20231624 Ver 1_Staff Report Zachary.Thomas_20231218 (7)

TranSystems
TRANSYSTEMS
January 11, 2024
Ms. Julia Tillery
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Dear Ms. Tillery,
2400 Pershing Road, Suite 400
Kansas City, MO 64108
Tel [phone]
www.transystems.com
The following includes responses to the additional information request received December 22,
2023 from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE):
Additionally, upon further review of the information provided in the 11/27/23 PCN and the
RFAI response referenced above, the following information is required to complete our
evaluation, confirm compliance with one or more General or Regional Conditions, and/or
complete consultation with another federal/state agency to verify the use of NWP-29:
The PCN indicates in Section 5a-d that potentially jurisdictional boundaries of
streams and wetlands have been delineated and verified by the Corps. Although
partial delineation information was included in your PCN, complete delineation
information and documentation for USACE concurrence was not included. Per NWP
29 General Condition 32(b)(5), this information is necessary to process your requestto
verify the use of this NWP, and as such your PCN is considered on hold until this
information is provided. Note also that a site visit may be required to verify your
delineation of potential waters of the US. Further, additional revisions may be
required on the PCN and plans based on the final Corps -verified boundaries of
potential waters of the US.
Specifically, I cannot confirm that a PJD or Delineation Concurrence was
issued because I cannot locate that documentation in our files or database.
Delineation documentation and Corps concurrence should always be
submitted with your PCN. Please submit the PJD/DC and all correspondence,
data sheets, supplemental documentation via email to me so that I may
continue review of the proposed project.
The Preliminary JD request was submitted to [e-mail] on June 16, 2022
and was assigned to April Norton, USACE. A copy of the Preliminary JD request (SAW-2022-01307
[1j

TRGNSYSTEMS
OWASA Morgan Creek Interceptor, Chapel Hill), and correspondence with April Norton is
attached to this response.
b. Additionally, based on evidence reviewed by the Corps in association with our
review of this project application there is sufficient reason to assume there
are jurisdictional wetlands and additional jurisdictional streams in the project
review area. Per General Condition 32.(4)(i) A description of the proposed
activity; the activity's purpose; direct and indirect adverse environmental
effects the activity would cause, including the anticipated amount of loss of
wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other waters expected to result
from the NWP activity, in acres, linear feet, or other appropriate unit of
measure; a description of any proposed mitigation measures intended to
reduce the adverse environmental effects caused by the proposed activity;
and any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used
or intended to be used to authorize any part of the proposed project or any
related activity, including other separate and distant crossings for linear
projects that require Department of the Army authorization but do not require
pre -construction notification. The description of the proposed activity and
any proposed mitigation measures should be sufficiently detailed to allow the
district engineer to determine that the adverse environmental effects of the
activity will be no more than minimal and to determine the need for
compensatory mitigation or other mitigation measures.
OWASA is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid
and minimize jurisdictional impacts and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all
remaining, unavoidable jurisdictional impacts. Avoidance measures were taken throughout the
planning and design stages, and minimization measures were incorporated as part of the
project design.
The proposed project will result in minimal adverse environmental effects, and impact areas
have been limited to one stream crossing at Morgan Creek. The installation will be completed
via open cut and includes bank stabilization. For the bank stabilization, natural material and rip
rap will be reinstalled per the stabilization detail sheet previously provided. Permanent stream
impacts from the installation will result in 56 linear feet (3,393.16 sq. ft.) of permanent impact.
No temporary stream impacts are proposed.
2. Per General Condition 15. Single and Complete Project. The activity must be a single
and complete project. The same NWP cannot be used more than once for the same
single and complete project. PCN Section 6a. Is this a phased project? Answer: No.
a. This answer contradicts supplemental documentation to the contrary -
specifically the following: "Phase II of the project involves the installation of
approximately 1,500 linear feet of 36-inch gravity sanitary sewer as a parallel
replacement for the existing gravity sewer. The new sewer is anticipated to be
[2l

TRGNSYSTEMS
installed via open cut and will result in permanent and temporary
impacts. Design of Phase II has not begun, however permanent impacts are
assumed to be an additional 15-ft of cleared area (parallel to existing cleared
easement). Additionally, permanent impacts may include installation of
permanent access from Flat Stone Court or the Mason Farm Wastewater
Treatment Plant. Temporary impacts are assumed to be a 30-foot cleared
area parallel to the alignment to be used during construction. It is likely that
two approximately 50 feet by 50 feet laydown areas will be placed within the
project area but the location of these is not yet known." - Morgan Creek
Sewer Interceptor Relocation Bat Surveys, EPR, 22 August 2023.
The proposed Morgan Creek Interceptor Replacement project is a single and complete project
and includes a 1,000-foot section of sewer line that has undergone numerous emergency repairs
and is in critical need of replacement. The purpose of the replacement is to improve the ability of
the existing line to meet the current and projected future flow conditions. The project will not
increase the existing utility footprint, and no additional development is anticipated to result
from the project. The project has been identified as critical, and the planning and design are
100% complete, including construction drawings.
The "Phase II" project is a separate project that is being reviewed for OWASA's comprehensive
Critical Improvements Plan (CIP). This plan includes future projects to be completed in the
utility's service area. The project has not been designed and is still undergoing the initial
planning and environmental investigations to avoid and minimize any potential environmental
impacts that could be associated with these future improvements to the utility.
Sincerely,
�V- �
Anna Reusche, PWS
Senior Environmental Project Manager
TranSystems
[3j

Attachment 1
USACE PJD Request and Agency Coordination

SEPI
June 13, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
[e-mail]
RALEIGH: 1 GLENWOOD AVENUE, SUITE 600, RALEIGH, NC 27603
OFFICE: 919.789.9977 / FAX: [phone] / WWW.SEPIINC.COM
Subject: Morgan Creek Interceptor Replacement
Orange County, North Carolina
Dear Sir/Madam,
NC Division of Environmental Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 276095
This submittal serves as a preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) request for the subject project.
The Orange Water and Sewer Authority (OWASA) proposes to replace approximately 2,000 linear feet of
the Morgan Creek Interceptor, located adjacent to Morgan Creek, in Chapel Hill, Orange County, North
Carolina (Figure 1). The coordinates of 35.893981°,-79.033120' generally correspond to the center of the
site which encompasses approximately +/- 13 acres along Morgan Creek. The site is located in the Cape
Fear River basin, but is in the Jordan Lake watershed (HUC # 030300020607).
During the May 11, 2022 site visit, 2 perennial waters of the US were identified. Morgan Creek and the other
is an UT to Morgan Creek were identified within the study area (Figures 2 and 3).
Please contact me at 919-816-7745 or [e-mail] you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Anna Reusche, PWS
SEPI Engineering
X

SEN
Attachments:
1.Figures
2.Agent Authorization Form
3.JD Request Form
4.PJD Form
5.ORM Upload Sheet
6. Stream Data Forms
7.Antecedent Precipitation
x

SEPI
Figures
x

WMISEM■■ 1�
t i
Project Vicinity
0
Finley
Golf
Rd Q C0urr
0
O 4wa
n'
Son Farm
a
r a University r f With
Carolina Clupel Hill
Sy
Bayoen� Ur
1
O t
a r
9 I
d f
d �
Project Boundary
N
Sha�1Y
0 500 1,000
Feet
Figure 1
Project Vicinity
Morgan Creek
Orange County NC
May, 2022
M

m
_o
-o,E _
of -
0
= o
_-_
62
�E -
=E
00 _
IEa
w� goo

Agent Authorization Form

RALEIGH: 1 GLENWOOD AVENUE, SUITE 600, RALEIGH, NC 27603
OFFICE: 919.789.9977 / FAX: [phone] / WWW.SEPIINC.COM
Rune 3, 2022
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Municipal Official
Name: Todd Taylor, Executive Director
Address: Orange Water and Sewer Authority, 400 Jones Ferry Road
Carrboro, NC 27510
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: Morgan Creek Interceptor Replacement
Date: 6/3/2022
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize SEPI,
Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to
furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from
this day forward. The 3rd_day of _ dune, 2022
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for
this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons,
is valid only for government officials to enter the property when
accompanied by SEPI staff. You should call SEPI to arrange a site meeting
prior to visiting the site.
BY: Todd Taylor BY:
Print Name of Landowner or Si nature of andowner or
Municipal -official's Name Municipal Of cial J
Q 131zz

JD Request Form

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re alatoiyPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aWx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: See attached
City, State: Chapel Hill
County: Orange
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 9797082499
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Anna Reusche
Mailing Address: One Glenwood, Suite 600
Raleigh, NC 27603
Telephone Number: 9198167745
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Orange County Water and Sewer
Mailing Address: 400 Jones Ferry Road
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address
Carrboro, NC 27510
919-537-4249
[e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/ParceVrax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Anna Reusche
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
5/19/22
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
I❑A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization. �
�J I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/iJSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
❑ Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
❑ Size of Property or Review Area +1- 13 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
0
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.893981
Longitude:-79.033120
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 lx 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
F] Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hit2://www.saw.usace.aM.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
❑ Vicinity Map
❑ Aerial Photograph
❑ USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
1_J Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.aM.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.aM.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approvedjurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District'swebsite
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

PJD Form

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Anna Reusche, SEPI INC. One glenwood suite 600 Raleigh NC 27603
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Orange City: Chapel Hill
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.:35.893981 Long.:-79.033120
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83
Name of nearest waterbody: Morgan Creek/ Jordan Lake
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 5/19/22
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
Morgan Creek
35.8935
-79.0281
3258.44
Non -Wetland Waters
404/401
UT.M.m-C-
35.8915
-79.0360
93.89
Non -Wetland Waters
404/401

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: aerial imagery and stream photos
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

ORM Upload Sheet

m
T
F
OIofof
� W W
�aa
mm
Of Of
N N
Q Q
UIw w
Of Df (
S w w
Of Df
of of
Of Df
zz
O O
Q Q
U U
S S
F F
00
z z
U
m m
m o�
U `o
m o
o� F
`o D
� S

SEPI
Stream Data Forms
x

Morgan Creek - Mainstem
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/11/2022
Project/Site: Morgan Creek
Interceptor Replacement Project
Latitude: 35.8935
Evaluator: A. Reusche, David Moose
County: Orange
Longitude:-79.0281
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if
54.5
Stream Determination: Perennial
Other: Chapel Hill
e.g. Quad Name:
>_ 19 or perennial if >_30
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 30 ) 1 Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong I SCORE
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3
3. In -Channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripplepool sequence
0
1
2
3
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
1 2
3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
3
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
I artiticial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 12)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
3
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 12.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
1
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1 1
1 1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
perenmai stream may also oe oeminea using omer memoas. - p..ro or manual.
Notes: Caddisflies, stoneflies, midges, frogs, salamanders, common Elliptio mussel shells
Sketch:

SC - UT To Morgan Creek
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/11 /2022
Project/Site: Morgan Creek/ UT to
Morgan Creek
Latitude: 35.8915
Evaluator: A. Reusche, David Moose
County: Orange
Longitude:-79.036
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if
39.5
Stream Determination: Perennial
Other: Chapel Hill
e.g. Quad Name:
>_ 19 or perennial if >_30
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 18 ) I Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong I SCORE
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3
3. In -Channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripplepool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
1 2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
2
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 13.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
3
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1 1
1 1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
0
'perennial stream may also be identified using other methods. See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Stonecase caddisflies
Sketch:

Antecedent Rainfall

11)
0cl�
c6
Q
� Z
0
F T �
❑ }
^l
O O
❑
O
Q
E
U
U_
.L
O
vl
2
1�
Ln
Q
Q
N
N
r n
�
V
N
\
r
Q
In
I
(N
a
C)
a
"
O
Z
N
�
rrr
OI
O
N
O
N
Ln
}W}��
V,
f6
L
Q
Z
Lrl\
O
a-J
U
L
a-J
W
W
U
a
IN
N N
M �
ON
N
Q ON
N
N
O
N
o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
v�
v
u
Q
T
0
rl
'-I
rl lfl
M
rl
O ~
~
r-I
Z
T
t6
d In
M h
1D N
rl rl
h
O]
a1
O
r
O
a�I-
l4N
m
ON
mO]rl D]
v O]
: rl
vl
66
l0 CJ
O] m
0 0
O
ri
N N
rl N
N
lfl
a)
d Into
o]IO
Nm
In M
mm
to m
'
=O
N O
ul T
M N
r-I O
W O
to lD
m
0 0
of 0
cJ
Ol 0
0 o]
y� N
O N
of In
N m
ID t0
m N
0 a)
m
7 to
N.--I
rl rl
INN
W to
O7
N
W
D]
m
N
D] m
O lfl
N IO
- vt
N O]
.... nj
lfl r-I
� In
T T
O lO
UJ
u
O '-I
4 r4
r4 r4
N N
L
In
Q
c
a
NO
rinh
rlm
ri
`Q»
I-ammr-
mm
oM
n-m
O1 T
ti O
ti o7
O]00001
Q In
al h
OInN
lfl
MMIflN
al O
N
W
�n a
rn ri
ul N
N �
h al
� rl
ul 01
00
0000
rl
r1 O
O O
a1 D]
-pTT
r
TTTTT
r r
r r
r r
TTTTD]
r r
r r
D]
r r
O
ION
07�
o7
�o7Nmrl
of l-m(+1
mof
NIO
t0 l6
LOON
Lr In
N
al
mmmm
Ol on
oT
m
al Ol
Ln In
M M
on oT
Ln In
M M
oo al
Ln Ln
M M
O h
lfl Ln
M M
J
N O
J r
a M
In T
D
O=
O
J 0=��
N
J a
.
J
O=
LC
J J
J J
J=
m a
nr n�
Q Q
J O
=
_ _
U1 I-m
U=
Of
Q=
J J
J J
d❑
Q=
a
a a
Q
io
aVUULuaa_av
aj
U
_
W
_
v
(S@gDUI) 112JU112�1

`. fr
«: a° o
n ,
C. •
4
Yi
T,
- t
g16e
;s firt
,
+Fwr,
_. :� ' 9.+�" •ram �. w ,"
s
• IYW/ a _
a � N
t N
T ,
N
t a �> 0 0 >
ui N z
� � U
y �,.. .. LL.
i
cy, 1 r
A r Q
Q
� m�a
■ eti
L -mEILI
—
m �
� a
4 QI E o O
pn '
10
w �
U
moa
1m
t E _ o z
d u
rc 3 a
E 60 .11
3 hoo
_� O

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Morgan Creek City/County: Durham Sampling Date: 10-14-22
Applicant/Owner: Orange County Water and Sewer Authority State: NC Sampling Point: UP -A
Investigator(s): Anna Reusche, Tori Fowler Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35 . 8917 Long: -79. 0364 Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Area is located in the floodplain of Morgan Creek. No surface hydrology present. No saturation or water table
present.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: UP -A
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Acer rubrum
3. Oxydendrum arboreum
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 45
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Polystichum acrostichoides
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
is
50% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
20
Yes
FAC
10
No
FAC
60
Yes
UPL
90 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18
10 Yes FAC
5 Yes FAC
15 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3
15 Yes FACU
15 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Testworksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
5
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
60.0%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
FACW species 0 x 2 =
0
FAC species 45 x 3 =
135
FACU species 15 x 4 =
60
UPL species 60 x 5 =
300
Column Totals: 120 (A)
495
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4.13
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: UP -A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/4 100 Loamy/Clayey Sandy Loam
4-8 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
8-12 7.5YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Morgan Creek City/County: Durham Sampling Date: 10-14-22
Applicant/Owner: Orange County Water and Sewer Authority State: NC Sampling Point: UP-B
Investigator(s): Anna Reusche, Tori Fowler Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35 . 8927 Long: -79. 0355 Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Area is located in the floodplain of Morgan Creek. No surface hydrology present. No saturation or water table
present.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: UP-B
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Acer rubrum
30
Yes
FAC
2. Carpinus caroliniana
15
Yes
FAC
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
5
No
FAC
4. Pinus taeda
5
No
FAC
5.
6.
7.
55
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
28
20% of total cover:
11
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1. Polystichum acrostichoides
15
Yes
FACU
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
20
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Ilex opaca
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
is
50% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Arundinaria gigantea
2.
3.
4.
5.
5 Yes FACU
5 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 1
20 Yes FACW
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Testworksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
4
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
6
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
66.7%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
FACW species 20 x 2 =
40
FAC species 60 x 3 =
180
FACU species 20 x 4 =
80
UPL species 0 x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 100 (A)
300
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.00
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: UP-B
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-10 2.5YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey Sandy Loam
10-12 2.5YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators.
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

From: Anna Reusche
To: Norton, Aoril R CN USARMY CESAW (USAI
Subject: RE: SAW-2022-01307 (Orange Water and Sewer Authority / Morgan Creek Interceptor / Chapel Hill NC / Orange County)
Date: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:58:00 PM
Attachments: innane002.Dno
innane003.Dno
innane004.Dno
innane010.Dno
innaoe011.Dno
innane012.ern
innage014.Dng
innane015.Dno
innage016.Dng
innane001.Dno
UPLAND DATA POINT B.Ddf
UPLAND DATA POINT A.Ddf
Fig 2 Morgan Creekr Data Point Location MaD.Ddf
Good afternoon April,
I apologize for the delay on getting back to you. Here are the upland data forms w/ corresponding map to assist you in processing the PJD.
Please let me know if you need anything further.
Thank you,
ANNA REUSCHE, PWS
Senior Environmental Project Manager
_ SEPI [A Division ofTranSystems]
SE P I One Glenwood Ave, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27603
A Division Or 919.747.5865 D 919.816.7745 M
T- Systems
From: Norton, April R CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail].m1l>
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2022 3:30 PM
To: Anna Reusche <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SAW-2022-01307 (Orange Water and Sewer Authority / Morgan Creek Interceptor / Chapel Hill INC / Orange County)
Hi Anna,
Could you please provide a wetland data form for the subject project as indicated below?
April R. Norton

Regulatory Division
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: Aoril.R.NortonCcDusace.army.mil
From: RaleighNCREG <Rale1RhNCREG6Dusace.armv.m1l>
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2022 4:18 PM
To: Anna Reusche <AReusche6Dsepiinc.com>
Cc: Norton, April R CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<Aoril.R.NortonCcDusace.army.mil>
Subject: SAW-2022-01307 (Orange Water and Sewer Authority/ Morgan Creek Interceptor / Chapel Hill INC / Orange County)
Good Afternoon,
Your JD request has been received, assigned action ID SAW-2022-01307 and forwarded to April Norton for further processing.
Please refer to the action ID in all correspondence.
Thank you,
Josephine Schaffer
From: Anna Reusche <AReuscheCcDsepiinc.com>
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2022 2:47 PM
To: RaleighNCREG <RaleiRhNCREGCDusace.army.mil>
Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Morgan Creek Interceptor Replacement - PJD Request (REVISED)
Good afternoon,
Please note the applicant information has been corrected and added to the attached.
On behalf of Orange County Water and Sewer, please see the attached PJD request for the Morgan Creek Interceptor Replacement
Project in Chapel Hill, INC.
Thank you,
ANNA REUSCHE, PWS
Senior Environmental Project Manager
SEPI, Inc. S_�I
One Glenwood, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27603
919.747.5865 D 919.816.7745 M
Celebrating Twenty Years