20240357 Ver 1_Barons Drive_JD PACKET_20240227

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re alatoiyPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aWx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 20 Barons Drive
City, State: Pinehurst, Moore County, NC
County: Moore
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 854207591376
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Adam Carter. Wetland Solutions LLC
Mailing Address: PO BOX 244
Telephone Number:
Bunnlevel NC 28323
910 890 2779
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: SMITH, LANCE J
Mailing Address: 4337 JOHNSON AVE
WESTERN SPRINGS, IL,60558
Telephone Number: 312-343-2161
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/ParceVrax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Samuel Adam Carter
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
12/1 /2023
Date
,n4-x�.4a-l� C�a�
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USAGE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 1.3410 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.204025
Longitude:-79.518256
❑✓ A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 lx 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hit2://www.saw.usace.aM.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
✓❑ Vicinity Map
❑✓ Aerial Photograph
❑ USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
14 Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
0 Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
1_J Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.aM.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.aM.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approvedjurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District'swebsite
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

i s
US Army Corps
of Engineers
wilminglor, ❑i�tFiGt Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations
Please note that the approval and signature of survey plats will only be done in association with
an Approved Jurisdictional Determination. The Corps accepts both electronic and hardcopy
plats for signature, however this will be at the discretion of the project manager. If a hard copy
is submitted, the Corps requires that all hard -copy submittals include at least one original Plat
(to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17". Submitted plats must be legible, including labeling (the
use of match lines for larger tracts are encouraged). Additional copies of a plat, including those
larger than 11"x17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. Prior to final
production of a plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the surveyor electronically
submit a draft of the survey to the Corps project manager for review.
PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
Must be signed and sealed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include an accurate graphic scale and verbal
scale)
Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g.
property corner, USGS monument)
F1Jurisdictional wetlands depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404 wetlands, wetlands, etc.
• Include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
❑ Jurisdictional non -wetland waters (non -wetland tidal/navigable waters,
tributaries, impoundments, ditches, etc.) depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent waters (RPW), pond, etc.
• Mark the centerline of linear waters (tributaries), with
approximate widths to the Ordinary High Water Mark
(OHMW) OR a surveyed OHWM boundary of the tributary.
• List the linear footage of linear features and area (using
approximate widths)
• Mark the extent of OHMW for non -linear waters such as lakes,
ponds, etc.
• List the acreage of non -linear features
• Identify each feature using an alphanumeric system
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as non jurisdictional. Please
include the acreage and/or linear length of these features as appropriate.
❑ Must include a legible Waters of the United States (wetlands and other
waters) Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes and bounds/GPS
coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
Must ensure that all depicted wetlands or other waters intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ Plats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of the Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations, this determination of Section
404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from this date. The
undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to
the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, 33 C.F.R. part 328
and other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: May 2017 Page 2

❑ Plats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual, 33 C.F.R. part 328 and other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
GPS SURVEYS
For surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the survey must include all of
the above, as well as:
7 be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification. One of more of the known points (property
corner, monument) shall be located with the GPS and cross referenced with the
existing traditional property survey (metes and bounds).
7 include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: May 2017 Page 3

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: #CURRENT DATE TRADITIONAL#
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Adam Carter, Wetland Solutions, LLC PO Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, #FOLDER NAME#,
#FOLDER DA NUMBER#
PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 20 Barons Drive
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Moore City: Pinehurst
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.2034640 Long.:-79.518260
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N
HUC: Lumber 0304020302 (Lower Drowning Creek)
Name of nearest waterbody: Sandy Run (Class: WS-II; HQW)
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEWAREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
a licable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
W1
35.203632
-79.518497
0.16 acre
Wetland
Section404
S1
35.203657
-79.518478
203 if
Non -wetland
Section 10/404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑Officedoesnotconcurwithdatasheets/de lineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24K, West End Quad
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO 20220121
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USF W S 20221006
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: FIRM Panel: 3710854200
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): NC CGIA 1/29/2021
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarilv been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
12/1 /2024
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person
staff member completing PJD requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

1 1,111 1 1 Q1. , .4 ,
22
05 22
4
24
705 15
L it t 1,
211 MOORE 24
211, 22
73
2
5
73
73
Aurnan
Lake
J.
WestEnd
61
zi
Jo
Rd
4i
U nion r!
E
0
Taylortown
2z
2
Pineh, urst
G:,If 71V[�
5
W�%
Sim f
N,
Aberdei
Project —Location National Geographic, Esri, Garmin, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA,
METI, NRCAN, GEBCO, NOAA, increment P Corp.
Project Name- 20 Barons Drive N
Location: Pinehurst, Moore County, NC
PIN-854207591376 Figure.
P.O. Box 244 0 1 2 3 4 5 Miles May 31, 2023
Bundevel, NC 28323 1 1 1 1 1 J

t
io
4
ti
WOTUS Impacts — 23 ft.
Preliminary WOTUS — 203 ft
Wetland Impacts — 714 sq. ft. (0.016 ac)
0 Proposed Driveway
Proposed House
Proposed Walkway
Homesite 5 Buffer2
Barons —Drive —Parcel Surveyed — 1.34 acres
F -, �07 Prelim Sec 404 Wetlands — 0.16 acre .
r i, Maxar, Earthstar Geograp
1111
Project Name: 20 Barons Drive N
Location- Pinehurst, Moore County, NC
Figure- 2c
SOLUTIONS LLC
PIN-854207591376
P.O. Box 244
0 50 100 150 200 Feet
Jan 30, 2024
Bundevel, NC 28323
1 1 1 1 1

El
4
N #* *%
low A�
Barons -Drive -Parcel Surveyed - 1.34 acres
I
`P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
i
iA
IN
0 250 500 750 1,000 Feet
I I I I IIr uc�
�Ny y Nuuulla
Project Name: 20 Barons Drive N
Location: Pinehurst, Moore County, NC Figure. 3
PIN-854207591376
USGS 7.5-Minute Topo; West End Quadrangle May 31, 2023

I
CaB
rti
7 jjIli 'Is
NC DEQ 24K Hydrology
Barons Drive Parcel — 1.34 acres
Soil Map Units
CaB—Candor sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
0 100 150 200 250 Feet CaC—Candor sand, 4 to 12 percent slopes
E i,.Maxar, Eartk,+,,
AJ
I
s r
Project Name- 20 Barons Drive N
Location: Pinehurst, Moore County, NC Figure.
6- PIN- 854207591376
P.O. Box 244 NRCS Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) May 31, 2023
BunnIevel, NC 28323

V r
A
17
'PEM1
aw � "
1 All' 1� 4
1
12
ova
rti
7
RAI
f S
Barons Drive Parcel - 1.34 acres
Wetland Type (Cowardin)
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
0 50 100 150 200 250 Feet Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
r Maxar, Earthstar Ge'dgTp",,h_Tcs9®R Ith, -MGIB Us-rCornmunity
Project Name: 20 Barons Drive N
Location: Pinehurst, Moore County, NC Figure. -5
PIN-854207591376
P.O. Box 244 USFWS National Wetland Inventory (20221006) May 31, 2023
Bundevel, NC 28323

� a
� r �
Q �
o:
c
L
d
LL
� N
Nc2>>ti
wy
% `akesiae Or
pat <,,
M
p'neorest
COO., Ra
c
zaslwo" stoneykirk Dr
a Whitehaven Dr
a
m
v o`
O
c
0 Aioo
N
_a
3
d
i
0
.o obi,. o
Chioke n punt Rct o o� �O
3AA A�
O
Lasswade Or
Larder ?Vd

9.2 13.7
16.5 • 9.7
• 013.7
21.2 12.6 14.1
12.7 16.0 13.9 0
15.8
9 9.7 011.0
14.8 14.4 13.5
8.00
13.9
•
11.718.2 10.3 10.2
13.0 9.0
213.6 *13.1
•
16.7 0 11.7
12.418463 19.8
9.9 10.9 11.1 11.2
.7 9.6
14.8 10.1 13.9
SJ IA.•*14.0 11.3 0 1 1
8.5
10.3 12.2 9.0 12.211.4
10.2 10.4
11.3 11.0
8.0 12.9 10.515.5
15.79.3
13.9 8.1
13.0•
11.1 13.6
12.4 13.3 •
.2 13.6• 10.3
10.6 • 8.0 8.6
9.7 10.9 11.5 10.3
12.1 13.6 12.9
.3 10.3 • 11.9
9.6
1.j14.3 13.1 11.7 9.910.2
13.4 0 12.9
• 10.1 8.5 10.1 10.3
8.08.9 8.0 10.3 13.9
15.3 11.113.7 10.4 13.6 *
8.2 8.3 8.2
11.3 8.0
0 15.3
10.8 10.9
16.3 15.2 9.1 8.8
• .0 014.9
0.5 9.1
8.4
15.2 1.3•
'Alt" '*

1 /15/24. 3:51 PM
Parcel Data
Ownership Data
Pin:
Parcel Id:
Owner Name:
Tax Address:
JNt Y_ 0 F_lN00
784
MORE COUNTY
854207591376
00991468
SMITH, LANCE J
4337 JOHNSON AVE
WESTERN SPRINGS, IL,60558
Deed/Bk Page:
5964 / 155
Trans Date:
1/20/2023
Sale Amt:
$80,000.00
Accessed Acres:
0.0000
Cal. Acreage:
1.3410
Assessment Summary/ Rates Per $100 Value
Values
Land Value:
Assessed Value:
Bldg Imp Value:
Parcel Map
rs1.. hr1 n AIn 1'l
ra1)')`11466
%RONS DR
1468
96000437
- , %
Monday, January 15, 2024 by Moore County GIS Department
Location Data
City Code: PH
Fire District: R
Class Code: RV
Land Use Type:
Zoning:
NBHD#:
Property Desc.:
$91,000.00
$91,000.00
N/A
00025256
R00
R30
656F
PINEWILD CC LOT 2294
Moore County GIS Disclaimer
All the information contained on this media is prepared for the inventory of real property found within Moore. All data is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, and
other public records and data. Users of this data are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of
the information. information contained herein was created for the County's internal use. MOORE COUNTY, ITS OFFICIALS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES MAKE NO
WARRANTYAS TO THE CORRECTNESS ORACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THIS MEDIA WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN FACT
OR IN LAW, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITYAND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE.Any resale of
this data is strictly prohibited in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes 132-10. Grid is based on North Carolina State Plane Coordinate System NAD83
(feet).
https://gis.moorecountync.gov/mooreinfo2010/Parcel.aspx?PARID=00991468 1 /1

a

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Moore County,
North Carolina
Barons Drive
December 15, 2022

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Moore County, North Carolina........................................................................
13
CaB—Candor sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes..................................................13
CaC—Candor sand, 4 to 12 percent slopes................................................14
References............................................................................................................16

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

Custom Soil Resource Report

a) .o L
a)
m
m
Q
a)
U
m
N
m
U O _0O
O
O
U 0
m
N
7
a) C
O
-6
a)
N U y
m 0
m
E
a)
-a y E
a) 'p U) 6
`—
fU)
O
N
C E
CL
U
m
O
m
m
Z
m
a)
O_ m `°
o u�
°' a
m
E
N
U)i -0 O
y
0
m E c
y
a)
m �?
CL y
O
N
Q
j
a)
y
E m
a)
a) CJ
N
Z
m O
U
U)
E u)i o
V
Q
3
y
'µL
O) p
O
y
Q
m
y U)
O d
O
6 a) p m
a) '6 (1) 7 m
O
Q
N
L
�
O
O
a)
O N>
! a)
2i
C
C
E
W
U
N m 0 `)
m Q L
U)
-
O
m
L
O_
m a)
p_
N
L
U)
Q
C_ U) m
Z CL
N
m
C y
p N Q
O
7
=
y E y
m
N
U48
`) m E O
0
a)
>+ (n
m
O
O_ - uj
E
>+
N
>
p O a)
O
7 U
>, i 0 U
m
'� O
O l!i
y
O
E% cL m
E
Z
-
m 0
O 6
a)
a) 2
L� '� m
`Q�
O�
V O
O_
N m
E
a)�
a)C
N
>
� �
0�
Na
o
a)
a)
-a
Q
U
m
E
JO
N O_'E O
O
-O
C
OQ
(6
D
ma
-0
m
Z
EEO
QUtl
a)
a)
O NE p
.E
U)
Q
m
E C
m
aN 2
c
O) M
m
a)
m
E
O N
a)
p-p
ya)
- +
>
a) m m 7
-U) '6
N
QU)
OO
-6 T
m
OOC_
O
m in
a) NE
O
m U)
3 °
U)
m m
�U
Q
O
'(n
L C o
Q m
U)
E ac
y
a)
0
m
O p a
'
aa)
m
a)
m
N
O
OO
U)O
O N
a)
u)
m
iU)
m
U O NE
Q
U) a)
E
O
)
O 'pa)
a
N
U
a
p p
O y
Ln
46
0O
U U)
a E
u)
Q 'O Q m
O
U) U)
N
LEU)
pmU)W—
H U
Q
y
d y
R O
Li U
R
L
L
Q
Q
>.
00
0
0
L
d
Q
0 J N
CL
a) .0. O
y o
O
m a
o
CL O
U) cn
Z
>
° aR
N L_ y
O cn cn
�
O
°
a)
R m
U
J a Q
0
R
R
0
O
C
p
O
Z
\
y
W
N
R
R +
K
Y.
F
m
W
J
y
a
a
pCL
y
o
o
)
w
o
a
o
a
N
y
Q
E
R
y
Q
a
o
a
O`
U
C
>
C C a)
> >
Q Q
w
3 R
3 y
O >
>
°
w o
o W
Q
_
`o
o
o
a R
R
R R y C)
LL 3
3
O T
a
w > >
= FL
a R w o
coi
O
o
Y o
a
y
Q
o
cn
0 0 o
cn cn p m
o R
m U
O
U (7 (7
>R
J J
y
a
o m
cn
R
cn cn
a
in in
o
cn
w
a
S
R
❑
+V+��
w
}f R
■
y0 ❑
®
0 °
�p
^ice
a.p`.w
!
o m �
�}
F9F1
00
i y
Q
y
0
r

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CaB
Candor sand, 0 to 4 percent
slopes
0.2
16.3%
CaC
Candor sand, 4 to 12 percent
slopes
1.1
83.7%
Totals for Area of Interest
1.3
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Moore County, North Carolina
CaB—Candor sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3thy
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Candor and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 3 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Candor
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: sand
E - 8 to 26 inches: sand
Bt - 26 to 38 inches: loamy sand
E' - 38 to 62 inches: sand
B't - 62 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 4 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 72 to 78 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 2.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F137XY001 GA - Dry Sandy Upland Woodland
Hydric soil rating: No
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
CaC—Candor sand, 4 to 12 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3thz
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Candor and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 3 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Candor
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: sand
E - 8 to 26 inches: sand
Bt - 26 to 38 inches: loamy sand
E' - 38 to 62 inches: sand
B't - 62 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 4 to 12 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 72 to 78 inches
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 2.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F137XY004GA - Dry Sandy Backslope Woodland -
PROVISIONAL
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
15

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
it.

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
17

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projectlsite: Barons Drive
Applicant/Owner: SMITH, LANCE J
Investigator(s) Adam Carter
City/County: Pinehurst/Moore
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: Pinehurst
Sampling Date: 12/1 /2023
Sampling Point: b4
Landform (hillslope, terrace. etc.). HIIISIope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRRP Lat: 35.203759 Long:-79.518077
Soil Map unit Name: CaC— Candor San d, 4 to 12 percent slopes NWI classification: U
slope (%): 3%
Datum: NAD
nd Forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes FT] No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation= Soil = or Hydrology= significantly disturbed=kre "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No =
Are Vegetation= Soil = or Hydrology= naturally problematic?=(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No
within a Wetland? Yes= No ✓�
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
wettano hyorotogy indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
seconcan, inaicators iminimum of two requirec
=Surface Soil Cracks (86)
=Surface Water (Al)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (1310)
=saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
=Mass Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (81)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
=Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (CB)
=Drift Deposits (B3)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
= Iron Deposits (85)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
=FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
r, Water -Stained Leaves (139)
r--ISphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes = No 0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes = No Q Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes = No = Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringes
Describe Recorded Data (s'ream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos„ previous
rks:
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No =
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: b4
wee Rtmfiim (plrt ci,. 25ft x 25ft
1 Longleaf Pine (Pinus palustris)
2 Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
1 % Cover _12geHes7 —Status
Number of Dominant Species
8
80% Yes FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
10% DLO-- FAC
Total Number of Dominant
9
-
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
-
Percent of Dominant Species
88 8888888
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
50% of total cover: 45
S_aDlino Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft
1 Longleaf Pine (Pinus palustris)
2 American Holly (Ilex opaca)
3. Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
4. -
90
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
20% of total cover:
18
Total % Cover of-
Multiply.Ly
OBL species
x 1 =
0
5%
Yes
FACU
FACW species
x 2 =
0
2%
Yes
FAC
FAC species
x 3 =
0
2%
Yes
FACT
FACU species
x 4 =
0
_
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 0
(A) 0 (B)
-
Prevalence Index = B(A= NaN
9 = Total Cover
Hy drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 4.5
20% of total cover:
1.8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Strati (Pict size: 25ft x 25ft )
✓
2 -Dominance Testis >50%
1 Wax Myrtle (Myrica cerifera)
2% Yes
FAC+
1
3 -Prevalence Index is <_3.0
2 Silky dogwood (Cornus amomum)
2% Yes
FACj
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
3.-
4.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.-
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.-
-
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
4 = Total Cover
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover: 2 ............................
20% of total cover:
0•8
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1 Wiregrass Pinelawn Three Awn (Aristida stricta)
2% Yes
FAC-
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2
-
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
-
4.
Shrub —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
_
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7 _ _ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
10.-
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
-
11.- -
50% of total cover: 1
1Noody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1. Cat Greenbrier (Smilax glauca)
2. Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)
3.-
4.-
5.-
50% of total cover: 2
2 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0.4
1 % Yes FAC
3% Yes FAC
Hydrophytic
4 = Total Cover Vegetation
— 20% of total cover: 0.8 Present? Yes No=
US Arrny Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: b4
r or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Co—P-_ Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR4/3 100% S
4-15 10YR6/4 100b
15-24 10YR7/6 100b
S
S
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
(Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
HHistosol
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (39) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 15313)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
EI
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑_
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150113)
Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No71
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/site: Barons Drive
Applicant/Owner: SMITH, LANCE J
Investigator(s) Adam Carter
City/County: Pinehurst/Moore
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: PlnehurSt
Hillslo e Concave a °
Landform {hillslope, terrace. etc.}: p Local relief {concave, convex, none]: Slope (/o): 2 �o
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLRP Lat: 35.203944 Long:-79.518418 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map unit Name: CaC— Candor sand, 4 to 12 percent slopes NWI classification: Headwater wetland
Sampling Date: 12/1 /2023
Sampling Point: b4
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes FT] No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation= Soil = or Hydrology= significantly disturbed=kre "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes= No=
Are Vegetation= Soil = or Hydrology= naturally problematic?=(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes Q No =
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
wettano hydrology indicators:
seconcan, inaicators iminimum of two requirec
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is
required; check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (86)
=Surface Water (Al)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
✓=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
=✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide odor (C1)
=Mass Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (81)
=✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
=Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
✓=Sediment Deposits (132)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (CB)
=Drift Deposits (B3)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Iron Deposits (85)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
=FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
77-1 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
r,Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes = No 0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes = No Q Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes Q No = Depth (inches): 4lnches
(includes capillary fringes
Describe Recorded Data (s'ream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos„ previous i
rks:
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No =
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: b4
Tree Stratum (Pict size: 25ft x 25ft )
1 Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
2 Red Maple (Acer rubrum)
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 6.5
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft
1 Red Maple (Acer rubrum)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 15
Shrub Stratum (Pict size: 25ft x 25ft )
1. Bitter gallberry, Inkberry (Ilex glabra)
2. Black Willow (Salix nigra)
3. American Holly (Ilex opaca)
4.-
5. -
6. -
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
o
S2ecies?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 /o
Y@S
AC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
3%
Yes
FAC/Fd
-
Total Number of Dominant
9
Species Across All Strata: (B)
-
Percent of Dominant Species
100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
13
20% of total cover:
2.6
Total % Cover of: Multiply bY_
OBL species x 1 = 0
3%
Yes
FAC/Fd
FACW species x 2 = 0
_
FAC species x 3 = 0
_
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
_
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
-
Prevalence Index - B/A- NaN
3
- Total Cover
Hy drophytic
Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover:
0.6
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
2%
Yes
FACW
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
0 o
Yes
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2% Yes FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
9 = Total Cover
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover: 4.5
20% of total cover: 1.8
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1 Rush (Juncus spp.)
5% -Yes FAMb
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2
-
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3. -
-
4.
-
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5 _
_
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
-
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7 _
_
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
-
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10, -
-
11,-
-
50% of total cover: 2.5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )�
1. Cat Greenbrier (Smilax glauca)
2. Grape (Vitis spp.)
3 Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)
4. Laurel -leaved Greenbrier, Bamboo Vine (Smilax lauirfolia)
5 Yellow Jasmine (Gelsemium sempervirens)
50% of total cover: 4
5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 1
1%
No
FAC
1 %
No
FAC\b
2%
Yes
FAC
1%
No
FAC\b
3%
Yes
FAC
_
8
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
1 .6
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Arrny Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: b4
r or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Co—P-_ Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR4/3 100% S
4-15 10YR5/2 96% 10YR6/6 4% C M S
15-24 10YR6/2 90% 10YR6/6 10% C M S
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
(Al) ❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (39) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
HHistosol
❑
❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (M LRA 15313)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) EI
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑_
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑
Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150113)
✓ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yesm No❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0