20080499 Ver 3_More Info Received_20151111

F EE7 /
PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC
November 11, 2015
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. David Bailey
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Wilmington District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Attn: Ms. Sue Homewood
Winston -Salem Regional Office - 401 Wetlands Unit
450 West Hanes Mill Road
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27105
Reference: Response to USACE Public Notice Letter
Individual 404/401 Permit — SAW- 2013 - 00556, DWR #08- 0499v3
Proposed Phase II Triad Business Park Access
Old Greensboro Road Extension
Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina
PEI Project No. 1010
Dear Mr. Bailey and Ms. Homewood:
Mr. Brian Hall, TDO Land Holdings, LLC, received a letter from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
( USACE) dated September 16, 2015 in response to the Individual 404/401 Permit Application for
the proposed Old Greensboro Road Extension, to provide access to Phase II of Triad Business
Park (TBP) in Kernersville, Guilford County, North Carolina. The letter indicates that our
proposal was advertised by public notice dated August 4, 2015. Comments were received from
the US Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS), North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
( NCWRC) and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources ( NCDWR). The USACE letter
indicates that the USFWS has reviewed the proposed project and believes that the proposed
project is not likely to adversely affect federally listed threatened and /or endangered species or
their critical habitat. Therefore, the USFWS believes that Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act (ESA) has been satisfied for the project. Additionally, the USACE requested additional
information. The purpose of this letter is to address the stated NCWRC concerns and USACE
requests for additional information. Our responses are shown below.
NRWRC Comment: Unnamed tributaries to the West Fork Deep River in the Cape Fear River
Basin flow though the site. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recently listed the Northern long -
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The
PO Box 128, Kernersville, NC 27285
www. Com

PEI No. 1010
November 11, 2015
Northern long -eared bat may be present within or in the vicinity of the project site. Therefore,
the project may impact this species and consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service may
be required.
Response: We reviewed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) Endangered and Threatened
Species List for Guilford County. Northern long -eared bat is not listed as a species that
potentially /probably inhabits Guilford County. Based on the USFWS List, it is unlikely that the
Northern long -eared bat inhabits the site. Additionally, the USFWS has indicated that the
proposed project is not likely to adversely affect federally listed species or their critical habitat.
Comment: NCWRC — Recommendation #1 to #6
Response: The applicant acknowledges receipt of recommendations associated with lot
development within phase II of TBP, as a result of 404/401 approval of the proposed road
access. The applicant indicates that the NCWRC recommendations associated with lot
development will be take into consideration upon 404/401 approval of the proposed road
access.
USACE Comment a: Permits for work within wetlands or other special aquatic sites are available
only if the proposed work is the least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative. Please
furnish information regarding any other alternatives, including upland alternatives, to the work
for which you have applied and provide justification that your selected plan is the least
damaging to water or wetland areas.
is The application states that the on -site bridge alternative would cost $1 million more than the
preferred alternative. However, the itemized preferred alternative cost analysis does not
appear to take the cost of proposed compensatory mitigation (stream, wetland, and buffer)
into account. Please re- evaluate and compare the total cost each alternative including the cost
of proposed compensatory mitigation.
Response: The proposed road width has been minimized (details included below). The
applicant has revised the estimated construction costs with revised mitigation costs for the
following alternatives: 1) No Build- Bridge; 2) On -Site Alternative 1A 3) On -Site Alternative 2A
(Preferred Alternative); and, 4) On -Site Alternative 3A. Copies of the construction cost
estimates are included as an attachment. The proposed on -site bridge alternative is
approximately more than $1,700,000 more than the proposed alternative.
ii: The Corps agrees with NCDWR that the applicant was sufficiently notified regarding
permitting the project in phases and the resulting infrastructure investments in phase I would
not preclude alternatives available to phase II of the project. Further, the Corps cannot include
the applicant's sunk costs when determining the least environmentally damaging, practicable
alternative per 40 CFR 230. As such, it is not appropriate to include prior infrastructure costs in
the current alternatives analysis.

PEI No. 1010
November 10, 2015
Response: The applicant remits previous "sunk" costs associated with phased development of
the project in evaluation of Alternative 3A. However, as indicated in the previous evaluation,
Alternative 3A still has a valuation reduction of approximately $800,000 to the preferred
alternative as a result of oddly shaped lots that are poorly conducive to industrial development
(i.e. lots 3, 5 and 11).
iii: The Corps agrees with NCDWR that On -Site Alternative Crossing Location 3 should be revised
to include retaining walls to minimize the impacts to streams and wetlands in order to provide
a comparable alternative to On -Site Alternative Crossing Location 2.
Response: The applicant has included the evaluation of retaining walls in Alternative 3A,
comparable to Alternative 2A (preferred alternative). The result of analysis of both alternatives
with retaining walls are similar impacts to streams, wetlands and /or buffer impacts as shown
on the attached drawings and in the below table:
Table 1- Impact Comparison of Alternatives 2A and 3A
Crossing Designation
Stream Impact (LF)
Wetland Impact (Ac)
Buffer Impact (SF)
Alternative 2A
188
0.53
27,576
Alternative 3A
174
0.63
27,088
Therefore, based on similar impact to jurisdictional features, the applicant's selection of the
preferred alternative is largely associated with economic differences between the alternatives;
whereas the preferred alternative has the potential of approximately $800,000 higher value
than alternative 3A.
USACE Comment b: It is necessary for you to have taken all appropriate and practicable steps to
minimize losses of Waters of the U.S., including wetlands. Please indicate all that you have
done, especially regarding development and modification of plans and proposed construction
techniques, to minimize adverse impacts.
i. For the on -site alternatives, do the proposed crossings include two or three lanes? Please
provide information on proposed lane widths. If more than two lanes are proposed, please
modify your plans and impact estimates accordingly, or provide information justifying why a
two lane design is not practicable.
Response: The initial application proposed three lanes (two drive lanes and one turning lane)
that would be 40 feet wide from curb to curb in the area of proposed impact, in accordance
with the Town of Kernersville general requirements for industrial roads. However, the Town of
Kernersville has agreed that removal of a turning lane and reduction of total curb to curb length
from 40 to 30 feet (curb to curb) would be allowed for the project, only within the proposed
area of impact to jurisdictional features. Therefore, the applicant has revised all previously
provided alternatives, including the proposed preferred alternative to a 30 foot road width in
efforts to further minimize impacts to jurisdictional features. It should be noted that the 30
foot road width, curb to curb, is below N.C. Department of Transportation standards, which are

PEI No. 1010
November 10, 2015
also the standards utilized by the Town of Kernersville. Based on safety concerns associated
with heavy industrial traffic, reduction of road width below 30 feet is not feasible. Thus, the
road width has been minimized to the extent possible within the area of proposed impact to
jurisdictional features while maintaining integrity of safe industrial travel.
The attached civil exhibits and Table 2 (below) show the results of the road width reduction as
it relates to proposed impacts for the project alternatives:
Table 2: Proposed Impacts Due to Road Width Reduction in Area of Impact
Alternative
Crossing
Designation
Permanent Impacts
Estimated Cost of
Construction ($)
Stream
(LF)
Wetlands
(Ac)
Riparian Buffer (SF)
Zone 1
Zone 2
EXH -1A
545
0.51
40,433
23,143
3,312,636.13
*EXH -2A
188
1 .53
161832
10,744
2,744,621.88
EXH -3A
174
0.63
16,144
10,944
2,784,408.86
*Preferred Alternative
Therefore, in efforts to further reduce and minimize impacts to streams, wetlands and buffers,
the applicant proposes to permanently impact 188 linear feet of stream channel, 0.53 acres of
wetlands and a cumulative total of 27,576 square feet of riparian surface water buffer.
USACE Comment c: The MOA requires that appropriate and practicable mitigation will be
required for all unavoidable adverse impacts remaining after the applicant has employed all
appropriate and practicable minimization. Please indicate your plan to mitigate for the
projected, unavoidable loss of waters or wetlands or provide information as to the absence of
any such appropriate and practicable measures.
is I have evaluated the compensatory mitigation plan included in your application, and have
determined the details to be generally sufficient for our evaluation. However, all of the on -site
alternatives require encroaching within the wetland conservation area required by Special
Conditions 2 and 3 of the Nationwide Permit (NWP) 12, verified under Action ID: SAW -2008-
02029 on September 12, 2008. In addition to proposing to record an amendment to the
conservation area boundaries with the Guilford County Register of Deeds, you must submit a
plan to compensate for the proposed loss of compensatory mitigation pursuant to the
authorization verified under SAW- 2008 - 02029.

PEI No. 1010
November 10, 2015
Response: To compensate for mitigation, the below table outlines the applicant's updated
mitigation proposal for unavoidable impact to jurisdictional features:
Table 3: Proposed Mitigation and Required Credits
Impact Feature
Impact Amount
Proposed Mitigation
Ratio
Required Credits
Streams
188 LF
2.25:1
423 LF
Wetlands
0.53 Ac
2.25:1
1.20 Ac
Zone 1 Buffer
16,832 SF
3:1
50,496 SF
Zone 2 Buffer
10,744 SF
1.5:1
16,116 SF
In consideration of previous USACE approvals, associated with projects determined by the
USACE to be single and complete and to account for proposed impact to the conservation
easement outlined as a mitigation condition in USACE authorization of verification of SAW -
2008- 02029, the applicant proposes a 2.25:1 ratio for the proposed impacts to streams and
wetlands.
The amount of proposed impact to the conservation easement is approximately 3.22% of
streams and 5.96% of wetlands that were previously protected by the conservation easement
mitigation condition of USACE authorization SAW- 2008 - 02029. Based on the above
compensatory mitigation proposal, the applicant is providing additional mitigation credits that
equate to cumulative totals of approximately 25% of streams and 15% of wetlands protected
within the previous conservation easement. Therefore, the applicant has proposed for losses
within the previous conservation easement at a 5:1 ratio for streams and 3:1 ratio for wetlands.
USACE Comment: Additionally, the following items must be resolved prior to continuing to
process your permit request:
1) Item 18 of your permit application describes — and Appendix VII (Transportation Analysis) of
your application package evaluates — extending Old Greensboro Road to South Bunker Hill
Road. Further, the letters of support included in Appendix VII of your permit application are
based on extending Old Greensboro Road to South Bunker Hill Road. However, all exhibits in
Appendix II of your application package show proposed Old Greensboro Road terminating via
cul -de -sac within the Triad Business Park property. Also, your written alternatives analyses do
not specifically describe extending Old Greensboro Road to South Bunker Hill Road as a through
road. Please clearly explain and /or correct this discrepancy.
Response: The Transportation Analysis and letters of support have been updated to reflect the
extension of Old Greensboro Road to terminate via cul -de -sac within Phase II of TBP. Copies of
the Transportation Analysis and letters of support are included as attachments. Extension of
Old Greensboro Road to South Bunker Hill Road is not being proposed by the applicant.
USACE Comment 2): Item 19 of your permit application states the project purpose as providing
safe and adequate industrial access to phase 11 of Triad Business Park. However, Appendix VII

PEI No. 1010
November 10, 2015
(Transportation Analysis and letters of support) of your application package evaluates the
benefits of extending Old Greensboro Road to South Bunker Hill Road as a through road. Note
that the two purposes are not the same. For your stated purpose, the Transportation Analysis
should instead focus on accessing undeveloped portions of Triad Business Park property via the
preferred alternative versus accessing via existing roads in a way that would not require a CWA
404 permit.
Response: The Transportation Analysis evaluates the need for the extension of Old Greensboro
Road to serve Phase II of TBP. Specifically, this study evaluates the effects with and without the
extension in place related to traffic operations, roadway capacity, travel time, and safety.
The capacity analysis found that the construction of the extension results in improved level of
service for offsite intersections. This is due to the fact that site traffic is able to remain onsite
when traveling to /from the west instead of being routed around TBP and increasing traffic on
offsite roadways. Less traffic on the offsite roadways results in improved level of service, delay,
and safety for the affected intersections.
Furthermore, the extension will decrease the truck traffic associated with the TBP on the offsite
roadways and rail grade crossings. The extension will allow trucks traveling from the eastern
portion of TBP to remain onsite when traveling west, avoid railroad crossings and interaction
with traffic on Bunker Hill Road and Mountain Street, and provide a direct route to /from the
newly constructed interchange at Macy Grove Road which has ample capacity. The extension
will enhance internal operations by providing adequate access and allowing site traffic to
remain onsite when traveling to destinations within the TBP.
The absence of the extension results in additional travel time, distance, and emissions for site
traffic traveling from the eastern portion of the park to destinations to the west. An additional
distance of 1.25 miles and time of approximately six minutes is estimated. Analysis results show
that approximately 480 PM peak hour trips would be subject to this additional travel time.
Based on the results of the Transportation Analysis, the extension of Old Greensboro Road is
recommended to provide adequate access to the remainder of the TBP, and enhance the safety
and operation of the surrounding roadway network.
USACE Comment 3): If the purpose of your project is instead a through road for vehicular traffic
(general and industrial), please resubmit your permit application package such that all aspects
are consistent with that purpose. Note that your alternatives analysis would likely change
considerably, and would likely resemble a NCDOT -type road project.
Response: The purpose and need of the application is to safely provide adequate industrial
traffic access to Phase II of TBP. Discrepancies of the initial application have been updated to
reflect the proposed action and need of the proposed action.
USACE Comment 4): The Transportation Analysis (pg. 27) states that NCDOT TIP project U -2800
will create ideal access to Triad Business Park from 1 -40 Business, while the next nearest

PEI No. 1010
November 10, 2015
interchange with 1 -40 is Sandy Ridge Road to the east which experiences capacity deficiencies.
However, TIP U -4758 proposes improvements to Sandy Ridge Road with the northern terminus
as its interchange with 1 -40. As such, the premise that the Sandy Ridge Road interchange is
insufficient to handle the increase in truck traffic is not necessarily supported given proposed
capacity improvements. Would access to Triad Business Park via the Off -site No Build
alternative be practicable with improvements to the Sandy Ridge Road /1 -40 interchange?
Response: The TIP 1 -5712 project involves improvements to the SR 1850 (Sandy Ridge Road)
and 1 -40 Business interchange in Greensboro. This project is in the preliminary stages and only
has a feasibility study complete at the moment. It is funded for 2019 with construction in 2020.
The Sandy Ridge Road interchange is approximately 2.7 miles in travel distance to the eastern
portion of TBP. This interchange currently experiences capacity deficiencies and is anticipated
to worsen in future conditions as traffic volumes continue to grow. Improvements to this
interchange are in the preliminary stages and are not planned until 2020. Furthermore, truck
traffic associated with the site would need to travel past Colfax Elementary School when
traveling to /from the interchange at Sandy Ridge Road. Ideally, heavy truck traffic should be
separated from school bus and parent traffic. Thus, the Macy Grove Road interchange provides
a more direct route to 1 -40 Business and diverts truck traffic away from Market Street and the
school, especially during peak times of school arrival and dismissal times.
The newly constructed 1 -40 Business interchange at Macy Grove Road provides an ideal access
to the interstate for truck traffic traveling to and from the Triad Business Park. This new
interchange has ample capacity and is in closest proximity to the site (approximately 1.5 miles
in travel distance to the eastern portion of the development). The proposed extension will
provide a more direct route to the interstate for TBP traffic to the newly constructed
interchange at Macy Grove Road, and will alleviate offsite roadways and intersections by
maintaining traffic onsite.
USACE Comment 5): Please itemize all proposed impacts into stream and wetland impacts due
to culvert /road fill (permanent loss of waters), rip rap dissipater pads (permanent impact, not a
loss of waters), and temporary impacts for construction access, etc. Also, provide a concise
restoration plan for all temporary impacts.
Response: An itemized table of proposed impacts to stream and wetlands is shown below:
Table 4. Itemized Permanent /Temporary Impacts to Streams and Wetlands
Feature
Permanent Impact
Loss of Waters
Permanent Impact
No Loss of Waters
Temporary Impact
No Loss of Waters
Stream (LF)
98
90
45
Wetlands (Ac)
0.53
0
0.10
Restoration of proposed temporary impact to streams and wetlands associated with
construction is shown in the attached drawing DET -1. The applicant proposes to restore stream
banks to natural grades and to use matting and live stakes to stabilize temporary disturbed

PEI No. 1010
November 10, 2015
stream banks. Additionally, the applicant proposes to restore areas of temporary impact to
wetlands by returning impacted wetland areas to similar grade and stabilizing the areas with
native seed mixtures, live stakes and potted plants. Matting and /or mulching will be used in
areas of temporary wetland impact where grades are conducive to excessive sediment run off.
USACE Comment 6): Several items in the administrative records of previously permitted
portions of Triad Business Park (SAW- 2008 -01894 and SAW- 2008 - 02092) document plans or
commitments to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters in the area of proposed access to phase
2 of the property, including:
a. A "Preliminary Plat, Phase I, Triad Business Park ", dated April 14, 2008, showing
access from Bunker Hill Road with cul -de -sac termini on each side of the
wetland- stream complex;
b. A letter titled "Exhibit B" of the Pre Construction Notice (PCN) dated July 18,
2008, signed by Mr. Arthur Samet, stating that "the intention of ... amending the
protective covenants of Triad Business Park is to protect the balance of the
jurisdictional waters from further impacts in the portion of Triad Business Park
that is yet to be developed, informally known as Phase 2."
c. A letter from Mr. Jeffrey Hatling, Community Development Director of the Town
of Kernersville, dated July 21, 2008, stated that the elimination of a road crossing
proposed for Triad Business Park would not be a major variance from that
initially conceived for the Subdivision. This indicated to the Corps that the Triad
Business Park could be completed without the proposed road crossing, that no
additional impacts would be necessary, and that the three portions of Triad
Business Park proposed could each be authorized via NWPs. See also the e -mail
exchange between Mr. Andrew Williams of the Corps and Mr. Brian Hall of
Samet Corporation dated October 4, 2011.
d. Special Conditions 2 and 3 of the NWP 12 verification, dated September 12,
2008, required that remaining jurisdictional areas be preserved and maintained,
as documented by Restrictive Covenants recorded in the Guilford County
Register of Deeds, including the area proposed for impacts by on -site
alternatives.
Considering this information (6 a -d), clearly describe what changes have occurred at the site
that now require the proposed crossing, when, in 2008, it was determined to be unnecessary.
Response: Considering Items 6 a -d, please accept the below response as a summary of the key
changes that have occurred at the site, which now necessitate the crossing, when, in 2008, it
was determined to be unnecessary.

PEI No. 1010
November 10, 2015
In 2008, the Corps issued a Nationwide permit for jurisdictional impacts inside of the
TBP, for the benefit of the new FedEx Ground HUB and for the City of High Point's sewer
extension project to serve both TBP and FedEx Ground. During that permitting process, the
industrial park owner, TDO Land Holding LLC (TDO) limited future development in Triad
Business Park by placing a conservation easement around all jurisdictional wetlands in the park,
TDO committed to no future jurisdictional impacts in the park and TDO committed to
eliminating a future road, stream /wetland crossing of Old Greensboro Road, as shown on the
originally approved master plan.
Since 2008 and the approval of that Nationwide permit there have been significant
changes to the characteristics and surrounding industrial development opportunity of TBP.
These changes are driving the need for TDO to request a permit to extend Old Greensboro Road
to provide safe and adequate industrial access to Phase II of TBP. The changes include the
increased need for large scale industrial sites in the Piedmont Triad Metropolitan Region and
the demand for growing collaboration of planning efforts among the region's municipal and
county governments for sustained economic development efforts, required to replace the jobs
and tax base lost in the Piedmont Triad Region. This newly engaged regional planning and
economic development effort has identified that sustainable economic development will
require industrially served sites, with infrastructure in place as a main requirement for
successful economic development in the Piedmont Triad Region of North Carolina.
Prior to the permit submittal in 2008, much of the western portion of Guilford County was
planned for industrial development. As part of the recent growth of the Piedmont Triad
International Airport (PTIA), in accordance with FAA regulations, PTIA released its airport
master plan update and strategic long range vision plan in September 2010 (attached and
enclosed for your review). This master plan projects the airports growth for the next 30+ years.
In this plan, the airport identified more than 2,200 acres of current industrial land in western
Guilford County that will be required to be converted for airport use for the sustained growth
PTIA aims to achieve. Phase II of TBP is adjacent to the projected growth plan for the airport
and this plan by the airport has impacted TBP in a significant way. Over 2,200 acres of the
closest, most competitive and comparable industrial land in our area is now clouded by the
airport's master plan and threat of eminent take through the airport's anticipated growth and
expansion. For any long term, large scale industrial client, locating a facility within the footprint
of the airport's proposed growth footprint is not acceptable. This means the Piedmont Triad
has seen a dramatic reduction in available industrially served sites, creating an increase in
demand for large industrial sites, and placing an unexpected stress on available, safe and
industrially served sites in the western portion of Guilford County that are necessary for job
growth and economic development for our region. This was recently validated by Pepsi
Bottling Ventures, LLC as they considered Phase II of TBP for a new bottling, sorting and
distribution facility. During their site visit at TBP, they stated that Phase II of TBP was a suitable
site for their industrial development, only if the site has the ability for their trucks to have direct
access by way of proposed extension of Old Greensboro Road to access the Business -40 Macy
Grove Interchange. Pepsi was unwilling to accept their trucks interfacing with Bunker Hill Road
or a potential at -grade railroad crossing to obtain highway access based upon safety of their

PEI No. 1010
November 10, 2015
drivers and industrial grade access for their trucks. It should be noted that Pepsi operates one
of North Carolina's largest trucking operations.
With limited other options for large scale industrial development in the immediate area, due in
large part to PTIA's expansion plan, TDO now understands that it's critical that Phase II of TBP
gain safe, industrial grade access to Old Greensboro Road to be a viable industrial site,
providing opportunities for regional economic development growth for Kernersville, Guilford
County, High Point and Forsyth County, each jurisdiction whom has a vested interest in creating
jobs and building tax base in Phase II of TBP.
With the need for economic development and job growth in our region, providing adequate
infrastructure to attract new jobs is critical. Since 2000, the Greensboro -High Point MSA has
lost more than 22,000 jobs, ranking 19th in the nation for job losses over that time span. With
the expansion plan of the PTIA announced in 2010, negatively affecting the supply of available
industrial sites by the airport, effectively laying claim to more than 2,200 industrial acres in the
immediate vicinity, TDO must now work to prepare and develop safe, industrially served sites in
order to attract new industry and job growth, working to replace all that's been lost over the
past 15 years. This major change since 2008, the reduction of more than 2,200 acres of
available industrial land supply in our community and the identified and increased municipal
support behind regional economic development, the future of TBP has changed since the 2008
permit. To provide opportunity for our community, to replace the jobs lost, TDO must work to
create additional safe, industrially served sites for the benefit of our community, in the form of
jobs, economic sustainability and tax base growth. The central area of the Piedmont Triad
Metropolitan Region is a dynamic economic development hub within the State of North
Carolina. The economic dynamics of our area, and specifically the long range planning of the
airport required by the FAA is causing significant changes to the land use planning for the TBP
and the surrounding area.
If there are questions regarding this request, or a need for further information, please contact
us at (336) 708 -4997.
Respectfully submitted,
PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Bradley S. Luckey
Michael T. Brame
Project Manager
Principal

11111���� V;�OF
tdaddesigngroup
Architecture I Engineering I interior Design
Triad Design Group, P.C.
4807 -C Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile 336- 218 -8010
www.triad- designgroup.com
NC Architecture Reg. 50709
NC Engineering Lic. C -1108
SAMET
CORPORATION
P.O. Box 8050
Greensboro, NC
27419
(336) 544 -2600
FAX:
(336) 544 -2638
60
F,S\(j' N
a ���PORq�F•;o';
SEAL
��11111
•,4tAN���
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD:
L. ALLAN HILL, P.E.
he
a
d
CO)
CO)
W
Z
D
a
cc
O
a
X
W
•
•
•
ca
O
If
0
O
Cn
O
U �
o °o
U
0
O
c
z
O °>
L
L
�>/ L
LL
^Q
W
0
Mk Date Description
Revisions
OVERALL
EXHIBIT
Date: AUGUST , 2014
Drawn: PGS 0heck: LAH
Job Number: 14 -064
Sheet:
EXH
1
2
3
4
5
6
o�
s�
2 D5�
s��t
M
RDU
I I
I0*
EAST MOON ST
0
E+«
y° SU
O1D GREENSBORO RD
pv
SR 180
SITE
I I
E��'
� � 1-40 6US,NESS
e
PyONC
E
o o
R
0
SCA/WCA
o
VICINITY MAP
° (SCALE 1 : 2000)
Area
WC-6
PARCEL NO. 0168909
PIN: 6896502711
PARCEL NO. 0220635 2B
N /F: TDO LAND HOLDING LLC
PIN: 6896601860
DB 6363 PG 393
O
N /F: SST PROPERTIES LLC
DB 7563 PG 683 I PB 186 PG 102
2C
2A
PB 175 PG 97 & 98
PA
1549 OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
PB 185 PG 89 PB 186 PG 102
OLD GR Area PA
— --
_
N85 °3 6'49 "E
�i
R�P�
so' PUB w
--
\�. \\ �` / WPA s10 °14ioo
126.18
S >o °70 * SB
NSgGRo
R`GN
?60
6p P
PARCEL NO. 0168911
PIN:
PIN: 6 89 569 581 9 \\ \� 525'21'10 "E
N /F: SB JOHNSON II, LLC AND ��
76.64'
NB JOHNSON II, LLC \\
N55 °0 "E
DB 6786 PG 2506
\ -� -�-
163.63'
PARCEL NO. 0168912
_ ::....:''
II
/
PIN: 6895495429
O \
N /F: FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSEM, INC.
DB 6939 PG 2918
PB 175 PG 97 & 98 \
OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
O1554
PB 175 PG 97 & 98
,
\
1544 A OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
,
\\ ISCA \
\ \
\ �\
\\
\ \\
�
EXHIBIT l
D
sc /wc
:.::.:
OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
:;:::: "
PROP. 80' R/W
.:.:.:.:.::..
:..........
EXH /B/ T 2
::
\�
OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
PROP. 80' R/W
ISD
PB
_�-
\�'----------
-- --
- -
EXHIBIT 3
/NDS
I
: WETLA
_
OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
_
PROP. 80' R/W
:e
S >g °»'30'E
SC/WC
54 93.
_
IRENE STACK I
DB 4973 PG 1561
::-::. > > > >:.:'
17 -94- 6946 - 1191 -65
ZONED: AG
/
C
_
�
C
w
L0
0 7
Are H
r0 `4_ ro
o
Q
Z
N74 5g 0 01W
C°
i� 00
on
136.00,
Z
N_4
56,14 W
S�\5\
9
91p'0»
98,E
r<v
��b
LEGEND
® POND
17-77-77 1`77-7-71
OR WETLAND
STREAM
B
B
A
A
GfRAF 4 I C SCALE
200
0 we 200 400
111 1111111 1-
800
1
C IN FEET
I Inch = 200 ft.
1
2
3
4
5
6
11111���� V;�OF
tdaddesigngroup
Architecture I Engineering I interior Design
Triad Design Group, P.C.
4807 -C Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile 336- 218 -8010
www.triad- designgroup.com
NC Architecture Reg. 50709
NC Engineering Lic. C -1108
SAMET
CORPORATION
P.O. Box 8050
Greensboro, NC
27419
(336) 544 -2600
FAX:
(336) 544 -2638
60
F,S\(j' N
a ���PORq�F•;o';
SEAL
��11111
•,4tAN���
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD:
L. ALLAN HILL, P.E.
he
a
d
CO)
CO)
W
Z
D
a
cc
O
a
X
W
•
•
•
ca
O
If
0
O
Cn
O
U �
o °o
U
0
O
c
z
O °>
L
L
�>/ L
LL
^Q
W
0
Mk Date Description
Revisions
OVERALL
EXHIBIT
Date: AUGUST , 2014
Drawn: PGS 0heck: LAH
Job Number: 14 -064
Sheet:
EXH

11111���� V;�OF
tdaddesigngroup
Architecture I Engineering I interior Design
Triad Design Group, P.C.
4807 -C Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile 336- 218 -8010
www.triad- designgroup.com
NC Architecture Reg. 50709
NC Engineering Lic. C -1108
SAMET
CORPORATION
P.O. Box 8050
Greensboro, NC
27419
(336) 544 -2600
FAX:
(336) 544 -2638
60
FS�GN GR�Ii
a pokgX
SEAL
��11111
GINE���
• 4tAN���
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD:
L. ALLAN HILL, P.E.
he
a
d
CO)
CO)
W
Z
D
a
cc
O
a
X
W
•
•
•
ca
O
If
0
O
Cn
O
U �
o °o
U
0
O
c
z
O °>
L
L
�>/ L
LL
^Q
W
0
Mk Date Description
Revisions
OVERALL
EXHIBIT 1A
Date: AUGUST , 2014
Drawn: PCS Check: LAH
Job Number: 14 -064
Sheet:
EX m1A
1
2
3
4
5
6
o�
s�
2 D5�
s��t
M
RDU
I
I
I0*
EAST MOON ST
0
y° SU pv E+«
O1D GREENSBORO RD
SR 180
SITE
\
I /
E
-
1-40
E
G
RD
-, SCA /WCA
VICINITY MAP
`
I
° (SCALE 1 : 2000)
Area
A CCESS DRl VE
I WC-6
PARCEL NO. 0168909
/ /0' RIW
PIN: 6896502711
PARCEL NO. 0220635
2B
N /F: TDO LAND HOLDING LLC
PIN: 6896601860
NPP ACOU /S /T /ON CO.
DB 6363 PG 393
O
N /F: SST PROPERTIES LLC I DB 449T PG 462
DB 7563 PG 683 I PB 186 PG 102 /T -94- 6946 - 1190 -59
ZA ZC ZONED. Hl
PB 175 PG 97 & 98
PA
1549 OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
PB 185 PG 89
PB 186 PG 102
OLD GR ENSBOR0 ROAD
Area PA
"E
—
NB5'36'49
0 R� P�
/
�NSgpRoF,
80' PU LIC RIGHT -OF -WAY
— — —
— S10 °19'41 "E
/ WPA 141.00'
�-
_ 126.18
S 3
0 °� O6' SB
�3'S
0 oGRe �c R`cN
0� P
PARCEL NO. 0168911
PIN: 6895695819
N /F: SB JOHNSON II, LLC AND
\� \ ....
�� S25 °21'1 0 "E
76.64'
I NB JOHNSON II, LLC
\ ��
N55 °0 "E
I DB 6786 PG 2506
\
163.63'
i
/
PARCEL N0. 0168912
PIN: 6895495429
O
.:- •...' ' : _
N /F: FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSEM, INC.
DB 6939 PG 2918
i PB 175 PG 97 & 98
O1554
OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
`
,,
PB175PG97 &98
,,
ISCA
�\
1544 A OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
\
sc /wc
t
LOT No. 11
t
........... ....
D
1
sc /wc /
9�� °S9
��
D
I
/
OLD GREENSBORO
ROAD
PROP. 80' R/W
�`.
LOT No. l0
•��•
w �+
-- LOT T No. 5
:.. a•.•.
V) v)
2L
SA /WA
l�
�\
�\
ISC
/
LOT No. 9
LOT
No. 7
PHASE 2
PHASE l
PB
:;:: =
LOT No. 6
LOT No. 8
.. -.... » »>
i
/
�o
,
I
WETLANDS
.:. .
_—
: :om t
e
. : :
3 . .. .........
. .S >6. 1 7' p'E SC /WC
_ —
f : :: ...... :
C
4
C
Are H
ro
cD
Q
808.01'
w
N7 4°
o
i\ oj
o
136.00,
N_4 56,14
Z
'
W
s/'4-,50,
9» E
9To 98,
r<v
��b
LEGEND
® POND
17-77-77 1`77-7-71
OR WETLAND
STREAM
B
B
A
A
GfRAF 4 I C SCALE
200
0 we 200 400
111 1111111 1-
800
1
C IN FEET
I Inch = 200 ft.
1
2
3
4
5
6
11111���� V;�OF
tdaddesigngroup
Architecture I Engineering I interior Design
Triad Design Group, P.C.
4807 -C Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile 336- 218 -8010
www.triad- designgroup.com
NC Architecture Reg. 50709
NC Engineering Lic. C -1108
SAMET
CORPORATION
P.O. Box 8050
Greensboro, NC
27419
(336) 544 -2600
FAX:
(336) 544 -2638
60
FS�GN GR�Ii
a pokgX
SEAL
��11111
GINE���
• 4tAN���
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD:
L. ALLAN HILL, P.E.
he
a
d
CO)
CO)
W
Z
D
a
cc
O
a
X
W
•
•
•
ca
O
If
0
O
Cn
O
U �
o °o
U
0
O
c
z
O °>
L
L
�>/ L
LL
^Q
W
0
Mk Date Description
Revisions
OVERALL
EXHIBIT 1A
Date: AUGUST , 2014
Drawn: PCS Check: LAH
Job Number: 14 -064
Sheet:
EX m1A

W W W 14,-__ _W___
/TEMPGkARY S - '
TREAM' SEE SHEET DET -1
IMPACT 25
LF AN
FOR STREAM BANK
----- - - - - -- / RESTORATION
''- -
/
/ i
/ CLASSR'B'QSTONE
FABRIC € -
W18 MIL POLYETHYLEN -------- - - - - --
I C ON FACE
----------------- -------- I
\ \\ W W W W W W W / W '
- - -- \`,(9 /qJ.�\ -'W \ \\ WJ \�'� \�' ��O�J -•Y\ `yJO .�� W \ / W W .W� `Y'
_��\ `W `+T_�,. \• -;1' \1,\\ W ��1'�= W W\ W \mil\ \ W W - � W W W'.
42.-Ap0 . W ,✓' W W W W� \z - \�\ \_y/ W \ INV. IN 900.48
/- AIL W W W W W \
/
64 ,,LF FiP
W W W W W W W Z -�4�_ _T' JL
W J5'x l0' E'KIER6Y DT SSI IAA TOWR
W W W W W W W W W W W - -- -- _ r9��J W J' (9p \ QV /0I
J
W W /W W W/ W W W W� W vlr. -gym r/^ � _ ___ __ �� '• -. '•` ____ ,-
W 4/�__ \ \
� 0 /
W W / W W W W . _ _ _ _ _ _ - �� - / / _ _ _ _ _
" � -'- _ - (9 /(9/W W W W - \•� 61
COFFER DAM - - _ •�
PERMANENT STREAM
IMPACT = 38g LF \\
- - - - -- il; OAT 902
/ ------------- - - - - -- - • ©. 2:
- -------------------- - - - -`- . ` �, AL
GRAPHIC SCALE 15809
40 0 10 40 e0 160 ., ` •�� G 1 N
•,��1,4LAN N
IN FEET OCTOBER 7, 2015
1 inch = 40 ft.
VICINITY MAP A 1 North
SCALE P = 2000'
STREAM IBUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1 = 21,368 SF
ZONE 2 = 14,866 SF
TEMP. STREAM IMPACTS =
25 LF
PERM. STREAM IMPACTS =
389 LF
TEMP. WETLAND IMPACTS
= 0.08 AC.
PERM. WETLAND IMPACTS
= OBI AC.
Triad Business Park
Old Greensboro Road Extension
Kernersville, NC
STREAM AND
WETLAND IMPACTS
SS-1

40
I '
0 +00
1+00
2 +00
GRAPHIC SCALE
to 40 w
IN FEET
1 inch = 40 ft.
STREAM
wm
CROSSING
VICINITY MAP A 1 North
SCALE P = 2000'
CONSTRUCTION IN EXISTING STREAM
/.KEEP CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAM BANKS AND BED TO A MINIMUM.
2. INSTALL PUMP AND LINE TO PUMP FLOW FROM AREA UPSTREAM OF
CONSTRUCTION AREA TO AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA.
BEGIN PUMPING AND CONTINUE PUMPING WHILE WORKING WI THI N
STREAM LIMITS.
J. INSTALL UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. CONSTRUCT DAMS WITH CLASS B STONE
AND POLYETHYLENE FABRIC. COVER PIPE INLET WITH FABRIC AND SAND BAGS.
4. INSTALL DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM TO PREVENT BACK FLOW INTO CONSTRUCTION AREA.
5. INSTALL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STONE OUTLETS ALONG TOP OF
BANK ON EACH SIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PER PLANS.
6. INSTALL DEWATERING BASIN OR SILT BAG AT TOP OF BANK. DEWATER CONSTRUCTION
AREA BETWEEN COFFER DAMS USING THE BASIN OR SILT BAG.
7. INSTALL PIPE PER PLANS AND CONSTRUCT ENERGY DISSIPA TOR.
8. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, REMOVE COFFER DAMS.
9. CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS AND FILL FOR DRIVEWAY.
•a SEAL ms's
15809
OCTOBER 7, 2015
Triad Business Park
Old Greensboro Road Extension
Kernersville, NC
STREAM AND
WETLAND IMPACT
SS -2 (EXH1)

\ -`_ \,
--
-------- - - - - --
------- - - - - -- 121F. CP
`� i y/, •� (NV. 1W,94-36"
- - - - -! -' -- ' y/ y,' \� �•\ / I COFFER AAM
/ t I CLASS
W/8 MIL'•PO �
------------- - - - - -- T
FABRIC ON, F
- - - - - --
40 0 10 40 w 160
IN FEET
I inch = 40 ft.
ZONE
ZONE;
PERMANENT STREAM
I IMPACT = 156 LF
TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT = 24 LF
1YLUX
1
SEE SHEET DET -I
FOR STREAM BANK
RESTORATION
o o
•a SEAL ms's
15809
•,�',94<AN N
OCTOBER 7, 2015
VICINITY MAP / 1 North
SCALE P = 2000'
STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1 = 13,066 SF
ZONE 2 = 6,21-1 SF
TEMP. STREAM IMPACTS = 24 LF
PERM. STREAM IMPACTS = 156 LF
WETLAND IMPACTS = 0.0 AC,
Triad Business Park
Old Greensboro Road Extension
Kernersville, NC
STREAM AND
WETLAND IMPACT
SS -3 (EXH1)

40
I '
0 +00
1+00
2 +00
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 40 w
IN FEET
1 inch = 40 ft.
STREAM
160
CROSSING
� h,
VICINITY MAP North
SCALE 1" = 20001
CONSTRUCTION IN EXISTING STREAM
/.KEEP CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAM BANKS AND BED TO A MINIMUM.
2. INSTALL PUMP AND LINE TO PUMP FLOW FROM AREA UPSTREAM OF
CONSTRUCTION AREA TO AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA.
BEGIN PUMPING AND CONTINUE PUMPING WHILE WORKING WITHIN
STREAM LIMITS.
1 INSTALL UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. CONSTRUCT DAMS WITH CLASS B STONE
AND POLYETHYLENE FABRIC. COVER PIPE INLET WITH FABRIC AND SAND BAGS.
4.INSTALL DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM TO PREVENT BACK FLOW INTO CONSTRUCTION AREA.
5. INSTALL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STONE OUTLETS ALONG TOP OF
BANK ON EACH SIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PER PLANS.
6. INSTALL DEWATERING BASIN OR SILT BAG AT TOP OF BANK. DEWATER CONSTRUCTION
AREA BETWEEN COFFER DAMS USING THE BASIN OR SILT BAG.
7. INSTALL PIPE PER PLANS AND CONSTRUCT ENERGY DISSIPATOR.
B. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, REMOVE COFFER DAMS.
9. CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS AND FILL FOR DRIVEWAY.
•a SEAL ms's
15809
•,�',9<LAN N
JUNE 10, 2015
Triad Business Park
Old Greensboro Road Extension
Kernersville, NC
STREAM AND
WETLAND IMPACT
SS -4 (EXH1)

11111���� V;�OF
tdaddesigngroup
Architecture I Engineering I interior Design
Triad Design Group, P.C.
4807 -C Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile 336- 218 -8010
www.triad- designgroup.com
NC Architecture Reg. 50709
NC Engineering Lic. C -1108
SAMET
CORPORATION
P.O. Box 8050
Greensboro, NC
27419
(336) 544 -2600
FAX:
(336) 544 -2638
60
a �3PORq�F,3';
SEAL
.,moo �Q•,
��11111
GINE���
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD:
L. ALLAN HILL, P.E.
he
a
d
CO)
CO)
W
Z
D
a
cc
O
a
X
W
•
•
•
ca
O
If
0
O
Cn
O
U �
o �o
U
0
O
c
z
O >
L
L
�>/ L
LL
^Q
W
0
Mk Date Description
Revisions
OVERALL
EXHIBIT 2A
Date: AUGUST , 2014
Drawn: PCS Check: LAH
Job Number: 14 -064
Sheet:
EX m2A
1
2
3
4
5
6
o�
s�
2 D5�
s��t
M
RDU
I
I
I0*
EAST MOON ST
0
y° SU pv E+«
O1D GREENSBORO RD
SR 180
SITE
\
I /
E
-
1-40
E
G
RD
-, SCA /WCA
VICINITY MAP
`
I
° (SCALE 1 : 2000)
Area
WC -6
PARCEL NO. 0168909
PIN: 6896502711
PARCEL NO. 0220635 2B
N /F: TDO LAND HOLDING LLC
PIN: 6896601860
DB 6363 PG 393
O
N /F: SST PROPERTIES LLC
DB 7563 PG 683 I PB 186 PG 102
2C
2A
PB 175 PG 97 & 98
PA
1549 OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
PB 185 PG 89 PB 186 PG 102
t OLD
GREENSBORO ROAD Area PA
"E
—
ORO RGPO
80'
PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY
WPA S10 *1 '41"
�_
NB5 °36'49
_ ST O.
STO. 366' SB
/off/ /
e
GRE�c�Rg
0 , 6e�
0 6p P
(
PARCEL N0. 0168911
PIN: 6895695819
N /F: SB JOHNSON II, LLC AND S25' 76.6 4' '
76.6
I
NB JOHNSON II, LLC
E
/
I
DB 6786 PG 2506 \ \
11
63.63'
I
/
PARCEL NO. 0168912
3
PIN: 6895495429
(
N /F: FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSEM, INC.
L7
DB 6939 PG 2918
PB 175 PG 97 & 98 \
I
1554 OLD GREENSBORO ROAD :::::::::::::::
4
PB 175 PG 97 & 98
`�
ISCA
1544 A OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
L 0 T No. 11
'
t
�.
t
D
I
t
SC /WC
o
s
N
�\
LOT No. /0
LOT No. 5
=t =
OLD GREE
SBORO ROAD
t
PROP. 80' R/W
t,
\�
I SD :::: =:.... .
ISC
PHASE /
PHASE 2
LOT No.
7
PB
LOT No. 6
• :. ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
— —
0
j
t =
LOT No. 9
.'
—_
:e
S76-17, 30'E :.. ..: :: .......:.:.. : ::: : :: ::: ::: ::: :: SC/WC - -
..
LOT No.
8
-:t
: :: .......
C
C
Are H
cD
Q
808.07'
N> 4"
w o
o
00,
N>4 X36 56,74
Z
'
W
s/'4-,50,
9»
9T0 98,E
r<v
��b
LEGEND
®
POND
OR
WETLAND
STREAM
B
B
A
A
GfRAF 4 I C SCALE
200
0 we 200 400
111 1111111 1—
800
1
C IN FEET
I Inch = 200 ft.
1
2
3
4
5
6
11111���� V;�OF
tdaddesigngroup
Architecture I Engineering I interior Design
Triad Design Group, P.C.
4807 -C Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile 336- 218 -8010
www.triad- designgroup.com
NC Architecture Reg. 50709
NC Engineering Lic. C -1108
SAMET
CORPORATION
P.O. Box 8050
Greensboro, NC
27419
(336) 544 -2600
FAX:
(336) 544 -2638
60
a �3PORq�F,3';
SEAL
.,moo �Q•,
��11111
GINE���
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD:
L. ALLAN HILL, P.E.
he
a
d
CO)
CO)
W
Z
D
a
cc
O
a
X
W
•
•
•
ca
O
If
0
O
Cn
O
U �
o �o
U
0
O
c
z
O >
L
L
�>/ L
LL
^Q
W
0
Mk Date Description
Revisions
OVERALL
EXHIBIT 2A
Date: AUGUST , 2014
Drawn: PCS Check: LAH
Job Number: 14 -064
Sheet:
EX m2A

1 1191
\` W\ �•` \• \\ \` \\, COFFER DAM''
CLASS''8'STONE 'W W W W W W W W W W W �' W W W
W, `\ \\ \\ \\ ` \'•,
------------------------------ WIt MIL POLYETHYLENE
W W
\� ; ' \ \ \ \ :• FABRIC. "OIV FACE. "" ,.
PERMANENT STREAM W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
IMPACT = 188 LF
W
W W W W W W W W W W W W W J(
W W W W W W W
\ \
W W W W W W
�1 \ \\ \� \` \ \ \ \` ` \ \�„ W =(71O \--- "_ -� /x - - - -" �``A`\•k\ `\Y \` 1(` �\ �^ W W Y W W W W /Jl, ,
`\ 906J ` \\ `\ W \\ W\ W W W W W W W W \ \W \\ `\ W W\ W\ W\ W / W W W,41 __- I /
\ \ \ \ \,�` ` \\ W` `•� W` \` \`�\ W W W \�W W W W` \;` \` \ \; W \W`9yJ \ \W W W W W W/ � ;Y _________ `
�\ QA/ `\ V \ S. W\ W`\ W `W W W W W W \ \ /•� W W W W
\ \ W W W
Q2j \W \� V• �� . W \\ � �W �� W W \W \ W W W W --- --
\ \
\Y\ �\ `A •D'\ W W`� \ \W� \W W W W W �I( W W �`�V W W I V. ILY- 'V7E�4 - -
W
Y W W W.•- W W W W �. W \ ¢' SEE­ -SHEET DET -1
FOR STREAM - BANK
Y W • "W W W W rI W ,•,.�- W W o _�\ '/ RESTORATION
y COfE& bAy QQ2 ' \
TEMPORARY STREAM
110 L 4" PI IMPACT = 45 LF
y 45 7W .6%
, �
WS
W W W W IW W ; W �;' y �'' •' I NV OUT-8
x /
W W W W W W W
6 OT / / y 0) 40': \ \ \
�/ �Jr '/� �/� `\ \ \` \ 1 \ `\ � ,11111111// /�
y W -' -' ` \ ' ` ` \ N CARP
I/ . \\ , \\ \\ \ \ \` �` \` • a SEAL
ciCAL
'4R 15809
40 0 10 40 80 V00
IN FEET OCTOBER 7, 2015
1 inch = 40 ft.
VICINITY MAP A hill
North
SCALE P = 2000'
STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1 = 16,832 SF
ZONE 2 = 10,144 SP
TEMP. STREAM IMPACTS =
45 LF
PERM. STREAM IMPACTS =
166 LF
TEMP. WETLAND IMPACTS
= 0.10 AC.
PERM. WETLAND IMPACTS
= 0.53 AC.
Triad Business Park
Old Greensboro Road Extension
Kernersville, NC
STREAM AND
WETLAND IMPACTS
W/RETAI N I N G WALL
SS-1

40
l'
0 +00
1+00
2 +00
GRAPHIC SCALE
m IV 4m 80
IN FEET
I Inch = 40 ft.
STREAM
The
CROSSING
� �
VICINITY MAP North
SCALE I" = 2000'
CONSTRUCTION IN EXISTING STREAM
/.KEEP CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAM BANKS AND BED TO A MINIMUM.
2. INSTALL PUMP AND LINE TO PUMP FLOW FROM AREA UPSTREAM OF
CONSTRUCTION AREA TO AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA.
BEGIN PUMPING AND CONTINUE PUMPING WHILE WORKING WI THI N
STREAM LIMITS.
3. INSTALL UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. CONSTRUCT DAMS WITH CLASS B STONE
AND POLYETHYLENE FABRIC. COVER PIPE INLET WITH FABRIC AND SAND BAGS.
4.INSTALL DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM TO PREVENT BACK FLOW INTO CONSTRUCTION AREA.
5. INSTALL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STONE OUTLETS ALONG TOP OF
BANK ON EACH SIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PER PLANS.
6. INSTALL DEWATERING BASIN OR SILT BAG AT TOP OF BANK. DEWATER CONSTRUCTION
AREA BETWEEN COFFER DAMS USING THE BASIN OR SILT BAG.
7. INSTALL PIPE PER PLANS AND CONSTRUCT ENERGY DISSIPATOR.
8. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, REMOVE COFFER DAMS.
9. CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS AND FILL FOR DRIVEWAY.
'a SEAL ms's
15809
JUNE 10, 2015
Triad Business Park
Old Greensboro Road Extension
Kernersville, NC
STREAM AND
WETLAN D I M PACTS
W/RETAI N I N G WALL
SS -2 (EXH2)
uwmmmmmv
i'mommommommomm
Mrs
knml,
Emmummummommomm
IMMISMIMEMENIME
as_4,
s rO
ffi,
as
®®®®®M®E®MI®
GRAPHIC SCALE
m IV 4m 80
IN FEET
I Inch = 40 ft.
STREAM
The
CROSSING
� �
VICINITY MAP North
SCALE I" = 2000'
CONSTRUCTION IN EXISTING STREAM
/.KEEP CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAM BANKS AND BED TO A MINIMUM.
2. INSTALL PUMP AND LINE TO PUMP FLOW FROM AREA UPSTREAM OF
CONSTRUCTION AREA TO AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA.
BEGIN PUMPING AND CONTINUE PUMPING WHILE WORKING WI THI N
STREAM LIMITS.
3. INSTALL UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. CONSTRUCT DAMS WITH CLASS B STONE
AND POLYETHYLENE FABRIC. COVER PIPE INLET WITH FABRIC AND SAND BAGS.
4.INSTALL DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM TO PREVENT BACK FLOW INTO CONSTRUCTION AREA.
5. INSTALL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STONE OUTLETS ALONG TOP OF
BANK ON EACH SIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PER PLANS.
6. INSTALL DEWATERING BASIN OR SILT BAG AT TOP OF BANK. DEWATER CONSTRUCTION
AREA BETWEEN COFFER DAMS USING THE BASIN OR SILT BAG.
7. INSTALL PIPE PER PLANS AND CONSTRUCT ENERGY DISSIPATOR.
8. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, REMOVE COFFER DAMS.
9. CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS AND FILL FOR DRIVEWAY.
'a SEAL ms's
15809
JUNE 10, 2015
Triad Business Park
Old Greensboro Road Extension
Kernersville, NC
STREAM AND
WETLAN D I M PACTS
W/RETAI N I N G WALL
SS -2 (EXH2)

11111���� V;�OF
tdaddesigngroup
Architecture I Engineering I interior Design
Triad Design Group, P.C.
4807 -C Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile 336- 218 -8010
www.triad- designgroup.com
NC Architecture Reg. 50709
NC Engineering Lic. C -1108
SAMET
CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 8050
Greensboro, NC
27419
(336) 544 -2600
FAX:
(336) 544 -2638
60
N
a ORq�F
SEAL
��11111
GINE���
• 4tANV
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD:
L. ALLAN HILL, P.E.
he
a
d
CO)
CO)
W
Z
D
a
cc
O
a
X
W
•
•
•
ca
O
If
0
O
Cn
O
U �
o �o
U
0
O
c
z
O °>
L
L
�>/ L
LL
^Q
W
0
Mk Date Description
Revisions
OVERALL
EXHIBIT 3A
Date: AUGUST , 2014
Drawn: PCS Check: LAH
Job Number: 14 -064
Sheet:
EX m3A
1
2
3
4
5
6
o�
s�
2 D5�
s��t
M
RDU
I
I
I0*
EAST MOON ST
0
y° SU pv E+«
O1D GREENSBORO RD
SR 180
SITE
\
I /
E
-
1-40
E
G
RD
-, SCA /WCA
VICINITY MAP
`
I
° (SCALE 1 : 2000)
Area
WC-6
PARCEL NO. 0168909
PIN: 6896502711
PARCEL NO. 0220635 2B
N /F: TDO LAND HOLDING LLC
PIN: 6896601860
DB 6363 PG 393
O
N /F: SST PROPERTIES LLC
DB 7563 PG 683 I PB 186 PG 102
2C
2A
PB 175 PG 97 & 98
PA
1549 OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
PB 185 PG 89 PB 186 PG 102
OLD GR _
Area PA
NB5 °36'49 ",E
— --
�i
(D
Q
80'
PUB W
/
WPA s10 °19'41 "E
141.00'
�'
126.18
s >o•�3 06' SB
36,E
O�Q GP 6 �G R�GN
6p
(
PARCEL NO. 0168911 \�
PIN: 6895695819 \
N /F: SB JOHNSON II, LLC AND � �
.
S25 °21'1 0 "E 76.64'
I
NB JOHNSON II, LLC \
�
"E
DB 6786 PG 2506
\
X\
163.6
163.63'
I
/
PARCEL N0. 0168912
PIN: 6895495429
(
O LOT No. 11
N /F: FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSEM,INC.
°
I
DB 6939 PG 2918
PB 175 PG 97 & 98 \
O1554
I
OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
.... ...... ...
PB175PG97 &98
,,
ISCA
1544 A OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
SC /WC
1
��
qr�o
L O T No. 9
D
I
SC /WC
D
\
: . a•.•.
Q� Q
a :. •.
:.:::::::::::::::::
1�
. :'
LOT No. 8
ISD
LOT No. /0
PHASE l
PB
PHASE 2
:: ::
..........
LOT No. 5
- - --
-___
G'
\\ ---
I
—'
- - - - --
LOT No. 7
I
: WETLANDS
OLD GREENSBORO
ROA
�—
PROP. 80' RIW
:
:-tom
e
:::: =..
> :: :: :: :: : :: :: >- = = S>6° >'3p sc /wc .—
LOT No. 6
C
`
C
I
Are H
CD
Q
N> 808.07'
4°
w o
i\ QJ
o
136.00,
N>4
Z r
'
--
S >\5-
9»
9TH 98,E
r<v
��b
LEGEND
® POND
17-77-77 1`77-7-71
OR WETLAND
STREAM
B
B
A
A
GfRAF 4 I C SCALE
200
0 we 200 400
111 1111111 1-
800
1
C IN FEET
I inch = 200 ft.
1
2
3
4
5
6
11111���� V;�OF
tdaddesigngroup
Architecture I Engineering I interior Design
Triad Design Group, P.C.
4807 -C Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile 336- 218 -8010
www.triad- designgroup.com
NC Architecture Reg. 50709
NC Engineering Lic. C -1108
SAMET
CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 8050
Greensboro, NC
27419
(336) 544 -2600
FAX:
(336) 544 -2638
60
N
a ORq�F
SEAL
��11111
GINE���
• 4tANV
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD:
L. ALLAN HILL, P.E.
he
a
d
CO)
CO)
W
Z
D
a
cc
O
a
X
W
•
•
•
ca
O
If
0
O
Cn
O
U �
o �o
U
0
O
c
z
O °>
L
L
�>/ L
LL
^Q
W
0
Mk Date Description
Revisions
OVERALL
EXHIBIT 3A
Date: AUGUST , 2014
Drawn: PCS Check: LAH
Job Number: 14 -064
Sheet:
EX m3A

TEMPOR4RY STREAM
IMPACT I 26 LF
k 1\ W
PERMANtNT STREAM i - - — - "" "i T
IMPACT = 174 LF \� 9)={/- =�i " \, A, � / CO I FER M W W W W. � W % •e
V CLAS,S'" ' STONE W J W ! W
n V / -y / W18AIL POLYETHYLENE
LO I' \ - _ _/ ERR W W W W W
\ -' N__ \ ----- ----- ------ - - - -1-- s9-� - ?=' IC ON FACE
4 _ _ _ _ \_ A •\ 9
_ _____ -\ . \_ `'N, \\ �I V. IN�B'93.60 W W W W
_` _ W W W W W W W
El .w
(912) °° \\`\ ' - - -- W W W W �W W `{'•' ,
\ \ \
8 IfE \ W W W W \ W W•• W W
D \ ` \\ �/ \ i- `Y •\ W, W \W W W W W W ,' J•\W W W J\
�, \V � ` \`\ W \ � ,4' W W W W W W ,•' W W W W W
\ `
T W QEW T -.W FOR W ST EAM BAN
KW �S-t-E- H NV� 9 3 / RtSTO W
W W W
W W W W J W W �I• \ \ W W W W J4• \ `\ W\ J� \\/' /�
W
W W W • W W W W W
\
F \ W
v[ W W W W \W ,•W W \ \, \\ ''� -_ ---
tC�p
/+\yW W W p \\`� \\
J' 3�5'X IV�NERG1 SI TOR W W W W ` \W \ \W a \V W \\ W W \ \\ J�.
W W W
W W W W IW W W W W W W W
W W W W/ ` \W \ W �A V� \ \W \ \W W ,\ xO(J}/ \ \
W W W W W W J// _W W\ \ \ r
09. \ \
0) \
W W W W/ W W W W W W W W• W W W W \ W \ W
\\; \\ W W\\
W
i W W W W W W W W W W ,' W W W W W W W \\ ^ \ \W ^^\\ \\ \i1\ \ 1. +10 O�
W V W W W W W W W W' W W W W W W W W �i$,�� ,CVO ♦\`\ \ \♦ "\
i W W W /a' W W W W W W W'• W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ,
W � W `I',`\ W W W W W W W W W W W W W 2J\ ��° � /hO ,' �\ •
41 41
W
iSIRA H SCALE
40 0 10 40 w 160
IN FEET
I inch = 40 ft.
VICINITY MAP lob,
North
SCALE P = 2000'
STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 1 = 16,144 SP
ZONE 2 = 10,944 SF
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT = 26 LP
PERM. STREAM IMPACT = 114 LP
TEMP. WETLAND IMPACT = 0.196 AC.
PERM. WETLAND IMPACT = 0.63 AC.
Triad Business Park
Old Greensboro Road Extension
L-\N OARo j 11, Kernersville, NC
' F E
SS/ I
• ° PERMANENT STREAM
•a SEAL ms's
15809
��:�� AND WETLAND IMPACT
.,GIN'
NN
114LAN N
OCTOBER 7, 2015 SS-1 E

910 0 + Q 1+00
2 +00
STREAM
GRAPHIC 6GALE
40 0 10 40 w 160
IN FEET
I Inch = 40 ft.
CROSSING
� h,
VICINITY MAP North
SCALE P = 2000'
CONSTRUCTION IN EXISTING STREAM
L KEEP CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAM BANKS AND BED TO A MINIMUM.
2. INSTALL PUMP AND LINE TO PUMP FLOW FROM AREA UPSTREAM OF
CONSTRUCTION AREA TO AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA.
BEGIN PUMPING AND CONTINUE PUMPING WHILE WORKING WI THI N
STREAM LIMITS.
3. INSTALL UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. CONSTRUCT DAMS WITH CLASS B STONE
AND POLYETHYLENE FABRIC. COVER PIPE INLET WITH FABRIC AND SAND BAGS.
4. INSTALL DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM TO PREVENT BACK FLOW INTO CONSTRUCTION AREA.
5. INSTALL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STONE OUTLETS ALONG TOP OF
BANK ON EACH SIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PER PLANS.
6. INSTALL DEWATERING BASIN OR SILT BAG AT TOP OF BANK. DEWATER CONSTRUCTION
AREA BETWEEN COFFER DAMS USING THE BASIN OR SILT BAG.
7. INSTALL PIPE PER PLANS AND CONSTRUCT ENERGY DISSIPA TOR.
8. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, REMOVE COFFER DAMS.
9. CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS AND FILL FOR DRIVEWAY.
•a SEAL ms's
15809
OCTOBER 7, 2015
Triad Business Park
Old Greensboro Road Extension
Kernersville, NC
PERMANENT STREAM
AND WETLAND IMPACT
SS -2 (EXH3)
He'd?
T161604
LIMA-
STREAM
GRAPHIC 6GALE
40 0 10 40 w 160
IN FEET
I Inch = 40 ft.
CROSSING
� h,
VICINITY MAP North
SCALE P = 2000'
CONSTRUCTION IN EXISTING STREAM
L KEEP CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAM BANKS AND BED TO A MINIMUM.
2. INSTALL PUMP AND LINE TO PUMP FLOW FROM AREA UPSTREAM OF
CONSTRUCTION AREA TO AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA.
BEGIN PUMPING AND CONTINUE PUMPING WHILE WORKING WI THI N
STREAM LIMITS.
3. INSTALL UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. CONSTRUCT DAMS WITH CLASS B STONE
AND POLYETHYLENE FABRIC. COVER PIPE INLET WITH FABRIC AND SAND BAGS.
4. INSTALL DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM TO PREVENT BACK FLOW INTO CONSTRUCTION AREA.
5. INSTALL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STONE OUTLETS ALONG TOP OF
BANK ON EACH SIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PER PLANS.
6. INSTALL DEWATERING BASIN OR SILT BAG AT TOP OF BANK. DEWATER CONSTRUCTION
AREA BETWEEN COFFER DAMS USING THE BASIN OR SILT BAG.
7. INSTALL PIPE PER PLANS AND CONSTRUCT ENERGY DISSIPA TOR.
8. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, REMOVE COFFER DAMS.
9. CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS AND FILL FOR DRIVEWAY.
•a SEAL ms's
15809
OCTOBER 7, 2015
Triad Business Park
Old Greensboro Road Extension
Kernersville, NC
PERMANENT STREAM
AND WETLAND IMPACT
SS -2 (EXH3)

AREA I EL. 1665
AREA 2 EL. 169.13
W
w `s
a:
> •r
ANCHOR STAKE,
I' OC
NATURAL FIBER
LIVE STAKES, MATTING
SEE DET.
FOR SPACING
12" DIA COIR FIBER ROLL
1/2 DIAL
y BANKFULL
ELEVATION
0
0
FOLD EDGE
UNDER FABRIC
6"
GROUND
BACKFILL AS REQUIRED
p j� REQUIRED
O OF LOG WITH THE $OIL
NOTE
NATURAL FIBER MATTING SHALL
EXTEND INTO c44AMEL To COVER
ONE-TWIRP AND/OR
- OPO O ��rk
TO ENSURE FULL CONTACT
ggN
eggam
--11'-2 "x2 "x36" WOOD STAKE
NOTE
I. STAKE SHALL BE EVENLY SPACED ALONG THE FIBER ROLLS (2' TO 3' APART).
2. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH WITH THE FIBER ROLL,
3. TOP FIBER ROLLS SHALL NOT HORIZONTALLY EXTEND BEYOND THE END OF THE LOWER ROLL.
4. COIR FIBER ROLLS SHALL BE BIOLOGS BY BON TERRA AMERICA OR EQUIVALENT.
S. NATURAL FIBER MATTING SHALL BE CM MATS BY BON TERRA OR EQUIVALENT.
DOUBLE COIR FIBER ROLL TOE STABILIZATION WITH LIVE STAKES.
DETAIL A /DET —I
SQUARE CUT
BUDS (FACING
LIVE CUTTING
(I" TO 2" DIAP
ANGLE CUT 3c
LIVE STAKES
RANDOMLY
SPACED ON
2' CENTERS -
2"x2 "x36"
BLACK WILLOW LIVE STAKE WOOD STAKE
FOR COIR LOG
ANCHOR
3/4" S/S"
=T1
v
M
v
0
3/S" THICK
12" ECO ANCHOR STAKE
FOLD EDGE UNDER
FABRIC 6" AND ANCHOR
WITH STAKES I' OC
I' TYP.
I' MINIMUM
UPSTREAM
OF DOWNSTREAM
OVERLAP WITH
FABRIC ON TOP
FABRIC
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I o 0 0
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
0 0
—
0 0
—
/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
_-.•0 0 0 0
0
0
10
0
0
0
W
ANCHOR TAKE
I
0 0 0 0 0 1
0
O
1
U
0 0 �, 0 0 0 0 0 0
01
0
3
0 a 1 1 1 0 1
0
10
1Vj
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
®
10
0
LL
STREAM FLOW
FIBER ROLL
TOE PROTECTION
NOTE
I. MATTING SHALL BE ROLLED PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR ALONG STREAMBANK.
2. MATTING SHALL EXTEND BELOW THE TOE PROTECTION TO 1/3 CHANNEL WIDTH
AND A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT OVER TOP OF BANK. IF MORE THAN ONE ROLL IS
REQUIRED, MID -BANK OVERLAP SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT AND SECURELY
FASTENED WITH ANCHOR STAKES.
3. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE BLACK WILLOW.
NO SCALE
LIVE STAKES WITH NATURAL FIBER MATTING
DETAIL 5/DET -1
NO SCALE
SARO`��'�9'':
'a SEAL �'s
15809
<<AN I�'c\ %0
JUNE 10, 2015
Triad Business Park
Old Greensboro Road Extension
Kernersville, NC
STREAM AND
WETLAND IMPACTS
DET -1

Schematic Design Estimate Summary- TBP Road Extension Exhibit 2 Br-Av-
Recap - With Taxes and Insurance ,Indirect Costs are Spread Group 1: Divisions
Estimator Group 2: Minor lternCode Groups
Project Size : 0 SF
Description Quantity UM TotalCost
01 - General trades
Design
Pre - Construction Services
Project Management and Coordination
Construction progress documentation
Quality control
Temporary utilities
Construction facilities
Construction aids
Project identification
Cleaning
Closeout submittals
* Total 01 - General trades
02 - Sitework
Site demolition
Site clearing
Grading
Erosion and sedimentation control
Water distribution
Sanitary sewers
Storm drainage
Flexible pavement
Curbs and gutters
Sidewalks
Fences and gates
Retaining walls
Bridge Structure
Lawns and grass
"Total 02 - Sitework
21 - Contingency
Other construction
* Total 21 - Contingency
Total Estimate
64,635.44
17,972.96
130,274.18
6,389.01
42,593.37
3,194.50
13,257.19
2,129.67
661.53
7,458.74
288,566.58
7,217.98
34,607.12
222,859.02
194,420.38
170,554.52
440,504.93
11,035.00 SY 639,270.11
65,873.31
58,024.95
21,464.40
2,129,668.70
47,917.55
4,032,382.96
159,725.15
159,725.15
4,480,674.70
109 039 TBP Exhibit 2 B Bridge 10.9.15.est Page 1 10/30/2015 05:01 PM

MSAMET
CORPMknoN
Road Extension 1A
ersville, NC
dule Of Values
k Scope Item
eral Trades
Samet Proj. No. 09 -039
November 9, 2015
ign
Included
Below
$
64,635.44
Construction Services
Included
Below
$
17,972.96
ect Management and Coordination
Included
Below
$
130,274.18
struction progress documentation
Included
Below
$
6,389.01
lity Control
Included
Below
$
42,593.37
iporary Utilities
Included
Below
$
3,194.50
struction facilities
Included
Below
$
13,257.19
struction aids
Included
Below
$
2,129.67
act identification
Included
Below
$
661.53
ming
Included
Below
$
7,458.74
;eout submittals
Included
Below
I General trades Included Below $ 288,566.59
Sitework
Mitigation fees
Site demolition
Site clearing
Grading
Erosion and sedimentation control
Nater distribution
Sanitary sewers
Storm drainage
Flexible pavement 14596.00 SY
Curbs and gutters
Sidewalks
Fences and gates
and grass
Sitework
Other Construction
Total 21 - Contingency
Total Building Cost with Site Improvements
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
Included Below
$ 422,371.24
$ 7,217.98
$ 43,189.68
$ 268,245.83
$ 201,796.76
$ 207,243.38
$ 504,808.15
$ 844,789.74
$ 89,978.50
$ 71,982.80
$ 21,464.40
$ 100,014.57
$ 53,241.72
$ 2,836,344.75
S 187,724.79
S 187,724.79
$ 3,312,636.13

MSAMET
CORPMknoN
Road Extension 2A
ersville, NC
dule Of Values
k Scope Item
eral Trades
Construction Services
ect Management and Coordination
struction progress documentation
lity Control
iporary Utilities
struction facilities
struction aids
act identification
submittals
I General trades
Sitework
Mitigation fees
Site demolition
Site clearing
Grading
Erosion and sedimentation control
Nater distribution
Sanitary sewers
Storm drainage
Flexible pavement 12146.00 SY
Curbs and gutters
Sidewalks
Fences and gates
and grass
Sitework
Other Construction
Total 21 - Contingency
Total Building Cost with Site Improvements
Samet Proj. No. 09 -039
November 9, 2015
Included
Below
$
64,635.44
Included
Below
$
17,972.96
Included
Below
$
130,274.18
Included
Below
$
6,389.01
Included
Below
$
42,593.37
Included
Below
$
3,194.50
Included
Below
$
13,257.19
Included
Below
$
2,129.67
Included
Below
$
661.53
Included
Below
$
7,458.74
Included
Below
Included
Below
Included Below $ 288,566.59
Included
247,404.16
Below
$
Included
Below
$
7,217.98
Included
Below
$
34,607.12
Included
Below
$
220,729.35
Included
Below
$
194,420.38
Included
Below
$
170,554.52
Included
Below
Included
Below
$
418,176.42
Included
Below
$
703,390.38
Included
Below
$
72,528.53
Included
Below
$
58,024.95
Included
Below
$
21,464.40
Included
Below
$
113,138.65
Included
Below
$
47,917.55
Included
Below
$
2,309,574.39
Included
$
176,380.91
Below
S
176,380.91
$ 2,774,521.89

MSAMET
CORPMknoN
Road Extension 3A
ersville, NC
dule Of Values
k Scope Item
eral Trades
Construction Services
ect Management and Coordination
struction progress documentation
lity Control
iporary Utilities
struction facilities
struction aids
act identification
submittals
I General trades
Sitework
Mitigation fees
Site demolition
Site clearing
Grading
Erosion and sedimentation control
Nater distribution
Sanitary sewers
Storm drainage
Flexible pavement 12226.00 SY
Curbs and gutters
Sidewalks
Fences and gates
and grass
Sitework
Other Construction
Total 21 - Contingency
Total Building Cost with Site Improvements
Samet Proj. No. 09 -039
November 9, 2015
Included
Below
$
64,635.44
Included
Below
$
17,972.96
Included
Below
$
130,274.18
Included
Below
$
6,389.01
Included
Below
$
42,593.37
Included
Below
$
3,194.50
Included
Below
$
13,257.19
Included
Below
$
2,129.67
Included
Below
$
661.53
Included
Below
$
7,458.74
Included
Below
$
61,078.90
Included Below $ 288,566.59
Included
Below
$
246,303.84
Included
Below
$
7,217.98
Included
Below
$
36,545.11
Included
Below
$
230,590.88
Included
Below
$
174,575.33
Included
Below
$
207,243.38
Included
Below
Included
Below
$
419,603.30
Included
Below
$
708,007.51
Included
Below
$
76,348.62
Included
Below
$
61,078.90
Included
Below
$
21,464.40
Included
Below
$
57,926.99
Included
Below
$
53,241.72
Included
Below
$
2,300,147.96
Included
Below
S
175,694.10
S
175.694.10
$ 2,764,408.65

0

DAVENPORT
Transportation Analysis
Triad Business Park
Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment
Guilford County, NC
Prepared for Samet Corporation
Original: September 5, 2014
Revised: October 9, 2015
Analysis by: 'Mary Mogan. P.E.
Dionne Brown, P.E.
•7 /7777771felfllf!
Drafting /Graphics by: Mary Morgan. P.E. *.• �� CA��� •,,r
Dionne Brown. P.E. +`•'�c���ss1i
SEAL
039
Reviewed by: Frank Amenya, P.E., PTOE
y�
I ;
P.
4Jr r "i '° a oC V Is
Sealed by: Mara Morgan. P.E.
91 M
4M This report is printed on recycled paper with 30% post-consumer content.
All paper is FSC Certified. The entire document. including binding, is
100% recyclable.
This document, together with the ooncepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific
purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others
without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.

k4w) DAVENPORT
Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment
Guilford County, NC
Prepared for Samet Corporation
Updated October 9, 2015
Executive Summary
This study provides an update to the Transportation Analysis dated 9/5/2014 completed
by DAVENPORT. This study was conducted to provide an evaluation of the potential
Extension of Old Greensboro Road in the Triad Business Park. Old Greensboro Road
currently runs through the western side of the park and currently terminates west of a
stream near the center of the site. The proposed Extension of Old Greensboro Road will
extend the road to the east. This study was updated to reflect the Extension ending in a
cul -de -sac within the site to serve the eastern lots. Additionally, construction of the Macy
Grove Road interchange is now complete and this analysis has been updated with
observed traffic counts at the interchange and along Macy Grove Road.
The Triad Business Park is located off Mountain Street and Bunker Hill Road in Guilford
County, NC. The park contains over 300 acres with 14 industrial lots. DAVENPORT
previously prepared a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the site in 2007 and
provided recommendations for interim (Phase 1) and full build conditions. A portion of
the western side of the park is developed and the remainder of the park is currently
undeveloped. Access is currently provided by Old Greensboro Road and also by
Business Park Drive which intersects with Mountain Street.
DAVENPORT was retained to determine the effects with and without the Extension in
place related to traffic operations, roadway capacity, travel time, and safety. The
following intersections were included in the study:
• Market Street /Mountain Street at Bunker Hill Road
• Bunker Hill Road at Proposed Access
• Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance
• Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive
• Macy Grove Road at Old Greensboro Road
• 1 -40 Business Eastbound Ramps at Macy Grove Road
• 1 -40 Business Westbound Ramps at Macy Grove Road
• Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps
To determine the impacts of the potential Extension of Old Greensboro Road, the
above - mentioned intersections were analyzed for the following two scenarios:
• Future Build Conditions without the Old Greensboro Road Extension
• Future Build Conditions with the Old Greensboro Road Extension
Assuming an absorption rate of 15 acres per year, a buildout year of 2028 was utilized
for this analysis. This analysis was carried out based on North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) typical standards. Information regarding the property was
provided by the developer, Samet Corporation.
10/9/15 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary

�J DAVENPORT
Need for the Old Greensboro Road Extension
This section discusses the effects of the Old Greensboro Road Extension and its
impacts on roadway capacity, travel time, and safety.
Capacity of Roadway Network
As shown in the capacity analysis results, the surrounding roadway network is
anticipated to be at or near capacity in future build conditions. With the Extension of Old
Greensboro Road, site traffic will be able to remain onsite using the Extension when
traveling to and from the west (see Exhibit A). Without the Old Greensboro Road
Extension, site traffic will have to travel on Bunker Hill Road then to Mountain Street to
reach destinations to the west. Therefore, the Extension helps relieve congestion on
offsite roadways and intersections by keeping the Triad Business Park traffic onsite.
This results in improved level of service for the following intersections:
• Market Street / Mountain Street at Bunker Hill Road (LOS F to LOS B)
• Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance (LOS E to LOS D)
• Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps (LOS E to LOS A)
Additionally, the newly constructed 1 -40 Business interchange at Macy Grove Road
provides an ideal access to the interstate for truck traffic traveling to and from the Triad
Business Park. This new interchange has ample capacity and is in closest proximity to
the site (approximately 1.5 miles in travel distance to the eastern portion of the
development).
The next nearest interchange with 1 -40 Business is located at Sandy Ridge Road, east
of the site approximately 2.7 miles in travel distance to the eastern portion of the
development. This interchange currently experiences capacity deficiencies and is
anticipated to worsen in future conditions as traffic volumes continue to grow. As
previously discussed, improvements to this interchange are not planned until 2020.
Furthermore, truck traffic associated with the site would need to travel past Colfax
Elementary School when traveling to /from the interchange at Sandy Ridge Road.
Ideally, heavy truck traffic should be separated from school bus and parent traffic. Thus,
the Macy Grove Road interchange provides a more direct route to 1 -40 Business and
diverts truck traffic away from Market Street and the school, especially during peak
times of school arrival and dismissal times.
Therefore, the Extension will provide a more direct access to the interstate for Triad
Business Park traffic to the newly constructed interchange at Macy Grove Road with
ample capacity, and alleviate offsite roadways and intersections by maintaining the
traffic onsite.
10/9/15 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary ii

�J DAVENPORT
Travel Time
As shown in Exhibit A, site traffic traveling to /from the west from the eastern portion of
the Triad Business Park will be routed around the site without the Old Greensboro Road
Extension. This results in additional travel distance, travel time and emissions for
affected site traffic. Site traffic will travel an additional distance of approximately 1.25
miles without the Extension and based on SimTraffic model results, will have
approximately six minutes of additional travel time. Analysis results show that
approximately 480 PM peak hour trips would be subject to this additional travel time,
distance, and emissions.
Furthermore, since offsite intersections will experience increased traffic without the
Extension, this will increase the delay, travel time, and emissions at affected
intersections for both site traffic and background traffic.
Safety — General
The frequency of accidents generally increases with the amount of vehicle -miles
traveled. By reducing the travel time and distance of site traffic, this will tend to reduce
the frequency and probability of accidents offsite. Also, the safety of an intersection can
be improved with better level of service and operation. As discussed, the Extension of
Old Greensboro Road is anticipated to improve the operation of several offsite
intersections. The improved operation will enhance the safety of these intersections.
In addition, the Extension will decrease the offsite truck traffic associated with the Triad
Business Park. The Extension will allow trucks traveling from the eastern portion of the
Park to remain onsite when traveling west, and avoid interaction with traffic on Bunker
Hill Road and Mountain Street.
10/9/15 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary iii

k4w) DAVENPORT
Safety — Highway -Rail Grade Crossings
The Old Greensboro Road Extension would allow for truck traffic to avoid the highway -
rail grade crossing on Bunker Hill Road. This crossing is located just south of the
intersection at Market Street / Mountain Street. The control devices at this crossing
consist of active flashing red lights and gates and a railroad crossing sign (Crossbuck,
R15 -1) is provided at the crossing. In addition, advance warning signs (W10 -1) and
grade crossing pavement markings are provided.
As discussed in the Methodology section of this report, 60% of site traffic was assumed
to travel to /from the new 1 -40 Business interchange on Macy Grove Road. With the
Extension in place, site traffic traveling to /from the new interchange on Macy Grove
Road will be able to access the site directly from Old Greensboro Road and not travel
through any at grade crossings. Without the Extension, affected site traffic will be
rerouted around the site and through the grade crossing on Bunker Hill Road to reach
these destinations.
Consequently, the construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension will enhance the
safety of the grade crossing on Bunker Hill Road by reducing the volume of experienced
truck traffic. Moreover, the Extension will result in reduced traffic on all of the grade
crossings in the area; this is due to the creation of a route from the new interchange on
Macy Grove Road for site traffic via Old Greensboro Road without any rail crossings.
10/9/15 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary iv

�J DAVENPORT
Implications to the Triad Business Park & Kernersville Area
As outlined in this report, the construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension will
enhance the operation and safety of the surrounding roadway network. This will
inherently benefit the operations within the Park by providing safer and more efficient
travel to and from the site. The Extension also allows site traffic to remain onsite when
traveling to and from destinations within the Triad Business Park itself. This will
enhance internal operations while relieving offsite congestion.
The Extension will provide adequate access to the future eastern portion of the Triad
Business Park. Without the Extension, the majority of site traffic from the eastern portion
of the Park will have to travel through the intersection of Market Street / Mountain Street
at Bunker Hill Road. This intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level
of service under this scenario (more information can be found in the Capacity Analysis
section of this report). This is expected even with the recent improvements of TIP R-
2611. As previously discussed, the lack of the Extension will also result in increased
travel time and delay for affected site traffic. Therefore, the future construction of the
remainder of the Triad Business Park is encumbered without the Extension of Old
Greensboro Road.
The Triad Business Park has the ability to serve the Kernersville area with job growth,
increased tax base, and overall economic development. As previously discussed, the
construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension will enhance the surrounding area
with improved roadway capacity, operation, and safety. Therefore, the Extension will
serve as a benefit to the Kernersville area.
10/9/15 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary v

�J DAVENPORT
Recommendations
The Extension of Old Greensboro Road is recommended to enhance the operation of
the surrounding roadway network by reducing offsite traffic and keeping site traffic
within the site. The Extension will provide adequate access to the future eastern portion
of the Triad Business Park and enhance onsite operations. Lastly, the Extension is
anticipated to benefit the surrounding area with improved traffic operations and safety
while also supporting future economic growth. The recommended cross section for the
Extension is three lanes — one through lane in each direction and a two -way left turn
lane.
The intersection of Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive should be further
evaluated for improvements as the Triad Business Park continues development of lots
and if Old Greensboro Road Extension is implemented. The recommended
improvements are depicted in Figure 9 of the report.
10/9/15 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary vi

�J DAVENPORT
Summary and Conclusion
The Triad Business Park is located off Mountain Street and Bunker Hill Road in Guilford
County, NC. The park contains over 300 acres with 14 industrial lots and DAVENPORT
previously prepared a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the site in 2007. A
portion of the western side of the park is developed and the remainder of the park is
currently undeveloped. Access is currently provided by Old Greensboro Road and also
by Business Park Drive which intersects with Mountain Street. Old Greensboro Road
runs through the western side of the park and currently terminates west of a stream
near the center of the site.
This study was conducted to provide an evaluation of the potential Extension of Old
Greensboro Road in the Triad Business Park to connect to the eastern lots and
terminate with a cul -de -sac. Specifically, this study evaluates the effects with and
without the Extension in place related to traffic operations, roadway capacity, travel
time, and safety. Two scenarios were considered in this analysis: Future Build
Conditions without the Old Greensboro Road Extension; and Future Build Conditions
with the Old Greensboro Road Extension.
The capacity analysis of this study found that the construction of the Extension results in
improved level of service for the following offsite intersections:
• Market Street / Mountain Street at Bunker Hill Road (LOS F to LOS B)
• Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance (LOS E to LOS D)
• Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps (LOS E to LOS A)
This is due to the fact that site traffic is able to remain onsite when traveling to /from the
west instead of being routed around the site and increasing traffic on offsite roadways.
Less traffic on the offsite roadways results in improved level of service, delay, and
safety for the affected intersections. Furthermore, the Extension will decrease the truck
traffic associated with the Triad Business Park on offsite roadways and rail grade
crossings. The Extension will allow trucks traveling from the eastern portion of the Park
to remain onsite when traveling west, avoid rail crossings and interaction with traffic on
Bunker Hill Road and Mountain Street, and provide a direct route to /from the newly
constructed interchange at Macy Grove Road with ample capacity.
The absence of the Extension results in additional travel time, distance, and emissions
for site traffic traveling from the eastern portion of the park to destinations to the west.
An additional distance of 1.25 miles and time of approximately six minutes is estimated.
Analysis results show that approximately 480 PM peak hour trips would be subject to
this additional travel time. Also, the Extension will enhance internal operations by
providing adequate access and allowing site traffic to remain onsite when traveling to
destinations within the Triad Business Park.
Based on the results of this study, the Extension of Old Greensboro Road is
recommended to provide adequate access to the remainder of the Triad Business Park,
10/9/15 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary vii

�J DAVENPORT
and enhance the safety and operation of the surrounding roadway network. The
recommended cross section for the Extension is three lanes — one through lane in each
direction and a two -way left turn lane.
The intersection of Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive should be further
evaluated for improvements as the Triad Business Park continues development of lots,
particularly if the Old Greensboro Road Extension is constructed.
In conclusion, this study has reviewed the impacts of the proposed Old Greensboro
Road Extension, and has determined that its construction is necessary in order to
provide improved access to the remainder of the Triad Business Park and improved
operation and safety of the surrounding roadway network.
10/9/15 13 -054 Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment — Executive Summary viii

��) DAVENPORT
Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment
Guilford County, NC
Prepared for Samet Corporation
Updated October 9, 2015
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction .............................................................................. ............................... 3
Figure1 — Site Plan ...................................................................... ............................... 4
Figure2A — Site Location ............................................................. ............................... 5
Figure2B — Vicinity Map ............................................................... ............................... 6
2.0 Existing Conditions ................................................................. ............................... 7
2.1 Inventory ................................................................................. ............................... 7
2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes ......................................................... ............................... 7
Figure 3 — Existing Lane Geometry .............................................. ............................... 8
Figure 4 — 2014 Existing Traffic Volumes ..................................... ............................... 9
3.0 Approved Developments and Committed Improvements .. ............................... 10
3.1 Approved Developments ....................................................... ............................... 10
3.2 Committed Improvements ..................................................... ............................... 11
3.2.1 TIP U -4734 Macy Grove Road Extension ...................... ............................... 11
3.2.2 TIP 1 -5712 Sandy Ridge Road Interchange ................... ............................... 11
4.0 Methodology .......................................................................... ............................... 12
4.1 Base Assumptions and Standards ........................................ ............................... 12
4.2 Trip Generation ..................................................................... ............................... 13
4.3 Trip Distribution ..................................................................... ............................... 14
4.4 Future No -Build Traffic .......................................................... ............................... 14
4.5 Future Build Traffic ................................................................ ............................... 14
Exhibit A — Site Traffic Rerouting with & Without Extension ....... ...............................
15
Figure 5A — Project Trip Distribution without the Extension ........ ...............................
16
Figure 5B — Project Trip Distribution with the Extension ............. ...............................
17
Figure 6 — 2028 Future No -Build Volumes .................................. ...............................
18
Figure 7A — Site Trips without the Extension .............................. ...............................
19
Figure 7B — Site Trips with the Extension ................................... ...............................
20
Figure 8A — 2028 Future Build Volumes without the Extension .. ...............................
21
Figure 8B — 2028 Future Build Volumes with the Extension ....... ...............................
22
5.0 Capacity Analysis .................................................................. ...............................
23
5.1 Level of Service Evaluation Criteria ...................................... ...............................
23
5.2 Discussion of Results ............................................................ ...............................
24
5.3 Level of Service Summary .................................................... ...............................
26
6.0 Need for the Old Greensboro Road Extension ................... ...............................
27
6.1 Capacity of Roadway Network .............................................. ...............................
27
6.2 Travel Time ........................................................................... ...............................
28
6.3 Safety — General ................................................................... ...............................
28
6.4 Safety — Highway -Rail Grade Crossings ............................... ...............................
29
6.5 Implications to the Triad Business Park & Kernersville Area ...............................
30
7.0 Recommendations ................................................................ ...............................
30
Figure 9 — Recommended Roadway Improvements ................... ...............................
31
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment

DAVENPORT
9.0 Summary and Conclusion .................................................... ............................... 32
Appendix....................................................................................... ............................... 34
TripGeneration ........................................................................... ............................... 35
Level of Service Analysis ............................................................ ............................... 36
TrafficVolume Data .................................................................... ............................... 45
ApprovedDevelopment .............................................................. ............................... 46
TIPInformation ........................................................................... ............................... 47
SupportingDocumentation ......................................................... ............................... 48
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment

��) DAVENPORT
Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment
Guilford County, NC
Prepared for Samet Corporation
Updated October 9, 2015
1.0 Introduction
This study provides an update to the Transportation Analysis dated 9/5/2014 completed
by DAVENPORT. This study was conducted to provide an evaluation of the potential
Extension of Old Greensboro Road in the Triad Business Park. Old Greensboro Road
currently runs through the western side of the park and currently terminates west of a
stream near the center of the site. The proposed Extension of Old Greensboro Road will
extend the road to the east. This study was updated to reflect the Extension ending in a
cul -de -sac within the site to serve the eastern lots. Additionally, construction of the Macy
Grove Road interchange is now complete and this analysis has been updated with
observed traffic counts at the interchange and along Macy Grove Road.
The Triad Business Park is located off Mountain Street and Bunker Hill Road in Guilford
County, NC. Figure 1 provides a site plan and Figures 2A and 2B provide site location
and vicinity maps, respectively. The park contains over 300 acres with 14 industrial lots.
DAVENPORT previously prepared a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the site in
2007 and provided recommendations for interim (Phase 1) and full build conditions. A
portion of the western side of the park is developed and the remainder of the park is
currently undeveloped. Access is currently provided by Old Greensboro Road and also
by Business Park Drive which intersects with Mountain Street.
DAVENPORT was retained to determine the effects with and without the Extension in
place related to traffic operations, roadway capacity, travel time, and safety. The following
intersections were included in the study:
• Market Street /Mountain Street at Bunker Hill Road
• Bunker Hill Road at Proposed Access
• Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance
• Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive
• Macy Grove Road at Old Greensboro Road
• 1 -40 Business Eastbound Ramps at Macy Grove Road
• 1 -40 Business Westbound Ramps at Macy Grove Road
• Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps
To determine the impacts of the potential Extension of Old Greensboro Road, the above -
mentioned intersections were analyzed for the following two scenarios:
• Future Build Conditions without the Old Greensboro Road Extension
• Future Build Conditions with the Old Greensboro Road Extension
Assuming an absorption rate of 15 acres per year, a buildout year of 2028 was utilized
for this analysis. This analysis was carried out based on North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) typical standards. Information regarding the property was
provided by the developer, Samet Corporation.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 3

1111�l� *;�M'F
tdaddesigngroup
Architecture I Engineering I Interior Design
Triad Design Group, P.C.
4807 -C Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile 336- 218 -8010
www.triad- designgroup.com
NC Architecture Reg. 50709
NC Engineering Lic. C -1108
SAMET
CORPORATION
P.O. Box 8050
Greensboro, NC
27419
(336) 544 -2600
FAX:
(336) 544 -2638
LN
a �3POR4�F
SEAL
•ff$$
I N��. N/
"'tAN N ��
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD:
L. ALLAN HILL, P.E.
he
19
a
d
W
z
7`
D
a
�c
O
N
a
NINO
X
W
•
•
ca
i�
O
L
Cn
LV ,
C
O CU
U �
o 2
'S U
C-
Z
U)
O '>
L
L
�>� L
LL Y
^0_
W
0
Mk Date Description
Revisions
OVERALL
EXHIBIT 2A
Date: AUGUST , 2014
Drawn: FCS Check: LAH
Job Number: 14 -064
Sheet
EX m2A
1
2
3
4
5
6
o�
s�
2 D
s��t
M
*C ROU
I
I
I ON
EAST MOON ST
0
y° SU pv E+«
OLD GREENSBORO RD
SR lace
SITE
\
I /
E
-
1-40
E
G
RD
-, SCA /WCA
VICINITY MAP
`
I
° (SCALE 1 : 2000)
Area
WC -6
PARCEL NO. 0168909
PIN: 6896502711
PARCEL NO. 0220635 2B
N /F: TDO LAND HOLDING LLC
PIN: 6896601860
DB 6363 PG 393
�
O
N /F: SST PROPERTIES LLC
DB 7563 PG 683 I PB 186 PG 102
2c
2A
PB 175 PG 97 & 98
PA
1549 OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
PB 185 PG 89 PB 186 PG 102
t OLD
GREENSBORO ROAD Area PA
"E
—
OR0 R0 PO
80'
(
PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY
— — — — WPA S10 °1 '41"
�_
N85 °36'49
126.18
0. 06' 366' SB
/off/ /
e
GRE�c�Rg
0 , 6e�
0 6p P
(
PARCEL N0. 0168911
PIN: 6895695819
N /F: SB JOHNSON II, LLC AND 525'21'10 "E
76.64'
I
NB JOHNSON II, LLC
E
/
I
DB 6786 PG 2506
1163.63'
I
/
PARCEL NO. 0168912
3
PIN: 6895495429
(
�
N /F: FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSEM, INC.
DB 6939 PG 2918
PB 175 PG 97 & 98
I
1554 OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
4
t,
PB175PG97 &98
`�
ISCA .............
1544 A OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
LOT No. 11
'
t
t
,�\
D
I
t
SC /WC
9r�
o
D
s
N
�\
LOT No. /0
LOT No. 5
=t =
OLD GREENSBORO
ROAD
t
PROP. 80' R/W
I SD
ISC
PHASE /
PHASE 2
LOT No.
7
PB
LOT No. 6
- --
.....:.:.:.:.:.:.:
/
0
j
t =
LOT No. 9
.'
—_
.'
:e
6 °� >'3o'E :=:=: 1 :: :: :: :: :: ::: ::::: :: : ::: : :
S SC /WC — —
..
LOT No.
8
-:t
...................
C
C
Are H
ro
Q
N> 808.07'
4°
w o
i\ C6
o
136.00,
N74 56,14
Z
'
W
S >,5\'09»
91p 98,E
r<v
��b
LEGEND
®
POND
17-77-77 1`77-7-71
OR
WETLAND
STREAM
B
B
A
A
GfR,4i=�4 f C SC,4L E
200
0 we 200 400
800
C IN FEET
I Inch = 200 ft.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1111�l� *;�M'F
tdaddesigngroup
Architecture I Engineering I Interior Design
Triad Design Group, P.C.
4807 -C Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile 336- 218 -8010
www.triad- designgroup.com
NC Architecture Reg. 50709
NC Engineering Lic. C -1108
SAMET
CORPORATION
P.O. Box 8050
Greensboro, NC
27419
(336) 544 -2600
FAX:
(336) 544 -2638
LN
a �3POR4�F
SEAL
•ff$$
I N��. N/
"'tAN N ��
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD:
L. ALLAN HILL, P.E.
he
19
a
d
W
z
7`
D
a
�c
O
N
a
NINO
X
W
•
•
ca
i�
O
L
Cn
LV ,
C
O CU
U �
o 2
'S U
C-
Z
U)
O '>
L
L
�>� L
LL Y
^0_
W
0
Mk Date Description
Revisions
OVERALL
EXHIBIT 2A
Date: AUGUST , 2014
Drawn: FCS Check: LAH
Job Number: 14 -064
Sheet
EX m2A

0
FIGURE 2A
SITE LOCATION MAP SITE INDICATOR

I
FIGURE 2B STUDY INTERSECTIONS
VICINITY MAP EXISTING
PROPOSED

DAVENPORT
2.0 Existing Conditions
2.1 Inventory
A field investigation was conducted by DAVENPORT staff to determine the existing
roadway conditions in the study area. Table 2.1 contains the results of this effort. Figure
3 illustrates the existing lane geometry.
2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes
Existing traffic volumes for this project were collected by DAVENPORT staff, including
the newly opened Macy Grove Road interchange. Table 2.2 contains the dates these
counts were conducted. Figure 4 shows existing AM and PM peak hour volumes. More
information can be found in the Traffic Volume Data section of the appendix.
Table 2.2 - Traffic Volume Data
Table 2.1 - Street
Inventory
Market Street /Mountain Street at Bunker Hill Road 8/5/2014
DAVENPORT
Facility Name
Route
Typical Cross
Pavement
Speed
Maintained
1�
#
Section
Width
Limit
By
Mountain Street /
SR
2 -lane undivided
Approx. 24 feet
45 MPH
NCDOT
Market Street
1008
DAVENPORT
Road
Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps
SIR
DAVENPORT
Bunker Hill Road
2-lane undivided
Approx. 20 feet
35 MPH
NCDOT
Old Greensboro
SR
2 -lane undivided
Approx. 22 feet
45 MPH
NCDOT
Road
1846
2 -lane divided
Business Park Drive
1994
2 -lane w/ TWLTL
Approx. 50 feet
Not posted
NCDOT
at site
Macy Grove Road
1860
2 -lane undivided
Approx. 22 feet
45 MPH
NCDOT
1 -40 Business
421
8 -lane divided
Approx. 96
65 MPH
NCDOT
feet
2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes
Existing traffic volumes for this project were collected by DAVENPORT staff, including
the newly opened Macy Grove Road interchange. Table 2.2 contains the dates these
counts were conducted. Figure 4 shows existing AM and PM peak hour volumes. More
information can be found in the Traffic Volume Data section of the appendix.
Table 2.2 - Traffic Volume Data
LCount Location Date Taken
By
Market Street /Mountain Street at Bunker Hill Road 8/5/2014
DAVENPORT
Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park
10/7/2015
DAVENPORT
Entrance
Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive
8/5/2014
DAVENPORT
Macy Grove Road at Old Greensboro Road
10/6/2015
DAVENPORT
1 -40 Business Eastbound Ramps at Macy Grove
10/7/2015
DAVENPORT
Road
1 -40 Business Westbound Ramps at Macy Grove
10/7/2015
DAVENPORT
Road
Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps
10/7/2015
DAVENPORT
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 7

A rU7NSIGNALIZED
N
INTERSECTION
- RIGHT IN /
RIGHT OUT
ROUNDABOUT
d
a L 300'
T N) p wo ROADWAY
o
cn _
r L
%-1001 oo' 50 --a- r 300' --a- TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
.� � � 1
0 r 225' Mountain Street 0 Market Street BLACK = EXISTING
75' 0 J 0 GREEN = COMMITTED
�t 200' ' t, `'ROPOSED +4 r 350'—r `T' �� �i 1
oo
75' 200' 0 0
N
-600'
M
)
N CA
d
111 � 550'
r � it
0 Old Greensboro Road ~
0 J J
Ti r 200' 1 r
0
0
W
a
�
Q�ID
ro
0
0
C 350' a
r
4j 11 r 400'
0 r 350'
0
0
C: FIGURE 3
hT
� I -40 Business EXISTING LANE
-n GEOMETRY
r
`r
1 1 ~ TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED
CONNECTOR ROAD
0
0 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
700' 1 of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
i ro and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. NOT TO SCALE ``

N
Jw o
cn t. 78/78
148 / 405
r 1/1
124 / 165 1 t
285/205--* I CO o
N J
cn
� rn
N
N
Ul �
CO 4
co (O
�jl
L 15/21
r
177/219
Old Greensboro Road
J W
N J
v
C7
ci
O
O
L 91 / 91
4 -0/5
r 54/40
t
N N
W N
A
co
N N �
N �
W O
O O
I
d
U
CL
330 / 222
RIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED
� � N
23/30
V "
`11`4
4- 187/511
r 135 /110
0 /0�►
0
INTERSECTION
0
0
W
6/30 a
U
330 / 222
RIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED
LSIGNALIZED J
INTERSECTION
6
pp
��
0 /0�►
11*
INTERSECTION
v
W
<
N
co
O
rn
'V
d
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
W
F
L 4/6
—mi.- TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
Mountain Street 0 Market Street
0
X1 /0
J
BLACK = EXISTING
8/22--*
x228 / 155 �J
GREEN = COMMITTED
BLUF ` PROPOSED
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. NOT TO SCALE
2/4�
J
r
1 -40 Business
W
x
0
O
01
C
U
RIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED
LSIGNALIZED J
INTERSECTION
. UNSIGNALIZED
0 /0�►
11*
INTERSECTION
• RIGHT IN /
RIGHT OUT
106 / 26 --t
N) N
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
ROUNDABOUT
L 27/114
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
ROADWAY
227 / 793
r 5/25
—mi.- TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
Mountain Street 0 Market Street
0
17/86 1 0
433 / 273 �
h 1
1
BLACK = EXISTING
8/22--*
J rn
GREEN = COMMITTED
BLUF ` PROPOSED
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. NOT TO SCALE
_
AM /PM PEAKS
W
x
0
O
01
C
U
RIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED
34 / 154 1
CONNECTOR ROAD
0 /0�►
11*
106 / 26 --t
A a
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054
cn w
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
po rn
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. NOT TO SCALE

DAVENPORT
3.0 Approved Developments and Committed Improvements
3.1 Approved Developments
Approved developments are developments that have been recently approved in the area,
but not yet constructed. There are two (2) developments in the vicinity of the project to be
included in the analysis.
The Kernersville Medical Center and the VA Healthcare Center are located on
Kernersville Medical Parkway in Kernersville, NC. An update to the traffic analysis for this
development was last provided by Little John Engineering Associates in 2014. The site
consists of a hospital, VA Clinic, medical offices, and the Blue Diamond Site which
proposes retail, office, and industrial uses.
Currently, the hospital has been constructed and is in operation. Therefore, potential trips
from the VA Clinic, medical offices, and Blue Diamond Site were estimated and distributed
onto the study area roadways.
Another development in the area is the Carrollton Mixed Use Development. The proposed
Carrollton Mixed -Use Development is located on the southwest quadrant of NC 66 and
Old Salem Road in Kernersville, North Carolina. The transportation impact analysis was
last updated by DAVENPORT in 2013 for this development. The proposed development
will ultimately consist of retail, residential, and a commercial /business park. The
development has a trip generation potential of 1,236 net trips in the AM peak and 1,673
net trips in the PM peak. Given this development's location, the background growth rate
applied to existing volumes was assumed to account for traffic associated with this
development.
More information related to the approved developments can be found in the Supporting
Documentation section of the appendix.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 10

�J DAVENPORT
3.2 Committed Improvements
Committed Improvements are improvements that are planned by NCDOT, a local
municipality, or a developer in the area, but not yet constructed.
3.2.1 TIP U -4734 Macy Grove Road Extension
TIP U -4734 proposes to extend Macy Grove Road north of Mountain Street to NC 150
(North Main Street). This project is currently unfunded for construction and therefore not
considered in this analysis.
3.2.2 TIP 1 -5712 Sandy Ridge Road Interchange
This project involves improvements to the SR 1850 (Sandy Ridge Road) and 1 -40
Business interchange in Greensboro. This project is in the preliminary stages and only
has a feasibility study complete at the moment. It is funded for 2019 with construction in
2020.
More information can be found in the supporting documentation of the Appendix.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 11

��) DAVENPORT
4.0 Methodology
4.1 Base Assumptions and Standards
In general, the analysis for this project was conducted utilizing commonly accepted
NCDOT standards. The following table contains a summary of the base assumptions:
Table 4.1 - Assumptions
Peak Hour Factor
0.90
Background Traffic Annual Growth Rate
2.0% per year for all roadways
Analysis Software
Synch ro/Si mTraffic Version 8
Sidra Intersection Version 5.1
Base Signal Timing /Phasing
Provided by NCDOT
Lane widths
12 feet
Truck percentages
3%
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 12

�J DAVENPORT
4.2 Trip Generation
As indicated earlier, the Triad Business Park consists of over 300 acres comprised of 14
lots. Table 4.2 provides a summary of the developed and remaining acreage per lot.
Lot
Table 4.2 - Development
Summary
Develope
(acres
Remaining
(acres)
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 3
Lot 4
Lot 5
Lot 6
• :
•
Lot 7
Lot 8
Lot 9 i
Lot 10
Lot 11
Lot 12
Lot 13
Lot 14
6 Total J
341.12 A&M
140.74 AM
•
.
200.38
Consistent with the TIA prepared by DAVENPORT in 2007, site densities for each lot
were determined by using densities of square footage per acre at a comparable industrial
park (Union Cross Industrial Park, Forsyth County — 5,960 square feet per acre). TripGen
2013 software, based on the 91" edition of ITE Trip Generation Manual, was used to
project trips for this development. Table 6.3 presents the results.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 13

�M) DAVENPORT
4.3 Trip Distribution
Site trips for the remainder of the Triad Business Park development were distributed
based on the existing traffic patterns and engineering judgment. The directional
distributions for site trips are as follows:
• 35% to and from the east on 1 -40 Business
• 25% to and from the west on 1 -40 Business
• 15% to and from the west on Mountain Street
• 10% to and from the east on Market Street
• 10% to and from the south on Bunker Hill Road
• 5% to and from the north on Bunker Hill Road
With the Extension in place, all site traffic entering and exiting from Macy Grove Road
and the new 1 -40 Business interchange to the west will be able to access the site by using
Old Greensboro Road. Without the Extension in place, site traffic on the east side of the
Triad Business Park will have to travel around the site via Bunker Hill Road, to Mountain
Street, then finally to the new roundabout to access Macy Grove Road.
Exhibit A provides a depiction of the routing of site traffic with and without the Extension.
The project trip distribution is shown in Figure 5A for the scenario without the Old
Greensboro Road Extension and Figure 5B for the scenario with the Extension
4.4 Future No -Build Traffic
The 2028 future no build traffic volumes were computed by applying a 2.0% compounded
annual growth rate to the existing traffic volumes. More information can be found in the
Traffic Volume Data section of the appendix. Figure 6 shows the 2017 future no build
traffic volumes for AM and PM peaks.
4.5 Future Build Traffic
The 2028 build -out traffic volume was obtained by summing the 2028 future no build
volumes and site trips due to the proposed development. Site trips without the Extension
are shown in Figure 7A and with the Extension in Figure 7B. The 2028 future build
volumes are shown for the scenarios with and without the Old Greensboro Road
Extension in Figures 8A and 8B, respectively. More information can be found in the Traffic
Volume Data section of the appendix.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 14

I
EXHIBIT A ROUTE WITHOUT EXTENSION
SITE TRAFFIC REROUTING WITH & ROUTE WITH EXTENSION
WITHOUT EXTENSION PROPOSED EXTENSION

N
.Q
0
Z 1 `45% OUT
`► — 15% OUT
15 %INS►
J,
0
O
C
1
r 15% OUT
Old Greensboro Road
A �
8 8
0 0
Z Z
v
O
C
C O
N
N W
U1 (11
0 0
00
C C
35% IN
25% IN 1
d
a
v
m
50% OUT
r� 10% IN
50% IN
O
h
r 5% IN
10% IN
1 Market
o
0
5% OUT
W
�
' o
o'
�J
LA.
O
0
O N
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
U [n
a o
N
M
_
Z Z
d
x
L
�►
20% OUT
4-15%
OUT
J
J
r
r
10% IN
1 -40 Business
Mountain Street
o
4-5% IN
z
r 5% IN
00
1 Market
5% OUT 1 O
Street
5% OUT
h 1*
50% IN
o 0
�J
O 0
C C
cn
0
Z
55% OUT 1
10% OUT --4
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and * ** NOT TO SCALE * **
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
W
c
7
m
2
M
O
W
C
ti
O
Z
O
SIGNALIZED
0
INTERSECTION
.
UNSIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
-
RIGHT IN /
RIGHT OUT
�J
ROUNDABOUT
ROADWAY
—pi.-
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
BLACK = EXISTING
GREEN = COMMITTED
ORIGIN
NODE
FIGURE PROJECT TRIP
DISTRIBUTION
WITHOUT EXTENSION
TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED
CONNECTOR ROAD
PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054

A
7e7uj
N
NTERSECTION
RIGHT IN /
RIGHT OUT
c
1!'�
r5'%I.
m
ROUNDABOUT
x
cn
o
4-10% IN
ROADWAY
r 25% IN
Mountain Street
�
00 Market
, TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
15% IN h
1-40
5% OUT 1
0 Street
15% IN �--►
h
BLACK = EXISTING
� 01
10 %OUTS
GREEN = COMMITTED
o° 8'
10% OUT �
L 0 0
0
o M -
Z
w
ORIGIN
o l
d
NODE
r 60% OUT
T L 40% OUT
0 Old Greensboro Road X60% OUT
0
J J
0 r+
� r
55% IN �►
0
0
Z
m
0
W
C
O
N
N W
U1 (11
0 0
M
00
m
� �
4 *---35%
C
IN
O
O
0
8
a
z
I -40 Business
FIGURE
PROJECT TRIP
DISTRIBUTION
0
c
-�
EXTENSION
O
TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED
O
25% IN 1 0
CONNECTOR ROAD
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and * ** NOT TO SCALE * **
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.

N
N
A N
120/103
195 / 628
r 1/1
223 / 270 1 t
376/274--* I It o
w
W �
N �
� N
a1 N
'j l
L 20/28
r
234/289
Old Greensboro Road
o ip
wo
A N
O w
A �
>v
A
ci
O
(D
L 120 / 120
4 -0/7
r 307 / 263
') t
co w
V
_ N
N W C71U1
I L.
I -40 Business I I
45/203 1
Toot
CONNECTOR ROAD
LSIGNALIZED J
INTERSECTION
lr
258/140--t
. UNSIGNALIZED
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054
tw
INTERSECTION
cn a,
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
RIGHT IN /
•
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
RIGHT OUT
Co
CL
1!'�
y
co W -4
ROUNDABOUT
w w
x %- 30 40
N a
L 36 / 150
iv
°' C° °
/
N
385 / 784
ROADWAY
1
*� 296/674
� ' 178 / 145
r 7/33
0
Mountain Street
0
Market Street
—mi.- TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
8 / 40 1
452 / 293
0
22 / 113 1 0
626 / 403
t
h 1
BLACK = EXISTING
8 / 13
pp No
11 / 29 -1,
�2 N
GREEN = COMMITTED
BLUE- PROPOSED
Co
y N
AM /PM PEAKS
.9
co
d
co
F L 5/8
,�
X10 /0
J
J
4r218 / 265 1
r
W
M
3/5�
F
2
0
O
01
C
I -40 Business I I
RIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED
45/203 1
Toot
CONNECTOR ROAD
0/02:
lr
258/140--t
N N
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054
tw
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
cn a,
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
Co
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. NOT TO SCALE

N
cn
N
00 �f t- 71/614
0 0 T2 24 / 205
r 0/0
0/01 t
174/28w►I o 0 0
0 /0� 0 0 0
V
00
L 0/0
r 24 / 205
Old Greensboro Road
d
CL
v
d
0 0 o x L 0/0
0 o O 4- 79 / 682
1 k, 0 r 116/19
0/0j
O N
ir.
O
C'
On
N A
W _
116/19
\ N
A W
v
O J
INTERSECTION
1
fll
:29:1
G1
CL
iii
c
0
m co
0
0 /0M-E!I�
A cT
O cT
0 /0-4
o 0
Wn v
0 0
L 407/65
r 0/0j
r 58/9
+-0 /0
116/19
00
Market Street
r 0/0
d
CL
v
d
0 0 o x L 0/0
0 o O 4- 79 / 682
1 k, 0 r 116/19
0/0j
O N
SIGNALIZED
O
O
C'
On
0 INTERSECTION
116/19
o p
v
O J
INTERSECTION
1
N
< N
N
:29:1
0
/ 47 1
0
m co
F
0 /0M-E!I�
�J It►
0 /0-4
o 0
J
0 0
d
CL
v
d
0 0 o x L 0/0
0 o O 4- 79 / 682
1 k, 0 r 116/19
0/0j
o
SIGNALIZED
O
581 / 93
0 INTERSECTION
116/19
. UNSIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
V
N
< N
N
- RIGHT IN /
cT ?
0
M
d
RIGHT OUT
m co
F
L 32/273
�J It►
L 0/0
4---24/205
J
4-- 58 / 9
ROADWAY
r 0/0j
r 58/9
r
116/19
00
1 -40 Business
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
Mountain Street
* ** NOT TO SCALE * **
W
C
7
i
2
M
0
W
C
SIGNALIZED
O
0 INTERSECTION
. UNSIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
- RIGHT IN /
RIGHT OUT
�J ROUNDABOUT
W O O
L 0/0
0 0 0
4-- 58 / 9
ROADWAY
r 58/9
00
Market Street
—Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
8 / 68 1
O
8/68
1
h 1 %�
BLACK = EXISTING
581 / 93
o
GREEN = COMMITTED
-4
�0
rnCo
co
w
W
AM PM PEAKS
0
O
O
87 / 750
16 / 136
O
O
* ** NOT TO SCALE * **
W
C
7
i
2
M
0
W
C

X,
m
� n
CL c
0
A M
O (T
n v L 407/65
+-0 /0
r 0/0
O N
O
o
A
O
v 4
O J
1
0 SIGNALIZED
0
291/47)
0
0 INTERSECTION
°
N
0 /0-4
o 0
0 0
. UNSIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
RIGHT IN /
RIGHT OUT
r24/
CL
v
1!'�
ROUNDABOUT
0 0 o
0 0 0
1
O O
L. 0/0
o O o
° °
✓
0/0
4� 0 / 0
cO ° °
0/ 19
ROADWAY
0
291 / 47 Mountain Street
0
Market Street
� TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
0
0
0/0
t
0 �
� 0
0
ti t 1.
8 /68 J o
ti t %
BLACK = EXISTING
174/28
O p p
174 / 28 —w�*
pp a ° 0
16 / 136
-� O o
GREEN = COMMITTED
0/ 0
O O O
N N p W
p 0
p M O
M cT
m
Ao
H
AM / PM PEAKS
L 0/0
V
d
0 o
r 95/818
_
m con
F L 63/546
00
Old Greensboro Road
4 It►
4-95 / 81 8
J
—
°
i r'
r o /oJ
r
O
639 / 102
o 4
X,
m
� n
CL c
0
A M
O (T
n v L 407/65
+-0 /0
r 0/0
1 -40 Business
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
* ** NOT TO SCALE * **
W
c
_
2
M
0
W
C
O N
O
o
O
v 4
O J
1
0
291/47)
0
0 /0M-Ell�
0 /0-4
o 0
0 0
1 -40 Business
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
* ** NOT TO SCALE * **
W
c
_
2
M
0
W
C

N
a w
cn cn
Co
1 -40 Business
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
Mountain Street
SIGNALIZED
O
°
�4 M
w
N m
O N
N�
I
d
C
INTERSECTION
191/717
1
W
0
336 / 250 1
�L
30/ 40
� 2 3
19 / 8
i
L 36 / 150
258 / 140
k'
4-375 / 1 356
0 294 / 164
ROADWAY
r 65/42
0
Market Street
223/270 1
t
8/ 40 1
1033 / 386
0
550/302 �►
I
BLACK = EXISTING
592/122--*
o N
GREEN = COMMITTED
v o_
rn
V 00 O
O
124/32
W
w °nN
1/3 O O O
0
M
N N
A
cn
O
L 20 / 28
N
w
m N
N
N
d
W
00
6
r 258 / 494
co 0)
F
L 37 / 281
00
Old Greensboro Road
�% ►
34 / J5
J
_
0
1
`218 / 265 1
Nil
r
w
119/24
N W
O _
co N
co
W �
fll
G1 iii
CL c
cn
N �
C, °
L 527/185
vw
+-0/7
1J j
k
r 307 / 263
a w
cn cn
Co
1 -40 Business
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
Mountain Street
SIGNALIZED
O
°
�4 M
w
O N
N�
I
rn rn
INTERSECTION
6] N_
1
0
336 / 250 1
0
ROUNDABOUT
0 /0�
L 36 / 150
258 / 140
N N
a w
cn cn
Co
1 -40 Business
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
Mountain Street
* ** NOT TO SCALE * **
W
C
7
i
2
M
0
W
.
SIGNALIZED
O
0 INTERSECTION
. UNSIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
- RIGHT IN /
RIGHT OUT
o
ROUNDABOUT
L 36 / 150
N
443 / 793
ROADWAY
r 65/42
00
Market Street
—Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
30/181 1 0
634 /471
h
BLACK = EXISTING
592/122--*
o N
GREEN = COMMITTED
rn
V 00 O
O
°
AM PM PEAKS
0
O
O
87 70
h
6
O
O
* ** NOT TO SCALE * **
W
C
7
i
2
M
0
W
.

N
N
? N
t- 120 /103
0 o N +...- 219 /833
r 1/1
223 / 270 � j c
550 / 302 o
1/3� 0 0 0
co
A
C.0 o
0)
o OD
jt.
20/28
r 329/1107
Old Greensboro Road
o�w
o A
A w
fll
G1 iii
CL c
0
cn
N �
C, ° L 527/185
vw 4-0/7
1J j r 307 / 263
�
�4 M
w
O N N�
rn rn I
6] N_
1 t1-41. 336 / 250 0 /0258 / 140
a w
cn cn
C O
d
CL
w w `
`30/40
O ° 4
j 0
4- 296 / 674
0 r
�
�4 M
w
O N N�
rn rn I
6] N_
1 t1-41. 336 / 250 0 /0258 / 140
a w
cn cn
C O
d
CL
w w `
`30/40
O ° 4
j 0
4- 296 / 674
0 r
a w
cn cn
C O
L
8/401
452 / 293
182/41
v 7 co
N 0)
N Cn �
�
� j � N W
N
l
d
rn
m W F L 68 / 554
W
4-105/818
l J
x218 / 265 1 r
642 / 107
1 -40 Business
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
Mountain Street
O \ O
60i N �
30 / 181 1 L
642 / 539
27/165'7
* ** NOT TO SCALE * **
SIGNALIZED
O INTERSECTION
0
. UNSIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
- RIGHT IN /
RIGHT OUT
�J
ROUNDABOUT
L 36 / 150
4-- 501 / 803 ROADWAY
r 7/33
Market Street —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
i
i
h 1 �► BLACK = EXISTING
w N GREEN = COMMITTED
N
W co
V AM /PM PEAKS
W
C
7
i
2
M
0
W
.
d
CL
w w `
`30/40
O ° 4
j 0
4- 296 / 674
0 r
8/401
452 / 293
182/41
v 7 co
N 0)
N Cn �
�
� j � N W
N
l
d
rn
m W F L 68 / 554
W
4-105/818
l J
x218 / 265 1 r
642 / 107
1 -40 Business
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
Mountain Street
O \ O
60i N �
30 / 181 1 L
642 / 539
27/165'7
* ** NOT TO SCALE * **
SIGNALIZED
O INTERSECTION
0
. UNSIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
- RIGHT IN /
RIGHT OUT
�J
ROUNDABOUT
L 36 / 150
4-- 501 / 803 ROADWAY
r 7/33
Market Street —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
i
i
h 1 �► BLACK = EXISTING
w N GREEN = COMMITTED
N
W co
V AM /PM PEAKS
W
C
7
i
2
M
0
W
.
1 -40 Business
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
Mountain Street
O \ O
60i N �
30 / 181 1 L
642 / 539
27/165'7
* ** NOT TO SCALE * **
SIGNALIZED
O INTERSECTION
0
. UNSIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
- RIGHT IN /
RIGHT OUT
�J
ROUNDABOUT
L 36 / 150
4-- 501 / 803 ROADWAY
r 7/33
Market Street —Pi TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
i
i
h 1 �► BLACK = EXISTING
w N GREEN = COMMITTED
N
W co
V AM /PM PEAKS
W
C
7
i
2
M
0
W
.
W
C
7
i
2
M
0
W
.

0 DAVENPORT
5.0 Capacity Analysis
5.1 Level of Service Evaluation Criteria
The Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) utilizes a term
"level of service" to measure how traffic operates in intersections and on roadway
segments. There are currently six levels of service ranging from A to F. Level of service
"A" represents the best conditions and Level of Service "F" represents the worst. Synchro
Traffic Modeling software was used to determine the level of service for studied
intersections. Note for unsignalized intersection analysis, the level of service noted is for
the worst approach of the intersection. This is typically the left turn movement for the side
street approach, due to the number of opposing movements. All worksheet reports from
the analyses can be found in the Appendix.
Table Capacity
Levels of Service and Control Delay Criteria
Signalized Intersection
Unsignalized Intersection
Level of Service
Control Delay Per
vehicle (sec)
Level of Service
Delay Range
(sec)
A
<- 10
A
<- 10
B
>10and < -20
B
>10and <_15
C
>20 ands 35
C
>15and <_25
D
>35and <_55
D
>25and <_35
E
>55and <_80
E
>35and <_50
F
> 80
F
> 50
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 23

��) DAVENPORT
5.2 Discussion of Results
The results of the capacity analysis are discussed by intersection below:
Market Street / Mountain Street at Bunker Hill Road
This signalized intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS C in the AM peak and LOS
F in the PM peak in future conditions without the Extension of Old Greensboro Road. With
the Extension in place, the LOS is expected to improve to LOS B during the AM and PM
peaks.
Bunker Hill Road at Proposed Access
The proposed access on Bunker Hill Road was assumed to have the recommended
improvements in place from the prior 2007 study which include signalization, a
southbound right turn lane, and separate right and left turn egress lanes. With these
improvements, LOS A is anticipated during the AM peak and LOS B during the PM peak
in the scenario without the Extension.
Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance
Without the Old Greensboro Road Extension, LOS D is anticipated during the AM peak
and LOS E during the PM peak in future build conditions. With the Extension in place, the
intersection is anticipated to be improved to LOS B during the AM peak and LOS D during
the PM peak.
Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive
The southbound approach of this unsignalized intersection is anticipated to operate at
LOS C during the AM and PM peaks without the Old Greensboro Road Extension. With
the Extension in place, site traffic will have the opportunity to remain onsite and travel
through this intersection to reach Macy Grove Road and the new 1 -40 Business
interchange. While this will relieve congestion and delay on offsite roadways, this
intersection will experience increased traffic and delay with the Extension in place and
operate at LOS F during the AM and PM peaks, respectively.
As the Triad Business Park continues development of lots and if Old Greensboro Road
Extension is implemented, this intersection can be further evaluated for improvements to
improve the LOS and accommodate future traffic volumes.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 24

�J DAVENPORT
Macy Grove Road at Old Greensboro Road
This intersection will be signalized and three - legged in future conditions. LOS C is
anticipated during the AM and PM peaks for the scenario without the Extension.
Increased traffic on the minor road (Old Greensboro Road) is anticipated with the
Extension in place and the intersection is estimated to operate at LOS D and F during the
AM and PM peaks, respectively. If the Extension is constructed, the signal timing at this
intersection could be optimized to better accommodate future traffic volumes.
1 -40 Business Eastbound Ramps at Macy Grove Road
In the scenario without the Old Greensboro Road Extension, LOS C is anticipated during
the AM and PM peaks. This is anticipated to remain unchanged in the scenario with the
Extension in place.
1 -40 Business Westbound Ramps at Macy Grove Road
For both scenarios with and without the Old Greensboro Road Extension, LOS C or better
is anticipated during the AM and PM peaks.
Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps
This new intersection is a roundabout and serves as the junction between Mountain Street
and Macy Grove Road. In the scenario without the Extension, LOS E is anticipated in the
AM and PM peaks. With the Extension in place, less traffic is anticipated at this
intersection and the LOS improves to LOS A during the AM peak.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 25

DAVENPORT
5.3 Level of Service Summary
Table 5.2 summarizes the level of service analysis at the study intersections.
Intersections that improve with the construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension
are shaded in yellow.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 26

DAVENPORT
6.0 Need for the Old Greensboro Road Extension
This section discusses the effects of the Old Greensboro Road Extension and its impacts
on roadway capacity, travel time, and safety.
6.1 Capacity of Roadway Network
As shown in the capacity analysis results, the surrounding roadway network is anticipated
to be at or near capacity in future build conditions. With the Extension of Old Greensboro
Road, site traffic will be able to remain onsite using the Extension when traveling to and
from the west (see Exhibit A). Without the Old Greensboro Road Extension, site traffic
will have to travel on Bunker Hill Road then to Mountain Street to reach destinations to
the west. Therefore, the Extension helps relieve congestion on offsite roadways and
intersections by keeping the Triad Business Park traffic onsite. This results in improved
level of service for the following intersections:
• Market Street / Mountain Street at Bunker Hill Road (LOS F to LOS B)
• Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance (LOS E to LOS D)
• Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps (LOS E to LOS A)
Additionally, the newly constructed 1 -40 Business interchange at Macy Grove Road
provides an ideal access to the interstate for truck traffic traveling to and from the Triad
Business Park. This new interchange has ample capacity and is in closest proximity to
the site (approximately 1.5 miles in travel distance to the eastern portion of the
development).
The next nearest interchange with 1 -40 Business is located at Sandy Ridge Road, east of
the site approximately 2.7 miles in travel distance to the eastern portion of the
development. This interchange currently experiences capacity deficiencies and is
anticipated to worsen in future conditions as traffic volumes continue to grow. As
previously discussed, improvements to this interchange are not planned until 2020.
Furthermore, truck traffic associated with the site would need to travel past Colfax
Elementary School when traveling to /from the interchange at Sandy Ridge Road. Ideally,
heavy truck traffic should be separated from school bus and parent traffic. Thus, the Macy
Grove Road interchange provides a more direct route to 1 -40 Business and diverts truck
traffic away from Market Street and the school, especially during peak times of school
arrival and dismissal times.
Therefore, the Extension will provide a more direct access to the interstate for Triad
Business Park traffic to the newly constructed interchange at Macy Grove Road with
ample capacity, and alleviate offsite roadways and intersections by maintaining the traffic
onsite.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 27

DAVENPORT
6.2 Travel Time
As shown in Exhibit A, site traffic traveling to /from the west from the eastern portion of the
Triad Business Park will be routed around the site without the Old Greensboro Road
Extension. This results in additional travel distance, travel time and emissions for affected
site traffic. Site traffic will travel an additional distance of approximately 1.25 miles without
the Extension and based on SimTraffic model results, will have approximately six minutes
of additional travel time. Analysis results show that approximately 480 PM peak hour trips
would be subject to this additional travel time, distance, and emissions.
Furthermore, since offsite intersections will experience increased traffic without the
Extension, this will increase the delay, travel time, and emissions at affected intersections
for both site traffic and background traffic.
6.3 Safety — General
The frequency of accidents generally increases with the amount of vehicle -miles traveled.
By reducing the travel time and distance of site traffic, this will tend to reduce the
frequency and probability of accidents offsite. Also, the safety of an intersection can be
improved with better level of service and operation. As discussed, the Extension of Old
Greensboro Road is anticipated to improve the operation of several offsite intersections.
The improved operation will enhance the safety of these intersections.
In addition, the Extension will decrease the offsite truck traffic associated with the Triad
Business Park. The Extension will allow trucks traveling from the eastern portion of the
Park to remain onsite when traveling west, and avoid interaction with traffic on Bunker Hill
Road and Mountain Street.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 28

��) DAVENPORT
6.4 Safety — Highway -Rail Grade Crossings
The Old Greensboro Road Extension would allow for truck traffic to avoid the highway -
rail grade crossing on Bunker Hill Road. This crossing is located just south of the
intersection at Market Street / Mountain Street. The control devices at this crossing
consist of active flashing red lights and gates and a railroad crossing sign (Crossbuck,
R15 -1) is provided at the crossing. In addition, advance warning signs (W10 -1) and grade
crossing pavement markings are provided.
As discussed in the Methodology section of this report, 60% of site traffic was assumed
to travel to /from the new 1 -40 Business interchange on Macy Grove Road. With the
Extension in place, site traffic traveling to /from the new interchange on Macy Grove Road
will be able to access the site directly from Old Greensboro Road and not travel through
any at grade crossings. Without the Extension, affected site traffic will be rerouted around
the site and through the grade crossing on Bunker Hill Road to reach these destinations.
Consequently, the construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension will enhance the
safety of the grade crossing on Bunker Hill Road by reducing the volume of experienced
truck traffic. Moreover, the Extension will result in reduced traffic on all of the grade
crossings in the area; this is due to the creation of a route from the new interchange on
Macy Grove Road for site traffic via Old Greensboro Road without any rail crossings.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 29

DAVENPORT
6.5 Implications to the Triad Business Park & Kernersville Area
As outlined in this report, the construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension will
enhance the operation and safety of the surrounding roadway network. This will inherently
benefit the operations within the Park by providing safer and more efficient travel to and
from the site. The Extension also allows site traffic to remain onsite when traveling to and
from destinations within the Triad Business Park itself. This will enhance internal
operations while relieving offsite congestion.
The Extension will provide adequate access to the future eastern portion of the Triad
Business Park. Without the Extension, the majority of site traffic from the eastern portion
of the Park will have to travel through the intersection of Market Street / Mountain Street
at Bunker Hill Road. This intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level
of service under this scenario (more information can be found in the Capacity Analysis
section of this report). This is expected even with the recent improvements of TIP R -2611.
As previously discussed, the lack of the Extension will also result in increased travel time
and delay for affected site traffic. Therefore, the future construction of the remainder of
the Triad Business Park is encumbered without the Extension of Old Greensboro Road.
The Triad Business Park has the ability to serve the Kernersville area with job growth,
increased tax base, and overall economic development. As previously discussed, the
construction of the Old Greensboro Road Extension will enhance the surrounding area
with improved roadway capacity, operation, and safety. Therefore, the Extension will
serve as a benefit to the Kernersville area.
7.0 Recommendations
The Extension of Old Greensboro Road is recommended to enhance the operation of the
surrounding roadway network by reducing offsite traffic and keeping site traffic within the
site. The Extension will provide adequate access to the future eastern portion of the Triad
Business Park and enhance onsite operations. Lastly, the Extension is anticipated to
benefit the surrounding area with improved traffic operations and safety while also
supporting future economic growth. The recommended cross section for the Extension is
three lanes — one through lane in each direction and a two -way left turn lane.
The intersection of Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive should be further
evaluated for improvements as the Triad Business Park continues development of lots
and if Old Greensboro Road Extension is implemented. The recommended improvements
are depicted in Figure 9.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 30

A rU7NSIGNALIZED
N
INTERSECTION
- RIGHT IN /
RIGHT OUT
ROUNDABOUT
d
a L 300'
T N) p wo ROADWAY
o
cn _
r
%-1001 ,00' L 50 --a- r 300' --a- TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
.� � � 1
0 r 225' Mountain Street 0 Market Street BLACK = EXISTING
75' 0 J 0 GREEN = COMMITTED
�t 200' ' t, `'ROPOSED +4 r 350'—r `T' �� �i 1
oD
75' 200' 0 0
N
-600'
< M
)
N N
d
111 � 550'
r � it
0 Old Greensboro Road ~
QO J J J
200' J r r
Evaluate for necessary 0
0
improvements
x 0 development and
0
a O • . Greensboro Road
'o p0
rD F
ID
s
-n L 350'
o
1 1 r 400' lu
0 r 350'
O
0 t
`1 1
c
FIGURE 9
1 -40 Business RECOMMENDED
-n IC IMPROVEMENTS
r
r
1 1 ~ TRIAD BUSINESS PARK - PROPOSED
CONNECTOR ROAD
0
0 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is PROJECT NUMBER 13 -054
intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse
700' 1 of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization
i ro and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and •
NOT TO SCALE
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. " ``

DAVENPORT
9.0 Summary and Conclusion
The Triad Business Park is located off Mountain Street and Bunker Hill Road in Guilford
County, NC. The park contains over 300 acres with 14 industrial lots and DAVENPORT
previously prepared a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for the site in 2007. A portion
of the western side of the park is developed and the remainder of the park is currently
undeveloped. Access is currently provided by Old Greensboro Road and also by
Business Park Drive which intersects with Mountain Street. Old Greensboro Road runs
through the western side of the park and currently terminates west of a stream near the
center of the site.
This study was conducted to provide an evaluation of the potential Extension of Old
Greensboro Road in the Triad Business Park to connect to the eastern lots and terminate
with a cul -de -sac. Specifically, this study evaluates the effects with and without the
Extension in place related to traffic operations, roadway capacity, travel time, and safety.
Two scenarios were considered in this analysis: Future Build Conditions without the Old
Greensboro Road Extension; and Future Build Conditions with the Old Greensboro Road
Extension.
The capacity analysis of this study found that the construction of the Extension results in
improved level of service for the following offsite intersections:
Market Street / Mountain Street at Bunker Hill Road (LOS F to LOS B)
Mountain Street at Business Park Drive /Triad Park Entrance (LOS E to LOS D)
Mountain Street at Macy Grove Road Ramps (LOS E to LOS A)
This is due to the fact that site traffic is able to remain onsite when traveling to /from the
west instead of being routed around the site and increasing traffic on offsite roadways.
Less traffic on the offsite roadways results in improved level of service, delay, and safety
for the affected intersections. Furthermore, the Extension will decrease the truck traffic
associated with the Triad Business Park on offsite roadways and rail grade crossings.
The Extension will allow trucks traveling from the eastern portion of the Park to remain
onsite when traveling west, avoid rail crossings and interaction with traffic on Bunker Hill
Road and Mountain Street, and provide a direct route to /from the newly constructed
interchange at Macy Grove Road with ample capacity.
The absence of the Extension results in additional travel time, distance, and emissions
for site traffic traveling from the eastern portion of the park to destinations to the west. An
additional distance of 1.25 miles and time of approximately six minutes is estimated.
Analysis results show that approximately 480 PM peak hour trips would be subject to this
additional travel time. Also, the Extension will enhance internal operations by providing
adequate access and allowing site traffic to remain onsite when traveling to destinations
within the Triad Business Park.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 32

DAVENPORT
Based on the results of this study, the Extension of Old Greensboro Road is
recommended to provide adequate access to the remainder of the Triad Business Park,
and enhance the safety and operation of the surrounding roadway network. The
recommended cross section for the Extension is three lanes — one through lane in each
direction and a two -way left turn lane.
The intersection of Old Greensboro Road at Business Park Drive should be further
evaluated for improvements as the Triad Business Park continues development of lots,
particularly if the Old Greensboro Road Extension is constructed.
In conclusion, this study has reviewed the impacts of the proposed Old Greensboro Road
Extension, and has determined that its construction is necessary in order to provide
improved access to the remainder of the Triad Business Park and improved operation
and safety of the surrounding roadway network.
10/9/15 13 -054 Triad Business Park — Old Greensboro Road Extension Assessment 33

KERNERSVILLE FIRE RESCUE
Fire Marshal's Office
gin., Post Office Drawer 728 • Kernersville, North Carolina 27285 -0728
October 28, 2015
Mr. Jeff Hatling
Director of Community Development
Town of Kernersville
Mr. Hatling:
This letter shall serve as a statement in support of the effort to establish a stream
crossing and continue Old Greensboro Road from its current dead -end to serve the
eastern portion of the Triad Business Park and potentially connect to Bunker Hill
Road.
Without a crossing, the eastern portion of the business park is essentially cut -off
from the western portion and emergency response times are extended beyond
nationally recognized standards. In order to respond to the eastern portion of the
park without a stream crossing, fire apparatus will be forced to travel W. Market
Street outside the city limits to Bunker Hill Road as opposed to traveling a
continuous route on Old Greensboro Road and remaining within current Kernersville
city limits. This is a more direct route and would enable the fire department units to
respond within appropriate time frames and provide emergency medical and /or
emergency fire services as needed. Extended response times effect the Insurance
Services Office ratings of the fire department and have a negative effect on
insurance rates in the areas of extended response times.
It is my opinion that the stream crossing will enable our department to better serve
the occupancies within the eastern portion of the park thereby providing timely
emergency services; protecting lives and reducing property loss. The proposed
crossing is within the best interest of public safety.
Please contact me if you need further information or have any questions.
Respectfully,
Bruce Hennequin
Fire Marshal
Kernersville Fire Rescue
Telephone [phone] . Fax [phone]

Kernersville Police Department
Scott A. Cunningham
Chief of Police
June 25, 2015
Mr. Jeff Hatling
Director, Community Development
Town of Kernersville
Mr. Hatling,
Post Office Box 728
Kernersville, NC 27285
Phone: [phone]
Far: 336.992.5470
I am writing in support of the project to establish a roadway across the stream near the
current dead -end of Old Greensboro Road. Continuing the roadway across the stream
will have immediate and definite benefits for the citizens regarding public safety.
The proposed road continuance, which requires the stream to be crossed, will provide
better access into Phase 2 of Triad Business Park and potentially South Bunker Hill
Road. It will allow for more frequent and efficient patrols by personnel of the
Kernersville Police Department (KPD). Officers will have quicker response times to
Phase 2 of Triad Business Park and to the Macy Grove/421 Interchange area. This
would enhance general service to the Park,
As Chief of the Kernersville Police Department, I am interested in and will support any
and all efforts to increase the safety of Our community and our citizens. I believe this
roadway expansion and stream crossing is essential and beneficial.
Please feel free to contact me if I can be of further assistance in this or any other public
safety matter.
Respectfully,
A
Scott A. Cunningham
Chief of Police
Kernersville Police Department
134 E. Mountain Street e Kernersville, North Carolina, 27244
www.toknc.co n
;A Nationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency

will allow PTAA to clearly identify future airport development needs to the various federal, state and local
transportation and land use planning agencies that will be affected by the airport's growth.
6.4 PHASED LAND ACQUISITION AND AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
This Airport Master Plan Update anticipates that PTAA will acquire additional land for aviation -related airport
development purposes in three phases. This multi -phase land acquisition program may potentially occur over
the next several decades as land is needed for airport growth and to accommodate new airport tenants.
Although strategically envisioned and planned as three distinct and separate phases of land acquisition, it is
clearly recognized that real-world dynamics will influence the timing, methodology and financial considerations
regarding when and how additional land would be acquired by PTAA. These factors may include, but would
not be limited to, the availability of needed land offered by a willing seller, the price of land, the availability of
funding required to purchase land, Interim- or Long -Term income generation potential of land under
consideration for purchase and the need for land under consideration for purchase to directly support aviation -
related activities. Thus, PTAA might find itself acquiring land within the next 10 years that was not anticipated
for purchase in the Airport Master Plan Update until a later time period (i.e., Phase 2 or Phase 3), because of
unforeseen circumstances, opportunities or a common sense decision to undertake such actions. Accordingly,
because this Airport Master Plan Update cannot accurately predict when these circumstances might occur, the
timeline for such land acquisition, as recommended, should be considered a guide rather than a rule.
6.4.1 PROPOSED PHASED AIRPORT LAND ACQUISITION PROGRAM
The proposed multi -phase acquisition of approximately 2,300 acres of land that will be required to
accommodate future strategic (30-50 year) airport development needs is depicted in Figure 6-3. At the
completion of the phased land acquisition program, the total airport land area would be approximately 6,200+
acres.
6.4.2 PROPOSED AIRPORT LAND ACQUISITION PHASE 1 (0-10 YEARS
Proposed land acquisition within Phase 1 includes 243 acres, much of which is located northwest of Bryan
Boulevard in proximity to the airport's new Runway 5L/23R, and a proposed future Taxiway G located parallel
and northwest of that runway. Acquisition of this land is necessary in the Near -Term to ensure the highest and
best use of the new runway and airport property that is not currently used for aviation -related purposes. That
is, the airport must have adequate land in proximity to the runway to accommodate tenants who will make use
of the runway.
Phase 1 envisions purchasing additional land along Regional Road and West Market Street, which is near the
southwest end of the Runway 5L/23R and west of the Runway 14/32. This property will allow infill
development of an area that is already largely occupied by airport cargo, maintenance and general aviation
uses. An additional parcel on the southeast side of the current airport property will fill out an area in close
proximity to Honda Aviation Company's headquarters and manufacturing campus, which is in turn adjacent to
the existing 10,001 -foot Runway 5R/23L.
The proposed multi -phased airport acquisition program is depicted in Figure 6-4.
J:\Greensboro Master Plan Update\MPU REPORT\Section 06- Strategic AMP lmp\Section6.doc 6-6 Airport Master Plan Update and
Strategic Long -Range Visioning Plan
Piedmont Triad International Airport

/i\\\`/// \ T °< o• POTENTIAL ° o
FUTURE RIDE
Q=<.�NTERCHANGE PL�PSpN� o'
o�<------------
I
POTENTIA FUTURE_
NTERSTATE 7HIGHWAY 68�
IKi R HANGE
_° II --
\ r
T RIDG_RD.
PLEA
M _ SAN E73
`ZA
zi
I•
68
-- ------------
--------
_=
�a
— \ �. .
POTENTIAL /I' -- V �.\ ✓ii �� ��A� 1
FUTURE
INTERCHANGE \ '�'� - —jL
° � �\ `� A I A •.� `ems. � /�/�)���
ip
� o ♦ � `. II � + ;! O" ��: � � i ii� _�,.• \_ � – -� ./� iii ii �.+� � �,..- �' � / g°:/I >
° i IAS � � '�i�,�� _ _ _ _ �-ewo.�,.���� M • �' � �«/
�_ - T4--_
\V�------
--------------------
;-A
° 11 � + I i � ill i 1 _, •-. . x-.-,� � i�" �� �.
AIRPORT PARK�� �'`
I T I I i i
Y' i -- i • o q � iii c= �
�l 1 I %.�.
Gy J� moo PTI DR.� ,/
� ^✓� _ ^� /�JE=
.wo
.m .
F h -- ------- -- --= - T
;Ile-,
� o - 1
�y °
0
o ..
°ate
ovia,
LN
0 d ' III j
�� I
. ��VII >• � : r � A
000 O
- _-- - - ----- ---- ----- <<
. DAL'F U ,
0
RD �
uo "
I
0 CHIMNEY ROCK RD.
� � o
1� 0 � D� a� 0 D 73 4 O
�y
vo
s � �
♦�� ♦� ♦ ' .
J,
eRYgN
oP
E
FIGURE
I
LEGEND
o
40
. ��VII >• � : r � A
000 O
- _-- - - ----- ---- ----- <<
. DAL'F U ,
0
RD �
uo "
I
0 CHIMNEY ROCK RD.
� � o
1� 0 � D� a� 0 D 73 4 O
�y
vo
s � �
♦�� ♦� ♦ ' .
J,
eRYgN
oP
E
FIGURE
I
LEGEND
----
EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE
—
FUTURE AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE
O
EXISTING AIRFIELD PAVEMENT
Q d
Q
-
EXISTING AIRFIELD BUILDING
cc a
cu
-
FUTURE AIRFIELD BUILDING/EXPANSION
a
FUTURE AIRFIELD PAVEMENT
J
-
ULTIMATE AIRFIELD CAPABILITY
Z Z
N
OEXISTING
00
d
AIRPORT PROPERTY (3,940± AC.)
CC
~
LAND ACQUISITION
(PHASE 1 - 243± AC.)
L
Q
N
W Z
w
LAND ACQUISITION
d
(PHASE 2 - 629± AC.)
LAND ACQUISITION
W
C
(PHASE 3 - 1,404± AC.)
Z
a
Q
ABANDONED OR RELOCATEDEm
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS (231 AC.)
2000
0 2000
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
^"
. ��VII >• � : r � A
000 O
- _-- - - ----- ---- ----- <<
. DAL'F U ,
0
RD �
uo "
I
0 CHIMNEY ROCK RD.
� � o
1� 0 � D� a� 0 D 73 4 O
�y
vo
s � �
♦�� ♦� ♦ ' .
J,
eRYgN
oP
E
FIGURE
I

ll
- ---
i LEGEND
EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE
FUTURE AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE
POTENTIAL FUTURE // °04 EXISTING AIRFIELD PAVEMENT
INTERSTATTFF�73/HIGHWAY 68
INTERCHANGE EXISTING AIRFIELD BUILDING
° Q o
p• ° ° \.6 --- --- �� a� FUTURE AIRFIELD BUILDING/EXPANSION a
FUTURE AIRFIELD PAVEMENT Q =
------ ULTIMATE ULTIMATE AIRFIELD CAPABILITY Z Z
`
,SANT RIDGE RD ,�,,o ° II. ° o EXISTING 0 o a
AIRPORT PROPERTY (3,940± AC.)
LAND ACQUISITION N
o Q
(PHASE 1 - 243± AC.) LLJ Q
o Z
73
o o
o O o Q.
2000 0 2000 a
' j� I o •® GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
� , •v '•v IIS. .,� ��� � E° : ..
I]Ia
® / .\ � � .� •:✓II III \� ����: � � b�_
o ♦ ''•^,.>, I .•. .�' �`
jltt, V
�� gR _ I II ✓,—� / _- -- III ,� ' ••'� ..d• o � d �O
•t
c_
.off.° * ,/ /• . - —— -- -- r t % �•.1, !' • i dVi �, i�
L -1, -
AIRPORT PARKWI=IIS --_�� o ee°.` l••�•:vo °«°t �.
rF —°'J
OC, ,''\ 11 J V Ii�I ASO "� • .°i o�° '°� °° °,. ° ° ° ��
PTI DR. �� ��� / 9 m -�. :O -t� . .-; ' .'+� •`���°•
V W �P2 i ,_'"`� - - --- �I Y a � \�� �� � � � � °� ��• ° ° ...°•moo:
10
o
�� ► � � � DOI��I > >.� -- -11[--- _ IIII _ << °�
� � d . � I II L ■ o � � ° 1° •�
O Z y\� { ' � _ � III III I o � � •/
O Oi
o
Z
I�
I
f_
i
-
s� r - � 44"� llf
�► o - i - \ 0ol
Wixom - -
���� _- --- - - - --
'L
e — —
DAR RD
wl(
1
O
u
ril—
J)G
FIGURE
6-4

6.4.3 PROPOSED AIRPORT LAND USE PHASE 1 (0-10 YEARS
Land uses to be developed within Phase 1 will be aviation -related and located immediately adjacent to the
airfield. These land areas will be developed to best accommodate new airport tenants and their associated
activities that may include, but would not be limited to: corporate general aviation or air cargo activities within
the airport's southwest quadrant west of Runway 14/32 and along West Market Street, and aircraft
manufacturing and maintenance east of Runway 5R/23L along Radar Road, Chimney Rock Road and west of
Runway 5L/23R east of Bryan Boulevard. It is envisioned that land areas west of Runway 5L/23R and east of
Runway 5R/23L will be developed to accommodate larger sized leased parcels. Aviation -related land uses
along West Market Street are anticipated to be developed on a smaller scale, but with the built-in flexibility to
accommodate a variety of facility layouts, shapes or sizes to best suit individual tenant operational and facility
development needs.
Land areas that do not have direct access to the airfield will be developed as demand dictates to
accommodate aviation -related land uses. Aviation -related land uses within the airport's northwest quadrant
will require the development of a cross -field taxiway system to provide access to the existing three -runway
system. The cross -field taxiway system would traverse land areas currently occupied by the airport
surveillance radar, Bryan Boulevard, the Pleasant Ridge Golf Course, multiple buildings and the future 1-73
right -of way corridor. To develop the northwest quadrant to its highest and best aviation -related use, it is
recognized that realignment or removal of portions of Bryan Boulevard would be required and would most
likely not occur until the 1-73 right -of way has been fully developed and in operation. The land areas
immediately adjacent to the future parallel Taxiway G and the cross -field taxiway would most likely be
developed first to support aviation -related activities that require direct access to the airfield. Other land uses
within the northwest quadrant may also be later developed to support aviation -related activities or, by
proximity, provide allied aviation support activities and services.
Other land uses on the airport would be expanded to their fullest geographical extent and developed to their
respective highest and best use. The general aviation land uses would be expanded west of Runway 14/32
and within the existing mid -field area. Passenger terminal expansion would include the addition of a third
(south) concourse similar in design and size to those that exist today. The air cargo development area
currently occupied by FedEx would be expanded southward to the safety area setback limits of the cross -field
taxiway system. The aviation -related land uses located southeast of Runway 5R/23L would be developed to
accommodate activities similar to those in use today (Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and aircraft
manufacturing) and would most likely utilize larger parcels and/or leased areas. The proposed land use
development that would most likely occur within Phase 1 (0-10 year period) is depicted in Figure 6-5.
6.4.4 PROPOSED AIRPORT FACILITY DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1 (0-10 YEARS
Planned airfield facility improvements that may occur within Phase 1 include, but would not be limited to the
following:
• Extension of Runway 5R/23L and associated parallel taxiways in the northeast direction,
• Construction of a high-speed exit taxiway for Runway 5R/23L,
• Parallel Taxiway G along the northwest side of Runway 5L/23R,
J:\Greensboro Master Plan Update\MPU REPORT\Section 06- Strategic AMP Imp\Section6.doc 6-7 Airport Master Plan Update and
Strategic Long -Range Visioning Plan
Piedmont Triad International Airport

• A new cross -field taxiway to serve the area currently occupied by the Pleasant Ridge Golf Course,
and
• A new cross -field Taxiway F to provide bi-directional taxi operation immediately southwest of the
FedEx complex.
6.4.5 PROPOSED LAND ACQUISITION PHASE 2 (BEYOND 10 YEARS)
Phase 2 would most likely occur sometime within the 11 to 30 year timeframe and would include
approximately 629+ acres comprising three geographic areas located immediately west of North Regional
Road and east of NC 68; northwest of Pleasant Ridge Road; and west of Old Oak Ridge Road. The proposed
Phase 2 land acquisition program is depicted in Figure 6-6.
6.4.6 PROPOSE AIRPORT LAND USE PHASE 2 (BEYOND 10 YEARS
Land uses proposed to be developed within Phase 2 will be aviation -related and have direct access to the
existing three -runway airfield system via the development of multiple cross -field taxiways. The highest and
best use of these land uses is based upon the assumption that major changes to the local roadways system
has occurred that would include: the relocation or closure of Bryan Boulevard; relocation of the airport
surveillance radar; major re -grading and leveling of topographical relief features and the completion of the 1-73
corridor. It is further assumed that the Pleasant Ridge Golf Course would be closed and all other previously
developed buildings and/or structures have reached or exceeded their respective useful lives and have been
closed, removed or abandoned.
The land areas immediately adjacent to the future parallel Taxiway G and the multiple cross -field taxiways
would be developed to support aviation -related activities that require direct access to the airfield. Other land
uses within the airport's northwest quadrant may also include other aviation -related development that, by
proximity orfunction, provides allied aviation -related support activities and services. The proposed continued
land use development that would most likely occur with the Phase 2 is depicted in Figure 6-7.
6.4.7 PROPOSED AIRPORT FACILITY DEVELOPMENT PHASE 2 (BEYOND 10 YEARS)
Planned airfield facility improvements that might possibly occur within Phase 2 include, but would not be
limited to the following:
• Improvement to Taxiway M,
• Extension of Taxiway J to the south,
• Extension of Runway 14/32 and associated parallel taxiways to the southeast, and
• Construction of a second cross -field taxiway connecting Runway 5L/23R to newly acquired land areas
currently located northwest of Bryan Boulevard.
6.4.8 PROPOSED ULTIMATEAIRPORT LAND ACQUISITION PHASE 3 (BEYOND 30 YEARS
The strategic vision for the growth of the airport over the 30- to 50 -year timeframe includes the potential
development of a third widely -spaced parallel runway (having a minimum runway centerline -to -runway
J:\Greensboro Master Plan Update\MPU REPORT\Section 06- Strategic AMP Imp\Section6.doc 6-8 Airport Master Plan Update and
Strategic Long -Range Visioning Plan
Piedmont Triad International Airport

m
/ ----- �� LEGEND
�, o —EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE
® EXISTING AIRFIELD BUILDING
POTENTIAL/FUTURE FUTURE AIRFIELD BUILDING/EXPANSION
INTERSTA 7 HIGHWAY 68 � � °, °°
IN ANGE / °
d AIRFIELD/RPZ
TERMINAL AREA
_—_" nn f�� oa ° ° TERMINAL SUPPORT/RAC
RIDGE RD ° a•° Ej
GENERAL AVIATION
7 c�`2, •, ° \ ' \ - PLEASANT---
—` AVIATION RELATED
/\ a _ AVIATION SUPPORT
RESERVED FOR FUTURE AVIATION RELATED
vv®""73 v 3 �a CARGO
OPERATIONS
Q D ��, vv ; Ivv o�, i;.• L� INSTITUTIONAL/COMMERCIAL
"C_ �� �v •°"_� .� ; d ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE/PROTECTED
UNCLASSIFIED
\.
i
_-_ \�\\�� Q�a /'/-IIr m s• _ . 2000 0 2000
0 �- - c_� \y`e •���' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
.s � / - ��' O- III \\ I \ \ tl e ••',�lJ•_
--------------
73
I
\ r.
20� � ---JI-.-__7YIRP�F'tTl_P.�FFtf�47AV`.-- -- ( Ii111 ,. OCO. � �� ' As+�+�,' O s•. �; ,�`rre•
PO'' u � III �� � � '�� �• • . ° j P � o . e'io� � .. �P. ®� $ ,/�
�'� \ �I 11 rf = l 1 QC• f , I• P .Z, , e , , • o _`f/
DR. — — m � � ',o �� i� ; . ��•�� ; �
P I 1 III I II I f` _ a � �Z .; • i : s .. � • , p,.•.
�L _r
�/ • -� � �- I _I :' ILII II I� _ •� � eP e 1.
Ll F�l
' a0
71
�•
_ D -
s '
'0eAV
QZD
3 840
CD
•
• o �; ! s� ♦ ♦ ♦ ,tip °,� s ®�.' °
V♦
Z OC
J W
o0
r
a'
�0
a •-
WW
N
04
0=
as
0
a
FIGURE
6-5

0
------- LEGEND
EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE
FUTURE AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE O
POTENTIALTURF EXISTING AIRFIELD PAVEMENT d
e, o -� INTERSTATE -,3 HIGHWAY 68 / °4
INTERCHANGE
/ �° V EXISTING AIRFIELD BUILDING
ca
FUTURE AIRFIELD BUILDING/EXPANSION 'CI
°� o �ENTIAL �- ° o �� I �0 J M
�6�TURE % �— gip. RIOG --\ n FUTURE AIRFIELD PAVEMENT a =
IN RCHANGE
Nom/ j P PN _
ULTIMATE AIRFIELD CAPABILITY Z Z �
i>.. I
\\ \ — PLEASANCE=R� __ ° ° L° " �. EXISTING O 0 d
AIRPORT PROPERTY (4,198± AC.) C '-
L � N
LAND ACQUISITION
(PHASE 2 - 629± AC.)
Lu
ABANDONED OR RELOCATED Z
�:�\- PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (105± AC.) d
73 �� �J W O
Q
2000 0 2000
rI �, �` 0 r .• �a
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SIR= iii
J L \ I/ Iii �i r' �' ©ai' •'
POTENTIAL � r /"�� ', ,'i � i i OAC �AVAY � �•�;
FUTUREINTERCHA
w
o ♦ I \ � � - � - - i LVO a h " ''�� - � �_' � . •' e ��
`lR o � I � / � II I '.— 7 — i 'I I � �e.1f' •� i�if �I ,.Y
V
ry
I I- 7<O-• __ T, I I � `-� � li ---� �� • •• a e'e,se vo , e
AIRPORT PARK '' ����0 e ♦� oe ri e ' o �` • °:ate.
'� �O � 09 Q° « ees ens , „•�,le � . e.' .d 9•�
� � iI ° �, � PTI DR. 7 - � ao �� �� %�� ,e ��.•
OG ,i e 8
s
��m - i `i �� �� e ° ° ° ��•e••
o z
0
.a
— ---
.0
�rx
r .
I
I►� �� I o. - ju i
DAR(
_ � p..I. p� IIffIIIIIIffII OOP/ 0 �IIg
4 Q r p
zl
r,
CHIMNEY ROCK RD.
/ a
o �
I �
%
•
N
J LV
N
�a
00.
w
R
FIGURE
6-6

a
m
4
I I
�''x.11
/ POTENTIAL t =i III III A \
1 FUTURE
\ INTERCHANGE
0 II
roll II v y — — --------------------------------
IVA T h J - — -- Ills III f
i
I\
,0 T _
PT DR.
�J-{ - i
it
J
H 3e �P
Ll F Tig
Jill
------------
1-I11 �I, •
,
II �� / I
v
CHIMNEY ROCK RD.
_R
�� 011L --
o Q s \
o °
73
• • • �• �•• mac^ '� '' S7101
� ��Q�®;� ��I(�°`4C �� � `� �• I`= �`
• 0 N
LEGEND
— EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE
- EXISTING AIRFIELD BUILDING
- FUTURE AIRFIELD BUILDING/EXPANSION
AIRFIELD/RPZ
TERMINAL AREA
TERMINAL SUPPORT/RAC
GENERAL AVIATION
- AVIATION RELATED
AVIATION SUPPORT
CARGO
® OPERATIONS
INSTITUTIONAL/COMMERCIAL
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE/PROTECTED
UNCLASSIFIED
2000 0 2000
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
��\ �,� gym• . � a V
{ '` _ •�.�.�' •,• 1 ISVi �I� a ems'
�� / • �� �1 1 Oe
7 s
C �, e• a®o a �t
�mo-�mmi®mro�mmmr�®mm�� � r
a
73
,
eRygN
a
0 �n
W
a
O
a
FIGURE
6-7
i� POTENTIAL UTURE
INTERSTATE 73/HIGHWAY 68
INTERCHANGE
/ ao
pTENTIAL
I� {
FUTURE
ERFHANGF' . �"�.�
G
9P��
RID40
\
\
pLEP
\
\
I I
�''x.11
/ POTENTIAL t =i III III A \
1 FUTURE
\ INTERCHANGE
0 II
roll II v y — — --------------------------------
IVA T h J - — -- Ills III f
i
I\
,0 T _
PT DR.
�J-{ - i
it
J
H 3e �P
Ll F Tig
Jill
------------
1-I11 �I, •
,
II �� / I
v
CHIMNEY ROCK RD.
_R
�� 011L --
o Q s \
o °
73
• • • �• �•• mac^ '� '' S7101
� ��Q�®;� ��I(�°`4C �� � `� �• I`= �`
• 0 N
LEGEND
— EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE
- EXISTING AIRFIELD BUILDING
- FUTURE AIRFIELD BUILDING/EXPANSION
AIRFIELD/RPZ
TERMINAL AREA
TERMINAL SUPPORT/RAC
GENERAL AVIATION
- AVIATION RELATED
AVIATION SUPPORT
CARGO
® OPERATIONS
INSTITUTIONAL/COMMERCIAL
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE/PROTECTED
UNCLASSIFIED
2000 0 2000
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
��\ �,� gym• . � a V
{ '` _ •�.�.�' •,• 1 ISVi �I� a ems'
�� / • �� �1 1 Oe
7 s
C �, e• a®o a �t
�mo-�mmi®mro�mmmr�®mm�� � r
a
73
,
eRygN
a
0 �n
W
a
O
a
FIGURE
6-7

centerline separation of 4,300 feet) that would be constructed northwest of Runway 5L/23R. The long-range
planning vision also anticipates a possible third parallel runway that would be interconnected to the existing
system of three runways via multiple cross -field taxiways previously developed within Phase 2. This third
runway would be developed as demand dictates.
Potential operational demand for a third runway may be driven by the need for additional airfield capacity due
to increased aviation activity at the airport overtime, or in response to the specific operational needs to
provide an additional, yet independently -operated parallel runway. Such runway development may be based
upon the need to support extensive or concentrated development of interconnected air cargo transport
facilities, manufacturing systems or other aviation -related facility development envisioned as part of the
Piedmont Triad Aerotropolis Plan.
To accommodate the potential development of a third runway, NC 68 would be relocated to the west with an
interchange at 1-73. It is estimated that land acquisition within Phase 3 may include approximately 1,400+
acres. The proposed phased airport land acquisition program is depicted in Figure 6-8.
6.4.9 PROPOSED ULTIMATEAIRPORT LAND USE PHASE 3 (BEYOND 30 YEARS
Land uses proposed to be developed within Phase 3 will be aviation -related and have direct access to the
proposed third parallel runway and the existing three -runway airfield system via the development of multiple
cross -field taxiways.
The land areas immediately adjacent to the future parallel runway and cross -field taxiways would most likely
be developed first to support aviation -related activities that require direct access to the airfield. Other land
uses within the northwest quadrant may also be aviation -related, or by proximity, provide allied services in
direct support of other aviation -related activities and services. The proposed land use development that would
most likely occur with the Phase 3 is depicted in Figure 6-9.
6.4.10 PROPOSED ULTIMATEAIRPORT FACILITY DEVELOPMENT PHASE 3 (BEYOND 30 YEARS)
Planned airfield facility improvements that may occur within Phase include, but would not be limited to the
following:
• Construction of two additional high-speed exit taxiways for Runway 5R/23L,
• Reconstruction and extension of Runway 14/32 and associated parallel taxiways to the northwest,
• Extension of Runway 5L/23R and associated parallel taxiways to the southwest,
• A new cross -field Taxiway from Taxiway G to land areas in the northwest quadrant, and
• Construction of a third parallel runway.
J:\Greensboro Master Plan Update\MPU REPORT\Section 06- Strategic AMP Imp\Section6.doc 6-9 Airport Master Plan Update and
Strategic Long -Range Visioning Plan
Piedmont Triad International Airport