20240203 Ver 1_Application Attachments_20240129

PCN Attachments
1. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
2. USGS TOPO VICINITY MAP
3. NRCS COUNTY SOIL SURVEY VICINITY MAP
4. USACE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD/AJD/CONCURRENCE
EMAIL)
5. S&EC WETLAND SKETCH MAP
6. NCDWR BUFFER DETERMINATION LETTER
7. S&EC THREATENED & ENDANGERD SPECIES REPORT
8. EXISTING CONDITIONS & PROPOSED CONDITIONS MAPS
9. IMPACT EXHIBITS

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Spite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
saudec.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: Waterfield Ridge Place S&EC Project # 6151
Date: 10/03/2023
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: David Bailey Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, authorize S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for
the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard
and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for
this project.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 1730065246 & 1730061385
Site Address: 500 & 600 Waterfield Ridge Place
City, County, State: Garner, Wake County NC
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name: Stephen F Eisenmann Sr Modern Mechanical HVAC LLC
Mailing Address: 1544 Mechanical Blvd. Garner NC 27529
Telephone Number: 919-610-5179
Email: SeisenmannsrCa)-modernmechhvac com
4 e.l F
case print)
Applicant Signature
/6 /4
Date
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

2
its
Al
f�
70 r�
► ,.
WATER FfELD DR
}
A J
cea
%A
U4
—V1
OV,
KING ARTA
ti
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
Project Number: Map Title: N
6151.W21 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: Figure 1- USGS Map I I I I I I I I
SB 500 Waterfield Ridge PI Feet
Scale: 11000' Garner, NC we's— A
" =
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: Source:
06/16/2023 2019 USGS Garner Quad 8412 Fa is of Neuse Road, Sui 104, Rat gh, NC 27615•Phone (9l9)846-5900•Faa (9l9)846946.
eae���m

3
1 T
k
° 1
r�
,y
pB
� 4
1
1 A
0l
WkE
bra'
r .
r
Lo
LoD
rya• '.,r # C INC Center for Geographic In o oration & Analysis
Project Number: Map Title: N
6151.W21 0 500 1,000
Project Manager: Figure 2- Soil Survey I i i i I i i i I
SB 500 Waterfield Ridge PI Feet
Scale: Garner, NC
1=500'
SourceWakCounty Soil Survey , Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: 8412 Falles ofN.— Road, 8�i. 104, Rzleigh. \( 27615 • Ph...: [phone] • F— [phone]
06/16/2023 Sheet 79 -d--,°

0
m-
w
n
C:;a
N =3
Q 'O :� :�o
= O_ n D
D Vf
AMMI LA
n
�T
(n
O
O
:Z.N
-.0O LQ
(D�, (D
O 0
�_.
(%f
D
OVA
n
c
O (p
(D
S
n mT
rt
N
O
2
3
�
rOr
2
(D O
4- <
a a
v
O
S rt
l0
(� F
Z7
N•
O' O O
Q =3 �'
fD
S 1O
(D
r+
v
Gi
Ci
G
(D
�
c 0
0
3
O
r-r
((DD
0
"O Ln
7
7
r+
0
s �_
r+
0 r+
(!!
70 bo
0
a
n
(D
O Ln 0
r0+
S 0 rt 0
S W
rr+
W
0�
(D
O
= n S v
t�0
S
(gyp
m
W
Z
N N
Q- 0 v O
0 O
(0
(D
C
m
m
O
<•
�.
v
0
7
(p (gyp
(D
N
Q (D
<
((DD
<,
(D (D
7
N
(D
(D
S �. z
O W N
Z
7
(D Q
C
cn
S
0
D v 0
�
W
J
r+
T
0
c
3
5
: �
N 0 (D (D
<
7
�
0o ,G
7C?
�_
N
cu
n
O
Np Q
0
�
W
F
n
w
ono
�
s
Q-
0
((D Gl
0
(D
0
� cn' "O
O N
N n
0
Cl
ED
in
,+
v
7
v
Q N
r� N
O O
N m
(/�
ZT
(/)
O D
N
Ln
N
O
N D
00
N
O
N N
O N
O
0
O
O O
0
r+
P (D N
N w
D
cu
=3
7
N cn
S O
O
N
v
n
p v
C
Cn
(p n
O
O
7
7
0
r,�,
Q
v
m
-rjO; Z
N S
N
O z Q
0
O
O
n
n < �• �
r+ p rr
(D
(u Q
0 (D
�G
(D
v
C) O Q
v
S
(D
(D
Z y O
v
W
s o
Q
c
wLn
o
0
Q
o
(� `
ce,
o o
m
O-
Q �.
H Z N
C v
n
= Z
N
0
O
n
c
Gl
cn
7
O 0
(D
0
n
(D
(o
O
0
+
Q O
(D
Q 0
oh
(D
0
`'
-h
0
0
v
00
Q
Z
(D S
3
0
(o
n
Q
0
rn
S
Q
S
(D
O N
(D � 0
0
C�
in•
S '� � O
(p
'��.
0 S
Z a
v
i
s S
v
O O
(D (D
Q Q :3 z
Q-
(D
O Z <
(D

I
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
• 4
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. G. RSecretary EEasley , Governor NCDEHR
(± OSS, SecreNORTH CAROLINA DEPAT RTMENOF
WilliamG.AND NATURAL RE:souRCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 5, 2001
Jennifer Burdette
Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject: Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules
NBRRO 01-300
Greenfield SE
S&EC Project #: 01-6151
Wake County
Dear Ms. Burdette:
On October 9, 2001, I conducted a site visit of the features involved in the above
referenced project. It was determined, that channels present on the property and shown on either
the Wake County Soil Survey and/or the USGS Garner, NC Quad map are subject to protection
under the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy; Protection and
Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T I 5A:02B.0233 (NCAC 0233).
The specific portions of the channels subject to the buffer rules include Feature D (below flag
#755), Feature E, Feature G (below flag #1001), Feature J (below flag #958), Feature K (below
flag #T107), Feature M, and White Oak Creek with its associated open water from former beaver
impoundments, which are shown on the attached USGS Garner, NC Quad map (Figure 1) and/or
Wake County Soil Survey Map (Figure 2). Features marked A, B, C, F, G (between flag #1027
and 1027A), H, I, and L are not subject to the Neuse Riparian Rule.
This office has assigned the reference number of NBRRO-01-300 to this project. Thank
you for your attention to this matter and if this Office can be of any assistance or if you have any
additional questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at 571-4700 ext.
237.
Sincerely,
t -
Charles Brown
Environmental Specialist
cc: John Dorney - DWQ
\neusbuf.let/nbr013 00.1 et
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

a
Sol! & Environment ^ti h r a _ sil Consultants,
PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 1 '
a 919 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
l l
Project: Greenfield SE/Project #: 01-6151
r
ky. Date: 10 O1 RoY15It11/0+
t Preliminary Buffer Approximation
Suitable for Preliminary Planning Only
,, S&EC reserves the right to modify thin map bard on mo, fieldwork, -
e �4 tit - t "`.� '•'^ �. -;' �' -x` surveyed delineation% and any other additional information. k '
`` \1 0 ,_� �_ . �::{ t �'<^- / ...-„ Approximations :ren mapped using topographlr. maps and ground frothing.
.5y *t I `�-.; 1I these areas are to be used, they must be approved and
,,.'�, permitted by the NC Division of Water Quality.
{y s ✓i� wit l 1J.
ilk
����:
M'r; �.+. -•!/ i Z-.�'�,"' SdI '•�.._. f; i �_ - Cal. .V i
�.:• `�.:1:'� .c:.,;-!"�. ac mot% ''`-:', ,�,3ti:`:.` i%:j�%�ii
y•
1 'rV..
�'.
IT
l: + \
�.:...
`y
r
'f 4 `
fit`
.v
.. � .,.:_-:.- ,.._ ,..,, .,r.=. , ... .._.-.. ..., _ _... ..> - _.. `•cam ..
L
i. -t/J wlte-r
LEGEND N S No f s�b� Octe cf -1-n ,rl1 � ,8vf'�'er
IFAJ
�.. '. = WATERS OF THE US SUBJECT' TO THE NEUSE BUFFER RULES
/:: �• ['Phis determination must be confirmed by the NCDWQ]
l �•� MARGINAL WATERS OF THE US • MAY BE SUBJECT TO NEUSE BUFFER RULES
•• f [S&EC does not believe these channels are subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules; however, �
this determination must be"Confirmed by the NCDWQ.j
aY ,
Mops and databases are public information supplied MapVUE
by various government agencies_ The author and/or
seller of the software program are in no way
responsible or liable for the information depicted
herein. Inquiries concerning the data should be 0 625 1250 1875 2500 8:23
I - ' APR 3, 2001
directed to the appropriate government agency. r Scale 1n Feet

Project#:
Scale:
09.6151
1" = 1320'
Figure 2 - -(I Survey
Fig
Greenfield Southeast
Bank of America
Project
Mgr.: JB
[Pate:
413101
Garner, Wake County, NC
of -'300
®` = Soil & Environmental Caristiltants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd. - Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com

7
Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone; [phone]
sandec.com
To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
November 14, 2023
S&EC Project No: 615 LW29
Re: Online Project Review Request, 500 Waterfield Ridge Place, Garner — Wake County, North
Carolina
We have reviewed the referenced project using the USFWS North Carolina Field Office's online project
review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We completed
our review November 14, 2023 and are submitting our project review package in accordance with the
instructions for further review.
Our proposed action consists of. A planned commercial development that is proposing impacts to
wetlands.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps.
500 Waterfield Ridge Place (35.689454,-78.560528). The site is located at 500 & 600 Waterfield Ridge
Place, Garner — Wake County, North Carolina.
Construction will commence following the anticipated Section 404 & 401 Approvals and should be
completed by the Nationwide Permit Expiration date of March 15, 2026.
This project review is needed under provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and
per General Condition 18 of Nationwide Permit 39.
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical habitat
considered in our review. The species conclusions table included in the package identifies our
determinations for the resources that may be affected by the project.
For additional information, please contact Mason Montgomery at [e-mail]
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Enclosures:
1. Project Request Review Package 6. FWS Official Species List
2. S&EC T&E Species Report 7. NHP Report
3. Vicinity Maps 8. FWS Species Conclusion Table
4. S&EC Photo Report 9. FWS Self -Certification Letter
5. Overall Site Plan

Environmental Consultants,
8412 balls of Neese Road, Suite 104, Raleijh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax
sandee.com
November 14, 2023
S&EC Project No.: 6151.W29
To: Modern Mechanical HVAC LLC
Attn: Stephen F Eisenmann Sr
1544 Mechanical Blvd
Garner, NC 27529
Re: THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT
500 Waterfield Ridge Place (+/- 10 acres)
500 & 600 Waterfield Ridge Place, Garner, Wake County, NC
Stephen Eisenmann Sr:
On October 11, 2023, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) evaluated the 500 Waterfield
Ridge Place property shown on the attached maps for potential endangered species. The property is
located at 500 & 600 Waterfield Ridge Place in Wake County, NC. Surface waters on -site flow into
White Oak Creek (Austin Pond) in the Neuse River Basin, which has been classified in the
"Classification and NC DWQ Standards Applicable to Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina"
as C; NSW.
We obtained the attached automatically generated official species list from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service (FWS) and N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) report identifying the protected species on or
within one mile of the project area that could potentially be affected by the project. These FWS & NHP
reports were updated as of the date of this report. The official species list is valid for 90 days.
We conducted preliminary habitat assessments to identify suitable habitat for the individual species
listed on the official species list. Detailed botanical surveys were conducted within the optimal survey
windows for the listed plant species. The preliminary habitat assessments included assessing the physical
characteristics of the streams, identifying forest types, and looking for evidence of the listed species on -
site. This survey did not include any detailed sampling or netting of aquatic species, nor did it include
any detailed mist netting or acoustic surveys for bat species. The results of the search are discussed
below.
500 Watefield Ridge Place - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 1 of 7

November 14, 2023
S&EC Project #6151.W29
RESULTS:
The FWS official species list identified the following species for the Evaluation limits:
• Tricolored Bat, (Perimyotis subflavus), Proposed Endangered
• Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Endangered
• Neuse River Waterdog (Necturus lewisl), Threatened
• Carolina Madtom (Noturus furiosus), Endangered
• Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masons), Threatened
• Dwarf Wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon), Endangered
• Yellow Lance (Elliptio lanceolata), Threatened
• Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus), Candidate
• Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxil), Endangered
Of the species identified on the official species list, the NHP report did not identify any Federally
threatened or endangered species within the project area or within one mile of the project area. Other
State listed species were found within on mile of the project area as listed in the attached NHP report.
The NHP report identified one managed area within one mile of the project area. These are listed out in
the attached NHP Report.
TRICOLORED BAT (Perimyotis subflavus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of potential suitable habitat for the Tricolored Bat's
within the project area. Relying upon the findings of the December 2021 Species Status Assessment
(SSA) Report for the Tricolored Bat. Due to the nature of the project being commercial development,
which will include tree removal, we concluded that the project would "May affect, not likely to
jeopardize the existence of the species" for TCB's.
RED -COCKADED WOODPECKER (Picoides borealis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of potential suitable habitat (foraging and cavity trees)
for Red -cockaded Woodpeckers (RCWs) within the project area. During our evaluation, we found no
evidence of individual RCWs within the project area. The NHP report did not list any known elemental
occurrence within the project area or within one mile of the site. We found no ideal suitable habitat
500 Waterfield Ridge Place - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 2 of 7

November 14, 2023
S&EC Project #6151.W29
(e.g., Long Leaf pine forests) within the project area. Given the lack of suitable habitat, we concluded
that the project would have "No effect" on RCWs.
NEUSE RIVER WATERDOG (Necturus lewisi):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams on -site for potential suitable habitat for
the Neuse River Waterdog. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
project area or within one mile of the site. This species is found in the Neuse River and Tar River
basins. The suitable habitat this species is found in is typically medium to large streams and rivers with
a moderate gradient and large bed material. The Neuse River Waterdog also needs riffles, runs, and
pools. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did not find any evidence of the
species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for potential suitable habitat.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. There is a short
section of a non -buffered perennial was +/-3 feet wide with no baseflow and had a sandy substrate.
Due to these observations, we have concluded that the project would have "No effect" on the Neuse
River Waterdog.
CAROLINA MADTOM (Noturus furiosus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams on -site for potential suitable habitat for
the Carolina Madtom. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project
area or within one mile of the site. This species is found in the Neuse River and Tar River basins. The
suitable habitat this species is found in is also medium to large streams and rivers with a moderate
gradient and large bed material. The Carolina Madtom also needs continuous year-round flow and
cover for nesting habitat. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did not find any
evidence of the species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for potential suitable
habitat.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. There is a short
section of a non -buffered perennial was +/-3 feet wide with no baseflow and had a sandy substrate.
Due to these observations, we have concluded that the project would have "No effect" on the Carolina
Madtom.
500 Waterfield Ridge Place - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 3 of 7

November 14, 2023
S&EC Project #6151.W29
ATLANTIC PIGTOE (Fusconaia masons):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams on -site for potential suitable habitat for
the Atlantic Pigtoe (Note: This did not include a detailed aquatic mussel survey for the presence of
mussels). The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area or
within one mile of the site. The suitable habitat for this species consists of medium sized creeks to large
rivers with excellent water quality. This species typically lives in streams with coarse sand and gravel
with moderate to high flowing water. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did
not find any evidence of the species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for
potential suitable habitat.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. There is a short
section of a non -buffered perennial was +/-3 feet wide with no baseflow and had a sandy substrate.
Due to these observations, we have concluded that the project would have "No effect" on the Atlantic
Pigtoe.
DWARF WEDGEMUSSEL (Alasmidonta heterodon):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams on -site for potential suitable habitat for
the Dwarf Wedgemussel (Note: This did not include a detailed aquatic mussel survey for the presence of
mussels). The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area or
within one mile of the site. The Dwarf Wedgemussel has little to no preference for stream size, flow
condition or bed material. Based on guidance from the USFWS staff, only 2nd order and larger perennial
streams are considered suitable habitat. While we did not conduct detailed mussel surveys, no mussels
(of any species) were observed during the preliminary suitable habitat survey.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. There is a short
section of a non -buffered perennial was +/-3 feet wide with no baseflow and had a sandy substrate.
Due to these observations, we have concluded that the project would have "No effect" on the Dwarf
Wedgemussel.
500 Waterfield Ridge Place - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 4 of 7

November 14, 2023
S&EC Project #6151.W29
YELLOW LANCE (Elliptio lanceolata):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams on site for potential suitable habitat for
the Yellow Lance (Note: This did not include a detailed aquatic mussel survey for the presence of
mussels). The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area or
within one mile of the site. The suitable habitat for this species consists of medium sized rivers and
small creeks with excellent water quality. This species typically lives in streams with clean, coarse sand,
and gravel with moderate to high flowing water. While we did not specifically sample for the species,
we also did not find any evidence of the species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the
streams for potential suitable habitat.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. There is a short
section of a non -buffered perennial was +/-3 feet wide with no baseflow and had a sandy substrate.
Due to these observations, we have concluded that the project would have "No effect" on the Yellow
Lance.
MONARCH BUTTERFLY (Danaus plexippus):
The Monarch Butterfly is currently listed as a candidate species, and not yet listed or proposed for
listing as threatened or endangered. Due to the current status of Monarch Butterfly, consultation with
USFWS under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act is not required. FWS recommends conserving
pollinator habitat where practicable.
MICHAUX'S SUMAC Whys michauxii):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat within the project area. We visited
a known population of Michaux's sumac within Wake County prior to conducting our preliminary
surveys. We found no individual Michaux's Sumac species within the project area. The NHP report
did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area. We found suitable habitat within
the project areas to include primarily disturbed open areas along roads and cleared areas. Other sumac
species identified on -site included Winged sumac (Rhus copallinum). Given the lack of species present
within the property boundaries, we concluded that the project would have "No effect" on Michaux's
sumac.
500 Waterfield Ridge Place - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 5 of 7

November 14, 2023
S&EC Project #6151.W29
BALD EAGLE (Haliaeetus leucocephalus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat, nesting sites, and individual Bald
Eagles within the project area. During our survey, we found no evidence of Bald Eagles or any nesting
sites within the project area. The NHP report did not identify any known nests on -site or within one
mile of the site. Given the lack of species present, we have concluded that the project is " Unlikely to
disturb nesting bald eagles ". We believe no Eagle Act Permit is required.
CONCLUSION:
After completing the habitat assessments and preliminary surveys, S&EC completed the attached
"Species Conclusion Table" and "Self -Certification Letter". Using language typically used by the FWS
in their conclusion letters, we have concluded that it appears the proposed project is not likely to
adversely affect any federally listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
We strongly recommend requesting a concurrence letter from the FWS.
Sincerely,
SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Digitally signed by Mason
Montgomery
Montgomery Date: 2023.1 1.14 16:13:01
-05 00
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Attachments:
1. USGS Vicinity Map
2. Soil Survey Vicinity Map
3. Aerial Map
4. Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS List of threatened and endangered species that occur in your proposed location, and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. Official Species List. September 25, 2023.
7. NHP Report: September 25, 2023.
8. S&EC — FWS Species Conclusion Table. November 14, 2023.
9. S&EC — FWS Self -Certification Letter. November 14, 2023.
500 Waterfield Ridge Place — S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 6 of 7

November 14, 2023
S&EC Project #6151.W29
References:
-North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2017. Biotics Database. Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
-US Fish and Wildlife Service. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) & Raleigh Ecological Services Field
Office Online Project Reviews website.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2021. Species status assessment report for the Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia mason). Version
1.2. December 2021. Atlanta, GA.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. Michaux's Sumac Recovery Plan. Atlanta, Georgia:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 30pp.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Recovery Plan for the Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
Second Revision. Atlanta GA 316 pp.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/ Southeast Region. 2021. Carolina Madtom. Species Profile.
https://www. fws.gov/southeast/wildlife/fishes/Carolina-madtom/.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/ Southeast Region. 2021. Neuse River Waterdog... Species Profile.
https://www. fws.gov/southeast/wildlife/amphibians/neuse-river-waterdog/
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2021. Species Assessment (SSA) Report for the Tricolored Bat (Perimyods subflavus)
Version 1.1. Hadley, MA.
-U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. 2022 Recommended Minimum Culvert Dimensions for Bat Roost Surveys in Western
North Carolina. Ashville, NC.
500 Waterfield Ridge Place — S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 7 of 7

;%LPb
— LLI
_TV lu urn
70
CL
tsar - -
,r
-�'54_r
_ _ • , KING AR T
wATERFIELD DR
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
Project Number: L1SGS Map Map Title: N
G151.W29 0 000 2,000
Project Manager: I i i i I i i i I
MM 500 Waterfield Ridge PI Feet
Scale: 11000' Garner, NC Eq M— A
" =
Date: Source: Soil & En irotimesital (.misultasits, PA 11 /01 /2023 2019 USGS Garner Quad

•
� p
4
t
� ill
Ap2Jill
�
A p1
M � Y
"0 �
0
0
wM
R
W
�A
Lo.. "
Lo D 77
pC
NC Center for Geographic'Inf.'rmation &Analysis
kAr
Project Number: SOII Survey Map Title: N
6151.W29 0 500 1,000
Project Manager: I i i i I i i i I
MM 500 Waterfield Ridge PI Feet
Scale: Garner, NC
1"=500'
Date: SourceWake County Soil Survey Soil & Environiiieiital Cotisultalits, PA
11 /01 /2023 Sheet 79

` -" _ ♦� .. '�..,,��►` � .µ•me �"°"•^„� 1a:,
1 \
1
�• / / % I l
.! �P • ♦ ter,. \ \ I►_I_•►► ,.
A ♦
?� ✓ IY
j � I ) 1/"- I/I�/ice/ � ! ��► �� ( �
Iol
IV
♦ 11 1 /) � I� / /per✓ / /% 1 \ �� / � %'
f//% 1ill1ff f Ijll/\.

4µ
i
L
_1
V

Lu
Av m
a
m
^
m � �
N
1
a
_ o o — a
Qe
o m E
e _
n N
co \
axogz
X n8981
2 — .' 00 N1
a,�
W � �°
w -- % a �� / H ®®.o•
Wp"P X� A / W = _
z..
— L3� _ O
2 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I x
I I I
II
III
's
NO
A
m n m
aawe
EXISTING CONDITIONS TOPOGRAPHIC & TREE SURVEY
NY5
�'
07
0
s.
LOCATED AT 500 & 600 WATERFIELD RIDGE PLACE
rvv5 ENCIrvEERs s coNsuluNM, INC
33WREGENCYPARNWAY,SUIMIM
T u
N321518
P.91985L19L2 wxw NVS mm
o m m
-
-- -
GARNER,ST. MARY5TWP., WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
----.
xcuw.uxcvs3

Y'ti9:r! h 44'Bk,LtYJft
United States Department of the Interior„"'
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office r
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0132824
Project Name: Wakefield Ridge Place
September 25, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

09/25/2023
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
https://www.fws. gov/sites/defaultlfiles/documents/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.pdf
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/what-
we-do.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservation-
migratory-birds.

09/25/2023
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
• Bald & Golden Eagles
• Migratory Birds
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

09/25/2023
4
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0132824
Project Name: Wakefield Ridge Place
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: This project is located in Garner, NC and is approximately 10 acres.
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.689829149999994,-78.56039821980698,14z
Counties: Wake County, North Carolina

09/25/2023
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 9 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
AMPHIBIANS
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
FISHES
NAME
►` K1111I
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528

09/25/2023
C-1
CLAMS
NAME
STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS
AND FISH HATCHERIES
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
BALD & GOLDEN EAGLES
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act1 and the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act2.

09/25/2023
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or
golden eagles, or their habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
2. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
There are bald and/or golden eagles in your project area.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read the supplemental
information and specifically the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird
Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data

09/25/2023 8
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle I I I I I 1 1 1 111 I I IIII I � +�+— +. I 1
Non -BCC I I I I I I I I— I
Vulnerable
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Managment https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/supplemental-information-mi ratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-ea les-may-occur-
project-action
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.

09/25/2023
BREEDING
NAME
SEASON
Black -billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus
Breeds May 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Oct 10
and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Aug 25
and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 20
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read the supplemental
information and specifically the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird
Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (')
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.

09/25/2023 10
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC ++ + —+—+ ++++ +++' + 4 +4-+ +---.---.- +—+—-4--+-�-'4N 4- ---�-- +—,-N-
Vulnerable
Black -billed
Cuckoo
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Chimney Swift
"""
++ + + I 1111 1 1 11 1 1 I I I I I I I— +—+—++BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
Kentucky Warbler
BCC Rangewide
+++++—+ ++++ ++`1 I 11 1 1 I I I I I I I_ +—+— ++—+ — —
— — +—++
(CON)
Prairie Warbler
Rangewide
++ + —+—+ + ,+, 11++ +'++ —� �— �+— + +—+ — —
— — +—++BCC
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler
'rt'rt
++ +�+ ++++ +— +�+— --�—
++ 'rt ++—+
+—++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
++—+ — —
+++, —+—+ ++++ +„+ ++++ +4-4--4- 4---- 4---4-- 4--11
— — +—++
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird +++++ ++++ ++++ +--- +—+— +—+— ++—+ -- — '++
BCC -BCR
Wood Thrush 1-1—,+—+ --�— +—++
BCC Rangewide + + + + + N-N—
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/librq�r/
rator.

09/25/2023 11
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-
project-action

09/25/2023
12
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Name: Mason Montgomery
Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Address Line 2: Suite 104
City:
Raleigh
State:
NC
Zip:
27615
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
7047732837

Roy Cooper, Governor
■■■10 INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■ ■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ONE
September 25, 2023
Robert Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Wakefield Ridge Place; 6151.W29
Dear Robert Zarzecki:
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy DirectDr, Natural Heritage Program
041011 .11]=IGAEAlri
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact the NCNHP at natural.heritage�dncr.nc.gov.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF N.A,TUFZAI. ANC) Cui_TURAL RESOUPCES
W '1 1 , , I�h:f S hFF?FeT'. can! E' 744 rV'C" �>7rn.i 1�Fl MAlt �,F��,^I F (�PIT���. ��fti!_EIC�H, r�C �1r�'9
(t; Q7 C T,.; ., ]';_r, PAX ','ti ) r ' T '_',

/
@
/
® 2 20
Z
O O
m
-
o
g
z z
z (D5
o x
z
\
¢ _�=
J s
\/
= o J
0\\
/j
/D\
\0
O
\2
z
gig
y
%
j
g
=
\j
o \
\
D
j \
(
°
\
(D»
= (D=
?
a
/ z
\:
e �J
9
®
O
0 \
\ j
/
o
j/
/ D
z
/
\/
\\
(DD_(D
D
7
(D/
©_
\ (D\
\
( (
D
/
n
/
\ \
D
/�U
: z
\
m
m
=
_
j
\\
O
\
\
22
°\
2
/
\
/
j
0
\DT
2
(D\
ƒ
9 /
ƒ\
e ; /
J
£
\ } %
\
( \
(
\
\
/
/\
\
\
\
/
%
/%
I J
} \
(D}e
\
s
\
»
/.
/
2
/
\
g /
Fi-
/
g
/O/c\
\
®
^ °
< c ^
z
\ (D/
\
(D\.
\
}ƒ
-,
g
2n/
J
\\
_
0
\
/
\\
j\
—m
y
\\
\
\
\
x:
\
(Dt�
z
2®
®
\
z\
J
&o
:
j
\ \
(D
\
\ j_
/
se
\ \
cn
f/
C
$/J
\
J z
/ (D/
{
j
G
z o
z
sz
\
/ /
\
/ /
\
J
m

o a
7
r.. a
'm
q� 4
O la
z
c�
9
�a
tiaa�7 drs
5�
a
a
v c
a
c
Raynor Rd
O
N
Ln
C 1
Q �
0 � 7
C,n
9�
ro,
rn
W
Z
C7
D
m
IV
W
=t?
TL
N
Q
rn
CD
�
C�}).�
lW

Cl)
co
Z3
v
CD
CD
o z
v O
cD CD
3
07
CD
N
CD
N
W
3 0
Q CD
Q(o
cD
( CD
0
07
C= (D
— (D
3
w
(D
� v
o
—. (D
�.
Q 3
v' v
(D o
(D
0
F'
0
CD
s=
CD
sz
v
O
CD
0
Q
CD
Q
CD
O
O
S=
0
CD
O
3
w
77
(D
w
C7
=�
�
m�
�C7
TD
z0
z�
57
��
cn
—
O
v v
Cn
ti
O
—0
0�
0 o_
o
� n
O
CD
CD m
c�
O O
Cn
Z CD
� C7
00
O
n
CD
=
c-D c�
_
x
r
CC
C
v
ti
�J
ti
�O CD
�_
N
�_
ti cD
Cn
0 �
O c�
_�
v co
v
cD CD
p �
�' OO
v
x
C) CD CD
v CD
C:)��—.
m CD
a
C70
D
No
C)
C
v
CD
C)ti
CD
a,
y• o
Cb
CD
CD
a
o
0
o
c0
CL
y
v
zz
CD
CD
CD
Z
00 C
N Cl)
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Cl)
C7
O
iv
N _
O
O
O
O
O
O
s=
O
C)-
Cn
cn
cn
cn
N
cn
v
�
_
m CD
cD- 07
s=
s=
s=
s=
s=
s=
07
0i
v
—
Cu O
o v
07
CD
07
07
cu
07
cu
07
cu
07
cu
:3
Cn o_
v
v
v
v
v
70
zs
zs
N '
zs
zs
zs
zs
zs
CD
v
70
07
CD 70
CD
70
W
(n
CD
CD
CD
CD
CCDD
CD
CD
CD
cQ
_
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
z
O
z
O
z
O
z
O
z
O
z
O
z
O
z
O
Z
O
CD
x.
m
Cn
CD Z
Cn
C-)C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C-)N
CD
n
D
c-)
O _
0
70
g o
CD
CD
—
70 CD
m
v
-
CD
CD S
CD
D
O
C
v
C7
CD
CD
a'
0
C/) -a
C/) -a
C/) -a
C/) -a
C/) -a
C/) -a
C/) -a
cn -a
cn -ao
mCD-
m(D
m(D
m(D
m(D
m(D
m(D
m(D
mCD-CD
o
0:3-
0:3-
0:3-
0:3-
0:3-
0:3-
0:3-
0:3-
0:3-
C-)
C--
:3 w
Z3 n)
Z3 n)
Z3 w
Z3 w
Z3 n)
Z3 w
Z3 w
Z3 n)
pSK
pSK
pSK
02-
02-
02-
pLa-
pLa-
pLa-
CD
C7
C7
C7 E
C7
C7 E
C7
C7 E
C7
n
NONONCNOONONON�O
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD i=
O
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
oN
oN
oN
oN
oN
oN
oN
oN
oN
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
W�
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
-
CD
o_
CD
o_
CD
o_
CD
o_
CD
o_
CD
o_
CD
o_
CD
o_
CD
o_
v
CD
z
O
CD
3
07
CD
N
CD
N
co
0
CD
z
v
CD
Cn
CD
CD
v
CD
CD
:Cl
CL
(o
CD
v
CD
N
(D
0
(D'
n
0
0
c
0'
N
fu
a'
(D

�pP��ENT OF TyF' fi
a
N p
RCN 3,A
g
United States Department of the
Project Name
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 11/14/2023
Self -Certification Letter
500 Waterfield Ridge Place
Dear Applicant:
F7EUIS&wIKKV ICEFE
Interior
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
❑"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
✓ proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑✓ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑✓ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at Raleighkfws.gov or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

00
D m n 0
z
0
00
m
...
EXISTING CONDITIONS TOPOGRAPHIC & TREE SURVEY
LOCATED AT 500 & 600 WATERFIELD RIDGE PLACE
NY5
W5 ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS, INC.
3300 REGENCY PARKWAY, SUITE 100
CARY, NC 27518

OD
84
�t
>>D©D�a
DU
n
3�1PF
o
DU1
A
AA
o
gg
_
mm
'm x
(n
m Q
�A
�m AO
x
n<2
A�DoO
�s
N
D„ Q
n D n m�
zzA
In m D
g07
m 0
Nnny O
N am O
s
0 Q
Nw Z
66.0n0
'
m
o
chi,
cNi,
Z
�1 zR
r
3Vom orn
u
z
�,z.

1
O ho .po E I`o ,N
N
Wo
8:
-
m
N
--1
m 0
A
,.,Z., m
= A D
n z
m o
A A o 0
�8
ad
x
��
y„ O
<
� D>3 �
�?my�
o
m A 0
Oo�nr
O
l01 O
�DnZ
6,0 0
m
0
Nn
Zoo
r
oz
3Vm z orn
u
" �,z.

O
m
oy��
D
Z
0
T
�
T
�t
DDDDD�a
DU 3
0_
n
D Ul
A
AA
v��a�o
_
3m
y
m0
�T
,.,z.,
=AD
�m=D
_
A�AoO
8 ag
�s
n
A0
VZnCI Q`
vACAiA i.TI
0
Nynp
NIrmp
s
l01 0
N W (z�
pUnp
m
� 0
cNn
�
rn
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 m p
N N IV IV CA.) IV IV < ---I-0 00 �I O CA.)IV O 00 'O m p
0
m
Zoo
r
ozp
3Vom z Y rn
u