20150012 Ver 1_Baseline Monitoring Report_20150427

ADDENDUM
PRESERVATION PROJECT AND
BASELINE DOCUMENTATION REPORT

MCGOWAN CREEK
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DMS Project No. 92604

Neuse River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03020201

Prepared for:

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603

Prepared by:

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603

June 2015
McGowan Creek Preservation Project
DMS ID 92604 Table of Contents Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 1
1.0 ADDITIONAL BASELINE INFORMATION...................................................................................... 1
2.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS ....................................................................................................... 2
3.0 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................... 3

APPENDICES

Appendix A. Figures and Photographs
Figure 1. Mitigation Assets Map
Site Photographs
Appendix B. Stream Forms
McGowan Creek Preservation Project
DMS ID 92604 Page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This addendum gives baseline information and mitigation units for streams and riparian buffer
assets located within the McGowan Creek Preservation Project (Site). Data in this addendum
reflects the results of a May 2015 stream delineation. Wetland mitigation units are included in
this document; however, remain unchanged from the February 2015 NC Division of Mitigation
Services (formerly NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program) Final Preservation Project and
Baseline Documentation Report McGowan Creek. Project goals and objectives, and Site
information can be found in that document.

The Site is located in west central Orange County, approximately 1 mile northwest of Efland on
McGowan Creek. The Site contains reaches of the McGowan Creek stream system in the Upper
Neuse River Basin, which drains to the Eno River and ultimately Falls Lake. The Site’s location
in the highly populated watershed is increasing the importance of managing water sources
including preservation of Site streams and riparian wetlands vital to maintaining water quality
within the watershed and the Falls Lake water supply.

1.0 ADDITIONAL BASELINE INFORMATION

Jurisdictional Streams
Watershed Summary
The Site provides water quality function to a 3.25-square mile (2079-acre) watershed at the
downstream end of the Easement boundary. The Site drainage area is primarily composed of
forested and residential land.

Reach Summary
The Site contains 7 jurisdictional stream reaches (5 perennial and 2 intermittent), which total
4878.53 linear feet of stream; the table below gives information for each reach. Buffer widths
vary for each reach ranging from buffer less than 50 feet from one or both sides of the stream to
greater than 100 feet from the top of bank on both sides of the stream; more detailed buffer width
information is included in Section 2.0 (Determination of Credits) below. The Site includes
unnamed tributaries as well as McGowan Creek, which is listed as Water Supply Watershed II,
High Quality Waters, and Nutrient Sensitive Waters by the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR 2013). No areas of concern were observed; all stream reaches within the
Site are stable.

Jurisdictional Stream Characteristics

Type Depicted
on USGS
Depicted on
NRCS Soil
Map
Drainage
Area (acres)
USACE
Form Score
Length
(linear Feet)
McGowan Creek Perennial Yes Yes 2080 58 552.49
UT-1 Perennial Yes Yes 370 54 852.70
UT-2 Intermittent No No 38 53 647.32
UT-3 Intermittent Yes Yes 95 51 163.63
UT-4 Perennial No No 13 51 575.02
UT-5 Intermittent/ Perennial Yes Yes 100 52 1606.30
UT-6 Intermittent No No 25 62 481.07
Total 4878.53
McGowan Creek Preservation Project
DMS ID 92604 Page 2
2.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS

Additional project mitigation assets were delineated in May 2015 using Global Positioning
Systems (Figure 1, Appendix A; Stream Forms, Appendix B). The following tables summarize
mitigation assets.

All credits will be released upon IRT approval. The project service area will be in compliance
with the DMS In-Lieu Fee Instrument.

McGowan Creek, Orange County, Neuse River Basin, 03020201 Cataloging Unit
EEP Project Number 92604
Mitigation Credits
Warm Stream Riparian Wetland Non-riparian
Wetland
Riparian
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient
Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient
Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE
Totals NA 976 NA 4.3 NA -- 60,181 NA NA
Stream Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation
components
Warm Stream
(linear feet)
Buffer <50 feet from
one or both TOB
(5:1)
Buffer 50-100 feet
from both TOB
(5:1)
Buffer >100 feet
from both TOB
(5:1)
Total Stream by Reach
McGowan Creek 171.05 371.22 10.22 552.49
UT-1 329.00 523.70 -- 852.70
UT-2 -- 608.96 38.36 647.32
UT-3 104.09 8.96 50.58 163.63
UT-4 -- 484.24 90.78 575.02
UT-5 313.12 897.33 395.85 1606.30
UT-6 481.07 -- -- 481.07
Total
(linear feet) 1398.33 2894.41 585.79 4878.53
Total SMUs 279.67 578.88 117.16 976 SMUs
Wetland Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation
components
Warm Stream
(linear feet)
Mitigation Ratio
Riparian Wetland
Non-riparian Wetland
Riverine Non-riverine
Wetland 1 5:1 20.99 -- --
Wetland 2 5:1 -- 0.46 --
Total
(acreage) 20.99 -- --
Total WMUs 4.2 0.1 --
McGowan Creek Preservation Project
DMS ID 92604 Page 3
*The area of mitigation beyond 100 feet from the TOB may comprise no more than 10 percent of the total mitigation area.

3.0 REFERENCES

NC Division of Water Resources (2013), Neuse River Basin Surface Water Classifications,
online (December 18, 2014). http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications. Department
of Environment and Natural Resources, NC Division of Water Resources, Raleigh, NC

NC Division of Mitigation Services (formerly Ecosystem Enhancement Program) (2015), Final
Preservation Project and Baseline Documentation Report McGowan Creek, Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, NC Division of Mitigation Services, Raleigh, NC

Riparian Buffer Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation components Mitigation
Ratio
Buffer
(square feet)
Buffer Receiving
Credit (square feet)
Rural Non-Subject Streams with 30-100 foot Buffer from TOB 5:1 196,975.25 196,975.25
Rural Non-Subject Streams with 100-200 foot Buffer from TOB 10:1 3,216.27* 3,216.27
Rural Subject Streams with 30-100 foot Buffer from TOB 10:1 201,501.61 201,501.61
Rural Subject Streams with 100-200 foot Buffer from TOB 20:1 6,276.35* 6,276.35
Total (square feet) 407,969.48 407,969.48
Total Buffer Mitigation Units 60,181
McGowan Creek Preservation Project
DMS ID 92604 Appendices

APPENDIX A
FIGURES AND PHOTOGRAPHS

!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
Photo 9
Photo 4
Photo 3
Photo 2
Photo 1
Photo 17
Photo 16
Photo 15
Photo 14
Photo 13
Photo 10 Photos 7, 8
Photos 5, 6
Photo 11, 12
Photo 18, 19, 20
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ/CLF
JUNE 2015
1:3000
14-018
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
OrangeCounty, NC
McGOWANCREEKPRESERVATIONSITE
MITIGATIONASSETS
1
³
0 500 1,000 1,500250Feet
Imagery Source: CGIA Most Recent Orthoimagery (2013)
Legend
Conservation Easement Boundary
Stream TOB
!Photo Points
^_Stream Form Locations
Beaver Dams
Old Stone Dam - Notched
Stream Centerline/Mitigation
Stream Buffer <50 feet on One or Both Banks
Stream Buffer 50-100 feet on Both TOB
Stream Buffer >100 feet on both TOB
Wetland Mitigation
Riparian Riverine
Riparian Non-riverine
Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Rural Subject Stream with 30-100 foor Buffer
Rural Subject Stream with 100-200 foot Buffer
Rural Non-subject Stream with 30-100 foot Buffer
Rural Non-subject Stream with 100-200 foot Buffer
Wetland 2Wetland 1
Wetland 1
McGowanCreek
U
T-1
UT-2
UT-3
U
T
-
4
U T-5
UT-6
McGowan Creek Preservation Project
DMS ID 92604 Appendices

Photo 1. Culvert at top of UT-5

Photo 2. Top of UT-5, facing downstream

Photo 3. Downstream end of UT-5, facing
Wetland 1

Photo 4. Downstream portion of UT-4

Photo 5. Downstream extent of UT-4, facing
upstream

Photo 6. Downstream extent of UT-4, where
stream disperses into Wetland 1

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
DMS ID 92604 Appendices

Photo 7. UT-4, facing upstream

Photo 8. UT-4, facing downstream

Photo 9. Beaver impoundment in Wetland 1

Photo 10. Lower portion of UT-2, facing
upstream

Photo 11. UT-2, facing upstream

Photo 12. UT-2, facing upstream

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
DMS ID 92604 Appendices

Photo 13. Upper portion of UT-2, facing
upstream

Photo 14. Lower portion of UT-1, facing
downstream

Photo 15. Easement marker at TOB on UT-1

Photo 16. UT-1, facing downstream

Photo 17. Easement marker at top of UT-6
(Wetland 2)

Photo 18. Top of UT-6, facing downstream
from headcut

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
DMS ID 92604 Appendices

Photo 19. Top of UT-6, facing downstream
from headcut

Photo 20. Headcut at the top of UT-6, facing
upstream

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
DMS ID 92604 Appendices

APPENDIX B
STREAM FORMS

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 td ' O uw" (_ e P It
Date:
Project/Site:;!�r �jdrr�, (i�p
Latitude: 3 (- 36c67
Evaluator: ��� �.�r✓5o�.
County:
Longitude: �501 7q r
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other 6" �_ lq'v)
e.g. Quad Name:
if _ 19 or perennial if - 30`
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = (`' i )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
6V
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
es -
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
1.5
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
.0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
IZP
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es =
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ f = ��7-_ )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 C
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
V 1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
CT51 1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es -
C. Biology (Subtotal = /0 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3)
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
i)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
T
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
tY
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
r?j 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

USACE AID#,
DWQ # Site #
�cG..✓an G�cor
_ (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following informatio for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: a 5 s� 2. Evaluator's name: lie 4, a✓50•V�/` X 1,i%✓`
3. Date of evaluation: <T- �A- a d I 4. Time of evaluation: /w c 1
6. River basin: Py } tG
5. Name of stream: (�'1 , (fid u--r1.�- � �tE� �
7. Approximate drainage area: y,, d- 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 0) /' 10. County: 0-2 241? -
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any).. lit-&dwa, C-,-,/T
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): t�J �7 G Longitude (ex. -77.55661 1): OO- 7717/ 0
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS er GI Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
f
0 l�r6dc-a_ "—epetf 5 4t1r�-r5c�:
14. Proposed channel work (if any): It -0 —G
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit: If' r M K �, r
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters ZWater Supply Watershed (l -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? off NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: rJ
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? i� NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? (P NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial _ZE% Agricultural
W % Forested /0 % Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width:
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 4 - S
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
i
Total Score 'V
A (from reverse): Comments: '" t
Yitijv ,/(J,*7tn, ruc I+ 4K l r; n f,P
U lV r/✓G' r dr, i'I,,p C O
Evaluator's Signature r r Date^�����✓
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

r.
Na. t !�
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points
B
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
V
no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max oints
,..,
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0- 5
0- 4
0- 2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding= max points)
y
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points
r
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA
0-4
0 - 5
fine, homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = max points)
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
12
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)•�
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
16
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
-'
�
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
x
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
20
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = maxpoints)-
-'
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
Z.
O
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)-�
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max oints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
`-
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

,f : -
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Pp - O
Date: �� `L
Project/Site: sjw« _ �
Latitude:
Evaluator:� j< �G� f
County: 0rq
Longitude:^
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if > 19 or perennial if >_ 30 `
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
1.5 Ti
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0 0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
25. Algae 0
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1,
FACW = 0.75;
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
,
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
Sketch:
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0es
= 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see cliscussips in manual
B. Hydroloqy (Subtotal = r , )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 Ti
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 �U
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
Q
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0Tfg
1
=7�
C. Biolow (Subtotal = -7 , '�` )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed &
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish 0
1
1.5
23. Crayfish I 1
0.5
1
1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae 0
0.5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 t -
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: CIL .0 y
r
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ #
U('
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information forthe stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: o 04 5/A&E
e 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: 6. River basin: c Gn e- tea
7. Approximate drainage area: 37� a,G,,e4 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: ) 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):�1/�'1��'jp-� c r%{c H, bot,-, ( vt
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 36, O1_rt�� 6 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): -7q `9 / T93
Method location determined (circle):,1 Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS the IS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): W rj,/ Z,
15. Recent weather conditions: //0 / G. r c,✓ P 2 `7 � �
16. Site conditions at time of visit: V-- J 'Lle L4,4 — r d
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrientt Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed /f (I -1V)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? (,f cam' NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: T t( (.-vim i v.`:,,
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? i�4 NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial % Industrial 4% Agricultural
'10 % Forested (% % Cleared / Logged 5� % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width:
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: K Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: �f a �' �K eF `� ir. 6.CW-4-
Evaluator's Signature -- Date
c�-
Cf p `� Q
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

oT_
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0 — 5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0— 5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0-4
0-4
V
(no discharge — 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
-�
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
'
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0— 3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints)
f
I 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 — 5
0-4
0 — 5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints)
l3
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-13
0-4
0 —5
�
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
IS
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
Z
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0 — 3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = magpoints)
1
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 - 6
0-6
F-*
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max oints)
J
W
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 — 5
0-5
0 —5
i-
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = rnaxpoints)
j
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
�0
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0 5
(no evidence = 0; common numerous types = maxpoints)
—
1
1
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

�) a, 2
NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PL 54'e,"
Date: _ _ i
Project/Site'. �V (DwN�/
Latitude: 7�,�
Moderate
Evaluator:
F/
County: �� ,�
Longitude: 71. i t1
v
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other b (c I 4��
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if ? 30'
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =A )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0.
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
J
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
r',
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
J 1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 A0 1
1.5
El
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 3)
1
C. Biology (Subtotal = "I-, )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
5
1
1.5
25. Algae
`0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBI =
1.5 00er 76
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41

USACE AID#
DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following informationfor the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: /✓nt4l 5/ a G (, 1J 2. Evaluator's name: P,?- t,6 Az --� iC1D'r-
3. Date of evaluation: p6 - �,d 15- 4. Time of evaluation: � '33 J9
5. Name of stream: 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: 0
9. Length of reach evaluated: ��� 10. County: or 9. t -q p
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimD
al degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): u 6
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3G - Oct t -f q �� Longitude (ex. -77.556611): - -7 � - J 7 / 0 7
Method location determined (circle): �d Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GISOther
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attac�entifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:yo � `t
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (1 -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES CT
V If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES I 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES 16
21. Estimated watershed land use: /% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
34 % Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width:
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends
V23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
/� Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>I 0%)
Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. _
Total Score (from reverse):—S Comments:
Evaluator's Signature_pDate
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by. the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
I
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
L�
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
J
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
Uno
discharge = 0; springs, sees wetlands, etc. = max oints
,..,
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
no floodplain = 0• extensive floodplain = max points)
2
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0 — 4
0-2
�l
a
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding= max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)1
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)^1
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
fine, homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
>0
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
1
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
d.
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
15
substantial impact =0• no evidence = maxpoints)
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
16
no riffles/ri les or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
J
10-6
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
L
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
,x(no
shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
�•
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
/
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = maxpoints)
'
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
*
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
rl
V
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 — 5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
4 7
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

�'-3
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
��6
Projec/Site:
Latitude: J D (��
Evaluator: O'C t` VV,
County: l/fir U'�
Longitude:
y
1
2
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
,
Other (J
Stream is at least intermittent -� -, -
S>_ a i perennial i if >- it t -1 - '
if
Ephemeral I ent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Str ng
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
cy
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ooI sequence
00
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
"�
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0)
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
r'
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.
11. Second or greater order channel
Eo - 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal= t , )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1111
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1. 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
es =_3 '
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal= 10,' )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
Cy
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
f9
1.5
23. Crayfish
0)
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 e -
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

USACE AID#
DWQ 9 Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET "
Provide the following informationfor the stream reach under assessment: j
1. Applicant's name: 0 Y f ` — AsGE P 2. Evaluator's name: ��' K I p �� u I Q0-,
3. Date of evaluation:�'a-�" as l Jr 4. Time of evaluation: /0 Gr
5. Name of stream: 6. River basin: if q/7p �
7. Approximate drainage area: 5"�'� 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County: 0-4" e,
11. Site coordinates if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name(if an ,`�
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): I • h 3 6 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): - ��_ 7 917/0
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS QChef IS Other
13. Loccation( sof reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): ! /)
70utl"I V1 i'l�17d�4_G'^OI��i�`Y
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Gt o I• — ur U�4 ; �
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES Off yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? " NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? E8 NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential _iE7% Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
70 % Forested _57% Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: /C1 f
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):_
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 1� ( Comments:
Evaluator's Signature_► tel: - Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
, ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0 — 5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; Contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
-�
,�
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
�-
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
,
CA
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
%
a
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; fre cent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 — 5
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
a
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
I
0-5
0-5
0-5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
1
0—�
0-4
0-5
(no visible roots — 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
<.
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
G
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
Ey
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
Z
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
J
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
C�
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
x
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 —5
0 — 5
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
1
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
L
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Oriqins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Dater _ �d
ProjecUSite:,t Cres{
Latitude: �& 070 Z
Evaluator: � I.,� dl `0 w
County: Ord C� C,Longitude:�7q_
I j-�
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Otherr
Stream is at least intermittent /
if > 19 or erennial if ? 30' S Q
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 15 � )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
J
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
1.5
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
Q
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
(7
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
10
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
0
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
= 3
d artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. HvdroloQv (Subtotal = V, , )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2)
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 J,0.5
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 r0.5)
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
J
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =.2'
1
C. Bioloov (Subtotal=
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2)
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
/ 0 `,
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0/
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBIL = 1.5 Other - 0_
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41

Lrf - u dd. ykS4_ea'_1
NC 11WO Ctrenm ldt-ntifivntinn Fnrm Vercinn 4.11 P6 -o1 r)"4'CV-.L4A
Date: �- (�(
Project/Site:�tG� (/
Latitude: _3G0O r
Evaluator: o, _ yCC(� ��
County: 01 -
Longitude: 7q_ j6�
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other l44 N Cl
Stream is at least intermittent I
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = �'i )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
L1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0�l
0 1 rlo-T)
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
10
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
OJ 1
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
- artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
R Hvrirnlnnv (Siihtntal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
00.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1 rlo-T)
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
mo- 0
Yes = 3
1
_% (' Rinlnnv (Ruhtntal = <_
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
4
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
+ 0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
10
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
OJ 1
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 5- d,� d5J a (n {'
�` /✓ e!' + /-rte.
�% .
'•i �� ; •�. .•. ... 1 , i/'' i ti's - ,s s
Sketch:

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 P/5-01- UN'_<0n
Date: S.- �_ f d'v !_
Project/Site: ����
Latitude:
Evaluator: p: l,„ l 5 id L`
County: 0
Longitude: -
Total Points:
Stream is least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other C
at
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ! i/ )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
<f->
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
'� 1.5
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
`
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
3
8. Headcuts
1
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1170
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
! 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0 -
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
(1-0
1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
.JY
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
<f->
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
'� 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = D
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal= �� )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41

USACE AID#.
DWQ #_
i
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information
/for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: '� P/ /.1� 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: y o� -ow 4. Time of evaluation: ld
5. Name of stream: ��� -6 3 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: 13 a 11-e5 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: �U 10. County: C?r Gtr c,
11. Site coordinates (if known):
prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): 6.0'
/f35-31 rwf7, h�
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): - V-1 I� Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 7�- { f 3
Method location determined (circle): 'I'opo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GISr S Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Soni 1 d �, iM.r.(-a(-.F,2_ (-._, x q- fL04v
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: i`' �, .._ � s- 1 LAi Wr, e
16. Site conditions at time of visit: L/0- 4 J`- tt v­�, , t/ I "t
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding. Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. 1s there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? � NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 4yo
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
% Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _LGentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%)
Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature ___ Date r 6ptaf 5
This channel evaluation orm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
—5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
G
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
J.
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
(no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
j
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
'x
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-1
3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural'meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
J"
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
I I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0 — 5
1
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
0(
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 — 3
0-4
0 —5
c�
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
7
J
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0 — 5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max oints
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 — 5
0 — 5
x
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 — 5
0-5
/
no evidence = 0; common numerous es = max points)
�
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxPoints)
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
�3
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 — 5
0-5
(no evidence — 0; abundant evidence = max points)
✓✓✓
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Piq �_I dou-7 f &4"
Date:/� - a `,
Project/Site:P �70�✓q �J
Latitude:
Evaluator: ��
e �-' 1A
County: (
Longitude: 1�_ l V -t 7t
L_
Total Points: f
Stream is at least intermittent �-�q,
if >_19 or perennial if >_30*
Stream Deter��tion (circle one)
Ephemeral Irnt_ermitt t Perennial
Other F_�aK
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Contihuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
S
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1.5
2'
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. �-
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
�0,
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = r' • -!_ _)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter 1. 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles J 0 0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0
Yes =
0 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = -
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
09, 1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0 0
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 ;D 5i
1
1.5
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
9 5
�G = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
1
Other = 0
1.5
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. �-
Notes:
Sketch:
'
J
41

i
@ oeq a
NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ,�- i -
Project/Site: ! ,':� ,. _
Latitude: j ,j L tGj
Evaluator:
plc�_�,��✓(V-01��
t
County: ���� ^,,
Longitude:��l �LJ�
f
Total Points: _
Stream is at least intermittent (�
Stream Determination (circle vqe)
Other qy
� -
Ephemeral Intermittent,, erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30'
(ff?
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = c
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
(ff?
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
(
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
1.5
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
c'
3
8. Headcuts
- p
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
07)
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
(0. 757
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated-, see discussions in manual
R Hvrirnlnnv ((;uhtntal = r 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
L31
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 Yes =
1
f: Rinlnnv (Suhtotal = %. 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
(
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
%
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
'-0 -
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
t 11
1.5
25. Algae
'4
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
-
Sketch:
41

UT- S (6-3 ; Me6"J• t"1
NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Oriains v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Ph- 7 j - E I oA fj 'qu J -,. e- 4 -
Date:` ' l
Project/Site:/�bocv(
l9Latitude: �r IX06
Evaluator: Xt .�, • -, �L
County:
Longitude: �- y, 30
J
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30' G I % e%
Ephemetal Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=.
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
7
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
(b
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence -
�I
��
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
6
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0.
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
Q)
i
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0?
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
0= 0
Yes = 3
d'�
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = r )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 (W
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1j
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0. 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 /d 9
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
C. Biology (Subtotal = (, -. )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1,+
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
%jS
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
(_P3)
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
(0-57)
1
1.5
25. Algae
0?
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW _=0. 7 0 B L = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
d'�
r•���'►j�ra�. (r"�
41

USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information7f r the stre m reach under assessment: Pe -
1. Applicant's name: N G I' 2. Evaluator's name: �` I✓✓5 or, � Kw/v
3. Date of evaluation:d� 4. Time of evaluation: '6. d an
5. Name of stream: Pte/ 6. River basin: Coe C -q---
7. Approximate drainage area: �" too 9,V,75 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated. �� 10. County: Or r?
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): of "a C.a Pfi (4nf���xwt�
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): d yo d-, Longitude (ex. —77.556611): 7
Method location determined (circle): GI' Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS ~re Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): g0,A $,
15. Recent weather conditions: dC .'. 1&vd a cy^- S 4 rJ eyi /a f -v vit�it 1 L� . CG e- -7 �v� •-'�
16. Site conditions at time of visit:ye- f Lir? l" -1 eii r G'
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (1 -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? U NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? � NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? 0 NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: t�_% Residential % Commercial % Industrial S/ % Agricultural
_SO % Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: c '~ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) XGentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): S ;�',. Comments:
Evaluator's Signature ���,� r Datr�0V
Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of now / persistent pools in stream
0 — 5
0-4
0 —5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0— 5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
-4
5
Groundwater discharge
0-1)
0-4
0-4
V(no
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
l
x
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
/
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
C
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
Channel sinuosity
0— 5
0— 4
0-1
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
1 I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
3
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 — 5
0-4
0 — 5
y�
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints).
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0 — 5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
l4
Root depth and density on banks
0 — 3
0-4
0-5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0 — 3
0-5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
7
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
J
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0 — 5
x
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy= max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
0-4
0 — 4
'
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structureNA*
= max)
—�
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 —5
0 — 5
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
04
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0— 6
0— 5
0— 5
1
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
={'
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

V I 1 i0
NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Oriqins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
PLS-oi decv6_. 5 k -nu..,
Date: �,
Project/Site'. I { �jdG,u�.
Latitude: 3-�,
Evaluator: pA� 14 Ir`��J , � � d
County: ��4"'S
Longitude: ` q- j yogl!j,
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other T! qr 0
Stream is at least intermittent
if >_19 or perennial if ? 30' T -
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
(2)
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri Ie- ooI sequence
0Q
Yes =
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
I
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
OBL = 1.5 frit e -
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No -O
Yes =
3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = i7, )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 0
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = Fi
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
s 911,
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 frit e -
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
----�
Notes:
4 L �. r, J �� , f4 -ate
5'�,5W
tC'S
Sketch:
41

U�'�P µbo�►tVItA� GV
NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Oriqins v. 4.11
NC IM0 ,Stream Identifientinn Form Version 4.11
ProjectSite, !) �
;�
Latitude:
Ur
3_C. oq
Evaluator: Pp, i.• S�.Y
.-`
County' Orr,
Longitude: 7q,l�7
Total Points:
is least intermittent i
S eam Determination (circle one)
Other j" t ►+
Stream at I JJ =
'
em I Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30'
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
<P
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-pool,(111)1
ripple -pool sequence
fro'' -0
Yes = 3
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
60
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
(0-)
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0 i
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
4f2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
'1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel=
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hvrirnlnnv (giihtntal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
4l 1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5 (V
15. Sediment on plants or debris
1 0.5 1
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 =03)
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
fro'' -0
Yes = 3
Rinlnnv (cuhtntal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1?
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0`_
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 '!
1
2
3
22. Fish
0 r'
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 i
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBI =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41

USACE AID#
ME
DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET'`
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: n
1. Applicant's name: f L om. 5 2. Evaluator's name: 1"�"��fWe-)y,-
3. Date of evaluation: �} -� `� _ a.0 <<1' 4. Time of evaluation: N. G
5. Name of stream: I' 6. River basin: C4/1",
7. Approximate drainage area: �" ��C4 S 8. Stream order: 0
9. Length of reach evaluated: 7 10. County: /'u_"`s e-
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): 0�tWtc-, 4
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3G. d `�ii1p l3 1 Longitude (ex. -77.556611):
T - �`�I oy
Method location determined (circle):, P Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
5 a w� " ) f IM( ("e,,r 1,14
14. Proposed channel work (if any): k✓du• -R-
15. Recent weather conditions: ^ S C r tt-f J S i Q (J S 5 tA;v .ru, -t� �IJu4 4
16. Site conditions at time of visit: W[t1 t)r•.4 k o - r'2 v
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (1 -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES :r1<1� if yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES CN� 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES �So)
21. Estimated watershed land use: / % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
q"( % Forested
22. Bankfull width:
% Cleared / Logged % Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): , _3
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) �, Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
6
t.
Total Score (from reverse) OLI Comments: �ay.►� d f % f - v
V._rvl, _. .. fLnd Q le..,Jr"4 4lif 1- W. :•l „ t"/IV? 1'ini-A.I_ �.CLrhfLp-"� �,.e%%SN-"-r!{f fj-*'a ­ ee1,L11.
Evaluator's Signature p", f - Date- #- U "'(5
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

J(- (o
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
I
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0 — 5
3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
1)
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-55
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
'
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0 — 5
(no buffer = 0; Contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0— 4
0— 4
U(no
discharge = 0, springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
,..
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
'x
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 — 5
0-4
0-2
a'
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
S
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
%
(no Nvetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints)
-�
I I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 — 5
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0 — 5
3
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 — 5
0 — 5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 — 3
0-4
0 — 5
7
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
/
15
impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
r
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
W
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0 —5
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canop = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
3
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
*-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
J
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
c�
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

FINAL
PRESERVATION PROJECT AND
BASELINE DOCUMENTATION REPORT

MCGOWAN CREEK
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
EEP Project No. 92604
Contract No. 006255 (Preservation Project And Baseline Documentation Report Template)

Neuse River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03020201

Prepared for:

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603

Prepared by:

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603

February 2015
McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Executive Summary Page i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The McGowan Creek Preservation Project (Site) is located in west central Orange County,
approximately 1 mile northwest of Efland on McGowan Creek. The Site contains reaches of the
McGowan Creek stream system in the Upper Neuse River Basin, which drains to the Eno River
and ultimately Falls Lake. The Site’s location in the highly populated watershed is increasing the
importance of managing water sources including preservation of Site riparian wetlands vital to
maintaining water quality within the watershed and the Falls Lake water supply.

This preservation report has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33
Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2) through
(c)(14) and 332.3(h); and NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program In-Lieu Fee Instrument
signed and dated July 28, 2010.

Site Description

Project Name and EEP Project Number McGowan Creek - Project #92604
County Orange
General Location 1 mile northwest of Efland
Basin Neuse
Physiographic Region Piedmont
USGS Hydro Unit 03020201
NCDWQ Sub-basin 03-04-01
Watershed Planning Information Within TLW 03020201030020
(Upper Eno River)
Preservation Mechanism Conservation Easement
Conservation Values
Drains to the McGowan Creek Preserve and
Floodplain, and Eno River Duke Forest Mesic Slopes
Natural Communities, approximately 2 miles and 3.5
miles downstream from the Site, respectively.

Permanent preservation of riparian buffer and
riparian wetlands, which drain to the Falls Lake
water supply.
Deed Recordation Date February 21, 2005

Mitigation Assets
Riparian Wetland Non-riparian Wetland Riparian Buffer
Total Credit Acreage 21.45 -- 358,181.70
Total Mitigation Units 4.3 -- 53,327

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Executive Summary Page ii
Conservation values for this project include the following.
• Drains to the McGowan Creek Preserve and Floodplain, and Eno River Duke Forest Mesic
Slopes Natural Communities, approximately 2 miles and 3.5 miles downstream from the
Site, respectively.
• Permanent preservation of riparian buffer and riparian wetlands, which drain to the Falls
Lake water supply.

A conservation easement deed was recorded on February 21, 2005; the conservation easement
deed document is included in Appendix B.

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Table of Contents Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. i
1.0 PRESERVATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................. 1
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................. 1
2.1 General Description ............................................................................................................. 1
2.2 Directions ............................................................................................................................. 2
3.0 SITE SELECTION .................................................................................................................. 2
4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION ................................................................................................. 2
4.1 Physical Features ................................................................................................................. 2
4.2 Plant and Wildlife Communities .......................................................................................... 2
4.3 Site Streams ......................................................................................................................... 3
4.4 Jurisdictional Wetlands ........................................................................................................ 3
5.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT .................................................................................... 3
5.1 Encumbrances ...................................................................................................................... 3
6.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS ......................................................................................... 4
7.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................................. 5
8.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES ................................................................................................. 5
9.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 5

APPENDICES

Appendix A. Figures and Photographs
Figure 1. Site Protection Instrument
Figure 2. Vicinity Map
Figure 3. Site Watershed Map
Figure 4. Site Mitigation Asset Map
Site Photographs
Appendix B. Site Protection Instruments
Appendix C. Wetland Forms
McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Page 1
1.0 PRESERVATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

The McGowan Creek Preservation Project (Site) is located in the 03020201 Cataloging Unit (CU),
in the Neuse River Basin and Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) 03020201030020. The Site
addresses several issues/stressors identified within the watershed in the Neuse River Basin
Restoration Priorities (NCEEP 2010) and Neuse River Basin Water Resources Plan (NCDWR
2010) including the following.

• Agricultural Runoff
• Increasing Urban Land
• Nonpoint and Point Source Pollution

The McGowan Creek Preservation Project addresses watershed stressors/issues with the following
goals.

• Protection of water quality by preserving riparian wetlands and riparian buffer within the
Site in a permanent conservation easement.
• Permanent preservation of riparian wetlands and riparian buffer in the McGowan Creek
stream system within the Upper Neuse Watershed (03020201), which drains to the Falls
Lake water supply. The Upper Neuse Watershed is highly populated; therefore, due to the
number of people depending on the water supply, management of the water sources is of
increasing importance (NCDWR 2010).
• Permanent preservation of riparian wetlands and riparian buffer in the McGowan Creek
stream system, which drains to the McGowan Creek Preserve and Floodplain, and Eno
River Duke Forest Mesic Slopes Natural Communities, approximately 2 miles and 3.5
miles downstream from the Site, respectively.

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 General Description
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) has established the McGowan Creek
Preservation Project (Site) located off of McGowan Creek Road in the west central portion of
Orange County. The Site is located in seven parcels owned by Louis A. Smith and Efland, LLC
(PINs 9845-42-1287, 9845-42-7231, 9845-52-1013, 9845-42-1788, 9845-52-7150, 9845-61-3439,
and 9845-71-14407) within 14-digit Cataloging Unit 03020201030020 (sub-basin 03-04-01) of
the Neuse River Basin (Figures 1-3, Appendix A). The Site is protected by a permanent
conservation easement recorded in Deed Book 3679 Pages 282-293. Current land-use at the Site
is comprised of mixed hardwood forest and open water due to beaver impoundment. Land-use
adjacent to the Site consists of mixed hardwood forest, agricultural fields, and residential areas.
The conservation easement boundary is well-marked with posts and signage.

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Page 2
2.2 Directions
Directions to the Site from Raleigh (Figure 2, Appendix A):
Travel west on I-40 to exit 160,
At top of exit turn right onto Mount Willing Road,
Travel 0.4 mile then turn left onto Forest Avenue East,
Bear Right onto N Efland Cedar Grove Road,
Travel 0.7 mile and turn left onto McGowan Creek Road,
The Site is south of McGowan Creek Road.
Site Latitude, Longitude 36.087955, -79.182745 (NAD83/WGS84)

3.0 SITE SELECTION

The Site contains riparian wetlands in the McGowan Creek stream system, which is currently
affected by agricultural runoff and increasing urban land uses.

Conservation Values
• Drains to the McGowan Creek Preserve and Floodplain, and Eno River Duke Forest Mesic
Slopes Natural Communities, approximately 2 miles and 3.5 miles downstream from the
Site, respectively.
• Permanent preservation of riparian buffer and riparian wetlands, which drain to the Falls
Lake water supply.

Threats of Adverse Modification
Adjacent agricultural land and increasing urban land uses in the Upper Neuse Watershed make
preservation of the Site important to maintaining water quality in the McGowan Creek watershed,
and downstream Falls Lake water supply.

4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION
4.1 Physical Features
The Site is located in the Carolina Slate Belt ecoregion of the Piedmont physiographic region of
North Carolina. Topography within the Carolina Slate Belt ecoregion is generally comprised of
dissected irregular planes, some hills, linear ridges, isolated monadnocks, and low- to moderate-
gradient streams with mostly boulder and cobble substrates. Topography within the Site is
moderate with elevations ranging from 610 feet at the downstream end of Site to 630 feet above
sea level in the northwest corner of the Site.
4.2 Plant and Wildlife Communities
The natural community dominating the Site is Piedmont/Mountain Semipermanent Impoundment
(a mix of Piedmont Marsh and Shrub Subtypes). The vegetation in the upland portion of the Site
is mature with a relatively full canopy throughout. Vegetation within the wetland is sparse with a
dominant herbaceous layer. Canopy and shrub species include sycamore (Platanus occidentalis),
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Acer rubrum), and black willow (Salix nigra).
Understory species include common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), rushes (Juncus spp.), sedges
(Carex spp.), and jewelweed (Impatiens capensis). Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), Japanese
stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), and multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) were observed scattered
throughout the Site, but in insignificant quantities.
McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Page 3
4.3 Site Streams
The Site provides water quality function to a 3.25-square mile (2079-acre) watershed at the Site
outfall of McGowan Creek (Figure 3, Appendix A). The Site drainage area is primarily composed
of agricultural and forested land with a small amount of residential land on roadsides.

The Site contains impounded reaches of McGowan Creek as well as unnamed tributaries to
McGowan Creek. McGowan Creek (Efland Millpond) within the Site is listed as Water Supply –
II, High Quality Water, and Nutrient Sensitive Waters by the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR 2013).

4.4 Jurisdictional Wetlands
The Site contains 2 jurisdictional wetland systems, which total 21.45 acres; the table below gives
information for each system.

Jurisdictional Wetland Characteristics
Type (Riparian, non-
Riparian, etc.)
Description
(Floodplain depression,
seepage slope, etc.)
Acreage
Wetland 1 Riparian Riverine Nontidal Freshwater Marsh 20.99
Wetland 2 Riparian Non-riverine Headwater Forest/Slough 0.46
Total 21.45

5.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT

The land required for stewardship of this mitigation project includes portions of the following
parcels. A copy of the recorded conservation easement deed is included in Appendix B.

Parcel Landowner PIN County
Site
Protection
Instrument
Deed Book
and Page
Number
Date Deed
Signed
Acreage
protected
Parcels
1-7
Louis A
Smith &
Efland, LLC
9845-42-1287/
9845-42-7231/
9845-52-1013/
9845-42-1788/
9845-52-7150/
9845-61-3439/
9845-71-14407
Orange Conservation
Easement
Bk 3679 Pg
282-293
February
21, 2005
31.28
acres

All site protection instruments require 60-day advance notification to the Corps and the State prior
to any action to void, amend, or modify the document. No such action shall take place unless
approved by the State.

5.1 Encumbrances
An old stone dam was observed toward the downstream portion of Wetland 1; it has been notched
with an approximately 35 foot gap. In addition, numerous beaver dams are located within Wetland
1 (Figure 4, Appendix A).

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Page 4
6.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS

Project mitigation assets were originally delineated in August 2004 using Global Positioning
Systems. Field reconnaissance with Global Positioning Systems was conducted in January 2015
to validate the wetland delineation (Figure 4, Appendix A and Wetland Dataforms, Appendix C).
The following tables summarize Site wetland and riparian buffer mitigation assets. Riparian buffer
mitigation credit was calculated in accordance with North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance
of Riparian Buffers (NCDWR 2015). Additional stream mitigation assets are available at the Site;
however, are not included in this report.

All credits will be released upon IRT approval. The project service area will be in compliance
with the EEP In-Lieu Fee Instrument.

*The area of mitigation beyond 100 feet from the TOB may comprise no more than 10 percent of the total mitigation area.

McGowan Creek, Orange County, Neuse River Basin, 03020201 Cataloging Unit
EEP Project Number 92604
Mitigation Credits
Warm Stream Riparian Wetland Non-riparian
Wetland
Riparian
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient
Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient
Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE
Totals NA -- NA 4.3 NA -- 53,327 NA NA
Wetland Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation
components
Warm Stream
(linear feet)
Mitigation Ratio
Riparian Wetland
Non-riparian Wetland
Riverine Non-riverine
Wetland 1 5:1 20.99 -- --
Wetland 2 5:1 -- 0.46 --
Total
(acreage) 20.99 -- --
Total WMUs 4.2 0.1 --
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation components Mitigation
Ratio
Buffer
(square feet)
Buffer Receiving
Credit (square feet)
Rural Non-Subject Streams with 30-100 foot Buffer from TOB 5:1 175,258.77 175,258.77
Rural Non-Subject Streams with 100-200 foot Buffer from TOB 10:1 426.65* 426.65
Rural Subject Streams with 30-100 foot Buffer from TOB 10:1 182,153.29 182,153.29
Rural Subject Streams with 100-200 foot Buffer from TOB 20:1 342.99* 342.99
Total (square feet) 358,181.70 358,181.70
Total Buffer Mitigation Units 53,327
McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Page 5
7.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN

Upon approval for close-out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the Site will be transferred
to the NCDENR Division of Natural Resource Planning and Conservation’s Stewardship Program.
This party shall be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required
in the conservation easement or the deed restriction document(s) are upheld. The NCDENR is
currently evaluating the endowment model. Until the evaluation is complete and any changes
resulting from the model are implemented, the long-term management of this project will be
funded annually.

8.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES

Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program’s In-Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources has provided the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal
commitment to fund projects to satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by EEP. This
commitment provides financial assurance for all mitigation projects implemented by the program.

9.0 REFERENCES

Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F.
MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South
Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.

NC Division of Water Resources (2010), Neuse River Basin Water Resources Plan. Department
of Environment and Natural Resources, NC Division of Water Resources, Raleigh, NC

NC Division of Water Resources (2013), Neuse River Basin Surface Water Classifications, online
(December 18, 2014). http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, NC Division of Water Resources, Raleigh, NC

NC Division of Water Resources (2015), Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 Mitigation Program
Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers, online (March 27, 2015).
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=ace25e21-9da3-4a69-8cf8-
47403f080b5f&groupId=38364. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, NC
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh, NC

NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (2010), Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities, NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
Raleigh, NC

Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A. S. (1990), Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina, Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Appendices

APPENDIX A
FIGURES AND PHOTOGRAPHS

NC OneMap, NC Center f or Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board, Source: Esr i, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS,AEX, Getm apping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swi sstopo, and the GIS User Community
FIGURE
Dr aw n by:
Dat e:
Scale:
Pro je ct No .:
KRJ
JAN 2015
1:3500
14-018
Title:
Pro je ct:
Pre pared for:
OrangeCounty, NC
McGOWANCREEKPRESERVATIONSITE
SITEPROTECTIONINSTRUMENT
1
³
0 500 1,000 1,500250
Feet
Imagery S our ce: CGIA Mo st R ecent Orthoimage ry (20 13)
Le gend
Conservatio n Easeme nt Boundary
Parcels
Lin Propert y
Lennon Property
Warren/VandeventerProperty Gill Property
Warren Property
Warren Property
Huff Pr operty
McGowan Creek Road
Copyr ight:© 2013 Nati onal Geographic Society, i-cubed
FIGU RE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ
JAN 2015
1:15000
14-018
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
OrangeCounty, NC
McGOWANCREEKPRESERVATIONSITE
VICINITYMAP
2
³
Copyr ight:© 2013 Nati onal GeographicSociety, i-cubed
Cop yrigh t:© 20 13 National G eographicSociety, i-cubed
Dir ect ion to the Site f rom Raleigh:
- Tr avel West on I-40 to exit 160,- At top of exit turn right onto Mount Willing Road,- Tr avel 0.4 miles then turn lef t onto Forest Ave E,- Bear right onto N Efland Cedar Grove Road,- Tr avel 0.7 miles and turn left onto McG owan Creek R oad,- The site is south of McG owan Creek R oad.- Site Latitude, Longit ude: 36.087955, -79.182745 (NA D83/WGS84)
£¤70
§¨¦40
§¨¦40
£¤70
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ
JAN 2015
1:15500
14-018
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
OrangeCounty, NC
McGOWANCREEKPRESERVATIONSITE
SITEWATERSHEDMAP
3
³
0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000 Feet
USGS Topographic Map - Rougemont, NC Quad Legend
Site Watershed - 3.25 sq mi (2079.2 ac)
Conservation Easement Boundary
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
Photo-9Photo-8
Photo-7
Photo-6
Photo-5
Photo-4
Photo-3
Photo-2
Photo-1
Photo-33
Photo-32Photo-31
Photo-30
Photo-29Photo-28
Photo-24
Photo-27 Photo-26Photo-25
Photo-23Photo-22
Photo-20
Photo-21
Photo-19
Photo-18
Photo-15Photo-14
Photo-13
Photo-12
Photo-11
Photo-10
Photo-16/17
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ/CLF
MAR 2015
1:3000
14-018
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
OrangeCounty, NC
McGOWANCREEKPRESERVATIONSITE
MITIGATIONASSETS
4
³0 500 1,000250Feet
Imagery Source: CGIA Most Recent Orthoimagery (2013)
Legend
Conservation Easement Boundary
^_Wetland Dataform Locations
!Photo Point Locations
Beaver Dams
Old Stone Dam - Notched
2004 Stream Delineation
Stream TOB
Wetland Mitigation
Riparian Riverine
Riparian Non-riverine
Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Rural Subject Stream with 30-100 foot Buffer
Rural Subject Stream with 100-200 foot Buffer
Rural Non-subject Stream with 30-100 foot Buffer
Rural Non-subject Stream with 100-200 foot Buffer
Wetland 2Wetland 1
Wetland 1
McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Appendices

Photo 1. Outer bend in northwestern end of
Site near top of easement

Photo 2. Easement markings in northeastern
portion of Site

Photo 3. Wetland 1, facing south, from
northwestern portion of Site

Photo 4. Small dam in upstream end of Site,
facing south

Photo 5. Facing south-southeast towards the
upper end of Wetland 1

Photo 6. Standing on beaver dam, facing
west/upstream, into Wetland 1

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Appendices

Photo 7. Standing on beaver dam, facing
north

Photo 8. Wetland 1, facing north

Photo 9. Standing on beaver dam, facing
upstream

Photo 10. Standing on beaver dam, facing
downstream

Photo 11. Stream entering Wetland 1 from
the north

Photo 12. Stream north of Wetland 1, facing
upstream

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Appendices

Photo 13. Beaver dam in Wetland 1, facing
south

Photo 14. Facing upstream in Wetland 1

Photo 15. Facing downstream in Wetland 1

Photo 16. Old stone dam, facing south

Photo 17. Old stone dam, facing south

Photo 18. Wetland 1, facing dam/north

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Appendices

Photo 19. Stream entering Wetland 1 from
north looking downstream

Photo 20. Stream entering Wetland 1 from
north looking upstream

Photo 21. Wetland 1, facing south from
eastern tributary

Photo 22. Facing north, approximately
midway up eastern tributary

Photo 23. Facing south, approximately
midway up eastern tributary

Photo 24. Easement marking

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Appendices

Photo 25. Wetland 2, facing north-northeast

Photo 26. Wetland 2, facing south

Photo 27. Wetland 2

Photo 28. Wetland 2

Photo 29. Wetland 2

Photo 30. Easement marking

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Appendices

Photo 31. Wetland 1, from downstream end
of Site

Photo 32. Wetland 1, from downstream end
of Site

Photo 33. Easement marking

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Appendices

APPENDIX B
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENTS

Poole Farm Holdings, LLC Parcel. Recorded Conservation Easement

8
20050222000069780 EASE
Bk:RB3679 P 82
:37!�72
02/22/2005 03 PM 1/12
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
FOR MULTIPLE PIN SHEET
411ZE LEO"101K 7 r U,
FILED Joyce H. Pearson
Register Of Deeds Qran9e COU"
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
ORANGE COUNTY
SPO File Number 68-AAB
Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General
Property Control Section
Return to: Blanc Rice, State Property Office
1.321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321 A:r
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, made this_ day of
2005, by between Efland, LLC consisting of Louis C. Smith and wife,
Martha M. SITilth, 630% individual interest, and Efland LLC, 37% undivided interest consisting of
In
Timothy A. Holleman, Member/Manager, J. David Morris, Meniber/Manager and S. Craig
Morrison, Meniber/Manager, ("Grantor"), to the State of North Carolina, ("Grantee"), whose
mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of Administration, State Property Office,
1.321 Mail. Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1321. The designations Grantor and Grantee as
used herein shall include said patties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
17 1
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et s�. the State
of North Carolina has established the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (formerly known as the
Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing, creating and preserving wetland
and riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood
prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities', and
WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation
Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; and
WHEREAS, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program in the Department of Enviroritnent
and Natural Resources has approved acceptance of this instrument; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in

Greensboro, NC on July .12, 2003. This MOA recognizes that the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Is to provide for compensatory mitigation by effective protection of the land, water and
natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing and preserving ecosystem functions; and
WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North
Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the
ID
Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina,
on the 8`1' day of February 2000; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8, two of the
components of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program are (1) restoration and perpetual
maintenance of wetlands, riparian areas, and surface waters and (2) land ownership and
management; and
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being
in Checks Township, Orange County, North Carolina ('the "Protected Property"), and being
more particularly described as being lots 1-1.7 as shown at Plat Book 91 page 137 as recorded in
Deed Book 2851 at Page 508 of the Orange County Registry; and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement over the lieretil
described areas of the Protected Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the included
areas of the Protected Property to the terms and conditions and purposes hereinafter set forth, and
Grantee is willing to accept such easement. This Conservation Easement shall be for the
protection and benefit of the waters of McGowan Creek.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and
restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby -rants and
conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation
Easement of the nature and character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over a described area
of the Protected Property, referred to hereafter as the "Easement Area", for the benefit of the
people of North Carolina. Easement Area being all of those tracts of land identified as
"Wetlands Mitigation Areas" totaling 22.50 acres and "Wetlands Purchase Areas" totaling
8.30 acres as shown on a plat of survey entitled "Wetland Areas and Stream Centerlines
Surveyed for the State of North Carolina at McGowan Creek Subdivision" dated December
10, 2004, certified by William H. McCarthy, Jr. North Carolina P.L.S. Number L-3248 and
also being recorded in Plat Book q:j Page or the Orange County
.3
Registry.
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, create and
preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Easement Area that contribute to the protection
and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat,
and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the Easement Area in its natural
condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of the Easement Area that will
significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these purposes, the following
conditions and restrictions are set forth:
N

I. DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual.. It is an easement in gross, runs with the
land, and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, their personal representatives, heirs,
successors, and assigns, lessees, agents, and licensees.
The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would impair
or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly reserved as a
compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Easement Area by the Grantor is prohibited
as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Any rights not expressly
reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. The following specific
uses are prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped
recreational uses, including hunting and fishing, and access to the Easement Area for the
purposes thereof. Usage of motorized vehicles in the Easement Area is prohibited.
B. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in educational uses
in the Easement Area not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, and the right of access
to the Easement Area for such purposes including organized educational activities such as site
visits and observations. Educational uses of the property shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or
topography of the site.
C. Vegetative Cutting. Except as related to the removal of diseased or damaged
trees and vegetation that obstructs, destabilizes or renders unsafe the Easement Area, all cutting,
removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation in the Easement Area is
prohibited.
D. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All are prohibited in the
Easement Area.
E. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses within the Easement Area including any
use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland are prohibited.
F. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna,
utility pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Easement Area.
G. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, walkways, or asphalt
or concrete paving, in the Easement Area. Foot trails with a pervious surface may be constructed
and maintained running parallel and at least 30 feet from the stream. These foot trails shall not
exceed five feet in width and must not require the felling or removal of any trees larger than 6
inches in diameter.
H. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except signs identifying
the owner of the Protected Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement, signs giving
3

directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Easement Area. Said signs
shall not exceed six inches in diameter.
1. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances or machinery, or other material in the Easement Area is
prohibited.
J. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading,
filling, excavation, dredging, mining, or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat,
minerals, or other materials.
K. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering or
tampering with
, i water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored,
enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition, any activity by the Grantor diverting,
causing, allowing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into,, within or out
of the Easement Area Is not allowed. All removal of wetlands., POI]Lltlllll or discharging into
waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited in the
conservation easement area. In the event of all emergency interruption or shortage of other water
sources, water from within the Easement Area may temporarily be used for good cause shown as
needed for the survival of livestock and agricultural production.
L. Subdivision and Conveyance. No further subdivision, partitioning, or dividing
of the Easement Area is allowed. Unless agreed to by the Grantee in writing, any future
conveyance of the Easement Area and the rights as conveyed herein shall be as a single block of
property. Any future division of the remaining fee simple rights shall be subject to this
Conservation Easement
M. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred ptll-SLI,,Illt to a transferable
development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise.
N. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non-
native plants, trees and/or animal species is prohibited.
D. Utilities. The Grantor reserves the right to a 50' (fifty feet) wide access area
for septic construction and maintenance as shown on Sheet 3, Detail "A" on the plat of survey
entitled "Wetland Areas and Stream Centerlines Surveyed for the State of North Carolina
at McGowan Creek Subdivision" dated December 10, 2004, certified by William H.
McCarthy, Jr. North Carolina P.L.S. Number L-3248. Through, over, under and across the
Septic Construction and Maintenance Area, Sheet 3, Detail "A", the following conditions shall
apply:
1) Any disturbed facilities, features and vegetation will be restored to their original
condition to the greatest extent reasonably practicable.
2) Corridor clearing width for construction will be limited to the minimum necessary to
construct or maintain the needed facilities, subject to line size, equipment size and
4

work zone. The impacted area will be re -vegetated with native herbaceous species at
the completion of disturbance.
31) Vegetative clearing and general construction disturbance will be minimized to the
greatest extent reasonably practicable.
4) Crossings will be perpendicular to the greatest extent reasonably practicable.
5) Erosion control devices shall be utilized to contain all disturbed materials and will
conform to State requirements. Crossing of the stream, waterway, wetland or other
water feature will be accomplished in a timely manner such that environmental and
flooding impact is minimized to the greatest extent reasonably practicable.
6) Depth of underground construction shall be to a sufficient depth to avoid fixture
exposure due to scouring to the greatest extent reasonably practicable.
III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES
The Grantee, authorized representatives of the Grantee and their successors or assigns
shall have the right to enter the Easement Area and shall have the right of reasonable ingress and
egress to the Easement Area over the Protected Property, at all reasonable times to widertake any
activities to restore, manage, maintain, enhance, and monitor the wetland and riparian resources
of the Easement Area, in accordance with a long-term management plan. These activities
include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous vegetation, installation of monitoring wells,
utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology
of the site, and installation of natural and manmade materials as needed to direct in -stream,
above ground, and subterraneous water flow. Unless otherwise specifically set forth in this
Conservation Easement, the rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public any
access rights.
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause
shown, provided that any such request is consistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Easement. The Grantor shall not vary from the above restrictions without first obtaining written
approval front the Ecosystem Enhancement Program, whose mailing address .is 1652 Mail
Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652.
IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement,
Grantee is allowed to prevent any activity within the Easement Area that is inconsistent with the
purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Easement
Area that may have been damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this
Conservation Easement by Grantor, their successors or assigns, that comes to the attention of the
Grantee, the Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify the Grantor, their successors or
assigns in writing of such breach. The Grantor, their successors or assigns, shall have ninety (90)
days after receipt of such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach
rernains uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by
appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief The Grantee shall
also have the pourer and authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any
impairment of the Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this
Conservation Easement; (b) to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to
5

seek damages from any appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee
reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive
ID
or other appropriate relief if the breach of the ten -n of this Conservation Easement is or would
irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation
Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the
In
Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of
the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and
remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement.
B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have
the night, with reasonable notice, to enter the Easement Area at reasonable times for the purpose
of inspection to determine whether the Grantor, their successors or assigns are complying with
the terns, conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement.
C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation
Easement shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor, their
successors or assigns for any injury or change in the Easement Area caused by third parties,
resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's, then- successors' or assigns', control, including,
without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any piudcnt action taken UI
good faith by the Grantor, their successor or assigns, under emergency conditions to prevent,
abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm to the Property resulting
from such causes.
D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring, any costs
I
incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor,
ID
Grantor's their successors or assigns including, without limitation, any costs of restoration
necessitated by Grantor's, their Successor or assigns, acts or omissions in violation of the terms
of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor.
E. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the
Grantee and any forbearance by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any
breach of any term set f6ttli herein shall not be deemed or construed to be a waiver by Grantee.
No delay or omission by Grantee in exercise of any right or remedy shall impair such right or
remedy or be construed as a waiver.
V. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This Conservation Easement shall be construed to promote the purposes of N.C.
Gen Stat. § 143-214.8 et s�. the Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
B. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision
to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.
M

20050222000069780 EASE
Bk:RB3679 P9:288
02/2212005 03:37:07PM 7112
C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested
to the parties at their addresses shown above or to other address(es) as either party establishes in
writing upon notification to the other.
D. Grantor, their successor or assigns, shall notify Grantee in writing of the name
and address and any party to whom the Protected Property or any part thereof is to be transferred
at or prior to the time said transfer is made. Grantor, their successor or assigns, further agrees to
make any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any interest in the Protected
Property is conveyed subject to the Conservation Easement herein created.
E. The Grantor, their successor or assigns, and Grantee agree that the terms of this
Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the
Property or any portion thereof.
F. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in a writing, signed by all
parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this
Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent
with the purposes of the Conservation Easement.
G. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement
are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees,
that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the
Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the
transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue M
perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing, from ownership of the Protected Property,
including the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the
Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited. or restricted herein, and are not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and
licensees, the right of access to the Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment of the
Easement Area.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for
the aforesaid purposes.
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same are free from
encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all
persons whomsoever.
7

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and sea], the day
and year first above written.
Grantor
By:
Louis C. Smith, Individual
Grantor I
By: -t"'l
—z
Martha M. Smith, Individual
For Efland LLC
Grantor
By:
Timothy A. Hol leni n, Member/Manager, Efland LLC
By:
J. Davi Monis, Member/Manager, Efland LLC
Grantor
r
By:
—� bei/ lange fl��
S. Craig
Grantor
By:
Member/Man- r, Efland LLC

20050222000059780 EASE
k:B3679 Pg:290
NORTH CAROLINA 02/2212005 03:37:07PM 9112
COUNTY OF
a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that Zl�w 104•i� ' Grantor, personally
P'A4.6 �4
appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing
instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the
/ day of 2005.
Notary Public
My corn miss1on expires:
mi o 5
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF _ �t1 `
a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid,
do hereby
certify that �d"' 3 Grantor,
personally
appeared
before me
this day and acknowledged the execution of the
foregoin<.,
instrumento <'F rt._fk", .;
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the
mm day of , 2005"'
F 3
Notary Public
Mmission expires:
9

0050222000069780 EASE
2Bk:RB3679 P9:291
NORTH CAROLINA 02r22r2005 03:37:07PM 10112
COUNTY OF
a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that z� r` ' a _, Grantor, personally
appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing
instrumente tJ &MUt.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set niy hand and Notary Seal this the
day of 20()�
Notary Public
l
n'" ission expires:
+' h
✓'
+> "" � µ gym';✓` _—
' t a x
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
a Notary Public inand fot the County and State
aforesaid do hereby certify that s % e n Grantor, personally
appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing
instrument.D e"LiV OF �.,('LANDt LLC,,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the
.m_ day of 200 .
z �
a_
ars ka. Notary Public
C�xI21SS1011 expires:
M." ii P
10

9
41-"N<
%"`�►,_tb
M
Joyce H. Pearson
Register of Deeds
Orange County
North Carolina
State of North Carolina, County of Orange
ANU MPIMIFILMARIP"
The foregoing certificate(s) of CONNIE L FAISON, NOTARY PUBLIC, ROBIN 0 JENKS, NOTARY
PUBLIC for the Designated Governinental units is/are certified to be correct. See filing certificate herein.
This day February 22, 2005.
Yellow probate sheet is a vital part of your recorded document. Please retain with original document and submit for recording.

a Sol*' :1
VY"04VADIS -1-7Z&Y-JKC M471
A 3
-DIINNIM1112
1,
aforesaid, do hereby certify that
a Notary Public in and for the County and State
Grantor, personally
appeared before ri-te this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoinznc,
u1struniclit.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Sea] dais the
clay of 12005.
Notary Public
My commission expires:

McGowan Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92604 Appendices

APPENDIX C
WETLAND FORMS

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Applicant/Owner:
lnve5ligator(3): _
City/Counly : fc^ ^[oftJ /^'^gc^e,^ Sampling Date:.
State: ^O
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ^.IMJt} (ft.(»^
Sampling Poini
Section. Township, Range:.
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
Soil Map Unit Name; f{/\
Local relief (concave, convex, none);.
Lat: ^(o.drOQ^ Long:l72J3$M5Zl Slope (%): 3
Datum: H/illlf^i
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation X , Soil ^ , or Hydrology X" significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation , Soil . or Hydrology naturally problematic?
NWI classification:
No (If no. explain in Rerharks.)
Arc "Normal Circumstances" pre sent? Yes _
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No X
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
X Yes.
Yes A:
Yes
No_
No_
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks;
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
)C Surface Water (AT)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (Bl)
Sediment Deposits (82)
Drill Deposits (83)
Algal Mnt or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
K Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
X Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
True Aquatic Plants (Bl 4)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01)
_2SOxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced iron (CI)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilted Soils (06)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two rcxunred)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Drainage Patterns (810)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (02)
Crayfish Burrows (08)
Saturation Visible on Aertat Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (02)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
MicrotopographJc Rclicl (D4)
TAC-Noutral rest (D5)
Field Observations:
X Surface Water Present? Yes X No Oeoth (inches); \
Water Table Present? Yes < No Deolh (inches): f
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): ( Wetland Hvdroloav Present? Ves ^ No
(includes capillary fringe)
Desaibe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ~!>'^.'/tnZ/n^ )
1 /ic-O- R^-il0^vt»^
2
3.
Absolute
% Cover
JO-
Donitiant Indicator
Species? Status
to
Sapling Stfatiiin (Plot si7e:
50% of total cover:
)
. = Tola! Cover
20% of total cover: S
X
50% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
^•3, [li lA/i^Cxc
Cor M>MMgAttt>v\
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:.
1..
2.
3 .
4,.
5._
6.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:.
1^
50% of total cover: '5-T 20% of
)
= Total Cover
total cover: ^
1. _
2. _
3 _
4 _
5. _
6. _
7 _
'i-
9 _
11.
o V
"y"
Ml V
S0% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3C)
50% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet;
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata; (B)
Percent of Dominant Species y ^/y
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: ^ (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet;
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species X i -
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =_______
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index - B/A -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Testis >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is £3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
bo present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 rn) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, rt-gardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes. No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to tfie depth needed to docuttient the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Mayix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typo Inc Texture Remarks
0'{, tH- ^' \^ '^A Cm ^1 z^5>?^-9
Q-llh lOr'T-y 10, 1-^ cj~
'Type:(i: fConcentration, D-Depletion. Rfvl-Reduced IVIalnx.MS^fMasked Sand Grains. Location: PL =Pore Lifting, M- Matnx,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
HiStOSOl (A1)
Histic Epipedon {A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR H)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stnppf^d Matnx (S6)
Dark Surface <S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin D,irk Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
7<s Depleted Matrix (r3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F 7)
Redox Depressions (F£)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (FT3) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplatn Soils (FT 9) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Matenal (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
2 cm Muck (AlO) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (f 19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type;
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1^0
Remarks;
us Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner:
lnvestigator(5): _
Cily/Coumy: ^^''''^Qf^Qi^
State:
Sampling Date: / I'^'^^S
_ Sampling Point: WAMhJ I ' ^
Section, Township. Range:.
Landform (hillslope. terrace, etc.): k '• f' "ifOA fc>
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): t^^-fi I^C-MllkaV. IG? ,0'lO^'€°\
Soil Map Unit Name: (<^*''*^<.\t^ f A/)all»,^
Local relief (concave, convex, none): C^/^<^-^ <! Long:l71^iliirj
Slope (%): ^
Datum:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Ves _
yv/ , or Hydrology _jAs/l significantly disturbed? // , Soil.
Are Vegetation I^X . Soil.
NWI classification:
Are Vegetation.
l/v^ , or Hydrology naturally problematic?
No (If no. explain in Rentarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
1/ No V
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes .
1 tydric Soil Present? Yes .
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes.
No K
No is Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators;
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (Bl)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (83)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
True Aquatic Plants (814)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (04)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Drainage Patterns (BIO)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (02)
Crayfish Burrows (08)
Saturation Visible on Aerta! Imagery (09)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
Geomorphic Position (02)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
1 AC-Neuiral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes .
Water Table Present? Yes .
Saturation Present? Yes.
(includes capillary fringe)
No.
No.
No
Depth (inches):.
Depth (Inches):.
Depth (inches):. Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available;
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
!
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: ^'^.Q
•n J '' 1 Absolute Doninant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size; P'^ rnj^t ) % Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test vi^orksheet:
Number of Dominant Species ~-\
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species ^
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: ^ (A/B) 5. Percent of Dominant Species ^
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: ^ (A/B)
Percent of Dominant Species ^
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: ^ (A/B)
= Total Cover
50% of total cover; 20% of total cover: G
Saplina StraturTi (Plot size; ) i ,
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: IVIultiolv by:
OBL species X i =
F'APW sripries x 2 =
CT A c~ w~\i~\f \ * —
2 rMi,^ species X J =
PAr^l 1 Qrwarif**; V 4 -3 rMvyU ^peciea A't -
1 lOi crv^^/'ioc V ^ 4, urL soectes x D -
L-uiunin iuiais. IMJ toj
Prevalence Index = B/A = 6-
L-uiunin iuiais. IMJ toj
Prevalence Index = B/A =
/ & = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Tost is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is £3.0'
4 - Morptiological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Tost is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is £3.0'
4 - Morptiological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Tost is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is £3.0'
4 - Morptiological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Tost is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is £3.0'
4 - Morptiological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Tost is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is £3.0'
4 - Morptiological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Tost is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is £3.0'
4 - Morptiological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
* Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size; )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Tost is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is £3.0'
4 - Morptiological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
* Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size; )
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata;
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 rn) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine All woody vines, regardless of height.
2.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata;
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 rn) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine All woody vines, regardless of height.
3.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata;
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 rn) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine All woody vines, regardless of height.
4,
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata;
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 rn) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine All woody vines, regardless of height.
5.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata;
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 rn) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine All woody vines, regardless of height.
6
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata;
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 rn) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine All woody vines, regardless of height.
7
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata;
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 rn) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine All woody vines, regardless of height.
8
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata;
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 rn) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine All woody vines, regardless of height.
9,
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata;
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 rn) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine All woody vines, regardless of height. 10
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata;
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 rn) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine All woody vines, regardless of height. 11.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata;
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 rn) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine All woody vines, regardless of height.
^ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover; |
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1
Hydrophytic .
Vegetation y
Present? Yes No A
2.
Hydrophytic .
Vegetation y
Present? Yes No A
3,
Hydrophytic .
Vegetation y
Present? Yes No A
4
Hydrophytic .
Vegetation y
Present? Yes No A
5. Hydrophytic .
Vegetation y
Present? Yes No A
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Hydrophytic .
Vegetation y
Present? Yes No A
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loe Texture Remarks
'Type: C^Concentration. D-Depletion, RM=Reduced Maifix. MS^Masked Sand Grains "Location: PL^Pore Lining, M^Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
HistOSOl (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (AlO) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matnx (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147.148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (r3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (FE)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Matenal (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
2 cm Muck (AlO) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16j
(MLRA 147,148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must IM; present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):.
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes. No 14
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site; M^cfgAM^ ^ ^'^'t^
AppltcanWOwner: _
lnve3ltgator(s): 1—^^.6 ^f/^
City/County: Sampling Date:
State: f^L^ Sampling Point: U^JL^iA/
0^ Section, Township, Range:,
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): _
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ^
Soil Map Unit Name: ^fO
Lat: iG.O'iWi^
Local relief (concave, convex, none): (if' «^a^ ie(%): .5^
Datum:
NWI classification;
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _
Are Vegetation ^ . Soil ^ . or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ^ . Soil 1^ . or Hydrology 1^ naturally problematic?
X No (If no. explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes.
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks,
X No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil FYesent?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes ^
Yes X.
Yes
_ No_
No_
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes K No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_25 Surface Water (A1)
>\h Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (Bl)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
True Aquatic Plants (Bl 4)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence o( Reduceti Iron (04)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (06)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two rrjquiriid)
Surface Soil Cracks (88)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
A Drainage Patterns (BIO)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (02)
Crayfish Burrows (08)
Saturation Visible on Aerial imagery (09)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
X Geomorphic Position (02)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (05)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes / No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes K No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes A No
(includes capillary fringe)
Descril
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: ^^'oM^
-> ,f: Absolute Doninant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: yajMi ) % Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata; (B) 3, Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata; (B)
4 Percent of Dominant Species ^
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: ^ ^ (A/B) 5 Percent of Dominant Species ^
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: ^ ^ (A/B)
6.
Percent of Dominant Species ^
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: ^ ^ (A/B)
'^)XJ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ^
Saolinq Stratum (Plot size: )
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv,
OBL species X 1 =
FACW snertps x 2 ™
I r^v..WV o^Jt:l.tt;3 A t .~
FAC species x 3 -
3 rh\j\i soectes x 4 =
4. UrL species x D -
5. column lotdis. (A) IDI
Prevalence Index = B/A = 6.
column lotdis. (A) IDI
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Covei
507o of total cover; 20% of total cover;
Shrub Stratum (Plot size; )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 • Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 • Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 • Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 • Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 • Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 • Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
=. Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1 V
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 • Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
=. Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1 V
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7,6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
fi (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
\
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7,6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
fi (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
\
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7,6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
fi (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
4
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7,6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
fi (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
5.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7,6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
fi (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
6,
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7,6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
fi (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
7
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7,6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
fi (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
8-
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7,6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
fi (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
9-
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7,6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
fi (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. 10-
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7,6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
fi (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. 11.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7,6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
fi (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover;
W(X)dv Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) .
2,
Hydrophytic . /
Vegetation \
Present? Yes /\o
3
Hydrophytic . /
Vegetation \
Present? Yes /\o
4
Hydrophytic . /
Vegetation \
Present? Yes /\o
5, Hydrophytic . /
Vegetation \
Present? Yes /\o
^0 - Total Cover
50% of total cover; 20% of total cover; ^
Hydrophytic . /
Vegetation \
Present? Yes /\o
Remarks; (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth lyigyix Redox Feat^ires
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Texture Remarks
L
L
V/ L
'Type: C--Concentration, D=Depletion. Rfyl=Reduced Matrix, fylS^falasked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M-Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (AlO) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stopped Matnx (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
./^Depleted Matrix (r3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F£)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
2 cm Muck (AlO) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox {A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
vw^tland hydrology must tx; present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tyf)e:
Depth (inches);. Hydric Soil Present ? Yes •/ No
Remarks;
0 V
us Army Corps of Engineers astern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: t^f, (9 tfu<M/ C~--
Applicant/Owner:,
Invesllgatorfs):.
Cily/County: _
state:
Sampling Date: 2-L—!-^—J-^
i^U Sampling Point: ^'y- Of
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): lA -
Section. Township. Range:.
Local telef (concave, convex, none): C Oy- •^'^ >C
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LfUlj?. WCt4l36> Lat: ^G.O^WX.
Soil Map Unit Name:
Long:zlfLili2i*_
Slope (%);
Datum:
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Ves No.
Are Vegetation . Soil !^/ . or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation y^/ , Soil ^ , or Hydrology ^/ naturally problematic?
(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _
No )C
No
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is rcKiuired: check all that apply)
Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (Bl)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drill Deposits (83)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
Iron Deposits (85)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (89)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
True Aquatic Plants 1814)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surlace Soil Cracks (86)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surfaci; (88)
Drainage Patterns (BIO)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (02)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
Geomorphic Position (02)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Suiface Water Present? Yes No Deoth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydroloqy Present? Yes NO A (includes capillary fringe)
Desaitie Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available;
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Pomv.JZlllli.
Absolute Doninant Indicator
JiiXi Stratum (Plot size: ! % Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species ^
That Are OBL. FACW/. or FAC: ' (A) 1 Pa',H-> C'-W-^J, t»lt M $"'5" / /^t^'^
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species ^
That Are OBL. FACW/. or FAC: ' (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: ' (B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: ' (B)
Percent of Dominant Species S cr- A
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: ^ (A/B) 5, Percent of Dominant Species S cr- A
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: ^ (A/B)
6.
Percent of Dominant Species S cr- A
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC: ^ (A/B)
=Toial Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ^ ^
Saolinq Stratum (Plot size: )
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
OBL species x 1 -
FAPW snprie*^ x 2 -
1 Ai^' fU..-c^ :^ y -Jk. C A I* cm\fif\c V T ~
AI 1 t>rArt/**i^c v J\
rALU SpGCiuS X -
1 r~\/'\ c V V
4.
UrL species x 3 -
r^f\i.((,iri Trii^it • (b\i 5. column lotais IMJ IE3J
Prevalence Index =• B.'A » 6.
column lotais IMJ IE3J
Prevalence Index =• B.'A »
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ^
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
bo present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
bo present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
bo present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
bo present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5-
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
bo present, unless disturbed or problematic. 6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
bo present, unless disturbed or problematic.
=• Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
bo present, unless disturbed or problematic.
=• Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1,
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 rn) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (tton-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
2.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 rn) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (tton-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
3
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 rn) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (tton-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
4
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 rn) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (tton-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
5.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 rn) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (tton-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
6.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 rn) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (tton-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
7,
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 rn) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (tton-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
8.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 rn) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (tton-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
9
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 rn) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (tton-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. 10-
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 rn) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (tton-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. 11.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 rn) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (tton-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover
WcK)dv Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) \
1. 9-.,10yr ^r>/M.,/LUr, ^0 X
Hydrophytic V/
Vegetation X
Present? Yes ' \o
2
Hydrophytic V/
Vegetation X
Present? Yes ' \o
3,
Hydrophytic V/
Vegetation X
Present? Yes ' \o
4.
Hydrophytic V/
Vegetation X
Present? Yes ' \o
Hydrophytic V/
Vegetation X
Present? Yes ' \o
3^0 - Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Q
Hydrophytic V/
Vegetation X
Present? Yes ' \o
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' loC Texture Remarks
Mik /c?^r-3 i££ ^
:Ji^
'Type: C=Concentration. D-Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS^Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL^Pore Lining. MMatrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (AlO) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (r3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Rod Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
2 cm Muck (AlO) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Typo.
Depth (inches):. Hydric Soil Present? Yes. No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mounta ns and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Mitigation Project Name McGowan Creek
EEP IMS ID 92604
River Basin NEUSE
Cataloging Unit 03020201
Applied Credit Ratios:1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 Various
St
r
e
a
m

Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
St
r
e
a
m

En
h
a
n
c
m
e
n
t

I
St
r
e
a
m

En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t

I
I
St
r
e
a
m

Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Ri
p
a
r
i
a
n

Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
Ri
p
a
r
i
a
n

Cr
e
a
t
i
o
n
Ri
p
a
r
i
a
n

En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
Ri
p
a
r
i
a
n

Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
No
n
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n

Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
No
n
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n

Cr
e
a
t
i
o
n
No
n
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n

En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
No
n
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n

Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Co
a
s
t
a
l

M
a
r
s
h

Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
Co
a
s
t
a
l

M
a
r
s
h

Cr
e
a
t
i
o
n
Co
a
s
t
a
l

M
a
r
s
h

En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
Co
a
s
t
a
l

M
a
r
s
h

Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Bu
f
f
e
r

Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n

(s
q

f
t
)
*
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)21.45 358,181.7
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)4.290 53,326.89
NCDOT Pre-EEP Debits (feet and acres):Not Applicable
EEP Debits (feet and acres):
DWQ Permit No USACE Action IDs Impact Project Name
2005-1701 2005-20292 Brighton Forest 1.600
2005-1849 2006-20237 Cardinal Lake Subdivision 0.300
2006-0493 2006-32428-292 Ten-Ten Commons 1.595
2005-1967 2006-40351-268
Waterstone Residential
Development 0.715
2005-0736 2005-20456 Heritage Pines 7.800
2007-0744 2006-20349-292 Watson Property 1.175
2004-0838 2007-03392 Walnut Creek Greenway 0.730
2005-1967 2008-00133
Old NC Hwy 86 Widening-
Waterstone Drive 0.100
2007-0241 2007-02851-239
Lake Glad Road Commercial
Development 1.950
2006-0993 2006-32677-292 Woodhurst Subdivision 1.500
2006-1151 2008-01457 Apex Peakway 2.550
2008-1817 2008-03273
Northeast Judd Parkway
Extension 0.880
2009-0053 2008-02953 Swift Creek Sewer Line 0.205
2009-0596 2009-00985
Water Interconnection for
Durham-Raleigh (US 70)0.350
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)0.000 358,181.70
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)0.000 53,326.89
*NOTE: Buffer breakdown:
Rural non-subject 30 - 100 feet 175,258.77 @ 5:1 = 35,051.754
100 - 200 feet 426.65 @ 20:1 = 42.665
Rural subject 30 - 100 feet 182,153.29 @ 10:1 = 18,215.329
100 - 200 feet 342.99 @ 20:1 = 17,1495
358,181.70 sq ft = 53,326.897 credits
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 03/17/2015