SW3240204_Supplement-EZ Form_20240305

SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE
FORMS LOADED
PROJECT INFORMATION_
1 Project Name Grasey Branch WRF Expanelon_
2 Project Area ac 1.41
3 Coastal Wetland Area ac _ 0
4 Surface Water Area ac 0.47
5 Is this project High or Low Density? _ _ Low
6 Does this project use an off-site SCM? No
WMPLLANCE VATH 02H.1003(4)
7 Width of ve etated setbacks provided(feet) _ 30
8 Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated? Yes
9 If BUA is proposed in the setback,does it meet NCAC 02H.1003(4)(c-d)? N/A ,
10 Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project? No
NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMe:
11 'Infiltration System 0
12 jBioretention Cell 0
13 Wet Pond 0
14 Stormwater Welland 0
15 Permeable Pavement 0 _
16 Sand Filter 0 _
17 Rainwater Harvesting(RWH) 0
18 Green Roof 0
19 Level Spreader-Filter Strip(LS-FS) 0
20 Disconnected Impervious Surface(DIS) 0
21 T SR19ntSwale 0
22 Dry Pond 0
23 StormFilter 0
24 Silva Cell 0
25 Ba alter 0 _
26 Filterra 0
FORMS LOADED
DESIGNER CERTIFICATION
27 Name and Title: Michael Parker,P.E.
28 Organization:_ Hazen and Sawyer
29 Street address: 9101 Southern Pine Boulevard,-Suits 250
30 !City.State,Zip: Charlotte,NC 28273
31 !Phone numberls): 17W4 940-8910
32 lEmail: [e-mail]
"fire on S [ an
I certify,under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ forrn and all supporting Infom nation were prepared under my direction or supervislorr,that the
Infornaflon provided In the loran t%to the best of my knowledge and befiet,true,accurate,and complete;and that the engines rig pier*,
specifications.operation and rrakrtanence agreements and other supporting Wornudlon we consistent WM the Information provided here.
r)cs"ikr�er
CA
Ar- t
- 0,
SEAL r Signature of Designer -K 1,
26432
D.
seal Date

DRAINAGE AREAS
1 Is this a high density project? No
2 If so,number of drainage areas/SCMs 0
3 Does this project have low density areas? Yes
4 If so,number of low density drainage areas 1
Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule
5 versions? No
FORMS LOADED
DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION Entire Site LID 1
4 Type of SCM Dispersed flow Dispersed flow
5 Total drainage area(sq ft) 61420 61420
6 Onsite drainage area(sq ft) 61420 61420
7 Offsite drainage area(sq ft) n/a n/a
8 Total BUA in project(sq ft) 20910 sf 20910 sf
New BUA on subdivided lots(subject to
9 permitting)(sq ft) n/a n/a
New BUA not on subdivided lots(subject to
10 permitting)(so 9320 sf 9320 sf
11 Offsite BUA(sq ft) n/a n/a
12 Breakdown of new BUA not on subdivided lots:
Parking(sq ft) sf sf
Sidewalk(sq ft) sf sf
Roof(sq ft) 2560 sf 2560 sf
Roadway(sq ft) 6760 sf 6760 sf
Future(sq ft) sf sf
Other,please specify in the comment box
below(sq ft) sf sf
New infiltrating permeable pavement on
13 Isubdivided lots(sq ft) sf sf
New infiltrating permeable pavement not on
14 subdivided lots(sq ft) sf sf
Existing BUA that will remain(not subject to
15 permitting)(sq ft) 11590 sf 11590 sf
16 Existing BUA that is already permitted(sq ft) sf sf
17 Existing BUA that will be removed(sq ft) sf sf
18 Percent BUA 18% 18%
19 Design storm(inches) 7.5 in 7.5 in
20 Design volume of SCM(cu ft) n/a n/a
21 Calculation method for design volume n/a n/a
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Please use this space to provide any additional information about the
22 drainage area(s):
The Grassy Branch WRF property boundary is less than 0.001%of the total
contributing drainage area according to StreamStats(Appendix D). Due to
the significant difference,offsite drainage was not considered in the BUA
table(Drawing C6). Percent BUA includes all BUA that will be on site after

LOW DENSITY
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECTS FROM 02H.1003
1 Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule? Yes
2 Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow? Yes
3 Has the use of piping been minimized per.1003(2)(c)? Yes
4 Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances(H:V) 3:1
5 Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10-year storm? 4.7
6 Are curb outlet swales proposed? No
7 Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s)(%) n/a
8 Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s)(feet) n/a
9 Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s)(H:V) n/a
10 Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s)(feet) n/a
11 Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales? No
12 Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow? Yes
13 Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion? Yes
14 Are variations to rule.1003 proposed? No
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
15 Please use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project:
A permanent conveyance swale has been designed to convey on-site and off-site runoff to the receiving stream.In general,the
project drainage patterns have been designed to mimic the existing drainage patterns.The site has been designed to use natural
conveyances in lieu of storm drainage curb and gutter.Please refer to Appendix C for supporting calculations for the permanent
conveyance swale.The drainage area size and peak flow were developed using USGS StreamStats,and backchecked using
available topographic and aerial imagery.
Swale Drainage BUA Pervious Q Slope Vanow V.—I Flow depth
# Area (ac) area C (cfs) (%) (fps) (fps) (ft)
1 18.70 n/a n/a n/a 27.00 1.70 16.00 4.70 1.40
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
2