E
N N zo MB 35 PG 553 WOODS ,,, oof7 L, 389.89'
N DB 12786 PG 731 N 38°55'48" EBOB
_ ( P) + N E 60.00' o
0518 520: r- ,� _ C F
_ -4
XISTING R/w
+ TES \.� -L - POT 27-+89:9C EXISTING
N ' �o
o l a N F KISTING R/� -
■ o o� o E; \
- F
> Ww � TES � �1► n�1 _ o R
_ ; 1 p
F -0 Z F-- 00
PI I 0512RNEWAOYSFORr �� , F --- END CONSTRUCTION
f�R EOUIPTM6NT I E I -SIDEPATH- POT Sto.26+65.00
N I C B ACCESS
I OUTLET P OTECTION I L 1 N
TES IF 10 TONSIL, S IPRAP5 / 11 wLTI
7 SY ` X LE �, o I TOWN .,� , MEWS �,, °
--- Q �' o 02 DB 29844 PG 453
E 1 O(y S OTATO�
7 vpr-
SY GE TEX SS Km co N 5/* 06' 56.3" W m
N 5/° 06' 56.3" W D o I I - : -Y4- PT Sto. 12+69.49
-Y2- POT Sto. /0+00.00 oo C 26'
1 I I I I' s 492.86w
mZ x 5S1 I < 4Q 32'13" W
C') o L ,qs , I / 104.86'
n z z
O Icr
m
- -' 7 -Y4- PRC Ste lI +80 I6
m w b z IJ_ rn .
E _ O CP-IV DMB0297PGG460
5267 � .01 _ � 0521 N 44°32'08" E 93.87'
-Y4- PC Sto. 10+9/.2
`� II
FI .00 .02 0523k- T CYNTHIA A. z
FT C6
N I I �'1C 0 WILLIAMS 0.,
N i 1 Ln
0524 �C) DB 10211 PG 311 iD `a
9 I o1 .03 IFS MB 29 PG 698 W
I T. �
BEGIN PROPOSED GRADE EX S�ONC
-Y4- POT Sto.10+45.00, 5 5 N 44°57 07" E 94.97'
�I 2
�� II OUTL PROTECTION SONDRA s
1 I_ m
-Y4- PT Sto. 10+00.00 clI J I11110 TONS CLASS I RIPRAP 1�1 I 7 SY GEOTEXTILE LAWRENCE -0
pi w 9N 1I�1 � � � I DB 10211 PG 228 �
I � u MB 29 PG 698
FI I 113.66'
'I- o CQdt _-N 34°I3'35" E MICHAEL DALE 2
T
IANTHONY AND WIFE, n GOLDIE THELMA �' `�cp BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
I
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
HL-0025 5
RzW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
V ENGINEER ENGINEER
00
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
-L - -Y2-
PI Sto /7+/3.57
PI Sto 1/+99.66
P1 Sto 13+69.90
A
= 23° 13' 14.4" (LT )
A
= 35` 49' 5/.8' (RT )
L
= 36` 18' 03.6" (LT)
D
= 3" 53' 04.1"
D
= 28` 38' 52.4"
D
= 17" 06' 11.6'
L =
597.78'
L =
125.07'
L =
212.25"
T
= 303.05'
T
= 64.66'
T
= 109.82"
R
= 1,475.00'
R
= 200.00"
R
= 335.00"
e =
NC (0.02)
e =
NC (0.02)
e =
NC (0.02)
V
= 30 mph
V =
25 mph
V
= 30 mph
-Y4-
PI Sto 9+25.47
PI Sto 1/+36.76
PI Sto 12+25.88
A
= /5` 37' 34.0" (RT)
A =
29" 57' 25.0"
(RT )Z�
= 30° 06' 20.6" (LT )
D
= 10° 25' 02.7"
D =
33° 42' 12.2"
D
= 33° 42' 12.2"
L =
150.00'
L =
88.88'
L =
89.33'
T
= 75.47'
T =
45.48'
T
= 45.72'
R
= 550.00'
R
= 170.00"
R
= 170.00'
e =
NC (0.02)
e =
NC (0.02
V =
25 mph
V =
25 mph
-Y3 -
PI Sto 1/+15.54
PI Sto 12+40.65
Z�
= 1° 59' 38.9" (RT) z�,
= 20° 13' 08.7" (RT )
D
= 2° 5/' 53.2"
D
= 38° //" 49.9"
L =
69.61'
L
= 52.93'
T
= 34.8/'
T
= 26.74'
R
= 2,000.00'
R
= 150.00'
e =
RC (0.02
V
= 20 mph
M
DETAIL B
LATERAL 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural _L Fill
Ground 3.7 D 11•.� 1'/Ft. Slope
Min. D= 1.5 Ft.
b= 2.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 19 + 50 TO STA. 21 + 28 LT
(39 CY DDE)
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
NOTE: ALL DRIVEWAY RADII 10 FT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
E. CHARLES ST.
6,000
4,400 1,300
PROPOSED FUTURE
GREYLOCK 11,600 7,500 GREYLOCK
RIDGE RD. RIDGE RD.
7,200) 200
1,700
2040 ADT TANK TOWN RD.
FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 6.
FOR -Y2- PROFILE SEE SHEET 6.
FOR -Y3- PROFILE SEE SHEET 7.
FOR -Y4- PROFILE SEE SHEET 7.
FOR -SIDEPATH- ALIGNMENT DETAIL SEE SHEETS 213-1 & 213-2.
FOR -SIDEPATH- PROFILE SEE SHEET 8.
FOR-Y3_DET- SEE SHEET 213-3.
FOR INTERSECTION DETAILS SEE SHEET 213-4.
FOR -L- MEDIAN DETAILS SEE SHEET 213-4.
I - (P.-Y4- POC Ste. 9+28.00
200.00' <10528 +28 Z DB 10535 PG 685
HYDRAULIC DESIGN
NOTE:
TOP OF RAIL ELEVATIONS SHALL BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED TO MATCH PLAN SET BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF CSX. FIELD VERIFY TOP OF RAIL ELEVATIONS POST
NEW CROSSING PANEL INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD ADJUST PROFILE AT DIRECTION OF ENGINEER AT
TIE-INS TO THE NEW CROSSING SURFACE PANEL AS THE ELEVATION MAY CHANGE.
BEGIN PROP.
2'-6"C&G F
MB 29 PG 698
OUTLET PROTECTION
p� 134.26'
ROADWAY DESIGN
FOR PIPE PROFILE SEE SHEET 2D-1.
U/ yL(M
/ITY Ln�
N 34°13'35" E
10 TONS CLASS I RIPRAP
=
A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
5400 TRINITY ROAD
7 SY GEOTEXTILE
r
FOR ADDITIONAL ROW & EASEMENT AT900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE, SUITE 325•RALEIGH, NC 27609
SUITE 102
p
o
[phone]•NC LICENSE NO. F-1049
FOR RAILROAD CROSSING DETAIL SEE SHEET 2B-9. INFORMATION SEE SHEET 5A. WWW.AMTENGINEERING.COM
RALEIGH, NC 27607
919.223.8965 NC LIC. NO. F-1285

Permit Drawings

c
z
U)
4-
:_
E
L
U
_O
T
L
/
/
0
0
Q
/
U
0
L
T
_
X
W
N
(Y
U
_O
T
N
L
C�
Q
O
O
O
M
X
W
Uz
U
_O
T
N
L
C�
CV
O
O
W
CV
O
C
W
C
N
C�
O
0
z
z
00
c9
U
N
H
U
O
POM
H
H
v
0
v
BEGIN TIP
H L-0025
M
5
END TIP
H L-002 5
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
GRAPHIC SCALE
PLANS
THESE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS COMPLY WITH
THE APPLICABLE REGULATIONS SET FORTH BY THE NCG-010000
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 2019
AND ISSUED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAW
WAM WMWr RBPBBBNCB M
MWr
Na
IWAL
wism
N.C.
K-0025
EG-1
WAM PR"N&
P.A.PR"NQ
OBfCR rrnmw
49490.1.1
PE
PLAN FOR PROPOSED
HIGHWAY EROSION CONTRO
THIS PROJECT CONTAINS
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
FOR CLEARING AND
GRU�3ING PHASE OF
CONSTRUCTION.
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 5
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
i
TIP 1-5507 /U-4714A
EROSION CONTROL
ENGINEER
SIGNATURE
P.E.
Prepared in the Office oh
W
LJ�/LJC�(nLr15LJ�/ (M
UMUMN
5400 TRINITY ROAD
SUITE 102
RALEIGH, NC 27607
919.223.8965 NC LIC. NO. F-1285
Designed by
B. Gregory Adolph, P.E. #053892
NAME
LEVEL III CERTIFICATION NO.
CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION
Roadway Standard Drawings
The following roadway english standards as appear in "Roadway Standard Drawings"- Roadway Design
Unit - N. C. Department of Transportation - Raleigh, N. C., dated January 2018 and the latest
revision thereto are applicable to this project and by reference hereby are considered a part of
these plans.
1604.01
Railroad Erosion Control Detail
1632.01
Rock Inlet Sediment Trap Type A
1605.01
Temporary Silt Fence
1632.02
Rock Inlet Sediment Trap Type -3
1606.01
Special Sediment Control Fence
1632.03
Rock Inlet Sediment Trap Type C
1607.01
Gravel Construction Entrance
1633.01
Temporary Rock Silt Check Type A
1622.01
Temporary -3erms and Slope Drains
1633.02
Temporary Rock Silt Check Type 3
1630.01
Riser 3asin
1634.01
Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type A
1630.02
Silt 3asin Type 3
1634.02
Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type
1630.03
Temporary Silt Ditch
1635.01
Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type A
1630.04
Stilling 3asin
1635.02
Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type 3
1630.05
Temporary Diversion
1640.01
Coir Fiber -3affle
1630.06
Special Stilling 3asin
1645.01
Temporary Stream Crossing
1631.01
Matting Installation

r
c
rri
n 2
S 46.39.30• IN
406.7 a
WOODSrn
0 `
PEGGY 6 PG 85E \\� 0
V47-21,13•
328.26' E S 46°33'14• w
III
897,59' v III
/ BEGIN CONSTRUCT/ON --------
-Y3 - POT Star 10+5500
-'HIGH FOIST_----____ - III I
1sFp BEGIN PAVING - - a• + Ir n
-Y3- POT Sto./0+7500 Elev. 5 r Q
ISFO -Y3- PC Star /0+80.74 23 X E .02 F 1
BEGIN PROPOSED GRADE o 1 01 I
x -Y3 - POC Star //+aiO,lOiO I ! I
l � I
F I .00
o _ _ `' -Y3- PT Star 11 +50.35 1 .o I -Y2-
xC3
3 _ Y3- PC ta.12+/3.90 02 I
©- ` C1+ o I F
TRUS E Q1
OF Mq ON 2SBLKBU B/R 97' E
LODGE N S a7H 331.! - 44, /
DAP 2 ► N I
N I
_ 20 cU (2)
POSSc
IiTF1E S
IO -_CHI NEr R/
1 - W-
o -'
GR I C ? :B � ^l'
� I � �- - �� � 051
206AD �
cr- y v _ 11
END CONSTRUCT/ON
-Y2- POT Star /5+3
+
FILL IN WETLAND
I A P RI B -/- I- � IOr 1Lr004019
•�s_� -F C_ rw .7
c6
N 64' 46 8r4' E
' I
7
KEN N T _ _ +T •,'r � ' -Y2- PRC Star l A-1820 = END CONSTRUCTION TIP HL-0025
/�. -Y3- PT Sto.13+03.77 ; d taw° R1«
ALEXANDER. HEIR E/ r7/5r90' C / �" � N EX`S
=9 PG 49 M -Y2- SRC Sto. 12+60.07 � -L- POT Star 24+50.69 = �� -L- POT STA. 2 5 + 3 0.00
x79 -Y4- POT Star 13+36B5 4�°'
N _ �� -L - POT Stor 22+2748 w w , N
-L PT $tor / • ° 10 O
20+0830 0
w - °? / �' -Y2- POT .Star /l+O0rQ0 O N 38.51.41' E c•'�°Q r . N
Lu I I CRESTDALE �• w a O R+
LJJ JOHN R. uurynzo. r r wzo I a' / c io6.47• _j z
= WOODS DB 989 PG 151 °j 05 I CROSSING �. N W t° � N
-Y2- PC Sto 11+3500 (0 °p : c HOMEOWNERS o a w #,, aNrn
r
c!i " I C I m z ASSOCIATION. INC. ' N w Nr z - N 40 07'59' E
LATERAL
DETADITIL B H 05 I : N : 0 MB 35 PG 553 WOODS con CO L" 389.89'
LL TDE E-� C TO "' z DB 12786 PG 731 N 38°55'48' E '' a
LJJ , + (nP) P) E 60.00'
TEE - 0518 320 N C F
to -
O
+
LO
N
O
01
O
-- -
t!1-E
�_�--
E
F I
HIGH POINT
I
EISV.7/8.98'
PROPOSED GR
Lu-Y2-
-BEGIN
POT Sto.10+162
Z
BEGIN CONSTRUCT/ON
J
-Y2- POT 90.10+0&
F �F XISTING R/W
< _ ��
TES ♦ -L - PDT Sid: 27+6i9X Ex�s W
o �o 04
F Exl
O O ' O
N N \ > >N C
F
- ------
1-1;
V �
13 051 70 1 .02 RI
_ o 3 KISTING R/W
,\ �F o'T' ' - �F' � o F R iF
z
' l 05 �N ``�F - _ END CONSTRUCT/ON
+61 01 F E
0512' 216 -SIDEPATH- POT S10r+65M
m ° 1 OUTLET P TEC 108 051
TES F 10 TONSW fPm w
7 SY `� X . I �, m .02
oo E 01W T ELT1� c a; A.
10TNS SS II 40
p x, i SY GE TEXAKmrV cm co ;' / N 5rOS' 56S W
rn N 5rOS' 56r3• W , n� o `° F / -Y4- PT Sto. /2+69.49
-Y2- POT Std. 10+00,00 '32 92.86'
i�N S 44 32'• W
�-- 0501 v+ I T °13S 44.32'13• ►y
OUTLET PROTECTION L I 104.86,
10 TONS CLASS I RIPRAP LA O z
7 SY GEOTEXTILE
2 rn w
-Y4NBRC ta. //+80.16
JOHN R. DOWNS. HEIRS L- E J Z .02 cP_1v 10277 PG 167
DB 989 PG 151 I 5 MB 29 PG 460
-Y4- PC Star 1D+9/28 0067 I 01 m I 1 0521 N 44°32108• E 93.87'
o OUTLET PROTEC ON
F o° .01 I 0523 ENT TOIL
4 N 1 a FF CB o E1 L)T T LA ING
N 1 0524 OB 10211 PG 311 N
+ 59 070 - MB 29 PG 698 ' W
EX 5I NC
BEGIN PROPOSED GRADE '
•
-Y4- POT Sto.10+45DO i o 5N 44"57'07• E 94.97' z
1 III OUTL PROTECT ON SONDRA s O
I I 110 TON LASE I PRAP a' p
-Y4- PT S +Q0 III 1 1 7 S O_RXTI E LAWRENCE s cp
p 6� I ' r OB 10211 PG 228
F11 O J MB 29 PG b98 z I 1 113.66
34°13'35' E MICHAEL DALE
MATTHEWS GATEWAY PROJECT. LLC 1 III
MB 51PG 968 I, ANTHONY AND WIFE. q
DB 23668 PG 825 i I I' ( o GOLDIE THELMA N � BEGIN CONSTRUCT/ON
Y4 POC Sto.9 28DO
200.00• 05 28 DB 10535 PG 685
F MB 29 PG 698
OUTLET PROTECTION OM 134.26'
10 TONS CLASS I RIP P = N 34°13'35' E
7 SY GEOTEXTILE
O
O
w
1f
W
W
U
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
H�-aa25 3
R/W SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS O
V ENGINEER ENGINEER
00
INCOMPLE% E PLANS
DO NOT USE FOIE W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PERMIT
DRAWING
SHEET
3
OF 5
-L -
-Y2-
P/ Sto // /J +13.57
P1 Sto /2+29.31
P1 Sto /4+14.33
0 =
23• /3' /4.4• (LT J
0
= 32' 2/' 49,D• !RT J 0
= 32" W 00Z !LT J
D=3'53'04.r
D=17'37'46.r
D=17'37'46.r
L =
597.78'
L
= /83r58'
L =
18624'
T =
303,05'
T
= 94.3/'
T
= 95.76'
R
= /.475.00'
R
= 325.W
R
= 325.W
e =
NC 10.02)
e
= NC f0.02J
e =
NC t0.02J
V =
30 mph
V
= 30 mph
V
= 30 mph
-Y4-
P1 Sto 9+25.47
P1 Sto //+36.76
P1 Sto /2+25B6
A
= 15° 37' 34,D• (RTJ
A
= 29" 57' 25.0• (RT)& =
30' 06' 210SO (LTJ
D
= V 25' Mr
D
= 33. 42' /22
D =
33" 42' 12Z
L
= /50.W
L
= 88r88'
L =
89.33'
T
= 75r47'
T
= 45.48'
T =
45.72'
R=550.W
R=170.00'
R=/70,00'
e
V
= NC 10,02J
= 25 mph
e =
V =
NC t0.02J
25 mph
-Y3-
P1 Sto H+15.54
P1 Sto /2+5029
A
= r 59' 389• (RT)
0
= 27' 16' 25r5' (RT)
D
= 2' 5r 53Z
D
= 38r Ir 49.90
L =
69.6r
L =
71.40'
T
= 34,8r
T
= 36.390
R
= 2.000.00'
R
= /50,D0'
e =
RC t0.02J
V
= 20 mph
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
NOTE: ALL DRIVEWAY RADII IO FT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
E. CHARLES ST.
6,000
J4,400 1,300
PROPOSED 11,600 7,500 FUTURE
GREYLOCK GREYLOCK
RIDGE RD. RIDGE RD.
1,200 200
11,700
2040 ADT TANK TOWN RD.
FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 6.
FOR -Y2- PROFILE SEE SHEET 7.
FOR -Y3- PROFILE SEE SHEET 7.
FOR -Y4- PROFILE SEE SHEET 7.
FOR -SIDEPATH- ALIGNMENT DETAIL
SEE SHEETS 213-1 & 213-2.
FOR -SIDEPATH- PROFILE SEE SHEET
8.
FOR -Y3 DET- SEE SHEET 213-3.
HYDRAULIC DESIGN
ROADWAY DESIGN
�7�n0�n�m(�
TR MA
A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
5400 TRINITY ROAD
6131 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD, SUITE 101•RALEIGH, NC 27609
AMTWWW.AMTENGINEERING.COM
SUITE 102
[phone]•NC LICENSE NO. F-1049
RALEIGH, NC 27607
1919.223.8965 NC LIC. NO. F-1285

In
Z
O
Ln
W
w
0 J/ / / I r v lip r
/ 1 .
I . W \/
/--\ C
V " ! _ , i .1i ' - �! PROJECT REFERENCE NO SHEET NO
!�
u � 1 If 'IDETAIL A
i _ II I_- W w BERM DITCH a
Ln
I
03 t ) , - �� /O Q ( Not to Scale) w �
�0 \ \ \ / 1 �' L - GR `1 N FCao/I r10 b.o'G o `,°\\ % '`. � I'D LAG `° ItyI '\ I` 1 I Y`�JA 1'0 I EOLEt ("5i IZO�' s.o�! L\ r \ '\ `j `\I I t �J / ` 1 "gyp ,J► 'I'1 0 g \`I/LI ' / f _ -1 I 10% .0' V.C. 7 D 1*
10 1-4
I. a' c 1 I I• 'i rm I
/ / ,-' ,/ MAT TWEE . RELS
/ ' - '
.
HL —0025
4
/ — \ D WIFE
�/ ,-
r 11
�_ _ - - ,I/ ,EAN Nk. PRfSSLEY '`I
R,W SHEET NO.
_I
w '`�♦ \I. 'DB 23fi0�G 491 1 `�I-
,\'�
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
,-
/ \ '^- e ` ` /— �' I
�I'- I
..
Q
'
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
F
`I _.
FILL IN WETLAN D � -1. ` '`, .
V
`,/" III ;;-'
,� � �, `, �
J - - - - - "' - - - -
Q
INCOMPLE
DO NOT USE FOR
E
/ W
PLANS
ACQUISITION
Us we ' \ � 72'IW \ ' I , 1-/ I I / a : MIn.D= 1.5 Ft. ; . /`-'___I- '� TRUSTEES �
Js 7� `,- \ _� — - I I z FROM STA. 16 + 2 8 TO STA. 19 + 50 LT _ / \ nt �o ►SONIC
♦ in ` `I I I ' i 10' C I o A FROM STA. 12+00 TO STA. 16+28 LT ,� I (< ,
`` 1= ,I. ' , /— ;.. , \ob9 ' 1 I I \ — = _ _ _ _ — —� - I c I / � 1 ``AGE 0.566
t I 1J� C � 1 1 u W 1 / 11 , \ \ `\ ♦ \ ` �-� 1 l'-/j III J ~ , 1 `-J i' \ 1 `�' -J ` , i_' / ' ` 7 i
_ \ I z 1_V L1 1 / ►V/ 1 , LI I / / - L L O j / /� , / \ . , a 13 27
O ` -{ 1 ` I ► 1 I '1 ,' 1 ` ; / I \ ' r'ol, I \ ` `°` `\ `♦ _ \\ Ii'1' �dl��
\ t r_ L 1:
\ i, � / I
70V_ \ I 1 1 \ / �I , I \ --+ 1 (( /, , -, ( 1 I ! , \ \_♦ `\ `♦ `\ ♦\ `_ Ie cy- 1 ' I �♦ ,1EFFR�Y BtDAVIES _� '`! i ,_.\ `\ o
�^ J I I 1 { , / I A-C 1 1 I I , I 1 `1 I ,. I ` L \ \ ♦ \ /' / / ! / L 1 / `C' ` D 2�7 P �3 ` ♦ `♦` / i Ss-
I I I I I , I tJ+ I O I I I'm r�"' j -' / , \, 1 `. `\ ♦ . , `, � `. , ' , /' - \ � �` 1 3 �` t
�I I nI � I I / ' I , ' •' , t 1 1 / I , `I I `♦ ♦ - \__ ' ' `�el. I11-It ; \ N Ak Z \ , 1 _,' l-' DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
I L� i ' ', / I I I,lo ,� I'1 ,0 1 ' \ 1 I ems` 1, \ I/ j , I 1 J /! - ♦ / . r- \ /_'I -' 1``i/ ''_ / t ''_ ,-
\ �l >r UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
I r S CHI- I L / la I I�,l I ` 1 I I ► &/,;#I
JJ1- I /' 'I / I ` 1 1 1 ' / / � 1 / ' I I' I / \ -/ ! '-- r-- `-i-�I 1 �- r \ I tp I I I , _� -, I ' ' 1 1 / / / /
.• • ' ; h '' ' ' �' p , 1 , , ; ` / / , =- p_72 PERMIT DRAWING
1 / ,/ �1 I L 1 1 I R AL J S A R P I 1 / - ` 1 r----� -
I , I 1 1 < III M�1 � /liJ I . ► J I I / �' • , _ -(0
► �- , / / I it / / ' - / -- - �/' / / �_ -'� . 714�
/ . 1 , 1 / / / / < . INV
1 1 / . / _/ / / / / J \ ,__ . II.
\ /-0 / ,. /- ; / 1 ♦ ; d / my ; / , , ; ► �I : I , I I I , --� , - , ! ; / I / ., - / '- / , , ► / , - , I I / , . - Assn �y -. ) SHEET 4 OF 5
00-
/ l.1I , //,f1 ,I J 1 , I 1 /,(1�}•J/ a I \ u III, I 1, 1 I I I \ t- f 1 , / J / I . ♦, I/ ,- / / , / / ► / ' t J I ` L 1 / _-,--_. _- / '-- `
/ ' `SKJ'' , / / I /.Y/ l I I 1 , f 1 ♦ ! / /� / L / . / / 1 t / , 1 1 , �.--'^_ _- .... - / 1
/ I i I / I� 1 `1 ` F tl It I , \ 1 /- I / - / I ^,,\ / , ' 1 / t 1 / , / , I f I \ , /' . - 1 I �-'� ,, ,,-_ ( �
.{ / / ! / 'Q- / / / / , I I N ,I . I \ 1 I us. I , ; - ► I ( r III /, I \ I 1/ \ I / I / ,/ \ I I 1 I I \ I !-' -- ,- \,, • -- / / -- I I
L. , / / / 11 / I / . I `J l\) I I I " L L IJ // \ ' a ,I 1 I ,, 1 , \ ♦ \ , 1 \` �.- ---�// �.�s^` ;► // /i- ', �_1 , I-/
11 / - W , .- - , I 1 , , , 1/ , 1 I / / 1 1 // / / \ \ l - _ NETH
I, I/ / -, 1 I I / / III 1 \ ( / r l / , I ► -� /
1 I I I . \ I 1 ` ` \ _ _ — _ _ :4L XANDER. HEIRS _, ' '
/ y o_/ •1 l / I / / ' / I I I ' ' / / I \ \ 1 1 \ `. ♦ / .,_- \ / _-__ �.�-__ _ �-.-- ,-
C , , / / / �o ' �, , ► , I °9 1, , / r I / 111 ,, ,, ,, I I I , / 1 , ` 1 1 1 - � - ` DB �-MG-11 -- - ,------ `-- --_-- /'0
/ - h / / , / I I I / \ r . \
%
r D/ / I / ' `� I I-// I /-ii=-, •/ 1 ln/ //l'/ / 1 �/� / 1 / 1E ` ` �` `, -_� ' /_-`'' _ _-.--'-_-� ' % ♦`` ♦� \" ` `'
ARM L.1 / /I / / -/ 1 /' / /' / ,/ I �' - % - _ ! 4, II 1 -� I 1 ' / / I / ' / 1 ( . ♦ \ I - . . , - -''_ / / !/ \ ` `` _ _ ,
/ I 1 ,-_ tom/ \ ♦ , / / .♦ �_-'--- \ ♦ / r \ _
07-_
�I / / I / / / / , / . I I I- . / / / / / / . / / I I le T$ \ E \ \ . \ - - . . I - - - -, - , / / / 1 LATERAL \
I / / 1--`.. > ► I \ .. / /I / / ,/ / . / •� - -_,� ♦ • .- ♦ / - -- . / --- ----, :V' DITCH -✓' r"
>�_ I, I / , _ ,I , I / / , / \ -_ , I , - / ► /, / I / ,_ -,-, // 1 , _ _ _ \` _ ` \ ` ..- I--- _ - _- /-`-_ / ` SEE DETAIL B
/ , I .11
1 / i i /'�/ I D� I r� I// 1 I I \ E' _ -1.--* �` `, `\ . - -- - .1 II I /'\ 1. `
• ,✓ / / / �I I I I I I 1 r\ I G \ L 1 _; _ /.�-(f ♦ ` ` � ♦ - ♦I—. _ / — --- _/ , / I� ♦\ J \ `� `♦
I J / I _ - * - - �/ / _ - - - - _p .�C, y�.per / ~ 0
/ ,� I, / ,/I I ^, 1 v \ ,m y, / ` .\ \ ' r_,,.�.I -D8 _11 1 •O c T `- -♦ `` `� �'/-- -. ' J`s^"• 9•DaR_ sl,+F -- / ` `'I,r`\ I`_ E
I `, oo / / / �// / /�j I,I 1 , / \ 1 I ,^ , I , Y w,P 1 I I ` \ \ SFTE - I �--' .- �� ` t- ' /� ,$�Q �/►� ��y -_. /-�/`_I11 `>> , n - �� � -=',/-!///'/', / U ►cl \ 0 \L 1 \ \ 1 g , / �� \ I -`-�� "\ ` ` ` ` -' i-f _ -`♦ `\ /_____i- /I r _-'-- / ;\`�- 1is, Lol/ L
-__-- I I I�' O \ ' / J� / I ­1 I/ / �./ I E D ,91E A -♦ I.'' __ __---' I / \ ' LATFR, L w�®ETCH I -'^ <-L\ G ♦ L I
Ii - / / It.p�,go - ` ,' ' ► ' I / ► I I 1 ' `- - - ♦ `� / BERM/ DITi\H . ,SEE DETAIL B , •
If
� / � 1 / / "' � Q O ' ' 11 It N- I I \ I I I I I , 1 I _ -_,�.,` ` -`. ;--`--__ I '$E DETA�iL A\ (_ 1 J / .-- ` - - ---. __'0 �( T / Fy / ♦ i c�
( ` I r /,'/'/ H ��� /�/, ♦ I �t r 1 I 11I I 1 I \ T 1 ` --` , / ` \ / / ' - \
\� _ _
't / I / I' / / ! W ' / /J ' II I I m I / ' \I\ t ► I� \` I ` - �- \DE %\ ` /�-___�•py _ -' / ----
` `._'' 1 J-'- /' __ ' /__ , .- e�
O I ra'%� / III ' / r 1 /Z� I,�/// II ; I U 1 / \ �� E \ I- NL , _i- �.�-__ -- �`r_ t V` `_,,0 -_J /,-- �,J'
► , �„to , (/ / ��I / J I (I / o 18 w/ ,os� .� _-_- - PDE E ` \
E I 1 pl I I / plPii /' 00 /% III 'f ` ' 2 E-i--I - _QQ - _ . `� `. . ,- ---- \ \ O
L Js � I „ri3, f �/1 / , •I , . 7+r,J --� ♦ -- ♦ -- CB ,`►_�' \ ♦ '__ L \ v
�� t,^ , 77 `l/J I - I I �'• , m III -I e \ I'� - _ ` " - - `. ` ` - �Q - ' ' s .I _ _ .yj I ,j. a.
_Y I I-' , uu./��,,./"ttti , en I I / ,/' r \1 I I \ \ - - ` - ` - 1 _ - - I ♦ i r - - _ / 0
I.
%
O - -II /// ' /Cp / / ` - /' / / I �' I _ - ��oo -_-zz -__ _- d 1\- ``_ �ITE '' ``. ' '' ' 1 ` ` ♦ � `` `♦ -�/ �0 _
L /l� �,-y17 II' \ F �, !— \ l0 11 rY -��_ - -� -_�� '_ - -- -- ♦ ib .- I . `♦ \ /-S _ �`
CD ,- • , / t_ �� I I III I%I'I— \ I I EDIGR I -�=L \ .�_ _ -. - `\ ` /� �` t� \-1 `. `. `/ Y__ `�`- -- 1
/ I.' -- 7 �_ (DI \ 1J11III� �_ - __ I I / _ S_k�� ,. - \ \ I �/ \- `- `. `� %L' ` ---`` -.`
r►
11
O —/� / �� I `% �- C7 1111 �1@11�Ii�1-_ _ / - ` ' - —��°` . ..- _- / 1 �� -- --- I-l- `\` `� \` ���\\ \t F, `�--III.`` .`` �]
• ` ^
W f POW-
\ / �/� K E ROAD . ` l f I1111111111 . -- 1 - / / \ -- %0 1 f- ` // \ \ \ \ ``♦
Q 55 , / GREi` - - 1 \ / II ,II,I,-- -. -- - _ / G
W I I / J I ., III - _ J . -- �,, \ c ,T, 11V / \` ` \ - - - -
I •-- 'i '_11\ ♦ ♦ •`O�' I I Ili h -� I . I ` `- - - -_ -*1 v - _
/ � o a 1 I / . - - \ I 14-�
L . -.♦ u \ ` ♦ _-I�`4714-ail_ 1 1 ' . _ -_ '
.0 �[ . N Ot 1 pl III \ � � - / 1 / . \ \ \ - -
<< +t °a ► \ ♦ Itl 1 / / / / / ♦ • / OL�11ri PROTECT'ON I �\
= .. �♦�� - , �• MSC . ♦ `\ I ` ' '`rilr\ 1't t 1 E i / t+n 31 i i �'. \ l�,`\ \ ♦ ♦ C �p ♦` ` 5 TONS CLAS I IP. 4P I , iy I 1 ► 20�` TONS LASS FR R,4P - -
_ .1 �.. a\ \ 0 G v ♦ I ► I l / ♦ \ ♦ . ♦ / • - - . y 1 1 Ufi ET F'ltOTE' TIO - ` I
HA \ `_-- --- \
_ •' /````'• ea Fa- °D y!2' EVG 2g1 8 1 \ I I (1y \ , \ \ ♦ - I, 36 SY GEO XTLE \ \ '-- L `-, \
/-- .1. 'p P I I 1 If W D�3 J \ o\ , I C . ♦ ♦_ ---_ 4 \ 1 / \, I 1 I .___
_ . 4 I \ \ 1 . \ _ _ _ \ o ►h IS S`T E EXTIL ` I t
' ; - s / � 1 I 1 I tI 1 I I A \\ � � \ ♦ � ♦ rn `\ \ � 1 � JQHN I� DOWNSI H9IRSN �� � — � ` � _ _ � _ `
_ 1 1 1 1 -I41- .-- . L 11 ♦ -
J �_
3 1 .� 7 m „1 � 1 h I ' r F . ♦ �s \ D'B \ PG I�h \ � \ ♦ � _ \ ,
"'%;==���a� 1 `I, \ �__��. 0p G 1 \ •► I c\t I I II _ k . I 1 1� 1 1 ` ` `.----m11ILET'PRO C ON \ \ 1 \1 \ .% -
„-- _ _ \ L \ -.r - - _ _b.\ r ►, I, I , I\ \ I I 1 1 I ♦ ST;ABI�IZ�' . - ` 10 TOS C` AS I R RAP \ \\ 1 ' I , .ram / ♦ ` �. I
H - 7 S L GpTE�CTIL \ I ♦ \ _ - --,-I-
_ /.��-��=� -' I T`� - . '0-� I , - , 1 / I I, I �, / d / \ \ 0 1 l ♦ WT ♦ - - t 1 ♦ --
'-- -- - \ -t \\, J Y 1 II still' _ \ 1 1 I F I 1 ♦ �1'DFASt� ` -- L \ \ L 1 \ `� ` \ ' ' `. ` 1
., I. I .p 7 II / 4I I' \ 1 I 1 1� '�` S`♦ �------- --- I I \♦ 1 ` ` \ /-' ,\ i' , _� ,.` ♦ 1 `
1' ,-- - I V I B - �I•— ♦ 1 0 11 \ 111 I If ,---- _I / 1 1 ♦ 1 , / ♦ ♦ -
- , / ' 11 I , 1 I 1 \ I II( 1 L L I \ ♦ ` ♦ \ \ 1 1 ! I I l ` 1 ♦ ,\-_ _ \ I
'-, - - '/ I I ♦ n' \\ l t I I , 1, h'I ,- I - �.\ ` \ I I 1 l I / ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ �— �t 1 , I I ` -- �• `\ `_' -- ____-�- .-` ` ` 1
1 ,, - / , IN I \ t I II , I 1 , I, 1� / , ♦ , \ I I I I 1 / ♦ __-_ __ I
O / - I 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 I \ / I I ,I,I , ♦ �, , /`� \ L 1 \ 1 1 I♦ ` ` ` `\ \ I 1 ' l /-' -_ ``- \ -. -'� �_' -'- __ _ ,- \ 1
- �! , II \CD t/ \ 7 11 1 I \ J ,I I \ ♦, /// . . .\ , / t ` /� ^__\ \ I / 1 I . / /- . -- -► ` \--^,_----___--- / 1.1 \ 1
O / --' .♦ ` 11 M I / Z I I Ill 1 /� `tlllll 1 I� II� l �-,- ♦ . _ \ L \ J � I ff ♦ ♦ ♦ \ I 1 1 I / l v J 1 I I , -- _-� __ '_ ---. ` ` I I
, -- \ s / L %� , CC11 1 lilt,, I I 11+ �i- / `� �� \\ \ L - 1 � ` \ ♦ ` / ,- ` � \ ♦ - I � I I ' I 1 //� `__ - - ` _ _ \ I -/ �` ` ♦ / / I /
T , ,- / I .O, \ l q�fj� F TH p 1 1 III I P\1t\ 411.1 I l� ./\\ • I I 1 , 1 , 1 / P \ ` ♦ \ ♦ ♦ _-' ♦ L \ 1 `1. .— - - / I I \� -_ �� I ___ ___ --\ ., ^ ` .-_ I I / / /
N 024,II, y��j ®RE 1 1 1 11 , / .\�', r ` I ♦ . _ , � ♦ \ \ \ � - ,''- -\ 1 ♦ \ \ \ .- --' /' � '/ I / I I ^. � � - - . , ,- -�
11 1 DfIV�A{.Y g� \1 I _ \l 1W/ 1 t 1/ 9 � I ` ♦ \ \� -- .-__- \ 1 ♦ \ ♦ \ , / , / ` \I( I I__- _ \ ♦ , \ ♦- i - - -, ' 1 / ♦ !
L /' �� o l!/1 1 ► PG 1 1 I _ h / 1 // / ,1 c__ .. -o UTLEIj PRbTE T I`% / ♦ _ / \ \ \ \ ` / / 1 , I / — -`� \ -\ \ _-- ,- _ \ I. I \ ♦ t `: W 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 r ' I/ a ,� ( / �( ♦ _ . , . I - - - \ - ♦ —
', \ 11 I �� 1 \11 I 'I 5 // o �c / \♦ ♦ . ` -' - - I\ \\ ``- , ` .\ ,% �- . - `t \ \ ♦ .
c� !- / 1 n I � D � 4 -3 ' 1 I I I � / I 1 ,. \ 2'0 TONS C S&� I RrA� / � 1 '
/ /1 1 1I a 1 G I \ I o J J , -�_ . _ ♦ \ \ T yFl
' / I = � � 92 1 I I L I f >\ 13 Y G407E>c II ,• _ \ . -- I I \ \ Ik Er 'S GAT 11�`�RQJECT LLCI .1
O I ` / 11 1 r III Ill I \\ / / II -�� \ tt -� _ f . \ ♦ - \ I-\ I - J
I- / I 1 1 111 I 1 \ ♦ , / I I. -'" \ ' 1 ' ♦ `. `. ♦ . - , \ ♦ ♦ \ \ \ \ ( 1 , \ \ - \ \ \ 1 - - . / I J . / - , -'
O � .. / 1 111 1 l l I �° I - _ _ _ \ 11 , ► I 1 11E ' / , ', . \ ` ` `I ' _ - - `, \ ` ` ' %` � / I 1 , DB 2 6 , `\ ` \ `' / t ► ,' / / -
Q - / ' / +t1t (b / I �{ I ♦ \ \ I 1 1 I I ,1 - r 11 - _ __ _ _ 1 N , ♦ \ \ `- - - l ♦ ` \ \ \ ♦ / L � I - \ \ 1 L ♦ l J r r /
I II' I' .11 ` 'P I\1 I I I ,II I it) \I \♦L tl ../y _-I ' '�� - t ` \ - ` ♦ _-. . /� L \ L \ \ \ \ 1 r 1 \ �\ . ` J
. / , I-' / / 1 1 l 1 , t ! I' I I I m 1 `II , \ / �' ` - - I /.'� ♦ ` ♦ / ` \ I IIt
\ I / \ \
/1.i II ,,1 1 I �ppRE 1 1, I 11 ' 1I 1 I ♦ - --- ,/1 I , / \ `% \ . \% / ` \ \ / I ) t,I 1 / /♦ ♦ \ / \ . t`1 ( I \
� ,,, _G \ l f01- , , 1 l 1 I a 1 CED 1 , I J 1 I 11 , t - / ♦- .i I . . , 1 1 \ / "\� ` � ' ` L\ \ ` \ \ - 1 I 1 1 1 ` \ `► — _ �_ I I ` .
� \ZI I I ,A I G (1 l .I - r - - 1 I 1 \ t I \ . \ . . I ♦ ♦ \ \ \ / 1 , r / \ 1 1 I.
- . — / J 1 ( I L L I ` _
!- , I� I 1 ( III I 1 I 11 I Il ` I \ 1 i♦ -.iL , _- ♦ � ^ /, , J I l I I I I / �/ �% ♦ ` ♦ \ \ .- / / ,__\ \ `\ \ \ L `\ \ \ `---_/ I ` 1 tt I I / / \_ \ _.� -. //\ `- \ t 1 I
�J 1 1 I \ O 1 1 1 t 1 . / 1 J I 1 1 , -_ ! \ . \ \ . \ `.
/ \ ,-4 ,11111 IJII 1 1 Z 1 t, II �,t / \ / -- ♦ ♦ I. .f \ \ 1-I I \ ` ♦ / . ♦ \ \ \ \ \ I. . \ I 1 ' l _ ♦ / 11 ♦ . _\ \
'0 / / 11 , / ,n I / a� I 1 1 / 1 . ` \ - - _ ^ / 1♦ \ \ 1 \ \\ \ / % 1 _ . \ \ \\ III I 1 `\ - _ .- - j ` ` I'f L' l%- � �- -.
�/, , -C, I111,1 N a 7�$r4l
� � t7 \ ,,I I11 1 , I- ,► L/ ,-- '�> � , ` I ``` / ►, 1 � � , . / ' \ `. \ \ 1 ` L . ♦ . . ' lilt 1 1 ♦ •_ 1 ' • , / � \�_ - • _ -
1 ✓ /I// /!/I .(TIr �' `` II 111 `I , 4J.F-' ♦ �_. ' / I \ \ , / \ N. 1 . ♦ ♦\ 1 ` , I I / ♦ -. - ♦ \ ``` ♦ \--\ .' \
l \ I I 1 I Imo- \ � \ . ` 1) / ` ♦ / ' ♦ ♦ \ ! - / - 1♦ - ♦. -
x / Int / I RRR I ► I I \ L 1/ L ♦ L \L\ \ _. , / / 1 , 1 . \ ♦ L ,-. L \. �� _` \�
1 , / ///, / /I F1 \ ►� 1 _ 11 I l\\ lIII l 1 11 ,\ V1 - ' .- \\ \ ` ` \ - ` , / "I I , `__ \\ / / , 1 1 1 , ___ I' I ♦ ., 1♦;`_--`
/ / I�•Y//,I iI I / 1 9P \ ---- .\ 1 1 1 / ' ► It I ♦` .\ - `♦ - `\ \\ % / ` `L \\ - 1 ► `I - ' I ` ` ` `♦
/ "y , /II 1 1 \ G1 1 ` ♦ 1 \L\ I�I I I 1 1 ) \ U r . I. \\\r cJ I I 1 I l ► `I ``. 1 / \L` 11 1 \ l i I / I l 111 t 1 I \- . L I\ ► J `\ \ ` \\ .
iY 1 1 \ O j . I 1 , ♦ - I I / , ♦ \ ♦L \ 1 ♦ \ \ 1 I J
/ /, // I I \ 11 II \ 1 oc / �`\\L 1 I ,- I `\1 ` t 1 1 I / /, `♦ �- \\. . / / / `♦ 1 \ \ ♦ \ \ \ N. ,, I/ I 1 l 1 I `- ,---�♦ 1 1 ♦ I 1 . `� ` ♦ `. \
// I 1 �\ \ / y11 , - ''. `/ ` \\-� ` I-- 1 1 I ♦ ♦♦ \I\ .' I / I \ 1 `---..-'' / I 1 \1 I 1 — \ -__ . / I^
/// / l 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 ' k. ` -^ ► ► I , . . ` \ '1 N,\ \ . � `' I / / /� .% ` I \I I \
/ / I/ I _ -s-�� . -II , 111 I , . , ♦.. P \ 1 ♦ ♦ , \ \ \♦ ♦ -`�-'- 1 ``_ ', / ♦` \ It ` 1 \-_ \ ♦ \
O //' ' 1 - - �' I I �1 l . 1 ♦. \s\ ^ I'-__' I I ' 1 i \ ♦ ♦ ♦ ` ♦ \ `� , 1 , / _-_. \` `\\� ` ♦ \ / \ / ,I \I \\\LEI 1 '/_► ` \`! �„--. 1 ♦ ♦ / / ♦ \ ♦ `
// \l 1 //11 I 1 / -1- ♦ ♦ \ 1 \ ♦ / \ \\
//,, ,,, I — - Vr4 ,11 I I,II ► I I\�.� 6 \,. \-_t.-_, � ♦. , - ♦`__, 1 I \ 1 III I \ 1 ♦ ♦, . , \ ` , _ 1 \ 1 -
� ///, I// / � —I / a--1 /\ 11 I I O 11 . I / - . , \ l , I l 1 ` , .` ♦` ♦` . /, / 1 \ \ 1\ \ `\ ` . � � — , -' ' , � � /- , ` , ! I ' \ ` � /
I/I/'I// I I OZ- Y ` ` a L 101, ` t �+ T E�I tilt II 1 � I_ I ' / I _j \L� /I",- I 1 , \ r I \ \I \ t I 1 \ . ♦ ♦` N ♦ !/ J \ 1 \ \ `\ \ / _ I / \ / / \ / , -I, \ ♦ ` \ , I,-
/// w < C�NC0\7LE 1 I I _ , ♦ . 1 -`� L I \ . _ . / I r - \ \ ` . ` _ - - - - • - ' ' 1 / \ 1 -. / \ \ >
L ,/// / IA I , o.J( \/ �� RIB / 1,1 f7 • %r / ! / --/ •/ ' - ♦� _ _ l I I ' \ I \ ♦♦ ♦ ♦ / I\ ♦ - -! I / / / II t / \ ` 1 I \ 1 / --
// t M\ PG O I I Z I/ /- .. I l , I . \ - � ` ` . � \ I / I I . \ \ I . .� . \ \ _/ . .- . i /, \ � I I I I \ I \ \ / \ I
/, /I I I-\ Ot„•b1 �� IIII I 11 n . I I / > / I I 1 -. . - ! / I ` \ \ I \ t �J ♦ \ \ . , t
'I "i- I C7 I "'Ic-I rk ` P 4 n ►111 III I I yII I / 'Y--, / / 1 _�`�`r- �♦ /' I' I I 111 I 1 ♦ \ \` ` - N. ♦\ ♦ \ ,I,�\ \ I 1
/ Ct ♦� \ 1 la ! \ L I %I� , ` r - - \ ♦ . < 1 1 ' I . ♦ ` `. I I ' I \ ' I I
� 'Ij I0p �Ww \\Cp L ) % � t7 - ,. T � Z I ;1I;, II II J, I 1 I II ♦ \ �. ( r \ I `. . \ \
CV / 1 -t Q_IO • 'A\ \ n I 1 ♦ ap I 1 1 \ \ � ♦ . / / / __ L \
� <7 l , 1 I I I 1/I I I\ \\ , 1 M `t`� • `L-,` -I ♦, \ T �� , . , ; ` `. `♦ `. ` _ / . ♦ , ` \
/' \ � I '0 a \ \--__--_ 1 -4 FbF �1\ \ \` `♦`♦`t.'`__ ,1 , . �-,`, \ I I ,`� - \\♦`\ � \ I ` 1 1 / __-` ` �```` ``---I /' / \ 1 1\ `L\
J t l` \\ 5 / -I I'\ -♦S. -- -_ / J / L\ , II I �, �, , \ ` , \ \ 1 > `� _-/ , ; `.\ \ 1 ,- . I . . 1 1 I 1 . ., . ♦ / \
= I �>'• `.8 O , ♦` `\``1 1 it,
I . 11' I \ \__ -� =-'-.' •♦Q♦ . .``;./// "/ / 1 1 ;l 1 1I,1 I , #g!'`\ -�♦ ♦ ♦ `y_ , �// - ^\``\\ ♦ \A
N -I ` 4° \\ 1 i _ , \ \III I I \ /I ' ' \ \ \ \ Z _-N - -- / 11 •N� - t `-eQ 1r 1 ' ' I I I' 11 I I / ♦ / t I. V ♦ \ \ \ - - \ 1- 1 \ ♦ \ \
/ _ �IA \ f L` / J \ \ I / \ \ ._ F- F\- ` �- 11, -' ►�- -� ♦ \11 e --I- / 1 I 1 1111 \ / l `♦ .`- ` N. \
♦ 1 / / ,� \ \� \I ,' Z I 1 L \ s\ \\ ♦ Q W -... / - L I N- ` , II - / I I \ ` ` -- ' ,-' ` ` \
l�II (7 U \\ -`t:. \`�� �J ,I , I/ / I II II\;;\\ `♦`♦ `-__''/' \\\`\`
[ �`., ` \ ` \ (n 1 \%`,% I I I `\ \ O- `\ ., `\ I, Ca , \. \. , / i I 1 , 1 / I I \ `\ �`♦ ---' I -
`1.♦` \
N ♦ ♦ ♦ \ ♦ �T p I'll 7 `>' N I 1 / ♦ ` . \ \ I , t k. ♦ \ \ C -/ , / / t r-- . -_-
oC0 I ` 2 ssk 1 \o\� / 1'I I I I �1 , I ♦ \L L ♦ .' -L `J J / 1 i �`� . 'I --' L I( . I ! I `..*� � ,,-"-\ ♦``\`.
0' I , /, I ,--_`-J-- I`. \" 1,/AI/' \ 1. ♦ �I
_-
I / , - /- `
.--- --, ice- i \; ♦\\',-
,-
ol
` \ \ ' Ofar= ' I I I \ `- - \ L . ' / t `� I, \ I I / `. / - - ♦ \ `. `' FROM STA. 13 + 21 TO STA. 13 + 50 RT - - - - -
\ \ `\ \ ♦ 1 1 -I - - -1 -4 ' 1%I\� I I I I I `/ I 1 \ -`' 1\ ' .1 I \I I ` ♦ \ ♦ - - - _' ` , \ `� -
O 1 \ O� CDC \ \\ 1 / I' I /l \ ---._ \ . / 1 / 1 / , ./ . ./_.
W , ` \\ \ \ l\ `\ \ Ot-4 IR C \ m\\\_. I, I r I I ` \ \ t \ , ---__ I �, 1 , , \ I -- / / I ! / /// / . \ ` , ---- -_ _- -- _ ,
I 1 \ ` I -, a / ! ♦ , -, -. /,, / -.^ .---- -__--- . ♦\ — �----------- I ♦ \ --
z l \ \ \ ♦ ` '\ \ ♦ u+Ln r . 11\`_ I I U tr / / ll \ \�"- `/ —assJ , I --' / / / / ` ` . _ _ - -
Ll \ \ �.�y - -� I L - \ \ \ - \ ` _ I \ - \ .,
Z ♦ \ `\✓ . I dw, " a 11 OZ l d �L I __ I I 1 'I 1\ ♦ - /I\ 1 __-1 _ - I \ \� • �1 /// I, ! , -./ \ - -/ ` I.,-\ '. . --
♦ -- . \ \ ' (P i OW �✓ -- -_ - t ` 1 1 � -! 11\ ----- / j - �! -,�- ' ,' ! �/ �-\ / `'-^ , `__- ♦ ~. _ �.�---_-,_"_---
\ . ` ` 0" r I ,:/ 'LIf ♦ I I II / \ ,/I -- . JI \/� -. - �—/ ♦ -, .- , -\ ----- -- - -- - - -_
CO I / _ \ \\�� -..FA --_ •. �- , . `, \ I L1 11, III \ ♦ / 1l J , 680- -' 1/. \`-=- /I. , - I - `- , `--I ~—\ \- `_ -
-
/ / , ♦ �` _ `� cn /1.>A �----I , /, 11 OG i \ ! I 11 I I ♦ 1 //I` �� --A'' -----_, - / i // I . -_-- _. \ -- E-
/, / 1 - - , i-1,-' \ I I \ L I J 1 1 it `.. / Itbeo \ .�.- -- , ^�--- /-- __- , / ,-- �♦ .— ��— \_ •- -
♦ \ _- ♦--- I I / E
( / 1 ` ,------- to ' , ' F , H 1 ♦ ♦` l\ ♦ , , , `♦ / - ' _- / \% ♦ — -- -- , V ♦ /� / -
0j I v- _ 1/ _.'-_I_./ 1 _/ _` `� -- - _- , r \ 1 �,I = 1 I ` ' `i ,� \►6I5-_ _`-,i- -- `- - „ `- ,-' _�♦ 1 /` `•�\`-.-' -Z
OL \ I� ', 1/I' 111 / , \`--/'�\\\` -- --►--- -'',� ,^ �'I ' `RN-3�,i 1 ` I d t I It I' \\ `- ``.��' -"i'� \�'�,,j"i��i-_-_-- -.-� _I 1 ` 1 �— ;_�E— f' /iI__`- _---.%`��I! �_ �� .„\ ` _ '\ /___. �`\/-. 11
O \� , I I 1 --- --- ` I 11 . " �-, _ _ ,- ♦° ��._I ir0��� +— 1 ,- - . - /-� . . -- I _- - - ♦ \ \ _— / 1 I -` -_ Ill \ I . . `. I 1 I -♦ �o z / , - , ` ♦ 1 E / . 6 Pr, -\ .. / '"♦ ./ �/ 1 ♦ "� - `- _!
w I _ 1 __ -- _ \ / Ot/f - �.� , I I PE 1 .'\ / --- . \,- __J -- / _/ , -. L t
L . /. 1 _ \_ 1 l --- _-- /I , _ \ - I .. \ _ - _ ----_/ R , - -. - -- - _ ,--- ---- -_ , .�_ _ -- _! r
__I I - I\ . 1 \ ______ /I /e- -• '_ •"" � \ t�l 00 1 - - -J' ^_, __- -'/ ` -'�� �,4j T0'YR ER / ♦ ,^ ^=✓ 1.-'/-\_ �_.i\ _I - r r-- i�1^I - �, \ LJVLJ��nO�LJULJ��
n / II\- _ -. . \ "sr / I �. - / I IC1r► .' % it - 0 5 �_ i _- r , - _/
CV L 3._-'/ \ \`�` _- `.I- `I`_—, ` ems— — _., \ _�-,_ = .`� ` 1 I 11 t / -I, `0 I E _ .. \' _�//�-J--\/<J \. J� _��ii_ —� - I IJ �J
C] __/-�`� `-\\ `♦�-.-"� /`\\�_\__ -'_-'____�—_—: I� o•`` 1 111` I O IZ V _ ______��► — - -,_ `\ I Jy-_,^-_--_ 1--_—I ♦`` �L`j`-7—. ---I `t '
N (71 -�` . `� -`\ ^ \ �� -.\ —/ —'-- ' ___-�,— ''� ` , __ — _ _,�,.w_-- __—__ __ `` I _I /' �- / ,, _/�/-�I- -_�'i���= -, -' 1 1 \ , A. MORTONTHOMASANDASSOCIATES, INC. 15400 TRINITY ROAD
— 5 \ / \ �! // . - - _ \ 6131 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD, SUITE 101•RALEIGH, NC 27609
rl—_ - - - - - - - - - - _ 11 11 d " ` ` - K ` ' !'- ,'- -' `I -\ -I I ^ / \ ♦ l / IAMT 919 855-9989• NC LICENSE NO. F-1049 SUITE 102
( _ - - - - - -% ♦ ♦ ♦ I. . ` - _ \ _ - ' i - _ _ _ _ _ ` r - 1 v} d .Zl l -/ ► I/N _ - ! , / , / , ( 1 RALEIGH, NC 27607
c� `--. \-_ .:�` ..•_ _'� Ilt�glD ,-' ml it 1 yam,': - 1 \ \ - _ �!/ ./- - �. / L WWW.AMTENGINEERING.COM
-/ .. - ., - - _ _ . _ _ a — '7 - ��w•.S_•>r - `, U. .Il - �I- I;. , t_ 9f ^.•�Z�_ � _ / . . J i - N . Z,/ ,.I \! _ ^ \ � - .91922.9.R.96.5 NC LIC_ Nn. F-

r
c
� �,� 1111111 PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
HL-0025 5
S 46 3 •30. RSHEET NO.
/ Q
jbODS O 7p•
V�/
200.00,
, ♦ / I 1,1,1111u I I
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
/ PEG M NCE i �\? / f' ilil�i' ' F FILL IN WETLAND x
�,� ENGINEER ENGINEER
DO 8"PG 85 / 1 ,1 ,� ,� ,1,1',a 1
/ / / I,I111111'1' 1 00
V47.2i'13• E `_ / , 1
328.26' _ -� - - - S 46°33.14• ' / ' I I a1l''''1'1' �' �' PO INCOMPLE E PLANS
_ V - 897,59 kY y " jIjII,'' 1' , , END CONSTRUCT/ON DO NOT USE FOR % W ACQUISITION
1 II
' - "off
do 7m �'1�;;1� -Y2- POT Star/5f30,D0
IIIIIIJill I 'Ih' '
-Y3- ���� 5 -_ }- .' , �Il'l'I' '
�}---7----��- I II;;;;I;
1SFp ,---___--- BEGIN PAVING
E1eVr'_ I��II''' 'III
-Y3- POT- Star/0f75 -
-Y3- PC St JA+#8 gR11.� Pq E 1''''I''1�'j' , 11 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
ISFO ` - 237 --_ a �' , 2 I,1,1 UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
-' - BEGIN PROPOS D GRADE I
x -Y3- FIX Star//f0o ---- I; ; PERMIT DRAWING
FI
00
-Y3-'PT Star 11f50.35___ 01 I'SHEET 5 OF 5
-Y2- PT Sto. 14f72.32 0
x v-60
ta.1 *13.90 .02 I A
6 TR EES 1 i .111 i i P1 Sto 17+13.57 P/ Sto 12+29.31 P/ Sto 14+14.33
US E Q1 / 0 = 23' /3' /4.� (LTl 0 = 32' 2/' 49.a !RTI 0 = 32" 50' OOZ !LT)
L ODC Ma I Jill
-2SSLKSUS ` �� �R arH s /g97i•13, E �' / � ► ��' 1 ���I I D = 3' 53' 04,r D = 17' 37' 46r/ D = 17' 37' 46X
8 E N r • 331, _ / , 11y,1 , , L = 597.78' L = /83.58' L = 18624'
1111 T 303,05' T 94.3/' T 95.76'
' 11101 R /.475.00' R 325.W R 325.W
Posse , 20,cu `2' "I;;1„ I it e = NC 10.02) e = NC f0.021 e = NC 10.021
•I NE j 1 + F MATT R/W - r- / I11�1
I I V = 30 mph V = 30 mph V = 30 mph /O
' 9R I C , _ 2° if051
- -Y4-
1' P1 Sto 9+25.47 P/ Ste //f36r76 P1 Sto /2f25.88
1 I
��� - c'- !�y - hor 1p - a R1 , '' I -Y3 - P7° for /2 f66.84 0 = 15' 37' 34.a (RT ) A = 29' 5T 25�0' tRT / A = 30' O6' 20,6" (LT )
_ D = /O' 25 02.7' D = 33r 42' /22' D = 33r 42' /2Z
. L = /50.W L = 8888' L = 89.33
�KbW , ,1,, 1
• N 64' E T = 75r47' T = 45.48' T = 45.72'
_ _ _
,` �'' ' _ • `� �F` -TR ,'', +� /� ' I ; , R 550A0' e = NC0 2) e = NC t .02)
f T : ` • �'• ' / z V - 25 mph V - 25 mph
KEN1V T , stor l 1820 = END CONSTRUCTION TIP HL-0025
t0.
,' ' T �Stor l3 3r77 ; �« 3 -
E�ANDE�i HEIR 7/
D� 14b0 PGA\49 •, 5.90' c t-' • 1� ' I4C to.12f60�07 -L POT stor24f50�69 = o EX,Sta -L- POT STA. 25 + 3 0. 00 -Y
/;9- 1► I -Y - POT Star13f36r85 �°' P1 Ste H+15.54 P1 Sto 12+5029.
1 , ,\ `cL ``�T Ster 2d `` - / ' - -� ♦ /` - I ,,Ste.22f27.48 Me sQ�Q'"� Q•
p = r 5938.90 (RT) 0 27' 16' 25.5 (RT)
-"s' °? 1 %�pr 1 , O N 38'51'41• E m D = 2' 5/' 532 D = 38' ll 49rJ
L ,Star /1f00A0 4 ywQ' L = 69.6r L = 71.40'
lk
W ``.`` `,` ®. `.` ' // , ,L , I 1 / �1 ; ; - \ O CRESTDALE 106.47• (A �z o m T = 34A/ T = 36.39'
LJJ ,AOHN'RIr,DOWN'S, HEIRS -I
wooDS �' DB 9 9 PG �51 \` °j % I / % I I `Z CROSSING N N V �, a � N R = 2.000+00' R = /50+00'
_ I o N e = PC (0.02)
05 HOMEO NERS �. N
l 1 -Y2'T PC Star l/ t3500 1 c °0 / ; ' ' 1 ; - = _ . _ r*,t _ V = 20 m
/ , I , 1 1 z z_ - �„__ --� N 40 0T59' E
/ ' LATERk 'V' DITCH ` 05 1 / 1 1 ,rn z A$$OCl�lr IOW
ell/// ' ' - i i ' i ' N 5 INC. - mf'f--: z 389.89'
SEE DETAI B / �/ ' i 1` 1 1 " , I v+ - N 0 MB/3 PG 55 , WOAD
LJJ TDE E C 1 1 z DB 12,786 PG,731 / 5�48' , o
LLJ i ( P) 051 ' ' i 1320 ,_- P) �N , E C Fi ► ♦„;`.`�
of .02 EN
O R ' i h ' -���--cos' '♦ I .�EXI
Pn + 0 - - - - - - - - + -L - PDT 3'id: P7+�rA0 sew
I N FIX
V, O I N
o L_0 1 /
r- - IV------ V - ------- - - - - -- -
_ RI
13 051 , --
(B Cps/ C . ■ ' 1 %ISTINo R/w
Ell 5
I F N1 /Nr -'- /�0502 �c �12 N - "-- �, END CONSTRUCT/ON
_I -L o. cB,- ro cB - ' ,� `+ s ,' -SIDEPATH- POT S10r26f65M
m 1 OUTLET P TEC (08 ' ' T 1 �� i �v'
`\ r TES 10 TONS S PI
BEGIN pP/ROPOSED GRADE - - F 7 SY �'
W ��` \�_`�� p"r6, ' -Y2- POT Sto.10+16r28 _ E _-I___'A: PC E T'
Z BEGIN CONSTRUCTION - - - o°1lvs , ss` r N ' ,I'j W ,m
J -Y2- PDT S10.10f0524 , o _ _ _ - SY TE ��F r
I" - - N I-Y4-0QP79f6to.12+69.49
()-Y2- POT Star /0f00A0 .I ' 44 32613• w
I
0501 : �, i +' S 44.32'13• W
Q OUTLET PROTECTION 104.86'
10 TONS CLASS I RIPRAP - _ 1I _ _ 1' O z
7 SY GEOTEXTILE 1 o - 3
0 Tr w Y4 '%*C to. // f80.16
JOHN R. DOWNS. HEIRS L- E J DB 10277 PG 167
D6 989 PG 151 ``� i1 ' i i I i - 1 C P-IV
MB 29 PG 460
01 N 44°32108• E 93.87•
-Y4- PC Star 10+9128
14 OUTLET PROTECI ON
1 Oa � 0 3 b ENT TOIL
CB o ElNW1LLl �T ;n LA ING
0524 DB 10211 PG 311 o ,,,
` 01 .0a - MB 29 PG 698 ' W
BEGIN PROPOSED 'GRADE ` 'if
' -
-Y4- POT Sla./0f45M `' i i I i, $ v 5• N 44"57'07• E 94.97' z
1 i i Ii''i I WTL ' 1 OTECT ON $ONDRA s O
-Y4- PT $ fOQ 1 ' i' Ii i II I10 7 S ORXTI ESP
� I � LAWRENCE
' r" I I, I DB 10211 PG 228 sp• `
,,��gq�11if MB 29 PG 698 'IFI zl
_ 113.66'
11 1� 34'13'35' E
. t, , My
MAT THEWS GATEWAY PROJECT. LLC , _ _ - - -\ ' ' �,I11G ICHAEL DALE
� -'
MB 51 PG 968 1 , , 1, �' I' 1 I, ANTHONY AND WIFE.0,
- - \ 1 I I I III' ' 1I I I I- _ ' N �`' BEGIN CONSTRUCT/ON
DB 23668 PG 825 V , , l , ,11,II1, 1 o GOLDIE THELMA
/' -, N.
I I I I I 1111 1,1i , Ir - , -Y4- POC Sta. 9f28M
200.00• ,' ,' ' DB 10535 PG 685
' ♦' ` ► 11 I I 11'' '�f , MB 29 PG 698
,oa \IIIIIII 1 1'UII'
■ Om 134.26'
OUTLET PROTECTIO
10 TONS CLASS I RIP P = N 34-13'35' E
7 SY GEOTEXTILE
O
O
N
If
co
W
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
NOTE: ALL DRIVEWAY RADII10 FT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
E. CHARLES ST.
6,000
J4,400 1,300
PROPOSED 11FUTURE
GREYLOCK ,600 7,500 GREYLOCK
RIDGE RD. RIDGE RD.
7,200) COO
1,700
2040 ADT TANK TOWN RD.
FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 6.
FOR -Y2- PROFILE SEE SHEET 7.
FOR -Y3- PROFILE SEE SHEET 7.
FOR -Y4- PROFILE SEE SHEET 7.
FOR -SIDEPATH- ALIGNMENT DETAIL SEE SHEETS 213-1 & 213-2.
FOR -SIDEPATH- PROFILE SEE SHEET 8.
FOR -Y3 DET- SEE SHEET 213-3.
HYDRAULIC DESIGN
ROADWAY DESIGN m@wnfflC
TRUMA
A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 5400 TRINITY ROAD
6131 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD, SUITE 101•RALEIGH, NC 27609 SUITE 102
[phone]•NC LICENSE NO. F-1049 RALEIGH, NC 27607
AMTWWW.AMTENGINEERING.COM 919.223.8965 NC LIC. NO. F-1

WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS URFA E WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
12+76.50 to 13+40.50 LT
Roadway Fill
0.01
2
+10.36 to 13+61.890 RT/L
Roadway Fill
< 0.01
3
12+87.48 to 13+27.09 RT
Drainage Pipe/Outfall
0.13
TOTALS":
j 0.15
j
i
i
i
j 0
j 0
j 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
2018 Feb

In -lieu Fee Mitigation Document

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Mr. Joel Howard
NCDOT Division 10 PDEA Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
716 W. Main Street0
Albemarle, North Carolina 28001
Dear Mr. Howard:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
March 13, 2024
Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
Division 10 Project — TIP Number HL-0025, Greylock Ridge Road Extension, Mecklenburg
County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide the
compensatory mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on March 13, 2024, the impacts
are located in CU 03050103 of the Catawba River basin in the Southern Piedmont (SP) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Catawba 03 ESA
Stream
Wetlands
Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
SP
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non-
Coastal
Zone 1
Zone 2
Riparian
Marsh
Impacts (feet/acres)
0
0
0
0.140
0.010
0
0
0
*Some of the impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit application for details.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation credits are not available in this service area. In accordance with the
directive from the February 8, 2011, IRT meeting, non -riparian wetland impacts located in the mountain or
piedmont areas of North Carolina can be accepted as requested but mitigated for utilizing riparian wetland
mitigation credits in the service area. This mitigation acceptance letter replaces the mitigation acceptance letter
issued on February 13, 2024. DMS commits to implementing sufficient compensatory riparian wetland mitigation credits
to offset the impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies in accordance with the In -Lieu
Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010, and consistent with the Guidance for Expanded Service Area for Mitigating Impacts
within the Lower Catawba River Basin approved by the IRT (Catawba 03 ESA). If the above referenced impact amounts
are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be
required from DMS.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420.
Sincerely,
C%' 1Y1aA_J")Z_
Elizabeth A. Harmon
DMS NCDOT ILF Coordinator
cc: Mr. Steve Brumangin, USACE — Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Mary Beth Plummer, NCDWR
File: HL-0025 Revised Division 10
D E Q2North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
NL 11I H UARO'_IN�",
neoanmrm �r e�;w�meneal 0 it, 919.707.8976

Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
NCDOT MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST
The following questions provide direction in determining when the Department is
required to prepare SEPA environmental documents for state -funded construction and
maintenance activities. Answer questions for Parts A through C by checking either
"Yes" or "No". Complete Part D of the checklist when NCDOT's Minimum Criteria
Rule categories 48, 12(i) or 415 are used.
TIP Project No.: HL-0025
State Project No.: 49491.1.1
Project Location: Town of Matthews, Mecklenburg County
Project Description:
Greylock Ridge Road Extension, from East John Street (SR 1009) to Tank Town
Road (SR 3453). The project is included in the 2020-2029 State Transportation
Improvement Program with right of way acquisition scheduled to begin in state
fiscal year 2023 and construction to begin in state fiscal year 2024. A two-lane
facility is planned and will include a 5' sidewalk on the north side and a 10' multi-
use side path on the south side. On -street parking will be provided along certain
sections of the facility.
Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements:
US Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit and NC Div. of Water Resources
401 Water Quality Certification anticipated; Certificate of Appropriateness from
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission anticipated.
Special Project Information:
Purpose and Need
The purpose of this project is to reduce travel time and improve the circuitous
traffic route for east -west travel between E. John Street and Tank Town Road,
including the Sportsplex/Family Entertainment District.
The project will provide service for vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle modes of
travel.
Alternatives
The recommended alignment has been developed to avoid impacts to adjacent
resources. A tributary to Four -Mile Creek is located to the south of the proposed
alignment (extending parallel to the proposed roadway alignment). Residential
development is located immediately to the north of the proposed alignment.
07/05/22 1 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
Therefore, the proposed alignment is considered a "best -fit" and no additional
alternatives have been developed, except for consideration of the No -Build
alternative.
A two-lane facility will be provided with turn lanes at intersections. Given the
project's context as a local street, on -street parking will be provided along certain
sections of the project.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
A section of the existing Crestdale Heritage Trail greenway will be displaced by
construction of the Greylock Ridge Road Extension. This part of the greenway was
constructed as a temporary feature - to be in place until funding and construction of
the Greylock Ridge Road Extension.
To accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists, this project includes a 5' sidewalk along
the north side and a 10' multi -use side path along the south side of the roadway.
Cost Estimates
The current State Transportation Improvement Program (2020-2029) includes the
following cost estimates:
Right of Way acquisition: $ 701,000
Construction: $5,892,000
Coordination
To inform key agency stakeholders, a start of study letter/project data summary
was provided to:
Centralina Council of Governments
Mecklenburg County
Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Schools Transportation Department
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Emergency Management
Town of Matthews
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
NC Division of Water Resources
US Army Corps of Engineers
US Fish and Wildlife Service
The project team reviewed all received comments for consideration in development
of the project design.
The project team coordinated with the Catawba Nation and Cherokee Nation tribes
regarding the proposed project.
07/05/22 2 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
Protected Species
Suitable habitat is located within the project study area for the federally threatened
Northern long-eared bat, and federally endangered Carolina heelsplitter, Smooth
Coneflower, Schweinitz's sunflower, and Michaux's sumac. Field surveys for these
species will be completed in September, 2022. If any populations of these species are
found within the potential impact area, further coordination will be undertaken to
ensure compliance with the Endangered Species Act.
Wetlands and Streams
The project will involve approximately .15 acre of wetland impact and 223 linear
feet of stream impact. A US Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit is
anticipated to be applicable for these jurisdictional impacts.
Historic Resources
The project will not affect any properties listed on the National Register of Historic
Places.
Archaeological Resources
The NCDOT Archaeology Group reviewed the project and determined no survey
for archaeological resources is required.
Historic Architectural Resources
Current project plans require a small amount of right of way from a locally
designated historic landmark - the Star of St. Matthews Masonic Lodge. The
project team will coordinate a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Charlotte -
Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission (if required).
To ensure compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
(required due to the Corps of Engineers permit), a review is currently underway to
determine if any properties within the Area of Potential Effect are eligible for the
National Register of Historic Places. If any properties are determined eligible for
the National Register, an effects determination will be coordinated (in accordance
with Section 106).
Public Involvement
As a locally generated project, the Town of Matthews has included discussion of the
facility at Town Board Meetings, Planning Board Meetings, a rezoning Community
Informational Meeting, and on the Town website. A public meeting is planned for
Fall, 2022 to provide detailed information regarding the project design.
07/05/22 3 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
Potentially affected property owners were notified about the project by letter prior
to Natural Environment surveys (Dec. 2021 and Feb. 2022).
Other NCDOT Projects
Two funded NCDOT projects are located in the immediate vicinity of the
Greylock Ridge Road Extension (HL-0025):
I-5507: addition of express lanes on I-485 (Design -Build project — underway).
U-4714: widening of John Street (SR 1009)/Old Monroe Road. This widening
upgrade of John Street will include a new traffic signal at Greylock Ridge
Road.
07/05/22 4 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA
Item I to be completed by the Project Manager. YES NO
1. Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity allowed ® ❑
under the Minimum Criteria Rule in which environmental
documentation is not required?
If the answer to number 1 is "no", then the project does not qualify as a
minimum criteria project. A state Environmental Assessment is required.
If yes, under which category? (26) "Implementation of any proiect
which qualifies as a 'categorical
exclusion' under the National
Environmental Policy Act by one of the
Agencies of the U.S. Department of
Transportation."
If either category #8, #12(i) or #15 is used complete Part D of this checklist.
PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS
Items 2 — 4 to be completed by the Project Manage'
YES NO
2. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality
impacts?
3. Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative
impacts that may result in a significant adverse impact -to human health
or the environment?
4. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the proposed
El Z
activity have such widespread implications, that an uncommon concern
for its environmental effects has been expressed to the Department?
Item 5-8 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer.'
5. Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on
wetlands; surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries;
parklands; prime or unique agricultural lands; or areas of recognized
scenic, recreational, archaeological, or historical value?
6. Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on the
Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list?
7. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water quality or
ground water impacts?
8. Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on
long-term recreational benefits or shellfish, finfish, wildlife, or their
natural habitats?
07/05/22 5 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
If any questions 2 through 8 are answered "yes ", the proposed project may not qualify as a
Minimum Criteria project. A state Environmental Assessment (EA) may be required. For
assistance, contact the Environmental Policy Unit at [phone] or EPC&ncdot.gov.
PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS
terns 9-12 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer. =
YES NO
9. Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its
® ❑
habitat, likely to be impacted by the proposed action?
10. Does the action require the placement of temporary or permanent
® ❑
fill in waters of the United States?
11. Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of
❑
fill in high quality or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as
mountain bogs or pine savannahs?
12. Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental
❑
Concern, as defined in the coastal Area Management Act?
Items 13 —15 to be completed by the Project Manager.
13. Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes?
❑
Cultural Resources
14. Will the project have an "effect" on a property or site listed on the
❑
National Register of Historic Places?
15. Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of
❑
way from publicly owned parkland or recreational areas?
Questions in Part " C" are designed to assist the Project Manager and the Division
Environmental Officer in determining whether a permit or consultation with a state or
federal resource agency may be required. If any questions in Part " C" are answered
11 yes ' , follow the appropriate permitting procedures prior to beginning project
construction.
07/05/22 6 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
PART D:(To be completed when either category #8, 120) or #15 of the rules are
used.
Items 16- 22 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer.
16. Project length:
17. Right of Way width:
18. Project completion date:
19. Total acres of newly disturbed ground
surface:
20. Total acres of wetland impacts:
21. Total linear feet of stream impacts:
22. Project purpose:
F�DOCUSigned by:
Prepared by: ' RAJAMW
��nrs ❑onn�n�r
Robert Hanson, PE Kisinger Campo & Assoc.
DocuSigned by:
Approved by: Fvbk-a aviff&
Donald dr- rifff05046E84D3...
Project EngiIn1Te11er
Division 10 Project Development
Date: 7/12/2022
Date: 7/12/2022
07/05/22 7 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
TIP No: HL-0025
Greylock Ridge Road Extension
From East John Street (SR 1009) to Tank Town Road
W BS# 4949.1.1
Protected Species
Suitable habitat is located within the project study area for the federally threatened Northern
long-eared bat, and federally endangered Carolina heelsplitter, Smooth Coneflower, Schweinitz's
sunflower, and Michaux's sumac. Field surveys for these species will be completed in
September, 2022. If any populations of these species are found within the potential impact area,
further coordination will be undertaken to ensure compliance with the Endangered Species Act.
Historic Resources
Current project plans require a small amount of right of way from a locally designated historic
landmark -the Star of St. Matthews Masonic Lodge. The project team will coordinate a
Certificate of Appropriateness from the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission
(if required).
To ensure compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (required due
to the Corps of Engineers permit), properties within the Area of Potential Effect are currently
under review to determine if any properties are eligible for the National Register of Historic
Places. If any properties are determined eligible for the National Register, an effects
determination will be coordinated (in accordance with Section 106).
State Minimum Criteria Checklist Page 1 of 1
Greensheet
July 2022

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
M atth e w
Maithewy Mint Hill Rd
s
O/ srJ
a
P�� OcbOr`o7 sr
Matthews Communcanc-n
Llbrarp Bldg.-tclatthea;
C
v
�C, S`
a 'Q
cl�
e Gt °4
s
� s
/ F ✓Q/ F Ch _aJ�C n0
Jr/ y o
sd si Ps o;P C' `Sr 3Ju � a
z
Or rRa a q6 Cresr
a
v
Kept Or �0' m�
Baucom s
Fark -.,.•� s
s
O � �
a -
o c�ac
e to°
Y ,IA
u
Clearbrook Rd
Vfh •��' ,..��, �artk 7
o R
� J
� A f aao F
e`testpt n �� �,• o^Gr
01
Matthews Public Wor
Ei % °�•
oo�
s�O GCee
tUt
G� ,
Q 52
U
a
Q- aoo�t`P\ Oa�\•c o Ot
G h
'7
O
6. off'
Ile
c
T; Legend N 750 375 0 750 Feet
MECKLENBURG ����° r"'-'I StudyArea Greenway wE
COUNTY U. -•r
- Project Limits s
Matthews Vicinity Map
j Notable Features
Greylock Ridge Rd. Extension
Streams HL-0025
49491.1.1
stallin La Project Description: MecklenburgCount North Carolina
Rd Indian Trail y'
Greylock Ridge Rd. Extension Gyo
FUN . from E John St. to Tank Town Rd.,Filry.�ure 1
Y in Matthews, NC KISINGER CAMPO `''
'C I A T E S

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
Pd1.1 tt1 i e r: ;
a V
fi
Mat[he Elem
.Kyt pR
to
4.
i
40��_
t
SONJ
- ' : ♦ - `PAS P `
10
i %tk1
rntileCreek
Project Description Legend
Greylock Ridge Rd. Extension
from E John St., to Tank Town Rd. ProjectLimits
in Matthews, NC _ StudyArea
USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle: Matthews
N
11000 500 0 1,000 Feet
W-*
s USGS Map
Greylock Ridge Rd. Extension
H L-0025
49491.1.1
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Kf V Figure 2
KISINGER CAMPO
'ES

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
Historic Resources Coordination (Archaeology)

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
Project Tracking No.
21-11-0032
.,
N O ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM.
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this
u �
Gil
project. It is not valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must
consult separately with the Historic Architecture and Landscapes Team.
.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: HL-0025
WBS No: 49491.1.1
Federal Aid No. -
Federal Permit Required?
County: Mecklenburg
Document: MCC
Funding: ® State
® Yes ❑ No Permit Type:
❑ Federal
NWP 3 / NWP 14
Project Description: The project involves the proposed extension of Greylock Ridge Road on
new location from E. John Street to E. Charles Street and Tank Town Road in Mathews in
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The proposed extension is 0.3 miles in length. The
archaeological APE measures approximately 45.8 acres in area.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Permitting and funding information was reviewed for determining the level of archaeological input
required by state and federal laws. Based on the submitted "request for cultural resources review"
form, the project is state funded with federal permit interaction. As such, Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act will apply and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) will
serve as the lead federal agency. Next, construction design and other data was examined (when
applicable) to define the character and extent of potential impacts to the ground surfaces embracing
the project locale. The archaeological APE encompasses all areas of potential ground disturbing
activity and encompasses a great deal of area around the proposed new location extension.
Once an APE was outlined, a map review and site file search was conducted utilizing on-line
resources provided to the NCDOT by the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Tuesday, November
30, 2021. No NRHP eligible archaeological sites or any other archaeological resources are located
within the APE or directly adjacent. Several prehistoric archaeological sites have been documented
within a''/2 mile radius of the currently defined APE, increasing the liklihood of encountering similar
resources.
Examination of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally
Designated (LD), Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources
available on the NCSHPO website is important in establishing the location of noteworthy historic
occupations related to a perspective construction impact area. A cross-check of these mapped
resources concluded that none of the above properties with potential contributing archaeological
components are situated within the APE. In addition, historic maps of Mecklenburg County were
appraised to identify former structure locations, land use patterns, cemeteries, or other confirmation
of historic occupation in the project vicinity. Archaeological/historical reference materials were
inspected as well. In general, the cultural background review established that no previously recorded
archaeological sites, cemeteries, or NRHP properties with potential archaeological components are
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGXFF.MFNT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVFY REQUIRED" FORM
1 of2

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E Project Tracking No.
21-11-0032
located within the APE. Based on cultural -historical factors, the APE is considered to have a low to
moderate potential for the documentation of archaeological resources.
Further, topographic, geologic, flood boundary, and NRCS soil survey maps (CeB2, EnD) were
referenced to evaluate pedeological, geomorphological, hydrological, and other environmental
determinants that may have resulted in past occupation at this location. Aerial and on -ground
photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer) and the Google Street View map application (when
amenable) were also examined/utilized for additional assessment of disturbances, both natural and
human induced, which compromise the integrity of archaeological sites. Environmental/impact
factors do not suggest a heightened potential for archaeological resource recovery.
(This project falls within a North Carolina County in which the following federally recognized
tribes have expressed an interest: Catawba Nation. We recommend that you ensure that this
documentation is forwarded to these tribes using the process described in the current NCDOT
Tribal Protocol and PA Procedures Manual.)
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably
predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE.
There are no existing NRHP eligible archaeological sites within the projects APE, and it is
unlikely to contain significant, intact, and preserved archaeological deposits. Although the
project is on new location, the soil data demonstrates about half of the APE to be moderately
eroded, and the remaining half to be relatively sloped. The potential for recording undisturbed
archaeological remains at this location is low. As currently proposed as a state funded project
with federal permit interaction, no further consultation is advocated. A finding of "no
archaeological survey required" is considered appropriate.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARC AEOLOGIST: NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
Scott Halvorsen 11/30/2021
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST II Date
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHALOLOGY T IMM "NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY RL•QU1RL'D" FORM
2of2

)ocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
hluit rli,� fiU
j lyS
s�
r �aOcar fo, -
-14 S�
Matthzm comnunr_atom
Ltbr4ry. 613y.-rdatlhe•.v•�
C
• � 'ttfow":. V
A_ \
ry �
ell
o �, ` C j •.,` 4
01
es/
0
"M
m 4
�• c
o /
ClParbrook Rd ��
/ 01P
3 <. / Matthews Animal Control
VC,ay
C ,(A
o as a`°s a®k GV
NO
apt
�acoc c 61* a O`
m
7 J\e
er' _
O✓ ,i��F�S G�c
U
.D
Legend N 750 375 0 750 Feet
MECKLENBURG wa
COUNTY Project Limits Streams
S
Greenway
Matthews Project Location
ym Het A Notable Features Greylock Ridge Rd. Extension
`, j Area of Interest HL-0025
' Sox
Project Description: 49491.1.1
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Stallings Lake Greylock Ridge Rd. extension
UNION from E John St. to Charles St., �. BAl Figure 1
COUNTY in Matthews, NC KISINGERCAMPO `yam
R ASSOC I A T F.S

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
Mttdtet.s
•.e o MAT iHEWS-MIN,-
10
IV
y
ti
A �! q,�9P k�r �b ' / +re s#�..°' � \ - � '` I� - ♦'i �r �---� �``,s°��F��J�\ .�s:�v...
m�e �� �- i �`.: d /•° �ri�ETP��� ts�
to
w i
p
i�RG
li
041
41
Gp1P�
Olt
a
� 111I Py���r '��f � I �✓;r r� \_��\)Ot'.1 ,_
Project Description Legend N 1,000 500 0 1,000 Fee
WF,
Greylock Ridge Rd. extension
from E John St., to Charles St. Project Limits s USGS Map
in Matthews, NC L__j Study Area Greylock Ridge Rd. Extension
HL-0025
49491.1.1
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle: Matthews''' Figure 2
.ate;>„ •.,
KISINGER CAMPO `'e,6�F'
& ASSOCIATES

I DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01 -0073-4045-B755-C9DE1 2ADE08E
V
W
i
OD
w Z
aw
T
FFA
W
CIO
w
a
(D
a)
I
LL
O
co
O
O
o• 0 0
L
c U
:3
d X L
L W 0
7
d ON-Z
O
Q�O� C
LL
90
IQ N 3
o
c v=0)U
LO
m m
L
Je
o 0
O
; Y
C U
W N
ii
i
F
U)
a)
C
3
0
m`
n
U)
0
�o�
-2
y� a
: cc
> N
W
y
LL
2
> o
�♦
N
= c
0
C
W
©
Y (0
x
CL
In
"
a
a
O
y
O U)
'a a)
ca
x c
N O E
o U
y
.N J
0 3 x '> Q
c
>, O
(D
a
Y
•L
� y
v E
m
Nd
LL 2
n o U)
d
= O 0 CO�.
CZ � r0i
4)
Im ®
y
0-
®t
a

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
0
Sources. Esrl, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCRE'MENiTiP,
NRCan";'Esrl Japan, METhEsn C.hirra (H,ong Kopg)';.E'srl K'oTea`
Es,n (Thalland),(NGCC, ©OpenS.treetMa`p contributors, antl the.
. \ r i I f i i ! it ,. .(. ,1 .
_GIS User Community, Srou\c�e: Esn,�DtigiialGlobesGeoE.ye.,
E'arthstar,Ge�ograph,lcs, CNES/Airbus D�S;.USDA,_IJSGS,
AeroGRtD,�IGN, and,the GI,S lJser�Corttmuni Y1
Portion of the Mathews topographic map illustrating the boundaries and location
of the project APE in Mecklenberg County, North Caroilina.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
ARC-GIS aerial shape file map illustrating the boundaries and location
of the project APE in Mecklenberg County, North Caroilina.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
Historic Resources Coordination (Historic Architectural Resources)

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
Project Tracking No. (Internal Use
21-11-0032
t HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
R "SURVEY REQUIRED FORM"
6 This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
HL-0025
County:
Mecklenburg
WBSNo.:
49491.3.1
Document
MCC
[corrected to 49491.1.1]
Type:
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
® State ❑ Federal
Federal
® Yes ❑ No
Permit
USACE
Permits :
T e s :
Proiect Description:
Extend Greylock Ridge Road on new location from E. John Street to East Charles Street,
approximately 0.3 mile. and realign E. Charles Street and Tank Town Road.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of HPOGIS web service was undertaken on January 6, 2022. A portion of this project
was evaluated for historic architecture for TIP U-4714. Three properties were determined not
eligible. There is one property which is a Local Landmark but has not been evaluated for
National Register eligibility. Masonic Lodge 9566 (MK2302). An Eligibility Evaluation is
required for this property. Please submit a request via eTracs.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
®Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ®Photos E] Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- "SURVEY REQUIRED"
skeLbUR-eap
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
Anticipated Fieldwork Completion Date: June 6, 2022
January 6, 2022
Historic Architecture and Landscapes SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement
Page 1 of 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: DEBCCE01-0073-4045-B755-C9DE12ADE08E
APE
MK2302
Historic Architecture and Landscapes SURVEYREQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 2

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use
21-11-0032
HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES AFFECTED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
HL-0025
County:
Mecklenburg
WBS No.:
49491.3.1
Document
MCC
Type:
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
® State ❑ Federal
Federal
® Yes ❑ No
Permit
USACE
Permits :
Typ e s :
Proiect Description:
Extend Greylock Ridge Road on new location from E. John Street to East Charles Street,
approximately 0.3 mile. and realign E. Charles Street and Tank Town Road.
Description of review activities, field surveys, results, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, relevant background reports, historic designations roster, and
indexes was undertaken on January 6, 2022. One property which is a Local Landmark has been
evaluated for National Register eligibility: Masonic Lodge 9566 (MK2302). In a letter dating
December 1, 2022, HPO concurred with NCDOT's recommendation that the property is eligible
for National Register Listing. In an email dated May 15, 2023, USACE representative Stephen
A. Brumagin concluded that Masonic Lodge 9566 (MK2302) is not in the permit area and
therefore not subject to Section 106 review. If the funding source changes this project will need
to be reviewed again. Additionally, the lodge is a Locally Designated Landmark and will require
a Certificate of Appropriateness.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
®Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ®Correspondence ®Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES AFFECTED
skeWL Reap
Ma,J ig, a023
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007
Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 2

[External] FW: Corps permit area, NCDOT Project HL-0025, Greylock Ridge Road Extension [USACE Action ID: SAW-2022-00623]
Robert Hanson <[e-mail]>
O T. OReap. ShdbyL
onaepu<. MaRhew lamy: eRudn�na lgrai.Ter,y w: t�Imward. IrtdM
�Fa arc aywed� �egwed�e r• r .z.za.
o� redid mmi. mez.ageo� s/nreoza /:o/ Aee.
DFig 3 HL-0025 Greylock Wetbnd and hiz[.dcpdf
2 M8
From: Brumagin, Stephen A (Strve) CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) 6teohen.A.Brumaeinbilusace.armv.mil>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 202312:27 PM
To: Robert Hanson <RH.—t@k—a co
u: Howard, Joel M <L how,,d@ncdot e—,, W—, William G <weweswtt@nrdat eo
Subject RECorpspermitarea,NCDOTProject HL 25,6reylock Ridge R.ad Extr,ion[USACEAC.o ID_SAW-202-623]
I[audan: E#ernal email.
Robert,
0 EJ Reply CxJ Reply All �® H
Tue 11111-11:11 AM
I wanted to follow up our wove—tlon from Friday related to the Corps p—ft area as it related m the information you provide£., Greylock Road E#ension projector Mecklenburg County, INC. eased on the attached wetland/historiral mapping you provided for this state funded
pmjeR along my undersmnding that all impacs [o water that require Corps authorization For this project ere located adjacent [o Sites 81-3, [he Corps permit area would bathe waters identified in Sites N 1-3 and the Immediately adjacent uplands. This permit area would not include
the entire projecterea as depicted In the attached mapping.
As part of any application for an authorization ro impact waers, the Corps requires applicaMz to provide information/details related to project purpose &need, demonrtretion that the project is a single and complete project and how the applicant has taken steps to first avoid
impacts, then steps to minimize impacts ro water and finally, zcepz ro mitigate unavoidable impanz.
Please be aware thA if the boundary of the eligible/listed historic source would change, the project swp. would change and/or other waters would be impacted by this pr.jx , then the Corps would have to re -visit this project to determine what influence those actions would have
on the Corps permit area. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.
Stephen A. Brumagin
NCDOT Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Charlrme Field Office, Wilmington District
Work cell 904 799-6471
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007
Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 2

Endangered Species Support Documents

KCAKISINGER CAMPO
& ASSOCIATES
i t•
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Joel Howard, NCDOT PDEA Engineer
Rob Hanson
9/14/2022 G!��� P
STIP HL-0025 NRTR Amended, WBS Element No. 49490.1.1
MEMO
This memo serves to update the STIP HL-0025 NRTR for the Greylock Ridge Road Extension in Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina (March 2022). This project is moving to final design. Therefore, the STIP HL-0025
Final NRTR along with the update described herein serve as the final NRTR for this project.
KCA biologists conducted additional botanical surveys on September 12, 2022, to resolved biological
conclusions for three species of plants protected under the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered
Species Act of 1973). This report serves as an update to the status of the federally protected plant species for
the above referenced project.
Survey date: September 12, 2022.
Length of survey: Four man-hours.
Protected Species
As of February 24, 2022, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and
Consulting (IPaC report listed three federally protected plant species, for the above referenced project (Table
1, Appendix A). Fieldwork for the original NRTR was conducted on February 21, 2022, outside the
recommended survey window for each plant species. For each species, a Biological Conclusion is rendered
based on survey results within the recommended survey windows.
Table 1. ESA Federally Protected Species within the Project Areal
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
Echinacea laevigata
Smooth coneflower
E
Yes
No Effect
Helianthus schweinitzii
Schweinitz's sunflower
E
Yes
No Effect
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's sumac
E
Yes
No Effect
'IPaC data checked on September 24, 2022 (Appendix A)
E —End a nge red; T—Threatened; T(S/A) —Threatened Similarity of Appearance; C— Candidate.
Smooth coneflower
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: late May -October
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Smooth coneflower habitat in the form of regularly maintained roadside and utility rights -of way are present
within the project area. Based on habitat conditions (density of vegetation), surveys were conducted in the
form transects through potentially suitable habitat. No smooth coneflowers were observed during the survey.

KISINGER CAMPO MEMO
ASSOCIATES
Additionally, a review of the A NCNHP records search of February 24, 2022 indicates no known smooth
coneflower occurrences within 1.0-mile of the project area (Appendix A).
Schweinitz's sunflower
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: late August -October
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Schweinitz's sunflower habitat in the form of regularly maintained roadside, utility rights -of way, maintained
powerlines and other sunny or semi -sunny habitats containing Enon and Cecil soils are present within the
project area. Based on habitat conditions (density of vegetation), surveys were conducted in the form
transects through potentially suitable habitat. No Schweinitz's sunflowers were observed during the survey.
Additionally, a review of the A NCNHP records search of February 24, 2022 indicates no known Schweinitz's
sunflower occurrences within 1.0-mile of the project area (Appendix A).
Michaux's sumac
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: May -October
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Michaux's sumac habitat in the form of regularly maintained roadside, utility rights -of way, maintained
powerlines and edges of artificially maintained clearings undergoing natural succession are present within the
project area. Based on habitat conditions (density of vegetation), surveys were conducted in the form
transects through potentially suitable habitat. No Michaux's sumac was observed during the survey.
Additionally, a review of the A NCNHP records search of February 24, 2022 indicates no known Michaux's
sumac occurrences within 1.0-mile of the project area (Appendix A).

IKCKISINGER CAMPO MEMO
& ASSOCIATES
Qualifications of Principal Investigators
Investigator: Pam Ferral
Education: M. Wildlife Biology, NCSU 1998, B.S. Fisheries and Wildlife Science, NSCU, 1985
Experience: Senior Scientist, KCA & Associates, June 2022-present
Senior Biologist, Wood E&I Services, April 2021-June 2022
Senior Environmental Scientist, Stantec, September 2011-April 2021
Environmental Scientist, AMEC, 2007-2011
Ecologist, The Nature Conservancy 1998-2006
Zoology Research Assistant, NCSU, 1993-1997
Wildlife Biologist, USFS, 1989-1993
RCW Research Assistant, NCSU, 1985-1989
Responsibilities: Document preparation, T/E species assessment
Investigator: Timothy E. Black
Education: B.S. Biology, 1991
M.S. Environmental Health, 1996
Experience: Environmental Scientist, Kisinger Campo & Associates, Present
Senior Project Manager, Scenic Consulting Group, 2018
Environmental Project Manager, SEPI Engineering, 2016-2018
Environmental Scientist, HSMM, 2001-2005
Environmental Specialist III, NCDOT, 1999-2001
Environmental Technician IV, NCDENR-DWQ, 1997-1999
Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, T&E surveys, document preparation/review

KCAKISINGER CAMPO
& ASSOCIATES
Appendix A
USFWS IPaC
and
NCNHP Report
MEMO

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EYF5XZLUKRAPZBWK7ZR...
IPaC
IPaC resource list
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as
critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project
area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the
project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the
project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have
on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g.,
vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed
activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for
the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the
introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS
Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources
addressed in that section.
Location
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Local office
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
JEJ [phone]
1 of 13 2/24/2022, 11:11 AM

IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EYF5XZLUKRAPZBWK7ZR...
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.htmI
G
2 of 13 2/24/2022, 11:11 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EYF5XZLUKRAPZBWK7ZR...
Endangered species
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI
includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by
activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish
does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or
eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can
change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project
area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and
project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list
from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local
field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesi and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program
of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under theirjurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC
also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status
page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see
FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
3 of 13 2/24/2022, 11:11 AM

IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EYF5XZLUKRAPZBWK7ZR...
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department
of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Clams
ilk 1_111h
STATUS
Threatened
STATUS 4040
Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata Endangered
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of
the critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3534
t
"sec s
NAME -ft*
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Endangered
Endangered
4 of 13 2/24/2022, 11:11 AM

IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EYF5XZLUKRAPZBWK7ZR...
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-
species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds
/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.g ratorybirds
it
/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To
5 of 13 2/24/2022, 11:11 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EYF5XZLUKRAPZBWK7ZR...
see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and
around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location,
desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic
Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of
bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast
birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to
properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
►1_1111s
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
BREEDING SEASON (IFA
BREEDING SEASON IS
INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON
YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY
..............................................................................................................................
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT
AREA SOMETIME WITHIN THE
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
6 of 13 2/24/2022, 11:11 AM

INC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EYF5XZLUKRAPZBWK7ZR...
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most
likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and
schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure
you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird
Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■) e"�..s
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid
cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as
12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The
survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence
score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey
effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events
in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey
events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the
Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted
Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of
presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative
probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a
7 of 13 2/24/2022, 11:11 AM

INC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EYF5XZLUKRAPZBWK7ZR...
statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is
the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season (
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in
your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. 1�4
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data(
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently
relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird
returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently
much more sparse.
r probability of presence breeding season 1 survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT
I NOV DEC
Bald Eagle I° ++++ ®+++ + + + + -�--�++ ++++ ++—+ ++++ ^ + ++ F "'
Non -BCC — NONE
......................................
Vulnerable
.................... ..............1.......-
(This is not a
.....................................................
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
in this area,
but warrants
attention
because of
the Eagle Act
or for
.........................
potential
susceptibilities
in offshore
areas from
certain types
of
development
or activities.)
8 of 13 2/24/2022, 11:11 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EYF5XZLUKRAPZBWK7ZR...
Prairie ++++ ++++ ++++ ++" 1111 1 ' ++­+ +'+1 ++++ ++++ +—++
Warbler
BCC
...................
Rangewide
(CON) (This is
a Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
Prothon
Warbler otary ++++ ++++ ++++ +�+ ++++ ++++ ++++ +�++
BCC
...............
Rangewide
.............................................
(CON) (This is
........................................................
a Bird of
..................................
Conservation
Concern (BCC)4011\
...........................................................
throughout its
..........................................................
range in the
continental
.............................................
USA and
Alaska.).
.............................
Red-headed�
Woodpecker
+++1 +1 i+++ ++++ ++7` Jill +1++ ++'+'—++
p
B.C.C............
Rangewide
.............................................
(CON) (This is I?
a Bird of
................................... 0
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
...................................................
continental
USA and
...................................
Alaska.)
Rusty ++++ ++1+ ++ ++ ++++ -+++ +++ ++�+ .+,
Blackbird '� � + + ++++ +++' ++++ +
BCC - BCR
(This is a Bird
of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
only in
particular Bird
Conservation
Regions
(BCRs) in the
continental
USA)
.....................
9 of 13 2/24/2022, 11:11 AM

IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EYF5XZLUKRAPZBWK7ZR...
Wood Thrush
BCC
...................
Rangewide
(CON) (This is
a Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when
birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying
the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization
measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the
Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the
type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project
site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC). and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey_, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention
because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species
that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project
area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds
potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided
by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey,
banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to
interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these
10 of 13 2/24/2022, 11:11 AM

IPaC: Explore Location resources
graphs" link.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EYF5XZLUKRAPZBWK7ZR...
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All
About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab
of Ornithology NeotropicaI Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding
season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at
some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does
not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout
their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the
Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs)
in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid
and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean
Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be
helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files
underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive
Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project
webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For
additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study_ and the nanotag studies
or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
11 of 13 2/24/2022, 11:11 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EYF5XZLUKRAPZBWK7ZR...
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the
migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the
"probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact
project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by
the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high
survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score
can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of
data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply
a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when
they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps
you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should
presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about
conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom
of your migratory bird trust resources page. N A,
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
I[ella111I41111111IG1►19Z�G11111111111011112111 �I[197►1
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands
12 of 13 2/24/2022, 11:11 AM

INC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/lOcatiowEYF5XZLUKRAPZBWK7ZR...
Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers District.
THERE ARE NO KNOWN WETLANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis
of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography.
A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any
particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through
image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the
image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth
verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source
imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work.
There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information
depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the
design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state,
or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government
agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland
areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency
regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
13 of 13 2/24/2022, 11:11 AM

Roy Cooper, Governor
■■■■ NC DEPARTMENT OF
i ■
■■Ia■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
1 ONE
February 24, 2022
Andrea Gordon
Kisinger Campo and Associates
301 Fayetteville St
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: Greylock Ridge Rd Extension; TIP HL-0025
Dear Andrea Gordon:
D_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
N CN H D E-17277
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httos://www.fws.Qov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod nev.butler(d)ncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919,707.9120 • FAX [phone]

\\�
e = 0 =
j
/ j ~ /
/
s c- s
J
>
75
1
/\
%
\
«\ \�
ƒ
§
0-M *
5
\
A d z
� \ /
m
\
y
® 0 0 o
4
\\ez
\
_ _=
j<
\ c V)
^
ƒ
c
CD
°
y m / /
z \
\ c:
\\�\
a\/\
De
- /u
a
«
^ g
\
2 -C
t
3 5 \
\
� -7
§�\\\
CD/5}e
\// \
%
c o u-
e E / /
c
® °
2 %
R o
J ±
/
3 2 9
}|0
5 Cl) / }
\
� \ \
\ \
\
�
0
o
o
%u=y
a L 0
m.9e
/ o z c
=ac
/ / e
% w = m
_
\\�\
*\/\»
/D
c 3
0
©\
\ s 2 \
\ 0 0 a
3c«T
»»c
c L
/
y& x 2
u y y Z
9 2\
\ /
® /\
\ %
\-Z
\ U s©
/ o
J /
e
o = o 0 z
w m
m e w s
®
»
\ \
M 2 'y ®
e .% m
�
/ -
2\y
s0
2 c E
}
\\�2
_
±/\2
u
m
J/cl
\
2
/ C D y
z%/
4
\ y c e
2
Clt
y/
\
\
E \ ��
\
k :2
g
2 /
}
_
\j ®
\
.2
»
~
CDD\v
/\\\\�
o
E \ y
u
: -
/
/
_
z 2 9
®
\\ j\
o
,m
®
\ \
»
` u \
\
®
\�ZJ
CL)u
u
«
�s0
\\
m
\
\ / 0
-C
\
G
°
§ ° / �
®
\ \ 0
2
y
u?=z
y
±
-y±
\
°
/ / e 2%
y
\ ƒ .\ /
_
\
E 2/ 2
s
?
»
o
e a \
a®
o
y
\
e\::
:\y
a
Z
2
2 o
o « °
e
°
/7 &
(
° \�
(
�
\ \ \
\ \
\
° g
\\
§
\
/
D
c
f
© t
/ Cl)
2
\ % /
E\/ 3
D
/
o
o
L
t?\ t
/ o ~ %
\
)
\
\
( \
2 \ c \
/
/
\ )
\ \
\
\
\
\ \ \
/
\
/
\ \
/
CD/
o
Cl)\
- z ±
3
ƒ \ m /
%
2
g
/
.g
f>
e 3 e e
\//
o
s U® 2%
o
s
g
c z= 2
Z
+ Z 3 m -0Z
2
+,z
9 j=
v
\
\
c

c
CD
\
s c
\
\\
\
n
o e
g
.
j
\
7
u
e /
_
.9 _ }
.0
m
a)
Cl �
n
e /
o
U
cNi
/
c
\
/\
/
\
>7
/
ev
)ƒ
®
/9
}/
2
t t
t t t t t t
3§
E
{s
\ \
\ \ \ \ \ \
c\
/
e
\ \
c a e
% % % % % %
u
\ \
\ \ \ \ \ \
\ \
*
§
u
. S O
S S S???
\2
2
©
\33
333333
TO
e
a / /
/ / / / / /
CF
/
Oaa
««wawa
c
I-
\i-
�\
\.»a
E\(®
m
e
E
--
� \
\ \ 0
�
0
\ / 3 9
/
7 ®^
C
e3e«T
g
o
-
ac
yoC>g
m�\eG
z
m
s o\±
/ 2\
g
e
\\
/6z/3
y ac3
»
Ve—u
7
3
/
J/
m u m o z
u g
9
a
e
e
e
±
»
>
-_
/2yc
\
«
t t
t m z z z z
&
/ /
/ / / / / /
\ /
\
c
u
UU
Ueeeee
°
3
/
./
0 0
o t t t t t
/\
\0
\
lu
-0
\
Cf)./ /
%
/
\
j
j \ \ \ \ \
\
CD
\
\ 0
m
m
\ \ \
\ \ \ \ \ \
e E
\
f
O y y
2/////
\
g
v
_
u
9
\
\co
c
ƒ
g
/
uI
\
\
0
\
g
\ \
/
H
«®
0
2
0
%
2
/\
\
y
\m
u
m
\
/
LL
}
\}
\
\
2
j\
/
t
\
u u
o s
E
c a a a a a
� �
\
E.±
/
}
s
t
/
_
//
/
z
ƒ
z z
U) U) U) U)�
G
c/
\
o
/
3
\ 0
c c c c c
c a a a a a
Z
2
y
c
/
o o
s z z z z c
\/
%—
®
±
o
»»
E
d o 0 0 0 0
\LLJ
\
s
o
t t
= a s e s
e
� \
j
\
$ / /
U U
/ } } } } }
U
\ \
%
±
e
« « « « «
u
«
±°
a p
p t t t t t
®
° o
}
/
«
\ % _
> / / / / /
c T
E/
2 0
\
=
s
9
s a a
9 j j
m a
a j\\\\\
-
°/\
y
e
\
//
2 2
2 c c c c c
-
j
\\\W\
/
\\\\\\\\\\\
\\
»
/
\
c

L
0
N
4—
X
7C)
ry
}W}••
NJ��
/
7C)
ry
Y
U
0
L
0
1A~
1 `
N
p-
T
1
2
Z
U
Z
r a'fe nnrt'L^ h a l
K,rr vr,
Vf � a
9
_ r
' _:P 6 �
F °
Aa
J eQb �vr
SW,L. PkW 4i
Z
-! uvlz
tizQ
PyN dfeG15
4
y.t
3 J
IY)
✓4
�Ir�
-
VN
�
,l
:der sr
y
a
,
�M
, s
r
4 �
adq
�,
hril:in4°d
a
S `L r.tkJr,y]
snJ:l4.
M11r0.R0.
�'+4LI
�
M�\a
97
eY
CP
�
L na he �l
pyu•a nr
3
'6�!T
ao
to
r C rl)
U cJa
ac
eJ$
z
Cl
o awg
No
E � Y
`m
W
0 o vzwa
Ll U
� 6 �7
i>-� Q
W
m Q
a)
C: O
Ncl
Q O
m
cq V N
N
N O` 3 l6
d m
ld
N 0
IL

From: Robert Hanson
To: Eric Black; Eric Black
Cc: Ashley Abdel-Hadi; Tom Pride
Subject: FW: [External] HL-0025 (Greylock Ridge Road Ext.) NLEB survey
Date: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 2:18:22 PM
Attachments: imaae001.ona
imaae002.i)na
KCA 7c65e990-22f6-4506-be59-456c52ca62c5.ona
Eric,
FYI, we're good to go relative to protected species (pending future developments regarding the
tricolored bat).
In addition to NLEB clearance, the mussel species were cleared based on the project site being
outside the species' range (see below).
However, historic coordination will need to be concluded prior to permit application.
Ashley & Tom,
I thought I'd provide a cc: for your information regarding these protected species.
Thanks,
Rob
T1P:HL-00 5 I Sub-TIP:HL-00 5 I WB : 49491.1.1
Section 7 Sunre;,
Internal DaWls Request Details
Milestones SWGLsks
Project area
drains to Fourmil4
Oarollnf Anna Burrouglm
',aus"l
Current Survey G3f2812022
No Er4d - Ouisld• of
Ck• which drains
hee*mer
Ooemplole
Rang*
to Mc,Wpine which
dr$Ins to Sugar
Crook in M...
CuF+a.tt Survoy
No EMoci - OlAsida of
NE -out of rangs
+Aus&el AlLanlie Cg00 Anne Burrou(ft
Com lele ��24 022
p
Ran
W INC loviow
324r2022
Robert Hanson, PE
JEPA/Planning Manager
Email: RHanson(a).kcaeng.com
Direct: 813.540.8394

11(CA
KISINGER CAMPO
& ASSOCIATES
Office: 919.882.7839
Cell: 919.274.6361
301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1500, Raleigh, NC 27601
From: Robert Hanson <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 2:08 PM
To: Stanton, Tyler P <[e-mail]>; Manley, Chris <[e-mail]>; Cox, Marissa R
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Ramirez, Nick <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] HL-0025 (Greylock Ridge Road Ext.) NLEB survey
Tyler,
Thank you for the good news (and the not -so -good news)!
I appreciate the heads -up ... we'll monitor developments regarding the tricolored bat.
- Rob
Robert Hanson, PE
NEPA/Planning Manager
I<CA
Email: RHansonCilkcaeng.com
Direct: 813.540.8394
KISINGER CAMPO Office: 919.882.7839
& ASSOCIATES Cell:919.274.6361
301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1500, Raleigh, NC 27601
From: Stanton, Tyler P <tstantonCo�ncdot.g_ov>
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 12:39 PM
To: Robert Hanson <RHansonC@kcaeng com>; Manley, Chris <[e-mail]>; Cox, Marissa R
<mrcoxC@ncdot.g_ov>
Cc: Ramirez, Nick <nramirezPamtengineering com>
Subject: RE: [External] HL-0025 (Greylock Ridge Road Ext.) NLEB survey
Hey Rob,
I've got good news for you, USFWS recently updated the range and "area of interest" which dictates
where we have to consult on a species and Division 10 is no longer in range of NLEB, so you can
remove it from the T&E list.
Now the not -so -good news. USFWS is proposing to list the tricolored bat as endangered. We're
anticipating the final decision to occur in or around September 2023. Depending on the let date and
relevant construction activities, the project will need to be reviewed for it; however, we do not have
to consult on any project that is not likely to jeopardize the existence of the proposed species until

the final listing. By that time, we will have a Programmatic in place for bats in Divisions 9-14.
Tyler
Tyler Stanton
Environmental Program Supervisor
Biological Surveys Group
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
919.707.6156 office
tstantonOncdot.aov
Chat with me in Teams
1000 Birch Ridge Drive (Delivery)
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
connect. ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/EAU/Pages/default.aspxx
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Robert Hanson <RHansonCo�kcaeng com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 11:52 AM
To: Manley, Chris <cdmanley1 ncdot.g_ov>; Stanton, Tyler P <tstantonna ncdot.gov>; Cox, Marissa R
<mrcox anncdot.g_ov>
Cc: Ramirez, Nick <nramirezna amtengineering com>
Subject: [External] HL-0025 (Greylock Ridge Road Ext.) NLEB survey
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.
Hello all,
I hope you all avoided any issues from the hurricane last week. I wanted to check on the status of
the NLEB survey (if needed) for this project. The project team expects to prepare the 404 permit
application in upcoming weeks; I wanted to make sure we have accounted for all of the necessary
protected species surveys.
The ETRACS system should have the request logged in.
Thanks for any info!
- Rob

I<CA
KISINGER CAMPO
& ASSOCIATES
Robert Hanson, PE
NEPA/Planning Manager
Email: RHansonCilkcaeng.com
Direct: 813.540.8394
Office: 919.882.7839
Cell: 919.274.6361
301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1500, Raleigh, NC 27601
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This communication may be privileged and confidential. It should not be disseminated to others.
If received in error, please immediately reply that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Thank
you.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

HL-0025) Questionnaire:
Existing Structure:
Can the existing bridge deck be removed during the winter months October 16 - March 31)?
NA
Trees:
Can the trees in the project footprint be cut during the winter months October 16 - March 31)?
No. With the current let scheduled for June 2025, the availability would be August 1s'
NCDOT does not plan to limit clearing to October 16 — March 31 to allow the construction phase to
proceed in a timely manner.
Blasting:
Will blasting be used for this project? Will blasting occur after tree clearing? If so, can it occur
between April 1 and October 15?
e don't anticipate blasting but if necessary, it would be after tree clearing. Due to project phasing, I
can't guarantee that the contractor wouldn't encounter rock between Oct 16- March 31 that required
blasting.
Utilities:
Will any clearing for utilities be necessary? If so, can the trees in the project footprint be cut during the
inter months October 16 — March 31)?
Minor clearing may be required for utility relocation. Clearing for utilities is not anticipated within
etland areas. To allow for timely utility relocation/placement in accordance with the construction
schedule, NCDOT does not plan to limit clearing to October 16 — March 31.
Percussive Activities:
What type of percussive activities will occur? (e.g., pile driving, guardrail installation
Small U-channel post will be driven into the ground for permanent signs. Small section of guardrail
ill be installed. Minimal percussive sound expected.
Lighting:
Will temporary lighting for nighttime construction be necessary between April 1 and October 15?
Does permanent lighting exist in the project area and if so, will it be removed or will new lighting be
added as a result of the project?
Don't anticipate nighttime construction. A few existing private lights will be relocated prior to
construction. Following the completion of this project, the Town will be installing decorative street
lighting.

Essential Fish Habitat Support Document

EFH Report
https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/efhreport/
EFH Mapper Report
EFH Data Notice
Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) is defined by textual descriptions contained in the fishery management plans developed by the regional
fishery management councils. In most cases mapping data can not fully represent the complexity of the habitats that make up EFH. This
report should be used for general interest queries only and should not be interpreted as a definitive evaluation of EFH at this location. A
location -specific evaluation of EFH for any official purposes must be performed by a regional expert. Please refer to the following links
for the appropriate regional resources.
EFH
No additional Essential Fish Habitats (EFH) were identified at the report location.
Pacific Salmon EFH
No Pacific Salmon Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) were identified at the report location.
Atlantic Salmon
No Atlantic Salmon were identified at the report location.
HAPCs
No Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) were identified at the report location.
EFH Areas Protected from Fishing
No EFH Areas Protected from Fishing (EFHA) were identified at the report location.
1 of 1 2/19/2024, 2:14 PM

FEMA Flood Service Map

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA FIRM PANEL LOCATOR DIAGRAM
;.� IREDELL 1 ROWAN
0.
LINT
GASTOI
:OLN
?
S
S
0�3ti
� rz
bh
R`o
CABARRUS
`♦
ME
KL
NB
RG
UNION
DATUM INFORMATION
The projection used in the preparation of this map was the North Carolina State
Plane (FIPSZONE 3200). The horizontal datum was the North American Datum of
1983, GRS80 ellipsoid. Differences in datum, ellipsoid, projection, or Universal
Transverse Mercator zones used in the production of FIRMS for adjacent
jurisdictions may result in slight positional differences in map features across
jurisdictional boundaries. These differences do not affect the accuracy of this
FIRM. All coordinates on this map are in U.S. Survey Feet, where
1 U.S. Survey Foot = 1200/3937 Meters.
Flood elevations on this map are referenced to the North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). These flood elevations must be compared to structure
and ground elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. An average offset
between NAVD 88 and the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29)
has been computed for each North Carolina county. This offset was then applied
to the NGVD 29 flood elevations that were not revised during the creation of this
statewide format FIRM. The offsets for each county shown on this FIRM panel are
shown in the vertical datum offset table below. Where a county boundary and a
flooding source with unrevised NGVD 29 flood elevations are coincident, an
individual offset has been calculated and applied during the creation of this
statewide format FIRM. See Section 6.1 of the accompanying Flood Insurance
Study report to obtain further information on the conversion of elevations
between NAVD 88 and NGVD 29. To obtain current elevation, description, and/or
location information for bench marks shown on this map, please contact the
North Carolina Geodetic Survey at the address shown below. You may also
contact the Information Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at (301)
713-3242, or visit its website at http://www.nQs.noaa.gov.
North Carolina Geodetic Survey County Average Vertical Datum Offset Table
121 West Jones Street County Vertical Datum Offset (ft)
Raleigh, NC 27601 MECKLENBURG -0.74
[phone] UNION -0.78
httD://www.ncas.state.nc.us
I I Example: NAVD 88 = NGVD 29 + (-0.74) 1 1
All streams listed in the Flood Hazard Data Table below were studied by detailed
methods using field survey. Other flood hazard data shown on this map may
have been derived using either a coastal analysis or limited detailed Riverine
analysis. More information on the flooding sources studied by these analyses is
contained in the Flood Insurance Study report.
FLOOD HAZARD DATA TABLE
Annual Chance(loo-year)
Water -Surface 9evation (feet NAVD88)
Floodwa y
Community EncroachmentLine
Cross
Section
Stream
Station'
Flood Discharge (cfs)
Distance in Feel From Center of Stream to
Encroachment Boundary (Looking Downstream)
Fx fisting Land
Use Conditions
Future Land
Use Condflkons
Fx fisting Land Use
Conditions
Future Land Use
Conditions
Left / light Left / Rght
FOURMILE CREEK
394
1 39,400
1 3,544
3,994
605.2
605.6
17 / 37
20165
406
40,600
3,076
3,497
609.5
610.1
23 / 50
97 / 74
421
42,100
2,451
2,796
618.1
618.7
70 / 45
127 / 72
433
43,300
2,451
2,796
627.2
628.7
30 / 39
77 / 42
444
44,356
2,451
2,796
630.0
630.7
18 / 45
28 / 91
452
45,200
11801
2,155
634.0
634.6
33 / 40
65 / 68
464
46,374
1,587
1,932
638.9
639.5
8 / 30
18 / 39
471
47,084
1,587
1,932
643.7
644.3
57 / 38
480
48,000
1,587
1,932
648.6
141
/ 30
489
48,900
1 575
741
651.1
651.7
1 / 29
25 / 75
497
49,700
575
741
655.5
656.1
9 / 21
509
50,900
1 575
741
1 666.2
667.3
0 / 27
0 / 27
' Feel above confluence w ith McAlpine Creek.
1 480 000 FEET 524000 m 80°44'00" 525000 M 80°43'30" 80°43'00" 526001 m 487 500 FEET 80°42'30"
500 000 FEET JOINS PANEL 4580
q 0 {� o aD __1 C,0L-J CJ
ObQ Q OLWU
a Ld� LJ
19,
W °/° Q ❑°°��
�En a ° o ��Q o�� Q °�� ° O oao Dq o�a��
o Q 0 a o °
YoQoo�°�i`,GPG ��,,�C9C
35°06'30" 1 2 C% ° w❑ o o ° O O O O t� Q T wry
°❑' If] EL]L]0 \ �o OO °poo
3885000M ( LC7 Q� �� o GEM P oo°o°� a d ❑ fl ° ❑ �4
LEI a �o a o° ° o '5 0, 6D fl a w a s C ZONE X
Oho O o i� ❑ ° Q d o E�XIS��N AND FUT17RE LAND-USCONDITIONS
0 0 n o o C� o� 0o D!Z �� a a OQ� 1 /oANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD DISCHARGE ZONE X
ZONE X ° Q ° 0 Q ° o C1d �° ° °i CONTAINED IN CULVERT\BRIDGE (FUTURE)
°�� o �� �QQ0 °❑ 40o Qooaoo Q� J so
D 3 ° o°°o MA O a a Q
o Z d ° a O �� o 6) Fourmile Creek
a O �o� C 4j ❑ ° ° q J Q�� ° ��ZONE X LIMIT OF
D oo Q 13 °° O Q OC] 0 O� C' ❑ O 0 (FUTURE) so9 DETAILED STUDY
o �° ❑ fl ° OQ°° )
❑ Q ° � , 666
CL3 C�Q o LE O ° o o C o d U G3 �� / 6s, ZONE AE
a El 661
'-ZONE X 4`
EXISTING AND FUTURE LAND -USE CONDITIONS Oo (FUTURE)
❑ �j o CANTERFIELD LN a Q El a TACONIC PIL
1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD DISCHARGE CONTAI ED 0 7 �� 4J
Q O IN CULVERT/BRIDGE \ I 13 , C C}�d y� 0 6G� PP - N
° p ou 6 = O /�J ° `CREEK Rio 630 _ ,ZONE AE O � p� 653 652 �8
Q� 6, b ZONE,
ZONE AE 0 [] Q % �w (FUTURE) w
ss2
-� ZONE X 2 °
605 �� 5p� Q° y� �j O ZONE X 0')) Q �� ° p� ZONE X �. [j 7 489
\'(� `6" v (FUTURE1"))
'� .� g O O �l Q N �❑ r03�� �i] ° a � (FUTURE) z � a) 651
604
627 6RENNPJ >
'$ 6 Fourmile Creek i9 'o Q bq Fourmile Creek 6� 649 f
t RIM FOU� 14 ❑ ° f `� i . 60
0 �;'
_ O 0
ZONE X 4n\ �� ° ° 0 0 o d 0 �'� CS, 3� Co
(FUTUR O ` ZONE X �° OL °639,
o �� ❑ O ❑ o r Ryti ''
C w
(FUTURE) -7 P w - % R Z
c) 609 0
1 490 000 FEET
500 000 FEET
A35006'30"
M
497 500 FEET
U - I Jm ° �
ZONE X� .+� �� Q ❑ Q a ZONE X
35006'00" A?� Q o V (FUTURE) O p ° q (FUTURE) Oy
ZONE X °
tV (FUTURE) 618 O 0 0 O Q li G,
° �>\ Q o G ZONE X 35°os'oo"
Q � O
A� �O �Q ° TRANQUIL
COVE CT
3884 [l ARTESIAN CT ° / ° °
g00 M O o Q o d o 0
0
ZONEX� �Ruso pO ° O� �� �� ° �' P� 00 ° L7 O [ cc?
Ll
O O o� _ ° ❑ Qn n n l 0 n V _ _J _ \,1 ° °Q�°,°asNN- Ci ° ° �' �?� `' , c� o ° ° �� a �Q fl p o �Q 38840
u"° � �° � ° _�O evQ~ o�a°°�� "� -�jroa ° qo v �� °Qo o v Q as��
�° o °� � ❑ C7 a a O ° � °�3 ° �° C "
'IT
° C� ❑ o a �4 a C° C> �O °C3 O Q ° ° Q ��20 ° ° ° a O Q �� ��° O 0 '° Q C� Q w
o Q O°OC a Q° z Z
w q � � a �y o ° a � O /� � pQd N�� a o � o �❑
Q
Q tij n ^ LN C �/ �� °° O� y2 0 O qO Q �'D Oa �� o p
U) � Q °° ° � ° � � � o O ti ° �� a ° oqo a° O�C:D° ° °� d OO Q° ° Q °o z
O13 afl Oro Oa a oa 0
�RD W�� p fl O fl Q Q
0 4 ❑ g Q Q� O Q OQ o� Town of Matthe�' ° °�Q aQ�� e D o �O O �O ; 0 O .�� p °are d Q
Ca O Q` O 370310 o F 0 O q
uJ Q pb.
01�1) °
c� a ]� Gi 0 d a 0 °d o� �" fl° �,❑ n°� a o 0 Q O
�a Qua a 0 0 o� o �° o a 0 qa {� e o
a C3 fl Q� o Q o 0 O a o o� °
� o ° o q a O
Q 0
�
�p�Na��R� 4 0��° a
M
O C=City of Charlottes Q° ° �'
370159 O a 61
0
35°05'30" O O O Q O
a 0
PO
35°05'30„
El
492 500 FEET n ° n v n°��
-Z a �° ° Qo
a ° °� o o Q a�
� °
3883000 M ON �� ?
P�PNTP�,LD O�
o � 3883000M
o � � o 0 00 � Oa � o o � �
CRO S O Q 13 ° `I U LD ��% \0
ZONE X tQ 2
a a o ZO o� 4
a
o as a �a� o p ANT aQ �
�p DR o O Oo RD F Cry
° Q ° o ° C� t:� Union County
Unincorporated Areas
370234 Town of Stallings
O 5 0 O f -j W mQ City of Charlotte C, g
1_J a ° mg 37�O 0 9 370472
490 000 FEET v 490 000 FEET
80044'00" 80°43'30" JOINS PANEL 4488 80043'00" 80042'30"
1 480 000 FEET 524000M 1 482 500 FEET 525000" 526000M 1 490 000 FEET
NOTES TO USERS
sy,a Charlotte -Mecklenburg VARY This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program. It does not necessarily Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by flood control structures. This map reflects more detailed and up-to-date stream channel configurations than those shown MAP REPOSITORY
ar"�F�� identifyall areas subject to flooding, articular) from local drainage sources of small size. The Refer to Section 4.4 "Flood Protection Measures" of the Flood Insurance Stud report for information on the previous FIRM for this jurisdiction. The floodplains and floodways that were transferred from Refer to listing of Map Repositories on Map Index or visit http://www.ncfloodmaps.com.
1 9. particularly 9 Y P P 1 P Y
TO �'�o community map repository should be consulted for possible updated or additional flood hazard on flood control structures in this jurisdiction. the previous FIRM may have been adjusted to conform to these new stream channel configurations.
WATER information. As a result, the Flood Profiles and Floodway Data tables in the Flood Insurance Study report (which EFFECTIVE DATE OF FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL
o�
ServicesBase map information and geospatial data used to develop this FIRM were obtained from various contains authoritative hydraulic data) may reflect stream channel distances that differ from what is
�LgNn seG�� To obtain more detailed information in areas where Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) and/or organizations, including the participating local community(ies), state and federal agencies, and/or shown on this map. MARCH 2, 2009
floodways have been determined, users are encouraged to consult the Flood Profiles, Floodway other sources. The primary base for this FIRM is aerial imagery acquired by the State and
Data, Limited Detailed Flood Hazard Data, and/or Summary of Stillwater Elevations tables contained planimetric base map information obtained from Mecklenburg County GIS Department. The time Please refer to the separately printed Map Index for an overview map of the county showing the EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISION(S) TO THIS PANEL
within the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report that accompanies this FIRM. Users should be aware period of collection for the imagery is 2010. The time period of collection and maintenance for the layout of map panels, community map repository addresses, and a Listing of Communities table - to change Base Flood Elevations and Special Flood Hazard Areas
that BFEs shown on the FIRM represent rounded whole -foot elevations. These BFEs are intended Mecklenburg planimetric base map information is current as of 2011. Information and geospatial containing National Flood Insurance Program dates for each community as well as a listing of the
FFMA's COOPERATING TECHNICAL PARTNER for flood insurance rating purposes only and should not be used as the sole source of flood elevation data supplied by the local community(ies) that met FEMA base map specifications were considered panels on which each community is located. FEBRUARY 19, 2014
information. Accordingly, flood elevation data presented in the FIS report should be utilized in the preferred source for development of the base map. See geospatial metadata for the assoicated
This digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was produced through a unique cooperative conjunction with the FIRM for purposes of construction and/or floodplain management. digital FIRM for additional information about base map preparation. If you have questions about this map, or questions concerning the National Flood Insurance
partnership between Charlotte -Mecklenburg, the State of North Carolina, the Federal Program in general, please call 1 - 877 - FEMA MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA website at
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Boundaries of regulatory floodways shown on the FIRM for flooding sources studied by detailed Base map features shown on this map, such as corporate limits, are based on the most up-to-date http://www.fema.gov.
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS) has developed a long term methods were computed at cross sections and interpolated between cross sections. The floodways data available at the time of publication. Changes in the corporate limits may have occurred
For community ma revision history prior to statewide mapping,refer to the Community Ma History table located in
were based on hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the National Flood Insurance since this ma was published. Ma users should consult the appropriate communit official or An accompanyingFlood Insurance Stud re report, Letter of Ma Revision LOMR or Letter of Ma v P ry p v p ry
Y 9 q p P PY Y P. P ( ) P
approach of floodplain management to decrease the costs associated with flooding. This isthe Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
Program. Floodway widths and other pertinent floodway data for flooding sources studied b website to verify current conditions of jurisdictional boundaries and base ma features. This ma Amendment LOMA revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this FIRM may be
demonstrated b CMSWS commitment to ma floodplain areas at the local level. As art
g Y p Y 9 Y Y 1 p p O gp p g Y
Y P p P
detailed methods as well as non -encroachment widths for flooding sources studied b limited may contain roads that were not considered in the hydraulic analysis of streams where no new available. Visit the North Carolina Flood lain Mapping Program website at To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact our insurance agent, the North Carolina
of this effort, CMSWS has joined in a Cooperating Technical Community agreement with 9 Y Y Y Y p pp 9 9 y, Y 9 ,
FEMA and a partnership with the NCFMP to produce and maintain this digital FIRM. detailed methods are provided in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report for this jurisdiction. The FIS hydraulic model was created during the production of this statewide format FIRM. http://www.ncfloodmaps.com, or contact the FEMA Map Information eXchange (FMIX) at 1-877- Division of Emergency Management or the National Flood Insurance Program at the following phone numbers or
report also provides instructions for determining a floodway using non -encroachment widths for FEMA MAP (1-877-336-2627) or its website at http://www.floodmaps.fema.ciov/fhm/fmx main.html websites:
www.ncfloodmaps.com flooding sources studied by limited detailed methods. for information on all related products associated with this FIRM. NC Division of Emergency Management Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services National Flood Insurance Program
[phone] [phone] 1-800-118-6620
http://stormwater.charmeck.org http/lwww.nccrimecontrol.org/nfp htto//stormwater.charmeck.org httpJ1wwwf.ma.gov/business/nfir)
LEGEND
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO
INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD
The 1% annual chance flood (100-year flood), also known as the base flood, is the flood that
has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The Special Flood Hazard
Area is the area subject to flooding by the 1% annual chance flood. Areas of Special Flood
Hazard include Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V, and VE. The Base Flood Elevation is the
water -surface elevation of the 1% annual chance flood.
ZONE A No Base Flood Elevation determined.
ZONE AE Base Flood Elevations determined.
ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); Base Flood Elevations
determined.
ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average
depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also
determined.
ZONE AR Special Flood Hazard Area formerly protected from the 1% annual chance
flood by a flood control system that was subsequently decertified. Zone AR
indicates that the former flood control system is being restored to provide
protection from the 1% annual chance or greater flood.
ZONE A99 Areas to be protected from 1% annual chance flood by a Federal flood
protection system under construction; no Base Flood Elevations determined.
ZONE VE Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); Base Flood Elevations
determined.
FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE
The floodway is the channel of a stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept
free of encroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without substantial
increases in flood heights.
COMMUNITY ENCROACHMENT AREAS (Mecklenburg County)
OTHER FLOOD AREAS
ZONE X Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with
average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square
mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood.
OTHER FLOOD AREAS (Mecklenburg County)
ZONE X Areas of future conditions 1% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual
chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas
less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual
chance flood.
OTHER AREAS
ZONE X Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain; areas outside future
conditions 1% annual chance floodplain.
ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined, but possible.
® COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS
OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAs)
CBRS areas and Cl are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas.
1% annual chance floodplain boundary (Mecklenburg County)
1% annual chance floodplain boundary
1% annual chance future conditions floodplain boundary
(Mecklenburg County)
0.2% annual chance floodplain boundary
Floodway boundary
- - - Community encroachment boundary (Mecklenburg County)
Zone D boundary
•�������������������• CBRS and OPA boundary
Boundary dividing Special Flood Hazard Area Zones and boundary
dividing Special Flood Hazard Areas of different Base Flood
Elevations, flood depths or flood velocities.
^-^--��- 513 Base Flood Elevation line and value; elevation in feet*
(EL 987) Base Flood Elevation value where uniform within zone; elevation in
feet*
* Referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988
u1z Cross section line
23- - - - - - - - 23 Transect line
97°07'30", 32°22'30" Geographic coordinates referenced to the North American Datum of
1983 (NAD 83)
4275000 M 5000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks, zone 17
1 477 500 FEET 2500-foot grid values: North Carolina State Plane coordinate system
(FIPSZONE 3200, State Plane NAD 83 feet)
BM5510North Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark (for more information
X
visit http://www.nc(is.state.nc.us)
BM5510® National Geodetic Survey bench mark (for more information visit
http://www.ncis.noaa.aov)
NGS-58 GPS 2-5 cm Vertical Control Marks or Contractor -Established
BM5510 NCFMP Bench Marks (for more information visit
htLp://www.nccis.state.nc.us)
RIM LSUG14 Mecklenburg County bench mark (for more information visit
- X fti)://fti)l.co.mecklenburci.nc.us/luesa/stormwater/FIRM Reference Marks/
0 M 1.5 River Mile
GRID NORTH
MAP SCALE 1" = 500' (1 : 6,000)
250 0 250 500 750 1,000
FEET
METERS
150 0 150 300
®
PANEL 4489K
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
PANEL 4489
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL
LAYOUT)
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY CID No. PANEL SUFFIX
CHARLOTTE, CITY OF 370159 4489 K
MATTHEWS, TOWN OF 370310 4489 K
MECKLENBURG COUNTY 370158 4489 K
STALLINGS, TOWN OF 370472 4489 K
UNION COUNTY 370234 4489 K
Notice to User: The Map Number shown below should be used
when placing map orders; the Community Number shown above
should be used on insurance applications for the subject
community.
MAP REVISED MAP NUMBER
FEBRUARY 19, 2014 3710448900K
Chadone-Mecklenburg „�srnrfa aer
b 0
STORM �- M
x V
WATER . r
F
Services
State of North Carolina
Federal Emergency Management Agency
®
m
�D
Lilf-
cc)
®
I�
®