20150862 Ver 1_More Info Received_20151109

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name: Troutman Charter Academy
2. Name of Property Owner /Applicant: Ryan Companies US, Inc.
3. Name of Consultant /Agent: Kimley -Horn & Associates, Inc.
*Agent authorization needs to be attached
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): SAW #2012 -00126
5. Site Address: East side of US 21/NC 115 between Lexus Drive and Flower House Loop, Troutman,
NC
7. City: Troutman
8. County: Iredell
9. Lat: 35.663076 Long: - 80.848978 (Decimal Degrees Please)
10. Quadrangle Name: Shepherds
11. Waterway: Kerr Branch
12. Watershed: HUC 03040102 / South Yadkin
13. Requested Action:
X Nationwide Permit # 39
General Permit #
X Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre - Application Request (Mitigation Proposal)
The following information will be completed by the Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site /Waters Name:
Keywords:
Begin Date

KimlepMorn
November 6, 2015
Ms. Tasha Alexander
M
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
� �'
suite 200
200 South Tryon Street
US Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte, North Carolina
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
28202
Asheville, NC 28801 -5006
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Resubmittal- 404/401 Preconstruction Notification (NWP 39) Application
Troutman Charter Academy Project
SAW #2012 -00126 & DEQ# 15 -0862
Troutman, Iredell County, NC
Dear Ms. Alexander /Ms. Higgins:
The 404/401 Preconstruction Notification Application for the above referenced
project pursuant to a Nationwide Permit #39 and General 401 Water Quality
Certification number 3890 was originally submitted on August 24, 2015.
However, due to design changes and efforts to successfully minimize stream
impacts, please accept this resubmittal on behalf of our client, Ryan Companies
US, Inc. The following information is included as part of this application
resubmittal:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Agent Authorization Form
• Pre - Construction Notification Form
• Project Site Figures
• Figure 1— Vicinity
• Figure 2 — USGS Topo (Shepherds Quadrangle, 1993)
• Figure 3 — SSURGO Soils (2015 ESRI Aerial)
• Figure 4 — Jurisdictional Features (2015 ESRI Aerial)
• Figure 5 — Proposed Site Layout (2015 ESRI Aerial )
• Figure 6 — Impact Area (2015 ESRI World Imagery Aerial)
• Construction Document Submittal For Troutman Charter Academy
Project Site Data Forms
• USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
• NCDWR Stream Identification Worksheet
• Project Site Photo Pages
The 404 /401 (NWT 39) application presents site conditions evaluated by KH
staff (Chris Tinklenberg, PWS) on May 15, 2015. The stream delineation was
performed utilizing survey prepared by a licensed surveyor (verified by KH).
■
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]

KimlepMorn
The proposed project site is located southeast of downtown Troutman, Iredell
County, NC. The project limits are located on the east side of US 21/NC 115
between Lexus Drive and Flower House Loop. Existing land uses in the vicinity
of the project area include single family residential and commercial /industrial
business. The project seeks to construct a charter school on a 34 -acre property
that would accommodate over 1,000 elementary and middle school students at
full enrollment. Offsite roadway improvements are necessary in order to service
the new school including the construction of a round -a -bout along US21/NC 115.
New location roadway is proposed to serve as the main entrance in to the school.
The project will result in permanent impacts to 86 linear feet of an Unnamed
Tributary to Kerr Branch (S 1) from the replacement of an existing 41 If, 48"
CMP culvert crossing at Crosstie Road with proposed 83 if of twin 60" RCP
culverts. Non - erosive design criteria will be met from the installation of 2 -15 if
rip -rap aprons (30 if of permanent impacts) at the inlet and outlet of the proposed
culvert. The rip -rap aprons will be installed so that the finished elevation of the
rip -rap does not exceed that of the original stream bed. The project requires 60
linear feet of temporary stream impacts to install impervious dikes, stone rings,
and a pumped bypass to allow work in dry conditions.
Please feel free to contact me at (704) 409 -1802 if you have any questions, or if
additional information is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Attachments
Cc: Brian Devlin, Ryan Companies US, Inc.
Chris Bostic, PE, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.

Kimley l) Horn
Project Name: Troutman Charter Academy
Project Summary Sheet
Applicant Name and Address: Brian Devlin
The Ryan Companies US, Inc.
101 East Kennedy Boulevard, Ste. 2450
Tampa, FL 33602
Telephone Number: 813 - 204 -5006
Type of Request: ® Nationwide PCN (NWP # 39 ❑ Individual Permit Application
❑ Jurisdictional Determination ❑ Other:
Included Attachments: ® Project Plans ® USGS Map ® NRCS Soil Survey
® Agent Authorization ® Delineation Sketch ❑ Delineation Survey
❑ Data Forms (Up & Wet) ® NCDWQ Stream Forms ® USAGE Stream Forms
❑ NCEEP Confirmation ® Aerial Photo ® Site Photos
® Agency Correspondence ❑ Other: ❑ Other:
Check if applicable: ❑ CAMA County ❑ Trout County ❑ Isolated Waters
❑ Section 7, ESA ❑ Section 106, NHPA ❑ EFH
❑ Mitigation Proposed (❑ NC EEP ❑ On -Site ❑ Off -Site ❑ Other)
County: Iredell
Waterway: Kerr Branch
H.U.C.: HUC 03040102 - South Yadkin
Property Size (acres): 34
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.663076 °N
Nearest City /Town: Troutman
River Basin: Yadkin -Pee Dee
USGS Quad Name: Shepherds
Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 0.12 ac.
- 80.848978 °W
Project Location: The proposed project is located southeast of downtown Troutman on the east side of US 21/NC 115
between Lexus Drive and Flower House Loop.
Site Description: The site is currently managed/ undeveloped. The majority of the surrounding area consists of commercial
businesses with some industrial businesses. A low density residential area is located south of the project area.
Impact Summary (if applicable): The project will result in permanent impacts to 86 linear feet of a UT to Kerr Branch (S1)
from the replacement of an existine 41 1£ 48" CMP culvert crossing at Crosstie Road with DroDosed 83 if of twin 60" RCP
culverts. 301f of permanent impacts will result from the installation of 2 -15 if rip -rap aprons. The project requires 60 linear
feet of temporary stream impacts to install impervious dikes, stone rings, and a pumped diversion to allow work in dry
conditions.
NWP
#
Open Water
(acres)
Wetland
(acres)
Stream
Channel
Intermittent and/or
Unimportant Aquatic
Function
Perennial and/or Important Aquatic
Function
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Tem .
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
If
ac
if
ac
if
ac
Lf
Ac
39
60
0.01
86
0.02
Total
60
0.01
86
0.02
Total Permanent Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.02
Kimley -Horn Contact: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
■
Suite 200
200 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
28202
Direct Number: (704) 409 -1802
■
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Project Name /Description: Troutman Charter Academy
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: Tasha Alexander
Field Office: Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
The Ryan Companies US, Inc. hereby designates and authorizes Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. to act
in my /our behalf as my /our agent solely for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional Determinations,
Section 404 permits /Section 401 Water Quality Certifications applications, and to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward until successful
completion of the permitting process or revocation by the owner.
In addition, 1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the day of VS a D1
r
er CS S
Print Prope ty Owner's Name Property Owner's Si 1nature
V 1Crz l)` v�--,
Cc: Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Project Name/Description-, Troutman Charter Academy
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: Tasha AIexander
Field Office: Asheville Regulaton Meld Office
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
The MPV Troutman Investors, LLC hereby designates and authorizes Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc,
to act in my /our behalf as my /our agent solely for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional
Determinations, Section 404 permits /Section 401 Water Quality Certifications applications, and to
furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward
until successful completion of the permitting process or revocation by the owner.
In addition, I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the day of
Print Propert �wrer's Name
�°��CS� �f3
Cc: Karen Heins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
0

o�0 W AT,
9QG
' Em
I I >
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page l of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Troutman Charter Academy
2b.
County:
Iredell
2c.
Nearest municipality/ town:
Troutman
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
MPV Troutman Investors, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB 2296, PG 1470
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
James E. Merrifield
3d.
Street address:
East side of US 21 /NC 115 between Lexus Drive and Flower House
Loop
3e.
City, state, zip:
Troutman, NC 28166
3f.
Telephone no.:
704 - 561 -5241
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
jmerrifield @mpvre.com
Page l of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Ryan Companies US, Inc.
4b.
Name:
Brian Devlin
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
The Ryan Companies US, Inc.
4d.
Street address:
101 East Kennedy Boulevard, Ste. 2450
4e. City, state, zip:
Tampa, FL 33602
4f.
Telephone no.:
813 - 204 -5006
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
brian.devlin @ryancompanies.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
5e. Telephone no.:
704 -409 -1802
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
chris.tinklenberg @kimley - horn.com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Tax Parcel #4750 -11 -1496
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.663076 Longitude: - 80.848978
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
34 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Kerr Branch
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C Water
2c. River basin:
Yadkin — Pee Dee
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The proposed project site is located southeast of downtown Troutman, Iredell County, NC. The project is located on US 21
and the majority of the surrounding area consists of commercial businesses with some industrial businesses. A low density
residential area is located south of the project area.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
—1,260 If
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project seeks to construct a charter school on a 34 -acre property that would accommodate over 1,000 elementary
and middle school students at full enrollment. Offsite roadway improvements are necessary in order to service the new
school including the construction of a round -a -bout along US21 /NC 115. New location roadway is proposed to serve as
the main entrance in to the school.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will result in permanent impacts to 86 linear feet of an Unnamed Tributary to Kerr Branch (S1) from the
replacement of an existing 41 If, 48" CMP culvert crossing at Crosstie Road with proposed 83 If of twin 60" RCP culverts.
Non - erosive design criteria will be met from the installation of 2 -15 If rip -rap aprons (30 If of permanent impacts) at the
inlet and outlet of the proposed culvert. The rip -rap aprons will be installed so that the finished elevation of the rip -rap
does not exceed that of the original stream bed. The project requires 60 linear feet of temporary stream impacts to install
impervious dikes, stone rings, and a pumped bypass to allow work in dry conditions. The project will require typical site
development equipment including but not limited to excavators, wheeled backhoes, track hoes, and dump trucks.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: SAW #2012 -00126
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Not known
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
C.
Proposed Impacts Inventory
1.
Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W 1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P FIT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Installation of
S1 — Impact 1
Impervious Dike
UT to Kerr Branch
❑ PER
® Corps
8
40
E] P ® T
and Pumped
E] INT
E] DWQ
Diversion
S1 — Impact 2
Installation of
UT to Kerr Branch
® PER
® Corps
8
15
® P ❑ T
Riprap apron
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S1 — Impact 3
Replace existing
® PER
® Corps
❑ P ® T
48" CMP w/ Twin
UT to Kerr Branch
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
8
42
60" RCPs
S1 — Impact 4
Installation of
UT to Kerr Branch
® PER
® Corps
8
15
® P ❑ T
Riprap apron
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S1 — Impact 5
Installation of
UT to Kerr Branch
® PER
® Corps
8
20
E] P ® T
Impervious Dike
E] INT
E] DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
132
3i. Comments: An existing 41 If CMP culvert will be replaced with 83 If of twin RCPs; total net loss of waters of the US is 42 If
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar- Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired?
B1 ❑P ❑T
F1 Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The location of the proposed roundabout and access road was shifted north to avoid impacts to Kerr Branch and reduced
permanent stream impacts from 147 If to 86 If (reduced by 61 If). The sidewalk was designed to the minimum width required to
minimize impacts to the stream channel during and post- construction.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The project is utilizing new impervious area but accompanied with proper sedimentation basins and ponds for water quality
considerations within project footprint. The side - slopes are at a maximum of 2:1 where appropriate to minimize stream
impacts. Temporary construction impacts will be limited by the installation of stone rings an impervious dike for temporary
stream diversion as well as restoring /stabilizing when construction is complete.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
28%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Per Town of Troutman Regulations, a BMP designed for a 10 -year storm will be required. Stormwater system shall be
designed to remove 85 percent of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) for the 1 -inch storm.
Post - development peak flow rates
shall not exceed the 2- and 10 -year pre - development peak flow rates. Stormwater approval will be provided once
approval is received.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Troutman
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
® Other: NCDOT
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
® Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts? Formal Section 7 Consultation has been submitted and is pending
® Yes ❑ No
as of the submittal date of this PCN.
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Letter correspondence dated August 18, 2015, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Natural
Heritage Program stated that there were no resources of concern located within a one mile radius of the site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The project is located in Iredell County, and is therefore not anticipated to impact EFH.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A search of the N.C. State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS service confirmed the project will not impact historic
or archeological resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
�J
11/06/2015
Applicant /Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant /Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

fr
m Figure 1 ' 0�,�\`P
0 ° `
t_ 7
x
• '(f�foore Vol Ile Ch i
e P =
Den Vr Lake dls �e
or- 3n �aLdsrn ROWAN
°o
0 5 10 \ CABARRU napoli
Miles t "Hitnfr -r g;iVs •• CONS .ES'
do
o
AUPIeh"/ Rd
Lipe Rd oQ
o N �
d 3
j ! 9
O
Clonfz Hill Rd z
v J) m
0
� m
ho n
Lsroh
R,y
idgr creek Dr �
w
1 r
m
� y
Pr House LOOP ttsl o` rn
r
a
7 L �e
\e 2t a
e� L n
� R
�o� Satlwinds d
t Y Sher herds B1u11�c
0 of
001 Springs Rd
-
2.
Parkertown Rd
a
w`
a° C,1 uri
c;
Barfield Rd Alban
y o
n ob,
G�
n
Belk \0 p
e m
`
Title: Figure 1 -Vicinity Legend:
Project Boundary RYAN'
0 1,500 3,000
Kimley >Morn N
Feet

fff •d
l
Cob r ��
op
'bt
Un`fir 1 � ti.+ � � ! • � '`�' \r -
Copyright.0 2013 National Geographic Society, i cubed
Title: Figure 2 - USGS 7.5' Topo (Shepherds Quad)
Legend:
000
Project Boundary RYAN'
1,
Kimley >Morn 1'� N
0 500
Feet

Iredell County SSURGO Soils
Symbol Description
ChA Chewacla loam, 0 to 2% slopes
DrB Dorian fine sandy loam, 0 to 6% slopes
PcC2 Pacolet sandy clay loam, 6 to 10% slopes
PcE2 Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to 25% slopes
M
9
x
Pc m :2aa.
E
Title: Figure 3 - SSURGO Soils Legend:
=1 Project Boundary
0 125 250 SSURGO Soils RYAH
Kimley >Morn I N
Feet

21
S1
UT to Kerr Branch
U�
S2
Kerr Branch,
771e: Figure 4 - Jurisdictional Features
Project Boundary
' 150 300 Survey Streams RYAN'
KimlepMorn 1' 1
Feet

F'KUJLU I LUUA I IUN
NTS
SITE DATA:
ZONING
GB
XX CLASSROOMS X 1.6 SPACES /ROOM
ADDRESS
SE CORNER OF
CROSSTIE LANE
PROPOSED PARKING PROVIDED
AND CHARLOTTE HWY 115/21
HANDICAP PARKING SPACES REQUIRED
TROUTMAN, NC
28166
IREDELL COUNTY REAL ESTATE ID
0162714
XX RACKS (2 BIKES PER RACK)
PARCEL ID
0764560612
AND ALL EMPLOYEES (APROX. XX)]
TOTAL ACREAGE
17.88 AC
1,513 LF
DENUDED ACREAGE
XX AC
PROPOSED WATER TAPS
REQUIRED ROADWAY SETBACKS
FRONT AND SIDE =15'
0
REAR =25'
0 LF
EXISTING GROSS BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE
0 GROSS SF
TOTAL PROJECTED SEWER FLOW
EXISTING BUILDING LOT COVERAGE
0%
PROPOSED GROSS BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE
76,100 GROSS
SF
PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT
43,330 SF
PROPOSED BUILDING LOT COVERAGE
9.65% (76,100
SF/788,852 SF)
PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT
2 STORIES (XX'
TO ROOF)
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
198,372 SF
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
0 SF
NET INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
198,372 SF
PROPOSED PARKING REQUIRED
XXX SPACES
XX CLASSROOMS X 1.6 SPACES /ROOM
PLUS XX EMPLOYEES X 1 SPACE /EMPLOYEE
PROPOSED PARKING PROVIDED
158 SPACES
HANDICAP PARKING SPACES REQUIRED
6 SPACES
HANDICAP PARKING SPACES PROVIDED
6 SPACES
PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED
XX RACKS (2 BIKES PER RACK)
[1 RACK PER 40 STUDENTS ABOVE 2ND GRADE (APROX.
XX)
AND ALL EMPLOYEES (APROX. XX)]
PROPOSED LINEAR FOOT OF ROAD
1,513 LF
PROPOSED LINEAR FOOT OF WATER LINES
1742 LF
PROPOSED WATER TAPS
1
PROPOSED RECLAIMED WATER TAPS
0
PROPOSED LINEAR FOOT OF SEWER LINES
0 LF
PROPOSED SEWER TAPS
0
TOTAL PROJECTED SEWER FLOW
XXXX GPD
XX,XXX SF X XXX GPD /SF
PROPOSED FIRE LANE
XXXX LF
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT SUBMITTAL FOR:
TROUTMAN CHARTER
ACADEMY
SE CORNER OF CROSSTIE RD AND
CHARLOTTE HWY 115 / 21
TROUTMAN, NC 28166
NOTE:
1. SIGN PERMITTING IS A SEPARATE APPROVAL PROCESS AND HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED
WITH THIS SITE PLAN. A MASTER SIGN PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT.
2. NO CHANGES TO ANY ASPECT OF THIS SITE PLAN, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LANDSCAPING,
GRADING, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN (ESPECIALLY COLORS), LIGHTING, OR UTILITIES SHALL BE MADE
WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE TOWN OF TROUTMAN,
WHICH APPROVAL SHALL NOT BE UNREASONABLY HELD.
3. UNLESS EXPLICITLY SPECIFIED IN THE NOTES ON THIS SITE PLAN, THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS
PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE TROUTMAN LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (LDO) AND ALL
OTHER APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES. IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE
APPROVED SITE PLAN AND THE APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OR GUIDELINES, AND ABSENT
CLARIFICATION OR APPROVAL OF SUCH STATED ON THE SITE PLAN OR OTHER RELATED APPROVAL,
THE APPLICABLE REGULATION OF GUIDELINE SHALL APPLY.
N APPLICANT
MR. MIKE HARRYMAN
RYAN COMPANIES US, INC
101 E. KENNEDY BLVD., SUITE 2450
W T—E TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602
PH. (813) 204 -5002
S
CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT
KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
333 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
MR. CHRIS BOSTIC, P.E.
PE #: 032582
PH. (919) 653 -2927
" SURVEYOR ARCHITECT
CHRISTOPHER G. DELLA LAI DESIGN ASSOCIATES, LLC.
GPA PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS MR. STEVE GRINAVIC
r�eedo�+�oes ■ CROSSTIE �� / ��; 805 PHILLIP DAVID DRIVE 10600 CHEVROLET WAY,
LANE / / / ' CHARLOTTE, 28256 -6916 ESTERO,OOFL 33928
PH. (704) 335 5 -8600
FAX [phone] PH (239)405 -6800
FAX [phone]
/ SITE' OWNER
MPV TROUTMAN INVESTORS LLC
521 E. MOREHEAD ST. SUITE 400
/ CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
rr;Bra / / PH. (704) 248 -2100
FAX [phone]
cj
SHEET LIST TABLE
z
VICINITY MAP
NTS
PARCEL INFORMATION:
ADDRESS: SE CORNER OF CROSSTIE RD AND
CHARLOTTE HWY 115 / 21
TROUTMAN, NC 28166
PIN 4750111496
ZONING: GB
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL
TOWN OF TROUTMAN AND /OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES, INCLUDING UTILITIES, SIDEWALKS, AND HANDICAP RAMPS
ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS AS SPECIFIED BY TOWN STANDARDS.
THESE FACILITIES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF TROUTMAN AND
SHALL BE SO INSTALLED UNLESS A CHANGE IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF
TROUTMAN.
EXECUTION OF THIS CONSTRUCTION PLAT BY THE REVIEW ENGINEER FOR THE
TOWN OF TROUTMAN. IN NO WAY LIMITS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER
AND ENGINEER OF RECORD WITH REGARD TO COMPLIANCE WITH ALL FEDERAL,
STATE, AND LOCAL STANDARDS AND /OR CONDITIONS.
OWNER HEREBY CERTIFIES AND AGREES TO TAKE SUCH ACTION AS MAY BE
REQUIRED BY THE TOWN OF TROUTMAN. TO CORRECT ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR
NON- COMPLIANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS AND /OR CONDITIONS DESCRIBED IN
THIS CONSTRUCTION PLAT, INCLUDING RE- SUBMISSION OR RE- EXECUTION OF THIS
CONSTRUCTION PLAT WITH THE APPROPRIATE CORRECTIONS AND /OR REVISIONS.
OWNER DATE
■
,iniie iorn
333 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600, RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
Sheet Number Sheet Title
C -0.0 COVER SHEET
C -1.0 GENERAL NOTES
C -2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
C -2.1 DEMOLITION PLAN
C -3.0 SITE PLAN
C -4.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
I C -5.0 UTILITY PLAN '
C -5.1 WATER LINE PLAN AND PROFILE
C -5.2 I WATER LINE PLAN AND PROFILE
C -6.0 I EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 1
C -6.1 I EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 2
C -6.2 I EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
C -7.0 SITE DETAILS
C -8.0 WATER DETAILS
C -9.0 SANITARY SEWER DETAILS
C -10.0 STORMWATER DETAILS
L -1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN
L -2.0 LANDSCAPE DETAILS
REVISIONS
DATE I DESCRIPTION I BY
This document, together with the concepts and designs
presented herein, as an instrument of services, is intended
only for the specific purpose and client for which it was
prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document
without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley —Horn
and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley —Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Copyright Kimley —Horn and Associates, Inc., 2015
DATE:
AUGUST 10, 2015
PRELIMINARY
SEAL:
JOB NUMBER:
012587004

V
U5
6
°
0
°
Q
a
°
0
E
0
0
Q
O
0
a
U
� o
a
cn
n °
- o
z
Y
1J 3
z
o
i
� o
o
i
i o
o
Q
Q
I °
n Q-
a
° o
i
°
a)
i a
i
� Q
U
o
V
�I 3
� o
n
� a
i
a
__j o
0
I a
Z' U
i w
� a
� T
b
� o
°
n .s
� o
i
0
z °
Q
Y Tw
t
z
I a
o,
Ja
0
°
0
E a
a
0 0
U U
Q N
� L
J
o
E °
o �
L E
+� U
� O
_n a
N �
N
U)
X
Q
cn
o No.
i
GENERAL NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS,
BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EXIT
PORCHES, RAMPS, DOWNSPOUTS, GRAVEL AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDING WALLS, UTILITY
ENTRANCE LOCATIONS AND BOLLARDS IN BUILDING SIDEWALKS.
2. ACCESSIBLE SIGNS WITH A "VAN" MARKING SHALL HAVE ADDITIONAL SIGN MOUNTED BELOW THE
SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY SIGN DENOTING VAN ACCESSIBILITY.
3. REFER TO DETAIL SHEETS C -7 FOR DETAILS OF ON -SITE SIGNAGE, STRIPING, AND PAVEMENT
MARKING. REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION.
4. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL TOWN, COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS
AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.
5. ALL ISLANDS WITH CURB & GUTTER SHALL BE LANDSCAPED. THOSE ISLANDS ARE TO HAVE
CURB & GUTTER AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.
6. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY, TREE, AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A FIELD
SURVEY BY RILEY SURVEYING, P.A. DATED OCTOBER 8, 2013.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY ALL NECESSARY BARRICADES, SIGNS, FENCES, FLASHING
LIGHTS, TRAFFIC MEN, ETC. FOR MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC AS REQUIRED BY
THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION ( NCDOT) AND TOWN OF TROUTMAN
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MONUMENTS, IRON PINS, AND PROPERTY CORNERS DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE EXISTING CONCRETE CURBS, SIDEWALK, PAVING,
AND GUTTER AS DICTATED ON PLANS AND AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING.
10. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS NOT AN AUTHORIZATION TO GRADE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. WHEN
FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT OFF -SITE GRADING, PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE
AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS.
11. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE NCDOT AND TOWN OF TROUTMAN.
12. COORDINATE ALL CURB AND STREET GRADES IN INTERSECTIONS WITH INSPECTOR.
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND
BETWEEN THE ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SHALL WAIT
FOR INSTRUCTION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING.
14. ALL SITE DIMENSIONS ARE REFERENCED TO THE FACE OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE REFERENCED TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THE
STRUCTURE.
15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AT ALL INTERSECTIONS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS
MANUAL (LATEST REVISIONS FOR ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAILS).
16. SIGHT TRIANGLES SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED.
17. ALL OFF -SITE CONSTRUCTION MUST BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT NCDOT
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. ALL ON -SITE CONSTRUCTION MUST BE PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF TROUTMAN STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS.
18. ALL WORK MUST COMPLY WITH NORTH CAROLINA STATE BUILDING AND HANDICAPPED
ACCESSIBILITY CODE CHAPTER 11.
TREE PROTECTION NOTES:
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL TREES AND SHRUBS OUTSIDE OF CUT /FILL LINES, IN
ADDITION TO THOSE THAT RECEIVE TREE /SHRUB PROTECTION BARRIERS. THE
CONTRACTOR IS ALSO REQUESTED TO SAVE ALL OTHER EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS
WHERE POSSIBLE.
2. WHEN ROOT PRUNING IS NECESSARY, CUT ROOTS CLEANLY USING A DISC TRENCHER AND
IMMEDIATELY COVER ALL ROOT CUT SURFACES LARGER THAN TWO INCHES IN DIAMETER WITH
TREE WOUND DRESSING. USE PLYWOOD FORMS WHEN TREE ROOTS ARE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED
CURB & GUTTER OR SIDEWALK.
3. NO SOIL DISTURBANCE OR COMPACTION, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, TRAFFIC, BURIAL PITS,
TRENCHING OR OTHER LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY ALLOWED IN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE.
TREE BARRICADES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY DEMOLITION, GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION
BEGINS, AND NOT REMOVED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION.
4. NO GRUBBING WITHIN TREE PROTECTION ZONE. LEAVE SOIL AND LEAF LITTER UNDISTURBED.
SUPPLEMENT WITH 1 -2 INCHES OF MULCH. RE -SEED WITH GRASS ONLY IN DISTURBED /GRADED
AREAS.
5. TREE BARRICADES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY DEMOLITION, CLEARING, GRADING OR
CONSTRUCTION BEGINS AND IS NOT TO BE REMOVED UNTIL AFTER CONSTRUCTION.
TRAFFIC CONTROL:
1. REFER TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (LATEST EDITION) FOR DETAILS OF
STANDARD TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND STANDARDS.
DRAINAGE:
1. STORM PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED:
15" DIAMETER AND LARGER: RCP, CLASS III PER ASTM C- 76,WITH FLEXIBLE PLASTIC BITUMEN
GASKETS AT JOINTS.
LESS THAN 15" DIAMETER: PVC
2. ALL STORM DRAINAGE WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE CLASS III REINFORCED
CONCRETE PIPE.
3. ALL PIPE LENGTHS AND SLOPES ARE APPROXIMATE.
4. ALL PIPES SHALL BE LAID ON STRAIGHT ALIGNMENTS AND EVEN GRADES USING A PIPE LASER
OR OTHER ACCURATE METHOD.
5. SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAY RE REQUIRED IN THE STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY IF DEEMED
NECESSARY BY THE INSPECTOR.
6. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
STANDARDS IN ADDITION TO OTHER APPLICABLE CRITERIA:
A. NO MORE THAN 500 LF OF TRENCH MAY BE OPENED AT ONE TIME.
B. EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF TRENCHES.
C. EFFLUENT FROM DEWATERING OPERATIONS SHALL BE FILTERED OR PASSED THROUGH AN
APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE, OR BOTH, AND DISCHARGED IN A MANNER THAT
DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT FLOWING STREAMS OR OFF -SITE PROPERTY.
D. MATERIAL USED FOR BACK - FILLING TRENCHES SHALL BE PROPERLY COMPACTED IN
ORDER TO MINIMIZE EROSION AND PROMOTE STABILIZATION.
E. DESTABILIZATION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS.
F. APPLICABLE SAFETY REGULATIONS SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH.
7. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL
BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND /OR REPLACE THE EXISTING
STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER.
8. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT
STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT.
9. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR INVERT FROM
INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT.
10. PRECAST STRUCTURES MAY BE USED AT CONTRACTORS OPTION. CATCH BASINS, MANHOLES,
FRAMES, GRATES, ETC. SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST EDITION OF THE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD DETAILS AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
11. THIS PLAN DETAILS PIPES UP TO 5FT FROM THE BUILDING FACE. REFER TO DRAWINGS BY
OTHERS FOR BUILDING CONNECTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY AND INSTALL PIPE
ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY.
12. ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND
SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING & COVERS. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER ".
13. STRUCTURE TOP ELEVATIONS SHOWN HERE ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST
AS NECESSARY.
REVISIONS
DATE BY
UTILITY NOTES:
1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION
OF PROPOSED UTILITIES.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE TOWN OF TROUTMAN UTILITY INSPECTORS
72 -HOURS BEFORE CONNECTING TO ANY EXISTING LINE.
3. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D 3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP
8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D 3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP
6" PVC SCHEDULE 40
DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 AND AWWA C151
4. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
6" AND LARGER - DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150
SMALLER THAN 6" - COPPER TUBE
5. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET.
6. PVC SANITARY SEWER SERVICES WHICH ARE 3 TO 14 FEET DEEP SHALL REQUIRE
BEDDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL 7000.10 & 7000.13 FOR PVC PIPE. PVC
SERVICES WHICH ARE GREATER THAN 14 FEET AND LESS THAN 20 FEET SHALL
REQUIRE CLASS A BEDDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL 7000.13. ANY SERVICES
OVER 20' AND LESS THAN 3' DEEP REQUIRE DIP.
7. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH THRUST BLOCKING AS
CALLED OUT IN STANDARD DETAIL 6000.13.
8. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING
18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE).
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 4' -0" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES.
10. IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATERLINES, SANITARY LINES,
STORM LINES AND GAS LINES (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE
SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON
BOTH SIDES OF CROSSING, THE WATERLINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH
APPROPRIATE THRUST BLOCKING AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18"
CLEARANCE. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA
C -151) (CLASS 50).
11. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE
BACKFILLING.
12. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION
STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I.
13. THE TOWN OF TROUTMAN HAS THE RIGHT TO INSPECT ALL PRIVATE WATER
SYSTEMS.
14. DRAWINGS DO NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES.
15. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY
NEW LINES.
16. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR TIE -IN LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF
ALL UTILITIES.
17. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE
TOWN OF TROUTMAN UTILITY DEPARTMENT WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS,
INSTALLATION, AND TESTING OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES.
18. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND /OR
ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON
RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,
MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON
AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE
UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST
EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES.
19. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL
EXISTING UTILITIES CHARTED OR UNCHARTED WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
20. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND /OR CERTIFICATIONS AND /OR TESTING REQUIRED
BY CODES AND /OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO
ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICE.
21. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION
REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
22. ALL UTILITY MAIN LENGTHS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
23. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE
PLACED UNDERGROUND.
24. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WORK TO BE INSTALLED
BY A LICENSED UTILITY CONTRACTOR.
25. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AS REQUIRED WITH DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
AND AT &T FOR INSTALLATION OF PRIMARY ELECTRIC SERVICE AND TELEPHONE
SERVICE TO THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS.
26. WHEN A WATER MAIN CROSSES OVER A SEWER MAIN, THERE MUST BE EIGHTEEN
INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPERATION. IF THE WATER MAIN MUST GO UNDER THE
SEWER MAIN, BOTH THESE LINES MUST BE OF DUCTILE IRON FOR A DISTANCE OF
TEN FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CROSSING WITH A TWELVE INCH VERTICAL
SEPERATION. THE CROSSING OF OTHER UNDERGROUND PIPE REQUIRES A MINIMUM
OF TWELVE INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPERATION. ALL DISTANCES ARE MEASURED
FROM OUTSIDE DIAMETER TO OUTSIDE DIAMETER.
27. WHEN A WATER LINE PASSES OVER OR UNDER A STORM SEWER, VERTICAL
SEPERATION OF 18 INCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNLESS BOTH LINES ARE OF
DUCTILE IRON OR ENCASED IN CONCRETE. A CONCRETE PAD SHALL BE POURED
BETWEEN THE TWO. DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM OUTSIDE DIAMETER TO
OUTSIDE DIAMETER.
BACKFLOW PREVENTION NOTES:
1. THERE SHALL BE NO TAPS, PIPING BRANCHES, UNAPPROVED BYPASS PIPING,
HYDRANTS, FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION POINTS OR OTHER WATER -USING
APPURTENANCES CONNECTED TO THE SUPPLY LINE BETWEEN ANY WATER METER
AND ITS TOWN OF TROUTMAN UTILITIES DEPARTMENT REQUIRED BACKFLOW
PREVENTER.
2. EACH TOWN OF TROUTMAN UTILITY DEPARTMENT REQUIRED BACKFLOW PREVENTER
ASSEMBLY IS REQUIRED TO BE TESTED BY AN APPROVED CERTIFIED TESTER PRIOR
TO PLACING THE WATER SYSTEM INTO SERVICE.
3. 2" REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY SHALL BE
INSTALLED PER TOWN OF TROUTMAN REGULATIONS INSIDE THE BUILDING.
4. THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER FOR THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE LOCATED IN A
DEDICATED RISER ROOM WITH EXTERIOR DOOR ACCESS.
Kimley)))Horn
© 2015 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
333 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600, RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
WWW. KIM LEY- HORN. COM
GRADING:
1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL TOWN OF
TROUTMAN AND NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
( NCDOT) REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.
2. ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS REFLECT FINISHED GRADES.
3. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK, AND THIS
MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO GROUND
BREAKING.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO OWNER ANY
DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SHALL WAIT FOR INSTRUCTION PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND
PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO
EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION
BACK TO EXISTING GRADE.
7. ALL FILL TO BE COMPACTED PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF A
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.
8. LIMITS OF CLEARING SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN ARE BASED UPON THE
APPROXIMATE CUT AND FILL SLOPE LIMITS, OR OTHER GRADING
REQUIREMENTS.
9. THE PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOWN IN DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS AND
SIDEWALKS ARE FINISHED ELEVATIONS INCLUDING ASPHALT. REFER TO
PAVEMENT CROSS SECTION DATA TO ESTABLISH CORRECT SUBBASE OR
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE ELEVATIONS TO BE COMPLETED UNDER THIS
CONTRACT.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE SO THAT RUNOFF WILL
DRAIN BY GRAVITY FLOW ACROSS NEW PAVEMENT AREAS TO NEW OR
EXISTING DRAINAGE INLETS OR SHEET OVERLAND.
11. ANY GRADING, BEYOND THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN ON
THE GRADING PLAN IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
12. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY
RILEY SURVEYING, P.A. DATED OCTOBER 8, 2013.
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL TERMS & CONDITIONS AS
OUTLINED IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FOR STORMWATER
DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
14. ALL UNSURFACED AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING OPERATION SHALL
RECEIVE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL.
15. CONTRACTOR SHALL GRASS DISTURBED AREAS UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND
OF GRASS IS OBTAINED.
16. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES
AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME.
17. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF ALL SHEETING, SHORING, BRACING AND SPECIAL
EXCAVATION MEASURES REQUIRED TO MEET OSHA, FEDERAL, STATE AND
LOCAL REGULATIONS PURSUANT TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE WORK
INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. THE DESIGN ENGINEER ACCEPTS NO
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESIGNS) TO INSTALL SAID ITEMS.
18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE IN THE CONTRACT PRICE ANY
DEWATERING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PROJECT AS SHOWN ON
THE PLANS AS AN ALTERNATE ALLOWANCE.
19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR
EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS
AND ELEVATIONS.
20. ALL FILL MATERIALS, EXISTING BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, PAVEMENT AND
UTILITY STRUCTURES, TOPSOIL AND ANY OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS
SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM WITHIN THE BEARING ZONE
BELOW THE STRUCTURE.
21. ALL FOUNDATION AND UTILITY EXCAVATION SHALL BE INSPECTED BY A
QUALIFIED GEOTECHNIAL REPRESENTATIVE TO DETERMINE WHETHER
UNSUITABLE MATERIAL MUST BE REMOVED. ALL UNDESIRABLE MATTER
SHALL BE REMOVED, BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED WITH SUITABLE
MATERIAL AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE AT
CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
22. GRADES, ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. AS
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, THEY MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE
UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS. STATIONS, OFFSETS AND ELEVATIONS REFER
TO THE CENTER OF DROP INLETS, MANHOLES AND JUNCTION BOXES, AND
THE MIDPOINT OF THE LIP FOR CATCH BASINS.
23. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST AND /OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS
NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE.
24. EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN AT 1
FOOT.
25. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES
INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES SERVING THE
STRUCTURE. UTILITIES ARE TO BE REMOVED TO THE RIGHT -OF -WAY.
EXISTING LEGEND
KHA PROJECT
012587004
DATE TROUTMAN CHARTER ACADEMY
08/10/2015
SCALE AS SHOWN PREPARED FOR
DESIGNED BY GCB RYAN COMPANIES US, INC.
DRAWN BY JCB
CHECKED BY COB TOWN OF TROUTMAN
NORTH CAROLINA
BUFFER LIMITS
EASEMENT
PUBLIC ROADWAY RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
LOT LINE
TREELINE(MATURE GROWTH)
TREELINE(SAPLINGS)
PROPOSED LEGEND
LIGHT POLE
COMMUNICATIONS BOX
FIRE HYDRANT
GATE VALVE
CATCH BASIN
SEWER MANHOLE
TREE
SIGN
PROPERTY /ROW
SETBACK
EASEMENT
CENTERLINE
MONUMENT
IRON PIPE /ROD
EDGE PAVEMENT
CURBLINE
CONTOURS (MAJOR)
CONTOURS (MINOR)
OVERHEAD POWER
FIBER OPTIC
GAS
WATER
SANITARY SEWER
STORM DRAIN
UNDERGROUND ELEC
UNDERGROUND TEL
INLET PROTECTION
RETAINING WALL
SILT FENCE
TREE PROTECTION
FENCE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
BENCHMARK
UTILITIES TO BE
ABANDONED
TREE TO BE
REMOVED
PAVEMENT TO
BE REMOVED
O
►t
O
O
u
ZL
O
IP
445
OHP
FO
G
W
m-
E
T
11
SF
TPF
CL
SITE BENCHMARK
H
o�oQoQo
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
O�OQOQO
0 0 0 0
PAVEMENT MARKING
DIRECTIONAL ARROWS
PROPOSED CONCRETE
TYPICAL FOR SIMILAR AREAS (TYP)
PROPOSED HANDICAPPED PARKING
PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE
IPF
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS +100.00
FIRELANE MARKING 0
DIVERSION DITCH >TD
GENERAL NOTES
SHEET NUMBER
C-1.0
CALCULATED POINT
®
EXISTING IRON ROD
XMAG
EXISTING MAG NAIL
O
IRON PIPE SET(5 /8 ")
•
EXISTING IRON PIPE
°
ELECTRIC METER
CLEAN OUT
Q
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
END OF PIPE NOT FOUND /NOT SURVEYED
®
WATER METER
wv
m
WATER VALVE
PX
FIRE HYDRANT
0
CATCH BASIN
CURB INLET
LIGHT POLE
®
IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE
Pa
BACK FLOW PREVENTER
SD
STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE
0
TELEPHONE BOX
`la'
UTILITY POLE
Q
TREE W/ SIZE & SPECIES
LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION(NO POLE)
HANDICAP ACCESS POINT
POST INDICATOR VALVE
oe
OVERHEAD POWER LINE(S)
S/
SANITARY SEWER LATERAL
SS
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
X
4' CHAINLINK FENCE
0
FAUX WROUGHT IRON FENCE
RIP -RAP
KHA PROJECT
012587004
DATE TROUTMAN CHARTER ACADEMY
08/10/2015
SCALE AS SHOWN PREPARED FOR
DESIGNED BY GCB RYAN COMPANIES US, INC.
DRAWN BY JCB
CHECKED BY COB TOWN OF TROUTMAN
NORTH CAROLINA
BUFFER LIMITS
EASEMENT
PUBLIC ROADWAY RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS
LOT LINE
TREELINE(MATURE GROWTH)
TREELINE(SAPLINGS)
PROPOSED LEGEND
LIGHT POLE
COMMUNICATIONS BOX
FIRE HYDRANT
GATE VALVE
CATCH BASIN
SEWER MANHOLE
TREE
SIGN
PROPERTY /ROW
SETBACK
EASEMENT
CENTERLINE
MONUMENT
IRON PIPE /ROD
EDGE PAVEMENT
CURBLINE
CONTOURS (MAJOR)
CONTOURS (MINOR)
OVERHEAD POWER
FIBER OPTIC
GAS
WATER
SANITARY SEWER
STORM DRAIN
UNDERGROUND ELEC
UNDERGROUND TEL
INLET PROTECTION
RETAINING WALL
SILT FENCE
TREE PROTECTION
FENCE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
BENCHMARK
UTILITIES TO BE
ABANDONED
TREE TO BE
REMOVED
PAVEMENT TO
BE REMOVED
O
►t
O
O
u
ZL
O
IP
445
OHP
FO
G
W
m-
E
T
11
SF
TPF
CL
SITE BENCHMARK
H
o�oQoQo
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
O�OQOQO
0 0 0 0
PAVEMENT MARKING
DIRECTIONAL ARROWS
PROPOSED CONCRETE
TYPICAL FOR SIMILAR AREAS (TYP)
PROPOSED HANDICAPPED PARKING
PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE
IPF
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS +100.00
FIRELANE MARKING 0
DIVERSION DITCH >TD
GENERAL NOTES
SHEET NUMBER
C-1.0

B. R. BASS - -_ - - - - - _ -_�_ _ _ _ - _ -_ -_ -� SUPERIOR PROPERTIES OF IREDELL LIMITED DB 737, PG 543 = - - _ - - - II \ \� PARTNERSHIP
4 PARCEL #4750 -02 -5121 ��i- _ -- - - -- _ = J _ - - ----- - - - - -- - _ -DB 1900, PG 1201
Q % j j, - - -- - - _-- - - - - -- - = - -
-
- -- PAS'_ #47 -5 -12 -1384
O SS
BP: 10 +00.00 `o -
= S' GO � M� � � + 60 JOINT RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT
-
60 R� �5� - / �/ DB 1790, PG 353; MB 58, PG 147 -
E P -
4 3 - _ - - -_ _ _ _ -� 60 JOINT RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT
_ 8
000 - �_846�4 4 = _ -� - _- - - -_ _ _ DB 1790, PG_353� b}B 5$, PG 147
Nv
_77
C __7 32 /�J/ i/ V �I �� I I /II�IIIII�IIIII�IIII�IVA \�IVA
2 V V v v / � v - - - IM : 839. 27
z jNV OU
�
z CO
I\
I
0
Q E v 0� �\
8�
8
_- - --RM 42
° v v v v 844 IlIIIII�IIII //v I \
- - RI 39.96 \VGA \�A� �
z ° \ \ V A (IIII l/ - �I �� -_ -- - - -- 836.93 A\ \\ \\ VAS AAA \ VA\ \ c
- - - -_
INV-AN:
\ \\ \\ \\ \\
\ II I /// I I ' INV OUT: 836.93
BLDG CONNECTION -01
�RIM: 839.99V�\ V�\
I
_ I 1 III III cr - ' -° - INV OUT: 837.00 A
V A \ I /IIII II III II / 179 LF OF. - - 7
LF OF RCP ® 0.50% a PROP. GYM
-12" PVC ® 1.00% / 10,935 SF; A \ \\ \ VA
A "r
843
111 IIIIIIIII �l ll I - - _ - 69 LF OF \ \\\ v\ \ ��VA o
t�fi
12" PVC @ 1.00% A I I \\ \Wwvv� �A \ V�VA
RIM: 838.37 - - _
RD -40 RD -41 �\ ��\
_ -' NV IN: 833.01 " I I I I \ \
NV IN: 833.64- RIM: 839.98 / V A V A \ 00
10 LF OF �� \ V \
z \ \ � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � JI // / / RIM:. 839.92 INV IN: 836.86 V� \v � \� \ \ \.A �
° - _ A �� )�ll ill /// /, / // / I -� V OUT: 832.91 -1V IN. 836.14 - PVC ®1.00 %INV IN: 836 74
&> \ \ i -- _ NV OUT: 836A4 - - 7 LF OF INV OUT:, 836.24
2 `a, _ _ - _ -- _ 12" PVC ® 2.00%
-
1111 / BLDG CONNECTION -02
RIM: 839.99
\ l 1111 ///IIII lI/
OOF
- �� i - INV OUT: 837.00 - 849
111 Ill Ill /IIII l /111 - _- _ B / X 9
83 LF OF PROP. 2STORY - -84 y/ y /y y ,� ,� y
- \
V lI /ll lIlllll y 11 // l/ 1111 / - M 12" PVC ® 3.00% SCHOOL BUILDING
�
7 LF OF 67.946 S.F. 4-
/ - - _ - _ l 12" PVC 1.50% F.F.E.- 840.00' _ 8 ��y y y �y
- _ / y i
u
v l 1 1111 11 / ll jl�j/ Illlll /I // / / _ ct) _ _ BLDG coNry oN_63_
I - - -_
[W.- -839.99 - -- -- _ _ 4�
�_ - - �� 1N�F OUT- 837 00 _ - - _ - ,, �8yg �y ,� �°l9 y /
0
��
RD-52 - - - -� � g38- - p�`
_INV IN: 8369
-INV OUT: 836-.89-
-BLDG -
° ONNR�IC TfO3N 7 fi.5II b 67 LF OF
o 12" PVC 0 1.50 % - INV OUT:-8�.31
° 7 LF OF _
V A A II /IIII lI II 11 I I l I III �l /l� // l /ll - - - - -82� y
i
- - i 153 LF OF / -12�� PVC ®2.00% _ - - i 7� $�
\ llI 11 // 111 I I lI II IIII l /l // l - _ _ - y _ _ .�
0
I IIII l ll \ / - RIME 839.99 CT19N - - _ - PROP. PLAY AREA 0r -826 5 /
/18" RCP ®0.50% -
(IIII
- \ / 183 1 II III IIII III ll j, -� - - �/ / /�- OUT'_
� V ll1 //I / /, -- -
�D�1 INV 8370 - g2
_ -
I �CB�30 - - - _ _ RIM: 839.68
v v IIII l / /Ill III I// 1I1/ V ' _ � 11111 VIII /III I I / / / + � � � � , / / � - - � _ � RBM �838.ss -
3 RIM-. 836.98 �'S - - - - _ INV�1N: - 835.89 _ 10 LF OF -
y y VIN: 831.4. y
o�- - A \ VIII Il/ l / /Ill/ / l \ V IlIIIII III 1111 IIII I I k/ IN: 834.3 _ INV IN: - 836.87 _
� _
\ \ I I I I
V/ llI / l /%/ /l / //1111 �lIl1I1IIlI�IIII III / / I IN�I ►N: 832 4 1NVOUT 835:89 _ 8" PVC ®2.00% y- y y INV OUT: 83130 y
\ V IIII I I I III/ llIll // 1111 --INV IN: 8 .14
IIIIIIIII Ill 111/11 l l l 1111111 /I /l l 11111 (IIII/ I 1 / / / �_ - - - 89 LF OF $a
i I III l 1 1 1 ll / ll Il I I - \/
I. ll ll l l l llll� //l 111/ Ill / 111 / INV OUT: 2.04 -
� o 18" RCP @ 3.40% � y y y
838 10
DBL CB -23
RIM: 836.37
INV OUT: 833.13
/
- --
��
� / / / /// s3s.o3,
A
12" Pvc ®1.50% � x -
° A\ I II IIII IIII IIlIII11lII IIII 1 / /Il llfllll/ /1 835.00 I - i
� 839 YI -2
a
% IIIIIIIIIII II I I lIIIIIII I / �/ / /// / 1 I PROP. TOT LOT / INV IN: 828.26
l
/ I I IIII Il l II I II II Ill/ l I l // /
III II II lI IIII I l �llll l 1111 111 111 i x 5000 SF INV OUT: 828.16
� 156 LF OF
_ 831 7 I /l \ \ � °o - 15" RCP ®1.83 %
�$ � - - - � 135 LF of
9 LF OF � LA " P ® 4.47% 36
x -
f
6 24" RCP ® 3.30% 108 LF OF 53 LF OF
„�llll11111 /Il / lip 1 �lll 11 /I 1111 ll/ /I /Il I lI + �^� �� �� 18" RCP ®2.33%
24" RCP @ 3.23% LF OF
° 1111 11 /l1 / /l /I /835 ��� �- �� � 8 154 RCP ® 0.50 %34
834
833 /l/ I ��� ��� I '
� AV AV A \ , �� � l /ii � /ii��lllllll /�1 I III 8g0 825 8 1p - -
o
z �� Ill II II 2
z� /ii �� _� 816
Q A I� �� I 831. /�„ �; i - -
// / /���II�I�� I L 814
LL-
-
��
2 823 824 825 826 827
Z 4 - s-
Q ° -� �� I�� /� - - - -- ate✓
C .s
CATCH BASIN
�
•
JUNCTION BOX
305
EXISTING CONTOUR
-302
I
PROP. STORM PIPE
N •=a
PROP. RIP RAP
I
I
PROP. FLARED END SECTION
PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE
-o
o \ \
-A
N
CD
\
}:
0
O
tt"
.'•
JB -22 _• '
RIM: 838.92 \ \
`INV
IN: 832.34
INV OUT: 832.24
/
•: i
\
I
I
O
•M. -1
CB -4
RIM: 833.07
INV OUT: 827.1
RIM: 823.29
z / - -- �. D
Q i �� PR PRR1Y INV IN: 820.00
PROPOSE CS -100 47 LF OF
RIM: 823.03 30" RCP @ 0.50%
INV OUT: 820.23
W E�AND
° - MB 58, p
J NEAM e„ /
°
_ �
o ° KE
MPV TROUTMAN INVESTORS, LLC RIM: 834.20 - RR Nlvc
E DB 2296 PG 1470 INV IN: 823.00 H
TAX PARCEL #4750 -11 -1496 INV IN: 826.00 v�v
a o INV OUT: 816.80 \� N \ /
Q »,
WETLAND R M: 819.25 �' - -- --
INV IN: 816.50 RIM: 830.98 \ \ \%
INV IN: 826.58
INVNOUT:� 826 48
LEGEND
CATCH BASIN
�
•
JUNCTION BOX
305
EXISTING CONTOUR
-302
I
PROP. STORM PIPE
PROP. RIP RAP
I
PROP. FLARED END SECTION
PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE
I I
LEGEND
CATCH BASIN
YARD INLET
•
JUNCTION BOX
305
EXISTING CONTOUR
-302
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROP. STORM PIPE
PROP. RIP RAP
PROP. FLARED END SECTION
PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
Knowmars below.
Cal before you dig.
T
KHA PROJECT LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
Kiom e )))Horn 012587004 SHEET NUMBER
cn
DATE IREDELL CHARTER ACADEMY
z
11/02/2015
Q SCALE AS SHOWN PREPARED FOR GRADING AND DRAINAGE P
©2015 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. RYAN C _4
333 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600, RALEIGH, NC 27601 DESIGNED BY JCB RYAN COMPANIES US, INC.
PHONE: 919 - 835 -1494 FAX: 919 - 653 -5847 DRAWN BY JCB
TJ WWW.KIMLEY- HORN.COM
No. REVISIONS DATE BY CHECKED BY COB I TOWN OF TROUTMAN NORTH CAROLINA

� 1
0
I
Q
0
0 0
E
0
I II
c /
0
0
�a
0
z
2 = I
E
Z �
z <
= o I
Z
a
< o
Z
I
Q
z o
N
_ L
- - - - - - -�-ee
IIA��VAIVAI - -J I I
B. R. BASS -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-
DB 737, PG 543 SUPERIOR PROPERTIE
�� _ - -II \\ - - - - - -- _ _ _ - - --
TAX PARCEL #4750 -02 -5121 -i- _- - - - -- _ - - - -- -- - -I - -- - - -- DB 1S
- - - - -` 1- - - - ------ - - - - -- -- - -- -- TAX PARCEL ;
0 � JOINT RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT
-- -_
I B.R. BASS I 1 1 � � RAG �5� _ - / / DB 1790, PGI 353; MB 58, PG 147
- - -
DB 762, PG 119 9� PG - - - - - - - _
TAX PARCEL #4750 -01 -3837 I �� - - _ _ _- = _�^�_ - 44 = Y - c,_ - - �- 60' JOINT RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT
Q , -- - -- _ -_ _Q X34_- -
- `� _ -� 46 DB 1790 PG 353; MB 58, PG 147
15' RIP-RA-P--APRON pER
HEADWALL -01
RIM: 841.59 -
INV OUT: 835.59 j �;., ' - - _ = o� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- = -8s < - 845
842 -
8
0
83 LF OF o - -- - - -_ -- --
\, i- 60 RCP 0 7.98%
cp
-1 - / �� -- - - -- - -
1
a
RDJ42
RIM:I 839.96
INV IOU 8 8393
T: 6.93 `�
N ' �
842 ��
I .
841 - - - -
::',. 8� 844 , I 'II l�llll� / I _ / i / - - =
RIM: 839.27 CB -32 _
BLDG CONNECTION-01
INV_ OUT: 833.90 RIM: 39.99
,----INV OUT: 837.00
139 tF OF - 7 LF OF
� ��, L _ � � v � \ I I �I l 11 , ; ll, / // , � �, � ' =� � / / ' , - - 15° RcP�-o.5o %- 12" PVC ®1.00%
_ _ j _ _
°
-
1 _
HEADWALL -02 / / I - _ / = 69 LF OF
� � � � � � � � Al,� 'ill /�
843 I I / / _
� / RIM: 835.00 II � � I i� � Il I I
INV IN: 829.00
CB -31 _ R _ 12" PVC 0 1.00%
l v1111111 I I W I�IIII 1 1
III t I I I I I I Ill 11 _ - �� RIM: 838.37 -- - D
- / RIM: 839.9
III II I II I l ll/ '� - - NV IN: 836.14 -
I ,INV IN: 833.01 e RD -41
- - INV IN: 833.64 10 LF OF RIM: 839.98
� I ) � � � W 1 IIII I V OUT: 836.14
o ���� _ &� \ \ IIII 111 / / / / v - - - - - INV OUT: 832.91 . - 12" PVC ® 1.00% INV IN: 836.86
i� I -. 15 RIP RAP
APRON��» I�1� V 1111 // / i - -I �� - INV IN: 836.24
1111 II 111 / /l� /f/ / �� 7 LF OF INV OUT: 836.24
l l -
- _ s42 / / /l�/ // // _ I, I - _ 12" PVC CAD 2.00%
BLDG CONNECTION -02
-
°
RIM: 839.99 • 849
- Q INV OUT: 837.00
PROP. 2 STORY '� y
/ F 1 SCHOOL BUILDING �� 6
I
67,946 S.F.
�� 7 LF OF F.F.E.= 840.00' _
_ ° 111 111 �r o _ l l/ l�lll I/ lll/ / i / - - - - _ _
�, o -� I I ° / I 1 1 1 � - - .;_f� 841 / / // I/ / � � - � _� - - - _ 12 PVC � 1.50%
/ I �� 11 \� 111. v� l 1/ 111 l 1 11 l/ / ll�llll�l -
2 RIM � 39 99 CTION -03 y y
° L INV OUT: 837.00 y
o ° -o
RD 52
ll� l 11111/ / 11
- - °° RIM: 839.97 y y
_ � � I I / I D � \ \ I l/ / / 1 /I �illl 111
153 LF OF o�-
"� INV IN: 836.89
� = INV OUT: 836.�g
/ - - t RCP 0 0.50% BLDG CONNECTION -05
0 // I 8� _
I / RIM 837.50 y y
I� I / \ _
° I / / I // I I 11/11/ 1 PVC 0 1.50 %
67
2' LFUT: 836.31
/ / I
_ 7 LF OF y y
x I I l/� l v III 1I Ill/ I I - 12" PVC ®2.00% y A
BLDG CONNECTION -04
DO
X839 I I RD -51 WV OUT 837.00 y y
j con -3-] / �� \ Il �l1 11 /Ill INV IN: °
RIM: 839.68 b�
/ / / I CB -30 835 89
w _ I / \ / I RIM: 836.98 10 LF OF y y
11 INV IN: 834.3 INV IN: 836.87 g" PVC 0 2.00%
INV IN: 83 4 INV OUT: 835.89 ® y y
INV IN: 8 .14
INV OUT: 32.04
Z I I li I, �/ i 1 838 CB -10 I PROP. TOT LOT 00 y y
5000 SF
V OUM: 835.00 I 103 LF OF 839 LL. d A
�I I I Il�llll; 112" Pvc ®1.50%
0 1
Ih11 - �
- X
o�
� 156 LF OF ao
15" RCP @ 1.83% x
�I IIII I /837
l I II II d>� I I $�S 24 <F 9 LF OF
836 831 ��� �cA ® OF 24" RCP 0 3.30%
I �I11111I1 � / III 1111 I
I 11111�I11 // IIII IIIIII�
II 11111 11 i / (IIII 111111 I
o I 11 1 I I� I1 III/ I)III��
Z
T\
PROPOSED PROPERTY
z _ LINE
/-
_
Q III I qj
I�`\ \`���\�.
z r=
I I I IIII 1 1 1
� � i, Iill I '11� 1111 I 1 i
I II 111111 1 1 I
IIII 111 11111
J� / I I I IIIIIIIII I I I
T � 1 1! VIII VIII I I I
II I III I I I
= o / II; IIII IIII I I �
Q E I I I �� I II I I I IIII I I APPROXIMAT
I l l j ' I I IIII IIII I I _ E LOCATION
11 IIII A -
MB 58, EAM D„ WETLAND
°
IIII III\ ��/ PO 147
-
�-
III 1111111I1� - -__�
-
-�� i1�11�11�-
_
Q
J
TJ
o No. REVISIONS DATE BY
2
83�
� _ 1
Kim e )))Horn
© 2015 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
333 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600, RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone] FAX: 919 - 653 -5847
WWW.KIMLEY- HORN.COM
823
831
MPV TROUTMAN INVESTORS, LLC
DB 2296, PG 1470
TAX PARCEL #4750 -11 -1496
KHA PROJECT
012587004
DATE IREDELL CHARTER ACADEMY
11/02/2015
SCALE AS SHOWN PREPARED FOR
DESIGNED BY JCB RYAN COMPANIES US, INC.
DRAWN BY JCB
CHECKED BY COB TOWN OF TROUTMAN
NORTH CAROLINA
r3o
N
� o
�N
'I-- V_ __'
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
24" RCP 0 3.23%
816815 814
879
819 820 82'
FES -01
RIM: 819.25
INV IN: 816.50 CB -3
RIM: 830.98
INV IN: 826.58
INV IN: 826.91
INV OUT: 826.48
15" F
823 824 825 t
W,
KEG
LEGEND
CATCH BASIN
YARD INLET
• JUNCTION BOX
305 EXISTING CONTOUR
302 PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROP. STORM PIPE
PROP. RIP RAP
PROP. FLARED END SECTION
PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE
IVpR H
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
Knowvunars below.
Cal before you dig.
SHEET NUMBER
C -4.1
CB -2
RIM:
834.20
INV IN:
823.00
INV IN:
826.00
INV OUT:
816.80
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
24" RCP 0 3.23%
816815 814
879
819 820 82'
FES -01
RIM: 819.25
INV IN: 816.50 CB -3
RIM: 830.98
INV IN: 826.58
INV IN: 826.91
INV OUT: 826.48
15" F
823 824 825 t
W,
KEG
LEGEND
CATCH BASIN
YARD INLET
• JUNCTION BOX
305 EXISTING CONTOUR
302 PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROP. STORM PIPE
PROP. RIP RAP
PROP. FLARED END SECTION
PROP. CONTROL STRUCTURE
IVpR H
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
Knowvunars below.
Cal before you dig.
SHEET NUMBER
C -4.1

r
m
k'
0
E
E
CULVERT -1
=
N
Z
0
84
STREAM IMPACT: 86 FT
�
J
TIN "
CMP CULVERT ®2.95
PROPOSED
CONCRETE
84
HEADWALL
42
Z
c
E
PROPOSE GRADE � e
E
N
t UZ <
L 2
W Y
J
�➢
840
40
b
�
10 +23.25 N
ELEV: 829.00 �
<�
o �
y�
W
PROPOSED
<N
CONCRETE
<>
83
HEADWALL
38
_
wNw
w5 a
�'¢ a
1836
83
ELEV:
907
36
n
EXISTI
G GRADE
zz,
I
1E
I
0
-E
83
>
ELEV 8
5 59
34
N
o
83"91.
J
1835.69 7
32
O
w
w
O
ELEV:
U�
V)
f
U
�O
On
X00
O
�N
Q\
V=i
V1
Qwy
y
m
m
QN
Lo
0\
m
B
Y O
a
vj
$3
�
PROPO ED 83 LF
3O
S °
J
60"
W
CULVERTS ®7.98
.J
N e
LL
O
w�
812
�
1�
o s
M~N�
W
s _
8G
/2��8J
2/
\_/
0. X
E
\—STA:
W
of
\W\
o.
10 +00
11+00
12 +00
U
z --
-
w —
Ua
Q w
U�<<
y
o�
U a
Lu
O
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0
w z Q
0 15 30 60
�_ Q
m E
SHEET NUMBER
o €
EX -1
a
�
10 +23.25 N
ELEV: 829.00 �

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: The Ryan Companies US, Inc. 2. Evaluator's name: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
3. Date of evaluation: 05/15/2015 4. Time of evaluation: 10:00 am
5. Name of stream: UT to Kerr Branch 6. River basin-Yadkin-Pee Dee
7. Approximate drainage area: 67 ac. 8. Stream order:. Second Order
9. Length of reach evaluated: 40 If 10. County: Iredell
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
35.663617
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): - 80.849913
Method location determined (circle): [D3PS[Dropo Shee ✓I rtho (Aerial) Photo /GIS[DDther GISE3Dther
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
S1 is located southeast of downtown Troutman on either side of US 21 /NC 115 between Lexus Drive and Flower House Loop.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Culvert Installation
15. Recent weather conditions: Mild, dry and temps. in the 70 -80's
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Partly cloudy and 70 -80T
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ,Section 10 FITidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
nTrout Waters 00utstanding Resource Waters ,l Nutrient Sensitive Waters Owater Supply Watershed. (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: 20 % Residential 10 % Commercial 10 % Industrial _% Agricultural
25 % Forested 35 % Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 21 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) QGentle (2 to 4 %) DModerate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight 00ccasional bends Frequent meander Overy sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 45 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 05/15/2015
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

UT to Kerr Branch
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
1
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
2
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 — 4
0-4
1
U5
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
0
�
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
1
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0 2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
1
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0 4
0 4
3
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
3
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
2
>4
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
F--1
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
2
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 — 4
0-5
2
F.,
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
4
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle- pool/ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
2
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
1
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
4
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0— 5
0— 5
0— 5
2
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 — 5
0-5
2
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
45
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: The Ryan Companies US, Inc. 2. Evaluator's name: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
3. Date of evaluation: 05/15/2015 4. Time of evaluation: 10:00 am
5. Name of stream: Kerr Branch 6. River basin: Yadkin -Pee Dee
7. Approximate drainage area: 67 ac. 8. Stream order:. Second Order
9. Length of reach evaluated: 40 If 10. County: Iredell
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
35.663076
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): - 80.848978
Method location determined (circle): [D3PS[Dropo Shee ✓I rtho (Aerial) Photo /GIS[DDther GISE3Dther
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
S1 is located southeast of downtown Troutman on either side of US 21 /NC 115 between Lexus Drive and Flower House Loop.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Extension of 1 UxT double box culvert
15. Recent weather conditions: Mild, dry and temps. in the 70 -80's
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Partly cloudy and 70 -80T
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ,Section 10 FITidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
nTrout Waters 00utstanding Resource Waters ,l Nutrient Sensitive Waters Owater Supply Watershed. (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: 20 % Residential 10 % Commercial 10 % Industrial _% Agricultural
25 % Forested 35 % Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 12' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 18'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) QGentle (2 to 4 %) DModerate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight 00ccasional bends Frequent meander Overy sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 56 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 05/15/2015
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

Kerr Branch
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
4
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
1
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 — 4
0-4
1
U5
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
0
�
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
1
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0 2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0 4
0 4
3
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
3
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
2
>4
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
F--1
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
3
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
3
H
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
4
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle- pool/ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
4
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
1
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
5
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0— 5
0— 5
0— 5
4
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 — 5
0-5
2
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
56
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 5/15/2015
Project/Site: Troutman Charter School/
Stream 1 (UT to Kerr
Latitude: 35.664169
Evaluator: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
County: Iredell
Longitude: - 80.850204
Total Points: 38
0
1
2
Stream Determination (ci
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten erennial
e.g. Quad Name: Shepherds
if ? 19 or perennial if >_ 30
3
2
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 20.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
,a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active /relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
2
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 11.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
0
1* streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes
Stream evaluated below 48" CMP beneath Crosstie Rd.
Geomorphology of stream above Crosstie Rd. is drastically different than downsteam
The bed elevation of S1 has cut down to bed elevation of Kerr Branch back to the culvert at Crosstie
Channel is approximately 15' deep and 15' wide with continuous baseflow

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 5/15/2015
Project/Site: Troutman Charter School/
S2 (Kerr Branch)
Latitude: 35.662961
Evaluator: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
County: Iredell
Longitude: - 80.849797
Total Points: 43
0
1
2
Stream Determination (ci
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten erennial
e.g. Quad Name: Shepherds
if ? 19 or perennial if >_ 30
3
2
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 24.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
,a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active /relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 8
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
1
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
0
1* streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Evaluation above the confluence with S1
Second order perennial stream

Kimley 4Horn

Kimley 4HIorn
S
°
f
i
�F-
� Y Y
k
View of S2 — Kerr Branch. Looking upstream.
View of S2 — Kerr Branch. Looking downstream.
Title
Site Photographs
Prepared For:
Project
Troutman Charter Academy Project
RYADate
Troutman, Iredell County,
North Carolina
Site
KHA Project Number
Photo Page
8/23/15
012587004
2
Kimley 4HIorn