Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130223 Ver 4_Nov 4 Sites 13 and 9 Inspection_20151104Wetland Inspection Report Project Num: 20130223 Version: 4 Project Name: NCDOT- Greensboro Western L County: Guilford Location: NCDOT- Greensboro Western Loop (U-2524 C& D) Latitude: +36° 08' SW Plan Location Site Owner Name NC DOT PDEA Inspection Date: 11/4/2015 Reason for Inspection Routine Inspection Type: Site Inspection (DOT) Inspection Contact Person: On-Site Representative(s): Title: Primary Inspector: Dave Wanucha Secondary Inspector(s): Facility Compliance Status: � Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Program Areas: Standards/Sediment Question Areas: � Unpermittable Activities Inspection Summary: Follow up is needed to determine if temporary stream crossing is underdesigned. Status: Issued Project Type: Road maintenance/repair/improvemen Region: �linston-Salem Longitude: -79° 53' 04" Phone: Phone: 336-776-9703 page: 1 Site Number: 20130223 Owner: Thorpe, Gregory Inspection Date: 11/4/2015 Inspection Type: Site Inspection (DOT) Reason for Visit: Routine Unpermittabie Activities # Note: This section should be completed only if the impact is unpermittable (eg. Sediment, draining wetlands, etc.). Is stream(s) free of unpermittable impacts? Is wetland(s) free of unpermittable impacts? Is open water(s) free of unpermittable impacts? Are other standards being met (turbidity, pH, etc.) in all surface waters onsite? Are surFace waters on the site free of illegal discharges? Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ � ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: I met with Jerry Parker, Bill Snell and Bob Brady to review sediment losses in wetlands near Sites 13 and 9. At Site 13, sediment deposits were determined to be normal over top of bank flooding obyHorsepen Creek which deposited sediments within the floodplain wetlands. The cause of the flooding was due to extreme rainfall. However, it may have been exacerbated by the temporarv stream crossinq. I requested that Bill double check the hydraulic capacity of the crossing and determine if more capacity is needed and to follow-up. Site 9 was still too wet to commence with removal of sediment from wetland underneath temporary bridging. Erosion measures were in place but were overwhelmed. page: 2