Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0082139_Permit Issuance_20150506OVA NC ENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart Governor Secretary May 6, 2015 Mr. Randall D. Emory, P.E., Director of Water Resources Greenville Utilities Commission 801 Mumford Road Greenville, NC 27835 Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO082139 Greenville Water Treatment Plant (WTP) 1721 Waterway Road, Greenville 27835 Pitt County Dear Mr. Randall: The Division of Water Resources (the Division) hereby issues the attached NPDES permit for the subject facility. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007, or as subsequently amended. The Division understands that you have made no significant changes to your facility since the last permit renewal. We have made the following updates to your previous permit: • removed monitoring for Total Zinc, Calcium and Magnesium monitoring • added continuous flow monitoring • updated Total Residual Chlorine limit to 17 µg/L • updated Aluminum, Iron, Copper, Fluoride, Total Phosphorous, TKN, Nitrate -Nitrite and Total Nitrogen monitoring to quarterly • added updates to facility map and parameter codes • added a re -opener clause in the permit for Whole Effluent Toxicity. Please note that the Utilities Commission will have 18 months from the effective date of this permit to install a continuous flow meter. Until then, instantaneous measurements can be taken noting the flow rate and duration so that the total flow maybe reported on the DMR. Please note that we have included a re -opener clause in the permit for Whole Effluent Toxicity Monitoring [Section A. (4.)]. The Division includes this condition if the permittee has demonstrated toxicity failures during the past permit cycle. Eligibility for Coverage under the General Permit NCG590000 — The Greenville WTP is not eligible for the general permit because there too many failures for toxicity testing. Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must submit 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919-807-63001 Fax: 919.807-64921Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 Internet:: www.ncwater o[g An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer Mr. Randall May 6, 2015 Page 2 of 2 DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates that these regulations will be adopted and is beginning implementation. The requirement to begin reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) intemet application has been added to your NPDES permit. [See Special Condition A. (3.)] For information on eDMR, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit the following web page: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/boglipu/edmr. For information on EPA's proposed NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, please visit the following web site: If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing, upon written request submitted within thirty (30) days after receiving this letter. Your request must take the forth of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of North Carolina General Statutes, and you must file it with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall remain final and binding. Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Resources or any other Federal, State, or Local governmental permits that may be required. If you have questions, or if we can be of further service, please contact Derek Denard at [derek.denard@ncdenr.gov] or call (919) 807-6307. i , Jay Zimmerman, Dire Division of Water Res es, NCDENR Enclosure: NPDES Permit NCO082139 (Issuance Final) he: Central Files NPDES Program Files WaRO Files/ Attn: David May ec: Aquatic Toxicology Unit, Susan Meadows [susan.meadows@ncdenr.gov] NPDES Permit NCO082139 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the Greenville Utilities Commission is hereby authorized to discharge treated wastewater from a facility known as Greenville Water Treatment Plant (WTP) 1721 Waterway Road, Greenville 27835 Pitt County to receiving waters designated as the Tar River, within the Tar-Pamilco River Basin, in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other applicable conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, and IV hereof. The permit shall become effective June 1, 2015. This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on October 31, 20 1 9. Signed this day May 6, 2015. /-Z i ve�;; VIvisS-afZimmerman, Directorion of Water Resources By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Page 1 of NPDES Permit NCO082139 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions described herein. Greenville Utilities Commission is hereby authorized to: 1. continue to operate a conventional technology water treatment plant [coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, and filtration] with discharge of wastewaters from media filter backwash and sedimentation basins with a design potable flowrate of 22.5 MGD and a maximum, monthly average wastewater discharge of 0.800 MGD, with water and wastewater treatment consisting of; • pre settling reservoir (63 MG) • rapid mix tank • flocculation basins • sedimentation basins • ozone contactor basin(s) • multimedia filters • finished water storage tanks • an effluent pump station with an effluent pump and a diesel backup pump • chemical usage consists of [note: note all chemicals currently in use] o alum / aluminum sulfate o fluoride o ammonia nitrogen / chloramines o sodium permanganate o powered activated carbon o copper sulfate o sodium hydroxide o acidic salts o ozone reagents: malonic acid / potassium acid malonate o ortho phosphate o polyacrylamide o sodium hypochlorite o ammonium hydroxide o sodium bisulfate located at the Greenville Water Treatment Plant (WTP), 1721 Waterway Road, Greenville, Pitt County; and 2. discharge from said treatment works via Outfall 001 at a location specified on the attached map, into the Tar River [Stream Segment 28-(94)], currently a Class C; NSW waterbody within Subbasin 03-03-05 of the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. Page 2 of 7 NPDES Permit NCO082139 PART I A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [15A NCAC 02B .0400 et seq., 02B .0500 seq.] During the period beginning on the effective date' of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge filter backwash via Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored' by the Permittee as specified below: j EFFLUENT° LimT5141401t1NG`1= `UIItE~E c�c?�n rSTxc [PTEiR GEODES] �._ lYfonthly daily measurementamp�e ;Sample; .Average Maximum Frequency r Type L'oca �o Flow (MGD) 2 50050 Continuous 2 Recording 2 Effluent Total Suspended Solids (mg/L) C0530 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L Weekly Grab Effluent pH (su) 00400 Not < 6.0 or > 9.0 standard units Weekly Grab Effluent Total Residual Chlorine 3 (µg/L) 50060 17 µgA, 3 Weekly Grab Effluent Turbidity (NTLT) 00070 Weekly Grab Effluent Total Aluminum 4 (µg/L) 01105 Quarterly Grab Effluent Total Iron 4 (µg/L) 01045 Quarterly Grab Effluent Total Copper 4 (mg/L) 01042 Quarterly Grab Effluent Total Fluoride 4 (µg/L) 00951 Quarterly Grab Effluent Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/L) C0610 Quarterly Grab Effluent Total Phosphorous (TP) (mg/L) C0665 Quarterly Grab Effluent TKN (mg/L) 00625 Quarterly Grab Effluent NO SN + NO2-N (mg/L) 00630 Quarterly Grab Effluent TN (mg/L) C0600 Quarterly Grab Effluent Chronic WET Testing 6 TGP3B Quarterly Grab Effluent Footnotes: 1. No later than 270 days from the effective date of this permit, begin submitting discharge monitoring reports electronically using NC DWR's eDMR application system. See Special Condition A. (3.). 2. The Utilities Commission will have 18 months from the effective date of this permit to install a continuous flow meter. Until then, instantaneous measurements can be taken noting the flow rate and duration so that the total flow maybe reported on the DMR. 3. The Division shall consider TRC effluent values reported below 50 µg/L to be compliant with the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina -certified laboratory method (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50µg/L. 4. Samples shall be collected concurrently with WET -test samples. 5. For a given wastewater sample, TN = TKN + NO3-N + NO2 N, where TN is Total Nitrogen, TKN is Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, and NO3 N and NO2-N are Nitrate and Nitrite Nitrogen, respectively. 6. Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) testing - testing of Ceriodaphnia dubia shall be performed as 7-day pass/fail test at 90% effluent concentration, during January, April, July and October [See A. (2)]. Comments: Samples shall be taken at the outfall but prior to mixing with the receiving waters. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or foam in other than trace amounts. Page 3 of 7 NPDES Permit NCO082139 A. (2.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PASSNAIL MONITORING (QUARTERLY) [15A NCAC 02B .0500 et seq.] The permittee shall conduct quarterl chronic toxicity tests using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised December 2010, or subsequent versions. The effluent concentration defined as treatment two in the procedure document is 90%. The testing shall be performed as a Ceriodaphnia dubia 7-day pass/fail test. The tests will be performed during the months of January, April, July and October. These months signify the first month of each three month toxicity testing quarter assigned to the facility. Effluent sampling for this testing must be obtained during representative effluent discharge and shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B. Additionally, DWR Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section/Aquatic Toxicology Branch 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Water Sciences Section no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/.physical measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Water Sciences Section at the address cited above. Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then monthly monitoring will begin immediately. Upon submission of a valid test, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly. in the months specified above. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. Page 4 of 7 NPDES Permit NCO082139 NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. A. (3.) ELECTRONIC REPORTING OF DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS [G. S . 143-215.1(b)] Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must submit DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates that these regulations will be adopted and is beginning implementation in late-*2013. NOTE: This special condition supplements or supersedes the following sections within Part 11 of this permit (Standard Conditions for NPDES Permits): • Section B. (11.) • Section D. (2.) • Section D. (6.) • Section E. (5.) Signatory Requirements 'Reporting Records Retention Monitoring Reports 1. Reporting [Supersedes Section D. (2.) and Section E. (5.) (a)1 Beginning no later than 270 days from the effective date of this permit, the permittee shall begin reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application. Monitoring results obtained during the previous month(s) shall be summarized for each month and submitted electronically using eDMR. The eDMR system allows permitted facilities to enter monitoring data and submit DMRs electronically using the internet. Until such time that the state's eDMR application is compliant with EPA's Cross -Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (CROMERR), permittees will be required to submit all discharge monitoring data to the state electronically using eDMR and will be required to complete the eDMR submission by printing, signing, and submitting one signed original and a copy of the computer printed eDMR to the following address: NC DENR / DWR / Information Processing Unit ATTENTION: Central Files / eDMR 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 If a permittee is unable to use the eDMR system due to a demonstrated hardship or due to the facility being physically located in an area where less than 10 percent of the households have broadband access, then a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements may be granted and discharge monitoring data may be submitted on paper DMR forms (MR 1,1.1, 2, 3) or alternative forms approved by the Director. Duplicate signed copies shall be submitted to the mailing address above. Page 5 of 7 NPDES Permit NCO082139 Requests for temporary waivers from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements must be submitted in writing to the Division for written approval at least sixty (60) days prior to the date the facility would be required under this permit to begin using eDMR. Temporary waivers shall be valid for twelve (12) months and shall thereupon expire. At such time, DMRs shall be submitted electronically to the Division unless the permittee re -applies for and is granted a new temporary waiver by Ahe Division. Information on eDMR and application for a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements is found on the following web page: http://portal.ncdenr.or web/wg/admin/bog/ipu/edmr Regardless of the submission method, the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following the issuance of the permit or in the case of a new facility, on the last day of the month following the commencement of discharge. 2. Signatory Requirements [Supplements Section B. (11.) (b) and supersedes Section B. (11.) (d)1 All eDMRs submitted to the permit issuing authority shall be signed by a person described in Part II, Section B. (11.)(a) or by a duly authorized representative of that person as described in Part H, Section B. (11.)(b). A person, and not a position, must be delegated signatory authority for eDMR reporting purposes. For eDMR submissions, the person signing and submitting the DMR must obtain an eDMR user account and login credentials to access the eDMR system. For more information on North Carolina's eDMR system, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit the following web page: http://porial.ncdenr.or web/wq/admin/bog/ipu/edmr Certification. Any person submitting an electronic DMR using the state's eDMR system shall make the following certification [40 CFR 122.22]. NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED: U certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations. " 3. - Records Retention_ [Supplements Section D. (6.)1 The permittee shall retain records of all Discharge Monitoring Reports, including eDMR submissions. These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the report. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 CFR 122.411. Page 6 of 7 NPDES Permit NC0082139 A. (4.) PERMIT RE -OPENER: WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY [G.S. 143-215.1(b)] Whole Effluent Toxicity monitoring results indicating aquatic toxicity may result in the Division of Water Resources re -opening this permit or requesting by letter that further action be taken. Additional metals testing, a toxicity identification evaluation, a toxicity reduction evaluation, and/or an assessment of discharge treatment alternatives may be requested. Page 7 of 7 Y Waterway Rd Outfall 001 t� [flows southeast] Tar River [flows southeast] \t -1 n ` •dam i Approximate Facility Boundary �� - t "'•0 as • :_` . _ Qd� � � I Jp/ , �rrT-GREE 1 U , • '/' R -.� 13 23 _• — IT 13 Greenville Utilities Commission Facility Greenville Water Treatment Plant Location A 1721 Waterway Road, Greenville NC 278M Seale 1:24,000 Receiving Stream: Tar River Stream Class: QNSW Stream Segmen[: 28-(94) Sub -Basin: 03-03-05 Drainaee Basin: Tar -Pamlico RUC: 03020103 NPDES Permit NC0082139 latitude: 35038'04" Longitude: 77023'55" 1 TTOy,� State Grid/USGS Ouad: E29NW/ Greenville NW, NC 1V h Pitt C011Tlty NPDES PERMIT NEW / RENEWAL V\l (6 ,e^ DRAFT / FINAL 11 CHECK LIST FILE CONTENTS: Facility G-YceHxu. I /c lit. �Y Permit No. Left e: BIMS Tracking Slip NPDES Permit Writer: DEREK DENARD Right Side: ❑ F— /Streamline Package Sheet (to region, only if streamlined) —a"0-Draft Permit Cover Letter. (add new policy text; summarize major changes to permit) Vraft Permit (order: cover; Sup to Cover Sheet; effluent page (s), special conditions; map) Facility Map (E-Map; include facility Outfalls; U and D sample locations) M act Sheet (documents permit writer's issues and/or re -issue logic) ❑✓lermit Writer's Notes (if not in Facts Sheet -- chronology, strategy, DMR Review, RPA, etc.) �/ Staff Report from Region (as appropriate -- not needed if streamlined) Id Permit 9 (Text, Effluent Sheets and Special Conditions) Permit Application. (New Permit or Renewal; any additional permittee correspondence) Ii-l"Acknowledgement Letter (NPDES Unit written response to Renewal Application) ❑ Permittee Responses (to acknowledgement letter, if any) ❑ Waste Load Allocation (reference date; notes if recalculated for current action) N te: Italics indicate special conditions not always required or applicable. BIMS update "initiated DRAFT deer Review Submitted to r tL/P er Review completed by Updated Public Notice Syst [date] _ miffed for Public tice on Regional Staff view [Draft mailed / rr 7 v.n : Date 2 M I% Admin cutoff/ PN date Date_&p AU5 �b is - Newspaper toAV,Pub, v Li + n + El Re Tonal Office Draft Approved by Klj LV r l , L` Updated BIMS Events: Date ? (' 0 Permittee Review [Dr mail /emailed] to I ` `rt 4l 1' � Date_ q/TOX (ATB) Review [Draft Permit a ai to ) A Shy+ 11,k7f I 1�1 Actual Notice date(s) [ J [Ilt ath o�r/v_ , `(^�I�ar� St�rtV +bow Date Comments ments received Date Date 2 ❑ TOX (ATB) Review/Approval by NV Received Date 0M ditional Review [other] J l h t-4' I / FINAL to oh / Tom for signature [date] z�� l S Letter Dated 2 �� Finals Transferred to Server (Permits Folder) �� ?�� f BIMS Final Updates: Events Lintits X /Scan Final Does / PDF (w/ signature)/[Date] S M if BIMS /Limits Double-check Email to Charles . Email Finals to �!� f d✓a ( Y �yy% Date Version 07Nov2014 Denard, Derek From: Bullock, Robert Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 9:54 AM To: Denard, Derek Cc: Vinson, Scott; Tankard, Robert Subject: RE: Draft Permit NC0082139 Greenville WTP Derek, The cover letter has "updated Total Residual Chlorine limit to 17 W This should be ug/l. In the description of the permit the only treatment unit that is used for treatment of discharge water is the sedimentation basin. All other items listed are for treatment of the drinking water and may not need to be listed. These items need to be added to the description: Effluent pump station with 1 effluent pump Diesel backup pump Robbie Bullock W WTP Consultant Division of Water Resources Water Quality Regional Operations 252-948-3843 Phone "E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties" From: Denard, Derek Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 1:48 PM To: May, David; Bullock, Robert; Tankard, Robert; Vinson, Scott; Meadows, Susan; Reid, Steve Subject: Draft Permit NC0082139 Greenville WTP Please find the attached draft permit for NC0082139 Greenville WTP. Please provide your comments, if any, to me no later than April 17, 2015 . AM DerekCDenard Enrfonme wspwas t NCDENR Dwsionof Water Resources W titer Qua[ny pernnm section Comps ,rxe 6 EV-&ed Permittirg ttr:it (919)W7-63W derekdererd@mdeargW 1617 Mti1$nta G--nvr.A Vp.#X 276994617 httpwp aU<::,-. _!::a:rn�.tt;tn-,.,'x E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Cooke COMMUNICATIONS NORTH CAROLINA LLC The Daily Reflector - The Daily Advance - The Rocky Mount Telegram Bertie Ledger- Chowan Herald - Duplin Times - Fannville Enterprise - Perquimans Weekly - Standard Laconic Tarboro Weekly - Times Leader- Williamston Enterprise Check# PO Box 1967 Greenville NC 27835 Date Paid NCDENR 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27699-1617 Account: 116382 Ticket: 39424 A/R Rep Copy Line: Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES Wastewater Permit Lines: 35 Total Price: $90.20 PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT NORTH CAROLINA Pitt County affirms that she is clerk of Daily Reflector, a newspaper published daily at Greenville, North Carolina, and that the advertisement, a true copy of which is hereto attached, entitled Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES Wastewater Permit was published in said Daily Reflector on the following dates: Thursday, March 12, 2015 and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper, document or legal advertisement was published, was at the time of each and every publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and qualifications of Chapter 1, Sec- tion 597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the Z of Chapter 1, Section 597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina. Affinne and subscribed before me this 1 th day of March 2015 (Notary Public Si nature) 0a (Notary Public Printed Name) My commission expires NOTARY PUBLIC Public Notice North Carolina Environmental Manage- ment Commission/NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES Wastewater Permit The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission proposes to permit to the person(s) listed below. Written comments regarding the pro- posed permit will be accepted until 30 days after the publish date of this no- tice. The Director of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) may hold a public hearing should there be a signif- icant degree of public interest Please mail comments and/or information re- quests to DWR at the above address. In- terested persons may visit the DWR at 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC to review information on file. Additional information on NPDES permits and this notice may be found on our website: httpJ/portal.ncdenr.orgtweb/wq/swp/ ps/npdes/calendar, or by calling (919) 807-6304. Greenville utilities Commission applied to renew NPDES permit for Green- ville WTP [NC00821391 discharging fik ter -backwash wastewater to Tar River, Tar -Pamlico River Basin. 3/12115 DENR / DWR / NPDES EXPEDITED FACT SHEET - NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT NPDES Permit NCO082139 Verek Venard, Compliance & 1✓x edited Permitting Unit / 919-807-6307 06Mar201 f - Facilety Information Applicant/Facility Name Greenville Utilities Commission Greenville Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Applicant Address . 801 Mumford Road, Greenville, NC 27835 Facility Address 1721 Waterway Road, Greenville, NC 27835 Permutted Flow, (MGD) Not limited Type of Waste Water Plants and Water Conditioning Discharge — dechlorinated filter -backwash - Conventional WTP System Facility Class. Physical Chemical 1 County Pitt Status; Renewal Regional Office. WaRO :.. Stream Characteristics Receryri ;. g Stream �� Tar River tream Classifcon , .� ah C; NSW Stream`Segment 28-(94) Drainage basin Tar -Pamlico Summer 9Q1,0 (cfs) 0 Subbasm 03-03-05 Winter 7Q10 :(cis) 0 use: Support Aquatic Life 30Q2 (cfs) 0 303:(d Zasfed No Average flow (cfs) 0 S#ate Grid E29NW G {%) 100% USGS Topic Quad Greenville NW, NC Facility Summarx This facility is a conventional technology water treatment plant [coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, and filtration] with discharge of wastewaters from media filter backwash and sedimentation basins with a design potable flowrate of 22.5 MGD and a maximum monthly average wastewater discharge of 0.800 MGD based on data submitted. The facility consists of the following water and wastewater treatment units: • pre settling reservoir (63 MG) • rapid mix tank • flocculation basins • sedimentation basins • ozone contactor basin(s) • multimedia filters • finished water storage tanks • chemical usage consists of [note: note all chemicals currently in use] o alum / aluminum sulfate o fluoride o ammonia nitrogen / chloramines o sodium permanganate o powered activated carbon o copper sulfate o sodium hydroxide o acidic salts Fact Sheet Renewal 2015 -- NPDES Permit NCO082139 Page 1 0 ozone reagents: malonic acid / potassium acid malonate 0 ortho phosphate o polyacrylamide o sodium hypochlorite o ammonium hydroxide o sodium bisulfate Monthly, average FLOW (MGD) — Last 36 months of reported discharge Dec2011-Nov2014: [Ave 0.502 MGD; Maximum, Monthly average flow = 0.800 MGD] Eli ig bility for Coverage under the General Permit NCG590000 — The Greenville WTP is not eligible for the general permit because there too many failures. WET evaluations showing a 67% passing rate for three years (Jan2012-0ct2014) and no failures in the most recent 4 quarters. See attached data spreadsheet. Toxici — With an IWC >0.25%, this permit requires Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) testing using Ceriodaphnia dubs to be performed as a 7-day pass/fail test at 90% effluent concentration, during January, April, July and October [TGP3B]. For Conventional WTP's failing toxicity tests a toxicity re - opener clause was inserted into the draft permit. Three (3) toxicity tests were reported as "FAIL" within two years. Renewal Summary — This permit reflects discharge at Outfall 001. DWR updated the facility description and Map; added parameter codes to Section A. (L); added Electronic Reporting - Discharge Monitoring Reports page [Section A. (3.]; added continuous flow monitoring; updated TRC limit to 17 mg/L; updated Aluminum, Iron, Copper, Fluoride, Total Phosphorous, TKN, Nitrate -Nitrite and Total Nitrogen monitoring to quarterly; removed Total Zinc, Calcium and Magnesium monitoring; and added re -opener clause for toxicity. Stream — Discharge from WTP for Outfall 001 is into Tar River [Stream Segment 28-(94)]. The segment [28-(94)] is not currently listed as impaired in the 2014 North Carolina 303(d) List. RPA — A Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) was conducted on Copper, Zinc, Aluminum, Iron and Fluoride effluent parameters data because Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) reported concentration above method -detection levels (MDLs) for the past four and one half (4 1 /2) years (June2010-Nov2014). [See attached RPA summary sheets.] Fact Sheet Renewal 2015 -- NPDES Permit NCO082139 Page 2 Permit NCO082139 Facility Greenville WTP maximum, montly flow 36 moni 0.800 :.::::::.::.::::::: X. . :. .:::.± :........ ........................ .................... `t ...............:: :knit : ` ::: .; ..:. . ' #>� ::::ii 1r:< ::.:.:.::.::.:....::::.; im :..:.........::::.:::.:.:::::.:::.:.:::::.::..::.:..::.:.:::::.:::.::::.:::...:..:.:.:::::::::.::.: ....................................................................................................... ............ ::::.:.::::. . :a%;oir: ......................................................... :.....:.................. .:.:::::::.........::.:..:. f::.' Qf.....................-.. 3115 ........... % % Continuou > 0.05 MGD apply change flow to Flow (MGD) 50050 s Recording Effluent continuous/recording 2 continous recording Total Suspended Solids (mg/L) CO530 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L Weekly Grab Effluent >0.5 MGD weekly, maintain maintain Turbidity (NTU) 0070 Monthly Grab Effluent >0.5 MGD, stream is not impaired, no limit, apply weekly maintain Total Residual Chlorine (µg/L) 50060 17 µg/L 2/month Grab Effluent IWC calculation=I00%, Allowable Cw = 17 ug, apply min of 17 ug/I 3 change limit to 17 mg/L pH (su) 00400 Not < 6.0 or > 9.0 Jonth Grab Effluent standard units maintain >0.5 MGD weekly Alum in use, No RP, Predicted Max Total Aluminum (mg/L) 01105 Quarterly Grab Effluent >_ 50% of Allowable Cw - apply 4 measurement Quarterly Monitoring quarterly RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Total Iron (µg/L) 01045 Quarterly Grab Effluent Quarterly Monitoring in conjunction 4 measurement with TOX Test quarterly RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Total Copper (mg/L) 01042 Quarterly Grab Effluent Quarterly Monitoring in conjunction 4 measurement with TOX Test quarterly Total Manganese (µg/L) 01055 Quarterly Grab Effluent Not WS stream, maintain quarterly 3 maintain Total Fluoride (mg/L) 00951 Quarterly Grab Effluent No RP and uses Fluoridated 4 measurement backwash, Apply Quarterly quarterly Total Zinc (mg/L) 01092 4 remove Calcium remove Magnesium remove Ammonia Nitrogen C0610 Quarterly Grab Effluent uses ammonia nitrogen/ chloramines measurement quarterly Total Phosphorous (TP) (mg/L) C0665 Quarterly Grab Effluent >0.05 MGD, quarterly monitoring measurement quarterly TKN' (mg/L) 625 Quarterly Grab Effluent >0.05 MGD, quarterly monitoring 5 measurement quarterly NO3-N + NO2-N 5 (mg/L) 630 Quarterly Grab Effluent >0.05 MGD, quarterly monitoring 5 measurementquarterly s TN (mg/L} C0600 Quarterly Grab Effluent >0.05 MGD, quarterly monitoring 5 measurement quarterly Chronic WET Testing TGP3B Quarterly Grab Effluent IWC > 0.25% Chronic test at IWC 6 maintain Fotenotes: 1 1. No later than 270 days from the effective date of this permit, begin submitting discharge monitoring reports electronically using NC DWR's eDMR application system. See Special Condition A. (3.). 2 The Town will have 18 months from the effective date of this permit to install a continuous flow meter. Until then instantaneous measurements can be taken with the duration of discharge to be noted in log books and a total daily discharge reported on the DMR. 3 The Division shall consider TRC effluent values reported below 50 µg/L to be compliant with the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina -certified laboratory method (including field certified), even if these values fall below SOµg/L. 4 Samples shall be collected concurrently with WET -test samples. For a given wastewater sample, TN = TKN + NO3-N + NO2-N, where TN is Total Nitrogen, TKN is Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, and NO3-N and NO2-N are Nitrate and Nitrite Nitrogen, respectively. Greenville WTP 2014 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability195% Confidence NCO082139 MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58 Qw (MGD) = 0.80 WWTP/WTP Class: PC-1 IQIOS (cfs)= 0.00 IWC @ IQIOS = 100.0% 7Q I OS (cfs) = 0.00 IWC @ 7Q I OS = 100.0% 7QIOW (cfs) = 0.00 IWC @ 7QIOW = 100.0% 30Q2 (cfs) = 0.00 IWC @ 30Q2 = 100.0% Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 0.00 IWC @ QA = 100.0% Receiving Stream: Tar River Stream Class: C; NSW Outfall 001 Qw = 0.8 MGD PARAMETER STANDARDS a CRITERIA (2) REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION TYPE J (1) NC WQS / Applied '/2 FAV / a z ' Cl # Det. Max Pred Allowable Cw Chronic Standard Acute CW Acute: 7.3 RID for AL(Cu,ZnA9,Fe,Gn.- apply Quarterly Copper (AL) NC 7 FW 7.3 ug/L 58 27 53.0 _ _ _ _ - — - — - _ _ _ — Monitoring In conjunctlon with`<TOX Test Chronic: fF RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly 29 value(s) > Allowable Cw Monitoring In conjunction with TOX Test Acute: NO WQS Fluoride NC 1800 FW ug/L 58 2 745.0 _ _ _---_ _ _ _ Chronic: 1,800.0 _ __-_-_----__ No RP - Fluoride in use -apply quarterly monttoring No value > Allowable Cw In conjunction with TOX Test; Acute: 67.0 No RP Predicted'Max < 50%'cf Allowable Cw - No Zinc (AL) NC 50 FW 67 ug/L 58 5 20.0 _ ----- - Monitoring required_- -_----_-- Chronic: 50.0 _—_ No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No No value > Allowable Cw Monitoring requlred Acute: NO WQS Aluminum NC 8000 HH µg/L 58 58 4,850.0 -_ _ ____—__ _ — Chronic: 8000.0 --_ — --_ ---------_ No RP , Predicted Max t 5095 ;of Allowable Cw - No value > Allowable Cw apply Quarterly Monitoring, Alarm In use Acute: NO WQS Iron NC 1000 FW 50 µg/L 58 58 2,000.0 Chronic: 1000.0 RP for AL(Cu,ZnAg,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly 8 values > Allowable Cw Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test NCO082139 9595 FRESHWATER RPA2014 22.xlsm, rpa Page 1 of 1 2/20/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS s Copper (AL) 9sc'PASTE SPECIAL Values^then "COPY" Fluoride . Maximum data points = 58 Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data BDL=1/2DL 1 ` 2012 16 16 Sid Dev. 8.8466 1 2012 < 100 50 2 2012 16 16 Mean 11.1897 2 2012 200 200 3 2012 12 12 C.V. 0.7906 3 2012 200 200 4 2012 18 18 n 58 4 2012 < 100 50 5 2012 38 38 5 2012 < 100 50 6 2012 53 53 Mult Factor = 1.00 6 2012 < 100 50 7 2012 13 13 Max. Value 53.0 ug/L 7 2012 < 100 50 8 2012 < 20 10 Max. Fred Cw 53.0 ug/L 8. 2012 < 100 50 9 2012 < 20 10 9 2012 < 100 50 10 2012 < 10 5 10 2012 < 100 50 11 2012 < 10 5 11 2012 < 100 50 12 2012 < 10 5 12 2012 < 200 100 13 2012 < 10 5 13 2012 < 100 50 14 2013 < 10 5 14. 2013 < 100 50 15 2013 < 10 5 15 2013 < 100 50 16 2013 < 10 5 16. 2013 < 100 50 17 2013 < 10 5 17 2013 < 100 50 18 2013 < 10 5 18. 2013 < 100 50 19 2013 < 10 5 19 2013 < 100 50 20 2013 < 10 5 20 2013 < 100 50 21 2013 < 10 5 21 2013 < 279 139.5 22 2013 22 22 22. 2013 < 655 327.5 23 2013 14 14 23 2013 < 190 95 24 2013 12 12 24. 2013 < 950 475 25 2013 23 23 25 2013 < 210 105 26 2013 16 16 26 2013 < 120 60 27 2013 16 16 27 2013 < 130 65 28 2013 25 25 28 2013 < 190 95 29 2013 15 15 29 2013 < 230 115 30 2013 18 18 30 2013 < 470 235 31 2013 14 14 31. 2013 < 310 155 32 2013 12 12 32 2013 < 1490 745 33 2013 14 14 33 2013 < 160 80 34 2013 11 11 34 2013 < 232 116 35 2013 < 10 5 35 2013 < 140 70 36 2013 < t0 5 36 2013 < 300 150 37 2013 < 10 5 37 2013 < 290 145 38 2014 < 10 5 38 2014 < 1230 615 39 2014 < 10 5 39 2014 < 260 130 40 2014 < 10 5 40 2014 < 179 89.5 41 2014 < 10 5 41. 2014 < 130 65 42 2014 < 10 5 42 2014 < 100 50 43 2014 < 10 5 43 2014 < 380 190 44 2014 < 10 5 44. 2014 < 350 175 45 2014 < 10 5 45 2014 < 480 240 46 2014 < 10 5 46 2014 < 650 325 47 2014 < 10 5 47 2014 < 200 100 48 2014 15 15 48 2014 < 760 380 49 2014 < 10 5 49 2014 < 230 115 50 2014 16 16 50 2014 < 720 360 51. 2014 < 10 5 51 2014. < 580 290 52 2014 16 16 52 2014 < 340 170 53 2014 13 13 53 2014 < 370 185 54 2014 < 10 5 54. 2014 < 220 110 55 2014 11 11 55 2014 < 180 90 56 2014 12 12 56 2014 < 620 310 57 2014 23 23 57 2014 < 210 105 58 2014 < 10 5 58 2014 < 450 225 . Maximum data paints = 58 Results SW Dev. 142.14113, Mean 152A569 C.V. 0.9323 n 58 Mult Factor= 1.00 Max. Value 745.0 ug/L Max. Fred Cw 745.0 ug/L NC0082139 9595 FRESHWATER RPA2014_22, data - i - 2/11/2015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS 18 `PASTE SPECIAL 19 Use "PASTE SPECIAL Zinc (AL) Values " than "Copt• Aluminum Values"then"COPY" 'Use . Maximum data . Maximum tlata points o 68 points = 58 Date Data BDL=112DL Results Date Data BDL=1/20L Results 1 2012 < 10 5 Std Dev. 2.7712 1 2012 2190 2190 StillDev. 868.7089 2 2012 < 10 5 Mean 5.9310 2 2012 2220 2220 Mean 1317.6379 3 2012 < 10 5 C.V. 0.11672 3 2012 1410 1410 C.V. 0.6593 4 2012 < 10 5 In58 4 2012 2430 2430 It 58 5 2012 < 10 5 5 2012 4770 4770 6 2012 < 10 5 Mull Factor = 1.00 6. 2012 192 192 Mull Factor= 1.00 7 2012 < 10 5 Max. Value 20.0 ug/L 7 2012 1700 1700 Max. Value 4850.0 Ng/L 8 2012 < 20 10 Max. Pred Cw 20.0 ug/L 8 2012 1300 1300 Max. Pred Cw 4850.0 pg/L 9 2012 < 20 10 9. 2012 980 980 10 2012 < 10 5 10 2012 1150 1150 11 2012 < 10 5 11 2012 1350 1350 12 2012 < 10 5 12 2012 701 701 13 2012 < 10 5 13. 2012 549 549 14 2013 10 5 14 2013 570 570 15 2013 < 10 5 15 2013 497 497 16 2013 < 10 5 16 2013 1480 1480 17 2013 < 10 5 17 2013 696 696 18 2013 < 10 5 18 2013 1230 1230 19 2013 < 10 5 19 2013 4850 4850 20 2013 < 10 5 20 2013 2170 2170 21 2013 < 10 5 21 2013 999 999 22r 2013 < 10 5 22 - 2013 2300 2300 23 2013 < 10 5 23 2013 1220 1220 24 2013 < 10 5 24 2013 1050 1050 25. 2013 < 10 5 25 2013 1640 1640 26' 2013 < 10 5 26 2013 2840 2840 27 2013 < 10 5 27 2013 1580 1580 28. 2013 12 12 28 2013 1320 1320 29 2013 < 10 5 29 2013 1380 1380 30 2013 13 13 30 2013 1160 1160 31' 2013 < 10 5 31 2013 1050 1050 32 2013 13 13 32 2013 908 908 33 2013 < 10 5 33 2013 1170 1170 34 2013 20 20 34 2013 737 737 35 2013 11 11 35 2013 820 820 36 2013 < 10 5 36 2013 724 724 37 2013 < 10 5 37 2013 1100 1100 38 2014 < 10 5 38 2014 1600 1600 39'. 2014 < 10 5 39 2014 979 979 40 2014 < 10 5 40 2014 358 358 41 2014 < 10 5 41 2014 137 137 42, 2014 < 10 5 42 2014 450 450 43 2014 < 10 5 43 2014 543 543 44 2014 < 10 5 44 2014 1990 1990 45. 2014 < 10 5 45 2014 1420 1420 46 2014 < 10 5 46 2014 892 892 47 2014 < 10 5 47 2014 947 947 48 2014 < 10 5 48- 2014 1280 1280 49 2014 < 10 5 49 2014 789 789 50 2014 < 10 5 50 2014 1620 1620 51 2014 < 10 5 51. 2014 801 801 52 2014 < 10 5 52 2014 1460 1460 53. 2014 < 10 5 53 2014 1580 1580 54'< 2014 < 10 5 54 2014 1150 1150 55 2014 < 10 5 55 2014 1060 1060 56 2014 < 10 5 56 2014 1290 1290 57' 2014 < 10 5 57 2014 922 922 58 2014 < 10 5 58 2014 722 722 NCOOB2139 9595 FRESHWATER RPA2014_22, data 2' 2/1112015 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS 20 Iron Date Data BDL=112DL 1 2012 1330 1330 2 2012 1400 1400 3 2012 706 706 4 2012 1010 1010 5 2012 2000 2000 6 2012 1030 1030 7 2012 888 888 8 2012 510 510 9 2012 280 280 10 2012 778 778 11 2012 693 693 12 2012 331 331 13 2012 308 308 14 2013 351 351 15 2013 205 205 16 2013 709 709 17 2013 294 294 18 2013 514 514 19 2013 1570 1570 20 2013 839 839 21 2013 459 459 22 2013 994 994 23 2013 582 682 24 2013 603 603 25 2013 781 781 26 2013 1390 1390 27 2013 728 728 28 2013 770 770 29 2013 655 655 30 2013 498 498 31 2013 343 343 32 2013 294 294 33 2013 349 349 34 2013 .242 242 35 2013 264 264 36 2013 192 192 37 2013 401 401 38 2014 542 542 39 2014 292 292 40 2014 92 92 41 2014 .262 262 42 2014 158 158 43 2014 214 214 44 2014 556 556 45 2014 630 630 46 2014 343 343 47 2014 523 523 48 2014 514 514 49 2014 275 275 50 2014 542 542 51 2014 323 323 52 2014 470 470 53 2014 522 522 54 2014 367 367 55. 2014 440 440 56 2014 513 513 57 2014 628 628 58. 2014 1060 1060 Use "PASTE SPECIAL- Values"then"COPY". Maximum data points = 58 Results Sid Dev. 379.0577 Mean 597,5345 C.V. 0.6344 n 58 Mult Factor = 1.00 Max. Value 2000.0 pg/L Max. Pred Cw 2000.0 pg/L NC0082139 9595 FRESHWATER RPA2014_22, data - 3 - 2/11/2015 2014 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58 REQUIRED DATA ENTRY Table 1. Project Information ❑ CHECK IF HQW OR ORW WQS Facility Name Greenville WTP W WTP/WTP Class PC-1 NPDES Permit NCO082139 Outfall 001 Flow, Ow (MGD) 0.800 Receiving Stream Tar River Stream Class C; NSW 7Q1 Os (cfs) 0.00 7Q10w (cfs) 0.00 30Q2 (cfs) 0.00 _ QA (cfs) 0.00 1 Q10s (cfs) 0.00 Data Source(s) ❑ CHECK TO APPLY MODEL Follow directions. for data entry. In some cases a comment menu list the available choices or a dropdown menu will provide a list you may select from. Error message occur if data entry does not meet input criteria. Par01 Par02 Par03 Par04 Par05 Par06 Par07 Par08 Pure ParIC Par11 Par12 Par13 Par14 Par15 Paris Par17 Par18 Par19 Pa2O Par21 Pa22 Table 2. Parameters of Concern Name Type Chronic Modifier Acute h O W a PQL Units g NCO082139 9595 FRESHWATER RPA2014_22, input 2/11/2015 IWC Calculations Facility: Greenville WTP NC0082139 Prepared By: Derek Denard Enter Design Flow (MGD): 0.8 Enter s7Q10 (cfs): 0 Enter w7Q10 (cfs): 0 Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) Daily Maximum Limit (ug/1) Ammonia (Summer) Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1) s7Q10 (CFS) 0 s7Q10 (CFS) 0 DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 0.8 DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 0.8 DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 1.24 DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 1.24 STREAM STD (UG/L) 17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L) 1.0 Upstream Bkgd (ug/1) 0 Upstream Bkgd (mg/1) 0.22 IWC (%) 100.00 IWC (%) 100.00 Allowable Conc. (ug/1) 17 Allowable Conc. (mg/1) 1.0 Ammonia (Winter) Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1) Fecal Coliform w7Q10 (CFS) 0 Monthly Average Limit: 20011ooml DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 0.8 (If DF >331; Monitor) DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 1.24 (If DF<331; Limit) STREAM STD (MG/L) 1.8 Dilution Factor (DF) 1.00 Upstream Bkgd (mg/1) 0.22 IWC (%) 100.00 Allowable Conc. (mg/1) 1.8 Total Residual Chlorine 1. Cap Daily Max limit at 28 ug/I to protect for acute toxicity Ammonia (as NH3-N) 1. If Allowable Conc > 35 mg/I, Monitor Only 2. Monthly Avg limit x 3 = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals); capped at 35 mg/I 3. Monthly Avg limit x 5 = Daily Max limit (Non-Munis); capped at 35 mg/I 4. BAT for Minor Domestics: 2 mg/I (summer) and 4 mg/I (winter) 5. BAT for Major Municipals: 1 mg/I (year-round) Fecal Coliform 1. Monthly Avg limit x 2 = 400/100 ml = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals) = Daily Max limit (Non -Muni) NPDES Server/Current Versions/WLA; TB 1/16/2009 ,, o p d wsal� f y _ a .91 ..„ S- Wn` S 3 -- I Jrf 9lvtl , ryVOr � 2 Sy, vL '2 ch l 9 ' ne M 'yC/`. /w• kq , YS},' vl:o 4/ 5i Wo, Mao.n. hYnEauhrpok Carh RPf {i5 .ICI - `� , C;NSW C;NSW C HST Ne S C;NSW G' .PNt Che ry Hill AmpHih a e Sources: Esri, HERE:DeLorme, TomTom; Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO,'NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esn Japan;-METI, Esri China (Hong Konc). - �OI rn 33 ..1r Ry, Stlm F tirau:,. a gAe�c ';� - 9yR`O`e!• - m M�rn3 ar .Pork - `J� M Rd ¢ G ryVGr c- i A r t Ye. J a� H. W 4 �o L , 9 n ry S3` G were rrp' Mpwp.. MeiEaMro°k vnlx o. a,• , 28-92 28-93 28-(94) ' Dorn. A., .. Attphlhene CM1e1ry Hill _ 4 r 1 Sources: Esn, HERE DeLdrme, TomTom; Intermap, increment P Corp'., GEBCO, USES, FAO;'NPS, _ NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan:-METI, Esri China (Hong Konq). ,- 7OL t Permit Reviewer Notes - Derek Denard Permit Number: Applicant/Facility Name: _ G�"CPtiv,�p �✓ l� Permit Status: Regional Office: Latitude: 7�• 3�,o'i Longitude: � ��. z3, ss� Facility Class: r2C / County: y� J Outfall: 001 Flow: Applicant Address: P Facility Address: 'y /l, y� o' Type of Waste: Stream Notes Receiving Stream: �tiv I�IJCt- Stream Segment: Stream Classification: Drainage Basin: 75 Summer &QZO (cfs): Subbasin: i57-� Winter 7Q10(cfs): HUC Code: O 3 O 2 30Q2 (cfs): _ State Grid: C ft Average Flow (cfs): USGS Topo Qua r , / L /N IWC (%): �y 303 (d): Nb Use: Dates Fe 4 SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No To: Water Quality Permitting Section Wastewater Branch, NPDES Permitting Attention: Joe Corporon Date: September 19, 2014 NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS County: Pitt NPDES Permit No.: NCO082139 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Facility and address: Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) WTP PO Box 1847 RECEIVED/DENR/DWR Greenville, NC 27834 2. Date of investigation: June 17, 2014 S E P 2 3 2014 Water Qua !'��yy 3. Report prepared by: Scott Vinson, Environmental Engineer Permitting Section 4. Person contacted and telephone number: Mr. Julius Patrick, ORC (252) 551-1561 5. Directions to site: The facility is located off Old River Road at 1721 Waterway Rd., Greenville, in Pitt County, North Carolina. 6. Discharge point(s), list for all discharge points: Outfall 001 Latitude: 350 38' 04" N Longitude: 770 23' 55" W Attach a USGS Map Extract. (attached) USGS Quad map: Greenville NW, NC 7. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Tar River a. Classification and Stream Index No.: C; NSW, 28-(94) b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Tar -Pamlico, 03-03-05 C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: At the outfall, the Tar River is classified and used for secondary recreation such as boating, jet skiing and other uses involving human body contact, aquatic life including propagation and for the use of fishing to include fish consumption. (Please note that BIMS has the Outfall incorrectly classified as WS-f V which is just upstream from the discharge point and is Greenville's raw water supply intake. The receiving stream in BIMS needs to be corrected to Index 28- (94).) Page Two PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS a. Volume of wastewater: Daily average flow over the past year is approximately 0.489 MGD. b. What is the current permitted capacity: 1.2 MDG C. Actual treatment capacity of current facility (current design capacity): 1.2 MGD d. Description of existing or substantially constructed WT facilities: Wastewater discharged results from the filter backwash and settling lagoon decant wastewater. e. Description of proposed WT facilities: None proposed. f. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: GUC WTP poses no apparent toxic impacts to surface waters. PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: None. Compliance: The facility is in compliance with the permit. See last inspection report attached conducted on April 29, 2014. RECEIVEDZENRIDINR SEP 2 3 2014 PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Water Quaury Permitting Section Greenville Utilities Commission WTP is operating within it's permit conditions and limits. Greenville Utilities Commission has requested the renewal of Permit No. NCO082139 and the Washington Regional Office recommends renewing the permit. Signature of Report Date Water Quality Regional Sup rvisor ate Greenville Utilities October 14, 2013 Mrs. Valery Stephens NC DENR, Division of Water Quality Point Source Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 RE: Renewal Application of NPDES Permit NCO082139 Greenville Utilities Commission, Pitt County Dear Mrs. Stephens: By way of this submittal the Greenville Utilities Commission is requesting renewal of the subject permit. Enclosed please find an original and (2) copies of the NPDES permit application (short form C-WTP), a schematic of flow through the facility and the sludge management plan for this facility. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Julius Patrick at (252) 551-1561. Sincerely, Randall D. Emory, P.E. Director of Water Reso es RDE/jh Enclosures cc: Mr. Anthony C. Cannon, General Manager/CEO Mr. D. Anthony Whitehead, Water Quality Manager PO Box 1847 Mr. Julius E. Patrick, Superintendent, Water Treatment Plant Greenville, NC 27835.1847 252 752-7166 www.guc.com Your Local Advantage a� a 62-MG Presettling Ozone Tar River Reservoir Contactor (not used) w O • O a U U Note: Not all chemical additions are in use 0 P., Rapid Mix Flocculation Basins Sedimentation Basins d "b c� a� pGO c� O U 3 'd O V-40 U wUU c° UU Water Distribution System Finished Water Multimedia Ozone Storage Filters Contactor PROCESS SCHEMATIC Aw. I I AN Environmental Consultants Greenville Utilities Commission, Greenville, North Carolina ..-I �-I ►.� v v tN I ri G N-.I f 1..A N 1 • RI✓15I D U A 1, -5 BA•5 (� - (ALUM. POND) •- Lc7Wr� F R U4 f� � A D LINE zp,o - n �-wkrgiz �5tj mAca ELf�V) 3•Z 3-0 ! V r O -qq 1 ` 4 LowesTTOP Or J3ANK S]., f aol WATER FULL ARI~P, I U i ato-71 4 3 9 c Y a +N o - C 'M AbWA L L AT ja v1 PON p R, 19 4- (a 1j_ I KluX 15r IN 4 WTOM EI-EVA►T10NS . 5N .�RpM �_ �+� o.RMAVION PROVIDFd eY Gu -oMtp oil 1 oI2K P R�oRM.ED I N t'U LY ocr ,19 s4- . 111tw/,F,,,,ll' AGARoi,. ♦�,`idyIBU R� i o1 Mpoew I N. _ HI�rlrr F1 5613oARD LIT . 26,7 1 N .�; s. 14 IGr�# 65T V P of 13A NK et~- 2a.: c y I107111 o c y / �o� o I 'PKEF- CAPACITY MMAI N(� T N o L-ffoo 1 19 4-0 o ON) 15 55,+% FUwL io''LOW 11 >:gEg Ida AN b 3Z,2` c, FULL -ro`NIGW ` ���� B�oAR� [IMF . Spruill & Associates In . i r i Memorandum To: Rick Langley From: Bill Dowbiggin Date: April 28, 2004 Subject: Alum Residuals Management Plan Camp Dresser and McKee (CDM) is pleased to provide this technical memorandum illustrating the updated residuals management calculations for lagoon life for the Greenville Utilities Commission Water Treatment Plant (GUC-WTP) sludge lagoon. The results of these calculations are summarized below. Evaluation The Residuals Pond Volumetric Survey conducted by Spruill & Associates Inc. in March 2001 illustrates the following points. ■ The lagoon was 55.4% full to the "low" freeboard line. ■ The total capacity of the lagoon to the "low" freeboard line was approximately 75 million gallons (mg). The water surface elevation on March 3, 2001 is defined as the "low" freeboard line. ■ Approximately 42 million gallons of sludge had accumulated in the lagoon at that time and the remaining lagoon free capacity to "low" freeboard line was approximately 34 million gallons. The following evaluation conservatively assumes all of the aluminum in the polyalun- num chloride precipitates as aluminum hydroxide. • f f Ricky Langley 04/28/04 Page 2 On the basis of the following equation, the estimated residual quantities under several flow scenarios are summarized in Table 1. where, 5=8.34*Q(4.9C+SS+A+1.9Fe+1.58Mn) S = sludge produced (lb/ day) Q = plant flow (mgd) C = coagulant dose, (mg/ L as Al) = 3.5 mg/ L (which is equivalent to 16.8 mg/1 of 4.9 lb/ gal PACI as reported) SS = raw water suspended solids (mg/L) = b * Tu b = correlation factor assumed to be 2.0 Tu = raw water turbidity (ntu) A = additional chemicals added (mg/L) - in the case, polymer plus TOC removed in mg/ L Fe = raw water iron concentration (mg/L) Mn = raw water manganese concentration (mg/L) Assuming that the sludge in the lagoon will eventually thicken to an average solids concentration of 8 %, Table 1 shows that the lagoons will not be full for the 10 year planning horizon. The remaining capacity in 2001 was 34 million gallons and the estimated additional sludge accumulation at the end of 2014 is about 21 million gallons. If the sludge consolidates beyond 8 %, more can be accumulated. Samples show that thicker sludge is achieved thus far in the lagoon. The 2001 results showing percent solids in the sludge samples, taken at three different locations and tested by GUC ranged from 7.4% to 32.3%. Ricky Langley 04/ 28/ 04 Page 3 Table 1: Summary of Residual Quantities 8% Solids Average Water Demand Total Solids (lbs/day) Total Solids Sludge Volume Yearly Sludge Volume Total Sludge Accumulation Year (MGD) ( dry tons/day) (gpd) (MG) (MG) 1.59 4578 1.67 1.67 2001 10.5 3182 1.52 4360 1.59 3.26 2002 10 3031 1.52 4360 1.59 4.85 2003 10 3031 1.56 4490 1.64 6.49 2004 10.3 3122 2005 10.6 3213 1.61 4621 1.69 8.18 1.65 4752 1.73 9.91 2006 10.9 3304 1.70 4883 1.78 11.70 2007 11.2 3394 1.74 5014 1.83 13.53 2008 11.5 3485 1.79 5144 1.88 15.40 2009 11.8 3576 1.83 5275 1.93 17.33 2010 12.1 3667 1.88 5406 1.97 19.30 2011 12.4 3758 1.92 5537 2.02 17.42 2012 12.7 3849 1.97 5667 2.07 19.40 2013 13 3940 2.02 5798 2.12 21.42 2014 [13.3 T- 4031 -1 where, C=3.5mg/ LasAl Tu = 9 NTU SS =18 mg/L A = 4 mg/L Fe = 0.075 mg/ L Mn = 0.03 mg/L