20120142 Ver 3_Nov 5 Inspection_20151106

Wetland Inspection Report
Project Num: 20120142 Version: 3
Project Name: NCDOT- US 74 Ellerbee Bypas:
County: Richmond
Location: NCDOT- US 74 Ellerbee Bypass (R-3421A, B and C)
Latitude: +35° 00'
SW Plan Location
Site Owner Name NC DOT PDEA
Inspection Date: 11/5/2015
Reason for Inspection Routine
Inspection Type: Site Inspection (DOT)
Inspection Contact Person:
On-Site Representative(s):
Title:
Primary Inspector: Dave Wanucha
Secondary Inspector(s):
Facility Compliance Status: ❑ Compliant � Not Compliant
Program Areas: Standards/Sediment
Question Areas:
� Unpermittable Activities
Inspection Summary:
Status: Issued
Project Type: Road
maintenance/repair/improvemen
Region: �entral
Longitude: -79° 46' 13"
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
For the loss near Site 33, DOT agreed to remove sediment from wetland as directed by whatever means necessary
(including the use of a pumper truck if other methods are not efficacious) and to limit damage to existing vegetation.
Barry made reccomendations for improving erosion control measures at this location to prevent further sediment losses.
The new multi-tiered basin was in place.
page: 1

Site Number: 20120142 Owner: Thorpe, Gregory
Inspection Date: 11/5/2015 Inspection Type: Site Inspection (DOT) Reason for Visit: Routine
Unpermittabie Activities
# Note: This section should be completed only if the impact is unpermittable (eg. Sediment, draining
wetlands, etc.).
Is stream(s) free of unpermittable impacts?
Is wetland(s) free of unpermittable impacts?
Is open water(s) free of unpermittable impacts?
Are other standards being met (turbidity, pH, etc.) in all surface waters onsite?
Are surFace waters on the site free of illegal discharges?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ � ❑
❑ � ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ � ❑
❑ ❑ � ❑
❑ � ❑ ❑
Comment: I met with Art King, Travis Morgan and Jason Crissman to review reported sediment losses near Sites 33
and 7. Barry Harrington was there as well to review erosion control measures throughout the project. The
basin at Site 33 was overwhelmed resultinq in upwards of 10 cy of sediment discharged to a downstream
wetland. Portions of the sediment had been cleaned but much remains in the wetland of which is
currently too wet to access. DOT was directed to clean remaining sediment from wetland as soon as is
practicable usinq whatever means required. This may include a pumper truck. Site 7 was cleaned of 57
stone satisfactorily.
page: 2