Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20151182 Ver 1_Application_20151110 Carpenter,Kristi From:Bryan, Roger D Sent:Tuesday, November 10, 2015 12:01 PM To:Beckwith, Loretta A SAW; Chambers, Marla J; Carpenter,Kristi; Barnett, Kevin; Buncick, Marella Cc:DeWit, Benjamin J; Medlin, Christopher D; Michael Clark (mgclark@vaughnmelton.com); dweber@owleconstruction.com Subject:Bridge 100402 Buncombe Permit Application Attachments:Bridge 100402 Buncombe Permit Application.pdf; Bridge 100402 Buncombe Plans.pdf; Bridge 100402 Buncombe PJD Form.pdf; Bridge 100402 photos.docx Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged I have attached a permit application and plans for NWP 14 on a bridge to culvert project in Buncombe County. I have also attached the PJD Form for the Corps file. Please email me if you need additional information. Thanks Roger D. Bryan Division Environmental Program Supervisor II Division 13 Department of Transportation 828 251 6171 office 828 337 5234 mobile rdbryan@ncdot.gov 55 Orange Street PO Box 3279 Asheville, NC 28802-3279 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 1 Corps Submittal Cover Sheet Please provide the following info: 1. Project Name: Bridge 100402, SR 2806 Garren Creek Road 2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: NC DOT 3. Name of Consultant/Agent: *Agent authorization needs to be atlached. 4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): 5. Site Address: N/A 6. Subdivision Name: 7. City: Fairview 8. County: Buncombe 9. Lat: 35.52872 Long: -82.32548 (Decimal Degrees Please ) 10. Quadrangle Name: _Black Mountain 11. Waterway: UT to Flat Creek 12. Watershed: Broad River 13. Requested Action: X Nationwide Permit # 14 General Permit # _ Jurisdictional Determination Request Pre-Application Request The following informatioi� will be completed by Corps office: AID: Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose: Site/Waters Name: Keywords: Transportation Noverober 10, 2015 Ms. Lori Beckwith US Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Subject: Nationwide Permit #14 Bridge 100402, SR 2806 Garren Creek Road State Project No. 17BP.13.R. I 10 Buncombe County, NC Dear Ms. Beckwith: PAT McCRORY Governor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON se�remry I have enclosed a set of plans, a PCN application for NWP # 14, and a vicinity map relative to the proposed bridge replacement project on SR 2806 Garren Creek Road, Bimcombe County, NC. We propose to replace the existing 1 Ttimber bridge with a 12' x 5'x 34' concrete box culvert with sills and baffles. Culve�t installation will result in pennanent impact to 34 linear feet of an UT to Flat Creek; bank stabilization will pennanently impact an additional 29 linear feet. Temporary impacts to 82 feet of the creek are due to a temporary impe�vious dike diversion during culvert construction. The stream is approximately 8 feet wide with a predominately gravel and cobble substrate. The UT to Flat Creed is classified as Class C, Trout. Fish are present. Existing channel morphology will be maintained upstream and downstream of the culvert. Riparian vegetation will be reestablished along disturbed areas associated with the project. Stormwater will be diverted through grass-lined ditches or vegetated buffers prior to entering streams. This project may impact potentially suitable northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalrs) (NLEB) summer roosting habitat via tree removal. Therefore, a may affect, not likely to adversely affect is requested for the NLEB. Tree clearing would be limited to a few suitable trees (<5) and would be perfonned between Oct. 15 to May L The existing bridge is constructed of creosote-treated timbers. The crown to bed measurement (distance from travel surface to streambed) is 5 feet Clearance between the bottom of the bridge and the stream surface is approximately 3 feet. A survey of the bridge did not reveal any evidence of usage by bats. No effect on the remaining counry list of federally protected species (threatened or endangered) or designated critical habitat will occur. Marella Buncick of US Fish and Wildlife Se�vice is copied on the application for review. �Nothing Compares� Sta�eoCNOrthCarolina I DepanmenlofTranspona�ion � DivisionTLirtew� 55 Oranye Slrce[ I �O Box 3279 I Asheville, NC 28802d279 82S 251 6171 T Ms. Lori Beckwith Page —2 Bridge 100402, Buncombe County November 1Q 2015 As a part of the 401 Certification process, the project was processed through the DOT Programmatic Agreement for Minor Project as required by Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and GS 121-12(a). No Historic Resources will be affected. By copy of this letter, we request Marla Chambers, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Western Region Coordinator, to comment directly to the Corps concerning the permit request. By copy of this letter, we are asking the Area Roadside Field Operations Eugineer, to comment on the above project The UT to Flat Creek is classified as Class C, Trout. The project will not require a trout buffer variance. By copy of this letter, I am forwarding one electronic copy of the application package to Kristi Lynn Caipenter, NC Division of Water Quality, Transportation Permitting Unit with cc to Kevin Barnett, NC DWQ Asheville Regional Office for review and comment. Please charge the application fee of $240.00 to WBS element # 17BP.13.R.110. Please forward comments directly to the Corps with copy to Division 13 Environmental Officer. Your earliest co��sideration for this request would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions or infonnation needs, please contact me at (828) 251-6171. Sincerely, �- 3 Roger D. Bryan � Division 13 Environmental Officer Enclosures cc: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E. Chris Medlin, P.E. Ben DeWit, CPGSC Kevin Barnett Marla Chambers Marella Buncick pi �uATEn o`'' �° °. �, :ry�� � ' LlIAJLX _; o � Offce Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the X Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit Corps: � 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number:14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? I X Yes ❑ No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes X No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes X Yes 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h I❑ Yes below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? I❑ Yes 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Bridge 100402, SR 2806 2b. County: Buncombe 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Fairview 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 176P.13.R.110 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if N/A ......�:....�.�_�. 3d. Street address: N/A 3e. City, state, zip: N/A 3f. Telephone no.: N/A 3g. Fax no.: N/A 3h. Email address: N/A X No ❑ No X No X No Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: North Carolina Department of Transportation 4b. Name: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E., Division Engineer 4c. Business name N.C. De artment of Trans ortation /if annlirahlcl� p P 4d. Street address: 55 Orange Street, P.O. Box 3279 4e. City, state, zip: Asheville, NC 28802 4f. Telephone no.: 828-251-6171 4g. Fax no.: 828-251-6394 4h. Email address: rdbrvan(cilncdot.aov 5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: N/A 5b. Business name N/A �:� ,.....�:....�.�_�. 5c. Streetaddress: N/A 5d. City, state, zip: N/A 5e. Telephone no.: N/A 5f. Fax no.: N/A Sg. Email address: N/A Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.52872° N Longitude: - 82.32548° W 1c. Propertysize: 0.1 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Flat Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, Trout 2c. River basin: Broad 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Existing bridge on SR 2806 surrounded by low density residential area and forested land. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 100 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Replace existing 17' timber bridge with a single barrel box (12' x 5') culvert with 1"' sills and 6" baffles. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: A permanent impact to 34 linear feet of the UT to Flat Creek will be necessary for culvert construction with 29' of rip rap bank stabilization. A temporary impact of 82 linear feet will be necessary for an impervious dike to dewater the work area during construction. Equipment used will include excavator, crane, and trucks. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / � Yes X No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): N/A Other: N/A 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes X No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes X No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands X Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts if there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem orar T W1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W2 � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ 1' ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ I' ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3 b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Strearn impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permaryent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width pinear Temp�xary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ❑ F X T Impervious Dike UT to Flat Creek X PER X Corps $ 82 ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S1 X P �] T Rip Rap UT to Flat Creek X PER X Corps $ 29 ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S1 X P�] T Culvert UT to Flat Creek X PER X Corps g 34 ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ SS ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 145 3i. Comments:34 feet of permanent culvert impact, 29 feet of permanent impacts for rip rap, 82 feet of temporary impacts for dike. Page 4 of 10 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Tem orar T 01 ❑P�T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number ofpond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total Sg. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem orar T im act re uired? 61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P�T ❑Yes ❑ Na 63 ❑P�T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Minimized length of culvert and added sills and baffles to maintain natural stream channel bottom within the structure. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. N/A 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for X Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ X Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this X Pa ment to in-lieu fee ro ram project? Y p 9 ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. X Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 34 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool X cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes X No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes X No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? X Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The project will use BMP's to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) in compliance with NCDOT's NPDES Permit No. 000250 Post Construction Stormwater Program ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? X DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? N/A ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed X Other: N/A 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been N/A attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 X Other: N/A 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review Sa. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? N�q 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? N/A Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (OWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surtace Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? Field survey of the project area and evaluation of current distribution data. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? Current Maps/Database 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Current Maps/Database 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project will not impact water passage or flood zone beyond existing conditions 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Current FEMA Maps Roger D. Bryan n 11/9/2015 /� o,� ApplicanUAgenYs Printed Name pplicanUAgenP Signature Date (Agent's signatur ' valid only if an authorization letler from the applicant is rovided. Page 10 of 10 xP �3.�"' j�`"' \a.:`:{ Environmenta! Quality PAT MCCRORY covemo. DONALD R. VAN DER VAAR7 Secrefory Mr. Roger Bryan NCDOT Division 13 Environtnental Supervisor North Cazolina Department of Transportalion Post Office Box 3279 Asheville, North Carolina 28802 Deaz Mr. Bryan: November 5, 2015 Subject: Mifigation Acceptance I,efler. Division 13 Project, Replace Bridge Number 100402 over UT to Flat Creek on SR 2506 (Gazren Creek Road), Bunwmbe Counry; WBS Element 17B.13.R110 The pwpose of this letter is W notify you tha[ [he Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide the compensatory sVeam mitigation for the subject project. Based on the iuformation received on November 4, 2015, the impacts are located i� CU 03050105 of the Broad River basin in the Southem Mountains (SM) Eco-Regioq and are as follows: Broad 03050105 SM Cold 34.0 Sheam Cool � Warm � Riparian WeUands � Buffer Zone l q. Ft.) Zone 2 Thia mitigation acceptance letter replaces the mitlgaHon acceptance letter issued on October 22, 2015. This impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by the NCDOT in the 2015 impact data. DMS will commit to implement sufficient compensatory stream mitigation credits to offset the impac[s associated with this project as determined by [he regula[ory agencies using the delivery timeline lis[ed in Section F3.c.iii of U�e In-Lieu Fee Insinunent dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced 'vnpact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be va(id and a new mitiga[ion acceptance letter will be required 1'tom DMS. If you have any questions ot need addilional informatioq please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-707- 8420. Sincerely, ��� V '" James Staufill Credit anagemenl Supervisor cc: Ms. Lori Beckwith, USACE - Ashevilie Regulatory Field Office Mr. Cluislopher D. Medlin, P.E., Division 13 Bridge Program Manager Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT - PDEA File: SR 2806 - Bridge 100402 - Division 13 Revised �`�Nothing Compares;�. Slaleo(NorthCam�ina � EnvironmenlalQuality 1601 MailServiceCenter I Faleigh,NorlhCamlina27699-1607 919-707�8600 ti h .i , }:; Figure 1. Bridge 300402, UT to Flat Creek (above and below bridge�, Buncombe County, NC. Figure 2. Bridge 300402, Bridge structure showing timber beams and proximity to stream bed, Buncombe County, NC. e ..' �-_' �' Fr. �+. -�- �+S , ��O'•�� ' e. �� � J � 4 \ ����' � � / _ �;E-. ��� �i " `w /� ' !�'°{ � � �+ '�'1 �. , � � � � �L � . _ � e + '�'` �`.- .•.� "itz� °(�� }S� -'.L S � Y ��_;v ��.� - . ir�f .. 3 : '� � Z w;g � ��,�,p-i �#R5, i�" �, `'s ' S �-��' � �, .�c = ,+ � - �,�• iR��; '_ �' � i :� '� �th � � G..,, r • � \ �.: -C .r _ - - �� 3��t� � �4 �. ,'(���"�''��'�� �'y'��l ;� ,�F.ti�' b�-�� / � _� < . .s' IF �� ' ` � $� €. � � ? ���. �� ; � � .; �� � �",��{ y<f.�-a° -.°,Y�.�,�' -• � � _ 3 7.F+� � l.�' vi ��1 ��i�; � � �r.�� � � .�__- Q -.���y ��-;� "s�. # 7:A `i` ..:�'� f. _ F �"�.i.._' � � �.y� '.'a�'�i� � Y�.:"_ ' � ' • �: ; � t�.:� .- ��� �. -. 4 .1. F _� �� � .s. ��� ..�`��� . . - 4 � .� �.:. �' — 1 � �,� F� .�1t +,.�.a.� �'s�.. -.v iL.Yy� _713I.�f. �, � � � � � � � � .', �' � � ��. �"�.,� -s •� �' � �'� i _ ?% '�c' � � ° ��� & ;,�.,� • , �. -_ . �s't ';�°�, `:; �' ��'� 1�� � a.t..i 1""�1�:' ,� 4 i. . _ $` ;�� ' � � , 1 � �'_ �F-' h, -` � :� �'�"`'� �' � „��,.-.�. ,y� -� ke. �`:+�� s= .. 'e� . �fe*L..�`� • 4 ��- �� . . 0.W'". �'4. _ �2 1 � �...► _ ,� ��_ --��� �� r- �.����`"; � , , '� _4 "�' � �� - +� . �, �. �-��-�..- �`' - .� -+�:. - - � � � . , �.� � _ - �` _ ,-;r ��A~�� �±.+' y� �., �,�.,� ���ti� i �" . . '�r' ��� `� t ,;s ��a-� �-� ' .,_ �.� ._A � : � ��, �� a� . w�: _.y� t "' • `�°+.� � ,�N � i ��� � �.� �,. , . r�. — -�-� s �. _ �- r,c �,�,�. v .yT�,� �. .rt��� ,�r��_ r�i``: �-,��- a, � > '�E'�" r. & j + �..e :.6_ ,_r, ��,'� �.� - �_ a`�.,•yy��� ��,�y ya' :..4I . ��.a"`.' ,: . � y , f.� S 1 Y �e'?' �'�+' _ ._��, xFb .� , �7 _-•�,_' `�.��� -°� y.:' _ 7 �, i����i 's . t� � - +'— K�.' .. .. �°"' " _. . ` - T - `` _, - �� �, �� . � ��'-S . ..� . . � ��+°.,.,y, ir_�'� � .`�. L it y'- � ' ^ :-�'�-� < - �i -� " ,-��°' � st � � °�-r` j � ` � �� +m°' �`� 'T �� R"',',C � � ��'-- d _'. O ' . . � �� r- ' y� . ' k.� .t y� � �� � � � . ��, � . : ���,,g-cs� '�' ��� if A .` • _ _ ,�� ,� � ? .4�,�r t �-. �j34����,F�e `s� _= � }`_. �'�" �`�•A� w.:,4� '� � � "'�`Y. '�+fi�`'7' ` .�., �..� � �.. ,`� h � � �" � _ �� ��4!.+�� �� ^ � t , ''''� ' ',,° �1 � "� . "� � 4 � . Y .:�"Y' _ _ �y/ ' � � F 4 �'� . _e� ) �.. 'w � � � 8�� � '� .' !'.� � '�v�� .-.'V ';, � j � �". � � n . �S � `, ►+� yA�'" ;'�� � ���r � � \` �' R�i'� �= � ",� 4;�'F ,��.�� � � �� � .c . ,� r �, �, ' C.. .n ' �- �' l �*` L t. .r . } _ � �, a.. '- �.' "a,� � � � s` -' '+.r" a _ i-,��'°rt"��-1�'�1.� , . :.� �I• -. •a'i � �'�y�.---. 'E � �.. , � 1 � "``Y �� t �, . . �. _.. ��tw�:,trs"�__ ��-:.�� _ ir! . r.,_.°s. _t-'`� � ��.-- R'-�Q ?w��"'�.+ . Figure 1. Bridge 100402, UT to Flat Creek (above and below bridge), Buncombe County, NC. �� � �—�_` r_ , , ,r , 1 � ' ) � �� � i� � '+�'� _a�` � � �. �"'�A' �'':rv4 �y�. m' ..— r ..� ��,�s;':,,�i`u'�.� i ��,� �,!'�,,y,'��Rb... t wd ,7� IF. ` f �y `� �. _0 '1i�� :�.� ��i` 'r�„ i� t ,7� � � � � ,���'"��J ��'1k '� �q,1 � . .. _`� . _ .�i� ��td', ��.- -`.ISS'!' � ��.3 � _ ,.::,.. .. . ��.. � * _ :��,�� - :�,,,r�.- ��,��� � � >`'��"�!'� - ,.� - �� _ 'p �, �z =�� � �. � � �--� ��� ,r-�"'�: �^ "`_ • A, f ��` ?� ��� `:1...." . . � `'r '�?�R . ��1 �. ��/r r �'+ � #.; �r � �'� 1�` �•` -_ f ��' �� � '��6 . JR� �I" � r .q�r..+� w "�..,"�-*tw-. ,��-'�'-�'t-r ��: y �T ti�„ ; -- e�� t'� �. o� � i��^'�r;'���� ��� ; � K �-.� . R!'�-' `` ° �` r �"+� : � +, - ,� o. ���'�� �� � 4 � ��a.,.. � iM �� j��� ,� � �� . `,►i � '� �n� .-, � Y���+ � s �f �,�� " - �-""�,�' ��� ,'.� •r� �� s �fM � n�.^�',1�' .�'�w. '�`►"y- "�l� 4R*������ �" . ` . �'� ' 4 �i a. �� } 15� �3.. . V . . 1�t .� :f � �` � � � -� � _ ..��+.� �- .ar�� � ,������� ��-`�� ".�,'� ._ - 'TY1 ' `� _ ' 'iej1 �.� . '� ���- � /r ,} �f_�`"� ^ ;� � �. � �-�'� �� -'�.�'��{ � i�� ��/ r'• �'��'! ' r . �. � � � Me�i��_ � t��� "� ,� f- , �'� r v� + i � . ��G'�F.�. °}'`E •��,�% �$�� e ,_.r • I1 �t 's+� r � ... �^' ` � "^.... i� �- �P 3 � � M. y �:, �,�k v r . � �,�'c-,7 � .� ��� , ,F°� "r :� -`.������,fA: . __ . - , � . �+�! v � �o Kf _ � ;.n �'. _�,,,y,f � `°'_3�1 �_ ` � .� � � x ^� � � I � .�rs"�er� .�.� � �_.� i 1 `�. ' �� � ^ � w� � • . �� i �4.y� ' �,.�"l � y .. �S� - � �Y �a ' +� �, .' � � � i.,,'� '�"�,' .'r.�,i.,... : .i�'�G 'RI/'t ��.9 1 � � 0�.'��_ -«�.:'' -� '�1; �4 i �.._ � � _ - .a� ?�' -�-�e� �� ' ! . "i� � p�I�•. „r;a�e�.. �y _ 1�i,t.�.. '� *�: - .. ' �` ��� '�� � iJ!:l � _.L '_ '`R'� �`$�,�N +.< .e,��� 4k'• �,,t� A'' A�,3 L i` '�� "�Y '..4 � 4�°� �' `- .F� �� . � � �l 4,� '� ^- -•r � .. '' `1e ! _ _ � vq �} � � ? �'� }�� y. a �lt Z� 3 S y i ,,,.? � 1-, i tF !' �.:`,} �, � � `' �` '� '4} - f � �S � �.s.� `f " a' �^ ���� �'�.i�,� '��� �" b� f �'� ��. �; ��e �� � i! � `�i� ���i'"� � �. (4�'�,`: ! � - _ '� � f r_ ��.If'y :,,���,y�� ` �� h �. 1' . a , .,. _ � � � �. ;�+ '►,,�`. �. �k� ; +� y - �. � L ����s.� � _ i e _ ". ,�M.. F '._i .I ,o r �- '��.'r� " � � �..s...�'S`��� .��'�`.. � �• r �ti 3 �, � . �� s i ��,e���:/��� ��°�' ''F`..�r +At' �,:t µ�� .I�y,, ` �, � �3.?+ �, �'.:- w '��,+ - �'}".""'� - � �v���� � ^r� y� � �� �k _ �s;w, � r j ' . �i li-,. 'L�� � :� � ��'�"� �2 J� r i - , �� i . ,��� - �;� - � s�T? � . ��� �� , ,� F., .�`�}fai �, A1'� �: r � .at�, i�"J �;�',y�",��( � - � � ,[ ° �; � p ��r ����� �"��o,�� .;� ��i. k'_ . . - ,- . ,_:;. '., 4'.'�.�'y'�`-� ?tp:` �� �.���i ' ����id.- � _ ��s4��� ,� � �lc��t _ � . , � . . .� �.��� ; .I'� �' ,��; Figure 2. Bridge 100402, Bridge structure showing timber beams and proximity to stream bed, Buncombe County, NC. k li�;l 1�� <14' North Carolina Department of Transportation S L[?l"l l itYcltPl� � Highway Stormwater Program �. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.02; Released April 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: TIP No.: 176P.13.R.110 County(ies): Buncombe Page 1 of 2 General Project Information WBS Element: TIP Number: 176P.13.R.110 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 10/7/2015 NCDOT Contact: Roger Bryan Contractor I Designer: Michael Clark Address: 55 Orange Street Address: 1318F Patton Avenue Asheville NC 28801 Asheville NC 28806 Phone: 828-251-6171 Ext 221 Phone: 828-253-2796 Email: rdb an ncdot.or Email: m clark vau hnmelton Cit ITown: Asheville NC 28801 Count ies): Buncombe River Basin s: Broad CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Description Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 215.00 Surroundin Land Use: Rural Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-Upon Area ac. 0.1 ac. 0.1 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: Two 9' travel lanes with 3' shoulders Existing cross sections vary within project limits. Average Lane Width 8.5' Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: 0.08 Year: Existin : 0.08 Year: 2014 General Project Narrative: This project consists of replacing existing 17' timber floor bridge with a proposed 12'x5' RCBC with 1' sills. Shoulder cross section draining to grass ditches. Proposed roadway (Description of Minimization of Water drainage maintains existing drainage patterns. Existing bridge is 18' wide with direct drainage to stream over edge of pavement. The proposed roadway above the culvert will Quality Impacts) drain in sheet flow across grass shoulders. Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): UT Flat Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 9-12 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Supplemental Classification: Trout Waters (Tr) Other Stream Classification: Impairments: Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? No Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? N/A (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) I Ii�;E71�'�]V North Carolina Department of Transportation � � :�iiUl`1]�1�1i�t1t('C I „�- .- Highway Stormwater Program �;' STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN —'�� (Version 2.02; Released April 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: TIP No.: 17BP.13.R.1 County(ies): Buncombe Page 2 of 2 Bridge to Culvert Avoidance and Minimization Proposed Structure Summary Sheet No. & Station Sheet No.: 4 Station: 12+22 Number of Culverts: 1 Drainage Area (ac or sq mi): 0.61 Sq. Miles Culvert Width/Diameter (ft : 12 Surface Water Body: 1 UT Flat Creek Culvert Height (ft): 5 Culvert T e: Reinforced Conrete Box Culvert Culvert Length (ft 34 Avoidance and Minimization Efforts: The proposed culvert is of minimum length given safety and construction considerations. (Bridge to Culvert) Stream Slope Fish and/or Aquatic Life Passage Existing Average Stream Slope (°/a): 4.00 % Existing Low Flow Channel Dimensions 6' Proposed Culvert Slope (%): 3.57 % in the Stream: Culvert Burial Proposed Culvert Burial Depth (ft): 1 Existing Streambed Material: cobble, gravel and sand Proposed Low Flow Dimensions 6' Through the Culvert: Proposed Sills/Baffles: To retain natural bed material, a 1' sill and baffles six inches higher are proposed. Existing Low Flow Velocities in the Stream (ft/s): 5'7 ropose ow ow e oci ies roug the Culvert (fUs): 3'7 Alternating Low Flow Sills/Baffles: To retain natural bed material, a 1' sill and baffles six inches higher are proposed. Culvert/Stream Alignment Stream Patterns Upstream and Downstream N/A of the Culvert that Could Affect Fish Passage and Bank Stability: Bed Forms Impacted by Culvert (riffles, All are impacted. pools, glides, etc.): Low Flow Floodplain Bench Required? Yes A low flow bench will be used to aid in transporting sediment through the culvert (provide justification) Sharp Bends at Inlet/Outlet? Yes The stream runs parallel to the road resulting in sharp bends where the road crosses. (describe culvert alignment with stream) Stream Realignment Necessary? (provide No justification) Bank Stabilization: Near the ends of the culvert rip rap will be placed for approximately 10' upstream and 30' downstream. Outlet Velocities Natural Stream Channel 2-yr Velocity (ft/s): 6.2 Natural Stream Channel 10-yr Velocity (ft/s): 7.4 Proposed Culvert 2-yr Outlet Velocity (ft/s): 4.1 Proposed Culvert 10-yr Outlet Velocity (ft/s): 9.5 Roadway Geometric Considerations Evaluate/Describe Roadway Geometric Constraints: The stream runs parallel to the road resulting in sharp bends where the road crosses. N 0 �s� �, � w � 0 ,�� � > O � . � . � � � � .� � V W 0 � � � N M � V • � � V � � O V ����� �� ������ �������� �������� �I� �������� B U1�lCOMBE CO U1�lTY LOCATI0IV: BRIDGE 111O.100402 OVER U11t11lAMED TRIBUTARY TO FLAT CREEK 0111 SR 2806 (GARRE11l CREEK ROAD) TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE BEGIN PROJECT 17BP.13.R.110 —L— STA. Il +25.00 � To � S � � �9/,p��� �� �\ �� ��� �� �� \ �� ' � ����� ��- BEGIN CULVERT - -L- STA 12 + 14.44 This project is not wiihin the boundary of any municipality. Clearing on this project shall be performed to ihe limits established by modified method II. PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 4 9 � o � ��,�� � ��s� o �o 0 END CULVERT -L- STA 12+30.34 SR 2806 % � , �s� -L- (GARREN � ' - � s� �\ � ,� -- —,6 ,� � � 5 $� —,s� _� - CREEK RD.) � 1 � _ ,s . -- -- � � ----- ----- ----------------- � __ TO FLAT CREEK RD s�y �,_,s__� UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO FLAT CREEK -----_ _ -"-���_ —L— STA.13+25.00 �\ /• \ % PERMIT DRAWINGS SUBMITiAL 5-162 OCTOBER 16, 2015 1P�8.1C1LdA�i[d�'.�1E3� ][�1LA�� DO VOT 1:5F, FOR COTSTRL'CTIOh �� C Trl-C=tles, IN ` 423-4ti��8401 L Knoxville, TN 865-54E�5800 Vaughn & Mellon n Spa�*a�b��s. 5� COn�ultir�G E�glnears 86A-5�4�4115 ❑ Charleston,SC Asheville, aas�s�a�se��o ■ North Carolina ❑ Mrdaieseoro, Kv 926�263-2796 606-248-6600 ❑ cn��io++e, Nc ❑ 000�o, Nc ❑ nria„+a, ca �04-35�-040b 826-355-9933 1�0�627�3509 Coplr�yh+ lp 2006 Vaua�n G Melton.lnc. AIIR�ghTS Reserved . � Prepare0 /n ti� Offlce of: HI'DRAULICS ENGINEER DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH VAUGHN F� MELTON STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ADT 2013 = 1300 ]318-F PATTON AVE. 20 10 0 20 40 LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 17BP.13.R.110 = 0.035 MI nsxEVrLCE xc, 28806 FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF HIGIiWAYS �� �°'�8�y LENGTH STRUCTURE PROJECT 17BP.13.R.110 = 0.003 MI zoiz sraNnarzn snEC�Ftcazioxs ���6� ���� PLANS T b%* ° �\ V = 40 MPH TOTAL LENGTH OF PROJECT VBP.13.R.110 = 0.038 MI MICHAEL CALHOUN, PE PE � �� 2� �� Q 2� 40 SIGNATURE: PROJECT ENGINEER � RIGHT OF WAY DATE: � _ o MAY 21, 2013 ROADWAY DESIGN ���� �Q�� *TTST - 3/o - - - REECE SCHULER, PE ENGINEER � V���� PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) DUAL = 3% eeo�ECr nES,cx ENCrNESx 4 2 0 4 $ FUNCT. CLA55=RURAL LOCAL LETTING DATE: xcDOr coxrncr: SUB-REGIONAL TIER MAY 21, 2013 VIRGINIA MABRY PROFILE (VERTICAL) MANAGER -PRIORlTY PROJECTS UN/T P'E' SIGNAT[7RE: Z 0 � � � � � � � � � z / Pl Sta �_/ D = � L = /� T = ; R = 4/S.00Y H = 533.0CJ' Ro = 83' Ro = 83' SE _ .068 SE — .0 V= 35 MPH V= 40 PH BM#1 -L- STA.11+94.54 19.00' LT. ELEV = 2 609.31' ��+0� � srA. = iz+zz -�- G.P. ELEV. = 2608.06' SKEW = 131° PROPOSED 1@ 12° X 5' RCBC CULVERT INVERT BURIED 1' Pl = 12t05.00 EL = 2,608.84' VC=75' K=64 V=40MPH -L- 12+00 13+00 � BRIDGE NO. PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 100402 /78P.13.R.1/0 2 WW SHEE7 NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAUUCS ENGINEER ENGINEER ]�1[b1E1LII�gN ]E3� ]�1LAN� DO NOT U9E PO CON9TRtiCTION OOI S �" ��� 6'� �PO PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 4 DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER �DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA DESIGN DISCHARGE = 270 CFS DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25 YRS DESIGN l-IW ELEVATION = 2606.8 FT BASE D/SCHARGE = 430 CFS BASE FREQUENCY = l00 YRS BASE HW ELEVATION = 2608.09 FT OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 350 CFS OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 50 YRS OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 2607.6 fT O � � � � � � � � � z � \ tltGIN YRO. iN� \ � \TA.11+ L- S R>� � � � 8 � � �, �6 � \ � � \ �RR�`N �'R �� eST ,IS-WF �� fek RD �� _ � / —L— CURVE DATA Pl Sta 10+9/ Pl Sta 12+26. 1 �_ 1548' 23.2" lLT) �= 8' 26' 36.8" (LT) D= l3° 48' 22.4" D= l0° 44' S8.8° L = 143.46' L = 78.55' T = 72.45' T = 39.34' R = 4/5.00' R = 533.00' Ro = 83' Ro = 83' SE _ .068 SE — .0 V= 35 MPH V= 40 PH BM#1 -L- STA.11+94.54 19.00' LT. ELEV = 2 609.31' �cb/� -Z,,.��m. �.�"�,�.i` �5�� � BEGIN CULV�RT �; �'S L- STA. 12 + 14.44 � � 2-D ..._�s... ....__ .. BRIAN E. & EDITH T. KINTNER �� \�s,,, OB 2815 PG 12 � � � DB 4132 PG 459 \�S\ ��� PB 89 PG 23 �Nn'AAF�� \� PB 79 PG 134 To Fi „rTRiBirr'� ��+0� 3-D DONALD J. & DENISE L. MADLE DB 2683 PG 438 �ititinlec �Riaur-nRr � � - - � TJ FLA CREEK � 15 �JS��-- 1S �_.-�. _ JS �-'- JS-� . JS- --------- --- Exisri�vc Piw �, � _�_ c^� �'------ Y\�� �ni vn°r i���.i. ----- cR���coRae ---_- �VA�, � ,� ------ - '���_�� i BEGIN C&G -L- END CULVERT \\ �' � y� � STA.12+27.50 RT �-------_ _-y �A w � -L- STA. 12+30:34 ,��_ — � / �� i - ; _ � � VA , - -- � � � ' - ------ - _�_ � ,� - " , ---� � srA. = iz+zz -�- G.P. ELEV. = 2608.06' SKEW = 131° PROPOSED 1@ 12° X 5' RCBC CULVERT INVERT BURIED 1' Pl = 12t05.00 EL = 2,608.84' VC=75' K=64 V=40MPH -L- 12+00 13+00 - ------------ �� ;az-- ExisTiNC Riw � �, ,,------- T � cy �� : <, . � �� i �� � � BRIDGE NO. PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 100402 /78P.13.R.1/0 3 WW SHEE7 NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAUUCS ENGINEER ENGINEER ]�1[b1E1LII�gN ]E3� ]�1LAN� DO NOT U9E PO CON9TRtiCTION O01 S �" � `� �r�\ �PO PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 4 DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER �DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA DESIGN DISCHARGE = 270 DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25 DESIGN l-IW ELEVATION = 2606.8 BASE D/SCHARGE = 430 BASE FREQUENCY = l00 BASE HW ELEVATION = 2608.09 OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 350 OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 50 OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 2607.6 CFS YRS FT CFS YRS FT CFS YRS � ATTACHMENTA PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUNDINFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: NC DepaAment of Transportation, 55 Orange Sireel, P.O. Box 3279 Asheville, NC 28802 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Bridge replacement with culvert for Bridge 100402, SR 2806, Buncombe County, NC (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/bOrough: Buncombe Clty: Fairview Center coordinates of site (IaUlong in degree decimal format): Lat. se.eza�z °N; Long. -az.azsas °W. Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: ur �o F�a� aeek Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: ioo linear feet: a width (ft) and/or acres. Cowardin Ciass: ���e���e Stream Flow: Wetlands: N�A acres. Cowardin Class: Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: Non-Tidal: E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): � Office (Desk) Determination. Date: � Field Determination. Date(s): ionsizo�a SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): � Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicanUconsultant: ❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the appl�nUconsultant. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: � USGS NHD data � USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps ❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: � z4000, eia�k Mo���a�� ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: � 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or � �the��Name&�ate�.Photosotstreamwithinpermitapplication,ll/9I2015 � Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: � Other information (please specify): 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicanYs acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) 0 � w �� 9.�[�� Sig ture and ate of person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable)