540032_Inspection_20240219

Facility Number, l - 'j,k O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
p Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: is Routine O Complaint O Follow-up 0 Referral O Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: a- - lC\ Arrival Time: Departure Time: t® County: kJAI" Region: W Rn
Farm Name: JT�(w(�FD �41 ro—, Owner Email:
Owner Name: SQp( LL L Phone:
Mailing Address: �3 l JO�CSIOYJY� 26k
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �\! �. CC D, \�Li t)i T Title:
Onsite Representative: i_7 \ Qt
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: ksm-i r
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Laver
Non -Laver
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv Pon.
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dniq C'ov+
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ N L
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
I
NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
rNoEl
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection: —
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes EJ-Njo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [.�]"N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [—]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [—]Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s)
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[✓]�N
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Ej No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
51Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
/
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�--�/
E
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection: —
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NF.
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [Io ❑ NA ❑ N F.
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [� Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
to question #): Explain Any YES answers and/or any
se drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
-S -23
`A- -Z3 1 .3
Sl(7Ol,R.. S0 c�-S -23 1 ULL' — 3,-7'
U
(A c�Lj, ' V�T . - y . 7 '
i tax C�YJp0.� Vv
G 1 �Ct f COY1�/� / vL�
CL, C)
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of
❑ Yes [] No
❑ Yes [P No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes [ + " ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes CJXo' ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes EjXo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes NA ❑ NE
ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: 1 Llq— OL) 3
Date: d ' 1 — p 7
511212020