20060911 Ver 1_Application_20060606

si,. STATF
~ ~:R
-e~,.~~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
D
,' '~ >~?
/~N
~y~,, ~ ~ ~rf Q
MWq~R i
DEPARTZVIEEN'T OF TRANSPORTATION eR,~"rr.`
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
June 5, 2006
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office .O ~ ~ ;-~ -~
Post Office Box 1000 ~ .~„
Washington, NC 27889-1000
Attention: Mr. William Wescott
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
Subject: Nationwide 23 Permit Application and Neuse River Basin Buffer
Authorization for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 53 over Swift Creek
on NC 102, in Pitt County. Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-102(2), WBS
33574.1.1, TIP No. B-4231.
Please find enclosed the permit drawings, buffer drawings, Pre-construction Notification (RCN),
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification Form (CE), Natural Resource Technical Report
(NRTR) Executive Summary, and half-size plan sheets for the above referenced project. The
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace existing Bridge No.
53 on NC 102 over Swift Creek in Pitt County. The project involves replacement of the existing
bridge structure with a single span 100-foot box beam bridge at approximately the same location
and slightly higher roadway elevation of the existing structure using top-down construction.
Since the proposed bridge will completely span Swift Creek, there will be no permanent impacts
to jurisdictional resources. Traffic will be detoured off-site- along surrounding roads, during
construction.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
General Description: The project is located in the Neuse River Basin (Hydrologic Unit
03020202). A best usage classification of "C SW NSW" has been assigned to Swift Creek [DWQ
Index # 27-97-(0.5)]. Neither High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I: undeveloped
watersheds or WS-II: predominately undeveloped watersheds), listed Section 303(d)
impairments, nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.0 mile (1.6 km) of project
study area. Swift Creek is not designated as a North Carolina Natural or Scenic River, or as a
national Wild and Scenic River.
Permanent Impacts: No permanent impacts will occur as a result of the proposed project. The
proposed bridge will completely span Swift Creek and no wetlands are present at the project site.
Temporary Impacts: No temporary impacts to jurisdictional resources will be necessary for.the
construction of this project.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ~ 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.DRG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

Utility ITnpacts: No impacts to jurisdictional resources will occur due to relocation of utilities in
the project area. Existing utility lines are in conflict with the proposed project; however, all
utility work will be conducted outside of jurisdictional areas.
Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
This project is located in the Neuse River Basin; therefore, the regulations pertaining to the
buffer rules apply. There will be a total of 14,345 ftZ of impacts to riparian buffers, 9,425 ftZ in
Zone 1 and 4,920 ftZ in Zone 2, due to construction of the new bridge and stormwater
management on NC 102 and Bridge No. 53 (See attached Stormwater Management Plan). All
practicable measures to minimize impacts within buffer zones were followed. According to the
buffer rules, bridges and road crossings are allowable. Uses designated as allowable may
proceed within the riparian buffer provided that there are no practical alternatives to the
requested use pursuant to Item (8) of this Rule. These uses require written authorization from the
Division of Water Quality.
Bridge Demolition
The existing bridge consists of a concrete deck on steel I-beams with anasphalt-wearing surface.
The substructure is composed of timber end bents and interior bents consisting of timber caps on
timber piles and an additional timber crutch bent. The bridge can be removed without dropping
components into Waters of the United States during construction. Best Management Practices for
Bridge Demolition and Removal will be followed to avoid any temporary fill from entering
Waters of the United States.
During project development, the National Marine Fisheries Service recommended restricting in-
water work between the dates of February 15 to June 30 to protect anadromous fish. Therefore,
Steam Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish will be implemented.
Federally Protected Species
As of March 8, 2006 the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists four federally protected
species for Pitt County (see Table 1). All biological conclusions remain valid for each protected
species. No species have been added or deleted from the list since the completion of the CE
(November 2004).
Table 1. Federally protected species of Pitt County.

Scientific Name Common
Name Federal
Status Habitat
Present
Biological Conclusion
Haliaeetus leucoce halus Bald ea le T PFD No No Effect
Trichechus manatus West Indian Manatee E No No Effect
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded wood ecker E No No Effect
Elli do steinstansana Tars in ussel E No No Effect
E -Endangered T (PFD) -Threatened "Proposed for Delisting".
T -Threatened
Avoidance and Minimization
Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to "Waters
of the United States". The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable
design features to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts. Avoidance and minimization
measures were incorporated as part of the project design these included:
NCDOT TIP B-4231 page 2 of 3

• Use of an off-site detour during construction.
• Bridge will completely span Swift Creek
• Construction of a 24-foot longer bridge
• Best Management Practices will also be utilized during demolition of the existing
bridge and construction of the new bridge.
Mitigation
No mitigation is proposed for this project.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway
Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The
NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized by a Nationwide Permit 23 (FR number 10,
pages 2020-2095, January 15, 2002).
Section 401 Certification: We anticipate 401 General Water Quality Certification number 3403
will apply to this project. All general conditions of the Water Quality Certifications will be met.
Therefore, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500(a) and 15A NCAC 2B.0200, we are
providing copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of Environmental and
Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality for their review.
Neuse River Basin Buffer Authorization: NCDOT requests that the NC Division of Water
Quality review this application and issue a written approval for a Neuse River Riparian Buffer
Authorization.
A copy of this application will be posted on the NCDOT website at:
http://www.doh.dot.state.nc.us/preconstruct/pe/neu/permit.html. Thank you for your time and
assistance with this project. Please contact Tyler Stanton at [e-mail] or (919)
715-1439 if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
~~~..
Gregory J.'Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
Cc W/attachment:
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ (5 Copies)
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Michael Street, NCDMF
Mr. Steve Sollod, NCDCM
Mr. Bill Arrington, NCDCM
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Jay Johnson, Division 2 Environmental
Officer
Cc W/o attachment:
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P.E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. John Williams, P.E., PDEA
NCDOT TIP 8-4231 Page 3 of 3

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(lt any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 23
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:~919) 733-9794
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
Name of project:
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
B-4231
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Pitt Nearest Town: Auden
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): -77.3994 °N 35.4709 °W
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Neuse River
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Rural with forested areas and scattered residential and
farms.
Page 2 of 9

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Replacement of the existing bridge structure with a 100-foot box beam bridge at
approximately the same location and slightly higher roadway elevation of the existing
structure using top-down construction.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:__ The bridge is considered to be structural
deficient and functionally obsolete and the replacement will result in safer traffic operations.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs maybe included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9

1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: N/A
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and floodin~_
Wetland Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, mazsh,

herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0
Page 4 of 9

Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody

(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,

ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact

(acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the nroiect:
Stream Im act (acres): 0
Wetland Irri act (acres): 0
Open Water Irri act (acres): 0
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
Page 5 of 9

techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Use of an off-site detour
during construction, construction of a 26-foot longer single-span bridge Best Management
Practices will also be utilized during demolition of the existing bride and construction of the
new bride.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
Page 6 of 9

additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify Neuse )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Page 7 of 9

Zone* Impact
s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 9,425 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 4,920 1.5 0
Total 14,345 0
cone i extenas out su reet perpena~cu-ar from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. 5tormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. See Stormwater Management Plan
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
N/A
Page 8 of 9

XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
~~~
G ~ ~~
Applicaynt/Agent's Signature D e
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
A.
TIP Project No.
State Project No.
W.B.S. No.
Federal Project No.
Project Description:
B-4231
8.1222101
33574.1.1
BRSTP-102 (2)
The purpose of this project is to replace Pitt County Bridge No. 53 on NC 102
over Svrnft Creek. The replacement structure will be a bridge approximately 110
feet long and will accommodate a 30-foot wide travelway. The cross section will
provide a minimum of two 12-foot lanes and 3-foot offsets. The roadway grade of
the new structure will be approximately the same as the existing grade at this
location
The approach roadway will extend approximately 370 feet from east end of the
existing bridge and 350 feet from the west end of the existing bridge. The
approach will be widened to a 24-foot pavement width providing two 12-foot
lanes. Eight-foot shoulders including 2 feet paved and 6 feet of turf will be
provided on each side. Shoulder width will be increased by 3-feet where
guardrail is warranted. The roadway will be designed as a Rural Local Route
with a 60 mile per hour design speed.
Traffic will be detoured offsite during construction (see Figure 1). The offsite
detour must be improved to carry the traffic from NC 102. The pavement must
be widened by 2 feet on both sides and then the whole road resurfaced. Bridge
No. 53 on the detour SR 1122 (Hines Road) must be crutched and gates and
signals must be placed at the rail crossing on SR 1122. Part of the funding (see
Special Project Information, Section D) for improvements to the offsite detour
will come from a source other than the Highway Bridge Replacement and
Rehabilitation Program.
B. Purpose and Need:
Bridge No. 53 includes athree-span superstructure composed of an asphalt-
weanng surface and concrete deck on I-beams. The substructure includes timber
caps and piles. A timber crutch has been added for temporary support until the
bridge can be replaced.
Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of
8.2 out of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is considered
structurally deficient and functionally obsolete (structure appraisal of 2 out of 9,
deck geometry appraisal of 2 out of 9) according to Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) standards and therefore eligible for FHWA's Highway
Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program.
The bridge carries 4200 vehicles a day and continues to remain open only because
of a temporary timber crutch. Rehabilitation of the 66-year old timber
substructure is not practical. If NC 102 is to continue its service to traffic into the
future, Bridge No. 53 must be replaced.

C. Proposed Improvements:
Circle one or more of the following Type II improvements which apply to the
project:
Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking,
weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing
pavement (3R and 4R improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
c. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drams
f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes,
including safety treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane)
i. Slide Stabilization
j. Structural BMP's for water quality unprovement
2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the
installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
c. Adding or upgrading guardrail
d. Installing safety bamers including Jersey type- barriers and pier
protection
e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g. ~ Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
i. Channelizing traffic
j. Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing
hazazds and flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
1. Installing bridge safety hazdwaze including bridge rail retrofit
3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of
grade sepazation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings.
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
c. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour
repair, fender systems, and minor structural improvements
O Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)
4. Transportation corridor fringe pazking facilities.
5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest azeas.

6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of--way or for joint or Limited use of
right-of--way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse
impacts.
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or neaz
a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support
vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and
ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land aze
required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open azea consisting of
passenger shelters, boarding azeas, kiosks and related street
improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high activity
center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in azeas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no
significant noise impact on the surrounding community.
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land
acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and
protective buying will be permitted only for a particulaz pazcel or a limited
number of pazcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only
where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives,
including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may
be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land
may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species
mitigation sites.
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil
or groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation
guidelines.

D. Special Project Information:
Estimated Costs:
Total Construction $ 575,000
Right of Way 28,000
Gates and Signals 135,000*
Crutching Bridge 176 135,000*
Offsite Detour Improvement 459,000*
Total $ 1,304,000
*Funding for these portions of the project will come from a source other than
the Federal Highway Bridge Replacement Program.
Estimated Traffic:
Current - 4200 vpd Year 2025 - 7400 vpd
TTST - 2% Dual - 3%
Design Exceptions: There are no anticipated design exceptions for this project
Bridge Demolition: Based on current construction practices it is anticipated that
the bridge can be removed without dropping any of its components into the water.
Offsite Detour: NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation of Offsite Detours for Brid e
Replacement Projects considers multiple project variables beginning with the
additional time traveled by the average road user resulting from the offsite detour.
The offsite detour for this project would include SR 1723, SR 1122, SR 1149 and
back to NC 102. The detour for the average road user would result in 10 minutes
additional travel time (2.6 miles additional travel at 35 mph) that falls within the
range where consideration is given to an onsite detour. Given that both
Emergency Services and the school system have indicated they could work with a
duration of a few months and given the desire to avoid building a temporary
bridge over an anadramous fish stream, an offsite detour has been determined an
appropriate measure. Efforts should be made to keep the duration of the project
to a minimum. The Division concurs in this recommendation.
Other Alternatives Considered: NCDOT developed two onsite detour
alternatives; one to the north and one to the south. The onsite detour to the north
was estimated at $1,050,000. The onsite detour to the south was estimated at
$1,100,000. Had NCDOT elected an onsite detour, the northern alternative would
have been preferred.
Funding: Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) has agreed to fund the
project up to the cost of the onsite detour. The reasoning behind this decision is
the desire to avoid spending money on a temporary bridge associated with the
onsite detour when the same money could be spent on permanent improvements
to make an offsite detour more acceptable. Therefore FHWA will fund up to
$1,050,000 for the replacement of the bridge and improvements to the offsite
detour. NCDOT's Program Development Branch has identified other funds
available for this purpose.
4

E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II
actions
ECOLOGICAL YES NO
(1) Will the project have a substantial impact on any
unique or important natural resource? ^ X
(2) Does the project involve habitat where federally

listed endangered or threatened species may occur? ^
X
(3) Will the project affect anadromous fish? ^
X
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1/10) of an acre and have all practicable measures

to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated?
X ^
(5) Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands? ^
X
(6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely

impacted by proposed construction activities? ^
X
(7) Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding Water

Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)? ^
X
(8) Will the project require fill in waters of the United States
in any of the designated mountain trout counties? ^ g
(9) Does the project involve any known underground storage

tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sites? ^
X
PERMITS AND COORDINATION YES NO
(10) If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or any ^
"Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)? X
(11) Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act ^
resources? X
(12) Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required?
X
(13) Will the project result in the modification of any existing ^
regulatory floodway? X
5

(14) Will the project require any stream relocations or channel
changes? X
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES YES NO
(15) Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned

growth or land use for the area? ^
X
(16) Will the project require the relocation of any family or

business? ^
X
(17) Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or
low-income population? ^ X
(18) If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the

amount of right of way acquisition considered minor?
X ^
(19) Will the project involve any changes in access control? ^
X

(20) Will the project substantially alter the usefulness

and/or land use of adjacent property? ^
X
(21) Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? ^ X
(22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,

therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)? ^
X
(23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic

volumes? ^
X
(24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing

roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? ^
X
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility)
and will all construction proposed in association with the

bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility? ^
X
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or
environmental grounds concerning the project? ^ X
(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws

relating to the environmental aspects of the project? ^
X
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? ~ X
6

(29) Will the project affect any azchaeological remains which aze ^
important to history or pre-history? X
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? ^ X
(31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as defined
by Section 6(f J of the Land and Water Conservation Act
of 1965, as amended? X
(32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for ^
inclusion in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers? X
F. Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
Response to Question 3: National Marine Fisheries Service has requested a risk averse
approach regazding anadramous fish. They recommend applying a moratorium from
February 15 to June 30 of any given year. Based on preliminary information, it appears
as though there will be no "in-water" construction. If upon further analysis, it is
determined that there will be in-water work, NCDOT will adhere to the moratorium.

G. CE Approval
TIP Project No.
State Project No.
W.B.S. No.
Federal Project No.
Project Description:
B-4231
8.1222101
33574.1.1
BRSTP-102 (2)
The purpose of this project is to replace Pitt County Bridge No. 53 on NC 102
over Swift Creek. The replacement structure will be a bndge approximately 110
feet long and will accommodate a 30-foot wide travelway. The cross section will
provide a minimum of two 12-foot lanes and 3-foot offsets. The roadway grade of
the new structure will be approximately the same as the existing grade at this
location
The approach roadway will extend approximately 370 feet from east end of the
existing bridge and 350 feet from the west end of the existing bridge. The
approach will be widened to a 24-foot pavement width providing two 12-foot
lanes. Eight-foot shoulders including 2 feet paved and 6 feet of turf will be
provided on each side. Shoulder width will be increased by 3-feet where
guardrail is warranted. The roadway will be designed as a Rural Local Route
with a 60 mile per hour design speed.
Traffic will be detoured offsite during construction (see Figure 1). The offsite
detour must be improved to carry the traffic from NC 102. The pavement must
be widened by 2 feet on both sides and then the whole road resurfaced. Bridge
No. 53 on the detour SR 1122 (Hines Road) must be crutched and gates and
signals must be placed at the rail crossing on SR 1122. Part of the funding (see
Special Project Information, Section D) for improvements to the offsite detour
vv~ll come from a source other than the Highway Bridge Replacement and
Rehabilitation Program.
Cate orical Exclusion Action Classification:
A
X TYPE II(B)
A roved:
~ ~ 2 a a ~/
Date
~~22~0
Date
Project De~belopment & Environmental Analysis Branch
Project Planning Unit Head
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
For Type II(B) projects only:
Date~~ F. Sullivan, III, ivision Ac
Federal Highway Administration

PROJECT COMMITMENTS:
Pitt County
Bridge No. 53 on NC 102
Over Swift Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-102 (1)
State Project No. 8.1222101
W.B.S. No. 33574.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4231
All Design Groups/Division Resident Engineer - Anadramous Fish
Based on preliminary information, it appears that it may be possible to accomplish the
replacement without in-water work. If this is the case, then the project let date is not constrained
by a moratorium.
NCDOT will implement Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadramous Fish Crossings
If in later design it is determined that in-water work is required, then the North Carolina Division
of Mazine Fisheries has indicated that a moratorium on in-water construction will be in place
from February 15 to June 30 of any given yeaz.
• To the extent practical, construction should be accomplished without the use of construction
pads in the water.
• To the extent practical, bridge demolition should occur without getting into the water.
• To the extent practical, the footprint of the proposed project should be minimized.
All Design Groups/Division Resident Engineer - Anadramous Fish
The offsite detour must be improved to carry the traffic from NC 102. The pavement must be
widened by 2 feet on'bgth sides and then the whole road resurfaced. Bridge No. 53 on the detour
SR 1122 (Hines Road) must be crotched and gates and signals must be placed at the rail crossing
on SR 1122.
Resident Engineer/Bridge Maintenance Unit/Roadway Design/Program Development
Overlapping Detours
The detour routes for B-4231 and TIP Project B-4237 (see Figure 1) shaze SR 1723 as one leg of
the detour. As part of B-4231, SR 1723 is to be resurfaced. B-4237 shall not begin utilizing an
offsite detour until improvements on SR 1723 as part of B-4237 are complete.
Roadway Design/Program Development -School Bus Concerns -Accelerating the Let
The Pitt County Schools Transportation Director has indicated that an offsite detour is not highly
desirable but workable if the duration of the project is only a few months. He has requested that
as much of the work as possible overlap the summer period (beginning in June) when school
busses are not running. If it becomes appazent that there will be no "in-water" work associated
with the project, and if it is practical to accelerate the Let so that some of the construction occurs
during the summer months, then consideration should be given to accelerating the Let of the
project.
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Page 1 of 2
Green Sheet
November 2004

Program Development -Funding
°~.
The Federal Highway Administration has agreed to fund up to the cost of the onsite detour
($1,050,000) out of the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. The Program
Development Branch agreed (10-15-04) to fund the remainder of the project costs out of other
funding sources. This remaining cost is estimated at $254,000
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion
Green Sheet
November 2004
Page 2 of 2

f
~ t~
~-~ ,~ Studied Detour „
o ~
'~ t746 /161
+ 9 , ~s ~ o
! 178 ~v/ fl 174
--. ,1, _
,. iti
"~ 1164 ,~' ~ ~ ,~ 14 ~.~ .7
t } } It~alen 1 t,13 C19 =a~~~ X;• .. ~~ ~, Z 3.
n x , ,e,a.fi, -r, 1 • ~ , 17215
,,
.3 ,, lt7 t71 ~~.1TSt
t» • ltd - ~~ ~ ~ ~
MIS, Vwdws
~~ 22 , -~ w- ,.
~. „~ -. ~ ~ 1>~ i 63 t72S
,,.
j ~ ~
~ _, ~-
.M

• 1118
-~ ~
~1
r

, ~
t72a ~
l
~ /
1 1\ -
`r.
1 t ~ C~5 t ~~ ~ ~ ` .
AYDEN ~ :` ~-4231'• tt~ t ~;~ '~ 1ioi~r Cewmik
`~ a
r
}
1rt ~ till
i 114 1• 1 t+
~ `• ^"
t - ~?~~ ,•
~'r `•~
t1e~ ~ 1
` r-

~.
'
-401
~
'
tt
'~.~ :
• J
--
,
~
, ~
1 3
•\ 190 )902 Y
a
t ! t~3(!J `
+- m lIOW NML ~ 13 •~~ 111 ~ tCg e 4
t ~ Ck
~-
Lifl~li I
~~ y ~ ~ .
III ,~ , .• t
.
,
' ~~
'~,..•~ L ,sts
I 11 t tae ~ 13rrdwa 1, e
•~ tt~o ~ .~ tit - ~
p Gilfi1'ON ~ _ _ ` • _
~' '~• ,~ "°' ~„ --• 247 t912- ;9u
I. ~ tl r ~ ,.g.
101 R
~`df NO"~ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
~~ TRANSPORTATION
' DMSION OF HIGHWAYS
'~+ ~ PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Ft
\~,, r~~ ENVIItONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
PITT COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO.53 ON NC 102
OVER SWIFT CREEK
B-4231
Figlue 1

_.Jott~ W ~ 1 t-aup~
~:, , f.,
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Admi~4istsator..,,,
Michael F. Easley, Governor •`` ~ ~ '~^', ti , ~'t„ Division of Historical Resources
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary = • ~~~~~ David J. Olson, Director
r~ ~ ;
Je~ey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary ~" ti~j ~,~
~.T, ;
k . _'?
June 25, 2003 ~ ~:~' ,.,. `~ ~., ""
~~ 1 ~7' J
MEMORANDUM ~ ~
~~.
TO: Greg Thorpe, Manager '`~''~'t,rg; ~ Ek~
Project Development and Environmental n ysis Branch
NCDOT Division of Highways
FROM: ~ David Brook ~ ~ ~(.~. /I
SUBJECT: Replacement bridge No. 53 on NC 102 over Swift Creek, B-4231, Pitt County,
ER03-0960
Thank you for your letter of Apri17, 2003, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a seazch of our maps and files and located the following structure of historical
or azchitectural importance within the general azea of this project:
Arden Historic District, listed in the National Register
We recommend that a Department of Transportation azchitectural historian identify and evaluate
any structures over fifty years of age within the project azea, and report the findings to us.
There aze no known archaeological sites within the proposed project azea. Based on our knowledge
of the area, it is unlikely that any azchaeological resources that may be eligible for conclusion in the
National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the project We, therefore, recommend that
no azchaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project
The above comments aze made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106
codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, eavironmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all
future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
www.hoo.dcr.state.nc.us
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail 5ervicx Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone] •733-865:
RESTORATION S 1 S N. Blount St, Raleigh NC 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4613 [phone] •715-480
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blourrt St., Raleigh NC 4618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699~t618 [phone] •71580

June 25, 2003
Page 2
cc: Mary Pope Fury, NCDOT
Matt Wilkerson, NCDOT

F~•ch•ral:lic! 11 BRSTP-l0?(?) T1P t1 B--x_31 Currnri•: Pitt
CONCURRENCE FORI\l FOR PROPER'I'lES NUT ELIGIBLE FOR
THE N:~TION:~L REGISTER OF HISTORIC I'L:~CES
Prr jeer Description: Replace Bridge No. 53 on NC 102 over Switt Creek
On 03/0?/3004, representatives of the
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
^ Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
^ Other
Reviewed the subject project at
^ Scoping meeting
Historic azchitectural resources photograph review session/consultation
^ Other
All parties present agreed
^ There aze no properties over fifty years old within the project's area of potential effects.
[~ There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria Consideration G within the
project's area of potential effects.
There aze properties over fifty years old within the project's Area of Potential Effects (APE), but based on the
historical ' ormation available and the photographs of each property, the property identified as
~' S is considered not eligible for the National
Register and n further evaluation of it is necessary.
[~ There are no National Register-listed or Study Listed properties within the project's azea of potential effects.
All properties greater than 50 years of age located is the APE have been considered at this consultation, and based
upon the above concurrence, all compliance for historic architecture with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project.
There are no historic properties affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as needed)
Signed:
Representative D - Date
-~ ~ ~ ~ 2 0
FHWA, for the Division Administrator, or ther Federal Agency Date
lei//~~~ / / ~~Z~(``~ .: ~I ~ l J`-f
Representative, HPO " Date ~
cafe Historic Preservation Officer Date -
J If a survey report is prepared, a final copy of this form and the attached list will be included.

v
Executive Summary
i The following is a Natural Systems Technical Report for the proposed replacement of
Bridge No. 53 on NC 102 over Swift Creek in Pitt County, North Carolina (TIP No. B-
AI
4231).
INTRODUCTION
1 The proposed prof ect will replace Bridge No. 53 on NC 102 over Swift Creek in Pitt
~; County, North Carolina. The project study azea is primarily disturbed urban and
agricultural lands and previously disturbed forests. The project study area is located in
the Coastal Plain physiographic region, approximately 10 to 40 feet (3 to 12 meters)
above mean sea level. Two hydric soils are within the project study azea including:
Bibb complex and Bladen fine sandy loam.
'~ PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
j Water Resources
Water resources located within the project study area lie in North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) Subbasin 03-04-09 and the United States Geological Survey
'~ Subbasin 03020202 of the Neuse River Drainage Basin. The best usage classification
of Fork Swamp (NCDWQ Stream Index #27-97-(0.5)) is Class C NSW SW (NCDEM,
2002). No water resources classified as High Quality Waters, Water Supplies, or
Outstanding Resource Waters or waters on the 303(d) list aze located within the project
study area.
Biotic Resources
Two plant communities were found within the project study area, Coastal Plain
bottomland hardwood and urban/agricultural disturbed. The following table shows the
azea of each of these communities occurring within the project azea.
Natural Systems
Report, B-4231
Kitt County
Exexutive Summary

i
1
~.
Natural Systems
Report, B-4231
Pitt County
Exexutive Summary
Plant Communities Within the Project Area
Community Area
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood 16.62 ac (6.73 ha)
Urban/Agricultural Disturbed Lands 8.97 ac (3.63 ha)
JURISDICTIONAL TOPICS
Surface Waters and Wetlands
Swift Creek is considered jurisdictional surface waters under Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act. Based upon the results of the field investigation, the project study area also
contains jurisdictional wetlands. Since no alternatives have been selected, impacts to
these "Waters of the United States" cannot be determined. The tables below indicate
the length or acreage of each jurisdictional surface water or wetland within the project
area. -
Surface Waters
Site Length
Swift Creek 520 feet (158 meters)
Wetlands
Site Total Area Cowardin Classification DWQ Rating
Wetland WA 0.15 ac (0.06 ha) PF01 Cd 47
Wetland WB 0.12 ac (0.09 ha) PF012Cd 47
Wetland WC 0.10 ac (0.06 ha) PF012Cd 47
Wetland WD 0.15 ac (0.06 ha) PF01 Cd 47
Due to the potential for water quality impacts during construction, in-stream
construction moratoriums to limit the effects on fishery resources have been suggested.
The moratorium applies if the following species are supported by the stream: sturgeon
(February 1 to June 30), brown and brook trout (October 15 to April 15), rainbow trout
(January 1 to April 15), spotfin chub (May 15 to August 15), smalhnouth bass (May 1
2

Tf N
to July 15), eastern sunfish (April 1 to June 30), western sunfish (May 1 to June 30),
~. and other anadromous fish (February 15 to June 30). A 25 foot (7.6 m) buffer
~ moratorium exists relative to the smalhnouth bass. Qualified biologists from the
NCDOT will assess the stream for the afovementioned species. Once the fish have
been identified as being supported by the stream, the appropriate moratorium will be
~ applied.
Essential fish habitat (EFI~ is defined as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish
for spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity." The aforementioned waters
.,; include aquatic azeas and their associated physical, chemical, and biological properties
used by fish and include aquatic areas historically used by fish where appropriate. The
aforementioned substrate includes sediment, hard bottom, structures underlying the
waters, and associated biological communities. The proposed project is not anticipated
to involve EFH.
Permits
~ The Nationwide Permit #23 (Approved Categorical Exclusions) should cover the
impacts to jurisdictional stream in the project study area. Nationwide Permit #33
(Temporary Construction, Access, and Dewatering) may be needed for temporary
construction access if that is not addressed in National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) document. A final permitting strategy cannot be developed until a design
alternative is selected
A Section 401 General Water Quality Certification is also required for any activity that
-may result in a discharge into "Waters of the United States" or for which an issuance of
a federal permit or license is issued. Certifications aze administered through the
NCDWQ. Final determination of permit applicability lies with the USACE.
Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. As of February 25, 2003, the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service identified three endangered species and one threatened
species as potentially occurring in Pitt County. The following table lists each species,
its status and biological conclusion.
Natural Systems
Report, B-4231
Pitt County
Exexutive Summary

Natural Systems
Report, B-4231
Pitt County
Exexutive Summary
Scientific Name Common Name Federal
Status Biological
Conclusion
Ha/iaeetus /eucocepha/us Bald Eagle Threatened No Effect
Trichechusmanatus West Indian Manatee Endangered No Effect
Picoidesborealis Red-cockaded woodpecker Endangered No Effect
E//iptio steinstansana Tar spinymussel Endangered Unresolved
Bald Eagle Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the bald eagle consisting of large bodies of water does not exist
within the project study area. In addition, there is a large amount of human disturbance
~.
within and around the project study area. Review of NCNHP maps indicated no
~ known populations of this species within one mile of the project study area. No
impacts to this species from project construction are anticipated.
~ West Indian Manatee Biological Conclusion: No Effect
i -
Suitable habitat for the West Indian manatee consisting of sufficient depth of at least 5
~ feet (1.5 meters) does not exist within the project study area. NCNHP has no records
of any known populations of the West Indian Manatee within aone-mile radius of the
project study area. No impacts to this species from project construction are anticipated.
Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the RCW consisting of old pine stands within or near the project
study area does not exist. In addition, large agricultural fields fracture the landscape
generating boundaries that RCWs do not typically cross. Therefore, a large enough
area of appropriate habitat is not located within the project study area. The NCNHP
lists no documented occurrences of the RCW within 5.0 miles of the project study area.
No impacts are anticipated to the RCW because of project construction
Tar spinymussel Biological Conclusion: Unresolved
Habitat needed to support Tar spinymussel is present within Fork Swamp of the project
study area. ARCADIS biologists were not able to conduct a detailed survey for this
species. A survey should be conducted to confirm the presence or absence of this
species.. NCNHP does not list any known occurrences of the Tar spinymussel within
4

{
two
Natural Systems
~ Report, B-4231
~~ Pitt County
_ Exexutive Summary
the project study area. NCNHP does not list this species as occurring in Pitt County in
,m.
over 20 yeazs.
,~ Surveys for these species aze valid for two years from the survey data. If the project is
not constructed within those two years, then the species may need to be resurveyed
~ before the let date.
CONCLUSIONS
,~
The project study area contains one perennial stream, approximately 5201ineaz feet
(158 meters), and four jurisdictional wetland areas, totaling approximately 0.52 acres
(0.21 ha). Since no alternatives have been selected, impacts to these "Waters of the
United States" cannot be determined. A Nationwide Permit #33 and a Section 401
General Water Quality Certification may also be required for the project. No federally
protected species, except the federally endangered Tar spinymussel, aze likely to be
impacted by this project.
During replacement of the bridge, construction of an onsite temporary detour bridge,
'°' use of existing roadways for anoff-site detour, or construction of an offsite temporary
detour bridge will be required. Approximately 0.52 acres (0.21 ha) of wetlands and a
perennial stream are located within the project study area. One wetland azea is located
~' northeast of the existing bridge, two wetland azeas aze located southeast of the existing
- ~ bridge, and one wetland area is located southwest of the existing bridge. Additionally,
~ several residences are located approximately six hundred feet west of the existing
bridge. If an onsite temporary detour crosses the wetlands, a geotechnical investigation
--~ of the wetland substrate's consolidation potential will have to be performed.
„~ Construction of a temporary detour bridge within the wetland azeas will potentially
degrade the ability of the wetland to function as well as it did before extreme
compaction or distortion of the substrate occurred from the weight of the bridge.
Removal of sections of the existing causeway, thereby lengthening the bridge, will not
be beneficial relative to wetland impacts since wetlands do not occur within the
existing causeway. Due to the width of the stream channel relative to the existing
causeway, lengthening of the bridge will not improve surface flows.

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN { MAY ~ 2eos
State Project 33574.1.1 (B-4231) Date: 4/28/ i~TS~~ ~F ~ii~i.~l~1YS
Pitt County ~EA'OFFICE Qr rl.'lTliSitl. E~11lIRONMENT
ROADWAY DESCRIPTION
The project involves the removal and replacement of Bridge #53 over Swift Creek on NC
102 in Ayden. The existing 24 ft. wide paved road is a two-lane road with two 12 ft.
paved lanes. The proposed road is 28 ft. wide with 12 ft. paved lanes and 2 ft. paved
shoulders. There will be guardrail placed at the beginning and end of the bridges and the
shoulder will be paved to the guardrail to help prevent erosion of the fill slopes. Bridge
#53 is 76.2 ft. long and will be replaced with a 100 ft. long bridge. An off-site detour is
proposed for this project.
ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION
Swift Creek is rated a Class C; Sw; NSW water classification. The project is located in
the Neuse River Basin. No wetlands will be impacted by the proposed project.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND MAJOR
STRUCTURES
Best Management Practices (BMPs) and measures used on the project to reduce the
stormwater impacts are grassed swales. The proposed bridge is a single span structure
eliminating the need for a bridge bent in the creek. There will be no deck drains on the
proposed structure. Also the storm drainage is being discharged as far away from the
stream as practicable. Off site drainage in northwest,northeast,and southeast quadrants
was piped through transportation facility directly to the creek as there was no viable
alternative for treatment within project limits.
The following summarizes where the BMPs used on the project:
GRASSED SWALES
From station 20+00-L- to 22+20-L- left and right
From station 24+OS-L- to 26+00-L- left.
From station 24+10-L- to 26+00-L- right.

NORTH CAROLINA

/\~~
~ 1122 \

'
a . 1 Y2 '
_--- m
~....
/ 1723 ~y i ~
~, /
172s
!~ ~
l .
m ~
-~ _ ~ n~
'102
~
~ ~
.
~ ~ 1725
_
r

L ~ ~
1723 1724 _ J '
~ - /
° ~ '~
• ~ PROJE B-4237 ',
'
1900 ~` .
"~.~ ~ ~ ~ J `
1723 ,
~ ~ _ _ ~ 1725

'
/
~
,_-_~
\ o

` 1900
~ ~ / ~ 1724 '
1724
~ ~ ` ~
~~~
t ~~ /
~ 1905 '1902
1900 ~
,a.....
NOT TO SC LE
~E2MIT DQ~W-n~CTS
~Y ~`L~l`~l ~~~
~~~~
, 1723
J - - - . ~
M I m -
v
~~
~•
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT:33574.L1 (B-~23ll
REPLACE BRG~ 53 OVER SWIFT
CREEg ON NC 102
SHEET ~ OF ~ 04 / 10 /

~ ~ ^
.-.~ ~~ -
Y n`
~ i 1717 / ~ 1 i
`
°
~
~
~ ~ l
~
~
~
~ ,
-~1 y
~' -~. \

~ ~.~
'>
'~~. .~ ~
~
~ x 19.0

~
'
: ~
~- l ••Cem,
121 . ~
~. - ~ ~,
~
,
-~-.~ , ,,y:~ ,,
Park \ L-,
1T~
Ay Sri Comm cnj ~ /
.~
i ce ,:
=
~,
~,
~ -
- ,
~; ___

'_-..~-~~
f-
~. ~
f - BM ~. .
~
`
i s
~ V
~
1 / / ~ X20.7
~.
'I J
Cem
. ~;\ ---- 1 ,~ ~\ \
\ \ \
~'
. ~
~
-
_
- .., ~ ___ ~ ~oa
-
~
~ _; _ o ~ `190 '~^ -- - ~ \ . Go Course
`~~ \ ~
isposal - ~ )
~ ~
j
o J
~ • ~ I
1149 ~ ~ !
J q
o !Q
~`'
\
^ ~~ \V ~
ry
~_ _~ ~o
1901 \ n ~~ , ~ _ ~' ~ ) •\~ I
~ mow. ~a -s.
' -
NOT TO SCALE
N. C. DEPT. ®F TRANSP®RTATION
DIVISI®N ®F HIGHWAYS
°~j~
®(~ ~ 1l ~ ®~ PITT C®UNTY
PR®JECT: 3357.1.1 (B~423ll
REPLACE BRG~ 53 ®VER SWIFT
CREEK ®N NC 102
SHEET .2 ®F !o

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

Site
No.

Station
(From/To)

Structure
Size /Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
-Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac) an
Clearing
in
Wetlands
ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
22+47 -L- 1 SPAN 100' 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0
BOX BEAM

TOTALS: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0
REMARKS: Structures- This bridge is proposed as a single span bridge
with no permanent impacts to the waterway.
Re~dsed 3/31/05

~~®1C'~~~ ~L
NAMES AND
PARCEL NO.
NAMES
®~~~~~
ADDRESSES
ADDRESSES
1 MARY ALICE HUBBARD 110 SPRJNGMOOR DR
RALEIGH, N.C. 27615
N~~~~C
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT:3357~.1.1 (B-231)
REPLACE BRG~53 OVER SWIFT
CREEg ON NC 102
SHEET ~' OF ~ 0~/10/

i ~
NORTH CAROLINA
~` ~ ~ 1122 \ m 1 Y2 ~
.
m ~ ~ - . ~ ~`

~ -
-
~+
~ 1725
'
~
--
_ 1723 ~y _~
~
A ~~ ~ J ~- J ----

J
~ s
~ i
~ ~.
l _
- ,
- ~ ~ M
'102 1725

• r r ~ \
1723
t 1724
.-_
-~
~ ~
` ~ _ ~ PROJE -
B-4237 ',
`
. `~~ 1900 ~` - ~ . ~ ,
1725
J
`
1723 ~
- - -
.~ ~ ® - -
~ _
,~ ~

. /
~~ - --
<~ i~
~ 1900 1905 ~~1902
~. -
NOT TO SC LE
1~1 ~'V ~~ ~JL ~Y ~~ ~~~~~~
~1l`1~~~~~~
I~A~IL~~
o,-
/ 1724 ~, 1724
~~ 1723
__J~ -- M ~-~ m
u
~~
~~
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT:3357~.L1 (B-~231)
REPLACE BRG~ 53 OVER SWIFT
CREEg ON NC 102
SHEET / OF ~O 0~/ 10/

'

zo ~-. ~ I .. _, __

~'
,` / ` ,
~
~ _ _~-. ... _.. .

~,,
~ ~
1

~
---'~

20
~
.v ~
r ~ o ~
.~
`1 \ \ ~ . ~
~
~ ~ ~
~ xr9.o
olttJ / ~
~

~C; ~ ,
1 Cem,

~...
-- 122 ~r n

~:,' .I 1 _ ('-~~
~ 1 -hem ` ~ ' ~ 1 ~'
-~~~ ~~~ , f
' h~
* Park
a
0 • • .
- 14
- -.:~
'; . t
coy,,,,
)
ce
~~,
Ay en chs i .
~f 3 ~'
`
~~
-_ __~~` 1 ~ ~ BM
.
~
'• R7.5
C ~ ~ ~ X20.7
~ ~ i

~
L
`
.
J
~
\
, ..~
Cem
- i ~ ____ _
o \~ \ \
~ ~
~-~
- -.

~ T ~
„~ -~' ~ o j `190

~ •0 1
~
•
~~.

~q _
~ , ~, ~ _. _
Wage ~j'.J~ -
~
l

- _,
~ `
' ~ . , ~ . Gol
• ••..
~ `~ i
Course '~

• ~~ isposa /
I,
O • i 1
\ ~4 (0
~
~
1149
~ ~ ; 1 •
~ ~( 1 0
s ~
~~~ \
w
F'
~'+J . _
J
Ja
--
~

` ~ ~ ,\
- ~
.
1901 0 cam.` o. / "- - -~ _ ~' \ l'~
..
~ \~~ ., ~.
~ -
l
-_____
_ _. ...,.
NOT TO SCALE
~~i ~~~i ~I~~i ~ ~~~~i 1Cs~ N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
®(~~~~®~ PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: 3357.1.1 (B~231)
REPLACE BRG'~ 53 OVER SWIFT
CREEg ON NC 102
SHEET oZ OF ~

.~
i3
wODDEN PiUNGS
tDGE DECK
~V~
y : r~ 4
I ~gi
! .
' 1
~ II

E--I - to
~i - TSio. 4f00J70 RoaL eNecK DAM j • • ~ ~
PDE ppE cLAU 'e' R1F RAF ToF
~ E. s- _. -- _ _ ,- B7.7a n TONE I = ~
1 F -~ u
... ,.,,~~~ MN
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
DEIAIL.A
LATERAL GRASSED SwALE py/ il1EFT NO,
I Nor ro Scale)
DETAIL B ROADWAY D[SIGN
roun II a SPECIAL Not Ito LSCO1i,SED SwAIE ENGINEER
Ylrt D= l5 Ft. Ftl
B= SA Ft. CrounG D -`o~t~ Sbpe ~
D= 5.0 Ft.
YIrL D = l,i Ft. ~ ,
FROM STA. 10+00 a. TO AA. 21+10 ~ LT. B =1.OFr. I '
a• ~ I
FROM STA.2A+0! -L. TO I6+00 -Ir LT, i • a l
FROM AA, 74+10 -J.~ TO 16+00 -I.~ R. I e
__ ` I
SFlCL4 LITERAL GMBBlD BWAL! \ ' I
S!! DlTAIL 'B' ~ i ~
SNlET NO.
01- 1.Beh
010. 23eb
D1- D.s e
o1a• o.s e
v1_ I.o ~
vto-1.1M
se. o,ooB A11
LINGTN- 193 h ors'

~~
I~
,~I
a
_e_ P
BeeB+ BBC BlGIN w
RT. AND LT.
w0005- G~ ~Qc`RAC CIiLCK DAM
CLAD KIF RAF TOF DETAIL E
r--- PD ICE -PDE eLEV.- seas ® Toles (see DerAIL 'e7 RocK cIECK DAu
RIF RAF t Not to ScoleJ /
•~• SFlCLLL LATERAL GRABBED fWALE
see DeTAIL'B' fz.oy
END STATE PROJECT 8-4231 ti'' TARES
DETAIL D -~`''~~° °•'
RIP RAP AT ELIBANKIIENT `CLASS 'B' AP
t wet re Saole~ ~ D.M 0.6 AC.
i ' . ~ ~' STA.1 -L-L- LT. 01- 2.Ic4
~rte~e. ].a ~ tB' r + _ i . ~ ~~ A. sB~ 6+DO -L- Lr. QD11a- o ~ n
J. I •Re~ ~ ' t ~ BTA. 16+00 -Ir RT. D10. 0.7 R
[st. 4.0 ionw 99ff~~
i ~ V16-~.Olpw
type of ue.r . CU6 B RF RAF !I 1 . ~ I y 'Y ' : a Bs- 0.001 A11
~ / I * 1 LEN67l4 190 A.
FROM STA. u+10 -L- LL ~ • ~ ~ 1
~-------
tZ .46 FROM STA. ss+10 + RT. ' / $IDt•EY CORNEI.E15 YAlIfJG st d
1
DG! ~ ' I
,,
/ ~' ~ WD BBG ETA. IB+B7 -L-
25 26 10 11 ~

m 1.1d~
~-0
~
D10-0A A
V2-1.0 fp
V10.1.1 fM STEEL 18E1u FR
asr ovEn
~
~~ 22o
A. -ORVI- PoTSIa
BEGIN CONSTRU
w9 KA9 lMMNKAI6VT
sES DETNL'n~
LIAfZY ALICE BULLOCK NU88AR0
uTESAL cKASSm swALE -
fEE DETNL 'A'
PD PDE--'~7`--PDE
NOOpS
I ~ ~ ~ 1f W • 1f' C79
~ Nooos / PDE
02-0.7eh E[GIN 6!G 19+99 ~. IR. L
D~2-0.7A R SEOIN fib 20+9A -Ir LT. p-uKlj CUSS f D PDE ~
D10-0.6 A ~ ~
V2-1.0 fps R1~ fAr EAfMNKAIENT ~
y10-1.! 1m SH DETNL'D'
LCiG ~~O A. DETAIL C f/ECIAL UTBUL DNSf® 6WAl!
LATERAL GRASSED SwALE fC! DlTNL'C'
(NOf t0 $COb7
1 ~ ~- 1oDe ~ DOG TSEGIN fRIDO!
1 1 ou i ,
Epp VARY IALICE BULLOCK IK188ARD 41n, D= I.5 Ff.
w +~ ;. pa 5,0 Ft. NLLOVn6LE IM-nCTS ZONE 1
9t'• ^a
~` r4p~ MOM 6TA IO+00 a. TO fTA 22+70 ~ IR. ©ALLOVABLE 11PAC TS ZONE 2
~}
\•
.'\~ , 1 `
~~c ~ ~ roo• so• o• loo•
~ .~
----'
SCALES I'= 100'
c
rn
a
E
a
v
r
/~
`%~ 19 20 21 22 23 24
o~

BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACT BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT

SITE NO. STRUCTURE SIZE
/TYPE STATION
(FROM/TO) ROAD
CROSSING PARALLEL
IMPACT ZONE 1
(ftZ) ZONE 2
(ft2) TOTAL
(ft2) ZONE 1
(ftz) ZONE 2
(ftZ) TOTAL
(ft2) ZONE 1
(ftZ) ZONE 2
(ftZ)
1 1 100' BOX BEAM 21+97-L-TO X 9425.0 4920.0 14345.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
BRIDGE 22+97-L-

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTAL: 9425.0 4920.0 14345.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: 33574.1.1 (B-4231)
4/1 012 0 0 6
SHEET OF Ci

~~®~~~ 1L 1l ®~~~~~
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO.
NAMES
ADDRESSES
1 MARY ALICE HUBBARD 110 SPRINGMOOR DR
RALEIGH, N.C. 27615
leT~~O~C
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: 33574.1.1 (B-4231)
REPLACE BRG~53 OVER SWIFT
CREEg ON NC 102
SHEET ~ OF ~ 0~/10/

..-
j co stem ;
PROGRAM
September 11, 2006
Mr. William Wescott
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
Dear Mr. Wescott:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
oC~v~ c/
~~ ~"~
B-4231, Replace Bridge Number 53 over Swift Creek on NC 102, Pitt
County; Neuse River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03020202); Northern Inner
Coastal Plain (NICP) Eco-Region
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) will provide the compensatory riparian wetland mitigation for the unavoidable impact
associated with the above referenced project. As indicated in the NCDOT's mitigation request
letter dated August 29, 2006, compensatory riparian wetland mitigation from EEP is required for
approximately 0.34 of riparian wetland impacts.
Mitigation for this project will be provided in accordance with Section X of the
Memorandum of Agreement between the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, the N. C. Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
signed on July 22, 2003. EEP commits to implement sufficient compensatory riparian wetland
mitigation up to a 2:1 ratio to offset the impacts associated with this project by the end of the
MOA year in which this project is permitted. If the impacts change from the above listed
amount, then this mitigation strategy letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation strategy
letter will be required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
• ` ~,.~-
William D. Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Director
cc: Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., NCDOT-PDEA
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-4231
n_i~..~'. w 1 ~'~ r~ ~ r ~~ ~ ;~ .. , ..., ~~ ~ ~ ., k .~~ ~~;~. rJ y ~ U .- ~ c. , ~. s. ~.,.,.~ 4- i i~ ~ ~ a ~ f :'~ ~ ,f, ~(.ia-. r~~' e~f~
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program,1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 21699-1652 / 919-115-0416 / www.nceep.net

`~--
Eo stem
. as ~.~ i. ~. ~,. ~ ~., j .~
PROGRAM
September 11, 2006
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-4231, Replace Bridge Number 53 over Swift Creek on NC 102, Pitt
County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) will provide the compensatory riparian wetland mitigation for the subject project. Based
on the information supplied by you in a letter dated August 29, 2006, the impacts are located in
CU 03020202 of the Neuse River Basin in the Northern Inner Coastal Plain (NICP) Eco-Region,
and are as follows:
Riparian Wetlands: 0.34 acre
Mitigation for this project will be provided in accordance with the Memorandum of
Agreement between the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the N. C.
Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers signed on July 22, 2003.
EEP will commit to implementing sufficient compensatory riparian wetland mitigation to offset
the impacts associated with this project by the end of the MOA year in which this project is
permitted. If the above referenced impacts amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance
letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
r~. ~~ ~-
Wi m D. Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Director
cc: Mr. William Wescott, USACE-Washington
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-4231
a.~,~ f. ~ '' L ~ i.w~,.>.~ .iY , ; t-" / . v~~ ..~ ti f _ 3 t,. .,,T ~ ~ ..i ~~~6C ~ ..~ L-'~, ~-i~~' ~~/'~
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program,1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-115-0476 / www.nceep.net

OEIAB_A
Q1-II~ LATERAL GRASSED SHALE RW EFEEI N0.
g10.1.1eh c Nor ro Saakl
D:-oa a eRacE so.sn II DErML B KoArn9A7 oewN NYDAAIRIG
D10-0.9 R STEEL (BEAU PRaNE aN w000EN PLINOS ~e SPECIAL LATERAL CRASSEO STALE ENGWElR [NGINlBI
VI-lA BST OyBi C010 BRDGE OECt r0u f NOt t0 $aalal
h0.1.1
Eyq,Op9 RR Yfn. D• 45 Fi. FlI
lINOTF•- 1108 -ORVI- PdT$-O, IQ+00.00 B~ 3.0 Fr. Ground p L tt~ Skme ~
BEGlN CONSTRUCrlO ~ !J D= s.o Ft.
pPIWPMRANKMB~R ~ ~ B AIR4D-1aFt, I;~
sa DErAIL'D' ~ 1, ~ F#AM srA. sD+00 a. TO RA a+1o -1. LT. B =1.DFr,
r~i ;, '1
FROM 9TA 2/+03 .L. TO Zb+00 -I. LT.
WRY ALEE BIALOtx MATBARD I F PROM 90.31+10 a,. TO 16+W + Rr. ~ `
. i
~E D~EIN~K9m 9WAL! 1 a i n ~ ~6P~~ e IL WAP3® 6N'AI! 1 , ~ / / 09-1.Ieh
.~~ ~ ~ T ~ I \, I
~ ~ F !- 11+7 I~ ' / m as e ~
(/~~~ to ' 010- D.6 R
tlOf DAM- 1 I 1 n ~ ~ ~_mj, $l0. 4~.~ ROCK LMFCK DAM ~ . ~ ~ `\ V1.1.D 1q
NP PAO Tt~s PD PDE-"'d"'-PDE F E PDE- PDE coat 'r NP !u TaP no• 1.1r1.
CT7JL, '!' I -- ~ ~ P MP \ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ 97.10' ® 17..TONa _~ j~\ \ LENGM- Idd 93~A r nib
~- T P O~~L'~I AAA-..~
w0oD5 1 I9' 19' iC woods ~ ~
. ~
.. .. .. ..
---- \
N0.
---- ---~-- .. ~r ~ ~
` ~ _ 13' W j 19' csr ~ 1!' CSP MN ~ ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
~ .. ~ .. .. .. ., woaos . .. . ~ .. PDE N _ ~ _ _ t0 .. aEa DAM ~.u.
+reoor
01-o,7~N xelN !eD Iv+~ ~ Rr. r~eee B PD PDE PD -PDE aEE ' NP !u roP DETUL E
E00.7•ids ILGIN 910 30+9A -I' LT. NP RAP ~~ n ICE GLV: 9&1D' ® TON9 (a!! D[fAlt'!1 RO[k CIECK DAM
DI.D,9 R E NP KAP I Noi to $calel
0160.6 R NP RAP lMMNINIlNT d ~ ,~p /~ ~ FECUl IAT9UL GAAf!® SWALE
V!-1A 56i DEWL'D' . ~ ~ E"•~/ a!! DRAIL'1' F2.0'i /
Lg,I~'~jgp a, IPN1LL uTDIAL ePA99® IWAl! n ~ , ~ END STATE PROJECT 8-4231 '~ ~" VARES
LATERAL C~RA~ SED $wALE 9s DIwL'c' DETAIL D
I NOt to Scald 1 L RP RAP AT EMBANKMENT Ouna CLA55 'B' P
DYD 61G 1lGIN aN00! i xot tw ScaN~ O.A.- 0.6 AC.
1 1 I / ou / I 1 ( i , \ 9TA I -4 LT.
`vr 1 ~r 9.7 1,!' I . \ ~ ~ 1 A Li. Q0. 71~
EP MART W.ICE B0.LOCK MRBARO Min. O= L$ Fi. I~ a0i-~^ r _ i , `~ D2- Ok R
~ B= 2.0 Ft. aLLOm3LE MPaCTS IONf I ~ I I I ~ke~ / ~ RA 36+00 -4 Rf. D10. DJ R
,? y, b= SA Ft.
oft ` Y e. ~ ~I Ee}, /.0 tau ~' ~ I : ~ I 1 VI- d.Np
m nat.
~' r ' ` kQ\ PROM 60.10+00 k TO rtA Yl+70 a. N'. ©aLLOwaBLE IWaCTS 20NE 2 Type or Linr . C1A69 E NF AAP 11 1 ~ ~ ~ ' ''° 9s D.001 IM
~ / 1 . , I IFNOTl~ 190 A.
~ ' ' ~~ FROM 50.13+1O kLT. 1 a ` ` I ,_..----
\~' , ~ ' • 1 -DAV2- POT$t0. 12+25.46 FROM fTA Z?+10 .4 Kr. 1 ` ~ $ptEY COFdELRIS MANNNG !9 d
100' S0' 0' 100' I ,
~ \a4 ` ~ \ I
~ ' `\ INiIN ak 1lOIN WDG! /
~' _~ '
- - - AT. AND LT. 1 fA
SCALE P= 100' ~~ ~
!ND 910 10.19+01 -Ir
c
m
i
a
E
n
a
i
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 10 11 ~

.dgn
: _
.- ...
_..... ; ;~ t iij.
; 1 , 1 t
MPYO PYl~ I I ~j ~ii `,, l~.vf" (
M 1 i 'SJ '
: ;
.. _ ;
I ~'.t
i
. y" i' 't i~ ' :i~~~: w
M Y ~~:
Y ~~ r i ; I v: i
~ ' R ~
.Y 9 '
~ 11`' _
N ~ ~~ ~ j 59'~I iI ~' j i
,i ~ ,
a I~ ." j~ cI ~
r ~ E 1
j . ~;, I
~ I ~ i
. -~ ,.
z z j i:: j I
~/ ~• EI ~ ~Is1
~ ~i `'
~ ~`l: ' ~ 1! ' g
Na I~l 1 ~ i ~
T r e (~ la I ~V.
+ i ~ I !:
J ~j! .
• ~ O> =1 ~~:'~ ~ i I j i i`~iij ~ O~~ ~!•Os01yF~
i `O
......:~ "~ N
-`. - y i'
~ ° ~ ~ ~~: ; j! ~ " i ,~ I ~a gag=+a~
.+~• :
G' omc y,, i~~ii ~ ::. ' i :iTl 'i.......
:Ee ~Ic;: i I ~~
'.
N ~ ~ 8. ~:, _:: i~j .,
N°o {:ib '' I i ''~~I~I i •~'
N ~i
i. F
~ ~: i :
-.... '
:' : p
',. ~..... is
;; P
_...
,l ,.'
m
v i'Il ~ ;<; i p i
`b' ~ :.
4 5i i
u L~ '~i~V ~ a Q~
~ : ~~ i i I ~~ i~l 5F
~' ~ ~ ~ ~5
: ! I.
q I .: ~l.i ~~.._
_ _ ., ~
gi gi yfy~ x mZ ° r~ 1 i I i ~ ro ~'t~~
a ~ Z ~ p1'+ . ki.~j I jj m
,... ;
r w m ~~ ' .' f ! f l 3. >~
m r
,.
' _ : Z
~ ~ ;..:::
r
z ~n
Fls ~O~
~9~7 Q mr
_....... _. ! ' ' N _
_... ~ m
~:1'',,5~'C.~,..~=tip..:. i ~1. - _ "':.i '3; '; ~isN,. ~~t ~ Q ~s
_.. ff
::::::.....
.... rvll...~l. _ 1
:_
E
_ :.:~. .:
~:..
~';,
xk's It a
.'., :
...
"'~F.-r' ~ ..
...'
`.
m 1 ~ ~-- ~~' i ^ '
~~~ i
: T ~
v N ~.. ~ "' @:.;
! 1.~'.
_:.. ~:
m ~ I .;'151 ,. IE i;~,;
:
: r ; '
:
O~ ~ ' \ Iii, i ~ ; ~' ~ m ` :::
:;
A
..,.. i j ~ i t~ ' O
i,
c
.. .%i
~ . i ~ ~ ~ i'
_ .. ,.
i ~ ~ ~0.• ! ~~1 ~ ~ i i~) 1 i ~~ ~' 1 I I ry Y~o
I
~ y ~ I
~ ,.:
f
G'G' r j ~ z[7 ~~ ~U) ~ )} ' i' I 1 Ij• $ I rn~ + vmc ^
op ' iv° m vi'~Qj mt" '! i i i ~1~~ ~g I ~Q Vj o oyoo m
1 y
~=~ .._.. m r ; I j i 1 6 V Yr e
_....I
'~ 1 ~
i '
• ~ 'b~ ~ii +~e 1
~ \\\ ~ ~ III t
I o ® ~.., ~ I 1) ~
Z ~~ Y I ? 1`~i li~~ j ~ ~s
•i
; ~j
gi \ / i
i ( ~Lr
W y '~) F l ~i I j ~'. ~ i' •.~~n ~ Nr
` ~ :, ~:
I ``~4e ~.....,~j~ Ij~~ij ~ ~~~jl ~ ~& my
~ . ~ i i i~ ;!I u r
I * »\ , '..I ~ is tj '~~'. T~ $~ m
I • // ! ~ 9 1111 ' •_ ' i
IM Y ~ ''::: 1 I j "all j i I~ I Is~• Y k 1
_'iL~ ~ Y~ ' ~'I~ 1'Y 1 i ~ i i y~gf, M j~Il1-
I•J7J® 71 ~
l i I~ ~1'I i l,i ~'i M ~
I i.
.'~ i i I I ~~ l~ /
:
T T T ~~a i,Rj .~ a~ij ?: ~1 ii ~ ~ ~ i
1i N ~ T ~m. ~ j, I ~ IE;:'~ Il ;~, r_YlM-~
:. :
++ ~ Ong ': I~~~j. iii. ~j :.
8 8 ~ N~ i l"'.i I:
} ~- ~ ~ti e~ j ::j ii i !i'~i j i
r r ~ °vrn ~ Crl li ! 51I ~SSs Q li
L ;
• N i !~'1
I i
s '. i [ i Y~aL~~ ~ D
` i
' '.
m a .....,
.:r
_- ~ 'i '
....._... i s
fi ... ~1 ~I, Ail ::.:
j
_ :\ i
I~ i ;~ ~~ ~
1 . ~~! I ; ..::
l~ ~
~ i! ~'' ~ i i i~ ;f z~ m
s, j ;; ! IE51
i I:` ~
:. (~ , i ~ I Ir:..
: : i I
o '
y ::
s~ Il:+fj'Ii' '~i ~' .. o
s ~°PoPoP~ v 'll~ij!j ~ jF~~.
88 o u~a (` 'I ; I I : t'
`8Np~ Vb.N~ 1 ~I Jr~,
ii i iii
`a~~jlii I i'r ~

1 ,
P
0'
m
a
c
P
U
a
>.
nn,
oQ
Na
~T
m
oa
a0o
Q! i
arv
M
N
r~
U

See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sleets
See Sheet 1-8 For Corrvenllona/ symbols
See Sleet 1-C For Survey Co~rol Sleet

r ~ , „~~ - ~ ,
~: ~-

AY. F J ' ,os Ve t
~
. - ~ 10 ' vsa

r Ina ' nzr
(
°
` ~ ~ ' PROJE ,8~4231~
~-~
~ vzz ~
-
~ ®~ _

laoa "~ Itz~ ~ nz+
~ '~~ ,-~

VICINITY MAP
-~-- OFFSITE DETOUR ROUTE
(SEE SHEET 2-B FOR DETOUR IMPROVEMENTS)
~~~~~-+ ®Il 6 i®~ JL ~ 'V•llr ~1®~~d 11)1 RAT° RAI~~WR 1p~R10
RJ1{ IMLN6 R/.°°0
PITT COUNTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO° 53 OVER SWIFT CREEK ON NC 102
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, GUARDRAIL,
AND STRUCTURE
STA° 18+50.00 -L- BEGIN TIP PROJECT 6-4231
SWIFT CREEK m
I -~ ,1
Ir
1' f / END BRIDGE
1' -L- STA, 22+97.00
I I
I~
11
I~
TO AYDEN
-DRV1-
,~
''
- ~t _
BEGIN BRIDGE ~ I __
-tom STa 21+9.00 -DRV2-
[~i
U
O
v
TO VENTERS
Ir
,1
I ~ 11
I II
J II
I II
SWIFT CREEK
STA, 26+50.00 -L- END TIP PROJECT B-4231
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III, PRELIMINARY PLANS
1W NOt -96 POR COMT!'R-CILDN
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL 80UNDARIES OF AYDEN,

GRAPJTIC SCALES
5o ss o eo 1ao
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2005 = 4s2o
PROJECT LENGTIi

31 Preo~vco m rM orrrce d.

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
f+feo BtreA Rldry Dr„ RoLl~i NC, S761A EYDRAULICS SNGAIEER LtIVlSION OF 9IGIiWAYS
STATE OP NORTS CAROLA'A
ADT 2025 = 7400 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 8--42
=0.133 MILES ,~, ,~~~
PLANS
5a ss 0 50 10o DHV = 60 %
D = t0 % LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4231 =0,019 MILES
~~ ~ wAY IaATB:
JAMES A
SPEER
PE ,d
87°"'n°''
~
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT 8-4231 =0
152 MILES .
. s
~~ ' , zxW~crzz+eo~ ROADW
A
GX as'Q's°`A` aN°°~
T = 3 % SEPTEMBER 16,1005 ~
G~ '

PROFILE {HORIZONTAL)
10 3 0 10 1G
y 60 MPH
'

LB~G DA18.

DANNY GARDNER DSPARTM8N7
OP TIPANSPaRTAT10N
IBVSRAL EIG7iWAY ADMIl1tISTRATfO
~ 1TS
~ 1% DUAL 2% r~+rz
FEBRUARY 19.2007
PROFILE (VERTICAL) ~ rs
srcns+zvu ~°D~
°rvzaraer e°arn~
utve ~

1 r
Note: Not to Scale
*S.U.Is. = Subsurface Utility Eugi>reering
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.•
State Une ----------------------------------
57[°.~°fl°lE ~F N~R°d°]H[ C~R~1L~N.~
II9I5JdSI~N ~]F ]EdICa]H[WA~~
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
County Une -----------------------------------
Townahip Line ~--------------------------------
City Une ------------------------------------
Reservation Une ------------------------------- - - - -
Properiy Line •---------------------------------
E:dsling Iron Pin ------------------------------
Properly Comer ------------------------------- --~
Properly Monument•---------------------------
Parcel/Sequence Number ---------------------
Existing Fence Une ~----------------------------x -x-x-
P e
ropoaed Woven Wire fence -----------------
Proposed Chain Unk Fence ----------°----- e
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence -----------------~
Existing Weiland Boundary -----°------------- -•~----
Proposed Wetland Boundary ----------------- •~
Existing High Quality Wetland Boundary •------ '° °'-
Existing Endangerod Animal Boundary w-
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary ~--------- E'°-
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.•
Gas Pump Yent or UYG Tank Cap ------------ o
Well ------------------------------------------- °
Small Mine ------------------------------------ x
Foundation ------------------------------------ 0
Aron Outiina --------------------------------- D
Cemetery ------------------------------------
Building --------------------------------------- ~--~
School ---------------------------------------
Church ---------------------------------------
Dam •------------------------------------------
HYDROLOGY,•
Stream or Bady of Water --------------------
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir ---------------------- r----~
~ ----J
River Basin Buffer ---------------------------- -Res
Flow Arrow -----------------------------------~-
Disappearing Stream •------------------------}----
Spring ----------------------------------------o^~./~
Swamp Marsh ------------------------------- ~
Proposed lateral, Tail, Head Ditch ----------- ~
t N
False Sump ---------------------------------- ~
RAILROADS••
Standard Guage ------------------------------
RR Signal Milepost ---------------------------- „~~,~
Switch ----------------------------------------- D
~.Rm
RR Abandoned •-------------------------------_.-. ~ T -.-
RR DiamaMled •-------------------------------
RIGHT OF WAY
Baseline Control Point ----------------------
Existing Right of Way Marker ---------------- 0
Existing Right of Way Line ---------------- -
Proposed Right of Way Line ---------°----- -~-
Proposed Right of Wary Une with ___________
_
_
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
Proposed Right of Way Une with
Concrete or Gron'rte Marker -------------
Existing Control of Access ------------------- - -:-~;--
Proposed Control of Access ------------------- -~-
Existing Easement Une •------------------ - -E--
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - E
Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement----- -TDE-
Proposed Pennonent Drainage Eosemer>t•---- -POE-
Proposed Permanent Utility Easement -------- -rue-
EXISTING STRUCTURES.•
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert ---------------- °°~
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall - ~ ~~
MINOR:
Head and End Wall ------------------------ ~~ X.

--------------------------------
Pipe Culvert -
- - - - -
Footbridge ----------------------------------- ~--------~
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB --------- ^C°
Paved Dikh Gutter-------------------------- -----
Storm Sewer Manhole ----------------------
Storm Sewer ------------------------------- Y
UT7LlTIES•
POWER:
Existing Power Pole --------------------------
Proposed Power Pole---------•--------------- b
Existing Joint Use Pole ----------------------- ~-
Proposed Joint Use Pole•---------------------
Power Manhole ------------------------------ 0
Power Une Tower ----------------------------
wArER:
Water Manhole----------•-------------------- 0
Water Meter•--------------------------------- o
Water Valve •---------------------------------
Wafer Hydrant ------------------------------- ~
Rewrded WG Water Une -----------------° •
Designated lhG Water Une (S.U.E.')--------- - ---•----
Above Ground Water Une ------------------- ~~° .mK
N:
N Satellite Dish ----------------------------- K
N Pedestal ----------------------------------
N rower ------------------------------------
U•G NCable Hand Hole •------------------
Recorded U~G N Cable -------------------- `

DBSI noted USG N Cable S,U,E.' --^----
Rewrded USG Fiber Optic Cable ------------ ^n--
Designated Un"a Fiber Optic Cable (S,U,E,')-- ----~•ro---
GAS:
Gas Valve ----------------------------------- Q
Gaa Meter ----------------------------------- ~
Recorded USG Gas Une ---•---: -------------
Designated USG Gas Une (S.U.E.'}----------- ----•----
Above Ground Gas Une •-------------------- "" `°~
Existing Edge of Pavement•------------------- -----
Feasting Curb •------------------------------- -----
Proposed Slope Slakes Cut ------------------ --- ~ ---
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill ------•------------ --- F -
Proposed Wheel Chair Ramp •----------------
Curb Cut for Futuro Wheel Choir Ramp ~----- cF
Existing Metal Guardrail ---------------------- - L -L -~-
Proposed Guardrail --------------------------
Existing Cable Guiderail -------------------- -°- ~ -0 -
--------
d
bl "
Propose
e Guiderail------------
Ca
Equaility Symbol ---------------------------
Pavement Removal -
YIs•GETATION.~
Single Tree ---------------------------------- ~
Single Shrub ---------------------------------- a
Hedge -----------------------------------------~^m.^~.y...~,-r,.
Woods Une ---------------------------------- ..
OrchardJ--------------------------------------- 4 4 {? 4
Ymeyar~_______________________________________~-hnaY~O ~
Power Transformer --------------------------- 8
WG Power Cable Hand Hole----------------
H-Frame Pole ------------------------------- ~--.
Recorded Ut; Power Une•-------------------
9 ( ) •------- --
Desi Hated L4G Power Line S.U.E,* --~----
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pale --------------------- -•-
Proposed Telephone Pais •------------------- -Cr-
Telephone Manhole -------------------------- m
Telephone Booth ~---------------------------- ~
Telephone Pedestal --------------°---------- D
Telephone CeIlTower ------------------------ ~,
USG Telephone Cable Hand Hole -----------
Rewrded II~G Telephone Cable ------------- "
Designated lLG Telephone Cable (S,U.E.')-- ----f----
Recorded USG Telephone Conduit --------- "~
Designated LVG Telephone Conduit (S,U.E.'j- ----R----
Recorded U~G Fiber Optic Cable ------------ r ~~-
Designated USG Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.'j- ----YYa---•
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole •---------•----------
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout •-------------------- p+
USG Sanitary Sewer Une -------------------- ss
Above Ground 5an'rtary Sewer -------------- ~~° s~,~,~-Y se.~
Recorded SS Forced Main Une•-------------- Yss-
Designated SS Forced Main Une (S.U.E,'~ •-- ----Yss----
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole ----------------------------------- •
Utility Pole with Base ----------------------- p
Utility located Obiect ------------------------ p
Utility Traffic Signal Box ---------------------- m
Ut'I' U kn WG U
i i
y n own ne •------------------ *"~-
U~G Tank; Water, Gas, 011 •------------------
AEG Tank; Water, Gas, Oii •------------------
USG Test Hole (S.U.E.'~ ---------------------- m
Abandoned Aaording fo Utility Records ----- AATUR
End of Infarmation --------------------------- i
E.0.1.

b
N ~~ ~ P 1/
\ - i ..
t0 ~ ~~ J 3!1 ,,
.\ /
~~ ~, ~
/ ~`
/ ~ -- ..~
~• m! ~_
Aydee ~ oPae433~\ ~ ~~ -
OPSl4171.7
i
~ ~
~ ~ ~' ~ ~
\ ~ ~
J
~~ ~ '
i•'• \ I /-
SURVEY CONTROL SHEET 8-4231
CONTROL DATA
BL
PO1NT DESC. NORTH-••••• •• •• EAST ••••• • ••ELEVATION•••• ..• •.-L STATION- •- -• DFFSET
.•• •
••••
2 .-•• -•
---••
BL•2 -••
630100.3170 2475291,7980 44,96 12.61.50 23.70 RT
3 BL•3 630281.4090 2475593,1638 41.78 15•%.BS 28.51 LT
q BL-4 630299.9300 2476281.3990 42.70 22.90.21 77.06 LT
5 BL•5 630485,74W 2476930.9158 41,03 29.48.28 10,93 LT
BENCFI~iARR DATA
l~
NCODT IASlWE RATION '3W' '
~ y~ ~~y4Cj ~ Td~90 N N0317d746 ! 341!649.416!
\~
~~\ \
lure
J t_...., ~~'_----'----
_ ,
_____ TO AYOB4 __NC 103 •- '-
NCDOT PAlB.IN! STATION 'SW'
N~60010D9170!! 3470~591.7t910~
t`, I
1
i
I I
~ ~ i
I
P0.01KT A!4lBIC! N0. iH!!T N0.
E-4371 1{
NCDOT FW581NE STATION 'l4~3'
LocAU~ PROTECT cooloiNATs
N 630/05.7460 ! 2476930.fl30
N 670739,9367 E
NOTES:
m
N
m
d
DATUM DESCRIPTION
THE IDCACIIEO COORDINATE SYSTEM DNECD°ED FOR THIS PROTECT
!5 BASED ON THE STATE PLWE CO~'DlNATES ESTAB.lSHED BI
AIbQf FpR IgNUYENf '84231.1'
WITH xAD iSB3/95 STATE PbwE GRID D,XXtDINATES Of
NQRTH1Nfe 630S026T34fft1 EASTINf~ 24/T5N964Nfe
THE aERAGE COYBIxED GRID FACTOR USED OY iH15 PROJECT
rcrx~xo ro cRra t~ o
THE NC LAMBERT GRID BEARIAG AND
lCCALlZED hgR1ZDYTRC7NN1R0 DISTAACE FAOY
'84231• I' i0 {• STATIDR 18$Ol0 !S
S 8D'28048" M ]1D635(fD
AfL LINEAR DIYENSIG95 ARE LOCKIIED hf1RlILWTAI DISIA4CE5
VERTICA[ DATUM USED !S xaD 88
BNl ELEVAT]ON • 44.39
N 630518 E 2476260
L STATION 23.04 235 LEFT
RR SPIKE SET ]N 20' GUM
NCGOT BEVCNMAIK '!M1'
IINATION- 44,39'
' ~ 11
~ll
I{' ((
N000T WNNC bTA710N 'EI.J' ~ I e
LOCAt1TE0 NIOIECf CDObDINATE7 ,
N 630399.9300 E 2Q6311~990
~ I .alv1,
~ / ~~
°g~.~'
THE CONTROL DATA FOR TBIS PROJECT CAN EE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY 3ELECTINO
PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT:
HTTP;\WR17V.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.U3PREL'ON9TRUCT/HIOHR7AY/LOCATION/PROJECTi64291 b eonlrol 060389.txt
SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HA9 NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT.
IF FURTHER DVFORMATION I8 NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.
® INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL AdONUdODIVT9 USED OR S&'1' FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL
BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.
PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISfD~D USDPO GLOBAL P09I2TONDVO SYSTEM
NET7VORE ESTABLISHED FROM NOS ONLIlVE P051TIONDPO USER SERVICE (OPUS)
NOTE: DRAtiVING NOT TO SCALE

P
N
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
C1 PROP.
AT AN APPROX. 11~" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 98.bB,
AVERAGE RATE OF 188 LBS. PER SD. YD.
C 2 PROP.
AT AN APPROX. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE TYPE 88, 6B,
AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS. PER SD. YD. IN EAGIH OF TWO LAYERS

3 PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE CDURSE TYPE SB.bB,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 112 LBS. PER SD. YD. PEA 1h DEPTH. TO
BE PLACED IN LAYERB NOT TO EXCEED 3" IN DEPTH.
E 1 PROP.
AT AN APPROX. 41~" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.08,
AVERAGE RATE OF 61B LBB. PEA SD. YD.

EI PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B26.OB,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE Df 114 LBS. PER 80. Y0. PER 1" DEPTH. TO
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN DEPTH OA SREATEA
THAN 612° IN DEPTH.
PROP. B" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE.
T EARTH MATERIAL.
EXISTING PAVEMENT.
W VAAIASLE DEPTH ABPHALT (SEE STANDARD WEDGING DETAIL}.
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES AAE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.

PlO1KT P$PR6VC! N0. SM!!r N0.
g-apjl 2
10A0WAY D~ION PAV[A4ENP OBION
GJGINl~ BIOWH!
-L-
m
T
r
12' 8' 12' 11' 8'
11' W/GR ~ 2' 10' 10' 2' 11' W/GR
1' 4'
PS C2 W C2 GRADE C2 yy C2 ~
EXISTING POINT
GROUND x,.08 ^D~ 'D2 - 'DB •- ~
-` 37 ~;t -------- - ---- ------ 'UP,3,~r gg GG
T T o *~~ GOUND
El 7.5" ~ ~ 7.5" El
GRADE TO THIS LINE NOTE: TRANSITION FROM EXISTING TO TYPICAL SECTION N0.1
-L- STA. 18+50.00 TO STA. 19+00.00
TYPICAL SECTION N0. ~ USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.1
-L- STA.19+00.00 TO STA. Zt +97.00 (BEGIN BRIDGE)
-L- STA. 22+97.00 (END BRIDGE) TO STA. 16+00.00
NOTE: TRANSITION FROM TYPICAL SECTION N0.1 TO EXISTING
-L- STA. 16+00.00 TO STA. 26+50.00

T
m
1'-1~

9L1 /11R Tn AIR
32'-10°
4tg" 12` 12' 4'-5"
5,5' ®
BEARING CONCRETE WEARING
SURFACE
GRADE

5°

4,75' ®
BEARING

Z 4J
~
BEARING
.OZ .

TYPICAL SECTION N0.2
NOTE: BRIDGE HAS BEEN WIDENED TO ACCOMMODATE HYDRAULIC DESIGN SPREAD.
-DRVI- & -0RV2-
~! lo' s/
i EXISTING
EXISTING
GROUND
~-~ ,vaR. vAR. i,~~
'~7
6" T ""
EXISTING
GROUND
GRADE TO THIS UNE
TYPICAL SECTION N0.3
-0RVt- STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 11+60.25
-DRV2- STA. 10+12.00 TO STA. 11+00.00
-~ .
~ g GG
~ ~GOUNQ
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.4
a~ GROUND r '
d -~-~ ~-
~ ~~~
r ~
fE SR 1122 (OFFSITE DETOUR)
12' 12'
4' 9' 3'
CROWN C2 C2
C2 POINT
EXIST ~ST-
~7.5" U--- U 7.5„
E1
GRADE TO THIS UNE
TYPICAL SECTION N0.4
MNUlCT !lRRBiC! N0. SHlLR N0.
~'-~. C1 ilk" TYPE SB.5B
C2 3" TYPE SB.58
C3 VAR, DEPTH TYPE SB.58
E1 41"1" TYPE B26.OB
E2 VAA~ DEPTH TYPE B25.OB
J 6" ABC
T EARTH MATERIAL
U EXISTING PAVEMENT
W WEDQINO
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.2
-L- STA. 21+97.00 (BEGIN BRIDGE)TO STA. 12+97,00 (END BRIDGE)
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.3
2.05 MILES SR 1122 CHINES DRIVE EXT.)

7 ~
P
N
m
EXISTING
GROUND ~- _
~ ~~~ \
- T ~ S N
7.5" U U 7.5„ T ~ ~GROnUN~
El El
GRADE TO THIS UNE
TYPICAL SECTION N0.5 1.10 MILES SR 1713 (AYDEN GOLF CLUB ROAD)

SR 1149 (OFFSITE DETOUR)
18'
EXIST. »~
SR 1723 (OFFSITE DETOUR)
i~~ ~rlcT
1.'
2' 10' 10' 2'
C2 C1 CRO N ~
POINT C2
,DB _ EXIST EXIST_ .OB
CRO
O POINT C1
p0S7_ I I _ EXIST EXIST_ I _ DOST
' ------ ------ -------- S -
EXISTING , • - - - - - - `. G
GRO_ UND , ' ` \ GRI~TI ND
`. U U
nto~ svese~ce Na. sH[er Na
8-423/ 2-B
[OADWAY DESIGN
NDBV®l MYG1lM 061p1
@1GWEiE
I~III~~ .. ~'~:

C1 1~" TYPE 58.58
C2 3" TYPE SB,SB
C3 VAR. DEPTH TYPE 58.58
E1 41~" TYPE B26.OB
E2 VAA. DEPTH TYPE B25.OB
J 8" ABC
T EARTH MATERIAL
U EXISTING PAVEMENT
W WEDGING
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0. b
m
d
r
TYPICAL SECTION N0.6
INSET A
NOTE:
GATES AND SIGNAL8 MUST BE PLACED AT
THE RAILROAD CROSSING OH SR 1122
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.5
0.68 MILES SR 1149 (LEE STREET)
NOTE: ADD INCIDENTAL STONE FOR APPROX. 27 DRIVEWAY TIE-INS
ALONG THE DETOUR ROUTE, n6' AVG. WIDTH X 12' LONG)
INSET B
NOTE:
BRIDGE # 176 ON THE DETOUR
SR 1122 NINES DRIYE EXT.)
hBIST BE RUTCHED.
NOT TO SCALE

r
a owLnEO rt• DAtF~ A06S^r A[AACIC! ND. sHta No.
INA
STATE ®F N®IdTI$ CAR®I
N .
IT, OATO
B-42,1 3-A
DIVISIGN ®1F IiIGI$WAYS
LIST OF PIPES, ENDWALLS, ETC. (FOR PIPES 48" ~ UNDER)

e+DwALU ~
'
f
~ n
~ ~ 3 AeluwEnoNs

srAnoN

B
~
cuu m ILC HA
NL9[ NOTED O7XEM'L41
N
IIfVAWIOUt NoAt® ct 1h14 TYEE e
NN~1 Olm On00Yliq
i n: i i n >,
~ ~

~

A
IAI
CUm
q

4
~

G! GTCi LWN
-
DI NAEbW DAOI INIII
N
01 ~
+
~ A
L
AND XooD i ~ .
I1D. u1.10
<
aANDAAO 1+0
0.1 D.L 01011NLfT
= N~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ LID,L MFINw DEOf MIFF
lAal
McouN DE
I
N3
oneAWlsq 3 . ~ i ~
.)
Fr
•I
~' ~
'R. ~ ~ pp
G
~ ; 4 1.6 lUNC110N BOX
712! ~ ~ 2
i ~ 1Y U' 1V U' 7Y 76' IS' N' 17' 1Y 1Y 11' 70' W 17' i1' ~ ! W
C CU YD[. A 1
~
~yj
~

~ M.N. NJNXOLF
T.L0.1, 7AAlTIC IEAdNG DB0I INLEE
~ A ~ ~ S i T.IJ,B. TEARIC YADNG JUCIION 107(
~
7H GAUG[ ~ ~ ~ I
S ~ C ~
f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ J N
tJ ~ ~ ~ ~ TYR Or GGi!
# ~ f ~
k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [ 1 0 - EEAUAF!
k RA F9+N a. 1 1 1 1
1 our n 7®IY
a, rtA 20+q LL 7 1 1 1
7 7 71
a. rtA:o+Id a. a 1 1 1
a our u 1ao1Y
-MaA17+u u. ~ I 1 1
~ 3 71
kaA77+70 a, ! 1 1 1
/ 6 116
-Ir RA11+y a. 1 I 1 1
f OUr 71 1®1Y
-0RN- aA 11+70 0. 7 10
-0M- aA 11+70 OL 1 W
A01lCr TOTAL 710 1M 6 6 ! 1 1 ~!.

M' . OLSTANCE ADM BDG! 01 L1NE TO MC a GUMOIAB. GUARDRAIL SUMMARY W TOTAL WOn1 0115AA! ADM IGMNPIG 0! rAAF TO IND OI GUAAD[NL
TOTAI lXOUIO~ WIDTH ~ DIaANC! AOM [OG! Or 7UYlL LANL Ta fHOULDlR IAlAK roINT. 6 GATING IMlACT ATTBVUATOR 7T}E 730
fLAA! L[NGTH DLn'ANC! !ADM LAtf flLTON 0~ MIULIFL GUAAOAAII TO END 0~ GUARDRAIL NO . NON-GATING IAVAC7 A71T31UATOA 7Y[E 750

~~ IENOnI WAAGNT -OIiT C~ TD7AL FL1AE LENGTH W ANDIORE A7TENUAIOR

101[ 1lG, SG, WO IrA IDCATpN

piOR

DOUYI

ARlROA01

TAAOAVO [!DM

EA.L lHOUIDlI

WIDTH

~

TAMING

A[RADACM

TAA61N0

OIWI TYR 760 AlMY10
[I/AIOlR
aAVm
MCm
em
IMD
~yp
e1D
END
ew
7so TYR II

FA

0

NO
~ 11+11.10 11+11,10 a 700 71+97.10 1 n I 1
a- 77+07.10 77+1040 ~ a 76 b+97.10 1 n I 1
a,. 30+!0.75 ZI+p.O LT 17740 71+99F! e n I 1
-L• fl+11A0 77+16,13 LT 7! 71+M.l5 1 11 I 1
WI-TOTAL !17,50 6 ~f
l65 OmUCnONi NM ANCXO[S
oAwaSO LSO • aa/
T1T! m (®11.73 • as
AaxT Toro nzal ~ ~
UY 77!,00
A00[IIONAL OUAIDR UI ROfli - 10 FA.
m
E
0
N
svMMARY of ~RTxwoRx
A
R
DS
IN CUBIC
Y
LOCATION cc
~~
U
N
IXCAVATION EMBT+96 BORROW WASTE
SUMMARY N0.1
a,- STA 18+50.00 TO 21+97.00 BEG BRG) 3 866 861
TOTAL SUMMARY N0.1 5 866 861

SUMMARY N0.2
-L- STA 22+97.00 (E1dD BRG) TO 26+50.00 185 1018 633
-0RVi- STA 10+00.00 TO 11+60,15 11 409 346
-0RY2- STA 10+11,00 TO 12+00.00 12 510 498
TOTAL SUMMARY N0, 2 208 1937 1729

SUMMARY TOTALS 213 2803 2590
5% TO REFUGE TOPSOIL IN BORROW PIT 130
PROJECT TOTAL 213 2720
SAY 250 YD 7 2750 YD1
UNDERCUT = 100 CY FABRIC FOR SOIL STABILW110N 100 SY
SELECT GRANUUR ~ 100 CY DRAINAGE DRCH IXCAVATION= 608 CY
APPROXIMATE OUANTiTIES ONLY. UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION.
BORROW EXCATION. FINE GRADING. CLEARING AND GRUBBING,
BREAKING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. AND REMOVAL OF EXISTING
PAVEMENT WILL BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT LUMP SUM PRICE
FOA "GRADING."

r ,
~I
v
n
m
J~
F!3 m
+~
Q. r.
Q Y
Q
J =
~ m
a W
U
W J
a~
W
~~
0~
N_J
~U
oWt
.,Z
00
~ J
~o
~+
~N
oN
N_
1 .~
~~
-DRVI-
PI Sro l0+5865 Pr Sto l1+2960
p• 7448'306rLT, p= 95'l9'439'rRT,
D = n435'296 D = w3'l422D'
~ T
3
T =
23' =4
,90'
R =5000' R =4000'
5E =VAR. SE = vAR
---
xc Iat zaasr
N 80' 35
----------------
'P^--~-----------r ro-----------
~ E

~o
i
NAR7 4ICE BU
BD 161•
r62•
i 1
t
EIp Tel C
LATERAALI, GRASSED
I Nod to`.6
Dun
`
P
5 ~~.
FODM Sa 30+00 -L. ro STA
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 2400 CFS
DESIGN fREOUEN~Y ^ 50 YRS
DESIGN NW ELEVATION =4014 fT
eASE ascHARGE = 3ooD cFs
BASE FREQUENCY ^ 100 YRS
BASE MM ELEVATION = 41.48 FT
OVERTOPPrNG DISCHARGE -4800 CFS
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY =500 YRS
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 43.97 FT
= FT
DATE OF SURVEY
WS,ELEVAT~N

AT DATE OF SUPVEY = 32.4 fT
19
Z~
-DRV2-
P! S1o p+8000 PI Sra 11+7070
p= 9z/8'58J'rRr,
' p= 7z26.1azrcr, _~I
D = 11435
296 D = IA'759'09.4

C =8056' ~Gl
L =3793'
T = 5206' r = 2191 S 2536
R =5000' R =3000' .

Sf =VAR. +~
SE =VAR. ~ ~ wu
DETAIL .
LATERAL CRASSFA SHALE
m BMI I not ro Swlsr
aRncE nos3 -BL- STA 15127.37
STEEL IBEAN FR.uE ON ^ODDEN PILINGS 218.15 LT -- hope
!sT DYER coND eR1DGE DECK ELEV=44.39' of
- POrSIa !0+00,00 win. B. Ls Ft.

CON$TRUCT,O ~
M 8= 3.0 Ft.
0= 5.0 Ft.
~
380' E-~ ~ I ~
kDl ; 118 N
'
F#OM !TA 10+DD a. ro tTA u+10 k LT.
DITCH LEGEND
47 J7 418,15 LEFT = LEfT DITCH - • - - -
+03.84 135.25 LEFT
ASE OF 10" GUM RIGHT DITCH
rz ^ zz+6o.
EL ^ 44.60'
YC. ^ iB0'
K = 298
11 22 23 24 25 16

DETAIL B
SPEpAL LATERAL GRASSED SHALE
fNOi t0 SCtlel
Grand D e~ °t FlSlope
B Mlr~ D =1A Ff. ~
B ~1.OFt, O!
FlOM STA 11+0! a,. ro 36+oD -I' lT. I
.
FlOA1 lu.u+io ~, ro le+DO ~,. rt. I
i
I' .,
OAA!!BD ~ M~
!oc! aeacb~M •
sff DEUa'
r
tLUS 'r aP tiv ToP .
~ ~
d ® I! TONS a
I
~
C ~'
+ -L. I /
I9.N'LT. ~• .~
I ~
Low . m13s 1 NI !AF I
FlOM sTAlav1D -M Lr.
FROM STAfl3+1D~~w
I If+u;ar Lr.
.: rtA.1l+oDlk Lr.
I sale+oa~-Ft
!HILT N0.
eNwNeel

I NIJ= /'
SEE BELOW FOR
-L-, DRY1- & DRVZ- PROFILES
Sd)rEr CDRNEI.uS FFAFHNG st tl
M 337 • PC IBS
DB 26A • PG 111

i
..
i
_prm_wet.dgn
I.O
I O
' N
INS
Iw
~~
Icn~

I ~

.;:
~ ;: '
;;' ~~. r
. , ~ ~ I i ;, ,.....
c , _..
d'r ' ;,~
f ~S j r..:,. 1
Y "x/ ~~~~~II~t I ~ I ~jt
,
o ~z.~: ; ; :`~~f :y-
1
T i.7 ':I~ ~ ~ ~I~j`~ ~ Q
+ ~ + I Y~ ~! ,~, 4e~1
} y~ }ii t~ ~~~Il i I F~~ ~!t
z ~ ~~~
~ ~ ~ ao
.~.
is I !iTll I
w vac S: ~ilf ~.~!iT . ~
ICI
~j
+ ~ r i i I ~ ! ~I~~
u ~nN m,. Nr ~ i s ~ i
° oo° ~ f '1, { Iji
L •,
11
. '
!
„
- v ~: _..
_ ~
,:
~; I i I
, :. ,
':
-_
CS
~ $ ~ "~ j
z ~~ l ~
s 9 I ~ `;
s^
:
g ~ (:~ .:
+ _
~f~ ~ ply ~ ~I i ~ I D '~ ~` ,...
a O~ .J. !III ~I m
o a L ~ I ~I ;
R ~~ I) '
°:%'.. 4 ~ i i ~
+.. I
............... .. 1.!~ i i
~ +i~l 'rn
i
(
.................
m~
r:,.:.::. ..... ~m
,:? , \~.
,z
Vii: pO
.
p h
=9iu::ac~~i::i~iifSifiFw.. ti .k~ ~~~., .... a ... "' ~::~. ::"h h a.~5:.~ :i.s!?~c ti~:e'_,~is'~iPi "~ ~:r: a
..u _ i11 ~::i!L'e'"'I'. 5F ::.:..-.... .... ~ i' h, ~ m if~:.._'i...~1','.!k:" clV u~:?!1....
,:.I.a . y.2 . N ,mxL~e:....,-
2~~.. 1~ . G~p$ x~.~E L :_ j~' jli I -- ^T Y33HJ 1~-" ~i
a
~•
- ""esq. ~u
vi
~,.
,..
i . ~~ ~:
_ E
''
I iss ii~~
I I.. I
~'i
g I ~
,
Ci
:~ ........ Y 1~~ I ~!I ~~ it ~.
I i
xyT `t II ~~l
,
l TI ~ i 1. ~' ~ ~ 't '~I.,.....,
'r
_ .::.
, ._.:..
i I ~ ~ i!
_.,, ,
~ .r :
r
i '
y~ ~ ~
: v ~v0 i EMI , a j ~;~ ' I
i
3 - ~ I '. M I
it ~
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 ~
~+TG'' ~ ~ ~~d ~~ ~~I' II~ i I is ~i:I mp + vac ~ ~s
~+u ~ u ms ~' j i I vj N 2
~ ~ ~
~t i {: I I I :! I :~ N
f:'_:_::.._::......._..__.__._.._.__._...._.. ._.....I
..............._..:...._.................._........... ' w I '.
-o V' i. I+~ ~ i illl j l ~
" ;:
~ / ~ ~a~ d
a. ~ 1
k ¢I!I~ I i ~ S! !+s o~~
N (,' °
I Va O Nr~
,
: I. >
£ ;' lil ~; I j~ %
i
: ; " u c c
_ :
a
~' -' uo m
" ~ ~\ 113 ~ ~~ ' ! ~ m~ I i tkI t I ~ ~:~ ~ ~ H~
/ I I ' i .; '
,':I 1 ~ r
~ ;'~ I !
s ' i..
P a T N y TM'y. i~~ i JT~ I ~ ~ `) ~,, I ~I II ~: \~•~J-~
yyy111 +E + 1 omL ,I I I~:~~~ ~ ~I
8 g ~r '~~ is 1. i I I1.: _ '
1'21
:,
f.
v~ c ! [ i ~ i 1 $ ~
N i
- ~
.. 1 i I it Y Q
a ~ .. :1' i :. i l~ t 1 Z 9~
,t
- --
i '
~" ` I
,,.
._..... ,
i '
;.
,''~''
' 1 ~ ! ~j' ~ ' !,{
;'
,'~'
I~' : ; ~! o
n ~~ ;,
~11. ~~~1 ,~r
~ ~` '' 1 ! a ,III 4 ~
~i; I: o

f 1
sTETL IBEAU F~gAY oxswoooEx P~LwGs
BST aVDt CGNC BRDGE OELM
-OAVI- t10rSta~+UOJaO
eECrly consrxucr ~ I~
sa DQNLEA~Bd KMEM ~ {
:IV;
/gl
WRY ALICE &JIIOCR IBIBBARD I .
I ~ 1
IATBUL GIISS® BwALe
SEE OEINL'A' ~
a
1 ; W
\ ~,, PD PDE--'o'---PDE ~ p ~\
APIA _ ~ r~ wu I /
woods _ ~,_
i ~~_' EY
F _
~ 1P woods /
Beta Bw Iv+IP a. KT.
BEGIN SIG 20+F/ -I' LT,
oErAK. c
LATERAL GRASSED SHALE
f NOt to Scab>
e
1 ..
O 1
uxl. D= l5 Ft,
Ep EIART BIB.IOCK IR188ARp 8= LO Ft.
W 5.0 Ft.
~~'~.. x10A1 rtA 20+00 -L TO 6TA it+30 -1. KT.
rn
a
v
m
x
E
n
e
L
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 10 11
OF7Ar1 A
LATERAL GRASSED SEEALE
t NOt to Scald
A
aun ~ ~
YIn. D= l5 Ft.
B= lA Ft•
o= s.o Ft.
RIOM STA 20+00 k TD STA.22+ID -1. LT.
~ L ~ `rue ` PDE
~~ _ ~~
1 tr woods ~ -

DETAIL B
SPECIAL LATERAL GRASSED SHALE
I Not to icdal
sAd SbOe
GrourW p A ~
w
x4t. D =t5 Ft,
B =LOF4 6', w =
FAO,M BTA u+DS -t_ To Id+ao .I. Li,
I

FROM 6TA 24+10 -1. i0 I6+00 k Kf. I
.
u GBAUeD EwA>r a

{/
row D~
AAl TW ;~
®®
fSff'TEInLI ~vt~
IIECT AFFEAEIICE N0, SNeeT N0.
BW BHEBT N0.
DWAY OdIGN XYDAAL{!CB
ENGINEER 9~~

nL Ale mesr - -
DrF le
a
_ ` i -
Id' +
w ° w ~"' IF ~ ~ it aF ~ ~~~ ~ ~
AI _ ~ ^ ^ 'f000S- -- - ~ CNKK DAM ursr vi
PD clAp aF KM TDF DETAIL E
CIAt2 B PDE PD ~E PDE elev. 9B.1D'D) TON! (see DRNL'e1
101 AAF E P At KM ROCK CNECK DAN
AlF BM EINANKAVENT ~ ~, E I xot to Swlel
BEB DETAR'a I I I T /~E _ / A~~Y~I~uTB.u eBASeED mAL6 Foy /
~/ 6+ OD
'~ w°W' G~ EWAU n ~• y END 5fATE PROJECT B-d231 tia ~" vAREis
DETNt'C' ~ DETAIL D
CiD EIG 1lGIN IRDG! / I lT' RIP RAP AT ENBANEUENT arnC C1A55 'B' P
AT.AND R, ~' / I rxw+ ro ScaNl
r I 1 /r~
~ ~ e . y~ / AA I LT.
I~I Ear. 60 far A' ' ~ STA ed+OD -L• R.
ryw of tlar . CABB 1 BIF A/f ~ , ~
`f
wa• so• a KJO• F#OM STAU+ID+Lr. ~ ; ~ ~~ /~._---~
~~ -DRV2- POrSla 12+25.96 R{OM AA II+IO a. KL SB71EY CORNELBIS wx++c et d
SCALE:h 100' IeGIN i1G IeGIN IAIDGe j'~~
KE. MID lT. r
eN0 BIG STA 2A+70 -L