20081143 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20151104

YEAR 5 (2015)
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
CRIPPLE CREEK MITIGATION BANK
Developed Through
RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF
UNNAMED TRIBUTARIES TO BOYD CREEK
AND ADJACENT PALUSTRINE WETLANDS
Alamance County, North Carolina
PREPARED BY:
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
1101 HAYNES STREET, SUITE 211
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
AND
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
218 SNOW AVENUE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603
September 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems, LLC has established a stream and wetland mitigation bank at the Cripple Creek Site
(The Bank) located approximately two miles northeast of Burlington, in northeast Alamance County. The
Bank is located within the Cape Fear River Basin in 14 -digit United States Geological Survey (USGS)
Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 03030002030050 of the South Atlantic /Gulf Region
(North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] subbasin number 03- 06 -02). This report serves as
the Year 5 (2015) annual monitoring report.
The Bank's mitigation plan included 1) construction of a stable, riffle -pool stream channel, 2)
restoration/enhancement of historic wetland functions, 3) enhancement of water quality functions
(reduced nonpoint source sedimentation and nutrient inputs), 4) restoration of a natural woody riparian
buffer (at least 50 feet wide) along the Bank's stream reaches, 5) restoration of wildlife habitat associated
with a riparian corridor /stable stream, and 6) establishment of a permanent conservation easement that
encompasses all restoration activities. After restoration, the Bank offers 4487 Stream Mitigation Credits
and 7.9 Wetland Mitigation Credits.
Eleven vegetation plots (10 -meter by 10 -meter in size) were established and permanently monumented.
These plots were surveyed in August 2015 for the Year 5 (2015) monitoring season following guidelines
established in CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008). Surveys
conducted in Year 5 (2015) indicate that there is 688 planted stems /acre (excluding livestakes) within the
Site, which is well -above success criteria; in addition, each individual plot was above success criteria.
Twenty cross - sections and approximately 3100 linear feet of longitudinal profile were measured for the
Year 5 (2015) monitoring. As a whole, monitoring measurements indicate that there has been minimal
change in both the longitudinal profile and cross - sections as compared to as -built data. The as -built
channel geometry compares favorably with the emulated, stable E/C type stream reach as set forth in the
detailed mitigation plan and construction plans. Current monitoring has demonstrated dimension, pattern,
and profile were stable over the course of the monitoring period. One problem area, a compromised left
bank arm of the furthest downstream crossvane on the Main Channel, was noted during Year 1 (2011)
annual monitoring. Bank stabilization along approximately 20 feet of the channel occurred in October
2012. Stabilization included bank contouring and matting /willow staking, and appears to have resolved
further erosion issues.
Six groundwater monitoring gauges were installed at the Bank with an additional groundwater gauge
installed in a reference wetland located approximately 4 miles west of the Bank. All six groundwater
gauges were inundated /saturated within 12 inches of the surface for greater than 12.5 percent of the
growing season (23 days), which extends from April 18 to October 22 (188 days).
In summary, Site vegetation, streams, and wetland hydrology met success criteria for Year 5 (2015)
monitoring.
Annual Monitoring Report
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
Executive Summary

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND .............................................................................. ............................... 1
1.1 Location and Setting ...................................................................................... ............................... 1
1.2 Project Objectives .......................................................................................... ............................... 1
1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach ....................................... ............................... l
2.0 ANNUAL MONITORING ................................................................................ ............................... 3
2.1 Vegetation Assessment .................................................................................. ............................... 3
2.1.1 Vegetation Success Criteria ................................................................... ............................... 3
2.1.2 Vegetative Contingency Plan ................................................................. ............................... 3
2.1.3 Vegetative Problem Areas ..................................................................... ............................... 3
2.2 Stream Assessment ........................................................................................ ............................... 4
2.2.1 Stream Success Criteria ......................................................................... ............................... 4
2.2.2 Stream Contingency Plan ....................................................................... ............................... 4
2.2.3 Bankfull Events ...................................................................................... ............................... 5
2.2.4 Stream Problem Areas ........................................................................... ............................... 5
2.3 Wetland Assessment ...................................................................................... ............................... 5
2.3.1 Wetland Success Criteria ....................................................................... ............................... 5
2.3.2 Wetland Contingency Plan ..................................................................... ............................... 5
2.3.3 Wetland Problem Areas ......................................................................... ............................... 5
2.4 Biotic Community Changes ............................................................................ ..............................5
3.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. ..............................6
4.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................. ............................... 8
Figure 1. Site Location ....................
Figure 2. Monitoring Plan View .....
FIGURES
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A. GENERAL TABLES AND FIGURES
Table 1.
Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3.
Project Contacts Table
Figure 1.
The Bank Location
Figure 2.
Monitoring Plan View
APPENDIX B. VEGETATION DATA
Table 4. Planted Stems and Natural Recruits by Plot and Year
Vegetation Plot Photographs
........ Appendix A
........ Appendix A
Annual Monitoring Report page i
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

APPENDICES (continued)
APPENDIX C. MORPHOLOGICAL SUMMARY DATA AND PLOTS
Table 5. Verification of Bankfull Events
Tables 6a -6b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 7a -7c. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Data Summary
Cross - section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plots
APPENDIX D. HYDROLOGY DATA
2015 Groundwater Gauge Data
APPENDIX E. BENTHIC DATA
2015 Results
Habitat Assessment Field Datasheets
APPENDIX F. REMEDIAL ACTION LETTER
Annual Monitoring Report page ii
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Location and Setting
Restoration Systems, LLC established a stream and wetland mitigation bank at the Cripple Creek Site (The
Bank) located approximately two miles northeast of Burlington, in northeast Alamance County (Figure 1,
Appendix A). The Bank encompasses 19.6 acres of land. Prior to construction, the Bank was accessible to
livestock and was routinely cleared and mowed for hay production, resulting in local disturbances to stream
banks and wetland soil surfaces. Additional land use practices, including the maintenance and removal of
riparian vegetation and relocation, dredging, and straightening of onsite streams, had resulted in degraded
water quality, unstable channel characteristics (stream entrenchment, erosion, and bank collapse), and
reduced storage capacity/floodwater attenuation.
Directions to The Bank:
➢ Take exit 150 off Interstate 85 -40 just east of Burlington
➢ Travel north/towards Haw River /Green Level for — 2.2 miles
➢ At the Highway 49 junction, turn right /travel north on Highway 49 towards Green Level /Roxboro
for —2.7 miles
➢ Turn left on Sandy Cross Road (at the Sandy Cross Mini Mart) for —1.6 miles
➢ Turn right on Fonville Road for —1.7 miles to a T- intersection
➢ Turn left on Deep Creek Road for —0.9 mile
➢ Turn left on Roney - Lineberry Road just after Deep Creek Baptist Church for —0.3 mile
➢ After passing through a trailer park, take a left at the stop sign into The Bank
➢ Point in center of road crossing at the upstream end of the Main Channel
Latitude: 36.138332274 °N, Longitude: 79.380963290 °W
1.2 Project Objectives
The primary components of the Bank's mitigation plan included 1) construction of a stable, riffle -pool
stream channel, 2) restoration /enhancement of historic wetland functions, 3) enhancement of water quality
functions (reduced nonpoint source sedimentation and nutrient inputs), 4) restoration of a natural woody
riparian buffer (at least 50 feet wide) along the Bank's stream reaches, 5) restoration of wildlife habitat
associated with a riparian corridor /stable stream, and 6) establishment of a permanent conservation
easement which will encompass all restoration activities.
1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
A 19.6 -acre conservation easement was placed on the Bank to incorporate all restoration activities. Prior to
construction, the Bank was accessible to livestock and was routinely cleared and mowed for hay
production, resulting in local disturbances to stream banks and wetland soil surfaces. Additional land use
practices, including the maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation and relocation, dredging, and
straightening of onsite streams, had resulted in degraded water quality, unstable channel characteristics
(stream entrenchment, erosion, and bank collapse), and reduced storage capacity /floodwater attenuation.
The primary goals of this stream and wetland restoration project focused on improving water quality,
enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat, which were accomplished by:
1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural activities including a)
excluding livestock from streams, stream banks, and floodplains; b) eliminating the broadcasting of
fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural materials into and adjacent to streams and wetlands; and
c) establishing a native woody riparian buffer (at least 50 feet wide) adjacent to streams and
Annual Monitoring Report page 1
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

wetlands to treat surface runoff which may be laden with sediment and /or agricultural pollutants
from the adjacent landscape.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters through a) reduction of
bank erosion associated with hoof shear, vegetation maintenance, and agricultural plowing, and b)
planting a diverse native woody riparian buffer (at least 50' wide) adjacent to The Bank's streams.
3. Reestablishing stream stability and the capacity to transport watershed flows and sediment loads by
restoring a stable dimension, pattern, and profile supported by natural in- stream habitat and
grade/bank stabilization structures.
4. Promoting floodwater attenuation through a) reconnecting bankfull stream flows to the abandoned
floodplain terrace, b) restoring secondary, entrenched tributaries thereby reducing floodwater
velocities within smaller catchment basins, c) restoring depressional floodplain and seepage slope
wetlands, thereby increasing the storage capacity for floodwaters within The Bank, and d)
revegetating floodplains to increase frictional resistance on floodwaters crossing The Bank.
5. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed variability and the use of in- stream structures.
6. Providing wildlife habitat including seepage slope wetlands, which are uncommon in the piedmont
portion of the State.
As constructed, Bank restoration activities resulted in the following.
• 4487 Stream Mitigation Credits by:
• Restoring approximately 4235 linear feet of stream channel through construction of stable
channels, thereby reestablishing stable dimension, pattern, and profile.
• Enhancing (Level II) approximately 629 linear feet of stream channel through the removal of
invasive species, cessation of livestock grazing, and bank stabilization.
7.9 Wetland Mitigation Credits by:
• Restoring approximately 5.7 acres of riparian wetlands and 1.2 acres of nonriparian wetlands
by reconstructing channels of tributaries that exhibit more natural, historic interplay with the
floodplain, filling ditched channels, rehydrating floodplain soils, and planting with native
woody vegetation.
• Enhancing approximately 1.4 acres of riparian wetlands and 0.5 acres of nonriparian wetlands
by reconstructing The Bank's tributaries within the floodplain, rehydrating floodplain soils,
removing livestock, and planting with native woody vegetation.
• Planting a native woody riparian buffer (at least 50' wide) adjacent to restored/enhanced streams
and wetlands within The Bank.
• Protecting The Bank in perpetuity with a conservation easement.
Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, and project contacts are summarized in
Tables 1 -3 (Appendix A).
1.4 Monitoring Plan View
Monitoring activities for the Site, including relevant structures and utilities, project features, specific
project structures, and monitoring features are detailed in the monitoring plan view in Figure 2 of Appendix
A. Site features including vegetation, stream dimension (cross- sections), stream profile and pattern,
wetland hydrology, and photographic documentation were monitored.
Annual Monitoring Report page 2
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

2.0 ANNUAL MONITORING
Monitoring of restoration efforts will be performed until agreed upon success criteria are fulfilled.
Monitoring is proposed for the stream channel, riparian vegetation, and hydrology (Figure 2, Appendix A).
Stream morphology is proposed to be monitored for a period of five years. Riparian vegetation is proposed
to be monitored for a period of seven years. Wetland hydrology is proposed to be monitored for a period of
five years; at which time a request will be made to the IRT to discontinue groundwater hydrology
monitoring. The IRT reserves the right to request additional groundwater monitoring if it deems necessary.
Monitoring reports of the data collected will be submitted to the IRT no later than December of each
monitoring year.
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
After planting was completed, eleven sample vegetation plots (10 -meter by 10- meter) were installed and
measured within the Site as per guidelines established in CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008). Vegetation plots are permanently monumented with 4 -foot metal garden
posts at each corner. In each sample plot, vegetation parameters to be monitored in years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
include species composition and species density. Visual observations of the percent cover of shrub and
herbaceous species will also be documented by photograph. Vegetation plot information can be found in
Appendix B.
2.1.1 Vegetation Success Criteria
Characteristic Tree Species include woody tree and shrub species planted at the Bank, observed within a
reference forest, or outlined for the appropriate plant community in Schafale and Weakley (1990). An
average density of 320 stems per acre of Characteristic Tree Species must be surviving in the first three
monitoring years. Subsequently, 260 Characteristic Tree Species per acre must be surviving by the end of
year 5, and 210 Characteristic Tree Species per acre by the end of year 7. The IRT may allow counting of
acceptable volunteer species toward the 210 -tree per acre density upon review and evaluation of the annual
monitoring data.
No single volunteer species (most notably red maple, loblolly pine, and sweet gum) will comprise more
than 20 percent of the total composition at years 3, 5, or 7. If this occurs, remedial procedures /protocols
outlined in the contingency plan will be implemented. During years 3, 5, and 7, no single volunteer
species, comprising over 20 percent of the total composition, may be more than twice the height of the
planted trees. If this occurs, remedial procedures outlined in the contingency plan will be implemented.
If, within the first 3 years, any species exhibits greater than 50 percent mortality, the species will either be
replanted or an acceptable replacement species will be planted in its place as specified in the contingency
plan.
2.1.2 Vegetative Contingency Plan
If vegetation success criteria are not achieved based on average density calculations from combined plots
over the entire restoration area, supplemental planting may be performed with tree species approved by
regulatory agencies. Supplemental planting will be performed as needed until achievement of vegetation
success criteria.
2.1.3 Vegetative Problem Areas
Based on comments from the US Army Corps of Engineers on the Year 3 (2013) monitoring report,
Restoration Systems had professional herbicide applicators treat sweetgum trees within areas identified in
the letter included in Appendix F. The sweetgum trees were treated locally using basal bark application of
Annual Monitoring Report page 3
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

Element 4 (triclopyr) on October 6 -7, 2014. The treatment is expected to resolve the issue of excessive
sweetgum trees; however, vegetation will continue to be monitored throughout the life of the project and
additional treatments will occur, if necessary. Currently treated areas have responded well and show no
signs of resprouts or natural recruits.
In addition, areas having low stem densities or low vigor of planted stems due to the overgrowth of
sweetgum trees were replanted with 1- gallon containerized saplings in March 2015. Supplemental planting
species and stem counts are as follows:
- 375 American elm (Ulmus americana)
150 white oak (Quercus alba)
125 red oak (Quercus rubra)
Overall, the newly planted stems appear vigorous, and no vegetation areas of concern were observed during
Year 5 (2015) monitoring.
2.2 Stream Assessment
Annual monitoring will include development of channel cross - sections on riffles and pools, pebble counts,
and a water surface profile of the channel as outlined in interagency Stream Mitigation Guidelines (USACE
et al. 2003). The data will be presented in graphic and tabular format. Data to be presented will include 1)
cross - sectional area, 2) bankfull width, 3) average depth, 4) maximum depth, 5) width -to -depth ratio, 6)
water surface slope, and 7) stream substrate composition. A photographic record of preconstruction and
postconstruction conditions will also be compiled.
As a whole, monitoring measurements indicate minimal changes in both the longitudinal profile and cross -
sections as compared to as -built data. The channel geometry compares favorably with the emulated, stable
E/C type stream reach as set forth in the detailed mitigation plan and as constructed. Current monitoring
has demonstrated dimension, pattern, and profile were stable over the course of the monitoring period.
Tables for baseline data and annual quantitative assessments are included in Appendix C.
2.2.1 Stream Success Criteria
Success criteria for stream restoration will include 1) successful classification of the reach as a functioning
stream system (Rosgen 1996) and 2) channel variables indicative of a stable stream system. Annual
monitoring will continue until success criteria are met and no less than two bankfull events have occurred,
as determined by in situ crest gauge and/or visual signs of overbank flooding.
Visual assessment of in- stream structures will be conducted to determine if failure has occurred. Failure of
a structure may be indicated by collapse of the structure, undermining of the structure, abandonment of the
channel around the structure, and/or stream flow beneath the structure.
2.2.2 Stream Contingency Plan
In the event that stream success criteria are not fulfilled, a mechanism for contingency will be
implemented. Stream contingency may include structure repair and/or installation; repair of dimension,
pattern, and/or profile variables; bank stabilization; chinking of in- stream structures to prevent piping;
securing of loose coir -fiber matting; supplemental planting along the channel; and/or maintenance to areas
of the stream bank where stormwater or floodplain flows are intercepted to prevent bank failure and head-
Annual Monitoring Report page 4
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

cutting of the channel. The method of contingency is expected to be dependent upon stream variables that
are not in compliance with success criteria.
2.2.3 Bankfull Events
One bankfull event was documented to date during the Year 5 (2015) monitoring period for a total of at
least ten bankfull events during the five year monitoring period.
2.2.4 Stream Problem Areas
The left bank arm of the furthest downstream crossvane on the Main Channel was noted as compromised
during Year 1 (2011) annual monitoring. Bank stabilization along approximately 20 feet of the channel
occurred in October of 2012. Stabilization included bank contouring and matting/willow staking, and
appears to have resolved any further stabilization issues in this area.
2.3 Wetland Assessment
Six groundwater monitoring gauges were installed at the Bank with an additional groundwater gauge
installed in a reference wetland located approximately 4 miles west of the Bank (Figure 1, Appendix A).
Hydrological sampling will continue throughout the growing season at intervals necessary to satisfy the
jurisdictional hydrology success criteria within each wetland restoration area (USEPA 1990). In addition, a
rain gauge was installed onsite prior to the 2012 growing season; rainfall data will be used for comparison
of groundwater conditions with extended drought conditions. Finally, groundwater gauges located within
riverine wetlands adjacent to restored stream reaches will supplement crest gauge measurements to confirm
overbank flooding events. Graphs of groundwater hydrology and precipitation from the onsite rain gauge
are included in Appendix D.
2.3.1 Wetland Success Criteria
Target hydrological characteristics include saturation or inundation for 12.5 percent of the growing season,
during average climatic conditions. During growing seasons with atypical climatic conditions,
groundwater gauges in reference wetlands may dictate threshold hydrology success criteria. These areas
are expected to support hydrophytic vegetation; if wetland parameters are marginal as indicated by
vegetation and/or hydrology monitoring, a jurisdictional determination will be performed.
2.3.2 Wetland Contingency Plan
Hydrologic contingency may include floodplain surface modifications such as construction of ephemeral
pools, deep ripping of the soil profile, and installation of berms to retard surface water flows.
Recommendations for contingency to establish wetland hydrology may be implemented and monitored
until hydrology success criteria are achieved.
2.3.3 Wetland Problem Areas
No wetland problem areas were identified within the Bank during Year 5 (2015) monitoring.
2.4 Biotic Community Changes
Changes in the biotic community are anticipated from a shift in habitat opportunities as the unnamed
tributaries to Boyds Creek are restored. In- stream, biological monitoring is proposed to track the changes
during the monitoring period. The benthic macroinvertebrate community will be sampled using NCDWQ
protocols found in the Standard Operating Procedures for Benthic Macroinvertebrates ( NCDWQ 2006)
and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Protocols for Compensatory Stream Restoration Projects ( NCDWQ 2001).
Biological sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates will be used to collect preconstruction baseline data for
comparison with postconstruction restored conditions.
Annual Monitoring Report page 5
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

Two benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring locations were established within The Bank (one on the Main
Tributary and one on the Southern Tributary) (Figure 2, Appendix A). It is anticipated that postrestoration
collections may move slightly from the prerestoration conditions in order to take advantage of developing
habitat niches (i.e. riffles, vegetative cover, woody debris in channel, overhanging banks) that cannot be
predicted prior to restoration. Benthic macroinvertebrate samples will be collected from individual reaches
using the Qual -4 collection method. Sampling techniques of the Qual -4 collection method consist of kick
nets, sweep nets, leaf packs, and visual searches. Collection procedures will be available for review by
NCDWQ biologists. Preproject biological sampling occurred on June 12, 2008; postproject monitoring
will occur in June of each monitoring year.
Benthic macroinvertebrates were collected using the Qual -4 protocol for streams with a drainage area less
than or equal to 3 square miles. This method consists of four samples including 1) one kick sample, 2) one
sweep sample, 3) one leaf pack sample, and 4) visuals where all organisms are picked. Samples were then
sent to a qualified lab (Pennington and Associates Inc.) for processing. Habitat Assessment Field Data
Sheets and results for Year 5 (2015) can be found in Appendix E.
3.0 CONCLUSIONS
All six groundwater gauges were inundated/saturated within 12 inches of the surface for greater than 12.5
percent of the growing season (23 days), which extends from April 18 to October 22 (188 days). A
summary of groundwater gauge data is included in the following table. Overall wetland restoration goals
have been met for the five year monitoring period, all groundwater gauges have generally exceeded success
criteria each monitoring year.
Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results
*Groundwater Gauge 6 is located outside of the wetland restoration/enhancement boundary and has been installed to verify
jurisdictional hydrology in a portion of the Bank not claimed for Wetland Mitigation Credits.
** Groundwater gauge data as of 08/21/2015, groundwater gauges will continue to be monitored through the end of the growing
season, and will be available upon request.
Annual Monitoring Report page 6
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
Success Criteria Achieved /Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
Gauge
(Percentage)
Year 1 (2011)
Year 2 (2012)
Year 3 (2013)
Year 4 (2014)
Year 5 (2015) **
I
Yes /41 days
Yes /23 days
Yes /43 days
Yes /37 days
Yes /56 days
(21.8 percent)
(12.5 percent)
(22.9 percent)
(19.7 percent)
(29.8 percent)
2
No/ 17 days
Yes /37 days
Yes /43 days
Yes /50 days
Yes /32 days
(9.0 percent)
(19.7 percent)
(22.9 percent)
(26.6 percent)
(17 percent)
3
Yes /151 days
Yes /188 days
Yes /188 days (100
Yes /188 days
Yes /126 days
(80.3 percent)
(100 percent)
percent)
(100 percent)
(67.0 percent)
4
Yes /49 days
Yes /77 days
Yes /188 days (100
Yes /126 days
Yes /126 days
(26.1 percent)
(41.0 percent)
percent)
(67 percent)
(67.0 percent)
5
Yes /188 days
Yes /188 days
Yes /188 days
Yes /188 days
Yes /126 days
(100 percent)
(100 percent)
(100 percent)
(100 percent)
(67.0 percent)
6*
No/ 14 days
Yes /53 days
Yes 150 days
Yes /50 days
Yes /31 days
(7.4 percent)
(28.2 percent)
(26.6 percent)
(26.6 percent)
(16.5 percent
Ref
No /9 days
No /21 days
Yes /33 days
No/ 18 days
No /20 days
(4.8 percent)
(11.2 percent)
(17.5 percent)
(9.6 percent)
(10.6 percent)
*Groundwater Gauge 6 is located outside of the wetland restoration/enhancement boundary and has been installed to verify
jurisdictional hydrology in a portion of the Bank not claimed for Wetland Mitigation Credits.
** Groundwater gauge data as of 08/21/2015, groundwater gauges will continue to be monitored through the end of the growing
season, and will be available upon request.
Annual Monitoring Report page 6
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

Summary of Planted Vegetation Plot Results
Plot
Planted Stems /Acre Counting Towards Success Criteria
Year 1 (2011)
Year 2 (2012)
Year 3 (2013)
Year 5 (2015)
Year 7 (2017)
1
769
809
728
768
2
567
769
809
728
3
688
769
728
728
4
567
567
567
567
5
809
688
769
647
6
1093
971
971
931
7
647
607
405
405
8
1052
1052
850
971
9
567
567
486
688
10
728
809
647
769
11
486
567
364
364
Average of All
Plots (1 -11)
725
725
666
688
Annual Monitoring Report
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
page 7

4.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2001. Benthic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring
Protocols for Compensatory Mitigation. 401 /Wetlands Unit, Department of Environment and
Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2006. Standard Operating Procedures for Benthic
Macroinvertebrates. Biological Assessment Unit, Department of Environment and Natural
Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs, CO.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina:
Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North
Carolina.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission, North Carolina Division of Water Quality (USACE et al.). 2003.
Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
United States Environmental Protection Agency ( USEPA). 1990. Mitigation Site Type Classification
(MIST). USEPA Workshop, August 13 -15, 1989. EPA Region N and Hardwood Research
Cooperative, NCSU, Raleigh, North Carolina.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map - 1974. State of North Carolina.
Weather Underground. 2011. Weather Station KNCBURL17 in Burlington, North Carolina. (online).
Available: http : / /www.wunderground.com/history /airport/KBUY /2013 /9 /30 /CustomHistory.html
[September 30, 2013]. Weather Underground.
Annual Monitoring Report
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
page 8

Appendix A.
General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Figure 1. The Bank Location
Figure 2. Monitoring Plan View
Annual Monitoring Report
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
Appendices

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Mitigation Activity
Mitigation Quantity*
Mitigation Units (Credits)*
Streams Wetlands
linear feet acres )
Stream Units
(SMUS)
Wetland Units
(WMUs
Stream Restoration
4235
4235
Aril 2011
Stream Enhancement Level II
629
252
October 2012
Ri arian Wetland Restoration
5.7
2014 Year 4 Annual Monitoring
5.7
Riparian Wetland Enhancement
1.4
0.7
Nonri arian Wetland Restoration
1.2
Construction and Planting Contractor
1.2
Nonri arian Wetland Enhancement
r 0.5
0.25
Total: 4487
Total: 7.85
*Mitigation quantities and units only include linear footages /acreages within the easement. All mitigation activities completed
outside of the easement are excluded from the mitigation units.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity or Deliverable
Completion or Delivery
Restoration Plan
August 2009
Construction Plans
December 2010
Site Construction and Planting
December 2010 -April 2011
As -built Construction Drawings/Baseline Monitoring Document
Aril 2011
2011 Year 1 Annual Monitoring
October 2011
2012 Year 2 Annual Monitoring
October 2012
2013 Year 3 Annual Monitoring
October 2013
2014 Year 4 Annual Monitoring
November 2014
2015 Year 5 Annual Monitoring
September 2015
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Sponsor
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
John Preyer and George Howard 919- 755 -9490
Designer, Baseline Data Collection, and
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Annual Monitoring Performer
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919 - 215 -1693
Construction Plans and
Florence and Hutcheson
Sediment and Erosion Control Plans
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Kevin Williams 919- 851 -6066
Construction and Planting Contractor
Land Mechanic Designs
780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Lloyd Glover 919 - 639 -6132
As -built Surveyor
K2 Design Group
5688 US Highway 70 East
Goldsboro, NC 27534
John Rudolph 919- 751 -0075
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

h s
�
Directions to the Site:
N
■ Take exit 150 off of Interstate 85 just east of Burlington
r` <<
■ Travel north/towards Haw River /Green Level for - 2.2 miles
sy
W
■ At the Highway 49 junction, turn right/travel north on Highway 49 towards
A,
Green Level /Roxboro for -2.7 miles
■ Turn left on Sandy Cross Road (at the Sandy Cross Mini Mart) for -1.6 miles
-_ - - - —
■ Turn right on Fonville Road for -1.7 miles to a T- intersection
■ Turn left on Deep Creek Road for -0.9 mile
■ Turn left on Roney - Lineberry Road just after Deep Creek Baptist Church for -0.3 mile
Pe = z z
■ After passing through a trailer park, take a left at the stop sign into the Site
i
0111
o \\
_
87
_I
cm _
l
`1
Reference Gauge
Latitude: 36.1503 °N
- 1
The Bank Location
'<
\
' f
Longitude: 79 4644 °W
Latitude: 36.1383322741N
°W
Longitude: 79.380963290
rvb ?3l r,•l F _ �
p-v'� 4 �
i I Fp
------ _ cc-
f
R TAiEI ep
w�pwa
a
c I
xlxaEa uY t�eN+CW 1�'
r
q -
119:
87
1. ke
n
o
j
�
�
5
5�.
0
119
'-F $ 1 34 s�
uck
+
rw
paTtfGA®Ix'p pp I 9eDeni9iir.-
r ~ 1 V - mepa, vl9e
� `i r . %y\ •�
J,�+`�, ,
Ai
Ba MI
V
• J
���I'
�
J
\\mil
�pe �E y- l i
��
x�
P
\ �
l
\
-
Y
c
0 1 mi. 4 mi. r% ,(� 11 1 J r
4
�
!
i
4trjyse•~d
aar
1:158,400
`P
Source: 1977 North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer, p.18.
Dwn. by:
218 Snow Avenue THE BANK LOCATION Ckdby: CLF FIGURE
Raleigh, NC 27603 WGL
(919) 215 -1693 CRIPPLE CREEK MITIGATION BANK
Date:
Alamance County, North Carolina April 2011
Project:
Axiom Environmental, Inc. 07-016 11116— —a

MW
_ A„
�,.. •�� Vii+. � : 4 � : + r
L
r _ a T
+� `�9
w �' is *y :� `,� +,►,�:1
'\ _ �\ X11 ;, � , \, r•;;;; �
� E
V -I'
0)
� � O
fo
4
� Flil
N%, ,
y
Ak
fi
Legend
n The Bank Boundary = —19.6 acres
�J Restoration Channels
^,r Braided Stream Enhancement Area
r Riverine Wetland Restoration
Riverine Wetland Enhancement
Nonriverine Wetland Restoration
l Nonriverine Wetland Enhancement
BMP Stormwater Wetland
Monitoring Reaches
Cross - sections
R Vegetation Plots
I _ Gauges
Benthic Stations
{ Stream Repair - 4 x
[� + October 2012 � y
,
�? tib 1 mil.
Ilk
.1,0 .q ,A �� f,. y li v ;j
0 100 200 400 600
SIGoPu, rcsew: Esri, DigitalGobe GeoFeet ILI Mo ad he GI 16.1.)
Feet e, i cubed, USDA, USGS, AEA , Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN,
Community
Dwn. by.
FIGURE
--
CLF /KRJ
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
(919) 215 -1693
MONITORING PLAN VIEW
CRIPPLE CREEK MITIGATION BANK
2
Date:
Sept 2015
Alamance County, North Carolina
Project:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
10 -001

APPENDIX B
VEGETATION DATA
Table 4. Planted Stems and Natural Recruits by Plot and Year
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Annual Monitoring Report
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
Appendices

Table 4. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Project Name: Cripple Creek
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY4 2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
cplck- AXE -0001
cplck- AXE -0002
cplck- AXE -0003
cplck- AXE -0004
cplck- AXE -0005
cplck- AXE -0006
cplck- AXE -0007
cplck- AXE -0008
cplck- AXE -0009
cplck- AXE -0010
cplck- AXE -0011
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
IP -all
IT
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
18
21
21
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
3
3
3
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
31
50
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
4
4
4
5
5
19
1
1
1
1
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Carya
hickory
Tree
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
2
2
21
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
6
6
6
4
4
41
3
3
3
2
2
2
9
9
10
1
1
11
8
8
8
9
9
9
8
8
8
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
3
3
41
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
65
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
5
1
1
11
2
2
2
1
1
1
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
30
47
2
4
7
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1 2
2
31
1
1
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
1 5
5
5
7
7
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
3
3
17
2
2
3
1
1
2
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
5
5
51
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
2
2
2
Quercus shumardii
Shumard's oak
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
9
26
1
11
4
14
Ulmus
elm
Tree
1
1
1
Ulmus alata
1winged elm
Tree
Ulmus americana
IAmerican elm
Tree
3
3
3
12
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
19
19
81
18
18
18
18
181
49
14
14
38
161
161
47
231
23
71
101
101
12
241
241
26
171
171
80
191
20
77
91
131
83
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
5
5
6
8
81
81
61
61
71
41
4
6
8
8
10
8
8
9
6
6
7
6
6
6
5
5
9
10
11
14
7
8
11
768.9
768.9
3278
728.4
728.4
728.4
728.4
728.4
1983
566.6
566.6
1538
647.5
647.5
1902
930.8
930.8
2873
404.7
404.7
485.6
971.2
971.2
1052
688
688
3237
768.9
809.4
3116
364.2
526.11
3359
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Table 4. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
Project Name: Cripple Creek
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
MY4 (2015)
MY3 (2013)
MY2 (2012)
MY1 (2011)
MYO (2011)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
60
40
38
7
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
3
3
3
3
3
5
2
2
2
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
81
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
25
121
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
15
151
30
151
151
29
211
21
21
24
24
24
39
39
39
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
5
5
5
5
5
5
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
1
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
5
5
5
11
11
11
21
21
21
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
50
50
51
65
65
68
60
60
601
33
331
33
271
27
27
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
191
19
211
181
18
181
19
19
19
11
11
11
4
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
14
14
76
12
12
50
23
23
69
47
47
47
57
57
57
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
90
162
86
104
15
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
4
2
2
4
3
12
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
2
21
2
21
2
2
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
17
171
17
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
61
6
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
6
6
24
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
Quercus
oak
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
10
10
10
13
13
13
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
11
4
4
4
11
1
1
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
4
4
4
41
4
41
41
4
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
13
131
15
13
13
13
13
13
13
9
9
9
4
4
4
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus shumardii
Shumard's oak
Tree
8
8
8
9
9
9
11
11
11
28
28
28
30
30
30
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
9
7
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
5
50
51
36
5
20
7
Ulmus
elm
Tree
1
1
1
11
1
ill
5
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
7
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
10
10
22
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
7
7
7
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
1
1
1
4
41
4
9
9
9
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
187
1921
582
181
186
511
197
202
422
1971
1971
344
2121
2121
227
11
11
11
11
11
0.27
0.27
0.27
0.27
0.27
211
221
25
20
211
25
211
221
271
151
151
23
111
Ill
12
6881
706.41
2141
665.9
684.31
1880
724.81
743.11
15531
724.81
724.81
1266
779.91
779.91
835.1
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Cripple Creek
2015 (Year 5) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken August 2015
Plot 1
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

Cripple Creek
2015 (Year 5) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken August 2015
(continued)
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

APPENDIX C
Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 5. Verification of Bankfull Events
Tables 6a -6b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 7a -7c. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Data Summary
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Cross - section Plots
Annual Monitoring Report
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
Appendices

Table 5. Verification of Bankfull Events
Date of Data
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo (if
Collection
available)
Visual evidence of overbank including wrack adjacent
to channels and a total of .93 inches* of rain
April 14, 2011
April 8 -9, 2011
documented on March 30, 2011 and 0.96 inches* of
Photos 1 -2
rain between April 8 -9, 2011 documented at a nearby
weather station.
October 2011
May 13 -15, 2011
Total of 1.57 inches* of rain documented between May
--
13-15, 2011 documented at a nearby weather station.
October 2011
June 27 -28, 2011
Total of 2.83 inches* of rain documented between June
27 -28, 2011 documented at a nearby weather station.
Total of 3.5 inches* of rain documented between
October 2011
September 21 -28, 2011
September 21 -28, 2011 documented at a nearby
--
weather station.
August 26, 2012
July 20 -23, 2012
Total of 3.44 inches of rain documented between July
photo 3
20 -23, 2012 documented at an onsite rain gauge.
August 26, 2012
August 19, 2012
Total of 1.82 inches of rain documented on August 19,
--
2012 documented at an onsite rain gauge.
September 30, 2013
July 10, 2013
Total of 2.29 inches of rain documented between July
7 -10, 2013 documented at an onsite rain gauge.
September 30, 2013
September 1, 2013
Total of 2.56 inches of rain documented on September
--
1, 2013 at an onsite rain gauge.
October 30, 2014
April 7, 2014
Total of 1.49 inches of rain documented on April 7,
--
2014 at an onsite rain gauge.
September 9, 2015
July 6, 2015
Total of 2.32 inches of rain documented between July
--
2-6, 2015 at an onsite rain gauge.
*Weather Underground 2011
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

Table 6a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cripple Creek Main Channel
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre- Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
I.I.
CI.
E .
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Max
Med
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft)
7.1
8.1
9.5
3.0
4.6
6.1
9.0
12.1
10.5
10.7
11.3
12.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
17
44
75
150
74
174
110
100
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
1.2
1.6
0.7
1.1
1.5
0.8
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.9
1.0
BF Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.9
2.3
1.0
1.7
2.3
1.1
1.4
1.3
1.0
1.2
1.5
BF Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
8.2
10.4
5.9
8.2
10.4
7.9
9.5
13.4
Width/Depth Rati
4.2
7.5
11.1
4.0
4.2
4.3
10.0
14.0
12.0
12.7
13.1
16.0
Entrenchment Ratio
2.6
5.3
8.2
24.6
3Z3
50.0
6.7
17.6
10.7
7.8
8.9
9.3
Bank Height Ratiol
1.3
1 1.6
1
1 1.8
1
1 1.0
1 1.3
1
1 1.5
1.0
1.3
1.1
1.0
Profile
Riffle length (ft
No distinctive repetitive pattern of
riffles and pools due to channel
straightening aectivities
8.9
21.6
20.7
42.3
Riffle slope (ft/ft
0.0000
0.0083
0.0154
0.0000
0.0236
0.0116
0.0004
0.0115
0.0123
0.0215
Pool length (ft)
8.3
23.0
22.2
44.4
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.0
1.7
2.3
0.9
2.4
1.6
1.0
1.2
1.5
Pool spacing (ft)
14.0
32.4
39.6
19.8
77.7
52.5
19.8
49.5
69.3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidtb (ft)
No distinctive repetitive pattern of
riffles and pools due to channel
straightening aectivities
15.1
24.3
29.2
19.8
66.5
42
19.8
39.6
59.4
Radius of Curvature (ft)
8.9
13.2
19.4
19.8
55.5
46.1
19.8
21.7
49.5
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft
1.2
1.8
2.7
2.0
5.0
2.2
2.0
2.2
5.0
Meander Wavelength (ft)
31
47.8
74
49.5
133.2
94.5
49.5
89.1
118.8
Meander Width ratio
4.3
6.6
10.2
2.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ibs /ftz
1.53
1
1
0.27
1
1
0.38
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
- - --
I
I
- - -_
I
I
- - --
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m
127.061
1
1
1
1 6.96
1
1
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classificatio
Eg -type
E -type
C'E -tvpe
C/E -type
Bankfull Velocity (fps
- - - - --
- - --
Bankfull Discharge (efs)
35.5 to 45.9
22.3
Valley Length (ft)
1728
239
Channel Thalweg.Length (ft)
1850
292
2075
2075
Sinuosity
1.07
1.22
1.25
1.2
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
0.0108
0.005
0.0065
0.01

Table 6b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cripple Creek - Tributaries
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Max
Med
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft)
3.9
4.3
4.9
3.0
4.6
6.1
5.1
6.2
5.6
5.3
6.3
7.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
8
13
25
150
25
65
45
15
50
100
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.7
0.9
0.7
1.1
1.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.3
0.5
0.6
BF Max Depth (ft)
1.1
1.6
2.6
1.0
1.7
2.3
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.4
0.7
0.9
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
3.2
5.9
3.2
1.4
3.0
4.1
Width/Depth Rat' o
4.1
6.1
7.7
4.0
4.2
4.3
8.0
12.0
10.0
11.2
14.4
18.3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.9
3.0
5.1
24.6
37.3
50.0
4.5
11.6
8.0
2.8
8.2
14.7
Bank Height Ratio
I.3
1.9
2.7
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.3
1.1
1.0
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
No distinctive repetitive pattern of
riffles and pools due to channel
straightening acctivities
4.6
10.5
67.1
Riffle slope (ft /ft)
0.0000
0.0083
0.0154
0.0000
0.0465
0.0330
0.0033
0.0202
0.0356
Pool length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.0
1.7
2.3
0.7
1.6
].1
1.1
1.2
1.2
Pool spacing (ft)
14.0
32.4
39.6
11.2
33.6
22.4
11.2
22.4
33.6
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
I No distinctive repetitive pattern of
riffles and pools due to channel
straightening acetivities
15.1
24.3
29.2
11.2
28
16.8
11.2
16.8
28
Radius of Curvature (ft)l
I
I
I
8.9
13.2
19.4
11.2
50.4
12.3
11.2
12.3
50.4
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)l
I
I
I
1.2
1.8
2.7
2.0
5.0
2.2
2.0
2.2
5.0
Meander Wavelength (ft)l
I
I
I
31
47.8
74
28
67.2
50.4
28
50.4
67.2
Meander Width ratio
4.3
6.6
10.2
2.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
Transport parameter s
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs /ft2
2.6
0.27
0.44
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
- - --
- - --
- - --
Stream Power (transport ca aci W /m2
11.75
6.96
11.02
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Eg
E -type
Eb -type
CIE-type
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
- - - --
- - - --
- - - --
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
0.07
22.3
Valley Length (ft)
2220
239
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2287
292
2823
2823
Sinuosity
1.03
1.22
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
0.02
0.005
0.0165
0.016

Table 7a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
CriDDle Creek - Main Channel
Parameter
Cross Section 2
Cross Section 3
Cross Section 4
Cross Section 9
Cross Section 10
Parameter
Pool
Riffle
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Dimension
MYO
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
BF Width (ft)
12.4
13.1
13.4
12.7
12.4
12.0
11.0
10.6
10.5
10.7
11.0
10.2
11.2
10.7
10.7
9.7
10.5
10.4
8.8
9.3
8.4
8.2
8.3
8.6
10.7
10.9
11.5
10.3
10.8
10.4
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
1.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
0.7
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100
100
100
100.0
100.0
100.0
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.7
1.2
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.3
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
BF Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.9
8.6
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
12.2
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
6.5
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.7
1
1.1
1.1
0.9
1.0
1.0
16.0
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
10.1
11.1
10.1
10.8
9.2
8.8
14.9
8.9
8.6
7.8
7.7
7.9
7.0
15.3
7.9
7.9
7.6
6.8
6.5
6.3
14.6
7.4
7
7.2
6.9
7.3
7.6
1 8.9
10.7
8.6
9.2
7.4
7.8
6.5
9.6
Width/De th Ratio
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
9.1
13.6
13.0
14.1
14.9
15.3
14.9
9.5
15.8
14.3
14.9
13.8
17.0
17.2
Bank Height Ratio
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.0
13.7
13.9
14.5
14.3
15.0
16.6
Entrenchment Ratio
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.0
9.1
9.5
9.5
9.3
9.1
9.8
8.9
9.4
9.4
10.3
9.5
9.6
Riffle length (ft)l
NA
I-4-0.3
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1 23
9.3
9.2
8.7
9.7
9.3
9.6
1 80.6
Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1
1 1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0137
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0347
d50 (mm)
0.0011
0.3
2.8
1.2
0.9
0.6
0.0144
0.0134
8.3
30.5
33.9
24.6
23.4
8.3
30.5
33.9
24.6
23.4
9.4
8.3
1 2.8
1 1.2
1 0.9
1 0.6
1
22.1
1 8.3
1 30.5
1 33.9
1 24.6
1 23.4
44.2
Parameter
Cross Section 11
Cross Section 13
Cross Section 14
Cross Section 15
Cross Section 16
Parameter
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Riffle
Pool
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
BF Width (ft)
12.8
12.5
12.8
12.6
12.4
12.3
9.7
9.9
9.4
9.7
9.1
6.5
11.4
12
11.5
11.3
11.0
11.5
11.1
10.4
11.9
11.4
12.0
11.6
13.9
13.5
13.8
13.2
12.2
12.1
Flood prone Width (ft) (a fox)
100
100
100
100.0
100.0
100.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.0
100
100
100
100.0
100.0
100.0
0.7
100
100
100
100.0
100.0
100.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BF Mean Depth (ft)
1
1
1
0.9
0.9
0.8
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.8
1.3
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
BF Max Depth (ft)
].5
].3
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.1
8.6
1.5
].6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.5
12.2
1.3
1.2
].1
1.0
1.1
1.0
6.5
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.]
1.2
2.4
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.5
2.8
16.0
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
13.4
12
12.2
11.8
10.8
9.6
14.9
7
6.9
6.1
6.1
5.9
5.5
15.3
10.5
9.6
8.4
8.5
8.1
7.8
14.6
10.1
7.2
9.9
8.8
9.0
8.5
1 8.9
15
14.5
15
13.3
13.7
13.3
9.6
Width/De th Ratio
12.2
13
13.3
13.5
14.2
15.8
9.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
9.5
12.3
15
15.8
15.0
14.9
17.0
Bank Height Ratio
13.4
15
14.2
14.8
16.0
15.8
1.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Entrenchment Ratio
7.8
8
7.8
7.9
8.1
8.1
1.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.8
8.3
8.7
8.8
9.1
8.7
Riffle length (ft)l
8.6
9.6
8.4
8.8
8.3
8.6
1 23
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1 80.6
Bank Hei ht Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 22.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 70.6
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0137
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0347
d50 (mm)
0.0011
8.3
30.5
33.9
24.6
23.4
0.0144
0.0134
0.3
2.8
1.2
0.9
0.6
8.3
30.5
33.9
24.6
23.4
9.4
8.3
30.5
33.9
24.6
23.4
23.8
22.1
0.3
2.8
1 1.2
0.9
0.6
44.2
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY4
MY -5
Dimension - Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft)
10.7
11.3
12.8
10.4
10.8
12.5
10.5
11.5
12.8
9.7
11.0
12.6
10.5
11.0
12.4
10.2
11.0
12.3
Flood prone Width (ft)
100.0
100
100
100
100
100
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
1.0
0.7
0.8
1.0
0.7
0.8
1.0
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.6
0.7
0.9
0.6
0.7
0.8
BF Max Depth (ft)
1.0
1.2
1.5
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.0
1.2
1.3
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.2
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
8
9.5
13.4
7.2
8.6
12.0
7.6
8.8
12.2
6.8
8.1
11.8
6.5
8.0
10.8
6.3
7.4
9.6
Width/Depth Ratio
12.7
13.1
16.0
12.5
14.2
15.3
12.8
14.9
16.4
13.9
14.2
15.3
13.8
15.7
17.5
14.6
16.5
17.3
Entrenchment Ratio
7.8
1 8.9
9.3
8.0
9.3
9.6
7.8
8.7
9.5
7.9
9.1
10.3
8.1
9.1
9.5
8.1
9.2
9.8
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Profile - Main Channel
Riffle length (ft)l
8.9
1 21.6
1 20.7
1 42.3
1
1 11.5
1 23
1 20.3
1 48.8
1
1 9.6
1 25.2
1 23.5
1 80.6
1
1 8.4
1 21.1
1 18.5
1 45.5
1
1 4.4
1 22.9
1 20.7
1 53.8
1
1 7
1 23.1
1 20.7
1 70.6
Riffle sloLth(ftt)
0.0115
0.0123
0.0215
- - - - --
- - - - --
- - - - --
0.0035
0.0137
0.0141
0.0292
0.0049
0.0156
0.0144
0.0347
0.0011
0.0149
0.0137
0.0403
0.0000
0.0144
0.0134
0.0314
Pool length
10.6
26.1
24.0
51.6
9.4
23.8
23.3
44.8
10.3
23.8
22.1
46.5
9.2
22.8
20.7
44.2
8.9
23.6
22.4
50.4
Pool Max d
L
1.7
2.4
1.6
1.7
2.5
1.6
1.8
2.5
].6
1.8
2.4
1.6
1.8
2.5
1.4
1.5
1.7
Pool s a
55.5
77.7
22.2
55.5
77.7
22.2
55.5
77.7
22.2
55.5
77.7
22.2
55.5
77.7
22.2
55.5
77.7
Additional Reach Parameters - Main Channel
Rosgen Classification
E/C -type
E/C -type
E/C -type
E/C -type
E/C -type
E/C -type
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2075
2075
2075
2075
2075
2075
Sinuosity
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2.
Water Surface Slope (Channel) ( ft/ft)
0.01
0.0098
0.0098
0.0099
0.0101
0.0098

Table 7b. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
(`Annlr C-k - Trihnt- 1
Parameter Baseline MY -1 MY -2 MY -3 MY -4 MY -5
Cross Section 1
Cross Section 5
Cross Section 6
Cross Section 7
Cross Section 8
Parameter
Riffle
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Dimension
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
BF Width (ft)
6.8
7.3
7.0
6.5
6.2
6.1
5.8
4.9
5.3
6.8
5.9
8.2
100
7
7.7
7.9
8.9
7.5
6.9
50
5.8
8.1
7.4
6.5
6.1
5.5
5.3
6.2
5.4
5.7
5.6
5.3
Flood prone Width (ft) (approx )
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
0.5
50
50
50
50
50
50
0.6
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.4
50
50
50
50
50
50
15
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.7
1 0.4
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
1.3
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
4.1
BF Max Depth (ft)
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
3.1
0.6
0.4
1.3
0.8
0.7
0.8
3.4
1.2
1.1
1.3
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.9
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.6
14.4
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.8
20.3
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
3.9
3.4
3.0
3.1
2.9
2.4
13.4
2.4
1.3
2.8
2.6
1.9
1.9
20.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.2
4.3
Entrenchment Ftiol
2.4
3.2
3.2
2.5
2.4
2.1
9.0
1.4
2.3
1.5
1.8
1.7
1.9
14.3
Width/Depth Ratio
12.0
15.7
16.3
13.6
13.3
15.5
9.0
13.7
18.9
10
17.8
18.3
35.4
16.4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
14
20.3
17.1
16.9
15.5
14.4
1.0
20.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Entrenchment Ratio
14.7
13.8
14.3
15.4
16.1
16.4
1.0
8.7
10.2
9.5
7.4
8.5
6.1
5.2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7.3
8.7
6.2
6.7
7.7
8.2
9.1
2.8
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
9.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
- - - - --
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0244
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0257
d50 (mm)
0.0572
3.4
19.8
15.0
23.1
12.1
3.4
19.8
15.0
23.1
12.1
7.2
12.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
10.1
20.9
3.4
19.8
15.0
23.1
12.1
6.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
1 0.1
0.1
0.4
Parameter Baseline MY -1 MY -2 MY -3 MY -4 MY -5
Dimension - Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft)
5.3
6.3
7.1
4.9
6.5
8.1
5.3
6.7
7.4
5.9
6.5
6.8
5.9
6.2
7.1
5.5
7.2
8.4
Flood prone Width (ft)
15.0
50.0
100
50
50
100
50
50
100
50
50
100
50
50
100
50
100
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.4
0.5
BF Max Depth (ft)
0.4
0.7
0.9
0.4
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.9
1.3
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.5
0.7
1.1
0.6
0.7
1.0
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1.4
3.0
4.1
1.3
3.2
3.9
1.9
3.1
4.3
2.3
3.1
3.4
1.9
2.9
3.6
1.9
2.4
3.8
Width/De th Ratio
11.2
14.4
18.3
10.8
14.6
20.3
10.6
13.5
18.5
10.2
13.4
17.0
12.4
14.2
20.0
13.8
16.8
41.0
Entrenchment Ftiol
2.8
1
14.7
6.2
9.0
13.7
6.8
8.9
14.3
7.4
8.9
15.4
7.0
9.0
16.1
6.0
8.5
16.4
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Profile - Tributa 1
Riffle length (ft)
5.2
1 9.9
1 9.2
17.4
3.6
7.9
7.3
13.8
5.3
8.5
8.1
19.4
4.6
9.8
8.8
19
4.2
9.2
1 8.5
1 17.9
4.7
9.5
9
19
Riffle slope (ft/ft)
0.0042
0.0232
0.0227
0.0340
- - - - --
- - - - --
- - - - --
0.0044
0.0263
0.0244
0.0433
0.0000
0.0221
0.0229
0.0417
0.0043
0.0261
0.0254
0.0471
0.0018
0.0257
0.0253
0.0572
Pool length (ft)
8.3
13.1
12.6
21.0
7.2
12.3
10.9
22.0
6.5
11.1
10.1
20.9
6.7
12.0
11.7
21.0
6.5
11.2
11.1
23.4
Pool Max de th (ft)
0.4
0.7
0.9
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.6
1.2
1.3
0.5
1.0
1.2
0.5
1.3
1.4
0.6
0.7
1.0
Pool spacing (ft)
11.2
22.4
33.6
11.2
22.4
33.6
11.2
22.4
33.6
11.2
22.4
33.6
11.2
22.4
33.6
11.2
22.4
33.6
Additional Reach Parameters - Tributary 1
Ros en Clasjh
E/C -type
E/C -type
E /C-type
E/C -type
E/C -type
E/C -type
Channel Thal we L
665
665
665
665
665
665
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slo e(Chann
0.0161
0.0164
0.0159
0.0164
0.0157
0.0157

Table 7c. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Crioole Creek - Tributaries 2 & 3
Parameter Baseline MY -1 MY -2 MY -3 MY4 MY -5
Cross Section 12
Cross Section 17
Cross Section 18
Cross Section 19
Cross Section 20
Parameter
Riffle
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Riffle
Dimension
MYO MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
MYO MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 FMY5 MY5+
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
MYO MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
MYO MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
BF Width (ft)
5.5
5.3
5.4
5.9
6.0
6.0
Max
7.1
6.7
7.3
6.6
6.7
7.2
6.4
5.7
5.7
5.2
5.5
5.4
6.7
6.7
6.2
6.0
6.7
6.8
7.6
6.8
6.7
6.5
6.7
6.1
7.1
8.4
5.5
Flood prone Width (ft) (a rox)
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
100
50
50
50
50
50
50
BF Mean Depth (ft)
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
BF Max Depth (ft)
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
1.1
1.3
1.2
1.0
1.3
1.2
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.1
0.7
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft')
1.8
1.8
1.9
2.3
2.0
2.1
3.6
3.1
3.8
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.4
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.3
2.9
11.2
3.8
3.2
3.1
3.3
3.2
3.3
4.1
3.9
4.3
3.4
3.6
3.8
Width/Depth Ratio
16.2
15.7
14.9
15.1
18.0
17.1
14.0
14.7
14.1
14.1
14.5
16.7
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6.2
11.8
11.9
11.3
13.6
14.5
17.5
11.0
10.8
10.3
10.9
14.0
18.6
Entrenchment Ratio
9.2
9.4
9.3
8.5
8.3
8.3
7.0
7.4
6.8
7.6
7.5
6.9
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7.4
8.1
8.4
7.5
7.4
6.6
7.5
7.7
7.5
8.2
7.0
6.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Riffle len th (ft)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
17.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
69.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
13.3
d50 mm
5.3
11
9.4
9.4
8.3
- - - --
5.3
11
9.4
9.4
8.3
0.0211
0.0203
0.1
6.9
1.2
0.7
0.1
0.0552
5.3
11
9.4
9.4
8.3
0.0041
0.0204
5.3
11
9.4
9.4
8.3
Parameter Baseline MY -1 MY -2 MY -3 MY4 MY -5
Dimension - Riffle On[)
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
can
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft)
5.3
6.3
7.1
4.9
6.5
8.1
5.3
6.7
7.4
5.9
6.5
6.8
5.9
6.2
7.1
5.5
7.2
8.4
Flood prone Width (ft)
15.0
50.0
100
50
50
100
50
50
100
50
50
100
50
50
100
50
100
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.4
0.5
BF Max Depth (ft)
0.4
0.7
0.9
0.4
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.9
1.3
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.5
0.7
1.1
0.6
0.7
1.0
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1.4
3.0
4.1
1.3
3.2
3.9
1.9
3.1
4.3
2.3
3.1
3.4
1.9
2.9
3.6
1.9
2.4
3.8
Width/De th Ratio
11.2
14.4
18.3
10.8
14.6
20.3
10.6
13.5
18.5
10.2
13.4
17.0
12.4
14.2
20.0
13.8
16.8
41.0
Entrenchment Ratio,
8.2
14.7
6.2
9.0
13.7
6.8
8.9
14.3
7.4
8.9
15.4
7.0
9.0
16.1
6.0
8.5
16.4
Bank Hei ht Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Profile - Tributa 2
Riffle len th (ft)
4.6
15.1
11.7
67.1
4.3
17.1
11.3
64.1
4.7
14.6
11.6
69.3
5.5
19
11.4
72.3
4.3
14
12.7
47
3.3
17.4
13.3
75.2
Riffle slo a (ft/ft)
0.0033
0.0180
0.0177
0.0356
- - - --
- - - - --
- - - - --
0.0039
0.0211
0.0203
0.0743
0.0048
0.0193
0.0160
0.0552
0.0000
0.0201
0.0172
0.0524
0.0041
0.0204
0.0184
0.0496
Pool len th (ft)
7.5
12.6
11.9
20.0
4.3
9.9
9.6
18.9
7.3
11.7
10.4
21.0
3.8
9.9
9.8
17.4
5.4
9.5
8.9
16.7
Pool Max de th (ft)
0.4
0.7
0.9
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.6
1.2
1.3
0.5
1.0
1.2
0.5
1.3
1.4
0.6
0.7
1.0
Pool s acin (ft)
11.2
22.4
33.6
11.2
22.4
33.6
11.2
22.4
33.6
11.2
22.4
33.6
11.2
22.4
33.6
11.2
22.4
33.6
Additional Reach Parameters - Tributa 2
Ros en Classification
E/C -type
E/C -type
E/C -type
E/C -type
E/C -type
E/C -type
ChannelThalwe Len h(ft)
1090
1090
1090
1090
1090
1090
Sinuosit
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Sloe (Channel) ft/ft)
0.0158
0.0156
0.0159
0.0157
0.0159
0.0159

Project Name
Feature
Station
0.0
5.7
8.8
14.0
19.3
30.1
39.4
46.7
53.1
60.8
65.9
76.3
92.5
102.0
108.8
111.3
124.3
138.0
142.7
150.2
153.6
168.3
185.0
191.2
201.3
206.0
214.3
228.2
Cripple Creek - Year 5 (2015) Profile
Main Channel Station 00+00 to 10+00
Profile
3/31/15
2011
As -built Survey
Bed Elevation
600.36
599.41
599.49
599.61
600.26
600.74
600.89
600.36
600.35
600.18
600.95
600.96
601.13
600.14
599.71
602.08
601.91
602.02
601.81
601.75
602.23
602.68
602.65
602.24
602.19
602.76
602.82
602.98
Water ElevatioE
600.68
600.63
600.67
600.63
600.74
601.06
601.17
601.19
601.23
601.21
601.22
601.32
601.56
601.57
601.58
602.20
602.25
602.48
602.47
602.48
602.57
602.87
602.99
602.98
603.00
603.08
603.20
603.32
Station
-22.2
-2.1
3.5
12.3
18.8
38.7
41.7
54.1
63.1
84.3
96.8
107.0
111.3
124.9
127.4
133.8
140.2
144.7
148.6
157.1
184.0
191.3
192.2
199.5
208.9
229.2
233.2
243.0
2011
Bed Elevation
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Bed Elevation
Water ElevatioE
600.0
-0.5
600.4
600.6
599.4
60Q�
599.6
600.5
600.3
600.6
600.6
601.1
600.5
601.1
600.3
601.0
600.9
600.4
600.9
54.4
600.4
601.3
599.6
601.3
602.1
71.7
601.9
601.2
601.6
602.2
601.6
602.2
601.8
602.2
601.2
602.2
601.4
602.2
602.5
602.1
602.5
602.8
602.2
129.7
602.8
602.2
602.1
602.8
602.7
149.2
602.8
602.2
602.3
603.1
602.4
603.2
2012
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
-25.0
599.8
600.4
-0.5
600.4
600.6
4.4
599.3
600.6
12.9
599.5
600.6
17.8
600.4
600.6
39.5
600.6
601.1
44.2
600.4
601.1
54.4
600.3
601.1
64.2
601.0
601.2
71.7
601.0
601.2
87.0
601.0
601.4
100.5
600.1
601.3
108.7
599.7
601.3
111.3
602.1
602.1
124.6
602.0
602.2
129.7
601.5
602.2
135.3
601.5
602.2
149.2
601.2
602.2
155.0
602.2
602.5
182.0
602.3
602.9
190.3
602.0
602.9
196.2
602.0
602.9
205.1
602.7
603.0
226.3
603.2
603.3
232.3
602.2
603.3
243.3
602.3
603.2
251.4
603.1
603.3
266.1
6032
603.5
2013
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water ElevatioE
-25.0
599.8
600.5
-2.1
600.2
600.7
4.2
599.3
600.7
9.0
599.4
600.7
13.0
599.7
600.7
18.1
600.3
600.8
28.3
600.7
601.0
37.2
600.6
601.2
44.8
600.2
601.2
53.6
600.3
601.2
59.2
600.4
601.2
63.3
600.9
601.2
73.1
601.0
601.4
88.8
601.4
601.5
93.9
600.3
601.6
102.6
599.8
601.5
109.4
599.9
601.5
111.1
602.1
602.1
123.7
601.9
602.4
129.9
601.4
602.4
138.5
601.6
602.3
1489
601.1
602.3
157.1
602.4
602.9
174.7
602.7
603.1
181.6
602.3
603.1
194.8
602.1
603.1
201.1
602.2
603.1
206.2
602.8
603.2
2014
Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
-18.0
600.0
600.5
-15.7
599.6
600.5
-12.5
599.7
600.5
-11.3
600.1
600.5
7.2
600.2
600.6
11.5
599.3
600.7
19.5
599.4
600.7
25.9
600.5
600.7
35.3
600.8
601.0
44.0
600.8
601.1
51.9
600.2
601.1
60.3
600.2
601.2
65.8
600.3
601.1
69.9
600.9
601.1
80.2
601.0
601.3
95.5
601.0
601.5
101.2
600.4
601.5
110.7
599.8
601.5
116.1
599.8
601.4
118.0
602.1
602.2
132.3
601.9
602.4
136.4
601.5
602.3
144.1
601.3
602.3
153.6
601.2
602.4
159.2
601.6
602.4
164.1
602.3
602.8
174.2
602.4
603.0
192.5
602.6
603.1
2015
Year 5 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
-18.7
600.1
600.3
4.7
600.4
600.6
11.3
599.2
600.6
19.7
599.7
600.7
26.6
600.3
600.7
44.7
600.7
601.1
54.2
600.1
601.1
60.5
600.2
601.2
65.1
600.1
601.1
69.1
600.7
601.1
93.5
601.1
601.5
99.0
600.3
601.5
115.6
599.7
601.5
118.0
602.1
602.2
129.7
602.1
602.3
137.2
601.4
602.3
148.2
601.3
602.4
156.9
601.4
602.3
163.1
602.1
602.7
180.7
602.6
603.0
192.4
602.5
603.1
199.8
602.3
603.1
207.1
602.2
603.0
210.4
602.8
603.2
233.5
603.1
603.5
238.0
602.4
603.5
246.9
602.5
603.5
253.3
602.5
603.4
2011
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0100
0.0098
0.0098
0.0099
0.0101
0.0098
Riffle Length
21
23
24
21
23
23
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0115
- - - --
0.0137
0.0156
0.0149
0.0141
Pool Length
22
26
23
24
23
24
Avg. Pool Slope
----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
Cripple Creek - Year 5 (2015) Profile - Main Channel Station 00 +00 to 10 +00
620
615
L
;0
L
610
W
C
°
605
°
W
600
595
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Distance feet
-As-built (2011) Bed -Year 1 (2011) Bed --*-Year 2 (2012) Bed -0(-Year 3 (2013) Bed Year 4 (2014) Bed Year 5 (2015) Bed -Year 5 (2015) Water Surface

Name Cripple Creek - Year 5 (2015) Profile
Main Channel Station 10+00 to 18 +00
Profile
3/31/15
Station
2011
As -built
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
Station
2011
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Bed Elevation Water F.lecal wn
Station
2012
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
2013
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
2014
Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
2015
Year 5 Monitoring \Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
991.9
609.7
610.1
975.3
609.5
21
970.6
609.4
609.8
998.4
609.9
610.2
998.3
610.1
610.4
998.7
609.2
610.1
1008.3
610.0
610.2
1008.7
610.1
-----
1005.5
610.2
-----
1000.5
609.7
610.2
1014.5
610.1
610.5
1001.5
609.8
610.1
1016.0
609.2
610.2
1018.4
609.5
610.2
1013.5
609.5
610.3
1008.6
609.9
610.2
1019.6
609.6
610.5
1017.2
610.0
610.4
1028.4
610.0
6103
1026.8
609.4
610.2
1022.8
609.5
610.3
1012.3
610.1
610.3
1029.8
609.5
610.5
1022.0
609.6
610.4
1043.7
610.4
610.6
1032.3
610.1
Distance (feet)
1027.4
610.3
1016.4
609.6
610.3
1034.0
610.1
610.6
1030.9
609.4
610.4
1056.4
610.5
610.8
1059.3
610.4
610.7
1057.0
610.6
610.9
1022.7
6095
610.3
1060.9
610.7
611.2
1036.5
610.0
610.4
1062.9
610.0
610.8
1068.7
609.1
610.7
1063.6
609.6
610.9
1028.5
609.4
610.3
1068.7
609.4
611.2
1064.4
610.5
610.9
1073.6
609.5
610.8
1074.0
609.6
610.7
1084.0
609.2
610.9
1033.0
610.1
610.4
1085.7
608.4
611.2
1069.9
609.6
610.9
1085.7
609.5
610.9
1088.3
609.6
610.7
1090.5
610.7
611.0
1042.1
610.4
610.7
1092.1
609.5
611.2
1085.7
608.4
610.8
1095.2
610.7
610.9
1094.2
610.7
11193
611.2
611.5
1059.0
610.6
611.0
1098.3
610.7
611.2
1092.5
609.2
610.8
1104.8
610.9
611.2
1110.2
611.0
1124.1
610.5.
611.5
1067.8
609.4
611.0
1113.4
611.1
611.5
1100.9
610.7
610.9
1120.9
611.1
611.4
1121.7
611.0
1128.1
610.7
1078.9
609.2
611.0
1124.8
611.2
611.6
1125.2
610.9
611.3
1125.6
610.4
611.4
1126.9
610.3
611.3
1133.5
610.8
611.5
1087.6
608.9
611.0
1130.4
610.5
611.7
1129.0
610.3
611.3
1133.0
610.4
611.4
1141.1
610.5
611.3
1155.3
611.4
611.7
1097.2
610.7
611.0
1133.0
610.6
611.7
1145.8
610.8
6113
1140.5
610.4
611.4
1148.1
611.1
1158.4
610.6
611.8
1111.9
611.0
611.4
1139.3
610.8
611.7
1160.6
611.2
611.4
1146.3
611.1
611.4
1159.7
6113
1162.3
610.8
611.7
1124.6
611.0
611.5
1151.9
611.4
611.8
1164.0
610.5
611.5
1156.9
611.3
611.5
1162.1
610.7
611.5
1164.7
611.6
1127.8
610.4
611.5
1160.0
611.4
611.9
1167.8
610.5
611.5
1160.0
610.5
611.6
1165.6
610.8
611.5
1176.9
611.6
612.0
1136.0
610.7
611.5
1163.5
610.7
611.9
1171.0
611.2
611.6
1163.7
610.5
611.6
1170.2
611.5
1185.2
609.5
611.9
1142.2
610.6
611.5
1167.0
610.7
611.9
1179.0
611.3
611.8
1167.9
611.3
611.6
1181.8
611.2
611.7
1195.8
612.4
1146.5
611.1
611.6
1171.4
611.4
611.9
1185.4
610.7
611.8
1180.2
611.2
611.6
1189.5
609.6
611.7
1207.9
611.9
612.4
1161.5
611.3
611.8
1187.5
610.9
6111
1199.4
609.7
611.8
1186.0
610.3
611.6
1198.2
609.9
611.7
1213.4
611.2
612.5
1164.9
610.5
611.8
1191.2
608.9
6111
1201.4
612.2
612.3
1196.1
609.8
611.7
1199.3
612.3
1218.4
611.4
612.4
1167.6
610.6
611.8
1199.0
610.2
612.1
1208.4
611.8
612.4
1197.1
612.3
612.4
1213.3
611.8
612.3
1227.9
612.4
612.5
1171.8
611.5
612.0
1200.7
612.4
612.6
1212.5
611.6
612.4
1206.0
612.0
612.4
1217.6
611.3
6123
1251.5
612.5
613.2
1182.4
611.3
612.0
1215.4
612.1
612.7
1222.5
610.9
612.4
1213.4
611.2
612.4
1224.9
611.5
612.3
1256.1
611.8
613.1
1187.5
610.7
612.0
1221.3
611.1
612.8
1228.3
611.2
612.4
1223.5
611.4
612.4
1231.9
612.3
1261.9
611.9
613.2
1193.4
609.4
612.0
1228.2
611.5
612.7
1234.1
612.2
612.7
2011
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0100
0.0098
0.0098
0.0099
0.0101
0.0098
Riffle Length
21
23
24
21
23
23
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0115
- - - --
0.0137
0.0156
0.0149
0.0141
Pool Length
22
26
23
24
23
24
Avg. Pool Slope
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
Cripple Creek - Year 5 (2015) Profile - Main
Channel Station 10 +00 to 18 +00
620
618
616
s.
:o
614
w
°0
612
W
610
608
606
1000
1100 1200 1300 1400
1500 1600 1700 1800
Distance (feet)
BAs -built (2011) Bed -Year 1 (2011) Bed -$-Year 2 (2012) Bed Year 3 (2013) Bed
7a -Year 4 (2014) Bed -*--Year 5 (2015) Bed -Year 5 (2015) Water Surface

Name Cripple Creek - Year 5 (2015) Profile
Tributary I
Profile
3/31/15
2011
As -built
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevatio
0.0
615.4
615.7
4.3
615.6
615.7
8.6
615.1
615.7
13.4
615.1
615.8
17.2
615.6
615.9
23.5
615.8
616.1
27.2
615.8
616.2
30.0
615.5
616.2
33.4
615.7
616.2
40.4
616.0
616.3
42.5
615.3
616.2
46.8
615.4
616.2
51.5
615.9
616.3
56.7
616.0
616.4
60.8
615.8
616.4
65.4
6163
616.6
71.3
616.5
616.8
81.9
616.6
617.0
85.3
616.1
617.0
91.4
616.2
617.0
96.7
616.2
616.9
100.9
616.7
617.0
108.1
617.2
617.2
113.7
616.5
617.3
118.0
616.4
617.3
122.2
617.0
6173
131.1
6173
617.5
T
Z
v
a
t
O
a
W
623
622
621
620
619
618
617
616
615
2011
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
-2.6
615.4
6.15.7
4.9
615.4
615.9
8.0
615.0
615.7
14.2
615.3
615.7
16.8
615.6
615.8
23.3
615.8
6159
28.5
615.5
616.1
29.1
615.4
616.2
33.2
615.9
616.2
36.7
615.9
616.3
43.1
615.2
616.2
45.2
615.3
616.2
49.7
615.8
616.3
54.9
616.3
616.4
58.1
615.8
616.4
60.7
615.9
616.3
64.9
616.2
6.17.0
78.8
616.4
616.9
81.1
616.6
616.9
85.8
616.0
616.9
95.0
616.1
616.9
99.8
616.7
617.1
107.7
616.9
617.1
112.7
616.4
617.2
115.5
616.4
617.2
122.0
617.2
617.5
129.0
617.2.
617.5
V 0 50
BAs -built (2011) Bed
2012
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
-3.0
615.3
6.15.7
4.2
615.6
615.9
7.1
615.2
615.9
12.1
615.0
615.8
15.1
615.3
615.8
17.1
615.6
6159
25.9
616.0
616.2
29.7
615.7
616.2
33.4
616.0
616.2
39.6
616.0
616.3
42.2
615.5
616.2
46.4
615.5
616.3
49.0
616.0
616.3
55.1
616.1
616.4
59.3
615.7
616.3
63.2
616.0
616.4
82.6
616.5
6.17.0
84.9
616.1
616.9
92.4
616.2
616.9
97.8
616.2
616.9
101.3
616.6
617.0
108.6
616.7
617.1
111.0
616.5
617.1
117.7
616.5
617.2
123.3
617.0
617.4
129.7
617.2
617.5
134.1
616.9
617.5
2013
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
-1.6
615.5
615.8
4.2
615.4
615.9
7.6
615.0
615.9
13.3
614.9
615.9
15.4
615.5
616.0
24.2
615.9
616.3
26.0
615.5
616.3
29.5
615.4
616.3
33.5
616.1
616.3
38.1
615.8
616.3
40.6
615.3
616.3
45.0
615.3
6163
48.7
616.0
616.3
54.9
616.0
616.5
57.3.
615.9
616.5
58.0
615.8
616.5
60.4
615.9
616.5
62.9
616.1
616.5
70.8
616.5
616.7
77.5
616.6
616.9
81.9
616.3
616.9
85.5
615.9
616.9
91.5
616.1
6169
96.0
616.0
616.9
100.2
616.6
617.0
107.7
616.8
617.3
t 12.2
616.2
617.2
Cripple Creek - Year 5 (2015) Profile - Tributary 1
100 150 200
Distance (feet)
Year 1 (2011) Bed -Year 2 (2012) Bed
62 I.0 619.4 0 19.K 338..
-it<-Year 3 (2013) Bed
250
Year 4 (2014) Bed
300
2014
2011
2012
2015
2014
2015
Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
0.0161
0.0164
Year 5 Monitoring \Survey
0.0164
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
0.0
615.6
615.9
0.0
615.6
616.0
4.2
615.5
616.0
4.7
615.6
616.1
7.4
615.0
615.9
8.3
614.9
616.1
14.8
615.1
615.9
14.0
615.0
616.1
16.5
615.8
616.0
17.2
615.9
616.1
25.0
615.9
616.4
25.8
616.0
616.4
30.3
615.6
616.5
30.0
615.6
616.4
35.8
615.9
616.4
31.6
615.7
616.5
43.1
615.5
616.5
33.4
616.0
616.4
45.6
615.4
616.5
40.4
615.9
616.4
48.2
615.8
616.5
42.1
615.4
616.5
56.4
616.2
616.7
47.1
615.6
616.4
59.8
615.8
616.7
49.6
615.9
616.5
63.6
616.1
616.7
55.9
616.3
616.6
81.5
616.6
617.1
58.5
615.8
616.6
85.8
616.0
617.1
60.1
615.8
616.6
90.0
616.1
617.1
62.8
616.2
616.6
96.6
616.1
617.1
81.8
616.6
617.0
99.2
616.7
617.1
85.9
616.1
617.0
106.6
616.9
617.2
95.6
616.0
617.0
110.8
616.2
617.2
99.0
616.7
617.1
115.0
616.2
617.2
108.4
616.7
617.3
119.6
616.9
617.2
112.3
616.3
617.3
128.3
617.2
617.5
116.9
616.5
617.3
133.1
616.6
617.6
119.7
617.1
617.3
135.2
616.7
617.6
128.8
617.2
617.6
139.3
617.2
617.6
132.3
616.7
617.6
Cripple Creek - Year 5 (2015) Profile - Tributary 1
100 150 200
Distance (feet)
Year 1 (2011) Bed -Year 2 (2012) Bed
62 I.0 619.4 0 19.K 338..
-it<-Year 3 (2013) Bed
250
Year 4 (2014) Bed
300
-*--Year 5 (2015) Bed
350
400
2011
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0161
0.0164
0.0159
0.0164
0.0157
0.0157
Riffle Length
10
8
8
10
9
10
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0232
- - - - --
0.0263
0.0221
0.0261
0.0257
Pool Length
it
13
11
11
12
11
Avg. Pool Slope
-----
------
------
------
------
------
-*--Year 5 (2015) Bed
350
400

Name Cripple Creek - Year 5 (2015) Profile
Tributary 2
Profile
3/31/15
Station
0.0
9.8
17.9
22.7
28.4
29.3
36.0
41.1
45.2
51.4
54.1
58.8
61.0
64.9
66.2
72.2
78.0
81.4
87.5
93.9
96.4
102.6
110.1
112.5
116.9
119.6
126.4
R
w
O
O
W
2011
As -built
Bed Elevation Water Elevati i
603.9
604.2
603.8
604.3
604.1
604.4
603.5
604.4
603.4
604.4
604.8
604.9
604.8
605.1
604.9
605.2
604.4
605.2
604.5
605.2
604.8
605.2
605.0
605.3
604.4
605.4
603.5
605.3
605.7
605.8
605.5
605.9
605.8
605.9
605.0
606.0
605.4
606.0
605.6
606.2
606.2
606.5
606.3
606.6
606.4
606.8
606.1
606.8
605.9
606.8
606.6
606.8
606.7
607.0
622
620
618
616
614
612
610
608
606
604
602
600
0
2012
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Station
2011
Water Elevation
-8.5
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
603.9
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
1019.2
620.1
604.0
1013.6
619.7
619.7
1005.3
619.3
619.7
1000.6
619.2
603.2
996.4
619.5
604.7
987.9
619.6
604.5
973.3
619.2
604.8
967.5
619.3
605.0
956.9
619.1
603.8
952.5
618.5
619.3
947.0
618.3
619.3
943.4
619.1
605.6
934.0
618.9
605.1
928.6
618.3
619.2
926.3
618.3
619.2
920.9
618.8
619.2
913.7
618.8
606.4
906.8
618.8
605.9
903.2
617.8
618.5
901.0
617.9
618.5
897.5
618.2
606.5
886.7
618.0
606.6
877.9
618.0
606.3
873.9
617.4
618.0
871.5
617.4
618.0
868A
617.7
4623
617.8
2012
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
-8.5
602.8
603.9
-5.0
603.9
603.9
5.6
604.0
604.4
14.0
604.1
604.5
20.5
603.5
604.5
24.2
603.2
604.5
25.4
604.7
604.8
39.6
604.5
605.0
47.0
604.8
605.0
52.6
605.0
605.2
57.6
603.8
605.2
60.6
603.5
605.2
62.0
605.6
605.6
74.1
605.6
605.8
77.6
605.1
605.8
79.8
605.6
605.8
85.2
605.4
605.8
93.2
606.1
606.3
107.2
606.4
606.7
110.6
605.9
606.7
111.9
606.0
606.7
114.7
606.5
606.7
121.8
606.5
606.9
131.2
606.6
606.9
134.8
606.3
606.9
137.8
606.4
606.9
142.4
606.6
607.0
2013
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
-2.2
603.9
604.3
15.4
604.2
604.9
19.8
603.6
604.8
24.0
603.3
604.9
27.0
603.2
604.9
28.1
604.6
604.9
39.6
604.7
605.2
53.2
604.9
605.5
57.2
604.3
605.5
61.6
603.5
605.6
63.0
605.5
605.5
74.3
605.4
606.2
79.6
605.2
606.2
85.2
605.3
606.2
88.0
605.4
606.2
94.2
606.1
606.4
105.7
606.6
606.9
109.4
606.1
607.0
113.4
606.0
607.0
115.2
606.5
607.0
1311
606.5
607.2
146.9
606.8
607.4
153.3
606.3
607.5
156.6
606.4
607.5
160.0
607.0
607.5
170.9
607.1
607.6
177.8
607.1
607.7
2014
Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
-1.0
604.0
604.3
14.9
604.4
605.1
18.9
604.0
605.1
253
603.4
605.1
28.0
604.6
605.1
39.9
604.9
605.3
43.4
604.5
605.3
47.7
604.8
605.3
50.2
605.1
605.4
54.6
605.1
605.4
57.4
604.4
605.4
62.8
603.7
605.4
63.7
605.7
605.8
80.6
605.4
606.1
84.2
605.5
606.1
87.4
605.8
606.1
97.5
606.2
606.6
106.8
606.6
607.0
110.8
606.1
607.1
116.5
606.4
607.1
119.0
606.6
607.1
132.0
606.7
607.2
136.2
606.4
607.2
138.5
606.4
607.3
143.0
606.9
607.3
151.9
606.8
607.4
153.8
606.5
607.4
Cripple Creek - Year 5 (2015) Profile - Tributary 2
100 200 300 400 500
BAs -built (2011) Bed -Year 1 (2011) Bed -Year 2 (2012) Bed Year 3 (2013) Bed
600
2015
Year 5 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
-1.0
604.0
604.3
16.0
604.3
605.0
21.2
603.8
605.0
27.8
603..5
605.0
28.8
604.8
605.0
41.0
605.0
605.3
43.7
604.4
605.3
47.9
604.5
605.3
49.9
605.0
605.3
55.6
605.0
605.6
58.2
604.5
605.6
64.5
605.7
605.9
84.5
605.5
606.1
107.2
606.6
606.9
110.7
606.1
607.0
114.3
6063
607.0
116.8
606.5
606.9
132.5
606.7
607.1
135.7
606.5
607.2
139.5
606.5
607.2
142.0
606.9
607.2
151.5
606.9
607.3
154.4
606.4
607.3
157.4
606.4
607.3
160.2
607.0
607.3
182.0
607.5
607.7
185.1
606.9
607.7
Year 4 (2014) Bed
700
fYeaar 5 (2015) Bed
800
+Year 5 (2015) Water Surface
900
1000
2011
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0158
0.0156
0.0159
0.0157
0.0159
0.0159
Riffle Length
15
17
12
19
14
17
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0180
- - - - --
0.0203
0.0193
0.0201
0.0204
Pool Length
11
13
10
12
10
10
Avg. Pool Slope
------
------
------
------
------
------
800
+Year 5 (2015) Water Surface
900
1000

Station
Elevation
Cape Fear
Cripple Creek
XS -1
Riffle
3/31/2015
619
w 618
------ - - -- --
0
�
W 617
616
0
..
:..
e
Stream Type C/E
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 1
------------ - - - - -- ----------------------
10
Station (feet)
I
-
---- Bankfull
- -- -Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2011
t MY -01
t MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
�20
MY -05
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Feature
Date:
Field Crew:
Perkinson,Jernigan
8.6
617.23
9.2
617.31
9.9
617.30
10.6
617.28
11.2
617.34
12.2
617.66
12.9
618.00
16.0
618.22
18.4
618.18
20.2
618.23
Station
Elevation
0.0
618.12
3.4
618.06
6.1
617.92
7.1
Field Crew:
Perkinson,Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.0
618.12
3.4
618.06
6.1
617.92
7.1
617.84
8.2
617.43
8.6
617.23
9.2
617.31
9.9
617.30
10.6
617.28
11.2
617.34
12.2
617.66
12.9
618.00
16.0
618.22
18.4
618.18
20.2
618.23
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
617.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
2.4
Bankfull Width:
6.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
618.5
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Banki'ull:
0.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
I5.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
16.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
Creek
XS ID
XS -2
Watershed:
Pool
Cripple
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
13.24
615.37
14.19
615.59
14.92
616.25
16.59
616.41
17.80
616.59
19.84
617.00
22.43
617.23
29.57
617.29
Stream Type E/C
Cape Fear River Basin,
Cripple Creek, XS - 2
618
617
c
0
----Bankfull
-� As -Built 2011
w 616
t MY -01
t MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
615
0
10
20
MY -05
30
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.00
Creek
XS ID
XS -2
Feature
Pool
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
617.22
6.33
617.38
10.25
617.37
11.96
616.23
12.80
615.55
13.24
615.37
14.19
615.59
14.92
616.25
16.59
616.41
17.80
616.59
19.84
617.00
22.43
617.23
29.57
617.29
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
617.2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
8.8
Bankfull Width:
12.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
619.1
Flood Prone Width:
- - - --
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
- - - --
Entrenchment Ratio:
- - - --
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Station
Elevation
Cape Fear
Cripple Creek
XS -3
Riffle
y`.
6.8
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Feature
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
11.6
614.98
12.4
614.86
13.3
614.83
14.3
614.92
16.1
615.00
17.5
614.95
18.6
615.31
19.8
616.04
21.1
616.40
22.6
k
26.9
616.39
29.7
616.21
td.
s
Stream Type E/C
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 3
618
c
616
m
------------ - - - - -� - - - - -
----Bankfull
-�
- -- • Flood Prone Area
w
-� As -Built 2011
.. MY -01
t MY -02
MY -03
614
0
10 20
Station (feet)
MY -04
30
MY -05
Station
Elevation
0.0
615.56
6.8
615.99
9.1
615.83
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.0
615.56
6.8
615.99
9.1
615.83
9.9
615.72
10.6
615.41
11.6
614.98
12.4
614.86
13.3
614.83
14.3
614.92
16.1
615.00
17.5
614.95
18.6
615.31
19.8
616.04
21.1
616.40
22.6
616.47
26.9
616.39
29.7
616.21
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
615.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
7.0
Bankfull Width:
10.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
616.8
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
14.9
Entrenchment Ratio:
9.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

SUMMARY DATA
Elevation
614.3
614.1
614.1
613.5
613.3
613.0
612.9
613.0
613.2
613.5
613.8
614.2
614.1
614.0
Cape Fear
Cripple Creek
XS -4
Riffle
3/31/2015
Perkinson, Jernigan
616
615 --------------------------------------------------------------------
c
2 614 - - - - - -_
u
w
613
612
0
b,
-
i
Stream Type
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 4
10
Station (feet)
i
At
E/C
20
----Bankfull
- -- -Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2011
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
30
MY -04
MY -05
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Featuer
Date:
Field Crew:
Station
0.0
6.5
9.4
11.7
13.0
14.7
15.6
17.1
17.8
18.7
19.6
21.6
24.7
29.9
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
613.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
6.3
Bankfull Width:
10.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
614.9
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
613.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
6.3
Bankfull Width:
10.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
614.9
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
17.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
9.6
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

SUMMARY DATA
Elevation
622.3
622.5
622.4
622.1
622.0
621.9
621.7
621.6
622.1
622.3
622.3
621.9
Cape Fear
Cripple Creek
XS -5
Riffle
ll
624
-----------------
623
CD
c g 622
co
w
621
620
0
�• j ,,,.
Stream Type C
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 5
--------------------------------------------------
10
Station (feet)
,
----Bankfull
- - -• Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2011
� MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Feature
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Station
0.0
4.2
8.5
9.8
11.1
11.5
12.0
12.8
13.5
13.9
17.0
23.6
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
622.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
1.9
Bankfu Width:
8.2
e
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
622.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
1.9
Bankfu Width:
8.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
623.1
Flood Prone Width:
50.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.2
W / D Ratio:
35.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.1
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Station E
Elevation
Cape Fear
Cripple
Creek
XS ID
River Basin:
Watershed:
Pool
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
d
:r
'y
e.'
Stream Type
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 6
621
620
W 619
----Bankfull
-A- As -Built 2011
Iw
t MY -01
- MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
618
0
10
MY -05
Station (feet)
Station E
Elevation
-0.6 6
Creek
XS ID
XS -6
Feature
Pool
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station E
Elevation
-0.6 6
620.3
4.6 6
620.0
7.1 6
619.9
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 619.7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 4.3
Bankfu Width: 6.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation: - - --
Flood Prone Width: - - - --
Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6
W / D Ratio: - - --
Entrenchment Ratio: - - - --
Wank Height Ratio: 1.0

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
618.9
4.9
Watershed:
7.7
Cripple Creek
Date:
3/31/2015
XS ID
Perkinson,Jernigan
XS - 7
618.2
10.9
Feature
11.5
Riffle
12.0
618.2
12.6
618.3
13.2
618.2
14.2
618.7
15.4
618.8
18.8
619.0
24.1
618.9
i`
r=
s.
Stream Type C
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 7
620
------------------------------------------------------------------
c
619
u
----Bankfull
w
- -- •Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2011
MY -01
�- MY -02
618
MY -03
0
10
MY -04
Station (feet)
MY -05
Station
Elevation
0.0
618.9
4.9
618.9
7.7
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson,Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.0
618.9
4.9
618.9
7.7
618.8
8.7
618.7
9.3
618.4
10.4
618.2
10.9
618.3
11.5
618.3
12.0
618.2
12.6
618.3
13.2
618.2
14.2
618.7
15.4
618.8
18.8
619.0
24.1
618.9
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
618.7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
2.1
Bankfull Width:
5.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
619.3
Flood Prone Width:
50.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
14.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
9.1
Bank Height Ratio:
0.9

SUMMARY DATA
Elevation
617.7
617.5
617.5
617.1
616.7
617.0
617.0
617.0
617.1
617.4
617.7
618.0
618.1
618.3
Cape Fear
Cripple Creek
XS -8
Riffle
619
--------------------------------------------------
c
0
Z 618 -- - - - - --
0
w
617
0
-
- 4.
..._
Stream Type C
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 8
---- - - - - -- -------- -
10
Station (feet)
_ *F
_
- - -- Bankfull
- - - -- - - - - Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2011
MY -01
t MY -02
MY -03
2 MY -04
MY -05
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Feature
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Station
-0.3
4.9
8.2
9.3
9.7
10.6
11.2
11.4
12.0
13.3
14.7
16.4
19.3
23.6
SUMMARY DATA
Banldull Elevation:
617.5
Banldull Cross - Sectional Area:
1.9
Bankfull Width:
5.3
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Banldull Elevation:
617.5
Banldull Cross - Sectional Area:
1.9
Bankfull Width:
5.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
618.3
Flood Prone Width:
15.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
14.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

SUMMARY DATA
Elevation
611.68
612.25
612.12
612.08
611.72
610.67
610.40
610.42
610.61
610.87
611.32
611.75
612.18
612.41
612.51
612.83
Cape Fear
Cripple
Depth
613
w 612 --- - - - - --
5
0
�
W 611
610
0
_
Stream Type -
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 9
- - ----------------- -----------------------
10 20
Station (feet)
1
-- Bankfull
•Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2011
t MY -01
t MY -02
MY -03
MY -04 30
MY -05
River Basin:
Watershed:
Pool
Date:
3/31 /2015
Field Crew:
Station
0.0
7.0
9.9
10.7
11.7
12.2
13.3
14.0
14.8
15.5
16.4
17.8
19.8
21.7
25.6
30.6
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
612.1
Creek
XS ID
XS - 9
Feature
Pool
Date:
3/31 /2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson,Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
612.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
7.6
Bankfull Width:
8.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.7
Mean at Bankfull:
0.9
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
Creek
XS ID
XS -10
Watershed:
Date:
Cripple
Field Crew:
Parkinson, Jernigan
13.03
ff
14.44
610.78
14.96
610.56
15.71
610.39
S
610.51
16.68
610.57
17.26
610.60
17.75
•
18.62
610.68
19.65
610.87
20.91
611.62
��
611.68
26.23
611.83
30.25
611.54
,'
``
i Y
'I
�;
I
r
J
4',
wa
.�
Stream Type
E/C
Cape Fear River Basin,
Cripple Creek,
XS - 10
613
612
I'
C
O
7777%
---- Bankfull
w 611
- - - - Flood Prone Area
-r As -Built 2011
t MY -01
MY -02
610
MY -03
0
10
20 30
MY -04
Station (feet)
MY -05
Station
Elevation
0.00
Creek
XS ID
XS -10
Feature
Riffle
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Parkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
611.31
4.65
611.39
8.33
611.52
10.47
611.35
11.65
610.73
13.03
610.67
14.44
610.78
14.96
610.56
15.71
610.39
16.21
610.51
16.68
610.57
17.26
610.60
17.75
610.58
18.62
610.68
19.65
610.87
20.91
611.62
22.69
611.68
26.23
611.83
30.25
611.54
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
611.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
6.5
Bankfull Width:
10.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
612.4
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
16.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
9.6
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Station
Elevation
Cape Fear
Cripple
612
611
c
2 610 --------------
u
w
609
608
0
°q
n
Stream Type E/C
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 11
_ _
- - - - -- ------------------ - - - - --
10 20
Station (feet)
r
I
-.
-------- - - - --
----Bankfull
- -- •Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2011
MY -01
�- MY -02
MY -03
30
MY -04
MY -05
River Basin:
Watershed:
Riffle
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
11.1
608.73
12.1
608.43
13.3
608.31
14.8
608.30
16.2
608.32
17.4
608.36
18.9
608.51
19.6
608.68
20.7
608.98
21.7
609.35
24.0
609.51
27.4
609.62
30.2
609.42
Station
Elevation
0.0
Creek
XS ID
XS -11
Feature
Riffle
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.0
609.73
4.7
609.97
7.6
609.87
9.0
609.71
10.2
609.09
11.1
608.73
12.1
608.43
13.3
608.31
14.8
608.30
16.2
608.32
17.4
608.36
18.9
608.51
19.6
608.68
20.7
608.98
21.7
609.35
24.0
609.51
27.4
609.62
30.2
609.42
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
609.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
9.6
Bankfull Width:
12.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
610.5
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.1
Mean Depth at Banldull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
15.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
8.1
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

SUMMARY DATA
Elevation
610.9
611.1
611.1
610.8
610.5
610.4
610.4
610.5
610.6
611.0
611.0
611.0
610.8
Cape Fear
Cripple Creek
XS -12
Riffle
Bankfull Eleva
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
Bankfu
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
Bank Height Ratio:
612
--------------------------------------------------------------------
c
0
u
W ----------
610
0
c
2.1
"
50.0
0.6
0.4
a
"
1.0
Stream Type C
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 12
- - - - -- ----- ---------
Station (feet)
10
----Bankfull
---• Flood Prone Area
As -Built 2011
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05 20
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Featuer
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Station
0.0
3.9
6.7
8.1
8.9
9.9
10.6
11.3
12.3
13.2
14.5
17.1
20.3
SUMMARY DATA
Elevation: on:
611.0
ll Width:
6.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Elevation: on:
611.0
ll Width:
6.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
611.6
W / D Ratio:
17.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
8.3

SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
Cape Fear
Cripple
Creek
N" j
River Basin:
Watershed:
Pool
Date:
Elevation
Field Crew:
:.
IGII
W.&I,
- _ -
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
Station
0.0
606.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
6.0
606.4
}.
10.6
606.2
12.7
606.2
14.0
606.0
14.5
605.5
- .
15.3
605.1
16.0
605.0
16.7
604.8
18.1
604.8
18.7
605.9
19.4
606.7
Stream Type
20.9
607.1
24.4
606.7
26.0
606.4
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 13
30.3
606.2
608
607
I'
606
u
---- Bankfull
- - -• Flood Prone Area
w
605
-� As -Built 2011
MY -01
t MY -02
MY -03
604
0
10 20
MY -04
MY -05 30
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
606.2
Creek
XS ID
XS -13
Feature
Pool
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
606.2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
5.5
Bankfull Width:
6.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Cripple Creek
XS ID
XS - 14
Feature
Riffle
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.0
605.1
6.6
605.0
8.9
604.8
10.5
604.4
11.7
604.0
12.5
604.0
14.6
604.0
16.3
603.9
17.6
604.0
18.7
603.8
19.3
604.4
20.6
604.9
21.2
605.1
24.0
605.1
26.7
605.0
30.0
605.1
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
604.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
7.8
Bankfull Width:
11.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
605.8
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
17.0
Entrenchment Ratio:
8.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
606
605
ID
C
O
w 604
603 +
0
Stream Type I E/C
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 14
10
Station (feet)
----Bankfull
- - Flood Prone Area
-�- As -Built 2011
�- MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
E MY -04
MY -05

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
604.7
Watershed:
Cripple Creek
Date:
3/31/2015
XS ID
Perkinson, Jernigan
XS - 15
Feature
Riffle
✓ff f'
e.
Stream Type E/C
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 15
606
605
-
c
2 604
m ____________________
_______________________
----Bankfull
°1
w
- - -• Flood Prone Area
-A- As -Built 2011
603
t MY -01
t MY -02
MY -03
602
0
10 20
MY -04 30
Station (feet)
MY -05
Station E
Elevation
0.0 6
604.7
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station E
Elevation
0.0 6
604.7
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevaon: 603.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 8.5
Bankfull Width: 11.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 605.0
Flood Prone Width: 100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7
W / D Ratio: 15.8
Entrenchment Ratio: 8.6
Bank Height Ratio: 1.0

Elevation
602.6
602.5
602.1
602.0
601.8
600.1
599.1
599.4
599.5
599.8
600.8
601.1
601.3
601.9
602.4
602.7
Cape Fear
Cripple
SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation:
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
603
602 -------------
601
c
0
w
600
599
0
601.9
13.3
12.1
-
-
2.8
1.1
-
-
1.0
Stream Type -
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 16
- - -- -- -------------------- - - - - --
10 20
Station (feet)
5
~'
- - - - - -- - - - --
- - -- Bankfull
-Flood Prone Area
-r As -Built 2011
-0-my-01
- MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05 30
River Basin:
Watershed:
Pool
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Station
0.0
5.1
8.5
10.3
10.4
11.9
13.0
14.1
14.6
15.3
16.0
16.7
18.5
23.0
27.2
29.7
Creek
XS ID
XS -16
Feature
Pool
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan

SUMMARY DATA
Elevation
619.03
618.89
618.55
618.26
617.87
617.76
617.85
617.84
617.87
618.13
618.27
618.51
618.78
619.10
619.38
619.83
Cape Fear
Cripple Creek
XS -17
Riffle
621
w 620
------------
0
�
d ���������-----
W 618
617
0
i
1 ..
Stream Type E/C
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 17
------------------------- - -- - --
- - - - -� ����������� �����������
�
10
Station (feet)
---- - - -- - --
-- Bankfull
��� • Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2011
t MY -01
t MY -02
MY -03
2 MY -04
MY -05
Bankfull Width:
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Feature
Field Crew:
Perkinson,Jernigan
Station
0.0
4.7
7.8
9.6
10.1
11.1
11.8
12.5
13.0
13.7
14.6
15.4
16.7
17.6
20.1
23.8
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
618.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
3.1
Bankfull Width:
7.2
Date:
3/31 /2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson,Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
618.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
3.1
Bankfull Width:
7.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
619.2
Flood Prone Width:
50.0
Max Depth at Bankiull:
0.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
16.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Cripple Creek
XS ID
XS -18
Feature
Pool
Date:
3/31/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
615.42
6.78
615.71
8.35
615.67
9.46
615.47
10.71
615.39
11.44
615.32
12.04
614.75
12.48
614.44
12.84
614.25
13.31
614.27
13.97
614.39
14.39
614.92
14.97
615.21
16.17
615.72
17.82
615.99
20.14
616.49
23.96
616.86
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
615.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
2.9
Bankfull Width:
5.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
618
617
_ 616
c
0
615
w
614
613
Stream TYP F, /C
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 18
---.Bankfull
-�- As -Built 2011
t MY -01
t MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
10 MY -05
Station (feet)
'+ L v P
r t
�a �t
Stream TYP F, /C
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 18
---.Bankfull
-�- As -Built 2011
t MY -01
t MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
10 MY -05
Station (feet)

SUMMARY DATA
Elevation
618.10
618.10
617.71
617.33
617.08
616.93
617.23
617.30
617.50
617.89
618.34
618.86
Cape Fear
Cripple Creek
XS -19
Riffle
3/31/2015
Perkinson, Jernigan
619
618
c
0
w 617
616
0
Stream Type E/C
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 19
________________ _________________---
10
Station (feet)
Bankfull Flood - -- -Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2011
t MY -01
MY -02
MY -04
MY -05
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Feature
Date:
Field Crew:
Station
0.0
6.0
8.7
10.5
11.1
11.6
12.3
12.9
13.7
15.0
19.8
24.0
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
617.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
3.3
Bankfull Width:
7.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
618.9
Flood Prone Width:
50.0
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
617.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
3.3
Bankfull Width:
7.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
618.9
Flood Prone Width:
50.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
17.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.6
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

SUMMARY DATA
Elevation
620.9
620.3
620.2
620.1
619.6
619.5
619.4
619.6
619.5
619.7
620.3
620.7
621.2
621.6
Cape Fear
Cripple Creek
XS -20
Riffle
3/31/2015
Perkinson, Jernigan
622
---------------------------------------------------------
2 620
w
618
0
Stream Type E
Cape Fear River Basin, Cripple Creek, XS - 20
10
Station (feet)
- - -• Bankfull
- - -• Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2011
t MY -01
t MY -02
MY -03 20
MY -04
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Featuer
Flood Prone Width:
Field Crew:
Station
0.0
4.1
7.1
8.7
10.0
11.3
12.1
12.9
13.8
15.1
16.3
18.6
21.2
24.5
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
620.2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
3.8
Bankfull Width:
8.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
620.9
Flood Prone Width:
50.0
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
620.2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
3.8
Bankfull Width:
8.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
620.9
Flood Prone Width:
50.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
W / D Ratio:
18.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

APPENDIX D
HYDROLOGY DATA
2015 Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Annual Monitoring Report
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
Appendices

Cripple Creek Groundwater Gauge 1
Year 5 (2015 Data)
12
10
October
22
8
April
18
Growing
Season
6
Growing
Season
End
4
2
0
-2
I
y -4
v -6
J
I
v -8
56 Days
3 -10
c -12
'o -14
-16
-18
-20
22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
A
A
A
In
In
In
In
01
a)
a)
Ol
V
V
V
V
V
00
00
00
00
W
l0
l0
l0
W
F+
N
F+ N
N
N
N
0)
N
N
N
W
N
F\-�
N
N
0000
N
N
N
l\A
N
N
N
N
l\O
N
N
W
lA
In
lA
Vi
In
Vi
In
lA
In
In
lJl
In
In
lA
In
In
In
In
lA
I-+
N N
1.2
1.0
c
0.8
c
3
0
E
M
0.6
m
oc
0.4
0.2
0.0

12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
v -4
-6
v -8
3 -10
c -12
P -14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
A A A ll1 Vt Vl Vt 01 01 01 Ol V V V V V 00 00 00 00 lD l0 lD l0 lD 0 0 0 0
VI N N lJl F-� N N N 1p N N W
O O O O
W N N 111 N F+ N 111 f+ U1 N V1 lfl N F+ N 111 N F+ F+ lfl V1 h+ W h+ W
Vl 111 V1 lft 111 Vt Vt lfl Vt lft 111 Vt Vt 111 Vt 111 V1 lfl V1 W L Vl + W
Vl Vt
Cripple Creek Groundwater Gauge 2
Year 5 (2015 Data)
1.2
1.0
0.8
c
a
m
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0

Cripple Creek Groundwater Gauge 3
Year 5 (2015 Data)
12
10
8
6
I
I
Growing
April
Start
18
Season
4
2
_ 0
2
-4
v
J
-6
O1
m
-8
3
c -10
P -12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
N N
Vt N
v Vt
N
ID
ut
O1
Ln
W W
Ln
N
O
Ln
N W CD
V O
Ln
Vt Vt
FJ
V
Ln
N
A
ut
F� 00 N N N U, N N N N l0 N N W
0 0 0 0
v N tD N W m O W O V F+ N N
� A F+ 00
VI In I--� - - Vt F+ N F+ Vt Ul F+ N H+ F+
Vt Ln Vt ut Ln Vt Ln ut Ln
V1 V1 V1
1.2
1.0
2
0.8 c
3
O
E
a
c
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0

12
10
8
6
4
2
0
c -2
-4
-6
a -8
3 -10
v
-12
° -14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
A
N
April 18 Cripple Creek Groundwater Gauge 4
Growing Season Year 5 (2015 Data)
Start
A A In In In In m O1 m 0) V V V V V 00 00 00 00 lL) W W W W - - - -
N N 00) F\-� N N W F\+ F\+ N F\-� 0000 F\-� N N V\i I\-� F\-� N N W - N W
N lD W O V O V A lf� N l0 N l0 Ol Ql W O V 1� N N
1.2
1.0
c
0.8
0
0
E
m
c
0.4
0.2
0.0

Cripple Creek Groundwater Gauge 5
Year 5 (2015 Data)
12
10
April
18
October
22
8
I
Growing
Season
Growing
Season
6
I
Start
End
4
L—oo!A
2
_ 0
-2
-4
-6
8
126
Days
3 -10
-12
0 -14
-16
-18
-20
-22
24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
V
N
N
Ol
N
W
N
N
N
v
N
N
111
N
N
W
N
N
N
l0
N
m
N
W
0
0
0 0
N
F+
N
N
VI
F+
f+
F+
V1
-
F+
-
F+
-
f+
V1
lfl
N
N
F+
lfl
N
111
111
N
F+
A
N oNo
111
lfl
Vt
l!1
111
Vl
111
lfl
Vt
111
Vt
V1
U1
lfl
V1
Vt
W
lf1
v
U1
Vl
V1
111
F+
N
V F+
V,
1.2
1.0
E
0.8
'o
E
a
c
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0

12
10
8
6
4
2
_ 0
2
-4
-6
a -8
m
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
p a
N N
N N
V1 V1
April 18 Cripple Creek Groundwater Gauge 6
Growing Season Year 5 (2015 Data)
Start
N 0) N N N W N N N N W N N N v N N N N ID N N W \ \ \ \
I N W 0 _ N 0 - N N O N D m N N 0 A N N
N W N N N Ln N N N W W N N N V1 N N N V1 V1 N N N N \ \ \
V1 VI W V1 V1 v v Ln lfl V1 VI V1 V1 V1 VI V1 V1 N N N
V1 lfl V1
1.2
1.0
c
0.8
0
E
a
c
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0

12
10
8
6
4
2
_ 0
2
-4
-6
-8
3 -10
m
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
LnA A
F+ N
W F+
N (P
Cripple Creek Groundwater Gauge Reference
Year 5 (2015 Data)
A In In In In 01 Ol 01 \ Ol V V V V \ V 00 00 00 \
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O O
N Ol W N N W 0 F+ N F+ 00 F+ N N V1 F� F+ N N l0 F+ N W \ \ \ \
0 -4 F+ V1 F+ F+ W V1 F+ W L+ V1 V1 F+ F+ W V1 F+ F+ W V1 V1 F+ F+ W F+ \ \ \
V1 VI lJl V1 V1 V1 V1 VI l!1 V1 VI lJl V1 V1 V1 (!1 In � � �
1.2
1.0
c
0.8
0
E
c
0.6 m
0.4
0.2
0.0

Appendix E.
Benthic Data
2015 Results
Habitat Assessment Field Datasheets
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, CRIPPLE CREEK, ALAMANCA CO., NC, 6/21/2015.
SPECIES
T.V.
F.F.G.
PA47263
PA47264
PA47265
Main
Tributary
Reference
MOLLUSCA
Gastropoda
Basommatophora
Planorbidae
SC
Helisoma anceps
6.6
SC
2
ANNELIDA
Clitellata
Oligochaeta
CG
Tubificida
Naididae
Tubificinae w.h.c.
CG
2
Tubificinae w.o.h.c.
CG
1
ARTHROPODA
Arachnoidea
Acariformes
Crustacea
Cladocera
Daphnidae
Ceriodaphnia sp.
1
Copepoda
Cyclopoida
2
Decapoda
Cambaridae
Cambarus sp.
7.5
CG
1
Procambarus sp.
9.3
SH
1
Insecta
Collembola
1
Ephemeroptera
Leptophlebiidae
CG
Paraleptophlebia sp.
1.2
CG
1
Odonata
Aeshnidae
P
Aeshna sp.
P
1
Basiaeschna Janata
7.1
2
Boyeria vinosa
5.8
P
2
Calopterygidae
P
Calopteryx sp.
7.5
P
1
Coenagrionidae
P
Argia sp.
8.3
P
2
Ischnura sp.
9.5
21
Gomphidae
P
Stylogomphus albistylus
5
P
1
Libellulidae
P
Libellula sp.
9.4
P
1
PAI, Inc. Page 1 of 2 CrippleCrl<_Benthics_2015.xlsx

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, CRIPPLE CREEK, ALAMANCA CO., NC, 6/21/2015.
SPECIES
T.V.
F.F.G.
PA47263
PA47264
PA47265
Main
Tributary
Reference
Neurocordulia sp.
5.3
1
Hemiptera
Gerridae
P
Aquarius sp.
P
1
Macroveliidae
Macrovelia sp.
2
Veliidae
P
1
Microvelia sp.
P
2
Megaloptera
Sialidae
P
Sialis sp.
7
P
8
8
Coleoptera
Dryopidae
Helichus sp.
4.1
SC
1
Hydrophilidae
P
Cymbiodyta sp.
CG
2
Hydrochara sp.
CG
2
Paracymus sp.
CG
6
Anacaena suturalis
4
Scirtidae
SC
Scirtes sp.
2
Diptera
Chironomidae
Brillia flavifrons
3.9
SH
1
Clinotanypus sp.
7.8
P
2
Dicrotendipes neomodestus
7.9
CG
2
Phaenopsectra punctipes gp.
7.1
1
Polypedilum illinoense gp.
8.7
SH
2
Procladius sp.
8.8
P
1
7
1
Dixidae
CG
Dixella sp.
CG
4
Ptychopteridae
Bittacomorpha sp.
5
TOTAL NO. OF ORGANISMS
52
37
20
TOTAL NO. OF TAXA
17
12
10
EPT TAXA
0
0
1
BIOTIC INDEX Assigned Values
8.63
7.60
5.90
PAI, Inc. Page 2 of 2 CrippleCrl<_Benthics_2015.xlsx

3106 Revision 6
Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Mountain/ Piedmont Streams
Biological Assessment Unit, DWQ [OTAIL SCORE �I
Directions for use: The observer is to survey a minimum of 100 meters with 200 meters preferred of stream, preferably in an
upstream direction starting above the bridge pool and the road right-of-way. The segment which is assessed should represent average
stream conditions. To perform a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the stream. To complete the form, select the
description which best fits the observed habitats and then circle the score. If the observed habitat falls in between two descriptions,
select an intermediate score. A final habitat score is determined by adding the results from the different metrics.
Streams '����< ^� - Location/road: 5 ' ,,::'` (Road Name )County kd'' °`' e
Date ( Z pS CC# 035""17-
Observers) a«� ype of Study: ❑ Fish
Basin
Subbasin 63 - 06
laBenthos ❑ Basinwide ❑Special Study (Describe)
Latitude 3(,,13567C, Longitude – ?". 22 '=r Ecoregion: ❑ MT �(P ❑ Slate Belt l=1 Triassic Basin
Water Quality: Temperature — °C DO - mgll Conductivity (corr.) pS /cm pH
Physical Characterization: Visible land use refers to immediate area that you can see from sampling location - include what
you estimate driving thru the watershed in watershed land use.
Visible Land Use: r 7 %Forest %Residential %Active Pasture % Active Crops
�{0 %Fallow Fields % Commercial %Industrial � %Other - Describe
Watershed land use: OForest 6Agriculture ❑Urban ❑ Animal operations upstream
Width: (meters) Stream '/-,(I Channel (at top of bank) Stream Depth: (m) Avg.? _Max
❑ Width variable ❑ Large river 725m wide
Bank Height (from deepest part of riffle to top of bank -first flat surface you stand on): (m)
Bank Angle: (y- . or ❑ NA (Vertical is 9W, horizontal is V. Angles , 90° indicate slope is towards mid - channel, < 900
indicate slope is away from channel. NA if bank is too low for bank angle to matter.)
❑ Channelized Ditch
❑Deeply incised- steep, straight banks ❑Both banks undercut at bend ❑Channel filled in with sediment
El Recent overbank deposits ❑Bar development ❑Buried structures []Exposed bedrock
❑ Excessive periphyton growth n ❑ Heavy filamentous algae' growth ❑Green tinge ❑ Sewage smell
Manmade Stabilization: ON t3Y- ❑Rip -rap, cement, gabions 1 Sediment/grade- control structure ❑Bermllevee
Flow conditions: ❑high `ormal ❑Low,
Turbidity: MClear ❑ Slightly Turbid ❑Turbid ❑Tannic ❑Milky ❑Colored (from dyes)
Good potential for Wetlands Restoration Project ?? DYES ONO Details
Channel Flow Status
Useful especially under abnormal or iow flow conditions.
A. Water reaches base of bath lower banks, minimal channel substrate exposed ............................ A
B. Water fills 575% of available channel, or <25% of channel substrate is exposed ........................ ❑
C. Water fills 25 -75% of available channel, many logs/snags exposed .............. ............................... ❑
D. Root mats out of water .................................................................................... ............................... ❑
E. Very little water in channel, mostly present as standing pools ...................... ............................... ❑
Weather Conditions: H- <"o f-* , Irh Photos: ❑N by Cl Digital 035mm .
Remarks:
39

1. Channel Modification Score
A. channel natural, frequent bends ........................................................ ................ .................................
B. channel natural, infrequent mends (channelization could be ofd) ....................... ............................... 4
C. some channelization present ............................................................................... ............................... 3
D. more extensive channelization, X40 %a of stream disrupted ................................ ............................... 2
E. no bends, completely channelized or rip rapped or gabioned, etc ...................... ............................... 0
® Evidence of dredging DEvidence of desnagging =no large woody debris in stream OBanks of uniform shape/height
Remarks Subtotal'
H. Instream Habitat: Consider the percentage of the reach that is favorable for benthos colonization or fish cover. If >70% of the
reach is rocks, 1 type is present, circle the score of 17. Definition: leafpacks consist of older leaves that are packed together and have
begun to decay (not piles of leaves in pool areas). Mark as Rare, Common, or Abundant.
ARocks t�. Macrophytes C Sticks and leafpacks rfL Snags and logs ('—' Undercut banks or root mats
AMOUNT OF REACH FAVORABLE FOR COLONIZATION OR COVER
Score
>70%
40 -70%
20-40%
<20%
3, embeddedness 40- 80% ........................................................................... ...............................
Score
Sco a
Score
Score
4 or 5 types present .................
20
12
8
3 types present .........................
19
15
11
7
2 types present .........................
18
14
10
6
1 type present ...........................
17
13
9
5
No types present .......................
0
2
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay .................................................................... ...............................
f 6
D No woody vegetation in riparian zone Remarks
Subtotal_ i
Subtotal
III. Bottom Substrate (silt, sand, detritus, gravel, cobble, boulder) Look at entire reach for substrate scoring, but only look at riffle
for embeddedness, and use rocks from all parts of riffle -look for "mud line" or difficulty extracting rocks.
A. substrate with good mix of gravel, cobble and boulders
Score
I . embeddedness <20% (very little sand, usually only behind large boulders ) .........................
15
2. embeddedness 204 0% ........................................................................... ...............................
12
3, embeddedness 40- 80% ........................................................................... ...............................
8
4. embeddedness > 80% .............................................................................. ...............................
3
B. substrate gravel and cobble
1. embeddedness E 20% ............................................................................. ...............................
2. embeddedness 20- 40% ................... __ ...... ............................................................................
1 l
3. embeddedness 40-80%..., ....................................................................................................
6
4. embeddedness > 80% ............................................................................. ...............................
2
C. substrate mostly gravel
1. embeddedness < 50% ............................................................................. ...............................
8
2. embeddedness > 50%,... ......................................................................... ...............................
4
D. substrate homogeneous
1. substrate nearly all bedrock .................................................................... ...............................
3
2. substrate nearly all sand ......................................................................... ...............................
3
3. substrate nearly all detritus ..................................................................... ...............................
2
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay .................................................................... ...............................
1 i
Remarks
Subtotal_ i
IV. Pool Variety Pools are areas of deeper than average maximum depths with little or no surface turbulence. Water velocities
associated with pools are always slow. Pools may take the form of "pocket water ", small pools behind boulders or obstructions, in
large high gradient streams, or side eddies.
A. Pools present Score
1. Pools Frequent ( >30% of 20(tn area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes ................................................................................ ...............................
b. pools about the same size (indicates pools filling in) ............................. ............................... 8
2. Pools Infrequent (t301/ of the 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes ................................................................................ ............................... 6
b. pools about the same size ....................................................................... ............................... 4
B. Pools absent ............................................................................................................. ............................... 0
Subtotal '
D Pool bottom boulder - cobble=hard Bottom sandy -sink as you walk D Silt bottom ❑ Some pools over wader depth
Remarks
Page Total Lj
40

Cr�fMArtiJ
V. Riffle Habitats
Definition: Riffle is area of reaeration -can be debris dam, or narrow channel area. Riffles Frequent Riffles Infrequent
Score Score
A. well defined riffle and run, riffle as wide as stream and extends 2X width of stream.... 12
B. riffle as wide as stream but riffle length is not 2X stream width ..... ............................... 14 7
C. riffle not as wide as stream and riffle length is not 2X stream width ............................. 10 3
D. riffles absent... ................................................................................. ............................... 0
Channel Slope,;EJTypical for area ®Steep =fast flow ❑Lov like a coastal stream Subtotal 16
V1. Bank Stability and Vegetation
FACE UPSTREAM Left Bank Rt. Bank
Score Score
A. Ranks stable /T\
1. little evidence of erosion or bank failure(except outside of bends), little potential for erosion (y
B. Erosion areas present
1. diverse trees, shrubs, grass; plants healthy with good root systems ...... ............................... 6 6
2. few trees or small trees and shrubs; vegetation appears generally healthy ........................... 5 5
3. sparse mixed vegetation; plant types and conditions suggest poorer soil binding ................. 3 3
4. mostly grasses, few if any trees and shrubs, high erosion and failure potential at high flow.. 2 2
5. little or no bank vegetation, mass erosion and bank failure evident ............ ............................... d 0
Total
Remarks
VII. Light Penetration Canopy is defined as tree or vegetative cover directly above the stream's surface. Canopy would block out
sunlight when the sun is directly overhead. Note shading from mountains, but not use to score this metric.
Score
Remarks
A. Stream with good canopy with some breaks for light penetration .............. ...............................
B. Stream with full canopy - breaks for light penetration absent ...................... ............................... 8-
C. Stream with partial canopy - sunlight and shading are essentially equal ..... ............................... 7
D. Stream with minimal canopy - full sun in all but a few areas ........................ ............................... 2
F. No canopy and no shading ............................................................... ............................... ........... 0
Subtotal
VIII. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Definition: Riparian zone for this form is area of natural vegetation adjacent to stream (can go beyond floodplain). Definition: A break
in the riparian zone is any place on the stream banks which allows sediment or pollutants to directly enter the stream, such as paths
down to stream, storm drains, uprooted trees, otter slides, etc.
FACE UPSTREAM Lft. Bank Rt. Bank
Dominant vegetation: P. Trees Z Shrubs b Grasses ❑ Weeds/old field ❑Exotics (kudzu, etc) Score Score
A. Riparian zone intact (no breaks)
1. width > 18 meters ...................................................... ...............................
S�
2. width 12 -18 meters .................................................... ...............................
4
4
3. width 6- 12 meters ...................................................... ...............................
3
3
4. width < b meters ....................................................... ...............................
2
2
B. Riparian zone not intact (breaks)
1. breaks rare
a. width > 18 meters .......................................... ...............................
4
4
b, width 12 -18 meters ........................................ ...............................
3
3
c, width 6 -12 meters ........................................ ...............................
2
2
d. width c 6 meters .......................................... ...............................
1
1
2. breaks common
a, width ] 18 meters .......................................... ...............................
3
3
b. width 12 -18 meters ....................................... ...............................
2
2
c. width 6 -12 meters ........................................ ...............................
1
1
d. width E 6 meters .......................................... ...............................
0
0
Remarks
Total
i3
Page Total
1J
❑ Disclaimer -form filled out, but score doesn't match subjective opinion - atypical stream.
TOTAL SCORE
41

Supplement for Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Diagram to determine bank angle:
9©0 45°
Site Sketch:
Other continents:
"Comical Stream Cross - section
r
� Extreme High Water
Normal High Water
Normal Flow
135°
Upper Bank —►{
Lower
BaAk
Stream Width 'This side is 45° bank angle.
42

3106 Revision 6
Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Mountain/ Piedmont Streams
Biological Assessment Unit; DWQ OTAL SCORE
Directions for use: The observer is to survey a minimum, of 100 meters with 200 meters preferred of stream, preferably in an
upstream direction starting above the bridge pool and the road right -of -way. The segment which is assessed should represent average
stream conditions. To perform a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the stream. To complete the form, select the
description which best fits the observed habitats and then circle the score. If the observed habitat falls in between two descriptions,
select an intermediate score. A final habitat score is determined by adding the results from the different metrics.
Stream O E 'c C_wV. Location/road: X' ^•" •�' "'(Road Name )County L l-"^' "-
Date uJ +S CC## n3C-0007- Basin L,,, Subbasin 0- t�ta -b
Observer(s) Type of Study: ❑ Fish I enthos ❑ Basinwide E)Special Study (Describe)
Latitude Longitude 3$!7' >G Ecoregion: ❑ MT )01P O Slate Belt ❑ 'Triassic Basin
Water Quality: Temperature — °C DO _- mg/1 Conductivity (corr.) pS /cm pH --
Physical Characterization: Visible land use refers to immediate area that you can see from sampling location - include what
you estimate driving thru the watershed in watershed land use.
Visible Land Use: `60 %Forest %Residential %Active Pasture % Active Crops
%°Fallow Fields % Commercial % Industrial � ° /nOther - Describe: (�25*weP
Watershed land use: Forest `Agriculture ❑Urban ❑ Animal operations upstream
Width: (meters) Stream 4. Channel (at top of bank) Stream Depth: (m) Avg • _I Max
❑ Width variable ❑ Large river >25m wide
Bank Height (from deepest part of riffle to top of bank -first flat surface you stand on): (m) �.
Bank Angle: . or ❑ NA (Vertical is 90°, horizontal is 0 °. Angles > 90° indicate slope is towards mid - channel, E 90°
indicate slope is away from channel. NA if bank is too low for bank angle to matter.)
❑ Channelized Ditch
❑Deeply incised- steep, straight banks ❑Both banks undercut at bend ❑Channel filled in with sediment
❑ Recent overbank deposits ❑Bar development ❑Buried structures ❑Exposed bedrock
❑ Excessive periphyton growth ❑ Heavy filamentous algae growth ❑Green tinge ❑ Sewage smell
Manmade Stabilization: ON }WY: ❑Rip -rap, cement, gabions Ok Sediment/grade- control structure ❑Bermilevee
Flow conditions: ❑High P41,formal ❑Low
Turbidity: 4Clear © Slightly Turbid ❑Turbid ❑Tannic ❑Milky ❑Colored (from dyes)
Good potential for Wetlands Restoration Project ?? ,KYES ONO Details
Channel Flow Status
Useful especially under abnormal or low flow conditions.
A. Water reaches base of both lower banks, minimal channel substrate exposed ............................
B. Water fills >75 % of available channel, or <25 % of channel substrate is exposed ........................ ❑
C. Water fills 25 -75% of available channel, many logs /snags exposed .............. ............................... Q
D. Root mats out of water ..................................................................................... ............................... D
E. Very little water in channel, mostly present as standing pools ...................... ............................... ❑
Weather Conditions. Photos: ON rK-Y IJ2( Digital 035mm P (f Z
Remarks:
39

I. Channel Modification
re
A. channel natural, frequent bends .........................................................................
...............................
B. channel natural, infrequent bends (channelization could be old) .......................
............................... 4
C. some channelization present ...............................................................................
............................... 3
D. more extensive channelization, X40% of stream disrupted..... .....................................
.................... 2
E. no bends, completely channelized or rip rapped or gabioned, etc .....................................................
0
❑ Evidence of dredging ❑Evidence of desnagging =no large woody debris in stream
DBanks of uniform shape/height
Subtotal
Remarks
! 6
1I. Instream Habitat: Consider the percentage of the reach that is favorable for benthos colonization or fish cover. If >70% of the
reach is rocks, 1 type is present, circle the score of 17. Definition: leafpacks consist of older leaves that are packed together and have
begun to decay (not piles of leaves in pool areas). Mark as Rare Common or Abundant.
Rocks c Macrophytes 1--� Sticks and leafpacks Y Snags and logs c'_ Undercut banks or root mats
AMOUNT OF REACH FAVORABLE FOR COLONIZATION OR COVER
a70 %o 40 -70 % 20 -40% <20%
Score Score Score Score
4 or 5 types present ................. 20 C16 12 8
3 types present ......................... 19 15 11 7
2 types present ......................... 18 14 10 6
1 type present, .......................... 17 13 9 5
No types present ....................... 0
! 6
❑ No woody vegetation in riparian zone Remarks
Subtotal
III. Bottom Substrate (silt, sand, detritus, gravel, cobble, boulder) Look at entire reach for substrate scoring, but only look at riffle
for embeddedness, and use rocks from all parts of riffle -look for "mud line" or difficulty extracting rocks.
A. substrate with good mix of gravel, cobble and boulders
Score
1, embeddedness <20 % (very little sand, usually only behind large boulders ) .........................
15
2. embeddedness 20- 40% ........................................................................... ...............................
12
3. embeddedness 40- 80% ........................................................................... ...............................
8
4. embeddedness > 801/o .............................................................................. ...............................
3
B. substrate gravel and cobble
1. embeddedness < 20%......• ...................................................................... ...............................
14
2. embeddcdness 20- 40% .......................................................................... ...............................
3. embeddedness 40 -80% ......................................................................... ...............................
6
4. embeddedness > 80% v ............................................................................. ...............................
2
C. substrate mostly gravel
1. embeddedness < 50% ............................................................................. ...............................
8
2. embeddedness > 50% ............................................................................. ...............................
4
D. substrate homogeneous
1. substrate nearly all bed rock .................................................................... ...............................
3
2. substrate nearly all sand ......................................................................... ...............................
3
3. substrate nearly all detritus ..................................................................... ...............................
2
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay .................................................................... ...............................
1 f
Remarks
Subtotal i�
IV. Pool Variety Pools are areas of deeper than average maximum depths with little or no surface turbulence. Water velocities
associated with pools are always slow. Pools may take the form of "pocket water ", small pools behind boulders or obstructions, in
large high gradient streams, or side eddies.
A. Pools present Score
1. Pools Frequent ( >30 % of 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes .................. ............................................................................................
b. pools about the same size (indicates pools filling in) ............................. ............................... 8
2. Pools Infrequent (C30% of the 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes ................................................................................ ............................... 6
b. pools about the same size ....................................................................... ............................... 4
B. Pools absent ............................................................................................................. ............................... 0
Subtotal I.
❑ Pool bottom boulder - cobble =hard 4 Bottom sandy -sink as you walk ❑ Silt bottom ❑ Some pools over wader depth
Remarks
Page Total L
40

V. Riffle Habitats
Definition: Riffle is area of reaeration -can be debris dam, or narrow channel area. Riffles Frequent Riffles Infrequent
S ore Score
A. well defined riffle and run, riffle as wide as stream and extends 2X width of stream.... 6 12
B. riffle as wide as stream but riffle length is not 2X stream width ..... ............................... 4 7
C. riffle not as wide as stream and riffle length is not 2X stream width ............................. 10 3
D. riffles absent.. .................................................................................. ............................... 0
Channel Slope: OTypical for area 13Steep =fast flow OLow =like a coastal stream Subtotal 16
VI. Bank Stability and Vegetation
FACE UPSTREAM Left Bank Rt. Bank
Score Score
A. Banks stable
1. little evidence of erosion or bank failure(except outside of bends), little potential for erosion. 7
B. Erosion areas present
1, diverse trees, shrubs, grass; plants healthy with good root systems ...... ............................... 6 6
2, few trees or small trees and shrubs; vegetation appears generally healthy ........................... 5 5
3. sparse mixed vegetation; plant types and conditions suggest poorer soil binding ................. 3 3
4. mostly grasses, few if any trees and shrubs, high erosion and failure potential at high flow.. 2 2
5. little or no bank vegetation, mass erosion and bank failure evident ............ ............................... 0 0
Total f
Remarks
VII. Light Penetration Canopy is defined as tree or vegetative cover directly above the strearn's surface. Canopy would block out
sunlight when the sun is directly overhead. Note shading from mountains, but not use to score this metric.
Sr—cre
A. Stream with good canopy with some breaks for light penetration .............. ............................... 10
B. Stream with full canopy - breaks for light penetration absent ...................... ...............................
C. Stream with partial canopy - sunlight and shading are essentially equal ..... ............................... 7
D. Stream with minimal canopy - full sun in all but a few areas ........................ ............................... 2
E. No canopy and no shading .............................................................................. ............................... 0
Remarks
Subtotal (n
VIII. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Definition: Riparian zone for this form is area of natural vegetation adjacent to stream (can go beyond f7oodplain). Definition: A break
in the riparian zone is any place on the stream banks which allows sediment or pollutants to directly enter the stream, such as paths
down to stream, storm drains, uprooted trees, otter slides, etc.
FACE UPSTREAM Lft. Bank Rt. Bank
Dominant vegetation. 0 Trees 0 Shrubs ❑ Grasses ❑ Weeds/old field DExotics (kudzu, etc) Score Score
A. Riparian zone intact (no breaks)
1. width > 18 meters ...................................................... ...............................
2. width 12 -18 meters .................................................... ...............................
4
3. width 6 -12 meters ...................................................... ...............................
3
3
4. width e 6 meters ....................................................... ...............................
2
2
B, Riparian zone not intact (breaks)
1, breaks rare
a. width > 18 meters .......................................... ...............................
4
4
b, width 12 -18 meters ........................................ ...............................
3
3
c. width 6 -12 meters ........................................ ...............................
2
2
d. width C 6 meters .......................................... .......................,.......
1
1
2. breaks common
a. width > 18 meters .......................................... ...............................
3
3
b. width 12 -18 meters ....................................... ...............................
2
2
c. width 6 -12 meters ........................................ ...............................
1
1
d. width < 6 meters .......................................... ...............................
0
0
Remarks
Total 10
Page
Total 50
0 Disclaimer -form filled out, but score doesn't match subjective opinion - atypical stream.
TOTAL SCORE qZ
41

Supplement for )Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Diagram to determine bank angle:
90° 450
Typicai Stream ross- section
Extreme High Water
Normal High Water
Normal Flow
Stuns Width
Site Sketch:
Other comments:
42
Lower
Bank
Upper sank
o
1350
This side is 45° bank angle.

3146 Revision 6
Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Mountain/ Piedmont Streams
Biological Assessment Unit, DWQ OTAL SCORE 1 ,
Directions for use: The observer is to survey a minimum of 100 meters with 206 meters preferred of stream, preferably in an
upstream direction starting above the bridge pool and the road right -of -way. The segment which is assessed should represent average
stream conditions. To perform a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the stream. To complete the form, select the
description which best fits the observed habitats and then circle the score. if the observed habitat falls in between two descriptions,
select an intermediate score. A final habitat score is determined by adding the results from the different metrics.
4" 3' r� 's ce -4 1 1- Of � Road Name }County k, v
Stream Location/road:
?JJ)S CC# 1703aOvZ
Date '� ' I/ J-
Observer(s) e4 n� wA Nlype of Study: ❑ Fish
Basin__! i ' / Subbasin
03 —0&' -0 -z-
OBenthos ❑ Basinwide ❑Special Study (Describe)
Latitude 3 (-,13V Z Longitude '' ' Y"1 a Ecoregion: ❑ MT f P ❑ Slate Belt ❑ "Triassic Basin
Water Quality: Temperature — °C DO - ,mgll Conductivity (corr.) — pSlcm pH —
Physical Characterization: Visible land use refers to immediate area that you can see from sampling location - include what
you estimate driving thru the watershed in watershed land use.
Visible Land Use: 160 %Forest %Residential %Active Pasture % Active Crops
%Fallow Fields % Commercial %Industrial %Other - Describe:
Watershed land use: kForest ❑Agriculture ❑Urban ❑ Animal operations upstream
Width: (meters) Stream I_� Channel (at top of bank) '' ` Stream Depth: (m) Avg Max 0
❑ Width variable ❑ Large river >25m wide
Bank Height (from deepest part of riffle to top of bank -first flat surface you stand on): (in)
Bank. Angle: ° or ❑ NA (Vertical is 90 °, horizontal is 0 °. Angles > 909 indicate slope is towards mid- channel, < 90°
indicate slope is away from channel. NA if bank is too low for bank angle to matter.)
❑ Channelized Ditch
❑Deeply incised- steep, straight banks ❑Both banks undercut at bend ❑Channel filled in with sediment
❑ Recent overbank deposits ❑Bar development ❑Buried structures ❑Exposed bedrock
❑ Excessive periphytoYhO(Normal. owth ❑ Heavy filamentous algae growth ❑Careen tinge ❑ Sewage smell
Manmade Stabilization: N ❑Y: ❑Rip -rap, cement, gabions ❑ Sediment/grade-control structure ❑Bermflevee
Flow conditions: ❑Hi ❑Low
Turbidity: l Clear ❑ Slightly Turbid ❑Turbid ❑Tannic ❑Milky ❑Colored (from dyes)
Goad potential for Wetlands. Restoration Project ?? ❑ YES I10 Details
Channel Flow Status
Useful especially under abnormal or low flow conditions.
A. Water reaches base of both lower banks, minimal channel substrate exposed ............................
B. Water fills >75% of available channel, or <25% of channel substrate is exposed ........................
C. Water fills 25 -75% of available channel, many logs /snags exposed .............. ............................... ❑
D. Root mats out of water .................................................................................... ............................... ❑
E. Very little water in channel, mostly present as standing pools ...................... ............................... ❑
Weather Conditions: �6k, )urw L� , 1)+g Photos: ON AY )0 Digital 1135mm -f,
I J
Remarks
39

I. Channel Modification Svore
A. channel natural, frequent bends ........................................................................ ...............................
B. channel natural, infrequent bends (channelization could be old) ....................... ............................... 4
C. some channelization present ............................................................................... ............................... 3
D. more extensive channelization, >40 % of stream disrupted ................................ ............................... 2
E. no bends, completely channelized or rip rapped or gabioned, etc ............ ............................... ......... 0
❑ Evidence of dredging []Evidence of desnagging=no large woody debris in stream ❑Banks of uniform shapelheight
Remarks Subtotal
H. Instream Habitat: Consider the percentage of the reach that is favorable for benthos colonization or fish cover. If >70% of the
reach is rocks, 1 type is present, circle the score of 17. Definition: leafpacks consist of older leaves that are packed together and have
begun to decay (not piles of leaves in pool areas). Mark as Rare, Common, or Abundant.
Rocks F Macrophytes k.--- Sticks and leafpacks i�_ Snags and logs � Undercut banks or root teats
AMOUNT OF REACH FAVORABLE FOR COLONIZATION OR COVED
Score
>70%
40 -70%
20 -40%
<20%
3. embeddedness 40- 80% ........................................................................... ...............................
Score
Score
Score
Score
4 or 5 types present .................
20
16
12
8
3 types present .........................
19
15
11
7
2 types present .........................
18
14
10
6
1 type present ...........................
17
13
9
5
No types present .......................
0
❑ No woody vegetation in riparian zone Remarks
Subtotal
III. Bottom Substrate (silt, sand, detritus, gravel, cobble, boulder) look at entire reach for substrate scoring, but only look at riffle
for embeddedness, and use rocks from all parts of riffle -look for "mud line" or difficulty extracting rocks.
A. substrate with good mix of gravel, cobble and boulders
Score
1. embeddedness <20% (very little sand, usually only behind large boulders ) .........................
15
2. embeddedness 20- 40% ........................................................................... ...............................
12
3. embeddedness 40- 80% ........................................................................... ...............................
8
4. embeddedness > 801/o .............................................................................. ...............................
3
B. substrate gravel and cobble
1. embeddedness < 20% ............................................................................. ...............................
14
2. embeddedness 20-40%. ........................................................................................................
11
3. embeddedness 40 -80% ......................................................................... ...............................
6
4. embeddedness > 80% ............................................................................. ...............................
2
Remarks
C. substrate mostly gravel
1. embeddedness C 50% ............................................................................. ............................... 8
2. embeddedness , 50% ............................................................................. ............................... 4
D. substrate homogeneous
1. substrate nearly all bedrock .................................................................... ............................... 3
2. substrate nearly all sand ......................................................................... ............................... r
3. substrate nearly all detritus... ......................................... ....................................................... 2
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay .............................. .... ........................... .............................. I
Subtotal �?
IV. Pool Variety Pools are areas of deeper than average maximum depths with little or no surface turbulence. Water velocities
associated with pools are always slow. Pools may take the form of "pocket water ", small pools behind boulders or obstructions, in
large high gradient streams, or side eddies.
A. Pools present Score
1. Pools Frequent ( >30% of 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes ................................................................................ ............................... 6
b. pools about the same size (indicates pools filling in) ............................. ............................... 8
2. Pools Infrequent (C30 %o of the 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes ................................................................................ ............................... 6
b. pools about the same size. .............................................................................................. ...... 4
B. Pools absent ............................................................................................................. ............................... 0
Subtotal
11 Pool bottom boulder - cobble =hardX0 Bottom sandy -sink as you walk ❑ Silt bottom ❑ Some pools over wader depth
Remarks
Page Total _LL
40

V. Riffle Habitats
Definition: Riffle is area of reaeration -can be debris dam, or narrow channel area. Riffles Frequent Riffles Infrequent
Score Score
A. well defined riffle and run, riffle as wide as stream and extends 2X width of stream.... 12
B. riffle as wide as stream but riffle length is not 2X stream width ..... ............................... 4 7
C. riffle not as wide as stream and riffle length is not 2X stream width ............................. 10 3
D. riffles absent.... ................................................................................ ............................... 0
Channel Slope: ❑Typical for area ❑Steep =fast flow ❑Low --like a coastal stream Subtotal ?
V1. Bank Stability and Vegetation
FACE UPSTREAM Left Bank Rt. Bank
Score Score
A. Banks stable
1. little evidence of erosion or bank failure(except outside of bends), little potential for erosion.
B. Erosion areas present
1. diverse trees, shrubs, grass; plants healthy with good root systems ...... ............................... 6 6
2. few trees or small trees and shrubs; vegetation appears generally healthy ........................... 5 5
3. sparse mixed vegetation; plant types and conditions suggest pooter soil binding ................. 3 3
4. mostly grasses, few if any trees and shrubs, high erosion and failure potential at high flow.. 2 2
5. little or no bank vegetation, mass erosion and bank failure evident ............ ............................... 0
Total - i
Remarks
VII. Light Penetration Canopy is defined as tree or vegetative cover directly above the stream's surface. Canopy would block out
sunlight when the sun is directly overhead. Note shading from mountains, but not use to score this metric.
re
A. Stream with good canopy with some breaks for light penetration .............. ............................... GEY
B. Streamm with full canopy - breaks for light penetration absent ...................... ............................... 8
C. Stream with partial canopy - sunlight and shading are essentially equal ..... ............................... 7
D. Stream with minimal canopy - full sun in all but a few areas ........................ ............................... 2
E. No canopy and no shading ............................................................................. ............................... 0
Remarks Subtotal!
VIII. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Definition: Riparian zone for this form is area of natural vegetation adjacent to stream (can go beyond floodplain). Definition: A break
in the riparian zone is any place on the stream banks which allows sediment or pollutants to directly enter the stream, such as paths
down to stream, storm drains, uprooted trees, otter slides, etc.
FACE UPSTREAM Lfl. Bank Ri. Batik
Dominant vegetation: ❑ Trees Q Shrubs E3 Grasses ❑ Weeds /old field ❑Exotics (kudzu, etc) Score Score
A. Riparian zone intact (no breaks)
r�
1. width > 18 meters ...................................................... ...............................
2. width 12 -18 meters .................................................... ...............................
4
4
3. width 6 -12 meters ...................................................... ...............................
3
3
4. width < 6 meters .......................... .................................................... ,.......
2
2
B. Riparian zone not intact (breaks)
1, breaks rare
a. width > 18 meters .......................................... ...............................
4
4
b. width 12 -18 meters ........................................ ...............................
3
3
c. width 6 -12 meters ........................................ ...............................
2
2
d. width < 6 meters .......................................... ...............................
1
1
2. breaks common
a, width > 18 meters .......................................... ...............................
3
3
b. width 12 -18 meters ....................................... ...............................
2
2
c. width 6 -12 meters ........................................ ...............................
1
1
d. width E 6 meters .......................................... ...............................
0
4
Total
Remarks
Q
Page
Total
❑ Disclaimer -form filled out, but score doesn't match subjective opinion - atypical stream.
TOTAL SCORE
41

Supplement for Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Diagram to determine bank angle:.
kv
90" 45"
Typical Stream Cross - section
Site Sketch:
Other comments:
42
1350
This side is 45° bank angle.

Appendix F.
Remedial Action Letter
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank

January 21, 2014
Ms. Jean B. Gibby
Chief, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Department of the Army, Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403 -1343
Transmitted via email.
RE: SAW - 2007 -01188 — Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
Response to Year 3 Annual Monitoring Report — remedial action request
Dear Ms. Gibby:
Thank you for your letter of December 16, 2013 regarding the Year 3 Annual Monitoring Report and
associated credit release for the Cripple Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank, which is in Alamance
County, North Carolina, and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03030002 of the Cape Fear River Basin.
Your letter noted the presence of Liquidambar styraciflua ( Sweetgum) in 0.4% excess of the vegetative
performance criteria for the mitigation bank (that no one volunteer tree species comprise more than 20% of
the total composition at years 3, 5 and 7. As requested, Restoration Systems will take remedial action to
address the issue. The Sweetgum is occurring most abundantly in three vegetative plots on the edges of the
wetland restoration area. Thinning of a few, select trees in these areas is an appropriate way to address the
issue. In addition to removal of Sweetgum, we will evaluate the vegetation on site in early spring, shortly after
leaf out, and determine if supplemental planting of trees may be appropriate. All remedial action will be
documented and included in the Year 4 Monitoring Report.
Please let me know if you are in agreement with this remedial action plan and we will proceed accordingly
appreciate your attention on this project.
Best regards,
7ala
Tara Disy Allden
Cc: Andrew Williams, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, USACE
Grant Lewis, Axiom Environmental
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492