Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0071528_Wasteload Allocation_19920820NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: NCO071528 PERMITTEE NAME: Lake Norman Woods Subdivision FACILITY NAME: Lake Norman Woods Subdivision Facility Status: Existing Permit Status: Renewal Major Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: Minor 0.025 MOD Domestic (% of Flow): Industrial (% of Flow): Comments: 100 % refer: Basinwide / Streamline WLA file at front of subbasin RECEIVINGSTREAM:L-m3yt- LAtAW6 �..t� Class: WS-III and B Sub -Basin: 03-08-32 Reference USGS Quad: E15NW4 (please attach) County- Catawba Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office Previous Exp. Date: 00/00/00 Treatment Plant Class: 2 Classification changes within three miles: No known changes Requested by Prepared by: Reviewed buya l -211 �Ot)t� gd•S w0.1 b19— Susan Robson Date: 4/24/92 —�t Date: IF1/7 9L ate: / a C Modeler Date Rec. TM rJ 5 � z tO Drainage Area (mil ) Avg. Streamflow (cfs): r JWA;tw,ti iAJfq.ufq�ltwt !t/Ls.tt 7Q10 (cfs) �o Winter 7Q10 (cfs)-? 0 30Q2 (cfs) Y0 Toxicity Limits: IWC % Instream Monitoring: Upstream Acute/Chronic Location Downstream Location Effluent Characteristics Summer Winter BOD5 (m ) NH3-N (mg/1) D.O. (mg/1) 6 (PPI TSS (mg/1) F. Col. (/100 ml) ZXV (4PP5) PH (SU) 6-1 // i7r+� %� /�Q �+iri✓ Al Fir, zm A5 D�$t n� FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility Status: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Topo Quad: A. C. DEpT. OY INATrM Request # �QESOURCES AND Odi11R UNITY DEVELOPAIM", JUL 2 2 1992 KVISION OF P4104wENTAL VANA661EIS M ORE AU REGIONAL OFFICE 80 (min. release) 80 (min. release) 80 (min. relege) =; r— s I Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) Facility requesting renewal of NPDES permit. Technical Support concurs with the recommendation of the Mooresville RO that BPJ limits be applied for the renewal of Lake Norman Woods. BPJ limits based on protection of WS classification of Lake Norman and ability of facility to meet the limits. Lake Norman Woods Subdivision NCO071528 Domestic - 100% Existing Renewal Lake Nornwi- Cans wsa� ra f WS-III & B 030832 Catawba Mooresville Robson 5/1/92 E15NW Stream Characteristic: USGS # Date: Drainage Area (mi2): Summer 7Q10 (cfs): Winter 7Q10 (cfs): Average Flow (cfs): 30Q2 (cfs): I 1. (%): Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: Recommended by: Reviewed by Instream . Regional Permits & Date:_7/V/92_ RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: W G 15 1992 2 Wasteflow (MGD): BODS (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): pH (SU): Residual Chlorine (µg/1): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): Recommended Limits: Wasteflow (MGD): BODS (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): pH (SU): Residual Chlorine (µg/1): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Monthly Average Summer Winter 0.025 30 monitor 5 30 200 6-9 monitor monitor monitor Monthly Average Summer Winter 0.025 15 4 6 30 200 6-9 monitor monitor monitor WQ or EL WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ Limits Changes Due To: Param=ds) Affected Change in 7Q10 data Change in stream classification Relocation of discharge Change in wasteflow Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.) Instream data New regulations/standards/procedures New facility information X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed. No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. e MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Adtnacy of Existing Treatment Has the facility demonstrated *abilitytmeet the pr ed new limits with existing treatment facilities? Yes No (f44��o Pam O If no, which parameters cannot be met? Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office recommendations: If no, why not? �=Mi AM tWOMWOM Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ _ (Y or N) (If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan) Additional Information attached? (Y or N) N yes, explain with attachments. . �Z,,iI Jf i /J n 1�/l. �0,a2S�/.SS� _ ,639 _ ,OU�� �` /✓0, i3OS� �o.oz5 l.ss> r 8� ifs 639 14 MEMO DATE: a TO: CtI AX C�... ✓C4.-�AS�Y� SUBJECT: b"kO Lky W2A5 Aj6ColsaL;;,) WLA rarest 4 C8% M R O f-a alhot m ►re. & r-eco rn►t.ev4d " 10-6 su,1«1 wLA, _ - -I�us is aM e�is�-ny-�UI��Y - 0-I�erJews-ti� -la rr�� g� %�n�-� I,v�t,e,,, fh2�r �P�►n�J a►~e. �ecQrn Q onS ,Pang l3.) 4b5 �5 w�� S�Y res�✓ar , a,�d -ire ev-��fin� �ac.�li�ip5 arc cofahfe of m�h.� l3PS li►m q / jp Pase (--Cr)4dd hae oe.ear dyow kav-e anj (jue5�1�5. <,.. STATEu w - North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources � r P„n,odonRe�laa�Pe, Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility Status: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Topo Quad: FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Request # Lake Norman Woods Subdivision NCO071528 Domestic - 100% Existing Renewal L*H�marr (l.rnwaaZ of WS-III & B 030832 X6, F_9fiEPT. or NATURAL. RtSOURC.ES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JUN 1 7.1992 DIVISION OT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAOEMEIQ NOORESVILLE R5109L 80E.' Catawba Stream Characteristic: Mooresville?w� USGS # Robson Date. 5/l/92 Drainage Area (mi2): E15NW Summer7Q10 (cfs): Winter 7Q10 (cfs): Average Flow (cfs): 30Q2 (cfs): IWC (%): 80 (min. release) 80 (min. release) 80 (min. release) Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) Facility requesting renewal of NPDES permit. Permit was previously revoked because nonpayment of the annual fee. Tech Support recommends sewn limits with DO=5 mg/l, TSS, and Fecal coliform. puc A&yn �{k6AP ' p �- -P dztut ojgraa t i X ULI lv�rj u -)?A, OAK�ZvuJ Dor, e Recommended Reviewed by Instream As went: j Regional Supervisor:, Permits & Engineering: RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: Date:_6/9/92_ JUL 14 1992 2 Previous Existing Limits: Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg ft NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): pH (SU): Residual Chlorine (41): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): __4 Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. V100 ml): pH (SU): Residual Chlorine (jig/1): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Monthly Average Summer Winter 0.025 30 monitor 5 30 200 6-9 monitor monitor monitor Monthly Average Summer Winter 0.025 30 monitor 5 30 200 6-9 monitor monitor monitor Limits Changes Due To: Change in 7Q10 data Change in stream classification Relocation of discharge Change in wasteflow Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.) Instream data New regulations/standards/procedures New facility information WQ or EL WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed •A No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. ' 3 MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDMONS Adequacy of Existing Treatment Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment l facilities? Yes No d1A�`� gLo ,�rec�n� e ant So �sl If no, which parameters cannot be met? Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office recommendations: If no, why not? iiiliri_�• Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) — N_ (Y or N) (If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan) Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.