20151112 Ver 1_Preservation Report_20150427

ADDENDUM
PRESERVATION PROJECT AND
BASELINE DOCUMENTATION REPORT

HAW RIVER TRACT
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DMS Project No. 169

Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030002

Prepared for:

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603

Prepared by:

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603

June 2015
Haw River Tract Preservation Project
DMS ID 169 Table of Contents Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 1
1.0 ADDITIONAL BASELINE INFORMATION...................................................................................... 1
2.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS ....................................................................................................... 2
3.0 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................... 3

APPENDICES

Appendix A. Figures and Photographs
Figure 1. Mitigation Assets
Site Photographs
Appendix B. Stream Forms
Haw River Tract Preservation Project
DMS ID 169 Page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This addendum gives baseline information and mitigation units for streams and riparian buffer
assets located within the Haw River Tract Site (Site). Wetland mitigation units are included in
this document; however, remain unchanged from the March 2015 NC Division of Mitigation
Services Final Preservation Project and Baseline Documentation Report Haw River Tract.
Project goals and objectives, and Site information can be found in that document.

The Site is located in southeast Rockingham County, approximately 1 mile south of
Williamsburg within the Cape Fear River Basin along the Haw River. The Site contains streams
and riparian wetlands within the floodplain of a reach of the Haw River, which is currently
affected by numerous stressors including turbidity, nutrient inputs, and habitat degradation.
Current agricultural, wastewater, and stormwater runoff, and increasing growth and development
pressures within the watershed are becoming of greater concern making preservation of Site
streams and wetlands vital to maintaining aquatic habitat within the Haw River and water quality
of the Jordan Lake reservoir.

1.0 ADDITIONAL BASELINE INFORMATION

Jurisdictional Streams
Watershed Summary
The Site provides water quality function to a 0.20-square mile (130-acre) watershed at the outfall
into the Haw River. The Site drainage area is primarily composed of forested and residential
land.

Reach Summary
The Site borders the Haw River and contains 3 jurisdictional stream reaches (2 perennial and 1
intermittent), which total 1380.69 linear feet of stream; the table below gives information for
each reach. Buffer widths vary for each reach ranging from buffer on one side of the stream only
to greater than 100 feet from the top of bank on both sides of the stream; more detailed buffer
width information is included in Section 2.0 (Determination of Credits) below. Site streams
drain to the Haw River, which is listed as Class C and Nutrient Sensitive Waters by the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR 2013). No areas of concern were observed; all
stream reaches within the Site are stable.

Jurisdictional Stream Characteristics

Type Depicted on
USGS
Depicted on
NRCS Soil
Map
Drainage
Area (acres)
USACE
Form Score
Length
(linear Feet)
UT1 Perennial No Yes 130 71 1155.97
UT2 Intermittent/Perennial No No 10 55/61 133.13
UT3 Intermittent No No 5 60 91.59
Total 1380.69

Haw River Tract Preservation Project
DMS ID 169 Page 2
2.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS

Additional project mitigation assets were delineated in May 2015 using Global Positioning
Systems. (Figure 1, Appendix A; Stream Data forms, Appendix B). The following tables
summarize Site stream reaches and mitigation assets.

All credits will be released upon IRT approval. The project service area will be in compliance
with the DMS In-Lieu Fee Instrument.

Haw River Tract, Rockingham County, Cape Fear River Basin, 03030002 Cataloging Unit
EEP Project Number 169
Mitigation Credits
Warm Stream Riparian Wetland Non-riparian
Wetland
Riparian
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient
Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient
Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE
Totals NA 276 NA 4.62 NA NA 15,674 NA NA
Stream Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation
components
Warm Stream
(linear feet)
Buffer <50 feet from
one or both TOB
(5:1)
Buffer 50-100 feet from
both TOB
(5:1)
Buffer >100 feet
from both TOB
(5:1)
Total Stream by Reach
UT1 26.01 57.33 1072.63 1155.97
UT2 -- 9.06 124.07 133.13
UT3 -- -- 91.59 91.59
Total
(linear feet) 26.01 66.39 1288.29 1380.69
Total SMUs 5.20 13.28 257.66 276 SMUs
Wetland Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation
Components Mitigation Ratio Riparian Wetland Non-riparian
Wetland Riverine Non-riverine
Wetland 1 5:1 0.347 --
Wetland 2 5:1 -- 11.966
Wetland 3 5:1 -- 0.032
Wetland 4 5:1 5.980 --
Wetland 5 5:1 4.043 --
Wetland 6 5:1 -- 0.353
Wetland 7 5:1 0.200 --
Wetland 8 5:1 -- 0.082
Wetland 9 5:1 -- 0.013
Wetland 10 5:1 -- 0.078
Total
(acreage) 10.57 12.52 --
Total WMUs 4.62 --
Haw River Tract Preservation Project
DMS ID 169 Page 3

*The area of mitigation beyond 100 feet from the TOB may comprise no more than 10 percent of the total mitigation area.

3.0 REFERENCES

NC Division of Water Resources (2013), Cape Fear River Basin Surface Water Classifications,
online (June 1, 2015). http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, NC Division of Water Resources,
Raleigh, NC

NC Division of Mitigation Services (2015), Final Preservation Project and Baseline
Documentation Report Haw River Tract, Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, NC Division of Mitigation Services, Raleigh, NC

Riparian Buffer Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation components Mitigation Ratio Buffer
(square feet)
Buffer Receiving
Credit (square feet)
Rural Non-Subject Streams with 30-100 foot Buffer from TOB 5:1 24,110.43 24,110.43
Rural Non-Subject Streams with 100-200 foot Buffer from TOB 10:1 31,732.43* 24,568.19
Rural Subject Streams with 30-100 foot Buffer from TOB 10:1 83,950.31 83,950.31
Rural Subject Streams with 100-200 foot Buffer from TOB 20:1 105,888.73* --
Total (square feet) 245,681.90 132,628.93
Total Buffer Mitigation Units 15,674
Haw River Tract Preservation Project
DMS ID 169 Appendices

APPENDIX A
FIGURES AND PHOTOGRAPHS

!!
!
Photo 1
Photos 2, 3Photos 4, 5
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP,swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
Rockingham County, NC
MITIGATION ASSETSHAW RIVER TRACTPRESERVATION SITE
FIGUREDrawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ
JUNE 2015
14-018
Title:Project:Prepared for:
11:3500
³
Legend
Conservation Easement Boundary
Stream TOB
!PhotosStream Centerline/Mitigation
Stream Buffer <50 feet on One or Both Banks
Stream Buffer 50-100 feet from Both TOB
Stream Buffer >100 feet from Both TOB
Riparian Buffer
Rural Subject Stream with 30-100 foot Buffer
Rural Subject Stream with 100-200 foot Buffer
Rural Non-subject Stream with 30-100 foot Buffer
Rural Non-subject Stream with 100-200 foot BufferWetland Preservation
Riparian Riverine (Riverine Swamp Forest)
Riparian Nonriverine (Bottomland Hardwood Forest)
Riparian Nonriverine (Floodplain Pool)
0 500 1,000 1,500250Feet
Wetland 2
Wetland 4
Wetland 3
Wetland 8
Wetland 9
Wetland 10
Wetland 5
Wetland 7
Wetland 6
Wetland 1
UT-1
UT-3
U
T-
2
Haw River Tract Preservation Project
DMS ID 169 Appendices

Photo 1. Downstream portion of UT-1

Photo 2. UT-2

Photo 3. Remnants of old beaver dam on UT-1

Photo 4. UT-3, facing upstream

Photo 5. UT-3, facing downstream

Haw River Tract Preservation Project
DMS ID 169 Appendices

APPENDIX B
STREAM FORMS

U'r- I
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 VA' ?q
Date: S Z I 1 5
Project/Site: I�Nw 2 ,u r.ci
Latitude:
Evaluator: <<.-.,^, �(r,}(7 -
County: ckAsjIv,
Longitude: Sg Z
Total Points:
Stream Determination (Cir
Other 041li-O S6.
Stream is at least intermittent 3 S
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30'
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0 0.5 1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
0.5
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
T
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
' O s
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = I S
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1. 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 Yes(t J3
0.5
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 32
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish TF
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish 0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians 0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae 0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: �, <rc o' e
r Macri ,4 f1 ,. s wer. f,
Sketch:
coj QST
j

DWQ 4 Site ��-(indicate on attached map)
STRFAIY QUALITY ASSESSMENT I—A'ORKSHEET
Provide the fullmaing information for the stream reach underassessment:
1. Applicant's name eeF 2. 1 valuator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: ����- - - - 4. I-ime of evaluation
5. Name of stream ave 1Zve/ — "3� - 6. River basin:_
'.:approximate drainage area. 8. Stream order:
1 / ke441 — At,
I Ar�
C - Pe Fe" -
9. Length of reach c\aluatcd —1004. 10. County
L^-�- --
11. Site coordinates (ifkiumn)1,,cfci m i:,inlial det*rees 12. Subdivision name (it all%.Y
'36I 't I; r\ �A 102;12 — �?-5 3 _ f.on••riuife ti\ »r,R•I 1 is r �. SOS �gL -
yIciliod location determined (circle) C iVS fuel, Sheet (_)rthcr IAcr:,it1 I'll n:6 (A her 6 I Other
13. Location (if reach under evaluation (note nearbti roads and landmarks and attach mate ielentil\ing stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any)
I-;. Recent \weather concht ions �.fM
It,. Site conditions at time of x isitIn1Lr.^ . Cuoo,i
F. Idcntit AM sf\ccial \\olio r\\a\ classifications known Section Il) Tidal Walter, Essential Fisheries habitat
T rout ',1 aicr> ( )uutandinu Rcsuurcr \N atcrs ;nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply \� atershed (14V t
lit. is there a pond or lake Ideated upstream ofthe evaluation point'' 'kS NO Ifyes, estimate the water surface area: 0.z ,acres'
19. Doc, channel appear on ('SGS quad map? NTS 24). Dues channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? a'FS N1 if
21. l sllrn;ttccl \\atershcd land lr,e: ?A Residential _'%) Commercial ®"-. Industrial ° s Agricultural
72. Bankfull width,
:�5 % Forested 1. Cleared lugged N Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1.54
24. t hannel lope down center of stream Flat (0 to "`lO X C;entle (2 to 4",,1 _Moderate (4 to IO°ia) —Steep (-10')s)
2i;. Channo•I inuosll\ Straight _Occasional pends X I request meander _Ver) sinuous _Braided channel
lostructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by detcrminin2 the most appropriate ecoregion based on
luc,rti,\ti, terrain. \gctation, stream classification. etc. F.very characteristic must he scored using the sante ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic \\ ithin the rank shown for the ecoregion Pkee ; provides ai brief' description of hov% to revie%% the
charactcristies identified in illi \\ork,hcet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated dui to site or weather conditions. enter () in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. \.here there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (cog.. the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest). the stream ma\ be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity. and a separate form used to.evaluate each
reach. The total score assiLmed to a ,tre tm reach must ranfae between () and Its(), with a score of 100 representing a stream of- the
highest quant
Total Score (from reverse):_ L _ Comments: - 54+e-,_- SAS e)c,*+d oil be -vu iti ec"'1J#K$'}
ani bid/ b.�ti �s r�vsh wl4.e ,incl. 01*ata ,ora "r rh7l
L
F \ aluator's Signature 4 Date
This channel evaluation forth is t t e only as a guide to assist landowners :ruff environmental professionals in
gatherim, the data required by c United `tate,, Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
qualm. Fhe festal score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not implw a
particular mitigation ratio, or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03, 1 o C"onuncnt. please call Q19-576-8441 \ _'h

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHFF i
" lliese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
4UE
f CHARACTERISTICS
OItlJA0\ 1 OIN
112\\(,I.'
- --- -
SCOW.
-
Coastal
- -
Piedmont
j
1t)u11tain
3
Presence of flow I persistent pools in stream
(no flow or saturation - 0; strong flow - max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0. 5
S
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration - max points)
3f Riparian zone
0-6
0_4 -
0_ 5
(no buffer - 0; contiguous. Fide butler - mak points)
`1
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
{) _ 5
0 - !
0-4
i (extensive dischargcs 0; no discharges max points)
Groundwater discharge
(no discharge 0. sprin y s, seeps. Wetlands. etc max points)
tl
0 - l
0 - a
Lf
Presence of adjacent floodplain
6
0-4
0 -
0-2
I ! (no floodplain = 0. extensive floodplain = max points)
i
Entrenchment I floodplain access
{} _ ;
0-4
0- 2-
(deeply entrenched - 0: frequent flooding max points)
-
Y
Presence of adjacent wetlands -- -- -
$
0.6
0-4
0-2
(rf
(no Wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands max points)
11
9 Channel sinuosity
O S
O _a
{) i
I
(extensive channelization - 0: natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input
0_ 5
' 0 - -i
0 4
(extensive deposition = 0; little or no sediment = mat points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA.
t)
I t)
(line, hoinogenous - 0; large. diverse sizes =max points)
Evidence of channel incision or widening
12j
o->
0-4
0
(deeply incised .m 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
Y-
Presence of major bank failures
13 -
0-5
0- 5
0-i
(severe erosion (}: no erosion. stable banks max points)
0 s
-
14 Root depth and density an banks
-
0 ;
- ---
0-4
(no visible roots - O} dense roots throuehout max point_.t
©
Is Impact by agriculture, livestock. or timber production
0 - i
0_4
0 -
u
(substantial impact =0, no evidence - max points)
0-3
0-6
/
z
Presence of riffle-pool/rippie-pool complexes
l6
0-5
(no riffles/ripples or pook 0: v� ell -developed max points)
I
1) Habitat complexity
(1-6
t1- 6
0- t-
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats - max points)
Canopy coverage over streatnbed
ti s
O s
s
hiding vegetation - 0: continuous canopy -max points)
©
77- Substrate embeddedness
lq -
NA*
0-4
o -a
emhe d = 0: loose structure max)
_(deeply
Presence of st invertebrates (see page 4)
0
{)
()
() 5
Z
(no evidence u: common, numerous types max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0--1
?
i(1--1
(no evidence 0: common, numerous types max points) _
J
Presence of fish
0
0-4
o f
f7
`_2
(no evidence = 0; common.. numerous types = max points)
Evidence of wildlife use
�l C1-6 0-�
(no evidence - 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 1(10 100
I
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
" lliese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

UT Z uPs+rcttnn
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5 Z 15
Project/Site: (%_ger
Latitude: �j ZGZ?Q
Evaluator: J, IV,
County:
Longitude: q 4 S Z S
Total Points:
Stream Deterircle one)
Other vj; 0 A
Stream is at least intermittent Z (�
Ephemeralnterrn! nt Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1)
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
4--03
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
0
Yes
= 3
aniTiciai aacnes are not ratea; see aiscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = -7- 1
6
(75-T
12. Presence of Baseflow
_01
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1)
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0'
No = 0
Yes
1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = _15
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0'
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
1
1
I
C�
3

11
USACI %11) i ©WQ ,i Site t# 146,o (indicate on attached map)
t 11
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT ti' ORKSHEET
Provide the follcm ing information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name- Ef Q 2. Evaluator's name �urti%j#A ' 4-+44 — 14orm
3. Date of evaluation:_ Z� lS - - 4. Time of evaluation: ►1:IS A#A
5. Name of stream:--- 0.w �_,,� (r«v� - K6-01 - 6. River basin: --
7_ Approximate drainage area: "-�0 -Atre5— - 8. Stream order:
9. 1 ength of reach ci aluatcd z5 0 10. C oumy:11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. l2. Subdivision name ( if any !:
Latitude,ex 148723I2t: 36.262397 Longitude tex-77i5ht,tt): ZS
Method location determine -d (circle): 6115 Topo tihect Ortho (Aerial) Phot IS t alter GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) location):
04 r_i W &,j
14. Proposed channel work (if an)): NorL - ---- — -
15. Recent weather conditions: btJarAA 0 �Pr -
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known- —Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters — Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed t 1-1 v t
R. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point., YES (3 f ves. estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on I'SG`S quad map" YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES Nf )
21. Intimated watershed land use- Residential ",) Commercial Pi, Industrial U. Agricultural
OD % Forested ®"o Cleared Logged % Other (
22. Bankf ill width: -7,4
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 21"„
23. Bank height t from beet to top of bank)
— Cientic ('- to 4%) Moderatc (4 to 10°'0)
4. S 4.
— Steep f 10" ")
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight 1K Occasional bends �I requent meander ^Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location. terrain. ve,etation. stream classification. etc. Fvery characteristic must be scared using the sante ecoregion. Assign point
to each characteristic v, ithin the ranLe shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in Cite worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the strearn reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot tic evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide in explanation in the
comment section. \NFlterc there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest). the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity. and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100. with a score of 100 representing a stream of tiro
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 5,6 Comments: � _��{�,Nt}�MtrA _ S�y�,,v► �r�;nirt 4 wei�on� ,
117
Evaluator's Signature �-�Date
This channel evaluation form is in nded ,.unfit' as a guide to assist landowners ani scnEn irunmental professionals in
gathering the data required by t e ed States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
qualit.. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to LISACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change - version 06 03 I -o Contnicrit. please call 9IQ-876-8441 x 20

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
These characteristics are nen assessed in coastal streams
T
1•:( ()12F:(:H)N POINTRANGE#
CHARACTERISTICScoastal
SCORE
i Mountain
-
- o - C
Piedmont
- -
n 0-4
(]
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
(no flow or saturation = 0: strong flow - max points)
—
- -
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
— -
0 -
0 -
s
(extensive alteration --0: no alteration - max points)
-
L
Riparian none
0-6
0-4
0-i i�
(no buffer = 0: contiguous, wide buffer max points)
r
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
4
t) -S
0-4
0-d
(extensive discharges - 0: no dischar rs max points)
Groundwater discharge
0- +
0-4
0-4
(no discharge - 0: springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. Max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplain
C,
0-4
0-4
,
0--
1
(no floodplain = 0 cxtcnsivc floodplain - mak points)
Entrenchment , Floodplain access
7
0- S
0-4
0
(deeply entrenched 0: Frequent floodntg max points)
04
0-23
Presence of adjacent wetlands
8
l)-6
(no \wetlands - 0; large adjacent wetlands max points)
U Channel sinuosity
n
0-4
0
(extensive channelization - 0: natters! rneancier max points)
—
j
0- 5
_
0 - 4
U-4
10 I ---- Sediment input -
2
(extensive deposition 0: little or no sediment - max points)
I I Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 - 4
0- s
(line. homogenous - 0; large, diverse sizes - max poin(s)
l , Evidence of channel 'incision or widening
o-
# t) -
(deeply incised - 0: stable bed K banks =rnax points)
c
I Presence of major bank failures
() _ i
—0-
—
0-5 0 5
s
(severe erosion - o: no erasion. stable banks rnax points)
Root depth and density on bankso
?
(no visible roots - O) dense roots throughout max points)
-r
a
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
Ji
11-� �
t)-4
(substantial impact =0: no evidence: - max points)16
0-3
0— �— -
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
-
i (no riffles ripples or pools 0: well-developed max points)
j Ilabitat complexity
17
0-6
0-.,
Z
(little or no habitat - 0; frequent, varied habitats max points)
18 Canopy coverage over streambed
=
0- S
0 s
0
(no shading vegetation 0: continuous canopy max points)
f Substrate
_
-
embeddedness
���
NA*
o-4
0-4
Z
(deeply embedded == o. loose structure max)
I
Presence of stream invertebrates (sec page !)
� '0
)-4
0
I
��(no evidence = 0. common, numert+ars types Max points) -
6
—
-- - --
O a--
�
j
21 Presence of amphibians
U
(no evidence 0: common. numerous t� pes max points)
I e -
--0— -—
—o
r 9,Presence of Fish - ---
0-40--!
0--t
O
(no evidence : 0; common, numerous types max points)
-�
--
Evidence of wildlife use
0 - t
o - S
0 -
Z
(no evidence - 0; abundant evidence - ma.x points)
100
Total Points Possible
100
100
j TOTAL SCORE (also enter cin first
page)
These characteristics are nen assessed in coastal streams

Ur - Z r, Gon4-1,A1t'11 cc
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 )6(-03
Date: 512 i I s
Project/Site: ,, ��
Latitude: 3 &, -1 L ZS5'-
Evaluator: r «<. I ���,k -.:
County:
Longitude:-,58�r5Zq
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle )
Other i°}
Stream is at least intermittent
"
Ephemeral Intermittent ere l
e.g. Quad Name: J
if ? 19 or perennial if >_ 30
T
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= i )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
T
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.51
26. Wetland plants in streambed
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No ='_00
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = L .S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
3
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
1.5
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
_
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: ��

Z l�� coot 4-C'AGl
\t'l�::�II):� D�k't� Site = (indicate ort attached map)
t STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
11ro%ide the follm%ing information for the stream reach under assessment: ,
1. Appl,cani's name 2. Evaluator's name: rJtCAigs-,1 l 4.-ol —A Ye's r"
3. Late of evaluation: 5(2-4-( IS
5. Narne of stream —_OW -J, Tz"Ju
7. Approximate drainage area -
9. 1 en th of reach eN aluatcd
4. 1-ime of evaluation: - -
iv? Is Alm —
G. River bas in:r
8. Stream order:
10. County:
11. Site coordinates o rf kiioxi 11) ptcic! i!i &c,mal dcvrcc. 12. Subdivision natne (if at vy
t,uitui, I e-, i4g-dtl,,t_on nudc(c. - T;;h,t!):
%Icih d location deterntrttecl (circtc) o il's I opo S-hect (ortho Genal Plio C� ullur 6 I 1)thcr
13. Location ofreach Under c%aluanou (none nearbs roads sand landmarks and attach rnap identifying stream(s) location).
( -C Z�11,11 3tnA �oo"
l4. Proposed channel cork I II tit , Oorle- -- — --- — —
I5. Recent %%eather conditions_-
Iti. Site conditions at lime of visit: O#Jm. Sammy . �w
I?. Idcntit\ any special ti\atcrwa} classifications kno%kn. � -Section 10 Nidal Waters Essential Fisheries habitat
__- I rout Waters —Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supple Watershed (1-tV )
18. k there it pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point`' YESOM If Nes, estimate the �yatcr surface area.
19. Docs channel appe,ir oil VSG5 quad trial," Yl.ti :'() 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Surrey? YLS
21. 1 suniated watershed land use. "o Residential "'u Commercial 'a Industrial no Agricultural
led Forested _11. Cleared Logged —0'6 tatter t _)
". Hankliill t\ idth 23. Bank heir hi I from bed to top of bank): 4.
24. l h:nntcl �h,hc dot, n certicr of stream —Flat (0 to _'t%) Genllc (2 to 4"to _KNioderatc (4 to IV -o Steep( -10"n)
25. ( harincl sinuosrts 'sirat-ht X(tccasional hends _Frequent meander _Ver} sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): IteOn b1 determining the most aPluopriate ecorrgion based on
location. terrain. Sc-etation, stream classification, etc. 1=.vcry characteristic mast be scored usinti_ the same ecoreiion. Assign potnt�
It, each characteristic "ithin the ran«_e shown for the ec oregion. Page , provides it brief description of how to review the
characteristic, identified in the a3orksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the strc-arn reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot he evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box :and provide an explanation in tate
comment section. Where there are obvious chartgcs in the character of a stream under review (e.g.. the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream mai he divided into smaller reaches that display more continuily. and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The tonal score assi,_ned io a stream reach must range hetwe•en 0 and 100• with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
hi,hest yualits.
Total ~core from reverse : G I Comments: orM — WpS
k•_yalaatur's Signature
s2�f IS
This channel evaluation forth is in 'n its r aide to assist tttndoKners and cmiromnental professionals in
t atherink the data required b� re noted States Army C'urlos of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
qualits. `rhe total score restiltim2 from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not implti it
particular mitit--ation ratio or requirement. Form aihicct r., ch.m c - ecrsion 06 0, 10 ( ornrtteot. please call 919-876-8441 \ 2t4.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
EeORE(IOe
I .#
CHARACI Rls,rics
--
Presence of flow a persistent pools in stream
1 �
Coastal
-
0-5
idmnt
os
E 0--►
ounlatnSCORE
Mountain
(no flow or saturation 0; strong flow max points)
ti-�
3
., Evidence of past human alteration
(extensive alteration 0; no alteration - mat points)
f
-
Riparian zone
—
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer - max points)
0-6
0 - .1
0 -
-1 t Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0- 5
0 - 4 0_4
t
(extensive discharges - 0: no discharges max points)
- Groundwater discharge
(no discharge - 0; springs, seeps. %vetlands, etc. max points)
0-
I
0-4 0_4
b Presence or adjacent floodplain
0 - 1
o-4 (1 -
(no floodplain = 0: extensive floodplain coax point)
Entrenchment ! floodplain access
7
a
0-i
0-4
(deeply entrenched - 0: frequent flooding max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
a
0-6
t) -a o_,
(no wetlands - 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
�
9
Channel sinuosity
0-i
0-4
0-1
(extensive channlization - 0; natural meander = max points)
i
()
ISediment input
0 - S
0-4
0 - )
Z
(extetisivc deposition- 0: little or tic) sediment - max points)
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
Z
I
NA
0 -
(fine, homogenous 0; large, diverse sires - max points)
11
Evidence of channel incision or widening
ti-;
1.
0-4
(t
(deeply incised _ 0: stable bed & banks - max points)
130-;
Presence of major bank failures
(severe erosion - 0: no erosion. stable banks max points)
t�0-
Z
Root depth and density on banks
; �
t)_� i
0-;
(no visible roots _ 0; dense roots di-max points)
n15roughout
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
t7- 5 �
0-4
0-5
1,+
(substantial impact -0; no evidence max points)
d
Iii
-
Presence of riffle- pool/rippie-pool complexes
C) -
U-5 U - ti
(no riftleslripples or pools - 0; well-developed - max points)
f7
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
t) -G
i
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Ila
Canopy coverage over streambed
(t''
t►-;
(1-`
11
(no shading vegetation = 0: continuous canopy max points)
0_4
U - .)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA"
C (deeph embedded -= 0: loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0_4 4
0 - ;
0 - 5
Z
(no evidence - 0: common, numerous types = max paints)
>
> Presence or amphibians
1 ''
O --I
-
t) -=J
-t
-.
U
(no evidence 0: common, numerous types = max points)
31 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
t) - !
0(no
evidence. = 0. common. numerous types max points_)
®Evidence of wildlife use
23 0-6 0
(no evidence = 0, abundant evidence = max points)
' Total Points Passible 100 1 ut) 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
j
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

jT-3
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 0 D I
Date: ! ! !
Project/Site: w �-�A(4-
Latitude: Su ' Z4 u 40
Evaluator:J(
County: ���i'n (,,
Longitude: , �R S$ 4�
I��
1
2
Total Points:
Stream Deter rcle one)
Other W ; eaw+S%u( 'j
Stream is at least intermittent ( L <
Ephemeral nterml!r erennial
e.g. Quad Name: ff
if ? 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
0
0.5
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ! i )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
�
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0 `
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
(_1__)
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =_
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
2
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes 3
1.5
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal = r )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
e0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

'X-
1'' \t'I •\IL),. DW -Q r Site ' 'LC,01(indicatc on attached map
M
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Prov ide the following inftwination for the stream reach tinder assessment:
1. \pphcant's name- --- � P 2. F valuator's name: _�Ivtilt &.4f,- &r+ayrt
3. Date of cvalUation 4. I ime of evaluatiotl: ZEN
�. Name of stream - —_ P.,PC ., T1.1-4 - 6. River basin: � ;___
\pI}ro\nnatc draina_c ,uca "S utrt S. `itrcartt order: �
9. Lt•noth of reach evaluated. ~'SO 10. Count -y: 44
11. Site coordinates (tl knol�n): pi4t,`i to dc%nnal degr4z4 12. Subdivision name (if anv)
1 .itllil is ii\ +.i 7 +t is 3(,. {-Y 0 _ Longitude tex -77 55h611 P: _ � q4, +"q :7 -4-4
\1C111"i'Ietennillcd('11" IopoSheet ttrtho(Amaltl'Ltx GIS (Wier 0IS (ither
13. I oc:rinut ofreacll Undct evaivartun (note nearh\ roads and landmark; and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
IJ. Piopocd channel mork iit an.) OVAL
I�;.Recent�ticatherconditiuns. Wand r
16. Site conditions at time of visit: W"pA t CL.0%olt l . I"r1
T,
1'. !denote ally spec till vvater%%ay classifications known: Section It) Ficial Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
I rout \k aterti t hitstandine resource Waters 'Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (1 -IV)
Fit. 1� dtere .t pond or lake located upstream otthe evaluation point" 1 ES i'( If) cs. estimate the water surface area: —
14. Ihie> channel aPPCdr on t SO" (Inad ttlap.' Yl S () 20, Doc channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
_I. 1 "itmati(I Ntialershed land tt�c Restdenttal „Commercial °i. Industrial n' AEricultural
(Go"9 forested Cleared. Logged Other ( t
22. Banklltll (( idth Z L 23. Bank height (from heti to top of bank)- �.S �• —
_J. ( hannct slope down center of stream Flat to to 2".) X, Gentle (2 to 41-v) kloderate (4 to I01'•,,) —Steep (-101,
25. Channel ,muosil� _ Strai��hi ()ccasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by dcterminin the most appropriate ecoregion based on
otanon. ierrain. \e€elation, .cream clUsSilication. etc. F.Ycry characteristic must be Scored using the same ecoregion. Assign point,"
10 c.1ch tharacterisiic "ithin tftc rant*c sho\\n for the ecore>yion. Page provides it brief description of hour to review the
charactcii�tic, identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
eiiataiterl,UL Cannel he e\dlUitled due' to tilts: or 4Neather c:ondilions. enter f) ill the scoring box and provide ail explanation in the
comment section. \\here there are obvious ehairgcs in the character of a stream under review (e.g.. the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may he divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity. and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. -file total score assigned to a strrani reach must rano-c between 0 and 10(), vvith a score of 100 representing a stream of the
hi�,hcsi yualit}.
luta( Score (frorn reverse): 60 Coinntent.:
Lvaluator's Signature
This channel evaluation forth is rn a f� b is as a guide to assist landowners and environn+enlal professionals in
gathering the data required by t t riled St:ttcs .�rnav Corps of Engineers 1(+ niakc a preliminary assessment of sheror
yualits. The total score resulting from the eonipletiun of this form is .object to USACE approval and does not irnph a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form auhjcct io change - version 06 03 1 o ( onuil nt. picase call 4)19-876-8411 v 26

Ui- 3
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
-
ECO14E(.I()N
POI N'l It.!\(;E
j CHARACTERISTIC'S
SCORN:
CoastalJ-Pi—ednimn,
I
♦tr a„lain
—
- -
0
- --
- - —-
Presence of flow/ persistent poolstre- in sam-
(no flow or saturation 0; strong floe max. points)
Q
Evidence of past human alteration
_ 1
0-6
s
j (extensive alteration = 0; no alteration - max points)
0- ,} 0 -
3 Riparian zone
0-6
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = mat points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
4
t)-5
0-1
it - A
i (extensive discharges 0. no discharges max points)
Groundwater discharge
(no discharge - 0; springs. seeps. wetlands. etc. points)
_max
Presence of adjacent floodplain
6
0--1
0-a
tl -_
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
-
— -
Entrenchment lood lain access
(deeply entrenched O; frequent flooding max points)
Q
t -
-
07
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
a -a
o-,
I (no wetlands = 0; large adjacent %%ctlands - max points)
Z
1 9
Channel sinuosity
p -i
t)-
0-3
(extensive channeliztttian - 0; natural meander max points)
10
Sediment input
---
0- i
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive deposition 0; little or no sediment = max points)
I I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 - 4
0 - ?
Z
(fine, homogenous - (I; large, diverse sizes max points)
I
F.yidence of channel incision or widening
IJ
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed &. banks max points)
-
-
13
Presence of major bank failures
_ -
- 0 _ S
O s 0 s
(severe erosion 0; no erosion, stable banks max points)
-
--
p -- -
Root depth and density on banks
- C)
� r) -J i t) _ �
14
I (no visible roots - 0: dense roots throughout max points)
®
_
I5
, I impact by agriculture, Ihestock. or timber production
it-�
0-J U-�
-I
j (substantial imp sct 0. no evidence max points)
�) -wi
i t)-` i tl-6
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
(no riffles/ripples or pools - 0; well-developed - max points)
j -
Fiabitat complexity170-
6
j
Z
(little or no habitat -- 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
1
Canopy coverage over stream bed
t) i
' 0 _ :
0 - ,
(no shading, vegetation = 0: continuous canopy - max points)
�
-
©
Substrate embeddedness
-- - �
0-4
1A
--
NA*
0-.1
(deeph embedded = 0: loose structure = max)
., I Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
(no evidence 0: common. numerous tvpes = max points)
Presence of amphibians
1
(i --t
1 0-4
()
0--1
(no evidence 0: common. numerous types - max points) -
-- -
0-4
(1-4
0- a
I
Presence of fish
(no evidence - 0; common. numerous types = max points)
j
Z
© j Evidence of wildlife use
23
0-0
0-=
0--
_^ I (no evidence =0; abundant evidence max pouts)
Total Points Possible
--
100
page)
- -
100 100
TOTAL SCORE. (also canter on first
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

FINAL
PRESERVATION PROJECT AND
BASELINE DOCUMENTATION REPORT

HAW RIVER TRACT
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
EEP Project No. 169

Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030002

Prepared for:

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603

Prepared by:

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603

March 2015
Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Executive Summary Page i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Haw River Tract Site (Site) is located in southeast Rockingham County, approximately 1 mile
south of Williamsburg within the Cape Fear River Basin along the Haw River. The Site contains
riparian wetlands within the floodplain of a reach of the Haw River, which is currently affected by
numerous stressors including turbidity, nutrient inputs, and habitat degradation. Current
agricultural, wastewater, and stormwater runoff, and increasing growth and development pressures
within the watershed are becoming of greater concern making preservation of Site wetlands vital
to maintaining aquatic habitat within the Haw River and water quality of the Jordan Lake reservoir.

This preservation report has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33
Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2) through
(c)(14) and 332.3(h); and NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program In-Lieu Fee Instrument
signed and dated July 28, 2010.

Site Description

Project Name and EEP Project Number Haw River Tract 169
County Rockingham
General Location 1 mile south of Williamsburg
Basin Cape Fear
Physiographic Region Piedmont
USGS Hydro Unit 03030002
NCDWQ Sub-basin 03-06-01
Watershed Planning Information Not Located in TLW or LWP
Preservation Mechanism Conservation Easement
Conservation Values
The Site is located within the floodplain of a reach of
the Haw River containing documented NC Natural
Heritage occurrences and habitat for the eastern
creekshell (Villosa delumbis) and notched rainbow
(Villosa constricta) (Alderman 2004).

The Site is located within the floodplain of a reach of
the Haw River located approximately 9 miles
upstream of the Altamahaw Alluvial Forest Natural
Community.

Permanently preserves riparian wetlands within the
floodplain of the Haw River within the Jordan Lake
Watershed (a water supply reservoir).
Deed Recordation Date August 4, 2005

Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Executive Summary Page ii

Mitigation Assets
Riparian Wetland Non-riparian Wetland
Total Credit Linear
Footage/Acreage 23.09 acres --
Total Mitigation Units 4.62 WMUs --

Conservation values for this Site include the following.

• The Site is located within the floodplain of a reach of the Haw River containing
documented NC Natural Heritage occurrences and habitat for the eastern creekshell
(Villosa delumbis) and notched rainbow (Villosa constricta) (Alderman 2004).
• The Site is located within the floodplain of a reach of the Haw River located approximately
9 miles upstream of the Altamahaw Alluvial Forest Natural Community.
• Permanently preserves riparian wetlands within the floodplain of the Haw River within the
Jordan Lake Watershed (a water supply reservoir).

A conservation easement deed was recorded on May 9, 2002 and is included in Appendix B.

Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Table of Contents Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. i
1.0 PRESERVATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................. 1
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................. 1
2.1 General Description ............................................................................................................. 1
2.2 Directions ............................................................................................................................. 2
3.0 SITE SELECTION .................................................................................................................. 2
4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION ................................................................................................. 2
4.1 Physical Features ................................................................................................................. 2
4.2 Plant and Wildlife Communities .......................................................................................... 2
4.3 Jurisdictional Wetlands ........................................................................................................ 3
5.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT .................................................................................... 3
5.1 Encumbrances ...................................................................................................................... 4
6.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS ......................................................................................... 4
7.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................................. 5
8.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES ................................................................................................. 5
9.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 5

APPENDICES

Appendix A. Figures and Photographs
Figure 1. Site Protection Instrument
Figure 2. Vicinity Map
Figure 3. Site Watershed Map
Figure 4. Site Mitigation Assets Map
Site Photographs
Appendix B. Site Protection Instruments
Appendix C. Wetland Forms
Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Page 1
1.0 PRESERVATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

The Haw River Tract Preservation Site (Site) is located in the 03030002 Cataloging Unit (CU), in
the Cape Fear River Basin. The Site is not located within a Targeted Local Watershed; however,
it addresses several stressors within the watershed outlined in the Cape Fear River Basin
Restoration Priorities (NCEEP 2009) and Cape Fear River Basin Water Quality Plan (NCDWQ
2005) including the following.

• Nutrient Inputs
• Turbidity
• Habitat Degradation
• Stormwater, Wastewater, and Agricultural Runoff
• Increasing Growth and Development Pressures

The Haw River Tract Preservation Site addresses watershed stressors/issues with the following
goals.

• Protection of water quality in the Jordan Lake Watershed (a water supply reservoir) by
preserving wetlands within the Site in a permanent conservation easement.
• Permanent preservation of riparian wetlands within the floodplain of a reach of the Haw
River containing documented NC Natural Heritage occurrences and habitat for the eastern
creekshell (Villosa delumbis) and notched rainbow (Villosa constricta) (Alderman 2004).
• Permanent preservation of riparian wetlands within the floodplain of a reach of the Haw
River located approximately 9 miles upstream of the Altamahaw Alluvial Forest Natural
Community.
• Permanent preservation of riparian wetlands within the floodplain of a reach of the Haw
River classified as Nutrient Sensitive Waters within a Water Supply V Watershed
(NCDWR 2013).

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 General Description
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) has established the Haw River Tract
Preservation Site located off of U.S. Highway 150 in the southeast portion of Rockingham County.
The Site is located in one parcel, PIN 89210066077, within 14-digit Cataloging Unit
03030002010040 (sub-basin 03-06-01) of the Cape Fear River Basin, and is part of the Jordan
Lake Watershed (a water supply reservoir) (Figures 1-3, Appendix A). The Site is protected by a
permanent conservation easement recorded in Deed Book 1104 Page 311-315. Current land use
at the Site is comprised of mixed hardwood forest, and land surrounding the Site consists primarily
of mixed hardwood forest and agricultural fields. The conservation easement boundary is well-
marked with signs at each corner.

Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Page 2
2.2 Directions
Directions to the Site from Raleigh (Figure 2, Appendix A):
Take I-40 West to exit 140 (University Drive),
Turn right onto University Drive and travel 1.9 miles,
Turn left onto Westbrook Avenue and travel 1.3 miles,
Take a right onto Springwood Avenue followed by an immediate left onto Burke Street,
Turn left onto Main Street then right onto Wharton Avenue/NC-61 N,
Follow NC-61 N for 9.7 miles, then continue on NC-150 E for 1.9 miles,
Turn right on Haw Road,
The site access is on the left in 1 mile.
Site Latitude, Longitude: 36.26666, -79.58947 (NAD83/WGS84)

3.0 SITE SELECTION

The Site contains riparian wetlands within the floodplain of a reach of the Haw River, which is
currently affected by numerous stressors including increased turbidity, nutrient inputs, and habitat
degradation resulting primarily from current agricultural, stormwater, and wastewater runoff in
addition to expanding development.

Conservation Values
• The Site is located within the floodplain of a reach of the Haw River containing
documented NC Natural Heritage occurrences and habitat for the eastern creekshell
(Villosa delumbis) and notched rainbow (Villosa constricta) (Alderman 2004).
• The Site is located within the floodplain of a reach of the Haw River located approximately
9 miles upstream of the Altamahaw Alluvial Forest Natural Community.
• Permanently preserves riparian wetlands within the floodplain of the Haw River within the
Jordan Lake Watershed (a water supply reservoir).

Threats of Adverse Modification
Adjacent agricultural land and increasing growth and development pressures adjacent to the Site
threaten Site riparian wetlands; therefore, preservation of the Site is important to maintaining water
quality and habitat in the Haw River watershed, and ultimately within the Jordan Lake Watershed.

4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION
4.1 Physical Features
The Site lies within both the Northern Inner Piedmont and Southern Outer Piedmont ecoregions
of the Piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina. Topography within the ecoregion is
generally comprised of dissected irregular plans, low to high hills, ridges, and isolated
monadnocks, and low- to moderate-gradient streams with mostly cobble, gravel, and sandy
substrates. Topography within the Site is nearly level with elevations ranging from 640 feet to
660 feet above sea level.
4.2 Plant and Wildlife Communities
The natural communities dominating the Site are Piedmont Bottomland Forest within the wetlands
and Mesic-Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont subtype) in the upland areas. The vegetation is
mature with a relatively full canopy throughout. Characteristic tree and shrub species include red
Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Page 3
maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera),
American beech (Fagus grandifolia), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii), southern red oak
(Quercus falcata), river birch (Betula nigra), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), shagbark hickory
(Carya ovata), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), box elder (Acer negundo), and American holly
(Ilex opaca). Dominant understory species include blue-eyed grass (Sisyrinchium sp.), wild garlic
(Allium vineale), greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), muscadine (Muscadinia rotundifolia),
blackberry (Rubus sp.), and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). Invasive species were observed
in minimal quantities throughout the Site and include Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum).
4.3 Jurisdictional Wetlands
The Site contains 10 jurisdictional wetland systems, which total 23.09 acres; the table below gives
information for each system.

Jurisdictional Wetland Characteristics
Type (Riparian, non-
Riparian, etc.)
Description
(Floodplain depression,
seepage slope, etc.)
Acreage
Wetland 1 Riparian Riverine Riverine Swamp Forest 0.347
Wetland 2 Riparian Non-riverine Bottomland Hardwood
Forest 11.966
Wetland 3 Riparian Non-riverine Bottomland Hardwood
Forest 0.032
Wetland 4 Riparian Riverine Riverine Swamp Forest 5.980
Wetland 5 Riparian Riverine Riverine Swamp Forest 4.043
Wetland 6 Riparian Non-riverine Bottomland Hardwood
Forest 0.353
Wetland 7 Riparian Riverine Riverine Swamp Forest 0.200
Wetland 8 Riparian Non-riverine Floodplain Pool 0.082
Wetland 9 Riparian Non-riverine Floodplain Pool 0.013
Wetland 10 Riparian Non-riverine Floodplain Pool 0.078
Total 23.09

5.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT

The land required for stewardship of this mitigation project includes a portion of the following
parcel. A copy of the recorded conservation easement deed is included in Appendix B.

Parcel Landowner PIN County
Site
Protection
Instrument
Deed
Book and
Page
Number
Date
Deed
Signed
Acreage
protected
Haw
River
Tract
Raymond G.
and Doris
M.
Bouchard
892100660773 Rockingham Conservation
Easement
Bk 1104
Pg 311-
315
May 9,
2002
95.431
acres

All site protection instruments require 60-day advance notification to the Corps and the State prior
to any action to void, amend, or modify the document. No such action shall take place unless
approved by the State.
Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Page 4
5.1 Encumbrances
No encumbrances were observed on the Site.

6.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS

Project mitigation assets were delineated in February 2015 using Global Positioning Systems.
(Figure 4, Appendix A; Wetland Dataforms, Appendix C). The following tables summarize Site
mitigation assets.

All credits will be released upon IRT approval. The project service area will be in compliance
with the EEP In-Lieu Fee Instrument.

Haw River Tract, Rockingham County, Cape Fear River Basin, 03030002 Cataloging Unit
EEP Project Number 169
Mitigation Credits
Warm Stream Riparian Wetland Non-riparian
Wetland
Riparian
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient
Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient
Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE
Totals NA NA NA 4.62 NA NA NA NA NA
Wetland Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation
components
Warm Stream
(linear feet)
Mitigation Ratio
Riparian Wetland Non-riparian
Wetland
Riverine Non-riverine
Wetland 1 5:1 0.347 --
Wetland 2 5:1 -- 11.966
Wetland 3 5:1 -- 0.032
Wetland 4 5:1 5.980 --
Wetland 5 5:1 4.043 --
Wetland 6 5:1 -- 0.353
Wetland 7 5:1 0.200 --
Wetland 8 5:1 -- 0.082
Wetland 9 5:1 -- 0.013
Wetland 10 5:1 -- 0.078
Total
(acreage) 10.57 12.52 --
Total WMUs 4.62 --
Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Page 5
7.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN

Upon approval for close-out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the Site will be transferred
to the NCDENR Division of Natural Resource Planning and Conservation’s Stewardship Program.
This party shall be responsible for periodic inspection of the Site to ensure that restrictions required
in the conservation easement or the deed restriction document(s) are upheld. The NCDENR is
currently evaluating the endowment model. Until the evaluation is complete and any changes
resulting from the model are implemented, the long-term management of this project will be
funded annually.

8.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES

Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program’s In-Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources has provided the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal
commitment to fund projects to satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by EEP. This
commitment provides financial assurance for all mitigation projects implemented by the program.

9.0 REFERENCES

Alderman, J.M. 1994. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Freshwater Mussel Data.

Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F.
MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South
Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.

NC Division of Water Resources (2013), Cape Fear River Basin Surface Water Classifications,
online (February 9, 2015). http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, NC Division of Water Resources, Raleigh, NC

NC Division of Water Quality (2005), Cape Fear River Basin Water Quality Plan, Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program, Raleigh, NC

NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (2009), Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
Raleigh, NC

Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A. S. (1990), Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina, Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC

Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Appendices

APPENDIX A
FIGURES AND PHOTOGRAPHS

NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board
Rockingham County, NC
SITE PROTECTIONINSTRUMENT
HAW RIVER TRACTPRESERVATION SITE
FIGUREDrawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ
FEB 2015
14-018
Title:Project:Prepared for:
11:3500
³
Legend
Conservation Easement Boundary
Approximate Parcel Boundary
0 500 1,000 1,500250Feet
Bouchard Property
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ
FEB 2015
1:28000
14-018
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
RockinghamCounty, NC
HAW RIVERTRACTPRESERVATIONSITE
VICINITYMAP
2
³
Copyright:© 2013 National GeographicSociety, i-cubed
Copyright:© 2013 National GeographicSociety, i-cubed
Direction to the Site from Raleigh:
- Travel west on I-40 for 52.4 miles to Exit 140 University Drive,- Turn right on University Drive and travel 1.9 miles,- Turn left on Westbrook Ave. and travel 1.3 miles,- Turn right on Springwood Ave. followed by an immediate left on Burke Street,- Turn left onto Main Street followed by the first right on N Wharton Ave.,- Follow NC-61 9.7 miles, then continue on NC-150 E for 1.9 miles,- Turn right on Haw Road,- The Site access is on the left in 1 mile.- Site Latitude, Longitude: 36.26666, -79.58947 (NAD83/WGS84)
¬«87
¬«150
£¤29
¬«61
¬«150
H
aw
R
o
a
d
¬«87
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ
FEB 2015
1:128000
14-018
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
RockinghamCounty, NC
HAW RIVERTRACTPRESERVATIONSITE
SITEWATERSHEDMAP
3
³
0 5 102.5 Miles
USGS Topographic Map - Belews Lake, Belews Creek,Ellisboro,Summerfield, Bethany, Lake Brandt, Reidsville,Browns Summit, Williamsburg, and Ossipee Quads.
Legend
Conservation Easement Boundary
Site Watershed - 161.40 sq mi (103,295.6 ac)
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
[
[
[
[
[
Photo-9
Photo-8
Photo-7
Photo-6
Photo-4
Photo-5
Photo-3
Photo-14
Photo-13
Photo-12
Photo-11
Photo-10
Photo-1,2
Rockingham County, NC
MITIGATION ASSETS
HAW RIVER TRACT
PRESERVATION SITE
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ
MAR 2015
14-018
Title:Project:Prepared for:
41:3500
³
Legend
Conservation Easement Boundary
[Wetland Form Locations
!Photo Points
Wetland Preservation
Riparian Riverine (Riverine Swamp Forest)
Riparian Nonriverine (Bottomland Hardwood Forest)
Riparian Nonriverine (Floodplain Pool)
0 500 1,000 1,500250
Feet
Wetland 2
Wetland 4
Wetland 3
Wetland 8
Wetland 9
Wetland 10
Wetland 5
Wetland 7
Wetland 6
Wetland 1
Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Appendices

Photo 1. Wetland 1, facing southeast

Photo 2. Wetland 1, facing west

Photo 3. Remnants of old beaver dam in
southern portion of Wetland 2

Photo 4. Wetland 2, facing north

Photo 5. Wetland 2, facing west

Photo 6. Haw River on eastern boundary,
facing north

Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Appendices

Photo 7. Wetland 4, floodplain pool, facing
west

Photo 8. Wetland 9, facing east

Photo 9. Wetland 4, facing south

Photo 10. Northern portion of Wetland 4,
facing south

Photo 11. Wetland 5, facing west

Photo 12. Carya ovata

Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Appendices

Photo 13. Wetland 4, facing south

Photo 14. Wetland 2, facing south

Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Appendices

APPENDIX B
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENTS

Recorded Conservation Easement

1104
0311
61
311
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
ROCK INGHAM COUNTY
0207885
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, made this day of 2002, by
and between CARL T. BOUCHARD and DORIS M. BOUCHARD, TRUSTEES UNDE HE CARL AND
DOTTIE BOUCHARD LIVING TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 28, 2001, Grantor, and the State of North
Carolina, Grantee, whose mailing address is State of North Carolina State Property Office, 116 West Jones Street,
Raleigh, NC 27603-8003. The designations Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their
heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by
context.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et sem•, the State of North Carolina
has established the Wetlands Restoration Program (as defined in N.C. Gen Stat. § 143-214.8) within the Department
of Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing, and creating
wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention,
fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; and
WHEREAS, the Wetlands Restoration Program in the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
has approved acceptance of this instrument; and
WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North Carolina has been
granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the Governor and Council of State
adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina, on the 8' day of February 2000; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Caen. Stat. § 143-214.8, two of the components of the
Wetlands Restoration Program are (1) restoration and perpetual maintenance of wetlands, riparian areas, and surface
waters and (2) land ownership and management; and
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being in Williamsburg
Township, Rockingham County, North Carolina (the "Protected Property"), and being more particularly described as
that certain parcel of land described and shown on that certain Plat Of Survey prepared by C. E. Robertson, P.L.S.,
dated 12 April. 2002 recorded in Map Book 49 at Page 80 of the Rockingham County, North Carolina Public
Registry; and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement on the Protected Property, thereby
restricting and limiting the use of the Protected Property to the terms and conditions and for the purposes hereinafter
set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept such easement.
OW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions
hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and conveys unto
Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation Easement of the nature
and character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over a portion of the Protected Property, referred to hereafter as
the Easement Area, for the benefit of the people of North Carolina, and being all of the tract of land as identified as
"Proposed Conservation Easement For NC Wetlands Restoration" as shown on a plat of survey dated 12 April 2002,
certified by C. E. Robertson, P.L.S., and recorded in Map Book 49, Page 80, Rockingham County Registry.
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, and create wetland and/or
riparian resources in the Easement Area that contributes to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood
aid

1104
0312
312
prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the
Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of the Easement Area
that will significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these purposes, the following conditions
and restrictions are set forth:
I.DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. It is an easement in gross, runs with the land, and is
enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, their personal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, lessees, agents,
and licensees.
II. RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would impair or interfere with
the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in,
or use of, the Easement Area by the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Easement. Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. The
following specific uses are prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational uses,
including hunting and fishing, and access to the Easement Area for the purposes thereof. Usage of
motorized vehicles in the Easement Area is prohibited.
B. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to undeveloped educational uses and the right
of access to the Easement Area for such purposes including organized educational activities such
as site visits, studies, and observations.
C. Vegetative Cutting. Cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any vegetation in the
Easement Area is prohibited.
D. Industrial Use. Industrial activities in the Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Residential Use. Residential use of the Easement Area is prohibited.
F. Commercial Use. Commercial activities in the Easement Area are prohibited.
G. Agricultural Use. Agricultural use of the Easement Area including use for cropland, waste
lagoons, or pastureland is prohibited.
H. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, or other structure
constructed or placed in the Easement Area.
1. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except interpretive signs describing
restoration activities and the conservation values of the Easement Area, signs identifying the
owner of the Protected Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement, and signs giving
directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the Easement Area.
J. humping. Dumping of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, abandoned vehicles, appliance or
machinery, or other material in the Easement Area is prohibited.
K. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation,
dredging, mining, or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals, or other
materials.
L. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering or tampering
with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or
created drainage patterns. In addition, diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface
or underground water into, within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands,
polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is
prohibited.
M. Subdivision. Subdivision, partitioning, or dividing the Easement Area is prohibited.
0)

1104
0313
313
N. Development Rights. No development rights which have been encumbered or extinguished by
this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a transferable development rights
scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise.
The Grantee, and authorized representatives of the Grantee, shall have the right to enter the Easement Area
and shall have the right of reasonable ingress and egress to the Easement Area over the Protected Property, at all
reasonable times to undertake any activities to restore, manage, maintain, enhance, and monitor the wetland and
riparian resources of the Easement Area. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous
vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and prepare the soil,
modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and manmade materials as needed to direct in -
stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow. In addition, the Grantee, and authorized representatives of the
Grantee, shall have the right to enter the Easement Area and shall have the right of reasonable ingress and egress to
the Easement Area over the Protected Property, at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting said property to
determine if the Grantor is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation
Easement. The easement rights granted herein do not include public access rights.
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause shown, provided
that any such request is consistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. The Grantor shall not vary
from the above restrictions without first obtaining written approval from the Wetlands Restoration Program, whose
mailing address is 1619 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1619.
111. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. In the event that the Grantee determines that the Grantor has violated or is threatening to violate
any of these terms, conditions, or restrictions, the Grantee may institute a suit to enjoin such
violation and if necessary, to require the restoration of the Easement Area to its prior condition at
the expense of the Grantor.
B. No failure on the part of Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision hereof shall discharge or
invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or provision hereof or affect the right of
Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a subsequent breach or default.
IV. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This Conservation Easement shall be construed to promote the purposes of N.C. Gen Stat. § 143-
214.8 et seas., the Wetlands Restoration Program.
B. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation
Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating
to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the remainder of the
provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision to persons or
circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be affected thereby.
C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the parties at
their addresses shown above or to other addresses) as either party establishes in writing upon
notification to the other.
D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom the
Protected Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is
made. Grantor further agrees to make any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by
which any interest in the Protected Property is conveyed subject to the Conservation Easement
herein created.
K,

1104
0314
314
V. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all rights accruing from ownership of the Protected Property, including the right
to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Easement Area that are expressly
reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not inconsistent with the purposes of this
Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to
the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and licensees, the right of access to the Easement Area, and the right
of quiet enjoyment of the Easement Area.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for the
aforesaid purposes.
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to convey
the permanent easement herein granted; that the same are free from encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and
defend title to the same against the claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, a ay and Fear first
above written,
(SEAL)
Le (SEAL)
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF Rockingham
I, Carolyn H. Lo ea Notary Public in and for the
County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that CARL T. BOUCHARD and DORIS M. BOUCHARD,
TRUSTEES, Grantor, personally appeared before me this da and acknowledged the execution of the
foregoing instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notarial
Seal this the 9th
My commission expires:
day of M a Y , 20011.
I:IPC\DatalWgUDHill\LegalDocs\DeedslConservation Easement Bouchard Prop File 79-E.wpd

1104
0315
315
THE BENEFICL4RIES OF THE CARL AND DOTTIE BOUCHARD LIVING TRUST
DATED NOVEMBER 28, 2001, CARL T. BOUCHARD AND DORMS M. BOUCHARD,
HEREBY JOIN IN THE EXECUTION OF THIS INSTRUMENT TO EVIDENCE THEIR
CONSENT TO THE TRANSFER AS DETERMINED BY ARTICLE FOUR, SECTION I (b)
OF THE LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT.
This the 9" clay of May, 2002.
(SEAL)
CARL T. BOUCHARD
aka Dottie Bouchard
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA - Rockingham County
I} Carolyn H. Laye
a Notary Public of said County, do hereby
certify that CARL T. BOUCHARD AND DORIS M. BOUCHARD aka DOTTIE BOUCHARD
appeared before me this day and acknowledged execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and sea], this the 9 t1day of May , 2002.
(SEAL)
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: . 3- 2 3 -- 2 0 0 3
NORTH CAROLINA-ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
Th4=
s Notary (Notaries) Public Is Carey oerd W to be correct.
This fnstrurnent end Oft ce 1ftate aro duly Ng tarod at
the data and time shown heroin.
REBECCA S. CIPRIAN1v REGISTER OF DEEDS
er
Register of Deeds
t`ytilitllllll
r
ti
o
+r %
Am Go
FIL9W•nRI_IFF
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY NC
REBECCA D. CIPRIANI
REGISTER OF DEEDS
5— 9-2002 14:33: 7
RECORDING 24.00
PROBATE 2.44
EXCISE TAX
RECEIPT NO. 98214—DUE
BOOK 1144 PAGE 311

Haw River Tract Preservation Project
EEP ID 169 Appendices

APPENDIX C
WETLAND FORMS

")O.J Z - tie 1 -
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - EasternMountainsand Piedmont Region
Project/Site. 4141- ilwi' City/County: Sampling Date.
Applicant/Owner. /t/C Lr6r �i Stale: � Sampling Point: ' 12,✓t�r
Investigator(s): A"-4�' r SSection, ns Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace. etc.): i1.-,c'rd `.4 J Local relief (concave, convex, none): 6i;,14E y,,Vt J[.dho� Slope (%): �% - f
Subregion (LRR or MLRRA): ?//I,/ Lai:3�, 2�3G79 Long: - 79• S89d 6S n—Datum: wESb'*1'/
Soil Map Unit Name: CeA-C' 1,,-.4A 0,?1- �FeEa. {= `'> NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes / No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo
�— Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes-----.,e-
No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
V- Lou ,r,&V,•f, e- l -W /C4< (34. y ""K# .rte t Q,e vdE of 92, o` - S/ o >
,a,,,n FaR 3 SWI ( 4 90 "wftsyw W4 --at o'.` 7 29'- i3, v") 3E€0-46 Fi&P r/sif
Relosel4a, eve /vRel WTI �.o�3GEs
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
—/5urface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (Bl)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)_
Dry- ason Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ rayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)Microtopographic
_ Relief (134)
_
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Field Observations:
/Depth
Surface Water Present? Yes No
(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):_
/
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): e�
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

k"01AA Z — vW cX
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: PC 12 ,rr
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
t44W /1 w6i Sr1E
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
3 r
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
/N �1 Gs (1,xiri�W
/o C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2,
Acltw /lv�
�y'J
J v
/�/iC
3
/ /��� /✓L /r /A
Gi
Z�
�C�
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
lCiy
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
9� = Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 20`/0 of total cover:
/e
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1
AcbA
FAC species x 3 =
2.(/�/fi61(/��
!/i�LoL.4•�iA.✓�
2p /
—�
/AC
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Il 4 on --.r zx,-�4L/ S
4 c7
l�ACW
UPL species x 5 =
4
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
-
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
B.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
-Total Cover o
2 �f /
_
_ 4 . Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50°x6 of total cover:
total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
_ Problernalic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
I.
2.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 It (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
50% of total cover:
�� 20% of total cover.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody ine Stratum (Plot size: )
hei ht.
1.
��7,.+�/,u �n
20 /
jAc
2.
� ILZ /l0-' /QA,-
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
Vegetation
Total Cover
Present? Yes No
50% of total cover:
2 2 • 2011. of total cover:
%
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
t44W /1 w6i Sr1E
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
„jt�A'd 2 - WC*
Sampling Point: Afl'&
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % T_vpe Loci Texture Remarks
r, C
- 12 /J /7 0-
'T : C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (f3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (A72)
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F 19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
rnarKS:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes / No
14Aw 111v&
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

O,A�,,,4-z - LA9
WETLLA,ND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern ountains and Piedmont Region
ProjectlSite: /7 �✓ Y 67 3(�- City/County: GL Sampling Date.
Applicant/Owner: /t/C CO State: A/C Sampling Point:
investigator(s): 4-/-,7, - Sectio Townshi Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace. etc.):f �r�Local relief (concave, convex, none): moi• ✓Emil Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 3 Lai: � 2Z e Long: ` 79. f 9 Datum: 9`
Soil Map Unit Name: Ce 0%iw,4e&4 zDAr D -Z Z I (" fe-py:V NWI classification_ —
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil `" , or HydrologyNi significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 1-." No
Are Vegetation iJ , Soil , or Hydrology '`f naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No—� within a Wetland? Yes No /
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
* Sce wc� 4r1A I FrcciQ,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B 14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
(A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
arks (B
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
nt D sits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Xion
sits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
at or Crust (64)
_, Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
posits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
tion Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aqudard (D3)
Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
/ Depth (inches):
-7
Water Table Present? Yes No
epth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): /Zf
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

L,,kK,#4Z - Uf
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: ✓oe i2,e
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9 than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 It (1
10. m) tall.
11. Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants, regardless
/ = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.281t tall.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
2 <_ / %AC
4. Hydrophytic
5. T Vegetation
35 = Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: /7,(- 20% of total cover: %
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
PA., At✓frl ft
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Doninant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
A'yA/r''
% Cover
_37Number
S cies?
Status
AC
of Dominant Species
1.
/QGc�k
/
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
L�lU��4��✓L/�ltQio
/
a�
3
�i►"�f �A
AcV
Total Number of Dominant
c�
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
- Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
�/2(
total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1
16&< V&4
/ J
✓
�'�1 C
FAC species x 3 =
2
�,i�%.� lil�2 , /,Q �d
�fj
/
FACU species x 4 =
3
r/<(,�,
/
F—�
UPL species x 5 =
4.
14OW &9_A41^
AJ
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
? - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
%O
3
- Total Cover
y
_
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb
50% of total cover:
Stratum (Plot size: )
209€ of
total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1.
9 c-Vlle�oLi!ov
At
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2.
(Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9 than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 It (1
10. m) tall.
11. Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants, regardless
/ = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.281t tall.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
2 <_ / %AC
4. Hydrophytic
5. T Vegetation
35 = Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: /7,(- 20% of total cover: %
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
PA., At✓frl ft
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
,),�iu�A 2 - CP
Sampling Point: Ilii 2 -
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
'Tvoe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
_Thick
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type:
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No /
NAw Rr,/Elt Sim
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

LW K - oe
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern untains and Piedmont Region
//''%%.Sampling3 j13
Project/Site:(lAt✓ ��/� City/County: Date: 2-
I
Applicant/Owner. /"/ C (r �r State: /`/G Sampling Point: 7 7
Investigator(s): AXi "' �A✓��� 1l�Qit//G�ir Section, wnshi Range: "I
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none): G°o✓t�{ Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRRA): P1 139�' �•`�
Lat. /6. 2�l Long: —719 Datum: k^-GSV
Soil Map Unit Name: Ce/4 ` CHCy,4Clio Co AM �"z�!%REQ. � � NWI classification: p� 1r
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No .0 (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
l�-
i4.✓D fes( 3 �o�Hf
HYDROLOGY
Yes
No
Yes
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
No
Yeses
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No
ISCCo+✓ ,r,Q>�..IL %� y�A,( (3<. y ��wriF+ ,. er¢.r er 2..✓ae` bF q2. on 5 0 n/
( ` 70".t?w -wg-qt 4_4r of 7, 0"- /j 09 /V/4& 15/cFeO w,71,
NR CS wE%S -? FFo EI
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reguired)
Primpry Indicatory minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
/surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants tB14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
,High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
, Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
__1 nundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
'Water -Stained Leaves (B9)icrotopographic
Relief (D4)
— Aquatic Fauna (B13)
:2_�FAC-Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes --"NoDepth
(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes % No
Depth (inches):
0
'_�No
Saturation Present? Yes _7 No
Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Doninant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %, Cover S ie 7 Status
tus
1. �C'/ �� r/G�j/ AG✓
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
—= Total Cover
50% of total cover: /Z20 o% o% f total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.A6,91
2.
3.
4,
5
6.
7.
8.
9.
Herb Stratum (Plot size
2.
3
4,
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
/✓ Total Cover
50% of total cover: i 20% of total cover: 2
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:—
Woody Vine Stratum m (Plot size: )
1. 0�lA cerko r,�c
3.
4.
s.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: ; 20% of total cover: Z
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
- lwl cy 'noo-i! 0-q4AGEP ✓L- VO- t'a fP�brG/lr�in
WmkU,t N wt: �-
Sampling Point: �G77G-
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
y (A)
t (B)
(00 t (A,B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 --
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 It (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
heiaht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
flAtw
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the a
we+A vtI H - wad
Sampling Point: _0L
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvne Loc Texture Remarks
o
2-
'Z
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=R
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (SS)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
_ Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
�amy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (1-3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F 19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TIF 12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
f 1
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

o,k1� A ti - AP
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - EasternMountainsand Piedmont Region
Project/Site. 1)4w City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: /✓C G r Stale: �C Sampling Point: 7ull
Investigator(s):Section., Range: �'►//«�R�" sr�ccG
Landform (hillslope. terrace, etc.): � a�(.d'r✓ Local relief(cconcave, convex, none): C,,✓X,- Slope (%): 0 I
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): X1101 13L Lal 361 Long: Long: - 7% /
37,103 Datum: IV e"(
Soil Map Unit Name: CfA - Cl4fW,40a 10A4+, CP -2 Z SoA1 _fiqt?. 4 16-0 NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No 1X91- (it no. explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes / No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _' No Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No -7
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants IB14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_
FAC Test (D5)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
-Neutral
Field Observations:
/
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
�,E7epth
/
Water Table Present? Yes
No (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No / Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size. }
2.
3.
4
5
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 00
Sapling/Shrub Ztratum (Plot size:
v 1
3-
4.
5.
6.
7
8
9
50% of total cover: 30
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Doninant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
y 1,2l Ac
yc? = TolaI Cover
20% of total cover:_
2p F,4c
64&
b r/ =Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover: 72
3V I-' .Ic ✓
V), ""A 4 - 'if
Sampling Point
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
-� (A)
(B)
> 5�
(A!B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
6 Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7 height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 it (1
10. m) tall.
11 Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover: 2 20% of total cover: / o
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
) height.
1. �MK.�7C /f�.�/Fou,O ! a rAG
2.
3.
4. Hydrophytic
5 Vegetation
�= Total Cover Present? Yes No
500h of total cover: 20% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
QlV()t fl -re
US Arrny Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
,)tN„Aik ll -CAP
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TyDe Loc Texture Remarks
s n __2�__
7.
1-7511 Z
-77-7 30
'TVDe. C=Concentration. D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains. `Location: r'L=Pare Linino, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (1=2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (1-3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
_Thick
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F 12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type.
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
k1m frt6
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

(,. .,J Lt — vj( k
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
hbtN Ri noir T 3 ) S-
Project/She ray` City/County: ) Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: L State: �_ Sampling Point: S1`f �� W -IL
Investigator(s): )^t1 >< h Section, ' , Range: A6V1 I
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): f� ^ fh Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): lP Lat: 3(" Zt:91 6Z Long: -�q . 591918 pDatum- L 944
Soil Map Unit Name: ��l�sJ�r tl oo+N NWI classification: 1 fb) e -
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on thd site typicat for this time of year? Yes No >6 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation /✓ , Soil i� , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation -4!�_ Soil �, or Hydrology A/ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Yes No
Is the sampled Area /
within a Wetland? Yesy No
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants fB14)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X No
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
Remarks:
�reciQ�4akierl �S
(oelo�
n",,,„ 1 ,���
�3� !' ner►� �°*°� �'> ��"-s�r,�
gota
4.4o
mole is 1.0"- 13.6
�,,ar�o: �rcdso�le' ti1� N2LS W�1 1able5
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants fB14)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
k High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C1)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
Iron Deposits (BS)
Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
k FRC -Neutral Test (05)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes Pi No
Depth (inches): (P
Water Table Present? Yes. No
Depth (inches): b
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover S ci s? Status
1. t u s D 15 _2P FALk✓
2. &etr mow.
3.
4.
5.
6.
_0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: i� 20% of total cover:_
Sapling Stratum (Plot -size:
1. t)o
2. tllkh
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
51p% oktotalcover: 20% of total cover:_
Shrub Stratum (PI size:
1. A(01)tl i IQl�.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ?i
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3,
4,
5.
G.
7.
v1jcV\#A1 N - wt''
Sampling Point: 5el - YB �
Dominance Test worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Number of Dominant Species
OBL species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
�(
Species Across All Strata:
v (B)
Percent of Dominant Species?
So
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multioly by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum IPlot size: 0,4k )
2. Ai n % y� �� /�
3.
4.
5.
1� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: Tri 20% of total cover: _
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
l,J,ki. d u -weir
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moi % Color (moist) %_ Tvoe Loci Texture Remarks
'Tvoe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=f ore Lininq, M=Matrix,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

wet -Aa 14— Of
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site W 1
Applicant/Owner: Ili (i
Investigator(s)
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)): _`
Soil Map Unit Name: 6111-Sfl_ i
_ City/County: /wcfl Sampling Date: 3 J�
State: Sampling Point:
_ Section ownsht ange: W�tlf.•"sb
Local relief (concave, convex, none): ipre> Slope (%): Z
26�il6Z Long: — X1,5919Ig Datum: W6,S-84
NWI classification: 4
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical Tor this time of year? Yes No _7,1� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N . Soil Al , or HydrologyN significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes I_ No
Are Vegetation N , Soil I, or Hydrology 4- naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _X No Is the Sampled Area v
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
_A7 FmW P 66 J ,tC1110.'c
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants 11314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ e atterns
_ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on
ots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (61) _
Presence of Re ron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Rec Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _
hin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inun isible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
— Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (05)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No K
Depth (inches): T 1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 14e,
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3P ` l A) % Cover S cies? Status
1. I S ' t�rt 15 _° l Cyd
2 ` vtt MN 3�u
3.
4
5.
6.
2 P = Total Cover
5 %oft tat cover: /� 20°�b of total cover.
Sanling Stratum (Plot size: 3P " in� th
1. k)ejxN I Y
2. hAY 6WKkO
z
4.
5.
W t.Nw^ 1t - UT
Sampling
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 � (AJB)
rrevaience inoex worKsneet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
6. Prevalence Index = BIA =
� = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% 0/ total cover: PV 20% of total cover:_ — 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: y-) ) 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 hwv r 4w -, f _ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
9
3.
4.
5.
�o = Total Cover
50% of total cover: S 20% of total cover: X
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
7
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
h (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
50% of total 11cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: R rt,It,., ) rL
1.��! I lt= is !/1L
2. 1k1 h 1° at
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: J0 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: �I
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color m i % Color (moist) % TvDe Loci Texture Remarks
o I +>-+
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N.
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (f3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

om.- l 5- wt �
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site. H1W City/County: �26Ck �1hrN Sampling Date: )Z
Applicant/Owner: tic i-- State: /\J C— Sampling Point: SF -o)* )ejl-
Investigator(s): 51im f Sectio Zownsh) Range: W, Iraw�Sbw
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local refef (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 7
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L(Z(2 Lat: 6 8 N 3 Z Long: - Datum: Iqq
Soil Map Unit Name. S"U+l NWI classification. Q r b l G
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No 2V (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation Soil _4/ or Hydrology 4L significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes " No
Are Vegetation A( Soil /r , or Hydrology Al naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Vx*� No Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yesy No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
frcuptri;vn bLlcw avw^�E �o� y(eK� 36.401
-l-or 3- C6.4o" — rtorpU� rwIt = -13'r) bc�we file 0;51'4
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
— High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
X Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
J Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Shallow Aqukard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
X Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
X FRC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches):1�
Saturation Present? Yes —U No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot sing -
1. tA&-"I M1iNt
2. & Wnhs
Absolute Dominant Indicator
) % Cover Species? Status
1) �_ W
3D y ttk U
3. A 11 l"► P*
30 FAL
4.
FACW species
5.
FAC species
6.
FACU species
x 4 =
90 = Total Cover
x 5 =
SO% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ( g
Saolino Stratum (Plot size:
1
Et lf"NAIARX11
2. i(. I
IO �A{W
3.
4.
5.
500/. of total cover C)
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. _-
2.
3.
4.
5.
WcW4,1 1 � - w itk"
Sampling Point: $F 14 A
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species /_50
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/13)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Z� = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover: _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Testis >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
- Total Cover j -Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1 'f S 1� y (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2. S 20% of total cover:
woody Vine Sqawm (Plot size: )
1.5M(1�. w +n +W � v 4
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: ? S 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
It (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ZNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
tje,�twd S - wed
Sampling Point: 5F--hlt
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Malrix Redox Features
inchesColor moi % Color (moist) % Twe Loc Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: fL=f ore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) 0 Depleted Matrix (1-3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (FQ
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present7 Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

t,\)2ilad i - Up
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite H a w ILL ✓e e- -r,, City/County: 4(kri�h t M Sampling Date: / V
ApplicanUOwnev L - 0 State: NL Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): 'Sm, -oh t Pe& i . h kni on Section, Township, Range: (,Jry�rd S�arg
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Ghvff Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): i.ae - Lac ZG ?w3 z Long: —'H, 'S 'I o }' ( Datum((Aas-gy
Soil Map Unit Name: hp54Ar: S,1 66 TA [oar NWI classification: rJA
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typicfal for his time of year? Yes No ,A*— (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Al , Soil V , or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes - No
Are Vegetation � Soil �, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes __X_ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No� within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: n
Y(C _ � � 1) n � i u r1 �• i.4 41 (A'JF,�'. J
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apaly)
rface Soil
_ Surface Water (Al)
_
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
e y Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
ainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on
oots (C3)ss Trim Lines (B16)
i5aturation
_ water Marks (Bl)
Presence of Red on (C4)
-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
Recen eduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
�
in Muck Surface (C7)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) :�'"
_
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Vis' on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
y
Depth (inches): 74
Saturation Present? Yes No
>(
Depth (inches): 8
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). if available:
Remarks.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Cly jky S � C U
2. I t h ►�1b
3. i J M4AL!M6
4. A017 W144 V*% fD Al
5.
6.
S = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 31,s 20% of total cover: IS
Saolina Stratum (Plot size: . )
1. prNintAJ Lhwnt CtNh �� AL
2.
3. -
O paha S -,4f
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species �j
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: /, 0 (A!B)
Prevalence rnaex worasneet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
6,
Prevalence Index = BtA =
1 S = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 7.S 20% of total cover: 3
- 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shru.4 Stratum (Plot size:
)
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2.
tp �_ rrtiLA
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
20 n Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Herb Stratum (Plot size
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9,
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: "1
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: -
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot tsize: )
2.
3.
4.
s._
10 - Total Cover
50% of total cover: S 20% of total cover:
numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants. including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

�JkAJ S -U(
SOIL Sampling Point: ' 2F- �f
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Feature_ s
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvoe Locr
Texture Remarks
1 o
S owp't
-0-5
S - i) o YK S � d
n YX S 4 is
••+
'Type: C =Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced
Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA-f47)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast PEaWe-f7e3ox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
,o, •��"` "(ALRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (1-3) ,_..—""
(MLRA 136, 147)
_
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dar ce (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_„DepW6d Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) --�
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
Sandy Mucky Miner RR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA LN,84)
MLRA 136)
y Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (i(observed):
Type.
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

we Arl#'i A Z - we k
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Y/ errs City/County: �� Nyt� Sampling Date: 3
Applicant/Owner: l/ State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): !n Section, own ' , Range: l� l(iuN^5�ikr°1
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):o ) Local relief (concave, convex, none): /j'oYYC Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 1 I LLai:31a•ZiyLong: — mac fA ,Datum:�GS4N
Soil Map Unit Name: c�(�r5i3in ( C�U� QooN NWI classification: FD
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no. explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation tv Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present"? Yes %I No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks: ,J ff ,, . r\
rf�ci(��1AI-111 tXI"'.► o a -ta, Uv1tl C
Ir '? - r 0 v1i40 S q0 n - 0.1-0A frlr 2
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is r uired• check all
hat a I
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
X Surface Water (A1) _ True
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
I Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence
of Reduced Iron (C9)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (65)
Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes —� No
Depth
(inches): b -1
Water Table Present? Yes A No
Depth
(inches): )Z
Saturation Present? Yes _X No
Depth
_
(inches): -7-
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge. monitoring well,
aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Skratum (Plot )' ' ) %t�) % Cover S cies? Status
FAN
2. Al��
3.
4.
5
6.
= Total Cover
5 %of tal cover: V20% of total cover:
Sa lin S ratum (Plot size: 3n 7 �f,14
1. r� 2� YY FhL
2.,ggAl W%tN JOW0 fiwVl� 4 t 14L
3.
4
5
6
_ = Total Cover
50% off total cover: 2(Z 20% of total cover:
Shr b Stratum (Plot size: I SLL rA&I )
2. kj r14 X4" 2D
3.
4
5
6.
_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4,
5..
6.
7.,
8.
9.
1C
11
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: -
Woody Vine Str t tm (P size: - )
F&
2.
Sampling Point: r-7 • Ti
Number of Dominant Species e
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: I (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 7, p
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
S = Total Cove Vegetation /
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes V No
a,,
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:i�s�
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % T77 —77— T exALiLe Remarks
04 10 5)F- dust."
'Type: C = Concentration, D=Depletion, RM =Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL -Pore Lininq, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (1-3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F 19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WC}-(uJ Z - up
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/She: W ) oil rA� City/County: 44)40(m Sampling Date: 3) 2 )S
Applicant/Owner: E State`:A/ Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): S I n A-\ Section, own ' , Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): I A-14 Local relief (concave, convex, none): toly6pf Slope (%): LZ
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LAX l Lat: 34.1 '6 H(6 Long: 'D'l`I. SA b 3 SH Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: L�9Gt x1')61 )OA^� NWI classification: //*
Are climatic ( hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No _2' (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation --dd, Soil /I/ , or Hydrology Al significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes l �/
No
Are Vegetation A/ , Soil N , or Hydrology V— naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No - C
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
� arc yip- �cla� a�e�
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)�
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely V ated"t o cave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
drogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_!Pre57ence
age Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
_idized Rhizospheres on Livi
3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (Bl)
_ of Reduced )
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ct Iro tion in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ uck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on A ' magery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (03)
_ Water-Staine es (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aqu auna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
4
V Depth (inches): 7i a
Saturation Present? Yes �_ No
Depth (inches): Ik
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot sizer i7W INJ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2. 1'W`'Vw1
3.Y_ L_
4.
5
6.
= Total Cover
't 50% of I taLcover: 3 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1. A01 AMY -N
2 YAR
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50 6 of tot I cover: /� 20% of total cover: ► v
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: y11�1h
. U >" nn �� Y
3.
4.
6.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: �Z 20% of total cover:_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.,
4.
5.
6.
7.
S.
9.
1C
11
= Total Cover
50% of total over: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (�11ot size: S' )
1.5Ay tro h hU 6"t
2
3
4
Sampling Point: uJ -
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: ^It? (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7S1% (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
of Five Vegetation
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants. including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
5.
T Hydrophytic
J = Total Cover Vegetation V/
50% of total cover: ate" 20% of total cover:_ Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
t\J, +t- V1 J- T ' (A e
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist). Color (moist)Type Loc" Textune Remarks
ky
'Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=f ore Linino, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils$:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) M
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coa edox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (1-3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dar ace (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Red pressions (FE)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
ron-Manganese Masses (F 12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Ma
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ edox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Mitigation Project Name Haw River Tract
EEP IMS ID 169
River Basin CAPE FEAR
Cataloging Unit 03030002
Applied Credit Ratios:1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
St
r
e
a
m

Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
St
r
e
a
m

En
h
a
n
c
m
e
n
t

I
St
r
e
a
m

En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t

I
I
St
r
e
a
m

Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Ri
p
a
r
i
a
n

Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
Ri
p
a
r
i
a
n

Cr
e
a
t
i
o
n
Ri
p
a
r
i
a
n

En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
Ri
p
a
r
i
a
n

Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
No
n
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n

Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
No
n
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n

Cr
e
a
t
i
o
n
No
n
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n

En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
No
n
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n

Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Co
a
s
t
a
l

M
a
r
s
h

Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
Co
a
s
t
a
l

M
a
r
s
h

Cr
e
a
t
i
o
n
Co
a
s
t
a
l

M
a
r
s
h

En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
Co
a
s
t
a
l

M
a
r
s
h

Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)23.09
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)4.618
NCDOT Pre-EEP Debits (feet and acres):Not Applicable
EEP Debits (feet and acres):
DWQ Permit No USACE Action IDs Impact Project Name
1989-0419 2001-20507
Meridian Parkway Business
Campus 1.100
1999-0326 1999-20734 Walden Creek Subdivision 2.095
1996-0320 1998-20919 Panther Creek 2.020
1998-1002 Durham Regional Mall 1.355
1999-0930 1995-01526
NCDOT TIP U-2406 - Elon
College Bypass 10.000
1998-0330 1995-02585
NCDOT TIP R-2541 - NC 55
Holly Springs Bypass 3.125
2004-0679 2003-20078 Providence Place Subdivision 0.675
2007-0235 2007-00939-268 Damascus Church Road 0.600
2007-0503 2008-00035
E-22 Elementary School
Access/Mills Park Drive 0.070
2008-1741 2008-00998
Little Drive and Louis Stephens
Drive Extensions 0.650
2008-1270 2008-02523 200 Willowlake Road 1.400
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)0.000
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)0.000
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 03/17/2015