20131045 Ver 1_More Info Received_20151029

(:-5- 1 ut4 5 v 5
Homewood, Sue
From: Kyle Smith <ksmith @awck com>
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3 38 PM
To: Bailey, David E SAW
Cc: Homewood, Sue
Subject: RE Senator Ralph Scott Parkway Extension (Project Swordfish) (UNCLASSIFIED)
Attachments: PCN-Revised 10 -29 -15 pdf
Dave,
Attached is a revised PCN form A table was added to section C 31 that shows itemized impacts This table is also broken
down in more detail on the Impact drawings cover sheet that was previously submitted Bank stabilization is on the banks
only There is a note on both the initial plans and the plans for the extension that says what class of rip rap and "On Banks
Only" at each crossing
There are plans in the works to pave Gov Scott Farm Road NCDOT is currently preparing the plans and from what I
understand they plan to perform the work next spring I don't want to speak for the NCDOT on this matter, but they did
perform a survey on the road and I think the existing culverts were wide enough to accommodate their proposed work
without generating any additional impacts
Let me know if you need anything else or have any additional questions
Thanks,
Kyle Smith
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From Bailey, David E SAW [mailto David E Bailey2 @usace army mil]
Sent Wednesday, October 28, 2015 4:03 PM
To Kyle Smith <ksmith @awck com>
Cc Homewood, Sue <sue homewood @ncdenr gov>
Subject RE Senator Ralph Scott Parkway Extension (Project Swordfish) (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats- NONE
Kyle,
Thank you for your PCN and attached information, dated and received 10/1/2015, for the above referenced project (SAW -
2013- 01456) I have reviewed the information and need clarification before proceeding with verifying the use of
Nationwide Permit 39 http / /www saw usace army mil/Portals /59 /docs/ regulatory/regdocs/NWP2012/NWP39_3 -23 pdf
Please submit the requested information below (via e -mail is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise
we may deny verification of the use of the Nationwide Permit or consider your application withdrawn and close the file
1) One small correction needed, is that the SG stream impacts should be itemized for fill due to culvert, fill due to bank
stabilization, and temporary impacts, all of this should show in section C 3 of the PCN If nothing else, this can be
clarified in the notes (C 31) Also, is the bank stabilization just rock on the banks, or does it include rock in the channel?
If rock in the channel, will the rip rap pad include rock sitting on top of the stream bed or (our preference) rock installed
so that the top of the rock is no higher than the original stream bed elevation?
2) Lastly, Senator Ralph Scott Parkway is now proposed to extend to Gov Scott Farm Road. The PCN mentions traffic
volumes including truck traffic, which brings into question the potential need to improve /pave Gov Scott Farm Road.
Does NCDOT or another entity plan to make these improvements? If so, what is the expected timing on such work? Note

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Freshwater Marsh
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
001
W2 ® P ❑ T
Fill
Freshwater Marsh
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
017
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
018
2h Comments The proposed road will permanently impact 0 18 acres of riparian wetlands by fill
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Culvert
UT To Back Creek
® PER
® Corps
2
56
(SA)
® INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ® P ❑ T
Culvert
UT To Back Creek
® PER
® Corps
5
94
(SB)
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ® P ❑ T
Culvert
UT To Back Creek
® PER
® Corps
3
75
(SC)
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ® P ❑ T
Culvert
UT To Back Creek
❑ PER
® Corps
2
17
(SH)
® INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ® P ❑ T
Culvert
UT To Back Creek
❑ PER
® Corps
7
85
(SK)
® INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ® P ❑ T
Culvert
UT To Back Creek
❑ PER
® Corps
3
113
(SG)
® INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
440
31 Comments 0 0068 acres of stream SG and 0 0099 acres of stream SK will be permanently impacted by culvert/rip- rap /fill
for the proposed construction of the roadway Mr Andrew Williams of the USACE has determined that these linear stream
impacts are unmitigable Although 0 0167 acres of USACE unmitigable stream channel will count towards Nationwide Permit
thresholds DWR has determined a 1 1 mitigation ratio for stream channel SG and due to stream channel SK being classified
Page 6of15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

as ephemeral by DWR, DWR will not require mitigation for stream channel SK
Design changes will result in the addition of 44 LF of impacts to Stream SG revising the total 113 LF
of stream impacts The
44 feet of additional impacts to Stream SG is what is being mitigated for in this
application See below table for impacts
summary
Stream ID Impacts from (If) Temporary Stream
Bank
Totals
Culvert Placement Impacts (If)
Stabilization (If)
(If)
SA 13 7
0
20
SA 31 30
12
73
SB 73 8
21
102
SC 68 7
7
82
SD 0 0
0
0
SE 0 0
0
0
SF 0 0
0
0
SG 99 11
14
124
SH 8 0
9
17
SI 0 0
0
0
Si 0 0
0
0
SK 72 0
13
85
See impact drawings for additional information
4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or,
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4L Total open water impacts
4g Comments Open water impacts are not proposed
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g Comments Constructed ponds or lakes are not being proposed for this portion of the site
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ®No If
yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
Page 7 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version