20130064_Report_20121203

r
The
Catena
Group
Sonia Carrillo
NCDENR
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Subject Division 7 Bridge Wetland and Stream Verification
Rockingham and Guilford Counties, North Carolina
Ms Carrillo
410 -B Millstone Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
(919) 732 -1300
December 3, 2012
I've enclosed the Preliminary JD forms, site figures, ACOE wetland data forms, NCDWQ wetland
rating forms, and NCDWQ stream identification forms for the following bridge replacement
projects in Rockingham and Guilford Counties If you have any questions or require additional
information, please contact me at the number above or by email csheats @thecatenagroup corn
We appreciate your assistance on these projects
TIP #
County
Bridge #
Route
Across
Watershed
17BP 7 R 13
Rockingham
780222
Whetstone Creek Rd
Whetstone Creek
Roanoke
17BP 7 R 31
Rockingham
780149
Park Rd
Big Beaver Island Creek
Roanoke
17BP 7 R 32
Rockingham
780050
Lemon Rd
Hogans Creek
Roanoke
17BP 7 R 55
Rockingham
780185
Fisher Hill Road
Martin Creek
Roanoke
BD 5107U
Rockingham
780221
Williams Rd
Hogans Creek
Roanoke
BD 5107V
Rockingham
780081
Lick Fork Creek Rd
Lick Fork Creek
Roanoke
BD 5107W
Rockingham
780269
Eden Rd
Buffalo Creek
Roanoke
17BP 7 R 27
Rockingham
780027
US 311
Reed Creek
Roanoke
17BP 7 R 22
Guilford
780895
Lexington Ave
Bouldmg Branch
Cape Fear
Sincerely,
Chris Sheats
The Catena Group, Inc
Attachments Preliminary JD Forms, Site Figures, ACOE Wetland Determination Data Forms, NCDWQ
Stream identification Forms, NCDWQ Wetland Rating Forms

r
Whetstone Creek
TIP # 17BP.7.R.13
Bridge # 780222

4-
D,
58
Ede-i
Parftry
Y-- Reidsville
Stokesdale
Branch
M
Greensboro
e-,m "-ns High Point
Bridge #222
The
Bridge 222 on SR 2148
Date: September 2012
Figure
Catena
over Whetstone Creek
1
Scale
Group
Vicinity Map
0 750 1,500 Feet
I 1
1
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6155

th-
N
f
qz
Q.
Nj
Bridge #222
f
6
E
•
4 s
t
a
f
i
a �
• �1
Bridge 222 on SR 2148
Date: September 2012
F19Ufe
The
Cateno
over Whetstone Creek
Scale
0 200 400 Feet
Group
Study Area
1 1
2
USGS Topographic Map
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6155

Bridge #222
h tston r ek
m
0
N
a
Study Area
Road
Perennial Stream
Bridge Location
The
Catena
Figure
Bridge 222 on SR 2148
over Whetstone Creek
:
Date September 2012
0��
Group
Jurisdictional Features
20 40 Feet
3
Job No.:
2010 Aerial Photography
Rockingham County, North Carolina
6155

SR 2147
MW
-1
SR21�
hB9
Bridge #222
i
or
i
M dD
R
Mid e
L211 3y
.
'L
Study Area
Road
. -
Bridge Location .
The
Catena
Bridge 222 on SR 2148
over Whetstone Creek
Date.
September 2012
Figure
Scale
0
200 400 Feet
Group
PJob
SDA -NRCS Soils Map
l —i
4
-
Rockingham County, North Carolina
No.:
6155

Whetstone Creek Bridge #222, Rockingham County, NC
View of Whetstone Creek facing downstream
from Bridge.
View of Bridge over Whetstone Creek facing
downstream.
View of bridge facing upstream.

T
LIEti U
MMA-
NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3- !p %12
Project/Site: �? .: Noes E # 42-1-
Latitude:
Evaluator.
County: �,
Longitude:
Total Poinft- . I,�
Stream is at least intemrifferr(
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
1
if Z 19 or perennial if a 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
-
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = �"
Absent
Weak
Moderate Strong
13- Continuity of channel bed and 'bank
0.
1
2 ,_3)
2. Sinuosity of cranel along thalweg
0
1
2
3 )
3. In- channel structure: ex. ^a?e -pool, step -poo'.
ripple-pool sequence
0
E 1
,;1
D
3
4_ Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
l 2
2
5_ ActNe/relict fioodplair.
I 0
1
' z
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
g.
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
8. Fieadcuts
0
1 ;
2
-3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1;
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1,;
1-5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
°artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ) }
12. Presence of Baseflow 0
1 2
( 3 )
13. iron oxidizing bacteria 0
% 1 2
3
14. Leaf litter 1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0
OS
t.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 )
r Rinlnnv (Sul^tnfal = of . 1
18. ri rous roots in streambed
i 31
2
1
j 0
19_ Rooted upland plants in streambed
3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
22
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0`
1
2
i 3
22. =ish
0
OS
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0 ?
0.5
1
1.5
24_ Amphibians
0 -'
0.5 i
1
1.5..
25_ Algae
0
I 0.5
1
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75: OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
N I-cites:
Sketch:
Leight (ft) ? S
it width (ft)
I
ater depth (in) Z��-
cannel substrate -til y, Si'Sand> Gravel, Cobble, Bedrock
elocity - fast, moderate, slog
la-ity - clear, slightly turbid, ttsbid

Y
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CENAP -OP -R-
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT
DIFFERENT SITES)
State: L County: rx ` city:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 3(..l S5 ° N, Long :19•S3 ° W
Universal Transverse Mercator: m Easting (x) m Northing (y)
Name of nearest waterbody:
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: ala linear feet: IZ)- 1'5 width (ft) and /or acres.
Cowardin Class: 53
Stream Flow: .�.«
Wetlands: O acres.
Cowardin Class: --
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal: �-,g c
Non - Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):

f �
1 �
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United
States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this
preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other
person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an
approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre - construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non- reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek
a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an
approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory
mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to
request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or
other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization
and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but
that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit
authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes
agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that
activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use
either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues
can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to
provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an
approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject
project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the
proposed activity. based on the following information:
2

i a
SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked
items should b(3 included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately
ref rence sour,-es below):
4 aps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Q Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps naviclable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS N HD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRh1 maps:
ePhotographs: 0 -year FI �odplain EI vation Is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
[Aerial (Name & Date): iX Iota
2 Other (Name & Date):�rin
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Cc►rps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)

Big Beaver Island Creek
TIP # 17BP.7.R. 31
Bridge # 780149

N
5
Airy Eden
DarbL�
Reidy
King
Stokesdale
Branch
Salem.
Greens
C,er-mons Hi h Point
S gyp\ •�
J`
Bridge #149
C?ee k
a
O�
Rage
_ dfaPle
— Qy.
Lte
e.�
n
%'Ist
Church Rq
Date:
Figure
The
Bridge 149 on SR 1321 over
September 2012
Cat
Big Beaver Island Creek
ca
Sle
ena
0 750 1,500 Feet
Group
Vicinity Map
1 t
Job No.:
Rockingham County, North Carolina
11 6156

I
Bridge #149
or
r
i
.
The
Catena
Bridge 149 on SR 1321 over
Big Beaver Island Creek
Study Area
Date: September 2012
Figure
2
oca� zoo 400 Fee[
��
Group
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6156

1• '
Y .
e ,
M1 t
.r
�e
I

Date: September 2012 Figure
L Bridge 149 on SR 1321 over
Big Beaver Island Creek Scar ,so 320 Feet
USDA -NRCS Soils Map
Job No.:
Rockingham County, North Carolina 6156

Big Beaver Island Creek Bridge #149, Rockingham County, NC
Upstream view of Big Beaver Island Creek from
bridge.
Northwest facing view of Big Beaver Island
Creek and bridge.
Bridge view facing upstream.
View of bridge facing downstream.
Southeast facing view of bridge.
l 1
f

I
I
NC DW0 Rtrpam Ydi-nlifiratinn jenrm Vareinn d II S1
Date: 3 to - Zo t Z
ProjectlSite: t3o.1 D 4 ii I j{q
BIG t p .._ .
Latitude:
Evaluator: SV IV
County: F.= i MO H A"
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (cirtj"ne)
Ephemeral Intermitte Perenr in 7
F
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
,7 a 19 or perennial if z 30' -
Y
1
A. Ueomor polo (Subtotal= )
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Str g
0.
1
2
1 , 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. 1n- channel structure: ex. r ,F- -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool se uence
0
1
2
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelreiict floodplain
0
1
2
3 )
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
r 1
2
2
3
8. Headcuts 0
9. Grade control 0
0.5
1
1 �i
10. Natural valley 0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0
Yes 3 i
arur-- ui- are iris raeeu, see uiscussrors m manual
R Hvrirnlnnv t.rrhtntai = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2 `
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1 '
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1. 1
16. Organic deb ^s lines or piles 1
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soii -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes- 3
U- titnlnnv tSUhtntal = , <, )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
1
1 0
1 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
? 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
L'
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1'
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
11
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75a OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also t>e identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
ank Height (ft) 2 3
ankfull width (ft) 7,--) ` 3
later depth (in)
hannel substrate CI a Si Gran Cobble, Bedrock
'elocity ± fasts moderate, slow
'laxity - clear, slightly tumid, turbid

i
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CENAP -OP -R-
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT
DIFFERENT SITES)
State: _ County: ' :.k.u, ., ,.v, City: 4 `'- -
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. ",:: ° N, Long. W
Universal Tran3verse Mercator: m Easting (x) m Northing (y)
Name of nearest waterbody:
Identify (estimE.te) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: I5q linear feet: + width (ft) and /or acres.
Cowardin Class:
Stream Flow: perk*"
Wetlands: - acres.
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal:
Non - Tidal: ".
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Des c) Determination, Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United
States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this
preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit app icant or other
person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an
approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre - construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity the permit
applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek
a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an
approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory
mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to
request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions, of the NWP or
other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization
and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but
that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit
authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes
agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that
activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement acti )n, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use
either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and al terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administra :ively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisJictional issues
can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exis, s over a site, or to
provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an
approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States o1 the subject
project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the
proposed activ*.,based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked
items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately
reference sours below):
9, aps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant,
Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS P HD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRAI maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
[Photographs: [Aerial (Name & Date): Q(bS 2n►c
['Other (Name &Date): c�Y
❑ Previous dE.termination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other inforration (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)

Hogans Creek
TIP # 17BP.7.R.32
Bridge # 780050

The
Catena
Group
Bridge 50 on SR 1104
over Hogans Creek
Vicinity Map
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Date:
September 2012
Scale
0 750 1,500 Feet
I I
Job No.:
6157
Figure
N
DarbLr;
Reidsville
ing
Stok*ale
-
Branch
lem
Q Ei Greensbor
Cler^mons Hiyh Point
.
3
Lexington
Libe .
eP
i.`
68
Bridge #50
u
i
`d
Ay
a
0� 0
�y
Q
65
v
aP
o
�
S,nrise Atr,,%d
Qrbr���i
The
Catena
Group
Bridge 50 on SR 1104
over Hogans Creek
Vicinity Map
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Date:
September 2012
Scale
0 750 1,500 Feet
I I
Job No.:
6157
Figure

•
Bridge #50
r? �
1
•
J
The
Bridge 50 on SR 1104
Date:
September 2012
Figure
Cotena
over Hogans Creek
o�a�e 200 400 Feet
Group
Study Area
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6157

Bridge #50
UT Hogans Creek
s
H ns Creek
Study Area
Bridge Location
Road
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Figure
Bridge 50 on SR 1104
Date:
September 2012
over Hogans Creek
o�a� 30 6o Feet
L
Jusrisdictional Features
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6157

tit-
{
fi
���' r i •�' t -
n Ni
Bridge #50
I _
ih
1
p B
Y � i
t
-
i
.4 J
ti
co,
Tk
1• y Q
7
-
I r,
■r
_E
n.
The
Bridge 50 on SR 1104
Date: September 2012
Figure
Cateno
over Hogans Creek
0
200 400 Feet
4
Group
USDA -NRCS Mapped Soils
L
-
L Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6157

Hogans Creek Bridge #50. Rockingham County, NC
View of Hogans Creek from bridge
View of Hogans Creek facing downstream from
bridge.
View of agriculture field in floodplain. Hogans
Creek is on the right.
View of UT to Hogans Creek origin.

View of UT to Hogans Creek. Notice the ag field access.

l �
� 1
arlk 1
O
Date: i,912- - -- -- -
Project/Site: k'
Latitude:
Evaluator: jr'
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
1
2
Stream is at least intermittent y
Stream Determination (ci�erenniOther
0
rf> 19 or perennial if 2:30* i
Ephemeral Intermitten
e.g . Quad Name:
H. veomo polo (Subtotal = U
Absent
Weak
Moderate
$ g
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex, riffle -poo:, step - pool.
0
0.5
2
3
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
.
1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
r 2
-2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
I 1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
FACW = 0.75; OBI = 1.5 Other - 0
2
3
0
1
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3'
9_ Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 I 0.5
: 1
1.5
11-S nd or greater order channel
No = 0 j Yes 3 )
ft.« , . .
�
B. Hvdrolonv tSi,htntal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
; 3
13.1 oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5_
1
0.5
Q_
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
3
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
- Yes= 3
18. Fibrous As in streambed
3;
2
1
0
19. Rooted and plants in streambed
3
2
1
I 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
72
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
QV
1 1.5
23. Crayfish
'
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1.5
26_ Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBI = 1.5 Other - 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: G as y aE
Sketch:
I
!eight (ft) �� 5
11 width (ft)
later depth (in) Z- n
hannel substrate -�E�la r it I Sand, Grave Cobble, Bedrock
'elocity -�f' :moderate, slow
J
'iari ty
ci , slightly turbid, turbid

Mk F
W
NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 57-
Date: 3_&_ Z 0 Z
Project/Site: Wild s�D
UT 40 1 f ID
Latitude:
Evaluator.
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
is
Stream at least intermittent
Stream DeterminaltiorL circle one)
_rmitte
Other
✓�
if >_ 19 or rennin! if a 30'
Ephemeral lr%f r. Perennial
e. Quad Name:
A. Georno hol Subtotal = i._v )
Absent
0.
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
3
_
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
2_ Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
1 3
3. In- channel structure: ex. ri``!e -poo:, step -pool,
ripple I sequence
0
1l
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1`
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1;
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
0.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0
1
1.5
10_ Natural valley
0 (0-0
1
1.5
11 _ Second or greater order channel
No 4 OQ
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =
12. Presence of 8aseflow
0
1
1 2
(._3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
"01"
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
(0.5)
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3,.
C_ Bioloav (Subtotal = 7 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
4
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3!
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
C
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0,
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
7 1,
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 08L = 1.5 Other = 0 )
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
ieight (ft)
11 width (ft) 2- ; ;
C
later depth (in) - z
hannel substrate - Clay .Sk.Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Bedrock
'elocity - farr,, moderate, slow
Aarity , cjear� slightly turbid, turb,

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CENAP -OP -R-
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT
DIFFERENT SITES)
State.- ylt— County: t City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. " •: ` ° N, Long. " ° W
Universal Transverse Mercator: m Easting (x) m Northing (y)
Name of nearest waterbody:
Identify (estimate) amount of w ters in the review area:
Non - wetland wa ers:f 't &Slinear feet: width (ft) and /or acres.
Coward in Classes=-
—
Stream Flow�-,�>Z,;
Wetlands:— 1. acres.
Cowardin Class: -
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal: tvL.
Non - Tidal: ;
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY:
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United
States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this
preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other
person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an
approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre - construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek
a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an
approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory
mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to
request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and condition3 of the NWP or
other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization
and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary J0, but
that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit
authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes
agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that
activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement act,on, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use
either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues
can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to
provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an
approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States cn the subject
project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the
proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked
items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately
ref rence sources below):
4/m, aps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
ata sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Eleyation is: (National Geodetic vertical Datum of 1929)
[Photographs: erial (Name & Date): pot.�0
ff�cl
(Name & Date): 5L, R1,A.,s
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)

Site
number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin
Class
Estimated
aquatic amount of
resource in
review area
Class of aquatic
resource
1 �j_
�,. �."+ ;,� -,
�!!:N cj(J��
L
�>a ��
, �� ��= • a�- ,�, ��
TNT -p.� ��, �,.�f -
,
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Martin Creek
TIP # 17BP.7.R. 55
Bridge # 780185

Ci
Fitz
14
Eden
87
»o
v
p
Bridge #185
S�
c-a
o
c
Rd
u
1:
4.
Overlook -..
_
-� =_ -- -
�—
o
Cemetery ''l "'`'
— .
y o
MOr
9a7
r-
d
to e
87
ti
e<'
The
Catena
Bridge 185 on SR 1700
over Martins Creek
Date:
September 2012
Figure
Scale
0 500 1,000 Feet
Grou PJob
Vicinity Map
1
Rockingham County, North Carolina
No.:
6158

�� ���� } ,+,Y � �� 'tea- .J■�'�•� �'•
Ile-
rte/ �'
r- +ti 15--- f Bridge #185
a I ,
Now
rob
• �. 55
r r• r� .
Vw-
� r
1 ��' rf � I.i•
The
Catena
Group
Bridge 185 on SR 1700
over Martins Creek
Study Area
Date: September 2012
Figure
2
Scare 200 400 Feet
1
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6158

'r,,l-
��"i ,
n
s
�1
r.
J� 1
Y,r
�� '� Mgr �Y ` � �• ♦�,
I •
,r
n

N
170�
WaF
HWO
Bridge #185
r
Cd8 2
t
w
B�
F19Ufe
The
Bridge 185 on SR 1700
Date:
September 2012
Catena
over Martins Creek
Sca o 100 200 Feet
16 Group
USDA -NRCS Soils Map
L
4
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6158

Martin Creek Bridge #185. Rockingham County, INC
Upstream View of Martin Creek. Kudzu
infestation on left.
Downstream view of Martin Creek. Cattle
pastures are on both sides of the channel.
Downstream view of Martin Creek from beneath bridge.

� S
yr nwn V,..._... . , ,
Date: J w
Absent Weak Moderate
0 1 2
ProjectlS -rte: ' `
Latitude:
Evaluator:
1
1
County: yC_�cc t NE1 f
Longitude:
Total Points:
0
1
2,
is
Steam ;s at least irrterm;tterri
< '. + .:
Stream Determination circa
� g g"
Other
if a 19 or Perennial if a 30'
'
Ephemeral Intermittent, erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
.+. vcVrnvr polo Subtotal = �' )
1 i Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent Weak Moderate
0 1 2
St>F+ong
2. Sinuosity of d�annel abng thalweg
3. In-channel structure: ex. -f`!e -pool, step -poo?.
ri 1 I s uence
0
0
1
1
2
2
$
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2,
3
5. ACt Velrelict fioodplain
0
1
2
0
6_ Depositional ban; or benches
0
i
2
Yes = 3
7. Recent alluvia; deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5.
1
1 C. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
t.
i 1. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
_. •••••,••�� �_ ..� .a«�, acc u:xJUJS�ViS m rnartuai
B.
Hydrology Subtotai = V,
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizino bacteria
y
0
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
15. Sediment on plans or debris
0
0.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or Di :es
0
0.5
1 1.
17. Sol: -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
U. uIwlw QuUtUL'al - 1 v'
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
' 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
f 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (rate diversity and abundance)
0
1
( 2 ..
3
21. Aquatic Moliusks
0
1
2
3
22- Fsh
0
0.5
1
1 }
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
! `0'
0.5
1
1_5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.6
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be ident.Fed using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: r -:. r
r a. k.
i
Sketch:
I
mk Height (ft) D - 2
inicfu.11 width (ft) 2 -- 2 ..
ater depth (in)
''Bedrock
cannel substrate - ;1Clay; Stlt; �anc�f\ obbl ,
elocity - fast, .moderese, sloe;
larity - clear, ightly turbo ttsbid

ELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
sam rwiROUND II ,4FORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CENAP -OP -R-
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT
DIFFERENT SITES)
State: -,j; _ County: City: Ems', tin
Center coordin 3tes of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. ON, Long. -xs ° W
Universal Tran:;verse Mercator: m Easting (x) m Northing (y)
Name of neare3t waterbody:`•��
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: a linear feet: width (ft) and /or acres.
Cowardin Class:l-vs?'"�
Stream Flow: ?c�G.-,,0
Wetlands: acres.
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal:
Non - Tidal:'.
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United
States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected partl requested this
preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other
person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an
approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual perrlit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre - construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity the permit
applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek
a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an
approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory
mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to
request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and condition. of the NWP or
other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization
and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that perm t, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the pr ,3liminary JD, but
that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit
authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking an,/ activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes
agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that
activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement act 3n, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use
either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues
can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to
provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an
approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States o i the subject
project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the
proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked
items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately
ref rence souri;es below):
[ aps, plan:i, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
[✓Data sheets, prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheet:, prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps naviciable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS hHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRKI maps:
❑ 00 -year Fl )odplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: (Aerial (Name & Date): t�oT'
[Other (Name & Date): SANG ps
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Carps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and dates of Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)

Hogans Creek
TIP # BD -5107U
Bridge # 780221

N
Darbury
Mayodart
tall)
s Kirq
6S
J ,- .
\\e v
Summertield
a
C
Na
�`a
Q
Branch
�=
Winston
-Salem
-52�a
Green
Bridge
#221
r
O
i ..,.
o
�
c
#p
'PV
220
Sarrys
C6,
r),(ker Rd
f Jpt�h
b
9�,
pr
R�
Ilisboro
The
Catena
Bridge 221 on SR 1125
over Hogans Creek
Date:
September 2012
Figure
Scale
0 500 1,000 Feet
Group
PJob
Vicinity Map
t l
Rockingham County, North Carolina
No.:
6163

1 125
Bridge #221
T 4
Y
s
d
r
Is J
1
T
The
Bridge 221 on SR 1125
Date: September 2012
Figure
Catena
over Hogans Creek
Soale
Group
Study Area
0 200 400 Feet
t
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6163

Bridge #221
by
�^
Study Area
Bridge Location
Perennial Stream
Figure
1 1 3
The
Catena
Group
Bridge 221 on SR 1125
over Hogans Creek
Jurisdictional Features
Rockingham County, North arolina C
Datei September 2012
Scale 20 40 Feet
Job No.
6163

Y�
i
a
w
l�
_ Bridge #221
r
1
r
_ .
�e q
1
M `
fS.
AILI
The
CatenQ
Bridge 221 on SR 1125
over Hogans Creek
USDA -NRCS Soils Map
Gate: ¢e
September
Figure
4
Scar
"� 3.3.E Feat
Group
Rockingham County, North Carolina
iob No.:
6162.

Hogans Creek Bridge #221, Rockingham County, NC
Upstream view of Hogans Creek from bridge.
View of bridge over Hogans Creek.
Dowstream view of Hogans Creek.

Bank Y
r
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
Project/Site: `` - - �.
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County.
Longitude:
Total Points:
Steam is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (cirdeonvi)
Other
if 2 19 or perennial if a 30' a 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent ,'Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. ueomoTnotogy (5ubtotai -- )
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
0.
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3'
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool. step -pool,
ri 1 ool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
;'3 `.
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
-0--7
0.5
1
r'I.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual - -
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = .K - - )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
'.
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5,
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.
' 1 '
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3'
C. BIQIOQV (Subtotal = i LA 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
119. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
717-
2
-a
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0 -5,
1 1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26_ Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
lSketch:
[eight (ft)
ll width (ft)�`
Cteu��ts� � C1�� �� ✓ }��
Water depth (in) I ?
Channel substrate - Clay, Silt .Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Bedrock
Velocity - fast, moderate, slow
Clarity - clear, slightly turbid, turbid

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
VC_T-) b" 7)�,j -
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CENAP -OP -R-
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT
DIFFERENT SITES)
State: � C _ County: K�,. City:
Center coordin;3tes of site (latflong in degree decimal format):
Lat.'� ° N, Long.-,g ° W
Universal Transverse Mercator: m Easting (x) m Northing (y)
Name of nearest waterbody:
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: (HS linear feet: 'q�^ width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: 'R3�,33
Stream Flow:
Wetlands: acres.
Cowardin Class: - -
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal:._
Non - Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United
States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party 'Nho requested this
preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other
person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the opt on to obtain an
approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity the permit
applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek
a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option ':o request an
approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory
mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applic<nt has the right to
request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or
other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization
and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but
that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit
authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes
agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that
activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any cf allenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicart elects to use
either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and al terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues
can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to
provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an
approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be "waters of the United States on the subject
project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the
proposed activity, based on the following information:
2

SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked
items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately
ref VM rence sources below):
I aps, plan:, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
ata sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ USDA Natu'al Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRNI maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic vertical Datum of 1929)
[Photographs: [� ,Aerial (Name & Date):
[� Other (Name & Date): ,r1 ,
• Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
• Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date! of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)

Lick Fork Creek
TIP # BD -5107V
Bridge # 780081

29
eN-
4
= F Ruffin
Fg't'S ,Q y 4A
\fit~
BYP
29
Reidsville ;
_< 87
i
i.
r
i
i
Bridge #81
I
I
I
I
I
os ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4a
� I
Lco I
The
Catena
Bridge 81 on SR 2565
over Licks Fork Creek
Date:
September 2012
Figure
Scale
0 Feet
Group
Vicinity Map
500 1,000
1 I
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6164

C3
Bridge #81
.�.
R
J J
Ip
•
Study Area
The
Catena
Bridge 81 on SR 2565
over Licks Fork Creek
Date: September 2012
Figure
S��
0 200 400 Feet
Group
Study Area
2
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6164

The
Catena
Group
Bridge 81 on SR 2565
over Licks Fork Creek
Jurisdictional Features
Rockingham County, North Carolina
September 2012
0 20 40 Feet
I I
ob No.:
6164
Figure
3

Ck
i
We DaB
nD
The
Cateno
Group
e� We
Bridge 81 on SR 2565
over Licks Fork Creek
USDA -NRCS Soils
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Y all
Date:
September 2012
Scale
0 200 400 Feet
i
Job No.:
6164
1 1
Figure
41

Lick Fork Creek Bridge #81, Rockingham County, NC
Upstream view of Lick Fork Creek from bridge.
o
Downstream view of Lick Fork Creek from bridge.
View of bridge facing downstream.

A 11
1�� L �♦ VLl Gil14 14{.L1 Wl�wa�vu -
Date: (, E I ('�
� - ' --
-ga-
Project0te: L, c -c; _ u .
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
stream Determination (circIe_Qm)_,
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if 2 19 or perennial if a 30'
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool:
ripple-pool sequence
Bank i
Bankf
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= )
Absent
Weak Moderate
Strong
12 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool:
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1 -
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2 �
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
31)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade oontrol
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
° artificial ditches are not rated: see discussrons in manual
Q V.�rlmlr.w /G d.+nMl -
- __ _ _ _ __ __ _
12. Presence of Baseflow
'!
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1 i
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
Y "
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
JL_-
1.5
16. manic debris !i nes or piles
0
0.5
1 ?-
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
.1 '
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0-5)
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5 '
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using ether methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
I
g
[eight (ft)
tll width (ft)
�' 15
C lvl I--,
Water depth (in)
Channel substrate - Clay, Silt, SanA, Gravel, Cobble, Bedrock
Velocity - fast, mt�der!0, slow
Clarity - clear, slightly turbid, turbid
LA;'_
Cis,,
U
N

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND 14FORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
4(.Dtr 'PIV! - -2
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CENAP -OP -R-
D. PROJECT I_OCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT
DIFFERENT SITES)
State: _ County: Z A.' . A, -_ City: •,�i s�, ` I
Center coordinates of site (latllong in degree decimal format):
Lat. 36 �' ° N, Long. 'W
Universal Transverse Mercator: m Easting (x) m Northing (y)
Name of nearest waterbody :
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 2-0 1 linear feet: .0 width (ft) and /or acres.
Cowardin Class:l3�fA
Stream Flow:
Wetlands: acres.
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal N„„
Non - Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United
States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this
preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other
person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the opt on to obtain an
approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity the permit
applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek
a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an
approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory
mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicE nt has the right to
request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or
other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization
and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that perm t, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necesse ry; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but
that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit
authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking an/ activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes
agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that
activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement actin, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicart elects to use
either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and al terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues
can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exis-s over a site, or to
provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an
approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States o-1 the subject
project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the
proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked
items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately
T�erence sources below):
Paps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Q Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office ccncurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geolouical Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ USDA Natu-al Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRNI maps:
hotograph3: 0 -year Floodplain El ation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
(Name & Date): ther (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and datE! of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)

Buffalo Creek
TIP # BD -5107W
Bridge # 780269

N
4a
�
M Brice
Q
Eden
Mayodan
Reidsville
Byp
68 I
29
Rd
�.�._..�- ��
;770;'
.
�� 770 I p
4T`
--^?
J
135
p_
Cnm TaSS&
f/.
Bridge #269
r
y
r a�
135 °� Pil�nQ Tra-i
a
�
b
a
The
Bridge 269 on SR 2221
Date: September
2012
Figure
Cat ena
over Buffalo Creek
e
Scale
Grou P
Vicinity Map
0
l
500 1,000 Feet
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No
6165

Bridge
#269
1
�
■
i�
�1
® Study Area
0
The
Bridge 269 on SR 2221
Date:
September
Figure
Ccl
over Buffalo Creek
Scale
Group
Study Area
J2012
Zoo 4
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6165

Bridge #269
Study Area
Bridge Location
Perennial Stream
F19Ufe
3
The
Cateno
Grou P
Bridge 269 on SR 2221
over Buffalo Creek
Jurisdictional Features
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Date:
September 2012
Scale
0 20 40 Feet
L
Job N—
6165

SVS
riB,,'
It
hI3
y Bridge #269
�i
r
r -
r
' y 1
] - �u e D
tj- n..
F i
Y M IJB
AL S
The
Catena
Group
Figure
Bridge 269 on SR 2221
over Buffalo Creek
USDA -NRCS Soils Map
Date- September 2012
Sale
I zoo aI Feet
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6165
I
____]

Buffalo Creek Bridge #269, Rockingham County, NC
View of floodplain pasture in the northeast of
View of bridge from right descending bank
the bridge.
downstream.
Downstream view of Buffalo Creek from bridge.
Upstream view of Buffalo Creek from bridge.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 lW
Date: Cli ui
Projecl/Site:
mot, �j
Latitude:
Evaluator. C4tt 1 4 S dl
County: 9
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is of least intermittent
Stream Determination (cir one)_,
Other
if ? 19 or perennial if a 30' -1 ` ,
Ephemeral Intermittent erennial;
e.g. Quad Name:
nn
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_� _ ~ )
Absent
Weak Moderate
Strong
1a Con' of channel bed and bank
0
1
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
(2 L
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
�3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
(2.?
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
11_3�
7. Recent alluvial deposits
25. Algae
1
2
(3)
8. Headcuts
(_01
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
i75
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 1s
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = I r3
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris Imes or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3'
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal = kv�
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 )
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1 1)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
! 1 .
2
22. Fsh
0
0.5
1
5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
24. Amphibians
0
1
i 1.5
25. Algae
0
-' 0.5
1
i 5
26. Wetland plants in strtreambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
Y�,fow, cjr
Bank Height (ft)
BankUl width (ft)
Water depth (in)
Channel substrate - Clay, Silt, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Bedrock
Velocity - fast, moderate, slow
Clarity - clear, slightly turbid, turbid
"�14
TtSM

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CENAP- OP -R -,
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT
DIFFERENT SITES)
State: �I� _ County:- ! City: L
Center coordinates of site flat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. Y ° N, Long. W
Universal Transverse Mercator. m Easting (x) m Northing (y)
Name of nearest waterbody: i� �: ,1 !,.L
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: y'; A linear feet: width (ft) and /or acres.
Cowardin Class:
Stream Flow: ti
Wetlands: acres.
Cowardin Class: -
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal:
Non - Tidal:' '-'rla.
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United
States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this
preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other
person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an
approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual perrlit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity the permit
applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek
a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an
approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory
mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to
request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and condition:, of the NWP or
other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization
and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that perm t, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization %ithout requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but
that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit
authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking an-/ activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes
agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in .any way by that
activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement actin, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use
either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and al, terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues
can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exis':s over a site, or to
provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an
approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States of the subject
project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the
proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked
items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately
ref rence sources below):
gaps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicantleonsultant:
IA Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office ccncurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office dc es not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geolocical Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geolocical Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ USDA Natu -al Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRIVI maps:
❑ 1100 -year Floodpiain Elevation is: (National Geodetic vertical Datum of 1929)
Q"Photograph ;: ffter al (Name & Date):'f- '
(Name & Date): '-
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)

Reed Creek
TIP # 17BP.7.R.27
Bridge # 780027

N
J
R�
rnce
-
tr
y Meld
m
K Fork Rd
Danbur;
odan
C
o
a
r�
King
P
65
68
`A9' 6
Sunnrnerfield
Q` Brench
Winston -Salem
v El
Tt
rbspn ���
Bridge #27
�rl, os
Rry
W�sfeY D Webste
311
L't
PPS
Reed Cre
lop,F
dy
GA
Rd
0
�
o
v
N
t
CU
a ~Jt
�
3
q_.40
C
The
Bridge # 27 on US 311
Date August2012
Figure
Ccitena
over Reed Creek
Scale
Group
Vicinity Map
1 inch = 2,000
feet
Job No.:
Rockingham County, North Carolina
6167

4
=
a-
Bridge #27
Y
■
ll '
■
y.
•" s
L..
....•'
� t
L�
The
Catena
Group
PJob
Bridge # 27 on US 311
over Reed Creek
Study Area
Date: August 2012
Figure
2
Scale
1 inch = 500 feet
Rockingham
County, North Carolina
No.:
6167

Stream SA (outside of study area)
_
Reed Creek
Study Area
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Figure
The
Bridge # 27 on US 311
Date: August 2012
Catena
over Reed Creek
Scale
Grou P
Jurisdictional Features
1 inch = 150 feet
Job No.:
Rockingham County, North Carolina
6167

L
'r5
1
y
_ Bridge #27
IV
Bridge # 27 on US 311
over Reed Creek
Date: August 2012
Figure
scale
LGroup
USDA NRCS Soils Map
1 inch = 400 feet
4
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Job No.:
6167
7-j

4PT
Ilk'
Its
— �T'tb,
TA,

Bank B
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 411
Date:
Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator:
' ' �� • � �
County:
tY:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at /east intermittent
Stream Determination c"
� 1� �
Other
if 'a '1 9 or perennial if 2 30` 4 ;
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g_ Quad Name:
A!-__.Y-
.�. vcvlIivI nviv (JUDtota1 = Absent
Weak
Moderate Strong
P10 Conti nu;,y of channel bed and bank 0
1
2 3
12. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0
1
14. Leaf fitter
3.n- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
2
2 3
ri le- ool sequen ce 0
1
2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
15. Organic debris lines or piles
0 U.5
5. Active/relict 9oodplain
0
1
2
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
22. Fish
( 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
18. Headcuts
0
1
1
2
2
3
i 9. Grade control
0
0.5
3
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
a�irfrrni riarti� �a ..,,....,..,a. ,.
No
= 0
Yes
1.5
= 3
B. Hydrology Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
;2 3
14. Leaf fitter
1.5
2
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1 5
15. Organic debris lines or piles
0 U.5
1
1 5
17. Soi( based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3 ,
18_ Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
1 21. Aquatic Mollusks
--0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
i
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5'
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5 '
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep.
35 of manual.
Notes:
I
Sketch:
- eia'It ft '
11 width (ft) 3 --) ,
Water depth (in) �! - "-
Channel substrate - Clay; Silt, Sand, ,Grave Cobbld, Bedrock
Velocity - fast, moderate slow
Clarity - clear, slightly turbid, turbid

Milk TH
IM-00
, }tt�:�il
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: G l'i1,;
ProjectlSite: (S A
Latitude.
Evaluator `�Nj' {.,j -
County:,��11
+ Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream p rrde one)
Other
Sbeam r e least intermittent
fi >_ 19 or rerrnial if z 3Q`
Ephemeral rrt erenniai
e. Quad Name:
g•
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= _ ! Absent
Weak
Moderate Strong
I" Continuity o` channel bed and bank 0
1
2 3
' 2. Sinuosity of channel along thaivreg 0
1
2 3
3. In- charnel structure: ex rule -pool, step -pool,
ri le of sequence
�0.
1
2 I 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Actvelrelict °oodNafn
0
1
2
I 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0O'
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0'
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5'
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = C Yes = 3
° artifidal d'dches are not rated: see discussions in nv maal
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = %
12. Presence of Saseflow I
' 0 1
2
3
13. Iron o)idizinc bade^a
0
j 2
3
14. Leaf litter i
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 1 0.5
1
1.5
16. Oroanic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.5
17. So+l wAd evidence c" •ligh :mte. table"
'Vo = 0
Yes =3
C. Biology (Subtotal
18_ Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in sireambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and aburdanoe)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0O'
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
C
C.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
C.5
1
1.5
A. Wetland plants in strearnbed
FACW = 0.75: OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
-perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of -r anual.
Notes:
Sketch:
i
.eight (ft) I
E width (it)
1 .. ,j
dater depth (in) 4
.hamel substrate - Clay, r Sand; Gravel, Cobble, Bedrock
7elocity - fas'., moderate, slow
:laxity - clear, slightly turbid, turbid.
i

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CENAP -OP -R
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT
DIFFERENT SITES)
State: County: L1k �, , .." City: kk,
Center coordinates of site (latflong in degree decimal format):
Lat. �e.'y= �: ° N, Long. D. oit ° W
Universal Transverse Mercator. m Easting (x) m Northing (y)
Name of neare3t waterbody:
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 4q-) linear feet: '31, width (ft) and /or acres.
Cowardin Class: F3s!.2,Li
Stream Flow: Pe cr,,�taV
Wetlands: - acres.
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal
Non-Tidal: }
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United
States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party %aho requested this
preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit app icant or other
person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an
approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- ccnstruction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity the permit
applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant hits elected to seek
a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an
approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory
mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to
request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and condition:, of the NWP or
other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization
and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that perm t, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but
that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit
authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking an,/ activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes
agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that
activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement actim, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use
either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and al terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues
can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to
provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an
approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States o i the subject
project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the
proposed activity, based on the following information:
2

SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked
items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately
reference sources below):
[� maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
[vjData sheet: prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office cc ncurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navicable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ USDA Natu-al Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRNI maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Z erial (Name & Date): K1i V0*f ?610
[a Other (Name & Date): ILK _'lo
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Cc rps and should not be relied won for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and datE• of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)

Boulding Branch
TIP # 17BP.7.R. 22
Bridge # 780895

N WOODCREST PAR Q Blench
KE IDGE TIMBERLAKE
pAKVIEW
ERMARK -
TERRACE ONDOS �� 52 311 Greensboro
M
'r \ t
- t H , LL T A� Jo7+n-
`OXCRO=T MADISON PA
Z esley Pleasant
>WNHOMES dia
�lege \ High int Garuen
N DCHAS -
VNHO I QUAiL RU1 $
S
Thomasville
�&
- - ��
F,E Xington New Market
Oak i I S�LC` ENGLISH WOOD= 64
�a
ti STER RIDGE THE ARBORS CARLISLE
1� ^pAKM NT
LAS AMBASSADO 61,
AND
S
TER WOODS TO OME
SING FOXFIRE
W TSH[R
APARTME TS
NTS PINEWOOIiajt
SUFF LK PL -
��_�
AR ARTM Bridge 895 G
FO EST K CONDOS 311
- LENWOOD , ("
` � HAMPS
HEIGHTS -EA O
=N .
G 69
F*je� RAIL
for OSSIN
o�
_e
NDOS D
`s►_ Q HA13 T WOODS
y
V
rmstr ly Z High Point
- R University JC MORC I:"
Washin APARTMEPJ -_' KIVETT
'M - Montlieu Ave Terrace Q 1NDUSTRIA.
� y CoWunity
Oak N1EL
LL A i Boulder' Brane park "7 -
°ENTS Me oral ROOKS '_DEN CIA EK,vetr Dr
ark c� AP RTMENTS 2 ARTMENTS
L NEW GAT@ UARDENS FIRST FA �+AING N
RE
FARMINGTON APARTM 11 TS
1 - FOREST ENTERPR == INDUSTRI L PARk.
.RTMENTS . NEV.,
GARDEN CARSON STOUT
-ENBRIAR APARTMENTS
APARTMENTS tT o G �A
:TMENTS r 3
The
Bridge # 895 on SRI 486
Date:
August 2012
Figure
Cateno
over Boulding Branch
scar
Group
Vicinity Map
1 inch = 2,000 feet
,bb No.:
Guilford County, North Carolina
6166

r .t
En
{•
1
Bridge 895
r
, t
4P
11.
� tit• •
'�
•
i
t
AN
4b 0
'ILL
Figure
The
Catena
Bridge # 895 on SRI 486
over Boulding Branch
Date: August 2012
Scale
Group
USDA NRCS Soils Map
= 400
feet
Guilford County, North Carolina
Job inch
6166

4u r,
A
1 1 ? ?rl 1 1 00 t =�

y .� � � w � .:y..,
s �.a .
�_ _
�t
,.r :k
�p� x.
h...
' � '•`•
•h�4 *, � _
1yl,t
1 W R A�
�., � 1,
w�' � � _ >
R
�� a
' i c
�;°:�►�:
��
��
-�
�' R 1
`�� AR .��T�,d� .4���

I I
View of SB entering Boulding Branch riparian buffer.
View of a 6ft headcut on stream SB after entering the Boulding Branch riparian buffer.

1 l
1 � i
WETLAND DETEtRMNATiON DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
��a5 ��l can \,J Cit/Coun: G"i V ProjeUSte: it !24 r' Sampling Date: :,fl`j,tZ
Applicant/Owner State: N tT Sampling Point: VjA
Investigator(s): 4gl1^0T`1 �v >!! Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.):. — E t�� Local relief (concave, convex, none). r.^r -a U Slope ( %):I -,a,%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA,1): �r `• Lot %S. ` Long: l'� Datum: aAD
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: ^
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ^t , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Sal or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
yv°a hc.�C i•- `IVC�-:: c�-IY+�. 1n ";�ciR��• w�rv.,vy M%G.RM^+� ��',
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
/Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
-Z Geomorphic Positron (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_✓ Water - Stained Leaves (69)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
/
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes . No Depth (inches): r
Saturation Present? Yes V No
Depth (inches): 11
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V/ No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
WA
(pUYiMJ
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
:'i�PaahfJ

c �
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: Yr i » ) ° Cover Species? Status
1. A 35 t1�5 Ft T-A� e-
2. — x ,,f aa. (Wr�lf �G Lt S ^L� -!
3. `1 C5 'PAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size' c JX5m, 1
100
.Total Cover
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
x2=
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
�v!
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
4.
N 0
XLL-
5. L.;w�+s�r�w, S►incanSc
.L:�
Gv
—
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: -� )
CIL- Vi
2. 1 iILt�
Sampling Point: %ti . � n
Number of Dominant Species
q
D
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
x2=
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
�v!
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply bv:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
X3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5-
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3_
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5
6.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
7
more in diameter at breast height (DOH), regardless of
-
height.
g, Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10. m) tall.
1t.
12, Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plat s": � Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
4.
5. J. �✓�
s ca -,JA
Z ' = Total Cover
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

i
Point:
Sampling
or co nfirm the absence of indicators-)
SOIL to document the indicator
pegcribe to the depth needed Te_ x�urt
( Redox Features L
R arks
on: e,
profile Descripfl Matrix rninr (moistl_ �-- G
C
—��
—_
Sand Grains. ZLocation:
, M= Matrix.
PL =Pore Lini dric Soils'=
for problematic
-�
—T: � — letion, RM=
Reduced Matrix MS--Masked indicators
2 con Muck (A10) LRA 147)
t: C= Concentration, ��
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Dark Surface (S7) 147,148)
S8 11iLRA
Surface ( ) (
—
_- Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(NILRA 147,148)
Histosol (A1)
_ Polyvalue Below 1481
Surface (S9) (ULRA 147,
Soils (F19)
_piedmont
—' on (A2)
_ Histic Epp
Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark
oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
06,147)
(iµ,FtA 136,147) •�12)
fiery Shallow Dark Surface
Black
—' Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Surface (F6)
— ether (Explain in Remarks)
_
—_ Stratified Layers (A5)
(A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 In Muck
— Depleted Below Dark Surface ( A11)
_
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Masses (F12) (LRR N,
vegetation and
— Thick 7hicic Dark Surface ( Al2)
Mucky Mineral (S1) l LRR N,
Iron - Manganese
— MLRA 136) 122]
136,
h ,c
indicators of hydropmu t be present.
hydrology
_ Sandy
MLRA 147,148)
Umbric Surface (F13) (IN
_ (ML 1 ")
Soils (F 19)
wetland
unless disturbed or Problematic.
Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain
127,147]
— Material (F21) (ML
_
sandy Redox (S5)
_ Red Parent
_
Stripped Matrix (S6)
No
Soil Present? Yes
Laver (if observed):
Hydric
Type:
Depth (inches):
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Versior
US Army Corps of Engineers

�1 jjWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont ont Region
Project/Site: D dy - -, �`�y
d`
6 1, City /County: {
ApplicanUOwner. NCDJ"_.
C''..: i a ofiq Sampling Date:
Sam L (, +4'rL
V
Investi ato s : 3nr4�
9 n) �S� Al
State: iV
—_ Sampling Point: 'ia °n Z
Section, Township,
Range: '�.� • ,
LandforRl (hillslopC, terrace, etc.): � d+.� '4 • M
Local relief (concave, convex, none): v�ohe, Slope (%): O -1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ��'�
^'C5j
Soil Map Unit Name: � '�- a � a
Lat: �.h Long: 7`1, ice' _)� Datum: ►.� r
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the
NWI classification: t�lov.
site typical for this time of ear? Yes ✓
y
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation `s , Soil "}^ or Hydrology '= significantly disturbed? 'Normal
Are Circumstances' present? Yes .✓ No
Are Vegetation `� ,Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic?
(if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling locations,
point transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes No '�
Hydric Soil Present?
Is the Sampled Area
Yes 1//
No
Wetland Hydrology Present?
within a Wetland?
Yes No ✓ Yea No
Remarks:
V cal � t PI-N1)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary indicar
- ors (minimum of one is reouired�
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
�+P�k all that aoolvl
— Surface Water (A1)
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
— True Aquatic Plants (B14)
— High Water Table (A2)
H dro en Sulfide Odor (CI) — Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
— Hydrogen ( )
Saturation
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (61)
s (
— Sediment Deposits (B2)
—
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) — Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
— Drift Deposits (B3)
— Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) — Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7) — Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Iron Deposits (B5)
— _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
— Geomorphic Position (D2)
(B7)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (89)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
— Aquatic Fauna (B13)
— Microtopographic Relief (D4)
tions:
— FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
70bservations
resent? Yes
No Depth (inches):
ent? Y es
a frin e
No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

is
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
7.
Cover Species ? Status
Number of Dominant Species
Total % Cover of Multiply by:
—
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
OBL species x 1 =
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
^O<
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1
FACW species x 2 =
(B)
FAC species x3=
Percent of Dominant Species
FACU species x4=
3
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(AB)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
8
Total % Cover of Multiply by:
—
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
OBL species x 1 =
= Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1
FACW species x 2 =
1
FAC species x3=
2
FACU species x4=
3
UPL species X5=
4
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
U
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Prevalence index = B!A =
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8
—
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
—
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
10
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
—
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
U
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5
6,
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
height.
8.
g
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10 3 j 1 ��
m) tall.
tL IL - 2`3;
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
12.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4,7 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height,
Remarks:
or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic ;
Vegetation J
Present? Yes No Y
= Total Cover
US Anny Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

I
SOIL
Sampling Point: "A' �_
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % _ Color (moist) % Type' Loc? Texture Remarks
RM= Reduced Matrix. M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stopped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ' ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

1
Bank H
..--A--
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Date: c. l 2
Project/Site: `&.1 `:
Latitude:
Evaluator: < li-
C• S6; 'S . . •
tY
County: i J
Longitude: -)I
9
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (cir
Other
if a 19 or perennial if a 30' °
Ephemeral Intermittent erennin. )
e.g. Quad •Name:
A. Ueornor hOlo Subtotal =_ '11 -'5 } A
Absent W
Weak M
Moderate S
Strong
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0
0 1
1 2
2 t
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. rifle-pool. step -pool, 0
0 1
1
2 3
t 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
5. AcVve/relict floodplain 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
8. hteadcuts 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
3
9. Grade control 0
0 0
0.5 1
1 1
1S
10. Natural valley 0
0 0
0.5 1
1 1
1.5
11. Second or neater order channel N
No = 0 Y
Yes = 3
a roal ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
S. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 -1-1 -, 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 `'( 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris fines or piles 0 I 0.5 `1 i S
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yom; 3
MIT 6 iK�artbblTil l
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) Q 1 2 t 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0,' 1 2 3
22• Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish (0'. 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians '101 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75: OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: iES , d. ,zaTrtS.
� �wM�VSt�1r '�Ir.�wCl3
leight (ft) ,
11 width (ft) i. 1
Water depth (in)
Channel substrate - Clay, di`Gravel, Cobble, Bedrock
Velocity - fast, moderate, slow
Clarity - ciear, slightly turbid, turbid
MIT 6 iK�artbblTil l
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) Q 1 2 t 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0,' 1 2 3
22• Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish (0'. 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians '101 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75: OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: iES , d. ,zaTrtS.
� �wM�VSt�1r '�Ir.�wCl3
leight (ft) ,
11 width (ft) i. 1
Water depth (in)
Channel substrate - Clay, di`Gravel, Cobble, Bedrock
Velocity - fast, moderate, slow
Clarity - ciear, slightly turbid, turbid
Water depth (in)
Channel substrate - Clay, di`Gravel, Cobble, Bedrock
Velocity - fast, moderate, slow
Clarity - ciear, slightly turbid, turbid

r +
i � Z
ark F
ankh
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Vercinn 4.11
Date:
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator: `
(County: l Longitude: I I. qq
1'' Continuity of channe! bed and bank
rd a,I
Total Points.
ent
SUeam is at least Infe-
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
f _ '9 or rennial if Z 30'
30
Ephemeral 4i termittenf' Perennial
e.g. Quad Name-
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
j Weak
Moderate
Strong
1'' Continuity of channe! bed and bank
0.
1
2
3 }
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1. i-
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex rile -pool, step -pool,
na le- sequence
0
1.;-
2
i 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0
No = 0
2
3
5. Active/relict fJoodplain I 0 1
'2)
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
I 0 1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposit
0 1 :
2
3
8. Headarts
0 1
I 2
3
9. Grade control
0 0
1
1.5
10_ Natt:ral valley
C
1
1.5
11. Second or Greater order channe:
No 4U
Yes = 3
`artitidal ditches are not, abed; see discussions in manual
B. Nvdroiocy (Subtotal = )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0 r 1
2
3
13. Iron o)ddiang bacteria
0
2
I 311
14. Leaf utter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris fines cr piles
0 ( 0.5'
1
1.5
17. So&based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3 -
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in st earnbed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plarrts in strearribed
3
2
1
0
24. Macvbenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
C.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 -'
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0:
0.5
I 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 075; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using olmer methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
s
[eight (ft)
dl width (ft)
0
later depth (in)
:hannel substrate - Clay, Silt, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Bedrock
'elocity - last, moderate, cloy/
rarity - elm) sli.`�htl� turbid, turbid

w r.
NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
Project/Sibe: P»�t.� k Pov , Z1,
s
Latitude: 35.y7 5
Evaluator: C S L c.;
County:
Longitude: ')ot cjqo�,
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle on
Other
Stream is at least inte/mittert
Ephemeral Intennittent� erenma
e.g. Quad Name:
if > 19 or perenniaf if a 30'
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
A_ Geomorphology ( Subtotal
Absent
Weak Moderalit
Stro.ng
1'' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0.
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2'
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodpiain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headc uts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No= 0
Yes = 3
Bank F
Bankfi
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hvriminnv fSrihtntal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1 2 `
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1 1 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
3
05 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No =0 Yes = 3
r'` Rinlnnv /G ih4nf�l n
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3.
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0�
1
2
3
22. Fish
0)
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0 5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
i
i
[eight (ft)
ill width (ft) 1
Qiw�l"
Water depth (in)
Channel substrate - Clay,'Silt, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Bedrock
Velocity - fast, moderate, slow
Clarity - clear, slightly turbid, turbid
l'!

r �
� L )
WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name
County C6­ '' ' ; -A
Name of evaluator CW1 s " • :- i y
Wetland location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other:
Nearest Road LIIAi , .�!1_ ky #Ae +dab)
Wetland area acres Wetland width VD fed
Date <T`v` a (14
Soil series:
predominantly organi - humus, muck, or
peat
predominantly mineral - non -sandy
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
steep topography
_ ditched or channelized
total wetland width > 100 feet
Wetland type (select one)*
,/ Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
_ Swamp forest
_ Wet flat
_ Pocosin
Bog forest
Adjacent land use
(within %s mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
,/forested/natural vegetati %
✓agriculture, urban/ uburban %
✓ impervious surface` %
•Dominant vegetation
(2)
Flooding and wetness
_ semipermanently to permanently flooded or
inundated
_' seasonally flooded or inundated
_ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Pine savanna
_ Freshwater marsh
_ Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina bay
Other:
The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
R
Water storage
I x 4.00 =
- — — - - - - --
0
A
Bank/Shoreline stabilization
a, x 4.00 =
® Wetland I
T
Pollutant removal
l x5.00=
rating
0
I
Wildlife habitat
�_ x 2.00 =
FTI
i N
Aquatic life value
y x 4.00 =
t (,
G
Recreation/Education
a. x 1.00 =
s Add 1
point if in sensitive watershed and >t 00/6 nonpoint source disturbance within
'/: mile upstream, upslope, or radius

Q I A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CENAP -OP -R-
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT
DIFFERENT SITES)
State: ij" _ County: (; <e A City: tic t r
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. ° N, Long. IW.•i I* W
Universal Transverse Mercator: m Easting (x) m Northing (y)
Name of nearest waterbody: j&--',k -1 '9C ; : ;
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters 5�Iinear feet:(._' nIJ idth (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin C ass: 5f. b" "k)
Stream Flow: � _.- b�'
Wetlands: I) 14 acres.
Cowardin Cass: '?fot
Name of any w -3ter bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal: —
Non - Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desl,:) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):

r
w A
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United
States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this
preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other
person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the opt on to obtain an
approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre - construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity the permit
applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek
a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option -:o request an
approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory
mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the appliumt has the right to
request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or
other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization
and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that perm t, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but
that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit
authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking anj activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes
agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that
activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any cl-allenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use
either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and al' terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues
can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to
provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an
approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject
project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the
proposed activity, based on the following information:

14,400
SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked
items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately
ref rence sources below):
Q�Daps, plank, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
ata sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office cc ncurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets: prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ USDA Natwal Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRNI maps:
❑ 00 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
[Photograph3: []Aerial (Name & Date):
[ -Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)

N f
q* 0DI
Site
number
Latitude
Longitude
Long
Cowardin
Class
Estimated
aquatic amount of
resource in
review area
Class of aquatic
resource
1
55.�� °.b
-i°1 tiY1aS t
4,35 e) 4
S5 I ; 2 -5f+ ,"j,
2 �,`✓
3�,. � °,a3
��.���x�
��
12 J;
CSC
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15