20050188 Ver 1_Application_20050201

MANEo
~-A
V „~Rq
~~ Vrr~~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTl~~NT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
p~U188
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
January 28, 2005
p ~~> 9,~~~~ D
FE=D Q 1 2QQ5
y~~1DS AND ST EOR1JIVrA~R BRANCH
ATTN: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Nationwide Permit 23 and 33 Application for replacement of Bridge No.
80 on NC 801 over South Yadkin River, Rowan/Davie Counties, Federal
Aid Project No. BRSTP-801(1), State Project No. 8.1632101, Division 9,
TII' No. B-4256
Please see the enclosed Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) acceptance letter, Categorical Exclusion, permit drawings and design
plans for the subject project. The NCDOT proposes to replace the 368-foot Bridge No. 80
with a new 5-span 400-foot pre-stressed concrete modified bulb-tee girder bridge. The
new bridge will have two bents in the water and will be located approximately 50 feet to
the north of the existing bridge. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge until
construction is complete for the new bridge. There will be 4051inear feet of permanent
stream impacts and 0.24 acre of temporary impacts. There will be an in-water
construction moratorium from April 1 thought June 30 to protect the fish migration,
spawning and larval recruitment of the white bass and sunfish.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE U1~TITED STATES
General Description: The project is located in the Yadkin River basin (YAD04 and
YAD06 sub-basin, HUC 03040102). This portion of the South Yadkin River and its
tributaries are classified as Class C water bodies. The South Yadkin River originates
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX [phone] CAaIrOL BOULEVARD
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTN_ ANALYSIS PARKER LINCOLN BUILDING, SUITE 168
1598 AAPJL SERVK:E CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC 27699
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
Page 6 of 12
Page 7 of 12
proposes, p-aus iwu piviiiw suuwmg uic uucw 1WLIJLl~I •VI Wes WG vl aSLlal all~l ^w~n.ca~w auwana niu~~ w wwuuw.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us¢s.eov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquesLCOm, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 456 feet
3. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Page8of12
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide

about 50 miles northwest of the project area and from the project area, the river meanders
in a southeasterly direction about 7.8 miles to its confluence with the Yadkin River.
At the NC 801 crossing the South Yadkin River is approximately 75 feet wide.
West of NC 801, an unnamed tributary (UT1) flows into the South Yadkin River on its
north side. This stream is a perennial stream as determined by the USACE (May 12, 2004
site visit) and the DWQ (June 29, 2004 site visit). Another unnamed tributary (UT2)
flows in a westerly direction under NC 801 to its confluence with UTI, and is located
within the project azea. A four-foot box culvert is used to direct the stream under the
road. A third unnamed tributary (LJT3) flows adjacent to NC 801 on the south side before
crossing under it and emptying into the river just to the east of the bridge. UT2 and UT3
have been determined intermittent streams and will not require mitigation according to
information gathered at the site visits by the USACE and the DWQ mentioned above.
Permanent Impacts: There will be 51 linear feet of stream impacts to UT1 due to bank
stabilization (site 3 on permit drawing sheet 13 of 13). The east bank of UT1 will be lined
with rip/rap to secure the stream and protect from further encroachment towazds the new
bridge. There will be 3301ineaz feet of roadway fill impacts to UT3 due to the new bridge
construction and new alignment (site 1 on permit drawing sheet 13 of 13). The stream
will be entirely relocated to the west of NC 801 through a lateral base ditch (see permit
drawings sheets 4 and 5 of 13). The pathway for this existing stream takes a sharp turn
along the west end of the proposed bridge which will compromise the new structure.
Construction of the relocated channel will be completed before roadway fill is placed in
the existing stream. There will be 751ineaz feet of permanent stream impacts from the
road realignment and a culvert extension for UT2 (see permit drawing sheets 6 and 7 of
13 and site 2 on sheet 13 of ~. The new fill slopes will extend outside the existing
culvert therefore making the culvert extension necessary for the project. Permanent
impacts to streams on this project will total 456 linear feet. The USACE and DWQ
determined UT2 and UT3 intermittent streams and will not require mitigation. There will
be 51 lineaz feet of stream mitigation required on this project.
Temporary! Impacts: There will be 0.24 acre of temporary impacts to the South Yadkin
River due to a causeway constructed for bridge removal and new bridge construction.
Construction of the causeway will be in phases. At no time will the river be impacted by a
causeway on either side of the river or together at a length greater than half the width of
the river.
1. Phase 1: Construct rock causeway on east and west bank to access and
construct the proposed bridge piers in the river.
2. Phase 2: Remove a portion of Phase 1 causeways and construct additional
causeways on the east and west bank to access and construct proposed new
span #3. Construct remainder of proposed bridge.
3. Phase 3: Upon completion of the proposed bridge, phase traffic onto the new
road facility. Remove portions of the Phase 2 causeways and construct
additional causeways on the east and west bank to access and remove existing
bridge superstructure and piers located over or in the river.
2

Utilitypacts: There will be no impacts to jurisdictional waters from the relocation of
electrical lines on the project site. Water and sewer lines will not need relocation due to
this bridge construction.
Bride Demolition: The superstructure consists of a reinforced concrete deck and girders
supported by reinforced concrete piles and caps. The existing bridge end bents are
protected by spill-through abutments armored with riprap. Two reinforced concrete
abutments are in the water. There is a potential for 43 cubic yards of reinforced concrete
components of the bridge to be temporarily dropped into the Waters of the United States
during construction. During construction, Best Management Practices for Bridge
Demolition and Removal will be followed. Components of the demolition process are
addressed as follows:
(a) T'he asphalt wearing surface will be removed prior to further demolition
without dropping into the water.
(b) The bridge rails and the deck portion of the deck/girder system will be
removed by non-fracturing methods without dropping materials into the water.
A causeway will be used.
(c) Removal of the bridge girders and interior bents will utilize causeways. To the
maximum extent practicable, girders and bents will be dropped onto
causeways or onto the shore rather than into the water.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with a federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The
USFWS lists 2 species under federal protection in Rowan County and l species for Davie
County as of January 29, 2003. A field survey was conducted in 2002 for all three species
and it was determined that the project site does not have habitat for the Michaux's sumac
or the Schweinitz's sunflower. An additional field survey was conducted in December
2004 to investigate habitat or an observation of a bald eagle. No bald eagles were
observed and it was determined that habitat does not exist for the bald eagle. The NC
Natural Heritage database of rare species and unique habitats was reviewed in December
2004 and there is no documentation of federally protected species within 1 mile of the
project area. The species under federal protection in Rowan and Davie Counties are listed
in Table 1.
Table 1. S ecies Under Federal Protection in Rowan and Davie Counties
Common Name Scientific Name County Federal
Status Habitat Biological
Conclusion
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Rowan T No No Effect
Michaux's sumac Rhus michauzii Davie E No No Effect
Schweinitz's sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Rowan E No No Effect
3

T'he USFWS list the Carolina heelsplitter, (Lasmigora decorata) as occurring in the
Yadkin River Basin. A mussel survey was conducted by NCDOT biologists in August
2002. There were no live mussels found during the survey. Given these results, it was
determined that the Carolina heelsplitter does not occur in the project footprint. In
conclusion, this species was given a "No Effect" for this area. The NC Natural Heritage
database does not list any known locations of the Carolina heelsplitter within the
proximity of the project.
AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION AND MITIGATION
Avoidance and Minimization:
Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to
"Waters of the United States". The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable
and practicable design features to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts, and to
provide full compensatory mitigation of all remaining, unavoidable jurisdictional stages;
minimization measures were incorporated as part of the project design. Practical means to
minimize impacts to surface waters impacted by the project include:
• Installation of temporary silt fences, earth berms and temporary ground cover during
construction
• Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control BMPs for the protection of
surface waters
• Rip/rap for bank stabilization will be limited to the streambank below the high water
mark, and vegetation should be used for stabilization above the high water elevation.
• Possible use of turbidity curtains during construction of permanent bridge bents.
• There will be an instream moratorium for white bass and sunfish from April 1 through
June 30.
• Best Management Practices will be followed for this project as outlined in "NCDOT's
Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities".
Miti ag tion: The Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide stream mitigation
for 51 linear feet of stream impacts to UT1 to the Yadkin River. (Please see attached EEP
Mitigation Acceptance Letter dated January 25, 2005.)
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Section 404 Permit: It is anticipated that the temporary work pads will be authorized
under Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33. We are therefore requesting the issuance of a
Nationwide Permit 33 for the workpads. The remaining aspects of the project are being
processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in
accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The NCDOT requests that these activities be
authorized by a Nationwide Permit 23 (FR number 10, pages 2020-2095; January 15,
2002).
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification numbers 3403 and 3366 will
apply to this project. All general conditions of the Water quality Certifications will be
met. Therefore, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500(a) and 15A NCAC
4

2B.0200 we are providing two copies of this application to the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their
notification.
Thank you for your time and assistance with this project. Please contact Carla Dagnino at
[phone] if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
~.~---
~__..
Gregory .Thorpe, Ph.D
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
w/attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ (7 copies)
Ms. Marla Chambers NCWRC
Ms. Marella Buncick, USFWS
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. S. P. Ivey, P.E. ,Division Engineer
Ms. Diane Hampton, P.E. , DEO
w/o attachment
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Dennis Pipkin, PDEA Project Planning Engineer
Ms. Beth Harmon, EEP
Ms. Laurie P. Smith, CPA, NCDOT, Program Management
5

Office Use Only: ~ ~ V ~ Q Q Form Version May 2002
~ ~+ V Q
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Appncanie° or ..NiA~~.l
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 23, NW 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for fiu'tlier details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NC Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: 1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1548
Telephone Number: (919)-733-3141 Fax Number: (919)-733-9794
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: NA
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is cleazly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of prof ect: Replacement of bridge No. 80 on NC 801 Over South Yadkin River
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4256
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Rowan-Davie County Neazest Town: Cooleemee
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From US 601 take NC 801 South
towards Cooleemee on US401 East make a right turn onto SR2044 and travel approximately
1 and %2 miles towazds the bridge No. 127.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35° 48.23'N, 80° 33.43'W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 0.35 mile * 120 feet = 5.1 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): South Yadkin River
8. River Basin: Yadkin River Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The proiect is in a rural area just south of Cooleemee. The
project azea is mainly forested with some residences and commercial areas and a large
industrial facility located in one quadrant of the project area.
Page 6 of 12

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The NCDOT
proposes to replace the 368 foot Bridge No. 80 with a new 400 foot, 4 span pre-stressed concrete
girder bridge approximately 50 feet north of the existing bride. The bride replacement wi11456
linear feet of~ermanent impacts to the receiving waters. UT1 will have 51 feet of impacts due to
fill associated with bank stabilization• UT2 will have 75 feet of impacts from a culvert extension
The traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge site. Construction equipment will consist of
heavy dutytrucks, earth moving_equipment, cranes, etc.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The existing_bridge is considered structurally
deficient and obsolete. The replacement of the bride will result in a safer and more efficient
use for traffic.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
NA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
NA
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 7 of 12

mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: See permit application attached (pa eg 2)
1. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
NA

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0 acre
2. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma linear feet) Before I act leases ec' )
1 Permanent 330 UT3 South Yadkin 3 feet Intermittent
River
2 Temporary Fill 0.25 acre South Yadkin River 75 feet Perennial
3 Permanent 51 LTTl So
u
th Yadkin 2 feet Perennial
l
R
4 Permanent 75 UT2 to U'Tl South 1 foot Intermittent
Yadkin River

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us¢s.eov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapyuest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 456 feet
3. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Page 8 of 12

Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
NA

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts mcmae, nut are not nmitea to: n,,, cxcavauvi,, wa,~.,,~,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
See attached permit ~ylication
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
Page 9 of 12

necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Compensatory mih~ation will be provided by EEP to 51 linear feet of stream impacts
imposed from bank stabilization to UT1 South Yadkin River located on the west side of
NC801 and connecting to the South Yadkin River on its north side.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 51
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate) funds or the use of public
(federaUstate) land?
Yes ® No ^
Page 10 of 12

If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ® No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts aze proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Taz-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ^ No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
3
1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 3U feet perpendicular from near bank of criannel; Gone 1 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
NA
Page 11 of 12

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
NA
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application?
Yes ^ No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA

,pplicant/Agent's Signature ~ D`ate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

s,-~FCO _ St~111
4 ~,
~_..t t: k ~ f k ~ k 't ~ '~ i R:
& ~
PROGRAM
January 25, 2005
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-4256, Bridge 80 over the South Yadkin River on NC 801,
Rowan and Davie Counties
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) will provide stream mitigation for the subject project. Based on the
information supplied by you in a letter dated January 7, 2005, the impacts are located in
CU 03040102 of the Yadkin River Basin in the Central Piedmont Eco-Region, and are as
follows:
Stream Impacts: 51 feet
The subject project is not listed in Exhibit 2 of the Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) among the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
the North Carolina Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Wilmington District dated July 22, 2003. The EEP is only committed to
provide the mitigation needs for projects listed on Exhibit 2 during the first two years of
the program; however Amendment 1 details how non-Exhibit 2 projects may be proposed
for EEP mitigation acceptance. Specifically, Amendment 1 amended Section IX.A. by
adding the following language:
"Exhibit 2 may be modified if requested jointly by NCDENR and NCDOT, and
approved in writing by the USACE. In no event may the total projected impacts
of projects per cataloging unit on Exhibit 2 exceed the total projected impacts of
projects per cataloging unit on Exhibit 2 as it existed at the time of the original
execution of the MOA, July 22, 2003."
North Earolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 17699-f652 / 9i4-115-0416 / www nceep.net

NORTH CAROLINA
AVIE OU
fir,,,,,, . ~ ~ ~ eo
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~.
CEO o~' ~
a~ J
c~~~
END ~ . `~
PRO./ECT ~` ~ ~ Cooleemee
/ ~.~ ~'
so
Y~o~~~
BEG/N R"'e~
ECT
~ ~~~
~~~
NCD®~
DIVISION OF HIQIIWAY3
~ICINIT~ ROWAN-DAME COUNTY
PROJECT:816S2101 ®-~1~ ,
~~~~
BRIDQE X80 OVER 90UTH
YADBIN RIVER ON NC 801
SHEET / OF /3

SITE •3
~ ~~
~ r ~
~~
SITE • SI ~• '
NCB®~
DIVISION OF HIQHWAY3
" ROWAN-DAME COUNTY
SI~]E ~~][~ pRO~cT:as~as~oi ~-~s~~
BRIDC~iE X80 OVBR SOUTH
YADSIN RIVER ON NC 801
SHEET v~ OF 13

CAUSEWAY DETAIL
25'
Class A min
Rip Rap
NWS = 630.1'' Q_ _ _ _
1.5:1
flow ~ 1.5:1
Quantities:
Class II Rip Rap = 3000 Tons
Class A Rip Rap = 380 Tons
Volume Below NWS = 1300 cu. yds.
Top of Causeway
= 632.1'
Class II
Rip Rap
~------
Shoe -t -3 v -~' - ~,

-WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY
]~
PROPOSED BRIDGE
WETLAND
L
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
• w DENOTES MECHANIZED
+i •' •' • CLEARING
FLOW DIRECTION
T~~ TOP OF BANK
-- WE- - EDGE OF WATER
- ~- - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- -F- - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
-~-- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG- - NATURAL GROUND
- - 1 - - PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- PDE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- - EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB- - E
~
PLANT BOUNDAR
- - 0 - - - WATER SURFACE
X xX X z LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
- - - CORE FIBER ROLLS
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
(DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
SINGLE TREE
~~ WOODS LINE
DRAINAGE INLET
~= ROOTWAO
RIP RAP
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
IF AVAILABLE
^ PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE (PSH)
LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
~ GRASS SWALE
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DAVIE.~ ROWAN COUNTY
PROJECT: 33598.1.1 (B-4856)
BRIDGE N0.80 OVER
SOUTH YADgIN RIVER
ON NC 801
SHEET 3 Q. OF

N <g 3g
~~W' 4]
~

o ~ ~~

a Z w? m~
1-~ ~4
W ~LL o~
~
~~
~ ~
~ ~ ,~ ~
~ 5 133N5 335 0
~
?< ~ s pprppfrZrols 3N/7HJIMIP
} 1 C N
d
~
!
~ k
~ 1 ~~
P I + b ~ ~
1~ / N ~
~+ II n II n `

$ ~-~t M
$t=J~~~ - % 9~9 ~
~
\ ~ l ON ~ d N
k
~ R
4,~ ~ +
. .. ., ~
s ~
~
i ~
~
..
f ... ~~~d~ s ~
r
r N
_ ~ A p r r I
~ ~>

^ T
~
SOY/TH
i ~
,
..' \ ~ `Z
YAAK/N gNE
~
~ ~ w
R

...
I ~ ~
V I m N
...
~_------~... CS
C N
~ Q
~. N
0 ~~~~~
~~~
~
W~
.. .. ~ . \ +
..
{u V
~ rrrrrrrrrr
r I

~ . ~
~ '
<
.. T
~
~~
~
D,' -
Or7
\. \
OO+OZ ~ ~ ~ \ W
~
W
~
~
~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
W 17 OZ 1S N
~ \
~R ~ ~
w ~ ~ W ~ ~ -
~ -
~ ~ `~ ~
~{ ~~~~~~
aa~ 3 ~
= sag
~
~,
s a
~
~ ~~~l~ ~
~ ~
~
x c ~
LL 3~ y~ ~ a n
1

W ~
~~ o ~
\
r N g
~
H~ y ~ ~

G • ~
\ ~
\ ® ~~ ~~~
K i a
~

+ I ~ ~ ~
•,
~ ~
1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ \ ~ ~
~
~
II: a~~~ a ~.e ~ 1 I 1 I~~ ~I n
~ r
~ ~
I 1 ~p / ~
/ ~~ ~~ of, ~~~~ ~ ~ ~O
1 '-
~ ~! sg~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ i ~~ jig ~ O
,
/ I
~ ~ -
$$~
~ /
~ ~
/
I ~ ~ ~ LL IL 4
4 ^ Q ~ I
~~
'
f~ II ~
8 ~" a
8 ~ ~..
. ~~~
~ma
\
~
~
d
~i «
~ F` ~j ~ a 1 ~ ~'
,
a~ f ~ rr
~ ~~~ ~ ~, ~~ ~
~
~f ~ y
~ a~~ F
I
~ ~
~ ~
~
~ ~
~ r r
w
~
~~I s, ;
~
~ V J

acn
~

•sd' _ Qt ~ ~
~~ 8 W
~'~ t ~ N ~' '~-~ =
v

/~•... a
.~ ,
r ~
rn
. ~
~ ~
/
/ ~
~ w >
•~`
..
~~
-
/
~
~
~ ~ ;~
a
I ~ ~~ sr - 73
.
~ ~
d
I ~~ _y ~
.. N •-
I \\
9

~ \
~
.b /
~
~ f / -- ~
~ ~ ~ \
~ al , Q ~ ~~ z~r ~
I
~~ ~ ~31ffr ~ g~
l ~
~~ 4 ~3~ a
C3 ~ 8
~
`~ I
~
,
a •sd '

. ~
-- ~ _
~ .~ ~
~J \ .~
•
~ a
~ ~ \\
~~
~ I ~ ~
~ I
~ ll
bb/LI/8 u6p•gys-ysd-fipa-ggZgq~u6isap\9926-8\~50~80 SOOZ-NVf \SZ

WS\~ROJECTS ~Gclen\B-4256\Design\b4256_rdy_psh_sh4.dgn
~ //~~II~ /~ll~rrii ~ ilr~~//~/ r Ullll~ll ~\~~
/ / i I ~ I l , 11,1611/l i ~~ ~. ~j/// ~ l / / / /1 ///~t/ / ~ ` '_. R/17 /99
/ / ~/ IIII I~ ll~~/~ / I ~~ /
/ ~/ // 11111111/ `~\I /~ l l I 1/ll~.~ ~

/ ~
~

' ~
~ ~ ~~~~ J ~ \ ~~
~~\1~~ ~ ~ //.II /
\
\
~ \
~
~
/
/
~ s1
_ \~-
\y,
l
I/III
i
'~
111 ~
ll al
I
~ ~l ll
~
\ \\
1
/
I
~ ~ ~ I
II ~ \

~ /
j~,
~
1
/I(
,
I ~
/ // IIII ~ ~~. \1 ~ ~
I
~
I
III 1

/
\~ I
~
~ - I I it
I
/ I1 I 1
~ i/
/ I ~/ ' ~ 1
a/2 ~
II
I
~/
1
/
/ l l / a \

~ 1
~ __,
:1111
~ f~~V,
~ /
\
_
~ 1
--
!
~
/ ~ .IIII
I
/ , i
IN \
~
~
/
I
~ ~
\ ~ I..I. .. _~~~~_~ II I ~ 1
\~\1

EL
3 I l I I - --~,~- -~ /
1i III
\I 1'
\
"`y
\ \11
\
~.
~ \
\
`
>
1
..
\
~~ f :/
~ l/I
11 \\ \ . I..I I I I .. .~- ~ /~~ F
l F ~ \
C RI ' ~\ 1 ~/ ~ ~ i ~" /~ ~ / ~~/ / ~ 1 I 1
:::
~
I
l ~
I
~ `
i
~
~
~ -
A J
i
,•
~
)
III/
~
,
" ti ~ ~.
~
n $ +
S \ (IIII f ~
~
•'
~ l
~ ~.
\ „
)
s
I
>
l ' J
~~~
~ }q{ I
/
>
l

~ w~ _
~ l •`
~ i~l I
~
/ \\\
`
I I I I I
~
\
J
~ /
//
/ ~
I
~
' ~ ~
.1
~
I
l -
~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ «

w ~

r
`

' ~

~
\ ~ ~ ~/
~ Y s
1 ~ °
\\11i~' ~),,'~'~ \\ l I
~ 1
\ I I
~
ll I
/
/~ /
l III
~ III
III

g
,~
"'
~ l~ ~
~,-
/~` ~
1
l~ ~
(
\ ~~
~ /
~ I I
~ ~ ~ I
j (J
~
~ ~ J~,,c f I
~/ I ~ ~
11 I I 1 l
_ ~ l
t J
/
~
1
/ ~_
~l ~ 1 ~ I \1

~
~ , 1 i I) ( .
I
~
~ ~ ~$s ~
~
II
`
'
~
ll ~
1
1\~ r
~ I
I
~
~
I
~ I~~%J
~
i~
i
g'IS<~ \ y
~
~
`IIII ~ / /f/~/III // ~~ ~^ I I ~ 1 I I
~~ ~~C~~-~ - $~~~~ ~ n
I. /
~ ~~ l
:
Il ~ . \I ~ / /
~ O JJl \~~ 1 ~~
w

\ ,
~ ~ ' ~
~ ~ ~~ ~
~' ~ Ile 'iii`` ~\ ~~
~ \ \ ~ ~~ 1
I \
~ ~
~~
/ i
~ ~
~
~ ~ 1111 ~~ ~
~
~
\\\\~ \
I ICI I / ~ ~ ~
,
~
' ~ ~
1 f`'- ~ III
,
~
~
~.
I
~ /
- ~ - ~
"' ~ ~ ~~ hI 111 I
~ I ~ ~ ~ 1 1
I l
z ~ ~ o- I
~ ~ f I ~I I 11 J \ k
~ $ BEG/ QGE ~ ~ _ ~ _ _.
~ ~

~'~ P~ ~~Q ~ ~ \ \\~~ / / ~ ~ J \ ~~ s~,~ x

ST 20 LT
~
~
~
a E .6 .00 ~^~ ~ \
~ I
\~ \\ / \ / ~
\ ~

~ t~
+ ~,
9 ~ ~ \ a ~ ~' ~ 1.
~ `
% ~ / i
*
2
5 _
_

* C0 ~
Vl (n ~ ~.. ~ _ _
~
_ _
~O ~ 4 ~~ V ~
i / ~'
_ _

~ ...~~
~
1 \
IJ ~
I
~ m
~~s~ ._ ~
~~ / ~~ _

~
m ~_ _ _ ~ I I
e~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ' I
~
~
nr
D I
E ~ ` ~4 \
$a„
1 ~~
_
P
~ ~ \

~ ` ` ~ ~ _ l
r
11111 1 bJ
\\ ~ \ ; , ~
~~
m ~ 4 # , ,
- ~ /
~ L ~
~ x 1
~ ~
~
~~\~ 1\ ~ p 11 ~f-~i
1 i ~ ~
~ \ I
~\\\11 /t
I
N o: 1 ~ ~\ '- ~ /~
r~'- 1
~ ~ ~~y`\~~1~~ l~il~ II V
II
A ~ t ~~\ \ sE 1 1 1 ~ \ ~
~~ Illt ~ \\ ~ \\ 1111
l l 111j1 I %/ ~

1
1 I
1 ~
~>l
~~ ~ \ \ 111 ~ ~\\ \ 1 1\1111111111N11 ~ /
I ~~\~\\\\111 ?1 ~\ \\ 1 1\\ \\1\ /
11111
\ ~
/~/// 4
II
~

v
~
o
/ 1111 111
~ 1 ~\ X111 ~ 1 \ \ \\
1111)) ~\~\\\\\\ 1
~` ~
~ \\\ ~l ~
~ I r~~lllll 1 `11\11\1`
~ ~ ~
~ ~ J II ~
I ,~
i ~
~
~ ~~1 ~~ 1 ) I ~ 1/1 I ~I III 11 /I j I I I I \\h\11,1 ~ 11111111\11 ~~ 1 11 I~~\z
I \ 11\11n111
1 / N`~111
1
~
f
~ ~
// l ~(
I ~
1~/
1
_
1
i~ j///j j/ 1111 I /
~
~ l II
I
~ \ 1
1 II I l
I
I
r~\ 1\I I ~1NII111 / ~~/~~l
~ J~~/~j~/ //1/11/11
~
/ I
\h (Ili
l
1 X1 ~
~ //\Ir I 1 1111111111r // )1\
~//-- ~ / /// / /// 1
i~ iii/ii~~ -~~ iiii~~~,~i~~~i~~i •.v~a~n~~au~,i i ~~~~~~a~iri i r ~ ~~~ii~ . ,,i„~ri ~ i i

o~
~~
~~
_~
N
~.
~ Z
W

n
~~~
~~
aQj$~V
~c
~ I
~~I
~~
~ ~ ~~
\ ~~r/ j~~
-~~ i
~'`/ ~ L I
~ ~
1 ~ ~ ~~~ ~~
~~g ~33~
~• ~ A~ S

d~
~~
"'Y
~~
~~I
~NI
cr l
~~
/~ .
~~
tl, ° k
• ~C
~ ~ ~ea.
/ ~~ .~

~. ~~e
4
a ~
i/ ~ ~ ~ ~
.\
/ ~ I
~/ i ~~ / k
~~b Sy~N~S
/~yJ~
h
~~
y ~
P~
V~
+/+
I~'I I~ I~ I
u6p•gyc-ycd-fipa-95249\u6~i°0\9524-9\
~NI
~crl
~NI
~NI
r

N
N
w
N
a
N
V
N
o~
N
~o
w
N
w
w

.mot ~-~~-\\\\~<<~~~\ \~~~\i^I~~ I~~/ \\ \~ ~\ \
~ \ ~„
1 ~ I 1 1 \\\ Ill ~ \ I ~ ~ ` - ~" rl / / /%~ ~/ / I f \ < /(//~/ / / ~ \\~'
~ / ~ \ \ /~/\ ~ ~ l I ~ ,- ~ J l l l ~ ~lllll~l / it ~~ III \ / ~ ~ / /~
-' ~~a~~ / / \ \ 1 i I ?~I \ +y~ch l ll~l~~llll~/ l / ~ ~l IIIII ~~ III' j I I
_ `i 11\~\ ~ jI Ilj 11.111 \ 1 \ /~ SF~ 11 111 ~ ~ ~ ~ j ))II~ ~I~\~~ I ~ I\ /I
~ / ~ / I . / 111 // ll),J\ \ 11 / ~ rr / Il\\\ v\~\ \\
^~ f ~~ _ ~ ~~/ll l// 1111 ~ \1111 ~ I "~~ ~ I~\\~~\ ~ 1\
`~~=~ jjj//////// X1111111 1111 1 lii ~' ~ ~~ III/^
_ . , ~ ~ ir/ / 11 III 1l % //I1/I
.. ~ ~ _ ~_ , ~i rig- I ~( ,( ~ ~ l ll // lji
/~I) I ~~ ~ Nth ~M~II/ ~ ~ ~%//%/ ~ ~~
//~i/~ ~~t,.
// y a Ifl .~ .~11~~ ~~ ~l% 1~~
~ // i 1 l i
~~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~/ / l//~/i~:.~~ - ~ .Ilia ~ ~(~ ii it ~ ~j/~ 'l /~~
~~? ~ ~ ~~ '' ~ ///// ~(~ 111 ~ ( i ~~///
~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ / .. ~ , _ , _ ~ ~ /III` 1 l ii~~il° l~=a l
r~ , --
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~yi ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~11 I' IIIII I I /~ I ~///~~ ~ ~`a~ l
X ~ ~
~~~~~~~~~~/ '.Z~`~, - ill ~Illlll I Illjl- ~~~~~
"' // I
~ ~ ~ ~ %~ ~%'~ _ - ~ ~•, ~ 'Ill ~ /1(~ \~
~ ~ ~ t 1 \ f
~ ~ nyld ~ a~,~ z ~,~~ I III III I/) 1 . , \\ ( ~
4~~ ~--- ~ Q~\ `l`T~~ ~ 1 • I~ 1111111 ~ I(1 ~ l\ 1
\F ti i\\ \ ~ ~ 11 ` I ~~ ~ ~ ~ r II Il~
= ~~\ ~,l\ ~ ~, 111 \\ \II~>9"g \\\ '` ~ X11111\
~ ~ ~ / /
\ tk ~~11 I I p~ ~~ I II ~\ \\\\ ~llll(I ~ `/`~ ~.
~ ~ \ ~
1 \1 ~~~ I I~ 111 \ r\ 1 \\~
\ \ \ ~ I I , ~ ' 1--d-~;~ ////( /111111\ ~ I ~\\~~~\ ~
I ~J J ~, ~/1/ \\\\ \\'\\\\\ ~\~~ JII~\1111~\ I
~°''-~~ 1 ~; • a ~ \ II I ~ I I I ~a // l~ I \I / J)) II I I\I
~~ ~~
\ I1- I~ \ ~ ~ ~~s ~ II ~~ ~ I j /) I~ / / // / ~ %_ --J~1 I !f jig 1 i
1 111111
~ \ , ~~ ~ ~ 1 J r 1 I 1 II 11 Il / ~/j~' ~ ~ ~~~ 1~~~~1~
// ~ \ \ ~ I 1111 ~ 1/J r 1 / i~~ia-~ ,! ~\ \
111))11 '//°$~ a\\\ III ~S~r~iii/T j -J~\~-~1~
_ 7 ~ / /~ .._II _J~
3.LI,OLOSS
.S9'SA I
I
~o m
Z
r
N
~~
~P
tir
Q=
~ ""
~~
a

oi-ocT-zooa oe:oa
W:\PRDJ~~TS\Galen\B-4256\Design\64256_rdu_xpi.dgn

NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
2 ROGER SPILLMAN PO BOX 738
COOLEEMEE NC 27014
3 DEBORAH SPILLMAN PO BOX 738
COOLEEMEE NC 27014
4
5
COOLEEMEE PARTNERS,LLC PO BOX 828
COOLEEMEE, NC 27014
ANDREW & LAWRENCE P, 0. BOX 688
BECK COOLEEMEE NC 27014

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFA CE WATERIMPACTS

Site
No.
Station
(FromlTo)
Structure
Size /Type
Fill In
Wetlands
ac
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
ac
Excavation
In Wetlands
ac Mechanized
Clearing
(Method III)
ac
Fill In SW
(Natural)
ac
Fill In SW
(Pond)
ac Existing
Temp. Fill Channel
In SW Impacted
ac f< Natural
Stream
Design
ft
1 18+00-20+00 Roadwa Flil ~ UT3 0.04 330

id a Constr
P
B
C 0.15
2 20+50 - 21+30
20+30 - 21+20 Rt r
ro
ausewa -
Causewa -Remove Exist Bride 0.09

3 23+25 Bank Stabilization 0.01 51

4 26+20 Culvert Extension 0.01 75

TOTAL S: 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0.24 `~S(v 0
~~.-~ r r~~l-vie ux~-~ev ~ 3'1.`1 Sire` ec~ = c~.Wa Ave,

Rowan-Davie Counties
Bridge No. 80 on NC 801
over South Yadkin River
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-801(1)
State Project No. 8.1632101
T.I.P. No. B-4256
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMIlJISTRATION
AND
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DMSION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
a~
ATE
y129 03
Date
Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
~c;o .~ i~-~..
~' Donald J. Voelker
Acting Division Administrator, FHWA

Rowan-Davie Counties
Bridge No. 80 on NC 801
over South Yadkin River
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-801(1)
State Project No. 8.1632101
T.LP. No. B-4256
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION

Documentation Prepared in Project Development and Environmental Analysis
Branch By:
~f-I~-o3
Date
Date

Dennis Pipkin
Project Planning Engineer

William T. Goodwin, Jr., P.E. V
Unit Head, Bridge Replacement Planning Unit

PROJECT CONIlVIITMENTS•
Rowan-Davie Counties
Bridge No. 80 on NC 801
over South Yadkin River
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-801(1)
State Project No. 8.1632101
T.I.P. No. B-4256
1. Roadway Design Unit, Structure Design Unit, Bridge Maintenance Unit, Project
Development & Environmental Analysis Branch (Permits), Resident Engineer:
Bridge Demolition:
The existing bridge has an asphalt wearing surface, and the remainder of the bridge, both
superstructure and substructure, is composed of reinforced concrete. The reinforced concrete
bridge deck is formed integrally with the girders. There is a potential for reinforced concrete
components of the bridge to be dropped into Waters of the United States during construction.
Components of the demolition process are addressed as follows:
(a) The asphalt wearing surface will be removed prior to further demolition, without
dropping into the water.
(b) The bridge rails and the deck portion of the deck/girder system will be removed by
non-fracturing methods without dropping into the water. Causeways may be used. However, to
the maximum extent practicable, the work to remove rails and decking will be performed without
the use of causeways and without having equipment enter the water.
(c) Removal of the bridge girders and interior bents may utilize causeways. To the
maximum extent practicable, girders and bents will be dropped onto causeways or onto the shore
rather than into the water.
The resulting temporary fill associated with the reinforced concrete components of the
bridge may be as much as approximately 43 cubic yazds. This assumes that all components
except one bent in the center of the stream will either be lifted cleaz, dropped onto causeways, or
onto the shore.
During construction, Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal
will be followed.
Construction Let Date / In-Water Construction:
The South Yadkin River contains game fish species such as white perch, white bass,.
lazgemouth bass, and black crappie. In order to accommodate Wildlife Resources Commission
concerns for periods offish migration, spawning or larval recruitment, the construction Let Date
will not be before May of the Let yeaz. In-water construction or other in-water activities will be
scheduled to begin after June 30 and to conclude by March 15 of the following yeaz.
The streambed in the project azea may have a large amount of gravel, sand, and silt. To
reduce sedimentation, use of a turbidity curtain will be considered.
Categorical Exclusion Document -Green Sheet 4-14-2003 Page 1 of 1

Rowan-Davie Counties
Bridge No. 80 on NC 801
over South Yadkin River
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-801(1)
State Project No. 8.1632101
T.I.P. No. B-4256
INTRODUCTION: Bridge No. 80 is included in the latest approved North Carolina Department
of Transportation (NCDOT) Transportation Improvement Program ('TIP) and is eligible for the
Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. The location is shown in Figure 1.
No substantial environmental impacts are anticipated. The project is classified as a Federal
"Categorical Exclusion".
I. PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 41.3 out of a
possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is considered to be structurally deficient and
functionally obsolete. The replacement of this inadequate structure will result in safer traffic
operations.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The project is located at the southern town limits of Cooleemee in Davie County, and connects
the two counties, Rowan and Davie, across the South Yadkin River (see Figure 1). Development
in the azea is industrial and residential in nature.
NC 801 is classified as a rural major collector in the Statewide Functional Classification System.
NC 801 is not a National Highway System Route. This route is not a designated bicycle route
and there is no indication that an unusual number of bicyclists use this roadway. The existing
bridge is not designed to accommodate pedestrian traffic, and there is no indication that an
unusual number of pedestrians use this bridge. In addition, there are no areas neaz the bridge that
would generate substantial pedestrian traffic across the structure.
In the vicinity of the bridge, NC 801 has a 20-foot (6-meter) pavement width with 6-foot (1.8-
meter) grass shoulders (see Figure 3). The roadway grade is in a horizontal curve through the
project azea. The roadway is situated approximately 42.0 feet (12.8 meters) above the creek bed.
Bridge No. 80 is a seven-span structure that consists of a reinforced concrete deck with an
asphalt wearing surface. The abutments and bents are constructed of reinforced concrete with pile
footings. The existing bridge (see Figure 3) was constructed in 1940. The overall length of the
structure is 368 feet (112 meters). The cleaz roadway width is 25.8 feet (7.7 meters). The bridge
is not posted for weight limits.
There are no utilities attached to the existing structure, but overhead power and telephone lines
cross the river just east of the bridge. Water and sewer utilities aze located in the town of

Cooleemee, approximately 600 feet (183 m) north of the bridge. Utility impacts aze anticipated to
be moderate.
There is a USGS survey marker located on the wheel guard at the northwest corner of the bridge.
This mazker is stamped " 39JAS 1965."
The current traffic volume of 5,400 vehicles per day (VPD) is expected to increase to 10,000
VPD by the yeaz 2025. The projected volume includes two percent truck-tractor semi-trailer
(TTST) and three percent dual-tired vehicles (DT). The posted speed limit is 55 miles (90
kilometers) per hour on the south in Rowan County, and 45 mph (72 kph) on the north in Davie
County.
There was one accident reported in the vicinity of Bridge No. 80 during a recent three yeaz
period. This accident resulted in a non-fatal injury.
There aze no school buses crossing this bridge from either county.
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Project Description
The replacement structure will consist of a 380-foot (115.9-meter) long bridge. The bridge
cross-section will be of sufficient width to provide for two 12-foot (3.6 meter) lanes with 4-foot
(1.2 meter) offsets on each side. Total cleaz width will be 32 feet (9.8 m). However, the cross-
section will be wider if curve widening is required in the final design.
The roadway elevation of the new structure will be approximately the same as the existing
elevation at this location. ..
The existing roadway will be widened to a 24-foot (7.2-meter) pavement width to provide two
12-foot (3.6-meter) lanes. Eight-foot (2.4-meter) shoulders will be provided on each side; four
feet (1.2 meters) of which will be paved in accordance with the current NCDOT Design Policy.
This roadway will be designed as a major collector.
Initial design indicates that completed project will provide a design speed of 60 mph (90 km/hr).
A design exception may be necessary due to the alignment of the north approach. This approach
is within the town of Cooleemee, and will likely remain posted at a lower speed due to the
existing adjacent residential and business development.
B. Reasonable and Feasible Alternatives
One alternative was studied for replacing Bridge No. 80:
The studied Alternative involves replacement of the existing structure with a new bridge placed
to the west of the existing alignment. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge during

construction. Because of the volume of traffic carried by NC 801, and the distance to alternative
river crossings, there is no feasible off-site detour route.
C. Alternatives Eliminated From Further Consideration
The "do-nothing" alternative will eventually necessitate closure of the bridge. This is not
acceptable due to the traffic service provided by NC 801.
"Rehabilitation" of the old bridge is not practical due to its age and deteriorated condition. The
bridge was constructed over 60 years ago, and has deteriorated to the, extent of having a
sufficiency rating of only 41.3 out of a possible 100.
D. Preferred Alternative
Bridge No. 80 will be replaced with a new bridge placed to the west of the existing alignment.
The NCDOT Division 9 Engineer concurs with the selected alternate.
IV. ESTIMATED COSTS
The estimated costs aze as follows:
Alternative 1
Structure $790,000
Roadway Approaches 709,000
Structure Removal 82,000
Misc. & Mob. 479,000
Eng. & Contingencies 340,000
Total Construction Cost 2,400,000
Right-of-way Costs 67,000
Total Project Cost $2,467,000
V. NATURAL RESOURCES
Soils
The map units in the project azea aze Chewacla loam, urban land, Enon fine sandy loam,
Mocksville sandy loam, Poindexter-Mocksville complex, and Zion-Enon complex.
• Chewacla loam, with 0-2 percent slopes and frequently flooded soils (ChA), is mapped in
Davie County immediately adjacent to the South Yadkin River and on the west side of NC
801. This soil is commonly. found on flood plains along creeks and rivers throughout the
county. It is somewhat poorly drained and frequently flooded for brief periods. Water and
air move through this soil at a moderate rate. The seasonal high water table is within 1.5 feet
3

(0.45 m) of the surface. The NRCS classifies this soil as a hydric soil when frequently
flooded.
• Urban land (LTr) is mapped in the northwest portion of the project area, adjacent to the
Chewacla soils. This map unit consists of azeas where more than 85 percent of the surface is
covered by asphalt, concrete, buildings, or other impervious material. The rest is used for
lawns, playgrounds, cemeteries, pazks, or drainageways. The original soils and drainage
patterns have been greatly altered. Runoff is excessive. This classification is not a technical
classification and carries no hydric/nonhydric designation by the NRCS.
• A small area of Enon 5ne sandy loam with 8-15 percent slopes (EnC) is mapped on the east
side of NC 801 at the northern end of the project area. This soil type is well drained and
occurs on narrow ridges and side slopes on uplands. Permeability is slow and the depth to
the water table is greater than S feet (1.5 m). This soil is not classified as a hydric soil by the
NRCS.
• Moclcsville sandy loam with 8-15 percent slopes (MsD) is mapped along the South Yadkin
River on the east side of NC 801. This soil is well drained and occurs on narrow ridges and
side slopes in the uplands. Permeability is moderate and the water table remains below 6 feet
(1.8 m). This soil is not classified as a hydric soil by the NRCS.
• In Rowan County, Poindexter-Mocksville complex with 15-25 percent slopes (PxD) is
mapped along the South Yadkin River throughout the width of the project area. Soils of this
series are moderately deep to very deep, and well drained. They have moderate permeability
and are found on Piedmont uplands. This soil is not classified as a hydric soil by the NRCS.
• Zion-Enon complex soils with 2 to 8 percent slopes or with 8 to 15 percent slopes (no
publication symbol given) are mapped along both sides of NC 801 in Rowan County,
adjacent to the Poindexter-Mocksville complex. These soils are moderately to very deep,
well drained, and have slow to moderately slow permeability. They are typically found on
gently to strongly sloping uplands in the Piedmont. This soil is not classified as a hydric soil
by the NRCS.
Water Resources
Physical Characteristics of Surface Waters
The project is located in the Yadkin River basin (YAD04 and YAD06 sub-basin, HUC
03040102). The South Yadkin River originates about 50 miles (81 km) northwest of the project
area in Alexander County. Less than one mile (1.62 km) upstream from the project site, the River
is dammed to form impoundments. From the project area, the river meanders in a southeasterly
direction about 7.8 miles (12.5 km) to its confluence with the Yadkin River.
The South Yadkin River is approximately 75 feet (23 m) wide in the study azea, and flows in a
southeasterly direction. On the day of the site visit, the water level was above normal because of
rainfall during the previous four days. The water was turbid and the flow was swift. Because of
the high water conditions it was not possible to determine the substrate of the river, but it is
believed to be mainly silt, sand, and gravel. The depth of the water was also indeterminable, but
is believed to be 4-10 feet (1.2-3 m) deep.

Upstream of Bridge No. 80, the riverbanks are approximately 10 feet (3 m) tall, and downstream
from the bridge the banks are only 4 feet (1.2 m) tall. The banks aze steep and vegetated with
mature trees and shrubs. The canopy covers approximately 40 percent of the river.
West of NC 801, an unnamed tributary flows into the South Yadkin River on its north side. This
intermittent stream roughly parallels NC 801 within the project vicinity, and meanders
approximately 10-50 feet (3-15.2 m) outside of the project azea. The average channel width is 6
feet (2 m) at the top of the banks and it is slightly sinuous. The water in the channel varies from
1 to 5 feet (0.3-1.5 m). The stream has a good pool and riffle sequence. The banks are 2-6 feet
(0.7-2 m) high, heavily eroded, and undercut. The overall condition of the stream worsens as it
neazs the South Yadkin River. The substrate is gravel and hazdpan clay. On the day of the site
visit the flow was swift, and the water was slightly turbid. The average water depth was 6 inches
(15.2 cm). A set of powerlines crosses over this stream, and the vegetation has been cleared in
this azea. The remainder of the channel has 100 percent canopy cover. This stream will be
referred to as unnamed tributazy 1 (LTTl) for the remainder of the report.
Another unnamed tributary flows in a westerly direction under NC 801 ~ to its confluence with
UT 1, and is located within the project azea. A four-foot box culvert is used to direct the stream
under the road. This ephemeral channel has well-vegetated banks 4 feet (1.2 m) high. The tops
of the banks are an average of 3 feet (1 m) apart, but the active channel is only 1 foot (0.3 m)
wide. These banks aze heavily eroded in some places, although the overall condition of the
stream is not as poor as that of UTl .The substrate is gravel and cobbles, with areas of some
sediment deposits. A lazge amount of leaf litter and other woody debris also fills the channel.
On the day of the site visit the water was moderately cleaz and the flow was moderate. The water
depth ranged from 2 to 6 inches (5-15 cm). This stream will be referred to as unnamed tributary 2
(LJT2) for the remainder of the report. A third tributary flows into the South Yadkin River within
the project azea. It flows adjacent to NC 801 on the west side before crossing under it and
emptying into the river just to the east of the bridge. This intermittent stream actually flows
under the bridge rather than through a culvert. The banks of this stream average 6 feet (2 m) in
height, although they attain a height of 15 feet (4.6 m) just upstream from the confluence with
the South Yadkin River. This stream is heavily degraded, so the banks are very steep and
support little to no vegetation. The water channel is 3 feet (1 m) wide and the banks average 8
feet (2.6 m) wide at the top of the banks. The substrate is gravel and sand. On the day of the site
visit the water was turbid and the flow was strong. The water depth averaged 8 inches (20.3 cm).
It will be referred to as unnamed tributary 3 (UT'3) for the remainder of the report.
Best Usage Classification
This portion of the South Yadkin River [Index # 12-108-19.5] is classified as a Class C water
body (NCDENR, 2002). Class C water resources aze waters protected for aquatic life
propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. There are no
restrictions on watershed development activities. The unnamed tributaries present within the
project area and project vicinity have not been classified individually by DWQ, therefore they
carry the same Class C rating as their receiving stream.
5

No waters classified as High Quality Water (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I or
WS-In or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.0 miles (1.6 km) of the
project study area.
Water Quality
General Watershed Characteristics
The watershed in which the project is located is primarily agricultural, although it does contain
several moderately sized towns. Because of development, many disturbances to the landscape
were observed in the immediate vicinity. In the northeast quadrant of the project azea there aze
several private residences, and a lazge industrial facility is located in the northwest quadrant. The
southwest quadrant is forested, however, a wastewater treatment facility is approximately 2000
feet (610 m) upstream from the project area. In the southeast quadrant a gas station and
convenience store are present.
Basin-wide Assessment Report
There aze two monitoring stations on the South Yadkin River. One station is located about
6 miles (9.72 km) upstream of the project area. It was sampled in August 1986, July 1989,
August 1994, and August 1996 and received classifications of Good, Excellent, Excellent, and
Good, respectively. Another station is located about 20 miles (32.4 km) upstream of the project
area. It was sampled in August 1996 and was classified as Excellent.
Point Source Discharge Permits
There is one permit issued to dischazge in the South Yadkin River as of January 2002 (NCDENR
2002). The Davie County Water System holds Permit N00024872 to dschazge from the
Cooleemee Waste Water Treatment Plant about 2000 feet (610 m) upstream of the project azea.
This is a Major Municipal permit classified as "Municipal, Lazge".
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Alternative 1 would fill approximately 63 lineaz feet (19 linear m) of UT2 and 161 lineaz feet (49
lineaz m) of UT3 as described above.
Project construction may result in the following impacts to surface water resources:
• Increased sediment loading and siltation as a consequence of watershed vegetation removal,
erosion, and/or construction.
• Decreased light penetration/water clarity from increased sedimentation.
• Changes in water temperature with vegetation removal.
• Changes in the amount of available organic matter with vegetation removal.
• Increased concentration of toxic compounds from highway runoff, construction activities and
construction equipment, and spills from construction equipment.
6

• Alteration of water levels and flows as a result of interruptions and/or additions to surface
and groundwater flow from construction.
NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be implemented,
as applicable, during the construction phase of the project in an effort to ensure that no sediment
leaves the construction site.
BIOTIC RESOURCES
Terrestrial Communities
Maintained Landscape Community
This community covers the area along the road shoulders, commercial azeas, and pastures or
lawns within the project area. This community is dominated by fescue (Festuca sp.), ground ivy,
(Glechoma hederacea), plantain (Plantago sp.), and other various grasses and weeds. In
roadside areas and in transitional azeas along the periphery of lawns and pastures, other species
such as blackberry (Rubes sp.), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), crown vetch
(Coronilla varia) and vazious asters (Aster spp.) become the dominant species. A few scattered
trees are found in the pasture area, including red cedaz (Juniperus virginiana), American
sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and northern red oak (Quercus rubra).
The animal species present in these disturbed habitats are opportunistic and capable of surviving
on a variety of resources, ranging from vegetation to both living and dead faunal components.
American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), European stazling (Sturnus vulgaris), and American
robin (Turdus migratorius) aze common birds that use these habitats. The azea may also be used
by the woodchuck (Marmota monax), Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), various species
of mice (Peromyscus spp.), Eastern garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis), and American toad (Bufo
americanus). No livestock were observed in the pastures on the day of the site visit.
Floodplain Forest Community
This community occurs along the banks of the South Yadkin River. Canopy species include box
elder (Ater negundo), American sycamore, silver maple (Ater saccharinum), willow oak
(Quercus phellos), river birch (Betula nigra), white ash (Fraxinus americana), and American
elm (Zllmus americana). Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) is the primary shrub species and
Japanese honeysuckle, blackberry, and muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia) aze the dominant vines.
The herbaceous layer consists primarily of violet (Viola sp.), ground ivy, and wild onion (Allium
sp.). This community probably represents a mazginal example of a Piedmont/Low Mountain
Alluvial Forest described by Schafale and Weakley (1990). The TNC classification is most likely
an I.B.2.N.d.3 Acer negundo Temporarily Flooded Forest Alliance.
Raccoon (Procyon lotor) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) tracks were observed in
this community. Other mammal species that can be expected include white-footed mouse
(Peromyscus leucopus), and eastern mole (Scalopus aquaticus). On the day of the site visit,
Earth Tech biologists observed the following bird species; eastern phoebe (Sayornis phoebe),

blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata), northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), white-throated sparrow
(Zonotricha albicollis), and American goldfinch (Carduelis tristis). Other bird species that can
be expected include great blue heron (Ardea herodias), belted kingfisher (Megaceryle alcyon),
eastern towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus), and Carolina wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus). The
species of herpetofauna that can be expected include eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina),
northern dusky salamander (Desmognathus fuscus fuscus), and northem water snake (Nerodia
sipedon sipedon).
Mesic Hardwood Forest Community
A mesic hardwood forest community is located on the south side of the South Yadkin River
adjacent to the floodplain forest community. This area is dominated by American sycamore,
sweetgum, tulip poplar, white ash, and black willow (Saliz nigra). Other dominant species
include Chinese privet, blackberry, Japanese honeysuckle, and cross vine (Bignonia capreolata).
A small portion of this community directly across from a convenience store has been disturbed
due to clearing, and is now regenerating as a dense. thicket. This community probably represents
a marginal example of a Basic Mesic Forest (Piedmont subtype) described by Schafale and
Weakley (1990). The TNC classification is most likely an I.B.2.N.a.24 Liriodendron tulipifera
forest alliance or I.B.2.N.a.22 Liquidambar styrac~ua forest alliance.
Mammal species that may be commonly seen in this community include eastern cottontail
(Sylvilagus floridanus), gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), and Virginia opossum. Bird species
expected here may include tufted titmouse (Pares bicolor), Carolina chickadee (Pares
carolinensis), gray catbird (Dumetella carolinensis), and downy woodpecker (Picoides
pubescens). The black rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta) and spotted salamander (Ambystoma
maculotum) are also likely inhabitants.
Piedmont Hardwood Forest Community
A very small area on the north side of the South Yadkin River and on the east side of NC 801
between the maintained landscapes contains a Piedmont hardwood forest community. This area
is used as pasture, and has a sparse herbaceous layer of fescue. The shrub layer is also sparse and
is generally composed of red maple (Ater rubrum). The other dominant species include northern
red oak, American beech (Fagus grandifolia), American sycamore, and tulip poplar. This
community probably represents a marginal example of a Basic Mesic Forest (Piedmont subtype)
described by Schafale and Weakley (1990). This community contains elements of the TNC
classifications of I.B.2.N.a.17 Fagus grandifolia - Quercus rubra - Quercus alba Forest
Alliance and I.B.2.N.d.9 Fagus grandifolia temporarily flooded forest alliance
Because of the small size of this area, the animal species that utilize this community will be
similar to those found in the maintained landscape community.
Aquatic Communities
Within the project area, the South Yadkin River is amid-gradient, fourth-order stream. On the
day of the site visit, the water was muddy with high levels of suspended sediment. Because of
s

high water conditions the bed material was unable to be sampled, however it is presumed to be
gravel, sand, and silt. The riparian community is mostly. deciduous trees and mixed evergreen-
deciduous shrubs. No rooted aquatic vegetation was observed.
According to Kin Hodges, District 7 Fisheries Biologist with the North Cazolina Wildlife
Resources Commission (NCWRC), the South Yadkin River was sampled in Apri11994,
approximately 3 miles (4.86 km) downstream from the project site. During this survey the
following species were collected: white perch (Morone americana), white bass (Morone
chrysops), striped bass (Morone saxatilis), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides),
pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus), bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), black crappie (Promoxis
nigromaculatus), flathead catfish (Pylodictis olivaris), channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus),
fieryblack shiner (Cyprinella pyrrhomelas), and white shiner (Luxilus albeolus). A time
limitation on in-water construction activities (similaz to a construction moratorium) may be
required. The tentative time limit is to exclude in-water construction activities from Mazch 15
through June 30 of any yeaz. This limit is to accommodate NCWRC concerns for spawning
activities of white perch, white bass, lazgemouth bass, and black crappie. It is anticipated that
NCWRC Habitat Conservation Division biologists will review the project plans during the
permit process and recommend whether these time limits will actually be necessary. Such items
as bents to be constructed in the water will affect the need for time limits.
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Terrestrial Communities
Terrestrial communities in the project area will be impacted permanently by project construction
from clearing and paving. Estimated impacts are based on the length of the alternate and the
entire study corridor width. Alternate 1 was considered to be approximately 80 feet (24 m) wide
and approximately 1300 feet (396 m) long. Table 1 describes the potential impacts to terrestrial
communities by habitat type. Because impacts are based on the entire study corridor widtli, the
actual loss of habitat will likely be less than the estimate.
Table 1. Estimated Area of Impact to Terrestrial Communities
Area of Impact in Acres (He ctares)
Alternate 1
Community Permanent
Maintained Landscape 0.62 (0.25)
Floodplain forest 1.02 (0.41)
Mesic Hazdwood Forest 0.52 (0.21)
Piedmont Hazdwood Forest 0.00 (0.00)
Total Impact 2.16 (0.8~
Destruction of natural communities along the project alignment will result in the loss of foraging
and breeding habitats for the various animal species that utilize the azea. Animal species will be
displaced into surrounding communities. The plants and animals that are found in the upland
communities aze generally common throughout the Piedmont of North Cazolina.
9

Aquatic Communities
Temporary and permanent impacts to aquatic organisms may result from increased
sedimentation. Aquatic invertebrates may drift downstream during construction and recolonize
the disturbed area once it has been stabilized. Sediments have the potential to affect fish and
other aquatic life in several ways, including the clogging and abrading of gills and other
respiratory surfaces, affecting the habitat by scouring and filling of pools and riffles, .altering
water chemistry, and smothering different life stages. Increased sedimentation may cause
decreased light penetration through an increase in turbidity.
Wet concrete should not come into contact with surface water during bridge construction as it
can adversely affect aquatic life. Potential adverse effects will be minimized through the
implementation of NCDOT Best Management Practices for Protection of Surface Waters.
JURISDICTIONAL TOPICS
Waters of the United States
Wetlands and surface waters fall under the broad category of "Waters of the United States" as
defined in 33 CFR § 328.3 and in accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). These waters aze regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USAGE). Any action that proposes to dredge or place fill material into surface waters or
wetlands falls under these provisions.
Characteristics of Wetlands and Surface Waters
The Cooleemee, North Carolina National Wetland Inventory (NWI) map shows no wetlands in
the project vicinity. No jurisdictional wetlands were observed within the project area during the
field evaluation. The South Yadkin River and two tributazes meet the definition of surface
waters, and aze therefore classified as Waters of the United States. UT2 is an ephemeral channel
and does not meet the definition of jurisdictional surface water. The channel of the South
Yadkin River is 75 feet (22.5 m) wide within the project area. The unnamed tributaries UTl and
UT3 aze 6 feet (1.8 m), and 8 feet (2.4 m) wide, respectively.
Bridge Demolition
Demolition and removal of a highway bridge over Waters of the United States must be addressed
when applying to the U.S. Corps of Engineers (COE) for apermit. Aworst-case scenario of
dropping components of the bridge in the water is assumed. NCDOT's Standazd Specifications
for Roads and Structures will be followed. To meet these specifications, NCDOT shall adhere to
Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface ~~~aters, as supplemented with Best
Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal.
The South Yadkin River in the vicinity of the proposed project is Class C water; therefore no
restrictions are imposed on watershed development activities. The South Yadkin River has not
10

been identified as a special resource water, and does not contain any threatened or endangered
species, however, it is associated with fish migration, spawning or larval recruitment. For these
reasons, Case 2 applies to the proposed project and certain limits on in-water construction
activities apply. See the attached Project Commitments (Greensheet) for details.
The superstructure consists of a reinforced concrete deck and girders supported by reinforced
concrete piles and caps. The existing bridge end bents are protected by spill-thmugh abutments
armored with rip-rap. Two reinforced concrete abutments are in the water. There is a potential
for reinforced concrete components of the bridge to be dropped into the Waters of the United
States during construction. The maxunum potential fill is 390 cubic yards (298 cubic meters).
The streambed in the project area is most likely gravel, sand, and silt. These conditions in the
stream raise sediment concerns, therefore a turbidity curtain will be considered.
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
No wetlands occur within the project area; therefore no wetlands will be impacted by the
proposed project.
Anticipated surface water impacts fall under the jurisdiction of the USACE and the DWQ. Table
2 shows the impacts to the South Yadkin River and UT 3 within the project area. A corridor
width of 80 feet (24.4 m) is assumed.
Table 2. Estimated Area of Impact to Jurisdictional Surface Waters
Water body Width in Feet
(Meters) Impact in Lineaz
Feet (Meters) Impact in Square
Feet (Meters)
South Yadkin
River 75 (22.2) 80 (24) 6000 (1800)
IJT3 8 (2.4) 160.9 (483) 1287.2 (386.2.)
Total Impacts -- 240.9 (72.3) 7287.2 (2186.2)
Permits
Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters aze anticipated from the proposed project. Permits and
certifications from various state and federal agencies may be required prior to construction
activities.
Construction is anticipated to be authorized by Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 23, as
promulgated under 67 FR 2020, 2002; January 15, 2002. This permit authorizes activities
undertaken, assisted, authorized, regulated, funded, or financed in whole or in part, by another
Federal agency or department where that agency or department has determined that, pursuant to
the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions
of the National Environmental Policy Act:
11

• the activity, work, or dischazge is categorically excluded from environmental
documentation because it is included within a category of actions that neither
individually nor cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment;
and
• the Office of the Chief Engineer has been fiunished notice of the agency's or
department's application for the categorical exclusion and concurs with that
determination.
This project will also require a 401 Water Quality Certification No. 3361 or waiver thereof, from
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) prior to issuance of the NWP
23. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act requires that the state issue or deny water certification for
any federally permitted or licensed activity that results in a discharge into Waters of the United
States. Final permit decision rests with the USACE.
Avoidance, Minimization, Mitigation
The function of avoidance, minimization, and mitigation is to restore and maintain the chemical,
biological, and physical integrity of waters of the United States by avoiding impacts, minimizing
impacts, and rectifying impacts. Each of these three aspects (avoidance, nnimization, and
compensatory mitigation) must be considered sequentially.
Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and practical possibilities of averting impacts to
waters of the United States.
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practical steps to reduce the adverse
impacts to waters of the United States. Implementation of these steps will be required through
project modifications and permit conditions. Practical means to minimize impacts to surface
waters and wetlands impacted by the proposed project include:
• Decreasing the footprint of the proposed project through the reduction of median width,
ROW widths, fill slopes and/or road shoulder widths
• Installation of temporary silt fences, earth berms, and temporary ground cover during
construction
• Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control BMPs for the protection of surface
waters and wetlands
• Reduction of clearing and grubbing activity in and adjacent to water bodies.
• Judicious pesticide and herbicide usage
• Possible use of turbidity curtains during construction of permanent bridge bents
• Use of a temporary work bridge instead of a construction causeway or haul road across the
South Yadkin River
• Implementation of a proposed time limitation on in-water construction activities (similaz to a
construction moratorium) from Mazch 15 to June 30 of any yeaz in order to minunize impacts
on fish migration, spawning, and larval recruitment into nursery azeas.
Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until anticipated impacts to waters of the
United States have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent possible. Appropriate
12

and practicable compensatory mitigation is required for unavoidable adverse impacts which
remain after all appropriate and practicable minimization has been required.
Because this project will likely be authorized under a Nationwide Permit, mitigation for impacts
to surface waters may or may not be required by the USACE. In accordance with the Division of
Water Quality Wetland Rules [15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h)] "Fill or alteration of more than one
acre of wetlands will require compensatory mitigation; and fill or alteration of more than 150
linear feet of streams may require compensatory mitigation." Written approval of the final
mitigation plan is required from NCDWQ before the regulatory agency issues a Water Quality.
Certification. Furthermore, in accordance with 67 FR 2020; 2092; January 15, 2002, the US
Army Corps of Engineers requires compensatory mitigation when necessary to ensure that
adverse effects to the aquatic environment aze minimal. The size and type of proposed project
impact and function and value of the impacted aquatic resource are factors considered in
determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation. Final
compensatory stream mitigation requirements will be determined by the US Army Corps of
Engineers under the statutory provisions of CWA § 404 and the January 15, 2002 Final Notice of
Issuance of Nationwide Permits.
There are no wetland impacts associated with this project. A total of 751ineaz feet (24.6 m)
of the South Yadkin River are located within the project azea for the proposed project. In
addition, 160.91ineaz feet (48.3 m) of UT3 aze also located within the study corridor. If the final
length of stream impact is greater than 1501ineaz feet (45.7 m), compensatory mitigation may be
required. The environmental regulatory agencies will ultimately provide final permit and
compensatory mitigation decisions for the project.
Rare and Protected Species
Some populations of plants and animals aze declining either as a result of natural forces or their
difficulty competing with humans for resources. Rare and protected species listed for Rowan and
Davie Counties, and any likely impacts to these species as a result of the proposed project
construction, aze discussed in the following sections.
Species Under Federal Protection
Plants and animals with a federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened ('T), Proposed
Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) aze protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973; as amended.
The USFWS lists 2 species under federal protection in Rowan County, and one species for Davie
County as of May 31, 2002, and February 11, 2003, respectively. These species aze listed in
Table 3 below.
13

Table 3. Species Under Federal Protection in Rowan and Davie Counties
Common Name Scientific Name County Federal
Status
Vertebrates
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Rowan T
Vascular Plants
Michaux's sumac Rhus michauxii Davie E
Schweinitz's sunflower Helianthus schweinitaii Rowan E
Sources: USFWS 2002
Key: T = Threatened, E =Endangered
NOTE: In addition to the above list for Rowan and Davie Counties, a survey was conducted for
the Carolina heelsolitter (Lasmigora decorata). This survey was conducted due to the USFWS
listing of the species for the Yadkin River Basin.
A brief description of the characteristics and habitat requirements of each species follows, along
with a conclusion regazding potential project impact.
Haliaeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle) Threatened
Family: Accipitridae
Date First Listed: Mazch 11, 1967 (Endangered)
Date Down Listed: July 12, 1995 (Threatened)
The bald eagle is a large raptor with a wingspan reaching 7 feet (2.1 m). Adults have a dazk
brown body with a pure white head and tail, whereas the juvenile plumage is chocolate brown to
blackish with white mottling on the tail, belly and underwings. Adult plumage is fully acquired
by the fifth or sixth yeaz.
The bald eagle is primarily associated with coasts, rivers, and lakes, usually nesting neaz lazge
bodies of water where it feeds. It preys primarily on fish, but will feed on birds, mammals,
turtles, and carrion when fish aze unavailable.
In the southeast, the nesting and breeding season runs from September to December. Lazge nests
up to 6 feet (2 m) across and weighing hundreds of pounds aze constructed from large sticks,
weeds, cornstalks, grasses, and sod. Preferred nesting sites are usually within one-half mile of
water, have an open view of the surrounding azea, and are in the lazgest living tree, usually a pine
or cypress. Excessive human activity may exclude an otherwise suitable site from use. Wintering
areas generally have the same characteristics as nesting sites, but may be farther from shores.
"Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region" have been
prepazed by the USFWS (1987). A Primary Zone extends 750 to 1,500 feet radius from nest, and
a Secondary Zone extends 750 feet to one mile radius azound nest.
Biological Conclusion:
No Effect
14

In light of the USFWS's "Habitat Management Guidelines for the bald eagle in the Southeast
Region", on July 12, 2002 Earth Tech biologists conducted a seazch for bald eagles, their nests,
and suitable foraging sites within a 1..5-mile (2.43 km) radius of the project azea. No eagles or
eagle nests were observed. The South Yadkin River is of mazginal size to provide an adequate
food source for bald eagles. In addition, the canopy over the river is somewhat closed, and
would impair foraging activity. Other lazge ponds aze within the search area, but are generally
too small and shallow to support foraging activities. No suitable nesting sites were observed
within this search area. In many places, the edges of water bodies have been cleazed due to
residential or agricultural practices. The remaining wooded areas azound the River and ponds are
covered in hazdwoods. Furthermore, the azea surrounding the bridge is highly developed which
creates excessive levels of disturbance for nesting or foraging eagles. A review of the NHP files
did not reveal any records of bald eagles in the project vicinity. It can be determined that the
project will not impact this threatened species.
Rhos michauxii (Michaua's sumac)
Family: Anacardiaceae
Federally Listed: 1989
Endangered
Michaux's sumac or false poison sumac is a densely hairy colonial shrub with erect stems, which
are 1 to 3 feet (0.3-0.9 m) in height. The shrub's compound leaves are narrowly winged at the
base, dull on the top, and veiny and slightly hairy on the bottom. Each leaf is finely toothed on its
edges. Flowers aze greenish-yellow to white and aze 4 to 5 parted. Each plant is unisexual. With a
male plant the flowers and fivits aze solitary, with a female plant all flowers are grouped in 3 to 5
stalked clusters. The plant flowers from April to June; its fruit, a dull red drupe, is produced in
October and November.
Michaux's sumac grows in sandy or rocky open woods in association with basic soils.
Appazently, this plant survives best in azeas where some form of disturbance has provided an
open azea. Most of the plant's remaining populations aze on highway rights-of--way, roadsides, or
on the edges of artificially maintained clearings. Other populations aze in areas with periodic
fires, or on sites undergoing natural succession. One population is situated in a natural opening
on the rim of a Carolina bay. Currently, the plant survives in the following North Cazolina
Counties: Richmond; Hoke, Scotland, Franklin, Davie, Robeson, and Wake.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
No suitable habitat exists in the project azea for Michaux's sumac. The soils within the project
azea range from strongly acidic to neutral, and are generally not rocky. No individuals of this
species were observed on the day of the site visit. A seazch of the NHP database found no
occurrences of Michaux's sumac in the project vicinity. It can be concluded that the project will
not unpact this endangered species.
15

Helianthus schweinitzii (Schweinitz's sunflower) Endangered
Plant Family: Asteraceae
Federally Listed: 1991
Schweinitz's sunflower is a rhizomatous perennial herb that grows from 3 to 6 ft (1 to 2 m) tall
from a cluster of carrot-like tuberous roots. Stems are usually solitary, branching only at or above
mid-stem. The stem is usually pubescent but can be neazly glabrous; it is often purple. The
lanceolate leaves are opposite on the lower stem, changing to alternate above. They aze variable
in size, being generally lazger on the lower stem, and gradually reduced upwazds. The
pubescence of the underside of the leaves is distinctive and is one of the best characters to
distinguish Schweinitz's sunflower from its relatives. The upper surface of the leaves is rough,
with the broad-based spinose hairs directed towazd the tip of the leaf. From September to frost,
Schweinitz's sunflower blooms with comparatively small heads of yellow flowers.
The species occurs in clearings and edges of upland woods on moist to dryish clays, clay-loans,
or sandy clay-loans that often have high gravel content and aze moderately podzolized.
Schweinitz's sunflower usually grows in open habitats not typical of the current general
landscape in the Piedmont of the Cazolinas. Some of the associated species, many of which are
also rare, have aimities to glade and prairie habitats of the Midwest. Other species aze associated
with fire-maintained sandhills and savannas of the Atlantic Coastal Plain and piedmont. The
habitat of this sunflower tends to be dominated by members of the aster, pea, and grass families,
an association emphasizing affinities of the habitat to both longleaf pine-dominated sandhills and
savannas of the southeastern coastal plain and to glades, barrens, and prairies of the Midwest and
Plains.
Biological Conclusion No Effect
Suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower does not occur within the project area, and no
individuals of this species were observed. The adjoining terrestrial communities do not include
any of the natural community types associated with this species. Soils of the area are of low
quality to support this species. Furthermore, NHP records show no occurrence of this species
within 2 miles (3.2 km) of the project site. The proposed project should have no effect on this
species.
Lasmigora decorata (Carolwa heelsplitter)
Mussel surveys were conducted 900 feet (300 meters) above and 300 feet (100 meters) below the
bridge crossing. The survey was conducted on August 20, 2002, by NCDOT biologists Jeff
Burleson, Tim Howell, and Tom Dickinson. No live mussels were found during the 2.25 man-
hour survey period.
Biological Conclusion No Effect
Given the survey results, it is appazent that the Cazolina heelsplitter does not occur in the project
footprint. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program does not list any known locations within
the proximity of the project. In conclusion, project construction will not affect this species.
16

Federal Species of Concern and State Status
Federal Species of Concern (FSC) aze not legally protected under the Endangered Species Act
and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed
or listed as Threatened or Endangered. Table 4 includes FSC species listed for Rowan and Davie
Counties and their state classifications. Organisms that are listed as Endangered (E), Threatened
(T), or Special Concern (SC) on the North Cazolina Natural Heritage Program list of Rare Plant
and Animal Species aze afforded state protection under the State Endangered Species Act and the
North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979. However, the level of protection
given to state-listed species does not apply to NCDOT activities.
Table 4. Federal Species of Concern in Rowan and Davie Counties
Common Name Scientific Name County State
Status Habitat
present
Vertebrates
Cazolina darter Etheostoma collis collis Rowan SC YES
Robust redhorse Moxostoma robustum Rowan
Davie SC NO
Insects
Cherokee clubtail Gomphus consanguis Davie SR NO
Vascular Plants
Virginia quillwort Isoetes virginica Rowan SR-L NO
Heller's trefoil Lotus helleri Rowan
Davie SR-T NO
Georgia aster ster georgianus Rowan C NO
Sources: Amoroso, ed., 2002; LeGrand, Hall, Finnegan, 2001
Key: SC=Special Concern, SR=Significantly Rare, L=limited range or endemic, Tzare throughout range
Two elements listed by the NC NHP occur approximately two miles from the project site. The
Fourth Creek floodplain, listed as a State Priority Area, and a Floodplain Pond Natural
Community both occur south of the project site along Fourth Creek.
No FSC species were observed during the site visit, and none are recorded at NHP as occurring
within 2 miles (3.2 km) of the project azea.
VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A. Compliance Guidelines
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
of 1966, as amended, implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
-Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at Title 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106
requires Federal agencies to take into account the effect of their undertakings (federally funded,
17

licensed, or permitted) on properties included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register
of Historic Places and afford the Advisory Council a reasonable opportunity to comment on such
undertakings.
B. Historic Architecture
The area of potential impact was surveyed for historic azchitectural resources, in accordance with
recommendations of the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). A Concurrence. Form for
Properties not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places was signed on October 18,
2001 (see appendix). Thus there will be no effect on historic architectural resources.
C. Archaeology
The SHPO recommended that no azcheological investigation be conducted for this project. Thus
it is judged that there will be no effect on archeological resources.
VII. GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of an inadequate bridge
will result in safer traffic operations.
The project is considered to be a Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope and
lack of substantial environmental consequences.
The bridge replacement will not have an adverse effect on the quality of the human or natural
environment with the use of the current North Carolina Department of Transportation standazds
and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No change in
land use is expected to result from the construction of the project.
No adverse impact on families or communities is anticipated. Right-of--Way acquisition will be
limited. No relocatees aze expected with implementation of the proposed alternative.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project is not expected to
adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the azea.
The proposed project will not require right-of-way acquisition or easement from any land
protected under Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966.
The Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981 requires that all federal agencies or their
representatives, to consider the impact of land acquisition and construction projects on prime and
important farmland soils. These soils aze determined by the US Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) based on criteria such as potential crop yield and possible level of input of
economic resources. The project will result in the conversion of a small amount of land but the
18

azea to be converted is void of agricultural uses. Therefore, no further consideration of impacts to
farmland is required.
This project is an air quality "neutral" project, so it is not required to be included in the regional
emissions analysis and a project level CO analysis is not required. If vegetation is disposed of by
burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations of the
North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC
2D.0520.
Noise levels could increase during construction but will be temporary. This evaluation completes
the assessment requirements for highway traffic noise of Title 23, Code of Federal Regulation
(CFR), Part 772 and for air quality (1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and the National
Environmental Policy Act) and no additional reports are required.
An examination of records at the North Cazolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of environmental Management, Groundwater Section and the North
Cazolina Department of Human Resources, Solid Waste Management Section revealed no
hazardous waste sites in the project area.
There are underground storage tanks located at a service station in the southeast quadrant of the
project. It is anticipated that these tanks will not be disturbed by the construction.
Both Rowan and Davie Counties are a participants in the National Flood Insurance Program. The
crossing is in a designated flood hazazd zone, where a detailed study has not been performed
under this Program .There are no practical alternatives to crossing the floodplain area. There are
no buildings located on either the upstream or the downstream floodplain, which consists
primarily of woodlands. The proposed project is not anticipated to increase the level or extent of
upstream flood potential.
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that no substantial adverse environmental
impacts will result from implementation of the project.
19

~w..
;... ~:.
~r,
Mile ""'"'%
~-~. - -
~ ~~ ~, -~
~~yH _~ rGwle ~'~~
~f r~ O W q ~~N~3.~.~.eti'~' -~~c
""' t.r~ri • une.Ni ~r~
~wrON~~ rp.. ~ GMO MNI r"r~ 1,
~~.u~rK -North Carolina Department of
~~~ Transportation
` , .Division of Highways
~~ , ~i Project Development d Environmental
oF,~.~" Analysis Breach
~~
Rowan County
Replace Bridce No. 80 on NC 801
Over South Yadkin River
8-4256
Figure 1

~.oo~;i: g north
across Eri~~c
\'o. ~~
Looiinc south j
across Bride
` ~o. &Q j
~:_=: 'north Caroiin« Department of Transporatior.
E Di~•ision of HigF.~r2~•s
;~~~- ` P.*ojcct De~~rlopment & En~•ironmentz! Anaiysis
'~="~l~ Brsnch
t.a,,.E-
Rowan-Dz~-ie Coanties
RepEace Bridae'So. SO on'.\C fifll
O~~er Soot:! ~'adi:in Ri~'er
B-'•..E
i-i~ttre TEtree

~- ,
t
~1' ..sutr.
a s y'
~ ~~~
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Archives and History
Lisbeth C. Evans Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
Mazc~130, 20(11 -
MEMORANDUM
To: William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development nvironmental Analysis Branch
From: David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
Re: Replacement of Bridge No. 80 on NC 801 over South Yadkin River,
TIP No. B-4?~6. Davie County, ER 01-7913
In December 2000, April Montgomery of our staff met with North Carolina Department
of Transportation (NCDOT) staff for a meeting of the minds concerning the above
project. VJe reported our available information on historic architectural and
archaeological surveys and resources along with our recommendations. NCDOT
provided project area photographs and aerial photographs at the meeting.
Based upon our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the meeting,
we offer our preliminary comments regarding this project.
In terms of historic architectural resources we are awaze of one historic structures located
within the area of potential effect:
Bridge No. 80
We recommend that an historic architectural survey be conducted for this project.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based on our
present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources which may
be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, will be affected by
the project construction. Vde, therefore, recommend that no archaeological investigation
be conducted in connection v~~th this project.
Loesfion M~ Addroa Telepiaae/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount SL. Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone] •733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount St. Raleigh NC X613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4613 • [phone] .715-4801
SURY£1' & PLANNING 515 N. Blount SL, Raleigh NC 4618 Mail Service Center. Raleigh NC 27699-4618 [phone] •715801

Page Two
William D. Gilmore
March 30, 2001
The above comments .are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for
Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have any questions concerning
the above comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, Environmental Review Coordinator,
at 919 733-4763.
CC: Mary Pope Furr
Tom Padgett

Federal Aid # BRSTP-801(1 ~ TIP #B-4256 C'ozrnty: Rowan and Davie
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Project Description: Replacement of Bridge No. 80 over NC 801 over South Yadkin River. Rowan and Davie
Counties
On October 18, 2001, representatives of the
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
^ North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
^ Other
Reviewed the subject project at
^ Scoping meeting
^~ Historic architectural resources photograph review session,•'consultation
^ Other
Afl parties present agreed
^ There are no properties over fifty ~•~ars old ~~~ithin the projects area of potential effecu.
^ There are no properties less than fir't`• years old which are considered to meet Criteria Consideration G within the
projects area of potential effects.
There are properties over fifiti• years old within the proiect•s .area of Potential Effects (APE). but based on the
historical information available and *.he photographs of zach propem~. the propem• identified as (List Attached) is
considered no[ eligible for the National Register and no further evaluation of it is necessary. ~(Z1toG~E -$~ ~
^ There are no National Register-listed or Stud~~ Listed propenies within the project's area of potential effects.
^ All properties greater than 50 years of age loca[ed in the APE have been considered at this consultation, and based
upon the above concurrence. all compliance for historic architecture with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 1? 1-12(a) has been completed for this project.
^ There are no historic properties affected by this project. (.9ttach am• notes or documents as needed
Signed: ~
" ~-Lg-ol
Representative, N DOT Date
~ ~i
FHWA, for the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency
Date
Representative, HPO Date

~~~(~/~-

State Historic Preservation Officer

H d ,w °'.y
~T ~ ~[ O
•,,,. n
~~ pw+~~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTN~NT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Transition Manager
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Dear Sir:
January 7, 2005
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
° ~~ ~L~a b
~D
JAN 2 6 2005
wEriAN~'E~~y~q~
Subject: Request for Mitigation Confirmation for replacement of Bridge No. 80
on NC 801 over South Yadkin River, Federal Aid No. BRSTP-801(1),
State Project No. 8.1632101, WBS Element No. 33598.1.1, Rowan-Davie
Counties, Division 9, TIP No. B-4256
The purpose of this letter is to request that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) provide confirmation that you are willing to provide compensatory
mitigation for the project in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
signed July 22, 2003 by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), and the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT).
This bridge replacement project is located on NC801 over the South Yadkin River along
the Rowan/Davie County line. There are four jurisdictional streams that will be impacted
due to the construction on this project: the South Yadkin River and three UTs to the
South Yadkin River (UTI, UT2 and UT3). The South Yadkin River and UTl are
perennial streams and only the UT1 will have impacts requiring mitigation. UT2 and
UT3 to the South Yadkin River are intermittent streams and not subject to mitigation
according to the USAGE and DWQ.
The NCDOT proposes to replace the 368 foot Bridge No. 80 with a new 400 foot, 4 span
pre-stressed concrete girder bridge approximately 50 feet north of the existing bridge. The
bridge replacement will not have permanent impacts to the South Yadkin River. There
will be 51 linear feet of permanent impacts to UT1 due to fill associated with bank
stabilization.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
2728 CAPITOL BOULEVARD
PARKER LINCOLN BUILDING, SUITE 168
RALEIGH NC 27699

Impacts to jurisdictional resources have been avoided and minimized to the greatest
extent possible as described in the permit application. The bank stabilization at the UT1
will impose 51 linear feet of impacts to the stream. These impacts will need
compensation for mitigation provided by the EEP Program. A copy of the permit
application can be found at
http://www.ncdot. org~lanning/pe/naturalunit/Applications.html.
This project is located in the Yadkin River Basin (YAD04 and YAD06 sub-basin, HUC
03040102). The following compensation is requested from the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program:
Compensatory mitigation is proposed to consist of mitigation provided by the EEP
for the 51 linear feet of impacts to UT1 to South Yadkin River (a warm water
stream) on the Rowan/Davie County line.
Please send the letter of confirmation to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer (USAGE Coordinator
Division 9) at U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, (6508
Falls of the Neuse Road, Raleigh, 27615-6814). Mr. Alsmeyer's FAX number is (919)
876-5823. The current let date for the project is May 17, 2005 for which the let review
date is March 29, 2004.
In order to satisfy regulatory assurances that mitigation will be performed; the NCDWQ
(North Carolina Division of Water Quality) requires a formal letter from EEP indicating
their willingness and ability to provide the mitigation work requested by NCDOT.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Carla Dagnino at
[phone]
Sincerely,
~~.
h
Gregory .Thorpe, Ph.D.,
Environmental Management Director
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Cc: Mr. John Hennessy,. Division of Water Quality
Mr. Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USAGE Division 9
Mr. Bruce Ellis, NCDOT
Ms. Laurie P. Smith, CPA, NCDOT, Program Management

..~
r ~co~ stem
~~ a ~~~
~~
Pl20GItAM
February 7, 2005
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
D S ~ c~ ~'
~°~'1
Q~c~~oe~~
FEB 1 4 2005
DENR -WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWIilER BRANCH
B-4256, Bridge 80 over South Yadkin River on NC 801, Rowan
and Davie Counties; Yadkin River Basin (Cataloging Unit
03040102); Central Piedmont (SP) Eco-Region
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) will provide mitigation for the 51 feet of unavoidable stream impact
associated with the above referenced project.
The subject project is not listed in Exhibit 2 of the Memorandum of Agreement
among the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North
Carolina Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District dated July 22, 2003. The EEP is only committed to provide the
mitigation needs for projects listed on Exhibit 2 during the first two years of the program;
however Amendment 1 details how non-Exhibit 2 projects may be swapped for an
appropriate project included on the Exhibit 2 list. Specifically, Amendment 1 states that:
"Exhibit 2 may be modified if requested jointly by NCDENR and NCDOT, and
approved in writing by the USAGE. In no event may the total projected impacts
of projects per cataloging unit on Exhibit 2 exceed the total projected impacts of
projects per cataloging unit on Exhibit 2 as it existed at the time of the original
execution of the MOA, July, 2003."
In this case, the NCDOT has not proposed to swap this project for an appropriate
project included on the Exhibit 21ist. However, EEP currently has surplus riverine
wetland and stream mitigation with sufficient assets to cover this years projected
mitigation requirements plus the mitigation for the above referenced project. Therefore,
the EEP intends to provide compensatory riverine wetland and stream mitigation up to a
_ _ ~~
_ _ .~. .. ,. _ _ ~ NC ENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program,1652~Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0416 / www.nceep.net

2:1 ratio in Cataloging Unit 03040102 of the Yadkin River Basin. Mitigation sites
currently containing surplus stream mitigation assets consists of, but not inclusive of, the
Shepherd's Tree and 5-Mile Branch Mitigation Sites.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at [phone].
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Director
cc: Phil Harris, Office of Natural Environment, NCDOT
John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-4256

`'~~--
-ECQ ~~~Ill
PRQGRAM
January 25, 2005
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-4256, Bridge 80 over the South Yadkin River on NC 801,
Rowan and Davie Counties
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) will provide stream mitigation for the subject project. Based on the
information supplied by you in a letter dated January 7, 2005, the impacts are located in
CU 03040102 of the Yadkin River Basin in the Central Piedmont Eco-Region, and are as
follows:
Stream Impacts: 51 feet
The subject project is not listed in Exhibit 2 of the Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) among the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
the North Carolina Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Wilmington District dated July 22, 2003. The EEP is only committed to
provide the mitigation needs for projects listed on Exhibit 2 during the first two years of
the program; however Amendment 1 details how non-Exhibit 2 projects may be proposed
for EEP mitigation acceptance. Specifically, Amendment 1 amended Section IX.A. by
adding the following language:
"Exhibit 2 may be modified if requested jointly by NCDENR and NCDOT, and
approved in writing by the USACE. In no event may the total projected impacts
of projects per cataloging unit on Exhibit 2 exceed the total projected impacts of
projects per cataloging unit on Exhibit 2 as it existed at the time of the original
execution of the MOA, July 22, 2003."
~+'~~,'~
NCaENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 165 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27649-1652 / 919-115-0416 / www.nceep.net

In this case, NCDOT has not proposed to swap this project with an Exhibit 2
project with similar attributes and impacts. Therefore, mitigation for the project must be
provided for under the conditions of Section X of the Tri-Party MOA. The EEP currently
has surplus mitigation in the CU sufficient to cover this years projected mitigation
requirements plus the additional compensatory stream mitigation for the 51 feet of stream
impacts associated with this project. Therefore, EEP agrees to accept responsibility to
provide compensatory stream mitigation up to a 2:1 ratio in Cataloging Unit 03040102 of
the Yadkin River Basin.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
~ ~~
Y
William D. Gilmore, P.E.
Director
cc: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USAGE-Raleigh
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-4256

Q'~~~
NCDENR
v~~c$~
~~~~~~~
~,
~~ ~~~~~
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
July 26, 2004
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Director
NCDOT-PDEA
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
JUL 3 0 2004
war~r~ i~uH~irY sECr~oN
Subject Project: ,B.4256,'Yadkin/Rowan Counties
Bridge No. 80, Highway 801
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Mitigation Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0506(h)
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
On June 29, 2004, John Hennessey, Beth Barnes, Polly Lespinasse, and Sue Homewood conducted an on-
site determination to review three stream features located adjacent to NC Highway 801 at Bridge No. 80
on the Yadkin/Rowan county line for applicability to the mitigation rules (15A NCAC 2H .0506(h)). The
features are labeled as UT 1, UT 2 and UT 3 to the South Yadkin River on the attached maps initialed by
Sue Homewood on July 26, 2004.
The Division of Water Quality (Division) has determined that the feature labeled as UT 1 on the attached
map is perennial and subject to mitigation rules, and that the feature labeled as UT 3 on the attached is
intermittent and not subject to mitigation rules. These on-site determinations concur with the
determination made by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) on May 12, 2004. The Division will
defer to the USAGE stream determination made for UT 2. This on-site determination shall expire five (5)
years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division or Delegated Local
Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the mitigation rules may request a
determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the
Director in writing c/o John Dorney, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650. Individuals that dispute a determination by the Division or Delegated
Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the mitigation rules may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby
notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party (including downstream
and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. The Division recommends that the applicant
conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made in a timely manner. To
ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714.
This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
~aturall~

Dr. Gregory Thorpe, PhD, Director
July 23, 2004
NCDOT Project B-4256
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation requirements and does not approve any
activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. If you have any additional questions or
require additional information please call Sue Homewood at 336-771-4600 extension 252 or at
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
v
Attachments: Location Map
cc: Carla Dagnino, Office of Natural Environment, NCDOT - PDEA
$rian Wrenn, Wetlands/401 Transportation Unit
Polly Lespinasse, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
WSRO File Copy
Central Files

i
'' ff ~~ wys;wyg://18/http://www.topodzone.com/pr...ize=m&symshow=n&layer-DEZG258cdatum=nad83
1/~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
/~y~!/~~y f ~,' ~ i r C, + '.F~1,'•;•j : l` i , r~'1l A w i`~ I 'I r ~,.:- rL'"-J ~ ;'~ ,'~;, t
COQ~I~Mi0Q9a-Ci1b,kL ,..~~~ I ,''i`~ i ~,j~ ~ f`f`.14 std.. - ~."..
~- f
_ ~"~'"~- ~'~9 _ •~sll 1 11 ~ T 1 ~j *.._ •i! ,~r ,. 'r r+.~''. +, ~ is
~ .f ~','C`i ~ ~,~, ~ - 1 r ~~rilf ~,~'~~t 1 / f ~ EI `~*• ~ y .y ~ a - 4 ~ ,
(,!1l 11 ~f ` 1
//J f `' tl r {f r
,rl, c1,~~~~/J 1 l i `I ~ ~i- I r _ ~~ ~
iti ~ ,~i f~.f.~ ~ ~ev _ ~. Cam.. ~ ~. 1/ ,, p f~`'... ~:~~ Ir{ .: ~ r. i ~ 1 . !
r~ ~~ ~ ~ } r~ t ~
y' ~x 1 i ~ kmY t ~. m' .'i2i '~. Y ttl~y ~ .~ r
,j Yr ,_,~`x1~~'r , ~ 3'~~ ~~~~ f ~~c,Y~ ~ . a u,~' aft,. ~Z~{,~,~._ i ^~_ y~V ~ .J~ ~. / t i
i~ r V. _ 4z- ~ ~' ~ r-
k Y Y~
f ~~ ~ _
,'~ ~ `~ ~`~,. iT-~~'' Vii- ' £d, ti,~ a '~' .. -"~
t r ~ ~
,}±_, f !- ,. :~ ai..h ~ ~ r ,`~ ~,tr 1 ~ ( rte'
'kf ~-, ~1 ~ u r ~,. ~ ~ ~,
i_
tlYy. - } S-+~-7FT.:"~," ^ ~ !'~ ` -C- „t .rtr--- t'e I ~'~ l
~`~~ ' !!'`. ~J'r ~ 4 E .a, vs .4zt~ ~. __ ~~~1- f-+-1~ y f _
l r +
i ~_l~~ ~.~ /~ ~ t i ++,
d~ .• ~ P ~ ~ ~ -~` ~' ~ ~. ~ t - +
J t r - ," ~ ~-- 11 - ,'r~~''~ -~~ "~~ •.
~•_ f ~`~ ~ ~` V 1. ~tif i~ t ll
l~~ ~ ; :I r M>K
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 km
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 mi
Map center is UTM 17 540125E 3962156N (WGS84/NAD83)
Cooleemee quadrangle
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum
~,:~
G
M=-~.~q6
r=u .'~6
3/23/2004 9:02 AM

~~-4~9-' ~5 11:16 FF3~C1-DENT EEF '~197152D4~1 T-~'~~ FIB; ~ U-~1r~1
r
._ ~ ~~~~
~~a~R~M
February ?, 2005
Mr. Eric AIsrneyer
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Fa11s of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Catalina. 27615
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer:
Subject: EEF Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
.,~._
~~ ~ ~~~ ~:~ l~
B-456, Bridge $0 over South `Yadkin River on NC $O1, Rowan
and Davie Counties;lYadkin River Basin (Cataloging Unit
03040102); Central Piedmont {SP) Eco-Region
The purpose of this letter is to notify you thak the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program. (EEP) will provide mitigation for the 51 feet of unavoidable stream impact
associated with the above referenced project.
The subject project is not ]fisted in E~thibit 2 of the Memorandum ot'Agreement
among the North Carolina Department of Enviranmez~t and Natural Resources, the North
Catalina Department of Transportation, and the IJ. S. Army Carps of Engineers,
Wilmington District dated July 22, 2003. The EEP is only committed to pravide the
mitigation needs for projects listed pn Exhibit 2 during the first two years of the program,
however Amendment 1 details how non-Exhibit 2 projects may be swapped far an
appropriate project included on the Exhibit 2 list. Specifically, Amendment 1 states that:
"Exhibit 2 may be modified if requested jointly by IYCDENR and NCDOT, and
approved in writing by the USAGE. Tn no event may the total projected impacts
of projects per cataloging unit on Exhibit 2 e~cceed the total projected impacts of
projects per cataloging unit on Exhibit 2 as it existed at the time of the anginal
execution of the IV1QA, July, 2Q03."
In this case, the NCDOT has not proposed to swap this project for an appropriate
project included an the Exhibit 2 Iist. I~owever, EEF currently has surplus riverine
wetland and stream mitigation with sufficient assets to cover this years projected
mitigation requirements plus the mitigation far the above referenced project. Therefore,
the EEP intends to pravide compensatory riverine wetland and stream mitigation up to a
r ~vrv~G
North taralina Ecosystem Enhancement Program,1652 Mail Service tenter, Raleigh, NC Z~699-1652 J 419-71S,OA76 / www. nceep.net
FEB-9-2BG5 WED 18:45 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 3

Cn~-aS-' ~5 11;1 ~ FfiC!M-DENF~ EEP 519 ~ 15~:~ct~t1 T-'~~'_~ F'Lt4 11-4~,1
2:1 ratio in Cataloging Unit 030401Q2 of the Yadkin River Basin. Mitigation sites
currently containing surplus stream mitigation assets consists of, but not inclusive of, tha
Shepherd's Tree and S,Mile Branch Mitigation Sites.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at (919} 715-2929.
Sincerely,
~~
iiliam b. Gilmore, P, E.
EEP Director
cc: Phil ~iarxis, Office of NatuKai Environment, NCD4T
John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-4256
FEB-9-205 WED 10:45 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLAhJDS P. 4

,..'i
''~ ~,~j:
:' k.
r
~z~"
• kE
'`r:
~':+
. )s: rs~
R +r.. ~~ 45 hJ',?
t°
f R ~ !+N.dl~.A• ~~ `j~
1 T i~~_~t~r~ser ~r
~^•v'T3}„~ ~~ yew ,•:
,F~
~"
~ c < ~ _
5
~
~
' 11 $
r
~ 'L
r F a ;
p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F
~ ~
e p y~
~ ~~ ~

i ~
SCy ~'~~i~{ : ~~u~ F . ~. ..w i ~~ ~
~?S .iY ~: !h s
~'
~ ~1~ ~ F
- ~ .:+'' A J J:
WA°
'~~y ~ ~ 3 ~
~.~
~
J
~
A~~4 ~ 'a~~l'~
. ~~
a s ,
YYY
~
t .V .. ~,: ~
F SST -
~

I
_~
* 5 T.~j ~
~ $
r ~
-
~ ~`~~~
~
~ ;
YI

~'°
6, ~~
~ ~ ~~

!~~ }

1
i
~ i ~ r~V~ `t
~
'.
~ ~~:~ S ~~ ~

x ,
?r
~ s
p ~
'
~.
f
r
6 ~`~
r ~
~ d ~ ~
'
~ ~
''~''
~ W ~ ~
'y4 T3}
~~`
r ~• ,
F ~ ~
rig ~ _ ~
$
F~ '~ ~
~ `
'
~ ~ J
f
r'. ~,
~..~: Kx ~': N ! Y'
l~
t
}}[[
J
~ ~
~f~

~ ~ tr
~7
~~~ v
' ~

M
~
)
~
A
~
li.1M ~ rJ~
; 7~ uJ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ S
1 ~ ~ ~~ ~' ~
~
~ 3 ~ ~~ S
"~~.tv_
•~
~ r i
~ P k t ~ j

H H•
W L
1
W O
w
r{x
~k
?
-~y,' ~~
T
`V ~
Q ~
i '~F.
`' '
1 Q .~
tt
I{ 0
~anr~l ur>1P~'-~, y~nog

~.I
In
0
G

a:
K:\51390\GIS\f2_~4256.mxd
rti'
~t
t y ~.
F .~ t~ r
t:
'b
/~ j.
~
~ a
'~ ~t
~ ~ \~ '

~.~'
~oz ~~ A
3~~,':t Z~
~~~
CD ~
-.
- ~ .-. ~ ~
.,
~ ~
~
C.n

o

~ ' .
-~
~~~ D

~
~
~ p
~_~ ~ ~
';
"
.
~:

~ z O C CQ JO L J ~ ,~ ~
y~ G
^ @i'
~
~ ~ ~ Z
CD ~ ~ ~
c ~
m ~ ~ a ~~
Q ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~
~' ~~~

T

~

~ h
1
~
V/ ~ ~ ~ O i'
r
F f ~~~ ~®~

~

z

D A> O +'~~ *

D v F~,~
' ~,~~
1~.ry
~
~
'
~ ~,
W O y
? ,
~,
~
~
}~~~
~
~~'1~"
'
~
l a
a 4
@
~
~
F
._
1 $ ,.
~m '~
~
~* `~~ ~ ~~~u~Q
~~k
~
W 4~
a
~~~ i ~ ~fyd 'S f
~` ~F f M.
~
~
~ My-~Rl)

~ ~
n t. ' .~ ~ Rp.
~
X. 3^C,
~ {
-~ ~ r its ;:Y'

/~
~'
~b~ 4
r
4~pa
`~ ~
~'fi[
~4~ ;1 F hut, f
r r~"," ~ d `.I
~~1
~,,
y ~ J
S ~yj11t'if ~'1~
~~ ,1
~ ~ ( ~ )
~~ ' ~ ~ tt ~ 6k ~Y
J + M ~4 f
'I~gtt'S ~~ , ~ i 'il lei 41
~~
~ ,':6.. ,k~ ~F
Fit .
' •R 'A .. ~~''~ ~
~ ~ ~
`~t ~~1~'~4~+1^k r
~~ ~ ~ 4 t
.a .. .u .~. ...

/..~..~.
i.. `I ~, l;,;I.µ~
+l"1
S ~;
~~.y ,.
61 ti,
~, t u
,~L~~~~'~+
,. _~.y'~~~iJ
F{ .R^ ~ ,. ~ . I
1~ e~ 1
1
r f k .' `,
3 ...
(~

tD

..,
t)

D
~
©w ~~, \~Atll1 9l lf~.
r~~
- ~~~
I r r'~
~h
~~ r ~ cl~'~,
~iIOH tl5,~ .
-
(-, ~'~ M O n
~ ~ '~1, Q
M~
to .~ ni
~ a .a ,
,~ ;R~ (~ a
,~r U• a cr'
cx~ m b uy ~ °, o 0
d. ~ ~ .r!
tjl n7 C7 Ip~ ro r: .7." t1.
j
~
~
!Q7 M
v. ,n, cx~ Cl ~
~,
..
~ s ty
c.

~y ~ ~'
y
"' m
~ ~
;I
'
; ~
!U ~ 1 I'7 re
~

,y ,
-.
-

'fj on

.~. 1- c
~
M
7
f f~

D ro
:ti
is
(
r-~
~~I
0 ~0
..,tw f
^~^
,J
fV
a~n!t.l ~a~~~r~~~ ~1} S
a
w

'~ dl a 1 r r ,yk
b
y`I ~ a
'
~
~ e F ~ ~
~~A`~!4~' ~"~~ M1u,4,1~ " .
`
y~
~
28
~
r4 ~
~~~ I~ x`13755
1~3'~
~
'~'
~ r
~
} F NMr! p! I,yrU: ~;;
~r~JJ11~y~ a yi
`~
~~~
~_,,
~''~'
i
1
~~c~~,
r ~i
tl,~
1
~t t i
'
.,
~~ v: • y ,~ ~~ r
n e'
..~ y~ r BSI yl~ r~ #~ y r ~~;~~~"~~ ~ 1 .
.
, ~
~. ~r`~
.'3 ~ ..
v h
~
'
' 1 ` i~ ( 1 .f.
~~
y
r~7r nl . ~5 'y
1
~:
~
~
'
q ~,~. ~
y~~:X
,r~ f'.
~ ~, .
VIN
Y, ~l~U~~w.~Yl
{ ! ~Y~r !
ll~ ~
k ga~
s'~r4~ ~
,
~
~~~
~
V
1
, ~~ ~
,
~ ~
~
~
~ a
rip.
aa 3 Syr. l' F ``~ 1' ~
~
}
5 6' r
.1 ^
~ -~,
~
~o
~
~
.
,~ I{ ~. 5"Y ~ .
~X
~ , ~ L 4 ..
< a*r ~~
..
,i
~C~Sr~ o _
r }
a A y'~'w`{YxXt, 4~yTr
~~
~~ t4
~
l'
~ "

,N 9~i ~
er
i r,. t
~
~
~ ~P
k
i
7N
`'~ 1 ~ r
F
j -a~ 1 ,
..
r B t
~
~i
.
1~t~
~
-~~~
~,~~, i
,
i
r .
145
,s ~
I
y
~
.
. ty r ~.
s,~..
y
,
i~M" e
r
~
.

~,y~ ~ c,
~
bFF i A: I
Q r
~.. ~ 4 y ~a ~¢
^
~ '
1 *Sfi7
,y~i ('
~'I
~ r4~ ~
1> V Y"+~ • tt3M
t' y ~{,
p .~,j ~ i35. Y.
~

,. ifI ~4 y~. ~ ~ S~Ql
¢ }
b ° l t.'
r~ ~~~4M:
y
1 v ~r
,
`~

k y~
1,
~ y d,,
~~
~
::
I A 1
,{ h
1; r
Y t +„ L x
~~S
1 5 4 ir` ~
M
k
fl
5~ ~I ~ I
~~p
s F
~ 1~1 ~1 ~r,.x ~ 9 ', 2'., i e
; w '
N F ,
jt
~
o-~,; ~~`~
~
~
~
~
,
~
~/ ~ 4 ~., 4yrt
'
~''iJ~ ~ ~` ~ 1 app' fr .fy `N}
1 ~. r ;_ A
t •
5 _91P: . ~ <. ~ 1. ~ ~~ 4~ .. ~
r r4 ~ G t ~Ni »Ea'
.~,. f, , r.u .A~. d
y 1
r/~
~~,,
,7: ih !
3

A
~O
ti
~I
N
N
O
V
i •~
See Sleet 1-A For Index of Sheets
See Slxet 1-B far Cornentional SymCols
g
~O
~ ` rQ w
__
,, ,
~~_; ~;

U
! o !~ 1
W
I,
I ~ to I COOLEEMEE N
I I ~i-TOWN LIMITS
\, W
-L_ ~
I,
-~-
/G~
STA. 12+60.04 -L- BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4256
~_
l°
o
TowN uMrrs
'i'WlJV -L-
~rd~e
:~..~
i ~
NC BOl
-_ -
,-
,
aun aAn vaan-r e~c~ce Na ~' '~'°`,
.C. 8 -4256 1
rt~n nia.Na xwwau.xa aenu+oN
33598.1.1 BRSTP-801 P.E.
33598.2.1 BRS1P~01(1) RW
33598.3.2 BRSTP~016 CONST

~ 5
°, M~~~ I~
x.00 -L ~~ T i
8-4256 / ~ ~-~
r
/ I ~
i ~ !~/ \ \
PRELIMINARY PLANS
-0 NOT U98 POA CON9TPVCTIDN
NCDOT CONTACT: CATHY HOUSER,P.E.PROJECT ENGJNEER -DESIGN SERVICES
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH
ADT 2005 = 6000
50 25 0 50 100 ADT 2025 = 10000 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4256 = 0.273 mi
DHV = 10 % LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 8-4256 = 0.076 mi
PLANS D = 60 %

T =
5 % " TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4256 = 0.348 mi
50 25 0 50 100
'• V = 50 MPH
PROFILE HORIZONTAL) "" V = 60 MPH
TTST 2% DUAL 3%
to ~ 0 l0 20 "" DAVIE CO.
""'
PROFILE (VERTICAL) ROWAN CO.
~~~ ll Jl.s ®ll ld ®~ 1L ~ `1~~~®~JL~~
~~~~~~®101 ®]F ~[~~l~~A~Y~
ROWAN-DAVIE COUNTIES
LOCATION: BRIDGE N0.80 OTTER SOUTH YADKIN RIVER ON NC 801
TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURE, AND PAVING
Prepared 1a the Offlce c4:
WANG ENGINF,ERING COMPANY, INC.
CARY, N.C.
rox xoxrs cuo~nw n~exn~r or rmv
ma saumuxn sr~acerroxs
RIGHT OF A'AY DATE: GREG S. PURVIS, P. E.
MAY 21.2004 P1O~'
BETTING DATE: SCOTT L. KENNEDY
MAY 17.2005 ` °~S°" °W'n'~"
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER Y DIVISION OF JTTGIIWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ROADWAY D1i.SIGN S'~~~ ~~+
ENGIXEF.R DRPARTMENT OF TRANSFORTATTON
FI~ERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRA2T0]
VICINITY MAP

STATF ~DF N®RT][~ CAR®]LINA
IIIVISI®N ®F HI~HIWA~S
I11 tDEX OF SHEETS

`S.U.E = SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEER ~][QI~~g®~ ®~, ~~~~~~~~
CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS

~ ROADS f~ RELATED ITEMS

Edge of Pavement ..... _... _... ......._. -____-- MINOR Recorded Water Line
_ _ _

Curb .._ .
-____--
Head & End Wall
_ _._ ...........

_..._
coN~w1
Designated Water Line (S.U.E.") -w-w-

w

Prop. Slope Stakes Cut _.
_. .. _-- ~ _-
- Pipe Culvert
_
------~ _. ...
Sanitary Sewer ._........ --
--w--

Prop. Slope Stakes Fill ..... _ . ....
_ _ _ F _ _
_ Footbridge .. .....

~---------`---c
Recorded Sanita Sewer Force Main
rY ss-ss-

-{ss-FSS

Prop. Woven ire Fence .._.........._..........
__....._.
$-$-

Drainage Boxes_ ................._.............. _.............

........ ~ ce

Designated Sanitary Sewer Force Main(S.U.E.' -

)__FSS -FSS--
Prop. Chain link Fence ... _... __......... ~ ~- Paved Ditch Goiter _ .........
_
._.._ Recorded Gas Line
rap. ire Fence ...__ ................. ~_
......_..... ____--
Prop. Wheelchair Ramp

..._._ .............._..... ..
®
............._ C Designated Gas Line (S.U.E.*) . _ ......................_. _
~- -0- -
Curb Cut for Future Wheelchair Ram
P
.._...._ _. ~
CF UTILITIES Storm Sewer ................._....._...__......................._ -s-S-
Exist. Guardrail .... _ ...._ ~ ~ ~ _ Exist. Pole Recorded Power Line ._... ._._ ... ___._ ... -,~-
Prop. Guardrail .. ..
_ .....
. East. Power Pole ._ .. _.. Designated Power line (S.U.E.') _. _ ~- ~- _
Equality Symbol _ _ ..... ~ Prop. Power Pole .. __ .. _.. . _... d Recorded Telephone Cable _... _........_ -T-T-
Pavement Removal Exist. Telephone...Pole. _ .... __.. .t Designated Telephone Cable (S.U.E.")
......... _
__ _.....

RIGHT OF WAY
..._ _... _
®
Prop. Telephone Pole ............

Exist. Joint Use Pole

-o- ._....._ ,

Recorded WG Telephone Conduit _ _T- -T- -

rc-rc-

Baseline Control Point
~ ...
Prop. Joint Use_Pole... ~ Desi noted IJ~G Tele hone Conduit S.U.E.'
9 P ( )
- -TC--rc- -
. ....
Existing Right of Way Marker _.___ _
0
Telephone Pedestal..
_. .. ~

o
Unknown Utility (S.U.E.') _ ...._..
-wn~~-

Exist. Right of Way Line w'Marker _ .
-__8_-- IJ~G Telephone Cable Hand Hold....... _..... H
~ Recorded Television Cable _._..__. -TV-1~-

Prop. Right of Way Line with Proposed Cable TV Pedestal ... __....... _....... ....._. © Designated Television Cable (S.U.E.*) ........... __Tw- TY-
- -

RrW Marker (Iron Pin & Cap) IJ~G TV Cable Hand Hold........
' ~ Recorded Fiber Optia Cable _.. _ . _.... -fo-FO-
......... . _._ ...__ _~,_ Ly(
, power Cable Hand Hold.
_... „H
~ Designated Fiber Optia Cable (S.U.E. )

Prop. Right of Way Line with Proposed
Hydrant...__ _ .. _ __
~ .....
Epst
Water Meter -_f0 O FO-
(Concrete or Granite) RAW Marker _.. .._ ._...
---~-- Sate ite Dish ...
_
Y .
USG Test Hole (S.U.E.')
East. Control of Access Line __....
_
-'~?-'- E~ost. Water Vabe .........
_
Sewer Clean Out

+0 _ _..

Abandoned According to WG Record . _ ~

Arrow
Prop. Control of Access Line --~- .._ ...
Power Manhole . _. ..._ ...... _ . ........ © End of Information . ..... .. e.o.~
Exist. Easement line _ _ _.. ._ ---_ -e____-_ Telephone Booth .....
_.. _._
~

Prop. Temp. Construction Easement Line ..._
__ -E
Cellular Telephone Tower .....
_ ~ BOUNDARIES f~' PROPE RTIES

Prop. Temp. Drainage Easement Line ..._ Water Manhole _._..
~
® State line ._.... ...._ ....._ .__. .... _ -___--
_ .... roE_
light Pole ... Cou Line.......
ntf' __ _

Prop. Penn. Drainage Easement Line .. __.....
. -Poe-
H-Frome Pole............ ___.
e-
Township Line . -__--

-------
HYDROLOGY Power Line Tower .. _ _ -~
_ ~ City Line .... _ _ . -_---
Pole with Bose Reservation line _

Stream or Body of Water ...___. _...__ _......

Ri
i
B
B
ff
.
_. _ . _

Gas Valve
__.. o
0
_... __

Property line.._. . - - _ - _ - -
ver
n
as
u
er.. _. _
Fl
A -RSa- Gas Meter _
_ .... _ _. Property Line Symbol ....

R
ow
rrow .._._. - _ ~ Telephone Manhole Exist. Iron Pin ..
__ _ o
Disappearing Stream ..... ~_ _ ....
Power Transformer ~
Pro
party Comer eIP

Spring _ _

'- -~ .. _

Sanitary Sewer Manhole._._.__..

®

_.. 0
_..

Properly Monument __ . _ _ +
_ -

_
~
Swamp Marsh ........ .......... ~ Storm Sewer Manhole

_..
~
s Property Number
_ E
123
S ore ine _.... _. .. -------------- Tank; Water, Gas, Oil _. .. Parcel Number... _. __
_. _ 6
Falls, Rapids _._ _ _..
Prop Lateral
Tail
Head Ditches _. _. ~._ ..-_-. Water Tank With Legs ~-~.( Fence Line __ . _ _. .. -x-x-x-
Ww ~ 'SBW
,
,
_ .
"~ Traffic Signal Junction Box __ .. .... M
_ ~ Existin Wetland Boundaries ......
9 - ---w~a----

Fiber Optic Splice Box
~ Hi h Quali Wetland Bounds
9 h' ry
-HO w.e--
STRUCTURES Television or Radio Tower _ .. _ ® Medium Quality Wetland Boundaries _ _ _ -Ma w~s-
MAJOR Utility Power Line Connects to Traffic Low Quality Wetland Boundaries __ .__ _... ~_a wEe--
Bridge, Tunnel, or Box Culvert
- _
_ r---~oN~ -i Signal Lines Cut Into the Pavement _ _ ...___ _ ._ ~~~~ Proposed Wetland Boundaries _ __ __ _. . W1B_
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall ~ ---J Existing Endangered Animal Boundaries.......... .. ___ EAR __
and End Wall _ _.. _ ... .. )caNC rvw( Existing Endangered Plant Boundaries ___EP9___
BUILDINGS Fy OTHER CULTURE
Buildings
............ ......
......
Foundations ...... _. ... .. _. __.. ~ J i
Area Outline ...... _ ~--~

Gate .... __.. _. __ _ .._. ~
Gas Pump Vent or l4G Tank Cap _.. o
Church _ .._..
School ................._............._........................._.__..... __..
Park ................_....................._........ _........_....__... ... r---,
---~
Cemetery _ _ .... _...._.. _ ~---,
---~
Dam ......... .......
Sign ... _ _ _ _..._... __ ._. _.... o

Well ..... s
o
W
Small Mine ....... __ _ _ ...: .. _. x
Swimming Pool ._ .... _ .... ........._ _ __ __..
TOPOGRAPHY
Loose Surface ._.. _ _ _____ __ ._ -----____--
Hard Surface _ __ _....
Change in Road Surface _ _ _ _ .__....._.....
Curb _.. ___.._ _
Right of Way Symbol _ _....... Riw
Guard Post _ _ _..__ ......__. _ .... ocf
Paved Walk _..... _.. ..... -------------
Bridge _ ....__ _. .. _... ___ _ __ ~~
Box Culvert or Tunnel _ ~ ------------+
-- ----~

Feny __ _ .... .
_.._ - --- ------
Cubert __ __.
Footbridge _ _. ___... _ ...............................
Trail, Footpath . _ _ _.....__.. _.. ,--~._---
Light House
__ ___
.
~
VEGETATION ~
Single Tree ___.. ... . __. _ _ _ ._._. ~
Single Shrub _. _ . _ _ _ _ .. _ ._ ... ..._
Hedge _ _ ..... _.... r
Woods Line ~~
Orchard ___ _. flQQ4€~fJ
Vineyard
__.. ....._ ...___ ~-----,
...... VMEYARO
J
RAILROADS -
----
Standard Gauge . _ ....... ___ ._.._ ___.._....... _

RR Signal Milepost _ __ ..._..... _ ............ _.. CSx rFaVS°aiIPJAN
.._ a
YllfPOSI 15
Switch _ _ .
~~
~eY~S~ UC/UL/W

SURVEY CONTROL SHEET 84256

BL
POINT DESC. NORTH
3 BL-3 749924,256m
2 84256-2 750818.2788
4 BL-4 751263.7650
5 BL-5 752236.5990
BM1 ELEV=685.45
N 750037 E 1537192
CHISTLED SOUARE IN THE NE
CORNER OF A CONCRETE PAD
AT OLD ABANDONED BAR, NOW
BURNING AS R JUNKYARD
L sTAnoN lm•mm
S 63' 29' 31.1' W DIST 507,31
B4256 GPS-I
N=749374.387
E=1536725.371
ELEV=698.40

EAST ELEVATION L STATION OFFSET
1537284.996m 68m.37 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS
1538221.1188 662.87 17.83.20 66.68 RT
1538507,5448 662.37 23.18.83 61.21 RT
1538753.8520 659,04 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS
BM2 ELEV•674.02
N 752227 E 1538922
R/R SPIKE IN ROOT ON THE
NW S[DE OF A 24" WILLOW DAK,
17.25' FROM THE EP OF
CENTER ST.
L STATION 32.58
N 76' 57' 49.4" E DIST 212.18
389 JAS ELEV•661.88
N 751243 E 1538461
LOCATED ON BRIDGE•80 OVER
THE SOUTH YADKIN RIVER, IN THE
NE END OF THE WHEELGUARD OF
BRIDGE. STANDARD TABLET STAMPED
"389 JAS 1965 663"
L STATION 22.76 34 RIGHT
64256 GPS-2
N=750810.278
E=1536221.110
ELEV=662.87
DATUM DESCR IPTIDN
THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT
IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY
NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "84256-1 "
WITH NAD 83 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF
NORTHING:1493143811(ftJ FASTING: 15361253714(ftJ
THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT
(GROUND TO GR IDJ IS: 0,999889750
THE N.C, LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND
LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM
'84256-1" TO -L- STATION 10+00,00 IS
N 45 ° 59'4134 " E 121910'
ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES
VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NGVD 29
E"8D
NOTES:
9~
C
,~~1~ILUE
o T~ ~
~,~~
~~ ~
~j'~`r
~' ~a
eJT
THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING
PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT:
HTTP: ~WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC. USPRECONSTRUCTiHIOHWAY/LOCATION/PROJECT
B4256 LS CONTROL 031209,TXT
SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HA3 NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT.
IF FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.
® INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL
BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEY3 UNIT.
PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM.
NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE
S,P
i~p3
~~
2

---- --
e-4zss __ z
1Y DESIGN PAVPMB~R DESIGN
iR~A BHG9!®l
,ELIM[N~ R7' FLANS
DO N07 USE VO bti5IT(UCTION
EX1571NG
-L- Sta. 12+60,04 to Sta. 16+82.34
-L- Sta. 24+07,79 to Sta. 31+00.00
:XISTING
GROUND
EXISTING
GROUND
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE

C1 PROP. APPAOx. 2.S" ASPNALT CONC. SURFACE COARSE, TYPE x.58,
IAYERBAYEAAOE RATE aF 110 L88 PER 90. YD. IN EACH OF Tlp
PROP, VM. DEPTH ASPHALT CONC. SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SG.5B,
CZ AT M AYEAABE RATE OF 112 LBS PEA sD. YD. PER 1" DEPTH
TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THA
"
N 1.25
OA OREAT81 THAN
1.5" IN DEPTH.
D1 PROP. MPROX. a" ABPWIT CIXIC. INTERMEDIATE COURSE,
TYPE f18.OB, AT M AYERA9E RATE OF 912 LBS PER 90. YD.
PROP. YM. OEPTN MPHALT CONC. INTEAYEDIATE COU118E, TYPF I18.OB
ATM AYERAOE RATE OF 114 L89 PER 90
Y
"

DL ,
D ~Ep 1
DEPTN
TO BE PUCEO IN UYEAS NOT LE88 THM 2
25 OA OAEATEA TXNi
.
4
"
[M DEPTX.
E1 }
q~
y~
"'"'• MPAOx. s.s° ABPXALT CONC. 948E COURSE,
TYPE 825.08, AT M AVERAGE RATE OF 827 LB8 PEA 90. YD.
PROP. VM. DEPTH ABPXALT CONC. SURFACE COINiBE, TYPE B25.OB,
E2 AT M AVERAGE MTE OF 11{ LBH PER 80. '~D PER 1" DEPTN
TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS TNM 9 OR GREATER THNI
6.5" IN DEPTN~
j EMTH MATERIAL
~ EXI9TIN8 PAVEYENi
NOTE: ALL SLOPES I:I UNLESS OTHERRISE SPECIFIED

ROCK PLATING
DETAIL
SHOULDER POIM
2.0 ft I i I ~
2.0 ft ~CLA88 II AIP RM i i i °1
\ 1.6 ft I I I--
YINYIN. 0- YE~ILM j j
TOE OF 8LOPE
I I I
/ ~ ~'S.T
s~~ FABRIC OVERLAP DETAIL
O~ NTS.
FLLTETI FMRIC J
(SEE ~ECIAL
PROYI9ION8)
- _ \
1
J jl/
~p 2.0 ft ~~ ~
10 ft
DYEAIAP
(]F AEOUIRED)
ROCK PLATING DETAIL
N.rs.
DETAIL SHOWING METHOD OF WEDGING
TYPICAL SECTION N0. I
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.IAS FOLLOWS
TYPICAL SECTION N0.2
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.2 AS FOLLOWS
-L- Sta. 17+09.14 to Sta. 18+75.00
-L- Sta. 23+25.00 to Sta. 24+07.79

~~

~

~

~

~

H

ia

s

~

~

~ ~
>
~

r

{-

t

~ „

~ 8

~
x ~ ~ ~
,' ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ y .'~i ~ LOCATION IlT, R7,0R ClT ~ u ~ ~ ~ $ ~ `~
+ FROM p 8 ~ 8 a°. j`

u
TO OTNUCTUREN0. ~6P7~ ~

~

o

~

+

y
8 Y 8
51 TOP RPYATpN ~ ~
~ -~ '
N
8 ~ ~
~ +
~
8 S
~ y¢
°
8 ~
£R 40 "d Ot 8 bt Si ~ ~ INYH1TNElEVATNNI +
+ y~ y ''C
8 & bl tl 8 8 1
OIYE]Q OUT aEVATgM 8 R FS di ~~~ hO9

x gLOFEgIRCAL
$ y4~p

9 ~ E ~ ~ a s i ai D"i ~ ~ R
8 N ~ ~ ~~

~
n

~
~i r r r- r r r ~

A
~
~
+
'
9R
~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ P
3 8 8 ° 8 8 s y
0.064 ry
-

~ o ~ ~
~ ~ 6*' +
~ '
~ Q

~
+s
~
s
o.aa
+y
~
$
y
~
8
8
8
8 ~
A
x x
A
O.OB/ q ~ ~ y ~ y i ~j
1.p
~Y ~ ~
N ~ N
g ~
' g
~ ~
d iA
8 iA
8
8 V $ ~'

0.W! ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~~

~
~

0.0D1
m ~ ~ ~

g
8
~ 'w
~//
y
~
R ~

8
8 m
0.1m ~"yO !^ O
~
V O m O O
•~
_
'
y
at +rNDEDNANPrE ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~
a s +r01DEDRANPWE = y
~
7r6NE DRAM PIPE 8 8 8 g a
~
b Q ~
~
'
8
8
8
8
~
n
~ ~~
~ ~ $ o
~
b ® .b ~j 'w
'w 1
v+
PER EACX IO'TNRU S~
~~ ~
p
$ n

M
N
BTNRU I0.P
>
~ PoIIOMIIUOE
LIRU0111101
~rodL Lr.rava ~

~

~

"C
po a 10.PAND
ABOVE m ~ a~.p,axm Eel ~
a
g
c.asro.6lamoNSro.71Dm
~
„ ~a~ ~~~~ ~ g ti
s
D1810.610.14OR Bi0. 810.10 + + ^
Dl FRA16: ANO GRATE BiD.010.10 ',$
Y.D.I TYPE'A'OTD.010.17OR01071 ~ + ~ ~ j
(q
YDI. TYPE 9.OTO.N0.10.OR /1071 $
'
'.

YD1 TYPE'D' OTD. M0.10 DR 0.10.10 N + + ~~ r
M1M1 i'
YDI FRAME YYfIN GRATE STD. 610.70
H U1

Y.D.L FRAME YYRX TYVD ORATW Bro.0E77

Y.D.L FRAl1ENITN TYPO GNATSero.Ep7!
~ ~S°= 'j
~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ 5 ~
~
~ ~
10'CB PPEf38OYY0 ~
9
{
~~
>~~
i
~m
x
~ Ri
eTEa ORATEAND FRAM Of0.610.77
o
s

~
tRAFFIC BEAwY1 DL MRD.010.81 ~ ~ ~
~ y~ ~j
"
'
~
fi
~~
e
WRR. BT®.FLBOYIi xD.C~ i
~ ~R~~

coMlc. WLLA76 a •e•YD' sro. e4o.77 ~ ~ 8 ~ S
A

C0NGOBIOL7(PAE0.11G.YD'6fD.M0.11

4 d 7 A m q PPE RBIDVAL W~71

~~3Q ~
E
~
~ ~ ~~

~ ~

s ~
m
9

O Q
71
fn

2
m
`~
N
r r
~
s +
s `~
~ c
~
~
s
~ a
,
C
~
~
Y l
~ ~
$ 8 ~~
0
H

y
~ ~ ~ ~

IN RElA7A]NSHIP TO ~A(WAY
-L- -L- '~ -L-
to 13+9172 PlSta 15+1585 '~~~' ~ ~ as,,~,
217' 308 ~ = T 29' 022' fLTI 6S \ dTf±59,68-'',,-' "asb7,jsT
= 160.00' D =2'5!'532' ~ = L60 ®- FILL EXISTING DITCH
=1~~• L = 26!24 Lr = IO6,68'
= 5334' ~ R = ~~ ST =53.34' O
y, DS - 6o Sta. 18+75.00 -L- Sto.19+00.00 -L- N
w°°°S ~ SE = 0.06 ~ n ApprQ~h 8egln ridge
CSStD. (1+0628 Slab '• unRU eAU ~+
STSfa 18+6628 srA 17+Ie k Lr. rD
$!0,14+45,04 2 ROGER P. SPE.LMAN STA 20+RO a. LT
Da T45 P6 ~ a onrta~ ortCN se OETAI ~1 DWCH 1n
_~ 5040' ~~ I JSl0. 1L+0114 ~~ ' ~ `^'~:;~' "'
~
~. +051ro 2697 CY DD! COI6IR
Cro
`~ +85
BO~OKTOF
~
596

,~ II ~ ~~ ..
'
~ I II
'

~ 1
.
ULT® BB+ORE
M
AP
T7
,,,MP IJOm~p~' AY R116 NACW
• aA55 A--
-

~ ~ -~ • ~ ~
~
`~
~~~-
~ ~
i ~ ~ ~ ~
Ai ~ TO
REAWYE e• ~ ewsfiiw WIE, `~ +H30
CIXUA Ni
k +5040
A
Irom brEU 1 TGN N 40
SY FP
,
~
i=-\
"~ `=;~=
= ~ ,
l
~ I D .E
IHW ~}iRUCH
+4544 /SNOI11D81 BBM cun[~. ~
IAE PA
+ ~.C~
_
rI - n
cY~xa
' ~~
s
_ ~ PAOM GURH STA 11+00`lT
TO
~fRI OPIADGF 50N F`
~ 5040
` ~ +5
~-TDE 85
~
Exlsr
R~~ o ~r w~e
~
~ ai
\
~ R 74b9
.
\
a
$ 2
~ 8 _ E'- \ \
5 /fin
/ / ~l
r
so.°o' ~ 4 ~ X CGµI- 7.SC --C - / u, ~ +W 90.00
z z~."'1'foN
II
~2~~ ~ +5540 -C--~ -~ "- _
ANDREW J. PAT9ER'5~0~l.I'~'IR:. w ' r ~ rte' ~'-a~ ~°'`Y -^ _ '^ 4
INE ~Y. PATTE Q ~m R°20 &s7 ~~nrc--._ ~~ ~ _ ~
522 P6 19 1 -'_ a ~j 1 ° ~ ~\ 3 c° °p G4i -G-~
1580 DP NAPS JTa `-_~'GR_ -'~- ~ ~ SO.OO~.' ~ TO Bo°Oi MP4R71,~ ~~.,~~
/ r ~ _ DWG ~ A pgQNi ~5 &sT 1~ ~'-~=3~ 1GI 1~GIIAIE
''~ ~ ~ ~ _
w ~" b it Rm',~ rs X ~
~/ ~ ~ ~m i' ~ r$I~I~I~o ~°IN° cOryL c4x°rr P.GRAU-3~Q'- _S; _~.y1e'~' °rvc
~ 1 .. o, ~1~ ~ ~ STA. RT. ~'--' ~~~
~~/ 'sro ec 1 ~" ~'li;;'n ~ w
I
~/ 1 41C GA ~ ! - -
Ir N i aB4NppryFdNAS ~ , 'KOiI ~ ~
r 1 SBLK BUS. J ~MONIiGRNC ~ ~ i
a e s I 1 wry
m L ' ` GOII ~ TAR amt \ - RFMOYE
m Out _ 1 3@ DEWl2 i'
~I7~II+ 1 J,~ STA.11+70 RF.
~X ~ ~ C~ V - ,/ H ro O ' 20 CY ODE //
~x_- I~ ~ ' ° DDB 719• P6 OMAN Hr
NILLIE J.LA~gY,JR. ~~~ BOOK OF RAPS 776 v '• i
AND WIFE eGS i i l ,
CWt15 gINT29.pG ~Y DETAIL I ; r /
8001( OF NAPS TT6 - LATERAL BASE DITCH 1 , '
~~GlN T P ECT 8-256 Irvor ,~ s~l,~ 1
/ ~ III , 5 11 , •~•,
p/~'~ (~ /~~/~/~~ JON 51tl~
rUl .7t JL TGI/A/7 ~~~ rountl 7;r 0 2d I'/Ft.
I e I MIn.O = I,0 Fi. 00~ .3`
4J B=7.O F7.
e1R ®- PAVEMENT REMWAL o =la.oF+.
cR
.'~ FlA F%KING

I 3
70i1VATE NG OIFaI
MY IIEUI v •> m / /
~
wo°OSB4256 GPS-2
1~ r'"
~ '
-BL-PINC 17+t},~3 c~
STA. 11+83.20 -L- ~
uo ,/
/
Q
66.68' RT.
~
~
DETAIL 2
TAIL DITCH
1 }
I N
1 .1
~
P
~
/
~

-
0
0 $04
8) ~
~
~
.
1
u `0 PO a COOLEEMEE
rwntl
P 0 ti.~
Y ~~P p0'`p•
/ TOWN LIMIT
M In, O = I Ft. `1~ Pp,Op
Y 0
BRIDGE NYDRAUUC DATA

DESIGN DISCHARGE = 22,x'0 CFS
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 50 YR
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 642.4'
BASE DISCHARGE = 26,000 CFS
BASE FREIXIENCY = 100 YR
BASE FAN ELEVATION = 643.8'
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE _ +38A00 CFS
OVERTOPPING FREtA1ENCY= +500 YR
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 6615'
DATE OF S
V
= 8/6/03
UR
EY
WS.EIEVATJON
AT DATE OF SURVEY = 630Y
<IW i . PIS Sto 24+5435 8-4256 4
~ ; 8s =4'58' 292' Rw srsr M D.
&I4
r' Ls = 145.OD• ROADWAY DEIGN MIDAAOIlCS
V ~ LT =9670' ~Mea e~~
~ ST =4837'
y
Q OOLEENfE PARTNERS,LLC
a ~ 4 °B ~ ~ 206 PRELIMIN

~
o :~
Pe a Pc E-M RY PLANS
° St
3 25 -L ~6
u~a
~
i ~ rv~ °~ ~v~«~
g .
m
End Apr h R
AM
ic
Wcuss uEW1vr
i Slob 1ao rats
2DD x ~
~ f
End Brl4 e --
I~Tm
TR oI TRDOGRY ~ T a. 2 3+57b4
a GP "^~
TIIBUTAAI• I I,~~.,•, F .
~!/
~~op
I F-
o
+ tGI VY
n
RAr GAA1E
50m I'r II 6 B, 7 M1
ESP «I• m d
_ ~~
W
~ zW
-~'~"- ~--
OVE i ~ SS
C ) U ~
ti
A0 /I D1A3SJI-- g
/ / ELEV. AIJA X 4
+/- IS TOMS x X~T, R/w
pIR1CNAE IAY
A
EI
WE k
IR D101YATE N G
ROADWAY RLL
'- 151AUCRIRf IAY
81--4
PINC 2 +
MP.GRA
A23+7 U-3 k STA. 23+18.83 -L-
5.00 RT.R?•
`
'~ DREW W. BECK \'
eH
IpppS
O
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Pls Sta 24+54 PI Sta ~
Bs = 4' 58' 292' . ~= 13'
Ls = 145.00' = 6'
' Lr = 9saa L =
48.37' T =
--~... DS
~-~., \
SE = 0.
Doss e ' U-t,
n \ ~PRAS'sT, ~ SCSta. f
rp \ F
Y ~
~ \ +7BL0
P 1S' CS9 6 73D0,1(b!
~~~~ ' exrsr.Riw ,
J~ ~ STA 25+50
~~ ~~ ~~a
~Q ~ 1' ~_

wooos
\+
\ S
~- S
C9
Hy
cf
W! 2GI N%'
~,w
'~„

CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA

DESIGN DISCHARGE = 110 CFS
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 50 YR
'
DESIGN FAV ELEVATION = 6402
BASE DISCHARGE _ !25 CFS

BASE FREQUENCY = 100 YR
BASE IfiY ELEVATION = 6407'

OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE _ +210 CFS
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= +500 YR
'
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 6592
SAG
DATE Of SURVEY = 8/6/03

fLEVATION
WS
.
AT DATE OF SURVEY = 6301'
P1s Sta 27+50,40 /
8s = 458'292' /
Ls = 145AD' //
~~ 9saa /
~sr ~ i
Q ' COOLEENEE PART RSa,LLC
`J GB I!6 PG 206 \~
PB3PC FN
~ PB 6 PG p2-143
~o r\~
M1
~ ~ i~~s
tOJECT 6'4256 \ ~
`OOAO -L- +
EIP \ p `~~
/ \
i Z~~
0
/~~
~Q
EIPI
n C
P a TOMS 3
~ STSta.28+47A3 /
/ $_~
~ " %"°'~

~
% ~
\ m
\

~- esr Pa
____~
j \
'~
~ ~~ BL-5
POT 33+28.83
_~ 15:1 flLL SLO9E
P30M STA 2B+00 TO ~ ~. ~~~
+70LV AIO 1EADW dL6 ~
TRAN /T1ON .. SYA 29+50 k Li
OUR uor6 Wz,AS3 '6'
\ \
ROCER P
$P
\
GUAR RNL REMOVE & ARM
AWRAP 5201oNS 950 SY fl
" .
ILLMAN
AND WIFE
~F -
.. REPLACE
EXIST SEE O6YAA SIH1=:
~ Q
i \
u OEB ~A 58A~ PIL~LMAN
7 .
DRA~
WJ
~...~~ 7865 •6.
~~ PB ] PG RHI
PB 6 PG N2-M3
E
~.
- wooos ~~
arem
YM RCIC +
1 y
~
~ ~

-
_ ` ~
~ ~ \ ~ -

_
_ _ .~
~
~
RRAIN ~ „
r ao.aa cnsr. xrn
y
- - -. _ _ p 4 ~~ p HC EQI 8 245'PMEO :

i --
r I ~

- -i-

'r , ss
--
~ =,m-~- -~
~
- S I~ I s
I ~ 1 ro uccKm~-~
-+ ~~_~_- s e' iC _0®

i
+~ X ~yONOWA~g ~DMD.Bgp le'c° ~ -'---I F-~ 1L'~ o ~C Im _ _~ ~~ ~r' ` ~ \\ '~ V '_r-(}- ~ ~~
1 _ F- CIE Z:7 '+r 1 9 n ~ RHAOVE ~i l t;l ° ~, ~~~ ~, coxc ~ ~ \``~\~ III I .---r w
I N5m - F E ~ PI ~ EIP `~N I ~ ~~ ~ EIP ~ 2 Ewe- \ F1P
o° c, I ~i > ~ /i "oi o ? c EiP'~ra Rw ~ ~ ~z~ ~ ~~ `>ol~ ~; " HENRY J, CLEVELAND
• 5214 °om ~ ~^ ~ m I / la°i A ;g
m I zsro - . ~ yl ~~I zsro - zsvo I'I - i zsvo °'0 \ \ \ AND WIFE
69m I ~ 1 I• i r IP '' 2sFO o a69.LIE ,q CLEVELAND
1~~2 ``II M0A0 x ~~ ~ °i coec \ (J jo i i i ~ zsro m APB 33 PG n-14
75Ll7 ; ~• ~ ~~ - }, f ~, ~ ~ r ~ 9 LARAY J. GRUB& JR. m -
~ 4955 x ~ i ~ r r ~ ~ - .. .. ~ fja AND WIFE o m
I`'I ~ ~` C4NOPY ' ' i a ~ MICHEAL L T . ~ ~~ \ HEILA D. GR _
75 I I I ~• r---- ~ I AND tl C DB,I@~PG 665
RA7L0 Q ~ I h; o ~ ~ ~_ , ~ s.~ ' ~ ~ PBc3' PG II-N
I I ~ ;-- JANET DURANT ~ ~'----_
ANDREW W. BECK I i i°w w ~ ~LLIApMrypE HELLARD _i _ ,~ s~ .. .. EIP s9.~,
Ar0 WIFE m sss i i m ~ s PEGGT W.LARD ~ o ~ ~ ~-- ~ pB p3 PC 61 n2 ~ ~~Er2.5s• r
}~sy~~ ~ P6 3 PG N-N ~ E
BETSY O. BECK \. ss ss ~-'~ ss ss DP6376PGII 1~6 ii i m N s rob \ i \~ N297ao~
LAWAENAE H. BECK ~ \ r sss i I LAWRENAE~H,BECK Nog \ ro \~ 2rza~.E EIP
DAPHNENE. BECK `~ _, I sss ~ ~ DAPHNE E. BECK ~ ~
DB 335 PG N2 ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~~"
5 Dg 35 PC I5q Q , , \ s LAWRENCE H.BECK ~ I~ pg 3 p~ ~2 EiP } ~,P~ACe p /~-~ ~`_
PB S PC 5T ELAINE M, KEARNEY r i Q ` A~ ~ I [N~ CON,STR(ICrION 6~-G.+o
D8 189 PG 22 ~ ~ ss ss DAPHNE. E. BECK r ~ `a
®- PAVEMENT REMOVAL Pe ~ Pc 6-N ~ ~ ^ ~ \ ~~ oa 3~ Pc Mz ~ ~ ~
q ' r ~ PB a Pc 11-M ~, POT Sta. 32+Q~00 -L- ^~ ~ p
ri s` li
RW sNeY No.
ROADWAY DFSION HYDIAULKS
BHGRiEER ENGIN631
PL POP
~ 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

EMBANKMENT COLUMN INCLUDES BACKFlLL FOR UNDERCUT
Stetlon Uncl. Exc. Embt
13+00.00 98 1
13+50.00 188 8
14+00.00 66 31
14+50.00 9 31
15+00.00 33 B
15+50.00 55 2
18+00.00 63 0
18+50.00 BB 0
17+00.00 71 94
17+50.00 40 792
18+00.00 33 1971
18+50,00 15 2808
23+50.00 8 941
24+00.00 26 1737
24+50.00 48 1408
25+011.00 59 380
25+50.00 41 881
28+00.00 10 800
28+50.00 2 897
27+00,00 2 723
27+50.00 2 587
28+00.00 2 479
28+50.00 3 273
29+00.00 4 133
29+50.00 5 177
30+00.00 7 188
30+50.00 21 124
31+00.00 40 75
31+50.00 23 57
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CROSS-SECTION SUMMARY
-w.
Approximate quantities ony. UrxSassified excavation, borrow expvation,
shoulder borrow, fine grading, dearing and grubbing, breaking of exialing
parement aitd removal of existing pavement will be paid for at the lump sum
price for "Grading"
PRELI MINARY PLANS
I)D NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
CROSS SECTION INDEX SHEET
~ LINE ~ STATION TO STATION ~ SHEET TO SHEET ~
X.,