20150620 Ver 1_401 Application_20151115

CWS
Caiohna Wetland Semces
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704 -527 -1177 - Phone
704 -527 -1133 - Fax
TO: Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWR — NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N Salisbury St
9th Floor, Archdale Building
Raleigh NC 27604
Joow--o
Date: 11/12/2015
CWS Project #: 2015 -3551
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ❑Attached ❑Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ JD Package ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ Wetland Survey ® Other
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS
KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
®For approval ❑Approved as submitted ❑Resubmit copies for approval
®For your use ❑Approved as noted ❑Submit copies for distribution
❑As requested ❑Returned for corrections ❑Return corrected prints
❑For review and comment ❑For your verification and signature
REMARKS: Karen, please find attached four revised copies DWR #15 -06201 of the Individual Water Quality
Certification application for UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site Project.
Copy to: File
Thank you,
Z - C 74 ..�
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Principal Scientist
NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA
[R(r--1E
F OV 1 2 2015

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional ❑7 Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description/ Purpose [PCN Form Bad and 133e]:
The purpose of this project includes retrofitting an existing pond into a stormwater BMP to treat
runoff from on -site impervious areas.
4. Property Owner/ Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
UNC Charlotte; POC: Mr. Philip M. Jones
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: CWS; POC: Mr. Gregg Antemann, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: SAW- 2015 -01300
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and /or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
Across from 8919 University Rd, Charlotte, NC 28270 (within 200 -foot buffer around Davis Lake,
located on UNC Charlotte Main Campus)
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: portion of 04931102A
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Toby Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Yadkin (HUC 03040105)
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 7 Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
✓ Standard Permit Pre - Application Request
9
Nationwide Permit # Unauthorized Activity
❑ Regional General Permit # Compliance
❑✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request ❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

LIM! W�rolina Wotland Sarvices
November 12, 2015
Mr. William Elliott
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273
866- 527 -1177 (office)
704 - 527 -1133 (fax)
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Section 404 Individual Permit Application and Section 401 Individual Water
Quality Certification
UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2015 -3551
SAW- 2015 -01300
Dear Mr. Elliot and Ms. Higgins:
The Davis Lake Site is approximately eight acres in extent and is located immediately south of
University Road on the University of North Carolina — Charlotte (UNC Charlotte) campus (Figures 1-
3, attached). The purpose of this project includes retrofitting an existing pond into a stormwater best
maintenance practice (BMP) facility to treat runoff from on -site impervious areas. Dewberry
Engineers Inc., has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401
permitting services for this project.
Applicant Name: UNC Charlotte; POC: Mr. Philip M. Jones
Mailing Address: 9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 2822
Phone Number of Owner /Applicant: 704 - 687 -0514
Street Address of Project: Across from 8919 University Rd, Charlotte, NC 28270 (within 200 -foot
buffer around Davis Lake, located on UNC Charlotte Main Campus)
Tax Parcel ID: portion of 04931102A
Waterway: UT to Toby Creek
Basin: Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin (HUC# 03040105)
City: Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35-3037520,-80.7351310
USGS Quadrangle Name: Harrisburg, NC, dated 1996
Current Land Use
The site consists of university buildings with maintained landscaping and wooded areas. Typical on-
site vegetation includes red maple (Acer rubrum), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), autumn
olive (Eleaganus umbellata), common violet (Viola sororia), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica), and fescue (Festuca sp.). - An aerial photograph of the project area is attached (Figure 4).
NORTH CAROLINA . SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS- INC.NET

UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site November 12, 2015
Section 404 Individual Permit Application CWS Pro iect No 2015 -3551
According to the Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County' (Figures 5 and 6, attached), on -site soils consist
of Urban land (Ur), Wilkes loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (WkE), and Wilkes loam, 25 to 45 percent
slopes (WkF). Urban land soils consist of an impervious layer over human transported materials.
Wilkes soils are well - drained soils. None of the on -site soils are listed on the North Carolina Hydric
Soils List for Mecklenburg Countyz or on the National Hydric Soils List for Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina.3
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Floodplams
The project is not located within the FEMA regulated 100 -year floodplain (Figure 7, attached)
Jurisdictional Delineation
On May 29, 2014, CWS scientists Thomas Blackwell, Professional Wetland Scientist (PWS), and
Kelly Thames, Wetland Professional in Training (WPIT) delineated jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
within the project area (Figure 8, attached). Jurisdictional areas were delineated (flagged in the field),
classified, and surveyed with a sub -meter Trimble Geo -XT GPS unit using the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE) Routine On -Site Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manua14, the 2007 USACE Jurisdictional Determination
Form Instructional Guidebooks, with further technical guidance from the Eastern Mountains and
Piedmont Regional Supplement6, dated April 2012.
Jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to recent USACE and North Carolina Division of
Water Resources (NCDWR) guidance. These classifications included sampling with a D- shaped dip net,
taking photographs, and defining approximate breakpoints (location at which a channel changes
classification) within each on -site stream channel.
On July 15, 2015, Mr. Gregg Antemann, Ms. Kelly Thames, and Ms. Aliisa Har uniemi of CWS met on -site
with Mr. William Elliott with the USACE and Mr. Alan Johnson with the NCDWR. During this site
meeting, Mr. Elliott (USACE) and Mr. Johnson (NCDWR) field- verified the extent of the jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. as depicted in Figure 8, attached.
Results
The results of the on -site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are two
jurisdictional stream channels (Streams A and B), two jurisdictional wetland areas (Wetlands AA and
BB), and one jurisdictional pond (Pond A) located within the project area (Figure 8, attached). On -site
jurisdictional streams include unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Toby Creek. Toby Creek is part of the
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin (HUC# 03040105)' and is classified as "Class C Waters" by the
NCDWR. According to the NCDWR, Class C Waters are defined as: "Waters protected for uses such
as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life including propagation,
survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture."
'United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2013. Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
'United States Department of Agriculture— Natural Resources Conservation Service, I999. North Carolina Hydric Soils List, USDA -NRCS
North Carolina State Office, Raleigh
USDA -NRCS Hydric Soils List, http //soils usda.gov/use/hydric/lists/state.htjnl, updated April 2012.
° Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual ", Technical Report Y -87 -1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi
5 USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook. 2007. USACE Regulatory National Standard Operation Procedures
for conducting an approved Jurisdictional determination (JD) and documenting practices to support an approved JD USACE Headquarters,
Washington, DC
6 US Army Corps of Engineers. April 2012. Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and
Piedmont Region. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
"HUC#" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S Geological Survey, 1974 Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina.
2

UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site November 12, 2015
Section 404 Individual Permit Application CWS Project No. 2015 -3551
On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. ultimately flow to the Rocky River, the closest Traditional
Navigable Waters to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
total approximately 0.87 acres (Table 1).
m_u_ i il,._.:.. T .,Lo c: +o _ c„mm.. of nn -site 9urisdictional waters of the U.S.
1 aisle
1. Mavis Lan\. —.1 -
--
----
Jurisdiction
Stream
NCDWR
Approximate
USACE/EPA
Intermittent/
Jurisdictional
Classification
Stream
Length
A roximate
pp
Acreage (ac.)
Feature
Rapanos
Perennial
Point
Classification
Linear Feet
Classification. s
SCP
( )
S core
I
Stream A
Seasonal
Intermittent
P1
25
573
0.052
FSCP2
Stream B
Seasonal
Intermittent
29.5
247
0.017
Stream Total:
8201f
0.07 ac.
Jurisdictional
USACE/EPA Rapanos
Data Point (DP)
Approximate Acreage ac.
Feature
Classification
Wetland AA
Directly Abutting RPW
DP2
0.092
Wetland BB
Directly Abutting RPW
DP2
0.015
Wetland Total:
0.107 ac
Jurisdictional
USACE/EPA Rapanos
Data Point (DP)
A roximate Acreage ac.
Feature
Classification
Pond A
Impoundment of RPW
N/A
0.68
Open Water Total:
0.68 ac.
Total On -Site Jurisdictional Waters of the US.
0.87 ac.
Seasonal Relatively Permanent Waters
Seasonal RPWs are those streams that exhibit flow seasonally. This flow regime is the result of a
lowering of the water table during dry periods that stops groundwater discharge to the stream channel.
Seasonal streams do not typically support aquatic life white require year -round flow for reproductive
and maturation life stages.
Stream A originates off site and flows west along the middle of the property for approximately 264 linear
feet until flowing into Pond A. Stream A exits Pond A and flows for another 309 linear feet before
continuing to an off -site confluence with Toby Creek (Figure 8). Stream A was classified as a Relatively
Permanent Water with Seasonal Flow (RPW) according to USACE/EPA guidance. Stream A scored 52
out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet and 25 out of a possible
63 points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form, indicating seasonal status (SCP1, attached). Stream
A exhibits a three to five foot average ordinary high water width, and substrate consisting of cobble and
gravel with bedrock outcrops. Photographs A and B (attached) are representative of Seasonal RPW Stream
A.
Stream B originates off site and flows northwest across the project area for approximately 247 linear
feet before its confluence with Seasonal RPW Stream A (Figure 8, attached). Stream B was classified
8 Classifications of streams include Traditionally Navigable Waters (TNWs), Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs), and Non - Relatively
Permanent Waters (Non- RPWs). Subcategories of RPWs include perennial streams that typically have year -round flow, and seasonal streams
that have continuous flow at least seasonally. Two classifications of jurisdictional wetlands are used to describe proximity and connection to
TNWs. These classifications include either adjacent or directly abutting Adjacent wetlands are defined as wetlands within floodplains or in
close proximity to a TNW but without a direct visible connection. Abutting wetlands have a direct surface water connection traceable to a
TNW.

UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site November 12, 2015
Section 404 Individual Permit Aualication CWS Protect No. 2015 -3551
as a Relatively Permanent. Water with seasonal flow (Seasonal, RPW) according to USACE/EPA
guidance. Seasonal RPW Stream B scored 37 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream
Quality Assessment Worksheet and 29.5 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream
Classification Form, indicating intermittent status (SCP2), attached. Stream B exhibits moderate
continuity of channel bed and bank, weak sinuosity, weak flow, and ordinary high water widths of
three feet. Biological sampling within Stream B revealed a weak presence of macrobenthos. Stream
characteristics indicate that continuous flow is present for at least three months in a typical year.
Photographs C and D (attached) are representative of Seasonal RPW Stream B.
Wetlands
The USACE and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) define wetlands as: "Those areas that
are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support,
and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life
in saturated soil conditions.s9 The USACE uses three parameters to identify jurisdictional wetlands.
These parameters are as follows: 1) Hydrophytic Vegetation, 2) Wetland Hydrology, and 3) Hydric
Soils. All three parameters must be present in order for an area to be determined to be a jurisdictional
wetland. This section describes each on -site jurisdictional wetland and the field observations that led
to their determinations.-.
Wetlands AA and BB are forested wetlands (PF01B) approximately 0.092 and 0.015 acre in extent,
respectively. Wetlands AA and BB are located directly abutting Seasonal RPW Stream A in the
eastern portion of the site (Figure 8, attached). Wetlands AA and BB contain low chroma soils (Gley
1 3 /10Y), saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil profile, oxidized rhizospheres on living
roots, water - stained leaves, and wetland drainage patterns. Dominant vegetation in this wetland
includes river birch (Betula nigra), red maple (Acer rubrum), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), blue
flag iris (Iris versicolor), giant goldenrod (Solidago gigantea), fringed sedge (Carex crinita), Japanese
stilt grass (Microstegium vimineum), and false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica). A Wetland
Determination Data Form representative of Wetlands AA and BB is attached as DP2. Photographs E
and F (attached) are representative of Wetlands AA and BB, respectively.
Ponds
Pond A (Figure 8, attached) is an impoundment of Seasonal RPW Stream A and is therefore
jurisdictional. Pond A is located in the middle portion of the property and is 0.68 acres in extent.
Photographs G and H (attached) are representative of Pond A. -
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources -
CWS consulted the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) online GIS service10 and found no sites
of architectural, historical, or archaeological significance within the project limits. Additionally, a
letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on June- 5, 2014 to determine the
presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by
the project. On July 8, 2014, a response from SHPO stated, "We have conducted a review of the
project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we
have no comment on the project as proposed. ",
' Environmental Laboratory 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual ", Technical Report Y -87 -1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
10 State Historic Preservation Office http: / /gis ncdcr gov/hpoweb /. Accessed June 17, 2014.
4

UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site November 12, 2015
Section 404 Individual Permit Application CWS Project No. 2015 -3551
Protected Species
CWS scientists Thomas Blackwell, PWS, and Kelly Thames, WPIT, conducted an assessment of the
project area on May 29, 2014. Transects were surveyed in areas identified as potential habitat for
possible protected species located in the area (Smooth purple coneflower [Echinacea laevigata],
Schweinitz's sunflower [Helianthus schweinitzii], Carolina heelsplitter [Lasmigona decorate],
Michaux's sumac [Rhus michauxii], and Georgia aster [Symphyotichum georgianum]). The survey
determined that none of the aforementioned protected species occur within the Davis Lake project
limits.
Additionally, CWS performed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) Data Explorer11 on October 28, 2015 to determine the presence of any federally - listed,
candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical habitat located within the project area. Based on
this review, there are no records of federally - protected species within the project limits or within a
mile of the project site. A copy of the data review report is attached.
The Northern long -eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) is one of the species of bats most impacted by the
white -nose syndrome disease. Habitat for the Northern long -eared bat includes forested areas of any
age, rocky areas with boulders, and culverts greater than four feet wide. Due to recent population
declines of almost 89% caused by white -nose syndrome and continued spread of the disease, the
Northern long -eared bat now receives protection as a Threatened species under the Endangered
Species Act. A Threatened species is defined as a taxon likely to become endangered within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range12.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is requesting the documentation of amount of wooded
acres cleared in connection with any construction project that takes place within any county shown on
the June 30, 2015 White -Nose Syndrome Buffer Zone Map, attached. This project takes place within
the Northern long -eared bat habitat range. Due to the nature of this stormwater maintenance project,
approximately 0.25 acre of wooded area will be cleared for this project. Therefore, it is unlikely that
this project will have a negative effect of this species populations. Please note that no physical
surveying for potential habitat within this project has been included in this scope at this time.
Purpose and Need for the Project
UNC Charlotte has a goal of creating a stormwater management program in order to provide treatment
of runoff from impervious areas created by future development. Their proactive approach includes
providing water quality treatment and stormwater opportunities prior to future development.
The purpose of this project is to retrofit an existing pond into a stormwater BMP to treat runoff from
surrounding and adjacent impervious areas (Figures 9 and 10, attached). Moreover, native wetland
plants will be utilized on the proposed littoral shelf to provide additional water quality treatment and
aesthetic values (Figure 10, attached). This proactive approach is a step forward in UNC Charlotte's
stormwater management program and will ensure that future development on campus will not cause a
negative impact to on -site and downstream waters.
11 North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer, https- / /ncnhde.natureserve org/ Accessed September 28, 2015.
Z The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 1973. Endangered Species Act http: / /www.fws gov /endangered/laws- policies/
5

UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site November 12, 2015
Section 404 Individual Permit Analication CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3551
Alternatives Analysis
Dewberry Engineers Inc. researched the possibility of utilizing the existing wetland as the forebay for
water quality treatment in lieu of the traditional open water forebay design. However, due to the
necessary depth requirements, the existing wetland is not deep enough, shaped appropriately, or large
enough to be utilized as a forebay. Therefore, this alternative was determined to not be practicable as the
goal of the retrofit is to provide adequate water quality treatment. Leaving the wetland in -situ as a
forebay would reduce the water quality treatment functionality of the design and would facilitate
increased inputs to the main pond.
The proposed forebay is designed to capture and settle out sediments prior to entering the main pond and
is sized according to the capacity required of the proposed retrofit (Figure 9, attached)
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be applied to minimize disturbances to
downstream waters. No impact to downstream waters is proposed.
The excavation for the stormwater management pond construction will be completed with equipment
operating from upland areas. Removed sediments will be hauled off site. All disturbed areas will be
seeded and matted with natural fiber matting.
CWS believes the proposed design represents the least damaging environmental alternative while still
meeting the goals of the project. The proposed impacts are designed to improve storm water management
and water quality treatment of stormwater runoff.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. associated with this project are limited to a total of
0.68 acre of a jurisdictional pond due its conversion to stormwater management facility, 82 linear feet (If)
of jurisdictional stream channel, and less than 0.1 acre of wetland areas due excavation associated with
the stormwater management facility construction (Figure 9, attached).
Pond Conversion to a Stormwater Management Facility
The existing 0.68 acre pond (Pond A) is proposed to be converted to a stormwater management
facility. The proposed new pond will have a pool surface area of 0.64 acre at normal pool elevation.
Pond A will partially filled due the construction of a littoral shelf, while the eastern portion will be
expanded by excavation. Therefore, total permanent loss of pond area totals 0.04 acre (Figure 9,
attached).
Excavation of accumulated sediments (pond maintenance) from the bed of the lake is necessary, and will
ultimately deepen the lake to increase detention capacity. During this process, the littoral shelf will be
constructed. The proposed littoral shelf will be planted with native wetland species (Figure 10, attached).
This stormwater feature improve water quality of stormwater runoff by filtration.

UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site November 12, 2015
Section 404 Individual Permit Application CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3551
Wetland and Stream Impacts
The eastern portion of the proposed stormwater management pond will be expanded by excavation and
this will impact 82 linear feet of a seasonal stream channel (Stream A) and 0.099 acre of jurisdictional
wetlands (Wetland AA and Wetland BB). These impacts to the jurisdictional stream and wetlands are
necessary to construct the proposed forebay for the stormwater management facility (Figure 9, attached).
The proposed forebay is designed to capture and settle out sediments prior to entering the main pond and
is sized according to the capacity required of the proposed retrofit.
Table 2 (below) summarizes the unavoidable impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
Table 2. Davis Lake Site. Summary of Impacts to on -site ,jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
Jurisdictional
Feature
Intermittent/
Perennial
Impact Type
Temporary /
Permanent
Approximate
Length (If)
Approx.
Acreage
Pond A
N/A
Fill
Permanent
N/A
0.04
N/A
Conversion to
stormwater
management facility
Permanent
N/A
0.64
Stream A
Intermittent
Excavation
Permanent
82
0.01
Wetland AA
N/A
Excavation
Permanent
N/A
0.007
Wetland BB
N/A
Excavation
Permanent
N/A
0.092
Permanent Pond Impacts
-
0.680 ac.
Stream Impacts (Excavation)
82 If
0.010 ac.
Wetland Impacts (Excavation)
-
0.099 ac.
Permanent Impacts (Total)
-
0.789 ac.
Compensatory Mitigation
Permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been limited to less than 0.1 acre of
wetland impacts and less than 150 linear feet of stream channel due to excavation. Due to the limited
impacts and current USACE and NCDWR policy to allow impacts to open water ponds without
providing compensatory mitigation, no mitigation is proposed for these impacts.

UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site November 12, 2015
Section 404 Individual Permit Application CWS Project No. 2015 -3551
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704 - 408 -1683, or through email at gregg @cws- inc.net should you
have any questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Awn- C - A_4;�,_
_�t /kwgd/
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Kelly Thames, WPIT
Professional Wetland Scientist
Project Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. USGS Site Location Map
Figure 3. Vicinity Aerial Photograph
Figure 4. Aerial Imagery Map
Figure S. USDA -NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Figure 6. USDA -NRCS Historic Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Figure 7. FEMA Floodplain Map
Figure 8. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Map
Figure 9. Proposed Impacts — Overview
Figure 10. Davis Lake Planting Plan
Agent Authorization Form
Preliminary JD Form
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 404 Individual Permit Application (ENG FORM 4345)
NCDWR Stream Classification Forms (SCP1 -SCP2)
USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet (SCP1 -SCP2)
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP 1 -DP2)
Agency Correspondence
White -Nose Syndrome Buffer Zone Map
Representative Photographs (A -H)
cc: Mr. Phillip Jones, UNC Charlotte
Ms. Elizabeth Frere, UNC Charlotte
Mr. Brian LaFranchi, P.E., Dewberry Engineers Inc.

N

r
ILa
yV
rn
Q01
MAGERY PROVIDED BY ESRI, ACCESSED 2015. Lk

Cone Parking Deck 1
' Lane�1
\. sl
—Road
Seasonal RPW Stream A
Seasonal RPW Stream A- �. --�`^ 264 LF\
309 LF
Wetland BB `.._ _✓ . �/
— ~' \ 0.015 ac
Memori all
y •,.
Pond A (Davis Lake)
0.68 ac
• '
� 1► 2 '.,- �.,_�_.._- Wetland
-0.09 ac -�
I
-- Seasonal RPW Stream B 4 'I Legend
247 LF V Q Project Limits
�f
Davis Lake
r
Wetlands
1
t
100 50 0 100 Fee /
..... seasonal RPW
Buildings
Roads
`L NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED. CLASSIFIED, AND MAPPED ,, , � 1i..1� i 1 t. \` Parcels
WTH A SUB-METER GPS UNIT BY CWS, INC. ON MAY 29,2014. JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES ♦SCPStreamClassificatonPoint
HAVE BEEN FIELD - REVIEWED BY USACE DURING A SITE VISIT ON JULY 15, 2015. !
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIS LAYERS PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS GDP Data Point � �/J I \� i 1
DEPARTMENT, DATED 2009. STREAM AND WETLAND LAYERS GENERATED BY CWS, INC., /
\ DATED MAY 2014. j \. Photo Location & Direction
SCALE: 1 100' 7 -22 -15 Appr oximate DATE: A ximate Jurisdictional FIGURE NO.
" : I,) _ Boundary Ma
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: p 8
2015 -3551 REV AVH Cws UNCC Davis Lake Site of
PPLICANTNO: CHECKED BY: -1 Charlotte, North Carolina
10
KMT WWW.CWS- INC.NET CWS Project No. 2015 -3551

1 2 3 4
5
If Dewberry�
__\\ _- '-_�_`_______ \_\ \ ♦\ \\ 1 l_ \ �` \\ \ \` Dewberry Engineers Inc.
680 —__ —_. ` / /'' ,/ r' I, N
cn�wm�, zezea �n. so
—� ------------
DO
- - -- DAVIS LAKE: \\ `\ ♦ \ \\ \\`\ ___'' ,' "// -610 /// rr�ir/ / /! , ` \` \\ / _ ''/ I_ Z LLI
- - - PROPOSED 0.64 AC. \j _ _ —/� �� 656 1 I I / / 1_ - -- _ " �?
_ o J
// ' //' r / \ \\ \, \ \ I 1 1 1\ 1 \ \ ♦\ ` - - - -_ -- I LI.) 06
- ---'-- - __ IMPACT TO POND A: r'_66 i/ / tf \ 1 \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ —� O¢
— - --.66 _ — 0.04 ACRE (FILL) 'i 5 \ \ \ ♦ \ W Stream A _ •� Y c� Z
------ 5 1 1 i ♦\ ` ` \� ` \ Seasonal RP " —�
11 11 11 111 \\i \ �s>5 �
I ✓/ - '- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- `I� -- ,�_�L _ -- \\ 11 1 11 I�Li.R Z`: \\ - -- �— i` - +r l�.J.fn Z�
D I I-------- - -- - -- -- - - - --- �/ y 1!! T ` \` ` \\ \ejo _ - - -- - - "_ -- ii 06
\ \ \ \ \\ \\ JN�TNDS� -BB
656 \ ij
1, — �� / `� o \ \I\ \\` \ \\`\�d `,,— a:0'�.�A-CRES -- - -
MEMORIAL - _ - - - -- -- -- --
I , L I /,/ ' X653 650 655 \ ` a \` `\DAVIS LAKE: IMPACT TO WETLAND BB :' J
HALL I — r //' - -_ l \ \ -- - - - - -- - - --- -- EXCAVATION -0.007 ACRE
/ pil SEAL
EXISTING 0.68 AC. - - -_ — - - - - - - -- _ j
_ _ PRELIMINARY -
\�I
----- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - -r -- -------- .:%j /' j'•' % / %' DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
_ -, ,, 1 I / / \ ` ♦` �- -_ _ __659 ,/i �', i� // iii i" "'
I I '� / , / \`� � _ �\ __ -- --' _ _657_ ♦ �_ -- -� ,r' �`/ i� /i'' � � i� /r
/ I \\\` \ ♦\\ _ - -_ 6.855. �/ I' i%r i r /, i REV PUN
/ '! 6s7.6
OFountain
Ulf
- ----- %�--- - -- --- .j^ ` --ill \\ ♦\ \I \I \ III I 1 , ♦ \ \ ' \i \\ \ / / /' /i�r''i �' /'' / �,'�' /i �'/ i
Tp 1 657.50' Btm: 648.71' DMtIS
r
\,� \, \, I i �I - LAKE I - - - I'll
.-7 / ! i,v /�',7 . ! > / 1 \r ! -- ` -- _ IMPACT TO SEASONAL SCALE r -zc
\ r' ' STREAM A:
.I /r/ EXCAVATION -82 LF
0' 10 20 40'
_ IMPACT TO WETLAND AA; / ' / / '� / / ' / ! / /
-0.092 ACRE
653 !
� ,!
'_____ 654 1
�'�__' - -_ ' - - - -�\ `\ __
- %�' '1 /,i / � ' � / /',/ ,'/ r"� "-�" INS fV'�Y• /r .� ' .- __ - - -___ `\ ��\ �� \` __ - I r' + /// / ', i'' / /i/� ''�� + "% / / i// '/i %'! � / j / / � / /
657
REVISIONS
/ / / /_ / / / / / /l! /rr1l' / '�/ ' ' i'' \ \\`\` _ `. \/ , // / /7 / /'/ //r 'i' ' /' %�� r DRAWN BY BML
( /' _ _ \\IC ! , / BML
/ / / Il / /\ / _ 666 �_� - -- ` - �` `� ♦ l \ APPROVED BY
/ r'J/ /' /' / '/ - - _ ` \\ \ ii \ / / / I I / , / 6� /'! // ' / i''/ / 36 RSN
-!J. J / / / �- - - -,-� ``` CHECKED BV
/ / / / \ / / /"•' ''� \ ` - - -- `_`` -_ ` -�` �\ \ ` �� �\ / / / / ! ! ! / / ! ' ' ' DATE
/ /` / /l rl , /\ ' \\\ l` l / l
l / I l I / ! / /, / / / •- _ _, -- _ \ \ \aa( 1 ! / / `/ / // , OCTOBER 16, 2014
! !! I ( 1 1 / / / / , , !' / // / /ice' \ _ -_ _ __ -` \\ +111!1 ! / 1 / /, , iicQ /� /,/ /
I I I r l r / , , , -'- ' �\ " l r /'^'./
_ Hitt:
! ' / / / l i ! I f / / /r !r / - - -__ _ ___- `` \ `` `` \__- J 1 / / ` / l 1 i l / rr, /,' „ //i' / /' / \ \
1 rr�'ir /i ' /p \ Al
rf
1 1 1 I u f / GRADING PLAN
A
1 \1111' I, � X11 1 t I I I I 1, ` 1 1 1 1 �/ I f j l/ I�l�XYI f 1 I — _. - -^Nw � \\�\ ``___`_ ____________' / / /� /l, ��'i / /'i i�/�'�'/ y l ♦ �/ !'
_ -_ ___ -_ - - -_ __ -''� ' /
. ` /' / /� /' r'
I I I 1 I t E 131 Y- C''• 'tr�i' _ / ,, r/, /r , r ', I !
� /i „/i ,;, /,, ,, ;�I �; � ! ;
\'/ I 1 1 1 l 1 � _ •�?�I'. ' , O' � // ! ! / PROJECT NO. 500420
Y A _ ''!'}:: •...,. _ _ 1 /rr, / /r, / //, r, / ! / l
p }Nr1��-V111''
1 1 1 I I% X 1 1 I I 1 1 1 t �' ��'' -_ - `\ __` �� - '�•r, ,�i / //, ,i, , , ` ! / / , r ,i /
1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I r \\ I 1 1 1
FIGURE 9
�\ \
l ` \ \ \ 1 1 I 1 1 � � , , `��' / \\ ti ' _ \ ✓ //, �� / / ' /... / / r / ! / f
/

19
7
CI
A
rl
�� - ' " ^I - _ _ i _` `_` \♦ ♦\ \ \\ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦\ ♦\ —/ /�- 651 � 1 I ' ,/ ,f I / l \ ♦ \ \ \ �- 680 - -_ _ � ^_^ ,-- _
\ \ '
_ lJ\l\_/�J'� I \� ♦ \\ \\ \ ' � - 11 1 ` \ ♦ \ \ \\ �� "� -_� \``__675- � —�_��I _^ 1�1^__ " "^ //.
_ _ \ I I ♦ "__ J' 1 \ ♦ \ \ ♦\ '� `� �_ __ _ _ - __ ^' .ter' �/
----- -- -- --
/,MEMORIAL It
HALL _ - _- - --
—
', --
�—� _
,/ 1 I I / I ! , . \ ''♦ ' ` -- ' - -- -_659 - - --
r------ ---- - - - - -- \\ - -y ! �� - - - -- fit;♦ i
OFountain \. 6 7.6
-- _- 655 -_I ♦ � _ I r„ .� 1 '�♦ � - � ,,,,,,, /„ ,, , �'J /
-_-_____ '- _- _-- -50 -- 1 \ \ 1 I 1 ♦ \ \ \\ ♦ \ 1 \ _- --_ / /JJJ /r„ /J /i,/ / J 'J i JJ //�
♦ \ \ / -G- 'i /i //, //1,/, JJ/ /,JJ J J t' / J
;Fop7 657.50' Btm:/648.71' DAV1§ ♦♦ I \ \ - - - -- -- 'i—��/ � —��' -/„ j / .J J'/ / /; /J J � J,J
- -_— - J/ i _ J I r / i `� ♦ \l I 2 1I r '1' 1\ __ -_ -,.04. - LAKE
/ �' /(( / / � ,' / /Ilf / ' 1 / I I / • '-r � � "• • —___ J J 1 ' / ^' �!!/ '/ '' J // ;' ;' /// // /� //, // // JJJ /J', // / //,
- /// / / //, ' /' //' �If / / /J''J,I - -__ - __ � %• - �._ / ' - ,% "�''�'i' "- 'JJ /// /JJJ /, / / /! /� / / / / / //' ' / "''
". �%/ // / / � // J /' / J / r / /' ' - - -_ - -- . \ F /. / � _�. JJJ J / • %.i i % _" I/ J / / / / / / / / /
Oil
WWII-
I /
' "/J / // /-.�` / / / t / i/ ' /' J - _- __ - /''- II,�__�_870 -��_`� ♦`\ \`� / "/ /JJJ / /' /J /' / JJ/ , / / _ / _ ' / /J
" �� / /Ji /J /i, / � �� / , r I J JJ J J - -__— � --' _— -- --- - -- \ \• ����\' `�;,_ tea_—
/
SEEDBED PREPARATION
CHISEL COMPACTED AREAS AND SPREAD TOPSOIL 3" DEEP OVER ADVERSE SOIL
CONDITIONS IF APPUCABLF
SCARIFY THE ENTIRE AREATO 6' DEEP.
REMOVE ALL LOOSE ROCK ROOTS AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS LEAVING SURFACE
REASONABLY SMOOTH AND UNIFORM.
APPLY AGRICULTURAL UME, FERTUZER AND SUPERPHOSPHATE UNIFORMLY AND
MIX MATH SOIL (SEE BELONG
CONTINUE TILLAGE UNTIL A MUL- PULVERIZED FIRM, REASONABLY UNIFORM
SEEDBED IS PREPARED 4 TO 6 INCHES DEEP.
SEED ON A FRESHLY PREPARED SEEDBED AND COVER SEED LIGHTLY WITH SEEDING
EQUIPMENT OR CULTIPACK AFTER SEEDING.
MULCH IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING AND ANCHOR MULCH.
INSPECT ALL SEEDED AREAS AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS OR RESEEDINGS
WITHIN THE PLANTING SEASON IF POSSIBLE IF STAND SHOULD BE OVER 60%
DAMAGED, REESTABLISH FOLLOWING ORIGINAL UME FERTILIZER AND SEEDING
RATES.
CONSULT INSPECTOR ON MAINTENANCE TREATMENT AND FERTILIZATION AFTER
PERMANENT COVER IS ESTABLISHED.
'APPLY:
AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE - 2 TONS/ACRE (3 TONSIACRE IN CLAY SOILS)
FERTILIZER - 1,000 LB &ACRE- 10.10.10
SUPERPHOSPHATE -500 LBSIACRE -20%
MULCH - 2 TONS/ACRE - SMALL GRAINSTRAW
ANCHOR - ASPHALT EMULSION 1 300 GALSIACRE
LEGEND
+ + + ZONE
ZONE
. x x
xr, x
xic
ZONE
ZONES 4,5.6
1 2'
1. '
42'
PLANTING PATTERN DETAIL
NTS
PLAN VIEW
BMP Plant List
ZONE
nUANnw
DENSITY
AREA
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
SIZE
ROOT
REMARKS
1
1079
1
2158
NYMPHAEA ODORATA
WHITE WATER LILY
5- HT/ 2' SPRD
SPRIGS
TRIANGULAR SPACING
1
1079
1
2158
NUPHAR LUTEUM
YELLOW COWLILY
5' HT/ 2- SPRO
SPRIGS
TRIANGULAR SPACING
2
8a
O.SISF
196
PELTANDRA VIRGINICA
ARROWARUM
5' HT/ 2 -SPRD
SPRIGS
TRIANGULAR SPACING
2
88
0.5/SF
196
DULICHIUM ARUNDINACEUM
THREE -WAY SEDGE
S HT/ 2' SPRD
SPRIGS
TRIANGULAR SPACING
2
86
0.5/SF
192
ELEOCHARIS QUANDRANGULAT
PERENNIAL ELEOCHARIS
5' HT/ 2- SPRD
SPRIGS
TRIANGULAR SPACING
3
400
O.SISF
800
SAURURUS CERNUS
LIZARD TAIL
5^ HT/ 2' SPRD
SPRIGS
TRIANGULAR SPACING
3
431
0.5 /SF
862
JUEERSIA ETIR OIDES
RICE CUTGRASS
5' Hi! 2' SPRD
SPRIGS
TRIANGULAR SPACING
3
400
0.51 SF
800
SCIRPUS ATROVIRENS
GREEN BULRUSH
5' HT/ 2' SPRD
SPRIGS
TRIANGULAR SPACING
3
400
1
800
ANDROPOGO 4 OLOMERATUS
BUSHY BEARDGRASS
5- HT/ 2' SPRD
SPRIGS
TRIANGULAR SPACING
3
430
0.5 /SF
860
LOBELIA CARDINALIS
CARDINAL FLOWER
5' HTI 2 -SPRD
SPRIGS
TRIANGULAR SPACING
3
400
0.5 /SF
800
PANICUM VIRGATUM
SWITCHGRASS
5" HT/ 2- SPRD
SPRIGS
TRIANGULAR SPACING
4, 5, 6
5840 SF TOTAL
FESCUE/SOD
Dewberry
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
etas T.x.h r.R, s-tsa
P M- . Nc 2ezm
n.: ttN.509.9918
F�: i� .508.9931
. ewbnry.com
NCBEl59F -0929
SEAL
PRELIMINARY-
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
KEY PLAN
SCALE V -20'H
0' 10' 29 41Y
Mom
Mom
Mom
Mom
M —m
ml mm
M —m
REVISIONS
H
Z
DRAWN BY
LL
0
Lu
�z
Er-
00
�
IC
o
lU
Y
o�
Fi
F�g�o
� �
U
Z�
0�
C'
r
SEAL
PRELIMINARY-
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
KEY PLAN
SCALE V -20'H
0' 10' 29 41Y
Mom
Mom
Mom
Mom
M —m
ml mm
M —m
REVISIONS
3MP LANDSCAPING PLAN
PROJECT NO. 50089/20
FIGURE 10
TLK /EPM
DRAWN BY
BML
APPROVED BY
CHECKED BY
BML
OCTOBER 16, 2014
DATE
TITLE
3MP LANDSCAPING PLAN
PROJECT NO. 50089/20
FIGURE 10

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
1, Philip M. Jones, representing the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, hereby
certify that I have authorized Gregg Antemann of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act
on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of
this request for wetlands determination / permitting and any and all standard and special
conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
Z-ra- C. —
Agent's signature
10/17/14
Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence.

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 11/12/15
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Gregg Antemann
550 E Westinghouse Blvd., 28273, Charlotte, NC
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Wilmington District
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Davis take, UNC Charlotte Main Campus, Charlotte, NC
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC
County /parish /borough: Mecklenburg
City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.303752 °N; Long. 80.735131 OW.
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Toby creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters:
820 linear feet: 3 -8 width (ft) and /or 0.75 acres.
Cowardin Class: R4sB3, L1UB2
Stream Flow: 820 linear feet of Intermittent stream
Wetlands: 0.12 acres.
Cowardin Class: PF01B
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non - Tidal:
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): January 28, 2014 and July 15, 2015
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD-
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant. -
*H Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD, data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale &quad name:
124,000, Hordrhurg, NC, dated 1080.
❑✓ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.,
Citation: Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM. maps:
7100- .year Floodplain'Elevation is:. - -
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
EM, accessed 2015
❑✓ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name &Date): or
❑✓ Other (Name & Date):,site photographs of the wetlands and streams
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other, information (please specify):
2

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; .(2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
3

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that•could be
affected by the proposed activity, -based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form' has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations. ;
11 /12 /I5 i
Signature and date of 'Signature and date of '
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD-
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable);.
J

Site
Number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardlan
Class
Estimated
Amount of
Aquatic
Resource in
Review Area
Class of Aquatic
Resource
Stream A
35.303752'
- 80.735131'
R48133
573 linear feet
non - section 10 -- non -tidal
Stream B
35.303752'
- 80.735131'
R4SB3
247 linear feet
Non - section 10 — non -tidal
Wetland AA
35.303752'
- 60.735131'
PF01 B
0.092 acre
non - section 10 -- wetland
Wetland BB
35.303752'
- 80.735131'
PFO1 B
0.015 acre
non- section 10 -- wetland
Pond A
35.303752'
- 80.735131'
L1 U132
0.68 acre
non- sectlon 10 -- non -tidal

Jurisdictional Determination Request
RiiiRia
a]
US Army Corps
of Engineers,
Wilmington Distdct
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on -line at: http:// www .saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug_ latoryPermitProgEam.as2x , by
telephoning: 910 -251 -4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
General Number: (828) 271 -7980
Fax Number: (828) 281 -8120
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: (919) 554 -4884
Fax Number: (919) 562 -0421
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: (910) 251 -4610
Fax Number: (252) 975 -1399
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910- 251 -4633
Fax Number: (910) 251 -4025

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: Corps approved and preliminary JDs identify
the limits of CWA (and RHA, if applicable) jurisdiction for the particular site identified in your
request. The JD may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of
the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
® Property Information
Address: 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223
County: Mecklenburg County
Directions: Davis Lake at UNC Charlotte Main Campus in Charlotte,
NC 28223
Parcel Index Number (PIN): portion of 04931102
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
® Name: Gregg Antemann, PWS
Mailing Address: 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone Number: 704- 408 -1683
Electronic Mail Addressl: gregg @cws- inc.net
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
® I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
® Name: UNC — Charlotte; POC: Mr. Philip M. Jones
Mailing Address: 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223
Telephone Number: 704 - 687 -0514
Electronic Mail Address 3: pjones @uncc.edu
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel /Tax Record data)
1 If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION4
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to
enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Property Owner (please print) Date
See the Agent Authorization Form
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation. (proceed to F and G
below).
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property /project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
® I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property /project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT /USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
® Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
® Size of Property or Project Area: 8 acres
® I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
F-1 Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
❑ Project Coordinates: Latitude N35.303752' Longitude W80.735131°
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
Tributaries:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets ❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
Locations of photo stations
Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08 -02, dated June 26, 2008
Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
® Project Coordinates: Latitude N35.303697° Longitude W80.735128°
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
® Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
® Aerial Photography of the project area
® USGS Topographic Map
® Soil Survey Map
® Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps)
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
® Wetland Data Sheets
® Upland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
® USACE Assessment Forms
® Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
® Landscape Photos, if taken
® Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
Locations of photo stations
Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Forms) ")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11 "x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11 "x17 ", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e -mail to the requestor.
Plats submitted for approval must:
❑ be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
❑ be legible
❑ include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑ include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings /metes and
bounds /GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
❑ clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
❑ clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
❑ when wetlands are depicted:
*include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
*identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
❑ when tributaries are depicted:
*include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
*include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using
approximate widths or surveyed OHWM)
*include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
❑ include the location of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
❑ include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently subject to
the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands ", "non jurisdictional
waters "). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to make an official
Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not jurisdictional.
❑ include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that transport
Wous
CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
❑ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
❑ include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross - referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
❑ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
PJ

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
FormApproved-
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
OMB No. 0710 -0003
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW -CO -R.
Expires: 30- SEPTEMBER -2015
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710- 0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for falling to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity. '
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320 -332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used In evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This Information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information Is voluntary, however, if information Is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be Issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and /or Instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3'. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BYAPPLICAN7)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent Is not required)
First - Philip Middle -M Last - Jones
First - Gregg Middle -C Last - Antemann
Company - UNC Charlotte
Company- Carolina Wetland Servises
E -mail Address -
E -mail Address - gregg ©cws- inc.net
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address- 9201 University City Blvd.
Address- 550 E. Westinghouse Boulevard
City - Charlotte State - NC Zip = 28223 Country -NC
city - Charlotte State - NC Zip - 28273 Country -NC
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE Nos. WAREA CODE
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. WAREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
704 - 687 -0514
704- 408 -1683
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, Gregg Antemann to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental Information in support of this permit application.
See the attached Agent Authorization Form
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (If applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Toby Creek
Address N/A
City - Charlotte State- NC Zip- 28223
15: LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: aN 35.303752° Longitude: 6W W80.735131°
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID 04931102A Municipality Charlotte
Section - Township - Range -
ENG FORM 4345, DEC 2014 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Across from 8919 University Rd, Charlotte, NC 28270 (within 200 -foot buffer around Davis Lake, located on UNC Charlotte Main
Campus). See the Figure 1. Vicinity Map for more details.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
The purpose of this project includes retrofitting an existing pond into a stormwater BMP to treat runoff from on -site impervious areas.
Please see attached letter report for details.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see Instructions)
UNC Charlotte has a goal of creating a stormwater management plan in order to provide treatment of runoff from impervious areas created
by future development. Their proactive approach includes providing on -site water quality treatment and stormwater opportunities prior to
future development.
The purpose of this project is to retrofit an existing pond into a stormwater BMP to treat runoff from surrounding and adjacent impervious
areas (Figures 9 and 10, attached). Moreover, native wetland plants will be utilized on the proposed littoral shelf to provide additional
water quality treatment and aesthetic values (Figure 10, attached). This proactive approach is a step forward in UNC Charlotte's
stormwater management program and will ensure that future development on campus will not cause a negative impact to on -site and
downstream waters.
USE BLOCKS 20 -231F DREDGED ANDIOR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. associated with this project are limited to a total of 0.68 acre of a jurisdictional pond
due its conversion to stormwater management facility, and 82 linear feet (If) of jurisdictional stream channel and less than 0.1 acre of
wetland areas due excavation associated with the stormwater management facility construction (Figure 9, attached).
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type In Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount In Cubic Yards Amount In Cubic Yards Amount In Cubic Yards
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see Instructions)
Acres
or
Linear Feet
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see Instructions)
Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Proper sediment and erosion
control measures will be applied to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. No impact to the downstream waters is proposed and
the total acreage of the jurisdictional pond.witl remain approximately the same. Please see attached letter report for details.
ENO FORM 4345, DEC 2014 Page 2 of 3

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? QYes QNo IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Walerbody (lf more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
a. Address -
City - State - Zip -
b. Address -
City - State - Zip -
c. Address -
City - State - Zip -
d. Address -
City - State - Zip -
e, Address -
City - State - Zip -
26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals /Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described In This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL* IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
Would Include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this Information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant. C
See the attached Agent Authorization Form 11/12/15
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, DEC 2014 Page 3 of 3

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �' r S % S
Project/Site: N/1 S 14Ce
Latitude: 3S. 30 3C
Evaluator: KIrIT I AYR
County: /It &A,
Longitude: 6U, 9-3S12 p
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2-.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeraieljtermitten erennial
Other Sep
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial if 2 30"
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = % `� )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1g Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0.5
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
Q
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
Q
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
0
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
24. Amphibians
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
25. Algae
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
0
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
`perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
B. Hvdrolopv (Subtotal = 6 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
ID
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
2
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = b )
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants In streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NV DWO Strenm irlentificatinn Form Version 4.11
Date: 'gC1 a d`t
ProjectiSite: Lg,4�Z
Latitude: N�5 �7D3
Evaluator: `, �-
County: �(
Longitude: wso, X361280
Total Points:
Stream Is at least intermittent
Stream Determl n (circle one)
Ephemera ntermitt t Perennial
Other & b
a g. Quad Name: 6 0
if?: Igor perennial if 2:30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
v�
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 e Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex riffle-pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
®
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
No = 0
1
2
_ 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1 5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 9.5 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
1
3
14. Leaf litter
0
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
t^. Rinlnnv (Si ihtntal = 41 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
SCP1— Intermittent RPW Stream A
MSTREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET L
1. Applicant's Name: UNC- Charlotte 2. Evaluator's Name: T. Blackwell, PWS & K. Thames, WPIT
3. Date of Evaluation: 05 -29 -2014 4. Time of Evaluation: 1P
5. Name of Stream:-Intermittent RPW Stream A 6. River Basin: Yadkin (HUC # 03040105)
7. Approximate Drainage Area: — 76 acres 8. Stream Order: 1st
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 1001f 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): south of University Road and west of Broadrick Blvd.
on the UNC- Charlotte campus in Charlotte NC
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N35.303697° W80.735128°
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): n/a
14. Recent Weather Conditions: hot sunny, mid 80s
15. Site conditions at time of visit: hot, sunny, low 80s
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point ?G) NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 2.18
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? (D NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YEN
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 70 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
20 % Forested 10% Cleared / Logged _% Other (
21. Bankfull Width: 3'- 5' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): l'-3'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2 %) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) ­x __Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight x Occasional Bends _ Frequent Meander _Very Sinuous _Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score
of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 52 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature 1 r LwV 1 `"1�.1 Date 05 -29 -14
This channel evaluation form is inte d to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP1— Intermittent RPW Stream A
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
4
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
0
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points )
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
1
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 4
0-4
1
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
—
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
1
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max point s
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
4
fine homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
>4
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
3
asevere
erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
3
H
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture or livestock production
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
2
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
4
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = max points)
Habitat
Habitat complexity
17
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
4
or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = max oints
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
3
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates
0-4
0 - 5
3
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max po ints
O
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
0
P4
no evidence = 0• common numerous es = max points)
Evidence of wildlife use
23
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
52
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
SCP2 — Intermittent RPW Stream B
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET �'✓
1. Applicant's Name: UNC- Charlotte 2. Evaluator's Name: T. Blackwell, PWS & K. Thames, WPIT
3. Date of Evaluation: 05 -29 -2014 4. Time of Evaluation: 2:30P
5. Name of Stream: Intermittent RPW Stream B 6. River Basin: Yadkin (HUC # 03040105)
7. Approximate Drainage Area: — 28 acres 8. Stream Order: 1st
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 100 if 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): south of University Road and west of Broadrick Blvd.
on the UNC- Charlotte campus in Charlotte, NC
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N35.303697% W80.735128°
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): n/a
14. Recent Weather Conditions: hot, sunny, mid 80s
15. Site conditions at time of visit: hot, sunnv, low 80s
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YEN
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 70 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
20 % Forested 10% Cleared /Logged _% Other ( )
21. Bankfull Width: 2'- 4' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): V-3'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2 %) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) __L _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight x Occasional Bends _ Frequent Meander _Very Sinuous _Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score
of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 37 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature I r "W'V ' �111."V Date 05 -29 -14
This channel evaluation form is inte d to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP2 — Intermittent RPW Stream B
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
2
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
2
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = max points
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
1
no discharge = 0• springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
U
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
0
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0— 5
0— 4
0— 2
1
p +
(deeply entrenched = 0• fre uent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
3
fine homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
2
>q
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
3
i�
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = max oints
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
2
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points
15
Impact by agriculture or livestock production
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
3
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
4
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
Habitat
17
complexity
0 -6
0 -6
0 -6
1
�
little or no habitat = 0, freciuent, varied habitats = max oints
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
4
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates
0-4
0 - 5
1
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
O
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max oints
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0 — 4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points)
Evidence of wildlife use
23
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
37
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

S�WWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Easteren" Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: l.� kA& A � City /County: ItAl�C�{(�Q,(/�u -��{^ Sampling Date:
Applicant /Owner: UNC Ct W 10HC p State: �� C, Sampling Point: Q p �
Investigator(s):1'LelftilP 411/ Pk/s J`` K'[i �' ei)L, IrSection, Township, Range: Wur.� �.b
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Y 1i ;I 0,01f- Local relief (concave, convex, none): VWV l Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): t, Lac: N 35.3030 a' o Long: %A(pv • -1- 3 S k 7-9 a Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: W i Ie _S 10401 1-9 Co — `1 S_ "/o `� WIS C� `- F ) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes )( No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ^)(-- No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No_%— Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No_X_ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No_X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
T True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
T_
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
, Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? 'Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
No 'X Depth (inches):
No —,X— Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No__X_
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
r�t wt wv
Wt+leto l hydalo j y 1`� ►'� S �1—�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: °pr_ akvld
7
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
. % Cover Soecies? Status
T._ _�
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ (A)
�— ly
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:_ (B)
Total Cover
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
%� l0
`
i' 20% of total cover:
50% of total cover: ' .
Percent of Dominant Species
Herb Stratum si e:
)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A1B)
,(PPllot
N W
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: + 20% of total cover: l
OBL species x 1 =
3. 1'Ot��t�J/lI 'Lt b(S MGN�I�G�D
FACW species x 2 =
f�f ivv4
FAC species x 3 =
k
FACU species x4=
iN �
UPL species x 5 =
At �AL
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6
Prevalence Index = B!A =
7,
— 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
Total Cover
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
`
i' 20% of total cover:
50% of total cover: ' .
,
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum si e:
)
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
,(PPllot
N W
y ,
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2. sl
G. ! 0 Y G
3. 1'Ot��t�J/lI 'Lt b(S MGN�I�G�D
Gl. U
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be disturbed
4. VI Ojd� nL& A-
�_ AC—
present, unless or problematic.
_
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7,
height.
8,
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10
m) tall.
11.
Herb -All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody less than 3.28 ft tall.
= Total Cover
plants
50% of total cover: a-f 20% of total cover: b-&
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
height.
.2
3.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes No 4_
50 % of total cover: 20% of total cover:
)ers here or on a separate sheet.)
I 7A
Gar�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color moist %
Color (moist) % _Type' Loci
Texture Remarks
.Q -go �y too
-
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De lesion, RM=
Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
zLocation: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
^ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
r_
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A1.0) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
T_
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
, Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (FB)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
4. are✓
V10 (14adds 0- 61CIn` C
wl !S
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

G
WETLAND
� DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern `Mountains
� and Piedmont Region ,r
Project/Site: Nj(j.1s ArLIM(�,C�,-" "` � p City/County: It► eb" [W/01/ °1 Sampling Date: 1 2�
Applicant/Owner: yilvL (w�,�rgP JWI1� -j��� 7—section, Sampling Point: AA
Investigator(s):1,aUc yW 1 ) S t� �' i d'u1M.P�, (�� [ section, Township, Range: PJA_N't0 6
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 421 1eq Local relief (concave, convex, none): CoYtCuVe— Slope ( %):,�'
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): , fr1�,AN" — Lat: LN, 3 5) Alp 3 (07 r-° Long: INOD T35126* Datum: NA C)
Soil Map Unit Name: W, I tY i 10AAW1 , S "1 S �l6 t �k r',� NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _X_ No
Are vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ �_ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes _ _ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? J Yes No
Dafih �o)�fi is t(�&+� t'C- o�f' �• � I�risc(«fi��i.l wefta�l a /+P�t
HVDRnI_nGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
- _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
i
�
/X Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC- Neutral Test (DS)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No -,X—
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes_ No
Depth (inches): l D y
Y
Saturation Present? Yes _ X No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes /' No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers- .
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: T ) %ICover Species? Status
J
2. lMvr��ts r_ -
3. hue- ✓�fiGc.✓C _
4.
7.
2 r = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2, 20°1. of total cover:_
Saolina /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) _
_/0 t —
3. �'� �. _�_ Al 091 -
4,
5.
7
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. 1el's y.tfsi Ph B
z A-,
3. t' 1M1_
4._ l �n lM ^ N
5. R9-(_h Gt. GU. VWn C&_ 5_ Al
6.
7
10.
11.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
3
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
rs here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Pointw2'p �M
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:_ (B)
Percent of Dominant Species a
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: OQ �° (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Ion% 04 dvywkApj she 4 are FAC td, v4fr. .
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: X74
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features �_�
(inches) Color moist % Color (moist) �_ Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-11 6INI 3 ioYq Vtgjtj. l a
i 20 I I �Iioj sy Gv= 3y 20 ► Lom
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De lesion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _„ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A1o) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_4 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) T Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: x
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes L No
Remarks:
qin
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

F 4
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
July 8, 2014
Kelly Thames
Carolina Wetland Services
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Re: Davis Lake Site, Charlotte, CWS 2014 -3318, Mecklenburg County, ER 14 -1208
Dear Ms. Thames:
Thank you for your letter of June 5, 2014, concerning the above project.
Office of Arcluves and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or renee.gledhill-
earley(@ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced
tracking number.
Sincerely,
6W112mona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 276994617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Pat McCrory Bryan Gossage Susan Kluttz
Governor Executive Director Secretary
Clean Water Management Trust Fund
October 28, 2015
Aliisa Harjuniemi
Carolina Wetland Services
550 E Westinghouse Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
aliisa @cws- inc.net
RE: UNCC Davis Lake Site; 2015 -3551
Dear Aliisa Harjuniemi:
NCNHDE -867
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources from our database that have been compiled for the project referenced
above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there
are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation /managed
areas within the proposed project boundary.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have
been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records
suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable
habitat exists and is included for reference. Please note that although there may be no documentation of
natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area
may not have been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for site - specific surveys
where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records. Tables of natural areas and conservation /managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning,
project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory
decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written
notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications.
Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally - listed species are documented near the
project area.
Thank you for your inquiry. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need
additional assistance, please contact Allison Schwarz Weakley at allison.weakley(&-n_ cdenr.gov or
919.707.8629.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Page 1 of 4

M
r
V
d
O
a
d
0
y
7
a
M
w
m
E
d
C
O
f0
C
M
acnuLO
M .9 N w
J C) co
N W
> O `2
amZm
MCA., O0
y" U m Q Z
�z o0
Qua
L
r
f6
Z
y
N
c
d)
L
V
v
O
c
m
E
m
W
a)
C)
d
2
7
A
Z
I
I
aa)
C
H O
d �
3 0
10 0
c
QI o
U
a) �
OLI 7
a
a) � N
aL+I C Y
y�0
7
m
c
10
O,
c
ZI
71 U
a m
a
C U)
O c
E a
3 00
O E Z
p ca c
Z :3
M U
M M a)
22.2
It
NO
a)
rn
m
o_
N 04
CO
CO
<0 Y
P•
Ln
LO m
d
O O
C7
C7
U'
C7
0 CD
c'')
(D
U
i
a� a)
y
m
(6 .0
(a
C d
N
C.
C
rte+ rU
N
U
�. C
(L6 U UU
C a C
U
C a C
U C
C `� a
01 O)
N N
U C
`•�
�?
i+
yN
a
7U V
7 U
7 0
C
a)L
w
()
>
>
>in �oww
O
c O C
O c
O c
L
m
7
d r+
U)
.0
47 cn
•U
N
I
I
N a)
I •U C
1
O
a
N
aV
C CU
aV
C
aV
aV
i
m
%LL
U) c)
cn
U)
U
7
N
J
N
J
J
O
J
N
N
V
d
tn
Q
M
co
M
M
M
i m
y C
U
_
U
U U
U
C
E
7 a)
O
O
O
c
O
'C C
O O
C
O
N
d
�W
U
y
2
c
2
2
NNU)
_
2
_
2 2
N
2
U
O
O
N
O
N
—
M
N
NO
4
O
d)
00
M
In
O
f-
ly0
M1 J y
lw'0
p N
00
0
rl-
N
I-
0 co C)
00
LO
N
`I
rn
m
m
rn
0
rn
rn
.-
Q
O
r�
U
A.
O
d)
O
d)
m
y i
i
i
0
3
p
w
0
N
Y
O
O
a)
cn
N
O
ca
°�
a
a
O
aa)
w
7
�
M
w
�
U
L
m
L
m
o
m
F- vii
N
Q
0
0
C
C
C
U
m
N (0
C
v7
m cn
O
O
O
N
U
O J
O
V
U
U
U
Z
U Fm-
2
CD
m
�
O
E
c
_R
U
a)
C rm
T -.
:3
r
E
m
U)
ca
c x
L
Z
rn
t
t
a
a)
m
m
L
r- E
'p
0
b'
ca
>
C
C
C
O
U O_
c
o
p�
m
c
�
a
CL
E
m
0_
x
E .c
r
�
�
a
d
y
.0
O
E
E
°
-
w n
a)
E o
E
=
U
U
m
m
a)
cn
>, a)
��
>
¢
¢
U
U
Uo
a
u) rn
O
C
N
co
't
co r-
't
cq
d
co
O
(0
rn
ti
N
C
W
c(0
—
L)
L)
c
m
c
m
c
m
c
m
c c
m m
c
m
c
�a
n
�
a s
a
E
c
�.
`m
ac
)
E
a
y
N
U
N
k a rn
N L
a
) ca
cn
(n
W
LL
m >
>
>
>
> >
>
>
I
I
aa)
C
H O
d �
3 0
10 0
c
QI o
U
a) �
OLI 7
a
a) � N
aL+I C Y
y�0
7
m
c
10
O,
c
ZI
71 U
a m
a
C U)
O c
E a
3 00
O E Z
p ca c
Z :3
M U
M M a)
22.2
It
NO
a)
rn
m
o_

Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
ana ed Area Name Owner Owner T pe
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
Mecklenburg C_
ounty Open Space l •'':: Mecklenburg County Local Government
Mecklenburg County Open Space _ _ Mecklenburg County Local Government -
Mecklenburg_ County Open Space ;? ; _ "` :'• ,Mecklenburg County Local Government
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and •codes can be found at https, /Incnhd e. natures ry .ora /content/helo. Data query generated on October 28, 2015; source: NCNHP, Q4 October 2015. Please resubmit
your information request if more than one-year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

W
^tj
W
ca
N
.>
co
0
U
Z
co
W
i
Z
U
Z
f �J
;i::. rib hTeE
!, 5S� ^ my�o 'Jw.lyJ nrc, .:�i`,. {.: �•a �� ',,
u �
0.d A F J
v;n;y V
v
SN �
tij .
t'ziH y
6 ,
t yK
I• l '',� a
olyOy -
��a
s
/� - IP, ^DIY -: - l ±•`` t
c
E Y �Z
O � o
do`
�z
E
N cY
N
r O cu
N O U
O p J
Z
Sa
Z
o O �Q
�LL
pe (tNI]l
N J
(0 Q
� W
7
m Q
N U
� Nc p
� m a a
N U d a)
m
m
N ca
a 02
0
G
a1
m
(9
a

U)
U
W
p
N
cn
■ O
L �
}O
z
Mm
W
C
/� ♦� O
W �L
CCU o
WN
1 �
� m
0 C
J o
L
rr^�^
v/
N
Z
O
Z�
e
rr' M ms
C A
v f r
u; x
It
a ,
0
.Ml m
tc>
r
O
N
O
M
C
d
a
�v
►]
> 1jri
0
v.
N O N
IL
C11 co
ro Q m
N 'a
L LL n Q ^\
3 t>3 O C ro y% (C Lo
0 a W o
) 35 a �N
co ` C O
- co O
b-
��
0 Z
i
b
L �
7 U
0.2
N
UJ�
Z
U
co
C
cn
E
N
Z3
cl 0
C
m
w
a
o
a) •`p
vi Z
ro c c
SU
c E
m C,)
=
co y
ro
Z a
a�
°c
�'aC0
o vii
�
LLJ — O
E U
0.0
tb
C
U
N C II
a O
CC)
-
m
L O
CN
C
II
n c
a
O
42
o
E a m`
Z
d.
4) w E
Cl)
mQ`o
z
v � E
() 0
ZO
LO
N

UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site November 12, 2015
404 Section Individual Permit CWS Project No. 2015 -3551
Photograph A: View of Seasonal RPW Stream A, facing upstream.
Photograph B: View of Seasonal RPW Stream A at pipe outfall, facing upstream.

UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site
November 12, 2015
404 Section Individual Permit CWS Project No. 2015 -3551
Photograph C: View of Seasonal RPW Stream B at pipe outfall, facing upstream.
Photograph D: View of Seasonal RPW Stream B, facing downstream.

UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site November 12, 2015
404 Section Individual Permit CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3551
Photograph E: View of Wetland AA, facing west.
Photograph F: View of Wetland BB, facing southwest.
iii

UNC Charlotte Davis Lake Site
November 12, 2015
404 Section Individual Permit CWS Project No. 2015 -3551
Photograph G: View of Pond A (Davis Lake), facing northwest.
Photograph H: View Pond A (Davis Lake), facing southeast.
iv