WQ0002883_2023 Residual Annual Report_20240228 (2)

Initial Review
Reviewer
nathaniel.thorn burg
Is this submittal an application? (Excluding additional information.) *
Yes No
If not an application what is the submittal type?* Annual Report
Residual Annual Report
Additional Information
Other
Annual Report Year* 2023
Permit Number (IR) * WQ0002883
Applicant/Permittee City of Elizabeth City
Email Notifications
Does this need review by the hydrogeologist? * Yes U No
Regional Office Wilmington
CO Reviewer
Admin Reviewer Wanda Gerald

Submittal Form
Project Contact Information
Please provide information on the person to be contacted by NDB Staff regarding electronic submittal, confirmation of receipt, and other correspondence.
Name* Stephen Cummings
Email Address*
[e-mail]
Project Information
.........................
Application/Document Type*
New (Fee Required)
Modification - Major (Fee Required)
Renewal with Major Modification (Fee
Required)
Annual Report
Additional Information
Other
Phone Number*
2524897317
Modification - Minor
Renewal
GW-59, NDMR, NDMLR, NDAR-1,
N DAR-2
Residual Annual Report
Change of Ownership
We no longer accept these monitoring reports through this portal. Please click on the link below and it will take you to the correct form.
https://edoes.deq.nc.gov/Forms/NonDischarge_Monitoring_Report
Permit Type:*
Wastewater Irrigation
High -Rate Infiltration
Other Wastewater
Reclaimed Water
Closed -Loop Recycle
Residuals
Single -Family Residence Wastewater
Other
Irrigation
Permit Number:*
WQ0002883
Has Current Existing permit number
Applicant/Permittee Address*
410 Pritchard Street, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Facility Name*
City of Elizabeth City Class B Residuals Program
Please provide comments/notes on your current submittal below.
At this time, paper copies are no longer required. If you have any questions about what is required, please contact Nathaniel Thornburg
at [e-mail].
Please attach all information required or requested for this submittal to be reviewed here.
(Application Form, Engineering Plans, Specifications, Calculations, Etc.)
EC Annual Report 23.pdf 17.78MB
Upload only 1 PDF document (less than 250 MB). Multiple documents must be combined into one PDF file unless file is larger
than upload limit.
* By checking this box, I acknowledge that I understand the application will not be accepted for pre -review until the fee (if required) has
been received by the Non -Discharge Branch. Application fees must be submitted by check or money order and made payable to the
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). I also confirm that the uploaded document is a single PDF with all parts
of the application in correct order (as specified by the application).
Mail payment to:
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
Attn: Non -Discharge Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Signature
Submission Date 2/28/2024

City of Elizabeth City
2023 ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL BIOSOLIDS REPORT
CLASS B PROGRAM
WQ0002883
Submitted by:
Atlantic OBX, INC.
PO Box 2560
Kitty Hawk, NC, 27949
2/28/24

noAir
- ; 0
;0
AO
P.O. Box 2560
KITTY HAWK, NC 27949
[phone]
S TEPHENkATLANTIC SE WAGE. COM
2/27/24
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re: 2023 LAND APPLICATION ANNUAL REPORT
Elizabeth City "Class B Program"
NC Permit No.: WQ0002883
Information Processing Unit:
Atlantic OBX, Inc. is submitting all monitoring and reporting requirements as specified in the above
referenced permit for the City of Elizabeth City. Atlantic OBX has compiled this report using data gathered
during the compliance year. This data includes (1) the annual certification Form, (2) residual sampling. (3)
field loading calculations, (4) pathogen and vector attraction reduction documentation, & (5) soil fertility
nutrient analysis.
The City of Elizabeth City conducted application events on permitted fields in Pasquotank County during
2023. A total of 491.19 dry tons or 3,780,000 gallons of permitted residual biosolids were generated by the
City of Elizabeth City's WWTP in 2023. A total of 117.04 dry tons or 728,000 gallons from the City's WWTP
were land applied to permitted fields in WQ0002883. An additional 374.15 dry tons or 3,052,000 gallons were
land applied under Atlantic OBX's Class B permit WQ0000974.
A total of 1,059.35 dry tons or 4,740,000 gallons of permitted residual biosolids were generated from the City
of Elizabeth City's WTP in 2023. A total of 371.61 dry tons or 1,830,000 gallons from the City's WTP were
land applied as a Class B product to permitted fields in WQ0002883. An additional 687.74 dry tons or
2,910„000 gallons of WTP residuals were distributed as a Class A product under permit WQ0040622.
The total amount of residuals land applied to permitted fields in Elizabeth City's Class B Permit WQ0002883
was 488.65 dry tons or 2,558,000 gallons.
Soil Samples for permitted fields WB 4 & 5 were sampled by WB Bateman & Sons. A reference page has
been implemented in the soil sample section of this report along with associated maps for those samples.
If there is any further information required or questions regarding this annual report, please do not hesitate to
contact me or Elizabeth City (252-337-6626) for further assistance.
Regards,
h, /," �
Stephen Cummings, Atlantic OBX, Inc.
Montre Freeman, City of Elizabeth City
Monica S. Cole, City of Elizabeth City

City of Elizabeth City 2023 Land Application of Residual
Biosolids Report
WQ0002883
Elizabeth City, NC
INDEX
Annual Certification Form
• Source Summary
• Field Loading Summary
Residual Sampling Summary Forms
• Elizabeth City WWTP
• Elizabeth City WTP
Field Summary Forms
Pathogen & Vector Reduction Forms
• Elizabeth City WWTP
Soil Samples

City of Elizabeth City
2023 Class B Annual Report
WQ0002883
Annual Certification Form
Source Summary
Field Loading Summary

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
WQ Permit#: WQ0002883 County: Pasquotank Year: 2023
Facility Name (as shown on permit):
Land Application Operator:
Atlantic OBX
City of Elizabeth City
Phone: [phone]
Land application of residuals as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
0 Yes ❑ No - If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also, If residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A - Residuals Application Summary.
Total number of application fields in the permit:
8
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year:
2
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites:
488.65
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year:
236.3
Part B - Annual Compiance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2023 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Resources. 0 Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action
taken.
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or the
limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of laboratory results are attached.
4) Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(a) or the Pollutant
Loading Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) All general requirements in as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1111 were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503
regulated facilities).
9) All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Resources.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
11) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals, as specified
in the permit.
12) No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
13) All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
Part C - Certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Monica S. Cole, Chief of Staff Monica S. Cole 28/02/2024
Monica S. Cole Feb 28 202409:05 ES
Permittee Name and Title (type or print) Signature of Pe itt e Date
2/26/202444�L L2 I 2/26/2024
Signature of Preparer* or Date Signat e o Land Applier Date
(if different from Permittee) (if different from Permittee and Preparer)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T. 1102 (26)
DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)

_Source Summary Report
WWTPI Volume Applied Total Dry Tons
Elizabeth City WTP 1,830,000 371.61
Elizabeth City WWTP 728,000 117.04
Total 2,558,000 488.65

2023 Field Loading Summary
Crops Used and Volume Applied Permitted Crops and Loading Rates
Acres Volume Crop 1 Crop 2 Total P Crop 1 Crop 1 % PAN 1 Crop 2 Crop 2 % PAN 2
Field Used Applied Total DT PAN Pan Ibs/Ac. Name PAN Used Name PAN Used
Ibs/Ac. Ibs/Ac.
Site # WB Wheat
Bateman
4 75.87 1,302,000 233.292 26.735 49.505 (GrainO 119 22.5%
Wheat
5 160.43 1,256,000 255.352 4.962 22.297 (Grain) 119 4.2%
Total 236.30 2,558,000 488.65

City of Elizabeth City
2023 Class B Annual Report
WQ0002883
Residual Summary Form
Elizabeth City WWTP
Elizabeth City WTP
Field Loading Calculations
2023 Analytical & TCLP

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
WQ Permit No. WQ0002883 Facility Name City of Elizabeth City Source Permit No. 04-70-010 Source Name Elizabeth City WTP
Laboratory 1
Laboratory 2
Sample or Composite Date
Parameter (mg/Kg) Class A Class B
Environmental
Chemists, Inc.
Environmental
Chemists, Inc.
Environmental
Chemists, Inc.
Environmental
Chemists, Inc.
Environmental
Chemists, Inc.
Environmental
Chemists, Inc.
1/19/23
4/3/2023
5/16/2023
7/10/2023
9/26/2023
11/6/2023
Aluminum
N/A
N/A
14,900
11,900
14,900
12,200
15,600
12,200
Ammonia
N/A
N/A
1430.0
1.02
1,030
<0.88
900
435
Arsenic
41
75
34.80
8.88
<20.491
<5.57
<9.66
<8.27
Cadmium
39
85
17.40
8.88
<10.2
<5.57
<9.66
<8.27
Calcium
N/A
N/A
162,000
307,000
484,000
291,000
374,000
354,000
Copper
1,500
4,300
17.40
8.88
<10.2
<5.57
<9.66
<8.27
Lead
Magnesium
300
840
17.40
8.88
<10.2
<5.57
<9.66
<8.27
N/A
N/A
13,700
12,700
16,400
11,100
15,500
15,200
Mercury
17
57
1.18
0.178
<0.804
<0.15
<0.916
<0.324
Molybdenum
N/A
75
17.40
8.88
<10.2
<5.57
<9.66
<8.27
Nickel
420
420
17.40
8.88
<10.2
<5.57
<9.66
<8.27
Nitrate -Nitrite
Nitrogen
N/A
N/A
39.5
12.2
30.40
5.71
33.6
17.2
Percent Solids
N/A
N/A
1.41
9.83
2.24
11.3
2.03
4.85
pH (no units)
N/A
N/A
8.30
9.65
9.05
9.45
9.27
7.92
Phosphorus
N/A
N/A
743
362
1290
136
330
150
Potassium
N/A
N/A
865
444
<513
<279.152
<483
<412
PAN (Inj./Inc.)
N/A
N/A
1470
13.22
1,060
6.59
934
452
PAN (Surface)
N/A
N/A
755
12.71
545
6.15
484
235
Selenium
100
100
17.40
8.88
<20.5
<5.57
<9.66
<8.27
Sodium
N/A
N/A
3,020
755
2,330
697
2,260
1160
SAR
N/A
N/A
0.23
0.11
0.13
0.12
0.14
0.11
TKN
N/A
N/A
1,450
1,090
3,960
1840.00
2,270
494
Zinc
2,800
7,500
17.40
8.88
<10.2
<5.57
<9.66
<8.27
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered
and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing
yv?,- violations."
/,I,, �%L 11/6/2023
sig-1- of pmp'-
Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)

Facility
Sampling Date
% Solids
Mineralization Rate
Gallons Per DT
pH
Elizabeth City WTP
1/19/2023
1.41
0
17007.67
8.3
Field Loading Estimate
SAR 0.23 <5.0 Safe 5.0 - 10.0 Careful Management >15.0 Do Not Land Apply
SAR Calculation
Value From source Meq/L
Na 3,020 1.851391304
Ca 162,000 114.21
Mg 13,700 16.0975
I Nitrogen Application Nutrient Application
TKN (mg/Kg)
1,450
lbs./1000 gal 0.171
(mg/Kg)
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/Kg)
1,430
lbs./1000 gal 0.168
Potassium
865
Nitrate -Nitrite (mg/Kg)
39.5
lbs./1000 gal 0.005
Phosphorus
743
Calcium
162,000
Plant Available Nitrogen Surface Applied
Magnesium
13700
PAN (mg/Kg) 754.5
(lbs./1000 gal)
0.089
Molybdenum
17.4
Chromium
17.4
Plant Available Nitrogen Injected/Incorporated Applied
PAN (mg/Kg) 1469.5 (lbs./1000 gal) 0.173
Volatilization Rate= .5 Surface Application
1.0 In ection /Incorporation
(lbs./1000 gal)
0.1018
0.0875
19.0731
1.6130
0.0020
0.0020
EPA Metal
Limits
Class A Ceiling
Class B Ceiling
Limits (mg/Kg)
Limits (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Concentration (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Loading (lbs./1000
Arsenic
34.8
Arsenic
0.0041
41
75
39
85
Cadmium
17.4
Cadmium
0.0020
1,500
4,300
Copper
17.4
Copper
0.0020
300
840
Lead
17.4
Lead
0.0020
17
57
Mercury
1.18
Mercury
0.0001
420
420
Nickel
17.4
Nickel
0.0020
100
100
Selenium
17.4
Selenium
0.0020
2,800
7,500
Zinc
17.4
Zinc
0.0020
Residual Nitrogen Calculation
Remaing
PAN
Remaing
PAN (T
Subsurface
TKN
Surface (S)
Organic N
TKN
(INJ)
Organic N
lbs/D
(INJ)
(S)
lbs/DT
(INJ)
1 st Year
1450
755
1.51
696
1450
1470
2.94
-20
2nd Year
696
0
0.00
696
-20
0
0.00
-20
3rd Year
696
0
0.00
696
-20
0
0.00
-20
4th Year
696
0
0.00
696
-20
0
0.00
-20
5th Year
696
0
0.00
696
-20
0
0.00
-20
Totall
755
1.51
1 Total
1470
2.94
Equations
1st Yr. PAN (1ng/hg)=(l-1R x (TKN-NH3))+(VR x NH3)+NOx
2nd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 2nd Yr. TKN x (b1R/2)
3rd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 3rd Yr. TKN x (NIR/4)
4di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 4th Yr. TKN x (NIR/8)
5di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 5di Yr. TKN x (b1R/16)

Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 . 910.392.0223 Lab ■ 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 . 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
sM 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 . 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS [e-mail]
Atlantic Sewage
Date of Report: Feb 16, 2023
PO Box 2560
Customer PO #:
Kitty Hawk NC 27949
Customer ID: 19120002
Attention: Dave Robertson
Report #: 2023-01415
Project ID: Elizabeth City WTP
Lab ID Sample ID:
Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
23-03510 Site: Sludge
1/19/2023
12:00 PM Solid/Sludge Stephen Cummings
Test
Method
Results
Date Analyzed
Chlordane (TCLP)
SW-846 8081 B
<0.02 mg/L
01/26/2023
Endrin (TCLP)
SW-846 8081 B
<0.0005 mg/L
01/26/2023
Heptachlor (TCLP)
SW-8468081 B
<0.0005 mg/L
01/26/2023
Heptachlor epoxide (TCLP)
SW-846 8081 B
<0.0005 mg/L
01/26/2023
Lindane (TCLP)
SW-846 8081 B
<0.0005 mg/L
01/26/2023
Methoxychlor (TCLP)
SW-8468081 B
<0.0005 mg/L
01/26/2023
Toxaphene (TCLP)
SW-846 8081 B
<0.05 mg/L
01/26/2023
2,4,5-TP (TCLP)
SW-8468151 A
<0.003 mg/L
01/26/2023
2,4-D (TCLP)
SW-846 8151 A
<0.003 mg/L
01/26/2023
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(TCLP)
SW-8468270E
<0.050mg/L
01/27/2023
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
2,4-Dinitrotoluene (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
Cresol (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene (TCLP)
SW-8468270E
<0.050mg/L
01/27/2023
Hexachlorobenzene (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
Hexachloroethane (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
m + p-Cresol (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
Nitrobenzene (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
o-Cresol (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
Pentachlorophenol (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.250 mg/L
01/27/2023
Pyridine (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
1,1-Dichloroethylene (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
1,2-Dichloroethane (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Benzene (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Carbon Tetrachloride (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Report # : 2023-01415
P.— 1 of'A

F7- 41 Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 . 910.392.0223 Lab . 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 . 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
SM` 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 . 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS [e-mail]
Atlantic Sewage
Date of Report: Feb 16, 2023
PO Box 2560
Customer PO #:
Kitty Hawk NC 27949
Customer ID: 19120002
Attention: Dave Robertson
Report #: 2023-01415
Project ID: Elizabeth City WTP
Chlorobenzene (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Chloroform (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Methyl ethyl ketone (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.05 mg/L
2/2/2023
Tetrachloroethylene (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Trichloroethylene (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Vinyl Chloride (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
RCI
Cyanide
SM 4500 CN D-2016
<1 mg/kg
01/30/2023
Sulfide
SM 4500 S D
<0.05 mg/kg
02/01/2023
Ignitability
SW 846 method 1010
>158 °F
01/26/2023
Sludge Residuals
Aluminum
EPA 200.7, Rev 4A, 1994
14900 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Arsenic
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<34.8 mg/kg
01/30/2023
Cadmium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<17.4 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Calcium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
162000 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Chromium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<17.4 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Copper
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<17.4 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Lead
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<17.4 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Magnesium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
13700 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Molybdenum
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<17.4 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Nickel
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<17.4 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Potassium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<865 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Selenium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<17.4 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Sodium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
3020 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Zinc
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<17.4 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
EPA 353.2
39.5 mg/kg
01/23/2023
Total Solids (%)
SM 2540 B
1.41 %
01/24/2023
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 C-2011
1430 mg/kg
01/24/2023
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
SM 4500 Norg B-2011
1450 mg/kg
01/24/2023
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
743 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Report #:: 2023-01415
0--- I ..s 7

row�'-- Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 . 910.392.0223 Lab . 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 . 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 . 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS [e-mail]
Atlantic Sewage
PO Box 2560
Kitty Hawk NC 27949
Attention: Dave Robertson
Date of Report: Feb 16, 2023
Customer PO #:
Customer ID: 19120002
Report #: 2023-01415
Project ID: Elizabeth City WTP
pH
SW 846 Method 9045D
8.30 units
02/14/2023
Result estimated. Analyzed out of 15 minutes hold time.
Mercury
SW-8467471B
<1.18mg/kg
01/25/2023
TCLP Metals
Arsenic (TCLP)
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<1.Omg/L
01/26/2023
Barium (TCLP)
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<1.0 mg/L
01/26/2023
Cadmium (TCLP)
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<1.0 mg/L
01/26/2023
Chromium (TCLP)
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<1.0 mg/L
01/26/2023
Lead (TCLP)
EPA 200 7, Rev 4.4, 1994
<1.0 mg/L
01/26/2023
Selenium (TCLP)
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<1.0 mg/L
01/26/2023
Silver (TCLP)
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<1.0 mg/L
01/26/2023
Mercury (TCLP)
EPA245.1
<0.0002 mg/L
01/27/2023
Comment: *Sludge residual results, except pH, reported on a dry weight basis. pH reported on an as received
basis.
Reviewed by: Z12
Report #:: 2023-01415 pane 'A of l

Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Sample Receipt Checklist 910.392.0223
Client: {fit �A L C= Date: —.1 12-01 ZS Report Number: 2023- ,
Receipt of sample:
❑ YES ❑
CHEM Pickup Client Delivery ❑
UPS ❑ FedEx ❑ Other ❑
NO
N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler?
❑ YES
Original temperature
❑
NO
upon
1K N/A 2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
receipt 2 Z °C
Corrected temperature upon receipt °C
How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank
Against Bottles
IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 210886869 IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0
YES
❑
NO
3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
YES
❑
NO
4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
YES
❑
NO
5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
YES
❑
NO
6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
YES
❑
NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
YES
❑
NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
YES
❑
NO
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
YES
�( YES
❑
NO
10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
❑
NO
11. Was adequate sample volume available?'
YES
❑
NO
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
❑ YES
❑
NO
13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2?
❑ YES
❑
NO
14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
❑ YES
❑
NO
15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
❑ YES
❑
❑
NO
16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? **
YES
❑
❑
NO
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
YES
10
NO
18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
by adding (circle one): H2SOQ HNO3 HCI NaOH
Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain anew sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. who was notified, date and time:
Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headspace
COMMENTS:
DOC. QA.002 Rev 1

o' ENV1R'ON1V(-N7['AI, CX + MISTS, INC /OUTER BANDS 6602 Windmill
Sam >L C011ection aWi
nd Chain of Custody Way
NCDENR: ])'VQ Cerlilicnle 1194, DU3 Ce iUicnie H37729 lmington, 284(]rJ
Analytica.4i C
l o»snl[fng Chemists Phone: [phone]
Client: pr G-;c O� %u • Fa
Collected -4424
Cd l? 1'zw�kti Ci W P ', g: (910) 392
k'� Cun+rvu Email:TchemW aol, m
Sam le T Inflnerit E _ cent W =Well ST=5treacn SO =S oil — Re ort NO:
SL— Sl 1
Sample
Identification
uc a Other:
Collection 61 ;" qa ]PRESERVATION
a c " p
z Wo d W ANALYSISRTQILSTLD1�ATL En
� c�:: PHI of
z
C
Transfer Relinquished By:
1. Satpl�tt� Curinn.i ry g /� � C��
2.
L(;J G
c r
G G
c r
G. G
1'
G G
P —
G G
G G
C P
G G
r, 4�_
r ,.
c P —
G G
c r —
CT Cj.
Date/Time
temperature )Wiell
Relinquished By:
I
Date/Ti>ie
)Delivered 73y: e1vcc��h Accepted: ,/
teje ted:— Resarnple Recluested.
Comments: Received 13 .
Date- 2-1 2 Time:

Facility
Sampling Date
% Solids
Mineralization Rate
Gallons Per DT
pH
Elizabeth City WTP
4/3/2023
9.83
0
2439.55
9.65
Field Loading Estimate
SAR 0.11 <5.0 Safe 5.0 - 10.0 Careful Management >15.0 Do Not Land Apply
SAR Calculation
Value From source Meq/L
Na 755 3.226804348
Ca 307,000 1508.905
Mg 12,700 104.0341667
I Nitrogen Application Nutrient Application
TKN (mg/Kg)
1,090
lbs./1000 gal 0.895
(mg/Kg)
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/Kg)
1.02
lbs./1000 gal 0.001
Potassium
444
Nitrate -Nitrite (mg/Kg)
12.2
lbs./1000 gal 0.010
Phosphorus
382
Calcium
307,000
Plant Available Nitrogen Surface Applied
Magnesium
12700
PAN (mg/Kg) 12.71
(lbs./1000 gal)
0.010
Molybdenum
8.88
Chromium
8.88
Plant Available Nitrogen Injected/Incorporated Applied
PAN (mg/Kg) 13.22 (lb s. / 1000 gal) 0.011
Volatilization Rate= .5 Surface Application
1.0 In ection /Incorporation
(lbs./1000 gal)
0.3644
0.3135
251.9871
10.4242
0.0073
0.0073
EPA Metal
Limits
Class A Ceiling
Class B Ceiling
Limits (mg/Kg)
Limits (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Concentration (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Loading (lbs./1000
Arsenic
8.88
Arsenic
0.0073
41
75
39
85
Cadmium
8.88
Cadmium
0.0073
1,500
4,300
Copper
8.88
Copper
0.0073
300
840
Lead
8.88
Lead
0.0073
17
57
Mercury
0.178
Mercury
0.0001
420
420
Nickel
8.88
Nickel
0.0073
100
100
Selenium
8.88
Selenium
0.0073
2,800
7,500
Zinc
8.88
Zinc
0.0073
Residual Nitrogen Calculation
Remaing
PAN
Remaing
PAN (T
Subsurface
TKN
Surface (S)
Organic N
TKN
(INJ)
Organic N
lbs/D
(INJ)
(S)
lbs/DT
(INJ)
1 st Year
1090
13
0.03
1077
1090
13
0.03
1077
2nd Year
1077
0
0.00
1077
1077
0
0.00
1077
3rd Year
1077
0
0.00
1077
1077
0
0.00
1077
4th Year
1077
0
0.00
1077
1077
0
0.00
1077
5th Year
1077
0
0.00
1077
1077
0
0.00
1077
Totall
13
0.03
1 Total
13
0.03
Equations
1st Yr. PAN (1ng/hg)=(l-1R x (TKN-NH3))+(VR x NH3)+NOx
2nd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 2nd Yr. TKN x (b1R/2)
3id Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 3id Yr. TKN x (NIR/4)
4di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 4th Yr. TKN x (NIR/8)
5di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 5di Yr. TKN x (b1R/16)

F"00, —. 77
Environmental Chemists,
Inc.
envirochem
6602 Windmill Way,
Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab - 910.392.4424
Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 - 910.347.5943 Lab/Fax
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS
infora;environmentalchemists com
Atlantic Sewage
Date of Report: May 02, 2023
PO Box 2560
Customer PO #:
Kitty Hawk NC 27949
Customer ID: 19120002
Attention Dave Robertson
Report #: 2023-06371
Project ID: Elizabeth City WTP
Lab ID Sample ID:
Collect DatelTime Matrix Sampled by
23-16091 Site: Sludge
4/3/2023
10:45 AM Solid/Sludge Stephen Cummings
Test
Method
Results Date Analyzed
Sludge Residuals
Aluminum
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
11900 mglkg
04/26/2023
Arsenic
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4.1994
<8.88 mg/kg
04/26/2023
Cadmium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<8.88 mg/kg
04/26/2023
Calcium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
307000 mg/kg
04/28/2023
Chromium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<8.88 mg/kg
04/26/2023
Copper
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4.1994
<8.88 mg/kg
04/26/2023
Lead
EPA 240.7, Rev. 4.4. 1994
<8.88 mg/kg
04/26/2023
Magnesium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
12700 mg/kg
04/26/2023
Molybdenum
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<8.88 mg/kg
04/26/2023
Nickel
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4 4, 1994
<8.88 mglkg
04/26/2023
Potassium
EPA 200.7. Rev 4 4, 1994
<444 mg/kg
04/26/2023
Selenium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4. 1994
<8.88 mg/kg
04/26/2023
Sodium
EPA 200 7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
755 mglkg
04/26/2023
Zinc
FPA 200 7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<8.88 mg/kg
04/26/2023
N itrate+N itrite-Nitrogen
EPA 3532
12.2mg/kg
04/05/2023
Total Solids (%)
SM 2540 B
9.83 %
04/04/2023
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 C-2011
<1.02 mg/kg
04/06/2023
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
SM 4500 Norg B-2011
1090 mg/kg
04/06/2023
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
382 mg/kg
04/11 /2023
pH
SW 646 Method 9045D
9.65 units
04/24/2023
Result est mated Ana.yzed out of 15 minutes ho d time
Mercury
SW-846 7471 B
<0.178 mg/kg
04/14/2023
Comment: Results, except pH, reported
on a dry weight basis. pH reported on an as received basis.
Reviewed by: {�
Report #: 2023-06371
Page 1 of 1

Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
Sample Receipt Checklist
r
Client:El , �rj'% ���_ pale: 3 Report Number:
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
910.392.0223
Receipt of sample: ECHEM Pickup ❑ Client Delivery ❑ JUPS,
FedEx ❑ Other ❑
❑ YES ❑ NO
JA N/A
1. Were custody seals present on the cooler?
❑ YES I0 NO
a N/A
2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
Original temperature upon receipt 'C Corrected temperature upon receipt °C
How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank Against Bottles
I Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 210886869 IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0
KL YES
YES
❑ NO
❑ NO
3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
YES
YES
❑ NO
❑ NO
5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
YES
❑ NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
YES
❑ NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
YES
❑ NO
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
YES
❑ NO
10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
YES
❑ NO
11. Was adequate sample volume availableT
YES
❑ NO
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
❑ YES
❑ NO
13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2?
❑ YES
❑ NO
14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
❑ YES
❑ NO
15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
❑ YES
❑ NO
16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? **
❑ YES
❑ NO
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
❑ YES
❑ NO
18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
by adding (circle one): H2SO4 HNO3 HCl NaOH
Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time:
Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headspace
COMMENTS:
DOC. QA.002 Rev 1

) NVIRONNZTNTAL CHEMISTS, INC /OUTER BANKS
tvin" Wft
Spun Ye Collection and Chain of Custod
NCD ENR-DWQ Cerlifientei194, DLS CerllacataN37729
Analytical & Conaniting Chainists
Tent: Aficm_E
Collectec! X3 ;
S2MI))lle Tyne: 1 = Influent_ T. = ..A.A. 1xI 1Yr..n r"w' _n
Sample
Identification
-
F
--
Collection
DATE T.iME TAMP
„
W
a
U
C
,a
U
0
°
C
G
P
G
C
G
P
G.
C-
G
G
C
G
G
C
G
11��
G
G
C
P�
G
G
C
1'
Transfer ' Relinquished By:
C p
G #G�
C
G
PRESERVATION
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
m ail:]CchemWQaoLcom
Report No: ..� -k.037-1
l 1 I I ANALS,sR3iQUliST}!D
KW)ftr► a a V*-&W S
Datelr'Te
Temperatu"e when Receive( : Acceptecl: Rejecte Resarnple Req t d: T Deliverer) BY: _ Received By: ,-
- - --
Comments: +r Y'-- ate:'Fime:
-.— _ �p—ate R _ . - ,
D XLV
at "r
Date/Time I Relinquished By:

Facility
Sampling Date
% Solids
Mineralization Rate
Gallons Per DT
pH
Elizabeth City WTP
5/16/2023
2.24
0
10705.72
9.05
Field Loading Estimate
SAR 0.13 <5.0 Safe 5.0 - 10.0 Careful Management >15.0 Do Not Land Apply
SAR Calculation
Value From source Meq/L
Na 2,330 2.269217391
Ca 484,000 542.08
Mg 16,400 30.61333333
I Nitrogen Application Nutrient Application
TKN (mg/Kg)
3,960
lbs./1000 gal 0.741
(mg/Kg)
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/Kg)
1,030
lbs./1000 gal 0.193
Potassium
513
Nitrate -Nitrite (mg/Kg)
30.4
lbs./1000 gal 0.006
Phosphorus
1,290
Calcium
484,000
Plant Available Nitrogen Surface Applied
Magnesium
16400
PAN (mg/Kg) 545.4
(lbs./1000 gal)
0.102
Molybdenum
10.200
Chromium
10.200
Plant Available Nitrogen Injected/Incorporated Applied
PAN (mg/Kg) 1060.4 (lbs./1000 gal) 0.198
Volatilization Rate= .5 Surface Application
1.0 In ection /Incorporation
(lbs./1000 gal)
0.0960
0.2413
90.5274
EPA Metal
Limits
Class A Ceiling
Class B Ceiling
Limits (mg/Kg)
Limits (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Concentration (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Loading (lbs./1000
Arsenic
20.491
Arsenic
0.0038
41
75
39
85
Cadmium
10
Cadmium
0.0019
1,500
4,300
Copper
10.2
Copper
0.0019
300
840
Lead
10.2
Lead
0.0019
17
57
Mercury
0.804
Mercury
0.0002
420
420
Nickel
10.2
Nickel
0.0019
100
100
Selenium
20.5
Selenium
0.0038
2,800
7,500
Zinc
10.2
Zinc
0.0019
Residual Nitrogen Calculation
3.0675
0.0019
0.0019
Remaing
PAN
Remaing
PAN (S)
Subsurface
TKN
Surface (S)
Organic N
TKN
(INJ)
Organic N
lbs/DT
(INJ)
(S)
lbs/DT
(INJ)
1 st Year
3960
545
1.09
3415
3960
1060
2.12
2900
2nd Year
3415
0
0.00
3415
2900
0
0.00
2900
3rd Year
3415
0
0.00
3415
2900
0
0.00
2900
4th Year
3415
0
0.00
3415
2900
0
0.00
2900
5th Year
3415
0
0.00
3415
2900
0
0.00
2900
Total
545
1.09
Total
1060
2.12
Equations
1st Yr. PAN (mg/hg)=(b1R x (TKN-NH3))+(VR x NH3)+NOx
2nd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 2nd Yr. TKN x (b7R/2)
3rd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 3rd Yr. TKN x (b7R/4)
4di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 4di Yr. TKN x (b7R/8)
5di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 5di Yr. TKN x (b7R/16)

F"10- -- Environmental Chemists, Inc.
• 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 ■ 910.392.0223 Lab ■ 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 ■ 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 ■ 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS info (c� environmentalchemists.com
Atlantic Sewage
Date of Report: Jun 19. 2023
PO Box 2560
Customer PO #:
Kitty Hawk NC 27949
Customer ID: 19120002
Attention:
Report #-. 2023-10014
Project ID: Elizabeth City WTP
Lab ID Sample ID:
Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
23-25116 Site: Sludge
5/16/2023
11:00 AM Solid/Sludge Stephen Cummings
Test
Method
Results Date Analyzed
Sludge Residuals
Aluminum
EPA2007 Rev 44.1994
14900mg/kg
05/31/2023
Arsenic
EPA 200 7 Rev 4 4 1994
<20.491 mg/kg
06/06/2023
Cadmium
EPA 2007 Rev 4.4 1994
<10.2mg/kg
05/31/2023
Calcium
EPA 200 7 Rev 4.4 1994
484000 mg/kg
06/14/2023
Chromium
EPA 200 7 Rev 4.4 1994
<10.2 mg/kg
05/31/2023
Copper
EPA 200 7 Rev 4 4 1994
<10.2 mg/kg
05/31/2023
Lead
EPA 200 7. Rev 4.4. 1994
<10.2 mg/kg
05/3112023
Magnesium
EPA 200 7. Rev 4.4 1994
16400 mg/kg
05/3112023
Molybdenum
EPA 2007. Rev 4.4 1994
<10.2 mg/kg
05/3112023
Nickel
EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4. 1994
<10.2 mg/kg
05/3112023
Potassium
EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4 1994
<513 mglkg
05/3112023
Selenium
EPA 200.7, Rev 4 4 1994
<20.5 mg/kg
06/0612023
Sodium
EPA 200.7, Rev 4 4 1994
2330 mg/kg
05/31/2023
Zinc
EPA 200 7, Rev 4 4 1994
<10.2 mg/kg
05/31/2023
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
EPA 353.2
30.4 mg/kg
05/22/2023
Total Solids (%)
SM 2540 B
2.24 %
05/18/2023
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 C-2011
1030 mg/kg
05/18/2023
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
SM 4500 Norg B-2011
3960 mg/kg
05/18/2023
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
1290 mg/kg
05/26/2023
pH
Sw846 Method 90450
9.05 units
05/17/2023
Resu-t estimated. Ana yzed out of 15 minutes hold time.
Mercury
SW-846 7471 B
<0.804 mg/kg
05/19/2023
Comment: Results, except pH, reported on a dry weight basis. pH reported on an as received basis.
Reviewed by:
Report*. 2023-10014
Page 1 of 1

Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94 6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
910.392.0223
Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: 4Llpe,* Date: Report Number: _23' 10Cj14
Receipt of sample: ECHEM Pickup ❑ Client Delivery ❑ E1PS FedEx ❑ Other ❑
❑ YES JEI NO i N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler?
❑ YES 10 NO N/A 12. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
Original temperature upon receipt _ Z , _°C CQVected temperature upon receipt °C
How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank Against Bottles
IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 210886869 IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0
YES ❑ NO 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded VC, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
❑ NO 4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
YES
VYES ❑ NO 5. Were sample ID's listed an the COC?
YES
❑
NO
1 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
YES
❑
NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COU
YES
❑
NO
B. Were tests to be performed listed on the COU
A
YES
❑
NO
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
YES
❑
NO
10, Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
YES
❑
NO
11. Was adequate sample volume available?'
YES
❑
NO
113.
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
❑
YES
❑
NO
Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2?
❑
YES
❑
NO
14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
❑
YES
❑
NO
15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
❑
YES
❑
NO
16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? **
❑
YES
❑
NO
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
❑
YES
❑
NO
18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Sample Preservation:
Sample(s)
by adding (circle one):
(Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
H2SO4 HNO3 HCI NaOH
e of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
y the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time:
tiles Sample(s)
were received with headspace
COMMENTS:
DOC. QA.002 Rev 1

kh—
Analytical & Consu]ting Chemists
: Atlantic Sewaae
Sample Identification
Transfer
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC OFF Windmill z-0223'F X910- z 24
NCDENR. DWQ CERTIFICATION 9 84 NCDHHS: MS CERTIFICATION # 37M [e-mail]
COLLECTION AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
PROJECT NAME; h6&), r Lh,4 66%,jr t�%4,A, REPORT NO.,
A, uux a TrsL---&- Plavoe
Date I Time T
i IAWz 11:Cv
Received
2' a 30
Temperature when Receive - Accepted: 9 Res
Delivered By: i Received Rv- Dat
Comments:
SO=Soil, SL in Sludge, Other.
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
WWWeks oma mid ws
r * hit% Tel_& -r 6Pt w
Datd ime
Time: \ -t�
D:

Facility
Sampling Date
% Solids
Mineralization Rate
Gallons Per DT
pH
Elizabeth City WTP
7/10/2023
11.3
0
2122.20
9.45
Field Loading Estimate
SAR 0.12 <5.0 Safe 5.0 - 10.0 Careful Management >15.0 Do Not Land Apply
SAR Calculation
Value From source Meq/L
Na 697 3.424391304
Ca 291,000 1644.15
Mg 11,100 104.525
I Nitrogen Application Nutrient Application
TKN (mg/Kg)
1,840
lbs./1000 gal 1.736
(mg/Kg)
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/Kg)
0.88
lbs./1000 gal 0.001
Potassium
279.152
Nitrate -Nitrite (mg/Kg)
5.71
lbs./1000 gal 0.005
Phosphorus
136
Calcium
291,000
Plant Available Nitrogen Surface Applied
Magnesium
11100
PAN (mg/Kg) 6.15
(lbs./1000 gal)
0.006
Molybdenum
5.570
Chromium
5.570
Plant Available Nitrogen Injected/Incorporated Applied
PAN (mg/Kg) 6.59 (lbs./1000 gal) 0.006
Volatilization Rate= .5 Surface Application
1.0 In ection /Incorporation
(lbs./1000 gal)
0.2634
0.1283
274.5731
10.4734
0.0053
0.0053
EPA Metal
Limits
Class A Ceiling
Class B Ceiling
Limits (mg/Kg)
Limits (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Concentration (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Loading (lbs./1000
Arsenic
5.57
Arsenic
0.0053
41
75
39
85
Cadmium
5.57
Cadmium
0.0053
1,500
4,300
Copper
5.57
Copper
0.0053
300
840
Lead
5.57
Lead
0.0053
17
57
Mercury
0.150
Mercury
0.0001
420
420
Nickel
5.57
Nickel
0.0053
100
100
Selenium
5.57
Selenium
0.0053
2,800
7,500
Zinc
5.57
Zinc
0.0053
Residual Nitrogen Calculation
Remaing
PAN
Remaing
PAN (S)
Subsurface
TKN
Surface (S)
Organic N
TKN
(INJ)
Organic N
lbs/DT
(INJ)
(S)
lbs/DT
(INJ)
1 st Year
1840
6
0.01
1834
1840
7
0.01
1833
2nd Year
1834
0
0.00
1834
1833
0
0.00
1833
3rd Year
1834
0
0.00
1834
1833
0
0.00
1833
4th Year
1834
0
0.00
1834
1833
0
0.00
1833
5th Year
1834
0
0.00
1834
1833
0
0.00
1833
Total
6
0.01
Total
7
0.01
Equations
1st Yr. PAN (mg/hg)=(b1R x (TKN-NH3))+(VR x NH3)+NOx
2nd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 2nd Yr. TKN x (b7R/2)
3rd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 3rd Yr. TKN x (b7R/4)
4di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 4di Yr. TKN x (b7R/8)
5di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 5di Yr. TKN x (b7R/16)

sM;
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS
Atlantic Sewage
PO Box 2560
Kitty Hawk
Attention:
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 ■ 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 ■ 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
[e-mail]
Date of Report: Aug 23, 2023
Customer PO #:
NC 27949 Customer ID: 19120002
Report #: 2023-14428
Project ID: Elizabeth City WTP
Lab ID Sample ID:
23-35882 Site: Sludge
Test
Sludge Residuals
Aluminum
Arsenic
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Magnesium
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Sodium
Zinc
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
Total Solids (%)
Ammonia Nitrogen
Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
7/10/2023 1:10 PM Solid/Sludge Stephen Cummings
Method Results Date Analyzed
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4. 1994
EPA 200.7. Rev 4 4. 1994
EPA 200 7, Rev 4 4, 1994
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4, 1994
EPA 200 7 Rev 4 4, 1994
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4 1994
EPA 200.7, Rev, 4 4, 1994
EPA 200 7, Rev 4 4, 1994
EPA 200 7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
EPA 200 7, Rev. 4.4. 1994
EPA 200 7, Rev 4 4, 1994
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4, 1994
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4, 1994
EPA 200 7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
EPA 353 2
SM 2540 B
SM 4500 NH3 C-2011
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) SM 4500 Norg B-2011
Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
pH SW 846 Method 9045D
Result estimated. Analyzed out of 15 minutes hold time.
Mercury SW-8467471 B
Comment:
Reviewed by:
12200 mg/kg
<5.57 mg/kg
<5.57 mg/kg
291000 mg/kg
<5.57 mg/kg
<5.57 mg/kg
<5.57 mg/kg
11100 mg/kg
<5.57 mg/kg
<5.57 mg/kg
<279.152 mg/kg
<5.57 mg/kg
697 mg/kg
<5.57 mg/kg
5.71 mg/kg
11.3 %
<0.88 mg/kg
1840 mg/kg
136 mg/kg
9.45 units
<0.15 mg/kg
08/01 /2023
08/16/2023
08/01 /2023
08/16/2023
08/01 /2023
08/01 /2023
08/01 /2023
08/01 /2023
08/01 /2023
08/01 /2023
08/01 /2023
08/01 /2023
08/16/2023
08/01 /2023
07/18/2023
07/14/2023
07/18/2023
07/19/2023
07/25/2023
07/21 /2023
07/31 /2023
Report #:: 2023-14428 Page 1 of 1

r-rivironmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
6602 Windmill Wa
Wilmington, NC 2840
1 Sample Receipt Checklist 910.392.022.
Client: N acw i c SQ,,p, Date:
' Report Number: -Z3 -�
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Receipt of sample:
O YES _ p Np
E HEM Pickup ❑ _
_4 Client Delivery ❑ UPS --- - — -
❑ YES
❑ NO
N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler? FedEx ❑ Other--- ❑
N/A
2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unb
Original temperature upon receipt C
° roken?
How temperature taken: Corrected temperature upon receipt_
Blank
IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable
YES ❑ NO
S/N❑210emperature
IR Gun Correction Against Bottles
Factor °C: 0.0
YES
❑ NO
3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./qA notified?
4. Were proper custod
YES
❑ NO
Y
p Procedures (relinquished/received) foll)wed?
5. Were sample IDs listed on the
YES
YES
❑ NO
❑ NO
COC?
6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
YES
❑ NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
YES
❑ NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
YES
❑ NO
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
10. Did samples arrive in
r YES
❑ NO
good condition for each test?
11. Was adequate sample volume available?'
YES
YES
❑ NO
❑ NO
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
13. Were acid preserved
YES
❑ NO
samples received at a pH of <2?
14. Were cyanide samples
YES
❑ NO
received at a PH >12?
15. Were sulfide samples received
YES
YES
❑ NO
❑
at a pH >97
16. -Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine
YES
NO
❑ NO
residual of <0.5 m/L? **
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
18.
Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15
minutes?
sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any samples) incorrect)
Samples) y preserved or with headspace)
were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
by adding (circle one): H2SO4 HNO3 HCI
Time of preservation: NaOH
If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time:
Volatiles Sample(s)
were received with headspace
COMMFNTc.
rn nnnn1n_-_.
• � ncv 1
cC

Way
on, NC
dmill
min
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC OFFI Ein9103 2-02231FAX[phone]
Analytical8 Consulting Chemists NCDENR:.DWO CERTIRCATION # 94 NCDHHS:_DLS_CERTIFICATION # 37729 Infc@environmentalchemists= m
COLLECTION AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Client: Atlantic Sewage
PROJECT NAME: Gib C43TP
REPORT NO: "Z - \-A42�
ADDRESS:
CONTACT NAME:
PO NO:
Permit:
PHONE/FAX:
COPY TO:
email:
Sampled By: Skoifr+ C,jnnmr,w:z SAMPLE TYPE: 1= Influent. E= Effluent, W = Well, ST = Stream, SO = Soil, SL = Sludge. Other.
Sample Identification19
REQUESTED
.ANALYSIS
.moo
-vu
Mimi
Tdmperature when Received 'Ir'! U V Accepted: i Rejected: I Resa%_7
uested:
Delivered By: c Received By: Date:1 V) Time: T O
Comments:_ _ MO rCL.P Of CI _ _ TUR AROUND:

Facility
Sampling Date
% Solids
Mineralization Rate
Gallons Per DT
pH
Elizabeth City WTP
9/26/2023
2.03
0
11813.21
9.27
SAR 0.14
SAR Calculation
Value From source
Na 2,260
Ca 374,000
Mg 15,500
Field Loading Estimate
<5.0 Safe 5.0 - 10.0 Careful Management >15.0 Do Not Land Apply
Meq/L
1.994695652
379.61
26.22083333
I Nitrogen Application Nutrient Application
TKN (mg/Kg)
2,270
lbs./1000 gal 0.385
(mg/Kg)
(lbs./1000 gal)
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/Kg)
900
lbs./1000 gal 0.153
Potassium
483
0.0819
Nitrate -Nitrite (mg/Kg)
33.60
lbs./1000 gal 0.006
Phosphorus
330
0.0559
Calcium
374,000
63.3949
Plant Available Nitrogen Surface Applied
Magnesium
15500
2.6273
PAN (mg/Kg) 483.6
(lbs./1000 gal)
0.082
Molybdenum
9.66
0.0016
Chromium
9.66
0.0016
Plant Available Nitrogen Injected/Incorporated Applied
PAN (mg/Kg) 933.6 (lbs./1000 gal) 0.158
Volatilization Rate= .5 Surface Application
1.0 In ection /Incorporation
EPA Metal
Limits
Class A Ceiling
Class B Ceiling
Limits (mg/Kg)
Limits (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Concentration (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Loading (lbs./1000
Arsenic
9.66
Arsenic
0.0016
41
75
39
85
Cadmium
9.7
Cadmium
0.0016
1,500
4,300
Copper
9.66
Copper
0.0016
300
840
Lead
9.66
Lead
0.0016
17
57
Mercury
0.916
Mercury
0.0002
420
420
Nickel
9.66
Nickel
0.0016
100
100
Selenium
9.66
Selenium
0.0016
2,800
7,500
Zinc
9.66
Zinc
0.0016
Residual Nitrogen Calculation
Remaing
PAN
Remaing
PAN (S)
Subsurface
TKN
Surface (S)
Organic N
TKN
(INJ)
Organic N
lbs/DT
(INJ)
(S)
lbs/DT
(INJ)
1 st Year
2270
484
0.97
1786
2270
934
1.87
1336
2nd Year
1786
0
0.00
1786
1336
0
0.00
1336
3rd Year
1786
0
0.00
1786
1336
0
0.00
1336
4th Year
1786
0
0.00
1786
1336
0
0.00
1336
5th Year
1786
0
0.00
1786
1336
0
0.00
1336
Totall
484
0.97
Total
934
1.87
Equations
1st Yr. PAN (mg/hg)=(b1R x (TKN-NH3))+(VR x NH3)+NOx
2nd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 2nd Yr. TKN x (b7R/2)
3rd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 3rd Yr. TKN x (b7R/4)
4di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 4di Yr. TKN x (NIR/8)
5di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 5di Yr. TKN x (-1R/16)

F"007
jLnviroche]m
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 ■ 910.392.0223 Lab - 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 - 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 - 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
info ci.environmentolchemists.com
Atlantic Sewage
Date of Report: Nov 06, 2023
PO Box 2560
Customer PO #:
Kitty Hawk NC 27949
Customer ID: 19120002
Attention:
Report #: 2023-22425
Project ID: Elizabeth City WTP
Lab 1D Sample ID:
Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
23-54645 Site: Sludge
9/26/2023
12:05 PM Solid/Sludge Stephen Cummings
Test
Method
Results
Date Analyzed
Sludge Residuals
Aluminum
EPA 2007, Rev. 4.4, 1994
15600 mg/kg
10/18/2023
Arsenic
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<9.66 mg/kg
10/18/2023
Cadmium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<9.66 mg/kg
10/18/2023
Calcium
EPA 200.7, Rev, 4.4, 1994
374000 mg/kg
10/27/2023
Chromium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<9.66 mg/kg
10/18/2023
Copper
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<9.66 mg/kg
10/18/2023
Lead
EPA 200 7, Rev 4 4, 1994
<9.66 mg/kg
10/18/2023
Magnesium
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4,1994
15500 mg/kg
10/18/2023
Molybdenum
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4,1994
<9,66 mg/kg
10/18/2023
Nickel
EPA 200.7 Rev 4.4, 1994
<9.66 mg/kg
10/18/2023
Potassium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<483 mg/kg
10/18/2023
Selenium
EPA 2007, Rev. 4A, 1994
<9.66 mg/kg
11/02/2023
Sodium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4 1994
2260mg/kg
10/18/2023
Zinc
EPA 200.7. Rev. 4.4 1994
<9.66mg/kg
10/18/2023
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
EPA353.2
33.6mg/kg
10/02/2023
Total Solids (%)
SM 2540 B
2.03 %
10/03/2023
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 C-2011
900 mg/kg
09/29/2023
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
SM 4500 Norg B-2011
2270 mg/kg
09/29/2023
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
330 mg/kg
10/04/2023
pH
SW 846 Method 9045D
9.27 units
10/09/2023
Result estimated Analyzed out of 15 m,nutes hold time.
Mercury
SW-846 7471 B
<0.916 mg/kg
10/11/2023
Comments *Sludge residual results, except pH, reported on a dry weight basis. pH reported on an as received
basis.
Reviewed by:
Report V 2023-22425
Page 1 of 1

Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
Sample Receipt Checklist
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
910.392.0223
C ,� �, gyp- �
Client: �i� to- l � 4""1 Date: 2 i" Z Report Number: _ 2023-,Z-2-q?-
Receipt of sample: ECHEM Pickup ❑ Client Delivery ❑
JUPS FeclEx ❑ Other ❑
❑ YES
❑ NO I x❑ N/A
1. Were custody seals present on the cooler?
❑ YES
10 NO C]X. N/A
2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
Original temperature upon receipt Corrected temperature upon receipt °C
How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank UO Against Bottles
IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 210886869 IR Gun Correction Factor *C: 0.0
O YES
❑ NO
3. if temperature of cooler exceeded 6*C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
9 YES
❑ NO
4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
I] YES
❑ NO
5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
IO YES
❑ NO
6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
ED YES
❑ NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
Z YES
❑ NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
O YES
❑ NO
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
UX` YES
❑ NO
10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
O YES
❑ NO
11. Was adequate sample volume available?'
YES
❑ NO
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
❑ YES
❑ NO
13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2?
❑ YES
❑ NO
14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
❑ YES
❑ NO
15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
❑ YES
❑ NO
16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? **
❑ YES
❑ NO
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <05 m/L?
O YES I
❑ NO
18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any samples) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
by adding (circle one): H2SO4 HNO3 HCI NaOH
Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. who was notified, date and time:
Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headspace
COMMENTS:
DOC. QA.002 Rev 1

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC OFFI F: s;aa Way � AX O'; z� 5
AnaMical & ConsuffJng Chemists HCDENR: DWQ CERTIFICATION N 94 NCDHHS: DLS CERTIFICATION # 37729 iato@envImnmentalch miftcom
COLLECTION AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Client: Atlantic Sewage PROJECT NAME: C It 'j REPORT NO:
ADDRESS: CONTACT NAME: PO NO:
Permit: PHONEIFAX:
COPY TO: email:
Sampled By: SAMPLE TYPE: I = h4uent E EfHuen#, W = Well, ST = SUMP, SO = Soil SL = Sludge.
Sample Identification
51�c�e,
CoVectlon
Date
t
Time
rz:us
Temp
Transfer
1.
'all6
z
1 3111 Or
R.
Daterrime
10`
Temperature when Received 'C: Accepted: ejected• Resample Requested:_
Delivered By: Received By. Date• Z"� Ztfi
Comments:
TURNAROUND:
Datenime
3 2120

Facility
Sampling Date
% Solids
Mineralization Rate
Gallons Per DT
pH
Elizabeth City WTP
11/6/2023
4.85
0
4944.50
7.92
SAR 0.11
SAR Calculation
Value From source
Na 1,160
Ca 354,000
Mg 15,200
Field Loading Estimate
<5.0 Safe 5.0 - 10.0 Careful Management >15.0 Do Not Land Apply
Meq/L
2.446086957
858.45
61.43333333
I Nitrogen Application Nutrient Application
TKN (mg/Kg)
494
lbs./1000 gal 0.200
(mg/Kg)
(lbs./1000 gal)
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/Kg)
435.00
lbs./1000 gal 0.176
Potassium
412
0.1668
Nitrate -Nitrite (mg/Kg)
17.20
lbs./1000 gal 0.007
Phosphorus
150
0.0607
Calcium
354,000
143.3612
Plant Available Nitrogen Surface Applied
Magnesium
15200
6.1556
PAN (mg/Kg) 234.7
(lbs./1000 gal)
0.095
Molybdenum
8.27
0.0033
Chromium
8.27
0.0033
Plant Available Nitrogen Injected/Incorporated Applied
PAN (mg/Kg) 452.2 (lbs./1000 gal) 0.183
Volatilization Rate= .5 Surface Application
1.0 In ection /Incorporation
EPA Metal
Limits
Class A Ceiling
Class B Ceiling
Limits (mg/Kg)
Limits (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Concentration (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Loading (lbs./1000
Arsenic
8.27
Arsenic
0.0033
41
75
39
85
Cadmium
8.3
Cadmium
0.0033
1,500
4,300
Copper
8.27
Copper
0.0033
300
840
Lead
8.27
Lead
0.0033
17
57
Mercury
0.324
Mercury
0.0001
420
420
Nickel
8.27
Nickel
0.0033
100
100
Selenium
8.27
Selenium
0.0033
2,800
7,500
Zinc
8.27
Zinc
0.0033
Residual Nitrogen Calculation
Remaing
PAN
Remaing
PAN (T
Subsurface
TKN
Surface (S)
Organic N
TKN
(INJ)
Organic N
lbs/D
(INJ)
(S)
lbs/DT
(INJ)
1 st Year
494
235
0.47
259
494
452
0.90
42
2nd Year
259
0
0.00
259
42
0
0.00
42
3rd Year
259
0
0.00
259
42
0
0.00
42
4th Year
259
0
0.00
259
42
0
0.00
42
5th Year
259
0
0.00
259
42
0
0.00
42
Totall
235
0.47
Total
452
0.90
Equations
1st Yr. PAN (1ng/hg)=(b1R x (TKN-NH3))+(VR x NH3)+NOx
2nd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 2nd Yr. TKN x (b1R/2)
3rd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 3rd Yr. TKN x (b7R/4)
4di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 4th Yr. TKN x (NIR/8)
5di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 5di Yr. TKN x (b7R/16)

:enviroehem]
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS
Atlantic Sewage
PO Box 2560
Kitty Hawk
Attention:
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 - 910.392.0223 Lab - 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 - 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 - 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
[e-mail]
Date of Report: Dec 05, 2023
Customer PO #:
NC 27949 Customer ID: 19120002
Report 9: 2023-26055
Project ID: Elizabeth City WTP
Lab ID Sample ID:
23-63055 Site: Sludge
Collect DatelTime Matrix Sampled by
11/6/2023 11:25 AM Solid/Sludge Stephen Cummings
Test
Method
Results
Date Analyzed
Sludge Residuals
Aluminum
EPA 200.7.Rev, 4.4.1994
12200mg/kg
11/21/2023
Arsenic
EPA 200 7. Rev. 4.4 1994
<8.27 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Cadmium
EPA200.7. Rev. 4.4 1994
<8.27 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Calcium
EPA 200 .. Rev. 4.4, 1994
354000 mg/kg
12/01 /2023
Chromium
EPA 2007. Rev. 4.4 1994
<8.27 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Copper
EPA 200 7. Rev. 4.4 1994
<8.27 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Lead
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4 1994
<8.27 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Magnesium
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4 1994
15200 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Molybdenum
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4, 1994
<8.27 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Nickel
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4 1994
<8.27 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Potassium
EPA 200 7. Rev. 4 4, 1994
<412 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Selenium
EPA200.7. Rev 44, 1994
<8.27 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Sodium
EPA 200 7 Rev 4 4,1994
1160 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Zinc
EPA 200 7, Rev 4 4. 1994
<8.27 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
EPA 3532
17.2mg/kg
11/13/2023
Total Solids (%)
SM 2540 B
4.85 %
11/09/2023
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 C-2011
435 mg/kg
11/10/2023
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
SM 4500 Norg B-2011
494 mg/kg
11/10/2023
Total Phosphorus
Sid 4500 P (F-H)-2011
150 mg/kg
11/13/2023
pH
SW 846 Method 9045D
7.92 units
11 /28/2023
Result estimated. Analyzed out
of 15 minutes hold time.
Mercury
SW-846 7471 B
<0.324 mg/kg
11 /14/2023
Comment: `Sludge residual
results, except pH, reported on a dry weight basis. pH reported on an as received
basis.
Reviewed by:
Report #: 2023-26055
Page 1 of 1

Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: Date: l 1-3-12-S ReportNumber:
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
910.392.0223
2023- Z(PDS�
Receipt of sample:
ECHEM Pickup ❑ Client Delivery ❑ UPS FedEx ❑ Other ❑
❑ YES ❑ NO
❑O N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler?
12.
❑ YES ❑ NO
L7 N/A If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
Original temperature upon receipt °C Corrected temperature upon receipt . nC
How temperature taken:
❑ Temperature Blank El Against Bottles
I Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 210886869 IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0
0 YES ❑ NO
3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6'C, was Project Mgr./QA
notified?
O YES
❑ NO
4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
0 YES
❑ NO
5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
0 YES
❑ NO
6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
O YES
❑ NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
❑x YES
❑ NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
O YES
❑ NO
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
O YES
❑ NO
10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
N YES
❑ NO
11. Was adequate sample volume available?`
9 YES
❑ NO 112,
Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
❑ YES
❑ NO
13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2?
❑ YES
❑ NO
14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
❑ YES
❑ NO
15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
❑ YES
❑ NO
16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? **
❑ YES 113 NO
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
❑ YES I0 NO 118.
Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Sample Preservation:
(Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
Sample(s)
were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
by adding (circle one):
H2SO4 HNO3 HCl NaOH
Time of preservation:
If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time-
Volatiles Sample(s)
were received with headspace
COMMENTS:
DOC. QA.002 Rev 1

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC OFFICE 9 0392-0223FAX9 o3922 wzas
Analytical 6 Consulting Chemists NCDENIR: DWO CERTIFICATION # 94 NCOHHS: DLS CERTIFICATION # 3T729 [e-mail]
COt_I. FCTION ANn f:NeIN ng: CiICTnnv
Client: Atlantic Sewage
PROJECT NAME: C-lnaVePr, ;
REPORT NO: 3 - 2 (D 5
ADDRESS:
CONTACT NAME:
PO NO:
Permit:
PHONEIFAX:
COPY TO:
email:
Sampled By: lornm yn SAMPLE TYPE: I = Influent, E a Effluent, W = Well, ST a Stream, SO = Soil, SL = Sludge, Other:
ollection g PRESERVATION
Sample Identification $ 0 s N a m w
0� c L o z � 0 0 0J � m ANALYSIS REQUESTED
U V a V e z x Z 7C Z o
Date Time TempLL
G
fJu�nv�i�y a Rda�dv0.iS
C P
G G
C P
G G
G P
G G
C P
G G
C P
G G
C P
G G
C P
G G
Transfer
1.
Datelrime
Received
D-a-t-etTimee
0 I.`-��
Temperature when Received'C; Accepted: R ected: ResamplgK
uested: t Delivered By: Received By:_. r j2 -e � Date: 1 �Z�j Time: j J
Comments: Cx- TROUND:
y
.-t

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
WQ Permit No. WQ0002883 Facility Name City of Elizabeth City Source Permit No. NC0025011 Source Name Elizabeth City W WTP
Laboratory 1
Laboratory 2
Sample of Composite Date
Pafametef (mg/Kg) Class A Class B
Environmental
Chemists, Inc.
Environmental
Chemists, Inc.
Environmental
Chemists, Inc.
Environmental
Chemists, Inc.
1/19/2023
4/17/2023
7/10/2023
11/6/2023
Aluminum
N/A
N/A
8,270
7,160
9,620
7,620
Ammonia Nitrogen
N/A
N/A
655
3,550
2.54
16,500
Arsenic
41
75
28.60
28.60
24.40
10.20
Cadmium
39
85
14.30
28.60
<13.6
<9.08
Calcium
N/A
N/A
125,000
122,000
111,000
115,000
Copper
1,500
4,300
204
196
252
281
Lead
Magnesium
300
840
14.30
28.60
26.10
23.10
N/A
N/A
4,420
4,540
6,270
5,980
Mercury
17
57
0.44
0.568
0.723
<0.782
Molybdenum
N/A
75
14.30
28.60
<13.6
<9.08
Nickel
420
420
14.30
28.60
<13.6
12.80
Nitrate -Nitrite
Nitrogen
N/A
N/A
32.60
7.08
9.00
13.00
Percent Solids
N/A
N/A
4.16
3.17
3.94
2.39
PH (no units)
N/A
N/A
12.00
12.12
7.67
8.46
Phosphorus
N/A
N/A
14,900
21,500
19,300
23,400
Potassium
N/A
N/A
4,350
4,640
6,040
10,500
PAN (Inj./Inc.)
N/A
N/A
11,711
14,102
12,701
25,093
PAN (Surface)
N/A
N/A
11,384
12,327
12,700
16,843
Selenium
100
100
14.30
28.60
<13.6
<9.08
Sodium
N/A
N/A
2,500
2,790
4,970
6,150
SAR
N/A
N/A
0.39
0.38
0.78
0.74
TKN
N/A
N/A
37,400
38,700
42,300
45100
Zinc
2,800
7,500
1 808
830
1 1020
1983
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered
and evaluated the ipformation submitted. i am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility offines and imprisonment for knowing
✓/I�Yy/////� � 11/6/2023 violations."
S:gg­1.1P'mPa '- / Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)

Facility
Sampling Date
% Solids
Mineralization Rate
Gallons Per DT
pH
Elizabeth City WWTP
1/19/2023
4.16
0.3
5764.62
12.00
Field Loading Estimate
SAR 0.39 <5.0 Safe 5.0 - 10.0 Careful Management >15.0 Do Not Land Apply
SAR Calculation
Value From source Meq/L
Na 2,500 4.52173913
Ca 125,000 260
Mg 4,420 15.32266667
I Nitrogen Application Nutrient Application
TKN (mg/Kg) 37,400 lbs./1000 gal
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/Kg) 655 lbs./1000 gal
Nitrate -Nitrite (mg/Kg) 32.6 lbs./1000 gal
Plant Available Nitrogen Surface Applied
PAN (mg/Kg) 11383.6 (lbs./1000 gal) 3.954
Plant Available Nitrogen Injected/Incorporated Applied
PAN (mg/Kg) 11711.1 (lbs./1000 gal) 4.068
Volatilization Rate= .5 Surface Application
1.0 In ection /Incorporation
EPA Metal Limits
Class A Ceiling Class B Ceiling
Limits (mg/Kg) Limits (mg/Kg)
41 75
39 85
1,500 4,300
300 840
17 57
420 420
100 100
2,800 7,500
Heavy Metal Concentration
Arsenic
28.6
Cadmium
14.3
Copper
204
Lead
14.3
Mercury
0.44
Nickel
14.3
Selenium
14.3
Zinc
808
12.991
0.228
0.011
/
Residual Nitrogen Calculation
Potassium
Phosphorus
Calcium
Magnesium
Molybdenum
Chromium
(mg/Kg)
4,350
14,900
125,000
4420
14.3
15.5
Metal
Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
(lbs./1000 gal)
1.5110
5.1757
43.4200
(lbs./1000
0.0099
0.0050
0.0709
0.0050
0.0002
0.0050
0.0050
0.2807
1.5353
0.0050
0.0054
Remaing
PAN
Remaing
PAN (T
Subsurface
TKN
Surface (S)
Organic N
TKN
(INJ)
Organic N
lbs/D
(INJ)
(S)
lbs/DT
(INJ)
1 st Year
37400
11384
22.77
26016
37400
11711
23.42
25689
2nd Year
26016
3902
7.80
22114
25689
3853
7.71
21836
3rd Year
22114
1659
3.32
20455
21836
1638
3.28
20198
4th Year
20455
767
1.53
19688
20198
757
1.51
19440
5th Year
19688
369
0.74
19319
19440
365
0.73
19076
Totall
18081
36.16
1 Total
18324
36.65
Equations
1st Yr. PAN (1ng/hg)=(l-1R x (TKN-NH3))+(VR x NH3)+NOx
2nd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 2nd Yr. TKN x (NIR/2)
3id Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 3id Yr. TKN x (D-IR/4)
4di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 4th Yr. TKN x (D-IR/8)
5di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 5di Yr. TKN x (NIR/16)

rowow—.— -,Mqql Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem J 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 . 910.392.0223 Lab . 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 . 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
§id 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 . 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS [e-mail]
Atlantic Sewage
Date of Report: Feb 16, 2023
PO Box 2560
Customer PO #:
Kitty Hawk NC 27949
Customer ID: 19120002
Attention:
Report #: 2023-01414
Project ID: Elizabeth City WWTP
Lab ID Sample ID:
Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
23-03509 Site: Sludge
1/19/2023
12:20 PM Solid/Sludge Stephen Cummings
Test
Method
Results Date Analyzed
Chlordane (TCLP)
SW-846 8081 B
<0.02 mg/L
01/26/2023
Endrin (TCLP)
SW-846 8081 B
<0.0005 mg/L
01/26/2023
Heptachlor (TCLP)
SW-846 8081 B
<0.0005 mg/L
01/26/2023
Heptachlor epoxide (TCLP)
SW-846 8081 B
<0.0005 mg/L
01/26/2023
Lindane (TCLP)
SW-846 8081 B
<0.0005 mg/L
01/26/2023
Methoxychlor (TCLP)
SW-846 8081 B
<0.0005 mg/L
01/26/2023
Toxaphene (TCLP)
SW-846 8081 B
<0.05 mg/L
01/26/2023
2,4,5-TP (TCLP)
SW-8468151 A
<0.003 mg/L
01/26/2023
2,4-D (TCLP)
SW-846 8151 A
<0.003 mg/L
01/26/2023
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
2,4-Dinitrotoluene (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
Cresol (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
0.220 mg/L
01/27/2023
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene (TCLP)
SW-8468270E
<0.050mg/L
01/27/2023
Hexachlorobenzene (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
Hexachloroethane (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
m + p-Cresol (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
0.220 mg/L
01/27/2023
Nitrobenzene (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
o-Cresol (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
Pentachlorophenol (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.250 mg/L
01/27/2023
Pyridine (TCLP)
SW-846 8270 E
<0.050 mg/L
01/27/2023
1,1-Dichloroethylene (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
1,2-Dichloroethane (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Benzene (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Carbon Tetrachloride (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Report #:: 2023-01414
0,,,,,, 4 f ,

F"10" -- -""7 Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 ■ 910.392.0223 Lab . 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 ■ 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 . 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS [e-mail]
Atlantic Sewage
Date of Report: Feb 16, 2023
PO Box 2560
Customer PO #:
Kitty Hawk NC
27949
Customer ID: 19120002
Attention:
Report #: 2023-01414
Project ID: Elizabeth City WWTP
Chlorobenzene (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Chloroform (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Methyl ethyl ketone (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.05 mg/L
2/2/2023
Tetrachloroethylene (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Trichloroethylene (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
Vinyl Chloride (TCLP)
SW-846 Method 8260D
< 0.01 mg/L
2/2/2023
RCI
Cyanide
SM 4500 CN D-2016
<1 mg/kg
01/30/2023
Sulfide
SM 4500 S D
4.56 mg/kg
02/01/2023
Ignitability
SW 846 method 1010
>158 °F
01/26/2023
Sludge Residuals
Aluminum
EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994
8270 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Arsenic
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<28.6 mg/kg
01/30/2023
Cadmium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<14.3 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Calcium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
125000 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Chromium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
15.5 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Copper
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
204 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Lead
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<14.3 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Magnesium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
4420 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Molybdenum
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<14.3 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Nickel
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<14.3 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Potassium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
4350 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Selenium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<14.3 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Sodium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
2500 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Zinc
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
808 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
EPA353.2
32.6mg/kg
01/23/2023
Total Solids (%)
SM 2540 B
4.16 %
01/24/2023
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 C-2011
655 mg/kg
01/24/2023
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
SM 4500 Norg B-2011
37400 mg/kg
01/24/2023
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
14900 mg/kg
01/26/2023
Report #-: 2023-01414
D- , s ,

Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 . 910.392.0223 Lab . 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 . 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
SM` 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 . 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS [e-mail]
Atlantic Sewage
Date of Report: Feb 16, 2023
PO Box 2560
Customer PO #:
Kitty Hawk
NC 27949
Customer ID: 19120002
Attention:
Report #: 2023-01414
Project ID: Elizabeth City WWTP
pH
SW 846 Method 9045D
12.00 units
02/14/2023
Result estimated.
Analyzed out of 15 minutes hold time.
Mercury
SW-846 7471 B
<0.442 mg/kg
01/25/2023
TCLP Metals
Arsenic (TCLP)
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<1.0 mg/L
01/26/2023
Barium (TCLP)
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<1.0 mg/L
01/26/2023
Cadmium (TCLP)
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<1.0 mg/L
01/26/2023
Chromium (TCLP)
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<1.0 mg/L
01/26/2023
Lead (TCLP)
EPA 200 7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<1.0 mg/L
01/26/2023
Selenium (TCLP)
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<1.0 mg/L
01/26/2023
Silver (TCLP)
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<1.0 mg/L
01/26/2023
Mercury(TCLP)
EPA245.1
<0.0002mg/L
01/27/2023
Comment: *Sludge residual results, except pH, reported on a dry weight basis. pH reported on an as received
basis.
Reviewed by:
Report#:: 2023-01414 D-, f,

Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Sample Receipt Checklist 910.392.0223
Client_kG(a C Ox, Date: 12� 2
Report Number: _ 2023-
Receipt of sample:
❑ YES ❑
ECHEM Pickup Client Delivery ❑
UPS ❑ FedEx ❑ Other ❑
❑
NO
N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler?
YES
Original temperature
❑
NO
upon
N/A 2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
receipt °C
Corrected temperature upon receipt o C
How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank
Against Bottles
IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 210886869 IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0
YES
❑
NO
3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6'C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
YES
❑
NO
4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
YES
❑
NO
5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
YES
❑
NO
6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
YES
❑
NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
YES
❑
NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
YES
❑
NO
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
YES
IS( YES
❑
NO
10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
❑
NO
11. Was adequate sample volume available?'
YES
❑
NO
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
❑ YES
❑
NO
13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2?
❑ YES
❑
NO
14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
❑ YES
❑
NO
15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
❑ YES
❑
❑
NO
16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? **
YES
❑
❑
NO
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
YES
❑
NO 118.
Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly
Y preserved or with headspace)
were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
by adding (circle one): H2.SOG HNO3 HCI NaOH
Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. who was notified, date and time:
Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headspace
COMMENTS:
DOC. QA.002 Rev 1

EN vmolvlv[.rNTAL ciuMISTS, INC /OUTER BANKS
6602 Windmill Way
„. , . ' Svn�le Collection and C11aiII o1•' Custody NCDTNR:DWQCeriitienfe1194�'DLlahiGcnte#37 t Wilmington, NC 28405
Analyticsil ,�c Cousultin6 Ci1emists
Client: 41 r�l;o X Phone: [phone]
F. [phone]
Collected B P
`.+ t;fmail:ICcliemW.com
SameI e: _ flilellt =Wcll ST=Stream SO =SoilSL= Shtd a Other o�l't N0:
Sample Collection PRl';SLrRVATION
IdentiCcatiou � � � •��
DATE TIMiZ 0 O5 p � � ANALYSIS REQUESTED
U U
�� v� c
! q/ 3 I2: W
G
C r Tap. R cr, nui-v; enls F rr+e la
G G
c r
G G _
G G
c r
— G G
_ C
G G
c p
G G
c r
c_ p —
.G G
C p —
C, G
Transfer Relinquislieci By: Da-te/Time Relinduisliecl By:
I. 5C, ,/ Date/Ti ie
5 }cn G�+�r^k^SS JV - Z/12.
. � ti
Temperature w Iell Received: 1 It'3 4=
Deliverecl By:�_a �� Accepted: Reject d:
Received i3y. Resample Reglieste 1:
Comments: ate• � 2D 2
'Fiore: p C)

Facility
Sampling Date
% Solids
Mineralization Rate
Gallons Per DT
pH
Elizabeth City WWTP
4/17/2023
3.17
0.3
7564.93
12.12
SAR 0.38
SAR Calculation
Value From source
Na 2,790
Ca 122,000
Mg 4,540
Field Loading Estimate
<5.0 Safe 5.0 - 10.0 Careful Management >15.0 Do Not Land Apply
Meq/L
3.845347826
193.37
11.99316667
I Nitrogen Application Nutrient Application
TKN (mg/Kg)
38,700
lbs./1000 gal 10.244
(mg/Kg)
(lbs./1000 gal)
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/Kg)
3,550
lbs./1000 gal 0.940
Potassium
4,640
1.2282
Nitrate -Nitrite (mg/Kg)
7.08
lbs./1000 gal 0.002
Phosphorus
21,500
5.6909
Calcium
122,000
32.2928
Plant Available Nitrogen Surface Applied
Magnesium
4540
1.2017
PAN (mg/Kg) 12327.08
(lbs./1000 gal)
3.263
Molybdenum
28.6
0.0076
Chromium
28.6
0.0076
Plant Available Nitrogen Injected/Incorporated Applied
PAN (mg/Kg) 14102.08 (lbs./1000 gal) 3.733
Volatilization Rate= .5 Surface Application
1.0 In ection /Incorporation
EPA Metal
Limits
Class A Ceiling
Class B Ceiling
Limits (mg/Kg)
Limits (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Concentration (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Loading (lbs./1000
Arsenic
28.6
Arsenic
0.0076
41
75
39
85
Cadmium
28.6
Cadmium
0.0076
1,500
4,300
Copper
196
Copper
0.0519
300
840
Lead
28.6
Lead
0.0076
17
57
Mercury
0.568
Mercury
0.0002
420
420
Nickel
28.6
Nickel
0.0076
100
100
Selenium
28.6
Selenium
0.0076
2,800
7,500
Zinc
830
Zinc
0.2197
Residual Nitrogen Calculation
Remaing
PAN
Remaing
PAN (T
Subsurface
TKN
Surface (S)
Organic N
TKN
(INJ)
Organic N
lbs/D
(INJ)
(S)
lbs/DT
(INJ)
1 st Year
38700
12327
24.65
26373
38700
14102
28.20
24598
2nd Year
26373
3956
7.91
22417
24598
3690
7.38
20908
3rd Year
22417
1681
3.36
20736
20908
1568
3.14
19340
4th Year
20736
778
1.56
19958
19340
725
1.45
18615
5th Year
19958
374
0.75
19584
18615
349
0.70
18266
Totall
19116
38.23
1 Total
20434
40.87
Equations
1st Yr. PAN (1ng/hg)=(l-1R x (TKN-NH3))+(VR x NH3)+NOx
2nd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 2nd Yr. TKN x (b1R/2)
3id Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 3id Yr. TKN x (NIR/4)
4di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 4th Yr. TKN x (NIR/8)
5di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 5di Yr. TKN x (b1R/16)

[en7viroc he
ANALYTICAL 8 CONSULTING CHEMISTS
Atlantic Sewage
PO Box 2560
Kitty Hawk NC 27949
Attention:
Lab ID Sample ID:
23-18951 Site: Sludge
Test
Sludge Residuals
Aluminum
Arsenic
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Magnesium
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Sodium
Zinc
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
Total Solids (%)
Ammonia Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 ■ 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 ■ 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 ■ 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
info,' environmentalchemisls.com
Date of Report:
May 01, 2023
Customer PO #:
Customer ID:
19120002
Report #:
2023-07452
Project ID: Elizabeth
City WWTP
Collect Date/Time Matrix
Sampled by
4/17/2023 11:20 AM Solid/Sludge Stephen Cummings
Method
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4. 1994
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4. 1994
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4. 1994
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4. 1994
EPA 200 7. Rev. 4 4. 1994
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4. 1994
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4. 1994
EPA 200 7. Rev 4 4. 1994
EPA 200 7. Rev 44 1994
EPA 200 7 Rev 44 1994
EPA 200 7 Rev 44 1994
EPA 200 ' Rev 44 1994
EPA 200 7 Rev 44 1994
EPA 200 7 Rev 44 1994
EPA 353 2
SM 2540 8
SM 4500 NH3 C-2011
SM 4500 Norg B-2011
Results Date Analyzed
7160 mg/kg
<28.6 mg/kg
<28.6 mg/kg
122000 mg/kg
<28.6 mg/kg
196 mg/kg
<28.6 mg/kg
4540 mg/kg
<28.6 mg/kg
<28.6 mg/kg
4640 mg/kg
<28.6 mg/kg
2790 mg/kg
830 mg/kg
7.08 mg/kg
3.17%
3550 mg/kg
38700 mg/kg
Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 21500 mg/kg
pH SW 846 Method 9045D 12.12 units
Mercury SW-846 7471 B <0.568 mg/kg
Comment: Results, except pH, reported on a dry weight basis, pH reported on an as received basis.
Reviewed by: Ym 4�LL xt'/
04/26/2023
04/26/2023
04/26/2023
04/26/2023
04/26/2023
04/26/2023
04/26/2023
04/26/2023
04/26/2023
04/26/2023
04/26/2023
04/26/2023
04/26/2023
04/26/2023
04/20/2023
04/20/2023
04/20/2023
04/20/2023
04/27/2023
04/24/2023
04/27/2023
Report # 2023.07452
Page 1 of 1

Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
910 392 0223
Sample Receipt Checklist
�e' Date Report Number:
-
Receipt of sample:
❑ YES ❑ NO
ECHEM Pickup ❑ Client Delivery ❑ UPS FedEx ❑ Other ❑
O YES
❑
N/A
1. Were custody seals present on the cooler?
Original temperature
NO
upon
N/A 2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
receipt °C
Corrected temperature upon receipt _ _ _ _ uC
How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank
Against Bottles
IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 210886869 iR Gun Correction Factor *C: 0.0
YES
YES
❑ NO
❑
3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6'C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
YES
NO
❑
4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
NO
5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
YES
❑ NO
6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
YES
❑ NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
YES
❑ NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
YES
❑ NO
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
YES
❑ NO
10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
YES
❑ NO
11. Was adequate sample volume availableT
YES
❑
❑ NO
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
YES
❑
❑ NO
13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2?
YES
❑ NO
14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >127
❑ YES
❑ NO
15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
❑ YES
❑ YES
❑ NO
❑
16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? **
❑ YES
NO
❑
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
NO
18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with heads ace)
Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
by adding (circle one): HZSO4 HNO3 HCi NaOH
Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time:
Volatiles Sample{s} were received with headspace
COMMENTS:
DOC. QA.002 Rev 1

Analytical & Consulting Chemists
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
NCDENR: DWQ CERTIFICATION # 94 NCDHHS: = CERTIFICATION # 37729
COLLECTION AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 25406
OFFICE: 914J92-0223 FAX [phone]
[e-mail]
Client: Atlantic Sewage
PROJECT NAME:
REPORT NO 3 �y52
ADDRESS:
CONTACT NAME:
PO NO:
Permit:
P HON EWAX:
COPY TO:
email:
Sampled By: -C—o owun)rgs SAMPLE TYPE:1= Influent, E = Effluent, W = Well, ST= Stream, SO - Soil, SL =Sludge, Other.
Sample Identification
9 (A���111111
���■o�
�11111111�
temperature when Received
V
Delivered By: , ( 5 Received By: Date: 1S 12S Time:
Comments: TUkA OUND•

Facility
Sampling Date
% Solids
Mineralization Rate
Gallons Per DT
pH
Elizabeth City WWTP
7/10/2023
3.94
0.3
6086.50
7.67
SAR 0.78
SAR Calculation
Value From source
Na 4,970
Ca 111,000
Mg 6,270
Field Loading Estimate
<5.0 Safe 5.0 - 10.0 Careful Management >15.0 Do Not Land Apply
Meq/L
8.513826087
218.67
20.5865
I Nitrogen Application Nutrient Application
TKN (mg/Kg)
42,300
lbs./1000 gal 13.916
(mg/Kg)
(lbs./1000 gal)
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/Kg)
2.54
lbs./1000 gal 0.001
Potassium
6,040.000
1.9871
Nitrate -Nitrite (mg/Kg)
9.00
lbs./1000 gal 0.003
Phosphorus
19,300
6.3495
Calcium
111,000
36.5179
Plant Available Nitrogen Surface Applied
Magnesium
6270
2.0628
PAN (mg/Kg) 12699.508
(lbs./1000 gal)
4.178
Molybdenum
13.600
0.0045
Chromium
18.600
0.0061
Plant Available Nitrogen Injected/Incorporated Applied
PAN (mg/Kg) 12700.778 (lbs./1000 gal) 4.178
Volatilization Rate= .5 Surface Application
1.0 In ection /Incorporation
EPA Metal
Limits
Class A Ceiling
Class B Ceiling
Limits (mg/Kg)
Limits (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Concentration (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Loading (lbs./1000
Arsenic
24.4
Arsenic
0.0080
41
75
39
85
Cadmium
13.60
Cadmium
0.0045
1,500
4,300
Copper
252
Copper
0.0829
300
840
Lead
26.1
Lead
0.0086
17
57
Mercury
0.723
Mercury
0.0002
420
420
Nickel
13.6
Nickel
0.0045
100
100
Selenium
13.6
Selenium
0.0045
2,800
7,500
Zinc
1020
Zinc
0.3356
Residual Nitrogen Calculation
Remaing
PAN
Remaing
PAN (S)
Subsurface
TKN
Surface (S)
Organic N
TKN
(INJ)
Organic N
lbs/DT
(INJ)
(S)
lbs/DT
(INJ)
1 st Year
42300
12700
25.40
29600
42300
12701
25.40
29599
2nd Year
29600
4440
8.88
25160
29599
4440
8.88
25159
3rd Year
25160
1887
3.77
23273
25159
1887
3.77
23272
4th Year
23273
873
1.75
22401
23272
873
1.75
22400
5th Year
22401
420
0.84
21981
22400
420
0.84
21980
Total
20319
40.64
Total
20320
40.64
Equations
1st Yr. PAN (mg/hg)=(b1R x (TKN-NH3))+(VR x NH3)+NOx
2nd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 2nd Yr. TKN x (b7R/2)
3rd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 3rd Yr. TKN x (b7R/4)
4di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 4di Yr. TKN x (b7R/8)
5di Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 5di Yr. TKN x (b7R/16)

ro""07 Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 ' 910.392.0223 Lab ' 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 ' 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
M 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 ' 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS [e-mail]
Atlantic Sewage
Date of Report: Aug 23, 2023
PO Box 2560
Customer PO #:
Kitty Hawk NC 27949
Customer ID: 19120002
Attention:
Report #: 2023-14432
Project ID: Elizabeth City WWTP
Lab ID Sample ID:
Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
23-35886 Site: Sludge
7/10/2023
12:35 PM Solid/Sludge Stephen Cummings
Test
Method
Results Date Analyzed
Sludge Residuals
Aluminum
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
9620 mg/kg
08/01/2023
Arsenic
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
24.4 mg/kg
08/16/2023
Cadmium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<13.6 mg/kg
08/01/2023
Calcium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
111000 mg/kg
08/01/2023
Chromium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
18.6 mg/kg
08/01/2023
Copper
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
252 mg/kg
08/01/2023
Lead
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
26.1 mg/kg
08/01/2023
Magnesium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
6270 mg/kg
08/01/2023
Molybdenum
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<13.6 mg/kg
08/01/2023
Nickel
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
<13.6 mg/kg
08/01/2023
Potassium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
6040 mg/kg
08/01/2023
Selenium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
<13.6 mg/kg
08/01/2023
Sodium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
4970 mg/kg
08/16/2023
Zinc
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994
1020 mg/kg
08/01/2023
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
EPA 353.2
9.00 mg/kg
07/18/2023
Total Solids (%)
SM 2540 B
3.94 %
07/14/2023
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 C-2011
<2.54 mg/kg
07/18/2023
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
SM 4500 Norg B-2011
42300 mg/kg
07/19/2023
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011
19300 mg/kg
07/25/2023
pH
SW 846 Method 9045D
7.67 units
07/21/2023
Result estimated. Analyzed out of 15 minutes hold time.
Mercury SW-846 7471 B 0.723 mg/kg 07/31/2023
Comment: Results, except pH, reported on a dry weight basis. pH reported on an as received basis.
Reviewed by:
Report #:. 2023-14432 Page 1 of 1

environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
Sample Receipt Checklist
6602 Windmill Wa
Wilmington, NC 2840
910-392.022
Client: � CLL-- Bate: '
w�' �13ReportNumber:
Receipt of sample: E HEM Pp icku ❑
❑ YES ❑ NO Clieni Delivery ❑ UPS FedEx ❑-`
N/A 1. Were custod seal Other ❑
0
0
0
0
n
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
❑ YES
Original temperature
❑ NO
upon
Y s present on the cooler?
N/A 2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
receipt
C
How temperature taken: _
p Blank Corrected temperature upon receipt
IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N❑210886869ture
Against Bottles
YES IR Gun Correction Factor °C:
YES
❑ NO
❑ NO
3p 0.0
. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
4. Were proper custody
YES
❑ NO
procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
5. Were sam on the
sample IDs listed
YES
YES
❑ NO
❑
COC?
6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
YES
NO
❑ NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
YES
❑ NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
YES
❑ NO
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
10. Did samples arrive in
YES
f
❑ NO
good condition for each test?
11. Was adequate sample volume available?'
YES
YES
❑ NO
❑ NO
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested 7
13. q tests.
YES
❑ NO
Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? *
14. Were cyanide samples
YES
❑ NO
received at a pH >12?
15. Were sulfide samples received
YES
❑ NO
at a pH >9?
16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol
YES
YES
❑ NO
received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? **
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine
❑ NO
residual of <0.5 m/L?
18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in" - field within 15 minutes?
sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly
y preserved or with headspace)
were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
by adding (circle one): H2SO4 HNO3 HCI
Time of preservation: NaOH
If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time:
Volatiles Samples)
were received with headspace
COMMENTS:
DOC. QA.002 Rev 1
°Ci

Way Wilmington, NC
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC OFFI EI::9403 2-0223FAX[phone]
n f NCDENR: DWQ CERTIFICATION # 94 NCDHHS: DLS CERTIFICATION *37729 Info@emiironmentatchemists,com
Analytical & Consulting Chemists
COLLECTION AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Client: Atlantic Sewa e
ROJECTNAME: 81, !
REPORT NO:
ADDRESS:
CONTACT NAME:
PO NO:
Permit:
PHONEIFAX:
COPY TO:
email:
Sampled By:_ r1 mrr+► SAMPLE TYPE:.I = Influent, E = Effluent, W = Well, ST = Stream, SO = Soil, SL = Sludge, Other:
Sample Identification
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
M-IMM
�iio��■iiiiiin�
Temperature when Received
Delivered
0MJ t Accepted: I t R Jected: l „__Resample Requested:
Received By: Date: 23 Time:
TURNAROUND:

Facility
Sampling Date
% Solids
Mineralization Rate
Gallons Per DT
PH
SAR 0.74
SAR Calculation
Value From source
Elizabeth City W W fP
11/6/2023
2.39
0.3
10033.81
8.46
Nn 6,150
Ca 115,000
Mg 5,980.0
Field Loading Estimate
<5.0 Safe 5.0 - 10.0 Careful Management >15.0 Do Not Land Apply
Meq/L
6.390652174
137.425
11.91016667
I Nitrogen Application
Nutrient Application
TKN (mg/Kg) 45,100
lbs./1000 gal 9.000
(mg/Kg)
(lbs./1000 gal)
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/Kg) 16,500.00
lbs./1000 gal 3.293
Potassium
10,500
2.0954
Nitrate -Nitrite (mg/Kg) 13.00
lbs./1000 gal 0.003
Phosphorus
23,400
4.6698
Calcium
115,000
22.9500
Plant Available Nitrogen Surface Applied
Magnesium
5980
1.1934
PAN (mg/Kg) 16843 (lbs./1000 gal)
3.361
Molybdenum
9.08
0.0018
Chromium
24.2
0.0048
Plant Available Nitrogen Injected/Incorporated Applied
PAN (mg/Kg) 25093 (lbs./1000 gal) 5.008
Volatilization Rate- .5 Surface Application
1.0 Injection /Incorporation
EPA Metal Limits
Class A Ceiling
Limits (mg/Kg)
41
Class B Ceiling
Limits (mg/Kg)
75
Heavy Metal Concentration (mg/Kg)
Heavy Metal Loading (lbs./l
Arsenic 10.2 Arsenic 0.0020
39
85
Cadmium
9.08
Cadmium
0.0018
1,500
4,300
Copper
281
Copper
0.0561
300
840
Lead
23.1
Lead
0.0046
17
57
Mercury
0.782
Mercury
0.0002
420
420
Nickel
12.8
Nickel
0.0026
100
100
Selenium
9.1
Selenium
0.0018
2,800
7,500
Zinc
983
Zinc
0.1962
Residual Nitrogen Calculation
Remaing
Remaing
PAN (S)
Subsurface
PAN (INJ)
TKN
Surface (S)
Organic N
TKN
Organic N
lbs/DT
(INJ)
lbs/DT
(S)
(INJ)
1st Year
45100
16843
33.69
28257
45100
25093
50.19
20007
2nd Year
28257
4239
8.48
24018
20007
3001
6.00
17006
3rd Year
24018
1801
3.60
22217
17006
1275
2.55
15731
4th Year
22217
833
1.67
21384
15731
590
1.18
15141
5th Year
21384
401
0.80
20983
15141
284
0.57
14857
Total
24117
48.23
Total
30243
60.49
Equations
1st Yr. PAN (mg/Kg)=(MR x (TKN -NH3))+(VR x NH3)+NOx
2nd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 2nd Yr. TKN x (MR/2)
Rd Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 3rd Yr. TKN x (MR/4)
4th Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 4th Yr. TKN x (MR/8)
5th Yr PAN (mg/Kg)- 5th Yr. TKN x (MR/ 16)

:envirochem]
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 29405 - 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax
710 6owsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab.- Fax
infofa envrronmentalchemists.com
Atlantic Sewage
Date of Report: Dec 12, 2023
PO Box 2560
Customer PO #:
Kitty Hawk NC 27949
Customer ID: 19120002
Attention:
Report #: 2023-26056
Project ID: Elizabeth City WWTP
Lab ID Sample ID:
Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
23-63056 Site: Sludge
11/6/2023
12:05 PM Solid/Sludge Stephen Cummings
Test
Method
Results Date Analyzed
Sludge Residuals
Aluminum
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
7620 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Arsenic
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
10.2 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Cadmium
EPA 200.7. Rev. 4.4, 1994
<9.08 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Calcium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
115000 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Chromium
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
24.2 mglkg
11/21/2023
Copper
EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994
281 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Lead
EPA 20C.7. Rev 4 4. 19 94
23.1 mg/kg
11121 /2023
Magnesium
EPA 200.7. Rev 4.4.1994
5980 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Molybdenum
EPA 20G.7, Rev 4 4.1994
<9.08 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Nickel
EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994
12.8 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Potassium
EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994
10500 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Selenium
EPA 200.7, Rev 4 4, 1994
<9.08 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Sodium
EPA 200.7, Rev 4 4, 1994
6150 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Zinc
EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994
983 mg/kg
11/21/2023
Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen
EPA353.2
13.0mg/kg
11/13/2023
Total Solids°t,)
SM2540B
2.39%
11/09/2023
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 C-2011
16500 mg/kg
11 /10/2023
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
SM 4500 Norg B-2011
45100 mg/kg
11/10/2023
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P (F H) 2011
23400 mg/kg
11/13/2023
pH
SW e46 Method 9045D
8.46 units
11/28/2023
Result estimated. Analyzed out of 15 minutes hold time.
Mercury
SW-U67471 B
<0.782 mg/kg
11/14/2023
Comment: *Sludge residual results,
except pH, reported on a dry weight basis. pH reported on an as received
basis.
Reviewed by:
Report #: 2023-26056 Page 1 of 1

Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: -1 i V�� �{ Date
Receipt of sample: ECHEM Pickup ❑
❑ YES ❑ NO 21 N/A 1.
❑ YES 10 NO x❑ N/A 12.
Original temperature upon receipt {
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
910,392.0223
I 7 12---; Report Number: _ 2023- ZZ(o D56
Client Delivery ❑
FedEx ❑ Other ❑
Were custody seals present on the cooler?
If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
°C Corrected temperature upon receipt __
How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank ❑x Against Bottles
I Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 210886869 IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0
x❑
YES
❑
NO
3. If temperature of cooler exceeded &C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
❑O
YES
❑
NO
4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
Ox
YES
❑
NO
S. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
❑x
YES
❑
NO
6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
❑x
YES
❑
NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COU
OO
YES
❑
NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
❑x
YES
❑
NO
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
YES
❑
NO
10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
x❑
YES
❑
NO
11. Was adequate sample volume availableT
❑x
YES
❑
NO
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
❑
YES
❑
NO
13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2?
❑
YES
❑
NO
14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
❑
YES
❑
NO
15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
❑
YES
❑
NO
16, Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? **
❑
YES
❑
NO
17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L?
❑
YES
❑
NO
jig.
Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Sample Preservation:
Sample(s)
by adding (circle one);
(Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
H2SO4 HNO3 HCI NaOH
Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time:
latiles Sample(s)
COMMENTS:
were received with he
DOC. CW.002 Rev 1
"C

mill Way
4=0 ton
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC OF CE:910-392-02231FAXg910392-4424$
AnalyticalB.Consulting Chemists
NCDENR: DWQ CERTIFICATION / 94 NCDHHS: DL.S CERTIFICATION # 37729 [e-mail]
COLLECTION AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Client: Atlantic Sewage
PROJECT NAME:
REPORT NO: lc
ADDRESS:
CONTACT NAME:
I
PO NO:
permit:
PHONElFAX•
COPY TO:
email:
Sampled By: (\ Cu M+`ti i rr.("5 SAMPLE TYPE: I = Influent, E = Effluent, W = Well, ST =Stream, SO o Soil, SL =Sludge, Other.
Sample Idendfication
tollection
�
-
��■■�111111�
ReMquished By,
VAR
Temperature when Received °C:
Delivered By:
Comments:
-/ ` I Reje ted: Resample
ved By:-. _ V-i -0
TU
nested:
L--.�_Tlme: 1 2)rp c

City of Elizabeth City
2023 Class B Annual Report
WQ0002883
Land Application Field Summary Forms
WB-4
WB-5

Annual Land Application Field Summary Form
Permit Numner WQ0002883 Site# WB County Pasquotank Crop 1 Wheat (Grain) Crop
Facility Name City of Elizabeth City Field Name 4 Soil Series Roper Crop 1 PAN 119 Crop 2 PAN
Land Owner W.B. Bateman Acres Permitted 75.87 Soil Abbreviation RoA
Date
Measurement
Volume
Applied
%Solids
Acres
Used
DT/Ac.
Dry Tons
Source
Soil
Condition
Precip.
Application
Method
P (lbs/1000
g(
TotalP
Volatilization
Mineralization
TKN
Ammonia
Nitrate-
Nitrite
Crop 1 Pan Crop 2 Pan
(Ibs/Ac) (Ibs/Ac)
Crop
1/3/2023
Gallons
35000
1.41%
75.87
0.027
2.058
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.040
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.04093
Crop 1
1/4/2023
Gallons
42000
1.41%
75.87
0.033
2.469
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.048
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.04912
Crop 1
1/5/2023
Gallons
21000
1.41%
75.87
0.016
1.235
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.024
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.02456
Crop 1
1/6/2023
Gallons
21000
1.41%
75.87
0.016
1.235
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.024
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.02456
Crop 1
1/9/2023
Gallons
35000
1.41%
75.87
0.027
2.058
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.040
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.04093
Crop 1
1/10/2023
Gallons
35000
1.41%
75.87
0.027
2.058
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.040
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.04093
Crop 1
1/11/2023
Gallons
35000
1.41%
75.87
0.027
2.058
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.040
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.04093
Crop 1
1/12/2023
Gallons
28000
1.41%
75.87
0.022
1.646
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.032
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.03274
Crop 1
1/13/2023
Gallons
28000
1.41%
75.87
0.022
1.646
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.032
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.03274
Crop 1
1/16/2023
Gallons
42000
1.41%
75.87
0.033
2.469
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.048
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.04912
Crop 1
1/17/2023
Gallons
28000
1.41%
75.87
0.022
1.646
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.032
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.03274
Crop 1
1/18/2023
Gallons
7000
1.41%
75.87
0.005
0.412
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.008
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.00819
Crop 1
1/25/2023
Gallons
35000
1.41%
75.87
0.027
2.058
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.040
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.04093
Crop 1
2/6/2023
Gallons
42000
4.16%
75.87
0.096
7.286
Elizabeth City WWTP
Moist
0
Surface
5.1760
2.865
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
2.18634
Crop 1
2/7/2023
Gallons
28000
4.16%
75.87
0.064
4.857
Elizabeth City WWTP
Moist
0
Surface
5.1760
1.910
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
1.45756
Crop 1
2/8/2023
Gallons
35000
4.16%
75.87
0.080
6.072
Elizabeth City WWTP
Moist
0
Surface
5.1760
2.388
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
1.82195
Crop 1
2/9/2023
Gallons
42000
4.16%
75.87
0.096
7.286
Elizabeth City WWTP
Moist
0
Surface
5.1760
2.865
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
2.18634
Crop 1
2/14/2023
Gallons
42000
4.16%
75.87
0.096
7.286
Elizabeth City WWTP
Moist
0
Surface
5.1760
2.865
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
2.18634
Crop 1
2/15/2023
Gallons
35000
4.16%
75.87
0.080
6.072
Elizabeth City WWTP
Moist
0
Surface
5.1760
2.388
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
1.82195
Crop 1
2/16/2023
Gallons
42000
4.16%
75.87
0.096
7.286
Elizabeth City WWTP
Moist
0
Surface
5.1760
2.865
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
2.18634
Crop 1
2/17/2023
Gallons
14000
4.16%
75.87
0.032
2.429
Elizabeth City WWTP
Moist
0
Surface
5.1760
0.955
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
0.72878
Crop 1
3/7/2023
Gallons
21000
4.16%
75.87
0.048
3.643
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
1.433
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
1.09317
Crop 1
3/9/2023
Gallons
42000
4.16%
75.87
0.096
7.286
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
2.865
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
2.18634
Crop 1
3/10/2023
Gallons
21000
4.16%
75.87
0.048
3.643
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
1.433
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
1.09317
Crop 1
3/14/2023
Gallons
7000
4.16%
75.87
0.016
1.214
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
0.478
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
0.36439
Crop 1
3/15/2023
Gallons
35000
4.16%
75.87
0.080
6.072
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
2.388
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
1.82195
Crop 1
3/15/2023
Gallons
28000
9.83%
75.87
0.151
11.478
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.3135
0.116
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00385
Crop 1
3/16/2023
Gallons
28000
4.16%
75.87
0.064
4.857
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
1.910
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
1.45756
Crop 1
3/16/2023
Gallons
28000
9.83%
75.87
0.151
11.478
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.3135
0.116
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00385
Crop 1
3/17/2023
Gallons
35000
4.16%
75.87
0.080
6.072
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
2.388
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
1.82195
Crop 1
3/17/2023
Gallons
35000
9.83%
75.87
0.189
14.347
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.3135
0.145
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00481
Crop 1
3/20/2023
Gallons
35000
9.83%
75.87
0.189
14.347
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.3135
0.145
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00481
Crop 1
3/21/2023
Gallons
35000
9.83%
75.87
0.189
14.347
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.3135
0.145
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00481
Crop 1
3/22/2023
Gallons
35000
9.83%
75.87
0.189
14.347
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.3135
0.145
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00481
Crop 1
3/27/2023
Gallons
7000
4.16%
75.87
0.016
1.214
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
0.478
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
0.36439
Crop 1
3/31/2023
Gallons
28000
4.16%
75.87
0.064
4.857
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
1.910
0.5
0.3
37,400
655
32.6
1.45756
Crop 1
11/6/2023
Gallons
35000
4.85%
76.87
0.092
7.079
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
2.357
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00234
Crop 1
11/7/2023
Gallons
21000
4.85%
77.87
0.055
4.247
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
1.396
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00139
Crop 1
11/8/2023
Gallons
28000
4.85%
78.87
0.072
5.663
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
1.838
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00183
Crop 1
11/20/2023
Gallons
28000
4.85%
78.87
0.072
5.663
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
1.838
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00183
Crop 1
11/21/2023
Gallons
28000
4.85%
78.87
0.072
5.663
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
1.838
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00183
Crop 1
11/27/2023
Gallons
35000
4.85%
78.87
0.090
7.079
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
2.297
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00228
Crop 1
11/28/2023
Gallons
28000
4.85%
78.87
0.072
5.663
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
1.838
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00183
Crop 1
11/30/2023
Gallons
7000
4.85%
78.87
0.018
1.416
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
0.459
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00046
Crop 1
Total Volume Applied
1302000
Total Dry Tons
233.292
Sum Total P 49.505
Crop 1
26.735 0.000
Crop 2
Reported
in Gallons
Total
Total
Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
PAN
PAN
Current Year
0.111
0.069
0.490
0.071
0.069
0.002
0.069
0.069
0.069
1.831
Prior Year
0.139
0.089
7.066
0.377
0.934
0.015
0.26
0.295
0.201
16.307
Cumulative Total
0.2496
0.1578
7.5559
0.4484
1.0028
0.0173
0.3288
0.3638
0.2698
18.1376
Permitted CPLR
36
34
1338
267
15
374
89
2498
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information
submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
��W/ 2/23/2024
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation -1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested
-0.2, aerobically digested-0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate

Annual Land Application Field Summary Form
Permit Numner WQ0002883 Site# WB County Pasquotank Crop Wheat (grain) Crop
Facility Name City of Elizabeth City Field Name 5 Sal Series Wasda-Conaby Complex Crop 1 PAN 119 Crop 2 PAN
Land Owner W.B. Bateman Acres Permitted 160.43 Soil Abbreviation WcA
Date
Measurement
Volume
Applied
%Solids
Acres
Used
DT/Ac.
DryTons
Source
Soil
Condition
Prenp.
Application
Method
P(Ibs/3000 g)
TotalP
Volatilization
Mineralization
TKN
Ammonia
Nitrate-
Nitrite
Crop 1 Pan
(Ibs/Ac)
Crop 2 Pan
(Ibs/Ac)
Crop
2/7/2023
Gallons
35000
1.41%
160.43
0.013
2.058
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.019
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.01936
Crop 1
2/8/2023
Gallons
42000
1.41%
160.43
0.015
2.469
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.023
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.02323
Crop 1
2/9/2023
Gallons
42000
1.41%
160.43
0.015
2.469
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.023
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.02323
Crop 1
2/14/2023
Gallons
42000
1.41%
160.43
0.015
2.469
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.023
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.02323
Crop 1
2/15/2023
Gallons
35000
1.41%
160.43
0.013
2.058
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.019
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.01936
Crop 1
2/16/2023
Gallons
42000
1.41%
160.43
0.015
2.469
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.023
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.02323
Crop 1
2/17/2023
Gallons
28000
1.41%
160.43
0.010
1.646
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.015
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.01549
Crop 1
2/20/2023
Gallons
28000
1.41%
160.43
0.010
1.646
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.015
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.01549
Crop 1
2/21/2023
Gallons
28000
1.41%
160.43
0.010
1.646
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.015
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.01549
Crop 1
2/22/2023
Gallons
28000
1.41%
160.43
0.010
1.646
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.015
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.01549
Crop 1
2/23/2023
Gallons
24000
1.41%
160.43
0.009
1.411
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.013
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.01327
Crop 1
2/28/2023
Gallons
14000
1.41%
160.43
0.005
0.823
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0875
0.008
0.5
0
1,450
1430
39.5
0.00774
Crop 1
3/6/2023
Gallons
42000
9.83%
160.43
0.107
17.216
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.3135
0.082
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00273
Crop 1
3/7/2023
Gallons
14000
9.83%
160.43
0.036
5.739
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.3135
0.027
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00091
Crop 1
3/8/2023
Gallons
21000
9.83%
160.43
0.054
8.608
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.3135
0.041
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00136
Crop 1
3/9/2023
Gallons
42000
9.83%
160.43
0.107
17.216
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.3135
0.082
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00273
Crop 1
3/10/2023
Gallons
35000
9.83%
160.43
0.089
14.347
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.3135
0.068
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00227
Crop 1
3/23/2023
Gallons
21000
9.83%
160.43
0.054
8.608
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
1.3135
0.172
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00136
Crop 1
3/27/2023
Gallons
7000
9.83%
160.43
0.018
2.869
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
2.3135
0.101
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00045
Crop 1
3/28/2023
Gallons
7000
9.83%
160.43
0.018
2.869
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
3.3135
0.145
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00045
Crop 1
3/31/2023
Gallons
35000
9.83%
160.43
0.089
14.347
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
1.129
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00227
Crop 1
4/3/2023
Gallons
35000
3.17%
160.43
0.029
4.627
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.6909
1.242
0.5
0.3
38,700
3550
7.08
0.71100
Crop 1
4/3/2023
Gallons
35000
9.83%
160.43
0.089
14.347
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
1.129
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00227
Crop 1
4/4/2023
Gallons
42000
9.83%
160.43
0.107
17.216
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
1.355
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00273
Crop 1
4/5/2023
Gallons
7000
9.83%
160.43
0.018
2.869
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
0.226
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00045
Crop 1
4/5/2023
Gallons
56000
3.17%
160.43
0.046
7.403
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.6909
1.986
0.5
0.3
38,700
3550
7.08
1.13760
Crop 1
4/6/2023
Gallons
63000
3.17%
160.43
0.052
8.328
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.6909
2.235
0.5
0.3
38,700
3550
7.08
1.27980
Crop 1
4/7/2023
Gallons
63000
3.17%
160.43
0.052
8.328
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.6909
2.235
0.5
0.3
38,700
3550
7.08
1.27980
Crop 1
4/10/2023
Gallons
7000
3.17%
160.43
0.006
0.925
Elizabeth City WWTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.6909
0.248
0.5
0.3
38,700
3550
7.08
0.14220
Crop 1
4/10/2023
Gallons
42000
9.83%
160.43
0.107
17.216
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.1760
1.355
0.5
0
1,090
1.02
12.2
0.00273
Crop 1
11/13/2023
Gallons
35000
4.85%
160.43
0.044
7.079
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
0.0607
0.013
0.5
0
494
435
17.2
0.02071
Crop 1
11/14/2023
Gallons
28000
4.85%
160.43
0.035
5.663
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
1.0607
0.185
0.5
0
494
435
17.2
0.01657
Crop 1
11/15/2023
Gallons
28000
4.85%
160.43
0.035
5.663
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
2.0607
0.360
0.5
0
494
435
17.2
0.01657
Crop 1
11/16/2023
Gallons
28000
4.85%
160.43
0.035
5.663
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
3.0607
0.534
0.5
0
494
435
17.2
0.01657
Crop 1
11/17/2023
Gallons
28000
4.85%
160.43
0.035
5.663
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
4.0607
0.709
0.5
0
494
435
17.2
0.01657
Crop 1
12/4/2023
Gallons
28000
4.85%
160.43
0.035
5.663
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
5.0607
0.883
0.5
0
494
435
17.2
0.01657
Crop 1
12/5/2023
Gallons
21000
4.85%
160.43
0.026
4.247
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
6.0607
0.793
0.5
0
494
435
17.2
0.01243
Crop 1
12/6/2023
Gallons
56000
4.85%
160.43
0.071
11.326
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
7.0607
2.465
0.5
0
494
435
17.2
0.03314
Crop 1
12/7/2023
Gallons
14000
4.85%
160.43
0.018
2.831
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
8.0607
0.703
0.5
0
494
435
17.2
0.00828
Crop 1
12/8/2023
Gallons
28000
4.85%
160.43
0.035
5.663
Elizabeth City WTP
Dry
0
Surface
9.0607
1.581
0.5
0
494
435
17.2
0.01657
Crop 1
Total Volume Applied Reported 1256000
Total Dry Tons
255.352
Sum Total
22.297
Crop l Total
4.962
0.000
in Gallons
PAN
Crop 2Total
PAN (Ibs./Ac.)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
(Ibs./Ac.)
Current Year
0.043
0.037
0.099
0.037
0.037
0.001
0.037
0.037
0.037
0.334
Prior Year
0.139
0.089
7.066
0.377
0.934
0.015
0.26
0.295
0.201
16.307
Cumulative Total
0.1815
0.1264
7.1653
0.4144
0.9714
0.0159
0.2974
0.3324
0.2394
16.6406
Permitted CPLR
36
34
1338
267
15
374
89
2498
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information
submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
2/23/2024
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatihzation Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation -1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested
-0.2, aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate

City of Elizabeth City
2023 Class B Annual Report
WQ0002883
Pathogen & Vector Reduction Forms
Elizabeth City WWTP - Lime
Stabilization Sheets

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM (02T Rules)
Facility Name: Atlantic OBX, INC. WQ Permit Number: WQ0000974
WWTP Name: Elizabeth City WWTP
NPDES Number: NCO025011
Monitoring Period: From l/l/2023 To 3/31/2023
Pathogen Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1106) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed:
Class A:
Alt. A (time/temp) ❑
I Alt B (Alk Treatment) ❑
I Alt. C (Prior Testing) ❑
Alt.D (No Prior Test) ❑
I Process to Further Reduce Pathogengs ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost ❑
Heat Drying ❑
Heat Treatment ❑
Thermophilic ❑
Beta Ray ❑
I Gamma Ray ❑
Pasteurization ❑
Class B:
jAlt. (1) Fecal Density ❑
I Alt. (2) Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens p
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization 0
Air Drying ❑
Composting ❑
jAerobic Digestion ❑
Anaerobic Digestion ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Parameter
Allowable Level
in Sludge
Pathogen Density
g �
Number o
Excee-
dences
Frequency
of Analysis
Sample
Type
Analytical
Tech -
ni ue
Minimu
Geo. Mean
Maximu
Units
Fecal Coliform
2 x 10 to the
6th power
per gram of
total solids
MPN
CFU
1000 mpn per gram
of total solid (dry
weight)
Salmonella bacteria
(in lieu of fecal
coliform)
3 MPN per 4 grams
total solid (dry
weight)
Vector Attraction Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1107) - Please indicate alternative performed:
Alt.1 (VS reduction)
❑
Alt. 2 (40-day bench)
❑
Alt. 3 (30-day bench) ❑
Alt. 4 (Spec. Oz uptake)
❑
Alt. 5 (14-Day Aerobic)
❑
Alt. 6 (Alk. Stabilization❑
Alt 7 (Drying - Stable) ❑
I Alt. 8 (Drying - Unstable)
❑
Alt. 9 (Injection)
❑
Alt. 10 (Incorporation)
❑
No vector attraction reduction alternatives were performed
❑
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
0 "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have been met."
❑ "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have not been met." (Please note if
you check this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the
requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system
designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
Stephen Cummings, Site Manager Bryan O. Lincoln, President
Preparer Name and Title (type or print) Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
12/31/2023 12/31/2023
Signature of Preparer* Date Signature of Land Applier (if applicable) Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM PVRF 02T (12/2006)

CERTIFICATION
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40CFR §503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirements in 40CFR §503.33 have been
met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification, including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment."
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
12/31/2023
Date

CERTIFICATION
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40CFR §503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirements in 40CFR §503.33 have been
met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification, including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment."
L��Zz��7
12/31/2023
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) Date

-bili-i-
MENEM==
MEMEmmEMMEMEMEME
CERTIFICATION
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40CFR §503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirements in 40CFR §503.33 have been
met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification, including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment."
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
12/31/2023
Date

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM (02T Rules)
Facility Name: Atlantic OBX, INC. WQ Permit Number: WQ0000974
WWTP Name: Elizabeth City WWTP
NPDES Number: NCO025011
Monitoring Period: From 4/l/2023 To 6/31/2023
Pathogen Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1106) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed:
Class A:
Alt. A (time/temp) ❑
I Alt B (Alk Treatment) ❑
I Alt. C (Prior Testing) ❑
Alt.D (No Prior Test) ❑
I Process to Further Reduce Pathogengs ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost ❑
Heat Drying ❑
Heat Treatment ❑
Thermophilic ❑
Beta Ray ❑
I Gamma Ray ❑
Pasteurization ❑
Class B:
jAlt. (1) Fecal Density ❑
I Alt. (2) Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens p
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization 0
Air Drying ❑
Composting ❑
jAerobic Digestion ❑
Anaerobic Digestion ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Parameter
Allowable Level
in Sludge
Pathogen Density
g �
Number o
Excee-
dences
Frequency
of Analysis
Sample
Type
Analytical
Tech -
ni ue
Minimu
Geo. Mean
Maximu
Units
Fecal Coliform
2 x 10 to the
6th power
per gram of
total solids
MPN
CFU
1000 mpn per gram
of total solid (dry
weight)
Salmonella bacteria
(in lieu of fecal
coliform)
3 MPN per 4 grams
total solid (dry
weight)
Vector Attraction Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1107) - Please indicate alternative performed:
Alt.1 (VS reduction)
❑
Alt. 2 (40-day bench)
❑
Alt. 3 (30-day bench) ❑
Alt. 4 (Spec. Oz uptake)
❑
Alt. 5 (14-Day Aerobic)
❑
Alt. 6 (Alk. Stabilization❑
Alt 7 (Drying - Stable) ❑
I Alt. 8 (Drying - Unstable)
❑
Alt. 9 (Injection)
❑
Alt. 10 (Incorporation)
❑
No vector attraction reduction alternatives were performed
❑
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
0 "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have been met."
❑ "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have not been met." (Please note if
you check this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the
requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system
designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
Stephen Cummings, Site Manager Bryan O. Lincoln, President
Preparer Name and Title (type or print) Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
12/31/2023 12/31/2023
Signature of Preparer* Date Signature of Land Applier (if applicable) Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM PVRF 02T (12/2006)

-bili-i-
MENEM==
MEMEmmENMEMMEEME
CERTIFICATION
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40CFR §503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirements in 40CFR §503.33 have been
met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification, including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment."
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
12/31/2023
Date

City of Elizabeth City W WTP
Monitoring Sheet for Lime Stabilization
Alternative 2 PSRP
Class 8 eiosoli ds
City of Elizabeth City W WTP
Monitoring Sheet for Lime Stabilization
N POES Permit # NCO025011 N—S Permit # NCO025011
Residuals Permit#Wg0002883 _ Residuals Permit#WQ0002883
40 CFR Part 503 Subpart 0 503.30-503.33 40 CFR Part 503 Subpart 0 503.30-503.33
CERTIFICATION
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40CFR §503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirements in 40CFR §503.33 have been
met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification, including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment."
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
12/31/2023
Date

CERTIFICATION
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40CFR §503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirements in 40CFR §503.33 have been
met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification, including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment."
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
12/31/2023
Date

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM (02T Rules)
Facility Name: Atlantic OBX, INC. WQ Permit Number: WQ0000974
WWTP Name: Elizabeth City WWTP
NPDES Number: NCO025011
Monitoring Period: From 7/l/2023 To 9/31/2023
Pathogen Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1106) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed:
Class A:
Alt. A (time/temp) ❑
I Alt B (Alk Treatment) ❑
I Alt. C (Prior Testing) ❑
Alt.D (No Prior Test) ❑
I Process to Further Reduce Pathogengs ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost ❑
Heat Drying ❑
Heat Treatment ❑
Thermophilic ❑
Beta Ray ❑
I Gamma Ray ❑
Pasteurization ❑
Class B:
jAlt. (1) Fecal Density ❑
I Alt. (2) Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens p
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization 0
Air Drying ❑
Composting ❑
jAerobic Digestion ❑
Anaerobic Digestion ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Parameter
Allowable Level
in Sludge
Pathogen Density
g �
Number o
Excee-
dences
Frequency
of Analysis
Sample
Type
Analytical
Tech -
ni ue
Minimu
Geo. Mean
Maximu
Units
Fecal Coliform
2 x 10 to the
6th power
per gram of
total solids
MPN
CFU
1000 mpn per gram
of total solid (dry
weight)
Salmonella bacteria
(in lieu of fecal
coliform)
3 MPN per 4 grams
total solid (dry
weight)
Vector Attraction Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1107) - Please indicate alternative performed:
Alt.1 (VS reduction)
❑
Alt. 2 (40-day bench)
❑
Alt. 3 (30-day bench) ❑
Alt. 4 (Spec. Oz uptake)
❑
Alt. 5 (14-Day Aerobic)
❑
Alt. 6 (Alk. Stabilization❑
Alt 7 (Drying - Stable) ❑
I Alt. 8 (Drying - Unstable)
❑
Alt. 9 (Injection)
❑
Alt. 10 (Incorporation)
❑
No vector attraction reduction alternatives were performed
❑
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
0 "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have been met."
❑ "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have not been met." (Please note if
you check this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the
requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system
designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
Stephen Cummings, Site Manager Bryan O. Lincoln, President
Preparer Name and Title (type or print) Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
Y✓ 12/31/2023 12/31/2023
Signature of Preparer* Date Signature of Land Applier (if applicable) Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM PVRF 02T (12/2006)

a
CERTIFICATION
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40CFR §503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirements in 40CFR §503.33 have been
met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification, including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment."
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
12/31/2023
Date

City of Elizabeth City W WTP
Monitoring Sheet for Lime Stabilization
Alternative 2 PSRP
Class 8 eiosoli ds
a/t
City f Elizabeth City W WTP
Monitoring Sheet for Lime Stabilization
NPOES Permit # NCO025011 NPOES Permit # NCO025011
Residuals Permit#W00002993 _ Residuals Permit#WQ0002993
40 CFR Part 503 Subpart 0 503.30-503.33 40 CFR Part 503 Subpart 0 503.30-503.33
o
©
.
CERTIFICATION
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40CFR §503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirements in 40CFR §503.33 have been
met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification, including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment."
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
12/31/2023
Date

City of Elizabeth City W WTP
Monitoring Sheet for Lime Stabilization
Alternative 2 PSRP
Class 8 eiosoli ds
9/t />n» 'In 'In,
City of Elizabeth City W WTP
Monitoring Sheet for Lime Stabilization
N PDES Permit # NC0025011 NP DES Permit # NCO025011
Residuals Permit#W00002993 _ —id ua is Pe -it #Wqo 002993
40 CFR Part 503 Subpart D 503.30-503.33 40 CFR Part 503 Subpart D 503.30-503.33
CERTIFICATION
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40CFR §503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirements in 40CFR §503.33 have been
met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification, including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment."
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
12/31/2023
Date

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM (02T Rules)
Facility Name: Atlantic OBX, INC. WQ Permit Number: WQ0000974
WWTP Name: Elizabeth City WWTP
NPDES Number: NCO025011
Monitoring Period: From 10/1/2023 To 12/31/2023
Pathogen Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1106) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed:
Class A:
Alt. A (time/temp) ❑
I Alt B (Alk Treatment) ❑
I Alt. C (Prior Testing) ❑
Alt.D (No Prior Test) ❑
I Process to Further Reduce Pathogengs ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost ❑
Heat Drying ❑
Heat Treatment ❑
Thermophilic ❑
Beta Ray ❑
I Gamma Ray ❑
Pasteurization ❑
Class B:
jAlt. (1) Fecal Density ❑
I Alt. (2) Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens p
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization 0
Air Drying ❑
Composting ❑
jAerobic Digestion ❑
Anaerobic Digestion ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Parameter
Allowable Level
in Sludge
Pathogen Density
g �
Number o
Excee-
dences
Frequency
of Analysis
Sample
Type
Analytical
Tech -
ni ue
Minimu
Geo. Mean
Maximu
Units
Fecal Coliform
2 x 10 to the
6th power
per gram of
total solids
MPN
CFU
1000 mpn per gram
of total solid (dry
weight)
Salmonella bacteria
(in lieu of fecal
coliform)
3 MPN per 4 grams
total solid (dry
weight)
Vector Attraction Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1107) - Please indicate alternative performed:
Alt.1 (VS reduction)
❑
Alt. 2 (40-day bench)
❑
Alt. 3 (30-day bench) ❑
Alt. 4 (Spec. Oz uptake)
❑
Alt. 5 (14-Day Aerobic)
❑
Alt. 6 (Alk. Stabilization❑
Alt 7 (Drying - Stable) ❑
I Alt. 8 (Drying - Unstable)
❑
Alt. 9 (Injection)
❑
Alt. 10 (Incorporation)
❑
No vector attraction reduction alternatives were performed
❑
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
0 "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have been met."
❑ "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have not been met." (Please note if
you check this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the
requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system
designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
Stephen Cummings, Site Manager Bryan O. Lincoln, President
Preparer Name and Title (type or print) Land Applier Name an W
Title (if applicable)(type or print)
12/31/2023 12/31/2023
Signature of Preparer* Date Signature of Land Applier (if applicable) Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM PVRF 02T (12/2006)

a
CERTIFICATION
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40CFR §503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirements in 40CFR §503.33 have been
met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification, including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment."
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
12/31/2023
Date

CERTIFICATION
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40CFR §503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirements in 40CFR §503.33 have been
met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification, including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment."
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
12/31/2023
Date

CERTIFICATION
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40CFR §503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirements in 40CFR §503.33 have been
met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification, including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment."
12/31/2023
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) Date

City of Elizabeth City
2023 Class B Annual Report
WQ0002883
Soil Samples

Soil Sample References
WB & Sons Desert Limepile
Soil Samples 27A-33G = Permitted Field WB-4
WB & Sons Desert 400 Acre Block
Soil Samples IA-14B = Permitted Field WB-5

WB Bateman Soil Analysis Average
W B-4
Desert Lime Pile 27-33
N P2O5
K2O Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
120-160 0
20.67 0 0
0
0
0
0
HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac
pH
P-1
K-1
Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I ZN-AI CU-1 Na
7.41 0.63
26.03 86.73 3.45
5.93
140.53
75.00
67.87 17.47 40.20 39.73 42.20 190.07 315.60 43.73 0.19
W B-5
400ac 1-14
N P2O5
K2O
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HM% W/V
CEC
BS%
Ac
pH
P-1
K-1
Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I ZN-AI CU-1 Na
8.72 0.72
25.49
83.79
3.91
5.69
157.07
128.52
68.90 12.40 45.60 59.31 50.21 142.45 236.45 48.29 0.15

Farm 2734
USDA United States
Department of Agriculture Pasquotank County, North Carolina
_
Pasquotank
0' 27
4A_
Desert Limepile
N.C139_T1988
Tract 1988
2019 Program Year
CLU
Acres
HEL
Crop
27
19.36
UHEL
28
13.59
UHEL
29
13.98
UHEL
30
13.76
UHEL
31
113.19
1 UHEL
32
12.61
UHEL
33
13.48
UHEL
34
15.19
UHEL
35
14.78
UHEL
36
14.75
UHEL
37
14.44
UHEL
38
13.5
UHEL
39
14.18
UHEL
40
15.09
UHEL
41
13.1
UHEL
42
13.7
UHEL
43
15.42
UHEL
44
19.29
UHEL
I Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 244.12 acres
Map Created March 18, 2019
Base Image Layer flown in 2018
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
QTract Boundary
Wetland Determination
• Restricted Use
1,100 0 Limited Restrictions
El Exempt from Conservation
Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership; rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data 'as is' and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size, shape, or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services Report No. FY24-SL007343
k5i I"14'4+;4
Client:
WB Bateman
Advisor: Stan Winslow
Predictive
Bateman Farms
Tidewater Agronomics /
°± f'
567 Meadstown Rd
TAG
Soil Report
Mehlich-3 Extraction
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
PO Box 310
1
Soil Testing Section
Sampled: 10/05/2023 Received: 10/10/2023 Completed:
10/20/2023 Farm: Desert limepile
Client ID:
Sampled County : Pasquotank
374077
Camden, NC 27921
Advisor ID: 403314
Sample ID: X
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
0
0 pH$ 0
0 0
Note: 3 Note: $
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N i
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All n-�?n Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
3.10 0.86 60.1 100 7.6
199 157 88 11
92 73
37 110
0.2 0
Sample ID: HL27
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
0
0 0 pH$ 0
0 0
Note: 3 Note: $
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class: Mineral -Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
3.77 0.87 26.6 97 0.9 7.0
273 153 76 18
43 50
31 123 154
69 0.2 1
North Carolina
Tcbwiv Truk f and Ctwinlsskm
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL007343
WB Bateman
of 14
Sample ID: HL
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (Ib/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
M����h�
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 Corn, grain 0.0 120 - 160 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in
Soil Class:
Mineral -Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH (-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na
SS-1 NO3-N
4.69 0.88 23.4
92 6.5 291 149 71 18
57
46
37
142
178
�11ESP
77
1
Sample ID: 27A
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain 0.0 120 - 160 0
20
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.21 0.63 24.4
89 2.7 6.1 164 64 71 17
35
25
30
190
315
40 0.2
1
Sample ID: 27RB
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain 0.0 120 - 160 0
40
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.96 0.57 28.1
88 3.4 5.9 105 53 68 20
36
44
44
150
249
32 0.2
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL007343
WB Bateman
Page 3 of 14
Sample ID: 27LB
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
50
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.54 0.55 26.3
87 3.5 5.9
136 45 68 18
37
41
44
260
432
42 0.2
1
Sample ID: 28D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
20
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
6.78 0.73 21.6
86 3.1 5.9
112 64 66 18
44
38
41
97
161
39 0.2
1
Sample ID: 28G
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.45 0.57 30.2
89 3.4 6.1
170 94 71 16
36
32
35
263
437
39 0.2
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL007343
WB Bateman
Page 4 of 14
Sample ID: 29D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
40
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
6.38 0.66 24.2
88 2.9 6.1
117 52 67 20
45
39
40
125
208
44 0.1
0
Sample ID: 29G
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.86 0.54 28.8
83 4.8 5.6
130 81 66 16
31
58
58
254
422
30 0.2
1
Sample ID: 30D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
50
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
6.99 0.72 19.7
82 3.6 5.7
103 45 65 15
45
43
48
141
234
50 0.2
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL007343
WB Bateman
Page 5 of 14
Sample ID: 30G
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
30
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.70 0.57 27.1
86 3.9 5.8
140 59 69 16
41
49
50
267
443
56 0.2
1
Sample ID: 31D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
10
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
6.58 0.69 22.9
86 3.3 5.9
116 75 65 19
46
41
44
151
251
57 0.2
1
Sample ID: 31G
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
30
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.54 0.55 29.4
85 4.3 5.7
159 59 65 20
39
45
48
280
465
52 0.2
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL007343
WB Bateman
Page 6 of 14
Sample ID: 32D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
20
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
6.58 0.72 22.9
87 3.0 6.0
130 69 67 18
50
30
35
117
194
42 0.2
1
Sample ID: 32G
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.96 0.59 27.8
85 4.1 5.8
162 109 67 16
35
42
46
232
385
32 0.2
1
Sample ID: 33D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
6.38 0.72 25.0
90 2.6 6.2
150 107 71 17
44
34
34
111
184
49 0.2
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL007343
WB Bateman
Page 7 of 14
Sample ID: 33G
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.21 0.63 32.0
90 3.1 6.2
214 149 72 16
39
35
36
213
354
52
0.2
1
Samp 34D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Orga
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-I Ca% Mg%
S-I
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
n-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NOs-N
6.58 0.75 21.9
85 3.2 5.9
133 02 64 19
41
40
43
120
199
48
0.1
0
Sample ID: 34G
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 - 160 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in me
cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
anic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn�551
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.24 0.63 32.7
91 6.2
179 99 73 17
38
35
35
199
330.1
0

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No. FY24-SL007343
WB Bateman
Page 14 of 14
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Ac
exchangeable acidity
Lime
B
boron
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 to 75 Ib/1000 sq ft)
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
at one time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the
CEC
cation exchange capacity
full rate is applied. If Mg is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitic lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Each nutrient recommendation for field crops or other large areas are listed separately in units of lb/acre unless
K-1
potassium index
otherwise specified. Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies for the crop
K20
potash
being grown, not on soil test results. Recommendations for K and P will depend on K-1 and P-1 soil test results and the
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
crop to be grown. Generally, at K-1 and P-1 values > 50, recommendations will be minimal. If Mg is needed and no lime is
MIN
mineral soil class
recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb/acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually
Mn
manganese
satisfy crop needs. Soluble salt levels (SS-1) appear only on reports for diagnostic/problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
Mn-I
manganese index
notations appear on the soil report in the recommendation section, refer to NCDA&CS
M-0
mineral -organic soil class
$Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. Various NCDA&CS crop notes also address lime and fertilizer needs.
N
nitrogen
Na
sodium
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
NO3-N
nitrate nitrogen
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit NCDA&CS Fertilizer Substitutions to find information that may
ORG
pH pH
organic soil class
current soil pH
help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read NCSU publication,
phosphorus index
A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer. In general, homeowners do not need to be concerned about micronutrients.
P-1
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
W/V
weight per volume
The first seven parameters [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity.
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
The remaining 16 parameters [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I,
NO3-N (not routinely available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit NCDA&CS
Understand Your Report for more information.

Farm 2734
USDA United States
Depart
Agrricult fetof Pasquotank County, North Carolina 400 ac Block
Pasquotank NC139 T1987 Al
�F
r
i
I
1� R
I
N
0 370 740 1,4
.. sir Fe
Tract 1987
2019 Program Year
CLU
Acres
HEL
Crop
1
16.34
UHEL
2
14.99
UHEL
3
15.71
UHEL
4
15.45
UHEL
5
115.68
1 UHEL
6
15.6
UHEL
7
16.43
UHEL
8
15.57
UHEL
9
15.15
UHEL
10
15.58
UHEL
11
15.25
UHEL
12
15.19
UHEL
13
15.31
UHEL
14
15.16
UHEL
15
15.38
UHEL
16
15.17
UHEL
17
15.47
UHEL
18
14.94
UHEL
19
14.77
UHEL
20
14.75
UHEL
21
14.31
UHEL
22
16.3
UHEL
23
15.29
UHEL
24
15.96
UHEL
25
14.24
UHEL
26
16.21
UHEL
Page Cropland Total: 400.2 acres
Map Created March 18, 2019
Base Image Layer flown in 2018
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination
6 Restricted Use
n Limited Restrictions
E Exempt from Conservation
Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership; rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data 'as is' and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size, shape, or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

FY24-SL010227
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
k5i I"14'4+;4
Client:
WB Bateman
Advisor: Stan Winslow
Predictive
Bateman Farms
Tidewater Agronomics /
°± f'
567 Meadstown Rd
TAG
Soil Report
Mehlich-3 Extraction
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
PO Box 310
1
Camden, NC 27921
Sampled: 10/23/2023
Soil Testing Section
Received: 10/25/2023 Completed:
11/08/2023 Farm: 400 ACRE
Client ID:
Sampled County : Pasquotank
374077
Advisor ID: 403314
Sample ID: 1A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class: Organic
HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
10.00 0.65
28.4 81 5.5 5.3
166 148 65 13
39 46
48 195 324
55 0.1 0
Sample ID: 1 B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class: Organic
HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
10.00 0.56
34.5 83 5.7 5.4
147 159 66 15
51 ill
86 287 476
71 0.2 1
North Carolina
Tcbwiv Truk f and Ctwinlsskm
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL010227
WB Bateman
Page 2 of 12
Sample ID: 1 D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.86 0.74 26.8
85 4.0 5.7
134 119 68 15
43
74
59
118
196
56 0.2
1
Sample ID: 2A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
10.00 0.66 33.5
89 3.6 6.0
191 142 76 11
33
32
30
199
330
58 0.2
1
Sample ID: 2B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
10.00 0.57 33.0
85 5.1 5.5
162 108 70 13
37
65
56
225
374
59 0.2
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL010227
WB Bateman
Page 3 of 12
Sample ID: 2D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.96 0.78 24.8
84 3.9 5.7
123 106 67 15
46
77
62
110
183
60 0.2
1
Sample ID: 3A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
$pH
0
0 0
Note: 3 Note: $
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.24 0.73 30.7
91 2.8 6.3
156 114 77 12
38
29
23
145
241
41 0.1
0
Sample ID: 3B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
9.59 0.53 39.9
92 3.2 6.2
166 170 78 12
35
37
29
228
378
51 0.2
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL010227
WB Bateman
Page 4 of 12
Sample ID: 3D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
6.20 0.86 27.4
92 2.3 6.3
144 98 76 14
39
40
29
111
184
57 0.1
0
Sample ID: 4A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
10.00 0.67 31.6
87 4.0 5.7
193 123 74 12
36
37
36
197
327
33 0.2
1
Sample ID: 4B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
10.00 0.55 31.2
83 5.4 5.4
171 168 67 13
46
92
74
217
360
29 0.2
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL010227
WB Bateman
Page 5 of 12
Sample ID: 4D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.96 0.70 29.2
91 2.6 6.2
144 141 75 14
42
42
32
129
214
35 0.1
0
Sample ID: 5A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.86 0.69 29.4
89 3.4 5.9
179 126 75 12
41
43
37
159
264
34 0.2
1
Sample ID: 5B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
10.00 0.62 24.2
77 5.6 5.1
170 166 62 12
42
115
92
197
327
32 0.2
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL010227
WB Bateman
Page 6 of 12
Sample ID: 5D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.96 0.76 23.7
86 3.4 5.8
155 129 67 16
52
63
51
110
183
31 0.2
1
Sample ID: 6A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
6 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.24 0.68 33.9
92 2.6 6.2
162 148 76 14
39
37
29
163
271
25 0.2
1
Sample ID: 6B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
6 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
10.00 0.62 28.7
83 4.9 5.4
174 192 68 12
36
76
64
173
286
15 0.2
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL010227
WB Bateman
Page 7 of 12
Sample ID: 6D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
6
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.21 0.80 24.4
89 2.7 6.1
121 121 69 17
46
49
38
76
126
21
0.2
1
Sample ID: 7A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
6
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.54 0.79 29.1
90 2.8 6.1
150 125 75 13
36
33
28
127
211
24
0.2
1
Sample ID: 7B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
9.21 0.71 27.6
86 3.9 5.7
148 140 72 12
37
49
44
135
224
27
0.2
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL010227
WB Bateman
Page 8 of 12
Sample ID: 7D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.24 0.81 23.4
87 3.1 5.9
146 141 68 15
44
54
43
100
166
31
0.2
1
Sample ID: 8A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.96 0.80 28.1
91 2.5 6.3
142 132 77 11
40
44
33
93
154
62
0.1
0
Sample ID: 8B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
10.00 0.70 25.9
84 4.2 5.6
138 121 71 11
40
62
53
137
227
38
0.1
0

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL010227
WB Bateman
Page 9 of 12
Sample ID: 8D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.54 0.78 23.5
85 3.6 5.8
144 128 71 11
43
54
46
106
176
43 0.1
0
Sample ID: 9A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
9.21 0.67 26.9
86 3.8 5.7
190 159 71 12
39
63
52
168
279
43 0.2
1
Sample ID: 9B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.86 0.72 26.9
88 3.3 5.9
161 195 72 12
39
55
44
126
209
43 0.2
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL010227
WB Bateman
Page 10 of 12
Sample ID: 9D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.96 0.79 26.1
89 2.8 6.1
142 124 74 13
42
57
42
88
146
51 0.1
0
Sample ID: 10A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
9.21 0.74 26.3
86 3.8 5.8
179 170 70 12
37
76
59
153
254
58 0.1
0
Sample ID: 10B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
9.59 0.71 24.2
82 4.3 5.5
174 158 68 11
38
90
71
161
267
108 0.1
0

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No. FY24-SL010227
WB Bateman
Page 11 of 12
Sample ID: 10D
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O
Mg S
Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean 0.0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Note: 3
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
7.45 0.81 25.2
90 2.5 6.2 146 166 74 13 36 63
45
91 151
66 0.1 0

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No. FY24-SL010227
WB Bateman
Page 12 of 12
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Ac
exchangeable acidity
Lime
B
boron
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 to 75 Ib/1000 sq ft)
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
at one time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the
CEC
cation exchange capacity
full rate is applied. If Mg is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitic lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Each nutrient recommendation for field crops or other large areas are listed separately in units of lb/acre unless
K-1
potassium index
otherwise specified. Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies for the crop
K20
potash
being grown, not on soil test results. Recommendations for K and P will depend on K-1 and P-1 soil test results and the
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
crop to be grown. Generally, at K-1 and P-1 values > 50, recommendations will be minimal. If Mg is needed and no lime is
MIN
mineral soil class
recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb/acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually
Mn
manganese
satisfy crop needs. Soluble salt levels (SS-1) appear only on reports for diagnostic/problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
Mn-I
manganese index
notations appear on the soil report in the recommendation section, refer to NCDA&CS
M-0
mineral -organic soil class
$Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. Various NCDA&CS crop notes also address lime and fertilizer needs.
N
nitrogen
Na
sodium
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
NO3-N
nitrate nitrogen
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit NCDA&CS Fertilizer Substitutions to find information that may
ORG
pH pH
organic soil class
current soil pH
help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read NCSU publication,
phosphorus index
A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer. In general, homeowners do not need to be concerned about micronutrients.
P-1
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
W/V
weight per volume
The first seven parameters [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity.
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
The remaining 16 parameters [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I,
NO3-N (not routinely available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit NCDA&CS
Understand Your Report for more information.

FY24-SL007333
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
k5i I"14'4+;4
Client:
WB Bateman
Advisor: Stan Winslow
Predictive
Bateman Farms
Tidewater Agronomics /
°± f'
567 Meadstown Rd
TAG
Soil Report
Mehlich-3 Extraction
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
PO Box 310
1
Camden, NC 27921
Soil Testing Section
Sampled: 10/05/2023 Received: 10/10/2023 Completed:
10/20/2023 Farm:400ac
Client ID:
Sampled County : Pasquotank
374077
Advisor ID: 403314
Sample ID: 11A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class: Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
8.86 0.71 21.0 80 4.3 5.5
173 104 66 11
54 62
55 162 269
61 0.1 0
Sample ID: 11B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class: Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
9.59 0.71 18.8 73 5.0 5.2
163 104 61 10
49 65
61 154 256
51 0.1 1
North Carolina
Tcbwiv Truk f and Ctwinlsskm
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL007333
WB Bateman
Page 2 of 16
Sample ID: 11D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
6.78 0.82 16.8
81 3.2 5.7
144 111 67 11
53
46
42
84
139
65 0.1
1
Sample ID: 12A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
9.21 0.72 19.5
77 4.6 5.3
159 100 65 10
53
62
58
139
231
53 0.1
1
Sample ID: 12B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
9.21 0.66 20.5
77 4.8 5.3
162 87 64 11
57
68
62
150
249
58 0.1
0

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL007333
WB Bateman
Page 3 of 16
Sample ID: 12D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
6.78 0.80 17.0
80 3.4 5.6
119 84 65 13
68
47
44
71
118
64
0.1
1
Sample ID: 13A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
9.21 0.72 19.1
73 5.1 5.1
156 96 60 11
55
68
64
126
209
49
0.1
1
Sample ID: 13B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
9.21 0.72 17.8
71 5.1 5.1
155 99 59 9
50
75
69
136
226
49
0.1
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL007333
WB Bateman
Page 4 of 16
Sample ID: 13D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.21 0.80 15.7
75 3.9 5.4
143 97 59 13
58
54
51
80
133
58
0.1
1
Sample ID: 14A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.86 0.72 19.0
76 4.6 5.3
152 83 63 11
48
55
54
126
209
49
0.1
1
Sample ID: 14B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
9.59 0.70 19.0
72 5.4 5.1
171 95 60 10
78
70
66
151
251
52
0.1
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No.
FY24-SL007333
WB Bateman
Page 5 of 16
Sample ID: 14D
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 _
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Organic
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
6.02 0.82 17.9
81 3.4 5.7
182 101 66 13
80
54
48
80
133
62
0.1
1
Samp 15A
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Orga
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
n-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
8.24 0.74 21.9
82 4.0 5.6
176 09 66 13
51
52
47
116
193
55
0.1
0
Sample ID: 15B
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) P2O5
K2O
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 _
.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and
meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Or
c
HM% W/V CEC BS% pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
u-1
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
7.45 0.70 22.6
4.0 5.6
181 100 68 12
50
47
44
134
222
57
0

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/Divisions/Agronomic-Services
Report No. FY24-SL007333
WB Bateman
Page 16 of 16
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Ac
exchangeable acidity
Lime
B
boron
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 to 75 Ib/1000 sq ft)
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
at one time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the
CEC
cation exchange capacity
full rate is applied. If Mg is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitic lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Each nutrient recommendation for field crops or other large areas are listed separately in units of lb/acre unless
K-1
potassium index
otherwise specified. Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies for the crop
K20
potash
being grown, not on soil test results. Recommendations for K and P will depend on K-1 and P-1 soil test results and the
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
crop to be grown. Generally, at K-1 and P-1 values > 50, recommendations will be minimal. If Mg is needed and no lime is
MIN
mineral soil class
recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb/acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually
Mn
manganese
satisfy crop needs. Soluble salt levels (SS-1) appear only on reports for diagnostic/problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
Mn-I
manganese index
notations appear on the soil report in the recommendation section, refer to NCDA&CS
M-0
mineral -organic soil class
$Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. Various NCDA&CS crop notes also address lime and fertilizer needs.
N
nitrogen
Na
sodium
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
NO3-N
nitrate nitrogen
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit NCDA&CS Fertilizer Substitutions to find information that may
ORG
pH pH
organic soil class
current soil pH
help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read NCSU publication,
phosphorus index
A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer. In general, homeowners do not need to be concerned about micronutrients.
P-1
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
W/V
weight per volume
The first seven parameters [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity.
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
The remaining 16 parameters [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I,
NO3-N (not routinely available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit NCDA&CS
Understand Your Report for more information.