20151177 Ver 1_Application_20151110

and
November 9, 20l 5
Mr. William Elliott
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
5] 2 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
Leonard S. Rindner, PLIC.
o C C�G��l�
���
NOV � � 2015 �
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification for NWP #14 for Shutterfly Road Extension, in
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC.
Dear Ms. Higgins and Messrs. Elliott, Johnson, and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) for the installation of a culvert to construct the
collector road extension of Shutterfly Road, in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County. Proposed impacts
are to 292 linear feet of degraded stream channel in order to construct a culvert and installation of
associated rip rap to facilitate truck traffic. The collector road will connect Shopton Road and
Sandy Porter Road and will enhance a bypass of the currently congested intersection of Sandy
Porter and Shopton Road. Congestion is expected to be further enhanced in the area due to its
relationship to I-485 and future development of significant industrial/distribution facilities
currently under construction in the vicinity along with the future proposed interchange of I-485
and Sandy Porter Road. The intersection of Shutterfly Road with Sandy Porter Road is required to
be a minimum of 750 feet south of the existing Sandy Porter Road and Shopton Road Intersection.
The collector road and intersection are identified on Existing and Proposed Major Collectors Plan
provided by the civil engineer who has been coordinating with City of Charlotte staff. This road
Charlotte Of(ice: �� www.wetlands-epg.tom � M� � Asheville Ofiice:
10612-D Providence Rd. I �70 Tu�nel Rd., Bidg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 1 [e-mail]

and
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
also aligns with a future industrial park across Sandy Porter Road. The extension project is adjacent
to Shopton Road Business Park. This site is comprised of existing building, roads, and parking;
buildings under construction; and future proposed large-scale commercial warehouses and
trucking facilities. Shopton Road Business Park was permitted in 2000 with Nationwide Permit
26 and l4 and accompanying 40l water Quality Certification. The existing and functioning
regional stormwater management facility was designed and sized to treat all stormwater runoff
from the site, including the proposed road. The delay in construction is associated with the
economic turn down in 2001 followed by the recent recession in 2007/2008 as well as other
planning and design factors.
Avoidance/Minimization/Miti�ation:
The applicant has attempted to avoid and minimize impacts to stream channels to the maximum
extent practicable while considering the site and design constraints associated with truck
transportation gradient and vertical curve criteria. With regards to complete avoidance, the
construction of a bottomless arch/span in this location would cost approximately $ 600,000 to
potentially over $1,000,000 due to the length, height of the fill, footings and retaining walls; and
potentially poor soil conditions. This was determined to be impracticable based on information
provided by the engineer on behalf of the developer. The proposed plan limits the impact to 292
linear feet. This includes 2:] stabilized slopes and guardrails. Also, the road width is being
proposed at the minimum width necessary to accommodate the type of traffic expected on this
section of road which would be large tractor-trailer vehicles. The road alignment/crossing could
not be moved as the connection to Sandy Porter Road is dictated by the required minimum distance
from the Shopton Road intersection (minimum of 750 feet). This distance requirement eliminated
the opportunity to move the road alignment to the north which could have avoided or minimized
impacts to the stream channel.
The proposed stream segment to be impacted is in the upper reach of an unnamed tributary of
Coffey Creek. The stream segment has been cut off by a functioning regional stormwater
management pond that was allowable and approved by the USACE and NCDENR in 2000. It
appears that downstream of the stormwater facility the stream reach continues uninterrupted to
Coffey Creek. Based upon stream identification/assessment forms provided, the stream channel
in the impact location scores was on the threshold between intermittent and perennial. WEPG
biologist, Patrick Kealy, conducted the recently implemented North Carolina Stream Assessment
Methodology (NCSAM) as an additional assessment to determine the quality of the stream channel
for the purposes of determining appropriate mitigation requirements. NCSAM data forms are also
enclosed which provides documentation of the quality of the channel when evaluated as either an
intermittent or perennial stream channel. Both assessments that were conducted for each type of
stream channel show medium to low ratings in all sub-functional classes. Based on the information
provided and observed in the field, we believe the stream channel would be considered degraded
and subject to reduced mitigation ratios.
With regards to mitigation, the applicant is proposing to mitigate for unavoidable impacts to 292
linear feet of stream channel through payment into the North Carolina Division of Mitigation
Services (DMS) at a 1:1 ratio. The stream channel impact is located in the Lower Catawba River
�. . n.�� _ �� .��.� ��.��., . v �,w...�. _ ..�.. . .� � 3
Charlotce Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Atheville Office:
I 0612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] (828j708-7059
[e-mail] z [e-mail] .

Wetlands and Environmental
Leonard S. Rindner,
Basin (03050103) and an acceptance letter from DMS is enclosed. Ultimately a reduced mitigation
ratio was proposed due to our findings documented by NCSAM.
Also since the previously approved permits/certifications were issued, the Northern Long Eared
Bat (NLEB) has been listed as federally threatened for Mecklenburg County: Since the portions of
the site and the road crossing is wooded, habitat does exist for the recently listed for NLEB within
the impact area. However, due to its location which is at least 45 miles away from a known
occurrence and the fact that there will be minimal tree clearing (less than l-acre in the impact
location), we believe this project is not likely to adversely affect the Northern Long Eared Bat and
ultimately not subject to tree clearing moratoriums. No other habitat was observed to be present
for other listed species in Mecklenburg County, therefore we believe that the project will have no
effect on any other listed species or their critical habitat under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act.
Thank you for your consideration and please contact me if you have any questions, (704) 904-
2277 or email at len.rindner(�a,wetlands-ep .g com.
Len Rindner, PWS
/"/.�
��
Principal
�, , r.r. .. � . .. ��.��.� ..�, _ � � � .. < �.,.�. � .,., < _ .�.� m. . ,a�_..�..,� ,
Charlocte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com �Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 _ Asheville. NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 3 [e-mail]

C
O
.�
u
a
a
Q
�
.�
L
�
�
Permit Application

O�O� W A T�9�G
�' r
> �,
� T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: �X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ❑X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes OX No ❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank ❑X Yes � No
or in-lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h � Yes ❑X No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Shutterfly Road E�ension
2b. County: Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Liberty Properties Limited Partnership
3b. Deed Book and Page No. DB 29A79 Pg 801
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if Massie Flippin
applicable):
3d. Street address: 1900 S. Boulevard, Suite 302
3e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28203
3f. Telephone no.: 704-426-8000
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Len Rindner
5b. Business name Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28277
5e. Telephone no.: 704-904-2277
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 20146106
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.168103 Longitude: -$0.951497
1 c. Property size: 67.96 acres
2. SurFace Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Coffey Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C
2c. River basin: Lower Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is currently used for commercial and manufacturing purposes and is composed of structures/buildings, access, loading and vacant, forested
areas. Portions of the site currently under construction. General land use in the vicinity consists of commercial and residential developments.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.65
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,600
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is the extension of Shutterfly Road to connect with Sandy Porter Road.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, trackhoe, dump trucks, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
ro'ect includin all rior hases in the ast? Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (If kllOWll): Len Rindner PWS Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
See attached NWP #26
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for �Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Action ID. 200030481-482 for NWP #14 and #26 (enclosed) and General Water Quality Certification # 3102 and 3108 (enclosed).
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Corps (404,10) or impact
Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Tem orar T
W1 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
�/2 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
�/�/3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
�/q - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
S1 P Culvert Stream A INT Corps 10 264
$2 P Fill Stream A INT Corps 10 28
S3 - Choose one - -
S4 - Choose one - -
S5 - Choose one - -
S6 - Choose one - -
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 292
3i. Comments:
Total impacts to stream channels are 292 linear feet which includes approximately 28 linear feet of rip rap.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Tem orar T
01 - Choose one Choose
O2 - Choose one Choose
03 - Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
p2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse � Tar-Pamlico � Catawba � Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number — mitigation impact impact
Permanent (P) or required? (square (square
Tem ora T feet feet
g� - Yes/No
B2 - Yes/No
63 - Yes/No
B4 - Yes/No
B5 - Yes/No
gg � - Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See attached narrative in cover letter. Crossing location of stream channel is ultimately dictated by intersection distance requirements from the
connection/intersection of Shuttertly Road to the Sandy Porter Road/Shopton Road intersection. The road crossing is being constructed to the
minimum width necessary to accomodate expected traffic flow/type in this area to include large tractor trailer vehicles along with other vehicular
access.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Appropriate sediment and erosion control devices will be installed to minimize impacts during construction.
2. Com ensato Miti ation for Im acts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): �X DWQ ❑X Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ❑X Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Com lete if Usin a Miti ation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Com lete if Makin a Pa ment to In-lieu Fee Pro ram
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. X❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 292 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. COmmentS: Applicant is proposing payment into NCDMS at a 1:1 ratio for 292 linear feet of stream impact due to degraded nature of stream
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires � Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes OX No
within one of the NC Ri arian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
� Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? �p o�o
2b. Does this ro'ect re uire a Stormwater Mana ement Plan? ❑X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: �
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Storm water on the site will be handled/treated by the existing onsite BMP (online impoundment) as shown on the attached plans that was previously
approved under DWQ# 000250 (attached). The 1st inch of rainfall collected along the road extension will be piped/treated in the existing on-line BMP.
Also, any new/proposed buildings/impervious surface will also be treated by the existing on-line impoundment.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Mecklenburg County
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local overnmenYs 'urisdiction is this ro'ect? Mecklenburg County _
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): � USMP
� Water Supply Watershed
� Other: NCDWR
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been X❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
�Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply �ORW
(check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑X Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑X Yes � No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? �X Yes � No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes 0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑Yes 0 No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in �Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The road extension will not facilitate any additional impacts to downstream water quality. Future/proposed development that may occur from the
construction of this road will not impact any additional streams/wetlands and storm water will be treating by existing/previously permitted on-line BMPs.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility through existing sewer lines.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. -
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Portions of the property and the road extension corridor is wooded which would be considered habitat for the Northern Long Eared Bat (NLEB).
However due to the minimal clearing associated with the road crossing, no adverse effects are anticipated to the NLEB.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
http://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov
� �.
/
� ��-----
Len Rindner `� � 11-09-2015
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the a licant is rovided.
Page 10 of 10

Wetlands and
A�ent Authorization Letter
Leonard $. Rindner, PLLC.
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name:
Property Address:
Shutterfly Road Exterrsion
3817 Shutterfly Road, Charlotte, NC 28273
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 20146106
Select one
Name:
I am the current property owner
Massie Flippin
Company: Liberty Properties Limited Partnership, c/o Liberty Property Trust
Mailing Address: 1900 South Boulevard, Suite 302, Charlotte, NC 28203
Telephone Number: 704-426-8000
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
�
Prope►�"y 4►v�ter%lnler'esled Bccy�r* /Other�
}v(�2 i
l�crie
* The Interested Buyer/Other acknolvledges that an agreement and/or fo��ma! contract io purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between 1he current p��operty owner and the signatory of this authori=ation in cases
ivhe��e the property is no! owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office: � �� h www.wetlands-epg.com �� � f�sheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bidg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10. PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville. NC 28805
[phone] {828)708-7059
[e-mail] z [e-mail]

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory
Governor
Massie Flippin
Liberty Property Trust
1900 South Blvd., Suite 302
Charlotte, NC 28203
Project: Shopton-Ridge Shutterfly Road Ext.
Division of Mitigation Services Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
October 13, 2015
Expiration of Acceptance: April 13, 2016
County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing, to accept payment for
compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please note that this
decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in-lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies
as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact pern�itting agencies to determine if payment to the
DMS will be approved. You must also comply widi all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations
associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of tl�e
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA pertnit within this time frarne, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy of the pertnit(s) an invoice will be issued based on
the required mitigation in that pernut and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in-lieu
fee to be paid by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by
permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
Rivcr Basin I CU I Stream (feet) I Wetlands (acres) Buffer I Buffer II
I Location S Ft.
f i Q• ) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold � Cool � Warm � Riparian I Non-Riparian � Coastal Marsh
pact � Catawba � 03050�103* � 0 � 0 I 300 I 0 I 0 I p —I — p
* The CataH ba 03 Eapanded Serviee Area will be util�zed for this imnact Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take
responstbility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee
Program instrument dated Tuly 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in-lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need additiona] information,
please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
S incerely,
James. tanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc: William Elliott; USAC�-Asheville
Len Rindner, agent
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Phone: [phone] Internet: http:Nportal.ncdenr.org/webfeep
An Equal Opporlunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - Made in part hom recycled paper

Previous Permits
N
�
.�
i_
�
�
N
�
�
.;
�
L
�

State nf fVorih Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Ho{man, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
i�lr. Barty Jemes
� � •
�
�
�
NORl.i CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURGES
April l U, 2004
Mecklenburg Counry
DWQ Project # 0(JOtiO
AYFROVAL uf 401 \i'ater Quality Ccrtitication and ADD�TIUNAL COR'DTTIONS
� American Asset Company
5950 Fairview Road
Charlotte, NC 28211
Dear Mr. ]ame;:
You have our approval, in aceordance with the attached coaditions and those listed below, to p3ace filI matenal in 0.98 acres of wetlands
nnd 12a0 (1,60Q feet frmn flooding and 39D feet from cul�-erting) linear feet of streams for lhe purpose of constructing the Sandy Porter
Road/Shopton Industrial Park at Shopton and Sandy Yorter Koads as descnbed in your application da�ed February 1], 200D. Aftcr revieH�ing
your application; we have decided that this fill is covered by General Wa[er Quality Certification Numbcrs 3102 and 3108. These eertifications
a11ow you to use 1�ationa•ide Pennit Numbers 14 and 26 when the Corps of Engineers issues them. Sn addition, you should get any othcr
federal, state or local perntits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to} Seditnen[ and Erosiun Control, Coastal
Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Water shed regu!ations. This approv.� will expi!'e �vhen t6e accompanying 40? or CAM.4
permit expires unless athenvise specified in the Genere! Ccrtification.
This approval is only va3id for the purpose and clesign that you desenbed in your application except as modiTied below. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new applicatinn. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a
co�y of this Cenification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wedand fills for this proiect
(now or in the future) excced one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7) For this
appro��al to be valid, yoi3 must follow the conditions listed in the attached cenification and any additiunal conditions listed below.
1. Decd notifications or similar rnechanisms shall be placed on all remaining junsdictional wetlands end streams to notify the. state in order
to assur� cvmpliance for fature wedand andlor water impact. 7hese mechanisms shall be put in place within 3U days of t}ie dare of this
]ettcr or the issuance of the 404 Penstil (whichever is le�ter).
2. An additionu] rondition is that a final, written stormwater management plan sha1l be appro�•ed by this C)ffice before the unpacts specified
in this Certification occur, 7'he stormwater management plan must include plans tuid specifications for slorm�ti�ater man�gemen� facilities
designed to remove RS% TSS according to the most recent version of lhe NC DENR Sronmvater fiesl Manr�geme.nt Proctic�es Manual.
Also, before any pemiAnent buAding is occuPied at the subject site, the facilities, es approved by this C1Cfice, shull bc cons�ructed and
operationai, and thc slormwater management plan, as approved by this Office, shall be implemented.
IF you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask fo� an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within ti0 days of
the dare that you reeeice this le.tter. 'i'o ask for a hearino, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapte.r 7 SOB of the NonF� Carolina
Gencra] Statu�es to the Offiee of Adminislrative Hearings, A.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 2761 i-7447. This certification �nd its conditinns arc
f,nnl and binding unless you ask for a lieuing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Watcr Qunli[y under Section 401 of the C!een vVater Act. !f you have uny yuestions,
pleasc telephone 3ohn Uomey at 919 733-9b46.
Attactunen(
cc Corps ot Enginecrs Ashe��ille Field Office
J�looresville DVJQ Regional Office
rile ci>py
Centrul Files
Todd St. John
Len Rindner
1'�� ��
,�
.
�
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
1821 Mail Service Center Raleigh iVC 27669-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX �t 733-9959
An Equal f�pportunity Affirmative Action Employer �
50% recycled.�10% post consumer paper

�� -_I �..
�i�t�a�c�� •�\
{�,,��,1;�����`, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
r ��...
�'� � � WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGiNEERS
,� I _ ; � ' P,O. BOX t89D
� �'�' � ' WILMING70N, NOATH CAROLINA 28402-1890
.� \ ` % ,
���--/-'
IN REPLY FEFER TO
Permit Number: 200030481-200030482
Permit TyQe: NW 14, NW 26
Name of County: Mecklenburg
Name oi Permittee: IaAC Real Estate Services, Tnc., Attn: Barry James
Date of Issuance: 10 April, 2000
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation
required by the permit, sign this certification and return it to the following
address:
iJ.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Atter_ion: CESAW-RG-A
151 Patton Avenue, Room 143
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Please note that your permitted activity is subjecC to a compliance inspection
by an U.S. Army Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with
this permit you are subject to permit suspension, modification, or revpcation.
I hereby certify'tha* tha work_ authorized by the above referenced permit has
been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the said permit,
and requir�d mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit
conditions.
Signature of Permittee pate

Action Id. 20003{1484-�82
IJ.S. A��' CO.�t]PS �&' �N��NEERS
WI.LIVIiN�'I'ON DIS�'R�C'I'
County �eck�enburg
GENEi2AL PE�Z11iIT (REGI�NAL ANI) NA'�'YONWIllE) V�RIFYCATION
Properry owner: AAC �2eal Estate Seevices, �nc., Att'n: l��r. �arry James
Aadress: 5950 Fai�view Roac➢, �rgct�e 200
Charlotte, NC 25210
'I'elephone No.:
Size and Location of project (water body, road �iame/nu�nber, town, etc.):
Sandy Porter Road / Shopton Road Tndustrial Park located on approx. 165 acre tract near I-
485; in Charlotte.
Description of Activiry:
(1) NWP 14 (200030AS1.) — Construct minor road crossing impacting approx. 60 LF of an
unn, trib. to Coffey Creek; (2) NWP 26 (20003048�) — Ira�pact unn. tribs to Coffey Creek
(determined to have "important" ac�uatic fu�nction) and approx. 0.65 �cre of headwater
wetlands for the purpose of general developmeni and for t}ie construction of tivater qualiiy
ponds. Impact to stream channels wilt include 150 LF of dam �11 and approx. 1,600 LF of
inundation from pond construction. Mitigation to offset the toss of wetlands will be
accomplished through creation of appro�:. 0,65 acre of bottomland hardwood/scrub/shrub
species belorv the pond da�ns. SPECIAL CONDITION: A report must be submitted to this
office ���ithin one year of the date of tlhis permit oatlining Lhe success of the wetland
n�itigation.
Applicable Law: X Sectivn 404 {Clean Water Act, 33 iI.S,C.1344).
(check all that apply) Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899).
Authorization: Regional Genera] Permit Nwnber,
J4L26 Nationwide Pern�it Number.
Your work is authorized by this Regior�al Genera] (RGP) or Nationwide Permit (NWP) provided it is
accompIished in strict accordanee with the attached conditions and your submitted plans. If your activity is
subject to Section 404 (if Section 404 block above is checked), before beginning work you must also receive
a Sectioi� 401 water quality certification from the N.C. Division of Envirorunental Manageir�ent, telephone
[phone]. }�or any activity within the t«�enty coastal counties, befor� heginning work yau must contact
the N.C. Division of Coastal Managemetit, telcpt�one (9l9)733-2293.
Please read and carefull}� comply with the attached conditions of the RGP ar NWP. Any violation of the
conditions of the RGP or the NWP referenced above may subject the pernlittee to a stop work order, a
restoration order, and/or appropriate. legai aciion.
This Departrnetit of ttie Arrtty RGP or N�'��P verification does ilot relieve the perm�ttee of the respot�sibility
to obtain any other required Federal, SEate, or tocal approvals/pern�its. The permittee may need to contact
appropriate State and (ocal agencies before hegiru�ing work.

If there are any questions regarding this authorization or any of tl�e condiiions of the General Permit or
Nationwide Pennit, please contact the Cozps Regulatory Official specifed below.
Date Apri] 10, 200O
Corps Regulatory Official Steve. �hapin Tefephot�e No. [phone]
Expiration Date of Verification_ : ebruary 11, 2002
cc: Mr. Leonard S. Itindner
CFSAW Forn 591
Revised luly 1995

+ tdriE(? ���UALIT`i PLANNIN(i Fax ; 919-715-5637 Ju 1 2' O1 l S� 09 P. 02/�J2
oF ��r �J'FA
� ¢ Q ANiChael F. Easiey
�� 4, . y :-::-:,� L Governor
`� �� � ��� � Witliem Q. Ross, Jr., SectePery
' '���"'��� � D�parlmen4 ot Environment and Nnturel Resources
o °'�:<=: � �r-��=' �'
- y�; �
`'�`"'"��-�''"'''�� Korr T. Stevons
���.Y�%' ' pivision of Watv� pualiry
June 20, 200i
�r. Q�arry Jamc�s
Amencan �sseti Comp�ny
5950 Fairview Fioac�
Charfo44e, iVC 28211
Subjec4: Stormwa4Qr Pond
S�ndy P�orter �oad/Shopton RoarS En�fustrial park
Nlecklenburg County, NC
DWQ# 000250
Dear PJIr. James
�his �ffice is in roceipt of the plans datecf 9�P�y �i, 2001 and revised June 7, 2001 Par th� ,tormwa4�r
rner�agement ponds ai �he subjoct facility prepared on your behal� by �urton Engineoring Associ�tes nnd
submiYied to �he �ivis;vri un Jui�a 7, 20� i.�iaff irorr► ih� 1rVetlana0s Unit reviewed the plans ��d fourrd Qham
acceptable. PIeF,se note that this :approvai shall not bc construed as an �pproval of the dam design for Dam
Saf�fy purposes.
cc:
I� you havv any qu�s4ions regerding fihis m�erer, please cont�r,t Mr. To�d St. John pt (919) 733-95�34.
Mr. Toc�d Si. .1ohn, Wetland�Wr�d4 �..1
hVloor�sville Region�l Office '
Mr_ CarlYon �3�rton, PE, Burfon Engineering, 5970 Fairview Road, Suite 100, Charlotts, NC. 28210
�ile �
Nqfih CElrolinfl 1:1�vislon ol Water Quality, 401 WAtlande_ Cortific:+9lon UnIP,
�GSO Mai{ S�rvica Ct�ntor, Ralcigit, NC 27�99�1650 (Maifing Addr�ss)
?.321 Crnbtroe Blvd., Ralei�h, NC 2760d-Q2fi� (l.ocafion)
9�9-J3J-1786 iph�ne), 919-733-6893 (fax), htTp�//h20.enLS4Et4e,nr,.u5lncwetlands/

3: mes 8. Hunt Jr., Govemor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
�,�s 5 h;
�,. �� a a°
r i
r� � �.. �
�u o
���� `�12c
�� V,,,,.
ER 00-8928
Reco.ded 2/22/00
Due 3/7/00
� C,�t�'�- Z/�3/CU
�,� a,� 3J,1��
I�ot-�� Carolina Dep�rQrne�t oi CulturaI itesources
NATIONWlDE PERMIT REVfEW p�visionofArchivesandHistory
Jeffrey !, Crow, Director
APPLiCANT: Mr. Barry James
American Asset Corp.
5950 Fairview Rd., Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28211
Project Location: Mecklenburg County
Proposed Project: Sandy Porter Rd. / Shopton Rd. Industria( Park
We have received the application for the above project from the Division of
Environmental Management and our comments are noted below.
Additionaf information is needed (maps, photographs, other).
� No comment.
We have reviewed the requested information and have no comment.
S i g ned _ T�. ���`QQJ'�, .,
Renee G edhill-Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
Historic Preservation Office
919/733-4763
FAX 919/733-$653
���� � � ��oo
�3t� _ -� 1 j I c�
F�i� � � 2�00
109 P,ast Jones Street • kalei�z, North Carnlina 27601-2807 ���

N
C
(d
�
�
N
d
cd
�
Maps/Plans

IS
4'
1�
Shutterfly Rd ��`�
���
as proposed ;���
. � ��-
ma�or collector ��1
� �� T �� �m ' �
` �
_ � �'� _� � � -
_ ` 7� j �
> �
`�� f
; ; �-.. � _,
� �u: �' � � 1�r � P � N�
� � 1� � , -r,-
ti
���. .
� � � ��
.
��.
A I���r� �
��,,'rr �� �'���� �
Ir 1i sn ►a� f''i
� , � � , :
� ,
(s� .I t� ',
;�.
. .1 . � � • f �i�� s �
�.� �r •:�►. ''
� � � �;: ,
.
' I �r4 I �
`f �?� �
��• A
r r} , � ' /
.' ��' � .?��� i�J
_+�� �.•� .� s�► . _ /.i���
' - '�
;,� ;
� • ♦`�' ,�
�,��.
.�'�� N.
�� o�,,
� ^}��� �
� �'/
�� "
.�
.�
9
N .F� �'
v/ t� ; qt
.�
— �' ��
�� ��
�`
� r
\�� �
1
1�'�\�. r
�
+�� �� -
� �. =�
i� � r'
ti ���
r �:
�` �I
f
.� )��
` �'
� fr' — —
.�.�.r�
�'��' _- � �.''► �R�'`s
�_�.,_ . � ��+j�
�.�� '���r ► �
� , ,r,��'' , �f1
���� ' �±` �1�� �
�l ,
��t�;����_����9
�
���,� ? f - �� � � � ��`
� ,t� l J i
�, '\' �
. �?�V��' � � �-��.»
I('-* \ ' '�{� �f �r�� I' r �' J �l
� � ,� _ � i
,, , �
� ' ��
� � < <,�
5 `�''„ �
'"1 � ra J � a' � '�
� _ � �, �
�- � �
:� °_` y.s t �- � �' �'
,fi � �
� Y 1 � �\
� 5 ' ,�,: '" � .1,,'�. � �i �
�y � ' 1 �
� 1 p . ��- -�r �
l�y '4 � %'
- {/s� !,.,�,,�'.�'"r - ``�-,' ��
,
�'�J7� rr --..." '�
, 1 �ry �ur � ��` ? R �
Y �
'�i�` '� ' r �yF'; `� ��-�aG_ •;� r,--�.
�-�, ir`� �1�� '� �' � - r�+'
5'�5.�. � �� � _
� ,� J�*� �' � !,
� �� � �
�-
` � v�y `, r '7: "°'�/
�, t` r 1�'�� ��
-�� i �.-
, . . - � . E7' !f � jT. ' /

' � � �r' �; . - � : . . . . <� . � � . . --.,�. .. 'yl�\�
► _ _ ' ��� -��
.: :�, � :f
� � . � �
� ` ' �+3��� .�+ _ �y�.S;
�.
-�� -��� . . � .
�
- , + • + ♦ �
a» : . ryr� ::-.• r::..,�.,����t' � �.'..
f,�. ..� ' �,�,c:� ,"L..,
��' ,' . .x , .
lt. "_ �a. t� s p � ., ',� . .'
� �,,�:�� � .., �:
• _ ''� i�t�..
� � .. ,°
;
�+ `� - ' �� :�� ...
Project Location ':'' � ,��. � '.
�
r .
' F' — �. �
�i , t , _ �
. ..� %.
.�_ - � .-' -�;� ,
N ��
�
�,,, _ -
Miles
0 0.05 0.1 0.2
FIGURE NO.
2
. ' � �
Shutterfly Road Extension
Mecklenburg County, NC
AERIAL MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJfCT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICAT(ON
�w
�
Kfi _
�.�
��
• i
�'
aProject Boundary
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
HAC LSR
DATE:
10/9/15 /

�� _- +�
�
� PIN a 101�5110
41�f SMnVTON R(1
SHOPTON OF VFLOPMf Ni
{� 1J0 SOUTM'CHURCn sT i
� CHARIOTTF YC:
�
� �:
,�� ��
. ��" ^ .
�,'�
. � � �
Prujcct I.��cation
w
�,
1+ �
��� �►
.
1 � � `�' � : � . � �^'Yw� � -
��_ • . . � *`. '•-, •Y
� t
� � � �'i � , _• '.. PiN s 701/6733 .. . .:. •� RN A 101/6131. � � ' � r r 1 �. .. ~� ' • ! i �y� �K£
•015 SNOPION RD � • . ''� . R PIM'� 1o1051i1 . e ;R �. '.. `
4.� SNOPTON RD �
SMOPTOM RIDGE 7K LLC SHOPTOM RIDGE E lLC 3E45 SMOPTON RD f{� �
MO SOUTM CNURCN STr800 �= � SNOPTOM RIDGE tdA LLC •+- ��` '�\
�„��� N� NO SWTN CMURCH Si /D00 Mp SWTN CNURCN ST '• � �`t.( ��!1j,� .
- �� CMARIOTTE MC CMAALOTTF NC i°� wy„ `�
� '1
�. � :
��, •' . �,,.r..... � .� . . y "�`� , PINi201aa�^� �
a
�—+�e�� ��:j�.'�-�o , � �s355�ao. c.e�
� i � :��,r�fi,.4115 SNOPTDN RO ���a���4 �r . IIBEHTVSMOFTCryA
- � t �- 7610SMU7"IERfLYRD SOOCMESTEitFIELpP
,SMOP70H�EVE�OP6�EHTLLC SNOPTOMRIDGEIEDLLC Y ;� MIyVEHM PA
� �' �� MO SOUTM CHURCH ST r.800 . /d0 SOUTM CNURCN ST '� �
�� . �CHARLOnF NC � ` ��
'. A, � �"�,�re,�.�._ 1 ',�CHARLOTTE NC� • ..
.�., _� . . .. ��*�.��,..� . � � `�
� ���� '_ 'y .. - .,_ -., . _. r��;
.-.4�,�y...\a �s�'
• L �-�%+r;,•'S � ���1G,` ' . .
�
n .
P�n azat��<a
� • �9zs siaoru.ea �
M1 LiBERTI'SXOPTONBL �� �
" :��OCHESTEF.FIEIDPK
•`.. . YOLVE?!l PA
a� ' �' �
1_ .�: .�-
R ?n
`
PIN f 201{6106 . � �•
]6I5 SMOPTON HO � w�'
L18ERTY VROPEHTV LII.ARED PARTH ' :��y,� �'' w�. �{':�,
SOOCXESTERFIELDPV _^��� i , +
MIILKRN M y��'Y�. PINi20116130�:•� • '
'j� :� • SIRON4DR
� Y- � uBEtiTYPROPlR �.�
� � `OOCMFSTEFlF1E� �ti
umvsou Y➢1
A*.,�.
FCC,
o ,� �o �
FIGURE NO.
3
� ' �
� viusz;ta., ;z
5039 SIRO'I:. GR
� iI' ��' P ROVE R i`� LI1.� ITEO
��y� SOOLXESTE0.FIELD � •
�.�.,��.' I.�nL�FRN PA
�n T.' . ' �:+ . .
���. _
Shutterfly Road Extension
Mecklenburg County, NC
Mecklenburg County GIS/Mapping System
Source: http://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov
Projsct Psrcals
o��n ��a�
Drawn By: I Reviewed By:
HAC LSR
DATE:
io/ia/ioi5
�

-- � - � N �_?• � �v� n.,., . . �� , l -+-, .1Ult!'J,r , , � � �[?" . ,
i ` �� �j, .` - �.s� ;� � ``� � � �� i � �o �� � `� '� nft � � � � ' ' ' ,
��. ' / I ''�'��; . ��'� �!+ •i ` I ; ,` • _:T •��1,i �,.-, ��X.� /('.
� ` 1 �`� � ' �'�` . _ �'� , �:J 'p�nj �,, � � ',�� .� � � �, � � � ,�'
�� \ �,� � / . � . y � � � \6s -" �,,_ �'� %� , ' �` ; �� � ` -
/' � � ��� � ��.'_ 1 /' �� . �' . �. \ .� �t�..
_ 1 / � l ! � ��r~s -` _ 'y�'•/`\�� �^�% ,�t-.� �� � , \ . � �- _ . ��\\_., ��f � � J /.:
/- �;,� ���. ` -.�s - 1° ''/�L� �� s` (( � 4 _ - • , ;, j-�.�� 7 �•1 F��
,: _ . . , `_. zF� � y •�y_ � .� - � ,�, +.� _ `t� �
� ��`i 7K°�. �..�-;� ��- _ � � � ._� � -- ,'." ., ---� ��.� � 'il'-� .��,;
6-- � - , i � ,% , � . ; y '�. •y 1,�,_ f _ �� _.,�
�.� `. .�� �.� ' � . �/'Y' ( '� . ,�4. � i..` � h � � . ��"' � I�� - ' {e
�'\� �,�)1 �1 �\ r' � ,���• ,, � � y� l` ������� '.O. � � f
. l o � � . . , . . �
�`. � . -. /� -,�, _ ; a��"`- �� ;L
-.. I - � ``p'� � �'`h �', �l,' � •p�° It• t'` � , : , �, _ J , i �\_ -'<--"� ' ' �,
���__ � .�`, • : 1 `- ��y` ��, .° trti.,--i-""`"`rJ ' �,n
�.� � - -��. .� r , : 1 � _ `" a ��� ..; ► ;1 ,.,�; •`, ,�-. ' � '� � ;.�
\\ � ..N��• � � (/�\ � r� y�4�',!'' � ^. *lt.. �� � b , � �l t � � � r , :��..�/ - � , �' 6i � } �, "�� ,
J �t_ �J Ot . J� � �a� ��JJ'y{ � � � t �� � � �c ' ��
r�i� '''iMJ'A�� ���. . �'� ,7f�L� �.t _ � � .`�r� + '—�'�.l ` `' 1
�_� Z) (`, � r s�� � i� �. �p � �
'I° —// _'-"' ,✓�.' .� �' aus; � l���' " ~ � ':��i4- � ' ��/ 1
��-'� � .�,��� r •�P� • ' ' . !�` � '� \ ;l
; � i, �' �/\ � � � ;,�i n �_'d � � � ' , � � � _ , ` , � ��
�/. �� \ t : • - _ - �,_"._1 : ��� . . � .
i �r�� f i �e � � !��' i. • � -� � � . _ �� ��
:,��?�'-<,: `!; � `• �.. -o ��; �:� � ,
. r ' - � ` O ' .. - . r_�. s� ' -..a
� "���� - / / . � � � � ••� � � i�. ' � ��� . .A -� �. � ,v 9 .
��s j /, f, . � I �ti � ` ��' j�r r ., �\,�� ��i??, . ���
i ; � `/, � - ''� � �2 � _-lb �t�� '�; �� � ����� \�� �' �`
�� - > . � ✓���-
� ���l� �'j � r � Project Location � �, � _'� - �,�- � � � ' �`
� � , a. � ; ' , �: i� "���i�>C'' � � . � . ,S a�
.� ��� . , \„�../I. ,; /r.. � i �_ � � �.._ � .. J� 1� � � `J �'�ti ,.,, - `�'' �..,� ,:� / . F.� i .
� ' � ' ��''�/ ` -- 1 ./ � � C�'�- �,r'J' "`��{�� � �`'� , l ,; '.� ,.
r
. � �`, � ;� `, t � � � � --. �: � _�..�-� �� -'� �_� ; � � �� - LOCATION
`' '� 1 ' ' � 4 . _ � 1 , ;,, ' `�� ,=,".' - o
�� ; � � ' � ' � � �_�� >>) � � , ,� ,.---1 Lat: 35.168103 -N
� � �;j�- ..� \ ��j ;� u - �
-� '� �� ��� �� f - ��`� ; `
' - "� � � �' ���--- � . : � � . �`' ` �; � �- � , � �,; , � Long: -80.951497 °W
i.," � o r� . i� )� _ _..`""sti-' `+� \ \ �; .�` .� ` �.�^ � HUC:03050103
`; �� r , � /,- ' , �� \,� � �I� - � .
� t ��� ; �• , ' � s\�o � ;. '� ��7 ��,.� M,� ��� •`��, LOWER CATAWBA
, /� �� � _ � �° �i�� ) �-� '� � � � '�. � � ` �
• ` l / ` � • I `' [' � i�
�,,,�° : ; � � � � `�� ,`� �� , �� - '�- % �\ $� ACRE�
� , � �`
� � ,"� � , °� )_. � �% � , - ., {: �; f �% 164.6
o -� .� ., - � • �--..�i� ,.
N � . _ -��/ ij � ` �,;� � �` i � Y �,�j� Q ( ) `.�� ��: :�'. � . '� USGS QUAD ;'
� �J � _` - - � ._ _ � � � "' Chariotte West, NC �`
A, �'�� -�_ . - r, . �� _.� __-- _
_ �-,;'� � +j��,a ,_ .
r y � o,`,. / /� �i ��,.,...._ L -- . r' . � .i� . _ ,=`..
Miles - • � , "�� �: �i' !'; �� ` i
0 02 0.4 0.8 �� j. ..a•"� t'` � '� �i.�J�, �-.•rf-J QPro�ect Boundary -
� \�� Q � .. � . � �� y � ' ��1'�� .. '-� �.: �.i ��-i
� - ` ' �`' '' ' �.- •s.• . . �. .' . �, n • , +•��� - ' ___/�� . " � � � . . . . � �13 Na�
FIGURE NO. Shutterfly ROad Extension Drawn By: Reviewed By:
4 A�� n� Mecklenburg Counry, NC HAC LSR
DATE:
USGS MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 10/9/15
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION

� ' ` • . 3 .- • �
PaE--�r - - ; - �r.— P:�E �` -- - - —
�- -� - --�, - . _ _ . _ _
--. _ � _,,.• , w;
� - _ . ��I.�•
, ,
�■
�`"� .Ci'
PR:? + '�"r"'' '�w -- .. L.��B ,.. �_ o�� � �
,�� � �
�1'.
_ - .�, ,�,;,. � � ,,
� �'��;�! ���b� E� y � t • � � l` +l�' ,YC+� ��
� � � � � "-=-`f _ _ - �� .`_ y_ . ` '
.-^�_. � � ~ — ' i .
- -. ,
� ' ' • �;
y r , . `±
_ i' `` �
- r.
.��;�.. ,71
_ - y- , � ��
. :'•�•s� ' ' �
• �� • - -_ •��•��� ..�.
`
�.�:: '��`�: ,
���
Wetlands and Environrtx�ntal Pianning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, Pll�.
len:rindee�fa wedands-epg.com
(70i}.�1�77
ww+w:vt�ai�ls-�pg.corn
� -- _ - - — --_ .���
/=f
_ � "�'
�
�
y���� ,
��%4
k8
•�

Map U nit Legend
Mocklatburg Count�t, Norlh Carolir�a (MC119)
Na�p UNt Symbol Map UNt Nanu Acns In AOi Panc�nt d AOI
Ce82 Ceal sandy day bam. 2 tn B 15_D 7.3%
peroer�t slopes. moderately
eroded
CeD2 Cea'I aandy day loarn, 810 15 22.1 10.8%
peroent slopes. rnoderately
erocled
Da8 Davicfsar� sandy day loam, 2 to 98.9 4B_396
8 peroent slopes
Da0 Davidso� sandy dsy loam. B to 11.6 5_8%
15 peroe�t slopes
MeD Mecklenburg �ne sandy bam. 8 15_3 7_596
to 15 percenl slopes
MD Monscan loam. 0 to 2 parnent 7_8 3.8%
slopes, irequendy Aooded
PaE Raoaiet sandy lo�m. 15 Eo 25 27.8 13.6%
peroent slopea
F83 Racdet-Cxdlied land complex, 6.2 3.0%
10 to 25 percent slnp�s
Totsls Mr Aros of InMrest 405.0 100.MN��i,
FIGURE NO.
Shutterfly Road Extension Drawn By: Reviewed By:
Mecklenburg County, NC LRG LSR
DATE:
SOILS MAP 2- WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 10/9/15
S1lBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION

�) � -- -- ���\:� � � i� ' � � �-�. �� �� � , \ ���,��' �:-� � V� ��\-�/�� �� / /�� � ��
I \ ` � � -� � � � � / � � ` �� � )1 .�--� � �g � �
1� `` _ � �\ � � � � � � �.� �/ � � � i —_ �� \�� V � � � \ � 1�4 � `�J / -- � � � �/ � �u �" � �f �{ � �j�
_ = � � � � � 1 � � � ��. � � r � � .— � �� �,�a�,�o,�0 8 . ,� ` � � ` _ � , r,; � �'a� 1 ( r ( �
- —� `L `/-- \ ` �� :1_� � � ��� �� � —=_--�` � �'a`�O �T� �`,<
� �-- — � \ � � J� — � � � � � �' �� \ \ `
� , ���� �:1� -/� ,� > r-----�_ _-�� _�'� ° � _.-- _ � \\��
< � ,� `�r�1 //' _� ( �.'� \�____- �) f. �, v—_ l'_, � .�� �\ 1\\ \����
�\¢ \ ��i" I ��' ------ --J / ��-----�— T— �i�'"�\\ 1� ���
� � � � � I l/�i�� = _ � — � � � ; — ' - — ' -_ — --� ��;���\ 1 � � ��
� w � J � I I/� � l/�/ — — � \ , `�ruic i � — — \ � � _ naYrn�c iee ` � �a iea l// /%j � � \`� � ) \ �
� � l /l � ll �%--, . �� � � \� � � — �oe,eoo ` / sor,�oo�. -re- � , �. .i � ioz.+oo .�-h � � ���/ / � .J �.� �
/ �� --��
$ � �. .._./ � � JI /�/�/ �' � ]> � � _ - _ i — — — — — — � / / � � r � r ,.
�.✓, //J���jl(j 1 /� ` -------_,�- ------- ' �/ /.,1 �''��\�
—�� `��l// f�l��►I���/ 1�� „'��( � _� — -- — __ �—_ __1� <—�� �� �%�j� �.�/�,i� � Il�� �.
�, `:� �� i �� i�ri� � ���f � _� ��-� � � .� � � � /� "� / �
- y%;� .-�i ��p��If 1����� _ ����������= ���y�>����`���� �- ------- ���-� �r� i.� �� i �� � ,
�` �"- - �- � // / I \��\ � � � � �� � \ `— �� � > >I , � ✓1 �. // ! � � .
i i ii � ���1���I1{� ���%������������=J���-`��"�ll�^-- �.��----� ��/l %��: ��� �///�'' /
I' � I � � � %/ \\ �� �, \\ �� �\ �� `� y�� �� / �� I
-�`�� � �� B �� ���� ����� �`���� ��`J l�f`�l� �\;�� __ -----%�/�/ �� / � � %�/ \ l
�:-� ►� ,� 1. �,.. � ���� \\Xc �� 'ti��i; � � >��� � �� — � _ _� � � .. ---•.�/�/ d� � � � //r � �� )
• tY , � ' �` � ��� 1)�l � �/ 1 � 1�\ � 1 � � >> ~ _ � �� � �J� no"' � `'�: ���"��" °" I � � / � � �� \ \
' � / � 1 � .
���; �. , , ,� 1J //%((c � `\ `�--� _� l�� �-- —������� /'//J� i 1- / �( �l � � �
�1EXISTING24'SANITARY � � I�/ -��`�� A�,`� /�/�� /
SEWER LINE �� � `\\{�. ,\+` � `\������\� �\� -� � � / / /1 � j � I � � l AQ' I
, � �. \� � `\ �' `T ���\�\\\\�\\ �\\\ � � 'EX1 ' �/� � � ��/� q Q' � � / � J + � //
\\ � L % ��\\� \�� \"��� � � � 'YN� \ / �/ / / ;o / -. _ � ` -,
� y � \ � � i ���\��\� \ ��` � �� �\t N��'�o"� �TbN � �. � ////��///H� � �/ � j/( / �� � (I �/�j
� � � � � \\ ; ` � ����\ �����\\ `� � �— �� ����`,`- -„�,�'� ��' , �, �. � �G �/� 9��� . � �� � 1 / � � � I � � I
� � �� � � .r_ � � ��� ��l)������������� � � �.�����„�r-� � � �/� �,� / ((� � � � � ��11��� I
� � .y/.��,� _ � , —� -- � \ll �` � ��� �� ��� � � y-�rr--y ` �� � �/ '"� / ) ) l l l I� � � }1 �11� l
! � � � 1 � � ri� 1 \� �`�_ �\\� �����\ �RETA�N�4 `� W,, \�� �� �� \ �-,�'/'� �/( � j � � � �� � � � ( � QI � � � ti �1 I�I�I
� � � ,_ � �� � ����������\\��\�' ��1PRE�� ��� ��/ �'���� � � f l I � 1 � � 1� 1�1s
�, ��1 l �`1 \ � � / � �, �� � ��� �������.V•'����� � ���� � ,. ��\� �� �� / . >> � ��.� i � ) � � / ` { �: l � 1� � 1�
� � � � � 1 1 1. � �� �\ �� ��,��` � �� :�\� \ �j r � � I
�. �\ � ,,� � � t ( � 1 � � � ��`�.�� \ \ % � / / / / � �.,1 �� ��,
�., . \ ���� � \ �-- i r � � _ C � ! I
� \ � ` ;,� {' �.�% � � J f 1. � 1 111111��`��\ r = � � _'� � / ' � � �� � � � li �. � � �I �1.
� �\ \ � � � ' �r' � � �/ / � l I 1 �� � � � �
� � -� � �; I� � / �. l i 1�i111 � \ � � oa� / ` l
/ Jl 1�1 \\ \1�� � � �/ / / ,� �� ( < �� ��1 1
, � �� 'r J � � �� �� � / 1 ( \ \�\1 � � 1 1
�. � �� ►. �� / � � � , `� �� � � � �� �i� // � //�� � I� I . \ \� \�l "�{�/ / �/ �`� � �� ��l ) � � .��'/ f J
\`�*\ .� � � � / �/�r --- .���i i��ii�%l I �, �\\\����I - �g�$ / i� �\ / � � .��� �� �, �,�� �
�,.�:��� ��� . \���i'li/ / ��%ii �// g �\��`)IJ �� � / / ) i/l/�
` � � �'� . � � � � �, � U�, , �� %�'%'%� , � � 1 rl� �., i iir��' i liJ ll - — � � I I �
^�,�- � ��,�- '-' .: � c���������������i�� ���iii���� �\\ �� l / /%�-�1���� o ��/����� _` :.f!�j�jl\�
—��\\\� \ `�,�` � � / � , �� /J�l � /// � /� �i�< �".:,,` �\�\ �� / �/ 3�'�, � � /� � _ — J %
� , s,, � / /, �� / � `�.- Q�� / / %/� � l = . l� � / /1
�, \ � �� \ \ \ � ,:"_''" �.--�: � f � -_ J ��/ ��/ ' i���� /%/i'". _ �� \ . \�\���� J�/�/�/� / �� .°' / / � (� � � � k ..� � �// � �
� \ �' �� ° �� / /�� � i � � � \\\Q��--i// � � —'�� -.:., ,,,. � r �
� 1 \� \ `�-`= �- =i �� %/ � � . \ ���� ,�/�•7� l �d i r I
.. '� 1 � � � t-- � // //���--��/ r — �\�� ��� � � � / � . l � � � � . • ,. _ ., / � I
���iti`�����`�`1,��1���F���r�r .;�irrf� ��'�� ��y��� �, ����,�� � � � �� ;_����� � ����
�� / ( � � � / � �,� \ _ \\ J , l � � �� � � >�. .l !
� `� � � \ /� I i (( �i��/i� . � /��/� � �� ._. � � _ � ) �e env / �� ii� \� \\ yt,�� � �� /
1 t1. � � � . r � ���,�:/ WATER QUALITY POND �� � � — � C � i :!� \\�� 1\•. �� � � ��l
�''�s.�`" ��' CONSTRUCTED i � � � � �'`=�)�1,� %- ��� '� ��\\� �/ / -- � 0 65 AC. WETLANOS CREATED
�, �:� �' jt' DWQ #000250i � ��/ j - � =�� l /���� �� � �:� i/�/i- ��� t I � ± ►'
1 1 /
� �... � �.� ��� � � ��r y� �
,. i �`,�\— ' � ' �� % � � �✓ � �1 � � ��� ��� � � \` �� d/i- _ /// 1 a�s�l,l�u'�r/ \ r � ��'�
�s . . �1 � ��/ ./ � � / '�, ^�' �� �e'��-` � � �
�. \� =;- ,�_ J / � �- �'� �\ ��ll �`.�/������ �.
ENGINEERING � � 1 '• •' \ ` =�i � / � i / �/ / `�`�\� � �\������ -\\. �
ASSOCIATES �'_ � • �,�/ —. / I � I /,' � � ,� � �� =--� \\\ \\\\\\�\�� \�
LHIORANNE35 �\ '„```�'���� �1.r•✓/ I I /l I!�..�`\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\����
s9wc.vai Rxi�.me+ s. i.�io, x�iaer�c�xx�o _\\\r" — _ `\ � �..� � �. � I � � I` r � 1 ` \\ \\� �\�\\�\�����
,� a..a� , � ��� ; �•� � , � � . ` , 4'` �, � ` , � � , ,�����\���������.
�` SHOPTON RIDGE BUSINESS PARK
: EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP
SCALE: 1"=400' DATE: 10/09/15
�
SHEET 1 OF 7

��� � _ __ -��-,.r;.,� �� , � , �� � , � � _ � � � �_ �.� � _ _ � � - ����/'� i � � �dl � / �' � �
� � ---- \\ \�\ ` ` �\ J ''� � i;J �_�����/ 1� ����``�_l�\ �--�/y", � /Q � r /�'i��:
r \�l�r� = ---�� I � � � � /� / �r �`�• � "—� � �\``�=�� —�i_-- � � �/'��
� �°
_ _ — � � � � � l ) � t \ � � ���..� !� � ',� � -- � ���\ �'Q°,-�"�°'t° � �� ,�� � � _ � � ; ��- � � �,� oe � � � 1� ' ���lf � r '
��J �� _ ���t` = -� � \� � � �==-- _ �� ? �� 11�'��.�� ��� �
� �"�i � „ � - - - -�- �� � ��-r'�- ��'�— \ � \ \ �
z°< � — �' — �.� —_—r �) I. �`,r _I_�� �. ( �� � \ \�\�.
^ �
�o�� �r ----- ----� �— -- � -----� __ �-/f ����� �11 ��\
� _� — _ ` ' ( ,- _ _ — — � /� � ��� � \ � � . .
� . � '.
W ��• - -�� n�rac iec - \ � �rnxi ies ✓ ` .- � ie. �// / ,r �\� ) \� \ �.
J �'�- "'� �/�I '-7?`I0�31 _ IO6�E00 p. R _ � f /� _' ,ypY;pp�q, Yt � �. �../ IOC.400 �2L ✓ \ ��� � \ � \\ � �
o _ `
N Wl�'-. d � � --' J � �i' -------r�� — ✓ � / `� i��\� � v
n � ��� \ �'%,y�� � I �1 / �\� � — — — — — SHARED TRUCK COURT � ./ I ,r � / / �" ���� �- : � .
,QN � I 4I�1 ����- _— — — =m�_ __ �1 <��� �� �— �,���� ���, � �� li��,
:� - o�--�', ��I l L� -- ��� �� _=--- � � � — --------�� `fl/i �f `�1 / ��� i r �.
� %� � ` I � � � / ^
� ^ � �i I �� � � , � � � \ \ � ,. �,\ ` Jl� � �� �� / � � � / �% � , � � l
P su �E � � � � _ � � `r �'� � ;, i ^ - w�:soa .4-rr- - -� ��1--- / / `�',�'� � //�% I /
' ' �� � - _ � - � /// ` � /r// ` /
� -
`��'I � e (, - �\ �� z ���"� ���� ,'�—- -_���-� =� �/ /� � � /f��� � �� J�
�:^��' r ' �` ~� _ _ � \ yatr�sx� ` -- � % \ ,�� � J / � 1 � � �
>> /
- ` � � =� � �,. � < , — ���� ���� �/ � � � 1 / �`�j� J� / � � )
� EXISTING 24' SANITARV � � / � � �� 1 ��
SEWER LINE .� ��`� ��` / � \ � �� � � � I ? � � � � � ��7 / �/ J / y'y-
`� . � \ � ��; �� � � ` � � 'EX1 �/� � O � / �Q' � � �� "� .� � / � �/'7'
` � �, \ � 1 � �\ �� \ � � � �-~ \ �' �� � � C � � � � �'.Y
� , � �� �� ����— ,�\\t -���T���� �� / /� �_��' � /�� ,� ��l/�i�
� 1 �� = � � � ���� `,���° . r ' , � A �- /// . / �
� • ) PROPOSED � � � � � � .. �� �'" //// �y � �/�( � �� I � // �,
ROAD CROSSING A -a = � � \\\�� ��� � � r�,: � / % � ���� � � ` � � � / �� �� I I�f� I %�i
� � �- ! , ��� �� � � Nrymr i c � �11 � I � r
SEE EXHIBIT A � m- � , � — ���t � � ..., �,;, ,� � � �, � I� J � 1 11 � I /
��.�- � Q� � � �-� �� �� �� — � / � � /��)) 11 �Q�� 1 `I��I��l�
J � r � � .,.� �ZS' �\ � �'O � �\ � �. \� ' NAAINING ���� \ � � � ` � �j / � // ( � � I � I III I 1,��\�;�)
/ � / \ `\ `�'� � � � � \�'�y \ \\ '..�� � �\ \ //�/ , � �\ � � / ' ( 1 � / j 1 i 1� 1�1 �111
\ \� ` \ \ � r�Z `� \�N� � \�'\���� ������`���\� �` �� / . �� ��,i k� � l 4 I � � l � �1\ �� itil
� \ � 1 �( � ��° \� \��� ���� �\\ � �� ����� \�� % � - � ��� l / i // I , , �;l �1`lll�l`III
�,% � �� � "� � �� � Q � i �� �l 1 1 � �1 "� �. ���� � �� ✓ i �` � �; _ �` � � �.. l 1 I I�l l`11.
-:... � � � o� � }1i 11��� �� � � � / _ �—� /-�i.�. I� I I t�1
� �� \ � / , , j � � � �� �J� I I 1 —������ � � �/ oa� / . ` ( < � � � 1t � I� �11
� �:\ � �� � , � � �� / -� � i� �%/ ��1 ��� � I � \�\\���\\� � � � � �/ / / �6 �� � l { � ►I
-� � � / l/ \ \ � {°a � � � ��l 1 � � ) E I
,�.�. . �� �� t �,�, � i �� � ��iir /ll �1 I�b� �\ ���\1 ��/ / / ��' -� 1 � \ f/��1i� I
° � ='� � � _ � � � i � ��' ��i��i� �� � \\\\\\`Ill� , �g�/ / i��\ / � �`�� �f �—'�%i%�l l�ll
� �� � � � l// � � i �'ii��� �l \�� lll�l� 1 �`��' //��� ' � / I /l� i / l /� J�l
�--� �,.
� �.fi "� / � � � iii� �i�i/1 � \\ f< , / /�///�) ) � j / � / �/�(�<<rr�i
r-' � ��'� *�\v �:�� � �� i,�i�i��ii�i iiiij��� �\ �� / / ///�/ / � / //��1� `=�� )1��\1 � (
'- ��� � 4 ...� r- � i / /�i��� ��< �l�« , _ 0��� / /� � �'°� � = -- _ � 1 1 t
! ��� � �. J �. , ,�r i'� � ��,, r �, �! _ �,_ , ������ � � � �,��,��, � i =� � � ��- � _ � �� ��11 I l �
�� � � \ !, � �� � � //r(�,� ij ����� � �,, � ���� ` -' � / � i �� / � _— � � � � i� i l
` �� 1\ � \ .....-- : . � ��� , i� ,�� s=-�� - � ��� ����` ��/�� � �� _ � � .�j_ l�l � ���
�'�`''`11���\� `.,�"--� �%= i�%/��0� — i �_ ��\��� �� ������i%/l / / ���;�`' / �1� =�-, �_� /I�lj�j��
�\.\� �� ����:�'� �Ir,=i�.�i,,, � � �i�=�� �����\�'� �����f � / ( �,_���`�� ���/�l�l�jl
�� �l�\ � \� �� DRAPN SYSEEM TO WET POND ���/� � \\=�.�..\ � ;... � �� �'V / l j ��\�� �`` "�- �� � fliji�IJ
� t �� , � ��'n -- i i � i = � i��i� � ,� � /� C � ,� � �� � 1 EXISTING, � �l�Jfl���l
. r�I�I��/ ll� � ���ii �=;= �l L�� .\\✓ / � s��; �._�j�i.-�\ l/l/�1
� J � � ,I,�I{, ( y � r �ii��i i - �' ��' / `�r�� ,!/ �� � � � �//�� \� ����FOREBAY' �l I l,lil,�
�`��_.f �t1+�\EXISTING�%//,ii fi- ���.�j,\� � \ �� � �..� ��\��iJ�/.,.�T,.�,-,\ ,))) 1;�, _ �ll/I,
BURTON WATER QUALITY POND; � % � � `��`�����%���� � \ . ••.`�1�\� ��
ENGINEERING � CONSTRUCTED i� �j i������'�%����������� � •�����\ � SHOPTON RIDGE BUSINESS PARK
ASSOCIATES / � �� ��—`� �
_��� e�+ciweens • � DWQ # 000250 �. .� � � � �� ` . .\\ . ���' \��� \ � \�'
5�`,F,�M Pa.s ^e,°� N� ��,o \_.� � — � ., � �� :� > � J J I ',� / � � , 0 65 AC. WETLANDS CREATED � � �� PROPOSED CONDITIONS MAP
.�.J i NWP � 26 DWQ � 000250 ���'
-a ssa�,.F,.onnn�ae�o ��\ . —' � \ \ � � � ,( , �`�'. �\��\\\ � �\' SCALE: 1"=400' DATE: 10/09/15
_ �� _ � .� � � 1 1, 1 ��\\.\�\�\.,��� �, .
SHEET 2 OF 7

4. �r "`
BURTON
ENGINEERING
ASSOCIATES
CryiL ENWNEEIIS
UNO RANNERS
ssw F.m,� Ra . suee �oacir�aroe. nc zuio
� �a� ssu��. c•. na� xsaeeo
EXISTING BUILDING LOT C
LOOKING NORTHWARD
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATE: 9/14/15
SHEET 3 OF 7

�.�� �
?" � $:�J9 �3
� � � � r
�BURTON
ENGINEERING
ASSOCIATES
CNII ENGINEEMS
LAND PIANHERS
'.950 F�rv�ew Re � Suse tOD�GrMIM. NC IE210
� �(NI S51B�t � F�. f�(YI553dBW
.�;_ _. .
- _ _ ;._ - - . _ _
� F ����---��. �,, . - -�. -.:r �
.�
EXISTING BUILDING LOT C
LOOKING SOUTHWARD
AERIAI PHOTOGRAPH DATE: 9/14/15
SFIEET 4 OF 7

�� �
� . � � - - --- � `� �
-� > � - ��\� � . NATURAL SPRING TO BE - �
`� — : 0%�1,� ��-� �����\ � COLLECTED INTO BYPASS ,�
\' -��- ��' (�" � ; _ _ ��� ' �� � � �� STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM
-� J'������ � \����� (STORMS GREATER THAN 1" OF
WATER QUALITY �' �\��'�' ' RAINFALL TO JURISDICTIONAL
STORM DRAINAGE �O ' \ >% STREAM)
SYSTEM ' ,// /�� \ �
1ST INCH OF RAINFALL) � �� _
� � � �\;\ '�\
�
ROAD CROSSING IMPACT A
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM
� ( 292 LF STREAM IMPACT )
�_ �o�� � ,,,P� � \� � � 6 0�� ��
� �,�� O \ _
.. �s . �
�o ��� � 80 � �
� 6� SAFETY RAIL 8 GUARD RAIL
m ..� � � -�
,
��.�t.�r �
_ w.���\�e.
1 b • = � � � �
�
s _� � �
�• ;�
� ��i� _ ���
� -- ��
=== ti�
�
�S�_' ��
J
�I�
.���- �27�
7=
—�7
�
420 t LF
���, ��� �
� �
� 30 -
i�
�j%/i��s
�l ���//i�
(�/��/ j�i
� � r
� J������
��= I� �! �
�- �
����� .", � '�`` =f
����a�� �i� :�r �f� �
� �, �
�' �_ �. "' ---- � o : =
. �.�����li�Yl�`����•m�- -
� � '=.���r�r �_ -
_ ���7Y�C\R��` `�\`�� ,
�'�_
�� �' � � t��`���\ $ "
�i� � . w�����° �a� \��\�' �
�- � ��� ``��� �t��
�� �-����_`����t
�� \��-��11� �\\
� �M�y �aY
�� � -�r.\�y_�
�� � � � Iy-��«..:� „� �,` ,z- �- _
2: i (H:V) bPES = = _-� �— � �" _� _
- � PIP 20 LF 30�� \ _ _ ��.
� E� .7% O.. RIP RAP APRON
� � , LENGTH = 28'
' � `WATER GIUALITY � '� �\' � � 6�'p u.S�nnDrH=�B'
,90� - .- STORM DRAINAGE �. PROP. MODULAR , � � � � � � D.S. WIDTH = 32'
�- -- SYSTEM (1ST INCH) \ �._ `RETAINING WALL \ \ � `. \� � � C� � R�P w►P
� ---- ( TO EXIST. WATER QUALITY � o � � \`�� \ D50- 12�
�--_ POND ) � � �� � � \ \ � �` \ \ THICKNESS=27"
, �\ V � � � �� 6+� �� � � \ ',� �� �� �
� � �\ , _ p ° � , �
\ \ \ \ \� \ . � � \ Z� �� `� `� ', � . SHOPTON RIDGE \
�
� � �, �� � � �� . � �'� � �� - _ � �� � � . BUSINESS PARK
/ � � � . � '� �` ��.. ` � �. � ,, � � �� '.� � � � IMPACT AREA PLAN
� \ , � �
� , � . � � �,'' ��� ��-.� `- SCALE: 1"=60' DATE: 10109H5�
�
SMEET S OF 7

%0�
.•�
.:�
670
660
EXIST <
dF CRE
650
ELEV = 64g.0
640 _ _
60 40
I
�
20
0
�
70�
.•�
.:�
. �,
. . �'
650
_ _ _ _ _ 640
20
SHEET 6 OF 7

C
O
.�
c
.�
L
�
�
�
�
f�
�
0
.�
V
�
N
�L
�
�
Jurisdictional Determination
Information

L � _�~ -�" _
���#r�• i;� _
f9 ;TM_• ,�?:
� ��t ., �
'i�..-� ,� . z �•-:., ��-
r'^' T C v�Y�M`p , , _
�i' L� `lp' 4. \ w
�~� i} �'� q� .�( i�/�°n ,�!f ._
��� _�y{} J �9 � � .q 2 � j
�•� �� � �
'��%' 3x���` � ::� s�/'�j�.:
YJ►"�� � ���.,..A++' �: sr. ,.�'
�� r _;����,� �'.�' t� �„
T"'� . y • .!� �� +�
rz T �-_ ����
,` �� ,� y ��J sr'�-� �S •
y y •i� ' -i & - .;.ic-r,q
�� .*.:�' `�� j iL..-'�
.` :� e
� �, .
'r, �
...%, ' -
�"1Yy�� �_6� �� _ ?� r .
r� �t"r i•d�:� �` �
`r ��' 'r���� +C
` c, , ,� ;�, . ti
't� •
�' ",�L�i,.�•�.
, . ;+; , h .-% %.�', � �.
• r+ � �+�'~ ��`��� ` � "�� �'�'- =T
. � 1� Vi'r��' 1� ' �
'� ,'���::� � . � � ��.-���,�,-,
f' � y w � ,��� 9"
� � � � � -�J= � � I ;��� = 1
-.[�� .'� .�' r-+•� J�0.i .. '„'b� � f
�� t'� '> ��� � ���• •'M
� �s � ����.�1� •�,. �� • C '~Ys
1 . 'i'��� Pi, r �_
�,1�, ^ .. ' � ? i�i [
i � _ y a �t'.}{ wr'a-v
� _ . i . • i . � �. .. �' r�-- �7F�f :a`'�'� -
�
���~_•�
c' '�'Y� � � r.
6 �,Ly .
�� ���
Teil�t� ��\ : �
�, � � � �
� ' ' _ ''.y .. 'i . .
�I , � _ ,� � � � .��� `f' r , �J / �
�.1� � i�f' �` y, . ��. ��
' • �y+C� ��Y/i � /' -,� "' x �
. .. ' • , � ,
7' ' r'�' �' wy �' i'+ x� • f�` � �
�/ / ; ; � •4 _' i . �. � ,j.. .' y.,t �'„ ` ���k
� 'h, �`�` {Y, �I �- •, . ,� ",�-�,� � /.
� ` ' � " '' � �'
� ��, r ; .. �r:� <�•� * �-:
�` �.. �� t ! \L -K�t� ,F.
/ �. ) l� �
�. . ,_n�. � �=' • 'e � . �1 _ �,� '�� . . �
�� . � •.� E ., , t y4 r .
r � • 11c� ' �� F �^ t� ,� ,t�� I
/ .�� . I ' ` '. s 4� - -� , ' ` #!�",�,�'�.
, � 4 �y, . � , `L [ _ '`� r `_ i +. r.�y
f .4' - -' .'� �.�'y ' ' 'f C.'� 'C'�r�i
� � •-� . /� `4 x;' ;� /; �
� � � � �� � �� '� i.� i � . . �
* �'� �. a�`), •. �'!� ,•,���
/' `� ' a� �� J. -
i \ '� � �`_' ' -� •
�! - r�
� .. •r � — , .•
',�', :�,
� � •��r � , ��' y��..- , ��
. / f . �. y - - ' ,.�
�
'�� • � ,
� . ���. .' a' - .
{" , 1—+ .�� 9��*�-' � ; F .
� � �.` � ' � ' :"�[�� � �ru '���t � �''�,T'i � ur�
� At� k4y�.w�ts t '^�`�w"� `S. .
. . 14..w - t Y
. . . . � ' . � �_q �`A
_ ` � Y��<
. i . . '.� ' .. . ' .� a � � � ryn.
'.t_. , � ' , � �i , � � 1^G� 11 .';�
. .:. ` . � * � �r .j��`�� � ..�_
f , .. .. � S , , i, <� � � %�' �

_ , �, �,..,� Culvert ! : -
' ' 1.. � �G� Y� y'tl L. 1, ..'��I'
, •
� „
� - :, ;� - - -- - .• - � _ : _ .,,,,_ � _ T _, , _ l�r+Fr"!(`�
_ _ - �. _ _ -_ �r -- �..
�- ,_ ;. � • ., ._....
, . • . - � -�.r.._ - -
. .. '--�-^ � ..
_ .. , w � � --'_.'�- . r — - • . � .
r �-
Existing � � ' '� 1 •���� � � • �� , - �
detention basin � � -- ' �='�
�' " ' . .
.� , . '
_;� ,� '��_�„yr�., �� Begin IntermittenUPerennial Tributary A(+l- 1000 If)
- ,
Existing s s. line �*' : r��r r" "-_ . . q
!� Approximate location of knick point � �° ,'� �a _'
E� '•- '��, '' F .` � : � ;� ��. ,
,� � 1 .�;'+s. 2 � , f �,� F � '' � �'
� - �,�s. .. � _� . , ; _ _ - „ . ���,�:.
Non-junsdictional `� - ' �� .'�`` � .: r ' �
-�� �- � . +l'�
channel/swale -- ;� . 4,;�,,� ��1; ? _ - �' �
engineered with ., }�'. :� ; ,� ` �.� .
rip rap �'��'� - ' � . . ��� '_�. • PROJECT
� _ ��` �J(tStar�g-6lftk�int� : .� '� BOUNDARY
, , � .. � � � „ �+;-) 164.6 ac.
Proposed road _ -;: � ,— . 3 � rj�der consxtu:ctiot��� �` _i ,_. � ��' � _ ::k
.,. �� v.
crossing � .,� �.,� / <' '� �,�'�`" T,
.i �'q / y�. �'� 0`
3 d� 4 �f �'�� '� ,,
"�4. , 1 \,:. ?
M REACH � 4 ;` �_; •.��� :� Perennial Tributary B
EVALUATION �% '�*.. _ (+/- 600 Ifl
FORM (DP 1) � - � r �,. _
.� '� , •� I �'-'�r _
UPLAND DATA �,� :.l � � � � . �
FORM (DP 2) r�'�,�" !� � ��'`' / °
rY
�, .
� !� � � S , 1�
� , i } ��
�, ,, - -, � � , ),� .; f�z` . =
�� ,`�_� �, ` - r � � ,, , 0.65 acres Existing
��; b �=°�,• ! � s � •, Wetiands created for
�'' V. .�3' ► t � p ;�. .
'� " r`�jc ' f � { . �, �" prior mitigation
�, � ya{* �.,. }.��,�. . , ,.t :,- �;=
�. M�j �}c,;: :�'- � • },-f t.��' K� �• �x `r ',� �+ � �. ' A
. q'4 : �.�.�
, t� ..t . , -. , � 1�' .' `Y
REPRESENTATNE ` ��� ,, Existin Water - �ooAT�oN:
9 'P� LATITUDE LONGITUDE
PHOTO LOCATION � ' "' • e
# �� Quali Pond •.� � 35,6�BN -eo�e, W
� AND DIRECTION -'`�, ��. ' � ,t � HUC 030W103
- DWQ #: 000250 .:� , N'�� ;;': ' LOWER CATAWBA
DATA POINT � '�._ � � — _ - , 3 r�S � � r. �,�
(DPq) LOCATIONS EXIStlfl9 DaI71 '°ry, . I,;-'�?�, �ou zSn SCn�E SocKFKn
! - 485
FIGURE NO.
SHUTTERFLY RD EXTENSION Drawn By: Reviewed By:
Mecklenburg County, NC P�K �SR
P
8
APPROXIMATE MAP: WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES DATE:
� ' ' ' EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
� � � , � 11/02/15
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VfR1FICATION

_ :.� Culvert ,
_ _ - - _ - !�, t/ ;"�
__ '_" hoPafNtl . ' . . 'l : �
. ' . . '. . .' .....- �
, . � � . . , .. . " ' "' - ` - . . . . "\ '
" ' �" ' ". •. .. _ . .. . . ..
., . ... ��� '__' "' '
'"'" )19-_..
. . . . .. . . . .....,�'�� . .
.. �' �. . . . • . _ """"'"" ' . , _ ... ''� � �
_ . ��
... ... .� . '. , �
��.... - "� " " �.-� � ........... . .. ... ' '" "
_ \\
rs� �, \
Existing , � ' . - . : •., �, ,` . . ,,, .;, \ ``
detention basin ' � . � �. � ':�'�`�,
� . ..... ......... . .. .. . Begin IntermittenUPerennial Tributary A (+/- 1000 Ifl .; = , � � 1 ;
..�� �� 4 `� - �
Existing s.s. line } ° : ° . ` � :
� ��� F� Approximate location of knick point � r�`; ". �
� - � .. o , < /� `
` �� , sn�it.� rpa __` .` � . 1 ��'"'4•. ��� � y�, ' ��.
.-... -.� � � �, .�� .,. ""' """" •'•' ....
2 .1
.�
Non-jurisdictional �. , "• . < „�. = .� _ __ .... , s°,✓` �
��Ft ` �
��E ,� l • �
channel/swale �►- ^ ;� ; , � ' " ` � � `.
engineered with , � + ` �.. � . , I
, F�. r �. .
�. :
rip rap ' 0 p 'l ' � ,. �h�� `� , ' PROJECT
� e �:. ��
�xistang 6uEiding ��'� '; � � �.� BOUNDARY
k r �i • '.. E�. �(+l-) 164.6 ac.
Proposed road - � 3 •�Under edr�struotionj /! )jr �w- �7��/ � f:
�� � l ` :t 4ryt "` % .: � / / ' � , . �, .
crossing � � I � .�. � a;.
K
� y.� � � � . . r�:-. � ' �� � �
� .� � , I yR�� � , •� ��f< . 4 � `
STREAM REACH , � - y �J ,t{ � ; � � .I�
. � 4 � • ',:, ...
eVAwATION � � yQ ,�s� �'� Perennial Tributary B
FORM (DP 1) . � � t T. � (+/ 600 If)
� � � � �
UPLAND DATA ,t.. ; ��� • ! ., ry "'� ' � i � �'�`'� k.;
� �ti ; ti s. . ,: '. .�
FORM (DP 2) �, .. �� \� ' ,1°� �.. rt �,
,� - + �,. w ::.
' �� j � . \,'� � .':I � . i.,.. � ' " - � . ':'.
• K�
��- - � � - � � ��� . 0.65 acres Existing
�
1` E : Y� ��` }�� � A�'\,` ,'��`� ' Wetlands created for
.� - - , � � prior mitigation
.1 -� ,�; .: �:�j� r , ., , �..
eao— -. � . � ' .. � - . . . � n. . ,��. .� .•
�� � ,- �' � �' �� ii
I � .. ��j �'1 ` .. _ 4 L �' :i
�•�� _ `i � � / �I
REPRESENTATIVE 1`,� . ��k f � '�`k,_ �_ �ocnrioN:
�1� Existing Water - a >. . R , E LATITUDE LONGITUDE
��� PHOTO LOCATION , i� !, r. 35.1678 N -80.9487 W
�� AND DIRECTION ::•� QUaII�/ POCICI '. � � HUC:03050103
t ' ��;, 5 , DWQ #: OOOZ�JO �=o � : � ` -. LOWER CATAWBA
DATA POINT ��� (+/- 4.2 acres) � � � � _ . � SCALE
(�P�) LOCATIONS �� EXIStlllg Dafll ;• s,,,, zso o soo�F�ni>
1- 485 i
$;, ' ti �
FIGURE NO. SHUITERFLY RD EXTENSION Drawn By: Reviewed By:
Mecklenburg County, NC P�K �SR
9 ' - -
.,
APPROXIMATE MAP: WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES DATE:
�' ` EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
� r SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VER/F/CATION 11/02/15

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: _Shutterfly Rd Extension City/Counry: Mecklenburg County Sampling Date: 10/22/15
Applicant/Owner: Liberty Properties Limited Partnership State: NC Sampling Point: DP2: UPL
Investigator(s): WEPG Section, Township, Range:
LandForm (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2— 4%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35.16800 N Long: - 80.95088 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: PaE: Pacolet Sandv Loam NWI classification:
Are ciimatic ! hydrologic condi[ions on the site typical for this time oF year? Yes Y No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N, Soil N, or Hyd�ology N significantly disturtied? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N, Soil N, or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks: Data point is approximately 30' west of Tributary A.
Normal weather and climate conditions at time of evaluation.
HYDROLOGY
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
P�imarv Indicators (minimum of one is �equired: check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (614) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (BS)
High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (61) _ Presence o( Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposi[s (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Other (Explain in Reina�ks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (65) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ 5hallow Aqui[ard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (69) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Ayuatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes IUo %� Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No %� Depth (inches}: Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes ca illar frin e)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous insnections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmo�t — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3�' ) % Cover Sbecies? StaWs
�. Liriodendron tulipifera 20 Y FACU
2. Liquidambar stvraciflua 1,� Y FAC
3. Pinus taeda 10 Y FAC
4.
5.
6.
45 = To[al Cover
50% of rotal cover. 22•5 20% of total cover: 9
Saolina Stratum (Plot size: 30' j
�. Liriodendron tulipifera 15 Y FACU
2. Juniperus virqinana 10 Y FACU
4.
5.
6.
25 . = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12.5 20% of total cover: 5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
i. Liqustrum sinense 50 Y FACU
2. Elaeagnus anpustifolia 40 Y FACU
90 = Total Cover
50°/a oi total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' }
i. Elaeaqnus anqustifolia 30 Y FACU
2. Liqustrum sinense 30 Y FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
10
11
60 = Total Cover
50% o( total cover: 3� 2b% of total cover: 12
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' �
�. Lonicera japonica 35 Y FAC
2.
5.
35 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: � 7•5 20% of total cover: �
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.
Sampling Point: DP2:UPL
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dom,inant Species
That Are OBL FACW, or FAC: 30% (A/B)
Total °/a Cover of: Multiqlv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Iridicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problerriatic.
Tree - Woody plants, exclutling woody vines,
approximately 20 ft.(6 m) or more in height, and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vi,nes, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than ap�roximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height..
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:DP2: UPL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
linchesl Color (moistl % Color Imoist) % Tvae Loc Texture Remarks
�-$ 7.5YR 6/4 100 sandy c�ay �oam '
8- � 8 10 YR 4/3 100 ��ay �oam
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked 5and Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (A1) _ Dark Surtace (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Oark Surtace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron•Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No %�
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date: � 10/22/15 � Evaluator: � WEPG
Proiect: ShutterFlv Road Extension: Tributar
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30"
(riqht-click the purple number and left-click Update Field to summarize
Tributary (A)
Easting: -80.95088 W
Northinp: 35.16806 N
A. Geomor holo Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
1a. Continuit of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosit of channel alon thalwe 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: riffle- / ste - ool se uence 0 1 2 3 1
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 1
6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
10. Natural valle 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
Geomor holo Subtotal 12.0
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. H drolo
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1
13. Iron Oxidizin Bacteria 0 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1
15. Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5
16. Or anic debris lines or iles Wrack lines 0 0.5
17. Soil-based Evidence of hiqh water table? No = 0
2 3
2 3
0.5 0
1 1.5
1 1.5
Yes = 3
�lopv Subtotal
C. Biolo
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversit and abundance 0 1 2 3 1
21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 1
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Cra fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 .5
24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 .5
25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 .5
26. Wetland lants in streambed FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0 0
Biolo Subtotal 8.5
' erennial streams ma also be identified usin other methods. See a e 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes: Substrate: Silt, sand, few gravel, few small cobble in upper reaches. Silt and sand in lower reaches.
+/- 3-4' wide channel, +/- 10' @TOB
Crayfish and salamanders (Only juveniles observed).
Snails (lunged): uncommon
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodoloqv for ldentification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their I(version 4.11)
Oriqins.

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date: � 10/22/15 � Evaluator: � WEPG
Proiect: Shutterflv Road Extension: Tributar
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30'
(riaht-click the aurple number and left-click Uodate Field to summarize
Northi
Tributary (A)
-80.95088 W
35.16806 N
A. GeOmo1' holo �Absent' WeaK Moderate . Strong SCORE
1a. Continuit of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosit of channel alon thalwe 0 1 2 3 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle- / ste - ool se uence 0 1 2 3 1
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 1
6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
10. Natural valle 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
Geomor holo Subtotal 13T0'
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. H drolo
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1
13. Iron Oxidizin Bacteria 0 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1
15. Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5
16. Or anic debris lines or iles Wrack lines 0 0.5
17. Soil-based Evidence of hiah water table? No = 0
2 3
2 3
0.5 0
1 1.5
1 1.5
Yes = 3
�loav Subtotal
C:. tilolo
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance) 0 1 2 3 1
21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 1
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Cra fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 .5
24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 .5
25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 .5
26. Wetland lants in streambed FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0 0
Biolo Subtotal 8.5
" erennfal streams ma also be idenUtfed usfn other methods. 5ee a e 35 ot NGUWC.l manual.
Notes: Substrate: Silt, sand, few gravel, few small cobble in upper reaches. Silt and sand in lower reaches.
+/- 3-4' wide channel, +/- 10' @TOB
Crayfish and salamanders (Only juveniles observed).
Odonata larvae: uncommon
Snails (lunged): uncommon
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodolopv for ldentification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their �(version 4.11)

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV ofthe JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND 1NFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Applicant: Liberty Properties Limited Partnership
Site: Shopton Ridge Business Park
Form for: Jurisdictional Perennial Tributary A(Perennial RP�V A), and Jurisdictional Perennial Tributary B(Perennial RPH' B).
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORn1ATION:
State:NC County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg Cit��: Charlotte .
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.1678° �V, Long. -80.9481 ° U.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Coffey Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water ("ITl W) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Sugar Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03050103
� Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
� Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Q Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION ll: SUMA4.4RY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION l0 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Ar� e o"navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [RequiredJ
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flo�v of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain: .
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [RequiredJ
l. VVaters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of watcrs of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): �
Q TNWs, including territorial seas
[� Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
� Relatively permanent waters� (RPWs) that flow directly or indirecYly into TNWs
Q Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Q Wetlands directly aburiing RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into 7NWs
Q Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Q Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flo�v directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 1960 linear feet: 10 width (ft) and/or 0.22 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known): .
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TTIW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., rypically 3 months). �
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: .

SECTION IIL• C�'1'A ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TN��1's
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over Tl�`��'s and wetlands adjacent to TNV1's. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section 1ll.A.1 and Section III.D.I. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNV1', complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.I.; otherw�ise, see Section ITI.B below.
1. TNVI'
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. «'etland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT V1'ETLANDS (IF ANl'):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNV1's where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resouree is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the H�aterbody° is not an RPVV, or a wetland directly abutting an RPV1', a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNV1'. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary ��ith adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.I for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite w�eUands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNV1's that flow directly or indirecHy into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: �ick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: 44 inches
Average annual snowfall: 0 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TN W.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are �'ick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are �'ick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are �iek List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
ldentify flow route to TN W5:
Tributary stream order, if known: 1.
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then 11ows into TNW.

(b) General Tributarv Characteristics (check all that applv):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Ayerage depth: feet
Average side slopes: ic� k tiisf.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain: rip-rap .
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: .
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: ick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: �ick. List
Describe flow regime: .
Other information on duration and volume: .
Surface flow is: ick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: �ick.I:ist. Explain rndings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed: .
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank ❑
❑ changes in the character of soil ❑
❑ shelving ❑
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ❑
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ❑
❑ sediment deposition ❑
❑ water staining ❑
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.� Eaplain: .
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Q High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other Qist):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g.; water color is clear, discolored; oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: .
Identify specific pollutants, if kno�vn: .
�A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily severjurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e g., tlow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of Flow above and belo�v the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): 0-Sm.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics: .
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Lxplain findings: .
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Gxplain findings: .
❑ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: .
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non= I'NW that flow directly or indirectly into TNV1'
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:Forested/open water.
Wetland quality. Explain:Fair to Good.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: ick List. Explain: .
Surface flow is: �Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: �'ick L� t. Gxplain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed: .
(c) Wetland Adjacencv Detennination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain: .
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain: .
(d) Proximity (Relationshipl to TNW
Project wetlands are �iek List river miles from TNW.
Project �vaters are PickrList aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flo�v is from: Pick List.
Estimate approaimate location of wetland as within the �Tick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., �vater color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: .
Identify specific pollutants, if known: .
(iii) Biological Characteristics. WeNand supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):50-100;.
❑ Vegetation rype/percent cover. Explain: .
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Lxplain findings: .
❑ Fish/spa�vn areas. Explain findings: .
❑ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: .
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:typical wetland species - amphibians, etc.
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directiv abuts? (YM) Size (in acresl Directiv abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: .
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the tlow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNV1'. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or behveen a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on thc TN�i', as identified, in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants ar flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TN W?
• Does the tributary, in combination �vith its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any); have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity ofthe TNW?
Note: the abo��e list of considerations is not inclusi��e and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPVV that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TN�1's. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D: .
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPV1' and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RP��1' flows directly or indirecHy into
TNV1's. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination �vith all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section Ill.D: .
3. Significant nexus Tindings for wetlands adjacent to an RPV1' but that do not directly abut the RPW. Gxplain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus belo�v, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section Ill.D: .
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATGRS/VI'ETLANDS ARE (CNECK ALL
THAT APPLl'):
l. TNWs and Adjacent V1'etlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
� Tributaries of TN Ws where tributaries rypically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Perennial Tributary A(Perennial RPW A) and Perennial Tributary B(Perennial RPW B) exhibit
geomorphology, hydrology, and biological indicators consistent with intermittenUseasonal flowing streams in the piedmont
ecoregion as documented by the attached NCDWQ Stream Identification Assessment Fonns.
Tributaries of TN W where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are.

[] Tributaries of T'NW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: .
Provide estimates ror jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
� Tributary waters: 1960 linear feet 10 �vidth (ft).
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
ldentify type(s) of waters: .
Non-RP�'�'s8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNVI's.
Q Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW; and it has a significant nexus �a�ith a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional �vaters �vithin the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .
V1'etlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent �vetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: .
Q Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries rypically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: .
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.182 acres.
V1'etlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RP�1' that flow direcHy or indirectly into TN«'s.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and �vith similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section 11I.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. V1'etlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNV1's.
� Wetlands adjacent to such waters; and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section II1.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Q Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED �INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE� VVATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATGD WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTIO�' OF V1'HICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COn1MERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH �4'ATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
gSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key m Section I II.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CN'A jurisdiction based solely on this categor��, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Men:ornndum Regnrding CWA Ac1 JurisdicBon Fo!lowing Rnpnnos.

❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated �vaters. Explain: .
❑ Other factors. Explain: .
Identify water bod�� and summarize rationalc supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Q Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. '
Identify type(s) of waters: .
❑ Wetlands: acres.
NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within Yhe review area; these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "S{4�ANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solelv on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus' standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: .
p Other: (explain, if not covered above): .
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Q Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (fi).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus' standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non-�vetland �vaters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: .
� Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicanUconsultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Off ice does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: .
❑ Corps navigable waters' study: .
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .
❑ USGS NIiD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
� U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: .
� USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: .
Q National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: .
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): .
Q FEMA/FIRM maps: .
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
� Photographs: � Aerial (Name & Date): .
or � Other (Name & Date):10/22/2015.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: .
❑ Applicable/supporting case law: .
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature: .
❑ Other information (please specify): .

z
n
�
3
T
O
�
�
�
NCWAM Forms

/ __ • • V � , �,- C�Ivert T ' �'` _ -- _ _� „a' � ,���,*-
,�� �' � ' �.i � '� � :w �. M �y. � �
S:«r-.rlr P - s..., _ • � . ..r� ��^��' 1
, s1 .: Ly' —_'._.� h� n . � '''i]Y � :.�
�� � � ` " 4 r r� .i
Existin � - ' •:� ' ' '�, �... ..;
g �� . �
detention basin _ . � .;
t• p► ���.,;,.,.; ��� Begin IntermittenUPerennial Tributary A �� .�
, � �. �
Existin s s line . �'' .; ^ r��� �� � ' , �•:
g , � .;_ , ' - - Approximate location of knick point ' �' �. y� '
�
,�'� ' i � ,:" ;�: : ; .
.
a ' , _ .
1Y� _ f ' ,. �' �
�� �' '_�' !:. : ` � � .. �w . �; � � .l : + � � .. � • . r :,:,+ .,n �'� . . - _. . , ";i� ,
� � �1✓a �l i . .4 - .. . . f ,��
�; - • ,� y � ' ' . . '$:. .
. �w
_ .
H
M
Non urisdictional �'
1 . '
channel/swale � • - - ,- �:�, y - �� ' ' -��- ._.� �±±�,�` �`.
' �•-' ��,.� ��vs ;,.-'.- `� � ' ''
engineered with � '! a -�; , ' �.�-
. . :. = . ;
ri ra i�� ' '' �� , ' , ' µ • PROJECT
p p � �'' j- BOUNDARY
� �� .ti .'r . �' '„
„ . � �, � 3, � � r� (+/-) 164 6 ac.
Proposed road '� .: t �,„� ` ,, ; �' ��'� .
crossing s� ��r , � -a�a �," � ��?' �`� ��
.� . 1 ^� . •f,:.
i �' h
. -��• '�y - _`� �'�a ���
� R �
,r, ',���;� ' Existing retaining wall {�+;�, �
� �.. Perennial Tributary B
NCSAM Stream :� ,'�'�. •1� � '� �"� - :�
Assessment � ' � '• r ' � . �� �;; ��
Reach , -�., n ,�� �; ♦ � " �. , , � ��,. .�.
+/-1000 If �' '�� i_ j�" � •.�;' +�� ���_ � ` � `� „.
� ♦ 0.65 acres Existin
� , � �, _ 9
;� � `�, � � � • G � � �Netlands created for
� � / r
�� Y � , � `J. �r� . �� � � \� ��} 7f
�. � �, ;r �,i�i ' t � � �ti ; � � prior mitigation
µ �+ �, ! . �, ,y•�` � �� .+. .,i r
� ����, ��.�v j +�R i/�, y � . M1�� ��- � S, } er . :`. . �
. } r �Rr" �' 'r . F �:
.� �' �yL x� ' r• � � ` .r ,q �-'� ��p•
., � t -► rv �.,� �, . :' - .. :_: ' �' � n�' .r� < S1. • '�'r' %� .
�t, y „ y , ��� .:�; , Existing Water Quality '' .,%.�� � +�'� � . �'A �.
�- r ?�.� ciruoe
^...� ... � , �,[ k _ �f 'Jtl A � .
Y�,: � ` Pond ' r w ��. ,, .; � �,� r ;, , W
C�� '�s � ,� �, ��, � � � � � 4 �',
l-485 -.�!'� i`�' DWQ # 000250 ,f���' i.�,� ��.
"� a'Sr � .l �•"�.�9e � ��� ar: + � � Y , `SCALE
i• ,�r-- � ' � EXIStI(1Cj �alll soo zw n sooiFee�l
. ;�n� �
FIGURE NO.
SHUITERFLY RD EXTENSION Drawn By: Reviewed By:
Mecklenburg County, NC P�K �SR
10
NCSAM STREAM ASSESSMENT MAP DATE:
� t,• • k, EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 11/02/15
..... ._,� . ��� ,._r:• .«.,�� SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION

/ - _ — Culvert :: ., - , :
—�� � � �` i� �
�AafRtl
� ' .- ... ..... "" _ '1f0 ._ -. .. ' -.. ..., " . �r . \\� .,�,,,•
" .. '�. '-.. ��' _ _ .._ ' ........ ... .... ""."' "....
� "'" """'... .. ...._
. \';\ ',\`'ti'
Existing - � � .
,, -: � . �
detention basin , � • . Begin IntermittenUPerennial Tributary A � . r� . `-� �
��, ' _ ";.r_ � � j,.. ... .. �- - --.. - -- - - \
Existing s.s. line ' �' ° ".rr�/'°'ro*'x�-.,,,,r,o _ "° �/''"•
- Approximate location of knick point �-� ;� .
_ - - �� '�
� . �' , sn�� � r'ne ..._ _. . � �� ��N�'S*� /
..... , r. y �. . ��. :.> � V ,._- -- ---'--....., �
� ,; � /�
,� ,� ,y..� -t �� �1t� ..__ .��,(
Non jurisdictional ' ` ' �' .. _.: �- : `� �
h, w � .� „� - � � .
,.� � , � _ r �, F, .
channel/swale � h, ,* . � �' ` � �
��. - : �� � ��v
engineered with . r• , � , ;; �f/ �� c . ..`^� �y, PROJECT
rip rap � m "�: -,: . : �'� '��
� � , , �x+Sting BUFldin9 ; � ' � �,.� BOUNDARY
�, t ,� '.. � ' (+l-) 164.6 ac.
Proposed road � ' - � ` . � . (Under construction) � � � � f � � , ;
9 � - � '�� '", : /�
crossin ,.�. � v �.� ,
ry Q;., �.
: �- �► � - � �7+•�- :� .• wi•� . ; �� � r .
� .� i I � �. . .r � .,; . L��•�..., �.'.'";.� .� ,
� �/�` ♦ . � :� ; ::,:: ��
" � ' g! ` � Existing retaining wall �
a ��. � . � :�„ M ,� , . Perennial�Tributary B
NCSAM Stream t '; � � � r � � � l�. , ,� �, � . .
, ,^, �
Assessment { ' - ' � , "`�. �1 i �' �,,a � k y
�ti r
Reach 1 .: .: -�i �,1 ' r�-�, �.d ,,, �:
� �
3' .- .
� . ; :. ; . , .� „
+/-1000 If ' �y
,!,t ��, � � 4 �r�rl
�,, �\; � , 0.65 acres Existmg
� - � �, ; �� ` �
�� + � � � , ;, � : . Wetlands created for
- .. , _ -- .._..-.. - � ` ,,,,. ;' �.. .� rior miti ation
.. ; � z4'�q : �' - � . P 9
een � ' � . .. . . � ' . - ''Y� , :, f+��� . � � � � ��
� � � � �-:, :;
... � k,�, ��� a ;' • , ,.;
,
a �� _ I.N.� �: . \��f -- ` �,.
; � .. . . '' . ,.. � t ��. . � 1 � LOCATION:
' \j � � � � - �., . •,,•, EXIStIfI WatE� QUallt . � ,�-3.}� . ,. LATITUDE LONGITUDE
_ � - , �c.y, _ � ., l � �,,.. .. g y �..�. .�' � " w E 35.1678 N - 80.9481 W
I- 485 •'` ; Pond �o a. �'. IOWER CATA,VuBA
- �. DWQ # 000250 : � �
- ` �a- •:� -..- ;� Existing Dam - � < 2 � SCA�E o
� �,�� a s oiFKn
45 . +t` 1 .
FIGURE NO. SHUTTERFLY RD EXTENSION Drawn By: Reviewed By:
Mecklenburg County, NC P�K LSR
11
NCSAM STREAM ASSESSMENT MAP DATE:
��, I.�, EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 11/02/15
,�,�, � • , . „ , _ SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VER/FICATfON

� • : :� ,1.+�
:... �` ;;,��,�' t�;r�g: • � �
`;f �•, ' t,.� � � . ,.:-i:.:. , �v..,
`?�-' s��° y
,.� 'YT +��'r�:,, � �
�� �,� -. • ' ��''. •�
. � t:�:,r ,,,.
� vi:: ; � °� _ � � ,��_;�?;�.� b i
c� � � s � y�•�3�;� _9Y1�„ �
�
.. , . ' �
. y�j_ :t��`s� - '���! ;�• t
��. • �(�—� '���Q�`. f�' .K��S 1.,�,� r
r-�� - ,�.w ��
..
+ � t• ,�. � _ '�+���:f�
e..�t�• ���'a.
,..� F'��r �c:.�
�{ + ij �i' ' J w , t . �, -
L �F�1� n � . . _ ` .
�, .�i
' ' `:�t��-
,� � ,�,' 'r, . -
��� ., �. �
�?*: :� . ��''q; •.
; �; ,�,. #, � ,�.t` .
�' ��ry�� s'�' �Y .
,' ;� ��`„ - , . j ',s
•.. _r;�,�i:..
.a A L. , � .
� r � � � ,..f`+t��
... � . ..� 4�.
�� `� _�►�.'l�.�`.,"',•.. . '�
� ���
:������ ' ��
. �
� . �``. �+�'' '•'�", � . . �� • N- � R r1 s. � r, k'. � !' . .�' . •� w� i
��i ' , e � ..� ,�. ..��� i. ' �.. S.. �[
1�.�� i �'i j � . � . , � R . � ^ , �� ���
. � . ���`� ;�� � , � � '• � bi `• .:� * a � ,
�. �. �, ��',��� y �.�M• v� .t� �f� '�M'�y����"ly�.�.( ��1� `� I��1 `��\
• � ,\�: . � .� ,w` ��� �� �,� • x °: f-1:'� � � .: i
'1"� � i � �j}j 1d�r�� t • �'
� ;:���+�� �� I . ,.�1t1�l,,�A ��� t .Eis:'�t ��. ��.
F 7�, �. �' ` ` i '�a, � � � , ��• � 4 �
. „�•.
� r �Y ��' t � ?, •h �'� �� .
•� ; �.' _ i . � � ��. . . � r -. � k' •
�� �+l;� _ , i� � 1.,0 _' y' . , , � \
(! . ', �. ., y� ,�. , ¢�. .
� ��� i �,l� � '.� �)'• N,
/ r � ' _ :' Pt' , 4; r, .y�?. , J. � ..,�' :
r •�, • �,� �. � � ��� ` _ r�• � �
/ �� " �'� . .. , .
' '�„ � `�►. �- •
, r•�1�:ti 4" ,
� •r . , r �
.� t _ . ' . �` . .
` . �' * `
� � J��__ `. �,'j �G -��'l�.v.,� K�.,,�'�� l�^�
, ' �;j� . �� ' � � t t��� `�� . �r-s , �.. '
� � � + ' _ ��`k�'�j���,.<
P�' '� � . ' `� - '
..� <.,,.
, 'i��. �t��'+'Jr ;��k� �;; . ,3a` e
L �i �'� — . � ..; , �: ` a�' ► � ,
;� • ; � .;,�, . _ ; � �,. ''�►' - �
�
f, � � r�i� � ` ' �
��l�i

Photo Location 3: Drainage channel engineered with rip rap (facing downslope).
Photo Location 4: Detention basin upslope of stream origin.
Shopton Ridge - Shutterfly Rd Extension, Stream Evaluation Photographs
Mecklenburg County, NC. Photos taken October 22, 2015
Weclands and Erwiro�mencal Plannin� Group Leorurd S. Rindoer, PLLC.

�'7F'►:''� i,'�'?N ,: , _
� �f ,F''; ;i
• , � . ` - . , , .
. ♦ y � . � � � �¢ �,
; 4 � `., ;,, , � : - �;:
'i . }: .•�- , krt ��..,r�,t`r ���,.�� fr r ��' _ }s�: � w�t�' . ��
. 4� .f - r R�� F : Y , � - � .'�,ey i/.•`� ,�� }7 - �
Y �{ � -l{: � j,�a , �?- % e �� • � �� y '�� -W� �t�.' =' F - .
{{{ L� �yz �' t c
�� �'�'{Ea s t''1k�• '*ai����j' � f}�� dG i' �*° n, ,�r� l
� ; 1.� ' � , �a � . t ��� , •� �y+. Z � , �+..� '. �i • '.{ .V
M:: i- �4s ��` ��� 9-�'�p �'( , �)i r +f..t-/ : y= � ��� ' f
-r � � T w . � � .�/ . , ``��.
- �, � � �.� _ � K
4.,` � .� � T"' '4 �"� � :l�t' p . /t. � "tit�' �^ ` � r 7 y � ., r` .,��' ti
� � 1
, ' ��{�<� Ja� ..i)•���t"., �c. w � 3if'„ � . �'.� ti �' .
� � � ,r { � .. f , �' �7f= Y � ^� � `2 � fV 7� . _a � �
, +.�� y, ( ` _ w���,rC�,1� '' _ .�e� ,'' J¢ '. , - , - .
. ��� a-� � "�''✓��- ��,/� . . _Ri..� ���,, t ;'`�.��'� _(�l �•,
! / ♦ �� � ` J' {� �. '#'�, �' .
. � .!: S ..��� ,� � � � '
., � b r�� � �, x �.��;� :i�.2. �t'R-.. ..� � ,
! ,�,, �y � � �
'�`' � . .', br ,� �,'�''�, . /f i -t , ,1 ��+N"''.�, ir ,a �i " ~ � .��
'�-��,,� _ � � _._, � - ,,- . �. - _ .
_ ,., �': : j. �-° .� ° { � .
.. �. , r �_; , l� , , . - `, x� .
�,Y � - ' �� t' , `'!` ee � i r � ,
• 1�' j,''� t��t�._ •`� �Y'� -Y' �_ ''t �' `' �`',.� �
; . . ' �, +� 1�� ,� � ���.���, i �� ��`� � ;� ,�.�.� i?,�'�r K _ •,' ~� .:,�
+ .+�. T r i.l � ^ L . .,1A. '
r .�♦ J .. -,�� �'. :c.�'!.. �n��l .�+� �.� 1•/ '�� • • . - ��!_ '� Wl�- �,
L
�. , , Jtit �` ' l,��i `j,,/"�, ( is
y�'• ! `�'ti '� '�� ` a # f � .. �r � '� , ' { r
�7�` � �i .. +' --+ "i;' � . �
�' ) i. +� . � � �•I i
' Jr '�-'. , � � �. � - ` t` '�' _�„� ,
� :, F 1T I
, � 'I
�
�• ���_;• `��r . r•� � ��� r /� � ! ^�i';� �,�` •.
, � ' ' + • ��• • ��. `, +�I
�,' !; ' ' ,iw � "� J• ! ��! �"�,
� � � Y�' ,' � � ' I. `
'�t_ �; T',''. � � � � �
' �J " �% � .� �!L_ �y ��
S. `i a : �L'. 1,; „(, '�� � ,�. . . �. -��+iQ� , 't � �
• i: .'�. - / ��'�_ . � �.; - '�� -. /
� ' ` � • ,N •/ l• . b �
I, 7. � •/1 •i. y�r. � �• ' � • ..�.
�_ r' "- - - °. - �` ��., . ' `�'�-": "'• '� �I1r -''�.�/
� �F f . _ _ • � K / ' �� 1.. - ;►.' : � : ��-I�. _ ,�y.
� �� ,� �' • � `. �1I � , � - �t1 . ..�(' �i,�� �
.. . � � :r �- � <,r � j'�. � = - - '���, Hf��rt
� � ,,� � �
' � �t ',� ��� ' ��r� ••t '�,.'
� � b�. ��� �, • �� \ ��.� ,� � �� •y .
/ � 5;��, ' � i �
� � '�� • � � { �•� ~ • �
'� ' " � ' " ' � ]A = . ,' �
� ^
1 U
� � ���, s ` ^ � � Mi
♦ )
• !. �. �`., �I �'.
/ �� � � , �9 �- � � ' �
_�1 ���I
� i � � . �" . y; � _ _ ::�
�
/
/
a

' 7� � v7 - � ,�� .�?:.'�s�l�` �i� .. .rt -�. •. . r . --
y . � ua i f� ty�� . ,� T. �:• �i f,. .
� '� rt ' ; }` rl +r ;i � '; r �r"* A .+7� � .i • � '� � . ' '. 11 L
,�„�� �!4 ''�:�C` r ,a,� �i�r,*� �i. !�� � •
• gwv�• ,d . ,i. F � �` 'ff -' '+; � �tl r { 7� r t . yrL:, J.� - � ••�:. ",
1 ,( :,`� �. [!�,1' .�' c� ,'� r rk'#iy, ,�. �S . � {� �Y w
,�`�t' ' r . . �r `� "� . ' � � 3� � r ��!'' ��y ,. a .
't + ' � ' - i p � v f' y 7 �, � �: '
� k f .f e� ��� � { ,� ��
���yt,�i� .�.,+�� r �t� ; li� yy. yt y`,yr-" l�' e�i„=,� 'w�' ,
�itl�"i: ��', � : . �' �§� - 1 " �y, �� '! / �-.� i iwt .'` :.t � � , � t w� .
'S� �y� � " F� 's } �i .�5� � . .�
r . .. ;� j
� , ' � � � r� -:�'.
.� � r .� � .�.. .�h.'' "� 'p i,.,.• �• �...`� ri "�' .` .4 y °�
i� ��c • �.� _} • - t _�•�` t� , _ ..
�` _ � �e s . , . _ . / t . ..- :N. TT r7
����. .. �t, ^R ,` A � , `� � `I � ' • � �
l .� ���� . ;�� •:.� .
r. � j,� `rY � .tr .. �j : .S '�', . `�•• r .
�i,�'L�II". ^5�4�1 ` �'t' ` � Y � ';,, '+ Zy � �` .
�� ,�.1��'.. �. . '' � . , i. . �'� �y.. ► _. � '
1 { ' ' � � .
�Kr ��° � ,._ ' � � ,'"' ` ' �. �� �� � � . �:
�•.4� �_ � ��� `, ,� , -^�,' A 4
�,�f;r,t.' , • .�F�,' � ; _ y �'��!'1�.�,..
' F �.� � Y �• �+ ~' � -�^'.. . � �� . .
'L � �' � ` �
. �'�'f -�- -- - �
� � �.�'� . � �
. 1 ..�I �y � .�-��+ � %4 � 5 ^ � .� l���, .
� ( Vs � ``� � ' ){
� , t.�
, � ' �'�,,�' 'a z ��.}/.+,+' � °' � �a' ;f
,+ .'�` ' � �
, . `�"ri;�+J�L•y 4t �C ,;�R, l �,� • v
' �.r � `.
' ��'�t~�' r -� Y' � .;'�J'%! , y�' • .f , " r ' �.
�. .�, ; , .•t� �'� =',' �A, -�. �,c �. � ' »_ r;. . ,1
'�,�<�r�� , � r �,..=�s f �, . ''_. . Tr3� .� .~ y Y �'
� �t��t �, �Y' ' , I. � , j _ \
� �'�"'c�° .Sj, `7� � � s>ti .�'�
���r'wl��� � �Z^ Y :1.�.�_ "s �Y r, 7_ r: .V ,,t��� ,��`�'^',�' !
u, y�_ �e�� � � � ,`� .. , � y �'� .� � 1�•.
e�Y A . �r^ , � - '- K - -= t. � t� +.
�' 4 •
� ' ;?, . • 's;�y,"^�y','�'„ 3 - -Y., x k�e ;-� i iS,L '�'�`-�- y� .}.. � � �` � . ' . •� w , � X"
� r �► _„�t r. ' /. '+`. '�,�!. t� c fY % % ."1-`' -�i'� � ♦ �� . ' i'�, a
�������� . , �x4��4�� �i�'� �:� . � y -'i:. L^ °�, ='T��'r- .� �' ' 1
r �L
� • l F„
�C A;�r'x k ' '� f ' . ! ' � ��yy �FC
f a �� "- n.. � ��°�'i?�� a�' �.�� � -� �r . �j�'�//
* �{�y� .� �..rR �� "� � ( <`!������s� �'k / •� .i
- / `�.�" �. ��� . � ' x � � i+K� �� ' \
� ti -L� �. ;.+ F ' �� � * '� ' � ..�K�utn► . , � • �
✓ .±.. � ' 'lI ;i.� � � ~ ~ ' < <
,� �.��' ,� ,� :,��� .,�-
i.� . , � �i ,� .:,
t �:. �,jar , � '
- .. "_ ��,��' � , ti " �* ���'� i
r : �.� � �:,. ' �'.`� <. r� > "Vr�'' :'i ti' A!j!�'f .., .I'� � r
�` R '�' .�.y� �` ''' ���ra' r =�� �'%, I `�� /�� '
./ j. 'e. � �� � _—�• y .�- �
F :1?i r� `'! � /'_, • •._�'��•y `'. '� . •
� � `�� .;w' �Y r.r . I,`�., ` ��^' '` ?+�
� � • � • , _ . y+ J�� � .
1 ? ' �' I --A� `> . � { � {�pC �,,'
. �t - '� .` v . . .y.J �:�T�� .c-.
�� `�
! ��'1•• �� � �.�•• -A
��'8 .. ��` .. �f � � _+ * ` i �1�T' _. i�t .
�

,
.
�
� -a � �Fj� � < .c � (- 'x'•• - ,yR ,-- .
. V 1ti�.(�r Ty` }. � �.�'•..�
,�, =y.h+� .S`'�. ��'�k ti,1 L:�ri �- '� �! .'-. Jb�c./� t �
r , '�� �'�� � '�� �y�' : i�'' =,E � ,� . � � 'n G•. � . � • �
/ � < ..�i/'�� �,� `-.l .�+ . y.:
s �'S�1 ! Y�• r�� ) "�i ': ! ,! " ' ` N '- • " .
< s 4. `r.a ^.^t�pv %: _�„� -
� .t. �\.�,,i - �' �1 �� � � � � •�y� . �-,. �.i �... -'�
�•�.Y�� �.. .� _ -�r Y �- s� t7.. �. t • . , ' . . .
I . . i: ..°.� , "�/ �' '` ' '���..:'� �' ¢" • ,, ' .
.� ��!� yv""` • �,� � ./4i�:it�� , '
� ��yi. ��' * � � �� ' � l� �. ' ,
N • ` <.�` ° j�'t"`�l' � . f�4��. . � , _ � • . � . 1 "
�" '•a - 'r= � ". �M�'. ��� ' ' � ' .
7',� <---- " y- � ��+ . • , t ;''" � w •.� ,, . � .
��� �J; , � i�.�" :��'%`�';f►� .��'�" � _ � � '�.�.
•i ., ' �X� � � ti / � yi i . �j' \! •�.� � • .
'tY�+ � "�, � f ! 4 , � S��- � �"� ' r ; • . �
/•��� - �:'i , .. �.� � 'r'li! ' • �:' /i *
� r' `'_ - , 1' :.�� � �' . ' ' '
• �.. .:�.. � i . � ,: �. � .�` � ^ �.a ' � � �
�. .: •.: ,' 4' f � ��� _��'"„ . ,x �
� ri�_ .�'� � - � -.'-• ".'— � � � �
i�� _ ! . �. `` :
'�.�.�, . � . � �; �� � - . �. - , �-
�/� �. s � -� • , t.� s :
� " . . ii. -.• • �Vr I� � . _ �.�y �� 'r ��y. � �
E,., t ' . :, ' . � ,�� '� � � , �, • �; �.; �
�� ��' , - _ . .;. -i �rv,�.� ��, � �r S�'
. . ~ ,�* ��' �� y- M�` r r
s .�h s_k.� �s�, �� �� � . �,,! .
�� pA�•,�,`_ =,'1+� ~ �.6 .��•��' ' , f
.:J \� f ' ,� • t ! �
V � r � ��,.'.�`�. .i
:�'!�','��'.�'"'�� � s. ' " . j' j; -*. '4
' �c,. •i:< � ... : . ,.�_ ~� .. � -� �
��� , �
1
0
y�
�
r y
� . �e,�t �K � A, '�r .. ' ,�j ..
* �r�i iN� a� 7 r .�
C� �����C'Y .7. . � • y � '
I � ��I Y,: �� ` {� + '��
.� _ . - .
�. r �. • r. _ . ;.� : :
� µ �
L �•~ •�
�i[ ' ^ � �'.
i.
.1 � ' �..
F (Y�' �- .�' .
�� �,,,,+ # � �' , .
, s.
�:�! � ;y. �;.� h. . . . . ,
. 1 _ .
�i , . �
.�:�`i '{�' . ��� ,s � � ^ . .
� �i- •
,� - � � ��. � � � _. �. � � �
� Y.� ��� � , ..+ i . . - . . .
[ ,�� ',����a� � %�Y� � �;�: .
C' - � , , -
' •
r,l. . .. � f?
,�::. -t � : � . . .
�. ..

�.ti..— �. T a .-
} . � . y'�'�+fa�J ''- �t
_ } +r +�.1
. � � � �
,�` ` ' • c' ;�� �
' �'!i'., r , ��� �'C
` � 4 �. .. • .,�c,.�# � �'�: ".�`n. w � � ^ �� �.. .
���_.�� . � . � . �
�_ �- -,.. w� � TF�Ra_'!. . ��
° ���s.�,°v'� -i..: --
��" :+-.-_-'. " �-
'°, . �� . �
� ' .;��>;:� .
t:. � �, � ,
: �.
'�� i ,� r,.` !,
t
P',.•`.Q"2i ,i ' ;���.3-•`,
,� , , �::. : �::
� �' ` i , � l�� � ��l- � 4 ��1 r �, ��.,G 1+G� `
� � �'�� f< � �� �l�ii ����� i��",TiW4
�y,'� ?r'`l �� �+;`qi�,i�r''. 1�. �i.`�':
�:� ��'�4t'�ii ;�� y �� �����9M�. -
t'.'�1C9k7F' '.
...n'Z�!r�''f .
' _q? �'.. f..� .
' � �'.. } � - � .
I
�'� �� 1
�' ~ � '
� � ` � � j� Y V � FKa
"�"r� " r �'c..� '�K ��,A�q�« �'
:iF: _�� ~.�R. ��`.' . .��i � - � J� • ��L.'� ` it �-+�!� ass_:.« . - _
�� �'. '�r c : ' ��- y F�� w- . _ =.S —f
� � :s 5 3} • .r ,?,g'j �I � � - � `„ .
. . a A , a � t � + t �C+�yi�7 s���� [ "���� _ . ��
� , ��T: t 'T ''it� ' '! ' t
s,;�� �- s �� l y�rY'� �: �.�- ir T' „ „ ..c � .
, P � :1 ,�' � r= � C- � ,� . � N �' i� .
� t �t3.:c �`� i ^ �.�: �`�• V� . t- .. �' ".� ' � _
A'�y,� �,�y�• x'i`� ` ,, � � 'yK 4��y s _ ` ! � �� �i ��� _
.�^� G- , �'��: � 1;� h
�„y i �•,� V S.'� _.:�. +:p �i'�S.i :N���; 1_,� G3�`�i.�'y"a'"si
y+.� -��,�,� �F `' -S�� ~�' , �-a' i� '+.� f
r1 �. ^ ,! 7�,� . �� ;Li�'+M�4„y,� ,� � -�.
p t F 1' C� ��y ' / ' �1:, . . '� . �_ '
�,• ,��- �-1 .i � . � .� � � - ' ?'! . � � • �`' " .
Y ' ' R , 'ry ` Y''�L'� ". r � Y . ' +Y� � - " �'^ �`.S '
-. r .
1 � �"',. . . �J,'Y �,'� ' ✓ _�.1'iie y .' *�' .
1 '. , �. � .,� ri , .
��; 1
- , , � ,� ^��"'�.'+. �� .e#'� 1��'�.w �,�sti�,J ��^i�,��a.���:$. . ` � - . sS �-
�

. _ �y>. - t . �G� ' �irr% ��-'� � ���- �,�+
�,.� . r�r�r .J�' }�R,�i ,.�t� �".._ ��` "X4�°"F' . °a " , . .,!�..� j •t � j.. �
., s t� s'1'. � �. t f
, -��,.- '�..� . � �. ,i. : 1 • �� i / -� +r
'�!». �,-�', � � : a_ , ,:r-�+ � E ?r7jl�,� ;• ,
, i. .a � -0 . .3 �. � � Y t . .
. . . ' r. , �°� ��Y .�1'!rli - - � r�:n"'�� �'i
e ����-"i -• ►•.,5 ,A'., � ����' ' .
, � �, •� t �' '•!: � , � .
' ._• � �:;'y.,� p _ �. :?� �' S `��i•> ,� �L.' `a
_ _ : �v �'�.: !;� k� J'* � ��'�`'��' .ly.. ..
4� . f�' - . p� •r ti ,
Y r
� r: �..�'� �: . ' ' ��► 1 ��L F �- �.�iw � �.�� -Y L
/y'i'. +S� 3,�i;`� ,� )` r_ .-�,v �,� �.�.
\ 4 � l: "ni' s RF'� . j.'..��' • n �� y �
.► . . Y'.. �. � � � . � j 'r - . � . .
�� . . . �h�f� .�
. ;;.
.�y,�. '�. ��� v � � .
.`` r�y �� �. � �. 1,� � . i
d �"'r ',+ • y. �,',a� ,, �c.c ' ,
'�� � rS Yi �. � : �T� , � . �G �I� ^
i;y;� , �w. - '� 'k i�� T : .�. � -Y s s..�'q,:•��.-1•+ � ..
' . . . � t . �i� ., j� 'r � •
•ri�y�a}r. � � ' ,L�� _ f ' � } �'�'�..��,► a. . i � '�
'�� + (� \���y• N�� +r ` . � �r�� ',�`f..
4'�� 1� , .� • �• II „t,y.; i � ,� �e P .� � � i� . ► ^ ��
f (��; ��►�c�,��� .` j.l. . ' j yI� :'�"�3� �� � �; �iY.Y� i� `twy - i' ' ' .
�j.,. + �-"^� h. . ; i .��: .
� r�ri--r.7� � y.Y � � si � ��7'�, k�~ ..a.
. ��w� ' a•' .���� ���a - �r''t '
� �- .'' :r � - ;. :-"'t .`
:� 4. ��k�Q� `��' .s ,�;= .H.�"' '�': � ::. ,r' �?�'-� .
:v« •
',uli`. i �d i. . • ,�� ,�� . 7� .
d � ;^Q . A'����`� . 9 x � �. � _ - � .
�y '�+�"k+� . r r-. �. � '6, ■ � a � riG�.' �
»( � K i � }�_���� � `} _ �;I �.� � . � � �A�i 3.�.
� : S' � \'� � �.Y' ' � �'"��.? � � . } � � . r \' . � - .. � .
i . ' ���:.i' l. ' � •���.• ' . �T. �'' .� ' . . .
a . ,�
, . ��� �� � � ,� �4 > � - r . . ' , �� _ �
. . ..� , � . , . ,^ .
i' � . r .. •l .�{�`��,�j - ,. �.7 ' � � � �
` Y�..,.4.'��� �dlL7� '7ya�f��sv ,.7, . � _ 1� � �� - '
• ' 4. ��', ' j��'•�• i ■• -,�l \ � • J�f
/'
. �,�• ' ^�i�`� � s`.�.. �
�' . '� � s�•' ` ►, `� �"� t �.,�.;�` _ `
` 6 ` ,. . , �,.,�'+ • .. ,' ' �} , . , r ' • y �..
' ti.�. .�• �� �:�. �. ' ���'
. . • ' ' _ � J: � ^�i
. . . . j' � �, �► : �1 �"l: � .
� • ! ' �. � � r� , � °
' �, � Y .� : ,k :
�� I = i�.
L y I �t� �'' nL�.
','�c; � i r,4:.
' , �� `:
d. � ;. •�
t •�
. ' . ���� ,c�
1� T ,
��, • 1
!�`� ' / '♦
. ' ! '
±ti; ' �rsr�T,
. : Ir.,..
���� `,�� . / �
��/ a:
' �s�,''a' ,�L
' i�.� .��: Y'i. �.�
Q*,�;��. ��,4
� A a ., �. �
��,�f r t`. '�� �
'�� � ��,�T: `' . ,
h♦,.

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2
Rating Calculator Version 2
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
Shopton Ridge:Shutterfly Rd
1. Project name (if any): Extension 2. Date of evaluation: 10/22/15
3. ApplicanUowner name: Shopton Ridge Business Park 4. Assessor name/organization: WEPG
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Lower Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Coffey Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.16596 N, -80.94848 W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 1000'
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 3 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 10 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow �Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM'CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) � Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic �A� ��, � �B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip �Size 1(< 0.1 miZ) ❑Size 2(0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) ❑Size 3(0.5 to < 5 mi2) ❑Size 4(? 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes �No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/suoplementarv measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? �Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
�A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
�B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
DA A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
�B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
�A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
�B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
�B �B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
�J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
�C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes �No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
70. Natural In-stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses � y ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) � m ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
�B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o�' ❑H Low-tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y L ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) t� ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots "� ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter.
❑E Little or no habitat
"�**"***'**""""`****************"REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS*"*"'*`**""**'********'***
11. Bedform and Substrate — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes �No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
�A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
�B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _> 10-40%, Abundant (A) _> 40-70%, Predominant (P) _> 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ � ❑ ❑ SilUclay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes �No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. �Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. �Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ �Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ �Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ �Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E) �
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae) �
❑ �Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ �Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ �Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae _
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ? 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
�N �N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs Qurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
�F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (z 24% impervious surface for watershed)
�D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf-on" condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
�B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
�A DA ❑A �A ? 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D �D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B �B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
�C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
if none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B �B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A �A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
�C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
�A �A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
�C �C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes �No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
Potential stream stressors include, s.s. line r/w, thick, non-native vegetation, buffer clearing with maintained vegetation, stormwater run-off,
impervious surfaces, stream down-cutting, and fill in the drainage area for retaining wall, buildings and roads.

Stream Site Name
Stream Category
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 2
Shopton Ridge:Shutterfly Rd Date of Assessment 10/22/15
Extension
Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization WEPG
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow LOW LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography NA NA
(3) Stream Stability LOW LOW
(4) Channel Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1) Habitat LOW LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) Substrate LOW LOW
(3) Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) In-stream Habitat LOW HIGH
(2) Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3) Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone
Overall
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2
Ratinq Calculator Version 2
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
Shopton Ridge:Shutterfly Rd
1. Project name (if any): Extension 2. Date of evaluation: 10/22/15
3. ApplicanUowner name: Shopton Ridge Business Park 4. Assessor name/organization: WEPG
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Lower Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Coffey Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.16596 N, -80.94848 W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 1000'
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 3 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 10 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: �Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) � Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic �A �V� �
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope)
�B
(less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip �Size 1(< 0.1 mi2) ❑Size 2(0.1 to < 0.5 miZ) ❑Size 3(0.5 to < 5 mi2) ❑Size 4(? 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes �No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementarY measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? �Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
�A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
�B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
�A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
�B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
�A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
�B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
�B �B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
�J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
�C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes �No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses � y ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) F@ ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
�B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o� ❑H Low-tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y L ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) r� ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots �� ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*'***"'*""`******"***************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS"**""**********"***""******* '
11. Bedform and Substrate — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes �No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
�A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
�B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _> 10-40%, Abundant (A) _> 40-70%, Predominant (P) _> 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ � ❑ ❑ SilUclay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes �No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. �Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. �Yes �No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ �Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ �Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ �Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ �Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ �Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ �Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surtace Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
�N �N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs Qurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
�F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (z 24% impervious surface for watershed)
�D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf-on" condition.
DA Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
�B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
�A ❑A ❑A �A ? 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D �D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B �B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
�C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following.stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metr ci 22 ❑
Abuts < 30 feet
LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A
❑B ❑B �B ❑B
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D
LB RB
❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B Maintained turt
❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A �A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
�C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
�A �A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
❑B ❑B
�C �C
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes �No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
DA < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E ? 230
Notes/Sketch:
Potential stream stressors include, s.s. line r/w, thick, non-native vegetation, buffer clearing with maintained vegetation, stormwater run-off,
impervious surFaces, stream down-cutting, and fill in the drainage area for retaining wall, buildings and roads.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 2
Stream Site Name Shopton Ridge:Shutterfly Rd Date of Assessment 10/22/15
Extension
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization WEPG
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
(2) Baseflow
(2) Flood Flow
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone
Overal I
YES
NO
YES
Perennial
USACE/
All Streams
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
NO
MEDIUM
NA
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NCDWR
Intermittent
, :'J:_ i: _ s _ _„
;.x,=r; _; .
, �;
_,,,. �;,., .,;, ` .: .